MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Todd W. Shaw, Chair Planning Commissioners Keith Mars, AICP, Community Tree Preservation Division Manager Development Services Department Lisa Killander, Public Works Department Urban Forester Public Works Department July 27, 2021 DATE: CASE: Tree Permit ROW ID 12709593 REQUEST: Right-of-Way Protected Tree Removal Appeal Overview On May 5, 2021, the City of Austin’s Environmental Commission granted a citizen’s request to remove a Protected Cottonwood located in the City of Austin right-of-way adjacent to 13213 Villa Park Drive. City Code 6-3-94(A) allows a person to appeal the Environmental Commission’s decision to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may overrule, sustain, or modify the Environmental Commission’s decision. Governing Code and Case Chronology This case is governed by City Code of Ordinances Title 6-3 Trees and Vegetation on public property. The following is a high-level chronology of the events prior to the July 27, 2021, Planning Commission hearing. • January 2020 – Mr. Patrick Fulker, 13213 Villa Park Drive, submitted a Tree Ordinance Review Application requesting removal of two Protected trees in the City of Austin right-of-way. The Public Works Department Urban Forestry Program assessed the trees and did not find justification for removal. • February 2020 to September 2020- Dialogue between Mr. Patrick Fulker and City staff to further assess the tree condition and possible damage to private and City utility lines. Based on evidence that one Protected Tree was damaging utility lines, the City agreed to remove one of the two Protected Trees identified in the January 2020 request. 2 1 of 73B-8 • September 2020- Per City Code of Ordinances Title 6-3-91 Mr. Fulker appealed the Public Works Urban Forester’s determination to deny removal of the the Board tree. remaining Protected Cottonwood (Environmental Commission) may overrule, sustain, or modify the Urban Forester’s determination. Agenda- http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=350288 Appellate backup- http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=350548 Staff backup- http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=350427 Title 6-3-93 states • November 2020- Environmental Commission heard the appeal. Commission voted to sustain the Urban Forester’s determination. Approved Minutes- http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=351205 • February 2021- Mr. Patrick Fulker requested the Public Works Department reassess the Protected Cottonwood. • March 2021- The Public Works Department Urban Forester assessed the tree and determined the condition had not changed since her last assessment in August 2020. The request for removal was denied. Mr. Patrick Fulker requested to appeal this determination to the Environmental Commission. • May 2021- Environmental Commission heard the second appeal of the Public Works Department Urban Forester’s …
PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN COMMISSION APPROVAL REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: SP-2016-0106C(XT2) PC DATE: 7/27/2021 PROJECT NAME: Waterloo Park Tower ADDRESS: 1201 Red River Street APPLICANT: Nalle Woods AGENT: Kimley-Horn (Amanda Brown) 512-418-1771 CASE MANAGER: Jeremy Siltala (512) 974-2945 or jeremy.siltala@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: Waller Creek APPLICATION REQUEST: The applicant proposes a second extension to an approved site plan which requires Land Use Commission approval (§ 25-5-63). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes construction of a 32-story hotel with associated parking, drives, utility, sidewalk, and landscape improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan extension. PREVIOUS APPROVALS: Staff approved a one-year administrative extension from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021. PROJECT INFORMATION: SITE AREA ZONING LAND USE IMPERVIOUS COVER BUILDING HEIGHT VEHICULAR ACCESS 18,823 SF or 0.43 acres Central Business District (CBD) Hotel 18,823 SF or 100% 357 FT, 32 stories East 12th Street NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Central Austin CDC City of Austin Downtown Commission Downtown Austin Alliance Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA) Waller District Staff Liaison Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Lower Waller Creek Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group Waterloo Greenway B-91 of 3 B-92 of 3 T.B.M SQUARE CUT IN CONCRETE ELEV.= 485.80 S73°41'57"E 6.11' S73°41'57"E 19.29' S73°41'57"E 137.40' ' 2 2 . 