Historic Landmark Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Upcoming meetings

Regular Meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission - Meeting held in Council Chambers
July 26, 2021

B.7.0 - 2210 Windsor Road original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 26, 2021 HR-21-099481 DAVIS-SIBLEY HOUSE 2210 WINDSOR ROAD B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a carport at the rear of the house; eliminate a non-conforming rear staircase. The applicant seeks review of a new design for the rear carport and approval of the elimination of a non-conforming rear stair and replacement with a covered landing. The proposed carport is now lower and smaller than previously proposed, and does not obscure any of the architectural features of the back of the house. The rear stair is non-complying, and the applicant has decided to remove it and replace with a covered landing. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project meets the design standards with the exception of the rear stair, which the Architectural Review Committee has determined is a character-defining feature of the rear elevation of the house and should not be removed. The Committee had no issues with the revised design for the carport in the back of the house, but felt strongly that the rear stair sought for removal should be retained, as it is a character-defining feature. Staff acknowledges that the stair is non-conforming and would suggest ways to retain the look of the stair, even if it is non-functioning. The current proposal does not do that. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION LOCATION MAP B.7 – 2 B.7 – 3

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:22 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.1 - 2210 Windsor Rd - drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

623'- 7" BUILDING HEIGHT " ' 1 - 7 2 " 0 - 8 ' " 0 1 12'-0" GARAGE PLATE 4'-0" DETACHED LIVING 3'-2" GARAGE/MUD FLOOR 596'- 6" AVERAGE ADJACENT GRADE 600.60' HIGH PT ADJ GRADE 12 4 " / 4 3 6 - 9 1 ' " / 2 1 0 - 8 ' " 7 " / 4 1 1 1 - 0 1 ' 21'-2 1/4" EXIST 2ND FL PLATE 12'-6 1/4" EXIST 2ND FL FINISH EAST WING 11'-111/4" EXIST 2ND FLOOR FINISH WEST WING 1'-0"= 597'- 6" EXIST MAIN LEVEL SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". REMOVE AND REVISE EXISTING ROOF TILES TO BE INSTALLED OVER NEW MEMBRANE ROOF AND 2" RIGID INSULATION. COPPER GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS TYP. PATCH, REPAIR, MAINTAIN EXISTING 12 4 12 4 12 4 " 0 1 - 0 1 ' RESTORED PORCH 1 NEW PORCH OVER EXISTING FLATWORK SOUTH ELEVATION 1 592.40' LOW PT ADJ GRADE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" COPPER GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS TYP. METAL CHIMNEY FLUE LUDOWICI TILE ROOF NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH HISTORIC UNITS EXISTING PLASTER AND ROOF TO REMAIN PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED 12 4 12 4 NEW WOOD DOOR WITH SINGLE LITE NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOW 12 4 NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOW 592.40' LOW PT ADJ GRADE NORTH ELEVATION 2 BARREL TILE CAP PROPOSED RECONFIGURED MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL NEW MEMBRANE ROOF NEW EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS TO MATCH EXISTING NEW LUDOWICI TILE ROOF NEW CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS 600.60' HIGH PT ADJ GRADE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" RESTORATION NOTE: ALL EXISTING TO REMAIN TRIM, WINDOWS, DOORS AND SHUTTERS TO BE RESTORED TO WELL-MAINTAINED CONDITION, REPAINT. = EXISTING = PROPOSED SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". 21'-2 1/4" EXIST 2ND FL PLATE 12'-6 1/4" EXIST 2ND FL FINISH EAST WING 11'-111/4" EXIST 2ND FL FINISH WEST WING 1'-0"= 597'- 6" EXIST MAIN LEVEL 0'-0" EXIST MASTER BR LEVEL " / 4 3 6 - 0 2 ' " / 2 1 0 - 8 ' " 7 " / 4 1 1 1 - 0 1 ' " 0 - 1 ' 12'-0" GARAGE/KITCHEN PLATE 4'-0" DETACHED LIVING 3'-2" GARAGE/MUD FLOOR KITCHEN FLOOR " / 2 1 1 1 - 0 1 ' " 0 - 8 ' " …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:22 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.1 - 2210 Windsor Road appliction original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for a City Landmark or Local Historic District Adopted December 2012 The Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) reviews proposed exterior and site changes to City Historic Landmarks and properties in Local Historic Districts to assist owners in retaining the character-defining architectural features of important historic sites and districts. An approved Certificate of Appropriateness from the HLC is required in advance of performing all non-routine exterior and site work, including installation of signage. Your building permit will not be released without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness review by the City HPO or the HLC. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for all non-routine exterior work, including alterations to historic materials or the visual appearance of a site or building façade. These include additions to existing buildings, construction of new buildings, re-painting of Landmarks with new colors, changes in roof color or materials, major landscape work including pools, and changes in sidewalks and driveways. HLC review is usually not required for ordinary maintenance work such as re-painting with existing colors and performing routine repairs using like materials. Please check with the City HPO if you are uncertain whether a historic review is required. Submit your building permit application for zoning review first, and provide a copy of the reviewed and stamped application and site plan to the City HPO prior to review by the HLC to ensure that your plans conform to all applicable zoning regulations. If a modifica- tion is required from the Residential Design and Compatibility Commission or Board of Adjustments, that approval must be obtained prior to review by the HLC. This form does not substitute for other required permit review applications. The City HPO may approve certain minor projects without a review by the HLC. Minor projects include the construction of one-story rear additions of less than 600 square feet, two-story additions not visible from the street, and pools, decks, fences, back porch enclo- sures or other minor features Submittal Requirements: _____1. One set of dimensioned building plans, with the scale indicated on each sheet, including elevations, floor plan, site plan or layout, and a roof plan. Plans must indicate all proposed exterior and site changes (additions, alterations, new construc- tion, or demolition). For changes and additions, the plan set must show existing and proposed conditions. Mechanical and electrical plans are not necessary. a. Elevation sheets must specify all exterior building materials and finishes …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:22 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.2 - 2210 Windsor Road - applicant statement original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Hello, See attached documents to be added to our Landmark review. The documents do not change our submittal, just better illustrate our intent. I have included 2 letters of support from neighboring properties. Our client has made us aware that other neighbors have directly submitted in addition to attached. Please let me know this email was received. Thanks for your time in reviewing our project, Mark Lakins

