01 1415 W 10th Street Residence HLC PRESENTATION | CLARK RICHARDSON ARCHITECTS | 7.09.2021 02 1415 W 10th | Site Survey (1415 W 10th Street) (1417 W 10th Street) 03 1415 W 10th | Street View Looking South 04 Existing Structure: Photo from Front of Property Existing Structure: Photo from Middle of Property 05 Existing Structure: Photo Looking South at Structure Existing Structure: Photo Looking East at Structure 06 96 FT Proposed Project: Site Plan 07 Proposed Project: Site Axonometric 09 10 11 12 OWANA Zoning Committee & Neighborhood Outreach Summary: 13 9.24.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting: Ed Richardson | CRA presents existing site conditions and proposed design to OWANA Zoning Committee. 10.13.2020: Meeting with Adjacent Neighbors: Ed Richardson | CRA meets all directly adjacent neighbors at 1415 W 10th to review proposed design. Topics included: - Reviewed Existing and Proposed Drainage on site with east neighbor. - Reviewed Height and Location of proposed structures. Reviewed what each neighbor with views into the lot could expect to see from their homes. - Discussed Fence Heights and Location. We will have lowered the fence along W 10th St. - Reviewed Second Floor Window Alignments: Between the proposed structure and the existing home to the east. - Clark Richardson field surveyed the window locations - and mapped them on the survey and reviewed with property owner. There are no direct window alignments. 10.22.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting II: Ed Richardson | CRA presented our responses to the comments / concerns from the previous meeting Shoring: The noise and disruption from potential shoring for the construction of the basement was a primary concern for neighbors. CRA recommends no driven piles be used for shoring and instead drilled piers be used in any temporary shoring required. The structural work for the shoring will be part of the means and methods for construction of the basement by the contractor and therefore while it will be engineered. The precise drawings will not be included in the architectural drawings. Street Façade: We’re proposing a specimen tree be added in front of the street façade complimenting the window located towards the west side of the façade (see 9). Site Drainage: We’ve sketched in the proposed French drain system for the lot and plan to use the front yard to filter run off from the southside of the lot. Not mentioned in the previous meeting, the second-floor roofed areas …
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to participate. This meeting will be conducted online and you have the opporhrnity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call the staff contact no later than noon the day before the meeting for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date, or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or commission amounces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: o delivering a written statement to the board or cornmission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concein (it ntay be delivered io the contact person listed on a notice); or . appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: . occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; o is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject properly or proposed development; or o is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within 500 feet ofthe subject property or proposed development. A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal form may be available from the responsible department. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our website: \\':y):.t.rjjlt:glLq:!:.1t,.*,gyi_AhS Written comments must be submitted to the board or commission (or the contact …
6 1 3 W E S T L Y N N 1 9 J U LY 2 0 2 1 E X I S T I N G S I T E C O N D I T I O N S WEST LYNN SPEC613 W LYNN ST, AUSTIN TX 7870319 JULY 2021 AIR CONDITIONED AREA: 4,854 SQFT PROJECT CODE ANALYSIS ZONING: PARCEL ID: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: LOT SIZE: FLOOR AREA RATIO: IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: MAIN HOUSE BASEMENT FLOOR: LEVEL 01: LEVEL 02: TOTAL: ADU LEVEL 01: LEVEL 02: TOTAL: CARPORT: GARAGE: 10'-9 1/2" BUILDING TENT 5; HIGHEST GRADE: 523'-11 3/4" MF-4 NP 106602 V-B 10,130 SQFT (.233 ACRES) PROVIDED: 39% (3,934 SQFT) ALLOWED: MAX 40% (4,052 SQFT) PROVIDED: 44% (4473.5) ALLOWED: 45% (4558.5) 1,187 SQFT 1,868 SQFT 701 SQFT 3,756 SQFT 549 SQFT 549 SQFT 1,098 SQFT 267 SQFT 445 SQFT 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 4; HIGHEST GRADE: 524'-9 1/2" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 3; HIGHEST GRADE: 527'-2" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 2; HIGHEST GRADE: 532'-3" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 1; HIGHEST GRADE: 536'-6" 32'-1/4" BUILDING LINE Y E L L A ' 4 1 . 