9 0 1 ' W " 2 5 7 1 ° 6 1 S R=590.00 L=111.08' N06°16'48"E LOT 1 T E E R T S ) . W O . . R ' 0 8 ( R E V I R D E R I I R E V R D E R F O N O T R O P D E N O D N A B A T E E R T S ) 0 3 2 1 . G P , 8 8 3 5 . L O V ( C=50.81' 20' ALLEY LOT 2 E L L A N S D O O W N A L A 6 4 1 2 1 0 5 0 0 2 . O N . C O D ) I I N T S U A F O Y T C L A N G R O 3 4 1 K L B I I , 2 T O L 3 / 2 . W , 1 T O L ( . C N I …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8J-2020-0148 P.C. DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBDIVISION NAME: Prospect Park Preliminary Plan AREA: 234.52 acres LOT(S): 806 OWNER/APPLICANT: Carma Easton, LLC (AJ Zorn) AGENT: Carlson, Brigance, and Doering,Inc (Brett Pasquarella) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: Apogee and Ausblick GRIDS: K12 COUNTY: Travis WATERSHED: North Fork Dry Creek JURISDICTION: Limited Purpose EXISTING ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) MUD PLAN: Pilot Knob MUD DISTRICT: 2 PROPOSED LAND USE: Residential- Single Family; greenbelt, landscape/ drainage easement lots, and public ROW VARIANCES: None SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be provided along all internal streets and the boundary street. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of the Prospect Park Preliminary Plan. The plan is comprised of 806 lots on 234.52 acres, proposing 784 residential lots, 17 greenbelt/park lots and 5 other lots for landscape/drainage easement, and approximately 37,436 linear feet of right-of- way/streets. Sidewalks are proposed on all streets. The proposed lots comply with the PUD zoning requirements for use and lot size. Parkland will be in compliance with the PUD. Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Austin. This plat is subject to HB3167. Staff recommends approval of the plan, subject to the conditions listed in the attached comment report (Exhibit C). After the conditions are met, the plan will comply with the City of Austin Land Development Code, Chapter 30-2-84(B). Some of the conditions include updating plan notes, show environmental setbacks, showing the use for 1 lot, verification of street names/street table, etc. These are administrative actions that require no discretionary review. An application that has been approved with conditions may be updated to address those conditions until the application expires and the plan does not need to be heard before the Commission/Court again. The plat has also been scheduled to be approved with conditions by the Travis County Commissioners Court at the July 27, 2021 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the plan, subject to the conditions listed in the attached comment report dated July 21, 2021, and attached as Exhibit C. CASE MANAGER: Sue Welch, Travis County Single Office PHONE: 512-854-7637 Email address: Sue.Welch@traviscountytx.gov EXHIBITS: A: Location Map; B: Proposed Plan; C: Prospect Park Comment report dated July 21, 2021 1 of 13B-10 CITY OF AUSTIN – TRAVIS COUNTY – SINGLE SUBDIVISION OFFICE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT C8J-2020-0148 00 Sue Welch UPDATE: U0 PHONE #: 512-854-7637 Prospect Park Preliminary Plan 7931-1/2 APOGEE …
Exhibit A Recommended changes to the affordability requirements for the Vertical Mixed Use Buildings (Commissioners Azhar and Connolly) a. The affordability requirements for owner-occupied units should be adjusted to reserve at least ten percent of the residential units in the VMU building for ownership and occupancy by households earning no more than 80 percent of the current Annual Median Family Income for the City of Austin Metropolitan Statistical Area, for not less than 99 years. b. The affordability requirements for rental units should be adjusted to reserve at least ten percent of the residential units in the VMU building as affordable, for a minimum of 40 years, for rental by households earning no more than 60 percent of the Annual Median Family Income. 1 of 1C-2
Meeting of the Planning Commission July 27, 2021 Planning Commission to be held July 27, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers, including applicants and representatives, must register in advance (Day before the scheduled meeting, July 26, 2021 by noon). To speak remotely at the July 27, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting, residents must: Preferably email the board liaison at andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-6508 the day before the meeting. The following information is required: 1. The speaker name. 2. Item number(s) they wish to speak on. 3. Whether they are for/against/neutral. 4. Mailing address. 5. Telephone number. Must be the number that will be used to call-in. Failure to provide the required information by noon July 26, 2021 shall render a request null and void. A registered speaker may not sign up another speaker. Previous registration on an item does not automatically roll over. •Once a request to register to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call with additional information regarding the call in process. •Handouts or other information must be emailed to andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov by 1:00 PM Tuesday, July 27 2021 This information will be provided to Commission members in advance of the meeting. •Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Postponement requests must be submitted to the case manager and Andrew Rivera by 5PM Monday, July 26, 2021 Reunión de la Comisión de Planificación Fecha 27 mes de julio de 2021 La Comisión de Planificación se reunirá el 27 mes de julio de 2021 con modificaciones de distanciamiento social. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-6508 andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunion, 26 mes de julio de 2021). 1. El nombre del orador. 2. Número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar. 3. Si están a favor / en contra / neutrales. 4. Dirección postal. 5. Número de teléfono. Debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar a la persona que desea hablar. Si la información solicitada no se envía antes del mediodía del 26 mes de julio , la solicitud será nula y sin efecto. Un orador registrado no puede registrar a otro orador. El registro …
From: To: Subject: Date: Chip Harris Meredith, Maureen; Graham, Mark; Mike Lavigne Re: Crestview NPCT Rec? - 901 & 907 Stobaugh St Monday, July 26, 2021 2:35:41 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Maureen, After a lengthy and thorough discussion and debate at the CNPCT meeting about the proposed NPA and zoning change for 901 & 907 Stobaugh, the following motion was made and approved, and it will serve as the CNPCT's recommendation: The CNPCT supports sustainable densification of 901 & 907 Stobaugh similar to other nearby properties that have resubdivided but maintained their SF-3 zoning as recommended in the Neighborhood Plan approved by the City Council. The CNPCT opposes the proposed plan amendment to change the property designation from single-family to multi-family and opposes the proposed zoning change from SF-3 to MF-4 or any MF category. While supporting increased density, many of the meeting participants cited multiple issues that led to their support of the motion, including the magnitude of the change and its effect on a narrow street populated with single-family homes. Additional issues stated included increased traffic, additional street parking impacting the safety of cyclists, pedestrians (many of whom are elderly or children), infrastructure capacity of the city, noise and neighborhood character. Thank you for conveying this recommendation by the CNPCT to the Planning Commission. Chip Harris, Facilitator Crestview Neighborhood Plan Contact Team < From: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 9:07 AM To: < Cc: Graham, Mark <Mark.Graham@austintexas.gov> Subject: Crestview NPCT Rec? - 901 & 907 Stobaugh St Crestview NPCT: Cases NPA-2021-0017.02 and C14-2021-0055 the plan amendment and zoning change applications for 901 & 907 Stobaugh Street are scheduled for the July 13 PC hearing date. If you’d like your team’s letter of recommendation added to the staff case reports, please send it to me and Mark Graham no later than Tuesday, July 6 at 4:30 pm which when our reports are due. If we get the letter after that date and time, it will not be in the staff reports but we will submit it as late back-up to the Planning Commission. Thanks. Maureen Maureen Meredith, Senior Planner City of Austin, Housing & Planning Dept. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1088 Austin, Texas 78767 Phone: (512) 974-2695 Maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If …
Citizen Stakeholder Comments on items #2 and #3 on Planning Commission Agenda for July 27, 2021 For All City of Austin Planning Commissioners Case NPA-2021-0026.01 Zoning Case C14-2021-0039 AGAINST July 26, 2021 Emailed to : andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Greetings Planning Commissioners: Thank you for listening to my voice on behalf of our community. I appreciate your efforts to provide service with integrity and thoughtful consideration on behalf of all of us in Austin . I agree with Ms. Lovera’s written statements I read in the case file about the damage it can do if you approve and recommend the applicant’s proposed zoning changes. Her words and concepts are right on target. The parcels under consideration as tract 1 and 2 are already zoned appropriately on the Neighborhood Plan (NP) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) if the health and well-being of the neighborhood and their contribution to the city overall is any part of your consideration. I, and many others deeply invested in this community for the long term, spent two and a half years of our lives, our time, energy, and focus, working closely with City of Austin professional planning staff in crafting our neighborhood plan and FLUM. We did that because we believe the city of Austin’s story that our neighborhood has value for its residents, businesses, schools, institutions, and culture, and can achieve an intelligent, integrated, harmonious greater good for our community and thus contribute to the larger city through