17.2 - 2611 Woodmont Ave - Owner's Petition — original pdf
Backup
Historic Landmark Commission Homepage
18.0 - 3006 Fruth St — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-141795 3006 Fruth Street 18 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1936 building. Architecture This single-story Craftsman bungalow features a large front porch that stretches across the right two-thirds of the front elevation. This wall also features two sets of paired hung wood windows that appear to be original or well-made replacements. A broad front gable covers the porch, with a side gable behind covering the main house at a moderate pitch. The original, narrow teardrop siding is present and is in good condition. Research Upon construction in the mid-1930s, the property was owned by Jeanie Prewitt, who was employed by the Texas State Highway Department. Throughout her ownership of 3006 Fruth Street, one or more renters are listed as living at the address. This continued after the house was sold to Kellie Parsons, who lived at the address with her husband as well as family members and a cycle of short term renters, the most common being students at the University of Texas. Shortly after their purchase of the property, Kellie Parsons and her husband, Jack Lovell Wilkerson, welcomed their first child, who was raised at the address. Property Evaluation The 2020 North Central Austin historic resource survey lists the property as a contributing resource to either a potential Fruth Street local or national historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Craftsman bungalow architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, or deconstruction and salvage over demolition, but approve the demolition permit …
18.1 - 3006 Fruth St - Photos — original pdf
Backup
19.0 - 812 Park Blvd — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-139336 812 Park Boulevard 19 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1937 building. Architecture This single-story, stone-clad house was constructed around 1937 but contains some design features that would become common to the ranch style commonly seen in many other parts of Austin. The low, horizontal form, with two separate front facing gables that bookend a long, low side gabled roof form, as well as the picture window alongside otherwise horizontally oriented fenestration, and the L-shaped plan would all become features of later developments, but here are combined with a white stone cladding and covered entryway that are more common to the older houses found on the rest of Park Boulevard. Decorative attic vents and two small, vertical windows on the front elevation appear to have embedded a slight Tudor Revival influence as well. Research The house was originally built for Ralph & Elizabeth Button of Button Ice Cream Company, which was developing into a larger organization after being founded some years before. However, this changed with the passing of Ralph Button in 1943, after which sole ownership passed to Elizabeth and after to Ralph Jr., who worked as a driver. Elton & Millo Marcum purchased the property after, and lived there for several years, adding on to the footprint in 1962. Property Evaluation The 2021 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek historic resource survey lists the property as a medium priority and eligible as a contributing resource to a potential Park Boulevard historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of an early ranch-inspired residence in this area of the city. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural …
19.1 - 812 Park Blvd - Photos — original pdf
0 20 40 SCALE: 1" = 20' TREE LEGEND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE = DIAMETER EQUAL IN FEET TO TWICE THE NUMBER OF INCHES OF THE TREE'S TRUNK DIAMETER (P) (H) PROTECTED TREE (DIAMETER > 19") HERITAGE TREE (DIAMETER > 24") Tag No. Type Trunk 3237 3238 PECAN ASH 27 1/2 " (H) 21 " (P) LOT 2 MARCUM ADDITION VOL 83, PG 101C P.R.T.C. LEGEND CALCULATED POINT "X" MARK SET ON TOP OF COLUMN 1/2" IRON PIPE FOUND (UNLESS NOTED) GAS VALVE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WASTE WATER MANHOLE WATER METER CLEAN OUT POWER POLE ELECTRIC METER COMMUNICATIONS JUNCTION BOX SIGN VAULT AIR CONDITIONING UNIT WOOD FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OVERHEAD UTILITY PROPERTY LINE ADJOINER LINE EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE AREA STONE AREA TOPOGRAPHIC, TREE AND SAG SURVEY OF LOT 1 MARCUM ADDITION SUBDIVISION VOLUME 83, PAGE 101C PLAT RECORDS, TRAVIS COUNTY, TX G E WW W CO PP E C CALLED 1.4720 ACRE DOC. NO. 2024121751 O.P.R.T.C. // \\\\ OHU OHU OHU W C A L HIC C U H A M L A T E B E A E T D P R S: S A L F 2 7°3 OIN E N C T F 7'0 E P R O M S 6 2°0 (S 59°38' E) (77.1') 3" E 7 7'5 7.0 9' S T 2' O 7"W 0.6 #271390 T O O H U P P O H U N G: 6 5: 6 O L 6: 6 6 E: 6 6 2 5 3.3' 2.9' 2.7' 2.2' // PP 3.5' 1.0' OFF O H U 3.6' U H O U H O // U H O U H O // U H O U H O U H O U H O 9.8' 1 O O H H U U O H U // O H U O O H H U U O O H H U U 26.2' STONE GARAGE FFE:623.97' 26.2' O H U 3.3' // O O H H U U O H U O O H H U U O H U // O O H H U U 5' E.E. (PLAT) 9.8' 1 O H U OHU O H U S A O H U // OHU O N O H U H U G: 652.7 G: 624.1' 6 2 4 E.E. S.B.L. VOL. PG. P.R.T.C. ON/OFF R.O.W. ( ) OHU NG ELECTRIC EASEMENT SETBACK LINE VOLUME AND PAGE PLAT RECORDS …
05.a - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Backup
05.b - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: patricia calhoun Monday, December 1, 2025 3:06 PM Historic Preservation Office patricia calhoun; Brenda Malik; Misael Ramos; Marilyn Poole 2406 E MLK, Jr. Blvd Demolition Protest Importance: High You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon, Hunter, Thank you for returning my call today regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd.. I am a resident of the Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Historic District and I am in favor of a Postponement of this ruling pending plans or some type of document showing the use of this property. This property is adjacent to an original and well-known homeowner of this Historic District; I would strongly object to approval for demolition without site plans or other documentation showing that the structure is not suitable for rehab. Thank you, Patricia Calhoun, ASID, IIDA, RID Patricia Calhoun THE PERFECT ADDITION 972-814-6543 (Cell) CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
