REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 737-291-3084, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on May 6, 2026. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Discussion and action to approve a recommendation regarding potential environmental impacts of the MoPac South Project, as presented to the Environmental Commission on May 6, 2026. 3. 4. 5. Discussion and action to approve a recommendation to Council regarding the Barton Springs Road Bridge Project, as presented to the Environmental Commission on May 6, 2026. Discussion and action to approve a recommendation to Council to purchase property located at 6202 and 6204 Caddie Street, 1600, 1604, 1606, 1608, 1610, 1612, and 1614 Montopolis Drive, and 6205, 6211, and 6215 Fairway Street. Presented by Susana Almanza, Poder. Sponsors: Vice Chair Bristol and Secretary Qureshi. Discussion and action to approve a recommendation to Council regarding implementation of efficient, local, natural gas-powered peaker generation units as part of Austin Energy’s Resource, Generation, and Climate Protection Plan to 2035. Sponsors: Vice Chair Bristol and Secretary Qureshi. COMMITTEE UPDATES 6. Update from the Urban Forestry Committee regarding the meeting on May 13, 2026. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS City Code requires at least two board members sponsor an item to be included on an agenda. This section of the agenda provides members an opportunity to request items for future agendas. Staff should assume that if there is no objection from other members expressed …
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on May 6, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Kruger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Mar Moretta-Urdiales PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 15, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 15, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Moretta-Urdiales were off the dais. Commissioner Fierro was absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the Barton Springs Road Bridge Project. Presented by Eric Bailey, Deputy Director, Austin Capital Delivery Services. The presentation was made by Eric Bailey, Deputy Director, Austin Capital Delivery Services. 1 The meeting was recessed from 8:09 p.m. until 8:18 p.m. without objection. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Name: SoLa Mixed Use, SP-2024-0397C Applicant: Hannah Riemer, P.E., LJA Engineering, Inc. Location: 2700 and 2800 South Lamar Boulevard Council District: 5 Staff: David Michael, Environmental Review Specialist, Austin Development Services, 512-974- 2263, David.Michael@austintexas.gov Applicant Request: Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone, per City Code 25-8- 26 Staff Recommendation: Recommended The public hearing was conducted and a motion to close the public hearing was approved on Commissioner Brimer’s motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Fierro was absent. The motion to recommend the project SoLa Mixed Use, SP-2024-0397C, located at 2700 and 2800 South Lamar Boulevard, to Council with conditions was approved on Secretary Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, with the following amendment, on a 10- 0 vote. Commissioner Fierro was absent. The conditions were to: • Augment community benefit and promote alignment with the City’s Comprehensive Vision Plan and the Comprehensive Austin-Travis County Food Plan: • Increase affordable housing units to 25% of all units from 30 - 60% Median Family Income (MFI) • Utilize bird-friendly building design • • Incorporate a community garden on the ground or rooftop level Incorporate dense, native plantings throughout the property, and utilize no- mow and no leaf-blowing principles year-round The amendment was made by Commissioner Fleury, seconded by …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260520-003: Barton Springs Road Bridge Project WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was given a briefing by Austin Capital Delivery Services on May 6, 2026, regarding the update for the Barton Springs Road Project; and WHEREAS, the bridge is noncompliant with current ADA standards; and WHEREAS, the Zilker Park area was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1997 as the Zilker Park Historic District with the existing historic bridge as a contributing feature to the Historic District; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Austin approved a Bond package in 2020, funding $11.1 million for the Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek; and, WHEREAS, the Austin City Council voted on May 2, 2024, to authorize a professional services contract for engineering services for the design of Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek in the amount of $9 million; and, WHEREAS, Austin Capital Delivery Services presented to the Environmental Commission on May 6, 2026, the preliminary plan for the new Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Land Commission, on May 6, 2024, voted to request Council reconsider its decision to demolish the existing Barton Creek Bridge; and, WHEREAS, the Section 106 document supplied by Capital delivery services states, “Removal and replacement of the existing bridge would have as significant an impact on Zilker Park…and the larger mass and scale of the bridge and new design elements would not be complementary to the historic district’s existing physical aesthetics and would impact the historic district’s integrity of design, setting materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. As such, it is recommended that the bridge replacement option would have an adverse effect on the NRHP-listed Zilker Park Historic District.” WHEREAS, the carbon dioxide (CO2) impact of replacing the current bridge is twice the impact of repairing the existing Bridge; and, WHEREAS, construction of the new Bridge may require up to seven acres of Zilker Park to be “taken” for the purposes of constructing the new Bridge; and, WHEREAS, the Bridge is currently rated as a “6” and is “satisfactory” with “minor to moderate deterioration, such as cracks, rust or spalling, which may benefit from maintenance”; and, WHEREAS, the Bridge deck is in need of replacement, and subsequently, some of the spandrel . beams may need to be replaced, and other critical repairs made for the purposes of safety and utility; and, WHEREAS, the …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission acts in an advisory capacity on all projects and programs that affect the quality of life for the citizens of Austin, and to make recommendations for standards and recommend and initiate specific studies; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission reviews and analyzes the policies relating to the environmental quality of the City; and WHEREAS, community-based organizations, People Organized in Defense of Earth and her Resources (PODER), have brought forward a recommendation to Austin City Council to purchase the properties at Montopolis and Fairway to secure them for future low-income single-family housing; and WHEREAS, in 2001, the Austin City Council adopted the Montopolis Neighborhood Plan, which called for sustaining its single-family zoning in the heart of Montopolis; and WHEREAS, the 2018 report, “Uprooted: Residential Displacement in Austin’s Gentrifying Neighborhood and What Can be Done About It,” commissioned by the Austin City Council and completed by University of Texas experts recommended that the city make strategic, anti- displacement investments in Montopolis to protect it from further gentrification; and WHEREAS, for years, the Montopolis Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, along with other supporters, have been fighting to sustain its single-family zoning; and WHEREAS, Montopolis already has the highest concentration of multifamily, commercial, and industrial zoning of any planning area in the city, and building under these zoning categories have been constructed at the permitted restriction of 80% impervious coverage, worsening the urban heat island effect, erosion of the Colorado River, and flooding without natural drainage from green spaces that once made Montopolis the most undeveloped neighborhood in East Austin; and WHEREAS, the 1.9 acres, known as the Montopolis-Fairway Zoning case, is currently zoned for single-family housing and includes properties at 6202, 6204 Caddie Street; 6205, 6211, 6215 Fairway Street; 1600, 1604, 1606, 1608, 1612, and 1614 Montopolis Drive; and WHEREAS, while the zoning request from the developer to change the zoning from single-family to vertical mixed-use was denied, the property remains vulnerable to future gentrifying developments; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Environmental Commission recommends that the City of Austin purchase the property included in the Montopolis-Fairway zoning case to build low- income single-family housing and protect the neighborhood from future gentrification.
