Environmental Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-008b: Austin Green PUD C814-2018-0154 Recommendation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20200115 008b Date: January 15, 2020 Subject: Austin Green Planned Unit Development, C814-2018-0154 Motion by: Katie Coyne Seconded by: Mary Ann Neely RATIONALE: WHEREAS, increased development pressure to the City’s east will make it even more vital to develop in environmentally sensitive ways; WHEREAS, the site is identified in Imagine Austin as a Town Center; WHEREAS, the applicant is committed to dedicating over 858.22 acres, approximately 40% of the site, as parkland or open space; WHEREAS, the applicant is committed to meeting existing code or in most cases, exceeding Planned Unit Development (PUD) superiority requirements; WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting approval to create a new PUD with superior environmental design; WHEREAS, the applicant is committed to restoring previously industrial land to functioning riparian and open space assets; and WHEREAS, City of Austin Staff recommends the approval with conditions outlined below. THEREFORE, approval of the requested PUD creation with the ongoing commitment of the applicant to meet superiority elements outlined in the meeting backup, and with the following conditions: Environmental Commission Conditions: 1. That the applicant continue to work with and get approval from the Watershed Protection department for a land management and maintenance plan for parkland, open space, riparian zones, green infrastructure features, and other environmentally sensitive areas on site to ensure the long-term environmental function of the landscapes; and, that the applicant commit to this plan in the long-term. 2. Explore carbon capture credits and other mitigation banking that may encourage climate action / carbon 3. 858.22 (40%) acres of public open space and parkland, which includes approximately three miles of Colorado sequestration efforts regionally. River frontage shall be provided. 1 4. Open space areas shall be restored with appropriate native vegetation outlined in the PUD. 5. Parks and open space areas shall utilize reclaimed water for irrigation. 6. 65% of stormwater shall be treated by dispersed green stormwater infrastructure which includes bio- filtration, rain gardens, and vegetated filter strips. 7. 77 acres of off-site drainage area shall be treated. 8. The project shall provide approximately 50 million cubic feet of additional storage volume for the watershed through a series of on-site retention ponds. Approximately 100 million cubic feet of additional storage volume shall be provided beyond the minimum required for on and off-site flows through three (3) on-site regional retention ponds for the Elm Creek watershed. The proposed 450-acre retention ponds will remove approximately 238 …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:51 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-003a: Buying & Selling Ecosystem Services Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 26 pages

Buying and Selling Ecosystem Services Presentation To City of Austin Environmental Commission January 15, 2020 Jim Blackburn Post Ike Research at Rice University’s SSPEED Center 2 How Do We Protect 2 Million Coastal Acres Lying At Or Below 20 Feet Elevation? Majority in Private Ownership Conserved Lands High Risk Surge: 20-Ft Above MSL Low-Lying Lands of Galveston Bay Economy and Ecology As A Land Management Strategy Could We Develop a Different Economy Here - - A Resilient Economy Based on Use, Appreciation and Protection of our Natural Values? Let’s Have A Conversation About Ecology $ $ 5 Ecosystem benefits provided by natural coastal lands • Storm surge protection • Flood storage • Carbon sequestration • Water supply enhancement • Fishery productivity • Endangered species habitat • Neo-tropical migrant bird habitat • Waterfowl habitat 7 © Soil Value Exchange TM 2018. All rights reserved. Unlock Natures’ Capital TM What Could We Sell? Carbon Dioxide Removal and Storage California Ca. $ 15 / tCO2 British Columbia $ 35 / tCO2 Do we have a CO2 credit desert? EU CO2 prices are increasing average is above $ 22 / tCO2 Sweden: Switzerland: Finland: France: $ 135 / tCO2 $ 100 / tCO2 $ 75 / tCO2 $ 50 / tCO2 Basic Concept SELLERS BUYERS Money Exchanged For Protection and Expansion of Ecological Services Carbon Neutral/Renewable Commitments Marketing opportunities – CO2 neutral driving 1 Car’s Emission 527 Gal Gasoline/yr 4.7 ton CO2/yr 0.47 ha 1.16 acres 88% of a Football Field Increase market share or sell premium product Market CO2 neutral gasoline Restoring land & support our ranchers Market CO2 neutral cars Restoring land & support our ranchers 10 yr CO2 emissions stored at car purchase $ 15/tCO2 ~$ 0.14 / Gal $ 70 /yr Increase market share or sell premium product Value opportunities – CO2 neutral oil refining Refinery emissions only Customer Emissions 85 kg CO2/b bl 150,000 bbl crude/d 4.6 MM t CO2/yr 432 kg CO2/bbl 24 MM t CO2/yr 500 mid size ranches CO2 neutral HC fuels Enabled by 2500 mid size ranches 0.6% of TX 1 MM acres 3% of TX 5.3 MM acres $ 15/tCO2 $ 69 MM/yr or $ 1.27 /bbl $ 15/tCO2 $ 360 MM/yr or $ 6.60/bbl The Future of Carbon Sequestration Perhaps 1 Billion Tons or More CO2 Storage Up to 20% of U.S. Carbon Footprint Donors Grantees $ Coastal Marshlands Prairies Forests Carbon Fish …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:51 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-005a: Common Variance Requests Conditions Table original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