05.c - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 1(713)6282228 <ctmavayaalerts@austintexas.gov> Tuesday, December 2, 2025 8:19 AM Historic Preservation Office [Transcribed] Voice Message From: 1 (713) 6282228 VoiceMsg[ID=1414728 G=40 F=228 A=588B9018-E3E0-4915-B196-27EE696E9546 C=1 CID= 1(713)6282228].wav Hello, my name is Marilyn Webb. I'm a neighbor of case number 20. G F 202-514-4858. The 2406 East Mar(cid:415)n Luther King junior Boulevard. I object to this applica(cid:415)on. The builder or whoever owns the property has has never discussed the cer(cid:415)ficate of appropriateness of a demoli(cid:415)on at this contribu(cid:415)ng property. I would like to see any alterna(cid:415)ves to pull demoli(cid:415)on. As it is a contribu(cid:415)ng property. Please give me a call, I'm going to make an a(cid:425)empt to file this objec(cid:415)on. Thank you. Yes. 1
05.d - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear Mr. Sturgill, Ora Houston Tuesday, December 2, 2025 9:49 AM Historic Preservation Office 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr., Blvd. - Case # - PR-2025-144142; GF 2025-144858 External Email - Exercise Caution I am Ms. Ora Houston and I own property at 1902 Maple Avenue, 78722, Lot 8 Washington Subdivision. Am requesting that the Historic Landmark Commission grant a postponement regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for the above referenced Case number. The applicant, Dmitriy Dubrovsky has not been in contact with nor has had any conversations with anyone in the Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District! Rogers Washington Holy Cross will probably be the only Historic District possible within the six square mile boundaries of the African American Cultural Heritage District. That will be because of the stringent requirements imposed by the State Representative and State Senator who were elected to 'represent not repress' the people of the District. It is unthinkable that this Case would go forward without the Applicant having no conversations with the people in the District in order to have an understand of what can and can not be deconstructed and/or constructed on the site. How disrespectful of the history of citizens of Austin whose structures are continuing examples of how beautiful, creative, engaged and resourceful they were throughout this community, City and State. Please grant a postponement until those conversation(s) can be held! Respectfully, Ms. Ora Houston 2207 E. 22nd Street 512-472-2951 “Service is the rent we pay for the privilege of living on this earth. It is the very purpose of life, not something you do in your spare time.” - The Honorable Shirley Chisholm 1 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2
08.3 - Congress Ave Streetscape Improvements - presentation — original pdf
Congress Avenue Urban Design Initiative Congress Avenue Urban Design Initiative Historic Landmark Commission Briefing | December 3, 2025 CAUDI Vision Plan "Congress Avenue, often called the "Main Street of Texas," is one of the most iconic, historic and lively streets in Austin. The Congress Avenue Urban Design Initiative (CAUDI) envisions a transformative urban design, placemaking, and implementation strategy for Congress Avenue between Riverside Dr. and 11th St.” “The goal of this effort is to create a multifunctional complete street with a dynamic public realm that contributes to Downtown Austin's evolution as a sustainable mixed-use downtown and supports Austin's identity as a unique and iconic cultural city." 2 Full Build Scenario Riverside Dr to South Shore of Lady Bird Lake (future, unfunded) Green Gateways (future, unfunded) Cesar Chavez St – 7th St (Planned First Phase, funded) Bridge Enhancements (Future, unfunded) 7th – 11th St (Future, unfunded) 3 How we got here & what we heard Grow into a plaza concept. Retail Street alternative north of 7th Street. High quality materials. Wider pedestrian zones. Support for trees. Balance parking, tree health, bikeway comfort, and pedestrian experience. 4 Planned First Phase Planned First Phase: Construction Impacts: Construction from Cesar Chavez St to Short-term vehicle detours possible 7th St starting early 2026 Timeline & Cost: Begins early 2026, continues through 2027 Approx. 3 months per block $13M budget for first phase Pedestrian access will remain open City + DAA campaign to support businesses 5 6 Trees Maintain existing trees unless identified as dead, diseased, or an imminent hazard. Provide new landscaped areas around trees with soil and hardwood mulch. Add new trees only as needed to fill significant canopy gaps or replace dead, diseased or hazardous trees – subject to further coordination. 7 Furnishings Above ground planters to be removed. Great Streets Furnishings proposed for trash + recycling receptacles, bike racks, and benches. Great Streets Bench Great Streets Bike Racks Great Streets Recycling Great Streets Trash 8 Pavers Match existing paver style. Use new OR salvaged pavers based on feasibility of removing existing pavers without damaging them. Typical granite paver style and size. Variations in pavers on 300 block. 9 Lighting Strategy: relocate light poles (only as needed) where they severely conflict with the proposed pedestrian path. Coordination ongoing. Example of …
09.a - 1806 Drake Ave - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: CLIFTON LADD Wednesday, November 26, 2025 3:47 PM Bat Taniguchi; Heimsath, Ben - BC; Larosche, Carl - BC; Grogan, Harmony - BC; Eppright, Harrison - BC; Alvarez, Jaime - BC; Acton, Jeffrey - BC; Rice, Judah - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC; Pleasant-Wright, Tonya - BC; McWhorter, Trey - BC Historic Preservation Office; Barbara Cilley; Susan Armstrong Fisher; Mary Fealkoff HLC meeting 12-3-25; item 9. PR-2025-142120 – 1806 Drake Ave. External Email - Exercise Cau(cid:415)on Good a(cid:332)ernoon, Commissioners - I am wri(cid:415)ng to urge you to deny the applica(cid:415)on for demoli(cid:415)on of 1806 Drake Avenue, as included on your agenda for your December 3 mee(cid:415)ng. 1806 Drake is a 1940s ranch-style home and a contribu(cid:415)ng structure in the Travis Heights - Fairview Park Na(cid:415)onal Register Historic District. We urge the owners to reconsider their applica(cid:415)on for demoli(cid:415)on and to look for ways to retain and remodel the exis(cid:415)ng home. Most of the homes in this block of Drake are contribu(cid:415)ng structures in the District, and it would be a shame to lose another valuable contribu(cid:415)ng home. We also note that the applicant has not provided any plans for what they would do on the property in place of the exis(cid:415)ng home. The Historic Landmark Commission must review plans for new construc(cid:415)on in Na(cid:415)onal Register districts before demoli(cid:415)on permits may be issued. The SRCC Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Commi(cid:425)ee does not agree to the demoli(cid:415)on of any contribu(cid:415)ng structure for which we do not have an opportunity to review replacement plans. There are many instances of similar homes being rehabilitated much more affordably than demolishing an exis(cid:415)ng home and building an en(cid:415)rely new one. We would hope that the owners would further consider this op(cid:415)on. Thank you for your considera(cid:415)on of these comments. Sincerely, Cli(cid:332)on Ladd SRCC Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Commi(cid:425)ee Co-Chair CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use cau(cid:415)on when clicking links or opening a(cid:425)achments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" bu(cid:425)on in Outlook. For any addi(cid:415)onal ques(cid:415)ons or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov". 1
