BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0036 BOA DATE: June 14th, 2021 ADDRESS: 6141 Jumano Ln OWNER: Chalice McGee COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 AGENT: Ron Thrower ZONING: SF-2-NP (West Oak Hill) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 8 BLK C LEGEND OAKS SEC 7 VARIANCE REQUEST: maintain an 8 ft. fence recently constructed SUMMARY: code violation issued ISSUES: triangular shaped lot and topography ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-2-NP SF-2-NP SF-2-NP SF-2-NP SF-2-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Bike Austin Circle C Neighborhood Assn. Covered Bridge Property Owners Association, Inc. East Oak Hill Neighborhood Association Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Legend Oaks II Home Owners Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Oak Hill Association of Neighborhoods (OHAN) Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan – COA Liaison Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Oak Hill Trails Association SELTexas Save Barton Creek Assn. Save Our Springs Alliance Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group TNR BCP – Travis County Natural Resources Western Oaks Property Owners Association F-1/1 F-1/2 F-1/3 F-1/4 F-1/5 F-1/6 May 6, 2021 Board Members, Elaine Ramirez, Board Liaison City of Austin, Board of Adjustment RE: C15-2021-0036 – 6141 Jumano Lane Dear Mrs. Ramirez and Board Members, The application submitted here-in is made to request variances to § 25-2-899 - FENCES AS ACCESSORY USES. The purpose of the variances is to maintain an 8ft privacy fence constructed on the subject property this past fall of 2020 by the current property owner, after receiving approval from the subdivision Homeowner’s Association. The 8ft fence was constructed to provide privacy due to unnecessary communication between adjacent property owners. Austin Police Department has a record of various disturbances (see attachments) near the subject tract that warrant a need for maintaining and maximizing privacy at this general area. The variances requested are as follows: § 25-2-899 - FENCES AS ACCESSORY USES. six feet or a maximum height of 7 feet. Requested variance: a maximum height of 8 feet. (D) …a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed an average height of (E) A solid fence along a property line may be constructed to a maximum height of eight feet if each owner of property that adjoins a section of the fence that exceeds a height of six feet files a written consent to the construction of the fence with the building official… Requested variance: if a owner F-1/7 (F) A …
F-1/31 F-1/32 F-1/33 F-1/34 F-1/35 F-1/36 F-1/37 221 West Sixth Street Ste. 960 Austin, Texas 78701 Attorneys at Law Brian J. Tagtmeier The Kelly Legal Group, PLLC P. O. Box 2125 Austin, Texas 78768 Dear Mr. Tagtmeier: April 16, 2021 We represent Chalice McGee and write in response to your March 25, 2021 correspondence. It seems that you have not been fully informed by your clients about the underlying circumstances about which you wrote. First, our client did obtain prior written approval of the Architectural Committee before constructing the fence in question, so there is no violation of the restrictions to discuss. There are no tents, shacks or other temporary structures present. Your claims that the fence encroaches on your client’s property, or that the existing fence was damaged during the course of construction of the new fence, are also unfounded. We suggest you investigate those claims further before launching a groundless lawsuit. If you choose to litigate, it is your clients who will face exposure for paying our client’s fees. Mr. Tagtmeier, we don’t know each other but I have had positive experiences in the past with other attorneys at your firm. Our client has no interest in antagonizing yours, but they have a long history of harassing and threatening her and many others in the neighborhood. The most