02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8 - Staff Report Part 1 — original pdf

Backup

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2025-0089 (1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway) DISTRICT: 8 ADDRESS: 1120 ½ South Capital of Texas Hwy SB, 1120 South Capital of Texas Hwy SB, 1122 South Capital of Texas HWY SB, 1220 South Capital of Texas Hwy SB ZONING FROM: LO and LR TO: LO-V-DB90 SITE AREA: 15.518 acres (675,964 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: AREIT City View LLC AGENT: Drenner Group, P.C. (Leah M. Bojo) CASE MANAGER: Beverly Villela (512-978-0740, Beverly.Villela@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends LO-V-DB90, Limited Office-Vertical Mixed Use Building-Density Bonus 90 Combining District, zoning. See the Basis of Recommendation section below. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 07, 2026: February 17, 2026: Approved Neighborhood postponement to April 7th on the consent agenda. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: N/A CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property consists of approximately 15.5 acres located at 1120 ½, 1120, and 1122 South Capital of Texas Highway southbound, on the west side of South Capital of Texas Highway (Loop 360), south of Lost Creek Boulevard, and within the City of Austin’s Full Purpose Jurisdiction. South Capital of Texas Highway is a Level 5 corridor per the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) and Lost Creek Boulevard is a Level 3. The site is currently 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 81 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 2 developed with office uses and a parking garage and is zoned Limited Office (LO) and Neighborhood Commercial (LR). Surrounding land uses include offices and townhomes to the north (LR; MF-1-CO; LO; GO), offices to the south (LR; GO), religious assembly and office uses to the east within the West Lake Hills ETJ, and single-family residences and undeveloped land to the west (COA ETJ (HB 3053 disannexation); I-RR). Please refer to Attachments A (Zoning Map) and B (Aerial View). While the subject property is located within the City of Austin’s Full Purpose Jurisdiction, the properties located immediately west of the site were disannexed through an election permitted by House Bill 3053, and are now in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Texas House Bill 3053 (88th Regular Session) took effect September 1, 2023, which required the City to hold elections to allow residents in certain areas to decide whether to disannex from the City. The required disannexation election was held on May 4, 2024 to allow residents of the Lost Creek area to determine whether to disannex from the full purpose limits of the City of Austin. The election results were approved on May 14, 2024 declaring that the Lost Creek Area should be disannexed pursuant to State and City law. The disannexation was approved effective September 9, 2024. The applicant is requesting LO-V-DB90, Limited Office-Vertical Mixed Use Building- Density Bonus 90 Combining District, zoning for a proposed development that would include multi-family units requiring an affordable component. A building constructed under density bonus 90 (DB90) standards allows for a mix of residential uses and commercial uses, and the result is typically retail, restaurants and offices on the ground floor, and residential units on upper levels. The overall project would consist of approximately 475 residential units and will not be seeking a partial/complete (0-100%) modification for the ground floor commercial space requirement. Please refer to Attachment C (Applicant’s Summary Letter). A development utilizing the “density bonus 90” incentives is permitted with a base LO district and must include an affordability component for residential use in order to obtain incentives, including height maximum of 70 feet in the LO district (40 feet base plus 30 feet incentive) and relaxation of development and compatibility standards, such as FAR, setbacks and building coverage. There are several methods of satisfying DB90 development affordability requirements. There are two options for projects including rental units: a minimum of 12% of the rental units in a building are affordable for a 40- 1. year period for households earning 60% or less than the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area MFI; or 2. described above for households earning 50% or less MFI. a minimum of 10% of the rental units are affordable for a 40-year period as There are two options of satisfying DB90 development affordability requirements which include ownership units: a minimum of 12% of the residential units in a building are affordable for a 1. 40-year period for households earning 80% or less than the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area MFI; or 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 82 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 3 2. an in-lieu-fee payment to the Housing Trust Fund, equivalent to the required percentage of the total residential units, including the mix of bedrooms required, at the rate set in the fee schedule at the time of final site plan submission. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The rezoning should be consistent with the policies and principles adopted by the City Council. City Council has provided policy and direction for having more residential density and increased affordability, as well as incentivizing vertical mixed use buildings throughout the City. This request is consistent with the “VMU2” option and Ordinance No. 20240229-073, which replaced the invalidated “VMU2” option. 2. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. The Limited Office district is intended for offices predominately serving neighborhood or community needs, which may be located within or adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The Vertical Mixed Use Building (V) combining district may be applied in combination with any commercial base zoning district and allows for a combination of office, retail, commercial and residential uses within a vertical mixed use building. The Density Bonus 90 combining district is intended, in exchange for providing affordable housing units and in combination with commercial base zoning districts, to allow a mixture of office, retail, commercial, and residential uses with modifications of compatibility standards and site development regulations including increased building height. 3. Zoning should promote clearly-identified community goals, such as creating employment opportunities or providing for affordable housing. This rezoning authorizes a property to participate in a voluntary density bonus or incentive program that provides modifications to development regulations or other regulatory-related benefits in exchange for community benefits. In exchange for increased development potential, the development is required to comply with affordable housing requirements. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: ZONING LAND USES Site North LR; MF-1-CO; LO; LO; LR Offices, Parking Garage Offices; Townhomes; Religious Assembly; Offices GO South LR; GO East West Lake Hills ETJ Offices Religious Assembly, Offices 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 83 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 4 West COA ETJ (HB 3053 disannexation); I-RR Family Residences; Undeveloped NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: N/A WATERSHED: Eanes Creek Watershed CAPITOL VIEW CORRIDOR: N/A SCENIC ROADWAY: Loop 360 SCHOOLS: Eanes Independent School District Forest Trail Elementary School West Ridge Middle School Westlake High School COMMUNITY REGISTRY LIST: City of Rollingwood, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Lost Creek Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, Save Our Springs Alliance, AREA CASE HISTORIES: NUMBER C14-2016-0127 REQUEST DR to SF-2 C14-2012-0086 LO to MF-1-CO TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources, Woods of Westlake Neighborhood Association COMMISSION To Grant Staff’s Recommendation of SF-2 (01/03/2017) To Grant Staff’s Recommendation of MF-1-CO (10/01/2012) CITY COUNCIL Approved SF-2 as Commission Recommended (01/26/2017) Approved MF-1-CO as Commission Recommended (10/18/2012) RELATED CASES: C8S-84-260 – Subdivision case (recorded plat) associated with the subject property. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Comprehensive Planning: Project Name and Proposed Use: 1120 S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY SB. C14- 2025-0089. Project: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway. 15.518 acres from LO and LR, LO to LO-V-DB90, LO-V-DB90, LO-V-DB90. Existing: office (139,776 SF and 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 84 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 5 130,294 SF). Proposed: office (139,776 SF), multifamily (475 units) and commercial (7,200 SF). Note that demolition is proposed (0 residential units to be demolished). Yes Imagine Austin Decision Guidelines Complete Community Measures * Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map: Located within or adjacent to an Imagine Austin Activity Center, Imagine Austin Activity Corridor, or Imagine Austin Job Center as identified the Growth Concept Map. Names of Activity Centers/Activity Corridors/Job Centers *: Mobility and Public Transit *: Located within 0.25 miles of public transit stop and/or light rail station. Mobility and Bike/Ped Access *: Adjoins a public sidewalk, shared path, and/or bike lane. Connectivity, Good and Services, Employment *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles to goods and services, and/or employment center. Connectivity and Food Access *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles of a grocery store/farmers market. Connectivity and Education *: Located within 0.50 miles from a public school or university. Connectivity and Healthy Living *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles from a recreation area, park or walking trail. Y Connectivity and Health *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles of health facility (ex: hospital, urgent care, doctor’s office, drugstore clinic, and/or specialized outpatient care.) • Within 0.5 miles of medical clinic along S Capital of Texas Highway Y Housing Choice *: Expands the number of units and housing choice that suits a variety of household sizes, incomes, and lifestyle needs of a diverse population (ex: apartments, triplex, granny flat, live/work units, cottage homes, and townhomes) in support of Imagine Austin and the Strategic Housing Blueprint. Housing Affordability *: Provides a minimum of 10% of units for workforce housing (80% MFI or less) and/or fee in lieu for affordable housing. Mixed use *: Provides a mix of residential and non-industrial uses. Culture and Creative Economy *: Provides or is located within 0.50 miles of a cultural resource (ex: library, theater, museum, cultural center). Culture and Historic Preservation: Preserves or enhances a historically and/or culturally significant site. Creative Economy: Expands Austin’s creative economy (ex: live music venue, art studio, film, digital, theater.) Workforce Development, the Economy and Education: Expands the economic base by creating permanent jobs, especially in industries that are currently not represented in a particular area or that promotes a new technology, and/or promotes educational opportunities and workforce development training. Industrial Land: Preserves or enhances industrial land. Y Not located over Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone or Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone 3 Number of “Yes’s” 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 85 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Drainage Page 6 The developer is required to submit a pre- and post-development drainage analysis at the subdivision and site plan stage of the development process. The City’s Land Development Code and Drainage Criteria Manual require that the Applicant demonstrate through engineering analysis that the proposed development will have no identifiable adverse impact on surrounding properties. Environmental 1. The site is not located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as a Water Supply Suburban Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City's Land Development Code. It is in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. 2. Under the current watershed regulations, development or redevelopment on this site will be subject to the following impervious cover limits: Development Classification One or Two Family Residential 30% 40% Multifamily Residential 40% Commercial % of Net Site Area % NSA with Transfers 40% 55% 55% Development within a Water Quality Transition Zone is limited to 18%. 3. According to floodplain maps there is no floodplain within or adjacent to the project location. 4. Standard landscaping and tree protection will be required in accordance with LDC 25-2 and 25-8 for all development and/or redevelopment. 5. At this time, site specific information is unavailable regarding vegetation, areas of steep slope, or other environmental features such as bluffs, springs, canyon rimrock, caves, sinkholes, and wetlands. 6. Under current watershed regulations, development or redevelopment requires water quality control with increased capture volume and control of the 2 year storm on site. 7. At this time, no information has been provided as to whether this property has any preexisting approvals that preempt current water quality or Code requirements. Fire No comments on zoning change. 