10.a - 1608 Pease Rd - public comment — original pdf
Richard E. Anderson 2307 Woodlawn Blvd. Austin, Texas 78703 T: 512.538.0051 November 13, 2025 Via email preservation@austintexas.gov City of Austin Historic Preservation Office Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 RE: 1608 PEASE ROAD, AUSTIN, TX To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this letter as my recommendation to demolish the duplex at 1608 Pease Road. The duplex was built in 1976, and the demolition would make way for a new home that honors and will contribute to the character of our neighborhood. For the past 25 years, my wife and I have lived at 2307 Woodlawn and are in favor of this demolition. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Richard E. Anderson /mjo
11.2 - 210 W 6th St - Presentation — original pdf
Claudia Taylor Johnson Hall Certificate of Appropriateness 1. Install awnings in same locations as historic awnings (south/west facades) 2. Replace glass at non-original windows (south/west facades) 3. Paint doors and frames (south facade) 4. Replace non-historic handrail (south facade) 5. 6. 7. Install accessibility doors (north facade) Install rooftop screening (west bay roof) Install signage (south/north facades) Install Sign (Compliant) Two New Accessibility Doors North Façade Install Rooftop Screening Install Awnings & Replace Glass West Façade Install Rooftop Screening Install Awnings, Replace Glass, and Paint Doors/Frames Install Signage (50 sf) Replace Handrail South Façade Lowered rooftop screening from 7 ft. to 5 ft. Confirmed glass replacement and door frame painting does not affect original or unaltered conditions. Revised south façade signage installation to have minimal impact on columns Removed trellis at patio Responsive to Committee Feedback Back-Up Slides
12.a - 2821 Salado St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
12.b - 2821 Salado St - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Vickie Schubert Monday, December 1, 2025 4:05 PM Historic Preservation Office GF2025-121036 Demo permit 2821 Salado St (followup) You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon. Prior to your meeting of December 3 I wanted to provide a follow-up to my previous email of November 14 in further support of demolition of the property at 2821 Salado. As of the time of my last email, the owner had just boarded up the house because an unhinged homeless man had taken up residence in the property and was yelling, breaking windows and who know what else in the house. It was a very uncomfortable and possibly dangerous situation to which the owner responded. In the two weeks since then, it has become a target of taggers (photos attached). They continue to visit the property and add more tags every several days. Finally today, I noticed the boarding over the back door has been torn off so either another homeless person has take up residence or the house is being scavenged for things like copper wire or both. In either case it has become a dangerous property to live next to and the costs of any sort of rehabilitation grow by the week. The developer met with Shoal Creek Neighborhood Association on November 17. The association decided to take no action to either support or oppose the project. I am urging and pleading with the Commission to take up this matter at the meeting of December 3 and approve the demolition so some positive progress can be made at the property. Thank you. Vickie Schubert 2819 Salado 1 2 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 3 Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 4
13.4 - 2117 W 49th St - presentation — original pdf
Rosedale School – AISD 2117 W 49th Street Rosedale School – DA-2025-142965 City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 1940 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025
13.a - 2117 W 49th St - public comments — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Leslie Currens Monday, December 1, 2025 9:27 PM Historic Preservation Office Postpone the Demolition Permit Decision for Old Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chairman Heimsath and commission members, As a neighbor near the Rosedale School, I request that you postpone a decision on the demolition of this property, as requested in case number: DA 25-142965. A legal fight over deed restrictions on the property is being waged in court, and it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish the building until the court case is resolved. The building itself may have useful life left on it. Until the future of the property is decided, it would be best not to demolish the building at this time. Sincerely, Leslie Currens 5615 Bull Creek Rd, Austin, TX 78756 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Joshua Villarreal Monday, December 1, 2025 9:27 PM Historic Preservation Office Old Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Joshua Villarreal, I am a resident and owner of 4700 Rosedale Avenue, literally feet from the old Rosedale School. I am writing to express my concern as an Austin and Rosedale resident on the hearing tomorrow to decide the historical value and potential demolition of the school. It seems to be premature to hold this hearing while there is a court ruling in the balance on the site's existing deed restriction limiting a single residence per parcel, and the hearing should be postponed until there is clarity on what could be built on the site. There is also an active lawsuit from Austin Independent School District suing the Rosedale H homeowners, which includes myself and my wife. Pretty shocking to be sued by my own school district and feels like a breach of the social contract between citizens and their own government who is supposed to be for them, not against them. Thanks, -- Joshua Villarreal (210) 328-9679 CAUTION: This is an …
