24th St. Aus n, TX - Night me Rendering Existing Proposed 1930s - 50s 02/19/2021 - Add Marquee and electrical dimming info. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Night View A.Q EVS 03/28/2020 2402 Guadalupe St. Aus n, TX SO 110031- pg. 2 D-1/1-PRESENTATION
Austin Moxy Hotel 2552 Guadalupe Street Austin, Texas Exterior Building Signage City Presentation Babendure Design Group 8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950 Dallas, Texas 75231 214.265.1960 214.265.5552 (fax) www.babendure.com Signage & Wayfinding Design Specialists 1 D-2/1-PRESENTATION F E A B C D 5 4 1 3.2 3.1 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Sign Location Plan 2 7 Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020D-2/2-PRESENTATION 1 RESTAURANT IDENTITY Projecting Sign Box with push-through Restaurant Logo Top of Sign = 12’-8” above grade 3.1 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 3.2 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 4 5 PICK UP WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. ORDER WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. BILLBOARD (Owned By Another Party) 1 A B 3.1 4 3.2 5 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0” 18'-3 1/2" (High Logo) 16'-3" (Low Logo) " 2 / 1 8 - ' 2 A Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 58’-8” above grade. " 6 - ' 1 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 B Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-8” above grade. D C Dimensional Letters mounted on the canopy ledge. Color to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-2” above grade. Projecting Sign Box with push-through graphics. Logo to be Moxy pink day. Top of Sign - 22’-8” above grade. East Elevation High and Low Level Signs 3 Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020D-2/3-PRESENTATION 18'-3 1/2" 16'-3 1/2" " 8 / 1 8 - ' 2 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 3 A " 8 / 5 9 " 2 / 1 2 " 1 1 - ' 1 " 4 - ' 2 LOCATION A HIGH LEVEL WALL IDENTITY FRONT ELEVATION • AREA CALCULATION: 60 SQFT Top of Sign = 58’-8” above grade. SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” 2 1/2" 6'-0" 5'-7" 1 3/4"Stroke Width 1" …
Application for Variance to Land Development Code Case No. C15‐2021‐0026 4005 Sidehill Path, Austin 78731 Paradisa Homes, LLC Speaker: Luis Zaragoza E-1/1PRESENTATION 4005 Sidehill Path: The issue Platted ‘Front’ Setback Along Stoneywood Platted ‘Side’ Setback Along Sidehill Path 4005 Sidehill Path is platted such that the front setback is along the natural side of the lot facing Stoneywood (left side of the lot in this image). The natural front is along Sidehill (above the lot in this image). The prior home on this lot was laid out using this natural front and encroached along the ‘front’ setback for 48 years. Applicant seeks to build a home facing Sidehill, similarly set out to the prior home, which would encroach on the platted front but would observe a 25’ setback along the platted side, natural front of the lot. E-1/2PRESENTATION Considerations 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations 2. Consistent with Previous Home Front Elevation 3. Consistent with City Requirements for SF‐3 Lots 4. Best Use of Lot to Protect Trees 5. Application Already Secured Building Permit Approval 6. Applicant Brought Issue to City Attention E-1/3PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • Of the 16 Interior Corner Lots on Stoneywood Dr. and Ridgestone Dr., 13 properties face the interior streets as our Design proposes. • There are 6 corner lots applying the City of Austin Standard Setbacks, as opposed to the platted setbacks, as our Design proposes. E-1/4PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 7612 Rockpoint Dr. E-1/5PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 4005 Pebble Path E-1/6PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 4004 Pebble Path E-1/7PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 4004 Petra Path E-1/8PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 4001 Myrick E-1/9PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 7629 Rockpoint E-1/10PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 3901 Sidehill E-1/11PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 3900 Sidehill E-1/12PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 3900 Pebble Path E-1/13PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 3901 Pebble Path E-1/14PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 3901 Petra Path E-1/15PRESENTATION 1. Consistency with Neighborhood Front Elevations • 3900 Petra Path E-1/16PRESENTATION 2. Consistent with Previous Home Front Elevation 4005 Sidehill Path E-1/17PRESENTATION 2. Consistent with Previous Home Front Elevation E-1/18PRESENTATION 2. Consistent with Previous Home Front Elevation E-1/19PRESENTATION 3. Consistent with City Requirements for SF‐3 Lots Lot …
