0 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN 1910 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/1-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 0 1 4 8 0 4 6 0 4 4 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 6 1 3 4 1 3 2 1 3 0 1 3 8 0 3 6 0 3 4 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 3 T E E R T S H T U R F WEST 34th STREET E N A L E N R O H T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A0-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/2-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A1-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/3-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP R 3 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A1-2 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/4-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP S T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN E A1-3 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/5-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP N T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN W A1-4 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/6-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP S2 S1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A1-5 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/7-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP E3 E2 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN E1 A1-6 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/8-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2D 1D 2 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A2-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/9-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP DS S N DE E W T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A2-2 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/10-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2E T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 …
February 2, 2021 Jennifer Garcia 2237 W Braker Ln Austin TX, 78758 Re: C16-2021-0005 Property Description: 0.2538AC OF LOT 2 BLK B KRAMER LANE 65 SEC 1 RESUB OF LOT 10 THE (PRORATE 1/1/19 TO 9/12/19) Dear Jennifer, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides; to all be illuminated and the NBG Ordinance no. 20180412-051: to increase the sign height from 6 feet to 10 feet in order to provide signage for the TownePlace Suites Hotel being in the a “NBG-NP”, North Burnet Gateway - Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Burnet Neighborhood Plan); Austin Energy does not oppose the above sign variance requests, provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
January 25, 2021 John Meyer 703 Fletcher St Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2021-0001 Property Description: CEN 35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD Dear John, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your revised application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (a); to decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested); and Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes; to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) on the west side of lot. In order to erect a Single-Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above variances requested, with the adjustments made to the proposed building figures, provided the proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. It is noted that the existing service drop for both 703 and 705 Fletcher Street is covered multi-plex secondary conductors. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
From: To: Subject: Date: Jeremy Blackman Ramirez, Elaine Case Number: C15-2021-0001 Saturday, January 30, 2021 3:05:56 PM Fully support *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-1/1 LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine 703 & 705 Fletcher / C15-2021-0001/ C15-2021-0002 Thursday, February 04, 2021 3:53:35 PM image001.png Hi Elaine, As I am a neighbor, I have received the Public Hearing Information in the mail. I was hoping that I could just email you rather then mailing the paperwork in. This applicant has purchased both properties, knowing the limitations and is now requesting rather significant variances on both properties so that he can construct larger homes for the purposes of greater profit. I think that this type of reasoning is what has ruined my neighborhood with the extreme number of demolitions and the resulting McMansions becoming the norm. What was an average neighborhood is now exclusively filled with million dollar homes. That said, I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF EITHER PROPOSAL. Let me know if this is sufficient. Hope all is well with you. Thank you. Jan Adler Plans Examiner Supervisor/ Commercial Plan Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, Tx. 78752 Office: 512-974-6377 Commercial Plan Review website: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/commercial-plan-review Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at Mitchell.Tolbert@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s F-1/2 LATE BACKUP F-1/3 LATE BACKUP p r o c e s s , v i s i t o u r w e b s i t e : w w w . a u s t i n t ~ x ~ s . g o v / d e v $ e r v i c e s . F o r a d d i t i o n a l i n f …
January 7, 2021 John Meyer 705 Fletcher St Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2021-0002 Property Description: W35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD Dear John, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (a); to decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested); and Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes; to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) on the west side of lot. In order to erect a Single-Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above variance request provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine 703 & 705 Fletcher / C15-2021-0001/ C15-2021-0002 Thursday, February 04, 2021 3:53:35 PM image001.png Hi Elaine, As I am a neighbor, I have received the Public Hearing Information in the mail. I was hoping that I could just email you rather then mailing the paperwork in. This applicant has purchased both properties, knowing the limitations and is now requesting rather significant variances on both properties so that he can construct larger homes for the purposes of greater profit. I think that this type of reasoning is what has ruined my neighborhood with the extreme number of demolitions and the resulting McMansions becoming the norm. What was an average neighborhood is now exclusively filled with million dollar homes. That said, I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF EITHER PROPOSAL. Let me know if this is sufficient. Hope all is well with you. Thank you. Jan Adler Plans Examiner Supervisor/ Commercial Plan Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, Tx. 78752 Office: 512-974-6377 Commercial Plan Review website: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/commercial-plan-review Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at Mitchell.Tolbert@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s F-2/1 - LATE BACKUP F-2/2 - LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Brent Ramirez, Elaine Case C15-2021-0002 Monday, February 01, 2021 9:48:03 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-2/3 - LATE BACKUP Brent F-2/4 - LATE BACKUP
February 2, 2021 Nancy Langdon 3805 Eton Ln Austin TX, 78727 Property Description: LOT 16 BLK N MILWOOD SEC 3 Re: C15-2021-0018 Dear Nancy, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements; To decrease the minimum street side yard setback from 15 feet (required) to become 2 feet (requested); In order to complete a shed in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above setback variance request, provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
