4507 NORTH INTERSTATE 35 Sign Proposal for Apple Tree Holdings ------------------ Alex Ybarra Director, Apple Tree Holdings LLC 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/1-PRESENTATION INTRODUCTION The property at 4507 North Interstate 35 is uniquely situated at the I-35 split and is surrounded by several trees. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/2-PRESENTATION LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Relevant Code: §25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign Districts) (B)(2)(b)(i) and §25-10-123 (B)(3)(a) which regulate the sign area and sign height, respectively. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/3-PRESENTATION VARIANCE FINDINGS First: The existing sign is blocked from view by large trees, many of which are over 35 feet high. These trees are either on neighboring properties or city property; therefore, petitioner has no control over those trees. We would also like to preserve trees on the 4507 property to the fullest extent possible. The proximity to the I-35 split also causes visibility issues. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/4-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/5-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/6-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/7-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/8-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/9-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/10-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/11-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/12-PRESENTATION VARIANCE FINDINGS Second: The granting of these variances will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties as our assessment is that continued development of 4507 provides a benefit to the neighborhood through crime reduction, continued investment, and improvement of a previously abandoned property. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/13-PRESENTATION LETTER IN SUPPORT Our neighbor, Copernicus STEM Academy, signed a letter in support of the sign variance. Originally, the concept was for a 240 square foot sign, and this larger design was supported by our neighbor. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/14-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT C-1/15-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/16-PRESENTATION VARIANCE FINDINGS Third: The proposed remodel of the sign is consistent with the character of the expressway corridor sign district. Many professional offices, restaurants, and other …
Click to edit Master title style 5413 Guadalupe C o n d o m i n i u m s 1 E-1/1-PRESENTATION Click to edit Master title style GOALS & OBJECTIVES 2 2 E-1/2-PRESENTATION Requesting for reduced side setback by 1-ft Click to edit Master title style • The property is zoned as MF4-CO-NP which allows condominiums • The adjacent property zoned as SF-3-NP • Required setback is 5-ft and requesting to reduce to 4-ft 3 3 E-1/3-PRESENTATION PROJECT LOCATION Click to edit Master title style 4 4 E-1/4-PRESENTATION PROJECT LOCATION Click to edit Master title style 5 5 E-1/5-PRESENTATION ZONING Click to edit Master title style 6 6 E-1/6-PRESENTATION CONCEPT PLAN Click to edit Master title style 7 7 E-1/7-PRESENTATION ELEVATION Click to edit Master title style 8 8 E-1/8-PRESENTATION SETBACKS SECTIONS Click to edit Master title style 9 9 E-1/9-PRESENTATION SETBACKS SECTIONS Click to edit Master title style 10 10 E-1/10-PRESENTATION Encourage redevelopment in appropriate locations Click to edit Master title style throughout the city. • The proposed development is in accordance with the city zoning requirements 11 11 E-1/11-PRESENTATION HIGHLIGHTS Click to edit Master title style • This will formulate a viable mix of housing types that will successfully diversify the housing market of Austin. • Screened from the neighboring properties • contribute to the long-term economic viability of the City by creating a medium density residential and Improve the tax base of the city and supports in creating healthy economic environment for the city and the existing businesses. 12 12 E-1/12-PRESENTATION Click to edit Master title style Thank You 13 E-1/13-PRESENTATION
E-2/1-PRESENTATION E-2/2-PRESENTATION E-2/3-PRESENTATION N 7 6 ° 4 0 ' 5 4 " W 4 5 . 3 5 ' 1 5 ' A L L E Y 512' T1 DOWN 12:12 DOWN 12:12 BLDG 1 NEW PRIMARY RESIDENCE DOWN 12:12 DOWN 12:12 D O W N 1 2 : 1 2 1 2 : 1 2 D O W N D O W N 1 2 : 1 2 1 2 : 1 2 D O W N N20°21'18"E 125.40' 5 1 8 '- 7 " P P P P P P P P P WM P P P P P P P P P P P P P . T S H T 9 . E 7 0 9 1 ' . 5 3 5 4 ' E " 4 5 0 4 ° 6 7 S BLDG 2 EXISTING SECONDARY RESIDENCE 523'-4" BLDG 1 FFE GM EM 513' 514' 515' 516' 517' 518' 519' S20°21'18"W 125.40' 521' 522' 523' 5 2 3 '- 6 " PW3612@80 PW3612@80 PW3612@80 PW3612@80 PW3624@96 PW3624@96 PW3624@96 SH3660@80 [E] PW3648@96 Bedroom 1 CLNG HT 7'->12' 13 x 13 S H 3 6 6 0 @ 8 0 [ E ] {X02} Deck Uncovered P A 3 6 8 0 UP UP SD3280 S D ( 2 ) 2 4 8 0 S D 3 2 8 0 Closet 1 CLNG HT 8' Bath 2 CLNG HT 8' Linen S D 1 8 8 0 SD3280 SD3280 Hallway CLNG HT 8' Closet 3 CLNG HT 7' P D 2 4 8 0 Linen {A208} CLNG HT 8' SD2480 UP UP Bedroom 3 CLNG HT 7'->12 10 x 10 S D 3 2 8 0 UP UP SH3660@80 [E] P W 3 6 1 2 @ 8 0 P W 3 6 1 2 @ 8 0 M W L 7 2 7 2 @ 9 6 [ E ] Covered Porch CLNG HT 10' E N 3 6 9 6 P W 2 4 4 8 @ 9 6 P W 2 4 4 8 @ 9 6 PA3696 U P PW4848@96 Pantry CLNG HT 10' SD(2)1896 Great Room CLNG HT 10' 35 X 13 SD3696 SD3296 Half Bath {A101} CLNG HT 10' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 1 5 1 4 3 1 12 G A 9 6 9 6 Garage CLNG HT 10' 20 …