13.b - 2117 W 49th St - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Trevor Howard Tuesday, November 25, 2025 8:20 PM Historic Preservation Office Clair Mattson Review Case Number: DA 25-142965 Objection to Demolition and Proposed Apartment Complex at 2117 W 49th Street You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Mr. Sturgill, Review Case Number: DA 25-142965 I am writing to express my strong opposition and objection to the proposed demolition of the property at 2117 W 49th Street, Austin, TX 78756 and the subsequent construction of the proposed apartment complex. The Rosedale neighborhood is a unique and cherished community, defined by its residential character, walkability, and family-friendly environment. The proposed project threatens to fundamentally alter this character. Specifically: • Neighborhood Integrity: The scale and density of the proposed complex are incompatible with the existing fabric of Rosedale. It risks eroding the sense of community that residents have worked hard to preserve. • Traffic and Safety Concerns: Increased traffic from a large apartment complex poses a serious danger in a neighborhood where children regularly play in the streets. The infrastructure here was not designed to handle such volume, and the risks to pedestrian safety are significant. • Quality of Life: Beyond traffic, the project would bring noise, congestion, and strain on local resources, diminishing the livability of the neighborhood for current residents. Said plainly, this project would ruin the character and safety of our neighborhood. I urge the Planning Department to reconsider approval of this demolition and development, and instead prioritize projects that respect the scale, safety, and integrity of Rosedale. To the extent that the demolition and proposed apartment complex are approved for construction, our family will strongly consider moving out of the neighborhood, despite not having the adequate financial resources to easily accommodate such a move. The risks associated with increased traffic and neighborhood density are not worth it given we have a 1 year old daughter and soon to be born child. 1 Thank you for your attention to this matter. I hope the voices of residents will be given full consideration in the decision-making process. I am available whenever to speak with you about our and our neighborhood's concerns with the project. Sincerely, Trevor Howard, Clair Howard 2210 W. 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 (m): 480-747-3339 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If …
13.c - 2117 W 49th St - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Karrie Key Monday, December 1, 2025 9:28 PM Historic Preservation Office Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution AISD wants to sell this historic property to OHT Properties so that OHT can build a tall apt complex with 600 plus apartments. I wager no apt building of that size has been built when said building will be surrounded by old, tiny two lane roads. The presentation made by OHT’s lawyer insisted that Burnet Road ran parallels Rosedale parcel. Wrong. Either the lawyer is lying or he cannot read a map. If the project is built on the Rosedale school parcel, pedestrian and vehicular deaths will occur. Please designate the Rosedale parcel as a historic site. Best regards, Karrie Key 512 507 1456. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
13.d - 2117 W 49th St - public comments — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Tom Goodrum Tuesday, December 2, 2025 7:44 AM Historic Preservation Office Postpone Decision on the Rosedale School Demo Permit You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chairman Heimsath and commission members: I live at 4808 Shoalwood Avenue, near the former Rosedale School site, which, as you may know, served our most fragile children with special needs in Austin. I support the postponement request by the Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association (DA 25-142965). I am utterly gobsmacked that AISD has sued 125 of my neighbors, including my wife and me, to try to nullify a deed restriction that allows only one residence per lot. Having never been sued before, I feel steamrolled, having had no prior notification that this was happening. As neighbors, we are fighting this in court, and believe it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish a building until the court case is resolved. I don’t know whether the school is historic, but there is absolutely no reason to decide on this now. Last time I was there with my dog (who has since passed), there was an area in the back corner where families had made a tribute to their deceased children. Walking through the area with special markers, painted rocks, and light catchers with the children’s names felt sacred - it’s clearly a meaningful place for those families. I’m not sure why AISD and OHT are in such a hurry to get a demo permit when there is a very good chance the courts will uphold the deed restrictions. For what it's worth, the neighbors are not opposed to having the building used, perhaps like Carpenters Hall, or as it has been most recently, for active shooter training. What we don’t want is for the Rosedale School to be bulldozed and replaced with a high-density apartment building when the streets and neighborhood aren't equipped to handle the cars that come with the (proposed) 435+-unit development. Our neighborhood is filled with young children being pushed in strollers, families walking their dogs, and older, white-haired ones hobbling along. There are no sidewalks, and because it’s so walkable and neighborly, cars drive slowly. If you agree to demolish Rosedale School without regard for what it will be replaced with, it is a mistake. Moreover, to make this decision without …
13.e - 2117 W 49th St - public comments — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Raquel Gorny Tuesday, December 2, 2025 1:51 PM Historic Preservation Office Notice of Appeal Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern - I live at 4519 Rosedale Ave and am a neighbor of the former Rosedale School site. I support the postponement request by Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association on case number: DA 25-142965. AISD has sued125 neighbors of the site to try to nullify a deed restriction that only allows one residence per lot. We are fighting this in court and it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish the building until the court case is resolved. I don't know if the old school is historic or not, but there is absolutely no reason to make any decision on this right now. Why are AISD and OHT in such a hurry to get a demolition permit, when there is very good chance the courts will uphold the deed restrictions and make their project impossible? It’s shocking to be sued by our own school district. We shouldn’t even have to be dealing with the historic value of building at this time. It feels like AISD and OHT are trying to steamroll us. Please take our opinions into consideration. Thank you, Raquel CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Nitin Agrawal Tuesday, December 2, 2025 1:20 PM Historic Preservation Office Play Fair With Rosedale Please! Historic Landmark Commission Demo Permit Hearing on Rosedale School.pdf You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Chairman Heimsath and commission members: My name is Nitin Agrawal, and I live at 4606 Rosedale Ave. I am a neighbor of the former Rosedale School site, and I am writing in support of the postponement request submitted by Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association regarding case number DA 25-142965. As you may know, AISD has sued 125 neighbors of the site—including myself, if applicable—in an effort to nullify a long-standing deed restriction that allows …