From: To: Subject: Date: NANCY LANGDON Ramirez, Elaine Langdon BoA hearing comment Friday, January 29, 2021 11:11:04 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** She is at 3701 Hawkshead Dr 512-836-2485 If you’d like to verify. Elaine - this is Nancy Langdon - Kathryn Slagel is elderly - she was sure she had my mail. So I came to explain this to her - she has no email but wanted to comment so she filled out the paperwork & I’m emailing for her. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Nancy Langdon F-3/1 - LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: KRAIG HEINZEL Ramirez, Elaine Case # C15-2021-0018 Saturday, January 30, 2021 10:21:30 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Sent from my iPhone F-3/2 - LATE BACKUP F-3/3 - LATE BACKUP F-3/4 - LATE BACKUP From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Katherine Daly Ramirez, Elaine Case number: C 15-2021-0018 Monday, February 01, 2021 1:38:20 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** My name is Katherine Daly Stratemann and I am the owner of 3806 Eton Lane, Austin, TX, 78727. My home, which I purchased in the fall of 2007, is across the street from 3805 Eton Lane, owned by Gary and Nancy Langdon. As a resident of the neighborhood, I do not oppose the shed that the Langdons are building. They are conscientious, respectful property owners, their home has lovely street appeal, and the structure will complement their main home. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Katherine Daly Stratemann 512-837-8966 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-3/5 - LATE BACKUP Written comments must be submitted to the contact person listed on the notice before or at …
February 4, 2021 Lawrence Graham 5909 Bull Creek Rd Austin TX, 78757 Property Description: LOT 22 ALLANDALE SEC 3 Re: C15-2021-0019 Dear Lawrence, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) rear setback requirements; to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 6 feet 7 inches (requested) in order to erect a Guest House in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. The proposed guest house was not shown or dimensioned within the application. DENIED BY AUSTIN ENERGY (AE), due to the proposal having written conflict with Austin Energy's clearance requirements. The Customer's existing facilities/installations shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 7 feet-6 inches from primary and neutral overhead AE distribution conductors, which reside in the rear portion of the property above, requesting a variance from rear lot line setback requirements. Owner/applicant must obtain written approval of conflict resolution from AE prior to BOA approval. Please contact Eben Kellogg with AE Public Involvement and Real Estate Services at 322-6050. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Please see attached. We are in favor. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Friday, January 29, 2021 1:40:59 PM C15-2021-0019 Ramirez, Elaine Allison Enderle Bassetti Date: Subject: To: From: F-4/1-LATE BACKUP F-4/2-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: 34th Street Cafe Ramirez, Elaine Fw: zoning 5909 Bull Creek Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:58:37 PM Scan.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Subject: zoning Hello Elaine, I am scanning my response to you but also wanted to add to it. Besides the fact that the goal here is not to block the building , because i know it will occur, but to look at it in a different capacity. First, my concern is that next door ( South ) they are building a very large two story home, once a one story bungalow. Then on the North side of my property, they are adding a 2 story structure obviously in the back yard. So what i will experience is something that i would like to ask to re-consider giving the variance to basically constrict a breeze in my back yard because of two new large structures. Not to mention no sun light for grass, landscaping, gardening, etc. How about just sun bathing to capture Vitamin D , especially during COVID. I also am interested in knowing if the home requesting the variance, ever pull permits for some of the past remodels, enclosing a garage, adding a large carport, adding sq footage, and now adding this structure. Also on the property is a portable building next door to me. (unsightly). I am sure the city is looking at the impervious coverage , because it sure does seem tight on this property. There is also a creek on the North side of the property. That would be a better location for this structure, because it's not really bothering anyone on that side, because of a small creek. The accesses is also better to put a walk way to the back to accesses , rather than walking all the way around the property to accesses during rain? i really think the architect and the home owner could improve …
Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association President: Alex Finnell – – 512.773.3379 February 3rd, 2021 To: City of Austin Board of Adjustment RE: C15-2020-0067 Address: 1112 Harvard Street Owner: Michael & Jeanette Abbink From: Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association Subject: Letter of Support for Variance from LDC to reduce required on-site parking spaces to zero. Please note that on January 28th, 2021, the Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association voted unanimously in favor of supporting Michael & Jeanette’s variance request from the Land Development Code to reduce the number of required on-site parking spaces to zero. Michael & Jeanette Abbink and their architect Ernesto Cragnolino of Alterstudio presented their intent to use the property at 1112 Harvard Street as an accessory studio to their planned home on the adjacent lot at 2414 East 11th Street. With the assurance that there would be no vehicular access to this subject property and that all visitor access would be from the adjacent property, the neighborhood’s concerns about removing on-site parking were adequately addressed. As Harvard Street is quite narrow, curved, and bound by extreme topography, in this particular and unique case removing on-site parking and removing access from the street should actually improve safety conditions. Sincerely, Alex Finnell President, Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association 512.773.3379 G-2/1-LATE BACKUP
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Interpretation Appeal Decision Sheet C-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0009 DATE: February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Robert Levinski OWNER/APPELLANT: Mary Ingle ADDRESS: 314 and 316 W 34TH ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The appellant has filed an appeal challenging staff decision in regards to the number of parking spaces. Base requirements is 2 parking spaces + 3 for the 3 new total bathrooms being added, which is then reduced to 4 parking spaces because of Urban Roadways Parking Reduction, Section 25-6- 478 (A). The appellant disagrees and argues that these two properties lack the requisite number of parking spaces, based on application of Part 6, Section 7 (J) of the NCCD ordinance in an “SF-3-NCCD-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Conservation Combining District- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. Note: Please reference North University Neighborhood Conservation Combining District, Ordinance No. 040826-58, PART 6 (7) Appellant is referring to (J) and Staff is referring to (K), page 22 of 46. BOARD’S DECISION: Feb 8, 2021 BOA meeting The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Rahm McDaniel motions to Grant the appellant’s appeal; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANTED APPELLANT’S APPEAL - The Board finds that the correct Interpretation is that the 20% Urban Core parking reduction applies only to those parking spaces required by 25-6 Appendix A and the additional parking requirement imposed under paragraph J of the NCCD applies if a Two-Family or Duplex Residential Use contains at least 5 bathrooms even if one (1) or both of the buildings comprising the Use contains fewer than 5 bathrooms-City Staff has only required 2 additional parking spaces in violation of the NCCD and City Staff has misapplied the Urban Core parking reduction to a zoning requirement and the initial interpretation is the correct one. FINDING: 1. There is a reasonable doubt of difference of interpretation as to the specific intent of the regulations or map in that: City Staff has only required two additional parking spaces in violation on the NCCD, city staff has misapplied the Urban Core parking reduction in granting parking reduction to zoning requirement. 