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:22 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.3 - 2210 Windsor Road plans original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". = EXISTING FOOTPRINT = PROPOSED FOOTPRINT LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8 AND THE NORTH 20 FEET OF LOT 7, ENFIELD "D", A SUBDIVISION IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 3, PAGE 158 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. PROPOSED CARPORT PROPOSED PORCH S 62°28'26" E 180.30' (180) " 0 - 5 ' . E . U . P 14'-1" EXISTING RESIDENCE EXISTING PORCH EXISTING POOL D A O E R S A E P ) ' 0 0 1 ( ' 2 1 . 0 2 1 ' E " 1 1 8 4 7 2 N ° EXISTING PORCH " / 8 3 7 - 3 1 ' 24'-0" EXISTING PORCH 25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK LOT LINE " ' 0 - 2 2 " 0 - 5 ' . E . U . P W I N S 0 1 ° 2 0 ' 5 D S O R " 6 W 1 R O 3 3 . 9 A 7 ' D MULCH 0 " D D E E 0 '- . L 6 B . 1 0 " R A R A B T 0 '- E R Y E S D A K C 5 '- P 0 " E U N 62°26'55" W 239.98' SITE PLAN 1 SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" TRUE NORTH ZONING SF-3-H LOT SIZE 25,252 SF TREE SCHEDULE TREE # SIZE/TYPE 776 23" CEDAR ELM 8719 34.5" CEDAR ELM 8703 CRAPE MYRTLE 8720 20" PECAN 8704 20" CEDAR ELM 85 SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 8706 24.5" LIGUSTRUM 86 SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 8707 19" RED OAK 91 CEDAR ELM 8708 33.5" RED OAK 01 LIVE OAK 8709 23" RED OAK 8711 CRAPE MYRTLE 8710 22" RED OAK 8718 19" RED OAK PROTECTED TREE NOTES: DRIP LINE CALCULATION 1'-0" PER 0'-1" OF TRUNK ALL TREES & NATURAL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF AUSTIN STANDARDS OF TREE PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMIT APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TREES WITH A DIAMETER OF 19" OR MORE. ALL EXCAVATION UNDER TREE DRIP LINE TO BE DONE BY HAND. CUT …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:22 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.4 - 2210 Windsor Road - applicant's presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

