CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-3 DATE: Monday June 14, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0027 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___N____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___-____Vacant ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Charles Shapiro ADDRESS: 12905 VERONESE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from Impervious Cover requirements to increase from 45% (maximum allowed) to 50% (requested), in order to construct a swimming pool to an existing Single-Family residence in an “SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA meeting April 12, 2021 cancelled; May 10, 2021; POSTPONED TO JUNE 14, 2021 DUE TO LACK OF BOARD MEMBERS/VOTES; JUNE 14, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to July 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board Member Don Leighton-Burwell nay); POSTPONED TO JULY 12, 2021. July 12, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to July 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board Member Don Leighton-Burwell nay); POSTPONED TO JULY 12, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: E-1/1 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Chairman ____________________________ Diana Ramirez for E-1/2 Ramirez, Elaine From: Sent: To: Subject: Charles Shapiro Thursday, June 17, 2021 8:47 AM Ramirez, Elaine Requesting BOA postponement for C15-2021-0027 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elaine, My family had a long planned trip for Rocky Mountain National Forest, which conflicts with the July 12th meeting. Wifi/cell service is questionable in that region. Based on this, can I request a postponement to the following month? Thanks much, Charles CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-9 DATE: Monday June 14, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0048 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Melissa Hawthorne RECUSING ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___-____Vacant ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Stephen Drenner OWNER: Austin Hedge 35 Borrower, LLC ADDRESS: 8300 IH 35 SVRD SB VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off- Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 1.5 spaces and 1.5 spaces + 0.5 spaces per bedroom (required) to 1 spaces (requested) in order to complete a Multi-Family residential structure providing 226 units of significantly Affordable housing in a “CS-MU-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services-Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Georgian Acres Neighborhood Plan) BOARD’S DECISION: May 10, 2021 POSTPONED TO JUNE 14, 2021 DUE TO LACK OF BOARD MEMBERS/VOTES; June 14, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Rahm McDaniel motions to postpone to July 12, 2021; Board Member Don Leighton-Burwell seconds on a 9-0 vote (Board Member Melissa Hawthorne recused); POSTPONED TO JULY 12, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: E-3/1 (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chairman Diana Ramirez for E-3/2 CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-8 DATE: Monday May 10, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0048 ____-___Thomas Ates ____Y___Brooke Bailey ____Y___Jessica Cohen ____-___Melissa Hawthorne RECRUISING ____Y___Don Leighton-Burwell ____Y___Rahm McDaniel ____Y___Darryl Pruett ____-___Agustina Rodriguez ____Y___Michael Von Ohlen ____Y___Nicholl Wade ____-___Vacant ____-___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ____-___Carrie Waller (Alternate) ____-___Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Stephen Drenner OWNER: Austin Hedge 35 Borrower, LLC ADDRESS: 8300 IH 35 SVRD SB VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off- Street parking …
BOA Monthly Report July 2020-June 2021 June 14, 2021 Granted 8 1) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 2) 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 3) Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R 4) 25-2-736 (D) (Lamar Subdistrict Regulations) to increase height limit 5) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) in order to increase the impervious and 25-2-963 (Modification and Maintenance of Non-complying Structures) (B) (2) to increase the finished floor elevation 6) 25-2-1463 (Secondary Apartment Regulations) (C) (5) (a) to increase Floor to Area ratio 7) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback and decrease the minimum Rear Yard Setback 8) 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) for a Two-Family Residential use location 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides and (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade and (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated 2) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from Impervious Cover requirements to increase 3) Section 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off- Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces 4) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated 5) 25-2-899 (D) (E) (F) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height 6) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback PP Cases 6 Withdrawn 1 Denied 1 1) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 1) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback Discussion Items 3 June 2021. Interpretations 0 new inquiries The deposition of the case items: (Added june# 2021) F-1/1 A. Granted 43 B. Postponed 49 C. Withdrawn 2 9 D. Denied E. Discussion Items 77 F-1/2 May 10, 2021 All cases postponed due to not …
§ 2-1-111 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. (A) The Board of Adjustment is established as provided in Local Government Code Chapter 211 (Municipal Zoning Authority). (B) The board shall be composed of 11 members. (C) Each board member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (D) The council may appoint alternate board members to serve in the absence of regular members. An alternate member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (E) A regular or alternate board member may be removed by council for cause on a written charge after a public hearing. (F) The board shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) board. hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and perform other duties prescribed by ordinance or state law. (G) The board shall hold meetings at the call of the chairperson and at other times as requested by the (H) The chairperson, or the acting chairperson in the absence of the chairperson, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. (I) Each case before the board must be heard by at least 75 percent of the board members. (J) The concurring vote of 75 percent of the board members is necessary to: reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official; decide in favor of an applicant on a matter on which the board is required to pass under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); or (3) authorize a variation from the terms of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning). (K) The board shall prepare minutes of its proceedings. The minutes shall include the vote of each member on each item before the board and shall state if a member is absent or fails to vote on an item. Source: Ord. 20071129-011; Ord. 20080110-048; Ord. 20080618-030; Ord. 20110526-098;Ord. No. 20141211-204, Pt. 14, 7-1-15. F-3/1 ARTICLE 3. - PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS Division 1. - Reserved.[2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45. - RESERVED. Division 2. - Appeals. § 2-5-61 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR APPEALS. Editor's note— Ord. No. 20170518-014 >, Pt. 4, effective May 29, 2017, repealed §§ …
Board of Adjustment Training & Staff Support Workgroup 2020-07-02 (Leighton-Burwell, Hawthorne, Von Ohlen & Bailey) -- UPDATED Results /Action Items Proposed by the Workgroup (for discussion and possible action by the whole Board at upcoming BOA Meeting): 1. We want to start BOA trainings ASAP (thanks to our Liaison, this is already underway). 2. We want to have knowledgeable staff available at our hearings to answer questions regarding issues outside of BOA Liaison’s expertise (residential zoning), such was Lake Austin, Signage, Waterfront Overlay, etc. 3. We want to find out status of GIS mapping efforts showing history of BOA cases (location, type, etc.). 4. We want to build new bridges with City Staff and repair relationships from past situations. In addition, we want to be able to increase staff accountability without it appearing as a personal attack. 5. We want to know what the Department Supervisors need / want from BOA to better support each other and our joint processes. 6. We want to temper our deliberations to be focused on the facts of the cases before us and be less inflammatory or confrontational towards applicants and staff. 7. We want to hold ourselves accountable and our BOA colleagues in a civil and respectful manner. 8. We want to create processes for transitions in BOA leadership and for additions of new members to our Board. 9. We want to include training on the role the legislature plays in the BOA. Specifically how we are governed by both City and State mandates and what that means in how we operate. F-4/1