2. An appeal of use provisions could clearly permit a use which is in character with the uses enumerated for the …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0005 DATE: February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jennifer Garcia OWNER: Michael Mahoney ADDRESS: 2237 W BRAKER LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s), a total of 4 signs on the property from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) a) (H) to allow for all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides, to all be illuminated and NBG Ordinance no. 20180412-051: b) to increase the sign height from 6 feet to 10 feet in order to provide signage for the TownePlace Suites Hotel in a “NBG-NP”, North Burnet Gateway– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Burnet Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs: (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. North Burnet/Gateway Ordinance No. 20180412-051 (4.8.2 Sign Regulations) (B) For all development located on a NBG Core Transit Corridor, one freestanding monument sign is permitted on a lot. The height of this sign should not exceed 6 feet and the sign area may not exceed 100 square feet. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA meeting Feb 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant with conditions that a) all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides, may all be illuminated and b) Maximum height of sign D-1/Presentation-1 to be eight (8) feet maximum height; Board Member Veronica Rivera seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANT WITH CONDITIONS A) ALL FOUR (4) SIGNS, ONE (1) MONUMENT SIGN, ONE (1) WALL SIGN ON EACH OF THE ON THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WESTSIDES, MAY ALL BE ILLUMINATED AND B) MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIGN D-1/PRESENTATION-1 TO BE EIGHT (8) FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: the proposed sign’s size …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0001 DATE: February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___N____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Claudia Salguero OWNER: Kate Ontes ADDRESS: 2402 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of two (2) wall signs and two (2) projecting signs in order to provide signage for CVS in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (H) states a sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Jan 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FEB 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Rahm McDaniel motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 9- 1 vote (Board member Jessisca Cohen nay); POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 DATE: February 8, 2021 _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne _______VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building.(G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting sign for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining); Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021 FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0001 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: John Meyer ADDRESS: 703 FLETCHER ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, a) 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested) b) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) c) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.7 Sidewall Articulation) to remove the requirement for articulation on the interior side (west) (requested) in order to erect a Single Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING Feb 8,2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width from FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-2 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0002 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ____Y___Brooke Bailey ____Y___Jessica Cohen ____Y___Ada Corral ____Y___Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ____Y___Don Leighton-Burwell ____Y___Rahm McDaniel ____Y___Darryl Pruett ____Y___Veronica Rivera ____Y___Yasmine Smith ____Y___Michael Von Ohlen ____-___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ____-___Vacant (Alternate) ____-___Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: John Meyer ADDRESS: 705 FLETCHER ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, a) Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested) b) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) c) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.7 Sidewall Articulation) to remove the requirement for articulation on the interior side (east) (requested) in order to erect a Single Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single- Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell ____________________________ Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-3 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0018 DATE: Monday February 08, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___N____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Nancy M Langdon ADDRESS: 3805 ETON LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance-(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum street side yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 2 feet (requested) in order to complete a Shed in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING FEB 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board member Darryl Pruett nay); GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: of the underground utility running through the small back yard leaving no other location to place the shed then there it’s at. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the house is built up to the setbacks on all 3 sides front, east west sides leaving a small backyard which is where all the underground utilities are located (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: due to the location and utility easements there is no other place on the property to place the shed 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the adjacent property is street. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-4 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0019 DATE: Monday February 08, 2021 _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne _______VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Lawrence Graham ADDRESS: 5909 BULL CREEK RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 6 feet 7 inches (requested) in order to erect a Guest House in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Meeting Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021 FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: _____________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