Daniel Salazar 2810 Gonzales St Austin, TX 78702 Variance Application Case # C15‐2020‐0083 F-2/1-PRESENTATION Variance Request I am requesting a variance from the land development code. This request is for a two family residential use lot. The location of the structure is located in the back of the main home. The location of the home is 5ft from back of property line. The reason the form was set at its current location was for the safety of my family. I feared for their lives and nothing else. After the form was approved by the local government (DSD). I began to continue with my build. The mistake was not identified by DSD, until the project was erected. F-2/2-PRESENTATION Framing of foundation F-2/3-PRESENTATION The Hardship • This Pecan Tree is, approximately, 35” DBH. It is an over‐mature, over‐extended tree with a spread about as wide as it is tall. The height is about 35’‐ 40’ tall.” • The local government simply missed the framing and location of the foundation. F-2/4-PRESENTATION F-2/5-PRESENTATION This Pecan Tree is, approximately, 35” DBH. It is an over‐mature, over‐extended tree with a spread about as wide as it is tall. The height is about 35’‐ 40’ tall.” TREE F-2/6-PRESENTATION F-2/7-PRESENTATION F-2/8-PRESENTATION F-2/9-PRESENTATION F-2/10-PRESENTATION F-2/11-PRESENTATION F-2/12-PRESENTATION F-2/13-PRESENTATION F-2/14-PRESENTATION
ZONING SF-3-NP MAX BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACKS FLETCHER ST SIDE YARD REAR YARD ALLOWABLE AREA 32' 25' 5' 10' ALLOWABLE 1 SITE AREA ALLOWABLE 2 BUILDABLE AREA 6,849 SF 3,998 SF ALLOWABLE 3 IMPERVIOUS COVER 3,082 SF (45%) ALLOWABLE 4 BUILDING COVER 2,740 SF (40%) F.A.R. ADU MAX 2,740 SF (.4:1) 1,027 SF (15%) PROPOSED AREA PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED BUILDING COVER 1,484 SF (22%) F.A.R. 2,471 SF (.36:1) IMPERVIOUS COVER 2,733 SF (40%) SITE PLAN LEGEND EXIST. ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SETBACK BUILDING SET BACK PROPERTY LINE PROJECT NAME: 703 FLETCHER ST F L E T C H E R S T F L E T C H E R S T 703 FLETCHER 705 FLETCHER LEVEL 2 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 703 FLETCHER 705 FLETCHER LEVEL 1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PORCH 8'-4" x 4'-4" ENTRY 14'-6" x 5'-9" DROP 7'-5" x 6' CL 2' x 7'-6" CL 4' x 7'-1" PDR 6'-7" x 6' BED 2 10' x 11'-2" BEDROOM 1 10' x 11' CARPORT 24' x 8' GARAGE 24' x 12' OPEN TO HALL BELOW 8'-3" x 9'-10" BATH 9' x 6' D LAUNDRY 8' x 6' W SIDE DECK 20' x 6'-8" KITCHEN/DINING 16'-5" x 23'-8" HALL LIVING 20' x 17' LN M BEDROOM 15' x 13'-2" REAR DECK 11' x 22'-2" BED 3 10' x 11'-3" CL 6'-5" x 11'-3" M BATH 11'-6" x 11'-2" CL 2' x 2' CL 2' x 8'-9" POTENTIAL OPTIONAL POOL 30' x 8' 25' SETBACK 1ST MCMANSION TENT (40'-0") 2ND MCMANSION TENT (40'-0") REQUESTED REMOVAL A A N N O O I I T T C C E E S S A N O I T C E S CARPORT 24' x 8' HALL 8'-3" x 9'-10" PORCH 8'-4" x 4'-4" ENTRY 14'-6" x 5'-9" DROP 7'-5" x 6' PDR 6'-7" x 6' GARAGE 24' x 12' BEDROOM 1 10' x 11' CL 4' x 7'-1" SIDE DECK 20' x 6'-8" KITCHEN/DINING 16'-5" x 23'-8" LIVING 20' x 17' REAR DECK 11' x 22'-2" POTENTIAL OPTIONAL POOL 30' x 8' REQUESTED REMOVAL OF ARTICULATION REQUIREMENT PLAN NORTH IMAGE NAME: DATE: SITE STUDY 03/01/2021 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1 PROJECT NAME:PAGEIMAGE NAME:703 + 705 FLETCHER STF-3/1-PRESENTATION " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 8 BATH HALL BED 3 DINING KITCHEN 5' BULDING SETBACK ALLOWED W/ REMOVAL OF MCMANSION TENT IN MIDDLE 40' SECTION +22'-6" ROOF " 0 - ' 2 " 0 …
ZONING SF-3-NP MAX BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACKS FLETCHER ST SIDE YARD REAR YARD ALLOWABLE AREA 32' 25' 5' 10' ALLOWABLE 1 SITE AREA ALLOWABLE 2 BUILDABLE AREA 6,849 SF 3,998 SF ALLOWABLE 3 IMPERVIOUS COVER 3,082 SF (45%) ALLOWABLE 4 BUILDING COVER 2,740 SF (40%) F.A.R. ADU MAX 2,740 SF (.4:1) 1,027 SF (15%) PROPOSED AREA PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED BUILDING COVER 1,484 SF (22%) F.A.R. 2,471 SF (.36:1) IMPERVIOUS COVER 2,733 SF (40%) SITE PLAN LEGEND EXIST. ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SETBACK BUILDING SET BACK PROPERTY LINE PROJECT NAME: 703 FLETCHER ST F L E T C H E R S T F L E T C H E R S T 703 FLETCHER 705 FLETCHER LEVEL 2 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 703 FLETCHER 705 FLETCHER LEVEL 1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PORCH 8'-4" x 4'-4" ENTRY 14'-6" x 5'-9" DROP 7'-5" x 6' CL 2' x 7'-6" CL 4' x 7'-1" PDR 6'-7" x 6' BED 2 10' x 11'-2" BEDROOM 1 10' x 11' CARPORT 24' x 8' GARAGE 24' x 12' OPEN TO HALL BELOW 8'-3" x 9'-10" BATH 9' x 6' D LAUNDRY 8' x 6' W SIDE DECK 20' x 6'-8" KITCHEN/DINING 16'-5" x 23'-8" HALL LIVING 20' x 17' LN M BEDROOM 15' x 13'-2" REAR DECK 11' x 22'-2" BED 3 10' x 11'-3" CL 6'-5" x 11'-3" M BATH 11'-6" x 11'-2" CL 2' x 2' CL 2' x 8'-9" POTENTIAL OPTIONAL POOL 30' x 8' 25' SETBACK 1ST MCMANSION TENT (40'-0") 2ND MCMANSION TENT (40'-0") REQUESTED REMOVAL A A N N O O I I T T C C E E S S A N O I T C E S CARPORT 24' x 8' HALL 8'-3" x 9'-10" PORCH 8'-4" x 4'-4" ENTRY 14'-6" x 5'-9" DROP 7'-5" x 6' PDR 6'-7" x 6' GARAGE 24' x 12' BEDROOM 1 10' x 11' CL 4' x 7'-1" SIDE DECK 20' x 6'-8" KITCHEN/DINING 16'-5" x 23'-8" LIVING 20' x 17' REAR DECK 11' x 22'-2" POTENTIAL OPTIONAL POOL 30' x 8' REQUESTED REMOVAL OF ARTICULATION REQUIREMENT PLAN NORTH IMAGE NAME: DATE: SITE STUDY 03/01/2021 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1 PROJECT NAME:PAGEIMAGE NAME:703 + 705 FLETCHER STF-4/1-PRESENTATION " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 8 BATH HALL BED 3 DINING KITCHEN 5' BULDING SETBACK ALLOWED W/ REMOVAL OF MCMANSION TENT IN MIDDLE 40' SECTION +22'-6" ROOF " 0 - ' 2 " 0 …
