04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8 - Staff Report - Part 1 — original pdf

Backup

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2025-0089 (1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway) DISTRICT: 8 ADDRESS: 1120 ½ South Capital of Texas Hwy SB, 1120 South Capital of Texas Hwy SB, 1122 South Capital of Texas HWY SB, 1220 South Capital of Texas Hwy SB ZONING FROM: LO and LR TO: LR-V-CO-DB90 (as amended)* SITE AREA: 15.518 acres (675,964 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: AREIT City View LLC AGENT: Drenner Group, P.C. (Leah M. Bojo) CASE MANAGER: Beverly Villela (512-978-0740, Beverly.Villela@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends LR-V-CO-DB90, Neighborhood Commercial-Vertical Mixed Use Building-Conditional Overlay-Density Bonus 90 Combining District, zoning. See the Basis of Recommendation section below. The Conditional Overlay will prohibit the following use: Service Station. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: July 07, 2026: April 07, 2026: APPROVED LO-V-DB90 AS STAFF RECOMMENDED. [R. PUZYCKI, T. MAJOR – 2ND] (6-4) L. OSTA LUGO – ABSENT February 17, 2026: Approved Neighborhood postponement to April 7th on the consent agenda. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 28, 2026: Approved Neighborhood’s postponement request to May 28, 2026 on the consent agenda. May 21, 2026: Approved Neighborhood’s postponement request to May 28, 2026 on the consent agenda. ORDINANCE NUMBER: No. ISSUES: Currently, there is a valid petition on this case at 40.25% of property owners, by land area within 200 feet of the rezoning request. This valid petition is directly related to the rezoning request of LO-V-DB90. Please refer to Attachment F. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 81 of 460C14-2025-0089 Page 2 *On June 22, 2026, the applicant submitted an amended rezoning request for LR-V-DB90. Staff recommended the addition of a Conditional Overlay that would prohibit the use, Service Station. The applicant is in agreement with staff’s recommendation. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property consists of approximately 15.5 acres located at 1120 ½, 1120, 1122, and 1220 South Capital of Texas Highway southbound, on the west side of South Capital of Texas Highway (Loop 360), south of Lost Creek Boulevard, and within the City of Austin’s Full Purpose Jurisdiction. South Capital of Texas Highway is a Level 5 corridor per the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) and Lost Creek Boulevard is a Level 3. The site is currently developed with office uses and a parking garage and is zoned Limited Office (LO) and Neighborhood Commercial (LR). Surrounding land uses include offices and townhomes to the north (LR; MF-1-CO; LO; GO), offices to the south (LR; GO), religious assembly and office uses to the east within the West Lake Hills ETJ, and single-family residences and undeveloped land to the west (COA ETJ (HB 3053 disannexation); I-RR). Please refer to Attachments A (Zoning Map) and B (Aerial View). While the subject property is located within the City of Austin’s Full Purpose Jurisdiction, the properties located immediately west of the site were disannexed through an election permitted by House Bill 3053, and are now in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Texas House Bill 3053 (88th Regular Session) took effect September 1, 2023, which required the City to hold elections to allow residents in certain areas to decide whether to disannex from the City. The required disannexation election was held on May 4, 2024 to allow residents of the Lost Creek area to determine whether to disannex from the full purpose limits of the City of Austin. The election results were approved on May 14, 2024 declaring that the Lost Creek Area should be disannexed pursuant to State and City law. The disannexation was approved effective September 9, 2024. The applicant is requesting LR-V-CO-DB90, Neighborhood Commercial-Vertical Mixed Use Building-Conditional Overlay-Density Bonus 90 Combining District, zoning for a proposed development that would include multi-family units requiring an affordable component. A building constructed under density bonus 90 (DB90) standards allows for a mix of residential uses and commercial uses, and the result is typically retail, restaurants and offices on the ground floor, and residential units on upper levels. The overall project would consist of approximately 475 residential units and will not be seeking a partial/complete (0-100%) modification for the ground floor commercial space requirement. Please refer to Attachment C (Applicant’s Summary Letter). A development utilizing the “density bonus 90” incentives is permitted with a base LR district and must include an affordability component for residential use in order to obtain incentives, including height maximum of 70 feet in the LR district (40 feet base plus 30 feet incentive) and relaxation of development and compatibility standards, such as FAR, setbacks and building coverage. There are several methods of satisfying DB90 development affordability requirements. There are two options for projects including rental units: 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 82 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 3 a minimum of 12% of the rental units in a building are affordable for a 40- 1. year period for households earning 60% or less than the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area MFI; or 2. described above for households earning 50% or less MFI. a minimum of 10% of the rental units are affordable for a 40-year period as There are two options of satisfying DB90 development affordability requirements which include ownership units: a minimum of 12% of the residential units in a building are affordable for a 1. 40-year period for households earning 80% or less than the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area MFI; or 2. an in-lieu-fee payment to the Housing Trust Fund, equivalent to the required percentage of the total residential units, including the mix of bedrooms required, at the rate set in the fee schedule at the time of final site plan submission. Staff recommends the applicant’s request of LR-V-CO-DB90 combining district zoning because it aligns with Council adopted goals by providing an avenue for more residential density and increased affordability in a part of town where both are currently scarce. The proposed zoning will also unify both subject tracts under one consistent zoning designation which will offer more options and flexibility for redevelopment. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The rezoning should be consistent with the policies and principles adopted by the City Council. City Council has provided policy and direction for having more residential density and increased affordability, as well as incentivizing vertical mixed use buildings throughout the City. This request is consistent with the “VMU2” option and Ordinance No. 20240229-073, which replaced the invalidated “VMU2” option. 2. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. Neighborhood Commercial (LR) district is intended for neighborhood shopping facilities which provide limited business service and office facilities predominately for the convenience of residents of the neighborhood. The Vertical Mixed Use Building (V) combining district may be applied in combination with any commercial base zoning district and allows for a combination of office, retail, commercial and residential uses within a vertical mixed use building. Conditional Overlay (CO) combining district may be applied in combination with any base district. The district is intended to provide flexible and adaptable use or site development regulations by requiring standards tailored to individual properties. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 83 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 4 The Density Bonus 90 (DB90) combining district is intended, in exchange for providing affordable housing units and in combination with commercial base zoning districts, to allow a mixture of office, retail, commercial, and residential uses with modifications of compatibility standards and site development regulations including increased building height. 3. Zoning should promote clearly-identified community goals, such as creating employment opportunities or providing for affordable housing. This rezoning authorizes a property to participate in a voluntary density bonus or incentive program that provides modifications to development regulations or other regulatory-related benefits in exchange for community benefits. In exchange for increased development potential, the development is required to comply with affordable housing requirements. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: ZONING LAND USES Site North LR; MF-1-CO; LO; LO; LR Offices, Parking Garage Offices; Townhomes; Religious Assembly; Offices GO South LR; GO East West Lake Hills ETJ COA ETJ (HB 3053 West disannexation); I-RR Offices Religious Assembly, Offices Family Residences; Undeveloped NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: N/A WATERSHED: Eanes Creek Watershed CAPITOL VIEW CORRIDOR: N/A SCENIC ROADWAY: Loop 360 SCHOOLS: Eanes Independent School District Forest Trail Elementary School West Ridge Middle School Westlake High School COMMUNITY REGISTRY LIST: City of Rollingwood, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Lost Creek Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, Save Our Springs Alliance, AREA CASE HISTORIES: TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources, Woods of Westlake Neighborhood Association 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 84 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 5 NUMBER C14-2016-0127 REQUEST DR to SF-2 C14-2012-0086 LO to MF-1-CO COMMISSION To Grant Staff’s Recommendation of SF-2 (01/03/2017) To Grant Staff’s Recommendation of MF-1-CO (10/01/2012) CITY COUNCIL Approved SF-2 as Commission Recommended (01/26/2017) Approved MF-1-CO as Commission Recommended (10/18/2012) RELATED CASES: C8S-84-260 – Subdivision case (recorded plat) associated with the subject property. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Comprehensive Planning: Project Name and Proposed Use: 1120 S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY SB. C14- 2025-0089. Project: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway. 15.518 acres from LO and LR to LR-V-DB90. Existing: office (139,776 SF and 130, 204 SF). Proposed: office (139,776 SF), multifamily (475 units) and commercial (7,200 SF). Note that demolition is proposed (0 residential units to be demolished). Yes Imagine Austin Decision Guidelines Complete Community Measures * Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map: Located within or adjacent to an Imagine Austin Activity Center, Imagine Austin Activity Corridor, or Imagine Austin Job Center as identified the Growth Concept Map. Names of Activity Centers/Activity Corridors/Job Centers *: Mobility and Public Transit *: Located within 0.25 miles of public transit stop and/or light rail station. Mobility and Bike/Ped Access *: Adjoins a public sidewalk, shared path, and/or bike lane. Connectivity, Good and Services, Employment *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles to goods and services, and/or employment center. Connectivity and Food Access *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles of a grocery store/farmers market. Connectivity and Education *: Located within 0.50 miles from a public school or university. Connectivity and Healthy Living *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles from a recreation area, park or walking trail. Y Connectivity and Health *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles of health facility (ex: hospital, urgent care, doctor’s office, drugstore clinic, and/or specialized outpatient care.) • Within 0.5 miles of medical clinic along S Capital of Texas Highway Y Housing Choice *: Expands the number of units and housing choice that suits a variety of household sizes, incomes, and lifestyle needs of a diverse population (ex: apartments, triplex, 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 85 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 6 granny flat, live/work units, cottage homes, and townhomes) in support of Imagine Austin and the Strategic Housing Blueprint. Housing Affordability *: Provides a minimum of 10% of units for workforce housing (80% MFI or less) and/or fee in lieu for affordable housing. Mixed use *: Provides a mix of residential and non-industrial uses. Culture and Creative Economy *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles of a cultural resource (ex: library, theater, museum, cultural center). Culture and Historic Preservation: Preserves or enhances a historically and/or culturally significant site. Creative Economy: Expands Austin’s creative economy (ex: live music venue, art studio, film, digital, theater.) Workforce Development, the Economy and Education: Expands the economic base by creating permanent jobs, especially in industries that are currently not represented in a particular area or that promotes a new technology, and/or promotes educational opportunities and workforce development training. Industrial Land: Preserves or enhances industrial land. Y Not located over Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone or Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone 3 Number of “Yes’s” Drainage The developer is required to submit a pre- and post-development drainage analysis at the subdivision and site plan stage of the development process. The City’s Land Development Code and Drainage Criteria Manual require that the Applicant demonstrate through engineering analysis that the proposed development will have no identifiable adverse impact on surrounding properties. Environmental 1. The site is not located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as a Water Supply Suburban Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City's Land Development Code. It is in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. 