02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8 - Staff Report Part 2

Zoning and Platting Commission – July 21, 2026

02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8 - Staff Report Part 2 — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of 161 pages

02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 888 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 889 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 890 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 891 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 892 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 893 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 894 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 895 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 896 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 897 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 898 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 899 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8100 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8101 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8102 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8103 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8104 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8105 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8106 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8107 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8108 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8109 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8110 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8111 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8112 of 466C14-2025-0089 Page 17 Attachment G 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8113 of 466 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8114 of 466Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: ReAnn Boss Monday, July 6, 2026 8:00 AM Villela, Beverly C14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Beverly, We are submitting updated AGAINST comments for consideration prior to the hearing for submission to the ZAP Commission. Case Number: C14-2025-0089 Contact: Beverly Villela, 512-978-0740 Public Hearing: July, 7, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission and August 27, 2026 City Council Subject: Opposition to Proposed Redistricting and Development Access Dear Members of the Zoning Commission, I am writing to formally oppose the proposed redistricting and development plan as currently presented, due to significant safety, environmental, and property concerns that directly impact my family and our home. Our residence is the first house in the neighborhood and sits at a particularly vulnerable location. We already experience frequent illegal U-turns, vehicles pulling into our driveway to turn around, and unsafe traffic behavior. Alarmingly, we have already had one vehicle leave the roadway and crash into our fence. These are not hypothetical risks—they are existing, documented safety issues that will only be intensified by additional development. From a safety and community welfare standpoint, I strongly urge the Commission to consider the following: 1. Traffic Study Required A comprehensive traffic impact study must be conducted before any approval. The proposed development could introduce an estimated additional 1,000 vehicles with access to Lost Creek Boulevard. This increase would place our home—and more importantly, our young children—at heightened and unacceptable risk. We already have semi-trucks barrelling around the corner from the other new major development. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8115 of 466 -TRAFFIC BLOCKAGE! Due to the limited egress and ingress of the neighborhood during morning rush hours- the line to leave the neighborhood extends back .25-.3 miles from the traffic light completely blocking Wilson Heights Drive preventing us from leaving and from EMERGENCY services entering. This will undoubtedly be worsened with the current plan to add housing into the immediate area- especially if they are granted access to Lost Creek Boulevard. 2. No Access to Lost Creek Boulevard The development should not be permitted egress to Lost Creek Boulevard. All access should be limited to Highway 360 to prevent increased traffic, dangerous turning movements, and cut- through driving directly in front of our property. 3. Reduction in Number of Residences The density of the proposed development should be significantly reduced to lessen traffic volume, noise, and overall impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. Environmental Impact Study An environmental study is necessary to identify what substances, dust, chemicals, or pollutants may be released during construction. We have young children who spend time outdoors, and the potential health impacts during prolonged construction must be fully disclosed and mitigated. 5. Physical Safety Barrier If the development proceeds in any form, we request consideration for minimum 10-foot concrete block wall should be required to separate our property from the development to provide a critical safety buffer, noise reduction, privacy and SAFETY. 6. Loss of Property Value and Compensation The construction and resulting traffic will negatively impact our property value. The Commission should address what compensation or remediation will be provided to homeowners whose property values are diminished as a direct result of this development. 7. EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESS! Recently- the new construction in the neighborhood resulted in a gas line breakage that resulted in a near 24 hr closure of the Lost Creek Boulevard/ 360 Mopac. This resulted in near 25 minute detour for emergency services. Residents, resident physicians, veterinarians and other health care professionals were unnecessarily detoured with real life-threatening implications. We respectfully ask the Commission to prioritize the safety of existing residents—especially families with young children—over development convenience. As currently proposed, this redistricting creates serious and foreseeable risks that should not be ignored. Thank you for your time, consideration, and commitment to public safety and responsible planning. Sincerely, ReAnn Boss 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8116 of 466 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8117 of 46602 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8118 of 466Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Patti Brennan Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:17 PM Villela, Beverly; ; ; Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: ● Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) ● Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less ● No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future ● Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan ● Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger ● Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential ● Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8119 of 466 Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Name: Patti Brennan Address: 5909 Cape Coral Drive, Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8120 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Heather Hudson Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:16 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Neighborhood Traffic Analysis — Case C14-2025-0089 -Rosedale You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution EMAIL TO: CC: SUBJECT: Request for Neighborhood Traffic Analysis — Case C14-2025-0089 -Rosedale? Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14- 2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Name: Heather V Hudson 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8121 of 466 Address: 2004 Port Royal Drive, Austin, TX 78746 Heather Hudson Broker Associate Certified Luxury Home Marketing Specialist AUSTIN RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2500 Bee Caves Rd, Bldg 3, Ste 200 Austin TX 78746 m: 512.431.2120 TREC Information About Brokerage Services TREC Consumer Protection Notice To help protect y our priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented auto matic download of this pictu re from the In ternet. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8122 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Heather Hudson Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:16 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car- dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: • Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less • No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan • • Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger • Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Name: Heather V Hudson Address: 2004 Port Royal Drive, Austin, TX 78746 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8123 of 466 Heather Hudson Broker Associate Certified Luxury Home Marketing Specialist AUSTIN RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2500 Bee Caves Rd, Bldg 3, Ste 200 Austin TX 78746 m: 512.431.2120 TREC Information About Brokerage Services TREC Consumer Protection Notice To help protect y our priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented auto matic download of this pictu re from the In ternet. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8124 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Patti Brennan Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:14 PM Villela, Beverly; Request for NTA You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet ● How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). ● What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. ● Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet ● What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints ● How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. ● What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8125 of 466 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Patti Brennan 5909 Cape Coral Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8126 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Scott Killen Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:51 PM Villela, Beverly Conditional Overlay Request for Case C14-2025-008 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: Lost Creek sits above Barton Creek and the Barton Creek Green Belt. This development could have a big negative impact on this area. The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: • Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less • No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future • Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan • Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger • Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Scott Killen 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8127 of 466 Resident of Lost Creek CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8128 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Scott Killen Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:43 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 request You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Scott Killen Resident of Lost Creek 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8129 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lisa Becker Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:22 PM Villela, Beverly Traffic Analysis needed for Lost Creek You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • • • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? • • • • • • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? • • • • • Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the • Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. • • 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8130 of 466 • • • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? • Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only • 113 actual vehicle trips. • How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips • • in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the • • • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI • • sole ingress and egress • • • • • for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. • • Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. 2. 3. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) 4. to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with 5. a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis 6. as a formal component of the NTA. 7. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8131 of 466 Thank you for your consideration. Lisa Becker Lost Creek Resident CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8132 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Walker Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:09 PM Villela, Beverly Request for neighborhood traffic analysis You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. EMAIL TO: CC: ; SUBJECT: Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8133 of 466 I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: ________________________________________________________________________ The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: • Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less • No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future • Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan • Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger • Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Walker 1211 Quaker Ridge Drive Get Outlook for iOS CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8134 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Cynthia Wilberts Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:48 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Neighborhood Traffic Analysis — Case C14-2025-0089 -Rosedale? You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. 