Page 1 of 3 DESIGN COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2019 AT 6:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM 1101 301 W. SECOND STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Commission Members David Carroll, Chair (District 1) Aan Coleman (District 8) Martha Gonzalez, Vice‐Chair (District 2)Beau Frail (District 6) Samuel Franco (District 3) Katie Halloran (District 7) Melissa Henao‐Robledo (District 5) Ben Luckens (District 10) City of Austin Planning & Zoning Staff Josue Meiners (District 4) Benjamin Campbell, Executive Liaison Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) Nichole Koerth, Staff Liaison Bart Whatley (District 9) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 1. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL a. The first five speakers, who shall sign up prior to the Call to Order, will each have three minutes to speak regarding items not on the agenda; 2. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether The Travis project, addressed at 80 Red River Street, complies with the Urban Design Guidelines, a gatekeeper requirement for the Downtown Density Bonus Program (LDC §25‐2‐586(C)(1)(a)(ii)) (Leah Bojo, Drenner Group; Michael Schooler, GDA Architects; Anna Hoge, Consort, Inc.); b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the 17th & Guadalupe Apartments project, addressed at 313 W. 17th Street, complies with the Urban Design Guidelines, a gatekeeper requirement for the Downtown Density Bonus Program (LDC §25‐2‐586(C)(1)(a)(ii)) (Brockett Davidson, Rhode Partners); c. Discussion and possible action on the Austin Energy Rainey Street Substation, located at 55 East Avenue, seeking a courtesy review and recommendation (Kim Doyal, Austin Energy); 3. OLD BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. None; Page 2 of 3 4. COMMISSION‐SPECIFIC BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action on the May 20, 2019 meeting minutes; b. Liaison Reports; c. Appointment of Committee/Working Group members by Chair; d. Discussion of a letter to Council regarding updating the Urban Design Guidelines (Vice‐Chair M. Gonzalez) 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: a. None; 6. ANNOUNCEMENTS: a. Chair Announcements; b. Items from Commission Members; c. Items from City Staff; 7. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. Please contact Nichole Koerth in the Planning and Zoning …
Page 1 of 3 DESIGN COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2019; 6:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM 1101 301 W. SECOND STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Meeting Minutes Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 6:06 p.m. Member List X David Carroll – Chair X Melissa Henao‐Robledo Martha Gonzalez – Vice‐Chair Ben Luckens X Aan Coleman X Evan Taniguchi X Beau Frail Bart Whatley X Samuel Franco X Josue Meiners X Katie Halloran Staff in attendance: Benjamin Campbell (Executive Liaison; PAZ); Nichole Koerth (Staff Liaison; PAZ), Vice‐Chair M. Gonzalez and Commissioners B. Luckens and B. Whatley were absent. 1. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None. 2. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether The Travis project, addressed at 80 Red River Street, complies with the Urban Design Guidelines, a gatekeeper requirement for the Downtown Density Bonus Program (LDC §25‐2‐586(C)(1)(a)(ii)) (Leah Bojo, Drenner Group; Michael Schooler, GDA Architects; Anna Hoge, Consort, Inc.); Leah Bojo, representative for the applicant, said that the project will be presented at the August 26, 2019 Design Commission meeting. No action taken. b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the 17th & Guadalupe Apartments project, addressed at 313 W. 17th Street, complies with the Urban Design Guidelines, a gatekeeper requirement for the Downtown Density Bonus Program (LDC §25‐2‐586(C)(1)(a)(ii)) (Brockett Davidson, Rhode Partners); Page 2 of 3 Brockett Davidson presented with help from Trent Rush (Hitchcock Design Group). Discussion followed. Commissioner S. Franco motioned to recommend that the project does not comply with the Urban Design Guidelines. The motion died for lack of a second. The motion to recommend that the project complies with the Urban Design Guidelines, pending the inclusion of a permanent awning along Guadalupe was made by Commissioner B. Frail, seconded by Commissioner K. Halloran. A friendly amendment, recommending that if the corner space is not a gallery, that it be dedicated to publicly accessible retail/benefit/art and recommending that the outdoor space be used for public art, was made by Commissioner A. Coleman. The friendly amendment was accepted by Commissioner B. Frail. The motion to recommend that the project complies with the Urban Design Guidelines, pending the inclusion of the recommended awning and including the friendly amendment, failed [4‐3‐1]. Commissioners J. Meiners, S. Franco, and Chair D. Carroll voted against. Commissioner E. Taniguchi abstained. c. Discussion and possible action on …
DOWNTOWN DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM (DDBP) SUBMITTAL APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS A property owner (Owner) or his/her representative (Applicant) acting on behalf of the Owner can initiate an administrative request to the Director of Planning (Director) seeking additional Floor-to-Area (FAR) entitlements as outlined in the Downtown Density Bonus Program as approved by Ordinance No. 20140227-054. In order for the Director to conduct an administrative review, the requirements listed below must be submitted. Once an application is deemed complete, the Director will inform the Applicant of review commencement. The following submittals are required in a complete PDF package of no more than 10 Mb in size with sheets no larger than 11x17 inches: 1. Completed DDBP Application; 2. Vicinity plan locating the project in its context, and showing a minimum 9 block area around the project; 3. Location and nature of nearby transit facilities; 4. Drawings (submitted drawings should demonstrate compliance with Subchapter E Design Standards, as applicable): o Site plan; o Landscape plan; o Floor plans; o Exterior elevations (all sides); o Three-dimensional views; 5. As part of the gatekeeper requirements, submit copy of the projects signed Austin Energy Green Building Letter of Intent; and 6. Other items that may be submitted but not required: Narrative / graphics / photos to further describe the project. 