the self determination of our neighborhood plan. We missed our kids’ dance recitals, soccer games and spelling bees, etc. to do the intensive work to get it right. And we did get it right. Planning Commissioners recognized that, City Council recognized that, and between them made it an ordinance. In those two and a half years we examined every parcel, every possible zoning option, every corridor, and existing and possible uses in the context of the goals, objectives, and vision for the planning area as it fits in the larger city. The FLUM zoning on each parcel is connected and integrated with those goals and objectives to serve the overall whole vision of this becoming and remaining a thriving healthy part of north Austin. I see from the staff backup report that staff cherry-picked bits and pieces of the NP narrative, took those out of their true context, and twisted them around in trying to find a way …
07/23/2021 Dear Chair Shaw and Planning Commission members, We write this letter in support of the applicant’s request for rezoning 1901 North Lamar. Unfortunately, this case began with a filing for CS zoning with no conditions and no initial discussion with the neighborhood association. For that reason, you will likely see a progression of letters- from strong opposition, to this letter of support. Since the initial filing, there have been a total of four neighborhood meetings on this case, two of which included the agent. After weeks of discussion and compromise, The Original West University Neighborhood Association (OWUNA) membership voted on 6/15/21 unanimously to support this application. Although we concur with staff that traditional CS zoning is incompatible with this specific section of Lamar Blvd., we feel that all the restrictions on uses, impervious cover, height, and FAR, support that position. With our current Land Development Code, CS proved to be an awkward tool, but ultimately provided for a project that, we believe, is compatible with the unique area and topography. The process was not easy, and both sides worked incredibly hard to come up with the current proposal. We believe the certainty and compatibility provided by this project is of benefit to the neighborhood and we enthusiastically hope for your approval of the zoning necessary to support it. Every restriction was integral to our support, and it is our hope that they are included in any final zoning decision. The final terms are included in this email, along with a letter from CANPAC, the official contact team, recognizing OWUNA as the neighborhood association for the geographic area including this parcel. 1 2 No vehicular access from the site to Lamar and access to the site shall be from adjacent CONDITIONAL OVERLAY Existing CO items to be maintained: street or through adjacent site Maximum building height is 30feet Maximum building height is two stories New CO items to be added: F.A.R. is limited to 1.35:1 Impervious Cover is limited to 85% Drive-in service use is prohibited as an accessory use to commercial uses PUBLIC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT- Case No. C14-2011-0100 All elements, including added protections for the heritage oak, are to remain in place. OWUNA makes an additional request for roof-top restriction for all uses, in addition to the existing restriction in the event of restaurant use. Alternative Financial Services USES PROHIBITED: Automotive Rentals Agricultural Sales & Services Automotive Repair Services …
Request to Sustain the Environmental Commission’s decision on the removal of a Cottonwood tree (allow removal) 20” Tree Located in the Right of Way on Crown Ct, Austin TX 1 INTENDED PURPOSE: • To communicate and demonstrate the serious issues that this tree causes to the City and adjacent property owners of Crown Ct. • To demonstrate that removal of this tree is necessary and warranted. • To seek a sustainment of the Environmental Commission’s modified opinion on the removal of this 20” Cottonwood tree. 2 20” 3 Background Information on Cottonwood Trees • It is well documented that cottonwood trees are problematic trees that are not well suited for urban environments. • Their roots are known to damage pipes and other infrastructure. • Their “cotton fuzz” seeds are a serious fire hazard and nuisance for municipalities and property owners. • Hundreds, if not thousands, of municipalities in the US have banned these trees for the above reasons. 