Backup — original pdf
Backup
Design Commission Homepage
Backup — original pdf
Date: To: From: Subject: February 18, 2022 City of Austin Design Commission Planning & Urban Design Working Group Density Bonus Working Group review of 307 E 2nd Street for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines February 2, 2022; 2:00 pm; Virtual Microsoft Teams Meeting Dave Anderson- Drenner Group Meeting date: Applicant: The project is located at 307 E 2nd Street. The project includes mixed use of residential (482,317 sf) and retail (17,444 sf). The project also includes 9 parking levels (none underground). The applicant is seeking a Density Bonus to raise the FAR from 8:1 to 25:1 resulting in a total project gross area of 573,900 gsf. The site is 0.527 acres (22,956 sf) with a current allowable building size of 183,648 sf based on the current allowable 8:1 FAR. The total building height is 756 ft (65 floors). The maximum height achievable under the Density Bonus program is unlimited. Per the Density Bonus Program ordinance, the applicant is required to meet the three gatekeeper requirements: • Substantially comply with the City’s Urban Design Guidelines • Provide streetscape improvements along all public street frontages consistent with the Great Streets Program Standards • Applicant must commit to a minimum of 2-star green building rating (3-star proposed). WORKING GROUP COMMENTS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AREA WIDE GUIDELINES 1. Create dense development – 25:1 far is being requested. Project complies with this Section. 2. Create mixed-use development – Residential (condos) and commercial (hotel) housing plus some streetscape oriented retail uses are proposed. Project complies with this Section. 3. Limit development which closes downtown streets – This project is not permanently closing down any streets. Project complies with this Section. 4. Buffer neighborhood edges- This project is located in a predominantly high-rise area so it blends in with the existing urban fabric. Project complies with this Section. Incorporate civic art in both public and private development – This project is proposing public art on the NW corner of the site. Project complies with this Section. 5. 6. Protect important public views – Since this project is already surrounded by high-rises, there are no important public views to protect. Not applicable. 7. Avoid historical misrepresentations – Project complies with this Section. 8. Respect adjacent historic buildings- There are no historic buildings adjacent to this project although a historic building is being relocated and restored. Not applicable. 9. Acknowledge that rooftops are …
Backup — original pdf
STRATUS | BLOCK 150 | AUSTIN, TX DESIGN COMMISSION | 0 2 - 2 8 – 2 2 DESIGN COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 02-28-2022 LOCATION MAP Lady Bird Lake DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN C C A A C C A A M M PIT PIT P P U U S S O O L L CIVICDISTRICT CIVIC DISTRICT CAPITOL D O M I N A N C E NIO STREET N T O N A SA U U N N I I V V E E R R SIT SIT A A U U S S Y Y O O TI TI N N F F T T E E X X A A S S 12TH STREET V I E W C 1/4 MILE RADIUS W W ESTEN EST EN D D O R R I D O R Shoal Creek MetroBus Stop MetroRail Stop Capitol Station DESIGN COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 02-28-2022 PROJECT OVERVIEW | PROGRAM SUMMARY 19,999 SF DMU 5.0 99,995 SF 10,412 SF DMU-H 5.0 52,060 SF 30,411 SF 15.0 456,165 SF 7,630 SF 15.0 14.6 448,535 SF 445,416 SF 588,048 SF 400’-0” 439,918 SF 337,794 SF 316 1,070 SF 8,972 SF 7,802 SF 340 1.07 156,033 SF SITE AREA LOT AREA: EXISTING ZONING: BASE FAR: BASE FAR AREA: AO WATSON SITE AREA: EXISTING ZONING: BASE FAR: BASE FAR AREA: COMBINED SITE AREA: MAX FAR: MAX ATTRIBUTABLE AREA: EXISTING HOUSE AREA: PROJECT MAX FAR: PROJECT ACTUAL FAR: TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR AREA: TOTAL REQUESTED FAR AREA: TOTAL BUILDING GSF: HEIGHT: RESIDENTIAL GSF: RESIDENTIAL NSF: UNITS: AVG. UNIT SIZE: AMENITY GSF: BOH/MECH GSF: SHARED PARKING STALLS: PARKING RATIO: PARKING GSF: DENSITY BONUS AEGB 2 STAR CERTIFICATION LEED SILVER CERTIFICATION BONUS FAR AREA: 345,421 SF AO WATSON PARCEL CONTRIBUTES TOWARDS PROJECT DENSITY BONUS. 12TH STREET GUADALUPE STREET DESIGN COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 02-28-2022 GREAT STREETS SITE PLAN ADDITIONAL BIKE PARKING ABOVE GREAT STREETS REQUIREMENTS SCULPTURE GARDEN S S S S S S AE VAULT DOORS SHIFTED TO THE NORTH ALLEY UBER/RIDESHARE PICKUP S COMMEMORATIVE SPACE FOR ANNIE WEBB BLANTON DESIGN COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 02-28-2022 SOUTH ELEVATION | 12TH STREET PUBLIC ENTRY LEVEL 1 E X I S T I N G S L O P E AT S I T E PUBLIC ENTRY LEVEL 1.5 DESIGN COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | …
Backup — original pdf
Block 150 URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES MATRIX AREAWIDE URBAN GUIDELINES # DESIGN GUIDELINE MET DISCUSSION AW.1 Create dense development YES Block 150 will provide a dense downtown development with an FAR of 15:1. AW.2 Create mixed-use development YES Block 150 will provide a mixed-use project with 316 residential uses above 8,972 gross sf of pedestrian-oriented, ground-floor amenity space and adjacent to the on-site AO Watson House featuring publicly available restaurant space. AW.3 Limit development which closes downtown streets YES The applicant will implement a traffic control plan during construction. No streets will be permanently closed. AW.4 Buffer neighborhood edges N/A Block 150 is in the Uptown/Capitol District and will fully comply with Downtown Density Bonus program requirements. AW.5 Incorporate civic art in both public and private development NO There is not currently any planned participation in the Art in Public Places program. However, the applicant is incorporating publicly accessible art gallery space and a publicly accessible commemorative garden into the ground floor of the project. AW.6 Protect important public views YES Block 150 will not impact any protected view corridors. AW.7 Avoid historical misrepresentations YES Block 150 will implement a commemorative garden that recognizes the history of The Delta Kappa Gamma Society International (above the ground floor, the building design is contemporary). It will also preserve and activate the on-site historic AO Watson House. {W1060521.4} # DESIGN GUIDELINE MET DISCUSSION AW.8 Respect adjacent historical buildings YES Block 150 will preserve the on-site historic AO Watson House – and will activate it for public enjoyment. AW.9 Acknowledge that rooftops are seen from other buildings and the street AW.10 Avoid the development of theme environments YES Block 150 will include above-ground outdoor terraces with plantings and will screen rooftop equipment. YES Block 150 will not include any mock representations or theme environments. AW.11 Recycle existing building stock NO To the extent possible, Block 150 will explore if it is feasible to salvage portions of the building stock. # DESIGN GUIDELINE MET DISCUSSION GUIDELINES FOR THE PUBLIC STREETSCAPE PS.1 Protect the pedestrian where the building meets the street YES Block 150 will provide street-tree coverage consistent with Great Streets standards along San Antonio and West 12th Street. In addition, the project will provide shaded ground-floor patio space and garden areas. PS.2 Minimize curb cuts YES Block 150 limits curb cuts only to San Antonio Street. PS.3 Create a potential for two-way streets YES Block …
Agenda — original pdf
DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, FEBRUARY 28, 2022, 6:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS, ROOM 1101 301 W 2ND STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Some members of the Design Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register email art.zamorano@austintexas.gov or call (512) 974-3583. CURRENT MEMBERS: David Carroll, Chair (District 1) Jon Salinas (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Melissa Henao-Robledo (District 5) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) Jen Weaver (District 6) Jessica Rollason Vice-Chair (District 7) Aan Coleman (District8) Bart Whatley (District9) Ben Luckens (District10) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion & Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Rainey Street Trailhead project, located at 36 East Ave., complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin. Applicant(s): Heidi Anderson Charlotte Tonsor and Nick Blok The Trailhead Foundation. b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the project at 307 and 319 E. 2nd St., complies with the Urban Design Guidelines for the city of Austin. Applicant(s): Dave Anderson, Drenner Group; Larry Speck, Page/; Trent Rush, Hitchcock Design Group; and Jake George, Intracorp c. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether Block 150, located at 402 and 416 W. 12th St., complies with the Urban Design Guidelines for the city of Austin. Applicant(s): Michael Whellan, Armbrust & Brown; and Kelly Somers, SCB,. 2. COMMISSION-SPECIFIC BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Approval of the January 24th meeting minutes b. Update from representative on the Downtown Commission regarding last meeting c. Update from representative on the Joint Sustainability committee regarding last meeting d. Update from representative on the South-Central Waterfront Advisory Board 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS: a. Chair Announcements; b. c. Items from Commission Members; Items from City Staff; 4. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring …
1.a - Rainey Street Trailhead Project — original pdf
City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review Application The Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1. City projects (see page ii for process) The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 2. Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process) The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 3. Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process) The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/ Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6) Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile Site plan and landscape plan Ground level, basement …
1.b - 307 and 319 E. 2nd Street Project — original pdf
Date: To: From: Subject: February 18, 2022 City of Austin Design Commission Planning & Urban Design Working Group Density Bonus Working Group review of 307 E 2nd Street for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines February 2, 2022; 2:00 pm; Virtual Microsoft Teams Meeting Dave Anderson- Drenner Group Meeting date: Applicant: The project is located at 307 E 2nd Street. The project includes mixed use of residential (482,317 sf) and retail (17,444 sf). The project also includes 9 parking levels (none underground). The applicant is seeking a Density Bonus to raise the FAR from 8:1 to 25:1 resulting in a total project gross area of 573,900 gsf. The site is 0.527 acres (22,956 sf) with a current allowable building size of 183,648 sf based on the current allowable 8:1 FAR. The total building height is 756 ft (65 floors). The maximum height achievable under the Density Bonus program is unlimited. Per the Density Bonus Program ordinance, the applicant is required to meet the three gatekeeper requirements: • Substantially comply with the City’s Urban Design Guidelines • Provide streetscape improvements along all public street frontages consistent with the Great Streets Program Standards • Applicant must commit to a minimum of 2-star green building rating (3-star proposed). WORKING GROUP COMMENTS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AREA WIDE GUIDELINES 1. Create dense development – 25:1 far is being requested. Project complies with this Section. 2. Create mixed-use development – Residential (condos) and commercial (hotel) housing plus some streetscape oriented retail uses are proposed. Project complies with this Section. 3. Limit development which closes downtown streets – This project is not permanently closing down any streets. Project complies with this Section. 4. Buffer neighborhood edges- This project is located in a predominantly high-rise area so it blends in with the existing urban fabric. Project complies with this Section. Incorporate civic art in both public and private development – This project is proposing public art on the NW corner of the site. Project complies with this Section. 5. 6. Protect important public views – Since this project is already surrounded by high-rises, there are no important public views to protect. Not applicable. 7. Avoid historical misrepresentations – Project complies with this Section. 8. Respect adjacent historic buildings- There are no historic buildings adjacent to this project although a historic building is being relocated and restored. Not applicable. 9. Acknowledge that rooftops are …
1.c -Block 150 Project — original pdf
Block 150 URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES MATRIX AREAWIDE URBAN GUIDELINES # DESIGN GUIDELINE MET DISCUSSION AW.1 Create dense development YES Block 150 will provide a dense downtown development with an FAR of 15:1. AW.2 Create mixed-use development YES Block 150 will provide a mixed-use project with 316 residential uses above 8,972 gross sf of pedestrian-oriented, ground-floor amenity space and adjacent to the on-site AO Watson House featuring publicly available restaurant space. AW.3 Limit development which closes downtown streets YES The applicant will implement a traffic control plan during construction. No streets will be permanently closed. AW.4 Buffer neighborhood edges N/A Block 150 is in the