13.f - 2117 W 49th St - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Contreras, Kalan Tuesday, December 2, 2025 10:32 AM ; Historic Preservation Office FW: Historic Landmark hearing for Former Rosedale School Ramsey-Nitschke_Line.pdf Good morning, Mr. Allen, Thank you so much for sharing this with me! Though it is too late for this additional research to make it into the staff report, I will ask our HLC liaison, Hunter, to upload it as backup so that the Commissioners may review on their own. Kalan Contreras Principal Planner Historic Preservation Office Austin Planning 512-974-2727 kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov From: Chris Allen Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2025 8:50 AM To: Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Historic Landmark hearing for Former Rosedale School External Email - Exercise Caution Good morning! I thought you'd appreciate some more background history on the impressive line of Ramsey women who shaped Rosedale for generations. Doing all of my research on the deeds for the school parcel, I learned a lot. Winnie Ramsey (one of F.T. Ramsey's 3 developer daughters) and her husband Hilliare created the original Rosedale H subdivision in 1938 and sold several lots to the Austin school district that year for the construction of the original school building. By 1946, Winnie's daughter Alice and husband Harry Wilder later sold additional lots to the school district for the expansion of the school. During my time dealing with land use in Rosedale, I've had the distinct pleasure of working with Diane Wilder Davenport Howard, daughter of Alice, who developed the Rosedale Village project (where Gusto and Citizen Allday are). Diane is 83 today and is being SUED by AISD over the deed restrictions her grandmother wrote and AISD agreed to. Funny world!! Diane's daughter Casey Davenport operated a doggy day care for several years where Citizen's allday sits and still lives in the neighborhood. That's a mighty impressive group of women who had quite an influence on our neighborhood. Their husbands' names are all over the records, but the Ramsey women are the constant thread in the story of Rosedale. 1 A lot of this information came from Karen Collins' "Rosedale Ramble" history walks, which we helped produce in the '90s, but this document I found a few weeks ago filled in some of the blanks: https://www.charlottes-web.com/Ramsey-Nitschke_Line.pdf (copy attached) Have a great day! Chris On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 3:18 PM Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> wrote: Good afternoon, all, We have queried our legal department …
13.g - 2117 W 49th St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
14.2 - 906 W 22nd St - presentation — original pdf
906 W 22nd Street Historic Landmark Commission Item No. 14 2025-141132 DA December 3, 2025 1 Neighborhood Aerial 2 Site Aerial 3 Property Details Size: • 0.1613 acres, or approximately 7,027 square feet • All lots: 0.4993 acres, or approximately 21,753 square feet Protected Bike Lanes Current Use: • Multifamily (Apartments, 8 units) Transit/Access: • CapMetro 22nd and Pearl Stop: • Route 642 – (UT Shuttle Weekdays + Sundays) • All Ages and Abilities Bicycle Priority Network • Pearl Street – Protected two-way bike lanes 4 Zoning and FLUM Map CS-NP Mixed Use /Office MF-4-NP MF-4-NP Mixed Use Multi- family MF-4-NP MF-4-NP High- Density Mixed Use MF-4-CO- ETOD- DBETOD-NP MF-4-NP (Moderate High-Density Multifamily Residential – Neighborhood Plan) Mixed Use Mixed Use 5 Landmark Designation Criteria City Code requires that a property must demonstrate significance in at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature 6 Landmark Designation Criteria City Code requires that a property must demonstrate significance in at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature 7 Landmark Designation Criteria Significance i. Architecture • The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. ii. Historical Associations • The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, institutions, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. iii. Archeology • The property has, or is expected to yield, significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region; iv. Community Value • The property has a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of …
14.a - 906 W 22nd St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
19.a - 812 Park Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Thanks so much, Terri Myers, (512) 695-7375 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2
19.b - 812 Park Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 1(512)5651337 <ctmavayaalerts@austintexas.gov> Tuesday, December 2, 2025 11:05 AM Historic Preservation Office [Transcribed] Voice Message From: 1 (512) 5651337 VoiceMsg[ID=1415068 G=40 F=228 A=E5A352CE-3B3C-4F48-9B9A-49022952E125 C=1 CID= 1(512)5651337].wav Hello, I'm calling concerning the review case number P R 202-513-9336 G F 202-514-4847. It's concerning 812 Park Boulevard a demoli(cid:415)on to be heard before the historic Landmark commission. I was wondering they don't intend to remove the Stone wall that there at the entry way apart Boulevard at red River, it's within their property line, I believe but it is historic and there's you know a matching one across the street at 813 Port Boulevard and then down the street on Port Boulevard. A(cid:332)er you pass the creek, that's my only concern and anyway, I'll try to give you a ring back and see if we can actually discuss it thank you. So much. My name is Mary Anderson and I'm at 512-565-1337. Thank you. 1
02.0 - Preservation Plan Summit Briefing - presentation — original pdf