4 “The Dirt Doctor” Article on Cottonwood Trees: • The author, Howard Garret is: • Nationally syndicated Organic Gardening talk show host • Arborist and specialist in natural organic tree care • Columnist for the Dallas Morning News • Author of 15 books on organic gardening, landscaping and pest control • Chairman of Texas Organic Research Center (TORC) • Organic Advisory Board Texas Department of Agriculture • https://www.dirtdoctor.com/garden/Cottonwood_vq924.htm 5 The Dirt Doctor – Cottonwood Trees • FINAL SPACING: Do not plant • IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION: Cottonwood is a very fast growing, upright messy tree. It sends out cotton all over the place in the spring, has brittle wood and it has large limbs. Its root system is extremely shallow, ravenous and destructive. It normally will have quite a bit of dead wood in the tree. • PROBLEMS: Cottonwood is short lived, has a destructive root system and the cottony seed from the female plant is a nuisance and damaging to electrical appliances. Stressed trees are commonly attacked by borers. The root system is susceptible to cotton root rot and other root diseases. This is a dangerous tree because large limbs or the entire tree can fall on cars, structures and even people. This is one tree that should be removed from most residential property. 6 Southern Living Article on Cottonwoods: • 6 Trees You Should Never, Ever Plant • Terrible Tree #4 -- Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) • What's wrong with it: Extremely …
Ana Aguirre Immediate Past Chair PO Box 19748 Austin, TX 78760 512-708-0647 July 26, 2021 Todd Shaw, Chair Yvette Flores, Secretary Awais Azhar Grayson Cox Jennifer Mushtaler Carmen Llanes Pulido Jeffrey Thompson Richard Mendoza, Ex-Officio Claire Hempel, Vice-Chair James Shieh, Parliamentarian Joao Paulo Connolly Patrick Howard Solveji Rosa Praxis Robert Schneider Jessica Cohen, Ex-Officio Arati Singh, AISD Ex-Officio RE: Neighborhood Plan Amendment Case Number: NPA-2021-0026.01 Rezoning Case Number: C14-2021-0039 Dear Honorable Chair Shaw and Commissioners: The Southeast Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team (SCNPCT) has a history of supporting responsible development. The SCNPCT held its regular monthly meeting on Monday, July 12, 2021, and met with representatives from the Rundberg area, who are part of the Eastern Crescent, to discuss the proposed FLUM and zoning changes pertaining to the properties located at 10609, 16011, 10613, 10615 Brownie Drive and 10610, 10612, 10614 Middle Fiskville Road: 1) Neighborhood Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the FLUM from single family and neighborhood commercial to mixed use; and 2) Rezoning from SF-3-NP and LR-NP to MF-4-NP and CS-MU-NP. The SCNPCT took into consideration the information provided by the Rundberg area representatives. With a quorum present and based on the information provided and comparing shared concerns of the residents within the Eastern Crescent, the SCNPCT membership voted unanimously not to support the proposed changes to the land use designation on the FLUM from single family and neighborhood commercial to mixed use land use and rezoning from SF-3-NP and LR-NP to MF-4-NP and CS-MU-NP. The SCNPCT voted to support the Rundberg area residents and join their efforts. The shared historical concerns of the Eastern Crescent communities include the continued and unprecedented gentrification and displacement of low income and people of color residents. The impact will include increased property values, which will result in increased property taxes for homeowners or increased rental fees for current residents. This basically guarantees an accelerated displacement of this vulnerable community. Additionally, families and children with long-term established neighborhood ties, including ties with neighborhood schools, current community resources and support systems will be pushed out. This results in destabilizing those relationships and adds cruel stressors as these same displaced residents will have to work on creating new support systems in whatever areas outside of the City of Austin they manage to find are affordable to them. There is no demonstrated neighborhood benefit to the current residents in this portion …
July 27, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting Speaker Registration: Zenobia C. Joseph Mailing Address: PO Box 143832 Austin TX 78714-3832 Phone: I anticipate calling from an unpublished San Antonio, Texas number. Area code (210). • Citizen’s Communication (Non-Agenda Item): Capital Metro Title VI Policy adoption history (2013-2021). Against Agenda Item: 7. Rezoning: C14-2021-0017 - 5708 Springdale Rd; District 1. “The Staff recommendation is to grant community commercial – mixed use – neighborhood plan (GR- MU-NP) combining district zoning.” Marcia Bruscato Poss' Letter to Council notes, in part, The Reserve at Springdale, 292 units (pp. 13, 25)—a "$43M investment," David Knoll noted November 1, 2017 (below). • Context: November 1, 2017 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("Capital Metro") Connections 2025 Public Hearings (Noon, 5:30PM). David Knoll, represented Ryan Companies and the Housing Authority of the City of Austin, testifying twice to save Route 300-Rogge and "retail, activating the street." • Nov 01, 2017 Capital Metro Board of Directors Public Hearing - Austin, TX • • • (swagit.com) Item I: Part 2 of 3. First