CARPORT ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL NEW CARPORT- SLIGHTLY LOWER AND SMALLER EXISTING OPENING EXISTING OPENING CARPORT ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL PROPOSED PORCH NEW CARPORT- SLIGHTLY LOWER AND SMALLER EXISTING OPENING EXISTING OPENING

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.5 - 2210 Windsor Road - Letter of support from neighbor original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: 2210 Windsor Remodel From our neighbor to the south. -----Original Message----- From: Kent Ferguson <Kent_Ferguson@hcfd.com> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 10:36 AM To: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com>; Rae Hill <raehill@me.com> Subject: 2210 Windsor Remodel To: Austin Landmark Commission c/o Richard Suttle From: Kent Ferguson RE: 2210 Windsor Rd Proposed Remodel Modifications Date: July 9, 2021 To Whom It May Concern, I am the property owner of the house located 2208 Windsor Road in Austin, Texas which adjoins the southern property line of the subject property. I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the house which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. As the adjoining neighbor, I am delighted that the subject home is being restored so as preserve the character of our neighborhood. [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe 1

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.6 - 2210 Windsor Road - Letter of support original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: From one of our neighbors. Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: Remodel 2210 Windsor Road On Jul 12, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Melissa Ferguson <melissa@montwalktx.com> wrote: To Whom It May Concern: I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the property at 2210 Windsor Road which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. I own the property at 2208 Windsor which is next door to the property on the south side. I love the plans for the home and think these two additions to the property will be beautiful! Thank you, Melissa Ferguson July 12, 2021 [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe Richard S. Hill Partner Direct: 512-538-0050 | Main: 512-835-4455 Address: 3700 North Capital of Texas Highway Suite 420 | Austin,Texas 78746 To help protect y ou r priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Visit the New HPITX.com → This e-mail may contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete this message. 1

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.a - 2210 Windsor Rd - owner comments original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: 2210 Windsor Remodel From our neighbor to the south. -----Original Message----- From: Kent Ferguson <Kent_Ferguson@hcfd.com> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 10:36 AM To: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com>; Rae Hill <raehill@me.com> Subject: 2210 Windsor Remodel To: Austin Landmark Commission c/o Richard Suttle From: Kent Ferguson RE: 2210 Windsor Rd Proposed Remodel Modifications Date: July 9, 2021 To Whom It May Concern, I am the property owner of the house located 2208 Windsor Road in Austin, Texas which adjoins the southern property line of the subject property. I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the house which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. As the adjoining neighbor, I am delighted that the subject home is being restored so as preserve the character of our neighborhood. [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe 1

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.7.b - 2210 Windsor Rd - citizen comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: From one of our neighbors. Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: Remodel 2210 Windsor Road On Jul 12, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Melissa Ferguson <melissa@montwalktx.com> wrote: To Whom It May Concern: I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the property at 2210 Windsor Road which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. I own the property at 2208 Windsor which is next door to the property on the south side. I love the plans for the home and think these two additions to the property will be beautiful! Thank you, Melissa Ferguson July 12, 2021 [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe Richard S. Hill Partner Direct: 512-538-0050 | Main: 512-835-4455 Address: 3700 North Capital of Texas Highway Suite 420 | Austin,Texas 78746 To help protect y ou r priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Visit the New HPITX.com → This e-mail may contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete this message. 1