Uptown/Capitol District and will fully comply with Downtown Density Bonus program requirements. AW.5 Incorporate civic art in both public and private development NO There is not currently any planned participation in the Art in Public Places program. However, the applicant is incorporating publicly accessible art gallery space and a publicly accessible commemorative garden into the ground floor of the project. AW.6 Protect important public views YES Block 150 will not impact any protected view corridors. AW.7 Avoid historical misrepresentations YES Block 150 will implement a commemorative garden that recognizes the history of The Delta Kappa Gamma Society International (above the ground floor, the building design is contemporary). It will also preserve and activate the on-site historic AO Watson House. {W1060521.4} # DESIGN GUIDELINE MET DISCUSSION AW.8 Respect adjacent historical buildings YES Block 150 will preserve the on-site historic AO Watson House – and will activate it for public enjoyment. AW.9 Acknowledge that rooftops are seen from other buildings and the street AW.10 Avoid the development of theme environments YES Block 150 will include above-ground outdoor terraces with plantings and will screen rooftop equipment. YES Block 150 will not include any mock representations or theme environments. AW.11 Recycle existing building stock NO To the extent possible, Block 150 will explore if it is feasible to salvage portions of the building stock. # DESIGN GUIDELINE MET DISCUSSION GUIDELINES FOR THE PUBLIC STREETSCAPE PS.1 Protect the pedestrian where the building meets the street YES Block 150 will provide street-tree coverage consistent with Great Streets standards along San Antonio and West 12th Street. In addition, the project will provide shaded ground-floor patio space and garden areas. PS.2 Minimize curb cuts YES Block 150 limits curb cuts only to San Antonio Street. PS.3 Create a potential for two-way streets YES Block …
Draft 1-24-22 Meeting Minutes — original pdf
X X X X X X DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, January 24, 2022 6:00 PM Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions, Room 1101 301 W. 2nd St., Austin, TX 78701 Meeting Minutes Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 6:01 p.m. Member List David Carroll – Chair (District 1) Jessica Rollason – Vice-Chair (District 7) Jon Salinas (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) X Melissa Hanao-Robledo (District 5) X X X X Jen Weaver (District 6) Aan Coleman (District 8) Bart Whatley (District 9) Ben Luckens (District 10) “X” Denote Commission Members who were in attendance CITY OF AUSTIN HOUSING AND PLANNING STAFF X Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison X Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison X Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: . 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center (ESB-MACC) Phase 2 project, located at 600 River Street, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Heidi Tse and Mari Boren City of Austin Public Works Department • Heidi Tse - City of Austin Public Works Department, Juan Miró, Miguel Rivera, Mariana Martins, - Miró Rivera Architect-Tatiana Bilbao Estudio JV, Stephanie Saulmon - Ten Eyck Landscape Architects and Brian Wells – MWM Design Group presented and answered questions. Page 1 of 4 • Commissioner S. Franco made a motion to approve that the project complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin Commissioner J. Rollason seconded. • Commissioner A. Coleman made a friendly amendment to include with the understanding that the connection between the butler trail and rainy s treet is stronger and does not have to go through the building Commissinor S. Franco and Commissioner J. Rollason accepted the friendly amendment. The motion was approved [ 11 ayes, 0 nays,] • b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Waterloo Greenway – Creek Delta project, located at Waller Creek, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Melissa Ayala and Chris Perkes Waterloo Greenway, Diana Wang City of Austin Waller Creek District Program. • Melissa Ayala and Chris Perkes Waterloo Greenway, Diana Wang City of Austin Waller Creek District Program presented and answered questions. • Commissioner E. Taniguchi made a motion …
Design Commission 2-28-22 — original link
Play video
Approved Minutes — original pdf
