BOA Monthly Report July 2021-June 2022 May 9, 2022 Granted (4) 1. 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of one (1) wall sign, one (1) illuminated blade, and one (1) illuminated parking blade 2. 25-2-601 (Industrial Park (IP), Major Industry (MI), and Limited Industrial Services (LI) District Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Rear Yard Setback 3. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback and 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope. 4. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback and 25-2-963 (Modification and Maintenance of Non-Complying Structures) (E) (1) (b) to increase the height. Postponed (5) 1. 25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign District Regulations) (B) (3), to exceed sign height 2. 25-2-757 (Setbacks; Compatibility) (E) to decrease minimum 30 feet from the centerline of adjacent street 3. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 4. 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope 5. 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope Denied (1) 1. 25-2, Subchapter F (Residential Design and Compatibility Standards) of the Land Development Code in connection with disapproval of a permit application for construction of a single-family home at the above- referenced address. The primary basis of the appeal is calculation of gross floor area for a “habitable attic” under the Land Development Code, in particular, requirements in Section 3.3 of Subchapter F. The appellant contends that staff incorrectly applies provisions related to the calculation of ceiling height for exempt space as applied to a two-story residence- INTERPRETATION Withdrawn (0) Discussion Items (5) May 2022. Interpretations 1 new inquiries The deposition of the case items: 38 A. Granted 59 B. Postponed 7 C. Withdrawn 7 D. Denied E. Discussion Items 50 (Added May 9, 2022 #’s) April 11, 2022 Granted (7) 1. 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of a blade sign 2. North University NCCD Ord. #040826-058, PART 7(Residential District) from: a) lot width requirements to decrease the minimum lot width and setback requirements to decrease the minimum interior side yard setback 3. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback 4. …
TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M Mayor and Council January 14, 2022 Denise Lucas, Director, Development Services Department Update on Resolution No. 20211014-045 – Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program On October 14, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 20211014-045 directing the City Manager to explore the creation of a Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program (BAAP) for residential homestead applicants who are requesting a hardship variance or special exception. The resolution contemplates the creation of a BAAP fund to support fee waivers or reductions for applicants who meet the eligibility criteria; as well as pro bono assistance with navigating the application process and subsequent proceedings. To meet the requirements outlined in this resolution, staff is working with the Financial Services Department to identify a funding source. In addition, staff is working with the procurement office to develop a process to procure pro-bono legal services. Staff does not anticipate completing all the components of the Council direction until May 2022 at which time a full response will be provided. Should you have questions or need additional information, please contact Doron Silberstein, Equity and Inclusion Program Manager, at doron.silberstein@austintexas.gov or (512) 978-1732. cc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager Rodney Gonzales, Assistant City Manager
§ 2-1-111 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. (A) The Board of Adjustment is established as provided in Local Government Code Chapter 211 (Municipal Zoning Authority). (B) The board shall be composed of 11 members. (C) Each board member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (D) The council may appoint alternate board members to serve in the absence of regular members. An alternate member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (E) A regular or alternate board member may be removed by council for cause on a written charge after a public hearing. (F) The board shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) board. hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and perform other duties prescribed by ordinance or state law. (G) The board shall hold meetings at the call of the chairperson and at other times as requested by the (H) The chairperson, or the acting chairperson in the absence of the chairperson, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. (I) Each case before the board must be heard by at least 75 percent of the board members. (J) The concurring vote of 75 percent of the board members is necessary to: reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official; decide in favor of an applicant on a matter on which the board is required to pass under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); or (3) authorize a variation from the terms of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning). (K) The board shall prepare minutes of its proceedings. The minutes shall include the vote of each member on each item before the board and shall state if a member is absent or fails to vote on an item. Source: Ord. 20071129-011; Ord. 20080110-048; Ord. 20080618-030; Ord. 20110526-098;Ord. No. 20141211-204, Pt. 14, 7-1-15. ARTICLE 3. - PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS Division 1. - Reserved.