ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 2022 MEETING SCHEDULE Current ARC schedule with new HLC meeting schedule Monday meetings at 4:30 PM at Street Jones Building** Monday, April 11th Wednesday, May 5th Monday, May 9th Wednesday, June 1st Monday, June 13th ** Wednesday, July 6th Monday, July 11th Wednesday, August 3rd Monday, August 8th Wednesday, September 7th Monday, September 12th Wednesday, October 5th Wednesday, November 2nd Monday, October 10th Monday, November 14th ** Wednesday, December 14th Monday, December 5th January 2023 With this schedule, the ARC meeting is 1 week after the previous HLC meeting and 3 weeks prior to the next HLC meeting. **Street Jones Building Rm 400A not available for 6/13 and 11/15 Shifted ARC schedule with new HLC meeting schedule - Mondays Monday meetings at time at location** Monday, April 11th Monday, May 16th Monday, June 20th (Juneteenth observed, City holiday) Monday, July 18th Monday, August 15th Monday, September 19th Monday, October 17th Monday, November 28th Monday, December 19th Wednesday, May 5th Wednesday, June 1st Wednesday, July 6th Wednesday, August 3rd Wednesday, September 7th Wednesday, October 5th Wednesday, November 2nd Wednesday, December 14th January 2023 With this schedule, the ARC meeting will be 2 weeks between HLC meetings but keeping them on Mondays. **time and location will need to be reserved
FOR HISTORIC REGULATORY REVIEW ONLY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. T E S W E I V E R C R O T S I H I e s u o H e o r W - n e m m u r C c M 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A , D A O R R O S D N W 0 0 3 2 I Revisions APRIL 8, 2022 Cover A0.0 G R A S S O G A Y A R C H I T E C T S info@grassogay.com office: (512) 913-3057 SHEET INDEX: A0.0 - COVER A0.3 - HISTORIC, NEW AND DEMO - SITE PLANS A0.4 - DEMO & HISTORIC PLANS BASEMENT & SECOND FLOOR A0.5 - DEMO & HISTORIC PLANS FIRST FLOOR A1.0 - BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - ARCHITECTURAL A1.1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN - ARCHITECTURAL A1.2 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN - ARCHITECTURAL A1.3 - ROOF PLAN - EXISTING W/ PROPOSED A3.0 - EXTERIOR ELEVATION HISTORIC DRAWINGS & EXISTING CONDITIONS IMAGES OF WEST & NORTH ELEVATIONS A3.1 - EAST ELEVATION - DEMO & ARCHITECTURAL A3.2 - NORTH ELEVATION - DEMO & ARCHITECTURAL A3.3 - WEST ELEVATION - DEMO & ARCHITECTURAL A3.4 - SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING NORTH & EAST HISTORIC EXTERIOR ELEVATION DRAWINGS IMAGES OF EXISTING CONDITIONS. D S O R R O A LOT 9 D W I N D S O R R O A LOT 9 D W I N TWO STORY RESIDENCE -HATCHED PORTION HISTORIC FOOTPRINT- TWO STORY RESIDENCE -HATCHED PORTION HISTORIC FOOTPRINT- NEW BACK PORCH NEW POOL 3 Image of Hand Drafted Site Plan - Historical NTS PEASE ROAD 2 Site Plan - DEMOLITION 3/32"=1'-0" PEASE ROAD 1 Site Plan - ARCHITECTURAL 3/32"=1'-0" FOR HISTORIC REGULATORY REVIEW ONLY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. T E S W E I V E R C R O T S I H I e s u o H e o r W - n e m m u r C c M 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A , D A O R R O S D N W 0 0 3 2 I Revisions APRIL 8, 2022 Site Plan A0.3 G R A S S O G A Y A R C H I T E C T S info@grassogay.com office: (512) …
2'-0" from Fascia Board 16 oz. Copper Roof ± " 4 / 1 2 " 4 / 1 0 1 - ' 2 1-1/2" w. Iron Bracket " 2 / 1 5 " 2 " 2 / 1 1 2" 1'-2 3/4" 3" 3 DOOR HOOD DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 16 oz. Copper Roof 5'-0" 4'-10 1/2" 3908 Avenue B, #309 Austin, Texas 78751 512|751-1374 " 4 / 1 0 1 - ' 2 3 3/4" Patch Siding where Light is removed Restore Existing Door, Transom and Trim to Remain Brick on Mortar Bed 4" Concrete Slab with 6x6, 10&10 WWF Reinf. Compacted Fill 8" CMU's, fill solid Brick Veneer New Brick Stoop 2 A-501 Poured Concrete Footing, with (2x)-#5 bars 1'-0" 1'-0" 7'-8" 5'-8" Brick Edge to Walkway 2 BRICK STOOP DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 FRONT ENTRY DETAIL Scale: 1" = 1'-0" T N E M P O L E V E D S D R B E V I F I K R A L P L I H P M E H 6 0 0 3 K R A P L L I H P M E H 6 0 0 3 5 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A ISSUE DATE PRINT: 4/5/22 SHEET NAME FRONT STOOP DETAILS SHEET NUMBER A-501 F I V E B I R D S D E V E L O P M E N T A U S T I N , T E X A S 7 8 7 0 5