COMMON VARIANCE REQUESTS & LOGICAL METHODS FOR THEIR EVALUATION Requirements Intent Mitigation Measures/Conditions Typical Examples Variance Request 1. Cut & Fill • Max 4 feet cut & fill allowed (except unlimited under buildings or within ROW) • Must restore & stabilize cut & fill areas • Up to 8 ft. administrative variance allowed in DDZ if not located on a slope gradient >15% or <100 feet of classified waterway • Administrative variances given for stormwater facilities (e.g., flood & WQ structural controls) • Maintain slope stability • Prevent loss of site character • Minimize site disturbance • Protect surface & groundwater quality by minimizing sediment discharges • Structural containment (retaining walls) • Restoration and revegetation • Terracing • Increased setback from significant features • Pervious pavers for sidewalks • For fill, provide enhanced erosion & sedimentation • Roadways • Driveways • Parking • Level Building Slab • Floodplain & Drainage Modifications 2. Construction on Steep Slopes • Maintain slope stability • Protect fragile environments • Prevent concentration of runoff • Reduce erosion & sedimentation • No roadway or driveway on slope >15% unless necessary for primary access to >2 acres with gradient of <15% or building sites for at least 5 residential units • No buildings/parking structures on slope >25% or parking areas on slope >15% • Building/parking structure OK on slope 15-25% if terraced, vegetation restored, <10% footprint on slopes >15% controls (e.g., Jersey barriers immediately downslope of silt fence to provide silt fence stability and robustness) • Reduced footprint of disturbance • Preserve trees and/or natural areas not already required to preserve • Apply Landscaping Ordinance for projects in the ETJ • When not otherwise required, geologist oversees excavation of project and cut/fill areas • Increased tree mitigation inches • Structural containment (retaining walls) – REQUIRED condition if slope exceeds 33% (3:1 slope) • Restoration & revegetation • Terracing • Enhanced erosion & sedimentation controls: o Place temporary erosion basins off-line unless designed as a dam (i.e., not located in natural draws/channels) o Require site plan to phase clearing & grading, with o Require spoils to be hauled off-site or stored away temporary stabilization from concentrated flow o Require more robust perimeter controls (e.g. filter fabric-encased gabions); superior to silt fencing o Require Jersey barriers immediately downslope of silt fence to provide silt fence stability • Preserve trees and/or natural areas not already required to preserve • Meet …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:52 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-007a: 614 S 1st Street PUD (CD-2019-0006) Development Assessment Briefing original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 40 pages