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 86 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 7 PARD – Planning & Design Review PR1. Residential units that are certified affordable and income-restricted are exempt from the parkland dedication requirements per City Code § 25-1-601(D)(4). Parkland dedication will be required for any new market-rate residential units that may be proposed by this development, at the time of subdivision or site plan, per City Code § 25-1-601. If the applicant wishes to discuss parkland dedication requirements in advance of site plan or subdivision applications, please contact this reviewer: ann.desanctis@austintexas.gov. At the applicant’s request, PARD can provide an early determination of parkland dedication requirements. Site Plan SP 1. NOTE: All comments regarding the effects of the proposed rezoning on subsequent Site Plan Review applications are subject to modification or reconsideration if affected by any change in property boundaries or if development is proposed on only a portion of the land proposed for rezoning. These comments are intended to assist in identifying potential areas of concern and are not intended to provide a complete list of development restrictions which may arise for any specific proposal. Austin Development Services offers a variety of pre-application review options to assist in evaluating specific development proposals prior to Site Plan Application. SP 2. Site plans will be required for any new development except for residential only project with up to 4 units. SP 3. Any new development is subject to Subchapter E. Design Standards and Mixed Use. SP 4. Additional comments will be made when the site plan is submitted. SP 5. The site is subject to compatibility standards due to the adjacency of SF-2-CO property to the south. (i.e., the triggering property). Reference 25-2-1051, 25-2-1053 SP 6. Any structure that is located (see below for additional information): a. At least 50 feet but less than 75 feet from any part of a triggering property may not exceed 60 feet b. Less than 50 feet from any part of a triggering property may not exceed 40 feet Reference 25-2-1061 SP 7. An on-site amenity, including a swimming pool, tennis court, ball court, or playground, may not be constructed 25 feet or less from the triggering property. Reference 25-2-1062 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 87 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 8 SP 8. The site is located within Hill Country Roadway Corridor. The site is located within the moderate intensity zone of Loop 360. The site may be developed with the following maximum floor-to-area ratio (FAR) for non-residential buildings: Slope 0-15% 15-25% 25-35% Maximum FAR 0.25:1 0.10:1 0.05:1 SP 9. Except for clearing necessary to provide utilities or site access, a 100-foot vegetative buffer will be required along Capital of Texas Highway. At least 40% of the site (excluding dedicated right-of-way) must be left in a natural state. The allowable height is as follows: Within 200 feet of Capital of Texas Highway the maximum height is 28 feet, and beyond 200 feet the maximum height is 40 feet. SP 10. In some cases, a Hill Country Roadway Development Bonus may be available which would increase minimum height requirements and/or decrease minimum vegetative buffer requirements. LDC Section 25-2-1128 and LDC Section 25-2-1129 SP 11. As the proposed rezoning includes the addition of the V (Vertical Mixed Use) and DB90 (Development Bonus – 90) Overlay zones, the following comments are offered in anticipation of an application in reliance on one or both of those Overlay Zones. SP 12. This site must meet affordability minimums established in LDC Subchapter E and/or LDC 25-2-652 to be eligible for the Development Bonuses available under either the Vertical Mixed Use or DB90 Overlay Zones. A signed approval letter from the Housing Department will be required with Completion Check submittal for a Site Plan for development using DB90 and/or as a component of the review of a Site Plan for development using Vertical Mixed Use. SP 13. Any Vertical Mixed Use or DB-90 buildings will be required to be designed for pedestrian-oriented commercial uses along 75% of the ground floor frontage facing the Principal Street. Lost Creek Boulevard is the principal street for all projects with frontage on that street. Capital of Texas Highway will be the Principal Street for any project with frontage solely on Capital of Texas Highway. A lobby serving a use other than a pedestrian-oriented commercial or civic space is not counted as a pedestrian-oriented commercial or civic use. NOTE: This requirement may be modified by City Council during consideration of a rezoning to add the DB90 Overlay Zone. SP 14. If a DB90 building includes a mix of uses, a non-residential use: • may not be located above a residential use; and • may not be located on or above the third story of the building. SP 15. If a DB90 project is proposed, the Compatibility standards referenced above would not apply. Those requirements would be replaced with a requirement to provide a compatibility buffer that is 25’ in width and designed to meet the standards in LDC Section 25-8-700 and LDC Section 25-2-652(G). 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 88 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 9 SP 16. If a Vertical Mixed Use project is proposed, the Hill Country Roadway maximum height, maximum FAR, minimum vegetative buffer and minimum amount of the subject site to be left in a natural state will continue to apply. SP 17. If a DB-90 project is proposed, the maximum height and maximum FAR established for the Hill Country Roadway Overlay Zone will not apply. However, the Hill Country Roadway minimum vegetative buffer and minimum amount of the site to be left in a natural state will continue to apply. Austin Transportation and Public Works Department – Engineering Review TPW 1. The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) calls for 116 feet of right-of-way for Lost Creek Boulevard. It is recommended that 59 feet of right-of-way from the existing centerline should be dedicated for Lost Creek Boulevard according to the Transportation Plan with the first subdivision or site plan application. [LDC 25-6-51 and 25-6-55]. TPW 2. The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP) calls for 116 feet of right-of-way for Lost Creek Boulevard. It is recommended that 59 feet of right-of-way from the existing centerline should be dedicated for Lost Creek Boulevard according to the Transportation Plan with the first subdivision or site plan application. [LDC 25-6-51 and 25-6-55]. TPW 3. The adjacent street characteristics table is provided below: Name ASMP Classification ASMP Required ROW Existing ROW Existing Pavement Sidewalks Bicycle Route Capital Metro (within ¼ mile) Lost Creek Boulevard Level 3 116’ 102’ 32’ S. Capital of Texas Highway Level 5 Coord. With TxDOT Coord. With TxDOT 44’ No No Yes No Yes No TIA: A traffic impact analysis is not required. Traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed the thresholds established in the City of Austin Land Development Code (LDC). 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 89 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Austin Water Utility No comments on zoning change. Page 10 FYI: The landowner intends to serve the site with City of Austin water and wastewater utilities. The landowner, at own expense, will be responsible for providing any water and wastewater utility improvements, offsite main extensions, utility relocations and or abandonments required by the land use. The water and wastewater utility plan must be reviewed and approved by Austin Water for compliance with City criteria and suitability for operation and maintenance. Depending on the development plans submitted, water and or wastewater Service Extension Requests may be required. For more information pertaining to the Service Extension Request process and submittal requirements contact the Austin Water SER team at ser@austintexas.gov. All new development within the proposed project will be subject to City Code Chapter 25-9 and any future amendments relating to reclaimed water connections, water benchmarking, and mandatory onsite water reuse. All water and wastewater construction must be inspected by the City of Austin. The landowner must pay the City inspection fee with the utility construction. The landowner must pay the tap and impact fee once the landowner makes an application for a City of Austin water and wastewater utility tap permit. INDEX OF EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS TO FOLLOW: Attachment A: Zoning Map Attachment B: Aerial Map Attachment C: Applicant’s Summary Letter Attachment D: Neighborhood Letters and Applicant Response Attachment E: TIA and TxDOT Correspondence Attachment F: Correspondence from Interested Parties 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 810 of 327 Attachment A 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 811 of 327!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(C14-04-0171C14-2016-0127C14-2012-0086C14-00-2136S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY SBS CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NBLOST CREEK BLVDWILSON HEIGHTS DRBARCLAY DRTHADDEUS CVSUNDOWN PKWYSHANNON OAKS TRLWILD BRIAR PASSETERNITY TERCITY VIEW STI-RRLOGOLOSF-2LRSF-2-CODRSF-1I-SF-2SF-1I-SF-2I-SF-2SF-1SF-1LRGOLRI-SF-2I-SF-2I-SF-2P-COI-SF-2SF-2SF-2I-SF-2MF-1-COSF-1-CODRSF-1-COSF-2P-COGRLRLROFFICESINGLE FAMILY83-26383-19083-16190-02204-0171C14-90-019R83-158R83-159DRIVE-IN BANKR83-170RCR83-263NOT ON\GROUNDUNDEVELOPEDBARTON CREEK WILDERNESS PARKOFFICESINGLE FAMILYOFFICEOFFICEOFFICER83-170RCR83-170RCZONING±This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal,engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only theapproximate relative location of property boundaries.This product has been produced by the Planning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference.No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:C14-2025-0089SUBJECT TRACT!!!!!!PENDING CASEZONING BOUNDARYCreated: 8/25/20250400200Feet02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 812 of 327Attachment B 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 813 of 327 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(C14-2025-0089C14-04-0171C14-2016-0127C14-2012-0086C14-00-2136S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY SBS CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NBLOST CREEK BLVDWILSON HEIGHTS DRBARCLAY DRTHADDEUS CVSUNDOWN PKWYSHANNON OAKS TRLWILD BRIAR PASSETERNITY TERCITY VIEW STI-RRLOGOLOSF-2LRSF-2-CODRSF-1SF-1SF-1SF-1LRGOLRP-COSF-2SF-2MF-1-CODRSF-1-COSF-1-COSF-2P-COGRLRLR1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway±This product has been produced by Planning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty ismade by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:LOCATION:SUBJECT AREA:MANAGER:C14-2025-00891120 and 1122 SCapital of Texas Hwy SB15.518 AcresMarcelle BoudreauxCreated: 9/23/2025SUBJECT TRACTZONING BOUNDARY!!!!!PENDING CASECREEK BUFFER1 inch equals 400 '02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 814 of 327C14-2025-0089 Page 13 Attachment C 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 815 of 327 August 14, 2025 Ms. Lauren Middleton-Pratt, Planning Director City of Austin Planning Department Permitting and Development Center (PDC) 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Via Electronic Delivery Re: 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway – Zoning application for the 15.518-acre combined properties located at 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway, comprised of TCAD IDs: 0111210201 and 0111210202 (the "Property") Dear Ms. Middleton-Pratt: As representatives of the owners of the Property, we respectfully submit the enclosed rezoning application package. The project is titled 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway and is 15.518-acres of combined land, located on the west side of S Capital of Texas Highway, south of Lost Creek Boulevard. The Property is in the Full Purpose Jurisdiction of the City of Austin. The Property is currently zoned LO (Limited Office) and LR (Neighborhood Commercial) The requested zoning is LR-V-DB90 (Limited Office – Vertical Mixed Use Building – Density Bonus 90). The Property is not located in a Neighborhood Planning Area. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required per the attached TIA determination waiver dated 5/8/2025 by Nazlie Saeedi from Transportation Department Services. Please let me know if you or your team members require additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your time and attention to this project. Sincerely, Leah M. Bojo cc: Joi Harden, Planning Department (via electronic delivery) Marcelle Boudreaux (via electronic delivery) 2705 Bee Caves Road Suite 100 | Austin, Texas 78746 | 512-807-2900 | www.drennergroup.com 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 816 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 14 Attachment D 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 817 of 327 February 24, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: Opposition to C14-2025-0089 Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, The proposed DB90 zoning under C14-2025-0089, for the property at 1120-1125 S. Capital of Texas Highway, is inconsistent with the City’s Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan and its Growth Concept Map, as it fosters car-dependent sprawl rather than compact, connected growth. Located along a very wide, high-speed highway with inadequate public transit and unsafe pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure, the project will predictably result in attracting hundreds of new cars to an environmentally sensitive area. The Eanes Creek Watershed is classified as a water supply watershed, which is an area that the comprehensive plan intentionally directs growth away from. The impervious cover, cut and fill, and oil-dripping cars are entirely avoidable by rejecting this proposal and supporting growth in areas with existing, sustainable infrastructure and transit. For these reasons, the Save Our Springs Alliance encourages the Zoning and Platting Commission to vote against the proposed rezoning. As a point of emphasis, we are also attaching a list of comprehensive plan policies that the requested rezoning plainly violates. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list but rather to emphasize that the proposed project is the kind of unsustainable development that works against the City of Austin’s goals. Many thanks, Bobby Levinski Senior Staff Attorney, Save Our Springs Alliance ______________ _ Austin’s water watchdog since 1992 _______________ 3201 Menchaca Rd, Austin, TX, 78704 • 512-477-2320 • SOSAlliance.org 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 818 of 327             Attachment For emphasis, the proposed rezoning C14-2025-0089 contradicts the following comprehensive plan policies: LUT P1. Align land use and transportation planning and decision-making to achieve a compact and connected city in line with the Growth Concept Map. LUT P3. Promote development in compact centers, communities, or along corridors that are connected by roads and transit, are designed to encourage walking and bicycling, and reduce healthcare, housing and transportation costs. LUT P4. Protect neighborhood character by directing growth to areas of change that include designated redevelopment areas, corridors, and infill sites. LUT P10. Direct housing and employment growth to activity centers and corridors, preserving and integrating existing affordable housing where possible. LUT P32. Assure that new development is walkable and bikable and preserves the positive characteristics of existing pedestrian friendly environments. Explanation for P1, P3, P4, P10, P32:  The project site is not located within an activity center or core transit corridor. It is within an environmental that is extremely dangerous and hostile to pedestrians and bicyclists. It is not within an area designated for change. LUT P22. Protect Austin’s natural resources and environmental systems by limiting land use and transportation development in sensitive environmental areas and preserving areas of open space. Growth Concept Map, p. 97 (emphasis added): “Directs growth away from the Barton Springs Zone of the Edwards Aquifer recharge and contributing zones and other water-supply watersheds.” Explanation for P22; Growth Concept Map:  The project site is located within the Eanes Creek Watershed, which is considered a Water Supply Suburban Watershed within the Drinking Water Protection Zone. It is an area where growth is expressly discouraged. The over-intensification of this site will require significant amounts of impervious cover and cut and fill, which leads to erosion and stormwater pollution. It would also predictably lead to a car-dependent development, 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 819 of 327    adding hundreds of oil-dripping cars and require the leveling of the land for new roads and parking lots.  