18 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8135 of 466 Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Cynthia Wilberts 2002 Point Bluff Drive Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8136 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kay Lee Fordham < Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:46 PM Villela, Beverly > Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request ; Ben Fordham You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. My children love walking and bike riding in our neighborhood to see their friends and I am very worried about the impact of this project on the traffic on Lost Creek Boulevard. The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • • • Height • • • • • • Unit • • cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8137 of 466 TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future • • • No • • • • • • Full • • • • • • Family-sized • • • • • • Stepped • massing • — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • • • • Dark • • • units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Kay Lee Fordham 2100 Point Bluff Drive Austin TX 78746 21 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8138 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Rosa Yupari Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:49 PM Villela, Beverly Jones, Austin Request for NTA — Case C14-2025-0089 compared to Rosedale C14-2025-0094 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, I am Rosa, a resident of Wilson Heights, home adjacent to City View in Lost Creek, writing to request that the City of Austin conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089 that is equivalent in scope to the NTA completed for Case C14-2025-0094 (the Rosedale Multifamily). We only want to be treated fairly. It seems like the Rosedale neighborhood was granted a professional NTA based on 1,975 trips. Is it unfair for us to ask for that same level of care, given our project exceeds 2,100 trips and is on a primary evacuation route? The Standard the City Applied at Rosedale On January 14, 2026, Austin Jones, P.E., Supervising Engineer at Austin Transportation and Public Works (ATPW), completed a five-page NTA memorandum for Case C14-2025-0094, which included the following elements: 1. ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily), producing 1,975 raw daily trips for 435 units (4.54 trips/unit/day). 2. Verified existing trip credit 3. Street capacity analysis: Each street was analyzed against LDC § 25-6-116 thresholds and 24-hour traffic counts. 4. 20% TDM trip reduction target: Supported by the site’s proximity to multiple Capital Metro bus stops, bicycle routes, sidewalks, and three ETOD Station Areas. 5. Trip distribution analysis: with net volumes calculated per roadway. What Lost Creek neighbors Case C14-2025-0089 received 1. The TIA Determination Worksheet for Case C14-2025-0089 concluded that no Traffic Impact Analysis and no Neighborhood Traffic Analysis were required. 2. It seems like there is a discrepancy between the Mid-rise design and the High-rise coding used on the worksheet. We should be using the same code and add the commercial status 3. How was the 3,000-trip credit calculated when current field counts show only 113 cars? The worksheet credited approximately 3,000 daily trips from the existing office buildings, which are 23 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8139 of 466 substantially vacant. The Rosedale NTA credited 489 trips since that office was actively occupied. 4. No actual traffic counts collected. 5. NTA box unchecked: The proposed driveway onto Lost Creek Boulevard. Per TIA Guidelines and the Transportation Criteria Manual, access to a residential street from a development of this magnitude requires a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis. Side-by-Side Comparison Factor Rosedale (C14-2025- 0094) Lost Creek (C14-2025- 0089) Proposed Units 435 475 ITE Code Used 221 — Midrise MF 222 — High-Rise MF Raw Trips/Day 1,975 (4.54/unit) 2,157 at actual rate 2,000-Trip Threshold Below but NTA conducted EXCEEDS for TA + TDM Existing Use Verified? Traffic Counts Collected Yes — active Sheriff’s Office No — buildings vacant 3 days, 24-hr tube counts None NTA Conducted? Yes — 5-page P.E. memo No TDM Reduction Required 20% at site plan None Transit Access Bus stops, bikes, ETOD Zero transit service Alternative Access 3 streets 1 route only Evacuation Route No Fatal Crash at Access No Yes — WUI Zone A/B Yes — April 6, 2025 Offsite Improvements çrossing, transit None required The Trip Generation Math Using the identical methodology, ATPW applied to Rosedale —475 units × 4.54 trips/unit/day = 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. This figure should trigger a mandatory TDM plan. We have no Capital Metro service, no bicycle routes on Lost Creek Boulevard. A 20% reduction in TDM would be unsupportable. Our Request 1. We respectfully request the following 2. Conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis for Case C14-2025-0089 equivalent in scope to the NTA completed for Case C14-2025-0094. 3. Determination Worksheet from 222 (High-Rise) to 221 (Midrise Multifamily), consistent with the code ATPW and Rosedale project. 24 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8140 of 466 4. Verify existing trip generation and Code 221 for Mid Rise, similar to Rosedale with a commercial addition 5. Require a TDM plan 6. Include a wildfire evacuation analysis as a component of the NTA. Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated WUI Zone. The additional 2,157+ daily trips on the only evacuation route for this community must be evaluated. We just want to make sure that if an emergency happens, we can all look back and say we did the math correctly. We support the development of this site and are requesting the same level of professional, data-driven analysis for our safety that the City provided to the Rosedale community for a comparable multifamily project. What is the best way for us to work with you to align this analysis with the City's standards? Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Respectfully, Rosa Yupari 1313 Wilson Heights Lost Creek Tel: +1 512.906.9015 www.linkedin.com/in/burnsrosa p.s. The NTA will help us determine the Conditional Overlays that will create a great relationship with the neighborhood and development. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 25 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8141 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Cindy Edwards Tuesday, March 10, 2026 7:00 PM Villela, Beverly Admin Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Subject: Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Cindy Edwards, my husband, Jerry and I are long time residents of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. We also have a new housing development under construction on Lost Creek Blvd and when you add 40+ homes you will have a significant increase in traffic with Lost Creek Blvd being the only access. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood...and let's not forget all the Barton Creek traffic that travels through our neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8142 of 466 • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for listening and for your time and consideration. Cindy & Jerry Edwards Torrey Pines Cove, Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8143 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: David Younger < Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:54 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) > You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is David. Younger and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood [6303 Southern Hills Place]. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8144 of 466 the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • • • • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, David Younger Lost Creek Resident Austin, TX 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8145 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Darcy Johnson Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:41 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Darcy Johnson, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek on Whitemarsh Valley Walk. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I kindly ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet does not match reality. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8146 of 466 Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Kind regards, Darcy Johnson Resident of Lost Creek 6654 Whitemarsh Valley Walk 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8147 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Julie Zuefeldt Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:47 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Julie Zuefeldt, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood [add Address if you wish]. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the city and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8148 of 466 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis before advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Julie Zuefeldt - Lost Creek Resident 6203 Augusta National Drive, Austin 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8149 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Bruce Barre Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:44 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Bruce Barre and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8150 of 466 I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Bruce Barre 1700 Lost Creek Blvd Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8151 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Jill Barre Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:36 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Jill Barre, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8152 of 466 Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jill Barre 1700 Lost Creek Blvd Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8153 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Cheryl Tulkoff Tuesday, March 10, 2026 5:01 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Cheryl Tulkoff, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood at 5903 Fox Chapel Dr. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8154 of 466 • • • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Cheryl Tulkoff 5903 Fox Chapel Dr. Austin, TX 78746 -- Thanks, Cheryl Tulkoff https://www.linkedin.com/in/ctulkoff/ CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8155 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 3:58 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis - Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Sta(cid:67), My name is Anne Grigg, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and sta(cid:67) to require a full Tra(cid:67)ic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current tra(cid:67)ic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reﬂect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing o(cid:67)ice buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline tra(cid:67)ic used in the worksheet signiﬁcantly overstates current tra(cid:67)ic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing tra(cid:67)ic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in tra(cid:67)ic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing tra(cid:67)ic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated tra(cid:67)ic study so that the City and the public can understand: The true baseline tra(cid:67)ic conditions at the largely vacant CityView o(cid:67)ice site The net new tra(cid:67)ic generated by the proposed residential development The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Tra(cid:67)ic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Tra(cid:67)ic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8156 of 466 Sincerely, Anne Grigg Lost Creek Resident Austin, Texas CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8157 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Samit Patel Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:05 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Samit Patel, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real- world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8158 of 466 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Samit Patel Resident on Whitemarsh Valley Walk Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8159 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Marsha Ratliff Friday, March 27, 2026 9:12 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Marsha Ratliff and am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood 1319 Thaddeus Cove. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8160 of 466 I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Marsha Ratliff 1319 Thaddeus Cove Austin TX 78746 Sent from my iPad CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8161 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Audrey Hime Friday, March 27, 2026 8:54 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, I have been a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood since 2002, and I am extremely concerned about the possibility of adding significant traffic to the Lost Creek corridor, which is already congested and over-used, especially during peak hours. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves approximately 8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8162 of 466 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Audrey Hime 1702 Mill Springs Dr. Austin, TX 78746 -- Audrey Hime PO Box 92525 Austin, TX 78709 cell: (512) 415-7790 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8163 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Shawn Reddy Wednesday, March 25, 2026 4:59 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Shawn Reddy, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • • 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8164 of 466 • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Shawn Reddy, MD Chair, Pain Management, BSW Marble Falls 2006 Plumbrook Dr. Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8165 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Sarah DeHay Wednesday, March 25, 2026 8:51 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Sarah DeHay, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8166 of 466 Sincerely, Sarah DeHay 6209 Cape Coral Drive Austin, Texas CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8167 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Katherine Watkins Tuesday, March 24, 2026 10:06 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Katherine Watkins and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Katherine Watkins 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8168 of 466 6307 Indian Canyon Dr Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8169 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Christine Travis Tuesday, March 24, 2026 9:33 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Christine Travis, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8170 of 466 Sincerely, Christine Travis 1103 Falcon Ledge Drive Austin, Texas 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8171 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Kat Schliemann Tuesday, March 24, 2026 3:35 PM Villela, Beverly You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Attn: Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff My name is Kathleen Schliemann, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood on Big Canyon Drive. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kathleen Schliemann Lost Creek Resident 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8172 of 466 Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8173 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Austin McAnally Tuesday, March 24, 2026 3:07 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Austin McAnally, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8174 of 466 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Austin McAnally Lost Creek Resident Austin McAnally CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8175 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Claire Hogan Tuesday, March 24, 2026 2:51 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Claire Hogan, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8176 of 466 Claire Hogan (1208 Wilson Heights Drive, Austin, Texas 78746) C L A I R E H O G A N C L A I R E M C C O R M A C K | P H O T O G R A P H Y c 830.456.6063 www.clairemccormack.com CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 18 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8177 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Diane Hern Monday, March 23, 2026 11:11 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Diane Hern, and I am a property owner in the Lost Creek neighborhood at 1303 Wilson Heights Drive. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8178 of 466 net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • • • • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Diane Hern Property Owner Lost Creek CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8179 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Doug Keenan Monday, March 23, 2026 3:36 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Full Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) 1120 TIA Worksheet with ITE Code 231 Recalc Feb 12 2026 DPK PDF w_pics.pdf External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly & the Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Doug Keenan, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand redevelopment is being considered, I respectfully request that the Commission and staff require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. Based on my review of the current documentation and real-world conditions, I believe a TIA is necessary for the following reasons: • Inaccurate Baseline Data: The existing traffic worksheet overstates current traffic because the CityView office complex is largely unoccupied. Site observations on February 12, 2026, showed only 113 cars in the parking lot. Using a standard turnover method, this represents only 434 daily trips, far below the ~3,000 trips used in current theoretical assumptions. • Substantial Traffic Increase: The proposed development of 475 residential units is estimated to generate 4,755 total trips per day. This results in a net increase of 4,321 daily trips. Such a significant volume exceeds the City’s >2,000 unadjusted daily trip threshold for a Transportation Assessment and approaches the >5,000 threshold for a full TIA. • Outdated Growth Projections: The current analysis appears to rely on 2019 TxDOT data. Applying a conservative 4% annual growth rate to the 2019 AADT of 5,162 suggests traffic volumes are already near 6,800 vehicles per day in 2026, even before accounting for the Loop 360 expansion. • Safety and Mobility Concerns: Lost Creek Boulevard is the primary ingress/egress for approximately 1,200 homes. A project of this scale, given the constrained roadway geometry, warrants a study to ensure necessary mitigation measures are identified. I have attached a redlined TIA Worksheet (dated February 12, 2026) which details these recalculations and includes photographic evidence of current site vacancy. Sincerely, Doug Keenan 2001 Port Royal Drive - Lost Creek Austin, TX 78746 21 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8180 of 466 This old worksheet is dead; a fresh one is required! X >2000 Trips/day → Transportation Assess X >5000 Trips/day → Neighborhood Traffic Analysis Estimated Daily Trips Using the standard turnover method 155 cars x 2.8 avg. turnover = 434 Daily Trips ITE std. rate for 321 (4.54 to 6.74 range) 475U x 6.74 Trips/U = 3202 Trips/day 4755 Trips/day ? ? 231 3202 222 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) 90 ft. 231 Mid-Rise Residential with Ground-Floor Commercial 70 ft. Expired in Nov ‘25 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8181 of 466Transportation Criteria Manual Section 10 Traffic Impact Analysis https://www.austintexas.gov/depart ment/transportation-development- services 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8182 of 466Existing City View Parking Lot 2/12/2026 2 pm 113 Cars 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8183 of 466 Villela, Beverly Subject: FW: Case C14-2025-0089 From: Jeryl Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2025 2:44 PM To: Boudreaux, Marcelle Subject: Case C14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution We have been residents of Lost Creek Community for 45 years. We did not VOTE for high rise buildings or low property listings. We want ACTION NOW. We do not want tall high density buildings. Please help those of us who have lived here the longest. Our children are not safe getting off buses, no walking sidewalks or public transportation. Please help us fight this battle. Thank you, CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8184 of 466 Villela, Beverly Subject: FW: Strongly against rezoning of 1120 &1122 Capital of Texas Hwy - NO DIRECT ACCESS to development from the south (Case Number: C14-2025-0089) From: Devlin DuVall Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2025 3:38 PM To: Morin, Danielle < < >; Rouda, Randall < >; Michael, David < ; < < >; Meeks, Stacy < >; DeSanctis, Ann < >; Ellis, Paige >; Middleton-Pratt, Lauren ; Curtis, Cathy >; Barron, Bradley >; McGuinness, Kayla >; Gonsoulin, Chase >; Saeedi, Nazlie >; Mayor Watson > Cc: Mike DuVall < Subject: Strongly against rezoning of 1120 &1122 Capital of Texas Hwy - NO DIRECT ACCESS to development from the south (Case Number: C14-2025-0089) > You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello, I am not sure exactly to whom I should be voicing my opinion and thoughts, but I am VERY, VERY concerned about the proposed rezoning of 1120 and 1122 S. Capitol of Tx. Hwy. (Case Number: C14-2025-0089). I live directly behind these two addresses. I am against this rezoning for a few reasons: - The proposal for 475 apartment unit is estimated to increase traffic by 2,000 trips per day in this area (per documents filed with the City of Austin). If you are coming from the south, there is NO DIRECT ACCESS to either property. DRIVES WILL HAVE TO MAKE A U-TURN to access the properties. THERE IS ONLY ONE U-TURN LANE. Please think about the additional congestion this will cause at that intersection. Lost Creek Boulevard is already mayhem at certain times of day. We have accidents at this intersection quite often and a few months ago had a fatal accident here. The entrance to Wilson Heights Drive (my street) already sees MANY, MANY ILLEGAL U-TURNS PER DAY, from people working in the office buildings looking for a shortcut or quicker access. This development will only make traffic difficulties even worse. One statement that is VERY concerning to me, is found in the Applicant Summary letter. It states: 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8185 of 466 The Property is currently zoned LO (Limited Office) and LR (Neighborhood Commercial) The requested zoning is LR-V-DB90 (Limited Office – Vertical Mixed Use Building – Density Bonus 90). The Property is not located in a Neighborhood Planning Area. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required per the attached TIA determination waiver dated 5/8/2025 by Nazlie Saeedi from Transportation Department Services. I do not understand how a traffic impact analysis can not be required when there is only ONE U- TURN lane to access this property if you coming from the south? - Westbank Drive is a main artery to West Lake High School. This light is already crazy enough at school times, and this proposed development would make it worse. - I am very concerned about the noise this development would cause for the neighborhood it abuts to. - I am very concerned about the proposed 475 units and 7-story building proposed for this site. That is way too much traffic, way too many people, way too much disturbance to not do any sort of impact study. - I am concerned about the proposal to include low-income housing. I would love to have more families have access to the school system here (Eans ISD is looking for ways to get more children in our school system), but there is NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO SUPPORT THESE FAMILIES. Before you approve a zoning change, I ask that you analyze the very real and negative impacts this development will have on this area. Sincerely, Devlin DuVall cell CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8186 of 466 Villela, Beverly Subject: FW: Opposition Letter to Zoning Application C14-2025-0089 From: Lorrie Bedell Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 10:01 PM To: Boudreaux, Marcelle < Cc: > < Subject: Opposition Letter to Zoning Application C14-2025-0089 ; District 8 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Lorraine and Kergin Bedell 1137 Lost Creek Blvd. Austin, TX 78746 September 17, 2025 Marcelle Boudreaux via email cc: Paige Ellis, City Council Woman Lost Creek Limited District Board of Directors Lost Creek Neighborhood Association President Dear Ms. Boudreaux, We are writing to oppose the application for zoning Case # C14-2025-0089 of Cityview 1120 and 1122 S. Cap. of Texas Hwy. Cityview's rezoning request, if approved, would cause a significant negative traffic impact on neighboring properties. The existing traffic at the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy is already congested and collision-prone, other residential developments (Milestone and Stratus) underway along Lost Creek Blvd are already going to add future traffic to the intersection, and the upcoming TxDOT 360 construction project will create additional traffic problems at the intersection. The Cityview proposal should not be considered without a comprehensive traffic study that considers all of the above factors. Any rezoning of 1120 and 1122 S. Cap. of Texas Hwy should allow for access only to S. Cap. of Texas Hwy, and have no access to Lost Creek Blvd. Lost Creek neighborhood is home to over 1200 single-family and condominium households. Despite this population, there are only three routes into and out of the neighborhood. Primary neighborhood access is through the intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy. The other two ways to access the neighborhood are via Barton Creek Blvd (4.5 miles and a 10 minute drive to the West) and a 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8187 of 466 route through small, winding residential streets through the Camelot neighborhood. The intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy is already problematic. Going out of the neighborhood during morning commuting time the traffic backs up for several turns of the light, and the westbound lanes spreading from one lane of traffic to three cause much confusion and last minute lane changes. Heavy traffic on S. Cap. of Texas Hwy both in the morning and late afternoon also prevents access to and coming out of the intersection. There have been numerous traffic collisions at the intersection, including multiple fatalities. The guard rail at the corner of 1120 S. Cap. of Texas Hwy has to be rebuilt frequently due to collisions. Currently, the cars accessing Cityview are there for commercial business. They are limited in number and flow in an opposite commuter direction from that of Lost Creek neighborhood. If Cityview were to change to residential use, that traffic would compound the congestion and problems already existing at the intersection. An additional complication at the intersection is the landscaped median along Lost Creek Blvd that prevents eastbound traffic left turns into Cityview, and cars frequently make illegal U-turns at Lost Creek Blvd and Wilson Heights Dr to double back into Cityview. The traffic at this problematic intersection is already looking at a sizable future increase from the Milestone and Stratus developments already in progress along Lost Creek Blvd. Milestone's Overlook at Westlake project is adding 49 homes on 36 acres. Stratus' Holden Hills development is much larger and is adding 74 single-family home lots and approximately 430 condominium units on 495 acres. Together, those two developments will add more than 550 residences of traffic to the already heavily-traveled Lost Creek Blvd. The prospect of adding another 475 Cityview residences of traffic to the bottlenecked intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy is undesirable and dangerous. The intersection also faces future congestion and hazard due to TxDOT's 360 project, which is running behind schedule but is planned to add an overpass at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy in the near future. For an example of traffic problems to expect when this project begins, one need only look at the current status of construction at Westlake Dr and N. Cap. of Texas Hwy. The construction has created more traffic backup, prevented access to cross streets, and forced traffic to travel more through residential streets. Cityview's properties will be directly in front of the TxDOT construction, and residents of Cityview's proposed plan will likely be exclusively funneled through Lost Creek Blvd during construction road closures. The current traffic backup and bottleneck from 7:00-9:30 am, the twice daily commuter congestion along S. Cap. of Texas Hwy, a history of collisions and fatalities, a 550 residence increase already in development, and the expected TxDOT construction project creates a confluence of problems already beleaguering the intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap of Texas Hwy. Cityview now requests to add an additional 475 residences right in the heart of this problem, and requests to do it without even a traffic impact analysis. Cityview should not be allowed to add 475 residences to the traffic at the intersection. Any rezoning considered should require that Cityview not have entrance or egress to Lost Creek Blvd and should include a comprehensive traffic study to ensure that Cityview's development would not negatively impact the flow of traffic through the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy. Sincerely, Lorraine and Kergin Bedell CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8188 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Deborah Castro Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:12 PM Boudreaux, Marcelle; Villela, Beverly Chris Vetromile; Marrs; Bob Sweeney; Jackson; Marvin Hecker; Rosa Yupari; Victoria Lavi; ann mccormick; Ruth Anne Abraham; Gaylon finklea Hecker; Lorrie Bedell; James Lear; Sharon Lear; Gary Sertich; Tanya Emmons; Heeru Thadani; Rezoning the office buildings at the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd. and Hwy. 360 Megan ; Rachel ; District 8; Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hi Beverly, I’m writing to express my strong concerns and opposition to any proposed zoning changes at the City View location. The traffic in this area is already overwhelming, and the recent developments—Strattus and Milestone—have only made matters worse. We’ve already seen an increase in accidents and dangerously heavy traffic, and these issues will only intensify once those developments are fully occupied. This is not sustainable for our community. Additionally, I’m deeply concerned about the proposed building heights, especially the possibility of 10-story structures. Such scale is out of character with the surrounding area and will further strain infrastructure, viewsheds, and our neighborhood’s overall quality of life. As an advocate with Dark Sky International, I also want to highlight a major environmental and community concern. Our neighborhood was the first in the City of Austin to earn the prestigious title of “International Dark Skies Development of Distinction,” one of only seven neighborhoods in the entire United States to receive this recognition. We’ve worked hard— residents, community leaders, and even local office buildings—to meet and uphold the five lighting principles established by the Illuminating Engineering Society 1. Lighting should serve a clear purpose. 