[2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45. - RESERVED. Division 2. - Appeals. § 2-5-61 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR APPEALS. Editor's note— Ord. No. 20170518-014 >, Pt. 4, effective May 29, 2017, repealed §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45, …
4507 NORTH INTERSTATE 35 Sign Proposal for Apple Tree Holdings ------------------ Alex Ybarra Director, Apple Tree Holdings LLC 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/1-PRESENTATION INTRODUCTION The property at 4507 North Interstate 35 is uniquely situated at the I-35 split and is surrounded by several trees. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/2-PRESENTATION LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Relevant Code: §25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign Districts) (B)(2)(b)(i) and §25-10-123 (B)(3)(a) which regulate the sign area and sign height, respectively. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/3-PRESENTATION VARIANCE FINDINGS First: The existing sign is blocked from view by large trees, many of which are over 35 feet high. These trees are either on neighboring properties or city property; therefore, petitioner has no control over those trees. We would also like to preserve trees on the 4507 property to the fullest extent possible. The proximity to the I-35 split also causes visibility issues. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/4-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/5-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/6-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/7-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/8-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/9-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/10-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/11-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/12-PRESENTATION VARIANCE FINDINGS Second: The granting of these variances will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties as our assessment is that continued development of 4507 provides a benefit to the neighborhood through crime reduction, continued investment, and improvement of a previously abandoned property. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/13-PRESENTATION LETTER IN SUPPORT Our neighbor, Copernicus STEM Academy, signed a letter in support of the sign variance. Originally, the concept was for a 240 square foot sign, and this larger design was supported by our neighbor. 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/14-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT C-1/15-PRESENTATION SAMPLE FOOTER TEXT 4507 N IH 35 SVRD; Case Number: C16-2022-0004 C-1/16-PRESENTATION VARIANCE FINDINGS Third: The proposed remodel of the sign is consistent with the character of the expressway corridor sign district. Many professional offices, restaurants, and other …
Click to edit Master title style 5413 Guadalupe C o n d o m i n i u m s 1 E-1/1-PRESENTATION Click to edit Master title style GOALS & OBJECTIVES 2 2 E-1/2-PRESENTATION Requesting for reduced side setback by 1-ft Click to edit Master title style • The property is zoned as MF4-CO-NP which allows condominiums • The adjacent property zoned as SF-3-NP • Required setback is 5-ft and requesting to reduce to 4-ft 3 3 E-1/3-PRESENTATION PROJECT LOCATION Click to edit Master title style 4 4 E-1/4-PRESENTATION PROJECT LOCATION Click to edit Master title style 5 5 E-1/5-PRESENTATION ZONING Click to edit Master title style 6 6 E-1/6-PRESENTATION CONCEPT PLAN Click to edit Master title style 7 7 E-1/7-PRESENTATION ELEVATION Click to edit Master title style 8 8 E-1/8-PRESENTATION SETBACKS SECTIONS Click to edit Master title style 9 9 E-1/9-PRESENTATION SETBACKS SECTIONS Click to edit Master title style 10 10 E-1/10-PRESENTATION Encourage redevelopment in appropriate locations Click to edit Master title style throughout the city. • The proposed development is in accordance with the city zoning requirements 11 11 E-1/11-PRESENTATION HIGHLIGHTS Click to edit Master title style • This will formulate a viable mix of housing types that will successfully diversify the housing market of Austin. • Screened from the neighboring properties • contribute to the long-term economic viability of the City by creating a medium density residential and Improve the tax base of the city and supports in creating healthy economic environment for the city and the existing businesses. 12 12 E-1/12-PRESENTATION Click to edit Master title style Thank You 13 E-1/13-PRESENTATION