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0075 BOA DATE: July 12th, 2021 ADDRESS: 813 Park Blvd OWNER: Chris Oakland COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: Tere O’Connell ZONING: SF-3-CO-NP (Hancock NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 34 BLK 23 OLT 14 DIV C PERRY ESTATE VARIANCE REQUEST: a) from 1,100 total square feet (maximum allowed) to 1,150 square feet (requested) and b) from 550 square feet on the second story (maximum allowed), to 575 square feet (requested) SUMMARY: remodel an existing Accessory Structure ISSUES: historically & architecturally tied to the style and character of the historic house ZONING SF-3-CO-NP SF-3-CO-NP Site North South GR-MU-CO-NP East West CS-1-CO-NP SF-3-CO-NP LAND USES Single-Family residential Single-Family residential Community Commercial-Mixed Use Commercial Liquor Sales Single-Family residential NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee) Central Austin Community Development Corporation Central Austin Urbanists Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Hancock Neighborhood Assn. Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Austin Neighborhood Alliance Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group D-11/1 S R E EIL 43R D L L E W S A C K E A S B E Y 44TH W E P E D 45T H E LLIN G S O N 44TH 43R D T T E N N E B 43 R D W O R R A B P A R K 42N D K C E P R E D RIV E R 41ST 40TH R E K C E B NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0075 813 PARK BLVD. ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 292 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. D-11/2 Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. This application is a fillable PDF that can be completed electronically. To ensure your information is saved, click here to Save the form to your computer, then …
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TRIANGLE CUT ON CURB TRIANGLE CUT ON CURB ASSUMED ELEVATION = 100.00' ASSUMED ELEVATION = 100.00' 100 PARK BOULEVARD (60' R.O.W.) 101 101 WM GFO WM WV CRZ 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ T331 26" OAK CRZ 1/2 CRZ T332 23" OAK T333 17" OAK 102 101 C.M. NPS 100 99 HB FF = 102.20' MAIN HOUSE EM FF = 99.20' EL = 98.70' EL = 98.70' HB FF=102.20' (FV) (0'-0") FF=102.20' (FV) (0'-0") 100 102.15' 101 HB AC AC PAD PAD? M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 98 97 " 0 - ' 5 5'-0" E sliding gate E 96 E AC M M M M POOL 99 98 HB M M M M M M M M M M SD-C SD-C SD EXISTING HOTEL SD-C1 FFE=98.76' " 7 - ' 6 2 SD SUBJECT PROPERTY RELATIVE TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PERRY ESTATE SUBJECT BUILDING SHOWN IN BLACK - EXISTING HISTORIC 2-STORY STRUCTURE PROPOSED FOR REUSE AS A SECONDARY DWELLING R E D R I V E R O V E R H E A D L I N E ??? ??? ??? E ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? D ??? FF=608.00 (BASEMENT) FF=618.00 (LOBBY) FF=620.00 (LEVEL 1) FF=632.00 (LEVEL 2) ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? P F B RESTAURANT B F P 1 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SITE PLAN Scale: 1/32" = 1'-0" 3908 Avenue B, #309 Austin, Texas 78751 512|751-1374 DOCUMENT FOR REVIEW TERESA O'CONNELL #15432 E S U O H G N O L - R E L L I M N O I T A R O T S E R 1 5 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A , D R A V E L U O B K R A P 3 1 8 ISSUE DATE PRINT: 6/7/21 SHEET NAME UDA SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER A-103 ±604.54 VACANT W W SD W W S D CO SD W W CO ??? ??? CO G . T . CO CO COMMODORE PERRY HOUSE CO CO EVENT SPACE SD W W 601.95 CARRIAGE HOUSE CO CO CO W W CO VAN VAN G . T . A A A A …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet CASE: C15-2021-0056 BOA DATE: July 12th, 2021 ADDRESS: 3006 Glenview Ave OWNER: Chase & Andrea Hamilton COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-3-NP (Windsor Road NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 55 FT OF LOT 3 BLK 7 BRYKERWOODS B SUMMARY: erect a detached garage/office ISSUES: lot has frontage on two streets (front and rear) ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Central Austin Urbanists Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Preservation Austin SELTexas Save Barton Creek Assn. Save Historic Muny District Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group West Austin Neighborhood Group D-2/1 R E K Y R B 32ND LY R E V E B 31ST W VIE N E L G N O S R E F F E J 29TH 33 R D Y E B R E K 31 S T 30T H M O HLE ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0056 3006 GLENVIEW AVE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 159 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. D-2/2 D-2/3 D-2/4 D-2/5 D-2/6 D-2/7 5/14/2021D-2/8 5/14/2021D-2/9 5/14/2021D-2/10 5/14/2021D-2/11 3006 Glenview Avenue Variance Request (LDC 25-2-515 Re: Rear Yard of a Through Lot) D-2/12 History & Background Details The current home was constructed in 2015 with surface parking in the rear. The subject property is located on Glenview Avenue in Brykerwoods. This street is unusual, in that homes on the east side of the street have curb cuts and driveway access from the front of the homes, while all homes on the west side of the street do not. Homes have historically treated Jefferson Avenue as an alley and all off-street parking for these …