2. Lighting should be time-limited—used only when needed, avoiding 24/7 illumination, which studies show does not improve safety. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8189 of 466 3. Use of appropriate fixtures that are fully shielded to reduce glare, light trespass, and scatter. 4. Preference for warmer color tones (yellow or gold hues) rather than harsh, bright white light. 5. Limiting light intensity to fixtures with outputs below or at 2700 Kelvins. Many developers market their lighting plans as “neighborhood friendly,” but in reality, they often fall short of these standards. In contrast, many of our residents use motion sensors or timers, which have proven to be both effective and compliant. One of the office buildings on Lost Creek Boulevard went so far as to completely remove a large spotlight on the top of their building at our request, helping us achieve and maintain our designation. Our efforts have been formally recognized by the City of Austin and Travis County, including annual proclamations during October’s Night Skies Month. This designation is a point of pride for our neighborhood and a model for others—including River Hills, which recently became the second neighborhood in Austin to receive the same honor. We ask that you respect the time, effort, and investment our community and Limited District have made in protecting our skies and quality of life. Please consider the lasting impact that these zoning changes and new developments could have—not just on traffic and infrastructure, but on the legacy and environment we’ve worked so hard to preserve. Thank you for your consideration, and I truly hope we can continue to work together as respectful and thoughtful neighbors. Best regards, Deborah Castro Lost Creek Dark Skies Travis County Friends of the Night Sky CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8190 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Kristen Dharamsi Monday, February 9, 2026 10:32 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kristen Dharamsi and I live at 6602 Torrey Pines Cove in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. My two children at Forest Trail Elementary have the maximum number of children allowed in their classrooms and the school is at max capacity. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Kristen Dharamsi 6602 Torrey Pines Cove 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8191 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Julia Keenan Monday, February 9, 2026 10:00 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Schools & Educational Impact Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, Julia Keenan here again, of 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 near the City View property. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed for another reason. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. As a former teacher in the Eanes District and Westlake High School, I am concerned about how this housing development will impact education. Valley View School, located across Loop 360 where the new students would logically attend, was shut down during the 2025-2026 school year (and was slated for sale) due to declining enrollment in the Eanes District. This housing project will focus on dwellings for families, which will dramatically increase enrollment in Eanes. Classroom size will undoubtedly be an issue that needs consideration when permitting an apartment development of this size. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you again, Julia Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8192 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Kendall Guinn Monday, February 9, 2026 9:58 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Safety Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kendall Guinn, and I live at 1509 Wilson Heights Drive in Austin, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This proposed development would add 475 apartments along Lost Creek Boulevard, a roadway that already feels over capacity. Daily traffic funnels through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360, where drivers regularly experience long backups and dangerous turning conditions. There was a fatal accident at this intersection within the past year, which underscores how serious the safety issues already are. Despite this, the application indicates that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required, even though the project is expected to increase traffic in the area by an estimated 30 to 40 percent. That level of added volume without a formal traffic study is deeply concerning. The application also fails to account for other major nearby developments, including the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus project (more than 600 homes and apartments), and the upcoming improvements by the Texas Department of Transportation to Loop 360. All of these projects will add traffic to the same limited road network. Our neighborhood has very few points of entry and exit, which is not only a congestion issue but also a serious concern for emergency response and potential wildfire evacuation. On a daily basis, simply waiting in line to get to Forest Trail Elementary adds roughly 30 extra minutes to my commute just to cross Loop 360. Traffic is already stretched beyond what the roads can reasonably handle. In addition, one of my children has sensory processing disorder, and prolonged nearby construction noise would be especially disruptive and distressing for them in our own home. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Commission to postpone this hearing until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed and reviewed. Our community deserves a thorough evaluation of the safety and infrastructure impacts before this case moves forward. 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8193 of 466 Thank you for your time and consideration, Kendall Guinn 1509 Wilson Heights Drive Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8194 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Maki Miller Monday, February 9, 2026 9:44 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Maria A Miller and I live at 1900 Big Canyon Dr in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. As a parent in Eanes ISD, I am already seeing the effects of overcrowding. The district has closed one elementary school, and Forest Trail Elementary is currently over capacity with full classrooms. Moving forward with this project without a complete Educational Impact Statement risks further straining an already impacted school system. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Maria A Miller 1900 Big Canyon Dr Austin TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8195 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Felipe Ribeiro Monday, February 9, 2026 9:35 AM Villela, Beverly Request to Postpone Hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 Due to Serious Safety Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Felipe Ribeiro, and I live at 1806 Big Canyon Dr, directly adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am formally requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This proposal would add 475 apartment units onto Lost Creek Boulevard, a road that already carries an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 vehicle trips per day and feeds into Loop 360 through a single, already overburdened left-turn lane. There was a fatal accident at this intersection within the past year. Despite this, the application claims that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required for a project that would clearly increase traffic by an estimated 30 to 40 percent. That assertion is irresponsible and unacceptable. Even more concerning, the application completely ignores other major developments already approved or underway in the same corridor, including the Marshall development with 48 homes, the Stratus development with more than 600 homes and apartments, and the ongoing TxDOT Loop 360 project. These projects compound each other. Treating this rezoning as if it exists in isolation is misleading and fails to reflect real-world conditions. Lost Creek has limited points of entry and exit. This is not just an inconvenience; it is a public safety issue. In the event of a wildfire or other emergency, evacuation capacity is already strained. Adding hundreds of new units without a comprehensive traffic and safety analysis puts current residents at real risk. As someone who lives here, I regularly experience very long delays trying to exit LC and have serious concerns about emergency vehicle access during peak traffic hours. These are not hypothetical issues. They are daily realities. At a minimum, this hearing should not proceed until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed and shared with the community. Anything less is a failure to meet basic standards of safety and due diligence. I strongly urge the Commission to postpone the February 17 hearing and require proper analysis before 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8196 of 466 moving forward. Sincerely, Felipe Ribeiro 1806 Big Canyon Dr CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8197 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Peter Emerson Monday, February 9, 2026 9:25 AM Villela, Beverly Request Postponement for Case C14-2025-0089 – Major Traffic Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Peter Emerson, and I reside at 2003 Trevino Drive, immediately adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed. The proposed project would introduce 475 additional apartments onto Lost Creek Boulevard, a corridor that already carries an estimated 8,000–10,000 vehicle trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. Tragically, a fatal accident occurred at this intersection within the past year. Despite this, the application indicates that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required—even though the project is expected to increase traffic volumes by roughly 30–40%. That conclusion raises serious safety concerns. In addition, the application does not account for other major developments already underway or planned in the area, including the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project. Our neighborhood has very limited points of access, which is not only a daily congestion issue but also a significant concern in the event of a wildfire or other emergency evacuation. With the traffic between Lost Creek Boulevard and Westlake Drive already being one of the most congested areas of the 360 loop, I find it irresponsible to proceed without further study. Our family already feels that the intersection of 360 and Lost Creek Boulevard is the most perilous part of our journey to and from our home. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that the Commission postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis can be completed and reviewed. Our community deserves the opportunity to evaluate this proposal with a clear understanding of its safety and traffic implications. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Peter Emerson 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8198 of 466 2003 Trevino Drive CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8199 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Rosa Yupari Monday, February 9, 2026 8:38 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Rosa Yupari and I live at 1313 Wilson Heights in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges, lack of teachers, and space in the classrooms. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. There has already been a school closure and the existing elementary school and highschool create incredible traffic at the corner of wilson heights and lost creek blvd. My daughte gets picked up righ there at the Blvd and there are too many cars doingillegal uturns so I am not sure if that was taken into consideration. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Rosa Yupari 1313 Wilson Heights CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8200 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Doug Keenan Monday, February 9, 2026 7:39 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Watershed & Environmental Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, Douglas Keenan here again, from 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746, adjacent to the property in Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed for a different reason. This site drains into the Eanes Creek Watershed and is adjacent to Barton Creek Watershed – waterways Austin has spent decades protecting. It is in the Hill Country Roadway Scenic Corridor, a wildlife protection area, and a dark skies community. Yet the application barely addresses any of this. A 90-foot, 475-unit building will massively increase impervious cover, stormwater runoff, and pollutant loading into protected waterways. I have seen what wildfires can do, as I have driven through Bastrop County many times in our travels here in Central Texas. The Bastrop County Complex fire was a conflagration that engulfed parts of Bastrop County, Texas, in September and October 2011. The wildfire was the costliest and most destructive wildfire in Texas history and among the costliest in U.S. history, destroying 1,696 structures and causing an estimated $350 million in insured property damage. An exceptional drought, accompanied by record-high temperatures, affected Texas for much of 2011. We are now in record drought conditions again right next to the Barton Creek Wilderness. We have to be careful for our safety, let alone the preservation of a Central Texas treasure of wildlife and natural beauty that is unique. Please postpone until an environmental review addressing watershed impact, the Hill Country Corridor, and wildlife habitat is completed. Thank you again, Douglas Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8201 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Lisa Almgren Sunday, February 8, 2026 6:49 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 - Request for Traffic Impact Studies Prior to Rezoning Approval Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, I am writing to request that this rezoning request not be approved until thorough traffic impact studies are completed and reviewed. Lost Creek Boulevard already has a single signalized exit onto Capital of Texas Highway (Loop 360), and that intersection is heavily taxed by existing daily Lost Creek resident traffic. Congestion is routine, and there have been numerous accidents at this intersection, many caused by high-speed traffic on Loop 360. Adding a residential apartment complex with over 450 apartments will significantly increase daily vehicle traffic and further strain this intersection. Because of the congestion, many drivers routinely ignore the clearly posted “NO U-TURN” sign at Lost Creek Boulevard and Wilson Heights Drive. These illegal U-turns are used to avoid long southbound traffic lines on Capital of Texas Highway and create daily traffic hazards. With apartment residents attempting to access the complex just past the Lost Creek traffic light, these unsafe driving behaviors will only increase. When drivers do not make illegal U-turns, many instead turn left from Lost Creek Boulevard onto Wilson Heights Drive and then use private driveways to turn around. I experience this firsthand at my home at 1203 Wilson Heights Drive daily. I work from home and have personally observed and counted approximately 10–15 vehicles per day using my driveway as a turnaround point before driving back to Lost Creek Boulevard, only to turn right and enter the existing office complex or continue traveling south on Capital of Texas Highway. This behavior is not only disruptive but also raises serious safety and liability concerns for homeowners. This type of shortcutting behavior will only increase with apartment residents attempting to access their homes more quickly by avoiding the congested traffic light at Lost Creek Boulevard and Capital of Texas Highway. Wilson Heights is a residential street with many families and young, school-aged children, and drivers who disregard posted traffic signs and rules cannot be relied upon to operate safely on neighborhood streets. Approving this rezoning without comprehensive traffic impact studies places existing residents at risk and ignores real, observable problems that already occur daily. Our neighborhood has limited access 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8202 of 466 points, and increased congestion also raises concerns about emergency vehicle access and evacuation safety. I respectfully request that the Commission require full traffic impact studies before considering approval of this rezoning request. Our community deserves a careful, data-driven evaluation of safety, infrastructure, and quality-of-life impacts before such a significant change is made. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Lisa Almgren 1203 Wilson Heights Drive CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8203 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kerri Green Sunday, February 8, 2026 4:14 PM Villela, Beverly Kerri Baldwin Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic, Pedestrian & Safety Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kerri Baldwin, and I live at 1343 Lost Creek Blvd, directly on Lost Creek Boulevard and immediately adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed until a comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and cumulative safety review are completed. This project would add approximately 475 apartment units to Lost Creek Boulevard, a residential roadway that already carries an estimated 8,000–10,000 vehicle trips per day and relies on a single left- turn lane at Loop 360 for neighborhood access. Lost Creek Boulevard is routinely used as a cut-through route between major arterials, resulting in traffic volumes and speeds far beyond what this roadway was designed to safely accommodate. I live on Lost Creek Boulevard and regularly observe vehicles traveling well above the posted 30 mph speed limit, frequently exceeding over 50 mph. These speeds are especially dangerous given that this is a residential corridor with homes fronting the street, school bus stops, cyclists, and pedestrians. Pedestrian infrastructure along Lost Creek Boulevard is extremely limited. There are only two marked crosswalks along the boulevard, and sidewalks are incomplete or nonexistent in many areas, forcing residents, children, and walkers to travel in the street or along narrow shoulders. Under current conditions, pedestrians already face significant safety risks, which would be substantially worsened by increased traffic volumes and congestion resulting from this development. Tragically, these safety concerns are not hypothetical. The intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360 experienced a fatal crash in April 2025, resulting in the loss of life and serious injuries. Many residents also remember a previous fatal crash prior to 2025 involving a Tesla and a man who lost his life along this same corridor. These incidents underscore the real consequences of excessive speed, congestion, and constrained roadway design in a residential setting. Despite this documented crash history, pedestrian vulnerability, and existing congestion, the rezoning application states that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required, even though the proposed development 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8204 of 466 would likely increase traffic volumes by 30–40 percent. The application also fails to account for cumulative impacts from other major projects already approved or underway in the same area, including: • The Marshall development (approximately 48 homes), • The Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and • The ongoing TxDOT Loop 360 improvement project. Lost Creek is a relatively small residential community with a limited number of homes located directly along Lost Creek Boulevard, yet it absorbs a disproportionate amount of non-local cut-through traffic. Many of the vehicles using the boulevard are not accessing neighborhood destinations, but are attempting to bypass congestion on Loop 360 and surrounding arterials, placing residents and pedestrians at increased risk. In addition to daily traffic and pedestrian safety issues, there are serious emergency access and wildfire evacuation concerns. Lost Creek has limited ingress and egress, and traffic routinely backs up through multiple signal cycles at Loop 360. During peak congestion or an emergency event, delays for fire trucks, ambulances, or evacuating residents could have life-threatening consequences. On multiple occasions, I have personally waited through several signal cycles just to exit the neighborhood, and I am deeply concerned about how emergency responders or evacuating residents would safely navigate Lost Creek Boulevard under heavier traffic conditions — particularly given current speeds, limited sidewalks, and minimal crossing infrastructure. I am not opposed to responsible growth, but growth must be data-driven and prioritize public safety, especially in a neighborhood with documented fatalities, limited pedestrian infrastructure, and constrained access. At a minimum, a full Traffic Impact Analysis and cumulative safety review should be completed and publicly reviewed before this case proceeds. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed until this essential analysis is conducted. Our community deserves a transparent and thorough evaluation of traffic, pedestrian safety, and emergency access impacts before any rezoning decision is made. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kerri Baldwin 1343 Lost Creek Blvd CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8205 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Deborah Castro Sunday, February 8, 2026 3:24 PM Villela, Beverly SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Dark Skies & Compatibility Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Deborah Castro and I live at 5800 Sedgefield in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. Our neighborhood is a designated Dark Skies Development of Distinction (formerly known as International Dark Skies Development of Distinction) achieved in 2015. We are one of only two neighborhoods in Austin, one of three in the state of Texas and one of six in the United States who have successfully achieved this designation. This project involved not only the Lost Creek neighborhood but the surrounding office buildings. Many chose to discontinue bright outdoor lighting to help with our Dark Skies designation. The City View application includes no detailed outdoor lighting plan and no acknowledgment or mention of our Lost Creek Dark Skies Development of Distinction. This property is currently low-rise office space that blends into the Hill Country landscape. A 90-foot tower is fundamentally incompatible with the character of this area and would cast light pollution below, above and beyond the perimeter. The starry night sky is one of Lost Creek’s most precious assets and the City of Austin and Travis County honored our Dark Skies designation in 2021, 2022 and 2023 with the October Night Skies proclamations. Please postpone until the impact on our Dark Skies Development of Distinction and neighborhood compatibility has been studied and discussed with our neighborhood association and the residents. Thank you, Deborah Castro 5800 Sedgefield Dr. Austin, TX 78746 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8206 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: ReAnn Boss Sunday, February 8, 2026 3:10 PM Villela, Beverly Comments for Consideration Case Number C14-2025-0089 Public Hearing Information Sheet.pdf; Opposition to Rezoning.pdf Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Case Number C14-2025-0089 Contact: Beverly Villela Public Hearing: February 17, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission Please see the attached comments for consideration by the Commission. Respectfully, ReAnn Boss ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case Number: C14-2025-0089 Contact: Beverly Villela, 512-978-0740 Public Hearing: February 17, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission Subject: Opposition to Proposed Redistricting and Development Access Dear Members of the Zoning Commission, I am writing to formally oppose the proposed redistricting and development plan as currently presented, due to significant safety, environmental, and property value concerns that directly impact my family and our home. Our residence is the first house in the neighborhood and sits at a particularly vulnerable location. We already experience frequent illegal U-turns, vehicles pulling into our driveway to turn around, and unsafe traffic behavior. Alarmingly, we have already had one vehicle leave the roadway and crash into our fence. These are not hypothetical risks—they are existing, documented safety issues that will only be intensified by additional development. 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8207 of 466 From a safety and community welfare standpoint, I strongly urge the Commission to consider the following: 1. Traffic Study Required A comprehensive traffic impact study must be conducted before any approval. The proposed development could introduce an estimated additional 1,000 vehicles with access to Lost Creek Boulevard. This increase would place our home—and more importantly, our young children—at heightened and unacceptable risk. 2. No Access to Lost Creek Boulevard The development should not be permitted access to Lost Creek Boulevard. All access should be limited to Highway 360 to prevent increased traffic, dangerous turning movements, and cut- through driving directly in front of our property. 3. Reduction in Number of Residences The density of the proposed development should be significantly reduced to lessen traffic volume, noise, and overall impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. Environmental Impact Study An environmental study is necessary to identify what substances, dust, chemicals, or pollutants may be released during construction. We have toddlers who spend time outdoors, and the potential health impacts during prolonged construction must be fully disclosed and mitigated. 5. Physical Safety Barrier If the development proceeds in any form, a minimum 10-foot concrete block wall should be required to separate our property from the development to provide a critical safety buffer, noise reduction, and privacy. 