BRIEFING SUMMARY SHEET DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT CASE NUMBER: CD-2019-0006 – 614 S. 1st Street PUD REQUEST: Presentation of a Development Assessment Report for the 614 South 1st Street Planned Unit Development (PUD), located at 614 South 1st Street, within the East Bouldin Creek Watershed. DISTRICT AREA: 9 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The applicant has submitted a development assessment for a proposed 8.185-acre multifamily development to be known as the 614 S. 1st Street PUD. It is located on the west side of South 1st Street with East Bouldin Creek as its western and northern most boundaries, see Exhibit A: Zoning Map and Exhibit B: Aerial Map. The property is located within the East Bouldin Creek Watershed, which is classified as an Urban Watershed. The proposed PUD is in an area that includes 100-year floodplain, stream buffers (critical water quality zones and erosion hazard zones) and due to its proximity to East Bouldin Creek, the possibility of critical environmental features (CEFs). CEFs were not identified within the development assessment application but have been requested to be shown if present on the PUD application. The applicant’s proposed PUD consists of up to 550 residential units (apartments) with underground parking and a maximum building height of 120’. The proposed project will be more compact than the existing development on site (Timbercreek Apartments), reducing and removing impervious cover currently located in environmentally sensitive areas. Vehicular access to the PUD will be from South 1st Street through an existing access easement agreement with the neighboring apartment property to the south. On the Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map, this site abuts the South Central Waterfront District and is along an Imagine Austin Activity Corridor (South 1st Street). The applicant is current working with the Austin Transportation Department (ATD) on potential roadway improvements on S. 1st Street (new signal, pedestrian hybrid beacon, etc.) at the project’s driveway per the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) for additional protection to cyclists and pedestrians crossing the street. The applicant has stated in their application materials that the project will meet or exceed all applicable Tier One requirements, and several Tier Two items (water quality, drainage, restoration, art, community amenities, transportation, affordable housing, accessibility and local small business). By meeting or exceeding these items, the applicant has stated the proposed PUD will result in a superior development compared to that which could be developed under conventional zoning standards, see Exhibit C: Letter from Agent …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:52 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-008a: Lantana PCA backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: January 15, 2020 Lantana PCA NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Michael Whellan Armbrust & Brown, PLLC LOCATION: 7415 Southwest Parkway COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF Atha Phillips, Environmental Officer’s Office (512)974-2132, atha.phillips@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: Williamson Creek Watershed, Barton Springs Zone, Drinking Water Protection Zone Consider a project consent agreement (PCA) to allow for the construction of a mixed-use development with a residential component. Staff recommended with conditions. 1. Applicant shall provide additional acreage of 3.098 acres to meet the Hill Country Roadway requirement of 40% undisturbed natural area per 25-2-1025. Lantana Project Consent Agreement (PCA) Briefing to the Environmental Commission Atha Phillips Environmental Officer’s Office January 15, 2020 What is a PCA? • PCA = Project Consent Agreement • PCAs are part of the 245 process detailed in 25-1-544 • PCAs are considered when the extent of a project’s vested rights are unclear and for incentivizing projects with clearly established vested rights to achieve greater compliance with current regulations • The 245 process lives within the Development Services Department • DSD has determined that this project is a candidate for a PCA Site Location Austin ETJ Austin City Limits Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Hwy 290 West Site Location Barton Creek Watershed Williamson Creek Watershed Watershed Boundary Site Location Site Data: • Williamson Creek Watershed • Barton Springs Zone • Drinking Water Protection Zone • Contributing Zone • Full-Purpose • Existing approved site plan (SP-2014-0262C(XT2)) • Existing project has vested rights under 245 • Existing site plan wants to change zoning from Office to Mixed Use • Mixed Use would allow for residential or multi-family Staff Recommendation Recommended with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall provide additional acreage of 3.098 acres to meet the Hill Country Roadway requirement of 40% undisturbed natural area per 25-2-1025. Questions? Contact Information: Atha Phillips Environmental Officer’s Office (512) 974-2132 Atha.Phillips@austintexas.gov