People Organized in Defense of Earth and her Resources TO: Mariana Krueger, Chair, and Environmental Commission Members FROM: Susana Almanza, Director DATE: May 13, 2026 Subject: Adoption or Resolution for City of Austin to Acquire Montopolis-Fairway Properties For years, the Montopolis Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, along with other supporters, has been fighting to sustain its single-family zoning. The 1.9 acres, known as the Montopolis-Fairway Zoning case, includes properties at 6202, 6204 Caddie Street; 6205, 6211, 6215 Fairway Street; 1600, 1604, 1606, 1608, 1612, and 1614 Montopolis Drive, which have been under constant threat from profit-seeking real- estate developers with little to no regard for the Montopolis community’s fragile natural and cultural environment, or its iconic history. Our green spaces, like our single-family zoning, are precious and limited. Help us to protect our families and our community by purchasing properties located in the Montopolis-Fairway zoning case. Montopolis already has the highest concentration of multi-family, commercial, and industrial zoning of any planning area in the city, and buildings under these zoning categories have been constructed at the permitted restriction of 80% impervious coverage, worsening the urban heat island effect, erosion of the Colorado River, and flooding without natural drainage from green spaces that once made Montopolis the most undeveloped neighborhood in East Austin. PODER request that the Environmental Commission support our Resolution to have the Austin City Council to purchase the Montopolis-Fairway Properties. PODER P.O. Box 17294 Austin, TX 78744 512-770-7896 email: poder.austin@gmail.com
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260520-005: Austin Energy Gas Peakers and Alternatives WHEREAS, it is the Environmental Commission’s responsibility to advise “on projects and programs which affect quality of life for the citizens of Austin”; and WHEREAS, the greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal established by the Austin City Council in the Climate Equity Plan is to achieve “net-zero community-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, utilizing a steep decline path followed by negative emissions,” which translates to approximately 75% reduction in emissions by 2030; and WHEREAS, meeting the greenhouse gas reduction goals adopted by the Austin City Council in the Climate Equity Plan isn’t possible without significant emissions reductions by Austin Energy in the near, medium, and long-term; and WHEREAS, any increase in greenhouse gas emissions does not align with the Climate Equity Plan or the greenhouse gas reduction goals adopted by the Austin City Council; and WHEREAS, reducing and eliminating local air pollution, especially in and near historically and currently marginalized and lower-income parts of the community, is an important equity and community health priority reflected in the Climate Equity Plan; and WHEREAS, methane - the primary component of natural gas - has 86 times the global warming potential as carbon dioxide when emitted directly into the atmosphere, which is a well- documented problem, and natural gas also releases carbon dioxide emissions when combusted; and WHEREAS, the Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan includes a commitment to “incorporating community input, prior to bringing a [natural gas peaker] project forward for approval”, and WHEREAS, the Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan states, “should Austin Energy seek Council approval for any peaker units, we will show any analysis performed demonstrating why a carbon-free alternative was not available and how the requested action will impact the utility’s ability to reach the goal of 100% carbon-free by 2035”, and . WHEREAS, the Austin City Charter states that all purchases greater than $5,000 must be let through a competitive bidding process, and WHEREAS, Texas state law requires municipalities to use competitive purchasing for purchases over $50,000, and WHEREAS, Austin Energy is requesting authorization to develop and execute a contract to purchase 400 megawatts of gas-burning peaker power generation without issuing a request for proposals or bids and without revealing to the public the cost, with whom the contract would be with, where the peakers would be located, how the …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260520-002: Mopac South Expansion WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was given a presentation on May 6, 2026, regarding the MoPac South Expansion; and WHEREAS, the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA) proposes adding two new toll lanes in each direction, a total of 4 new lanes, from Cesar Chavez Street to Slaughter Lane; and WHEREAS, CTRMA has expanded the project, proposing to add between one and three new auxiliary and free lanes in each direction along the eight-mile route; WHEREAS, the proposed bridge over Lady Bird Lake, Zilker Park, and Austin High School would be expanded from 8 lanes to 13 lanes; and WHEREAS, the Austin City Council has passed Resolution 20241212-066 expressing concern about the environmental impact of the MoPac South expansion, lack of consideration of viable alternatives, and integration with existing public transportation; and WHEREAS, the Austin City Council passed Resolution 20190808-078 declaring a Climate Emergency on August 8, 2019, declaring greenhouse gas emissions from transportation a leading cause of climate change; and WHEREAS, the Austin City Council passed Resolution 20260423-064 expressing concern that the CTRMA Draft Environmental Assessment for the MoPac South Expansion is incorrect in its assertion that the Mopac South Expansion, “is likely to have no significant environmental effects on air and water quality, endangered species, caves and karst features, public parkland and community spaces, and vulnerable school-aged communities”; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin Urban Transportation Commission Recommendation 20260203-006 recommends that the CTRMA produce a complete Environmental Impact Study with a thorough study of alternatives before moving forward with the project; and WHEREAS, Hays County, over the objection of the Travis County Commissioners Court and with a contractor led by the former CTRMA Executive Director, is simultaneously moving forward with studies and planning aimed at connecting State Highway 45 Southwest to Interstate 35 (I-35), with roughly half of this project located in Travis County; and WHEREAS, if these two projects are both completed, MoPac would be converted from a local commuter highway into an alternative freeway, inviting large amounts of . interregional and interstate traffic, including truck traffic, onto MoPac, with harm to the environment, neighbors, and local commuters from Travis County, northern Hays County, and Williamson County; and WHEREAS, both construction and operation of the project would do direct harm to Lady Bird Lake parkland, Austin High School, Lady Bird Lake, Zilker Park, Barton Springs, the Barton …
Testimony provided 05/20,2026 to the Environmental Commission related to Barton Springs Road Bridge Project Hello and thank you for all of your countless hours of work on this commission. I realize that it can be a thankless job at times. My name is Katerina Dittemore. I have 30 yrs experience in grant writing, grant administration and environmental. I am here tonight to discuss the Historic Sec 106 Report which I am handing out now. PLEASE ACCEPT THE 2 HANDOUTS AS PART OF THE RECORD. THIS IS MY ATTEMPT TO FILL IN SOME OF THE INFORMATION GAP THAT IS SURROUNDING THIS PROJECT. It was prepared JAN 2023 by Ama Terra, most likely as part of the Bridge Infrastructure Fund Grant application for the BSpRd Bridge. I do not have access to the Attachments A, B or C. Please note Page 1 and Page 11- the proposed action would result in a change in setting, design, mlts, workmanship and feeling of the Zilker Park Historic District …having an adverse effect on historic properties. Historic is considered a part of the environmental it is in your wheelhouse. The same conclusion is reached on page 11 with regards to rehab. Now the definition of rehab, that is your 2nd packet. This is the conceptual design as presented by City staff to the Historic Commission. The reason I bring up the definition of rehab is because the bridge does need to be addressed, but not in the way as conceived in the packet. In order to reduce confusion, I am recommending that we approach the design as a retrofit/rehab. I also recommend hiring a Preservation Civil Engineer with heavy experience in historic structures. I want to bring your attention to the following: 1. Original intention/ purpose of the bridge In 1926 the bridge was constructed to provide safe crossing for vehicular traffic across a flood prone Barton Springs AND to serve as a gateway to Zilker Park. To connect the public to recreation. 2. Road Classification of Barton Springs Road- it is a MINOR ARTERIAL AND SCENIC ROADWAY. That means it is to provide LOCAL access. The Scenic classification requires additional site plan/ design considerations. THIS CLASSIFICATION says nothing about ACL / 3C 18 wheeler trucks bringing in equipment or about connecting to a major thoroughfare such as MoPac. 3. Current NEPA- In my opinion, the NEPA should be stopped until the new design is …
20260520-003, Barton Springs Road Bridge Project Public Comment Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to speak. My name is Barbara LaFollette, President of the Barton Hills Neighborhood Association, and I’m here to ask you to oppose demolition and full replacement of the Barton Springs Road Bridge, and instead urge the City to pursue a lower-impact rehabilitation and roadway “diet” alternative. First, the environmental footprint of full replacement is enormous and has not been fully presented to this Commission. Demolishing a nearly century-old bridge in the middle of Barton Creek’s floodplain will require heavy construction in and adjacent to the channel, deep foundations, dewatering, and staging areas that will permanently convert parkland and temporarily clear even more acreage during construction. Staff materials and past briefings acknowledge parkland takings and substantial construction easements, but this Commission has not been given a current, comprehensive environmental impact summary. Proceeding toward demolition without that information before the Environmental Commission is exactly backward. Second, the bridge is located within the Zilker Park Historic District, and the federal Section 106 process has already concluded that the proposed project would adversely affect historic resources. The City’s own historic consultants found that replacement would damage the setting, design, materials, workmanship, and feeling of Zilker Park’s historic entrance, which is part of the “human environment” your body is charged to consider. In plain terms, we are talking about tearing out a contributing historic structure at the front door of Austin’s most iconic park and replacing it with a much wider, more intrusive modern bridge. Third, scale matters. Commissioners have already raised concerns that the proposed bridge cross-section almost doubles the width—from roughly 60 feet today to on the order of 100 feet or more—despite Barton Springs Road already operating as a single lane in each direction for safety. A much wider deck, longer construction duration, and larger footprint directly translate to more shade changes, more concrete over Barton Creek, more habitat disturbance, and more permanent encroachment into parkland, all to push additional vehicle capacity into a constrained, two-lane roadway on either side. That is not a context-sensitive solution in a sensitive riparian corridor. Fourth, the record shows that rehabilitation is feasible and that cost differences between rehabilitation and replacement are small. Commissioners have noted that engineering estimates characterize the cost difference as negligible, while life-cycle expectations are on the order of 50 years for rehabilitation …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE URBAN FORESTRY COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026, AT 12:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Urban Forestry Committee may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Richard Brimer, Chair Annie Fierro Justin Fleury Martin Luecke AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Urban Forestry Committee Regular Meeting on December 1, 2025. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding an update on the Urban Forest Replenishment Fund. Presented by Emily King, Urban Forester, Management Services. Staff briefing regarding the Youth Forestry Council. Presented by Britney Huynh, Program Development Coordinator, Management Services. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion of Windsor Park Neighborhood Association's Shade the Streets initiative. Presented by Commissioner Luecke. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Nicole Corona at Austin Watershed Protection, at 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Nicole Corona at 512- 974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov.