Granted 5 PP Cases 7 BOA Monthly Report July 2020-June 2021 Feb 8, 2021 1) appeal challenging staff decision in regards to the number of parking spaces, Section 25-6-478 (A). The appellant disagrees and argues that these two properties lack the requisite number of parking spaces, based on application of Part 6, Section 7 (J) 2) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides, to all be illuminated and NBG Ordinance no. 20180412-051:b) to increase the sign height 3) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum street side yard setback 4) (a) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback (b) Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (E) (2) to increase maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient 5) 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B) (1) (b) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of two (2) wall signs and two (2) projecting signs 2) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood OverlayZoning District Signs), total of 12 signs on the property: a)(F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides(G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side c)(H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated 3) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width b) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane c)Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.7 Sidewall Articulation) to remove the requirement for articulation on the interior side 4) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width b)Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane c)Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.7 Sidewall Articulation) to remove the requirement for …
February 2, 2021 Stormi Wolf 2101 Rio Grande St Austin TX, 78705 Re: C16-2021-0006 Property Description: LOT 5&6 OLT 23 1/2 DIV D HORSTS LOUIS SUBD Dear Stormi, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a sign variance from the following section of the Land Development Code; Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (G) which does not allow illuminated signs. (required); To install - (3) three signs at the above location (requested) (1) blade, (1) awning, & (1) hanging sign in order to provide adequate readable signage during the day and at night for the 21 Rio Apartment complex in a "LO-NP, MF-4-NP”, Neighborhood; Austin Energy does not oppose the above sign variance request provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
Board of Adjustment Meeting March 8, 2021 (Versión en español a continuación) Board of Adjustment to be held March 8, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (March 7, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the March 8, 2021 Board of Adjustment Meeting, members of the public must: • Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-2202 or elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (March 7, 2021 the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. • If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Board of Adjustment FECHA de la reunion (March 8, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (March 7, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunion March 8, 2021, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-2202 o elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (March 7, 2021 el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono …
March 4, 2021 David Howell 4005 Sidehill Path Austin TX, 78731 Re: C15-2021-0026 Property Description: LOT 1 BLK F NORTHWEST HILLS NORTHWEST OAKS II Dear David, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) rear setback requirements; to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 15 feet (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the variance from the front yard setback, provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
March 3, 2021 Ms. Elaine Ramirez CASE NUMBER C-15-2021-0026 Contact: Elaine Ramirez; elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov Public Hearing Board of Adjustment; March 8th, 2021 Dear Ms. Ramirez, My name is Salomon Stavchansky and I live in 4000 Sidehill Path, Austin, TX 78731. I am writing to express my disappointment with the City of Austin, and to strongly OBJECT to the application of Matt Williams ((512)600-4324) on behalf of the owner, Mr. Luis Zaragoza ((512)782-8582) concerning a variance from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492. 1. I am disappointing with the City of Austin because its representatives assume that everyone has a scanner and a computer in the house to respond to the request made by Ms. Ramirez. It is truly insensitive to assume that everyone, especially elderly residents, have a scanner at home and a computer to deliver a scan of a document and an email stating their opinion concerning this case. The City of Austin should respect and facilitate the ability of its residents to respond in writing or in person (if needed, provide transportation) to the Austin City requests. 