7 4 W " 5 2 ' 3 2 ° 5 2 S 520 D R A Y R A E R D E C U D E R " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S 521 522 D R A Y R A E R " 0 - ' 0 1 K C A B T E S 520 521 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 1 521'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 2 533'-7 3/4" NEW 2 GARAGE (445 SF) NEW 2-STORY ADU (1,098 SF + 295 SF CARPORT) 523 524 525 0.233 ACRES 10,130 SQ.FT EXISTING POOL HIGH POINT TENT 2 +532'-3" HIGH POINT FRONT SETBACK +536'-3 3/8" 15'-0" HISTORIC PRESERVATION REQUIRED " 7 - ' 9 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 9 SIDE YARD SETBACK 5'-0" MIN. ADJ. GRADE +527'-5 1/2" BASEMENT BELOW REPRESENTED AS HATCHED. FULLY CONTAINED WITHIN LEVEL 1 D R A Y T N O R F " 0 - ' 5 2 K C A B T E S LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD EXISTING PAVING FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 0 527'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 1 538'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 2 550'-7 3/4" NEW 2-STORY ADDITION (3,417 SF) EXISTING 1-STORY TO REMAIN (339 SF) MAX ADJ. GRADE +536'-2" D E P A C S …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT PERMITS JULY 26, 2021 PR-21-092304 2521 JARRATT AVENUE OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT C.9 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a ca. 1948 house that is contributing to the historic district. One-story, wing-and-hipped roof brick veneered ranch house with a partial-width inset porch o ornamental metal supports; banded fenestration in an early mid-century Modern aesthetic. The house was built in 1948 by Gibson R. Randle and his wife, Sarah. Gibson Randle was a prominent attorney in town, having served as Austin’s city attorney for many years. Sarah Randle was the daughter of a prominent judge. While living here, Gibson Randle had a private law practice, and in 1962, he was appointed to the State Board of Law Examiners. He and Sarah divorced in 1979k and Gibson married Audray Bateman, one of the founders of the Austin History Center. However, it is not known at this time whether Audray Bateman lived in this house. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register Historic District. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The house reflects a ranch house design, popular in Austin after World War II, with its long, low configuration and expansive front porch; there are also elements of mid-century Modern design in the house in the use of banded windows. The house may have architectural significance as an intact example of its design type. b. Historical association. The property is significantly associated with Gibson R. Randle, a prominent attorney who served as Austin’s city attorney for a number of years and was a member of the State Board of Law Examiners. His first wife, Sarah, was a teacher and counselor in the Austin public schools. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, …
July 24, 2021 To the Austin Historic Preservation Office and Historic Landmark Commission Regarding the Demolition Application on 1173 San Bernard, Case # PR 21-093159-1173 To Amber Allen, or Whom it May Concern: My wife and I wish to voice our support for the demolition permit on 1173 San Bernard. We own an adjoining property (1170 Angelina St), so we have a particular interest in what becomes of 1173 San Bernard. The current structures are sub-standard and are not well-suited to a cost- effective rehabilitation. Therefore, we believe that a new build is more appropriate for that site. My interest in that street, and my familiarity with it, date back to 1974. I believe the new owners of 1173 San Bernard also have a strong appreciation for the neighborhood, and will develop the property in a way that is compatible with that fine street. Thank you. Charley and Diane Mansfield
From: CleanTag Permits <c Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 10:45 AM To: Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> Cc: Allen, Amber <Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: 3703 Meadowbank Dr. - Existing Photos Hello Kalan and Amber, The owner of 3703 Meadowbank called a few moments ago to request a postponement for their hearing with HLC. There has been extensive damage to the structure due to pipes bursting in February and they are waiting for a structural engineer to assess the damage. The plans under review currently are for an addition/remodel. The engineer's report may recommend complete demolition. What is your advice moving forward? Thanks, Linda Linda Sullivan Mindy Briggs 4804 Menchaca Rd. Unit B Austin, TX 78745 CleanTag Permits