URBAN FORESTRY COMMITTEE MINUTES REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2025 The Urban Forestry Committee convened in a regular meeting on Monday, December 1, 2025, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Brimer called the Urban Forestry Committee Meeting to order at 11:04 a.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Richard Brimer, Chair Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: None PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on September 17, 2025. The minutes from the Environmental Commission regular meeting on September 17, 2025, were approved on Chair Brimer’s motion, Commissioner Luecke’s second, on a 3-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Fierro were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. Discuss strategies to implement Environmental Commission Recommendation 20241204-004, related to supporting Austin’s Urban Forest. Discussed. Discuss the 2026 Urban Forestry Committee meeting schedule. Discussed. 1 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Presentation by Tree Folks. Sponsors: Commissioner Luecke. ADJOURNMENT Chair Brimer adjourned the meeting at 12:26 p.m. without objection. 2
Youth Forest Council Internship Overview Youth Forest Council Paid, year-long internship for young people (16-20) to: Use their unique skills and talents to support Austin’s Urban Forest Learn about green careers (Forestry-related and others) Work alongside their communities, peers and professionals to foster “a healthy urban forest for all” The Team Britney Huynh Program Development Coordinator Zane Williams Youth Program Technician Ashleigh Pettus Conservation Program Coordinator Program Structure Yearlong program June - May 12-16 interns each year Recruitment focused on young people coming from high priority areas with lower tree canopy Interns are paid part-time temp employees working about 10-15 hours per month. Participant Demographics 2025-26 cohort from high-priority areas (from the Community Tree Priority Map) Schools represented: Austin Community College Austin High School McCallum High School University of Texas at Austin LBJ Early College High School Garza High School Westwood High School Hispanic/Latinx41.7%White16.7%Mixed16.7%Asian8.3%Black/AfricanAmerican8.3%Native American8.3%69% Monthly Meetings and Excursions Meetings include: Pathway trainings Youth Programming Community Engagement AISD Tree Inventory Tree climbing Kayaking and trash removal along Barton Springs Restoration workdays Structural Pruning Super Volunteer training Tree planting and care Forest bathing
Youth Programming Summer PlaygroundsNature Kit WagonAssemblyCity SproutsLibrary programmingYMCAAISD EnvironmentalStewardship AdvisoryCommittee (ESAC) Community Engagement Tabling Zero Waste Resource Fairs CTX Climate Summit Neighborwoods Events Community Events HOA meetings Social media content creation Participate in event planning Lead tree ID walks AISD Tree Inventory 6+ schools 985+ trees inventoried Inventory tree species, DBH, and tree health on AISD campusesWork with the AISD Urban ForesterLearn Tree ID Interns get to work with various professionals in the environmental field and learn about their careers through our meetings and workshops. They also get the opportunity to attend: Networking events Environmental career panels Green Career Fest 100% of interns feel more confident in professional development and communication skills as a result of participating in YFC 100% of interns have cultivated a stronger professional network through this internship Professional Development+ Career Exploration Community Action Project (CAP) Gain leadership experience by engaging their community Use their creativity and strengths to propose, plan, and implement a project of your own Program Impacts 2025-26 1505 Community members engaged by YFC interns in environmental service 21 Partnerships formed with AISD campuses, non- profits, and City of Austin departments 240 Hours spent performing eco restoration, environmental education, and community service 365 Trees planted in local parks, greenways, and school campuses "Seeing the visible change we’re able to make by connecting communities and planting trees [wasthe most impactful part of YFC]. It gave me a role where I felt encouraged and knowledgeableenough to teach others about something I dearly care about." - Youth Forest Council Member
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 15, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the Barton Springs Road Bridge Project. Presented by Eric Bailey, Deputy Director, Austin Capital Delivery Services. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Name: SoLa Mixed Use, SP-2024-0397C Applicant: Hannah Riemer, P.E., LJA Engineering, Inc. Location: 2700 and 2800 South Lamar Boulevard Council District: 5 Staff: David Michael, Environmental Review Specialist, Austin Development Services, 512- 974-2263, David.Michael@austintexas.gov Applicant Request: Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone, per City Code 25- 8-26 Staff Recommendation: Recommended DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion on the MoPac South Project. Presented by Mike Sexton, Director of Engineering, Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA), and Charlotte Gilpin, General Engineering Consultant, CTRMA. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Approve a nomination of a member of the Environmental Commission to the Urban Forestry Committee. COMMITTEE UPDATES 6. Update from Urban Forestry Committee regarding the meeting on April 28, 2026. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS City Code requires at least two board members sponsor an item to be included on an agenda. This section of the agenda provides members an opportunity to request items for future agendas. Staff should assume that if there is no objection from other members expressed at the meeting, the members’ silence indicates approval for staff to include on the next agenda. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed …
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Krueger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Annie Fierro Mar Moretta-Urdiales PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Susana Almanza, Poder, Montopolis-Fairway Mixed Use Zoning Case. Bobby Levinski, Save Our Springs Alliance, Draft MoPac Environmental Assessment, MoPac South Project. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 1, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 1, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Changsut was absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Presentation, discussion, and recommendation to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and amend Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review 1 processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure. Presented by Donna Galati, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Project Connect, donna.galati@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2733. The public hearing was conducted and a motion to close the public hearing was approved on Vice Chair Bristol’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Changsut was absent. The recommendation to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and amend Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure was approved with the following proposed amendments: • Only native (no adaptive) plants, including trees, will be used. • To promote insect and other pollinator survival, rain gardens and other green spaces in the Right of Way will never be mowed, but periodic efforts to remove non-native, invasive species will be made. • To promote the survival of insects and amphibians, fallen leaves from street trees will not be blown, but may be raked around the circumference of the tree and/or left in green space. • Deny administrative waiver for heritage trees, maintaining the current code standards. If the waiver is granted, then every effort …
Parks Board – Barton Springs Rd. Bridge Update Eric Bailey, P.E. – Deputy Director Capital Delivery Services May 6, 2026 Barton Springs Road Bridge 100years old built in 1926 1946 Bridge Expansion 20,000 Vehicles per day Key Entrance to Zilker Park and for Major City Events FUNDING SOURCE: • Preliminary Design: 2012, 2018 and 2020 Bonds • Design: 2020 Bond • Construction: FHWA/City 2 Project Development Process - PRELIMINARY PHASE 2015 - 2023 - DESIGN PHASE 2024 - 2027 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2027 - 2029 PUBLIC MEETING April 2023 RESPOND TO COMMENTS Summer 2023 REFINE REPORT Fall 2023 COUNCIL ACTION December 2023 60% DESIGN + NEPA PUBLIC MEETINGS + BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS FINAL DESIGN AND PERMITTING BID AND AWARD + COUNCIL ACTION CONSTRUCTION WE ARE HERE Current Condition Spalling Concrete in Bridge Structure Concrete Cores Delamination of Beams Curb And Railing Do Not Meet Current ADA Standards Load Restricted As Of November 2023 – Heavy Vehicles Moving Eastbound Must Use Outer Lanes 4 Analysis Structural and Mobility Analysis: • • • • External Structure - Spalling Concrete • ADA compliance – Pedestrian Circulation Internal Structure – Deteriorating Steel Geotechnical Data –Replacement Design • Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility – no improvement to existing condition Cost/Benefit Analysis – extended life vs. cost Historic Analysis: • Coordinated with US Army Corps (USACE) and Texas Historic Commission (THC) • The bridge is a contributing feature to the Zilker Park Historic Landmark designation • The Texas Historic Commission has approved potentially fully replacing the bridge. As the process continues, the final design will be reviewed and approved by USACE and THC. 5 Project Options 6 Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Structure Rehabilitation 1 Remove Existing Bridge Deck and Spandrel Columns 2 Remaining Portion of Existing Structure 3 New Components: Exterior Pairs of Arch Ribs, Spandrel Columns, Deck, and Abutment Extensions Less than half of the original structure will remain Remaining structure will require refacing with new material surfaces View of old arches will be mostly blocked by new structure 7 City Council Actions 1 Direction from Council in 2020 Bond Resolution (20200812-011): 2 Previous Council Action/Hearings: 11/30/23 – Council conducts a public hearing to recommend the bridge replacement alternative 12/12/23 – Council work session on the recommended option 12/14/23 – Council conducts a public hearing and directs Staff to pursue replacement option 03/07/24 – Council Directs TPW Director to apply for a federal bridge grant …
Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone SoLa Mixed Use 2700 & 2800 South Lamar Blvd Austin, Texas 78704 SP-2024-0397C David Michael Environmental Review Development Services Department 1 AGENDA The Site The Code The Project 2 The Site 3 VICINITY MAP N PROJECT LOCATION 4 WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION MAP N PROJECT LOCATION 5 EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE MAP PROJECT LOCATION N RECHARGE ZONE 6 AERIAL IMAGE 7 Property Data • Barton Creek Watershed & West Bouldin Creek Watershed • Barton Springs Zone Classification & Urban Watershed Classification • Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone • Full Purpose Jurisdiction • Council District 5 • All uplands (no CWQZ; no WQTZ) 8 The Code 9 What is the Redevelopment Exception (RE)? Section 25-8-26 of the Land Development Code (Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone) allows for redevelopment of existing commercial properties in the Barton Springs Zone. Section 25-8-26 supersedes Article 13 (Save Our Springs Initiative), to the extent of conflict. There are many requirements associated with the redevelopment exception. However, in brief summary the redevelopment exception resets the watershed impervious cover limit equal to the amount of impervious cover currently on site. 10 What is the Redevelopment Exception (RE)? (continued) So the redevelopment exception allows the developer to remove existing impervious cover and build back up to the same amount of impervious cover. To be clear, there are other requirements including regulations that provide environmental benefit. 11 What are the requirements of the RE? LDC 25-8-26(E) lays out nine requirements: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. May not increase impervious cover. May not increase non-compliance Critical Water Quality Zone, Water Quality Transition Zone, or Critical Environmental Feature requirements. Must comply with Environmental Resource Inventory, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, and fiscal requirements. The water quality controls on the redevelopment site must provide a level of water quality treatment that is equal to or greater than that which was previously provided. Item no. 6 provides additional WQ requirements. Must obtain a Barton Springs Zone Operating Permit for ponds. 12 What are the requirements of the RE? (continued) 6. A site with more than 40 percent net site area impervious cover, must have: (a) sedimentation/filtration ponds for the entire site; or (b) SOS ponds and sedimentation/filtration ponds for the entire site. 7. A site with 40 percent or less net site area impervious cover, must have SOS ponds for the entire site. 8. Must mitigate the effects of …
APPENDIX Q-4 CALCULATION FOR PAYMENT INTO THE BARTON SPRINGS ZONE MITIGATION FUND A. OWNER/AGENT INFORMATION: Joe Warnock Name: Seamless LMA, Ltd. Company: (512) 970-2223 Telephone: SoLa Mixed Use B. PROJECT INFORMATION: Name: Location or Address: 2700 & 2800 South Lamar Blvd, Austin, Texas 78704 Permit Number: Case Manager: Total Gross Site Area (GSA): Total Net Site Area (NSA): Total Acres Impervious Cover: Percent Impervious Cover of NSA = Total Acres Impervious Cover / Total Net Site Area Percent Impervious Cover of NSA: SP-2024-0397C, (Withdraw/Resubmit of SP-2023-0283C) Chris Sapuppo 4.489 4.255 3.008 0 70.69 ac. ac. ac. % C. MITIGATION CALCULATION: 1. OVERALL MITIGATION Overall Mitigation Required (ac.) = (Total Acres Impervious Cover / 0.20) - Acres Gross Site Area Overall Mitigation Required: If the entire site is treated with sedimentation/sand filtration or an equivalent level of water quality control, skip to section 3. Final Mitigation Required is equal to Overall Mitigation Required. 2. NON-DEGRADATION (ND) REDUCTION Total Site Area Treated with ND Controls (including Treatment Area): Total Acres Impervious Cover Treated with ND Controls: Non-Degradation Reduction (ac.) = (Acres of ND Impervious Cover / 0.20) - Acres of ND Site Area Non-Degradation Reduction: 3. FINAL MITIGATION Final Mitigation Required (ac.) = Overall Mitigation - Non-Degradation Reduction Final Mitigation Required: 10.551 10.551 ac. ac. 0 0 ac. ac. ac. 0 D. PAYMENT CALCULATION: Mitigation Land Provided by Applicant: Mitigation by Payment (ac.) = Final Mitigation Required - Mitigation Land Provided by Applicant Mitigation by Payment: Base Fee: Annual Adjustment Factor: Adjusted Fee: Total Fee: Mitigation by Payment (ac.) * Adjusted Fee = 10.551 $15,000 7% beginning October 1, 2008 $50,698.98 $ 534,927.24 0.00 ac. per acre ac. E. AUTHORIZATION: Owner/Agent: Reviewed by: APPENDIX Q-1 NET SITE AREA NOTE: NET SITE AREA IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO WATERSHEDS CLASSIFIED AS WATER SUPPLY SUBURBAN / WATER SUPPLY RURAL / BARTON SPRINGS ZONE (BSZ) TOTAL SITE AREA DRAINING TO BSZ = 4.489 ACRES SITE DEDUCTIONS CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE (CWQZ) = WATER QUALITY TRANSITION ZONE (WQTZ) = WASTEWATER IRRIGATION AREAS = 0.000 ACRES 0.000 ACRES 0.000 ACRES DEDUCTION SUBTOTAL = 0.000 ACRES UPLAND AREA (GROSS SITE AREA MINUS TOTAL DEDUCTIONS) = 4.489 ACRES NET SITE AREA CALCULATION AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES 0-15% = AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES 15-25% = AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES 25-35% = AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES > 35% = 4.172 x 100% = 0.178 x 40% = 0.059 …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 6, 2026 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: SoLa Mixed Use, SP-2024-0397C NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Hannah Riemer, P.E., LJA Engineering, Inc. LOCATION: 2700 and 2800 South Lamar Boulevard COUNCIL DISTRICT: District 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: David Michael, Environmental Review Specialist, Austin Development Services, 512-974-2263, David.Michael@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: REQUEST: Barton Creek Watershed (classified as Barton Springs Zone) and Bouldin Creek Watershed (classified as Urban) Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone, per City Code 25-8-26 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommended STAFF CONDITION: Conditions do not apply for this type of request Austin Development Services Staff Recommendations Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance (current code) SOLA MIXED USE Request: The request is for an affirmative recommendation for this project to develop using the Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone [LDC 25-8-26] Per LDC 25-8-26(F), this project requires approval from City Council because the redevelopment includes more than 25 dwelling units. § 25-8-26 REDEVELOPMENT EXCEPTION IN THE BARTON SPRINGS ZONE. (A) This section applies to property located in the Barton Springs Zone that has existing commercial development if: (1) no unpermitted development occurred on the site after January 1, 1992, and COMPLIES (2) the property owner files a site plan application and an election for the property to be governed by this section. COMPLIES (B) For property governed by this section, this section supersedes Article 13 (Save Our Springs Initiative), to the extent of conflict. (C) In this section: (1) STANDARD POND means water quality controls that comply with Section 25-8-213 (Water Quality Control Standards) or are approved under Section 25-8-151 (Innovative Management Practices); and (2) SOS POND means water quality controls that comply with all requirements of Section 25-8-213 (Water Quality Control Standards) and the pollutant removal requirements of Section 25-8-514(A) (Pollution Prevention Required). (D) The requirements of this subchapter do not apply to the subdivision of property if at the time of redevelopment under this section subdivision and site plan applications are filed concurrently. Not applicable (E) The requirements of this subchapter do not apply to the redevelopment of property if the redevelopment meets all of the following conditions: (1) The redevelopment may not increase the existing amount of impervious cover on the site. COMPLIES (2) The redevelopment may not increase non-compliance, if any, with Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions), Section 25-8-281 (Critical Environmental Features), Section 25-8-282 (Wetland …