A side-by-side comparison of the previous and current survey shows that a non-complaint garage structure was removed in order to make room for two off-street parking spaces as required by city code. D-2/14 Aerial views by Google Maps show driveways along Jefferson Avenue with varying distances from the ROW. Some have been updated and some have not (photos to follow). Most range from 19’ to 23’ from the asphalt. Avenue Jefferson D-2/15
A variance was granted for a neighbor’s property at 3200 Glenview Avenue in 2014 and a garage and studio apartment were built. D-2/18 Proposed Garage and Home Office D-2/19 Proposed Site Plan 5/14/2021 D-2/20
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-1 DATE: Monday June 14, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0036 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Don Leighton-Burwell (no vote/late) ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___-____Vacant ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Ron Thrower OWNER: Chalice McGee ADDRESS: 6141 JUMANO LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from Section 25-2-899 (D) (E) (F) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height permitted from 6 feet (required) to 8 feet (requested) in order to maintain a recently constructed 8 ft. fence in an “SF-2-NP”, Single- Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed an average height of six feet or a maximum height of seven feet. (E) states: a solid fence along a property line may be constructed to a maximum height of eight feet if each owner of property that adjoins a section of the fence that exceeds a height of six feet files written consent to the construction of the fence with the building official; and (2) a structure, including a telephone junction box, exists that is reasonably likely to enable a child to climb over a six foot fence and gain access to a hazardous situation, including a swimming pool. (F) A solid fence may be constructed to a maximum of eight feet in height if the fence is located on or within the building setback lines. BOARD’S DECISION June 14, 2021 POSTPONED TO JULY 12, 2021 FINDING: E-2/1 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chairman Diana Ramirez for E-2/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0036 BOA DATE: June 14th, 2021 ADDRESS: 6141 Jumano Ln OWNER: …
E-2/34 E-2/35 E-2/36 E-2/37 E-2/38 E-2/39 E-2/40 E-2/41 April 16, 2021 Brian J. Tagtmeier The Kelly Legal Group, PLLC P. O. Box 2125 Austin, Texas 78768 Dear Mr. Tagtmeier: We represent Chalice McGee and write in response to your March 25, 2021 correspondence. It seems that you have not been fully informed by your clients about the underlying circumstances about which you wrote. First, our client did obtain prior written approval of the Architectural Committee before constructing the fence in question, so there is no violation of the restrictions to discuss. There are no tents, shacks or other temporary structures present. Your claims that the fence encroaches on your client’s property, or that the existing fence was damaged during the course of construction of the new fence, are also unfounded. We suggest you investigate those claims further before launching a groundless lawsuit. If you choose to litigate, it is your clients who will face exposure for paying our client’s fees. Mr. Tagtmeier, we don’t know each other but I have had positive experiences in the past with other attorneys at your firm. Our client has no interest in antagonizing yours, but they have a long history of harassing and threatening her and many others in the neighborhood. The most egregious example which has been documented is described in the attached police report. Part of her motivation for building this fence was to avoid any further such confrontations, and so far it has seemed to achieve that goal. She just wants to be left alone, and to avoid any further tension or escalation with her neighbors. Please see what you can do to de-escalate this situation. We look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, /s/ Daniel H. Byrne Daniel H. Byrne DHB/mpy Enclosure cc: Client E-2/42 E-2/43 E-2/44 E-2/45 E-2/46 E-2/47 E-2/48 E-2/49 E-2/50 E-2/51 LOH-Legend Oaks HOAc/o Goodwin & Company11149 Research Blvd Ste 100Austin TX 78759Voice faxDate: 10/18/2020 8:47:08 PMProject Ref: [49615552] 6141 Jumano LaneChalice McGee6141 Jumano LaneAustin TX 78749Dear Chalice McGee,I am pleased to inform you that the LOH-Legend Oaks HOA Arc Committee has approved yourapplication for the following project item(s): FenceThe approval is contingent upon compliance with the specifications set forth in the approvedapplication. If your change or addition requires a county, city or state permit, it must be obtained beforeconstruction.We feel this improvement will make a fine addition to our community and look forward to …