Presentation First, I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to present my case to you today In October 2018, My wife and I purchased the property located at 4522 Caswell with the expectations that when I retired, we would move to Austin. I needed an office where I could continue to wrap up my practice. The obvious choice was to transform the garage into a space that would be comfortable, away from the house, with good internet. We hired Christian Gutierrez and his company to act as General Contractor for the project. Our proposed plans to renovate the existing garage into a secondary dwelling have been denied permit approval due to a hardship created by two conflicting code restrictions, those specific code sections are referenced in our variance request application. On one side we were told that we could not move the structure closer to the existing protected trees because doing so would affect them and thus would deny our permit request. Its worth mentioning that leaving the structure where it is would grant us Tree Ordinance approval as it has been stated by the city Arborist upon inspection. On the other side we were told that we are encroaching over the rear yard setback restrictions and would have to move the structure outside the setback restriction to comply so we can be granted our permit request. As you can see, these two code regulations conflict with each other. So we move one way, we are denied a permit from Tree Ordinance. If we move the other direction, we are denied approval from Zoning Department. We are not here to change the complexion of Hyde Park nor the character of our neighborhood. On the contrary, the proposed structure is designed in a way to preserve its architectural historic features an values consistent with our house and with the houses in the area. Our house is a beautiful old 1930s Craftsman Home and we would love to preserve that as much as possible. We are asking this Board for a variance to the regulations that have created a hardship due to the conflicting set of rules. We ask that we be issued a permit that allows us build 3 feet into the setoff restriction zone. Thank you for your time E-3/1-PRESENTATION
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2715 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0011 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 1,097.55 sf of IC. We are requesting 2,000 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. This lot needs more IC than the adjacent one to protect the large tree in the center of the lot. b. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 22% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 40% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development …
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2715 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0011 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 1,097.55 sf of IC. We are requesting 2,000 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. This lot needs more IC than the adjacent one to protect the large tree in the center of the lot. b. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 22% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 40% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development …
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2717 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0012 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 580.35 sf of IC. We request 1,900 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 19.5% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 43% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development regulations, the LA zoned lot must be a minimum of 43,560 SF in size (1 acre), and the lot in question is …
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2717 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0012 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 580.35 sf of IC. We request 1,900 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 19.5% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 43% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development regulations, the LA zoned lot must be a minimum of 43,560 SF in size (1 acre), and the lot in question is …