These are certainly not the only comprehensive policies that the proposed rezoning violates, but it should help demonstrate how this is an unsustainable request. We urge ZAP to vote against the zoning change. Thank you for your consideration. 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 820 of 327  March 30, 2026 Beverly Villela Senior Planner – Current Planning Austin Planning Department P.O. Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 Re: Case No. C14-2025-0089 – LCNA Position for April 7, 2026 ZAP Hearing Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, On behalf of the Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA), we appreciate the opportunity to provide updated input regarding the proposed rezoning for Case No. C14- 2025-0089. We respectfully submit this letter for inclusion in the Zoning and Platting Commission (“ZAP”) briefing materials ahead of the April 7 hearing. At the outset, we want to clearly state our position: LCNA is not opposed to redevelopment of this site. We recognize the importance of accommodating growth and supporting thoughtful land use evolution within the City of Austin. However, we remain concerned that the current zoning request represents a premature and under-analyzed upzoning that has not yet been supported by the level of technical analysis and coordination warranted for a project of this scale. Recent ZAP deliberations on comparable cases, such as the rezoning of the former Rosedale School site, underscore a broader trend in which staa-supported cases are generally advanced with an expectation that remaining issues will be resolved between the applicant and stakeholders after a recommendation is made. While we understand this procedural reality, it heightens the importance of ensuring that foundational due diligence is completed prior to zoning approval, rather than deferred. The proposed development must also be evaluated in the context of cumulative growth pressures currently impacting the Lost Creek area. Nearby projects, including the Stratus development, which is anticipated to deliver hundreds of residential units, and the MileStone project adding 48 new homes, will collectively introduce substantial additional traaic into an already constrained roadway network. When combined with the proposed 475-unit development under this zoning request, the aggregate eaect represents a significant increase in daily vehicle trips that has not been holistically analyzed. Without a comprehensive, cumulative traaic assessment that accounts for these overlapping developments, the Commission cannot fully understand the true impact on mobility, safety, and neighborhood access. 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 821 of 327To date, LCNA and surrounding residents have consistently raised substantive concerns that remain unresolved: • Traaic impacts and lack of a comprehensive Traaic Impact Analysis • Coordination with TxDOT regarding access and planned roadway improvements • Environmental and watershed considerations • Public safety constraints, particularly related to ingress and egress • Incomplete or undefined elements within the zoning application These concerns were formally documented in our prior correspondence requesting postponement, and we believe they remain directly relevant to the Commission’s consideration. LCNA’s Request for April 7 In the spirit of constructive engagement, LCNA respectfully requests that the Zoning and Platting Commission consider conditioning any recommendation on the completion and validation of the following key items: 1. Tra6ic Impact Analysis (TIA): A comprehensive and current TIA that evaluates both site-specific and cumulative impacts, including interaction with nearby developments and corridor conditions. An inaccurate baseline assumption by City of Austin staa led to the decision not to complete this analysis. Observations on February 12, 2026 revealed as few as 113 cars were present on-site leading to an estimated 434 daily trips, far below the ~3,000 trips used in the assumption. 2. TxDOT Coordination: Formal confirmation of coordination with TxDOT regarding access, intersection performance, and compatibility with planned improvements along Loop 360. 3. Full Site Impact Evaluation: A holistic assessment of the project’s eaects on surrounding infrastructure, including drainage, utilities, and neighborhood connectivity. 4. Infrastructure Capacity Confirmation: Verification that public infrastructure and services, including emergency response and public transportation, can adequately support the proposed density. The nearest CapMetro bus stop is 2.6 miles. 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 822 of 3275. Context-Sensitive Height and Compatibility Measures: Consideration of reasonable height transitions and buaering strategies adjacent to existing residential areas to ensure compatibility. Our intent is not to delay progress unnecessarily, but to ensure that any zoning decision is grounded in complete information and results in a project that is both viable and compatible with its surroundings. We also want to emphasize that LCNA is committed to maintaining a constructive and solutions-oriented dialogue. We are asking for a better process and a better project, not the elimination of redevelopment opportunities. We appreciate the Commission’s time and consideration and look forward to continued engagement with City staa, the applicant, and all stakeholders to achieve an outcome that reflects sound planning principles and community compatibility. Respectfully, Shriya Josephsen President Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) cc: Zoning and Platting Commission Members, The Drenner Group 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 823 of 327 EXHIBIT A Wildfire Intensity Map – Lost Creek CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 824 of 327 Extreme Fire Intensity Scale: Extreme Fire Intensity Scale represents an average of near worst-case intensity results at the flaming front of the fire. This “average- worst” uses the average of the worst five percent of Weather Types to produce one value at each location on the map. Web address: https://wrap.texaswildfirerisk.com/Map/Public/#map-themes Data Source: Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment, Pyrologix 2023 (includes fuel disturbances through 2022) LOST CREEK DOWNTOWN AUSTIN 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 825 of 327 1120 Capital of TX HWY 1122 Capital of TX HWY ONLY THREE STREETS FOR INGRESS & EGRESS TO LOST CREEK IF WILDFIRE EVENT OCCURS 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 826 of 327EXHIBIT B Loop 360 Expansion – Mopac to RM 2244 CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 827 of 327 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT Texas Department of Transportation LOOP 360 FROM: MOPAC TO: RM 2244 TRAVIS COUNTY, AUSTIN DISTRICT CSJ 0113-13-170/171/172 DATE: APPROVED: NOT A BIDDING DOCUMENT EDUARDO GUTIERREZ, P.E. TEXAS REGISTRATION NUMBER 75994 DATE LEGEND EXISTING MAINLANE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN PROPOSED MAINLANE PAVEMENT PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FRONTAGE ROAD, CROSS STREET, RAMP, OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE PROPOSED SHARED-USE PATH & SIDEWALK PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0' 50' 100' 200' SCALE 9 2 . 6 4 + 7 2 6 T O P 630+00 635+00 D A O R E V A C E E B BLVD W REN ROW R U TH AR KING PROJECT LANCELOT WAY LIMITS N O Y N A C IM R WHIPOORWILL TRL Barton Creek Country Club BARTON CLUB CREEK JO U STIN G E G LED LEDGE-ROCK VALLEYRIDGE CASTLE RIDGE GALAHAD D R E G ID R 360 D O O W L L O N K FORESTHILL CASTLE 2244 N SUNDOW Y PKW W IL S O N H G T S WILD Y LA C R A B S K A O N O N N A H S BRIAR SCOTTISH WOODS CAMP L IL H CRAFT LOOP Y E R R U S R E K A U Q E G ID R BAY BLVD LOST CRK A KITTAN- R R O SETT N IM IN K T H A D D E U S H ILL T FF P LU B K C O R B M U L P Barton Creek Greenbelt BARTON 360 Barton Creek Wilderness Park BENCRENSHAW CYPRESSPOINT CYPRESS N LOST N O LC A F W H IT E ILLER J M AGUSTA NATL H P O LU LLO M R O W Y A L O IN V E R T IG B N O Y N A C M A R S H LOST DARTMOOR INDIAN CANYON DIAMOND HEAD CANOE CREEK BROOK CAPE AL R QUAKER CO RIDGE FRONT ROYAL L A Y O R T S E W Y E K T R O P Barton Creek Greenbelt MAUNAKEA D O R A L C Y P R E S S P T E TURTLEPT BEND O'RIVER Barton Creek Wilderness Park IT IM L Y IT C IN T S U A P O IN T W POINT O'W OODS LOOP LOST ILL KINGSM Lost Creek Country Club C CREEK BLVD SCALE 1"=100' BEND CIR BUD LITTLE RIDGE TRAIL BEND RANCH IG B RED FLINTRIDGE 2244 ROAD LIVE YAUPON OAK RIDGE LIVE OAK CIR R E IP N JU WINDSONG RED B U D WEST LAKE HILLS Pop 2,542 S K Y L IN E W O L L O H KNOB HILL R O B R A H W IE V T A C CIR D IL W Creek IR C LL U H NORMAL POOL ELEV 493.0' IC N E C S KENNEL-WOOD H IG LE CLEARVIEW A R R O CHERRY O M K BRIDLE C O R BONNIE M AD R O N E VALLEY T EN R R U IFTC SW LAUREL VALLEY TRL SPILLAR BUCKEYE Little TRL Bee Creek Bee Caves Preserve RED BUD R E IV R IEW V TRL Y K C O R EST R FO OAKRIDGE ROCKYLEDGE K P R A D E C K R C K C O R University of Texas R ELL ILLA N W SP N O EN C V A H EST W C M ROCKY RIVER SPRING ILLE E K LA ST E W E V E R S ISA R B HONEY- COMB RIDGE EANESSCH RD KONSTANTY CRAFT P M A C WEST BANK ALLEN EASY .6 3 BROOK- HAVEN K O O R B T S E W G ID R IND IAN GREY FOX N LIA U B S LA WEST- WOOD D O - D O R O ELW IA O R W B R U LA E LU B 3.7 S G P S SANDERLING S A M LO MULE-SHOE HILLCREST H ILLS HATLEY PLEASANT NIXON K R A P Y D A R B D O O W E G ID R S A L K A E P H T R O N GREG- ORY TIMBERLINE S K A E P BEE Hatley Park LLIS A W GENTRY ROLLINGWOOD ROLLING- WOOD Pop 1,388 CAVES ROCKW AY VAN CE INWOODALMARION BETTIS LEY ILEY R FA LE A PICKWICK V R R D R E ILV ILL S H RIPPLE CRK P A S A MOON RIV T N A T S N O C DAR- TER Lions Municipal Golf Course Red Bud Isle Park LA K E A U ST IN University of Texas CAN YONCIR STRATFORD H T R O W H S A E N E O G T ID S R R R E T E N O T S HERON FALCON RAIN FOREST RIDGE TARLTON N O T LE R A T LN LSH A W HONEY PINNACLE H LS A W W O L L A W S N R A B EANES- WOOD E A N E S BRIGHT- WOOD CIR OAKS IN 1000 GLEN MISTYWOOD FOX ATER HEADW WYCHWOOD TAMARRON BLVD T O IC R P A TERVAIL R E T IN W K R A P HOLLY HILL LOVELAND ANGELFIRE Barton Creek Greenbelt Tucker CR EEK 360 O L L E B E T N O M T C - E T N O M O L L E B Y PKW CAPITOL MO-PAC 2244 EXPRESSWAY 1.8 1 SPYGLASS Barton Creek Greenbelt B A R T O N SKYW AY Campbells Hole BARTONCLIFF C R E S T H A V E N G LE N C LIF F FOX GLEN BRIARCREST N TO R BA Y W K P E G ID R BARTON FOREST BEND BARTON LOOP 1 E L A D E M O H F O U R M HILLS A T T E R H O R N O A K S ROCK TERRACE ROCKINGHAM N TO R A B WILKE W R U TH R A B B A R ARPDALE LA CASA PARKWAY R E T S FO TRAVIS IL A TR COUNTRY CREST FIELDSTONE WEST CAP ROCK KNOBOAK RED STONE LN N O T T A P D O O W K R A P SOUTHWEST Oak Hill Park PARKWAY TRAIL CANYONW OOD SIDEWOOD- E N O T C LIFFS MESAVILLAGE M E SA O A K S Travis County Park TRAVIS COUNTRY B E N D Travis County Park C A N Y O N Barton Creek Wilderness Park Barton Creek Greenbelt 1.5 rton a B 360 N E V A H - R A W D IE E C V BLU VIEW FF PROJECT WESTHILL B A R T O N OAK Gus Fruh Park Creek LIMITS K A O W T S E R O F K C O R T S E W 343 SKYW A Y VICINITY MAP N.T.S PRELIMINARY THIS PRINT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. THE PLAN INFORMATION OR OTHER DATA SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MUST NOT BE CONSTRUCTED AS FINAL LOOP 360 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT MOPAC (LOOP 1) TO DATE: 6/9/2020 RM 2244 5 4 : 1 N G D . 1 _ O O _ R E D R O B _ B X E _ F D M _ T W 0 6 3 0 L S \ s t i b i h x E \ s e l i F e c n e r e f e R r e t s a M \ D P A - 2 \ 1 7 1 - 3 1 - 3 1 1 0 J S C \ 0 6 3 L S - n i t s u A 1 0 2 0 T O D x T \ s t c e j o r P \ : Z 0 2 0 2 / 9 / 6 OPTION 1: OVERPASS AT LOST CREEK BOULEVARD AND AT WESTBANK DRIVE AND AT WALSH TARLTON LANE HEB ST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC CHURCH LEGEND EXISTING MAINLANE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN PROPOSED MAINLANE PAVEMENT PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FRONTAGE ROAD, CROSS STREET, RAMP, OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE PROPOSED SHARED-USE PATH & SIDEWALK PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4 4 2 2 M R 640+00 3 0 . 8 9 + 7 3 6 T O P RANCH 2244 ROAD EXISTING ROW LOOP 360 EXISTING ROW 645+00 NB FRONTAGE ROAD NB ENTRANCE RAMP NB ENTRANCE RAMP NB ENTRANCE RAMP SL 360 NB MAINLANES SL 360 SB MAINLANES SB FRONTAGE ROAD SB EXIT RAMP EXISTING ROW PROPOSED ROW 10' SHARED-USE PATH 650+00 8 0 . 8 2 + 1 5 6 C P 6' SIDEWALK Y A W K R A P S A M I C S A L 655+00 Y A W K R A P S A M I C S A L PROPOSED ROW 10' SHARED-USE PATH NB EXIT RAMP 680+00 660+00 665+00 9 2 . 6 1 + 9 6 6 T P 670+00 675+00 SB ENTRANCE RAMP PROPOSED ROW 685+00 D R A V E L U O B K E E R C T S O L 6' SIDEWALK SOURCE: https://www.txdot.gov/content/dam/project-sites/loop360/docs/ mopac-rm-2244-jul-2019-exhibits.pdf VALLEY VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6' SIDEWALK 690+00 EXISTING ROW NB FRONTAGE ROAD SL 360 NB MAINLANES SL 360 SB MAINLANES SB FRONTAGE ROAD 695+00 LOOP 360 EXISTING ROW 0 0 + 9 9 6 A T S E IN L H C T A M 10' SHARED-USE PATH LEGEND EXISTING MAINLANE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN PROPOSED MAINLANE PAVEMENT PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FRONTAGE ROAD, CROSS STREET, RAMP, OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE PROPOSED SHARED-USE PATH & SIDEWALK PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 828 of 327 EXHIBIT C Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Determination Worksheet CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 829 of 327 X >2000 Trips/day → Transportation Assess X >5000 Trips/day → Neighborhood Traffic Analysis Estimated Daily Trips Using the standard turnover method 155 cars x 2.8 avg. turnover = 434 Daily Trips ITE std. rate for 321 (4.54 to 6.74 range) 475U x 6.74 Trips/U = 3202 Trips/day 4755 Trips/day ? ? 