Equity-Based Preservation Plan Summit Briefing to Historic Landmark Commission December 3, 2025 Image credits, from top right; Anonymous; Rowena Dasch; Pearl Wu; Bruce Evans; photo by Keep It Digital, submitted by Linda Y. Jackson Summit Goals Update key stakeholders on implementation of the Equity-Based Preservation Plan Lay solid groundwork for collaboration on near-term recommendations 2 Attendees 50 collaborators Historic Landmark Commission members Preservation Plan Working Group members Community ambassadors and mini-grant organizations Staff from across City departments Other partners in Plan development and outreach People and organizations who can help implement Plan recommendations 3 Impact Areas 1. Keep residents and businesses in place 2. Improve processes 3. Provide more resources 4. Raise the visibility of preservation 5. Tell Austin’s full story 4 Impact Areas 5 Collaborative Brainstorming + Discussions 6 Next Steps 7
05.e - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - public comments — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Misael Ramos Tuesday, December 2, 2025 2:53 PM McWhorter, Trey - BC; Castillo, Raymond - BC; bc-jamie.alvarez@austintexas.gov; Larosche, Carl - BC; Evans, Roxanne - BC; Grogan, Harmony - BC; Heimsath, Ben - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC; Historic Preservation Office; ' Postponement Request - 2406 E. MLK BLVD Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged You don't often get email from Dear Commissioners, External Email - Exercise Caution The Historic Rogers-Washington Neighborhood Association is writing to request the postponement of the demolition at 2406 E. MLK. This house is a contributing house in our historic district and should remain until further notification from our neighborhood association. The current applicant has not spoken with our neighborhood about this property nor have they submitted any site plans to the city to show what they intend to do with the property. As some may know, it took us 5 years of organizing our neighbors to eventually receive the historic designation. During that process, we created design standards that keep the historical significance alive in our community. These design standards pay respect to the Black architects that built our neighborhood and other parts of East Austin. Given the lack of communication and insight into their plans, the neighborhood association thinks it is prudent to pause the process until plans are shared, we are given time to review the plans to understand how they work with the historic designation and provide feedback to the applicant. We thank you for your review of this case. Please reach out if you have any questions. Signed, Misael Ramos President - Rogers-Washington Holy Cross Neighborhood 1 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Marilyn Tuesday, December 2, 2025 4:06 PM Historic Preservation Office PR-2025-144142/GF 2025-144858 - 2406 E. Martin Luther King Jr Blvd Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged You don't often get email from Ms Sturgill: External Email - Exercise Caution I am a homeowner in the Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Historic District, and I am deep disturbed by the pending application for CA and demolition. I object to the application for the following reasons. …
05.f - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - public comments — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: brenda malik Wednesday, December 3, 2025 2:14 PM Historic Preservation Office Opposition to Demolition Permit @2406 E. M.L.K., Jr. Blvd External Email - Exercise Caution Greetings Commissioners, My name is Brenda Malik, and I am opposed to this demolition application and frankly annoyed that such an application would even come before without our neighborhood design standards being addressed. We worked more than five years to obtain our 'preservation district', yet it appears that the hard work and design standards on the books are deemed irrelevant. My fervent request is that this request for demolition be thrown out, or at least postponed pending further analysis and clearer information. No contact has been received from the applicant. Sincerely, Brenda Malik Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Historic Preservation District CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Tanya Moore Wednesday, December 3, 2025 2:26 PM Historic Preservation Office Postponement for the Demolition to Grant Certificate of Appropriateness Case 2025-144142/GF 2025-144858, 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good Afternoon, Mr. Sturgill. My name is Tanya M. Moore, resident of 2508 Givens Ave. property. I would like to request a postponement of the demolition of the property located at 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. The Rogers-Washington Holy Cross neighborhood association worked many years to develop the criteria by which others should adhere to keep the history of our community. Our request is simple as a member of this neighborhood association. We request to be contacted by the applicant, Dmitriy Dubrovsky, to share with us plans on how this property will be renovated while preserving the architectural history of our community. Thank you, in advance, for your consideration. Sincerely, Tanya M. Moore CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2
13.h - 2117 W 49th St - public comments — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Jeanne Cseri-Martin Tuesday, December 2, 2025 2:22 PM Historic Preservation Office Please defer demolition permit for old Rosedale school Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Historic Landmark Commission, I am a resident in Rosedale on Ramsey Avenue and raising my hand to request your postponement of the decision on the OHT’s request for a demolition permit for all or part of the old Rosedale school. We do not understand any reason to decide or push this through right now, especially given the legal case that’s been raised related to the development, and will need to be settled presumably in court. We heard of the AISD/OHT proposal as a compromise in that part of the old school might be kept as part of the proposed high-rise complex. However, this “compromise” had no participation by the Rosedale residents who have so much at stake in this development. We hope you can hear and heed the people of Rosedale to postpone this decision until the case is resolved. Thank you for your support. Respectfully, Jeanne Cseri-Martin 4202 Ramsey Avenue CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Jeannine and Ian Tuesday, December 2, 2025 2:25 PM Historic Preservation Office Rosedale School Hearing - Case #DA 25-142965 > You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chairman Heimsath and commission members: • I live at 1805 W 46th St and am a neighbor of the former Rosedale School site. • I support the postponement request by Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association on case number: DA 25-142965. • AISD has sued 125 neighbors of the site to try to nullify a deed restriction that only allows one residence per lot. We are fighting this in court and it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish the building until the court case is resolved. • I don't know if the old school is historic or not, but there is absolutely no reason …