2609 San Pedro Street Austin, TX 78705 VARIANCE REQUEST to reduce 30’ from centerline of street requirement to 24’. Per UNO District LDC 25-2-757 (E); requirement of a building setback of 30’ from the centerline of the adjacent street G-2/1-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street neighboring properties distance from centerline of street G-2/2-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street 30’ distance from centerline of street unique to UNO • 910 Poplar Street – under construction within the UNO overlay but permitted under the properties LO-MU base zoning. Because the project did not opt into UNO, the 30’ from centerline requirement was not applicable • 2802-2806 San Pedro Street – about to break ground just outside the UNO overlay. Because being not an UNO project, will not have to comply with the 30’ from centerline requirement. • 2816 San Pedro Street – project under entitlement just outside the UNO overlay. Because being not an UNO project, will not have to comply with the 30’ from centerline requirement. G-2/3-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street • Intent of requirement is for fire department to be able to only block traffic in one direction. In the case of a one way, one lane, street, perhaps the measurement should be from the opposite side of the street, not the centerline as there is no opposing traffic. G-2/4-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street neighborhood improvements that come with project • 12’ wide streetscape w/ pedestrian lighting • Fully fire protected building • Affordable SMART housing units • Significant improvements to storm water infrastructure on San Pedro Street G-2/5-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street I am happy to answer any questions and/or provide additional clarification Thank you for your time and consideration. Cater Joseph G-2/6-PRESENTATION
509 E 38th E 38TH STREET(60' R.O.W.) 509 E 38th St - Subdivision Info E 38TH STREET(60' R.O.W.) Y T R E B L I T E E R T S ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( Seeking variance to keep existing 1954 home that would encroach into the 10-FT rear setback required per building code. For information purposes, this is the 50-FT frontage required for a lot subdivision, which creates the rear lot line for the existing house. Y T R E B L I T E E R T S ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( POA (cid:43) (cid:3) (cid:37) (cid:46) (cid:46) (cid:50) (cid:41) (cid:48) (cid:54) (cid:46) (cid:55) (cid:53) (cid:48) (cid:49) (cid:37) (cid:9) (cid:3) (cid:43) (cid:41) (cid:48) (cid:52) (cid:39) (cid:39) (cid:48) (cid:41) (cid:48) (cid:39) (cid:43) (cid:54) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:56) (cid:52) (cid:39) (cid:53) (cid:3) (cid:37) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:55) (cid:53) (cid:43) (cid:3) (cid:14) (cid:3) (cid:38) (cid:35) (cid:49) (cid:52) (cid:35) (cid:37) (cid:35) (cid:42) (cid:37) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:47) (cid:3) (cid:18) (cid:18) (cid:18) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:46) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:3) (cid:19) (cid:23) (cid:20) (cid:23) (cid:196) (cid:26) (cid:24) (cid:21) (cid:3) (cid:11) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:23) (cid:10) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:25) (cid:26) (cid:25) (cid:3) (cid:53) (cid:35) (cid:58) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:3) (cid:14) (cid:43) (cid:48) (cid:54) (cid:53) (cid:55) (cid:35) (cid:22) (cid:18) (cid:23) (cid:24) (cid:19) (cid:196) (cid:40) (cid:3) (cid:26) (cid:21) (cid:3) (cid:38) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:59) (cid:54) (cid:52) (cid:39) (cid:36) (cid:43) (cid:46) (cid:3) (cid:54) (cid:39) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:54) (cid:53) (cid:42) (cid:54) (cid:26) (cid:21) (cid:3) (cid:39) (cid:3) (cid:27) (cid:18) (cid:23) (cid:23) (cid:18) (cid:25) (cid:26) (cid:25) (cid:3) (cid:53) (cid:35) (cid:58) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:3) (cid:14) (cid:43) (cid:48) (cid:54) (cid:53) (cid:55) (cid:35) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:46) (cid:50) (cid:35) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:35) (cid:39) (cid:46) (cid:36) (cid:35) (cid:38) (cid:46) (cid:43) (cid:55) (cid:36) (cid:38) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:49) (cid:47) (cid:39) (cid:38) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:35) (cid:38) (cid:59) (cid:36) (cid:43) (cid:48) (cid:49) (cid:54) (cid:37) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:52) (cid:49) (cid:37) (cid:48) (cid:49) (cid:53) (cid:56) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:43) (cid:17) (cid:43) (cid:16) (cid:49) (cid:48) (cid:38)(cid:35)(cid:54)(cid:39)(cid:28) (cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:40)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:39)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:18)(cid:27)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:26)(cid:54)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:52)(cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:54) (cid:38)(cid:52)(cid:35)(cid:57)(cid:48)(cid:28) (cid:41)(cid:16)(cid:46)(cid:16)(cid:52) (cid:53)(cid:42)(cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:54) (cid:19) (cid:49)(cid:40) (cid:19) DEMO PLAN XXX XXX XXX SCALE IN FEET 1":10' BUILDABLE AREA G-3/1-PRESENTATION Exhibit A: 509 E 38th - Rear Encroachment from Subdivision The blue shaded area is the re-subdivided Lot 1. This variance request is adjacent to and affecting Lot 2 of the subdivision (not another