231 3202 222 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) 90 ft. 231 Mid-Rise Residential with Ground-Floor Commercial 70 ft. Expired in Nov ‘25 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 830 of 327Transportation Criteria Manual Section 10 Traffic Impact Analysis https://www.austintexas.gov/depart ment/transportation-development- services 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 831 of 327Existing City View Parking Lot 2/12/2026 2 pm 113 Cars 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 832 of 327EXHIBIT D Map: Access to Public Transportation from CityView Development CityView Rezoning Case (C14-2025-0089) Lost Creek Neighborhood Association (LCNA) 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 833 of 327 THERE IS NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1120 & 1122 S CAPITAL OF TX HWY. LOST CREEK Source: https://platform.remix.com/project/7b6385a3?latlng=30.36625,-97.55017,10.569 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 834 of 327THE CLOSEST ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1120 &1122 S CAPITAL OF TX HWY IS IS OVER 2.5 MILES AWAY AT BARTON CREEK MALL. Source: https://platform.remix.com/project/7b6385a3?latlng=30.36625,-97.55017,10.569 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 835 of 327Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Scott, Ashley Fisher Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:55 PM Scott Smith; Villela, Beverly Leah Bojo Re: Submission – LCNA Letter and Exhibits for Case C14-2025-0089 (April 7 ZAP Hearing) External Email - Exercise Caution Thank you for sharing your letter regarding the proposed rezoning. We appreciate the collaborative approach and that Lost Creek Neighborhood Association is not opposed to redevelopment of the site. In response to a few of your concerns listed in the letter, here is some information. We agree that all these issues are important, but the details of these issues are better handled through the site plan process. Traffic Impact Analysis: The city staff have determined that a traffic impact analysis is not Coordination with TXDOT: Coordination with TXDOT will also occur during the site plan • required because the proposal does not exceed the thresholds establish in the Land Development Code. Further transportation analysis may be required through the site plan process. • process. • site to comply with current environmental regulations which are more stringent than those at the time the site was developed previously. • 360 and one to Lost Creek Blvd. Access will also be part of the site plan process. Public Safety related to ingress and egress: the Site currently has two driveways, one to Environmental and Watershed considerations: redevelopment of the site will require the We are happy to meet again this week if you would like. Let us know if you would like to set a time for a virtual meeting. Ashley Ashley Fisher, Senior Project Manager Drenner Group, PC | 2705 Bee Cave Road | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78746 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 836 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 15 Attachment E 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 837 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Tucker Ferguson Thursday, March 26, 2026 7:02 PM Scott Smith Shriya Josephsen; Villela, Beverly; Orlando Gallegos RE: Request for Transportation Coordination Review (City View / Loop 360 & Lost Creek Blvd) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good evening Mr. Smith. Developers are responsible for coordinating with our office when their projects require access to the state highway system. We work closely with local jurisdictions during the development review process; however, this coordination typically occurs during the site development or building permit phase. At that stage, cities and counties generally require developers to secure the appropriate access permits before proceeding. The safety and operational evaluations you referenced are conducted once a site plan has been developed and sufficient traffic data is available. This allows for a more accurate assessment of potential traffic impacts and the identification of any necessary mitigation measures. Thank you, Tucker Ferguson, PE Austin District Engineer Texas Department of Transportation 7901 North I-35 Austin, TX 78753 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 838 of 327 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Determination Worksheet Applicant must complete this worksheet except where noted for TPW Staff. Please submit completed worksheet to the TIA Determination Worksheet portal (https://atd.knack.com/development- services#services/traffic-impact-analysis-determination/) for review and signature. Project Name: Location: Applicant: Telephone No: Application Type: *Indicates determination is optional Dev. Assessment (Zoning) Zoning Site Plan Dev. Assessment (Site Plan)* Concept Site Plan* By checking the box below, the applicant acknowledges that City Council has adopted a Street Impact Fee (SIF) program effective December 21, 2020, and that street impact fees will be assessed for any building permit pulled on or after June 21, 2022. For more information on the Street Impact Fee program, please visit www.austintexas.gov/department/street-impact-fee Applicant acknowledgment of Street Impact Fee program FOR TPW STAFF USE ONLY Zoning Land Use Units** I.T.E. Code Trip Rate Trips Per Day EXISTING: Tract Number Tract Acres Please note that existing trip generation in the above table is applicable only to this worksheet. Existing trip generation for use in transportation studies and SIF calculations shall be determined separately. PROPOSED: Tract Number Tract Acres Zoning Land Use Units** FOR TPW STAFF USE ONLY I.T.E. Code Trip Rate Trips Per Day **Applicable based on land use (e.g., dwelling units for residential, building square footage for commercial, etc.) 1 of 2 Revised 03/21/2024 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway SB, Austin, TX 78746Leah M. Bojo512-807-2918441 (1120)8.424LO and LROffice139,776 SF710FCE1,5532 (1122)7.094LOOffice130,204 SF710FCE1,4601 (1120)8.424LO-V-DB90Office139,776 SF710FCE1,5532 (1122)7.094LO-V-DB90Multifamily High Rise475 units222FCE2,163Commercial7,200 SF822FCE534Total Existing 3,013Total Proposed 4,250Total Net Proposed 1,23702 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 839 of 327 ABUTTING ROADWAYS: Street Name Proposed Access (Y/N) Proposed Number of Driveways ASMP Street Level FOR TPW STAFF USE ONLY A neighborhood traffic analysis (NTA) is required per LDC 25-6-114. The applicant may have to collect current traffic counts. Please contact the Lead Development Review Engineer. A traffic impact analysis is required. TIA scoping is required prior to beginning the study. Please see below for the type of study required; for more information on each study, please refer to Section 10 of the TCM. Full TIA Transportation Assessment (TA) Zoning Transportation Analysis (ZTA) A TIA compliance memo is required. The memo must demonstrate this case complies with the following TIA. Please refer to the City of Austin TIA Guidelines Section 6 for more information. A traffic impact analysis is NOT required. Traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed the thresholds established in the City of Austin Land Development Code (LDC). Mitigation per LDC 25-6-101 may still apply. A Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan is required. For more information on the contents required in a TDM Plan, please refer to Section 10 of the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM). The traffic impact analysis has been waived. See notes below. Staff Notes: Reviewed By: Date: More information on study requirements and how to submit can be found online at the TDS customer portal (https://atd.knack.com/development-services#customer-portal/) NOTE: A TIA determination must be made prior to submittal of any Zoning or Site Plan application; therefore, this completed and reviewed worksheet must accompany any subsequent application for the identical project. Changes to the proposed project may require a new TIA determination. This worksheet will remain valid for six months from the approval date above, after which a new TIA Determination Worksheet may be required. 2 of 2 Revised 03/21/2024 Lost Creek BoulevardY13S Capital of Texas HighwayY154Nazlie Saeedi5/8/202502 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 840 of 327 C14-2025-0089 Page 16 Attachment F 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 841 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Patti Brennan Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:17 PM Villela, Beverly; ; ; Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: ● Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) ● Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less ● No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future ● Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan ● Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger ● Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential ● Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 842 of 327 Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Name: Patti Brennan Address: 5909 Cape Coral Drive, Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 843 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Heather Hudson Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:16 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Neighborhood Traffic Analysis — Case C14-2025-0089 -Rosedale You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution EMAIL TO: CC: SUBJECT: Request for Neighborhood Traffic Analysis — Case C14-2025-0089 -Rosedale? Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14- 2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Name: Heather V Hudson 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 844 of 327 Address: 2004 Port Royal Drive, Austin, TX 78746 Heather Hudson Broker Associate Certified Luxury Home Marketing Specialist AUSTIN RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2500 Bee Caves Rd, Bldg 3, Ste 200 Austin TX 78746 m: 512.431.2120 TREC Information About Brokerage Services TREC Consumer Protection Notice To help protect y our priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented auto matic download of this pictu re from the In ternet. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 845 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Heather Hudson Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:16 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car- dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: • Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less • No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan • • Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger • Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Name: Heather V Hudson Address: 2004 Port Royal Drive, Austin, TX 78746 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 846 of 327 Heather Hudson Broker Associate Certified Luxury Home Marketing Specialist AUSTIN RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2500 Bee Caves Rd, Bldg 3, Ste 200 Austin TX 78746 m: 512.431.2120 TREC Information About Brokerage Services TREC Consumer Protection Notice To help protect y our priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented auto matic download of this pictu re from the In ternet. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 847 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Patti Brennan Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:14 PM Villela, Beverly; Request for NTA You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet ● How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). ● What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. ● Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet ● What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints ● How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. ● What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 848 of 327 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Patti Brennan 5909 Cape Coral Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 849 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Scott Killen Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:51 PM Villela, Beverly Conditional Overlay Request for Case C14-2025-008 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: Lost Creek sits above Barton Creek and the Barton Creek Green Belt. This development could have a big negative impact on this area. The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: • Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less • No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future • Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan • Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger • Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Scott Killen 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 850 of 327 Resident of Lost Creek CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 851 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Scott Killen Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:43 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 request You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Scott Killen Resident of Lost Creek 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 852 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lisa Becker Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:22 PM Villela, Beverly Traffic Analysis needed for Lost Creek You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • • • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? • • • • • • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? • • • • • Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the • Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. • • 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 853 of 327 • • • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? • Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only • 113 actual vehicle trips. • How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips • • in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the • • • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI • • sole ingress and egress • • • • • for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. • • Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. 2. 3. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) 4. to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with 5. a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis 6. as a formal component of the NTA. 7. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 854 of 327 Thank you for your consideration. Lisa Becker Lost Creek Resident CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 855 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Walker Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:09 PM Villela, Beverly Request for neighborhood traffic analysis You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. EMAIL TO: CC: ; SUBJECT: Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request Dear Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 856 of 327 I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. Why I care: ________________________________________________________________________ The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: • Height cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • Unit cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less • No vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future • Full TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan • Family-sized units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger • Stepped massing — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • Dark sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Walker 1211 Quaker Ridge Drive Get Outlook for iOS CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 857 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Cynthia Wilberts Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:48 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Neighborhood Traffic Analysis — Case C14-2025-0089 -Rosedale? You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, The residents of Lost Creek are formally requesting that the Planning Department conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089. We require this professional analysis to be completed now so that the zoning case may be approved with the necessary Conditional Overlays to ensure public safety. Our request is based on the clear precedent set in Case C14-2025-0094 (Rosedale Multifamily), where the City performed a rigorous technical analysis for a project of similar density. A comparative audit of the two cases reveals significant deviations that must be addressed: 1. Discrepancy in ITE Trip Generation Methodology in the TIA Worksheet • How are we to reconcile the use of ITE Code 222 (High-Rise) for a mid-rise project? The Rosedale project (75–90 feet) correctly utilized ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily). • What is the basis for bypassing the 2,000-trip threshold? Applying the Rosedale standard of 4.54 trips per unit to our 475 units results in 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. • Per the Transportation Criteria Manual (TCM), exceeding 2,000 trips triggers a mandatory Transportation Assessment and TDM plan. Using Code 222 artificially defers these requirements. 