E-2/1-PRESENTATION E-2/2-PRESENTATION E-2/3-PRESENTATION N 7 6 ° 4 0 ' 5 4 " W 4 5 . 3 5 ' 1 5 ' A L L E Y 512' T1 DOWN 12:12 DOWN 12:12 BLDG 1 NEW PRIMARY RESIDENCE DOWN 12:12 DOWN 12:12 D O W N 1 2 : 1 2 1 2 : 1 2 D O W N D O W N 1 2 : 1 2 1 2 : 1 2 D O W N N20°21'18"E 125.40' 5 1 8 '- 7 " P P P P P P P P P WM P P P P P P P P P P P P P . T S H T 9 . E 7 0 9 1 ' . 5 3 5 4 ' E " 4 5 0 4 ° 6 7 S BLDG 2 EXISTING SECONDARY RESIDENCE 523'-4" BLDG 1 FFE GM EM 513' 514' 515' 516' 517' 518' 519' S20°21'18"W 125.40' 521' 522' 523' 5 2 3 '- 6 " PW3612@80 PW3612@80 PW3612@80 PW3612@80 PW3624@96 PW3624@96 PW3624@96 SH3660@80 [E] PW3648@96 Bedroom 1 CLNG HT 7'->12' 13 x 13 S H 3 6 6 0 @ 8 0 [ E ] {X02} Deck Uncovered P A 3 6 8 0 UP UP SD3280 S D ( 2 ) 2 4 8 0 S D 3 2 8 0 Closet 1 CLNG HT 8' Bath 2 CLNG HT 8' Linen S D 1 8 8 0 SD3280 SD3280 Hallway CLNG HT 8' Closet 3 CLNG HT 7' P D 2 4 8 0 Linen {A208} CLNG HT 8' SD2480 UP UP Bedroom 3 CLNG HT 7'->12 10 x 10 S D 3 2 8 0 UP UP SH3660@80 [E] P W 3 6 1 2 @ 8 0 P W 3 6 1 2 @ 8 0 M W L 7 2 7 2 @ 9 6 [ E ] Covered Porch CLNG HT 10' E N 3 6 9 6 P W 2 4 4 8 @ 9 6 P W 2 4 4 8 @ 9 6 PA3696 U P PW4848@96 Pantry CLNG HT 10' SD(2)1896 Great Room CLNG HT 10' 35 X 13 SD3696 SD3296 Half Bath {A101} CLNG HT 10' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 1 5 1 4 3 1 12 G A 9 6 9 6 Garage CLNG HT 10' 20 …
Presentation First, I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to present my case to you today In October 2018, My wife and I purchased the property located at 4522 Caswell with the expectations that when I retired, we would move to Austin. I needed an office where I could continue to wrap up my practice. The obvious choice was to transform the garage into a space that would be comfortable, away from the house, with good internet. We hired Christian Gutierrez and his company to act as General Contractor for the project. Our proposed plans to renovate the existing garage into a secondary dwelling have been denied permit approval due to a hardship created by two conflicting code restrictions, those specific code sections are referenced in our variance request application. On one side we were told that we could not move the structure closer to the existing protected trees because doing so would affect them and thus would deny our permit request. Its worth mentioning that leaving the structure where it is would grant us Tree Ordinance approval as it has been stated by the city Arborist upon inspection. On the other side we were told that we are encroaching over the rear yard setback restrictions and would have to move the structure outside the setback restriction to comply so we can be granted our permit request. As you can see, these two code regulations conflict with each other. So we move one way, we are denied a permit from Tree Ordinance. If we move the other direction, we are denied approval from Zoning Department. We are not here to change the complexion of Hyde Park nor the character of our neighborhood. On the contrary, the proposed structure is designed in a way to preserve its architectural historic features an values consistent with our house and with the houses in the area. Our house is a beautiful old 1930s Craftsman Home and we would love to preserve that as much as possible. We are asking this Board for a variance to the regulations that have created a hardship due to the conflicting set of rules. We ask that we be issued a permit that allows us build 3 feet into the setoff restriction zone. Thank you for your time E-3/1-PRESENTATION
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2715 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0011 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 1,097.55 sf of IC. We are requesting 2,000 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. This lot needs more IC than the adjacent one to protect the large tree in the center of the lot. b. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 22% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 40% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development …
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2715 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0011 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 1,097.55 sf of IC. We are requesting 2,000 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. This lot needs more IC than the adjacent one to protect the large tree in the center of the lot. b. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 22% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 40% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development …