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:53 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-008b: Austin Green PUD C814-19-0154 - Backup 1 of 3 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: Contiguous to District 2 TO: PUD CASE: C814-2018-0154 – Austin Green ZONING FROM: DR; Unzoned ADDRESS: 11600 – 12337 Harold Green Road SITE AREA: 2,126.25 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (Kate Glaze) AGENT: MG Realty Investments, LLC (dba Groundwork) (Steven Spears) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment to planned unit development (PUD) district zoning, as shown in the proposed Land Use Plan and as provided in Exhibits B-1 and B-2, C and D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 3 through 10. The Restrictive Covenant includes all recommendations listed in the Transportation Mitigation Memo, dated November 21, 2019, as provided in Attachment A. URBAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: December 10, 2019: BRIEFING HELD ON THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: January 15, 2020: PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD: January 28, 2020: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: January 28, 2020: November 26, 2019: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF [C. KENNY; P. SEEGER – 2ND] (7-0) A. AZHAR, Y. FLORES, P. HOWARD, C. LLANES-PULIDO, R. SCHNEIDER; J. SHIEH – ABSENT June 11, 2019: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF [C. KENNY; A. AZHAR – 2ND] (13-0) C814-2018-0154 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 14, 2020: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: None at this time. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The proposed Austin Green PUD contains a 2,126 acre active sand and gravel mining site (a basic industry use) and is generally located at the intersection of SH 130 and Harold Green Road, with limited frontage on FM 973, Platt Lane, and FM 969, and bounded by approximately 3.2 miles of Colorado River frontage along its southern boundary. Except for a portion of the Colorado River frontage west of SH 130 that has development reserve (DR) zoning, the site is currently outside of the City limits and proposed for limited purpose annexation and concurrent creation of a Municipal Utility District (MUD). Similarly, except for the Colorado River frontage, all of the surrounding properties are located outside of the City limits. Land west of SH 130 is characterized by industrial and open space uses, with manufactured home and detached single family residential subdivisions bordering the southwest property boundary. The majority of the adjacent land east of SH 130 functions as open space, with the Austin Colony …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:53 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-008b: Austin Green PUD C814-19-0154 Exhibits B-I - Backup 2 of 3 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 66 pages

Exhibit B - Summary Letter Austin Green PUD Superiority Table ITEM 2.3 TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS General REQUIREMENT PROPOSED PUD SUPERIORITY 2.3.1.A: (MEET) Meet the objectives of the City Code. 2.3.1.B: (MEET) Provide for development standards that achieve equal or greater consistency with the goals in Section 1.1 (General Intent) than development under the regulations in the Land Development Code. • Austin Green will meet the objectives of the City Code. • Austin Green will provide for environmental, community, design and regional goals that meet or exceed Code standards and encourage high-quality mixed-use development. • Austin Green will encourage high-quality development with extensive open space areas. • Austin Green will provide a mixed-use project that adds employment, housing and other activities as described for this Town Center location in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. • At the densities proposed, Austin Green can help • achieve the vision of a Major Town Center in Imagine Austin, significant housing units as expressed in the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint and transit- supportive densities in the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan. This is possible because the site has great mobility opportunities, few residential neighbors that would push back on such densities, the potential for transit service as CapMetro’s service area expands and proximity to the airport, which will support an employment center. In addition to the rare characteristics of the site that make it perfect for higher densities than in other previously settled parts of the city, it is a site that the city wants restored and put into public use for recreation and a regional trail connecting downtown Austin to downtown Bastrop as described in the Austin Urban Trails Master Plan, Colorado River Corridor Plan, Travis County Parks Master Plan and the Austin- Bastrop River Corridor Plan . This level of reconstruction and dedication is unachievable with lower densities. • Austin Green PUD will provide 761.75 acres of combined parkland and open space (Exhibit F- Proposed Parkland and Open Space Master Plan). To meet Tier 1, 196.58 acres of open space would be required, we have provided 761. 75 acres. That is nearly four times as much open space as needed to achieve this superiority item. In addition, except in the areas where public parks and OS areas are adjacent to rivers, major highways or utility easements, parks and open space must have direct frontage on a road for 20% of its edge and must …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:54 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-008b: Austin Green PUD C814-19-0154 Exhibits J-N and Attachments - Backup 3 of 3 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