6. Loss of Property Value and Compensation The construction and resulting traffic will negatively impact our property value. The Commission should address what compensation or remediation will be provided to homeowners whose property values are diminished as a direct result of this development. We respectfully ask the Commission to prioritize the safety of existing residents—especially families with young children—over development convenience. As currently proposed, this redistricting creates serious and foreseeable risks that should not be ignored. Thank you for your time, consideration, and commitment to public safety and responsible planning. Sincerely, ReAnn Boss CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8208 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Julia Keenan Sunday, February 8, 2026 7:55 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Dark Skies & Compatibility Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, My name is Julia Keenan, and I live at 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. The Dark Skies movement throughout Central Texas is important to us. Ever since we moved to Texas and Lost Creek in 1987, we have enjoyed not having street lights. This makes the skies themselves light up with the natural beauty of the moon and the stars when we go outside at night. It is a beauty that we and our neighbors cherish. We are also careful with our home’s lighting for safety using Dark Skies compliant fixturing. Our neighborhood is a dark skies community – one of the few left near Austin. A 90-foot building with 475 apartments would introduce massive light pollution from hundreds of windows, parking areas, and exterior lighting. The application includes no lighting plan and no acknowledgment that this is a dark skies area. This property is currently low-rise office space that blends into the Hill Country landscape. A 90-foot tower is fundamentally incompatible with the character of this area. Please postpone until the impact on our dark skies community and neighborhood compatibility has been studied. Thank you, Julia Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 22 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8209 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Doug Keenan Sunday, February 8, 2026 7:42 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, My name is Douglas Keenan, and I live at 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. Even today we are experiencing heavy traffic at this intersection at a variety of times throughout the day, particularly early in the morning when I travel to get in my recreation at the gym or the City’s golf course facilities. It often takes multiple traffic light changes for me to get on the road instead of being stuck at the intersection of Loop 360 and Lost Creek Boulevard. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Douglas Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 23 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8210 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Jill Monday, February 9, 2026 2:34 PM Villela, Beverly please delay the process of case #: C-14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution board or commission's name: Zoning and platting commission. date of public hearing: Feb 17, 2026 at 6pm. case number: C14-2025-0089 contact person: Beverly Villela, 512-9780740 Dear Beverly: I live within the zoning project of "1120 1/2 south capital of Tx Hwy SB, 1120 outh capital of Tx Hwy Sb, 1122 South Capital of Tx Hwy SB, 1220 South Capital of Tx Hwy SB". I'd like to ask for a postpone the public hearing for the case of C14-2025-0089 for several reasons. 1. Environmental damage- Wilson Height Dr. and Thaddeus Cv are in the immediate contact with the Hill of life and the barton creek wilderness park. With all the construction, what will it be the cost for the environment and wild life? 2. traffic study? 3. school capacity? Are EANES ISD ready for such a big number of potential students? 4. Safety of the neighborhood? As a neighborhood, we are not ready for such construction. Please don't destroy such a beautiful neighborhood. Thank you! Sincerely, Jill CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8211 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Elton Monday, February 9, 2026 2:25 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Richard Elton and I live at 6309 Indian Canyon Drive in Lost Creek, near the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through the only entrance to the Lost Creek neighborhood from Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. As a long term Lost Creek resident (>30 years) I that position neither reasonable or acceptable. The application also ignores several other major development projects on-going or planned in the area. These include the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area and on-going time-frame. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. I have personally witnessed numerous crashes and near crashes at the Loop 360 entrance to Lost Creek as well as along Loop 360 just south of Lost Creek Blvd where commercial traffic merges from the existing building drives. This will only get worse with increased commercial and now, residential density. Please postpone this hearing until a thorough Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Richard Elton 6309 Indian Canyon Dr Austin, TX. 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8212 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: John Newton Monday, February 9, 2026 1:33 PM Villela, Beverly I respectfully ask that the hearing be postponed You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is John Newton, and I live at 1209 Wilson Heights, adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add approximately 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already carries an estimated 8,000–10,000 vehicle trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection within the past year. Despite this, the application indicates that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required for a project that could increase traffic volume by an estimated 30–40%. That raises serious safety concerns. The application also does not account for other significant nearby developments, including the Marshall project (48 homes), the Stratus project (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 improvements currently underway. Our neighborhood has limited points of entry and exit, which adds additional concern regarding emergency and wildfire evacuation capacity. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that the hearing be postponed until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed and reviewed. Our community deserves that basic level of safety evaluation before moving forward. Thank you for your consideration. John Newton 1209 Wilson Heights CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8213 of 466 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8214 of 466Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Anne Declerck Friday, February 13, 2026 9:51 AM Villela, Beverly Anne Declerck; Steven Declerck SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Anne Declerck a I live at 6620 Whitemarsh Valley Walk, Austin TX 78746, in The Lost Creek Neighborhood impacted by the proposed development. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed until May 19th This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. My two children attend Forest Trail Elementary and a daughter attends Westridge Middle School both apart of EISD. Recently due to budget deficits EISD had to close an elementary school Valley View which replaced those kids into existing elementary schools in EISD namely in Forest Trail Elementary and the class sizes have gotten much larger. They also started school an hour earlier earlier to handle the busing 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8215 of 466 which has a negative impact on kiddos sleep and makes it impossible to get out of the neighborhood between 7-9am in one of the only exits out of the Lost Creek Development which is adjacent to proposed zoning change and is also adjacent to a 48 house build of homes in Lost Creek. A reckless change in zoning without proper education impact assessment and communication with EISD officials endangers the kids currently in school and the financial security not the district. Also have any safety impact been considered about building this close to an elementary school? The build is directly opposite the elementary school. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD Anne Declerck 6620 Whitemarsh Valley Walk Austin, Texas Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8216 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Anne Declerck Friday, February 13, 2026 9:39 AM Villela, Beverly Anne Declerck; Steven Declerck SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Watershed & Environmental Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Anne Declerck and I live at 6620 Whitemarsh Valley Walk, Austin TX 78746, nearby and within the same development to the property in Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed until May 19th. This site drains into the Eanes Creek Watershed and is adjacent to Barton Creek Watershed – waterways Austin has spent decades protecting. It is in the Hill Country Roadway Scenic Corridor, a wildlife habitat protected area, and a dark skies community. And, even though the developer states clearly that this is a “wildlife and scenic roadway,” they are providing none of the compliance requirements, notices, or steps for addressing these restrictions on the property. A 90-foot, 475-unit building will massively increase impervious cover, stormwater runoff, and pollutants loading into protected waterways. We already have a 48 house development going in across form this site the Milestone Development and it’s caused so many issues already with traffic and wildlife have disappeared. I know mitigating run off issues was a huge part of getting this development Ike’s and changing the zoning before realistically assess the watershed runoff impact to the watershed seems irresponsible. Further would the site even be able to comply with all necessary COA Permitting requirements for run off and retaining wall etc. environmental impact assessments must be done first. 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8217 of 466 Please postpone until an environmental review addressing watershed impact, the Hill Country Corridor, and wildlife habitat is completed. Thank you Anne Declerck 6620 Whitemarsh Valley Walk Austin, Texas Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "c ". 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8218 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Tim Green Friday, February 13, 2026 6:19 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement request — Case C14-2025–0089 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution My name is Tim Green and I live at 1306 Thaddeus Cove, Austin, 78746, in the neighborhood next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025- 0089. I am requesting that the Feb. 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000-10,000 car trips per day at Loop 360. Several fatalities have occurred at the Loop 360-Lost Creek Boulevard intersection over the years, including one this past year. The application says no traffic impact analysis is needed — for a project that would increase traffic 30 percent to 40 percent. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall Tract development (48 homes), the Stratus Development (more than 600 homes), and the TxDot Loop 360 project — all happening at the same time. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is a serious wildfire evacuation concern. The traffic backup at Lost Creek going onto 360 is bad enough as it is, let alone the addition of a major mixed-use development at the intersection. Please postpone the hearing until a traffic analysis is completed. This basic safety concern should be addressed. My name is Tim Green and I live at 1306 Thaddeus Cove, Austin, 78746, in the neighborhood next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025- 0089. I am requesting that the Feb. 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000-10,000 car trips per day at Loop 360. Several fatalities have occurred at the Loop 360-Lost Creek Boulevard intersection over the years, including one this past year. The application says no traffic impact analysis is needed — for a project that would increase traffic 30 percent to 40 percent. That is not acceptable. 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8219 of 466 The application also ignores the Marshall Tract development (48 homes), the Stratus Development (more than 600 homes), and the TxDot Loop 360 project — all happening at the same time. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is a serious wildfire evacuation concern. The traffic backup at Lost Creek going onto 360 is bad enough as it is, let alone the addition of a major mixed-use development at the intersection. Please postpone the hearing until a traffic analysis is completed. This basic safety concern should be addressed. Thank you. Tim Green CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8220 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Melissa Howitt Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:30 PM Villela, Beverly SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Please see the following letter from my daughter, Allison Howitt. Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Allison Howitt. I live at 5506 Bay Hill Cove, Austin, TX 78746, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17, 2026 hearing be postponed until May 19, 2026 to obtain accurate traffic information. The numbers in the application do not seem to be correct. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360/Capital of Texas Highway. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. Every Monday-Friday, 7:30 am - 9:00 am and 3:30 pm - 6:30 pm, the traffic light at Lost Creek and Loop 360/Capital of Texas Highway is already quite overly congested with day-to-day commuter traffic. Add in construction of the 48 new homes being built, and/or an event (lockdown, performances, football games, etc.) at Forest Trail Elementary School and/or Westlake High School, and it becomes unreasonably and dangerously slow getting out of Lost Creek. This is already the case. I lived in Steiner Ranch during the September 2011 wildfire. I know how my family and many others were affected by the slow traffic flow out of this subdivision. Even slower traffic flow than we have now exiting Lost Creek would make conditions less safe for residents and others passing through our neighborhood. This must be considered. In addition, as a recent Westlake High School graduate who drove to and from school and was involved in many extracurricular activities, I can attest to the significant effect that increased traffic during “rush hour” has on a Lost Creek resident's daily life. We need data on how this project might contribute to the traffic patterns and safety in our neighborhood. 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8221 of 466 Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Allison Howitt Lost Creek Resident CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8222 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Matthew Howitt Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:26 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Matt Howitt and I live at 5506 Bay Hill Cove, Austin, TX 78746, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17, 2026 hearing be postponed until May 19, 2026 to obtain accurate traffic information. The numbers in the application do not seem to be correct. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360/Capital of Texas Highway. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. Every Monday-Friday, 7:30 am - 9:00 am and 3:30 pm - 6:30 pm, the traffic light at Lost Creek and Loop 360/Capital of Texas Highway is already quite overly congested with day-to-day commuter traffic. Add in construction of the 48 new homes being built, and/or an event (lockdown, performances, football games, etc.) at Forest Trail Elementary School and/or Westlake High School, and it becomes unreasonably and dangerously slow getting out of Lost Creek. This is already the case. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Matt Howitt Lost Creek Resident CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8223 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Melissa Howitt Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:05 PM Villela, Beverly SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, I live at 5506 Bay Hill Cove, Austin, TX 78746, in the Lost Creek subdivision, next to the property proposed for rezoning under this case. I am requesting that the February 17, 2026 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed until May 19, 2026. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement (required for any project with 200+ multifamily units). The property is in Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not an optional one. My husband and I chose to move to this area in large part so that our two children could go to school in this exceptional district. As a former teacher, current substitute teacher, and active parent volunteer in this school district, I have firsthand knowledge of the high quality of the schools here, and of the ingredients that make them excellent. I also know the potential impact to class sizes and current infrastructure that a substantial population increase could have. Again, the district is already dealing with budget challenges and class size and school building challenges. The potential impact this project would have on our schools needs to be explored and made known. Please postpone the hearing until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Melissa Howitt Lost Creek Resident CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8224 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Thomas Lavigne Thursday, February 12, 2026 9:30 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, I am Thomas Lavigne a resident of 1803 plumbrook dr. I am writing to express my strong opposition to proceeding with the hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 on February 17. I request a postponement until May 19 to ensure the Commission has access to an accurate and comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis. The proposal to add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard is being pushed forward without a formal traffic study, despite a projected 30–40% increase in vehicle volume. Currently, 8,000–10,000 cars daily are funneled through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360—a location that saw a tragic fatality just this past year. It is also concerning that the application ignores the "compounding effect" of three other major projects in this immediate area: the Marshall and Stratus developments and the TxDOT Loop 360 project. With our neighborhood's limited access points, this level of congestion creates a dangerous bottleneck that would severely hinder emergency services or a wildfire evacuation. Our local infrastructure is already failing to meet current demand during peak commute hours and school events at Westlake High and Forest Trail Elementary. Proceeding without a rigorous safety and traffic review is a risk our community cannot afford. Please postpone this case until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Sincerely, Thomas CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8225 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Caldwell Thursday, February 12, 2026 9:17 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Caldwell Moore and I live at 2006 Trevino Dr. in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed until May 19th This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. I have a 15 month old son and just moved into the neighborhood 1.5 years ago specifically for the school district. It is of utmost importance to me that the Eanes ISD school district maintain its high reputation and educational standards. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Caldwell Moore 2006 Trevino Dr. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8226 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: katie maratta Thursday, February 12, 2026 4:30 PM Villela, Beverly lost creek development [You don't o(cid:74)en get email from h(cid:76)ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden(cid:75)ﬁca(cid:75)on ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Cau(cid:75)on i live in the lost creek, and was just informed of a major development that is gearing up for the entrance to our neighborhood. please take the (cid:75)me to hold open mee(cid:75)ngs and actually include us in the planning and decision-making. this neighborhood had horses in the ﬁeld as you entered the development and that’s why we bought our house here. the horses are long gone, but we would like to keep that vibe. ka(cid:75)e mara(cid:76)a Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use cau(cid:75)on when clicking links or opening a(cid:76)achments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" bu(cid:76)on in Outlook. For any addi(cid:75)onal ques(cid:75)ons or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8227 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Sam Gwynne Thursday, February 12, 2026 4:11 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, Hello: I am writing to express concern about the traffic problems that will be caused by development of the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I would like to request that the February 17 hearing be postponed until May 19th so that we can better assess the traffic situation. The numbers provided in the application do not seem to be correct. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), and the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), all happening in the same area. We only have 3 ways in and out of the neighborhood for the current 1200+ homes. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. I would also propose that a balloon be floated to the height that represents the top of the proposed building, as I understand is common practice for such projects, so the community can see for ourselves, from various perspectives, the visual impact it will have. Our community deserves those basic reviews. Thank you, Samuel Gwynne Lost Creek Resident 2108 Point Buff Drive Austin 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8228 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Lauren Burris Thursday, February 12, 2026 4:04 PM Villela, Beverly Postpone Meeting for Case c14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Beverly, I am a Lost Creek resident and respectfully request that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025- 0089 be postponed. The community has not had sufficient time to review the proposal, particularly regarding traffic, school impact, environmental concerns, and application completeness. Please allow adequate time for proper review before proceeding. Thank you, Lauren Burris CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8229 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Patti Brennan Thursday, February 12, 2026 3:57 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request for Case C14 - 2025-0089 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Patti Brennan and I live at 5909 Cape Coral Dr in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. We raised 3 kids through Eanes ISD and valued the quality of the education and the attention the students receive because the classrooms are not overly crowded. This development has the potential to add an extremely large number of students to Forest Trail Elementary, the school they are most likely to attend. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Patti Brennan CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8230 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Javier Corona Thursday, February 12, 2026 3:32 PM Villela, Beverly re - please postpone hearing You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution I attended a recent meeting with concerned Lost Creek residents to discuss pressing traffic and safety issues affecting our neighborhood. With several major developments underway or proposed—including the 48-home Marshall Tract project, the nearly 500-unit CityView proposal with commercial space at our neighborhood’s entrance, the Stratus development adding over 600 new residents beyond the country club, and TxDOT’s Loop 360 expansion at Lost Creek Boulevard—our community faces significant cumulative impacts. Of particular urgency is the rezoning request for Case C14-2025-0089, which seeks a Density Bonus 90 to permit construction of 475 apartments up to 90 feet tall along the Barton Creek and Eanes Creek watersheds. Because we only received notice of this hearing on February 6 and it is scheduled for February 17, we respectfully request that the hearing be postponed until a comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis and safety review can be completed. This delay would enable residents and local agencies to properly assess the implications for traffic flow, pedestrian and emergency access, and watershed protection. Regards, Javier Corona CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8231 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: andrew may Thursday, February 12, 2026 3:25 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 - Proposed Rezoning You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Andrew May 1111 Falcon Ledge Dr. Austin, TX 78746 Re: Case C14-2025-0089 Good afternoon Beverly, I am writing as a resident of Lost Creek to respectfully request that the Commission postpone or deny the upcoming rezoning proposal that would allow the construction of a 475-unit apartment complex within our community. This project represents a dramatic and unprecedented shift from the established land-use patterns that have defined our area for decades. I urge the Commission to consider the following concerns, which reflect the views of many residents who value responsible, sustainable growth. 1. Severe Traffic and Infrastructure Impact Our roadways are already operating near capacity during peak hours. Adding hundreds of new units — potentially introducing 700–900 additional vehicles — would create significant congestion, increase commute times, and strain intersections not designed for high-density housing. The current infrastructure simply cannot support this level of intensification without major upgrades that have not been planned or budgeted. 2. Environmental and Dark-Sky Impacts Our community is one of the few designated dark-sky areas in Texas, a distinction that residents deeply value. A development of this scale would introduce substantial light pollution, permanently altering the character of the area. Additionally, the environmental impact — including increased runoff, loss of green space, and disruption to local wildlife — has not been adequately addressed. 3. School Capacity and Resource Strain Our school district is one of the strongest in the state, in large part because growth has been carefully managed. A sudden influx of hundreds of new households would place significant pressure on school capacity, staffing, transportation, and resources. Without a comprehensive impact study and a clear plan for accommodating this growth, the quality of education could be compromised. 4. Inconsistency With the Comprehensive Plan The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the long-standing planning vision for this area, which has emphasized low-density residential development, environmental preservation, and infrastructure-aligned growth. Approving this project would set a precedent for future high-density proposals, fundamentally altering the community’s character and long-term planning framework. 5. Public Safety and Emergency Services 18 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8232 of 466 Police, fire, and EMS services are already stretched across a wide geographic area. A development of this magnitude would increase call volume and response times, potentially impacting public safety for existing residents. 6. Need for Further Study and Community Input Given the scale of this proposal and its potential long-term consequences, it is essential that the Commission allow more time for impact studies, traffic analyses, environmental reviews, and meaningful community engagement. A postponement would ensure that decisions are made with full information and transparency. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Commission postpone or deny the rezoning request until comprehensive studies are completed and the community has had adequate opportunity to participate in the process. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration of the residents who have invested deeply in this community. I appreciate your commitment to thoughtful, responsible planning. Sincerely, Andrew May CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8233 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: C L Thursday, February 12, 2026 3:10 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Postponement – Case No. C14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, As a member of the Lost Creek community, I am writing to respectfully request a postponement to the public hearing for Case No. C14-2024-0089 until May 18th. Project Location: 1120½ S. Capital of Texas Hwy SB, 1120 S. Capital of Texas Hwy SB, 1122 S. Capital of Texas HWY SB, 1220 S. Capital of Texas Hwy SB Proposed Zoning Change: LO and LR to LO-V-DB90 Scheduled Hearing: February 17, 2026 – Zoning and Platting Commission We are not opposed to responsible development of this site; however, the scope and scale of what is being proposed—475 residential units on a currently low-density commercial property—demands meaningful community review for issues such as Traffic Impact that has not yet been possible. Lost Creek Boulevard currently accommodates approximately 8,000 to 10,000 vehicle trips per day with limited ingress and egress points and a single left-turn lane at the intersection with Loop 360 (Capital of Texas Highway). A 475-unit development could add 2,000 to 3,000 additional daily vehicle trips—a 30 to 40 percent increase. Furthermore, the application fails to account for the cumulative traffic impact of other developments already in progress in the immediate area, including the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (approximately 300 homes and 300 apartments), and the ongoing TxDOT Loop 360 improvement project. An independent, updated Traffic Impact Analysis must be conducted before any zoning decision is made. Thank you for your consideration. Charles Lopez CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8234 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Ross Leonoudakis Thursday, February 12, 2026 2:55 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Ross Leonoudakis and I live at 1703 Lost Creek Blvd in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed until May 19th This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. I have two small children. One is at Forest Trail Elementary, the other one will be soon. We chose this neighborhood because of, among other things, the school district, the class sizes, and the ratio of teachers to students. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Ross Leonoudakis 1703 Lost Creek Blvd CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 22 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8235 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Kj Stanley Thursday, February 12, 2026 2:53 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kerry Stanley. I live at 6809 Cypress Pt N, in the Lost Creek neighborhood adjoining the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Of even greater concern is the fact that there are two roads for evacuation from the Lost Creek neighborhood in case of an emergency such as a wildfire. This additional number of potential evacuees must be taken into account and planned for. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis has been completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Kerry Stanley 6809 Cypress Pt N Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 23 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8236 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Andrea Sheridan Thursday, February 12, 2026 2:19 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Andrea Sheridan and I live at 6905 Crosby Circle in Lost Creek, near the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. This development at the entrance to Lost Creek will impact every neighborhood resident, and I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed until May 19th to obtain accurate traffic information and impact. The numbers in the application do not seem to be correct. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE! More importantly the application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, and the traffic at peek rush hours is already significant just trying to enter and exit the neighborhood!! Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Andrea Sheridan 6905 Crosby Circle 24 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8237 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Thursday, February 12, 2026 2:01 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns February 2 letter re proposed expansion.docx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Please find the attached letter concerning the referenced postponement request. Linda Gordon CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 26 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8238 of 466 February 12, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission City of Austin Texas E-mailed to: SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns My name is Linda Gordon and I live at 5909 Front Royal Drive in the neighborhood next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed until May 19th, 2026. This project would add up to 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says that no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed, which does not seem right for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. When I exit the Lost Creek Subdivision, I must constantly wait at the light at the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd and HWY 360. The traffic moves slowly, but many people from Lost Creek wanting to go South on 360, turn “right on red”. Most certainly more north-bound traffic wanting to enter the proposed development would require a U turn at the red light to head south on 360. This would have a big impact on traffic going south on Hwy 360 in addition those trying to turn right from Lost Creek Blvd, We request that a third-party traffic study be done so that our community can better understand the impact of this development. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Linda Gordon 5909 Front Royal Drive 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8239 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Jack Spradlin Thursday, February 12, 2026 1:22 PM Villela, Beverly You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution SUBJECT: Postponement pf Zoning Commission Request for – Case C14-2025-0089 – Major Traffic Concerns Dear Zoning and Platting Commission: My name is Jack Spradlin and I live at 6210 Indian Canyon Dr, near the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I request that the February 17 rezoning hearing for such Case be postponed until May 19th in order to [provide and fullly assess critical and accurate traffic information relating to this Case.The numbers in the application do not appear to be correct. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. I spend a lot of time on Loop 360 and at the Lost Creek Blvd 27 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8240 of 466 turnoff. The Texas Department of Transportation has an ongoing Loop 360 Project trying to deal with rthe extremely heavy traffic on Loop 360. Approval of this rezoning application would be contrary to such Loop 360 Project and its purpose and obectives. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Jack Spradlin 6210 Indian Canyon Dr Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 28 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8241 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Lexie Moore Thursday, February 12, 2026 1:20 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Lexie Moore and I live at 2006 Trevino Dr. in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed until May 19th This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. I have a 15 month old son and just moved into the neighborhood 1.5 years ago specifically for the school district. It is of utmost importance to me that the Eanes ISD school district maintain its high reputation and educational standards. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Lexie Moore 2006 Trevino Dr. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " 29 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8242 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Thomas Leath Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:50 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Thomas Leath and I live at 1601 Falcon Ledge Drive, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. My children are teenage drivers. Like many families in our neighborhood, I'm concerned about their safety at such a busy intersection. There is already significant traffic and congestion for Forest Trail Elementary School and Westlake High School in the immediate vicinity. Additionally, that intersection is one of 3 exit points for the neighborhood in emergency situations such as a wildfire. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Sincere thanks, Thomas Leath CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " 30 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8243 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Angela D'Andrea Thursday, February 12, 2026 9:43 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Angela D’Andrea and I live at 2106 Key West Cv, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. I have lived in this neighborhood since 1991 and can recall many fatalities that have occurred at this intersection over the years. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Angela D'Andrea 512-658-5235 angdandrea gmail.com CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " 31 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8244 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Adam Hafemeister Thursday, February 12, 2026 9:36 AM Villela, Beverly Rezoning C14-2025-0089 request to postpone or deny You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Beverly, I am submitting this statement in strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of 1120 and 1122 South Capital of Texas Highway (“City View”). The current application is inadequate and premature, with serious unresolved issues related to traffic, safety, environmental protection, and procedural due process. Inadequate Public Notice and Community Engagement The surrounding community has not received sufficient notice or opportunity to review and respond to the scope and impact of this large-scale proposal. Given the complexity and potential consequences, meaningful public input has been severely limited. A postponement is warranted to ensure residents have time to assess and provide informed feedback. Traffic and Safety Impacts No Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been conducted, despite the project’s significant size and the cumulative effects of nearby developments. Lost Creek Boulevard currently carries 8,000–10,000 vehicles per day; this project would add an estimated 2,000–3,000 more, a 30–40% increase. The existing intersection at Loop 360 and Lost Creek already experiences dangerous congestion and multiple fatalities, compounded by the upcoming TxDOT Loop 360 expansionand limited wildfire evacuation routes. Other pending developments — The Marshall tract (48 homes) and Stratus (approximately 600 total units) — are not included in any existing traffic modeling. Without a full TIA accounting for these projects, it is impossible to accurately gauge the safety or infrastructure implications of this rezoning. Educational Impact and School Capacity At 475 multifamily units, this proposal requires an Educational Impact Statement (EIS) for Eanes ISD as mandated by city policy. The application lists Eanes ISD but provides no completed EIS, triggering an automatic delay under city procedures. Eanes ISD is already under budgetary pressure, and the addition of hundreds of potential new students would place further strain on facilities and staffing. No rezoning should proceed without a complete and reviewed EIS. 32 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8245 of 466 Environmental and Watershed Concerns The site lies within a sensitive environmental zone, affecting both the Eanes Creek and Barton Creek watersheds, and within the Hill Country Roadway Scenic Corridor. The current application fails to adequately address water quality protection, erosion control, or habitat preservation. A comprehensive environmental and watershed impact study is essential before approval can be considered. The proposed 90-foot structure will disrupt the Hill Country skyline, introduce significant light pollution in a dark skies community, and increase impervious cover in a recharge area critical to downstream creeks and reservoirs. These issues speak directly to Austin’s environmental stewardship commitments and require a formal review. Application Deficiencies Multiple sections of the application are marked “TBD,” “Unknown,” or left incomplete, including key data on parking, open space, childcare availability, and affordability commitments. Such omissions are unacceptable for a development of this magnitude. Furthermore, the application seeks a density bonus without providing any SMART Housing participation or affordability plan, contradicting City policy objectives. Safety and Quality of Life Beyond traffic and environmental hazards, this proposal threatens core aspects of community character and safety. Lost Creek residents face constrained evacuation routes in a wildfire-prone corridor, and the introduction of large-scale high-rise lighting threatens nighttime visibility and safety for residents and wildlife alike. Requests for Action Given the significant procedural and substantive deficiencies, I respectfully request that the Planning Commission and City Council: 1. Postpone or deny the rezoning request until a complete Traffic Impact Analysis and Educational Impact Statement are submitted and publicly reviewed. 2. Require a full environmental and watershed assessment to evaluate development impacts on Eanes Creek, Barton Creek, and Hill Country Roadway protections. 3. Ensure public notice and neighborhood engagement requirements are fully met before future hearings. 4. Reject incomplete applications with “TBD” or “Unknown” data fields until all required information is provided and verified. This community supports thoughtful, responsible growth — but only when it is grounded in data, transparency, and due process. The current proposal fails on all these counts and must not move forward at this stage. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued commitment to protecting Austin’s safety, environment, and quality of life. 33 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8246 of 466 Sincerely, Adam Hafemeister CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at 34 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8247 of 466 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Angela Bluer Thursday, February 12, 2026 8:56 AM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 postponement request: Traffic Concerns Pic attached IMG_4412.HEIC You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Angela Bluer and I live at 1504 Wilson Heights Dr, Austin TX 78746, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed until May 19th to obtain accurate traffic information. The numbers in the application do not seem to be correct. Every Monday-Friday, 7:30 am - 9:00 am, 3:30 pm - 6:30 pm, the traffic light at Lost Creek and Capital of TX is already grossly overly congested with day to day commuter traffic. Add in construction of the 48 new homes being built, or an event (lockdown, performances, Football games) at Forest Trail Elementary School/Westlake High School and you can’t get out of Lost Creek. (PLEASE SEE PHOTO ATTACHED ON A CURRENT NORMAL DAY OF TRAFFIC - you can see from the picture that the line (with a 4 minute wait till at the 360 intersection already cause massive backlog on a NORMAL day CURRENTLY. At certain times, we can't even get out of Wilson Heights Dr to Lost Creek Boulevard as we have to yield to backlog on LC Boulevard. The traffic back up all the way up Lost Creek Boulevard in the morning school run!) This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Kind regards, Angela Bluer 35 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8248 of 466