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2717 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0012 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 580.35 sf of IC. We request 1,900 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 19.5% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 43% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development regulations, the LA zoned lot must be a minimum of 43,560 SF in size (1 acre), and the lot in question is …
Monday, June 6, 2022 To: Board of Adjustments City of Austin 301 W 2nd St, Austin, TX 78701 Reference: - Supplemental Letter - 2717 Long Bow Trail - Case # C15-2022-0012 I am writing to provide you with the additional information requested by the Board of Adjustments during our meeting on April 11, 2022. I have attached a copy of the supporting documents for the comments below and answer the questions and concerns you had during the hearing. Directly below, you will see our justifications for approval, and below that is the backup information concerning the property and the reasoning for our justifications. Justifications for approval: - The less is more version 1. Based on the slope analysis, the current site only allows for 580.35 sf of IC. We request 1,900 sf of impervious coverage to meet the Apache Shores POA minimum living area requirements, a two-car garage for proper parking, and the required driveway using ribbon designs. a. As an item of reference, this lot will only have 19.5% of the total site area, which is half of the standard IC allowed under typical zoning regulations. 2. The new design that the developer created reduced the originally requested IC by 43% by utilizing a single-car ribbon drive and reducing the house size and footprint. 3. Based on the engineering report and design provided by 3PX engineers, they created a drainage plan that will prevent any additional/adverse runoff created by the proposed development. This plan was created by using Vegetative Strips that are allowed under the ECM Section 1 - 1.6.7 (B) 4. Without this variance, we will not be able to develop any structure on this property that will meet the COA development regulations and the Apache Shores POA development requirements on the deed restrictions. Backup Information Zoning Regulations: The primary basis of our request is that the property has been zoned for both LA (Lake Austin) zoning and the Lake Austin overlay. As shown below, both regulations require a min. of 1-acre lot size per the City of Austin development regulations. The application of the LA regulations on this lot makes it non-developable for reasonable use. The LA regulations are also shown as the strictest zoning regulations specified in 25-2-33 (b). 1. Per 25-2-492 site development regulations, the LA zoned lot must be a minimum of 43,560 SF in size (1 acre), and the lot in question is …
2609 San Pedro Street Austin, TX 78705 VARIANCE REQUEST to reduce 30’ from centerline of street requirement to 24’. Per UNO District LDC 25-2-757 (E); requirement of a building setback of 30’ from the centerline of the adjacent street G-2/1-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street neighboring properties distance from centerline of street G-2/2-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street 30’ distance from centerline of street unique to UNO • 910 Poplar Street – under construction within the UNO overlay but permitted under the properties LO-MU base zoning. Because the project did not opt into UNO, the 30’ from centerline requirement was not applicable • 2802-2806 San Pedro Street – about to break ground just outside the UNO overlay. Because being not an UNO project, will not have to comply with the 30’ from centerline requirement. • 2816 San Pedro Street – project under entitlement just outside the UNO overlay. Because being not an UNO project, will not have to comply with the 30’ from centerline requirement. G-2/3-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street • Intent of requirement is for fire department to be able to only block traffic in one direction. In the case of a one way, one lane, street, perhaps the measurement should be from the opposite side of the street, not the centerline as there is no opposing traffic. G-2/4-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street neighborhood improvements that come with project • 12’ wide streetscape w/ pedestrian lighting • Fully fire protected building • Affordable SMART housing units • Significant improvements to storm water infrastructure on San Pedro Street G-2/5-PRESENTATION 2609 San Pedro Street I am happy to answer any questions and/or provide additional clarification Thank you for your time and consideration. Cater Joseph G-2/6-PRESENTATION