Exhibit J- Proposed Plant List for Reclamation in Open Space Areas As shown on Exhibit I-Proposed Reclamation Guidelines, the existing reclamation standards of the existing permits specify the application of basic plant species seed mix. The proposed plant list is more comprehensive and complex. Even the City’s Grow Green Guide includes plants that are more suited to the arid Hill Country than the moist Bottomland Hardwoods. The following lists are tailored to the individual ecological habitats onsite to promote and enhance their natural characteristics and ecological function. BLACKLAND PRAIRIE LANDSCAPE - BLACKLAND PRAIRIE PLANT LIST Seed application rate: 10 pounds per acre (Source of application rate: Native American Seed Company). Scientific Name Common Name Agalinis heterophylla Andropogon gerardii Andropogon virginicus Asclepias incarnata Asclepias speciosa Asclepias tuberosa Bothriochloa barbinodis Bouteloua curtipendula Buchloe dactyloides Callirhoe involucrata Callirhoe leiocarpa Centaurea americana Chamaecrista fasciculata Chasmanthium latifolum Chloris cucullata Dalea purpurea var. purpurea Desmanthus illinoensis Dracopis amplexicaulis Elymus canadensis Elymus virginicus Engelmannia peristenia Eragrostis trichodes Eriochloa sericea Prairie Agalinis Big Bluestem Broomsedge Bluestem Rose Milkweed Showy Milkweed Butterflyweed Cane Bluestem Sideoats Grama Buffalograss Winecup Annual Winecup American Basketflower Partridge Pea Inland Seaoats Hooded Windmill Grass Purple Prairie Clover Illinois Bundleflower Clasping Coneflower Prairie Wildrye Virginia Wildrye Cutleaf Daisy Sand Lovegrass Texas Cupgrass Scientific Name Eryngium yuccifolium Gaillardia pulchella Glandularia bipinnatifida var. bipinnatifida Helianthus annuus Ipomopsis rubra Leptochloa dubia Lindheimeri texana Monarda citridora Panicum virgatum Paspalum floridanum Penstemon cobaea Plains Bristlegrass Plains Coreopsis Rudbeckia hirta Salvia farinacea Schizachyrium scoparium Silphium albiflorum Sorghastrum nutans Sporobolus cryptandrus Triden albescens Tridens flavus Tripsacum dactyloides Common Name Rattlesnake Master Indian Blanket Prairie Verbena Maximilian Sunflower Standing Cypress Green Sprangletop Texas Yellow Star Lemon Mint Switchgrass Florida Paspalum Foxglove Plains Bristlegrass Plains Coreopsis Black-eyed Susan Mealy Blue Sage Little Bluestem White Rosinweed Indiangrass Sand Dropseed White Tridens Purpletop Eastern Gamagrass Submittal Date: November 27, 2019 Page 1 of 3 PUD CASE #: C814-2018-0154-AUSTIN GREEN Exhibit J: Proposed Plant List for reclamation in Open Spaces Areas Exhibit J- Proposed Plant List for Reclamation in Open Space Areas BLACKLAND PRAIRIE LANDSCAPE - RIPARIAN RECOVERY PLANT LIST Seed application rate: 9 pounds per acre (Source of application rate: Native American Seed Company). Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name Andropogon gerardii Andropogon glomeratus Asclepias incarnata Bothriochloa barbinodis Bouteloua curtipendula Chamaecrista fasciculata Chasmanthium latifolum Coreopsis tinctoria Desmanthus illinoensis Dracopis amplexicaulis Elymus canadensis Elymus virginicus Engelmannia peristenia Eriochloa sericea Helianthus angustifolius Helianthus maximiliani Iva annua …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:57 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-008b: Austin Green PUD C814-19-0154 Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: January 15, 2020 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: Austin Green PUD C814-2018-0154 NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Steven Spears Groundwork LOCATION: 11600-12337 Harold Green Road COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2-mile ETJ, will be District 2 once PUD is approved ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: ZONING CASE MANAGER: WATERSHED: REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: Atha Phillips, Environmental Officer’s Office (512) 974-2132, atha.phillips@austintexas.gov Wendy Rhoades, Planning and Zoning (512) 974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov Colorado River Basin and Elm Creek Watershed, Suburban Watershed Classification, Desired Development Zone To create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Staff recommended with conditions 1. 858.22 (40%) acres of public open space and parkland, which includes approximately three miles of Colorado river frontage shall be provided. 2. Open space areas shall be restored with appropriate native vegetation outlined in the PUD. 3. Parks and open space areas shall utilize reclaimed water for irrigation. 4. 65% of stormwater shall be treated by dispersed green stormwater infrastructure which includes bio-filtration, rain gardens, and vegetated filter strips. 5. 77 acres of off-site drainage area shall be treated. 6. The project shall provide approximately 50 million cubic feet of additional storage volume for the watershed through a series of on-site retention ponds. Approximately 100 million cubic feet of additional storage volume shall be provided beyond the minimum required for on and off-site flows through three (3) on-site regional retention ponds for the Elm Creek watershed. The proposed 450-acre retention ponds will remove approximately 238 acres of neighboring property and 43 acres of Harold Green Road ROW from the floodplain. These calculations are based on the Atlas 14 flood model for the adjusted 100-year floodplain. 7. Shall provide 29 acres of additional critical water quality zone. 8. Shall preserve 12.91 acres of wetland CEFs, 12.74 acres of wetland CEF shall be enhanced and 9.97 acres of wetland CEF shall be mitigated at 150% acre-for-acre and given the 150-foot buffer required by code. 9. Impervious cover shall be capped at 65% gross site area. 10. Shall preserve a significant stand of trees that have been identified on-site and shall meet current code for tree removal and mitigation. 11. Shall provide 6 miles of public trails throughout the development. 12. Shall meet a Carbon Impact score of 8. Page 2 of 2 Austin Green PUD C814-2018-0154 Atha Phillips, Environmental Program Coordinator Environmental Officer’s Office Site Location Austin ETJ Austin City Limits Edwards Aquifer …