neighbor). G-3/2-PRESENTATION Exhibit B: 509 E 38th - Existing Rear Setback Encroachment The existing rear garage is 4.4’ (aka 4’-5”) from …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-2 DATE: Monday May 9, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0012 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jonathan Kaplan OWNER: David Scott Kosch ADDRESS: 2717 LONG BOW TRL increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent or increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) (a) less from 35 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (b) and not more than 25 percent from 10 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (c) percent and not more than 35 percent from 5 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (d) to 27 percent (requested), in order to complete a Single-Family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient greater than 35 percent Note: This section of the Land Development Code applies to lots that are included in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982 or a tract that is not required to be platted. For the above address the Subdivision Plat was recorded on November 17, 1969 (E) This subsection specifies additional development standards based on slope gradient in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (2) On a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road or utility F-2/1 that cannot be reasonably placed elsewhere, or a non-mechanized pedestrian facility, such as a foot path, sidewalk, or stairs. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 14, 2022; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 14, 2022; March 14, 2022 POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022 BY APPLICANT; April 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to deny; Board Member Nicholl Wade seconds on a 10-1 vote (Board member Kelly Blume nay); DENIED. RECONSIDERATION REQUESTED: MAY 9, 2022 POSTPONED TO JUNE 13, …
F-2/75 From: To: Subject: Date: Jon Kaplan - UBSTX Ramirez, Elaine Postponement Request - C15-2022-0011 + C15-2022-0012 Thursday, May 05, 2022 11:56:24 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Board of Adjustments. I am writing to formally request a 30-day postponement in my hearing date to be able to gather all the requested information for our case. This time is primarily needed to have the civil engineer design the water mitigation plan that was requested. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards Jon Kaplan C.P.B.D. - 44-752 ICC Combination Inspector - 9061592 Urban Building Services of Texas LLC www.ubstx.com J P: (512) 768-2789 EXT: 501 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-2/76 Ramirez, Diana From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hilary Brown Friday, May 6, 2022 12:41 PM Ramirez, Elaine Opposition to G-1 C15-2022-0011 & G-2 C15-2022-0012) 81EaZ2ZYRk2DOBEGKQPGzA.jpg; JOibv6DRSKKUMzMUZxOHKw.jpg; dc30F77nTb2OhJI%u2P0WQ.jpg; IMG_8316.JPG *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Email regarding: 2715 Long Bow Trail (case G-1 C15-2022-0011) and 2717 Long Bow Trail (case G-2 C15-2022-0012) Ms. Ramirez, My name is Hilary Brown, I am an Apache Shores resident, my home address is 14404 Hunters Pass. I am also a Texas Master Naturalist, a Master Birder, and a former employee of the USDA, Forest Service. I implore the council reviewing the two cases above to deny the variance request. These lots were purchased by developers who do not live in our community, their sole objective is building large houses to maximize their financial gain, the concerns of this community do not impact them. The houses they have built in Apache Shores so far have …
AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT June 13, 2022 at 5:30PM Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To participate/speak remotely you will have to register with the Liaison via email elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-2202. You must register before 12p.m. the day before the meeting, Sunday, June 12, 2022. ___Thomas Ates ___Brooke Bailey ___Jessica Cohen (Chair) ___Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair) ___Barbara Mcarthur ___Darryl Pruett EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CALL TO ORDER ___Agustina Rodriguez ___Richard Smith ___Michael Von Ohlen ___Nicholl Wade ___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM Staff requests approval May 9, 2022 draft minutes A-1 On-Line Link: Item A-1 draft minutes B. C. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM B-1 Staff and Applicant requests for postponement and withdraw of items posted on this Agenda SIGNS NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 C16-2022-0004 Apple Tree Holdings LLC, Tony Nguyen 4507 N IH 35 SVRD NB (B) (3) (a) to exceed sign height of 35 feet (maximum allowed) to 50 feet (B) (2) (b) (i) to exceed sign area of 107 square feet (maximum allowed) to 200 On-Line Link: Item C-1; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign District Regulations): a) square feet (requested) and b) (requested) in order …