City of Austin Environmental Commission ____________ MoPac South Environmental Study Briefing May 6, 2026 MoPac South • Limits: Cesar Chavez Street to Slaughter Lane • Length: Approximately 8 miles • Project Status: Environmental Study, Draft Environmental Assessment published • Recent Activity: – Public Hearing: March 9 to May 3, 2026 • Current Activity: – Review all comments – Prepare Public Hearing Report • Next Steps: – Prepare final Environmental Assessment 2 Public Hearing Overview • Virtual Public Hearing Completed: March 9, 2026 through May 3, 2026 • In-person Public Hearing Completed: March 24, 2026 • Promoted via: Social media, postcards to residents, newspaper ads, media outreach, agency newsletter, variable message sign boards on the corridor • Comment Received Via: – In writing at the in-person Public Hearing – Online – Email – Mail – Voicemail • 79-day review period • 55-day comment period • All comments received will be reviewed and posted with responses as part of the NEPA process. 3 Public Hearing Materials At both the In-person and Virtual Public Hearing, participants viewed: – The Draft Environmental Assessment and accompanying Technical Reports – Information on Project history and the NEPA process – Environmental findings on topics including but not limited to water quality, air quality, cultural resources, and traffic noise. – Preliminary Project schematic and proposed Bike/Pedestrian Improvements – Official Public Hearing Presentation Video – Video fly-through – Information on how to submit comments 4 Environmental Assessment (EA) • The study type and process are determined by TxDOT’s Environmental Affairs Division under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) assignment from the Federal Highway Administration. The preparation of an EA or EIS was discussed and confirmed with TxDOT on several occasions throughout the process, including in early 2026 as we finalized the draft EA. • TxDOT and FHWA classified the MoPac South environmental document as an Environmental Assessment based on factors including minimal ROW needs for some alternatives being studied, no relocations or displacements required, and consistency with the CAMPO RTP. • There is no difference in the resources studied for an EA or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). • There is no difference in the consultation process for endangered species for an EA or an EIS. • An Environmental Finding of no Significant Impact or a Record of Decision for an EA or EIS, respectively, both consider the measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts. • TxDOT will determine …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260506-003: SoLa Mixed Use Redevelopment Exception, SP-2024-0397C WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that the applicant, LJA Engineering, is requesting a Redevelopment Exception; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone within Barton Creek Watershed & West Bouldin Creek Watershed; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff recommends this redevelopment exception. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Environmental Commission recommends the SoLa Mixed Use Redevelopment Exception with the following conditions: • To augment community benefit and promote alignment with the City’s Comprehensive Vision Plan and the Comprehensive Austin-Travis County Food Plan: o Increase affordable housing units to 25% of all units from 30 - 60% Median Family Income (MFI) o Utilize bird-friendly building design o Incorporate a community garden on the ground or rooftop level o Incorporate dense, native plantings throughout the property, and utilize no-mow and no leaf-blowing principles year-round o Help meet the city’s goal of connecting all residents with a park by working with the City of Austin to enhance and formalize the access point on the Barton Creek Green Belt. Date of Approval: May 6, 2026 Motioned By: Secretary Qureshi Seconded By: Commissioner Brimer Vote: For: 10-0 Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, Commissioners Brimer, Changsut, Fleury, Luecke, Moretta-Urdiales, Morrison, and Sullivan Against: Abstain: None None Off the dais: None . Absent: Commissioner Fierro Attest: _____________________________________________ Liz Johnston, Executive Liaison
REGULAR MEETING OF THE URBAN FORESTRY COMMITTEE TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026, AT 12:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1401 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Urban Forestry Committee may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Richard Brimer, Chair Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro Justin Fleury Martin Luecke AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Urban Forestry Committee Regular Meeting on December 1, 2025. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding an update on the Urban Forest Replenishment Fund. Presented by Emily King, Urban Forester, Management Services. Staff briefing regarding the Youth Forestry Council. Presented by Britney Huynh, Program Development Coordinator, Management Services. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion of Windsor Park Neighborhood Association's Shade the Streets initiative. Presented by Commissioner Luecke. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Nicole Corona at Austin Watershed Protection, at 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Nicole Corona at 512- 974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Mar Moretta-Urdiales Allison Morrison David Sullivan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 1, 2026. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Presentation, discussion, and recommendation to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and amend Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure. Presented by Donna Galati, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Project Connect, donna.galati@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2733. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. Approve a recommendation to Council regarding the Final Draft of the Rain to River Strategic Plan. Presented by Jorge Morales, Director, Austin Watershed Protection. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from the Bird-Friendly Design Working Group regarding the meeting on April 10, 2026. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Nicole Corona at Austin Watershed Protection, at 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Nicole Corona at 512- 974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 1, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Krueger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Mar Moretta-Urdiales Allison Morrison David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jennifer Bristol, Chair PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Corbin Graham, Landfill leachate leakage in Walnut Creek watershed Roy Waley, Elon Musk’s data centers APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on March 4, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on March 4, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Chair Bristol was off the dais. 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Name: 1404 East Riverside PUD, C814-2025-0111 Applicant: Amanda Swor, Drenner Group Location: 1404 East Riverside Drive Council District: 3 Staff: Sean Watson, Environmental Program Coordinator, Austin Watershed Protection, 512- 963-2167, Sean.Watson@austintexas.gov Applicant Request: The applicant proposes a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Staff Recommendation: Recommended with conditions The meeting was recessed at 6:38 p.m. until 6:47 p.m. without objection. The public hearing was conducted, and a motion to close the public hearing was approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on an 11-0 vote. The motion to recommend the project 1404 East Riverside PUD, C814-2025-0111, located at 1404 East Riverside Drive, to Council with conditions and the following amendments was approved on Secretary Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second on an 11-0 vote. The following amendment was made by Commissioner Fleury and seconded by Chair Bristol. The amendment was to revise the condition “Of the existing parking on site, reserve at least ten parking spaces, including ADA-compliant parking, on the ground level garage floor for public parking and park access” to read: “Of the existing parking on site, reconsider reserving some parking spaces, including ADA- compliant parking, on the ground level garage floor for public parking and park access.” The amendment was approved on a 10-1 vote. Commissioner Brimer voted nay. The following amendment was made by Chair Bristol. The amendment was to remove the condition of maximum allowable height of 120 feet. The amendment was approved on an 11-0 vote without objection. 3. Name: …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 15, 2026 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: C20-2026-003 Transit System Projects Ordinance Amendment Sponsor Department: Austin Project Connect City Staff: Donna Galati, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Project Connect, donna.galati@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2733 Description: Amend the 2022 Transit System Projects Ordinance to add additional streamlining elements with a focus on project-specific technical regulation. Background: On October 29, 2021, Council approved Ordinance No. 20211029-003 directing staff to review City Code, criteria manuals, and permitting procedures to identify impediments to the design, construction, implementation, and operation of Project Connect to add streamlining elements with a focus on project-specific technical regulation. The foundational ordinance for Transit System Projects, Ordinance. No. 20221115-048, was approved by Council on November 15, 2022. The Transit System Projects foundational ordinance created a central location for transit- specific regulations, expanded permitting options, clarified uses, and provided a programmatic approach to construction noise mitigation. Summary of Proposed Code Amendment: 1. Modifies site plan requirements to accommodate permitting tools for the light rail permitting process. 2. Recission of obsolete utility ordinance from 2000. 3. Establishes back-of-curb streetscape standards for light rail. 4. Establishes a water quality compliance program for light rail. 5. Establishes administrative review of heritage trees for Transit System Projects. 6. Incorporates administrative rule modifications that proactively address constrained right of way conditions where compliance will be challenging and ensures consistency in expiration of site plan components. Proposed Text Amendment(s): See attached draft ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Recommended Staff supports the proposed amendments to Ordinance No. 20221115-048. The amendments will further support Resolution No. 20211029-003, which directed staff to review City Code, criteria manuals, and permitting procedures to identify impediments to the design, construction, implementation, and operation of Project Connect to add streamlining elements with a focus on project-specific technical regulation. Board and Commission Action: April 15, 2026 – To be considered by the Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee. April 15, 2026 – To be considered by the Environmental Commission. April 28, 2026 – Tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission. May 21, 2026 – Tentatively scheduled for City Council action.
WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES PART 1. On November 15, 2022, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20221115-048 (the “Original Ordinance”), approving the Transit System Project Regulations to facilitate the construction of Project Connect (“Project”), the City’s high-capacity transit system expansion. PART 2. The attached exhibits are incorporated into this ordinance in their entirety as though set fully in the text of this ordinance. The exhibits are as follows: Exhibit A and A-1: Transit System Project Map Exhibit C: Preliminary Water Quality Treatment Map PART 3. This ordinance and the attached exhibits amend the Original Ordinance as amended for the Transit System Project Regulations, modifying conditions and replacing any likewise named or identified exhibits in the Original Ordinance as amended. Development of and uses for the Transit System Project shall conform to the limitations and conditions set forth in this ordinance and in the attached exhibits. If this ordinance and the attached exhibits conflict, this ordinance controls. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this ordinance, all other rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Austin (“City”) apply to a Transit System Project. PART 4. This ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 000309-114. PART 5. Code Modifications. The following code modifications apply to a Transit System Project. (A) General Requirements and Procedures (1) City Code Section 25-1-21(108) (Definitions, Site) is modified to provide that a site can be a noncontiguous area and may cross a public street or right-of-way. (2) The Director of Austin Development Services may allow development to be reviewed and approved in multiple layers within one overall site plan. (B) Transportation (1) City Code Section 25-6-171 (Standards for Design and Construction) is modified to allow Project Connect Design Criteria to supersede any conflicting requirements in Chapter 25-6 (Transportation), subject to final approval by the City Traffic Engineer or Director of Austin Transportation and Public Works. (2) Notwithstanding any provision in Title 25 (Land Development) excluding Chapter 25- 2 (Zoning), the planting of street trees in the right-of-way shall follow the criteria of this subsection. WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES (a) Street trees planted in the right-of-way can have a horizontal clearance from the outer edge of the root barrier to the outer edge of an existing storm drain that is running parallel to the light rail alignment of: (i) five feet; or (ii) three …
2 3 4 Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD) The Final Environmental Impact Statement includes: • Responses to each individual public comment received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Design updates in response to community feedback • Analysis of environmental effects and commitments to address potential project impacts • Mitigation Monitoring Plan documenting measures that reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts, noting implementation and monitoring practices The Record of Decision: • Enables us to proceed into the next phase of project work The FEIS/ROD will conclude our NEPA compliance and affirm the preferred project 5 LRT Contractor Preconstruction Overview Pre-Construction Activities 2026 Preconstruction (1A): Design Progression & Construction Planning 2027 2028 … 2/18/2026 Board Authorization Preconstruction (1B): Final Design & Permitting Board Authorization to finish final design Construction Packages Board Authorization for Construction Packages Preconstruction (1A): Design Progression & Construction Planning • Advance design and initiate permitting • Field work and utility coordination Preconstruction (1B): Final Design & Permitting • Advance design and refine construction cost estimates to execute construction packages (may be staggered) • Constructability reviews, innovation, and integrated cost estimating • Advance Right-of-Way acquisition activities • Obtain Third Party approvals and permits • Planning for construction: phasing, sequencing, and schedule • Engage community in design and construction planning • Prepare for FTA requirements 7 Transit System Projects Ordinance Amendment Austin Project Connect | April 15, 2026 Transit System Projects Ordinance Response to: Resolution No. 20211029-003 which directed staff to: • Review City Code, criteria manuals, and permitting procedures to identify impediments to the design, construction, implementation, and operation of Project Connect • Develop new regulations and procedures to address those impediments Foundational ordinance approved by Council on Nov. 15, 2022 Established home for Transit System Project regulations Modified permitting tools to accommodate Austin Light Rail Anticipated additional impediments would be identified as project progressed Amendments address these issues and support the project as it enters final design 9 Components of this Ordinance 1. Site Plan Modification 2. Removal of Outdated Utility Policy 3. Austin Light Rail Streetscape Standards 4. Austin Light Rail Water Quality Compliance Program 5. Administrative Review of Heritage Trees 6. Administrative Rule Modifications 10 1. Site Plan Modifications To facilitate the permitting process for Austin Light Rail, site plans will be allowed to have non-contiguous limits of construction (LOC). Refresher: Site Plan Layers Tool …
ORDINANCE NO. 20221115-048 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE TITLE 25 AND CHAPTER 9-2 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN TRANSIT SYSTEM PROJECTS AND RELATED TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: Project Connect is the City's high-capacity transit system expansion, PART 1. which will ultimately consist of a light rail network, an expanded bus system, transportation terminals and stations, maintenance facilities, and all associated improvements necessary for operation of the transit system. To facilitate the construction ofthis critical transportation infrastructure, certain modifications and waivers to City Code are necessary to ensure the construction of a high-capacity transit system. This ordinance and the attached Exhibits A and B consist of the PART 2. "Transit System Project Regulations". Development ofthe Transit System Project shall conform to the limitations and conditions set forth in this ordinance. If this ordinance and the attached exhibits conflict, this ordinance controls. Except as otherwise provided by this ordinance, all other rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City apply. PART 3. The attached exhibits are incorporated into this ordinance in their entirety as though set forth fully in the text of this ordinance. The exhibits are as follows: A. Transit System Project Map B. Light Rail Construction Noise and Mitigation Plan Requirements PART 4. Definitions. A. Transit System Project means a transportation project generally depicted on Exhibit A with any related appurtenances, including but not limited to a rail and public transit line, rail station, or a transportation terminal, funded by a public entity. B. Unless otherwise specifically defined, all terms in this ordinance shall have the meaning established in Title 25 of Code of the City of Austin, Texas (the .,Land Development Code"). Page 1 0f 3 A Transit System Project for light rail lines or any associated PART 5. infrastructure necessary to construct the light rail lines must comply with a noise and mitigation plan approved by the City that meets the requirements listed in Exhibit B. To the extent there is a conflict with Chapter 9-2 (Noise and Amplified Soundj, the approved noise and mitigation Plan will control. PART 6. Transit System Uses A. The use of a site for a traction powered substation is a Local Utility Service use as described in City Code Section 25-2-6(28). B. The use of a site for the provision of maintenance, repair, vehicular or equipment servicing, material storage, or similar activities for …
A STRATEGIC PLAN TO PROTECT AUSTIN’S CREEKS AND COMMUNITIES City of Austin | Austin Watershed Protection FINAL DRAFT 2026 A Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks & Communities LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT As we introduce the Rain to River Strategic Plan, we ground our work in the recognition that every watershed has a story – one that began long before Austin was a city. By sharing this land acknowledgment, we hope to honor the Indigenous peoples who have cared for these lands and waters for generations while acknowledging the harms that persist today. We acknowledge, with respect, that the land we are on is the traditional and ancestral homelands of the Tonkawa, the Apache, the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, the Lipan Apache Tribe, the Texas Band of Yaqui Indians, the Coahuitlecan and all other tribes not explicitly stated. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge and pay respects to the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, the Kickapoo Tribe of Texas, Carrizo & Comecrudo, Tigua Pueblo, Caddo, Comanche, Kiowa, Wichita, Chickasaw, Waco nations, and all the American Indian and Indigenous Peoples and communities who have been or have become a part of these lands and territories in Texas, here on Turtle Island. Not all indigenous peoples listed claim Texas as ancestral lands, as many were forcibly relocated to Texas from their ancestral homelands. Though our work is just beginning, the vision and values in this strategic plan call us to care for our watersheds with humility, gratitude, and a deep sense of responsibility for generations to come. This shared purpose is reflected in the plan’s commitments and strategies, which prioritize equity, resilience, and collaborative stewardship. In adopting this new plan, we affirm our responsibility to learn from the land, repair relationships, and build trust as we work toward a future where watershed protection and cultural respect go hand in hand. 1 The clear, flowing water of Barton Creek at Sculpture Falls Scientist evaluating a wetland along Gilleland Creek Crew repairing a tributary of Tannehill Branch Creek Youth educator exploring a cave in the Edwards Aquifer Engineer assessing erosion on a tributary of Walnut Creek WELCOME LETTER I’m pleased to introduce Rain to River, the updated strategic plan for Austin Watershed Protection. This plan represents more than a set of strategies – it reflects a shift in how we approach our work, our partnerships, and our long-term responsibilities to the people and environment of Austin. Our …