2. Under the current watershed regulations, development or redevelopment on this site will be subject to the following impervious cover limits: Development Classification One or Two Family Residential 30% 40% Multifamily Residential 40% Commercial % of Net Site Area % NSA with Transfers 40% 55% 55% 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 86 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 7 Development within a Water Quality Transition Zone is limited to 18%. 3. According to floodplain maps there is no floodplain within or adjacent to the project location. 4. Standard landscaping and tree protection will be required in accordance with LDC 25-2 and 25-8 for all development and/or redevelopment. 5. At this time, site specific information is unavailable regarding vegetation, areas of steep slope, or other environmental features such as bluffs, springs, canyon rimrock, caves, sinkholes, and wetlands. 6. Under current watershed regulations, development or redevelopment requires water quality control with increased capture volume and control of the 2 year storm on site. 7. At this time, no information has been provided as to whether this property has any preexisting approvals that preempt current water quality or Code requirements. Fire No comments on zoning change. PARD – Planning & Design Review PR1. Residential units that are certified affordable and income-restricted are exempt from the parkland dedication requirements per City Code § 25-1-601(D)(4). Parkland dedication will be required for any new market-rate residential units that may be proposed by this development, at the time of subdivision or site plan, per City Code § 25-1-601. If the applicant wishes to discuss parkland dedication requirements in advance of site plan or subdivision applications, please contact this reviewer: ann.desanctis@austintexas.gov. At the applicant’s request, PARD can provide an early determination of parkland dedication requirements. Site Plan SP 1. NOTE: All comments regarding the effects of the proposed rezoning on subsequent Site Plan Review applications are subject to modification or reconsideration if affected by any change in property boundaries or if development is proposed on only a portion of the land proposed for rezoning. These comments are intended to assist in identifying potential areas of concern and are not intended to provide a complete list of development restrictions which may arise for any specific proposal. Austin Development Services 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 87 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 8 offers a variety of pre-application review options to assist in evaluating specific development proposals prior to Site Plan Application. SP 2. Site plans will be required for any new development except for residential only project with up to 4 units. SP 3. Any new development is subject to Subchapter E. Design Standards and Mixed Use. SP 4. Additional comments will be made when the site plan is submitted. SP 5. The site is subject to compatibility standards due to the adjacency of SF-2-CO property to the south. (i.e., the triggering property). Reference 25-2-1051, 25-2-1053 SP 6. Any structure that is located (see below for additional information): a. At least 50 feet but less than 75 feet from any part of a triggering property may not exceed 60 feet b. Less than 50 feet from any part of a triggering property may not exceed 40 feet Reference 25-2-1061 SP 7. An on-site amenity, including a swimming pool, tennis court, ball court, or playground, may not be constructed 25 feet or less from the triggering property. Reference 25-2-1062 SP 8. The site is located within Hill Country Roadway Corridor. The site is located within the moderate intensity zone of Loop 360. The site may be developed with the following maximum floor-to-area ratio (FAR) for non-residential buildings: Slope 0-15% 15-25% 25-35% Maximum FAR 0.25:1 0.10:1 0.05:1 SP 9. Except for clearing necessary to provide utilities or site access, a 100-foot vegetative buffer will be required along Capital of Texas Highway. At least 40% of the site (excluding dedicated right-of-way) must be left in a natural state. The allowable height is as follows: Within 200 feet of Capital of Texas Highway the maximum height is 28 feet, and beyond 200 feet the maximum height is 40 feet. SP 10. In some cases, a Hill Country Roadway Development Bonus may be available which would increase minimum height requirements and/or decrease minimum vegetative buffer requirements. LDC Section 25-2-1128 and LDC Section 25-2-1129 SP 11. As the proposed rezoning includes the addition of the V (Vertical Mixed Use) and DB90 (Development Bonus – 90) Overlay zones, the following comments are offered in anticipation of an application in reliance on one or both of those Overlay Zones. SP 12. This site must meet affordability minimums established in LDC Subchapter E and/or LDC 25-2-652 to be eligible for the Development Bonuses available under either the 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 88 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 9 Vertical Mixed Use or DB90 Overlay Zones. A signed approval letter from the Housing Department will be required with Completion Check submittal for a Site Plan for development using DB90 and/or as a component of the review of a Site Plan for development using Vertical Mixed Use. SP 13. Any Vertical Mixed Use or DB-90 buildings will be required to be designed for pedestrian-oriented commercial uses along 75% of the ground floor frontage facing the Principal Street. Lost Creek Boulevard is the principal street for all projects with frontage on that street. Capital of Texas Highway will be the Principal Street for any project with frontage solely on Capital of Texas Highway. A lobby serving a use other than a pedestrian-oriented commercial or civic space is not counted as a pedestrian-oriented commercial or civic use. NOTE: This requirement may be modified by City Council during consideration of a rezoning to add the DB90 Overlay Zone. SP 14. If a DB90 building includes a mix of uses, a non-residential use: • may not be located above a residential use; and • may not be located on or above the third story of the building. SP 15. If a DB90 project is proposed, the Compatibility standards referenced above would not apply. Those requirements would be replaced with a requirement to provide a compatibility buffer that is 25’ in width and designed to meet the standards in LDC Section 25-8-700 and LDC Section 25-2-652(G). SP 16. If a Vertical Mixed Use project is proposed, the Hill Country Roadway maximum height, maximum FAR, minimum vegetative buffer and minimum amount of the subject site to be left in a natural state will continue to apply. SP 17. If a DB-90 project is proposed, the maximum height and maximum FAR established for the Hill Country Roadway Overlay Zone will not apply. However, the Hill Country Roadway minimum vegetative buffer and minimum amount of the site to be left in a natural state will continue to apply. Austin Transportation and Public Works Department – Engineering Review TPW 1. The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) calls for 116 feet of right-of-way for Lost Creek Boulevard. It is recommended that 59 feet of right-of-way from the existing centerline should be dedicated for Lost Creek Boulevard according to the Transportation Plan with the first subdivision or site plan application. [LDC 25-6-51 and 25-6-55]. TPW 2. The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) calls for 116 feet of right-of-way for Lost Creek Boulevard. It is recommended that 59 feet of right-of-way from the existing centerline should be dedicated for Lost Creek Boulevard according to the Transportation Plan with the first subdivision or site plan application. [LDC 25-6-51 and 25-6-55]. TPW 3. The adjacent street characteristics table is provided below: 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 89 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 10 Name ASMP Classification ASMP Required ROW Existing ROW Existing Pavement Sidewalks Bicycle Route Capital Metro (within ¼ mile) Lost Creek Boulevard Level 3 116’ 102’ 32’ S. Capital of Texas Highway Level 5 Coord. With TxDOT Coord. With TxDOT 44’ No No Yes No Yes No TIA: A traffic impact analysis is not required. Traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed the thresholds established in the City of Austin Land Development Code (LDC). Austin Water Utility No comments on zoning change. FYI: The landowner intends to serve the site with City of Austin water and wastewater utilities. The landowner, at own expense, will be responsible for providing any water and wastewater utility improvements, offsite main extensions, utility relocations and or abandonments required by the land use. The water and wastewater utility plan must be reviewed and approved by Austin Water for compliance with City criteria and suitability for operation and maintenance. Depending on the development plans submitted, water and or wastewater Service Extension Requests may be required. For more information pertaining to the Service Extension Request process and submittal requirements contact the Austin Water SER team at ser@austintexas.gov. All new development within the proposed project will be subject to City Code Chapter 25-9 and any future amendments relating to reclaimed water connections, water benchmarking, and mandatory onsite water reuse. All water and wastewater construction must be inspected by the City of Austin. The landowner must pay the City inspection fee with the utility construction. The landowner must pay the tap and impact fee once the landowner makes an application for a City of Austin water and wastewater utility tap permit. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 810 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 11 INDEX OF EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS TO FOLLOW: Attachment A: Zoning Map Attachment B: Aerial Map Attachment C: Applicant’s Summary Letter Attachment D: Neighborhood Letters/Postponement Request and Applicant Correspondence Attachment E: TIA and TxDOT Correspondence Attachment F: Valid Petition Attachment G: Correspondence from Interested Parties 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 811 of 460 Attachment A 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 812 of 460!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(C14-04-0171C14-2016-0127C14-2012-0086C14-00-2136S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY SBS CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NBLOST CREEK BLVDWILSON HEIGHTS DRBARCLAY DRTHADDEUS CVSUNDOWN PKWYSHANNON OAKS TRLWILD BRIAR PASSETERNITY TERCITY VIEW STI-RRLOGOLOSF-2LRSF-2-CODRSF-1I-SF-2SF-1I-SF-2I-SF-2SF-1SF-1LRGOLRI-SF-2I-SF-2I-SF-2P-COI-SF-2SF-2SF-2I-SF-2MF-1-COSF-1-CODRSF-1-COSF-2P-COGRLRLROFFICESINGLE FAMILY83-26383-19083-16190-02204-0171C14-90-019R83-158R83-159DRIVE-IN BANKR83-170RCR83-263NOT ON\GROUNDUNDEVELOPEDBARTON CREEK WILDERNESS PARKOFFICESINGLE FAMILYOFFICEOFFICEOFFICER83-170RCR83-170RCZONING±This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal,engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only theapproximate relative location of property boundaries.This product has been produced by the Planning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference.No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:C14-2025-0089SUBJECT TRACT!!!!!!PENDING CASEZONING BOUNDARYCreated: 8/25/20250400200Feet04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 813 of 460Attachment B 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 814 of 460 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(C14-2025-0089C14-04-0171C14-2016-0127C14-2012-0086C14-00-2136S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY SBS CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NBLOST CREEK BLVDWILSON HEIGHTS DRBARCLAY DRTHADDEUS CVSUNDOWN PKWYSHANNON OAKS TRLWILD BRIAR PASSETERNITY TERCITY VIEW STI-RRLOGOLOSF-2LRSF-2-CODRSF-1SF-1SF-1SF-1LRGOLRP-COSF-2SF-2MF-1-CODRSF-1-COSF-1-COSF-2P-COGRLRLR1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway±This product has been produced by Planning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty ismade by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:LOCATION:SUBJECT AREA:MANAGER:C14-2025-00891120 and 1122 SCapital of Texas Hwy SB15.518 AcresMarcelle BoudreauxCreated: 9/23/2025SUBJECT TRACTZONING BOUNDARY!!!!!PENDING CASECREEK BUFFER1 inch equals 400 '04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 815 of 460C14-2025-0089 Page 13 Attachment C 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 816 of 460 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Beverly, Ashley Fisher <AFisher@drennergroup.com> Tuesday, June 30, 2026 10:29 AM Villela, Beverly Leah Bojo Case C14-2025-0089 External Email - Exercise Caution We are in agreement with the staff recommendation to prohibit Service Station use. Thanks, Ashley Ashley Fisher, Senior Project Manager Drenner Group, PC | 2705 Bee Cave Road | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78746 Office: 512.807.2900 | Direct: 512.807.2911 | Cell 512.496.8819 afisher@drennergroup.com | www.drennergroup.com CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 817 of 460 June 22, 2026 Ms. Andrea Bates, Interim Planning Director Austin Planning Permitting and Development Center (PDC) 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Via Electronic Delivery Re: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway – Updated Zoning application for the 15.518- acre combined properties located at 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway, comprised of TCAD IDs: 0111210201 and 0111210202 (the "Property") Dear Ms. Middleton-Pratt: As representatives of the owners of the Property, we respectfully submit the enclosed updated rezoning application package. The project is titled 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway and is 15.518-acres of combined land, located on the west side of S Capital of Texas Highway, south of Lost Creek Boulevard. The Property is in the Full Purpose Jurisdiction of the City of Austin. The Property is currently zoned LO (Limited Office) and LR (Neighborhood Commercial) The updated requested zoning is for LR-V-DB90 (Neighborhood Commercial– Vertical Mixed Use Building – Density Bonus 90). The Property is not located in a Neighborhood Planning Area. The redevelopment of the site is not expected to be immediate, therefore, a base zoning of LR instead of LO will allow a few more uses, such as small scale restaurant or retail, on the site in the interim. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required per the attached TIA determination waiver dated 5/8/2025 by Nazlie Saeedi from Transportation Department Services. Please let me know if you or your team members require additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your time and attention to this project. Sincerely, Leah M. Bojo cc: Joi Harden, Planning Department (via electronic delivery) Marcelle Boudreaux (via electronic delivery) 2705 Bee Caves Road Suite 100 | Austin, Texas 78746 | 512-807-2900 | www.drennergroup.com 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 818 of 460 August 14, 2025 Ms. Lauren Middleton-Pratt, Planning Director City of Austin Planning Department Permitting and Development Center (PDC) 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Via Electronic Delivery Re: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway – Zoning application for the 15.518-acre combined properties located at 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway, comprised of TCAD IDs: 0111210201 and 0111210202 (the "Property") Dear Ms. Middleton-Pratt: As representatives of the owners of the Property, we respectfully submit the enclosed rezoning application package. The project is titled 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway and is 15.518-acres of combined land, located on the west side of S Capital of Texas Highway, south of Lost Creek Boulevard. The Property is in the Full Purpose Jurisdiction of the City of Austin. The Property is currently zoned LO (Limited Office) and LR (Neighborhood Commercial) The requested zoning is LR-V-DB90 (Limited Office – Vertical Mixed Use Building – Density Bonus 90). The Property is not located in a Neighborhood Planning Area. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required per the attached TIA determination waiver dated 5/8/2025 by Nazlie Saeedi from Transportation Department Services. Please let me know if you or your team members require additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your time and attention to this project. Sincerely, Leah M. Bojo cc: Joi Harden, Planning Department (via electronic delivery) Marcelle Boudreaux (via electronic delivery) 2705 Bee Caves Road Suite 100 | Austin, Texas 78746 | 512-807-2900 | www.drennergroup.com 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 819 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 14 Attachment D 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 820 of 460 June 29, 2026 Ms. Beverly Villela Senior Planner City of Austin Planning Department Dear Ms. Villela, On behalf of the Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA), I respectfully request that the recently revised zoning application for the City View development be postponed from the July 07, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission agenda and rescheduled for the Commission's August 18, 2026 meeting. The applicant has now submitted a revised zoning application requesting LR-V-DB90 zoning across the property in place of the previously proposed LO-V-DB90 zoning. Although the applicant characterizes this revision as allowing only "a few more uses" during an interim period, the change nonetheless expands the range of commercial activities that could occur on the site. It represents a material revision to the zoning request that neighboring property owners have been evaluating over the past several months. The Lost Creek community learned of this revised application only recently. Residents, property owners, and the Association have not had a reasonable opportunity to fully review the revised submission, understand its implications, consult with planning professionals, or prepare informed comments for the Commission. Given the scale of this proposal, which includes approximately 475 residential units and commercial uses on more than 15 acres, adequate public participation is essential to ensuring that the Commission makes an informed recommendation. We are also concerned that the revised application continues to rely upon a Traffic Impact Analysis waiver issued in May 2025 despite the change in requested zoning. Because LR zoning permits a broader range of commercial uses than the previous request, residents deserve sufficient time to understand whether the prior transportation analysis remains appropriate or whether additional evaluation should occur. The additional time would also allow City staff and the public to fully assess whether any other supporting analyses should be updated in light of the revised application. Importantly, our request is not intended to delay the project unnecessarily. Rather, it is intended to ensure that the Commission's consideration is based upon a complete 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 821 of 460 understanding of the revised proposal and that affected residents are afforded a meaningful opportunity to participate in the zoning process. A postponement to the August 18 meeting would provide approximately one additional month for: ● City staff to complete its review of the revised application; ● Neighborhood stakeholders to analyze the changes between the original and revised zoning requests; ● Residents to understand the implications of the expanded LR zoning district and associated permitted uses; ● Clarification regarding the continued applicability of the previously issued Traffic Impact Analysis waiver and other supporting studies; and ● Productive discussions between the applicant, City staff, and neighborhood representatives before the matter returns to the Commission. LCNA has consistently sought to participate constructively throughout this process. We believe that providing additional time now will improve the quality of the public process, reduce confusion surrounding the revised application, and ultimately assist the Commission in making a more informed recommendation. Thank you for your consideration of this request. We appreciate your continued professionalism and willingness to work with both the applicant and the surrounding neighborhoods to ensure a fair and transparent review process. Please let us know if there is any additional information the Association can provide in support of this request. Sincerely, Shriya Josephsen President Lost Creek Neighborhood Association 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 822 of 460 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Beverly, Ashley Fisher Tuesday, May 26, 2026 8:59 AM Villela, Beverly Leah Bojo Item 109: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway External Email - Exercise Caution We agree with the neighborhood request to postpone Item 109 (1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway) to the July 23 City Council Meeting. Thanks, Ashley Ashley Fisher, Senior Project Manager Drenner Group, PC | 2705 Bee Cave Road | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78746 Office: 512.807.2900 | Direct: 512.807.2911 | Cell 512.496.8819 | www.drennergroup.com CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 1 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 823 of 460 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Doug Keenan Friday, May 8, 2026 4:39 PM Villela, Beverly Scott Smith; Rosa Yupari; Matthew Berend; Marvin Hecker; James Chatfield; Jack Spradlin Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 Lost Creek Limited District Formal Request (Responses) - Form Responses 1.pdf Follow up Flagged Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, Douglas Keenan here again, and still living at 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746, near the the City View property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the May 21, 2026 City Council hearing be postponed until the next available date of July 23, 2026 per the 2026 schedule. The reasons are as follows: We have petitioned the neighbors in Lost Creek and have support from 166 of them signing and commenting. See their comments attached. We are also in the final stages of filing a Valid Protest to trigger a supermajority vote requirement at the City Council's hearing. Plus, we have no assurances that the Conditional Overlays will be honored through the site planning, and permitting processes. They were summarily ignored at the ZAP Commission April 7, 2026, even though the vote was unusual at 6-4 to move the rezoning proposal ahead. These items are: --No traffic impact study (Erroneous assumptions concerning any future TXDOT Lost Creek Blvd/360 intersection improvements as well as current traffic flow) --No Firewise impact study (Fire response, evacuation routes, etc.) --No Environmental study (Barton Creek watershed, etc.) --No consideration of the fact that TxDOT was not consulted and there is no budget in the 10 year plan for 2244/Bee Caves Rd to Mopac expansion. --The Hill Country Corridor (Loop 360) has a maximum height limit of 40 ft. or 53 feet with a waiver vs. the DB90 / 90 ft. proposal, clearly a regulatory violation - 225% of the Code-Mandated limit. The postponement is necessary to move the project from its current "expedited" status to a Standard Review Track to allow for the studies listed above. Thanks for your consideration, Douglas Keenan 512 663 6954 7 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 824 of 460 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Beverly, Ashley Fisher Monday, May 18, 2026 10:38 AM Villela, Beverly Leah Bojo Item 70 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Hwy External Email - Exercise Caution We agree to a postponement to May 28th for Item #70 (120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Hwy). Thanks, Ashley Ashley Fisher, Senior Project Manager Drenner Group, PC | 2705 Bee Cave Road | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78746 Office: 512.807.2900 | Direct: 512.807.2911 | Cell 512.496.8819 | www.drennergroup.com CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 1 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 825 of 460 TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/1/2026 12:39:33 LISA ALMGREN 1203 Wilson Heights Dr 5/3/2026 18:48:26 charles mccormick 1204 Arronimink Cir 5/1/2026 12:15:05 James R Cahtfield 1204 Wilson Heights Driv 5/4/2026 12:40:47 Jase Burner 1205 Arronimink Circle 5/2/2026 9:41:53 Brent Baker 1206 Wilson Heights Driv 5/4/2026 12:47:11 Sheila Hilts 1207 Wilson Heights Dr. A 5/1/2026 12:46:38 Claire Hogan 1208 Wilson Heights Drive 5/5/2026 8:33:39 John Newton 1209 Wilson Heights 5/4/2026 18:07:01 Nan Jiang 1211 Lost Creek Blvd I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. critical issue of safety and quality of life in LC The negative effects of the proposed development are obvious. Also, the transcript of the LD board's February meeting clearly shows that the board recognized and understood it's primary responsibility when the President stated, 3 or 4 times, that the LD board would not allow anything that changes the character of the neighborhood. It is incumbent for the board to proactively protect the interest of all Lost Creek residents in this case. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory com on this formal letter to the Board. This has been hurried and expedited for reasons we do not understand. Please allow time for proper deliberation and assessment so as not to injure the entire Lost Creek Neighborhood and particularly those closest to this new development. The zoning committee didn't not have correct information. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/7/2026 5:19:19 Sandy Kerr 1301 Lost Creek Blvd omI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Please delay the May 21st vote until the research is complete. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 826 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/3/2026 13:29:41 MARY D DUVALL 1301 Wilson Heights Dr 5/2/2026 12:14:05 Michael DuVall 1301 Wilson Heights Driv 4/30/2026 21:55:41 Susan Tipton-Hines 1304 Wilson Heights Dr, A Please consider at least asking the City of Austin not to fast track this vote until due diligence has been done and we know the true impact of this development. In my time at Lost Creek, I have driven up on the aftermath of two different fatal crashes at our entrance. The guardrail has been rebuilt numerous times, and fresh broken glass an car parts are very common to see. This is a quality of life concern. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/6/2026 15:53:30 Susan Nowstrup 1305 Sawgrass Cove, Aus I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Please delay vote until evacuation and traffic studies are complete, and formalize the Firewise CWPP in the Record: Submit our evacuation plan as part of the official City case record. 5/4/2026 13:53:50 Mark Cooper 1312 Thaddeus Cv 5/1/2026 10:47:04 Rosa Yupari 1313 Wilson Heights 5/3/2026 20:36:58 Ilana Mendelow 1316 Falcon Ledge Drive 5/3/2026 22:00:17 Edward Dawson 1317 Wilson Heights Driv 5/1/2026 11:08:21 Marvin Hecker 1319 Wilson Heights Drive 5/4/2026 12:42:59 Marvin Hecker 1319 Wilson Heights Driv I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. t I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Requesting that the board speak up on behalf of Lost Creek. Not only will this development negatively impact every resident of Lost Creek, but those of us living near the development will see our home values greatly diminished and will suffer from safety concerns. Not only does this rezoning pose a danger to all of the residents of Lost Creek and violate Dark Skies, watershed, and scenic byway protections, those of us who live near the development will see the resale values of our homes drop significantly. As one of the Zoning and Platting commissioners said, "It's great to want to put density and affordable housing in District 8, but this is the wrong location. No access to public transportation so every apartment dweller will need a car." 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 827 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/4/2026 13:57:30 Karen S. Blair 1320 Wilson Heights Driv 5/1/2026 12:13:48 Vicky Puckett 1321 Wilson Heights Driv 5/4/2026 14:41:52 James Jacobson 1337n Lost Creek BLVD 5/3/2026 17:30:38 Jesse Kasnicki 1339 Lost Creek Blvd Aust 5/3/2026 16:20:43 Kerri baldwin 1343 Lost Creek Blvd 5/4/2026 20:14:14 Utz Baldwin 1343 Lost Creek Blvd 5/3/2026 19:44:31 Shari Mitchell 1400 Quaker Ridge 5/1/2026 17:32:48 Paty Barcena 1403 Wilson Heights Dr 5/3/2026 14:57:48 Amy Brady 1405 Bay Hill Drive 5/4/2026 13:18:21 Jenny DeTrinis 1406 Bay Hill Dr 5/3/2026 20:41:06 Lindsay Nester 1408 Bay Hill Drive I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. t I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. There are significant disparities and worthy of further studies for not just our neighborhood but all surrounding areas, including 3 schools within 1 mile, that would also be affected by rezoning, further development and a rush to push through. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory .com on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 828 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) This is unreasonable and will be a total traffic nightmare at the corner of lost Creek Boulevard and Of Texas Highway. I adamantly oppose this development of multifamily use. 5/4/2026 13:49:42 Andrew Nester 1408 Bay Hill Drive, Austin Dave Bair 5/4/2026 13:04:23 1408 Thaddeus Cove 5/4/2026 11:07:09 Vivek Garg 1501 Canoe Brook Drive, A 5/4/2026 12:39:57 William Reichhold 1502 Falcon Ledge Drive 5/3/2026 20:24:47 Meghan Donahoe 1504 Johnny Miller Trail 5/3/2026 20:15:33 Meagan Rose 1504 Silverado Circle 5/3/2026 20:16:07 Ethan Glenn 1504 Silverado Circle 5/3/2026 20:16:45 Angela Rose 1504 Silverado Circle 5/4/2026 17:08:46 Bart Gaskins 1507 Falcon Ledge Dr. 5/3/2026 17:09:49 Megan Jill Gaskins 1507 Falcon Ledge Dr., Au 5/3/2026 21:43:02 Kevin Davidson 1508 Ben Crenshaw Way m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 829 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/4/2026 14:59:22 Douglas Youngwith 1514 Ben Crenshaw Way I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 11:12:31 Mary Youngwith 1514 Ben Crenshaw Way, mI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/4/2026 15:57:40 Helen Edwards 1601 Lost Creek Blvd Aust 5/4/2026 21:04:04 Meghan Ann Barchet 1603 Ben Crenshaw Way 5/3/2026 20:34:12 Katherine Cranis 1609 Bay Hill Dr. Jill Barre 5/4/2026 21:14:49 1700 Lost Creek blvd 5/5/2026 8:20:52 Bruce Barre 1700 Lost Creek Blvd. 5/3/2026 16:52:31 Mari Jackson 1701 Lost Creek Blvd. 5/4/2026 13:52:24 Dustin Hall 1701 Mill Springs Dr 5/3/2026 14:21:02 Sherri Sims 1703 Mill Spings Dr 5/4/2026 5:55:58 CW Sheehan 1712 Ben Crenshaw Way I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory com on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. We already have way too much construction and traffic and with improvements to 360 medical and police will not have access to residents in case of emergencies, besides heavy traffic times with school buses. This is too much traffic for the safety of everyone. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 12:29:41 Kayci Sheehan 1712 Ben Crenshaw Way I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 16:30:24 Carly Feingold 1724 Camp Craft Rd I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 830 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/3/2026 20:48:34 Nidhi Kasetty 1734 Ben Crenshaw Way 5/4/2026 12:22:06 Aldean Kainz 1800 Congressional Circle 5/3/2026 20:30:55 Nancy Kainz 1800 Congressional Circle 5/2/2026 15:18:06 Meredith Traweek 1804 Groveton Cove 5/4/2026 14:59:23 Chris Scott 1805 Georgia Landing Cov 5/3/2026 20:18:19 Bonnie Masri 1808 Trevino Dr. 5/4/2026 13:30:41 Nicole Fabiano 1900 Ringtail Rdg 5/4/2026 14:22:34 Marc Hernandez 1901 Big Canyon Dr. Austi 5/4/2026 5:53:52 Angela Milliman 1901 Big Canyon Drive 5/4/2026 10:57:02 Becky Berend 1904 Ringail Ridge, Austin 5/3/2026 10:26:15 Matthew Berend 1904 Ringtail Ridge I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be ncluded as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. l.com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 831 of 460 TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) I am particularly concerned about the proximity of two very large housing districts with limited evacuation options in the event of fire. Thank you, Rosa! Thank you, Rosa! 5/5/2026 0:19:56 Frank Edwards 1904 Trevino Dr 5/4/2026 16:07:42 Molly Hart 1905 Port Royal Drive 5/4/2026 13:11:29 Katharine Shields 2001 Big Canyon Drive 5/3/2026 16:42:15 Mindy Clark 2001 point bluff 5/1/2026 7:47:50 Julia Ann Keenan 2001 Port Royal Drive, Aus 5/1/2026 7:43:22 Douglas Prescott Keenan 2001 Port Royal Drive, Aus 5/4/2026 17:42:37 Anna Balthazar 2003 cypress point west 5/3/2026 20:39:20 Peter Simms 2005 Ringtail Ridge 5/4/2026 10:21:03 Peter William Simms 2005 Ringtail Ridge 5/3/2026 16:37:36 Britta Simms 2005 Ringtail Ridge Austin 5/4/2026 13:20:38 David Zolno 2006 Big Canyon Drive I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 832 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/4/2026 13:04:51 Shawn Reddy 2006 Plumbrook Drive 5/4/2026 20:46:34 Meredith Mann 2006 Plumbrook Drive om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I am a doctor and patients expect me to do due diligence before I recommend a surgery. I would hope a decision such as this (which would affect thousands of families) would hinge on the council having any and all relevant information before a decision is made as well. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 833 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/4/2026 18:11:12 Damon Williams 2006 Port Royal Drive I authorize my name and address to be .com included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Opposing the rezoning request in Case C14‑2025‑0089 for 1120 ½, 1120, 1122, and 1220 S. Capital of Texas Highway from LO and LR to LO‑V‑DB90. While I support adding housing and affordability in appropriate locations, this proposal raises serious concerns regarding traffic and safety, school capacity, compatibility, environmental impacts, and the adequacy of the proposed affordability benefits. 1. Affordability benefits are modest and do not justify the scale of the up-zoning The applicant seeks significant entitlements under DB90, including height up to 70 feet and relaxed development standards, in exchange for an “affordable component.” However, DB90 typically results in: A small percentage of units at shallow affordability levels (60–80% MFI) Primarily studio and 1‑bedroom units, not family‑sized units Time‑limited affordability, while the impacts of height, traffic, and intensity are permanent For a project of this size in a sensitive corridor, the public benefit is not proportional to the entitlements requested. 2. Traffic and ASMP concerns on a high‑speed, car‑dependent corridor Loop 360 is designated a Level 5 corridor under the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan — a high‑speed, high‑volume regional roadway with limited multimodal options. Adding ~475 units plus commercial space will: Increase vehicle trips and turning movements on and off 360 Heighten crash risk on an already dangerous corridor Encourage cut‑through traffic through Lost Creek and nearby neighborhoods Undermine ASMP goals to reduce car dependence and vehicle miles traveled Without a robust, enforceable transportation mitigation plan, the burden will fall on existing residents and the traveling public. 3. Incompatibility with adjacent neighborhoods and the scenic Loop 360 corridor The proposed 70‑foot height is incompatible with the surrounding context of single‑family homes, townhomes, and low‑rise offices. The project would: Alter the scenic hill country views that define the Loop 360 corridor Introduce late‑night lighting, noise, and commercial activity Set a precedent for similar DB90 up-zonings along 360, transforming a scenic gateway into a mid‑rise corridor without a comprehensive plan This is a dramatic and premature intensification of a sensitive area. 4. Environmental, wildfire, and infrastructure concerns The 15.5‑acre site sits in a Hill Country environment with steep terrain and sensitive drainage patterns. Intensifying development here raises concerns about: Increased impervious cover, runoff, and erosion Wildfire evacuation challenges on a limited‑access corridor Additional strain on utilities, emergency services, and public infrastructure These issues require deeper analysis before granting such entitlements. 5. Significant and unmitigated impacts on Eanes ISD schools This site lies within Eanes ISD, one of the most capacity‑constrained districts in Texas. Valley View Elementary has already been closed Valley View Elementary — directly across Loop 360 — was closed beginning in the 2025–26 school year due to declining enrollment (down to 275 students) and facility limitations. Its closure reduced the number of elementary campuses serving this area. Forest Trail Elementary is already growing Forest Trail is projected to grow from 501 → 550 students next year — nearly a 10% increase — even before accounting for new development. Districtwide enrollment declines do not equal available capacity Eanes ISD’s total enrollment is projected to drop from 7,598 → 7,295, but this is due to graduating classes being twice the size of incoming kindergarten cohorts (728 vs. 350). This does not create usable capacity in the Forest Trail attendance zone. Eanes ISD cannot expand capacity The district has: No land for new schools Severe topographic and environmental constraints Limited road access Political and financial barriers to new construction Eanes are closing schools, not opening them. Rezoning decisions in Austin directly impact a district with no zoning authority Eanes ISD has no vote in Austin’s zoning decisions yet must absorb the consequences. 6. School‑related traffic and safety impacts Adding hundreds of units near Forest Trail Elementary will worsen: Drop‑off/pick‑up congestion Loop 360 is not designed for school‑zone traffic patterns. Backups already occur during peak times. Additional residents will increase delays and unsafe maneuvers. Pedestrian and student safety There are no continuous sidewalks or safe crossings. Students cannot safely walk or bike to school. More cars = more risk. Neighborhood cut‑through traffic Lost Creek Blvd will see increased traffic diversion from parents and residents avoiding 360 congestions. Emergency response delays Congestion during school peaks can slow emergency vehicles — a serious safety concern. 7. A more appropriate path forward I am not arguing that the site should remain frozen in time. A rezoning here should be more modest, better aligned with the corridor’s constraints, and tied to: Deeper, more durable affordability Specific transportation and safety improvements Environmental and wildfire mitigation A school capacity analysis and mitigation plan Until these issues are addressed, I urge you to deny the requested LO‑V‑DB90 zoning for Case C14‑2025‑0089 or significantly scale back the entitlements. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 834 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/5/2026 16:54:24 Cami Dato 2006 Port Royal Drive I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/2/2026 13:42:56 Lisa Killough 2200 Cypress Point East 5/3/2026 14:37:33 Bob woody. 2204 point Bluff Austin, T 5/4/2026 13:05:01 J. Winston Chapman, Jr 2211 Cypress Point East, 5/3/2026 21:18:04 Rosemary Shults 2300 Cypress Pt W, Austin I oppose this redistricting I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory n.com on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 17:10:54 Daniel M. Laney 2302 Cypress Point West I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I fully support the propositions that much more study is required before anything else happens. Traffic, especially, need to be carefully studies regarding the current traffic situation and, also, in light of the TXDOT plans to change the traffic pattern at Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. There is only one exit from Lost Creek to Loop 360. The addition of significant traffic now or TXDOT changes the traffic flow simply does not make sense. Given only that one exit out of Lost Creek to 360, it is paramount the Lost Creek Community have a viable evacuation plan in place. Frankly, given the only one exit to 360 the current evacuation plan is totally insufficient. Adding addition traffic to that burden is suicidal. 