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 12:59 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

20200115-7a: 614 S. 1st Street PUD Development Assessment (CD-2019-0006) Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

Briefing on Proposed 614 S. 1st Street PUD Presented by Kate Clark, Zoning and Planning Department Atha Phillips, Environmental Officer January 15, 2020 PROJECT INFORMATION CURRENT AND PROPOSED ZONING NEXT STEPS Planning and Zoning Staff Briefing January 15, 2020 2 Project Information  Address: 614 South 1st Street  Size: 8.185 acres  District: 9  Located in East Bouldin Creek Watershed  Currently Developed:  Timbercreek Apartments  Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map:  Along Activity Corridor  Abuts South Central Waterfront District January 15, 2020 3 Key Components of Proposed PUD Up to 550 dwelling units; Modified compatibility setback on westside; Maximum of building height of 120’. Proposed 3-star Austin Energy Green Building Rating; Removing existing impervious cover from CWQZ, EHZ and FL; Clustered development near South 1st Street. Parking located entirely underground; Provide public creek access for bike/pedestrian connectivity; Considering options for pedestrian safety across S. 1st Street. Will meet or exceed all Tier One and several Tier Two Requirements. January 15, 2020 4 Current and Proposed Zoning Existing Zoning: Multifamily – Medium Density – Neighborhood Plan (MF-3-NP) Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development – Neighborhood Plan (PUD-NP) Current Site Regulations Max. Impervious Cover Max. Building Coverage Max. Building Height Min. Front Setback Min. Street Side Setback Min. Interior Side Setback Min. Rear Setback 65% 55% 40’ 25’ 15’ 5’ 10’ Proposed Site Regulations Max. Impervious Cover Max. Building Coverage Max. Building Height Min. Front Setback Min. Street Side Setback Min. Interior Side Setback Min. Rear Setback 50% 55% 120’ 2 : 1 0’ 15’ 5’ 10’ Max. Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) 0.75 : 1 Max. Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) January 15, 2020 5 Development Assessment PUD Zoning Application Commission and Council Process PUD Zoning Process Next Steps We are here in the process. We do not need a recommendation at this point. Scheduled for a Council Briefing on January 23, 2020. January 15, 2020 6