egregious example which has been documented is described in the attached police report. Part of her motivation for building this fence was to avoid any further such confrontations, and so far it has seemed to achieve that goal. She just wants to be left alone, and to avoid any further tension or escalation with her neighbors. Please see what you can do to de-escalate this situation. We look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, /s/ Daniel H. Byrne Daniel H. Byrne Value Driven...Client Oriented (512) 476-2020 Fax: (512) 477-5267 www.FBHG.law DHB/mpy Enclosure cc: Client F-1/38 F-1/39 F-1/40 F-1/41 F-1/42 F-1/43 F-1/44 F-1/45 F-1/46 F-1/47 LOH-Legend Oaks HOAc/o Goodwin & Company11149 Research Blvd Ste 100Austin TX 78759Voice faxDate: 10/18/2020 8:47:08 PMProject Ref: [49615552] 6141 Jumano LaneChalice McGee6141 Jumano LaneAustin TX 78749Dear Chalice McGee,I am pleased to inform you that the LOH-Legend Oaks HOA Arc Committee has approved yourapplication for the following project item(s): FenceThe approval is contingent upon compliance with the specifications set forth in the approvedapplication. If your change or addition requires a county, city or state permit, …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0055 BOA DATE: June 14th, 2021 ADDRESS: 1206 W Oltorf St OWNER: Ruben Valdez COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-6-NP (Bouldin Creek) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 5 BLK A SOUTHWOOD SEC 1 VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease minimum front yard setback from 25 ft. to 0 ft. SUMMARY: maintain a carport and covered entry ISSUES: heritage tree, crime on the rise in the area ZONING LAND USES Site SF-6-NP North MF-3-NP South East West SF-3 SF-6-NP SF-6-NP Single-Family Multi-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Perry Grid 614 Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group South Central Coalition F-2/1 F-2/2 F-2/3 F-2/4 F-2/5 F-2/6 F-2/7 F-2/8
BOA Monthly Report July 2020-June 2021 May 10, 2021 All cases postponed due to not enough votes/board members Granted 0 PP Cases 13 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs a)(F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides b)(G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side c)(H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated 2) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from IC requirements 3) 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) which requires an Accessory Dwelling Unit 4) 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements 5) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements 6) LDC Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R 7) Section 25-2-736 (D) (Lamar Subdistrict Regulations) to increase height limit 8) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) in order to increase the IC and b) 25-2-963 (Modification and Maintenance of Non-complying Structures) (B) (2) to increase the finished floor elevation 9) 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces 10) 25-2-1463 (Secondary Apartment Regulations) (C) (5) (a) to increase Floor to Area ratio 11) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to: a) decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback and b) decrease the minimum Rear Yard Setback 12) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 13) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback Withdrawn 0 Denied 0 Discussion Items 6 May 2021. Interpretations 0 new inquiries The deposition of the case items: A. Granted B. Postponed 35 43 (Added may# 2021) G-1/1 1 C. Withdrawn D. Denied 8 E. Discussion Items 74 Granted 6 April 12, 2021 BOA meeting cancelled due to technical difficulties with notification database Mar 8, 2021 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 3 signs: (H) to allow for all three (3) signs, one (1) blade, one (1) awning, and one (1) hanging sign to all be illuminated 2) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood …
§ 2-1-111 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. (A) The Board of Adjustment is established as provided in Local Government Code Chapter 211 (Municipal Zoning Authority). (B) The board shall be composed of 11 members. (C) Each board member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (D) The council may appoint alternate board members to serve in the absence of regular members. An alternate member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (E) A regular or alternate board member may be removed by council for cause on a written charge after a public hearing. (F) The board shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) board. hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and perform other duties prescribed by ordinance or state law. (G) The board shall hold meetings at the call of the chairperson and at other times as requested by the (H) The chairperson, or the acting chairperson in the absence of the chairperson, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. (I) Each case before the board must be heard by at least 75 percent of the board members. (J) The concurring vote of 75 percent of the board members is necessary to: reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official; decide in favor of an applicant on a matter on which the board is required to pass under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); or (3) authorize a variation from the terms of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning). (K) The board shall prepare minutes of its proceedings. The minutes shall include the vote of each member on each item before the board and shall state if a member is absent or fails to vote on an item. Source: Ord. 20071129-011; Ord. 20080110-048; Ord. 20080618-030; Ord. 20110526-098;Ord. No. 20141211-204, Pt. 14, 7-1-15. G-2/1 ARTICLE 3. - PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS Division 1. - Reserved.[2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45. - RESERVED. Division 2. - Appeals. § 2-5-61 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR APPEALS. Editor's note— Ord. No. 20170518-014 >, Pt. 4, effective May 29, 2017, repealed §§ …
Board of Adjustment Training & Staff Support Workgroup 2020-07-02 (Leighton-Burwell, Hawthorne, Von Ohlen & Bailey) -- UPDATED Results /Action Items Proposed by the Workgroup (for discussion and possible action by the whole Board at upcoming BOA Meeting): 1. We want to start BOA trainings ASAP (thanks to our Liaison, this is already underway). 2. We want to have knowledgeable staff available at our hearings to answer questions regarding issues outside of BOA Liaison’s expertise (residential zoning), such was Lake Austin, Signage, Waterfront Overlay, etc. 3. We want to find out status of GIS mapping efforts showing history of BOA cases (location, type, etc.). 4. We want to build new bridges with City Staff and repair relationships from past situations. In addition, we want to be able to increase staff accountability without it appearing as a personal attack. 5. We want to know what the Department Supervisors need / want from BOA to better support each other and our joint processes. 6. We want to temper our deliberations to be focused on the facts of the cases before us and be less inflammatory or confrontational towards applicants and staff. 7. We want to hold ourselves accountable and our BOA colleagues in a civil and respectful manner. 8. We want to create processes for transitions in BOA leadership and for additions of new members to our Board. 9. We want to include training on the role the legislature plays in the BOA. Specifically how we are governed by both City and State mandates and what that means in how we operate. G-3/1