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Human Rights Commission Recommendation Number 20220411-002a: Work Environment in the Office of Civil Rights WHEREAS, there are allegations of a hostile work environment inside the Office of Civil Rights, and; WHEREAS, the current director of the Office of Civil Rights is still running the office, and; WHEREAS, the allegations are directed at the director and an outside law firm is investigating the allegations, and; WHEREAS, the Austin Human Rights Commission received notice on Monday, April 11, 2022, that all agendas will be reviewed by the Civil Rights Officer and Legal prior to approval. This new mandate has timing that coincided with a meeting that included an agenda item to discuss the current investigation into the Civil Rights Officer. WHEREAS, in December 2021, the City Council removed the Commission’s authority to conduct hearings that review findings of cause or no cause by the Civil Rights Office, and; WHEREAS, NAACP President Nelson Linder communicated that the current situation in the Office of Civil Rights is a disparate impact caused to those reporting claims to the Office of Civil Rights, and; THEREFORE, be it resolved, that: The Austin Human Rights Commission asks the City Council to request that the city manager place the Civil Rights Officer on administrative paid leave until the conclusion of the investigation. The Austin Human Rights Commission requests that commission meeting agendas be reviewed by the Clerk’s Office and Legal that complies with all policies, procedures, and laws until the conclusion of the investigation. The Austin Human Rights Commission requests the City Council restore the Chapter 21 commission language that provided authority to conduct hearings that review findings of cause or no cause. (See exhibit A – attached) Date of Approval: April 11, 2022 Record of the vote: 6 in favor -1 abstension; Commissioner Garry Brown motion, Chair Davis second. Voting in favor were Commissioner Griffith, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Museitif and Commissioner Griffith. Commissioner Caballero abstained. Commissioner Breckenridge, and Commissioner Weigel were absent. Attest: Andrea Jordan Andrea Jordan Staff Liaison
ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220411-4b Seconded By: Jo Anne Norton Date: April 11, 2022 Subject: Budget Item: Funding to Support Equitable Microchipping of Pets in Austin Motioned By: Luis Herrera Recommendation The Austin Animal Advisory Commission recommends that the Austin City Council approve $100,000 in the FY23 budget to be used to make microchipping of pets free (and therefore equitable) in the City of Austin, at least until that amount is spent. Description of Recommendation to Council The chips, in bulk, are very cheap. The $100,000, in addition to help purchase the chips, can be used for paying the staff for the expenses of setting up a movable microchipping clinic, and the travel costs associated with such a program. Also, important would be the capturing of data so to determine how much money may be saved by the program keeping animals out of the shelter. Rationale: Microchipping is an inexpensive and efficient way of using new technology to link a pet to a owner. This helps to rapidly get lost pets back to their families and keep them out of the shelter. Vote: 10 For: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: Attest: 2 (plus one vacancy) Director, CASO Austin Animal Services Office 1 of 1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 2022 MEETING SCHEDULE Current ARC schedule with new HLC meeting schedule Monday meetings at 4:30 PM at Street Jones Building** Monday, April 11th Wednesday, May 4th Monday, May 9th Wednesday, June 1st Monday, June 13th ** Wednesday, July 6th Monday, July 11th Wednesday, August 3rd Monday, August 8th Wednesday, September 7th Monday, September 12th Wednesday, October 5th Wednesday, November 2nd Monday, October 10th Monday, November 14th ** Wednesday, December 14th Monday, December 5th January 2023 With this schedule, the ARC meeting is 1 week after the previous HLC meeting and 3 weeks prior to the next HLC meeting. **Street Jones Building Rm 400A not available for 6/13 and 11/15
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 DATE: April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Melissa Hawthorne (ABSTAINING) ___-___Barbara Mcarthur (out) ___-____Rahm McDaniel (out) ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non- electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building. (G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting sign for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining); Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021; March 8, 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Veronica Rivera motions to Postpone to April 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-0 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained); POSTPONED TO APRIL 12, 2021. (RENOTICE) VARIANCE REQUESTED: RENOTICE The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: a) b) c) (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-2 DATE: April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2022-0001 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur (OUT) ___-____Rahm McDaniel (OUT) ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Esteban Arrieta OWNER: Eames Gilmore ADDRESS: 10107 RESEARCH BLVD SVRD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign District Regulations) (B) (3), to exceed sign height of 35 feet (maximum allowed) to 45 feet (requested) in order to complete signage for Target store in a “NBG-NP”, North Burnet Gateway-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Gateway Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-123 Expressway Corridor Sign Regulations (B) This subsection prescribes regulations for freestanding signs. (3) The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (a) 35 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (b) 20 feet above grade at the base of the sign. BOARD’S DECISION: POSTPONED TO MARCH 14, 2022 (AE DENIAL); March 14, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Darryl Pruett motions to postpone to April 11, 2022; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022. April 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to postpone to May 9, 2022; Board Member Richard Smith seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MAY 9, 2022. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair ____________________________ for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-3 DATE: April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2022-0002 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur (OUT) ___-____Rahm McDaniel (OUT) ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Clay Hardman OWNER: Campus Investors Austin, LP ADDRESS: 2323 SAN ANTONIO ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of a blade sign in order to provide signage for The Castilian in a “CS-1-NP & CS-NP”, General Commercial Services - Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (H) states a sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts BOARD’S DECISION: March 14, 2022 APPLICANT NO SHOW -Board Member Brooke Bailey motions to postpone to April 11, 2022; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022. April 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to approve with conditions to dim the lights from 11PM to 7AM; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS TO DIM THE LIGHTS FROM 11PM TO 7AM. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: applicant would like to add internal illumination to an existing blade sign that has been installed for years OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: N/A OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: N/A AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: granting this variance should not be considered a special privilege as many of the neighbors have internally illuminated signage similar to what is being asked for. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair ____________________________ for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 DATE: Monday April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0025 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur (OUT) ___-____Rahm McDaniel (OUT) ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Karen McGraw OWNER: Suzannah Covx ADDRESS: 3709 CEDAR ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the North University NCCD Ord. #040826-058, PART 7(Residential District) from: a) b) c) d) lot width requirements to decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 41 feet (requested) in order to allow a Two-Family residential use and setback requirements to decrease the minimum interior side yard setback from 5 feet (required) to 3 feet (requested) in order to erect a detached garage in an “SF-3- NCCD-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Conservation Combining District Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North University NCCD Neighborhood Plan). Note: (1st variance request) Ordinance No. 20110804-040 Part 3 (5) (b) Allows TwoFamily use on a lot at least 5,750 square feet. The existing lot is 41 feet wide and contains 6,636 square feet. (2nd variance request) North University NCCD No. 040826-058 Part 7 (3) (d) a noncomplying accessory building may be reconstructed at its existing location, but may not be less than 3 feet from the rear and interior side property lines. The owner requests to remove the existing garage and replace it with a new garage 3 feet from the south property line – not on its existing location. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING APRIL 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to approve with conditions no STR, limited to .4 FAR, and as per Site plan D-1/8 in Presentation and 3 foot setback only length of garage; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 11-0 vote; GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS NO STR, LIMITED TO .4 FAR, AND AS PER SITE PLAN D-1/8 IN PRESENTATION AND 3 FOOT SETBACK ONLY LENGTH OF GARAGE. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: this site has a 41’front width which is the narrowest on the block except for 3711 which has the same and a new home is being constructed there now, the owner wishes to maintain the existing 854 sf home and add a second dwelling of 850 …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 DATE: Monday April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0026 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur (OUT) ___-____Rahm McDaniel (OUT) ___N____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michele Rogerson Lynch OWNER: Lennar- Kevin Pape ADDRESS: 7236 & 7240 DANCING WIND LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 16.5 feet (requested) for each lot in order to erect a Single-Family attached residence in a “MF- 2”, Multi-Family zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING APRIL 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to approve; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-1 vote (Board member Darryl Pruett nay); GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the property is located in the city limited purpose jurisdiction and is subject to both 25-2-492 for MF-2 site development regulations as well as 30-2-233 for single family attached use in the ETJ per approved plant 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the site property is irregular shape, curve in the front, shape of the lot. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: the entire subdivision of 94 single family attached dwelling units and 47 lots is nearly completed and this is one of only two single family attached dwellings that will have slightly less than the 25 foot setback for MF-2 site development regulations 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: as noted the subdivision is nearly completed and this is only one of two single family attached dwellings that will have a slight deviation from the MF-2 setback regulations. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-3 DATE: Monday April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0028 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur (OUT) ___-____Rahm McDaniel (OUT) ___N____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michele Rogerson Lynch OWNER: Lennar-Kevin Pape ADDRESS: 7129 DANCING WIND LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 20.5 feet (requested) for each lot in order to erect a Single-Family attached residence in a “MF- 2”, Multi-Family zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING APRIL 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to approve; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-1 vote (Board member Darryl Pruett nay); GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the property is located in the city limited purpose jurisdiction and is subject to both 25-2-492 for MF-2 site development regulations as well as 30-2-233 for single family attached use in the ETJ per approved plant 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the site property is irregular shape, curve in the front, shape of the lot. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: the entire subdivision of 94 single family attached dwelling units and 47 lots is nearly completed and this is one of only two single family attached dwellings that will have slightly less than the 25 foot setback for MF-2 site development regulations 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: as noted the subdivision is nearly completed and this is only one of two single family attached dwellings that will have a slight deviation from the MF-2 setback regulations. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-4 DATE: Monday April 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0032 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: David Cancialosi OWNER: Cody Stavig ADDRESS: 2904 RIVERCREST DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section(s): a) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 40 feet (required) to 25 feet (requested) and b) 25-2-963 (Modification and Maintenance of Non-Complying Structures) (E) (1) (b) to increase the height from 23 feet 8 inches (allowed) to 24 feet 1 inch (requested) in order to remodel an existing non-complying Single-Family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, Section 25-2-963 (E) A person may increase the height of a building that is a noncomplying structure based on a height requirement of this title if: (1) the increase is made to a portion of the building that: (b) complies with the yard setback requirements of this title. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING APRIL 11, 2022 POSTPONED TO MAY 9, 2022 DUE TO AE DENIAL FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