5/5/2026 17:18:13 Marilyn W. Laney 2302 Cypress Point West I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I fully support the propositions that much more study is required before anything else happens. Traffic, especially, need to be carefully studies regarding the current traffic situation and, also, in light of the TXDOT plans to change the traffic pattern at Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. There is only one exit from Lost Creek to Loop 360. The addition of significant traffic now or TXDOT changes the traffic flow simply does not make sense. Given only that one exit out of Lost Creek to 360, it is paramount the Lost Creek Community have a viable evacuation plan in place. Frankly, given the only one exit to 360 the current evacuation plan is totally insufficient. Adding addition traffic to that burden is suicidal. 5/4/2026 14:18:29 Michael S Bruno III 2303 Cypress Pt. W. 5/3/2026 17:26:34 Kathy Smith 2310, Cypress Point West 5/3/2026 17:41:49 Paul Harrington 2325 Cypress Point East, I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. l.com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Hi, this neighboorhood is growing extremely quickly and traffic has become a major problem for Lost Creek Blvd. For the major proposal to rezone at the front of our neighboorhood, we need a traffic assessment. 5/6/2026 7:27:31 Prentiss Brown 2329 Cyoress Pt E I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. com.com 5/4/2026 13:03:10 Marilyn Brown (Montano) 2329 Cypress Point East 5/3/2026 23:10:51 Tamatha Anders 2330 Cypress Point East com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Additionally, I'm concerned about increased light pollution given our Dark Sky Community status 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 835 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/4/2026 12:08:19 Simal Ozen Irmak, PhD, MPH523 Beardsley Ln 5/3/2026 16:04:41 Josh Darby 5504 Bay Hill Cove 5/3/2026 21:04:27 Paige Darby 5504 Bay Hill Cv 5/4/2026 21:36:48 Ziyu Huang 5606 sedgefield drive 5/3/2026 19:04:49 Howard Garner 5701 Sedgefield Dr Austin 5/4/2026 10:34:41 Lauren podnos 5701 sedgefield dr austin 5/4/2026 10:59:31 Charleen Maxwell 5803 Fox Chapel Dr 5/3/2026 20:55:06 Cara Marcantonio 5806 Fox Chapel Dr 5/4/2026 16:09:46 Cheryl Tulkoff 5903 Fox Chapel Dr. 7874 5/4/2026 12:54:48 Ashok Vadgama 5904 Cape Coral drive, Au 5/5/2026 8:56:04 William Brennan 5909 Cape Coral I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory il.com on this formal letter to the Board. ail.com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. 5/6/2026 7:32:43 Linda Gordon 5909 Front Royal .comI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 836 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/5/2026 10:27:14 Linda S Gordon 5909 Front Royal Dr, Austi l.comI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. As you have seen, the comparison of what the developer told the Lost Creek Limited District Board and what was submitted to the city has many inconsistencies and needs to be reconciled. The actions of this vote have put the safety of the Lost Creek residents, Forest Trail elementary students and future apartment residents at risk. 5/3/2026 22:52:51 Sarah Casey 5911 Front Royal Dr 5/4/2026 0:49:58 Christian Casey 5911 Front Royal Drive, Au 5/4/2026 11:18:34 Lauren Quinones 5929 Cape Coral Drive 5/2/2026 9:47:59 Kathryn Mancl 6000 Front Royal Dr Julie Hill 5/4/2026 18:46:46 6001 Cape Coral Dr., Austi 5/4/2026 17:09:57 Julia Thompson 6002 Front Royal Dr 5/2/2026 9:28:48 Jo Thornton 6004 Front Royal Drive I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. .com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 17:02:27 Kelly Moore 6005 Cape Coral Dr. Austi I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/6/2026 20:17:42 Rebecca Spillane 6007 Cape Coral Dr mI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/4/2026 12:57:17 Sam Boone 6008 Diamond Head Dr 5/2/2026 11:54:19 Kelley Vender 6009 Front Royal Dr 5/2/2026 11:55:21 Kelley Vender 6009 Front Royal DR I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 837 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/2/2026 11:56:01 Doug Vender 6009 Front Royal Dr 5/2/2026 11:56:46 Arden Vender 6009 Front Royal Dr 5/4/2026 12:44:17 Nicole Hafemeister 6104 Cape Coral Drive 5/3/2026 20:10:09 Julie Smith 6202 Augusta National Dr 5/3/2026 20:10:34 Todd Smith 6202 Augusta National Dr I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory il.com on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/6/2026 8:00:47 Jacob Dunlap 6205 Diamond head Circl mI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 19:43:04 Jenni Dunlap 6205 Diamond Head Circl I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/3/2026 17:14:08 Dawn Breyfogle 6205 Indian Canyon Dr. 5/4/2026 16:09:10 Jean Marie Heard 6209 Augusta National Dr 5/4/2026 15:01:27 Natasha Eitel 6209 bend of the river dr 5/4/2026 11:00:10 Aaron Maxwell 6210 Cape Coral Dr 5/3/2026 8:57:19 Jack Spradlin 6210 Indian Canyon Dr I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 838 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/5/2026 0:24:10 Jeremy Brueggemann 6213 Augusta National Dr 5/5/2026 0:22:34 Thao Lien 6213 Augusta National Dr 5/4/2026 13:25:46 Maria Nehring 6301 Nicklaus Place 5/4/2026 11:12:29 Adam Ritter 6304 Plum Hollow Overloo 5/4/2026 13:06:44 Ashley Patel 6305 Whitemarsh Valley W 5/4/2026 13:11:30 Samit Patel 6305 Whitemarsh Valley W mail.com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Postpone the May vote! 5/5/2026 14:07:00 Julie T Martin 6306 Mauna Kea Dr, Austi I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/4/2026 12:54:18 Marsha Spears 6405 Indian Canyon Dr. 5/4/2026 13:00:00 Margaret Weisenberger 6512 Cypress Pt. N 5/4/2026 23:04:32 Latif Dharamsi 6602 Torrey Pines Cv I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. com I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. 5/6/2026 6:02:04 william Seale 6603 Torrey Pines Cove I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/4/2026 14:40:49 Mary Jacobson 6605 Cypress Point Nort I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory om on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 839 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/2/2026 13:13:52 Eryn Myers 6606 Cypress Pt N 5/3/2026 15:31:09 Anne Declerck 6620 Whitemarsh Valley 5/4/2026 6:52:01 Emily McCullough 6631 Whitemarsh Valley W 5/3/2026 20:11:48 Ayesha Bhargava 6643 Whitemarsh Valley W 5/3/2026 15:41:19 Darcy Johnson 6654 Whitemarsh Valley W 5/3/2026 19:10:08 David Miller 6654 Whitemarsh Valley Xin Shen 5/3/2026 17:08:54 6655 Whitemarsh valley w I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory il.com on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. om I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. It seems very unwise to not consider how this development will severely impact getting in and out of the lost creek neighborhood. Not exit thru lost creek please. Also consider watershed issues! The traffic patterns and safety needs to be studied not just for cars, but also bike and pedestrians. 5/5/2026 12:42:58 Victoria Lavi 6659 Whitemarsh Valley I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/4/2026 13:20:51 Allysa Martin 6667 Whitemarsh Valley W 5/3/2026 17:28:21 Cara Hegge 6668 Whitemarsh Valley W It is imperative that the relevant assessments be conducted and evaluated. Therefore a postponement is requested. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 16:00:26 Johnathan Hegge 6668 Whitemarsh Valley I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. No public transport, no safe crossing to services, choke point of a busy intersection 5/4/2026 14:59:46 Alyson Sierra 6677 Whitemarsh Valley W I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 840 of 460TimestampFull Name Street Address Email Address Authorization Comments (Optional) Link to additional evidence/documents (Optional) 5/3/2026 20:20:57 Morgan Bayer 6702 Saint Andrew’s Way 5/4/2026 17:43:32 Clarice Luum 6800 Cypress Point North 5/4/2026 14:18:45 Cristen Daniel 6801 Cypress Point Cove, 5/3/2026 20:26:25 Mallory Knight 6801 Saint Andrews Way 5/4/2026 14:57:44 Kerry Stanley 6809 Cypress Pt N I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. m I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 9:35:56 Claude Smith 6820 Cypress Point N #26 omI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/4/2026 12:57:46 Richard Lindley III 6820 Cypress Point N Uni 5/4/2026 13:17:56 Nancy Bedford 6820 Cypress Pt N #23 I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory m on this formal letter to the Board. I authorize my name and address to be ncluded as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/5/2026 13:25:53 Kristine McAndrews 6820 Cypress Pt N Apt 9 A omI authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 5/7/2026 17:19:22 Mark Smith 2310 Cypress Point West I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. Traffic has already grown 3x along Lost Creek Blvd since 2018. It has become a cut through from Southwest Parkway to Loop 360. That will only get much, much worse when Holden Hills is built and Tecoma Circle connects to Lost Creek Blvd. And don’t forget to add the 120+ new cars coming from the Overlook at Westlake development. The number of cars at the light turning West into Lost Creek Blvd from 360 during rush hour use to be 4-6. Today at 4:30 it was 14, with the last two cars (including mine) blocking the northbound 360 traffic going north. Those cars are going 65-70 mph and then come up on stopped cars in their lane. Please do a traffic study factoring in the two new developments impact as well as the SW Parkway cut through traffic. 5/8/2026 12:22:14 Kathy Harrell 2303 Cypress Point East I authorize my name and address to be included as a signatory on this formal letter to the Board. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 841 of 460Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Jim Emmons Wednesday, May 13, 2026 2:03 PM Villela, Beverly Correspondence from Lost Creek Limited District Lost Creek Limited District Concerns – Case No. C14-2025-0089_v2.pdf Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Ms. Villela, Attached please find correspondence from Chris Vetromile, President, Lost Creek Limited District. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Regards, Jim Emmons — Jim Emmons General Manager Lost Creek Limited District 512 327 6243 (office) 512 751 6737 (cell) CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at 4 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 842 of 460 May 13, 2026 Beverly Villela Senior Planner – Current Planning Austin Planning Department P.O. Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 Re: Lost Creek Limited District Concerns – Case No. C14-2025-0089 Dear Ms. Villela, On behalf of the Lost Creek Limited District (LCLD) Board of Directors, I am writing to formally outline the Board’s concerns regarding the proposed rezoning associated with Case C14-2025-0089, commonly referred to as the City View development proposal. At the outset, the Board would like to clearly state that the LCLD is not categorically opposed to the redevelopment of the site. We recognize the importance of responsible growth and understand the need for thoughtful redevelopment within the City of Austin. However, the Board believes that several significant issues remain unresolved and warrant additional review and coordination before further consideration of the rezoning request proceeds. The Board’s primary concerns include the following: 1. Traffic Impacts and Transportation Analysis The Board remains concerned regarding the lack of a comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) evaluating both site-specific and cumulative impacts associated with this development and surrounding projects. Existing roadway infrastructure in the Lost Creek area is already constrained, and the addition of significant new residential density without a validated transportation analysis raises substantial concerns regarding congestion, circulation, and roadway safety. 2. Public Safety and Emergency Access Public safety constraints related to ingress and egress remain a critical concern for the Board, particularly during emergency situations such as wildfires, major traffic incidents, or other evacuation events. Lost Creek has limited access points, and additional density may further impact emergency response capabilities for Fire and EMS services, evacuation timing, and overall community safety during extreme conditions. The wildfire risk mapping and evacuation concerns previously submitted underscore the importance of evaluating these issues comprehensively prior to additional entitlements being granted. 3. Environmental and Watershed Considerations The Board requests additional review and transparency regarding environmental impacts associated with the project, including considerations involving the Barton Creek Watershed, Edwards Aquifer recharge features, and sensitive habitat areas, including the Golden-cheeked 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 843 of 460 Warbler. The environmental sensitivity of this corridor necessitates careful evaluation before substantial increases in density are approved. 