Austin Moxy Hotel 2552 Guadalupe Street Austin, Texas Exterior Building Signage City Presentation Babendure Design Group 8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950 Dallas, Texas 75231 214.265.1960 214.265.5552 (fax) www.babendure.com Signage & Wayfinding Design Specialists 1 C-1/1-PRESENTATION F E A B C D 5 4 1 3.2 3.1 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Sign Location Plan 2 7 Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020C-1/2-PRESENTATION 1 RESTAURANT IDENTITY Projecting Sign Box with push-through Restaurant Logo Top of Sign = 12’-8” above grade 3.1 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 3.2 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 4 5 PICK UP WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. ORDER WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. BILLBOARD (Owned By Another Party) 1 A B 3.1 4 3.2 5 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0” 18'-3 1/2" (High Logo) 16'-3" (Low Logo) " 2 / 1 8 - ' 2 A Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 58’-8” above grade. " 6 - ' 1 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 B Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-8” above grade. D C Dimensional Letters mounted on the canopy ledge. Color to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-2” above grade. Projecting Sign Box with push-through graphics. Logo to be Moxy pink day. Top of Sign - 22’-8” above grade. East Elevation High and Low Level Signs 3 Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020C-1/3-PRESENTATION 18'-3 1/2" 16'-3 1/2" " 8 / 1 8 - ' 2 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 3 A " 8 / 5 9 " 2 / 1 2 " 1 1 - ' 1 " 4 - ' 2 LOCATION A HIGH LEVEL WALL IDENTITY FRONT ELEVATION • AREA CALCULATION: 60 SQFT Top of Sign = 58’-8” above grade. SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” 2 1/2" 6'-0" 5'-7" 1 3/4"Stroke Width 1" …
Daniel Salazar 2810 Gonzales St Austin, TX 78702 Case# C15‐2020‐0083 D-1/1-PRESENTATION Variance Request I am requesting a variance from the land development code. This request is for a two family residential lot. The location of the structure is located in the back of the main home. The location of the home is 4.6ft from back of property line. The reason the form was set at its current location was for the safety of my family. I feared for their lives and nothing else. After the form was approved by the City Of Austin. I began to continue with my build. The mistake was not identified City of Austin, until the project was erected. D-1/2-PRESENTATION Framing of foundation D-1/3-PRESENTATION The Hardship • This Pecan Tree is, approximately, 35” DBH. It is an over‐mature, over‐extended tree with a spread about as wide as it is tall. The height is about 35’‐ 40’ tall.” • The City of Austin simply missed the framing and location of the foundation. D-1/4-PRESENTATION D-1/5-PRESENTATION This Pecan Tree is, approximately, 35” DBH. It is an over‐mature, over‐extended tree with a spread about as wide as it is tall. The height is about 35’‐ 40’ tall.” TREE D-1/6-PRESENTATION Location of new build D-1/7-PRESENTATION D-1/8-PRESENTATION D-1/9-PRESENTATION D-1/10-PRESENTATION D-1/11-PRESENTATION D-1/12-PRESENTATION D-1/13-PRESENTATION D-1/14-PRESENTATION D-1/15-PRESENTATION
1510 E 2nd St - 1 & 2 1513 E 2nd St - A & B D-11/1-PRESENTATION 1513 E 2nd St – Units A & B (Next door to 106/108 Comal) New construction 1,143sf primary house w/ attached 1,156sf Secondary Apartment. Front yard setback averaging used for 12ft setback facing E 2nd St. There is a 15ft setback from Comal St and 5ft setback from the side yard neighbor. D-11/2-PRESENTATION D-11/3-PRESENTATION 1510 E 2nd St – Unit 1 New construction 1,790sf main house set back 15ft from Comal and 5ft from the side yard neighbor. 1510 E 2nd St – Unit 2 New construction 1,080sf Accessory Dwelling Unit with front door facing Comal St. The front of the unit is set back 15ft from Comal and the back of the unit is set back 5ft from the side yard neighbor. D-11/4-PRESENTATION D-11/5-PRESENTATION 99 COMAL ST Existing non-compliant 600sf home facing Comal with front yard setback of 10 ft or less. 85 COMAL ST Existing non-compliant 807sf home facing Comal permitted for addition of 695sf. Front yard setback is 10ft or less. D-11/6-PRESENTATION D-11/7-PRESENTATION