2. I strongly object to granting Mr. Matt Williams a variance from the Lan Development Code, Section 25-2-492 for the following reasons: a. The application requires clarification because the requested variance involves a corner lot impacting the streets of Sidehill Path and Stoneywood. It is not clear from the application if the applicant is requesting a variance of both Sidehill Path and Stoneywood or only Sidehill Path or only on Stonewood. The applicant should specify in writing to the City of Austin which street or if both streets will be impacted. b. If the Variance impacts the street of Sidehill Path, then, I strongly object to the application. One of the reasons for my objection involves the impact that the variance will have on my neighbor’s front yard. Fundamentally, my neighbor will lose sun light and all other neighbors withing 500 feet, including myself, will be looking at the sidewall of a future house. Furthermore, the harmony of the neighborhood will change, and more importantly it opens the door to future applications by other neighbors or builders to request similar variances which would destroy the harmony of the neighborhood, which is one of the reasons that attracted the applicant and owner to buy an old house and demolish it to build a new house. In addition, the impervious cover will decrease, potentially …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 DATE: March 8, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0006 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___-____Yasmine Smith NO SHOW ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) ___Y____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Stormi Wolf OWNER: ,Michael Harris ADDRESS: 2101 RIO GRANDE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 3 signs on the property: (H) to allow for all three (3) signs, one (1) blade, one (1) awning, and one (1) hanging sign to all be illuminated in order to provide adequate signage for the 21 Rio Apartment complex in a “LO-NP, MF-4NP”, Limited Office – Neighborhood Plan – Multi- Family – Neighborhood Plab zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton- Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: 21 RIO is surrounded by illuminated signage that have been granted ;thru the variance process, RIO is very dark at night OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: Many of the neighboring properties have internally illuminated signage, the type of illumination that is proposed is a low impact halo-lit type sign illumination and not requesting any additional deviations from the sign code OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: the reverse lit illumination is a low impact type of light but will substantially improve the ability of the apartment complex to be found and recognized AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: allowing illuminated signage for 21 RIO would provide commensurate readability and recognition as …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0001 DATE: March 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___-____Yasmine Smith NO SHOW ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) ___Y____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Claudia Salguero OWNER: Kate Ontes ADDRESS: 2402 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of two (2) wall signs and two (2) projecting signs in order to provide signage for CVS in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (H) states a sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Jan 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FEB 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton- Burwell, Board Member Rahm McDaniel motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board member Jessisca Cohen nay); POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. March 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to Grant with conditions to allow illumination on only 3 signs: S-1, S-2, and S-5 as shown on exhibit D-1/5; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS TO ALLOW ILLUMINATION ON ONLY 3 SIGNS: S-1, S-3 AND S-5 AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT D-1/5. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: this business is located in a high traffic part of downtown, drivers and pedestrian need to be able to easily find this business at night time especially because this is a pharmacy, an illuminate sign will not only benefit this business to be able to have the opportunity to have a successful future, but it will also benefit potential customers while trying to find …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 DATE: March 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___-____Melissa Hawthorne (abstaining) ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___-____Yasmine Smith NO SHOW ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___Y____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building.