4. Coordination with TxDOT The Board also requests confirmation and documentation of coordination with TxDOT on access management and planned improvements for Loop 360, Lost Creek Boulevard, and the RM 2244 (Bee Cave Road) corridor. Existing and future roadway projects in the area may substantially affect traffic operations and neighborhood accessibility, and these factors should be incorporated into any comprehensive review process. 5. Incomplete or Undefined Zoning Elements Finally, the Board remains concerned about several incomplete or undefined elements in the zoning request, including matters related to the Hill Country Roadway Corridor (HCRC) regulations and the request to change from LO and LR to LO-V-DB90 zoning designation, which references height allowances and waivers that are not typically allowed in the HCRC. While we understand current discussions indicate a maximum building height of approximately 70 feet with waivers, the Board seeks formal clarification confirming how the sought “DB90” is allowable and being advanced as part of this application. The LCLD Board also wishes to address any potential concerns regarding the District’s authority to raise these matters. Based on established precedent involving Municipal Utility Districts and Limited Districts throughout Austin, requesting a comprehensive traffic safety and public safety analysis falls squarely within the Board’s responsibility to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents we serve. Accordingly, the Board respectfully requests that further substantive consideration of the rezoning application pause until these concerns are meaningfully addressed by the City and the applicant. This request should not be interpreted as opposition to the project itself, nor is the Board presently requesting a postponement for the purpose of delaying proceedings. Rather, the Board seeks validation that these issues are legitimate, material concerns deserving of appropriate analysis, coordination, and mitigation before any additional action proceeds. The Board remains committed to constructive engagement with City staff, the applicant, and other stakeholders to pursue a project that appropriately balances redevelopment objectives with public safety, infrastructure capacity, environmental stewardship, and neighborhood compatibility. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Christopher Vetromile President Lost Creek Limited District (LCLD) Board of Directors 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 844 of 460 cc: Lost Creek Limited District Board of Directors Lost Creek Neighborhood Association Working Group City of Austin Zoning and Platting Commission The Drenner Group 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 845 of 460 February 24, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: Opposition to C14-2025-0089 Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, The proposed DB90 zoning under C14-2025-0089, for the property at 1120-1125 S. Capital of Texas Highway, is inconsistent with the City’s Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan and its Growth Concept Map, as it fosters car-dependent sprawl rather than compact, connected growth. Located along a very wide, high-speed highway with inadequate public transit and unsafe pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure, the project will predictably result in attracting hundreds of new cars to an environmentally sensitive area. The Eanes Creek Watershed is classified as a water supply watershed, which is an area that the comprehensive plan intentionally directs growth away from. The impervious cover, cut and fill, and oil-dripping cars are entirely avoidable by rejecting this proposal and supporting growth in areas with existing, sustainable infrastructure and transit. For these reasons, the Save Our Springs Alliance encourages the Zoning and Platting Commission to vote against the proposed rezoning. As a point of emphasis, we are also attaching a list of comprehensive plan policies that the requested rezoning plainly violates. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list but rather to emphasize that the proposed project is the kind of unsustainable development that works against the City of Austin’s goals. Many thanks, Bobby Levinski Senior Staff Attorney, Save Our Springs Alliance ______________ _ Austin’s water watchdog since 1992 _______________ 3201 Menchaca Rd, Austin, TX, 78704 • 512-477-2320 • SOSAlliance.org 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 846 of 460             Attachment For emphasis, the proposed rezoning C14-2025-0089 contradicts the following comprehensive plan policies: LUT P1. Align land use and transportation planning and decision-making to achieve a compact and connected city in line with the Growth Concept Map. LUT P3. Promote development in compact centers, communities, or along corridors that are connected by roads and transit, are designed to encourage walking and bicycling, and reduce healthcare, housing and transportation costs. LUT P4. Protect neighborhood character by directing growth to areas of change that include designated redevelopment areas, corridors, and infill sites. LUT P10. Direct housing and employment growth to activity centers and corridors, preserving and integrating existing affordable housing where possible. LUT P32. Assure that new development is walkable and bikable and preserves the positive characteristics of existing pedestrian friendly environments. Explanation for P1, P3, P4, P10, P32:  The project site is not located within an activity center or core transit corridor. It is within an environmental that is extremely dangerous and hostile to pedestrians and bicyclists. It is not within an area designated for change. LUT P22. Protect Austin’s natural resources and environmental systems by limiting land use and transportation development in sensitive environmental areas and preserving areas of open space. Growth Concept Map, p. 97 (emphasis added): “Directs growth away from the Barton Springs Zone of the Edwards Aquifer recharge and contributing zones and other water-supply watersheds.” Explanation for P22; Growth Concept Map:  The project site is located within the Eanes Creek Watershed, which is considered a Water Supply Suburban Watershed within the Drinking Water Protection Zone. It is an area where growth is expressly discouraged. The over-intensification of this site will require significant amounts of impervious cover and cut and fill, which leads to erosion and stormwater pollution. It would also predictably lead to a car-dependent development, 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 847 of 460    adding hundreds of oil-dripping cars and require the leveling of the land for new roads and parking lots.  These are certainly not the only comprehensive policies that the proposed rezoning violates, but it should help demonstrate how this is an unsustainable request. We urge ZAP to vote against the zoning change. Thank you for your consideration. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 848 of 460  March 30, 2026 Beverly Villela Senior Planner – Current Planning Austin Planning Department P.O. Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 Re: Case No. C14-2025-0089 – LCNA Position for April 7, 2026 ZAP Hearing Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, On behalf of the Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA), we appreciate the opportunity to provide updated input regarding the proposed rezoning for Case No. C14- 2025-0089. We respectfully submit this letter for inclusion in the Zoning and Platting Commission (“ZAP”) briefing materials ahead of the April 7 hearing. At the outset, we want to clearly state our position: LCNA is not opposed to redevelopment of this site. We recognize the importance of accommodating growth and supporting thoughtful land use evolution within the City of Austin. However, we remain concerned that the current zoning request represents a premature and under-analyzed upzoning that has not yet been supported by the level of technical analysis and coordination warranted for a project of this scale. Recent ZAP deliberations on comparable cases, such as the rezoning of the former Rosedale School site, underscore a broader trend in which staa-supported cases are generally advanced with an expectation that remaining issues will be resolved between the applicant and stakeholders after a recommendation is made. While we understand this procedural reality, it heightens the importance of ensuring that foundational due diligence is completed prior to zoning approval, rather than deferred. The proposed development must also be evaluated in the context of cumulative growth pressures currently impacting the Lost Creek area. Nearby projects, including the Stratus development, which is anticipated to deliver hundreds of residential units, and the MileStone project adding 48 new homes, will collectively introduce substantial additional traaic into an already constrained roadway network. When combined with the proposed 475-unit development under this zoning request, the aggregate eaect represents a significant increase in daily vehicle trips that has not been holistically analyzed. Without a comprehensive, cumulative traaic assessment that accounts for these overlapping developments, the Commission cannot fully understand the true impact on mobility, safety, and neighborhood access. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 849 of 460To date, LCNA and surrounding residents have consistently raised substantive concerns that remain unresolved: • Traaic impacts and lack of a comprehensive Traaic Impact Analysis • Coordination with TxDOT regarding access and planned roadway improvements • Environmental and watershed considerations • Public safety constraints, particularly related to ingress and egress • Incomplete or undefined elements within the zoning application These concerns were formally documented in our prior correspondence requesting postponement, and we believe they remain directly relevant to the Commission’s consideration. LCNA’s Request for April 7 In the spirit of constructive engagement, LCNA respectfully requests that the Zoning and Platting Commission consider conditioning any recommendation on the completion and validation of the following key items: 1. Tra6ic Impact Analysis (TIA): A comprehensive and current TIA that evaluates both site-specific and cumulative impacts, including interaction with nearby developments and corridor conditions. An inaccurate baseline assumption by City of Austin staa led to the decision not to complete this analysis. Observations on February 12, 2026 revealed as few as 113 cars were present on-site leading to an estimated 434 daily trips, far below the ~3,000 trips used in the assumption. 2. TxDOT Coordination: Formal confirmation of coordination with TxDOT regarding access, intersection performance, and compatibility with planned improvements along Loop 360. 3. Full Site Impact Evaluation: A holistic assessment of the project’s eaects on surrounding infrastructure, including drainage, utilities, and neighborhood connectivity. 4. Infrastructure Capacity Confirmation: Verification that public infrastructure and services, including emergency response and public transportation, can adequately support the proposed density. The nearest CapMetro bus stop is 2.6 miles. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 850 of 4605. Context-Sensitive Height and Compatibility Measures: Consideration of reasonable height transitions and buaering strategies adjacent to existing residential areas to ensure compatibility. Our intent is not to delay progress unnecessarily, but to ensure that any zoning decision is grounded in complete information and results in a project that is both viable and compatible with its surroundings. We also want to emphasize that LCNA is committed to maintaining a constructive and solutions-oriented dialogue. We are asking for a better process and a better project, not the elimination of redevelopment opportunities. We appreciate the Commission’s time and consideration and look forward to continued engagement with City staa, the applicant, and all stakeholders to achieve an outcome that reflects sound planning principles and community compatibility. Respectfully, Shriya Josephsen President Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) cc: Zoning and Platting Commission Members, The Drenner Group 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 851 of 460 EXHIBIT A Wildfire Intensity Map – Lost Creek CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 852 of 460 Extreme Fire Intensity Scale: Extreme Fire Intensity Scale represents an average of near worst-case intensity results at the flaming front of the fire. This “average- worst” uses the average of the worst five percent of Weather Types to produce one value at each location on the map. Web address: https://wrap.texaswildfirerisk.com/Map/Public/#map-themes Data Source: Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment, Pyrologix 2023 (includes fuel disturbances through 2022) LOST CREEK DOWNTOWN AUSTIN 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 853 of 460 1120 Capital of TX HWY 1122 Capital of TX HWY ONLY THREE STREETS FOR INGRESS & EGRESS TO LOST CREEK IF WILDFIRE EVENT OCCURS 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 854 of 460EXHIBIT B Loop 360 Expansion – Mopac to RM 2244 CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 855 of 460 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT Texas Department of Transportation LOOP 360 FROM: MOPAC TO: RM 2244 TRAVIS COUNTY, AUSTIN DISTRICT CSJ 0113-13-170/171/172 DATE: APPROVED: NOT A BIDDING DOCUMENT EDUARDO GUTIERREZ, P.E. TEXAS REGISTRATION NUMBER 75994 DATE LEGEND EXISTING MAINLANE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN PROPOSED MAINLANE PAVEMENT PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FRONTAGE ROAD, CROSS STREET, RAMP, OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE PROPOSED SHARED-USE PATH & SIDEWALK PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0' 50' 100' 200' SCALE 9 2 . 