7. Coordination memo acknowledgment from the City of Austin’s Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Department (NHCD) detailing affordable housing community benefits. Please contact Ms. Sandra Harkins at NHCD for more information. Page 1 of 9 DOWNTOWN DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM (DDBP) SUBMITTAL APPLICATION 1. Project Name 2. Case Number 3. Property Owner Name: Address: Phone: E-mail: 4. Applicant/Authorized Agent Name: Address: Phone: E-mail: 5. Anticipated Project Address: Page 2 of 9 6. Site Information a. Lot area (also include on site plan): b. Existing zoning (include any zoning suffixes such as “H,” “CO,” etc. If the property has a conditional overlay (CO), provide explanation of conditions (attach additional pages as necessary): c. Existing entitlements: I. Current floor to area (FAR) limitation: II. Current height limitation (in feet) : III. Affected by Capitol View Corridors (CVCs) Yes/No? Yes No If yes, please provide specify height allowed under CVC: 7. Existing Deed Restrictions Detail existing deed restrictions on the property (if any): Page 3 of 9 8. Building Information a. Total square footage - Only include the square footage that counts towards FAR; see LDC 25-1-21(40), (44), and (45): b. Gross …
80 Red RiverDesign Commission Working GroupApril 25, 2019 DAVIS STRAINEY STRED RIVER ST Property FactsLot Size: 2.291 acres / 99,796 square feetEntitled FAR: 8:1*Entitled Height: 40 feetUp to 15:1 FAR and unlimited height allowed in the Rainey Street district with participation in the Downtown Density Bonus Program*8:1 FAR achievable with compliance with Waterfront Overlay Rainey Street subdistrict affordable housing provision requirements. Project Facts1,236,806 total square feet13:1 total proposed FARPhase I –575 feet in heightPhase II –695 feet in heightApartment -662,636 Gross SFCondo -377,247 Gross SFHotel -194,523 Gross SFCoffee/Bar -2,400 Gross SF Gatekeeper Requirements1.2-Star Green Builder2.Great Streets Compliance3.Substantial Compliance with Downtown Design Guidelines Affordable Housing•24,518 SF of new affordable housing in the Rainey Street Subdistrict.•Affordable housing fee-in-lieu is $2,070,767. Downtown Urban Design Guidelines Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense development Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use development Residential (Rental)Hotel/Residential(Condo) Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streets Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edges Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private development Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private developmentAW.6Protect important public views Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private developmentAW.6Protect important public viewsAW.7Avoid historical misinterpretations Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private developmentAW.6Protect important public viewsAW.7Avoid historical misinterpretationsAW.8Respect adjacent historic buildings Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private developmentAW.6Protect important public viewsAW.7Avoid historical misinterpretationsAW.8Respect adjacent historic buildingsAW.9Acknowledge that rooftops are seen from other buildings and the street Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private developmentAW.6Protect important public viewsAW.7Avoid historical misinterpretationsAW.8Respect adjacent historic buildingsAW.9Acknowledge that rooftops are seen from other buildings and the streetAW.10Avoid the development of theme environments Area Wide Guidelines AW.1Create dense developmentAW.2Create mixed-use developmentAW.3Limit development which closes Downtown streetsAW.4Buffer neighborhood edgesAW.5Incorporate civic art in both public and private developmentAW.6Protect important public viewsAW.7Avoid historical misinterpretationsAW.8Respect adjacent historic buildingsAW.9Acknowledge that rooftops are seen from other buildings and …
i City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review ApplicationThe Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1.City projects (see page ii for process)The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086).2.Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process)The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program.3.Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process)The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1)Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6)2)Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography3)Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile4)Site plan and landscape plan5)Ground level, basement plan, and typical floor plan6)Elevations and/or 3d views7)Any letters of support or findings by other commissions8)Staff reports, if any9)Records of public participationDesign …
i City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review ApplicationThe Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1.City projects (see page ii for process)The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086).2.Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process)The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program.3.Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process)The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1)Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6)2)Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography3)Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile4)Site plan and landscape plan5)Ground level, basement plan, and typical floor plan6)Elevations and/or 3d views7)Any letters of support or findings by other commissions8)Staff reports, if any9)Records of public participationDesign …