X X X X X X DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, January 24, 2022 6:00 PM Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions, Room 1101 301 W. 2nd St., Austin, TX 78701 Meeting Minutes Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 6:01 p.m. Member List David Carroll – Chair (District 1) Jessica Rollason – Vice-Chair (District 7) Jon Salinas (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) X Melissa Hanao-Robledo (District 5) X X X X Jen Weaver (District 6) Aan Coleman (District 8) Bart Whatley (District 9) Ben Luckens (District 10) “X” Denote Commission Members who were in attendance CITY OF AUSTIN HOUSING AND PLANNING STAFF X Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison X Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison X Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: . 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center (ESB-MACC) Phase 2 project, located at 600 River Street, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Heidi Tse and Mari Boren City of Austin Public Works Department • Heidi Tse - City of Austin Public Works Department, Juan Miró, Miguel Rivera, Mariana Martins, - Miró Rivera Architect-Tatiana Bilbao Estudio JV, Stephanie Saulmon - Ten Eyck Landscape Architects and Brian Wells – MWM Design Group presented and answered questions. Page 1 of 4 • Commissioner S. Franco made a motion to approve that the project complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin Commissioner J. Rollason seconded. • Commissioner A. Coleman made a friendly amendment to include with the understanding that the connection between the butler trail and rainy s treet is stronger and does not have to go through the building Commissinor S. Franco and Commissioner J. Rollason accepted the friendly amendment. The motion was approved [ 11 ayes, 0 nays,] • b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Waterloo Greenway – Creek Delta project, located at Waller Creek, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Melissa Ayala and Chris Perkes Waterloo Greenway, Diana Wang City of Austin Waller Creek District Program. • Melissa Ayala and Chris Perkes Waterloo Greenway, Diana Wang City of Austin Waller Creek District Program presented and answered questions. • Commissioner E. Taniguchi made a motion …
20220228-1A: Rainey Street Trailhead Project Recommendation Letter — original pdf
David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Jon Salinas Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Gunner Garnos Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220228-1A Date: March 07, 2022 Subject: Design Commission recommendation for the Rainey Street Trailhead project, located at 36 East Avenue. Commissioner Meiners Commissioner Henao-Robledo Seconded By: Commissioner Franco Motioned By: Amended By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the Rainey Street Trailhead project, as presented to us on February 28, 2022, complies with the City of Austin’s Design and Sustainability Standards. This endorsement comes with the additional recommendation that the project provide clearer direction on what means of water access will be allowed and that easily identifiable trail access is provided for all means identified. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the Rainey Street Trailhead project, as presented to us. Our review found the following positive attributes: 1. Proposes to increase tree canopy/ shade 2. Conducted thorough community outreach 3. Provides for extensive native plan restoration 4. Design provides both active and rest areas. 5. Proposes improved trail lighting Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Chair Carroll, Commissioner Salinas, Commissioner Franco, Commissioner Meiners, Commissioner Henao- 6- 0 - 1 Robledo, Commissioner Weaver Against: n/a Abstain: Commissioner Taniguchi Absent: Vice-Chair Rollason, Commissioner Coleman, Commissioner Whatley, Commissioner Luckens Attest: David Carroll, Chair City of Austin Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20220228-1A Rainey Street Trailhead Project
20220228-1C: Block 150 Project Recommendation Letter — original pdf