19.c - 812 Park Blvd - public comment — original pdf
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Pattye Henderson Wednesday, December 3, 2025 1:43 PM Sturgill, Hunter Fw: PR-2025-139336: GF-2025-144847 [You don't o(cid:332)en get email from h(cid:425)ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden(cid:415)fica(cid:415)on ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Cau(cid:415)on ________________________________________ From: Pa(cid:425)ye Henderson Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2025 1:36 PM To: perserva(cid:415)on@aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov; //h(cid:425)ps://gcc02.safelinks.protec(cid:415)on.outlook.com/?url=h(cid:425)p%3A%2F%2Fwww.aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov%2Fhlc&data=05%7C02%7C hunter.sturgill%40aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov%7C2532f67e72ed4ba947ba08de32a430cb%7C5c5e19f6a6ab4b45b1d0be4608a9a67f %7C0%7C0%7C639003877969665535%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDA wMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1h0Yx8WmVAK0oUtoXOaKFldah V%2BXWS6nrR%2B%2FxihLddo%3D&reserved=0 Subject: PR-2025-139336: GF-2025-144847 Case Number PR-2025-139336; GF-2025-14487 Dear Historic Landmark Commission Members, My concerns are those of a neighbor and someone familiar with the subject property and Park Blvd. for over 50 years. At this (cid:415)me, there is too li(cid:425)le informa(cid:415)on and I do not support demoli(cid:415)on un(cid:415)l more informa(cid:415)on on what the replacement structure, if there is to be one, will look like from both streets that border it. The Miller-Long House, a historic property, sits on the corner across the street from this address. Working within the Historic Review process, the owner has gone to great expense and years long efforts to maintain the architectural integrity of that CORNER property and its contribu(cid:415)on to the neighborhood as the Eastern gateway to the residen(cid:415)al area that Park Blvd. represents; Hancock and Hyde Park Neighborhoods. One of the matching stoneworks that stand on EACH CORNER of Park Blvd. at Red River, stands on this property. They are iden(cid:415)cal to two others, located westward on Park Blvd., one on each side of the street. The stone bridge over the creek which crosses Park Blvd. is of similar design and construc(cid:415)on. These elements are important to our city and neighborhood heritage and should be maintained. No decision should be made has(cid:415)ly or without more informa(cid:415)on. I feel sure the majority of those living nearby would be pleased to see the renova(cid:415)on of an older property IF the new construc(cid:415)on maintains the character of the homes that surround it. At this (cid:415)me, I am opposed to the permit to demolish the current structure per this applica(cid:415)on. Please consider reserving your decision un(cid:415)l more informa(cid:415)on re. the replacement structure, if there is to be one, will look like from both streets that border it. 1 Thank you for your service and considera(cid:415)on of my comments ! Sincerely, Pa(cid:425)ye Henderson 723 Park Blvd. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use cau(cid:415)on when clicking links or opening a(cid:425)achments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" bu(cid:425)on in Outlook. …
Play video — original link
Play video
11.0 - 210 W 6th St - Staff report revision — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Permits in National Register Historic Districts December 3, 2025 HR-2025-144243 Sixth Street Historic District 210 West 6th Street 11 – 1 Proposal Rehabilitate a contributing building for use as a food service and event space. Project Specifications 1) Install awnings above windows at south and west facades, in the same locations as historic awnings. 2) Replace glass at non-original windows at the west façade with textured glass to obscure kitchen services and allow for ventilation to be installed. 3) Paint non-original entry doors at north façade, which date from 2020. 4) Replace non-historic handrail at Sixth Street entry. 5) Install two pairs of doors at the north façade for egress and accessibility routes. 6) Install rooftop screening at west bay roof to visually obscure kitchen equipment. 7) Install signage at south and north elevations, with additional logos on awnings at south and west facades. Architecture The following is from the site’s historical marker: Claudia Taylor Johnson Hall The University of Texas System Constructed during the period 1912-1914. This building was the seventh United States post office location in Austin, Texas. The supervising architect for the neo-classical revival style structure was James Knox Taylor of the U.S. Treasury Department. It was built by Dieter and Wenzel Construction Company of Wichita, Kansas, at a cost of $172,987. The land cost $40,000. Following construction of a new post office and federal building in 1965, the building was given to the University of Texas system by the federal government; it was remodeled into administrative offices by the university in 1970. The building was named in honor of Claudia Taylor Johnson, wife of the 36th president of the United States of America. The building was previously owned by the University of Texas system, and underwent some rehabilitation at the building envelope in 2020. Since that time, it has sat vacant. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards Several areas of proposed work are to occur in locations where original material has already been removed. In consultation with Historic Preservation Office staff, the scope of work has been adjusted to direct work to these areas where alteration or removal of non-historic material is easily …
Community Interest Announcement — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION COMMUNITY INTEREST ANNOUNCEMENT Preservation Plan Summit Friday, November 21, 2025, at 9 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1406/1407 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS A quorum of Commission members may be present. No action will be taken, and no Commission business will occur. Questions? Contact Cara Bertron (512) 974-1446