Downtown Network Substation Locations$60M initiative to increase capacity, resiliency, and reliability to meet the needs of our growing city. •Increase Distribution Tie Circuits•Add 70 MVA to Seaholm Substation•Build New Downtown Substation•Rebuild Brackenridge Substation•Upgrade Network Distribution Feeder Circuits•Convert 69kV Transmission Lines to 138kV Repowering Downtown Austin Energy operates 77 substations across 437 square miles of service area. The downtown substation is being designed as a gas-insulated switchgear substation, which is ideal for densely-populated urban locations. Downtown SubstationGas-Insulated Switchgear (GIS) Compared to Air-Insulated Switchgear (AIS) Compact Design Significant footprint reduction (approximately 70% smaller)Capital CostsApproximately 2x moreO&MLower maintenance costsAestheticsGIS portion in a building and station surrounded by enclosureReliabilityGIS is less susceptible to faultsInstallationFaster site assembly with pre-assembly and testing completed at manufacturer EquipmentStandard power transformers and enclosed medium voltage utilized to reduce cost and increase maintainability •Selected in 1999 for the future electric needs of downtown•Austin Energy is coordinating with other involved agencies, including:•TxDOT •Watershed Protection for storm drain•City of Austin to incorporate Great Streets•Total Site: 1.46 acres•Substation Footprint: 0.81 acres•Site Updates: •3 transmission poles (currently 2) to allow clearance over heritage trees•Two driveways The SitePRELIMINARY SITE PLAN –SUBJECT TO FINAL SITE APPROVAL •Public meeting held in June 2018 –178 surveys received Top Preference for Outward AestheticsInput on the Site•Priority placed on an attractive enclosure •Desire to preserve trees and incorporate landscaping•Concern for impact the facility would have on neighborhoodCommunity EngagementColorful/Artistic Most Preferred Design OptionsName:Rainey Street SubstationDesign Theme: Modernreported that they were satisfied with the opportunities to provide public input98%LandscapingNative Grasses & WildflowersNatural Boulders•Public meeting held in February 2019 –440 surveys received Survey Profile Profile Zoning Preserve Heritage Oak Trees on SiteNative Plants Selected for Drought Tolerance and Water ConservationConsider Great Streets Guidelines•Compatible with Rainey Historic District•18-foot-wide zone for public use•Incorporate trees, benches, and bicycle parkingLandscaping Considerations Landscaping Plan Landscaping Plan Parameters•GIS building height up to 30 feet tall•Enclosure height up to 10 to 12 feet tall•Enclosure will include removable panels for future maintenance and cannot be climbable •Entrance gates will be integrated into design of the wall•Equipment located outside of the GIS building is required to remain open and uncovered for safety, accessibility, and operational reasonsEnclosure Considerations Enclosure Wall Lambie Street East Ave. ScheduleNext Steps:•Final engineering and design•Coordinate next public meeting (August2019) to share design and renderings
Page 1 of 3 DESIGN COMMISSION MONDAY, MAY 20, 2019; 6:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM 1101 301 W. SECOND STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Meeting Minutes Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 6:06 p.m. Member List X David Carroll – Chair X Melissa Hanao‐Robledo X Martha Gonzalez – Vice‐Chair X Ben Luckens X Aan Coleman X Evan Taniguchi X Beau Frail Bart Whatley Samuel Franco VACANT Katie Halloran Staff in attendance: Benjamin Campbell (Executive Liaison; PAZ); Nichole Koerth (Staff Liaison; PAZ), Commissioners K. Halloran, S. Franco, and B. Whatley were absent. Commissioner A. Coleman arrived at 6:15 p.m. 1. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None. 2. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action on the Del Valle / Moore’s Crossing Fire and EMS Station seeking a courtesy review and recommendation (Burton Jones, City of Austin Public Works Department); Burton Jones (Public Works), Michael Meihaus (Studio Balcones) and Cris Ruebush (PGAL) provided the courtesy briefing and remained to answered questions by the Commission. No motion taken. 3. OLD BUSINESS (Discussion and possible Action): None. Page 2 of 3 4. COMMISSION‐SPECIFIC BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action on the April 22, 2019 meeting minutes; The motion to approve the minutes as drafted was made by Commissioner A. Coleman and seconded by Commissioner E. Taniguchi. The motion was approved on a unanimous vote of [7‐0‐0]. b. Election of Officers; The motion to reappoint D. Carroll to Chair, and M. Gonzalez to Vice‐Chair was made by Commissioner E. Taniguchi; Second by Commissioner A. Coleman. The motion was approved on a unanimous vote of [7‐0‐0]. c. Appointment of a Design Commission Liaison to the Joint Sustainability Committee; The motion to appoint Chair D. Carroll to be the Design Commission Liaison to the Joint Sustainability Committee was made by Chair D. Carroll; Seconded by Commissioner B. Frail. The motion was approved on a vote of [6‐1‐0]. Commissioner A. Coleman opposed. d. Liaison Reports; Commissioner M. Henao‐Robledo reported on a presentation from the Downtown Commission regarding homelessness in Austin. e. Appointment of Committee/Working Group members by Chair; Commissioners were chosen to attend upcoming Downtown Density Bonus Program Working Group meetings. 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: None. 6. ANNOUNCEMENTS: a. Chair Announcements: None. b. Items from Commission Members: Page 3 of 3 Vice‐Chair M. Gonzalez reported that she had asked her Council Representative, Delia Garza, about a potential revision …