David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Jon Salinas Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Gunner Garnos Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220228-1C Date: March 07, 2022 Subject: Design Commission recommendation for the Block 150 project located at 402 & 416 West 12th Street. Seconded By: Commissioner Henao-Robledo Motioned By: Commissioner Meiners Friendly Amendment: Commissioner Franco Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the Block 150 project located at 402 & 416 West 12th Street, as presented to us on February 28, 2022, substantially complies with the City of Austin Urban Design Guidelines, with the additional recommendation that the proposed public art space prioritizes underserved artists in the community. Rationale: Dear Director of Housing and Planning Department, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s recommendation that the Block 150 project located at 402 & 416 West 12th Street, substantially complies with the Urban Design Guidelines as one of the gatekeeper requirements of the Downtown Density Bonus Program, with the additional recommendation listed above. Our review found the following positive attributes: 1. For community benefits, the project proposes public art gallery, outdoor garden, public restaurant with outdoor seating, sculpture garden, and a public terrace. 2. Project engages the A.O. Watson house as an amenity 3. Proposed design places all utilities in alley 4. Proposed design does not place any curb cuts on 12th Street, which has a steep grade. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao-Robledo, Jen Weaver, Josue Meiners, David Carroll, Jon Salinas, Samuel 7 - 0 - 0 Franco Against: None Absent: Ben Luckens, Aan Coleman, Jessica Rollason, Bart Whatley Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20220228-1C Block 150 Project
ESB MACC Improvements Presentation — original pdf
Backup
ESB MACC Project Review Application — original pdf
City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review Application The Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1. City projects (see page ii for process) The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 2. Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process) The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 3. Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process) The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/ Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6) Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile Site plan and landscape plan Ground level, basement …
Agenda — original pdf
DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, January 24, 2022 6:00 PM Austin City Hall, Boards & Commissions, Room 1101 301 W 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 David Carroll, Chair (District 1) Vacant (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Melissa Henao-Robledo (District 5) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) CURRENT MEMBERS: Jen Weaver (District 6) Jessica Rollason Vice-Chair (District 7) Aan Coleman (District8) Bart Whatley (District9) Ben Luckens (District10) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion & Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center (ESB-MACC) Phase 2 project, located at 600 River Street, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Heidi Tse and Mari Boren City of Austin Public Works Department. b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Waterloo Greenway – Creek Delta project, located at Waller Creek, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Melissa Ayala and Chris Perkes Waterloo Greenway, Diana Wang City of Austin Waller Creek District Program. 2. COMMISSION-SPECIFIC BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Approval of the December 13th meeting minutes b. Discussion and Possible Action on recent Council approval to update the Urban Design Guidelines c. Discussion and Possible Action related to the current Urban Design Guidelines Working Group d. Update from representative on the Downtown Commission regarding last meeting e. Update from representative on the Joint Sustainability committee regarding last meeting f. Update from representative on the South-Central Waterfront Advisory Board 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS: a. Chair Announcements; b. c. Items from Commission Members; Items from City Staff; 4. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. Please contact Aaron Jenkins in the Planning and Zoning Department Aaron.Jenkins@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-2752, for additional information. TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711 Design Commission: Committees, Working Groups, Representatives and Liaisons 1. Executive …
12.13.2021 Meeting Minutes — original pdf
DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, December 13, 2021 4:00 PM Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, TX 78752 Meeting Minutes Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 4:06 p.m. X X X X Member List David Carroll – Chair (District 1) Jessica Rollason – Vice-Chair (District 7) Vacant (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) X Melissa Hanao-Robledo (District 5) X X Jen Weaver (District 6) Aan Coleman (District 8) Bart Whatley (District 9) Ben Luckens (District 10) “X” Denote Commission Members who were in attendance CITY OF AUSTIN HOUSING AND PLANNING STAFF X Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison X Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison X Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None. 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): Chairman Carroll has recused himself from this item and has relinquish Chairman duties to Commissioner Taniguchi for Item 1.a. a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether 80 Rainey, located at 80 Rainey Street, complies with the Urban Design Guidelines for the city of Austin; Amanda Swor Drenner Group; Gregory Klosowski Pappageorge Haymes; Chris Jackson TBG Partners; Scott Wuest Wuest Group. • Pawel Hardej with Lincoln Ventures, Amanda Swor with Drenner Group, Gregory Klosowski Pappageorge Haymes; Chris Jackson TBG Partners; and Scott Wuest Wuest Group presented and addressed questions. Page 1 of 4 • Commissioner S. Franco made a motion to approve that the project substantially complies with the Urban Design Guidelines Commissioner J. Meiners seconded. • The motion was approved [6 ayes, 0 nays, 1 Recuse (D. Carroll)] b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether City of Austin-Bergstrom International Airport AUS Cargo Development East located at 9402 Freight Lane, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards for the City of Austin; David Smythe-Macaulay Austin-Bergstrom International Airport • David Smythe-Macaulay COA-ABIA staff presented and addressed questions. • The Design Commission provided feedback and recommendations for the project, but no action was taken. c. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the 51st Street Revitalization Project located at 51st Street, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards for the City of Austin; Andrew Wong City of Austin Public Works Department • Andrew Wong, COA Public Works and Angel-Lina Soutdarany, Atkins and Jill Fagan, Economic Development presented and addressed questions. • Commissioner J. Weaver made a motion to approve …
Creek Delta Presentation — original pdf
Waterloo Greenway Creek Delta Project Update Design Commission Meeting December 13, 2021 1 Agenda 1. Waterloo Greenway Program Overview 2. Creek Delta Project Update 3. Possible Action: Request Support for Creek Delta Project & Recommendation to Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit 2 Program Overview Sponsoring City Departments: Watershed Protection Department & Parks and Recreation Department Non-Profit Partner: Waterloo Greenway Conservancy 3 4 Community Programming 5 OUTREACH OVERVIEW • • Feb 2018 – Waller Creek public meetings at MACC June 2018 – School field trip collaboration: Waller Creek/MACC • Aug 2018 – Tabling at trail: Waller Creek/MACC Feb 2019 – Tabling at Austin Energy meeting at • MACC • May 2019 – Environment Commission presentation • Summer 2019 – Presentation at Rainey neighborhood meeting at MACC Sept 2019 – Tabling at MACC ”¡Viva México!” event • Sept 2019 – Presentation at HQOL Commission • • Oct 2019 – Presentation at District 9 Rainey Street Historic District Visioning Meeting • Nov 2019 – Tabling at MACC “Día de Los Muertos” • event Feb 2020 – Palm District: R/UDAT Community/Project Area Tour • March 2020 – MACC Advisory Board meeting presentation • March 2020 – MACC Advisory Board meeting presentation Jan 2021 – MACC Advisory Board meeting • • March 2021 – MACC Working Group meeting Jan 2021 – Rainey Street Neighborhood • presentation Sept 2021 – Environment Commission presentation • • Oct 2021 – Parks and Recreation Board presentation • Nov 2021 – Creek Show at Waterloo Park 66 7 Creek Delta • • • • Located along Waller Creek between Lady Bird Lake and 4th Street Identified in Council- approved Waller Creek Design Plan Approximate 10-acre project area. Creek restoration, 1 mile of new trails, pedestrian bridges, water quality and utility improvements Preparing 100% construction documents, anticipated by December 2021 8 9 Moving away from the convention of hard engineering solutions… 10 …toward soft engineering solutions 11 Environmental Goals Functional Assessment (Environmental Criteria Manual) • • Water Quality - Biofiltration Pond and Inline Stormwater Treatment • Trees o Vegetation and Soil Protection Zones o Enhanced tree mitigation and planting Sustainable SITES Certification • 12 Connectivity & Mobility 13 Elevated Walkway + Bridges 2 3 1 *Lattice Bridge 3 is currently an add/bid alternate. * 14 Lattice Bridges 15 15 Elevated Walkway 16 Cypress Grove + Trailhead Plaza 17 Lagoon Overlook + Leaf Deck 18 Lagoon Overlook + Leaf Deck 19 …