LOT SIZE Name LOT MAXIMUM FAR Area 9,877 SF 3,950 SF TREE SCHEDULE # TREE TYPE PROTECTED TREE DIAMETER 7884 7885 7886 7887 7888 7889 7890 7891 7892 7893 A YES SPANISH OAK NO TALLOW YES PECAN YES PECAN TEXAS ASH NO MULBERRY NO NO PECAN YES PECAN NO PECAN YES PECAN YES PECAN 1' - 9" 1' - 2" 2' - 6" 1' - 10" 1' - 2" 0' - 9" 1' - 5" 1' - 7" 1' - 2" 2' - 7" 1' - 10" KEYNOTE LEGEND 508 509 530 531 533 1/4 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE - NO CUT OR FILL WITHIN THIS AREA 1/2 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE - NO CUT OR FILL GREATER THAN 4" WITHIN THIS AREA EXISTING BUILDING OVERLAPS 1/4" CRZ - NO DEMO IN THIS AREA EXISTING BUILDING OVERLAPS 1/2" CRZ - NO DEMO IN THIS AREA NEW PRIMARY STRUCTURE TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 10'-0" TO THE REAR OF EXISTING ADU 25' - 0" PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 7888 - TEXAS ASH 14"Ø NO SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING DRIVE 7889 - MULBERRY 9"Ø NO " 0 - ' 5 7890 - PECAN 17"Ø NO 7891 - PECAN 19"Ø YES 7885 - TALLOW 14"Ø NO 7886 - PECAN 30"Ø YES 220SF DEMO OF SINGLE STORY 10' - 0" 7892 - PECAN 14"Ø NO 509 508 E E N N I I L L G G N N D D L L I I U U B B I I K K C C A A B B T T E E S S T T N N O O R R F F 7887 - PECAN 22"Ø YES 509 508 531 EXISTING FRONT PORCH 1100SF EXISTING SINGLE STORY PROPOSED TO BE CLASSIFIED AS ADU NEW PRIMARY DWELLING IS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THIS AREA AT THE REAR OF THE LOT • PRIMARY DWELLING TO BE CONSRUCTED A MINIMUM OF 10'-0" BEHIND EXISTING STRUCTURE. FOOTPRINT TO AVOID 1/2 AND 1/4 CRZ FOOTPRINT TO REMAIN INSIDE SETBACK LINES FAR FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE NOT TO EXCEED 2850SF FOR A SITE FAR NOT TO EXCEED 40% OR 3950SF BUILDING ENVELOPE TO REMAIN INSIDE MCMANSION TENT • • • • 533 509 530 508 7893 - PECAN 31"Ø YES " " 0 0 - - ' ' 5 5 SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE " " 0 0 - - ' ' 5 …
NEIGHBORHOOD MAP D-4/1-PRESENTATION SURROUNDING STRUCTURES D-4/2-PRESENTATION 1712 DRAKE AVE. / 1711 BRACKENRIDGE ST. 1710 DRAKE AVE. / 1709 BRACKENRIDGE ST. 1707 BRACKENRIDGE ST. 1705 BRACKENRIDGE ST. SURROUNDING STRUCTURES D-4/3-PRESENTATION 1613 BRACKENRIDGE ST. 1611 BRACKENRIDGE ST. 1607 BRACKENRIDGE ST. 1605 BRACKENRIDGE ST. SURROUNDING STRUCTURES D-4/4-PRESENTATION EAST MONROE STREET (RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES) CONCRETE WALK 548' 549' 25" LYGUSTRUM 550' 1/2 CRZ . E . O U.P. O . E . ) ' 0 0 . 6 4 ( ' W " 0 0 5 0 ° 2 1 S CURB WATER METER STOP SIGN 551' LOT 6304sf CURRENT DEVELOPABLE AREA 243 SF K C A B T E S ' 5 2 1/2 CRZ EXISTING PRIMARY DWELLING ADDITION 15' SETBACK 552' U.P. 5' SETBACK 24" PECAN 553' 12'-6" 10'-0" 25'-8 1/2" 10'-2" 38'-5" 22'-6" 15'-3 1/2" 25'-0" 15'-0" BENCHMARK ELEV = 547.74' STOP SIGN B R U C T E L N I ) ' 0 6 ( T E E R T S E G D R N E K C A R B I E T E R C N O C K L A W ) ' 0 0 . 6 4 ( E " 9 1 4 0 ° 2 1 N ' S77°59'26"E (137.06') WALKWAY (77sf) O.E. FRONT PORCH 322sf ' 8 . 3 5 5 = . . E F F . GAS METER AC 9sf K C A B T E S ' 5 2 N77°59'26"W (137.05') SITE PLAN - EXISTING SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" " 0 - ' 5 1 " 0 1 - ' 5 1 " 2 - ' 0 1 ) ' 0 6 ( E U N E V A E K A R D B R U C O . E . N D-4/5-PRESENTATION BENCHMARK ELEV = 547.74' STOP SIGN B R U C T E L N I ) ' 0 6 ( T E E R T S E G D R N E K C A R B I E T E R C N O C K L A W ) ' 0 0 . 6 4 ( E " 9 1 4 0 ° 2 1 N ' EAST MONROE STREET (RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES) CONCRETE WALK 548' CURB WATER METER STOP SIGN 549' 25" LYGUSTRUM 550' 1/2 CRZ S77°59'26"E (137.06') WALKWAY (77sf) O.E. FRONT PORCH 322sf ' 8 . 3 5 5 = . . E …