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 1 a.m.
Jan. 15, 2020

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

3. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, January 15, 2020 The Environmental Commission convened in a public meeting on Wednesday, January 15, 2020 in Council Chambers City Hall, 301 W. 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Commissioners in Attendance: Andy Creel Peggy Maceo Perry Bedford Curtis Smith Pam Thompson Kevin Ramberg Mary Ann Neely Katie Coyne Linda Guerrero Wendy Gordon Commissioners Absent: Ryan Nill Staff in Attendance: Chris Herrington Atha Phillips Kaela Champlin Wendy Rhoades Kate Clark Scott Hiers Radmon Rice 1. 2. CALL TO ORDER Commissioner Guerrero called the meeting to order at 6:03 P.M. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers should sign up to speak prior to the meeting being called to order; you will receive a three-minute allotment to discuss topics not posted on the agenda. None EDUCATION a. Buying and selling ecosystem services, Jim Blackburn, Professor in the Practice of Environmental Law, Rice University (15 minutes) Item conducted as posted. No action taken. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND ACTION a. Approve the minutes of the regular Environmental Commission meeting of December 4, 2019 (5 minutes) 1 5. 6. 7. 8. The minutes of the regular Environmental Commission meeting of December 4, 2019 were approved on Commissioner Ramberg’s motion, Commissioner Thompson’s second on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Nill were absent. ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER’S UPDATE ON PAST COMMISSION ACTIONS AND REPORT ON ITEMS OF INTEREST a. Update on Ventura at Parmer Lane, SP-2018-0564D (5 minutes) b. Discussion on 218 S. Lamar PUD (C814-2018-0121) (5 minutes) Item conducted as posted. No action taken. Item conducted as posted. No action taken. STAFF BRIEFINGS* a. None ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION a. Development Assessment Briefing on 614 South 1st Street Planned Unit Development, CD- 2019-0006—Kate Clark, Senior Planner, Planning and Zoning Department Item conducted as posted. No action taken. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND POSSIBLE ACTION a. Name: Lantana PCA Applicant: Michael Whellan, Armbrust & Brown, PLLC Watershed: Williamson Creek Watershed, Barton Springs Zone, Drinking Water Protection Location: 7415 Southwest Parkway (District 8) Staff: Atha Phillips, Environmental Officer’s Office Zone Request: Consider a Project Consent Agreement waiving provisions of City Code Chapters 25-7 (Drainage) and 25-8 (Environment), including Chapter 25-8, Article 13 (Save Our Springs Initiative), to allow construction of a mixed-use residential project at located at 7415 Southwest Parkway in the East Oak Hill Neighborhood Planning Area. This action concerns land located in the Barton Springs zone. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended with conditions (30 minutes) Item …

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2020, 12:40 a.m.
Jan. 7, 2020

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

1 Environmental Commission Urban Forestry Committee January 7, 2020 at 11:00 A.M. – 12:30 P.M. One Texas Center 505 Barton Springs Road, 11th Floor The Cavern Conference Room Austin, Texas 78704 Agenda COMMISSIONERS: Peggy Maceo (D-7) Pam Thompson (D-3) Mary Ann Neely (D-5) Linda Guerrero (D-9) 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers should sign up to speak prior to the meeting being called to order; you will receive a three-minute allotment to discuss topics not posted on the agenda. 3. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION a. Discuss and consider Land Development Code Revision relating to tree regulations—Keith Mars—Community Tree Preservation Division Manager, Development Services Department 4. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. For additional information, please call Kaela Champlin, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974-3443; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Kaela Champlin, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974-3443. * A member of the public may not address a board or commission at a meeting on an item posted as a briefing, per City Code Section 2-1-144(E).

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 1 a.m.
Jan. 7, 2020

Meeting Audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: Jan. 20, 2020, 1 a.m.
Jan. 7, 2020

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION URBAN FORESTRY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 7, 2020 The Environmental Commission Urban Forestry Committee convened in a public meeting on Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at One Texas Center in the Big 12 Conference Room, Suite 1200 at 505 Barton Springs Road, Austin, Texas 78704. Commissioners in Attendance: Linda Guerrero Peggy Maceo Pam Thompson Commissioners Absent: Mary Ann Neely Staff in Attendance: Emily King Keith Mars Kaela Champlin Chris Herrington Naomi Rotramel 1. 2. CALL TO ORDER Commissioner Peggy Maceo called the meeting to order at 11:11 A.M. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers should sign up to speak prior to the meeting being called to order; you will receive a three-minute allotment to discuss topics not posted on the agenda. None ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION a. Discuss and consider Land Development Code Revision relating to tree regulations—Keith 3. Mars—Community Tree Preservation Division Manager, Development Services Department Item conducted as posted. No action taken. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Peggy Maceo adjourned the meeting at 12:35 P.M. 4. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. For additional information, please call Kaela Champlin, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974- 3443; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Kaela Champlin, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974-3443. * A member of the public may not address a board or commission at a meeting on an item posted as a briefing, per City Code Section 2-1-144(E).

Scraped at: Feb. 13, 2020, 4:10 p.m.