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Carla Penny Friday, July 23, 2021 10:36 AM PAZ Preservation 2502 Park View GF-21-103669 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Please save this house from demolition. I have lived in this neighborhood 29 years and deeply value the history of the mid‐century homes that give our community character. This home in particular has such important provenance that it would be an irreplaceable loss to Allandale and Austin we’re it to be destroyed. Carla Penny 2500 Albata Ave Austin, TX 78757 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Neena Husid Friday, July 23, 2021 11:02 AM PAZ Preservation 2502 Park View Drive *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Please, please, please stop developers from destroying the integrity of our Austin neighborhoods. This is a great house. I have long admired it and wondered how, if it ever went on the market, I might be able to buy it—to refurbish it, not steam shovel it into oblivion. Allandale is a tight enclave, chocked‐full of friends and neighbors deeply distressed over the systematic leveling of cherished mid‐century homes for cookie‐cutter, poorly built, price‐gouging new constructions. On our street alone there are three identical Paradiso homes priced well‐over a million dollars. Two of these homes have had significant construction issues and detract from the quaint beauty of the much‐loved older homes on the block. It seems to me a city that respects its roots should be working overtime to encourage revitalization to older neighborhoods rather than allowing for the destruction of its gems. Entice architects and builders into our neighborhood who would like nothing more than to help homeowners maintain the integrity of these historic homes. When history, particularly a unique community history, is diminished, caring neighbors and good citizens become apathetic strangers living in rows of uninviting, generic, over‐priced, houses. It’s a sad future and one I hope Austin can avoid. Thank you for listening, Neena Husid 2503 Ellise Avenue 78757 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Margaret Herman Friday, July 23, 2021 11:44 AM PAZ Preservation public comment re: 2502 Park View Drive *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, I'd like to submit a comment on the proposal to demolish 2502 Park View Drive being discussed at your July 26th meeting. My name is Margaret Herman, and I work at a historic preservation agency in New York City (writing today for myself as an individual). I happen to be a former resident of Allandale ‐ my family moved into a house a few streets over from 2502 Park View Drive in the 1980s when I was a young child, and my mother still resides there today. As longtime residents of the neighborhood and for myself as an architectural historian, we both strongly oppose this proposal for demolition. I recently became aware of the proposed National Register nomination for Allandale's Air‐Conditioned Village, of which this property at 2502 Park View Drive is an essential piece. Referred to as the "Chrysler Air Temp Home," it retains a high degree of integrity to its period of significance during the air‐conditioning tests, and its paneled facade and window pattern, its perforated brick screens, and overhanging roof line continue to express the story of Allandale's role in the history of mid‐20th century HVAC engineering and modern architecture in the southwestern United States. Local residents such as my mother are supportive of efforts to preserve the low‐slung 1950s ranch homes of Allandale, many on large lots with mature trees, which contribute to its distinct sense of place and have made it such a beautiful community to raise their families. Now that the historical significance of 2502 Park View Drive and the Air‐Conditioned Village project as a whole has come to light, there's a new level of pride in the neighborhood. Please prevent this demolition from occurring. Surely there are preservation‐minded ways to repair/rehab the house while retaining its historic fabric so that residents in the future can be reminded of the house's and the historic district's importance. Best Regards, Margaret E. Herman, Ph.D. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