5409 AVENUE H Additional information pertaining to variance request 2021-000019 BA Property history 1951: 1996: 2002: 2004: 2010: 2021: Original home permitted and built. Home remodeled and air-conditioned (permit 1996-002466 BP). Home purchased by previous owners. Waiver from interim (pre-Subchapter F) development regulations pertaining to secondary apartment special use granted by City Council to previous owners (ordinance 041104-52). January 2006: Secondary apartment constructed and granted certificate of occupancy (permit 2005-004989 BP). October 2006: Subchapter F (Residential Design and Compatibility Standards) takes effect. Current owners purchase home. Current owners request variance to expand existing primary residence by 290 SF, a variance which (if granted) would result in an overall property gross floor area exceeding Subchapter F regulations by 207 SF. Current and proposed gross floor area calculations Lot area Maximum gross floor area 6250 SF 2500 SF (40% of lot area) 1147 SF Existing primary residence Existing detached parking 860 SF (parking exemption per Subchapter F)-450 SF 860 SF Existing secondary apartment 2417 SF (38.67% of lot area) Existing gross floor area Proposed addition 290 SF Resulting gross floor area as proposed 2707 SF (43.31% of lot area) Effects of proposed addition on subject property and adjacent properties Required parking will not be reduced (property currently contains two covered parking spaces and one uncovered parking space). Impervious coverage as proposed will not exceed maximum impervious cover allowable by zoning (existing IC is 37.95% of lot area; proposed IC would be 42.55% of lot area; maximum allowable IC is 45% of lot area.) No protected trees’ critical root zones will be affected by proposed construction. D-6/1-PRESENTATION
300 Pressler St 301 Pressler St 1505 W. 3rd Street M U L T I - F A M I L Y D E V E L O P M E N T Case No. C15-2021-0035 D-7/1-PRESENTATION 2 D-7/2-PRESENTATION 3 D-7/3-PRESENTATION 4 D-7/4-PRESENTATION 5 D-7/5-PRESENTATION VARIANCE REQUEST Exceed Maximum Height allowed in this district of the Waterfront Overlay from 60 feet to 75 feet 6 D-7/6-PRESENTATION 7 D-7/7-PRESENTATION 8 D-7/8-PRESENTATION P R O J E C T P L A N *Work with and be compatible with the park *Aid in resolving connectivity and mobility issues for Old West Austin *Resolve the barrier created by the Union Pacific railroad tracks *Provide extraordinary public amenities 9 D-7/9-PRESENTATION P R O J E C T P L A N *Developer has worked with the City of Austin since 2017 Austin Water Austin Energy Austin Transportation Department Parks and Recreation Department and Parks Board *Parkland Improvement Agreement *Quiet Crossing and Safety Enhancement Agreement *Community Facilities Agreement 10 D-7/10-PRESENTATION P U B L I C I M P R O V E M E N T S A N D A M E N I T I E S • Union Pacific Quiet Crossing and Safety Installation • Bike and Pedestrian Trail Created from Pressler St to Lance Armstrong • Public Trailhead at Terminus of Pressler at the Park with seating and ADA Bikeway accessibility • Lamar Beach Park Beautification Project • Includes mass grading, ~4,900 linear feet of rock walls, and ~750 inches of new trees planted • Burying and Improving Existing Utilities 6 utility borings under the Union Pacific right-of-way • • Overhead Austin Energy Line Placed Underground • Upgraded Water and Wastewater Lines with enhanced service to Old West Austin 11 D-7/11-PRESENTATION 12 D-7/12-PRESENTATION 13 D-7/13-PRESENTATION P U B L I C P L A Z A O P E N S P A C E T S R E L S S E R P T S L U A P UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD K E E R C CONSTRAINTS SUMMARY (SF ) Public Plaza Open Space 2,400 N P U B L IC P L A Z A O P E N S P A C E L A M A R B E A C H P A R K K E E R C 14 D-7/14-PRESENTATION 15 D-7/15-PRESENTATION 16 D-7/16-PRESENTATION 17 D-7/17-PRESENTATION 18 D-7/18-PRESENTATION 19 D-7/19-PRESENTATION 20 …