speaker: Knoll worked with Pecan Springs Neighborhood Association one year. Video: https://austintx.new.swagit.com/videos/45318 Item I: Part 3 of 3 (1:00:15): Knoll followed Patricia Crowe, then-Reserve resident. "On the mixed-use and encouraging mixed-use (uhm) along the corridor (I guess the 51st Street corridor), uh-well, we've made with the Housing Authority, a $43 million investment in this community based on the bus route and to, hopefully, activate for the neighborhood and for (uh), in coordination with City Council. . . . So we're right here at Rogge Lane and Springdale. (uh) I would say that the investment we've made there is greater than any investment of the residential-owning developers along this whole 2-mile course from Berkman all the way down to 51st. And I would say we're a start; we're not all of it, a spark for more but certainly removing the bus will kill any multi-use there or mixed-use there (uh) that we start to encourage with the live-work units at Springdale, the café and then also orienting the development to the street." (Crowe also spoke during Part 1 of 3: 55:07). June 3, 2018 Capital Metro Short-Range Planning Manager Roberto Gonzalez unilaterally eliminated 300-Rogge, anyway. After Cap Remap 52 route changes, planners (Lawrence Deeter and Gonzalez) met with Reserve residents but refused to restore fixed- route service. • Pecan Springs - Springdale Hills (p. 20): I support the Pecan Springs-Springdale …
Speaker Citizen Communication Zenobia Joseph B1 Applicant - Amanda Swor Kate Kniejski Harrison Hudson Opposed Andie Haddad David Piper Greg Smith Loraine Atherton B2 / B3 Applicant - Victoria Haase Ron Thrower Opposed Jade Lovera Crystal Starkey Preston King Ev Lunning Jessica Roberton Lyn Galbreth Ana Aguirre B4 / B5 Applicant - Victoria Haase Ron Thrower Opposed Helen Kelley Mathew Dubin Caitlyn Ryan Ainsley Benton Sean Benton Chip Harris Time Allotment 3 min. 6min and 3min Rebuttal 3 min. 3 min. 6 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 6min and 3min Rebuttal 6 min. 3min. 3min. 3min. 3min. 3min. 3min. 6min and 3min Rebuttal 6 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. B6 Applicant - Victoria Haase Ron Thrower 6min and 3min Rebuttal 3 min. For Tressie Damron Megan Meisenbach Karrie League B7 Applicant - Leah Bojo Anaiah Johnson Opposed Marci Poss Kate Taylor Sonia Seeman Meena Ysanne Jennifer Sherburn Zenobia Joseph For Donna Hoffman Brad Bertram Renee Houseman Luther Houseman Guy LeBlanc Kurt Anderson Opposed Patrik Fulkner Brad Hunt Louis Silvas Vangie Silvas 6min and 3min Rebuttal 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 6 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. 6 min. 3 min. 3 min. 3 min. B8 Appellant - Kendra Rodis 6min and 3min Rebuttal B9 Applicant - Amanda Brown B10 Applicant - Charles Brigance C-2 Neutral Ana Aguirre 6min and 3min Rebuttal 6min and 3min Rebuttal 3min.
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0047 – Moore’s Crossing Farmhouse, Tract 3 DISTRICT: 2 ZONING FROM: SF-2 ZONING TO: MF-4 ADDRESS: 7508 McAngus Road SITE AREA: 26.99 acres PROPERTY OWNER: SR Development, Inc. AGENT: Alice Glasco Consulting (Bill Gurasich) (Alice Glasco) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant multifamily residence – moderate-high density – conditional overlay (MF-4-CO) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay is for a maximum of 212 units. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: July 13, 2021: June 22, 2021: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO JUNE 22, 2021, BY CONSENT [G. COX; J. SHIEH – 2ND] (12-0) S. PRAXIS – NOT YET ARRIVED June 8, 2021: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO JUNE 22, 2021, BY CONSENT [A. AZHAR; J. MUSHTALER – 2ND] (11-0) Y. FLORES; J. SHIEH – ABSENT CITY COUNCIL ACTION: August 26, 2021: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: None at this time. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject unplatted property is undeveloped, has access to the unbuilt Ross Road right-of- way and to McAngus Road, and is zoned single family residence – standard lot (SF-2) district. There is undeveloped land with a site plan application in process for 240 multifamily residences and parkland dedicated by the Moore’s Crossing MUD to the City to the north (MF-3; SF-2; P); two undeveloped tracts proposed for multifamily residences and B-011 of 12 C14-2021-0047 Page 2 MF-4 zoning, and parkland across the unbuilt Ross Road right-of-way to the east (SF-4A; P); undeveloped land and the Circuit of the Americas facility to the south (County; PUD); and the Dry Creek East floodplain and single family residences in the Stoney Ridge Section 5-B subdivision to the west (P; SF-2). Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and A-1 (Aerial View). The Applicant proposes to rezone the property to the multifamily residence – moderate-high density (MF-4) for the construction of up to 212 units on the property. The Applicant’s intent is to extend Ross Road to both Tracts, and utilize the MF-4 development standards to maximize the number of units that can be built (up to 54 units per acre which can be achieved through a reduced minimum site area for each dwelling unit and a 60 foot height limit). In 1988, the property was zoned SF-2 with many other tracts that comprise the Moore’s Crossing MUD. SF-2 zoning precedes adoption of the Airport Overlay ordinance …
MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: Todd Shaw, Chair Planning Commission Members FROM: Wendy Rhoades, Principal Planner Maureen Meredith, Senior Planner Housing and Planning Department DATE: RE: July 6, 2021 NPA-2021-0020.01 – Shelby Lane Residences (Plan Amendment Case) C14-2021-0015 – Shelby Lane Residences (Rezoning Case) Request for Postponement by Applicant ************************************************************************ The Staff requests a postponement of the above-referenced neighborhood plan amendment and rezoning cases to August 24, 2021. The Applicant has recently submitted a traffic study to the Austin Transportation Department for review. A postponement will allow Staff the time to evaluate the transportation-related information provided by the Applicant, and prepare recommendations for each case. Please refer to attached correspondence. Attachment: Map of Property 1 of 3B-2 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Meredith, Maureen; Rhoades, Wendy Good, Justin; Hutchens, Amber RE: July 13 PC- S Congress NPCT Rec: NPA-2021-0020.01_4700 Weidemar Ln -& C14-2021-0015 - Shelby Lane Residences - TIA has been Submitted - Under Review By ATD Monday, July 5, 2021 1:49:29 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Maureen/Wendy, Our Traffic Engineer submitted a TIA to ATD last week for Shelby Lane Residences and is under review. Therefore, can staff request a postponement of the two cases to August 24th so ATD can complete its TIA review and issue a TIA memo? I have copied Justin Good and Amber Hutchens with whom we have been communicating about the TIA, for confirmation. =========================== Alice Glasco, President Alice Glasco Consulting 512-231-8110 W 512-626-4461 C CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 2 of 3B-2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RIAL\W A R E H C14-70-001 LI-NP G AININ R T O U S E S T N E M Y O L P M E MINI- STORAGE S C 1 34 7-0 9 P S ! ! ! ! ! ! 05-0107 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MOBILE HOM E PARK MH-NP C14-2019-0018 ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ! ! ! SF-2-NP ! ! SP- 97 -0 3 41 CS LI-CO-NP 05-0107 ( 1 0 70-0 7 4 83-2 LI-NP LI-CO-NP W …
MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: Todd Shaw, Chair Planning Commission Members FROM: Wendy Rhoades, Principal Planner Maureen Meredith, Senior Planner Housing and Planning Department DATE: RE: July 6, 2021 NPA-2021-0020.01 – Shelby Lane Residences (Plan Amendment Case) C14-2021-0015 – Shelby Lane Residences (Rezoning Case) Request for Postponement by Applicant ************************************************************************ The Staff requests a postponement of the above-referenced neighborhood plan amendment and rezoning cases to August 24, 2021. The Applicant has recently submitted a traffic study to the Austin Transportation Department for review. A postponement will allow Staff the time to evaluate the transportation-related information provided by the Applicant, and prepare recommendations for each case. Please refer to attached correspondence. Attachment: Map of Property 1 of 3B-3 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Meredith, Maureen; Rhoades, Wendy Good, Justin; Hutchens, Amber RE: July 13 PC- S Congress NPCT Rec: NPA-2021-0020.01_4700 Weidemar Ln -& C14-2021-0015 - Shelby Lane Residences - TIA has been Submitted - Under Review By ATD Monday, July 5, 2021 1:49:29 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Maureen/Wendy, Our Traffic Engineer submitted a TIA to ATD last week for Shelby Lane Residences and is under review. Therefore, can staff request a postponement of the two cases to August 24th so ATD can complete its TIA review and issue a TIA memo? I have copied Justin Good and Amber Hutchens with whom we have been communicating about the TIA, for confirmation. =========================== Alice Glasco, President Alice Glasco Consulting 512-231-8110 W 512-626-4461 C CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 2 of 3B-3 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 05-0107 ! ! RIAL\W A R E H C14-70-001 LI-NP G AININ R T O U S E S T N E M Y O L P M E MINI- STORAGE S C 1 34 7-0 9 P S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MOBILE HOM E PARK MH-NP C14-2019-0018 ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ! ! ! SF-2-NP ! ! SP- 97 -0 3 41 CS LI-CO-NP 05-0107 ( 1 0 70-0 7 4 83-2 LI-NP LI-CO-NP W …