FROM RAIN TO RIVER: WORKING WITH WATER’S PROMISE AND PERIL WHY WE’RE UPDATING THE PLAN At Austin Watershed Protection, our work begins with a drop of rain and follows its journey across the land, into our streets and neighborhoods, and through the creeks that shape Austin’s people, places, and ecosystems. Water brings life, offering spaces to swim, fish, and connect with nature, nourishing our neighborhoods and local wildlife. Rain can also bring devastation, flooding streets and homes, endangering lives, and creating stress, uncertainty, and lasting harm. Every storm carries this duality (promise and peril, vitality and risk) and our work is grounded in navigating both sides of that reality. For decades, decisions about how to protect and manage Austin’s creeks, floodplains, and stormwater infrastructure were guided primarily by technical assessments, environmental monitoring, engineering models, and permitting requirements. While essential, these tools often overlooked the equally vital human systems that define watershed health: the social, historical, and cultural contexts of the communities that live alongside these waters and the realities they face every day. The Rain to River Strategic Plan marks a deliberate shift. We cannot do this work with technical expertise alone; we need the wisdom of those who experience flooding, erosion, and water pollution firsthand. By treating lived experience and community knowledge as data, we combine technical expertise with the insights of residents and community leaders to create strategies that are both practical and responsive to community needs. The Rain to River Strategic Plan charts a forward-looking path for the next decade. It responds to Austin’s changing climate, rapid growth, and the pressing need for equity, setting goals and strategies to ensure our watersheds—and the people who rely on them—are protected, resilient, and healthy. When we last updated our strategic plan in 2016, Austin faced many of the same challenges we see today. In the years since, those challenges have grown in scale, urgency, and complexity. Since 2016, our city has experienced severe floods, extreme heat, winter storms, and prolonged drought. These events had devastating impacts, with some Austinites losing their homes and others losing their lives. Population growth has accelerated development, increasing the pressure on our natural systems and aging infrastructure. At the same time, our community’s understanding of environmental justice and climate vulnerability has evolved, bringing a sharper focus on who benefits from public investment and who bears the greatest risks. Our previous plan helped us make …
OUR VALUES | STEWARDS These represent the core values that we, as Watershed Protection staff, aspire to as stewards of Austin’s watersheds. They were formally adopted by leadership in 2025 after extensive conversations with staff across the department about what matters most in how we do our work. As stewards, we care for our watersheds and safeguard our infrastructure to support the communities that rely on them. We recognize the environment’s fundamental connection to protecting health and safety. We address urgent needs while planning for a sustainable and resilient future. We use public funds responsibly and transparently to implement solutions. We are committed to equity, prioritizing efforts to achieve fair outcomes for all. Through shared stewardship, we collaborate with city and community partners, leveraging our collective wisdom and strengths. Staff at the Central Texas Juneteenth Parade SERVICE Show up TEAMWORK Paddle together EQUITY Lifts all boats WISDOM Reflect and listen ACCOUNTABILITY Anchor trust RESILIENCE Ride the waves DEDICATION Dive in SUSTAINABILITY Shape tomorrow Service is at the core of our work, ensuring we provide high quality support and effective solutions to the community. • We hold ourselves to the highest standards of customer service by listening, engaging, and responding in a timely manner. • We provide accurate and consistent service to our internal customers to ensure our staff works safely and effectively while serving the community. We promote teamwork and collaboration, knowing we can rely on each other and that we are stronger when we work together. • We invest time and effort in cultivating effective teams, characterized by mutual support and respect for each other as whole people. • We value collaboration beyond our department, understanding that working across agencies and with community members is essential to achieving our missions. We are committed to equity by acknowledging that different people and environments need different resources to thrive. • We foster a workplace where everyone is valued, empowered, and has the chance to succeed and grow. • We prioritize our work towards achieving equal outcomes for all. We strive for excellence in our work by leveraging the wisdom of our staff, community, and watersheds. • We learn from the knowledge and experiences of our community, ensuring their voices shape our work and guide our decisions. • We foster a culture of creativity, continuous learning, and data- informed decision making. We hold ourselves accountable to each other, our community, and the …
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES Connecting with our community ambassadors The community priorities were developed through several years of listening, surveying, and working directly with Austin residents, especially those historically left out of city planning. Input was gathered through a multi-year community engagement process. Across these efforts, residents consistently raised concerns about flooding, water quality, equity, access to natural spaces, and the need for clearer communication and proactive action from the City. These findings were synthesized into draft themes and priorities. The Community Activation Group (CAG) then refined and validated these priorities to ensure they reflected community needs and values. While these priorities highlight areas where the community sees the greatest opportunities for improvement, they do not encompass the full scope of our work. Our core services and functions remain the foundation of what we do, and we will continue delivering them reliably. The recommendations identified here are intended to build on that foundation, addressing gaps and strengthening the programs that matter most to residents. Some of the community recommendations outlined in this section may go beyond what our department can directly lead. To address these priorities, we will need to rely on strong partnerships and connections with other city departments, community organizations, and residents. Through collaboration on initiatives such as parks, trails, and housing, we can expand our impact and work together to make meaningful progress. The community priorities and our department values share a common focus on equity, resilience, sustainability, and collaboration. Acting as stewards, we draw on the wisdom of the community to guide decisions, prepare for challenges, and shape solutions. By grounding our work in these values, we aim to deliver results that are measurable and enduring. 47 Community Priorities: 1. EQUITY & INCLUSION 2. FLOOD MITIGATION & EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3. CLIMATE RESILIENCE & SUSTAINABILITY 4. NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION & RESTORATION 5. ACCESSIBILITY & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 6. TRUST & COLLABORATION 7. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & GROWTH 8. SUPPORT FOR UNHOUSED & VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 9. EDUCATION & YOUTH ENGAGEMENT 10. INNOVATION & LEADERSHIP Students showing their #creeklove at Barton Springs University Rain to River: A Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks & Communities | FINAL DRAFT 1. EQUITY & INCLUSION Ensure historically underserved communities have equitable access to resources and decision-making processes. S S E N D E R A P E R P Y C N E G R E M E I I & N O T A G …
Rain to River: Austin Watershed Protection Strategic Plan Review and Adoption Environmental Commission Austin Watershed Protection | April 15, 2026 What is Rain to River? Austin Watershed Protection’s Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks and Communities Guiding Blueprint for Department Communication Resource – Establishes our mission, – Helps explain our vision, and values – Sets strategies and direction for the next 10 years work and priorities to staff, policymakers, and the community Note: Rain to River will update and replace the current Watershed Protection Strategic Plan 2 Guiding Principles for the Plan • • • • • • Center the needs of vulnerable populations Engage the community through clear and open communication Align our aspirations with community priorities Strengthen partnerships for greater impact Empower our leaders to advocate for our mission Create a dynamic and inclusive framework 3 Plan Highlights • Our mission remains unchanged to reduce the impacts of flooding, erosion, and water pollution • Reflects how we will strengthen and adapt our work to center community and build resilience • Expands our focus to include community voices, lived experience, and shared stewardship as essential components of our infrastructure • Holistic and proactive approach that balances immediate needs with our long-term vision • Equity not as a one-time initiative, but as an ongoing practice rooted in accountability and trust 4 Our Challenges • Climate change is driving more extreme weather, including more intense storms and prolonged drought • Historic inequities have left some neighborhoods more exposed to flooding and degraded waterways • Urbanization and development add pressure to our natural environment and infrastructure • Housing costs are driving displacement of residents and an increase in people experiencing homelessness 5 Community Engagement • Robust and inclusive process that spanned multiple years • We identified stakeholder groups that have been historically underrepresented in our past planning efforts and worked to engage with them more directly • We partnered with local organizations, community ambassadors, and advocacy groups to reach residents in every district • Engagement took many forms—surveys, interviews, focus groups, neighborhood meetings, and community events 6 Community Activation Group The Community Activation Group (CAG) helped shape the content of the plan and ensured that the diverse voices of our community are integral to the Rain to River planning process and Austin Watershed Protection’s work. • Diverse community leaders with expertise in the environment, community health, and disaster preparedness and recovery • …
WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES PART 1. On November 15, 2022, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20221115-048 (the “Original Ordinance”), approving the Transit System Project Regulations to facilitate the construction of Project Connect, the City’s high-capacity transit system expansion. PART 2. The attached exhibits are incorporated into this ordinance in their entirety as though set fully in the text of this ordinance. The exhibits are as follows: Exhibit A and A-1: Transit System Project Map Exhibit C: Preliminary Water Quality Treatment Map PART 3. This ordinance and the attached exhibits amend the Original Ordinance as amended for the Transit System Project Regulations, modifying conditions and replacing any likewise named or identified exhibits in the Original Ordinance as amended. Development of and uses for the Transit System Project shall conform to the limitations and conditions set forth in this ordinance and in the attached exhibits. If this ordinance and the attached exhibits conflict, this ordinance controls. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this ordinance, all other rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Austin (“City”) apply to a Transit System Project. PART 4. This ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 000309-114. PART 5. Definitions (A) Austin Light Rail means the light rail system generally depicted on Exhibit A-1 with any related appurtenances funded by a public entity. PART 6. Code Modifications. The following code modifications apply to development applications for the Austin Light Rail. (A) General Requirements and Procedures (1) City Code Section 25-1-21(108) (Definitions, Site) is modified to provide that a site can be a noncontiguous area and may cross a public street or right-of-way. (2) The Director of Austin Development Services may allow development to be reviewed and approved in multiple layers within one overall site plan. (B) Transportation (1) City Code Section 25-6-171 (Standards for Design and Construction) is modified to allow Project Connect Design Criteria to supersede any conflicting requirements in Chapter 25-6 (Transportation), subject to final approval by the City Traffic Engineer or Director of Austin Transportation and Public Works. WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES (2) Notwithstanding any provision in Title 25 (Land Development) excluding Chapter 25- 2 (Zoning), the planting of street trees in the right-of-way shall follow the criteria of this subsection. (a) Street trees planted in the right-of-way can have a horizontal clearance from the outer edge of …
Rain to River: Austin Watershed Protection Strategic Plan Review and Adoption Environmental Commission Austin Watershed Protection | April 15, 2026 What is Rain to River? Austin Watershed Protection’s Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks and Communities Guiding Blueprint for Department Communication Resource – Establishes our mission, – Helps explain our vision, and values – Sets strategies and direction for the next 10 years work and priorities to staff, policymakers, and the community Note: Rain to River will update and replace the current Watershed Protection Strategic Plan 2 Guiding Principles for the Plan • • • • • • Center the needs of vulnerable populations Engage the community through clear and open communication Align our aspirations with community priorities Strengthen partnerships for greater impact Empower our leaders to advocate for our mission Create a dynamic and inclusive framework 3 Plan Highlights • Our mission remains unchanged to reduce the impacts of flooding, erosion, and water pollution • Reflects how we will strengthen and adapt our work to center community and build resilience • Expands our focus to include community voices, lived experience, and shared stewardship as essential components of our infrastructure • Holistic and proactive approach that balances immediate needs with our long-term vision • Equity not as a one-time initiative, but as an ongoing practice rooted in accountability and trust 4 Our Challenges • Climate change is driving more extreme weather, including more intense storms and prolonged drought • Historic inequities have left some neighborhoods more exposed to flooding and degraded waterways • Urbanization and development add pressure to our natural environment and infrastructure • Housing costs are driving displacement of residents and an increase in people experiencing homelessness 5 Community Engagement • Robust and inclusive process that spanned multiple years • We identified stakeholder groups that have been historically underrepresented in our past planning efforts and worked to engage with them more directly • We partnered with local organizations, community ambassadors, and advocacy groups to reach residents in every district • Engagement took many forms—surveys, interviews, focus groups, neighborhood meetings, and community events 6 Community Activation Group The Community Activation Group (CAG) helped shape the content of the plan and ensured that the diverse voices of our community are integral to the Rain to River planning process and Austin Watershed Protection’s work. • Diverse community leaders with expertise in the environment, community health, and disaster preparedness and recovery • …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260415-002: City Code Title 25 (Land Development) Ordinance No. 20221115- 048 Amendment for Project Connect WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was given a presentation on the updates for the Austin Light Rail plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin and Austin Transit Partnership seek to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Austin Transit Partnership and Austin Project Connect want to: 1. Modify site plan requirements to accommodate permitting tools for the light rail permitting process. 2. Rescind utility ordinance from 2000. 3. Establish back-of-curb streetscape standards for light rail. 4. Establish a water quality compliance program for light rail. 5. Establish administrative review of heritage trees for Transit System Projects. 6. Incorporate administrative rule modifications that address constrained right of way conditions where compliance will be challenging and ensure consistency in expiration of site plan components. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Environmental Commission recommends the proposed amendments to Austin City Council with the following additions: • Only native (no adaptive) plants, including trees, will be used. • To promote insect and other pollinator survival, rain gardens and other green spaces in the Right of Way will never be mowed, but periodic efforts to remove non-native, invasive species will be made. • To promote the survival of insects and amphibians, fallen leaves from street trees will not be blown, but may be raked around the circumference of the tree and/or left in green space. . • Deny administrative waiver for heritage trees, maintaining the current code standards. If the waiver is granted, then every effort will be made to leave heritage trees in their current locations, followed by transplanting them, rather than cutting them down. • Staff, ATP, APC, and relevant stakeholders will present updates to this Commission regularly as they become apparent. • Clearly define “end of project” in the ordinance. • Any reimbursement for exceeding water regulatory requirements be limited to a specifically defined formula, as defined by the City. Date of Approval: April 15, 2026 Motioned By: Secretary Qureshi Seconded By: Commissioner Sullivan Vote: For: 9-0 Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, Commissioners Fierro, Fleury, Luecke, Moretta-Urdiales, Morrison, and Sullivan …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260415-003: Rain To River Strategic Plan WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was given a presentation on the Austin Watershed Protection Rain to River Strategic Plan; and WHEREAS, climate change is driving more extreme weather, including more intense storms and prolonged drought; and WHEREAS, historic inequities have left some neighborhoods more exposed to flooding and degraded waterways; and WHEREAS, Urbanization and development add pressure to our natural environment and infrastructure, with rising housing costs driving the displacement of residents and an increase in people experiencing homelessness; and WHEREAS, the Rain To River Strategic Plan seeks to reduce the impacts of flooding, erosion, and water pollution with a holistic and proactive approach that includes community voices, lived experience, and shared stewardship as essential components of an equity-focused infrastructure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Environmental Commission recommends Austin City Council to adopt the Rain To River Strategic Plan with the following additions: • Create an online implementation dashboard, similar to that of the Austin Climate Equity Plan, to monitor progress and allow for public accountability and support. • Explore opportunities for collaboration with local indigenous groups in the pursuit of greater ecological restoration and community healing. Date of Approval: April 15, 2026 Motioned By: Secretary Qureshi Seconded By: Commissioner Brimer Vote: For: 10-0 Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, Commissioners Brimer, Fierro, Fleury, Luecke, Moretta-Urdiales, Morrison, and Sullivan Against: None Abstain: None . Off the dais: None Absent: Commissioner Changsut Attest: _____________________________________________ Mariana Krueger, Chair