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.8.0 - Kenney House - 611 W. 22nd Street original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 26, 2021 C14H-1981-0018 KENNEY HOUSE 611 W. 22ND STREET B.10 - 1 PROPOSAL Review a sign for the front of the house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant has been before the Commission with an application for several signs and was granted approval for all signs on the property except for the one over the front door. This application seeks another review of the sign over the front door; the sign on the side of the house will not be used, so this and the previously-approved monument sign in the yard will be the only signs on the property. The applicant’s proposal is: 1. Starbucks will only have one sign on the building located over the 611 W. 22nd main entrance. Option A is the preferred option as it identifies the space as a coffee shop (the Siren), “Pick Up” identifies that it is not a place to sit and meet others. It is a takeout only. The size of the sign is designed so that people on both sides of 22nd Street can readily identify the location. This is a good idea for those who rely on navigation apps. Option B is the hanging sign suggested by the HLC architecture review committee. The problem is this sign has 6 ft 9 in clearance. Option C is dropping the siren and only have “PICK UP”. This might add to confusion as the “Siren” is a trademark that identifies this as a coffee shop STANDARDS FOR REVIEW COMMITTEE FEEDBACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION The proposed sign meets the City of Austin’s Sign Standards in terms of number, size, material, and illumination. The Committee reviewed the application again and offered the suggestion to reduce the size of the sign so that it doesn’t compete with the architectural features of the building, or to craft a sign that would be suspended from the fascia, and would be more in keeping with the character of the landmark building. The applicant addressed the feedback above. Staff still believes this can be done better to suit both the tenant’s needs and the interests of historic preservation and prefers the Committee’s recommendation for a reduced size of the sign or a suspended sign. However, staff does understand the limitations of a suspended sign both from the potential for vandalism being so low on the building, or for liability if a patron …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

B.8.1 - Kenney House sign proposal original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Backup

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.1.0 - 911 Congress Ave original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

C.1 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICTS JULY 26, 2021 HR-2021-085748 CONGRESS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT 911 CONGRESS AVENUE PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Review of a plan to deconstruct, store, and re-erect historic building façade. Catalog and store, then re-erect the historic building façades of the Grandberry Building, Mitchell-Robertson Building, and the building at 911 Congress Ave. as part of a redevelopment project at a later date. In conjunction with proposed additions, deconstruction and reconstruction of these façades has received approval from the Historic Landmark Commission on three separate occasions: September 25, 2006 (for 907 and 909 Congress Ave. only), January 26, 2015 (pending development of more detailed plans for treatment of the three façades), and June 25, 2018. See Prior Commission Action below. On March 24, 2021, the Building Standards Commission (BSC) issued an order requiring that conditions be remedied within 90 days or imposing fines on the property owner. The BSC orders are uploaded as backup to this meeting for reference. In discussion at the April 24, 2021 meeting, Commissioners suggested that the applicant determine if scaffolding erected for purposes of documenting and dismantling the façades would suffice for compliance with the BSC orders. The orders do not mention stabilization or bracing as options, and Code Department staff have confirmed that scaffolding would be insufficient to meet the requirements. Instead, the orders require repairs to fully remedy the violations, which include cracks and openings in exterior walls, roof and drainage issues, and missing windows, among other concerns. Per the applicant, stabilization and repair of the buildings in place is not technically feasible due to the extent of deterioration, including mortar loss, shear failures and racking, and the inability to adequately shore the façades following demolition of masonry party walls that provide lateral support. The proposed scope of work entails developing a detailed plan for deconstruction and reconstruction of the historic façades, including as an initial phase: review of existing documentation, visual and non-destructive analysis of building materials and assemblies, structural evaluation, and development of a finalized scope of work and sequence of implementation. Laser scanning has been performed, and analysis of the resulting point cloud is underway. Deconstruction will be done by hand and treated much like an archeological investigation, with specific conditions and hidden elements documented as work progresses. This information will inform preparation of reconstruction drawings and specifications. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Two-story, two-part commercial block …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.1.3 - 911 Congress Avenue - 2009 zoning change review sheet original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 61 pages

