Environmental CommissionMay 20, 2026

20260520-005, Austin Energy Gas Peakers and Alternatives Draft Recommendation — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260520-005: Austin Energy Gas Peakers and Alternatives WHEREAS, it is the Environmental Commission’s responsibility to advise “on projects and programs which affect quality of life for the citizens of Austin”; and WHEREAS, the greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal established by the Austin City Council in the Climate Equity Plan is to achieve “net-zero community-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, utilizing a steep decline path followed by negative emissions,” which translates to approximately 75% reduction in emissions by 2030; and WHEREAS, meeting the greenhouse gas reduction goals adopted by the Austin City Council in the Climate Equity Plan isn’t possible without significant emissions reductions by Austin Energy in the near, medium, and long-term; and WHEREAS, any increase in greenhouse gas emissions does not align with the Climate Equity Plan or the greenhouse gas reduction goals adopted by the Austin City Council; and WHEREAS, reducing and eliminating local air pollution, especially in and near historically and currently marginalized and lower-income parts of the community, is an important equity and community health priority reflected in the Climate Equity Plan; and WHEREAS, methane - the primary component of natural gas - has 86 times the global warming potential as carbon dioxide when emitted directly into the atmosphere, which is a well- documented problem, and natural gas also releases carbon dioxide emissions when combusted; and WHEREAS, the Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan includes a commitment to “incorporating community input, prior to bringing a [natural gas peaker] project forward for approval”, and WHEREAS, the Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan states, “should Austin Energy seek Council approval for any peaker units, we will show any analysis performed demonstrating why a carbon-free alternative was not available and how the requested action will impact the utility’s ability to reach the goal of 100% carbon-free by 2035”, and . WHEREAS, the Austin City Charter states that all purchases greater than $5,000 must be let through a competitive bidding process, and WHEREAS, Texas state law requires municipalities to use competitive purchasing for purchases over $50,000, and WHEREAS, Austin Energy is requesting authorization to develop and execute a contract to purchase 400 megawatts of gas-burning peaker power generation without issuing a request for proposals or bids and without revealing to the public the cost, with whom the contract would be with, where the peakers would be located, how the financial impact of peakers compares to batteries and other clean energy options, or resulting emissions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Environmental Commission to recommend that the Austin City Council: • Direct the city manager to conduct a thorough and well-promoted public engagement process on the choice between gas peakers and a combination of zero emissions alternatives; and • Ensure that input and feedback from the public are incorporated into subsequent plans for procuring energy resources; and • Direct the city manager to use the established transparent competitive purchasing processes for all procurement, in accordance with the Austin City Charter; and • Be fully transparent with the community about the cost of any Austin Energy resources; and • Direct the city manager to conduct an independent economic analysis to evaluate the feasibility of implementing zero emissions technologies and energy management compared to gas peakers; and • Fully fund the development of a robust and carbon-free resource generation plan that can achieve reliable and carbon-free energy delivery by 2035; and • Make every possible effort to implement zero-emissions technologies to achieve zero carbon emissions from Austin Energy’s generation sources by 2035. Seconded By: Date of Approval: Motioned By: Vote: For: Against: Abstain: Off the dais: Absent: . Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, Commissioners Brimer, Changsut, Fierro, Fleury, Luecke, Moretta-Urdiales, Morrison, and Sullivan Attest: _____________________________________________ Mariana Krueger, Chair