June 9, 2022 Tony Nguyen 4507 N IH 35 Svrd NB Austin TX, 78722 Re: C16-2022-0004 Dear Tony, Property Description: LOT 1 TERRY ROSS ADDN Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from LDC Sections 25-10-123 (B)(2)(a)(i) and (B)(3)(a) at 4507 N IH 35. Austin Energy cannot approve the variance request at this time, as more time is needed to research whether the proposed sign can meet required clearances from the existing overhead electric lines located adjacent to this site. A decision will be reached regarding this variance request prior to the July 2022 Board of Adjustments hearing. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 Cody.Shook@austinenergy.com C-1/1-AE REPORT
C-1/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Stefan Sinclair Ramirez, Elaine C16-2022-0004 : Code variance request for sign on IH-35 Srvc Rd / Delwood2 Thursday, June 09, 2022 9:41:09 AM Sign04_2009.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good morning Ms. Ramirez, My name is Stefan Sinclair, and I live on Bentwood Road in the Delwood 2 neighborhood of Austin TX. We were made aware of a request for variance in sign height for the sign at the law office on the IH-35 service road of our neighborhood, case number C16-2022-0004 - and as a resident in the neighborhood I wanted to voice our household's opposition to this variance request. We feel that an increase in sign height is not warranted, and would have a negative impact on our neighbors who live behind the law office in question requesting the variance. An increase in sign height has the potential to bleed light into the homes behind the law office, and would negatively impact the residential character of our neighborhood. Also, as a long-time resident of the neighborhood, I've observed how the sign has become obscured over time simply by virtue of one tree on the law office property that has grown over time to a height which obscures the sign. An increase in sign height is not going to prevent this tree from continuing to grow and obscure the sign once again at a greater height. Regular pruning of the tree seems a viable alternative. I have attached some photos of the sign and surrounding area to illustrate. Sign01_06082022 was taken yesterday (June 8). It shows the sign as viewed from IH-35. The advertisement portion is clearly visible from the highway, however the digital clock below is obstructed by the tree canopy. Sign02_06082022 taken yesterday shows the same area from the service road height Sign03_06082022 shows the sign as viewed from the sidewalk when walking along the service road. The sign is completely obscured by the tree from this angle. Sign04_2009 is a Google Street View shot of the same area taken in 2009, when the tree on the property was much shorter. As you can see, at that time the advertisement and digital clock were both visible. Thank you for considering our opposition to this request for code variance in this matter. Sincerely, Stefan Sinclair Delwood 2 resident C-1/2-LATE BACKUP C-1/3-LATE BACKUP C-1/4-LATE BACKUP C-1/5-LATE BACKUP C-1/6-LATE BACKUP From: …
From: Subject: Date: Attachments: Target 2409 Austin Monday, June 06, 2022 4:27:55 PM image001.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I would like to postpone the variance hearing for the Target to the July 11th meeting. Thank you MAY GOD BLESS YOU , Tambra A. Nance Director of Operations TITAN Services, LLC P: (817)778-9195 M: (817)948-5897 W: www.pstitan.com CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-1/1-LATE BACKUP
From: *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** C15-2022-0002 June 13th 2022 Elaine Ramirez Please see attached. Thanks Glenn Page owner 705 Franklin blvd. 78759. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-1/1-LATE BACKUP
From: To: Subject: Date: Stephen Stepka Ramirez, Elaine Case # C15-2022-0047 Wednesday, June 08, 2022 11:58:59 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Elaine, Please RSVP that you received this email. Thank you. I was told that replying by email was a satisfactory way to respond to a Public Hearing Notice I recently received in the mail. I am responding to case # C15-2022-0047 for the Board of Adjustment to be heard on June 13, 2022. You are the contact person listed. I object to the proposed code variance request. I feel that instead of reducing the required 10' setback to the proposed 5' on the Rear Yard Setback and compromising their neighbor they should add the 5' they are trying to gain to the front of the Garage/Studio which has ample distance to accommodate the 5'. This added 5' should be on the front side of the building that faces E.46th St. instead of compromising the neighbor and the Rear Yard Setback. Thank you. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-3/1-LATE BACKUP
*** External Email - Exercise Caution *** From: To: Subject: Date: David Ramirez, Elaine case C15-2022-0447 Saturday, June 04, 2022 12:52:14 PM case C15-2022-0447 4522 Caswell Ave We are in favor of the requested variance. David Orr 4509 Avenue F Austin, TX 78751 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-3/1-LATE BACKUP E-3/2-LATE BACKUP CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** From: E-3/3-LATE BACKUP