June 12, 2020 Emily Reed, Chair City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: 2502 Park View Drive Dear Ms. Reed, Preservation Austin has been our city’s leading nonprofit voice for historic preservation since 1953. We write today to express our dismay at the proposed demolition of 2502 Park View Drive, located in Allandale’s Air Conditioned Village. We ask the Historic Landmark Commission to support historic zoning for this significant property in the areas of Architecture, Historical Associations, and Community Value. The Air Conditioned Village was built in 1954 to assess the cost-effectiveness and profitability of central air in middle-class housing. Twenty-three houses, each featuring air-conditioning systems from a different manufacturer, were sold to families who agreed to allow their homes and habits to be studied by University of Texas scientists. Austinite Ned Cole, an architect and head of the air-conditioning subcommittee of the National Association of Homes Builders, spearheaded the project, which was the first multi-home experiment of its kind worldwide. Local architects and builders designed each unique home with energy-saving design elements to test their effectiveness. These include window placement along north and south facades; trees, trellises, and overhangs; pale paint colors and white roofing materials to reflect sunlight. Architect Fred Day designed 2502 Park View Drive, known as “The Air Temp.” Energy-efficient features include south-facing orientation and a wide, low-pitched roof which extends nearly four feet beyond the home’s footprint on all sides. Distinctive brick screens, exposed roof beams, and its asymmetrical façade make this home one of the development’s most stylized examples of mid-century design. Day (1926-2014) was a recent graduate of the UT School of Architecture. He worked for Ned Cole and Fehr & Granger before establishing his own firms in the 1960s. Day merged with Jessen Jessen Millhouse Greeven & Crume to become Jessen, Inc. in 1969, and served as the firm’s principal and president until 1993. His distinguished career included numerous awards from AIA Austin and the Texas Society Architects. He was president of AIA Austin and awarded an honorary Life Membership on the UTSOA Advisory Council. His works include Austin’s Teacher Retirement System Building, Faulk Central Library, Austin Doctors Building, renovations to the UT Law School and Student Union, the Recreation and Convocation Center at St. Edwards University, the pro bono master plan and drawings for Laguna Gloria, and the Visitors Center at McDonald Observatory. According to his obituary: “An innovative designer, he …
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: Dan Keshet Friday, July 23, 2021 3:50 PM Brummett, Elizabeth 1308 Lavaca Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Completed *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, I am writing to urge against the initiation of historic zoning for the disused gas station at 1308 Lavaca St. The building is indeed old, but it does not in any way contribute to the character of downtown. It is an eyesore and entirely out of context. There is no use for this building which at once honors its origins as a chain corporate gas station and contributes to its surroundings. If it is allowed to stand, there is nobody that is going to look at it and say "I'm so glad we preserved this building." On a list of Austin icons, nobody is going to say: the Driskill, the Bremond Block, the Capitol, and that old busted‐up Mobil station. Instead, it will continue to be a useless eyesore. Even if they find a use for it, that use will be inappropriate for this portion of downtown, which is increasingly pedestrian‐oriented, without the large featureless surface parking lot that this lot has. It would honestly be an embarrassment for Austin to enshrine this as one of its key shining historic landmarks. Thank you, Dan Keshet 908 Nueces St #22 78701 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
From Subject Received Size Catego... Mention .x x x. Save No-Comply, oppose demolition of 812 W ... Sat 7/24/... 46 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Do it for the skateboarders. This s a staple in the Austin area we cannot lose. .x x x.: 1 item(s), 1 unread 097mbanos: 1 item(s), 1 unread 10304josh: 1 item(s), 1 unread 2k420 Homies: 1 item(s), 1 unread 097mba... No-Comply, oppose demolition 812 W. 12 st Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To who it my concern, Please do not demolition No-Comply, they are a local business for 10304jo... Save No-Comply, oppose demolition of 812 W.... Sat 7/24/... 37 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** No Comply is such a staple of Austin. The countless trips I've taken to your city, they are 2k420 H... SAVE NOCOMPLY Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** DONT RUIN HISTORY AND COMMUNITY THAT SHOP IS A BACKBONE FOR SKATEBOARDING : 1 item(s), 1 unread 346349... Sat 7/24/... 813... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** <end> 3than Balmer: 1 item(s), 1 unread 3than B... No Comply skate shop Mon 7/26... 