Creek Delta Project Exhibits — original pdf
EXHIBIT 2 - ZONING & TOPOGRAPHY E 5TH ST E 5TH ST T S S E H C E N E 4TH ST T R S E D RIV E R T S S O Z A R B E 3RD ST T Y S NIT RI T E 2ND ST D LV O B T N I C N JA A S T S E BIN A S E 6TH ST T E S BIN A S B 5 S N IH 3 E 3RD ST B D S R V 5 S N IH 3 B 5 N N IH 3 B D N R V 5 S N IH 3 E 3RD ST T E S N I B A S E CESAR CHAVEZ ST SUBJECT SITE (LOC) +/- 13.07 Acres T Y S H S U R B DRISKILL ST WILLOW ST DAVIS ST T Y S E AIN R E V T A S A E RIVER ST WILLOW ST T S S O C R A N M A S SPENCE ST TAYLOR ST Waller Creek from 4th St to the Colorado River Austin, Travis County, Texas 0 150 300 30174001.05 | 09.04.2019 | BIGREDDOG.COM 600 Feet I CBD CBD-CURE CBD CBD CBD E 5TH ST CBD CBD CBD E 4TH ST CBD CBD E 3RD ST CBD CBD T Y S NIT RI T CBD CBD CBD CBD T S S O Z A R B CBD CBD CBD CBD-CURE CBD CBD CBD E 2ND ST D LV O B T N I C N JA A S CBD CBD CBD CBD E 5TH ST P-H P CBD-H CBD CBD CBD CBD-H CBD CBD T S S E H C E N CBD-CURE CBD CBD T R S E D RIV E R CBD CBD-H CBD CBD CBD CBD-H CBD CBD-CURE T E S N I B A S GR-H E CESAR CHAVEZ ST CBD-CURE CBD DMU CBD CBD-CURE CS WILLOW ST DRISKILL ST CBD CBD DAVIS ST CBD T Y S E AIN R CBD P CBD T S E BIN A S CBD CBD CBD CBD-H CBD CBD-H E 6TH ST CBD T E S BIN A S CBD CBD B 5 S N IH 3 CBD B D S R V 5 S N IH 3 E 3RD ST UNZ UNZ TOD-CURE-NP TOD-NP TOD-NP TOD-NP SF-3-NP B 5 N N …
Creek Delta Project Review Application — original pdf
A. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name The Death Star Project Type: Infrastructure Private project Other City building & site Density bonus Project Location/Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Galactic Empire, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Darth Vader, Sith Lord Property Owner Darth Vader, Sith Applicant Mailing Address 1Imperial Avenue Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Telephone Number 999-999-9999 Property Owner Mailing Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Austin, TX 78704 Property Owner Telephone Number 999-999-9999 Project Start Date January 2017 Project Completion Date March 2018 Applicant’s Architect Darth Vader, Sith Lord; ABC Architect Applicant’s Engineer Darth Vader, Sith Lord Engineering Company Design Commission - Project Review Application 1 of 6 1] Indicate if proposed Project is required by City Ordinance to be reviewed by the Design Commission. Yes, the project is required to be reviewed by the Design Commission. 2] Describe the recommendation that you are requesting from the Design Commission. We are looking for a recommendation of support from the Design Commission for the project as well as Alternative Equivalent Compliance for setbacks and missing sidewalks. 3] Current Design Phase of Project (Design Commission prefers to see projects right after approved schematic design). Schematic design phase 4] Is this Project subject to Site Plan and/or Zoning application approvals? Will it be presented to Planning Commission and/or City Council? If so, when? Yes, the project is subject to Site Plan approvals and Zoning approvals. We anticipate presenting to the Planning Commission in mid-May and City Council in late June. 5] Does this Project comply with Land Development Code Subchapter E? List specifically any Alternative Equivalent Compliance request if any. Please refer to website for Alternate Equivalent Compliance (AEC) requirements. https://www.municode.com/library/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH25- 2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_EDESTMIUS Yes, the project generally complies with SubChapter E with 8 foot sidewalks, street trees, and street furniture. However, we need alterative Equivalent Compliance for encroachment into setbacks. Design Commission - Project Review Application 2 of 6 B. PROJECT BACKGROUND 6] Provide project background including goals, scope, building/planning type, and schedule. Broadly address each of the “Shared Values for Urban Areas” that are listed on Page 6 of the Urban Design Guidelines. Attach additional pages as needed. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 7] Has this project conducted community/stakeholder outreach? If so, please provide documentation to demonstrate community/stakeholder support of this project. Yes, the project has conducted 6 months of community outreach …