509 E 38th E 38TH STREET(60' R.O.W.) 509 E 38th St - Subdivision Info E 38TH STREET(60' R.O.W.) Y T R E B L I T E E R T S ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( Seeking variance to keep existing 1954 home that would encroach into the 10-FT rear setback required per building code. For information purposes, this is the 50-FT frontage required for a lot subdivision, which creates the rear lot line for the existing house. Y T R E B L I T E E R T S ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( POA (cid:43) (cid:3) (cid:37) (cid:46) (cid:46) (cid:50) (cid:41) (cid:48) (cid:54) (cid:46) (cid:55) (cid:53) (cid:48) (cid:49) (cid:37) (cid:9) (cid:3) (cid:43) (cid:41) (cid:48) (cid:52) (cid:39) (cid:39) (cid:48) (cid:41) (cid:48) (cid:39) (cid:43) (cid:54) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:56) (cid:52) (cid:39) (cid:53) (cid:3) (cid:37) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:55) (cid:53) (cid:43) (cid:3) (cid:14) (cid:3) (cid:38) (cid:35) (cid:49) (cid:52) (cid:35) (cid:37) (cid:35) (cid:42) (cid:37) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:47) (cid:3) (cid:18) (cid:18) (cid:18) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:46) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:3) (cid:19) (cid:23) (cid:20) (cid:23) (cid:196) (cid:26) (cid:24) (cid:21) (cid:3) (cid:11) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:23) (cid:10) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:25) (cid:26) (cid:25) (cid:3) (cid:53) (cid:35) (cid:58) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:3) (cid:14) (cid:43) (cid:48) (cid:54) (cid:53) (cid:55) (cid:35) (cid:22) (cid:18) (cid:23) (cid:24) (cid:19) (cid:196) (cid:40) (cid:3) (cid:26) (cid:21) (cid:3) (cid:38) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:59) (cid:54) (cid:52) (cid:39) (cid:36) (cid:43) (cid:46) (cid:3) (cid:54) (cid:39) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:54) (cid:53) (cid:42) (cid:54) (cid:26) (cid:21) (cid:3) (cid:39) (cid:3) (cid:27) (cid:18) (cid:23) (cid:23) (cid:18) (cid:25) (cid:26) (cid:25) (cid:3) (cid:53) (cid:35) (cid:58) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:3) (cid:14) (cid:43) (cid:48) (cid:54) (cid:53) (cid:55) (cid:35) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:46) (cid:50) (cid:35) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:35) (cid:39) (cid:46) (cid:36) (cid:35) (cid:38) (cid:46) (cid:43) (cid:55) (cid:36) (cid:38) (cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:49) (cid:47) (cid:39) (cid:38) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:39) (cid:54) (cid:35) (cid:38) (cid:59) (cid:36) (cid:43) (cid:48) (cid:49) (cid:54) (cid:37) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:52) (cid:49) (cid:37) (cid:48) (cid:49) (cid:53) (cid:56) (cid:39) (cid:52) (cid:43) (cid:17) (cid:43) (cid:16) (cid:49) (cid:48) (cid:38)(cid:35)(cid:54)(cid:39)(cid:28) (cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:40)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:39)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:18)(cid:27)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:26)(cid:54)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:52)(cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:54) (cid:38)(cid:52)(cid:35)(cid:57)(cid:48)(cid:28) (cid:41)(cid:16)(cid:46)(cid:16)(cid:52) (cid:53)(cid:42)(cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:54) (cid:19) (cid:49)(cid:40) (cid:19) DEMO PLAN XXX XXX XXX SCALE IN FEET 1":10' BUILDABLE AREA G-3/1-PRESENTATION Exhibit A: 509 E 38th - Rear Encroachment from Subdivision The blue shaded area is the re-subdivided Lot 1. This variance request is adjacent to and affecting Lot 2 of the subdivision (not another neighbor). G-3/2-PRESENTATION Exhibit B: 509 E 38th - Existing Rear Setback Encroachment The existing rear garage is 4.4’ (aka 4’-5”) from …
AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, JUNE 13th, 2022 FROM 6:00 TO 8:00 PM City of Austin Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Room 2103 Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Board may be participating by videoconference Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register: Call or email the board liaison at Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov or 512-974-1364. The information required is the speaker’s name, item number(s) they wish to speak on if applicable, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Sharon Mays, Chair Andrea Abel Lisa Barden Joi Chevalier, Vice-Chair Frances Deviney Kacey Hanson CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION Cecilia Hogan Adrian Lipscombe Karen Magid Emily Nicola DeMaria Rosamaria Murillo Errol Schweizer AGENDA 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM MAY MEETING 2. STAFF and COMMUNITY BRIEFINGS a. Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Office of Sustainability at City of Austin – updates on food planning, State of the Food System Report, Disaster Food and Water appendix, City of Austin food related contracts 3. OLD BUSINESS b. Board Infrastructure & Protocol i. Review board members’ meetings with City and County officials c. Review prior board recommendations and discuss City and County budgets d. Community engagement e. Board vacancies and appointments f. Discuss Annual Internal Review 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Working group and individual project briefings AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, JUNE 13th, 2022 FROM 6:00 TO 8:00 PM City of Austin Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Room 2103 Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Board may be participating by videoconference i. Good Food Purchasing Program Recommendation ii. Healthy Food Access Working Group iii. Food System Planning Working Group iv. Community Agriculture Working Group v. Charitable Feeding Organization Working Group b. Other items, ideas, or general updates for group discussion or board attention c. Review of Board Member Assignments 4. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 5. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. …
FAQ Category: Animal Services Access Classification: Internal Topic: Austin Animal Center Summary: General information about the Austin Animal Center. Reference Text: Address: 7201 Levander Loop, Building A, Austin, 78702 Main Number: 512-978-0500 Animal Services Fax: 512-978-0619 QLESS Paging System: 512-687-1472 Animal Intake To bring in a found pet, submit a Stray Intake Appointment Request Form found on the Animal Center Website. Found pet appointments are scheduled Monday through Friday only. Intake of animals without an appointment will not be accepted. As of May 2022, due to ongoing space issues, the Animal Center is currently only accepting sick or injured dogs for intake. Cats are not subjected to this restriction. The Center will not accept animals found outside the city of Austin or Travis County. If an animal is brought in from outside of the jurisdiction, resident will be asked to return the animal to the area where it was found. Pet Surrender To surrender a pet, see the Rehoming a Pet website and click the link to schedule an owner surrender consultation appointment. Walk-in owner surrenders are not accepted. For more information see the Animal Services Issues KB Doc. Animal Adoption Hours Monday - Saturday 11am - 7pm Sunday temporarily closed The latest that a resident may go into the Austin Animal Center to adopt an animal is Monday - Friday is 6:30pm, and Saturday is 6pm, as they often have a 1.5 - 2 hour wait. To schedule an adoption appointment, email ASOanimaladoption@austintexas.gov. Fees There are fees associated with reclaiming animals at the shelter. In certain cases, the Animal Center can work with individuals on reclaim fees. It is best going to the Animal Center as soon as possible to work out a possible arrangement. The Shelter accepts Mastercard, Visa or Discover. They also accept cash. If the payment total is less than $100, they will not accept a $100 bill as it is hard to find change. Emergency Animal Clinics North Emergency Clinic at 12034 Research Boulevard in Austin (512-331-6121) accepts wildlife. South Emergency Clinic at 4434 Frontier Trail in Austin (512-899-0955). does not accept wildlife. Night drop boxes for animals are not available. Residents with injured animals will need to take them to an afterhours clinic. They would need to hold strays until morning. It is a violation to abandon an animal at the front door of the shelter. FAQ Category: Animal Services Access Classification: Internal Topic: …
AAC Meeting Minutes 2021-05-09 REGULAR MEETING MAY 9, 2022 ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES The Animal Advisory Commission convened for a regular meeting on Monday, May 9, 2022, 6 p.m., in the Boards and Commissions Room 1101 at Austin City Hall. Commission Chair, Craig Nazor, called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. and welcomed new District 4 Commissioner, Dr. Paige Nilson, to her first meeting. Chair Nazor conducted a roll call of those in attendance and confirmed a quorum of 10 commissioners. Seven Commissioners attended the meeting in person: Nazor, Jarl, Clinton, Smagula, Herrera, Hassen and Dr. Paige Nilson. Three Commissioners attended via teleconferencing: Mitchell, Neuhaus, and Dulzaides. Commissioner Nemer joined the meeting at Old Business, Agenda Item 3b. Commissioner Norton was absent, and District 10 is vacant. Commission Members Absent: Norton Staff in Attendance: Don Bland, Jason Garza, Belinda Hare, Dr. Kathryn Lund, Abigail Varela, Rebekha Montie, Kelsey Cler, Sarah Luce, Mary Brown, Nicole Savage PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: GENERAL Virtual: Emily Steinberg Eileen McFall Stephanie Loayza Zachary Loayza 1 AAC Meeting Minutes 2021-05-09 In Person: Beverly Luna Ashley Niels Shelly Leibhan Rhonda Pickens Joann Molinyawe 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Jarl moved to approve the minutes from the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting, April 11, 2022. Commissioner Dulzaides seconded the motion which passed unanimously, 10 to 0, with all Commissioners in attendance at the time voting approval: Nazor, Jarl, Clinton, Smagula, Herrera, Hassen, Dr. Paige Nilson, Mitchell, Neuhaus, and Dulzaides. Commissioner Nemer joined the meeting at Old Business; Commissioner Norton was absent, and District 10 is vacant. 