(G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting sign for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining); Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021; March 8, 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Veronica Rivera motions to Postpone to April 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-0 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained); POSTPONED TO APRIL 12, 2021. (RENOTICE) VARIANCE REQUESTED: RENOTICE APRIL 12, 2021 BOARD’S DECISIONFINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 DATE: Monday March 08, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0026 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___-____Yasmine Smith NO SHOW ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) ___Y____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Matt Williams OWNER: , Luis Zaragoza ADDRESS: 4005 SIDEHILL PATH VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 15 feet (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: March 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant -25 feet setback on Sidehill Path and 15 feet setback on Stoneywood Drive; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANTED 25 FEET SETBACK ON SIDEHILL PATH AND 15 FEET SETBACK ON STONEYWOOD DRIVE. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: The setbacks on this lot treat the natural front of the lot, along Sidehill Path, as the side of the lot, the house originally occupying the property built in 1973 was laid out facing the natural front and substantially encroaching into the front setback along its side and stood without apparent dispute or problem for nearly fifty years 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the natural and logical front of the lot faces into Sidehill Path, while the official front of the lot as defined in the neighborhood plat faces Stoneywood Dr, the setbacks defined on the neighborhood plat are turned such that the natural front is technically the side of the lot, however the prior single family home on the lot faced Sidehill Path and was laid out as though the front setback ran along Sidehill Path (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: all other corner lots exhibit the turned setbacks, all other homes on corner lots with turned setbacks face the natural front (official side) of the lot requiring this lot to additionally a number of large, mature trees are located on the lot which prevent moving the structure to align …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0067 DATE: Monday March 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___-____Yasmine Smith NO SHOW ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) ___Y____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Linda Sullivan OWNER: Micheal and Jeanette Abbink ADDRESS: 1112 HARVARD ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off- Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 2 spaces (required) to 0 spaces (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family residence in a “SF-3- NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan) BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021; Feb 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Veronica Rivera motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. March 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Darryl Pruett motions to Grant with conditions to include the shared driveway/parking agreement (after approval by City Legal) and No STR of any type on Lot 8; Board Member Veronica Rivera seconds on a 10- 0 vote; GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS TO INCLUDE THE SHARED DRIVEWAY/PARKING AGREEMENT (AFTER APPROVAL BY CITY LEGAL) AND NO STR OF ANY TYPE ON LOT 8. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the lot in question 1112 Harvard St does not have reasonable access in order to construct the required off-street parking 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the topography adjacent to the only existing paved city access makes construction of off street parking extremely disruptive to the surrounding area, there is no alternative access via Bryan St. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: the topography challenges presented by the lot in question are unique to this property in that the lot drastic changes in slope and there is no street level access to the lot 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-2 DATE: Monday March 8, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0083 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___-____Yasmine Smith NO SHOW ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) ___Y____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Daniel Salazar OWNER: Enez Salinas ADDRESS: 2810 GONZALES ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) for a Two- Family Residential use location at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to erect a Secondary Dwelling Unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Govalle Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC the second Dwelling Unit must be contained in a structure other than the principal structure and must be located at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JAN 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Brooke Bailey motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Darryl Pruett seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. March 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Postpone to April 12, 2021 Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO APRIL 12, 2021. (RENOTIFICATION NEEDED) VARIANCE REQUESTED: RENOTICE APRIL 12, 2021 BOARD’S DECISION: FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell ____________________________ Chairman Diana Ramirez for