E-2/60 E-2/61 Written comments must be submitted to the contact person listed on the notice before 9 a.m. the day of the public hearing to be viewed by the Board the night of the meeting. Your comments should include the name of the board or commission, or Council; the scheduled date of the public hearing; the Case Number; and the contact person listed on the notice. All comments received will become part of the public record of this case. Case Number: C15-2021-0036 Contact: Elaine Ramirez; elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov Public Hearing: Board of Adjustment; June 14th, 2021 Your Name (please print) To m o -m j La / Your address(es) affected by this application "JKl am in favor O I object *1*- r Signature Date Daytime Telephone: S 1^-9%O 6 08 Comments: PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to attend a public hearing, you are not required to attend. However, if you do attend, you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application’s hearing to a later date, or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or pommission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. A board or commission’s decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: • delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice)-, or appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; • and: • occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; • is the record owner of property within …
2309 Panther Trail The Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders Sign Variance Application C16‐2021‐0010 1 C-1/1-PRESENTATION The Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders 2 C-1/2-PRESENTATION Front Façade Wall Sign 3 C-1/3-PRESENTATION Interlocal Agreement with AISD Not re‐zoned under ERC 4 C-1/4-PRESENTATION Sign District – Low‐density Residential 5 C-1/5-PRESENTATION Façade Sign Permitted by Applicable Code Not re‐zoned under ERC 6 C-1/6-PRESENTATION Our Proposed Sign Not re‐zoned under ERC 7 C-1/7-PRESENTATION Our Proposed Sign Not re‐zoned under ERC 8 C-1/8-PRESENTATION Our Proposed Sign Not re‐zoned under ERC 9 C-1/9-PRESENTATION Grove Apartments Hamilton Apartments In‐N‐Out Concentra Red Lobster Pluckers Pep Boys LA Fitness Wheatsville Coop Tramor at Creek Village Apartments 10 Town and Country Montessori School C-1/10-PRESENTATION Requested Sign Would Not Impose Adverse Impact Upon Neighbors Not re‐zoned under ERC 11 C-1/11-PRESENTATION Requested Sign Would Not Impose Adverse Impact Upon Neighbors Not re‐zoned under ERC 12 C-1/12-PRESENTATION Strict Enforcement Prohibits an Adequate Sign 13 C-1/13-PRESENTATION Strict Enforcement Prohibits an Adequate Sign 14 C-1/14-PRESENTATION Joint Use Policy 15 C-1/15-PRESENTATION Granting a Variance Will Not Conflict with Purpose of Sign Ordinance 16 C-1/16-PRESENTATION School Purpose and Legacy 17 C-1/17-PRESENTATION We respectfully request a variance from Section 13‐2‐ 862(g) of the City’s Land Development Code as it existed on January 1, 1994 to allow for a wall sign of total area up to 260 square feet and up to 33’ in maximum height. • Variance does not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated AND • Strict enforcement of the provisions of the sign regulations prohibit any reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs. • Granting the variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties. • Granting the variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of the sign regulations 18 C-1/18-PRESENTATION
1409 Possum Trot BOA Request C15-2020-0038 D-1/1-PRESENTATION Our Variance Request • A variance from LDC 25-2-492; the rear setback in an SF-3 zoning district is 10 feet. We are requesting a rear setback of 5 feet. • The existing 1942 duplex has a 5-foot setback. It will continue to have the same 5- foot setback if the variance is approved. D-1/2-PRESENTATION Duplex at 1409 Possum Trot Requested 5-foot rear setback D-1/3-PRESENTATION Proposed Subdivision Plat D-1/4-PRESENTATION Property History • The existing structures were built in 1942 as a single-family residence and a duplex. • The property was annexed into Austin’s Full Purpose Jurisdiction and zoning regulations on March 14, 1946. • Because the property is within the City’s Full Purpose Jurisdiction with three existing units, it is classified as a legal non-complying use. D-1/5-PRESENTATION Property History (cont.) • On September 27, 2002, the City of Austin issued a Legal Tract Determination, which exempted this property from the platting requirements. • In 2019, the new owner purchased the property, and he wishes to subdivide the property into two lots, in order to bring it into compliance with the zoning regulations. D-1/6-PRESENTATION We are asking for BOA support for the following reasons: • The structures have existed since 1942, so variance approval will not impact the neighborhood. • This is a minimal departure. If this property were part of a neighborhood residential infill, the rear setback for a duplex would only be 5 feet, under 25-2-1535. However we do not qualify because residential infill requires a residential site area of one acre, and this site is smaller. D-1/7-PRESENTATION