B.1 - 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: PC DATE: November 16, 2009 December 14, 2009 CASE NUMBER: C14H-2009-0059 APPLICANT: 911 Congress, L.L.C., owner HISTORIC NAME: 911 Congress Avenue WATERSHED: Town Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 911 Congress Avenue ZONING FROM: CBD to CBD-H SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from central business district (CBD) district to central business district – Historic Landmark (CBD-H) combining district zoning. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The building is listed in the Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey (1984) as a priority 2 for research. ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: CITY COUNCIL DATE: ORDINANCE READINGS: 1ST 2ND 3RD CASE MANAGER: Steve Sadowsky NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION: Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: The ca. 1881 commercial building was the home to several prominent early Austin attorneys, Gammel’s Book Store (one of the first west of the Mississippi River), a Jewish tailor, the Knights of Pythias Hall, a prominent local photography studio, a hardware store, and several restaurants. The applicants intend to restore the historic façade of the building in the future. PHONE: 974-6454 Architecture: Two-story rectangular-plan flat-roofed brick commercial building with a concrete slipcover over the second story of the building; the storefront has been modified and boarded over. The building has been vacant for many years. Historical Associations: The building appears to have been built around 1881; it appears in a ca. 1881 photograph of Congress Avenue with cattle grazing in the middle of the street. The B.1 - 2 first known occupants were Carl W. Berryman, who had a dry goods store, and the offices of the White Star Steamship Line. The owner of the property was Duncan Ogden, who passed away in 1859; at some point before 1916, Sol Silverman, a Jewish tailor, who had his shop in this building, purchased the building, which is shown as vacant on the 1894 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map. Silverman leased space in the building to several prominent early attorneys in Austin, including Charles Stephenson and Henry Faulk (Faulk was the father of John Henry Faulk, who became internationally known as a CBS personality and who was blacklisted during the McCarthy era of the 1950s). Silverman sold the building in 1916, but apparently maintained his tailor shop here until around 1919. Faulk had his offices in the building until around 1915. By 1916, Gammel’s Book Store opened in the building …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:23 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.1.a - 911 Congress Ave - citizen comments original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:24 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.10.0 - 3103 Oakmont Blvd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 26, 2021 PR-21-091021 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 3103 OAKMONT BOULEVARD C.10 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1947 contributing house and construct a new residence with garage. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish existing contributing house. 2) Construct a new 2-story house. The proposed building features a full-width front porch supported by boxed columns. It is clad in horizontal wood siding with board-and-batten at the second-floor dormer. Triangular brackets are proposed at dormer eaves. The building’s compound side-gabled roof is clad in composite shingles. Window configurations include 2:2, fixed and sliding single-pane, 1:1, and 3:1. 3) Construct a detached garage at the rear of the property. It will be clad in horizontal siding to match the main house and will be capped by a pyramidal roof covered in composite shingles. The garage door faces the street. ARCHITECTURE One-story house with compound gabled roofline, stucco cladding, and multilight steel casement windows. Side elevations feature a built-in planter and flat-roofed detached carport. A limestone retaining wall spans the front of the lot, elevating the property above sidewalk level. RESEARCH The existing contributing house was built in 1947 by A. S. Hull and contractor Zelotus D. Yeaton and his wife, Elaine, who were also its first occupants. By 1952, the Yeatons sold the property to G. W. and Rues Archer; they remained there until at least 1955. By 1955, Army veteran and music educator Nelson G. Patrick had moved into the home. Patrick, director of the Stephen F. Austin High School band, went on to serve as the University of Texas’ associate and acting dean of the College of Fine Arts. Dr. Patrick taught UT music students arrangement, history, and physics, and organized the University’s first Longhorn Music Camps. Dr. Patrick worked as the music director for the University Interscholastic League from 1961 to 1984, creating programs for the Texas State Solo Ensemble Contest, the Texas State Marching Band Contest, the Texas State Wind Ensemble Contest, and the Texas Music Adjudicators Association (see Legacy.com obituary, below). He remained active as a consultant to the organization until his death. Throughout his career, he used his substantial experience to inform the Texas legislature on music and music education and to publish prolifically, appearing in scholarly publications and popular music journals alike. Dr. Patrick’s other honors are enumerated in his 2004 obituary: He served…in the …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:24 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.10.1 - 3103 Oakmont Blvd - Renderings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