2. BRIEFINGS a. Austin Animal Center and Animal Services Reports b. COVID Update c. Austin Pets Alive! Quarterly Report 3. OLD BUSINESS: Update, Discussion and Possible Action a. Monthly Reporting of Data b. Working Group on How to Increase Microchipping in the City of Austin c. Austin Pets Alive!’s Future at the Town Lake Animal Center and the Maintenance of No d. Transferring Austin Animal Center Animals to Other Communities No action. No action. Kill No action. No action. 4. NEW BUSINESS: Discussion and Possible Action a. Austin Animal Center Space Crisis and Recommendations from the Space Crisis Working Group Commissioner Neuhaus moved to resubmit the recommendations from the Space Crisis Working Group; Commissioner Nemer seconded the motion which passed with a vote of 9 to 1 with one abstention. Nine commissioners voted for the proposal: Nazor, Jarl, Clinton, Smagula, Hassen, Mitchell, Neuhaus, …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-2 DATE: Monday May 9, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0012 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jonathan Kaplan OWNER: David Scott Kosch ADDRESS: 2717 LONG BOW TRL increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent or increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) (a) less from 35 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (b) and not more than 25 percent from 10 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (c) percent and not more than 35 percent from 5 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (d) to 27 percent (requested), in order to complete a Single-Family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient greater than 35 percent Note: This section of the Land Development Code applies to lots that are included in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982 or a tract that is not required to be platted. For the above address the Subdivision Plat was recorded on November 17, 1969 (E) This subsection specifies additional development standards based on slope gradient in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (2) On a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road or utility F-2/1 that cannot be reasonably placed elsewhere, or a non-mechanized pedestrian facility, such as a foot path, sidewalk, or stairs. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 14, 2022; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 14, 2022; March 14, 2022 POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022 BY APPLICANT; April 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to deny; Board Member Nicholl Wade seconds on a 10-1 vote (Board member Kelly Blume nay); DENIED. RECONSIDERATION REQUESTED: MAY 9, 2022 POSTPONED TO JUNE 13, …
F-2/75 From: To: Subject: Date: Jon Kaplan - UBSTX Ramirez, Elaine Postponement Request - C15-2022-0011 + C15-2022-0012 Thursday, May 05, 2022 11:56:24 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Board of Adjustments. I am writing to formally request a 30-day postponement in my hearing date to be able to gather all the requested information for our case. This time is primarily needed to have the civil engineer design the water mitigation plan that was requested. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards Jon Kaplan C.P.B.D. - 44-752 ICC Combination Inspector - 9061592 Urban Building Services of Texas LLC www.ubstx.com J P: (512) 768-2789 EXT: 501 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-2/76 Ramirez, Diana From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hilary Brown Friday, May 6, 2022 12:41 PM Ramirez, Elaine Opposition to G-1 C15-2022-0011 & G-2 C15-2022-0012) 81EaZ2ZYRk2DOBEGKQPGzA.jpg; JOibv6DRSKKUMzMUZxOHKw.jpg; dc30F77nTb2OhJI%u2P0WQ.jpg; IMG_8316.JPG *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Email regarding: 2715 Long Bow Trail (case G-1 C15-2022-0011) and 2717 Long Bow Trail (case G-2 C15-2022-0012) Ms. Ramirez, My name is Hilary Brown, I am an Apache Shores resident, my home address is 14404 Hunters Pass. I am also a Texas Master Naturalist, a Master Birder, and a former employee of the USDA, Forest Service. I implore the council reviewing the two cases above to deny the variance request. These lots were purchased by developers who do not live in our community, their sole objective is building large houses to maximize their financial gain, the concerns of this community do not impact them. The houses they have built in Apache Shores so far have …