37 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi, I’m writing in favor of preserving the No-Comply skateshop in Austin on 12th st. It’s : 1 item(s), 1 unread 4austinz... Save No-Comply, oppose demolition of 812 W.... Sat 7/24/... 38 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi, 7ain77: 1 item(s), 1 unread 7ain77 Protest of Proposed Demolition of 812 w. 12th... Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To who is reading this regarding the demolition of 812 w. 12th st. No comply is a big part of A A SAVE NO-COMPLY, oppose demolition of 812 ... Sat 7/24/... 37 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Most of my friends/ and family have No- Comply tattooed on them. For life. This is dire. This A O Reject the demolition permit for No Comply Sat 7/24/... 35 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a resident of Austin, I ask that the city please reject or nullify the demolition permit given A A: 1 item(s), 1 unread A O: 1 item(s), 1 unread A Pitts: 1 item(s), 1 unread A Pitts SAVE NO-COMPLY, OPPOSE DEMOLITION OF 8... Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External …
Annual Internal Review This report covers the time period of 7/1/2020 to 6/30/2021 Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________ The Board/Commission mission statement (per the City Code) is: Pursuant to Section 2-1-147(B) of the Code of the City of Austin, the Historic Landmark Commission: 1. Shall prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks. 2. Shall prepare, review, and propose amendments to the Historic Landmark Preservation Plan. 3. Shall review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission, as determined in accordance with Section 25-1-46 of the Code of the City of Austin. 4. Shall provide information and counseling to owners of structures that are designated as historic structures. 5. May initiate zoning or rezoning of property to establish or remove a historic 6. May recommend amendments to the Code of the City of Austin relating to designation. historic preservation. 7. May recommend that the City acquire property if the Commission finds that acquisition by the City is the only means by which to preserve the property. 8. May advise the Council on matters relating to historic preservation. 9. For an object that is not permanently affixed to land, may recommend that Council confer special historic designation, and 10. Shall perform other duties as prescribed by the Code of the City of Austin or other ordinance. Annual Review and Work Plan – Historic Landmark Commission Year 2020-2021 Page 2 1. Describe the board’s actions supporting their mission during the previous calendar year. Address all elements of the board’s mission statement as provided in the relevant sections of the City Code. 1. The Commission references several surveys in evaluating historical significance for historic-age properties subject to applications for demolition and relocation permits, as well as building permits in National Register districts. These include the East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016), the Old Austin Neighborhood Association / West Downtown survey (2020), and the North Central Austin survey (2021), among others. A survey of Cherrywood, Wilshire Wood, and Delwood is anticipated to be completed in fiscal year 2021-22. 2. The Commission recommended new citywide Historic Design Standards as an essential resource for property owners and professionals that increases equity in City processes. A working group of dedicated residents, professionals, and City staff drafted clear, accessible standards that balance high local development pressures …
July 26, 2021 City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: Agenda Items B2 and B3 Historic Landmark Commissioners: I represent the owners of Capitol Center, an office building at 919 Congress Avenue. We have owned this property since 2005, and for almost that long, the buildings at 907, 909 and 911 Congress Avenue have been in total disrepair. They are dilapidated, unsafe and unsightly, especially as this path is the gateway to the Capitol. While we support the applicant’s proposal to demolish the buildings, we do so only under the express understanding the demolition be done in accordance with all laws and codes. As a directly adjacent property owner, we also expect to review and approve all proposed plans, construction and demolition work techniques and delivery condition of the vacant lot. Additionally, we would expect decorative fencing be installed as to dissuade loitering and other unlawful uses to maintain a safe environment. We look forward to an improved condition for these buildings and seeing future development plans for the site. Sincerely, Julia Taylor Executive Vice President