Backup

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:24 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.10.2 - 3103 Oakmont Blvd - Plans original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

June 14, 2021 4 0 0 D 2 A C O T U A r e h o t d n a i , s n o s n e m d i , s t n e m e r u s a e m e h T , t n e m u c o d s h i t n o n w o h s , s n o i t a c i f i c e p s l . y n o e s u n o i t c u r t s n o c r o f s e n i l i e d u g e r a d e h s n i i f e h t f o s n o i t a c i f i c e p s l a u t c a e h T y a m t n e m u c o d i s h T . y r a v y a m e r u t c u r t s f o n o i t a t n e s e r p e r a s a n o d e i l e r e b t o n . e k i l k o o l l l i w e r u t t c u r t s d e e p m o c e h l t t a h w C s e m o H y e l k e e W d i v a D D A O R R O S D N W I D V L B T N O M K A O 3 0 1 3 3 0 7 8 7 X T , N I T S U A NORTH C284-A PLT_PLN-1 CENTRAL LIVING 4 0 0 D 2 A C O T U A r e h o t d n a i , s n o s n e m d i , s t n e m e r u s a e m e h T , t n e m u c o d s h i t n o n w o h s , s n o i t a c i f i c e …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:24 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.10.a - 3103 Oakmont Blvd - citizen comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bill W Wednesday, July 14, 2021 5:20 PM PAZ Preservation 3103 Oakmont Blvd. PR-2021-091021 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Commissioners: The Historic Review Committee of the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association has been in contact with the owner and architect of 3103 Oakmont Blvde and reviewed and discussed the plans. Then our recommendation was put to a vote of the Board of Directors of the NA. We do NOT oppose this demo/rebuild. (By way of information, our Neighborhood Association only votes to “oppose” or “not oppose;” we do not “support.”) Bill Woods Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Historic Review Committee CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:24 p.m.
July 26, 2021

C.11.0 - 1602 Northumberland Rd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 26, 2021 PR-2021-097458 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1602 NORTHUMBERLAND ROAD C.11 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1948 contributing house and construct new building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a two-story house. The proposed building has a compound roofline clad in standing-seam metal, with side- gabled form at the main mass and flat, hipped, and shed rooflines at secondary massing. It is clad in stucco with cast- stone trim and decorative accents throughout. Fenestration is regularly placed at the primary elevation and includes French doors with partial glazing at the second floor, full height multi-light windows and double entry doors at the first floor, and a round accent window. Round windows and horizontal multi-light fixed and casement windows appear at secondary elevations. An iron railing encloses the second-floor balcony at the main elevation. 2) Construct a detached garage. The proposed garage is located behind the primary building and is clad in stucco with cast stone trim to match. It has a steeply pitched hipped roof of standing seam metal with barrel-roofed dormers at each elevation. Multi-light horizontal pane fixed windows are used to match secondary elevations of the main building. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS One-story Transitional Ranch house clad in brick, with inset partial-width porch, cross-gabled roof with deep eaves, and front-facing garage. Fenestration at the main façade includes screened 2:2 aluminum windows and multilight picture windows with inoperable shutters; the front door is not visible from the street. The house at 1602 Northumberland Road was constructed in 1948 for Jennie Covert. Covert was the widow of Clarence Covert, a prominent auto salesman in Austin; after his death, she helped her sons run the family business. Covert was an active member of the Junior League, past president of the Settlement Club, and multi-year PTA president. She lived in the home for at least ten years. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new buildings appear to be set back appropriately from the street, with the garage located to the rear of the main building. 2. Orientation Both proposed buildings maintain an orientation that is consistent with contributing buildings elsewhere in …

Scraped at: July 22, 2021, 7:24 p.m.