8300 N IH-35 SVRD SB Board of Adjustment June 14, 2021 600 E Powell Ln. Site: 1.74 acres 75,795 SF 8300 N IH- 35 SVRD SB Site: 3 acres 130,680 SF Project Summary • Reuse existing extended stay hotel building for a deeply Affordable multifamily residential use • 218 hotel units = 226 proposed residential units • 67 studios • 138 one-bedroom units • 21 two-bedroom units • 50% of units @ 60% MFI • Affordable for 40 years • Affordable units will match overall unit mix of Off-Street Request Requesting a variance from LDC § 25-6, Appendix A Loading (Tables Requirements) for Multifamily Use to decrease the parking requirements for 1-bedroom and dwelling units larger than 1-bedroom to 1 space in order to convert existing hotel into deeply Affordable multifamily use. Parking and Hardship The hardship is incurred by the conversion of the hotel into a dense Affordable multifamily use. the existing hotel Thereby necessitating use of structures and on-site parking to provide 113 units @ 60 % MFI and below. Hardship Parking: Studio 1-bedroom 2-bedroom Total Request: Bedroom Type Total Units Required Parking per Unit Required Parking 67 138 21 226 units 1.5 1 2 67.0 207.0 42.0 316 284 Total parking with §25-6-478 (E2) Reduction: 317* 0.9 • Approx. additional 18% reduction to minimum parking requirements. Area Character 20% Urban Core Reduction by Right Reasonable Use Options Parking Spaces On-Site Off-Site Impact on Rent Impact on Density 239 spaces None None 239 spaces 44 spaces Raise Rents None 239 spaces None Lose: 20 1-bedrooms 14 Studios 0 0 A B C
June 3, 2021 Leah Bojo 715 W 23rd St Austin TX, 78705 Re: C16-2021-0008 Property Description: 1.2028 AC OF LOTS 28-32 & 0.1402 AC OF LOTS 25-27 OLT 38 DIV F WOOLDRIDGE MARY ANN RESUB PLUS 1/2 ADJ VAC ALLEY (TOTAL ACR: 1.3430) Dear Leah, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a sign variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H); to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated, five (5) LED illuminated wall signs and one (1) internally illuminated cabinet wall sign in a “CS-NP”, General Commercial Services – Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Austin Energy does not oppose the requested sign variances, provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
715 W 23rd Street The Standard Sign Variance Application C16-2021-0008 E-1/1-PRESENTATION The Standard E-1/2-PRESENTATION 4 – Signs on Northern Façade 2 - Signs on Western Façade E-1/3-PRESENTATION Illumination Should Be Approved & Updated ERC ERC PUD ERC E-1/4-PRESENTATION List of Nearby Locations Where Illumination Variances Were Granted 1. April 12, 2021 – C16-2021-0003 (2552 Guadalupe Street) 2. March 8, 2021 - C16-2021-0006 (2101 Rio Grande Street) 3. March 8, 2021 – C16-2021-0001 (2402 Guadalupe Street) 4. November 9, 2020 – C16-2020-0007 (2234 Guadalupe) Six Variances From this Code Mistake Have Been Granted in Total. Not re-zoned under ERC The Standard E-1/5-PRESENTATION Night Photos of Neighboring Signs 911 W 21st 2323 San Antonio St 2502 Nueces 2400 San Gabriel 2323 San Antonio St 910 W 25th Not re-zoned under ERC E-1/6-PRESENTATION Request is Only For Illumination • Plans comply with other portions of the UNO Sign Regulations: • 150 square-foot maximum size per Code Section 25-10- • No freestanding or roof signs per Code Sections 25-10- • Only one projecting sign per façade per Code Section 25- 133(C) 133(D) and (E) 10-133(F) E-1/7-PRESENTATION Sign Locations Sign 1 Sign 4 Sign 2 Sign 6 Sign 5 Sign 3 E-1/8-PRESENTATION Overall Site Plan E-1/9-PRESENTATION Sign 1 – Western Facade E-1/10-PRESENTATION Sign 2 – Western Façade E-1/11-PRESENTATION Western Façade E-1/12-PRESENTATION Western Façade E-1/13-PRESENTATION Sign 3 – Northern Façade E-1/14-PRESENTATION Sign 4 – Northern Facade E-1/15-PRESENTATION Sign 5 – Northern Façade E-1/16-PRESENTATION Sign 6 – Northern Façade E-1/17-PRESENTATION Northern Façade E-1/18-PRESENTATION Northern Façade E-1/19-PRESENTATION Request We respectfully request a variance from Land Development Code Section 25-10-133 to allow for the illumination of five wall signs and one internally illuminated cabinet wall sign. E-1/20-PRESENTATION