5607 Highland Crest Drive C15-2021-0074 Hearing Date July 12, 2021 The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-773 (Duplex Residential Use) (B) (5) (b) from two stories (maximum allowed) to three stories (requested) in order to erect a Duplex Residential use in an “SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. 1. Section 25-2-773 specifically restricts duplexes to 30 feet; OR two stories. The interpretation is not applied to each unit of the two unit duplex, but rather it is applied to the total structure height. This variance is requesting a total structure height of three stories and none of the units will be more than two stories on their own. The building tent will be fully respected. 2. The hardship for this site is the cross slope which naturally splits the foundation into two elevations roughly 12’ apart, vertically. With the first floor of each unit starting 12’ apart a natural side by side duplex will become three stories. 2. The previous duplex structure was approximately the same scale, but that structure burned down in 2019. We would like to rebuild in the same approximate scale and space as the previous structure. 3. Given the need for housing units in Austin TX, the best use for this site is to build two units again, as it was before the fire. 4. The neighbor to the west is also a duplex and zoned SF-3. The two story portion of our structure will be directly adjacent to our residential neighbor. The three story portion will be adjacent to our office building neighbor zoned both GR and CS. Refer to following exhibits to scale comparison. D-10/1-PRESENTATION Exhibit 4 C15-2021-0074 - 5607 Highland Crest - Sean O’Brien D-10/2-PRESENTATION Exhibit 3 C15-2021-0074 - 5607 Highland Crest Dr - Sean O’Brien D-10/3-PRESENTATION Subject Site Neighbor Duplex Exhibit 1 C15-2021-0074 - 5607 Highland Crest Dr - Sean O’Brien D-10/4-PRESENTATION Subject Site Neighbor Duplex Exhibit 2 C15-2021-0074 - 5607 Highland Crest Dr - Sean O’Brien D-10/5-PRESENTATION PARTIAL BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE SURVEY LOT 2, HIGHLAND CREST DRIVE SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOL. 76, PG. 174, P.R.T.C.T. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS T. J. CHAMBERS SURVEY, A-7 A LOT 1 HIGHLAND CREST DRIVE SUBDIVISION S17° 00' 31"W 1.24' LOT 1 PARKCREST CENTER NO. 2 DETAIL "A" (NOT TO SCALE) 1 L H I G H L A N D C R E S T D R I V E A …
Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Tere O’Connell, Speaker Chris Oakland, Owner D-11/1-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. View of Main House and Garage D-11/2-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Garage North elevation with original doors D-11/3-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Garage West elevation D-11/4-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Garage East elevation D-11/5-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Garage North elevation of Garage mimics east elevation of Main House D-11/6-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Original Garage doors D-11/7-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Garage Interior, Lower level D-11/8-PRESENTATION Case Number: C15-2021-0075 Miller-Long House Garage Interior, Upper level D-11/9-PRESENTATION ZONING: SF3-CO-NP ZONING: SF3-CO-NP TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TRIANGLE CUT ON CURB TRIANGLE CUT ON CURB ASSUMED ELEVATION = 100.00' ASSUMED ELEVATION = 100.00' 100 PARK BOULEVARD 101 101 GFO WM WV CRZ S 59°56'24" E 60.04' S 59°53'15" E 90.29' C.M. CRZ 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/2 CRZ T331 26' OAK T331 26" OAK T332 23' OAK T332 23" OAK T333 17' OAK T333 17" OAK T334 16" MAGNOLIA ' . 3 8 9 4 1 ' E " 4 5 0 0 ° 0 3 N 20'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING TRANSFORMERS AND CONCRETE PADS TO REMAIN E 96 WM 100 99 97 E 98 E 25' ZONING SETBACK 102 101 ' . 9 8 9 4 1 ' E " 3 4 1 0 ° 0 3 N NPS O V E R H E A D L I N E R E D R I V E R POWER POLE F I E L D V E R I F Y 1 2 7 ' - 0 " N 3 0 ° 0 0 ' 5 4 " E 1 4 9 . 8 3 ' 101 AC PAD? 100 MAIN HOUSE 0 5 10 15 20 25 FT M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M NEW SWIMMING POOL 99 98 M M M M M M M M M M M M M …