6 4 + 7 2 6 T O P 630+00 635+00 D A O R E V A C E E B BLVD W REN ROW R U TH AR KING PROJECT LANCELOT WAY LIMITS N O Y N A C IM R WHIPOORWILL TRL Barton Creek Country Club BARTON CLUB CREEK JO U STIN G E G LED LEDGE-ROCK VALLEYRIDGE CASTLE RIDGE GALAHAD D R E G ID R 360 D O O W L L O N K FORESTHILL CASTLE 2244 N SUNDOW Y PKW W IL S O N H G T S WILD Y LA C R A B S K A O N O N N A H S BRIAR SCOTTISH WOODS CAMP L IL H CRAFT LOOP Y E R R U S R E K A U Q E G ID R BAY BLVD LOST CRK A KITTAN- R R O SETT N IM IN K T H A D D E U S H ILL T FF P LU B K C O R B M U L P Barton Creek Greenbelt BARTON 360 Barton Creek Wilderness Park BENCRENSHAW CYPRESSPOINT CYPRESS N LOST N O LC A F W H IT E ILLER J M AGUSTA NATL H P O LU LLO M R O W Y A L O IN V E R T IG B N O Y N A C M A R S H LOST DARTMOOR INDIAN CANYON DIAMOND HEAD CANOE CREEK BROOK CAPE AL R QUAKER CO RIDGE FRONT ROYAL L A Y O R T S E W Y E K T R O P Barton Creek Greenbelt MAUNAKEA D O R A L C Y P R E S S P T E TURTLEPT BEND O'RIVER Barton Creek Wilderness Park IT IM L Y IT C IN T S U A P O IN T W POINT O'W OODS LOOP LOST ILL KINGSM Lost Creek Country Club C CREEK BLVD SCALE 1"=100' BEND CIR BUD LITTLE RIDGE TRAIL BEND RANCH IG B RED FLINTRIDGE 2244 ROAD LIVE YAUPON OAK RIDGE LIVE OAK CIR R E IP N JU WINDSONG RED B U D WEST LAKE HILLS Pop 2,542 S K Y L IN E W O L L O H KNOB HILL R O B R A H W IE V T A C CIR D IL W Creek IR C LL U H NORMAL POOL ELEV 493.0' IC N E C S KENNEL-WOOD H IG LE CLEARVIEW A R R O CHERRY O M K BRIDLE C O R BONNIE M AD R O N E VALLEY T EN R R U IFTC SW LAUREL VALLEY TRL SPILLAR BUCKEYE Little TRL Bee Creek Bee Caves Preserve RED BUD R E IV R IEW V TRL Y K C O R EST R FO OAKRIDGE ROCKYLEDGE K P R A D E C K R C K C O R University of Texas R ELL ILLA N W SP N O EN C V A H EST W C M ROCKY RIVER SPRING ILLE E K LA ST E W E V E R S ISA R B HONEY- COMB RIDGE EANESSCH RD KONSTANTY CRAFT P M A C WEST BANK ALLEN EASY .6 3 BROOK- HAVEN K O O R B T S E W G ID R IND IAN GREY FOX N LIA U B S LA WEST- WOOD D O - D O R O ELW IA O R W B R U LA E LU B 3.7 S G P S SANDERLING S A M LO MULE-SHOE HILLCREST H ILLS HATLEY PLEASANT NIXON K R A P Y D A R B D O O W E G ID R S A L K A E P H T R O N GREG- ORY TIMBERLINE S K A E P BEE Hatley Park LLIS A W GENTRY ROLLINGWOOD ROLLING- WOOD Pop 1,388 CAVES ROCKW AY VAN CE INWOODALMARION BETTIS LEY ILEY R FA LE A PICKWICK V R R D R E ILV ILL S H RIPPLE CRK P A S A MOON RIV T N A T S N O C DAR- TER Lions Municipal Golf Course Red Bud Isle Park LA K E A U ST IN University of Texas CAN YONCIR STRATFORD H T R O W H S A E N E O G T ID S R R R E T E N O T S HERON FALCON RAIN FOREST RIDGE TARLTON N O T LE R A T LN LSH A W HONEY PINNACLE H LS A W W O L L A W S N R A B EANES- WOOD E A N E S BRIGHT- WOOD CIR OAKS IN 1000 GLEN MISTYWOOD FOX ATER HEADW WYCHWOOD TAMARRON BLVD T O IC R P A TERVAIL R E T IN W K R A P HOLLY HILL LOVELAND ANGELFIRE Barton Creek Greenbelt Tucker CR EEK 360 O L L E B E T N O M T C - E T N O M O L L E B Y PKW CAPITOL MO-PAC 2244 EXPRESSWAY 1.8 1 SPYGLASS Barton Creek Greenbelt B A R T O N SKYW AY Campbells Hole BARTONCLIFF C R E S T H A V E N G LE N C LIF F FOX GLEN BRIARCREST N TO R BA Y W K P E G ID R BARTON FOREST BEND BARTON LOOP 1 E L A D E M O H F O U R M HILLS A T T E R H O R N O A K S ROCK TERRACE ROCKINGHAM N TO R A B WILKE W R U TH R A B B A R ARPDALE LA CASA PARKWAY R E T S FO TRAVIS IL A TR COUNTRY CREST FIELDSTONE WEST CAP ROCK KNOBOAK RED STONE LN N O T T A P D O O W K R A P SOUTHWEST Oak Hill Park PARKWAY TRAIL CANYONW OOD SIDEWOOD- E N O T C LIFFS MESAVILLAGE M E SA O A K S Travis County Park TRAVIS COUNTRY B E N D Travis County Park C A N Y O N Barton Creek Wilderness Park Barton Creek Greenbelt 1.5 rton a B 360 N E V A H - R A W D IE E C V BLU VIEW FF PROJECT WESTHILL B A R T O N OAK Gus Fruh Park Creek LIMITS K A O W T S E R O F K C O R T S E W 343 SKYW A Y VICINITY MAP N.T.S PRELIMINARY THIS PRINT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. THE PLAN INFORMATION OR OTHER DATA SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MUST NOT BE CONSTRUCTED AS FINAL LOOP 360 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT MOPAC (LOOP 1) TO DATE: 6/9/2020 RM 2244 5 4 : 1 N G D . 1 _ O O _ R E D R O B _ B X E _ F D M _ T W 0 6 3 0 L S \ s t i b i h x E \ s e l i F e c n e r e f e R r e t s a M \ D P A - 2 \ 1 7 1 - 3 1 - 3 1 1 0 J S C \ 0 6 3 L S - n i t s u A 1 0 2 0 T O D x T \ s t c e j o r P \ : Z 0 2 0 2 / 9 / 6 OPTION 1: OVERPASS AT LOST CREEK BOULEVARD AND AT WESTBANK DRIVE AND AT WALSH TARLTON LANE HEB ST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC CHURCH LEGEND EXISTING MAINLANE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN PROPOSED MAINLANE PAVEMENT PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FRONTAGE ROAD, CROSS STREET, RAMP, OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE PROPOSED SHARED-USE PATH & SIDEWALK PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4 4 2 2 M R 640+00 3 0 . 8 9 + 7 3 6 T O P RANCH 2244 ROAD EXISTING ROW LOOP 360 EXISTING ROW 645+00 NB FRONTAGE ROAD NB ENTRANCE RAMP NB ENTRANCE RAMP NB ENTRANCE RAMP SL 360 NB MAINLANES SL 360 SB MAINLANES SB FRONTAGE ROAD SB EXIT RAMP EXISTING ROW PROPOSED ROW 10' SHARED-USE PATH 650+00 8 0 . 8 2 + 1 5 6 C P 6' SIDEWALK Y A W K R A P S A M I C S A L 655+00 Y A W K R A P S A M I C S A L PROPOSED ROW 10' SHARED-USE PATH NB EXIT RAMP 680+00 660+00 665+00 9 2 . 6 1 + 9 6 6 T P 670+00 675+00 SB ENTRANCE RAMP PROPOSED ROW 685+00 D R A V E L U O B K E E R C T S O L 6' SIDEWALK SOURCE: https://www.txdot.gov/content/dam/project-sites/loop360/docs/ mopac-rm-2244-jul-2019-exhibits.pdf VALLEY VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6' SIDEWALK 690+00 EXISTING ROW NB FRONTAGE ROAD SL 360 NB MAINLANES SL 360 SB MAINLANES SB FRONTAGE ROAD 695+00 LOOP 360 EXISTING ROW 0 0 + 9 9 6 A T S E IN L H C T A M 10' SHARED-USE PATH LEGEND EXISTING MAINLANE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN PROPOSED MAINLANE PAVEMENT PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FRONTAGE ROAD, CROSS STREET, RAMP, OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE PROPOSED SHARED-USE PATH & SIDEWALK PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 856 of 460 EXHIBIT C Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Determination Worksheet CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 857 of 460 X >2000 Trips/day → Transportation Assess X >5000 Trips/day → Neighborhood Traffic Analysis Estimated Daily Trips Using the standard turnover method 155 cars x 2.8 avg. turnover = 434 Daily Trips ITE std. rate for 321 (4.54 to 6.74 range) 475U x 6.74 Trips/U = 3202 Trips/day 4755 Trips/day ? ? 231 3202 222 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) 90 ft. 231 Mid-Rise Residential with Ground-Floor Commercial 70 ft. Expired in Nov ‘25 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 858 of 460Transportation Criteria Manual Section 10 Traffic Impact Analysis https://www.austintexas.gov/depart ment/transportation-development- services 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 859 of 460Existing City View Parking Lot 2/12/2026 2 pm 113 Cars 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 860 of 460EXHIBIT D Map: Access to Public Transportation from CityView Development CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 861 of 460 THERE IS NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1120 & 1122 S CAPITAL OF TX HWY. LOST CREEK Source: https://platform.remix.com/project/7b6385a3?latlng=30.36625,-97.55017,10.569 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 862 of 460THE CLOSEST ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1120 &1122 S CAPITAL OF TX HWY IS IS OVER 2.5 MILES AWAY AT BARTON CREEK MALL. Source: https://platform.remix.com/project/7b6385a3?latlng=30.36625,-97.55017,10.569 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 863 of 460Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Scott, Ashley Fisher Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:55 PM Scott Smith; Villela, Beverly Leah Bojo Re: Submission – LCNA Letter and Exhibits for Case C14-2025-0089 (April 7 ZAP Hearing) External Email - Exercise Caution Thank you for sharing your letter regarding the proposed rezoning. We appreciate the collaborative approach and that Lost Creek Neighborhood Association is not opposed to redevelopment of the site. In response to a few of your concerns listed in the letter, here is some information. We agree that all these issues are important, but the details of these issues are better handled through the site plan process. Traffic Impact Analysis: The city staff have determined that a traffic impact analysis is not Coordination with TXDOT: Coordination with TXDOT will also occur during the site plan • required because the proposal does not exceed the thresholds establish in the Land Development Code. Further transportation analysis may be required through the site plan process. • process. • site to comply with current environmental regulations which are more stringent than those at the time the site was developed previously. • 360 and one to Lost Creek Blvd. Access will also be part of the site plan process. Public Safety related to ingress and egress: the Site currently has two driveways, one to Environmental and Watershed considerations: redevelopment of the site will require the We are happy to meet again this week if you would like. Let us know if you would like to set a time for a virtual meeting. Ashley Ashley Fisher, Senior Project Manager Drenner Group, PC | 2705 Bee Cave Road | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78746 1 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 864 of 460 C14-2025-0089 Page 15 Attachment E 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 865 of 460 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Determination Worksheet Applicant must complete this worksheet except where noted for TPW Staff. Please submit completed worksheet to the TIA Determination Worksheet portal (https://atd.knack.com/development- services#services/traffic-impact-analysis-determination/) for review and signature. Please contact Lead Development Review Engineer if you have any questions. Contact information is available at: TPW-TDS Website Project: Location: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway, Austin, TX 78746 Approved TIA? TIA name: Applicant/Consultant: Leah M. Bojo Email: lbojo@drennergroup.com Approved PUD? Location Jurisdiction: Full Purpose Approved PUD name: Phone: 5128072918 Application Type (Please select only one): Zoning X Site Plan Site Plan Extension Dev. Assessment Concept Site Plan PUD By checking the box below, the applicant acknowledges that City Council has adopted a Street Impact Fee (SIF) program effective December 21, 2020, and that street impact fees will be assessed for any building permit pulled on or after June 21, 2022. For more information on the Street Impact Fee program, please visit www.austintexas.gov/department/street-impact-fee I, the applicant, acknowledge this development is subject to the Street Impact Fee program. Brief description of existing & proposed uses: Existing Land Use: Tract Acres Land Use Type Zoning office to multifamily/commercial/office Land Use (Select Type First) Units Value ITE Rate/FCE Trips/Day TPW STAFF USE ONLY 1 2 8.42 LO and LR Office_700s 710 - General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 139.78 710 7.09 LO Office_700s 710 - General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 130.20 710 FCE FCE 1553 1460 Custom: If none of the land use options in the spreadsheet work, please contact Lead Development Review Engineer for next steps. Please note that using custom uses may significantly increase review time. Use of custom land uses may also require data collection and analysis conducted by a licensed professional engineer in Texas before final determination Proposed Land Use: Tract Acres Zoning Land Use Type Land Use (Select Type First) Units Value ITE Rate/FCE Trips/Day TPW STAFF USE ONLY 1 2 8.42 LR-V-DB90 Office_700s 710 - General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 139.78 710 FCE 7.09 LR-V-DB90 Residential_200s 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Dwelling Units 475.00 221 4.54x Retail_800s 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 1,000 SF GFA 7.20 822 54.45x 1553 2157 392 Custom: If none of the land use options in the spreadsheet work, please contact Lead Development Review Engineer for next steps. Please note that using custom uses may significantly increase review time. Use of custom land uses may also require data collection and analysis conducted by a licensed professional engineer in Texas before final determination Abutting Roadways: Street Name Lost Creek Blvd. S.Capital of Texas Highway Proposed Access (Y/N) Y Y Proposed # of Driveways 1 1 1089 Net Trips: ASMP Street Level 3 N/A Please submit completed spreadsheet to TPW through KNACK (link at top of sheet). If you used Excel for the Web, please download and submit. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 866 of 460For TPW Staff Use Only A neighborhood traffic analysis (NTA) is required per LDC 25-6-114. The applicant may have to collect current traffic counts. Please contact the Lead Development Review Engineer. A traffic impact study with TDM is required. TIA scoping is required prior to beginning the study. Please see below for the type of study; for more information on each study, please refer to Section 10 of the TCM. Full TIA TA ZTA TIA Update A TIA compliance memo is required. The memo must demonstrate compliance of this case with the following TIA. For more information, please refer to the City of Austin TIA Guidelines Section 6. A traffic impact analysis is NOT required. Traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed thresholds established in the City of Austin Land Development Code (LDC). Mitigation per LDC 25-6-101 may still apply. ✔ A standalone Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan is required. For more information on the contents required in a TDM Plan, please refer to Section 10 of the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM). The traffic impact analysis has been waived. See notes below. Reviewer: Juan Valera PE Date: 6/29/2026 More information on study requirements and how to submit can be found online at the TDS customer portal (https://atd.knack.com/development- services#customer-portal/) NOTE: A TIA determination must be made prior to submittal of any Zoning/Site Plan application; therefore, this completed and reviewed worksheet must accompany any subsequent application for the identical project. Changes to the proposed project may require a new TIA determination. This worksheet will remain valid for six months from the approval date above, after which a new TIA Determination Worksheet may be required. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 867 of 460Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Tucker Ferguson Thursday, March 26, 2026 7:02 PM Scott Smith Shriya Josephsen; Villela, Beverly; Orlando Gallegos RE: Request for Transportation Coordination Review (City View / Loop 360 & Lost Creek Blvd) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good evening Mr. Smith. Developers are responsible for coordinating with our office when their projects require access to the state highway system. We work closely with local jurisdictions during the development review process; however, this coordination typically occurs during the site development or building permit phase. At that stage, cities and counties generally require developers to secure the appropriate access permits before proceeding. The safety and operational evaluations you referenced are conducted once a site plan has been developed and sufficient traffic data is available. This allows for a more accurate assessment of potential traffic impacts and the identification of any necessary mitigation measures. Thank you, Tucker Ferguson, PE Austin District Engineer Texas Department of Transportation 7901 North I-35 Austin, TX 78753 1 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 868 of 460 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Determination Worksheet Applicant must complete this worksheet except where noted for TPW Staff. Please submit completed worksheet to the TIA Determination Worksheet portal (https://atd.knack.com/development- services#services/traffic-impact-analysis-determination/) for review and signature. Please contact Lead Development Review Engineer if you have any questions. Contact information is available at: TPW-TDS Website Project: Location: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway, Austin, TX 78746 Approved TIA? TIA name: Applicant/Consultant: Leah M. Bojo Application Type (Please select only one): Approved PUD? Email: Location Jurisdiction: Full Purpose Approved PUD name: Phone: 5128072918 Zoning X Site Plan Site Plan Extension Dev. Assessment Concept Site Plan PUD By checking the box below, the applicant acknowledges that City Council has adopted a Street Impact Fee (SIF) program effective December 21, 2020, and that street impact fees will be assessed for any building permit pulled on or after June 21, 2022. For more information on the Street Impact Fee program, please visit www.austintexas.gov/department/street-impact-fee I, the applicant, acknowledge this development is subject to the Street Impact Fee program. Brief description of existing & proposed uses: Existing Land Use: Tract Acres Land Use Type Zoning office to multifamily/commercial/office Land Use (Select Type First) Units Value ITE Rate/FCE Trips/Day TPW STAFF USE ONLY 1 2 8.42 LO and LR Office_700s 710 - General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 139.78 710 7.09 LO Office_700s 710 - General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 130.20 710 FCE FCE 1553 1460 Custom: If none of the land use options in the spreadsheet work, please contact Lead Development Review Engineer for next steps. Please note that using custom uses may significantly increase review time. Use of custom land uses may also require data collection and analysis conducted by a licensed professional engineer in Texas before final determination Proposed Land Use: Tract Acres Zoning Land Use Type Land Use (Select Type First) Units Value ITE Rate/FCE Trips/Day TPW STAFF USE ONLY 1 2 8.42 LO-V-DB90 Office_700s 710 - General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 139.78 710 FCE 7.09 LO-V-DB90 Residential_200s 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Dwelling Units 475.00 221 4.54x Retail_800s 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 1,000 SF GFA 7.20 822 54.45x 1553 2157 392 Custom: If none of the land use options in the spreadsheet work, please contact Lead Development Review Engineer for next steps. Please note that using custom uses may significantly increase review time. Use of custom land uses may also require data collection and analysis conducted by a licensed professional engineer in Texas before final determination Abutting Roadways: Street Name Lost Creek Blvd. S.Capital of Texas Highway Proposed Access (Y/N) Y Y Proposed # of Driveways 1 1 1089 Net Trips: ASMP Street Level 3 N/A Please submit completed spreadsheet to TPW through KNACK (link at top of sheet). If you used Excel for the Web, please download and submit. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 869 of 460For TPW Staff Use Only A neighborhood traffic analysis (NTA) is required per LDC 25-6-114. The applicant may have to collect current traffic counts. Please contact the Lead Development Review Engineer. A traffic impact study with TDM is required. TIA scoping is required prior to beginning the study. Please see below for the type of study; for more information on each study, please refer to Section 10 of the TCM. Full TIA TA ZTA TIA Update A TIA compliance memo is required. The memo must demonstrate compliance of this case with the following TIA. For more information, please refer to the City of Austin TIA Guidelines Section 6. A traffic impact analysis is NOT required. Traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed thresholds established in the City of Austin Land Development Code (LDC). Mitigation per LDC 25-6-101 may still apply. ✔ A standalone Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan is required. For more information on the contents required in a TDM Plan, please refer to Section 10 of the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM). The traffic impact analysis has been waived. See notes below. Reviewer: Juan Valera, PE Date: 4/7/2026 More information on study requirements and how to submit can be found online at the TDS customer portal (https://atd.knack.com/development- services#customer-portal/) NOTE: A TIA determination must be made prior to submittal of any Zoning/Site Plan application; therefore, this completed and reviewed worksheet must accompany any subsequent application for the identical project. Changes to the proposed project may require a new TIA determination. This worksheet will remain valid for six months from the approval date above, after which a new TIA Determination Worksheet may be required. 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 870 of 460C14-2025-0089 Page 16 Attachment F 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 871 of 460 Case Number: C14-2025-0089 PETITION Total Square Footage of Buffer: Percentage of Square Footage Owned by Petitioners Within Buffer: Date: 5/26/2026 865406.5176 40.25% Calculation: The total square footage is calculated by taking the sum of the area of all TCAD Parcels with valid signatures including one-half of the adjacent right-of-way that fall within 200 feet of the subject tract. Parcels that do not fall within the 200 foot buffer are not used for calculation. When a parcel intersects the edge of the buffer, only the portion of the parcel that falls within the buffer is used. The area of the buffer does not include the subject tract. TCAD ID Address Owner Signature Petition Area Precent LIMESTONE CREEK PROPERTIES L P BOSS REANN MARIE KRIENKE TRENT B & JOY M ALMGREN LISA CHATFIELD JAMES R & SANDY LOU PHILLIPS ANNA BAKER BRENT N & ALISON M HILTS SHEILA T LIFE ESTATE HOGAN BENJAMIN J & CLAIRE M NEWTON JOHN & EMILY ATX OFFICE OWNER 5 LP DOOLIN JAMES H & REBECCA S DUVALL MIKE A AMOS OSCAR D & MAGGIE S HERN DIANE LEE & PAUL M ANDERSON TIPTON SUSAN HIGH BAR N LLC LAWRENCE ARTHUR JAMES JR BYINGTON GERALD L SMITH AMANDA C & MATTHEW J KEHOE BINNING ROBERT & BROOKE SCOTT THOMAS CRAIG K & ALESSANDRA THOMAS LAWSON EDWARD L JR SIMMONS BRYAN C JR & TRACY MCCRACKEN BURNS ROSA YUPARI SALEM IVONNE C SCHMIDT BRUCE W & SANDRA L 0111230502 1114 LOST CREEK BLVD 78746 0111230201 1200 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 MUDD DAVID 0111230416 1201 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230202 1202 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230415 1203 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230203 1204 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230414 1205 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230204 1206 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230413 1207 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230205 1208 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230412 1209 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111210203 1250 S CAPITAL OF TX HY 78746 0111230311 1301 THADDEUS CV AUSTIN 78746 0111230411 1301 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230312 1302 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230410 1303 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230313 1304 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230409 1305 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230314 1306 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230408 1307 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230315 1308 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230407 1309 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230316 1310 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230406 1311 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230317 1312 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230405 1313 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230318 1314 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230404 1315 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230319 1316 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 MAHAFFEY MICHAEL L & LAURIE E 0111230403 1317 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230320 1318 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230402 1319 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230321 1320 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230401 1321 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 0111230322 1400 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111230418 1401 WILSON HEIGHTS DR AUSTIN 78746 WOMACK CLOVIS & POLLY A 0109210724 1402 BARCLAY DR 78746 0109210723 1402 D BARCLAY DR 78746 0109210722 1402 E BARCLAY DR 78746 0111230417 1403 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0109230118 1405 WILSON HEIGHTS DR 78746 0111210204 BARCLAY DR 78746 Total SARRIS SHIRLEY RUTH LUO XINYUE & JIE QIN STITES GREGORY LEE & JULIE MANARD STITES LOOK-JAMESON MARION DILTZ JEFFREY & PAMELA OEHLER WIENECKE LP DAWSON EDWARD CALDWELL & AMY ELIZABETH FOWLER-DAWSON GITNIK ELENA HECKER MARVIN L & GAYLON FINKL BLAIR KAREN MANAGEMENT TRUST PUCKETT VICKY SMALLING SAMUEL A & ELENA WHITLOCK no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes 114166.12 9292.83 20764.54 4712.57 11262.57 4047.09 10643.35 3826.75 10934.66 8201.39 10827.42 184920.14 5563.67 10903.24 4053.35 11915.35 4023.41 11709.24 4095.68 11550.48 4007.64 11605.70 4073.90 12014.78 4150.38 11651.50 4158.94 11663.87 4209.51 12006.90 3981.41 11302.82 4186.31 11840.34 5089.02 13682.89 13588.58 16675.63 1447.44 13127.44 6797.61 56425.61 0.00% 1.07% 2.40% 0.54% 1.30% 0.47% 0.00% 0.44% 1.26% 0.95% 1.25% 0.00% 0.64% 1.26% 0.47% 1.38% 0.46% 0.00% 0.00% 1.33% 0.46% 1.34% 0.47% 1.39% 0.00% 1.35% 0.48% 0.00% 0.49% 1.39% 0.00% 1.31% 0.48% 1.37% 0.59% 1.58% 1.57% 1.93% 0.00% 1.52% 0.79% 6.52% 695102.08 40.25% 04 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 872 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 873 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 874 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 875 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 876 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 877 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 878 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 879 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 880 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 881 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 882 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 883 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 884 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 885 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 886 of 46004 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 887 of 460