Agenda — original pdf
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 19, 2025, at 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 2004 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Judah Rice, Chair Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order or, for remote participation, no later than noon the day before the meeting, will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on July 22, 2024. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on October 17, 2025. STAFF BRIEFINGS 3. Staff briefing regarding previous historic sign cases in Austin and good practices from other cities. Presentation by Cara Bertron, Program Manager II, Austin Planning. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion of Historic Sign Standards. Discussion of ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Cara Bertron at Austin Planning at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Operations Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.
2. Minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on October 17, 2025 — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Friday, October 17, 2025 – 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center Conference Room 1401 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, TX 78752 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: x x x Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter Judah Rice DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Feedback on educational and outreach material use cases • Historic Preservation staff shared draft use cases with committee members • Committee members discussed identified gaps in educational and outreach materials and shared additional considerations for prioritizing material creation and updates 2. Potential update to historic sign standards • Committee members suggested moving this item to a future meeting to allow for more time to prepare and invite guest speakers 3. Ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings • Committee members suggested moving this item to a future meeting to allow for more time to prepare and invite guest speakers 4. Cadence of in-person and hybrid meetings • • • Committee meetings occur once a month Only the Chair must be present in person for meetings, other committee members may join remotely Chair can appoint someone to chair for them if they are unable to attend the meeting in person 5. Discussion of items for future Committee agendas • • November Committee meeting to address historic sign standards and Historic Landmark Commission bylaws Future Committee meeting to discuss ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974- 3393 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Operations Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at 512- 974-1446.
Play audio — original link
Play audio
Approved Minutes — original pdf
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 19, 2025, at 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 2004 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Judah Rice, Chair Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order or, for remote participation, no later than noon the day before the meeting, will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on July 22, 2024. Minutes not available for approval. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on October 17, 2025. MOTION: Approve the minutes by Commissioner McWhorter. Commissioner Acton seconded the motion. Vote: 3-0. STAFF BRIEFINGS 3. Staff briefing regarding previous historic sign cases in Austin and good practices from other cities. Presentation by Cara Bertron, Program Manager II, Austin Planning. Staff briefing not available. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion of Historic Sign Standards. • Commissioners reviewed suggestions from Commissioner Koch, including to clearly define hardship and when exceptions to the historic sign standards may be made, non- complying signs, and unique district character. • Commissioners reviewed good practices from other cities, including standards for both new and historic signs. Commissioners appreciated example graphics of recommended and not recommended work, as well as tables outlining sign requirements by neighborhood. • Commissioners discussed the issue of outdated standards and other documents being available online without context that they are obsolete. • Make the process for historic sign review clear, including 5-day administrative approval. • Discuss neon signs and the percentage of window coverage: are these priorities? Should they be changed? • Commissioners will do field research to identify effective and iconic signs for comparison against the historic sign standards, including on both older/historic and new large-scale buildings. • Discuss historic signs with Preservation Austin, sign fabricators, and historic sign restoration companies. Integrate historic sign standards into Historic Design Standards in the future. • • Consider significant murals on buildings that themselves may not be eligible for landmark designation. • Mary Marrero, Austin Law, responded to commissioner questions. 5. Discussion of ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings. • Item will be discussed at a future meeting. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Meeting minutes approved at …
Agenda — original pdf
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 12, 2025, at 4 p.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Carl Larosche, Chair Roxanne Evans CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Bat Taniguchi AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order or, for remote participation, no later than noon the day before the meeting, will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. 3. 4. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on January 18, 2023. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on December 16, 2024. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on January 9, 2025. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on October 17, 2025. STAFF BRIEFINGS 5. Staff briefing regarding implementation of the Equity-Based Preservation Plan. Presentation by Cara Bertron, Program Manager II, Austin Planning, and Annie Flom, Senior Planner, Austin Planning. DISCUSSION ITEMS 6. 7. Discussion of Preservation Plan Summit agenda and attendees. Discussion of Equity-Based Preservation Plan annual report. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Cara Bertron at Austin Planning at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974- 1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.