2. Verification of Existing Traffic Credits in TIA Worksheet • What was the methodology for a 3,000-trip credit for vacant facilities? Office buildings that are substantially vacant, our field counts show only 113 actual vehicle trips. How does this align with the Rosedale precedent? City verified only 489 trips in an actively occupied area. 3. Critical Life-Safety and Evacuation Constraints • How does the current waiver account for the unique constraints of a WUI Zone? Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI) Zone A/B. • What is the City’s plan for ensuring evacuation safety? No field traffic data has been collected for Lost Creek, despite a fatal crash at our primary access point on April 6, 2025. 18 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 858 of 327 Our Request To ensure the equitable application of City standards and the protection of public safety, we respectfully ask the Planning Department to do a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis : 1. Correct the ITE Code to 221 (Midrise) to ensure mathematical consistency with the Rosedale project and the TCM. This will demonstrate the need for NTA, with a Wildfire Evacuation Analysis as a formal component of the NTA. We look forward to your guidance on aligning the City View analysis with the professional standards demonstrated in the Rosedale case. This analysis is an essential prerequisite for zoning approval with the correct overlays to protect the long-term livability and safety of the Lost Creek community. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Cynthia Wilberts 2002 Point Bluff Drive Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 859 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kay Lee Fordham < Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:46 PM Villela, Beverly > Case C14-2025-0089 — Conditional Overlay Request ; Ben Fordham You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Ms. Villela and Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, I am a Lost Creek resident writing about Case C14-2025-0089. This site is in one of the most environmentally protected areas of Austin, and the proposed rezoning ignores nearly every applicable protection. My children love walking and bike riding in our neighborhood to see their friends and I am very worried about the impact of this project on the traffic on Lost Creek Boulevard. The Save Our Springs Alliance has formally opposed this rezoning, calling it “inconsistent with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan” and “car-dependent sprawl.” The site is in the Eanes Creek Watershed — a Water Supply Suburban Watershed in the Drinking Water Protection Zone. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28– 40 feet and requires 40% natural state. The City’s reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply.” The 90-foot request is 225% of the code limit. This is a scenic roadway, protected watershed, dark skies community, and wildfire zone. OUR ASK — LO-V-DB90 with Conditional Overlay: cap: 50 feet (commercial ground floor + 3 residential stories) • • • Height • • • • • • Unit • • cap: 400, or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 860 of 327  TIA & Evacuation Study required before site plan vehicular access from Lost Creek Blvd — no driveways or connections, current or future • • • No • • • • • • Full • • • • • • Family-sized • • • • • • Stepped • massing • — no structure above 40 ft within 100 ft of residential • • • • Dark • • • units — minimum 30% must be 2-bedroom or larger sky lighting — below 3000K, fully shielded Why are these conditions reasonable? The developer told our community “maximum 400 units” at “52–53 feet, four stories.” The application says 475 units at 90 feet. We’re asking the Commission to hold them to their own words. The unit cap of 400 — or the number supported by the TIA and Evacuation Study, whichever is less — ensures density is based on real infrastructure capacity.. The Hill Country Roadway Corridor limits height to 28–40 feet. The City’s own reviewer said DB90 relief “does not appear to apply” to these standards. 50 feet is generous relative to the 40-foot code limit. Staff claimed 3,000 daily trips from vacant buildings. We counted 113 cars. The corrected number is 4,300+ net new trips on a 32-foot street with no sidewalks, no transit (nearest stop: 2.6 miles), and no alternative route for 1,200 families. I support housing with affordable units and neighborhood retail. I am requesting an NTA so we can add the appropriate Conditional Overlay that protects our safety and aligns with the developer’s own promises. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Kay Lee Fordham 2100 Point Bluff Drive Austin TX 78746 21 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 861 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Rosa Yupari Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:49 PM Villela, Beverly Jones, Austin Request for NTA — Case C14-2025-0089 compared to Rosedale C14-2025-0094 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Ms. Villela, I am Rosa, a resident of Wilson Heights, home adjacent to City View in Lost Creek, writing to request that the City of Austin conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) for Case C14-2025-0089 that is equivalent in scope to the NTA completed for Case C14-2025-0094 (the Rosedale Multifamily). We only want to be treated fairly. It seems like the Rosedale neighborhood was granted a professional NTA based on 1,975 trips. Is it unfair for us to ask for that same level of care, given our project exceeds 2,100 trips and is on a primary evacuation route? The Standard the City Applied at Rosedale On January 14, 2026, Austin Jones, P.E., Supervising Engineer at Austin Transportation and Public Works (ATPW), completed a five-page NTA memorandum for Case C14-2025-0094, which included the following elements: 1. ITE Code 221 (Midrise Multifamily), producing 1,975 raw daily trips for 435 units (4.54 trips/unit/day). 2. Verified existing trip credit 3. Street capacity analysis: Each street was analyzed against LDC § 25-6-116 thresholds and 24-hour traffic counts. 4. 20% TDM trip reduction target: Supported by the site’s proximity to multiple Capital Metro bus stops, bicycle routes, sidewalks, and three ETOD Station Areas. 5. Trip distribution analysis: with net volumes calculated per roadway. What Lost Creek neighbors Case C14-2025-0089 received 1. The TIA Determination Worksheet for Case C14-2025-0089 concluded that no Traffic Impact Analysis and no Neighborhood Traffic Analysis were required. 2. It seems like there is a discrepancy between the Mid-rise design and the High-rise coding used on the worksheet. We should be using the same code and add the commercial status 3. How was the 3,000-trip credit calculated when current field counts show only 113 cars? The worksheet credited approximately 3,000 daily trips from the existing office buildings, which are 23 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 862 of 327 substantially vacant. The Rosedale NTA credited 489 trips since that office was actively occupied. 4. No actual traffic counts collected. 5. NTA box unchecked: The proposed driveway onto Lost Creek Boulevard. Per TIA Guidelines and the Transportation Criteria Manual, access to a residential street from a development of this magnitude requires a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis. Side-by-Side Comparison Factor Rosedale (C14-2025- 0094) Lost Creek (C14-2025- 0089) Proposed Units 435 475 ITE Code Used 221 — Midrise MF 222 — High-Rise MF Raw Trips/Day 1,975 (4.54/unit) 2,157 at actual rate 2,000-Trip Threshold Below but NTA conducted EXCEEDS for TA + TDM Existing Use Verified? Traffic Counts Collected Yes — active Sheriff’s Office No — buildings vacant 3 days, 24-hr tube counts None NTA Conducted? Yes — 5-page P.E. memo No TDM Reduction Required 20% at site plan None Transit Access Bus stops, bikes, ETOD Zero transit service Alternative Access 3 streets 1 route only Evacuation Route No Fatal Crash at Access No Yes — WUI Zone A/B Yes — April 6, 2025 Offsite Improvements çrossing, transit None required The Trip Generation Math Using the identical methodology, ATPW applied to Rosedale —475 units × 4.54 trips/unit/day = 2,157 unadjusted daily trips. This figure should trigger a mandatory TDM plan. We have no Capital Metro service, no bicycle routes on Lost Creek Boulevard. A 20% reduction in TDM would be unsupportable. Our Request 1. We respectfully request the following 2. Conduct a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis for Case C14-2025-0089 equivalent in scope to the NTA completed for Case C14-2025-0094. 3. Determination Worksheet from 222 (High-Rise) to 221 (Midrise Multifamily), consistent with the code ATPW and Rosedale project. 24 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 863 of 327 4. Verify existing trip generation and Code 221 for Mid Rise, similar to Rosedale with a commercial addition 5. Require a TDM plan 6. Include a wildfire evacuation analysis as a component of the NTA. Lost Creek Boulevard is the sole ingress and egress for over 1,200 households in a designated WUI Zone. The additional 2,157+ daily trips on the only evacuation route for this community must be evaluated. We just want to make sure that if an emergency happens, we can all look back and say we did the math correctly. We support the development of this site and are requesting the same level of professional, data-driven analysis for our safety that the City provided to the Rosedale community for a comparable multifamily project. What is the best way for us to work with you to align this analysis with the City's standards? Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Respectfully, Rosa Yupari 1313 Wilson Heights Lost Creek Tel: +1 512.906.9015 www.linkedin.com/in/burnsrosa p.s. The NTA will help us determine the Conditional Overlays that will create a great relationship with the neighborhood and development. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 25 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 864 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Cindy Edwards Tuesday, March 10, 2026 7:00 PM Villela, Beverly Admin Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Subject: Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Cindy Edwards, my husband, Jerry and I are long time residents of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. We also have a new housing development under construction on Lost Creek Blvd and when you add 40+ homes you will have a significant increase in traffic with Lost Creek Blvd being the only access. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood...and let's not forget all the Barton Creek traffic that travels through our neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 865 of 327 • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for listening and for your time and consideration. Cindy & Jerry Edwards Torrey Pines Cove, Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 866 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: David Younger < Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:54 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) > You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is David. Younger and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood [6303 Southern Hills Place]. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 867 of 327  the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • • • • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, David Younger Lost Creek Resident Austin, TX 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 868 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Darcy Johnson Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:41 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Darcy Johnson, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek on Whitemarsh Valley Walk. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I kindly ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet does not match reality. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 869 of 327 Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Kind regards, Darcy Johnson Resident of Lost Creek 6654 Whitemarsh Valley Walk 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 870 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Julie Zuefeldt Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:47 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Julie Zuefeldt, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood [add Address if you wish]. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the city and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 871 of 327 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis before advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Julie Zuefeldt - Lost Creek Resident 6203 Augusta National Drive, Austin 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 872 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Bruce Barre Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:44 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Bruce Barre and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 873 of 327 I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Bruce Barre 1700 Lost Creek Blvd Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 874 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Jill Barre Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:36 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Jill Barre, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 875 of 327 Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jill Barre 1700 Lost Creek Blvd Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 876 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Cheryl Tulkoff Tuesday, March 10, 2026 5:01 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Cheryl Tulkoff, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood at 5903 Fox Chapel Dr. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 877 of 327 • • • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Cheryl Tulkoff 5903 Fox Chapel Dr. Austin, TX 78746 -- Thanks, Cheryl Tulkoff https://www.linkedin.com/in/ctulkoff/ CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 878 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 3:58 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis - Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Sta(cid:67), My name is Anne Grigg, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and sta(cid:67) to require a full Tra(cid:67)ic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current tra(cid:67)ic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing o(cid:67)ice buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline tra(cid:67)ic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current tra(cid:67)ic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing tra(cid:67)ic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in tra(cid:67)ic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing tra(cid:67)ic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated tra(cid:67)ic study so that the City and the public can understand: The true baseline tra(cid:67)ic conditions at the largely vacant CityView o(cid:67)ice site The net new tra(cid:67)ic generated by the proposed residential development The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Tra(cid:67)ic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Tra(cid:67)ic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 879 of 327 Sincerely, Anne Grigg Lost Creek Resident Austin, Texas CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 880 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Samit Patel Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:05 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Samit Patel, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real- world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 881 of 327 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Samit Patel Resident on Whitemarsh Valley Walk Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 882 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Marsha Ratliff Friday, March 27, 2026 9:12 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Marsha Ratliff and am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood 1319 Thaddeus Cove. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 883 of 327 I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Marsha Ratliff 1319 Thaddeus Cove Austin TX 78746 Sent from my iPad CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 884 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Audrey Hime Friday, March 27, 2026 8:54 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, I have been a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood since 2002, and I am extremely concerned about the possibility of adding significant traffic to the Lost Creek corridor, which is already congested and over-used, especially during peak hours. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves approximately 8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 885 of 327 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Audrey Hime 1702 Mill Springs Dr. Austin, TX 78746 -- Audrey Hime PO Box 92525 Austin, TX 78709 cell: (512) 415-7790 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 886 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Shawn Reddy Wednesday, March 25, 2026 4:59 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Shawn Reddy, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • • 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 887 of 327 • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Shawn Reddy, MD Chair, Pain Management, BSW Marble Falls 2006 Plumbrook Dr. Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 888 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Sarah DeHay Wednesday, March 25, 2026 8:51 AM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Sarah DeHay, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 889 of 327 Sincerely, Sarah DeHay 6209 Cape Coral Drive Austin, Texas CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 890 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Katherine Watkins Tuesday, March 24, 2026 10:06 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Katherine Watkins and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Katherine Watkins 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 891 of 327 6307 Indian Canyon Dr Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 892 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Christine Travis Tuesday, March 24, 2026 9:33 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Christine Travis, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 893 of 327 Sincerely, Christine Travis 1103 Falcon Ledge Drive Austin, Texas 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 894 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Kat Schliemann Tuesday, March 24, 2026 3:35 PM Villela, Beverly You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Attn: Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff My name is Kathleen Schliemann, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood on Big Canyon Drive. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kathleen Schliemann Lost Creek Resident 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 895 of 327 Austin, TX CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 896 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Austin McAnally Tuesday, March 24, 2026 3:07 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Austin McAnally, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 897 of 327 A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Austin McAnally Lost Creek Resident Austin McAnally CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 898 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Claire Hogan Tuesday, March 24, 2026 2:51 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Claire Hogan, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • The net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 899 of 327 Claire Hogan (1208 Wilson Heights Drive, Austin, Texas 78746) C L A I R E H O G A N C L A I R E M C C O R M A C K | P H O T O G R A P H Y c 830.456.6063 www.clairemccormack.com CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 18 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8100 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Diane Hern Monday, March 23, 2026 11:11 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Diane Hern, and I am a property owner in the Lost Creek neighborhood at 1303 Wilson Heights Drive. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand that redevelopment of this property is being considered, I respectfully ask the Commission and staff to require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. The current traffic worksheet appears to rely on assumptions that do not reflect real-world conditions at the site today. The existing office buildings within the CityView complex are largely unoccupied, meaning the baseline traffic used in the worksheet significantly overstates current traffic volumes. As a result, the analysis may incorrectly assume that a large amount of existing traffic already occurs at the site. If the property is redeveloped with approximately 475 residential units, residents estimate that the project could generate well over 2,000 additional daily trips, which would represent a substantial increase in traffic through the Lost Creek Boulevard corridor. Lost Creek Boulevard already serves ~8000 – 10,000 daily trips and functions as the primary ingress and egress route for roughly 1,200 homes in the Lost Creek neighborhood. Given the existing traffic patterns, the constrained roadway geometry, and the lack of alternative neighborhood access points, a development of this scale warrants a comprehensive and updated traffic study so that the City and the public can understand: • • • The true baseline traffic conditions at the largely vacant CityView office site • • • • • The 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8101 of 327  net new traffic generated by the proposed residential development • • • • • The impact on Lost Creek Boulevard and the Loop 360 intersection • • • • • Any necessary roadway improvements or mitigation measures to ensure safety and mobility • • A Traffic Impact Analysis would allow the City to make an informed decision based on accurate data rather than outdated or theoretical assumptions. I respectfully request that the Commission require a full Traffic Impact Analysis prior to advancing this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Diane Hern Property Owner Lost Creek CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8102 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Doug Keenan Monday, March 23, 2026 3:36 PM Villela, Beverly Request for Full Traffic Impact Analysis – Zoning Case C14-2025-0089 (CityView / Loop 360) 1120 TIA Worksheet with ITE Code 231 Recalc Feb 12 2026 DPK PDF w_pics.pdf External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly & the Zoning and Platting Commission Members and Planning Staff, My name is Doug Keenan, and I am a resident of the Lost Creek neighborhood. I am writing regarding Zoning Case C14-2025-0089, the proposed rezoning of the CityView property near the intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360. While I understand redevelopment is being considered, I respectfully request that the Commission and staff require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) before any zoning decision is made. Based on my review of the current documentation and real-world conditions, I believe a TIA is necessary for the following reasons: • Inaccurate Baseline Data: The existing traffic worksheet overstates current traffic because the CityView office complex is largely unoccupied. Site observations on February 12, 2026, showed only 113 cars in the parking lot. Using a standard turnover method, this represents only 434 daily trips, far below the ~3,000 trips used in current theoretical assumptions. • Substantial Traffic Increase: The proposed development of 475 residential units is estimated to generate 4,755 total trips per day. This results in a net increase of 4,321 daily trips. Such a significant volume exceeds the City’s >2,000 unadjusted daily trip threshold for a Transportation Assessment and approaches the >5,000 threshold for a full TIA. • Outdated Growth Projections: The current analysis appears to rely on 2019 TxDOT data. Applying a conservative 4% annual growth rate to the 2019 AADT of 5,162 suggests traffic volumes are already near 6,800 vehicles per day in 2026, even before accounting for the Loop 360 expansion. • Safety and Mobility Concerns: Lost Creek Boulevard is the primary ingress/egress for approximately 1,200 homes. A project of this scale, given the constrained roadway geometry, warrants a study to ensure necessary mitigation measures are identified. I have attached a redlined TIA Worksheet (dated February 12, 2026) which details these recalculations and includes photographic evidence of current site vacancy. Sincerely, Doug Keenan 2001 Port Royal Drive - Lost Creek Austin, TX 78746 21 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8103 of 327 This old worksheet is dead; a fresh one is required! X >2000 Trips/day → Transportation Assess X >5000 Trips/day → Neighborhood Traffic Analysis Estimated Daily Trips Using the standard turnover method 155 cars x 2.8 avg. turnover = 434 Daily Trips ITE std. rate for 321 (4.54 to 6.74 range) 475U x 6.74 Trips/U = 3202 Trips/day 4755 Trips/day ? ? 231 3202 222 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) 90 ft. 231 Mid-Rise Residential with Ground-Floor Commercial 70 ft. Expired in Nov ‘25 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8104 of 327Transportation Criteria Manual Section 10 Traffic Impact Analysis https://www.austintexas.gov/depart ment/transportation-development- services 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8105 of 327Existing City View Parking Lot 2/12/2026 2 pm 113 Cars 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8106 of 327 Villela, Beverly Subject: FW: Case C14-2025-0089 From: Jeryl Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2025 2:44 PM To: Boudreaux, Marcelle Subject: Case C14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution We have been residents of Lost Creek Community for 45 years. We did not VOTE for high rise buildings or low property listings. We want ACTION NOW. We do not want tall high density buildings. Please help those of us who have lived here the longest. Our children are not safe getting off buses, no walking sidewalks or public transportation. Please help us fight this battle. Thank you, CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at . 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8107 of 327 Villela, Beverly Subject: FW: Strongly against rezoning of 1120 &1122 Capital of Texas Hwy - NO DIRECT ACCESS to development from the south (Case Number: C14-2025-0089) From: Devlin DuVall Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2025 3:38 PM To: Morin, Danielle < < >; Rouda, Randall < >; Michael, David < ; < < >; Meeks, Stacy < >; DeSanctis, Ann < >; Ellis, Paige >; Middleton-Pratt, Lauren ; Curtis, Cathy >; Barron, Bradley >; McGuinness, Kayla >; Gonsoulin, Chase >; Saeedi, Nazlie >; Mayor Watson > Cc: Mike DuVall < Subject: Strongly against rezoning of 1120 &1122 Capital of Texas Hwy - NO DIRECT ACCESS to development from the south (Case Number: C14-2025-0089) > You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello, I am not sure exactly to whom I should be voicing my opinion and thoughts, but I am VERY, VERY concerned about the proposed rezoning of 1120 and 1122 S. Capitol of Tx. Hwy. (Case Number: C14-2025-0089). I live directly behind these two addresses. I am against this rezoning for a few reasons: - The proposal for 475 apartment unit is estimated to increase traffic by 2,000 trips per day in this area (per documents filed with the City of Austin). If you are coming from the south, there is NO DIRECT ACCESS to either property. DRIVES WILL HAVE TO MAKE A U-TURN to access the properties. THERE IS ONLY ONE U-TURN LANE. Please think about the additional congestion this will cause at that intersection. Lost Creek Boulevard is already mayhem at certain times of day. We have accidents at this intersection quite often and a few months ago had a fatal accident here. The entrance to Wilson Heights Drive (my street) already sees MANY, MANY ILLEGAL U-TURNS PER DAY, from people working in the office buildings looking for a shortcut or quicker access. This development will only make traffic difficulties even worse. One statement that is VERY concerning to me, is found in the Applicant Summary letter. It states: 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8108 of 327 The Property is currently zoned LO (Limited Office) and LR (Neighborhood Commercial) The requested zoning is LR-V-DB90 (Limited Office – Vertical Mixed Use Building – Density Bonus 90). The Property is not located in a Neighborhood Planning Area. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required per the attached TIA determination waiver dated 5/8/2025 by Nazlie Saeedi from Transportation Department Services. I do not understand how a traffic impact analysis can not be required when there is only ONE U- TURN lane to access this property if you coming from the south? - Westbank Drive is a main artery to West Lake High School. This light is already crazy enough at school times, and this proposed development would make it worse. - I am very concerned about the noise this development would cause for the neighborhood it abuts to. - I am very concerned about the proposed 475 units and 7-story building proposed for this site. That is way too much traffic, way too many people, way too much disturbance to not do any sort of impact study. - I am concerned about the proposal to include low-income housing. I would love to have more families have access to the school system here (Eans ISD is looking for ways to get more children in our school system), but there is NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO SUPPORT THESE FAMILIES. Before you approve a zoning change, I ask that you analyze the very real and negative impacts this development will have on this area. Sincerely, Devlin DuVall cell CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8109 of 327 Villela, Beverly Subject: FW: Opposition Letter to Zoning Application C14-2025-0089 From: Lorrie Bedell Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 10:01 PM To: Boudreaux, Marcelle < Cc: > < Subject: Opposition Letter to Zoning Application C14-2025-0089 ; District 8 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Lorraine and Kergin Bedell 1137 Lost Creek Blvd. Austin, TX 78746 September 17, 2025 Marcelle Boudreaux via email cc: Paige Ellis, City Council Woman Lost Creek Limited District Board of Directors Lost Creek Neighborhood Association President Dear Ms. Boudreaux, We are writing to oppose the application for zoning Case # C14-2025-0089 of Cityview 1120 and 1122 S. Cap. of Texas Hwy. Cityview's rezoning request, if approved, would cause a significant negative traffic impact on neighboring properties. The existing traffic at the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy is already congested and collision-prone, other residential developments (Milestone and Stratus) underway along Lost Creek Blvd are already going to add future traffic to the intersection, and the upcoming TxDOT 360 construction project will create additional traffic problems at the intersection. The Cityview proposal should not be considered without a comprehensive traffic study that considers all of the above factors. Any rezoning of 1120 and 1122 S. Cap. of Texas Hwy should allow for access only to S. Cap. of Texas Hwy, and have no access to Lost Creek Blvd. Lost Creek neighborhood is home to over 1200 single-family and condominium households. Despite this population, there are only three routes into and out of the neighborhood. Primary neighborhood access is through the intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy. The other two ways to access the neighborhood are via Barton Creek Blvd (4.5 miles and a 10 minute drive to the West) and a 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8110 of 327 route through small, winding residential streets through the Camelot neighborhood. The intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy is already problematic. Going out of the neighborhood during morning commuting time the traffic backs up for several turns of the light, and the westbound lanes spreading from one lane of traffic to three cause much confusion and last minute lane changes. Heavy traffic on S. Cap. of Texas Hwy both in the morning and late afternoon also prevents access to and coming out of the intersection. There have been numerous traffic collisions at the intersection, including multiple fatalities. The guard rail at the corner of 1120 S. Cap. of Texas Hwy has to be rebuilt frequently due to collisions. Currently, the cars accessing Cityview are there for commercial business. They are limited in number and flow in an opposite commuter direction from that of Lost Creek neighborhood. If Cityview were to change to residential use, that traffic would compound the congestion and problems already existing at the intersection. An additional complication at the intersection is the landscaped median along Lost Creek Blvd that prevents eastbound traffic left turns into Cityview, and cars frequently make illegal U-turns at Lost Creek Blvd and Wilson Heights Dr to double back into Cityview. The traffic at this problematic intersection is already looking at a sizable future increase from the Milestone and Stratus developments already in progress along Lost Creek Blvd. Milestone's Overlook at Westlake project is adding 49 homes on 36 acres. Stratus' Holden Hills development is much larger and is adding 74 single-family home lots and approximately 430 condominium units on 495 acres. Together, those two developments will add more than 550 residences of traffic to the already heavily-traveled Lost Creek Blvd. The prospect of adding another 475 Cityview residences of traffic to the bottlenecked intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy is undesirable and dangerous. The intersection also faces future congestion and hazard due to TxDOT's 360 project, which is running behind schedule but is planned to add an overpass at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy in the near future. For an example of traffic problems to expect when this project begins, one need only look at the current status of construction at Westlake Dr and N. Cap. of Texas Hwy. The construction has created more traffic backup, prevented access to cross streets, and forced traffic to travel more through residential streets. Cityview's properties will be directly in front of the TxDOT construction, and residents of Cityview's proposed plan will likely be exclusively funneled through Lost Creek Blvd during construction road closures. The current traffic backup and bottleneck from 7:00-9:30 am, the twice daily commuter congestion along S. Cap. of Texas Hwy, a history of collisions and fatalities, a 550 residence increase already in development, and the expected TxDOT construction project creates a confluence of problems already beleaguering the intersection at Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap of Texas Hwy. Cityview now requests to add an additional 475 residences right in the heart of this problem, and requests to do it without even a traffic impact analysis. Cityview should not be allowed to add 475 residences to the traffic at the intersection. Any rezoning considered should require that Cityview not have entrance or egress to Lost Creek Blvd and should include a comprehensive traffic study to ensure that Cityview's development would not negatively impact the flow of traffic through the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd and S. Cap. of Texas Hwy. Sincerely, Lorraine and Kergin Bedell CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8111 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Deborah Castro Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:12 PM Boudreaux, Marcelle; Villela, Beverly Chris Vetromile; Marrs; Bob Sweeney; Jackson; Marvin Hecker; Rosa Yupari; Victoria Lavi; ann mccormick; Ruth Anne Abraham; Gaylon finklea Hecker; Lorrie Bedell; James Lear; Sharon Lear; Gary Sertich; Tanya Emmons; Heeru Thadani; Rezoning the office buildings at the intersection of Lost Creek Blvd. and Hwy. 360 Megan ; Rachel ; District 8; Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hi Beverly, I’m writing to express my strong concerns and opposition to any proposed zoning changes at the City View location. The traffic in this area is already overwhelming, and the recent developments—Strattus and Milestone—have only made matters worse. We’ve already seen an increase in accidents and dangerously heavy traffic, and these issues will only intensify once those developments are fully occupied. This is not sustainable for our community. Additionally, I’m deeply concerned about the proposed building heights, especially the possibility of 10-story structures. Such scale is out of character with the surrounding area and will further strain infrastructure, viewsheds, and our neighborhood’s overall quality of life. As an advocate with Dark Sky International, I also want to highlight a major environmental and community concern. Our neighborhood was the first in the City of Austin to earn the prestigious title of “International Dark Skies Development of Distinction,” one of only seven neighborhoods in the entire United States to receive this recognition. We’ve worked hard— residents, community leaders, and even local office buildings—to meet and uphold the five lighting principles established by the Illuminating Engineering Society 1. Lighting should serve a clear purpose. 2. Lighting should be time-limited—used only when needed, avoiding 24/7 illumination, which studies show does not improve safety. 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8112 of 327 3. Use of appropriate fixtures that are fully shielded to reduce glare, light trespass, and scatter. 4. Preference for warmer color tones (yellow or gold hues) rather than harsh, bright white light. 5. Limiting light intensity to fixtures with outputs below or at 2700 Kelvins. Many developers market their lighting plans as “neighborhood friendly,” but in reality, they often fall short of these standards. In contrast, many of our residents use motion sensors or timers, which have proven to be both effective and compliant. One of the office buildings on Lost Creek Boulevard went so far as to completely remove a large spotlight on the top of their building at our request, helping us achieve and maintain our designation. Our efforts have been formally recognized by the City of Austin and Travis County, including annual proclamations during October’s Night Skies Month. This designation is a point of pride for our neighborhood and a model for others—including River Hills, which recently became the second neighborhood in Austin to receive the same honor. We ask that you respect the time, effort, and investment our community and Limited District have made in protecting our skies and quality of life. Please consider the lasting impact that these zoning changes and new developments could have—not just on traffic and infrastructure, but on the legacy and environment we’ve worked so hard to preserve. Thank you for your consideration, and I truly hope we can continue to work together as respectful and thoughtful neighbors. Best regards, Deborah Castro Lost Creek Dark Skies Travis County Friends of the Night Sky CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8113 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Kristen Dharamsi Monday, February 9, 2026 10:32 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kristen Dharamsi and I live at 6602 Torrey Pines Cove in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. My two children at Forest Trail Elementary have the maximum number of children allowed in their classrooms and the school is at max capacity. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Kristen Dharamsi 6602 Torrey Pines Cove 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8114 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Julia Keenan Monday, February 9, 2026 10:00 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Schools & Educational Impact Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, Julia Keenan here again, of 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 near the City View property. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed for another reason. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. As a former teacher in the Eanes District and Westlake High School, I am concerned about how this housing development will impact education. Valley View School, located across Loop 360 where the new students would logically attend, was shut down during the 2025-2026 school year (and was slated for sale) due to declining enrollment in the Eanes District. This housing project will focus on dwellings for families, which will dramatically increase enrollment in Eanes. Classroom size will undoubtedly be an issue that needs consideration when permitting an apartment development of this size. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you again, Julia Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 3 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8115 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Kendall Guinn Monday, February 9, 2026 9:58 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Safety Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Members of the Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kendall Guinn, and I live at 1509 Wilson Heights Drive in Austin, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This proposed development would add 475 apartments along Lost Creek Boulevard, a roadway that already feels over capacity. Daily traffic funnels through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360, where drivers regularly experience long backups and dangerous turning conditions. There was a fatal accident at this intersection within the past year, which underscores how serious the safety issues already are. Despite this, the application indicates that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required, even though the project is expected to increase traffic in the area by an estimated 30 to 40 percent. That level of added volume without a formal traffic study is deeply concerning. The application also fails to account for other major nearby developments, including the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus project (more than 600 homes and apartments), and the upcoming improvements by the Texas Department of Transportation to Loop 360. All of these projects will add traffic to the same limited road network. Our neighborhood has very few points of entry and exit, which is not only a congestion issue but also a serious concern for emergency response and potential wildfire evacuation. On a daily basis, simply waiting in line to get to Forest Trail Elementary adds roughly 30 extra minutes to my commute just to cross Loop 360. Traffic is already stretched beyond what the roads can reasonably handle. In addition, one of my children has sensory processing disorder, and prolonged nearby construction noise would be especially disruptive and distressing for them in our own home. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Commission to postpone this hearing until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed and reviewed. Our community deserves a thorough evaluation of the safety and infrastructure impacts before this case moves forward. 4 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8116 of 327 Thank you for your time and consideration, Kendall Guinn 1509 Wilson Heights Drive Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8117 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Maki Miller Monday, February 9, 2026 9:44 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Incomplete Educational Impact Statement Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Maria A Miller and I live at 1900 Big Canyon Dr in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. As a parent in Eanes ISD, I am already seeing the effects of overcrowding. The district has closed one elementary school, and Forest Trail Elementary is currently over capacity with full classrooms. Moving forward with this project without a complete Educational Impact Statement risks further straining an already impacted school system. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Maria A Miller 1900 Big Canyon Dr Austin TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 6 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8118 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Felipe Ribeiro Monday, February 9, 2026 9:35 AM Villela, Beverly Request to Postpone Hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 Due to Serious Safety Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Felipe Ribeiro, and I live at 1806 Big Canyon Dr, directly adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am formally requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This proposal would add 475 apartment units onto Lost Creek Boulevard, a road that already carries an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 vehicle trips per day and feeds into Loop 360 through a single, already overburdened left-turn lane. There was a fatal accident at this intersection within the past year. Despite this, the application claims that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required for a project that would clearly increase traffic by an estimated 30 to 40 percent. That assertion is irresponsible and unacceptable. Even more concerning, the application completely ignores other major developments already approved or underway in the same corridor, including the Marshall development with 48 homes, the Stratus development with more than 600 homes and apartments, and the ongoing TxDOT Loop 360 project. These projects compound each other. Treating this rezoning as if it exists in isolation is misleading and fails to reflect real-world conditions. Lost Creek has limited points of entry and exit. This is not just an inconvenience; it is a public safety issue. In the event of a wildfire or other emergency, evacuation capacity is already strained. Adding hundreds of new units without a comprehensive traffic and safety analysis puts current residents at real risk. As someone who lives here, I regularly experience very long delays trying to exit LC and have serious concerns about emergency vehicle access during peak traffic hours. These are not hypothetical issues. They are daily realities. At a minimum, this hearing should not proceed until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed and shared with the community. Anything less is a failure to meet basic standards of safety and due diligence. I strongly urge the Commission to postpone the February 17 hearing and require proper analysis before 7 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8119 of 327 moving forward. Sincerely, Felipe Ribeiro 1806 Big Canyon Dr CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 8 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8120 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Peter Emerson Monday, February 9, 2026 9:25 AM Villela, Beverly Request Postponement for Case C14-2025-0089 – Major Traffic Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Peter Emerson, and I reside at 2003 Trevino Drive, immediately adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed. The proposed project would introduce 475 additional apartments onto Lost Creek Boulevard, a corridor that already carries an estimated 8,000–10,000 vehicle trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. Tragically, a fatal accident occurred at this intersection within the past year. Despite this, the application indicates that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required—even though the project is expected to increase traffic volumes by roughly 30–40%. That conclusion raises serious safety concerns. In addition, the application does not account for other major developments already underway or planned in the area, including the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project. Our neighborhood has very limited points of access, which is not only a daily congestion issue but also a significant concern in the event of a wildfire or other emergency evacuation. With the traffic between Lost Creek Boulevard and Westlake Drive already being one of the most congested areas of the 360 loop, I find it irresponsible to proceed without further study. Our family already feels that the intersection of 360 and Lost Creek Boulevard is the most perilous part of our journey to and from our home. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that the Commission postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis can be completed and reviewed. Our community deserves the opportunity to evaluate this proposal with a clear understanding of its safety and traffic implications. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Peter Emerson 9 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8121 of 327 2003 Trevino Drive CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 10 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8122 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Rosa Yupari Monday, February 9, 2026 8:38 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Rosa Yupari and I live at 1313 Wilson Heights in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. This project proposes 475 multifamily units, which triggers a mandatory Educational Impact Statement for any project with 200+ multifamily units. The property is in the Eanes ISD, which is already facing budget challenges, lack of teachers, and space in the classrooms. The application’s own EIS form leaves the number of bedrooms per unit as “TBD.” We cannot confirm that a completed EIS has been submitted to or reviewed by Eanes ISD. If the EIS is incomplete, the hearing should not proceed. This is a regulatory requirement, not optional. There has already been a school closure and the existing elementary school and highschool create incredible traffic at the corner of wilson heights and lost creek blvd. My daughte gets picked up righ there at the Blvd and there are too many cars doingillegal uturns so I am not sure if that was taken into consideration. Please postpone until the Educational Impact Statement is completed and reviewed by Eanes ISD. Thank you, Rosa Yupari 1313 Wilson Heights CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 11 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8123 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Doug Keenan Monday, February 9, 2026 7:39 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Watershed & Environmental Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, Douglas Keenan here again, from 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746, adjacent to the property in Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed for a different reason. This site drains into the Eanes Creek Watershed and is adjacent to Barton Creek Watershed – waterways Austin has spent decades protecting. It is in the Hill Country Roadway Scenic Corridor, a wildlife protection area, and a dark skies community. Yet the application barely addresses any of this. A 90-foot, 475-unit building will massively increase impervious cover, stormwater runoff, and pollutant loading into protected waterways. I have seen what wildfires can do, as I have driven through Bastrop County many times in our travels here in Central Texas. The Bastrop County Complex fire was a conflagration that engulfed parts of Bastrop County, Texas, in September and October 2011. The wildfire was the costliest and most destructive wildfire in Texas history and among the costliest in U.S. history, destroying 1,696 structures and causing an estimated $350 million in insured property damage. An exceptional drought, accompanied by record-high temperatures, affected Texas for much of 2011. We are now in record drought conditions again right next to the Barton Creek Wilderness. We have to be careful for our safety, let alone the preservation of a Central Texas treasure of wildlife and natural beauty that is unique. Please postpone until an environmental review addressing watershed impact, the Hill Country Corridor, and wildlife habitat is completed. Thank you again, Douglas Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 12 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8124 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Lisa Almgren Sunday, February 8, 2026 6:49 PM Villela, Beverly Case C14-2025-0089 - Request for Traffic Impact Studies Prior to Rezoning Approval Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, I am writing to request that this rezoning request not be approved until thorough traffic impact studies are completed and reviewed. Lost Creek Boulevard already has a single signalized exit onto Capital of Texas Highway (Loop 360), and that intersection is heavily taxed by existing daily Lost Creek resident traffic. Congestion is routine, and there have been numerous accidents at this intersection, many caused by high-speed traffic on Loop 360. Adding a residential apartment complex with over 450 apartments will significantly increase daily vehicle traffic and further strain this intersection. Because of the congestion, many drivers routinely ignore the clearly posted “NO U-TURN” sign at Lost Creek Boulevard and Wilson Heights Drive. These illegal U-turns are used to avoid long southbound traffic lines on Capital of Texas Highway and create daily traffic hazards. With apartment residents attempting to access the complex just past the Lost Creek traffic light, these unsafe driving behaviors will only increase. When drivers do not make illegal U-turns, many instead turn left from Lost Creek Boulevard onto Wilson Heights Drive and then use private driveways to turn around. I experience this firsthand at my home at 1203 Wilson Heights Drive daily. I work from home and have personally observed and counted approximately 10–15 vehicles per day using my driveway as a turnaround point before driving back to Lost Creek Boulevard, only to turn right and enter the existing office complex or continue traveling south on Capital of Texas Highway. This behavior is not only disruptive but also raises serious safety and liability concerns for homeowners. This type of shortcutting behavior will only increase with apartment residents attempting to access their homes more quickly by avoiding the congested traffic light at Lost Creek Boulevard and Capital of Texas Highway. Wilson Heights is a residential street with many families and young, school-aged children, and drivers who disregard posted traffic signs and rules cannot be relied upon to operate safely on neighborhood streets. Approving this rezoning without comprehensive traffic impact studies places existing residents at risk and ignores real, observable problems that already occur daily. Our neighborhood has limited access 13 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8125 of 327 points, and increased congestion also raises concerns about emergency vehicle access and evacuation safety. I respectfully request that the Commission require full traffic impact studies before considering approval of this rezoning request. Our community deserves a careful, data-driven evaluation of safety, infrastructure, and quality-of-life impacts before such a significant change is made. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Lisa Almgren 1203 Wilson Heights Drive CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 14 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8126 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kerri Green Sunday, February 8, 2026 4:14 PM Villela, Beverly Kerri Baldwin Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic, Pedestrian & Safety Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Kerri Baldwin, and I live at 1343 Lost Creek Blvd, directly on Lost Creek Boulevard and immediately adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed until a comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and cumulative safety review are completed. This project would add approximately 475 apartment units to Lost Creek Boulevard, a residential roadway that already carries an estimated 8,000–10,000 vehicle trips per day and relies on a single left- turn lane at Loop 360 for neighborhood access. Lost Creek Boulevard is routinely used as a cut-through route between major arterials, resulting in traffic volumes and speeds far beyond what this roadway was designed to safely accommodate. I live on Lost Creek Boulevard and regularly observe vehicles traveling well above the posted 30 mph speed limit, frequently exceeding over 50 mph. These speeds are especially dangerous given that this is a residential corridor with homes fronting the street, school bus stops, cyclists, and pedestrians. Pedestrian infrastructure along Lost Creek Boulevard is extremely limited. There are only two marked crosswalks along the boulevard, and sidewalks are incomplete or nonexistent in many areas, forcing residents, children, and walkers to travel in the street or along narrow shoulders. Under current conditions, pedestrians already face significant safety risks, which would be substantially worsened by increased traffic volumes and congestion resulting from this development. Tragically, these safety concerns are not hypothetical. The intersection of Lost Creek Boulevard and Loop 360 experienced a fatal crash in April 2025, resulting in the loss of life and serious injuries. Many residents also remember a previous fatal crash prior to 2025 involving a Tesla and a man who lost his life along this same corridor. These incidents underscore the real consequences of excessive speed, congestion, and constrained roadway design in a residential setting. Despite this documented crash history, pedestrian vulnerability, and existing congestion, the rezoning application states that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required, even though the proposed development 15 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8127 of 327 would likely increase traffic volumes by 30–40 percent. The application also fails to account for cumulative impacts from other major projects already approved or underway in the same area, including: • The Marshall development (approximately 48 homes), • The Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and • The ongoing TxDOT Loop 360 improvement project. Lost Creek is a relatively small residential community with a limited number of homes located directly along Lost Creek Boulevard, yet it absorbs a disproportionate amount of non-local cut-through traffic. Many of the vehicles using the boulevard are not accessing neighborhood destinations, but are attempting to bypass congestion on Loop 360 and surrounding arterials, placing residents and pedestrians at increased risk. In addition to daily traffic and pedestrian safety issues, there are serious emergency access and wildfire evacuation concerns. Lost Creek has limited ingress and egress, and traffic routinely backs up through multiple signal cycles at Loop 360. During peak congestion or an emergency event, delays for fire trucks, ambulances, or evacuating residents could have life-threatening consequences. On multiple occasions, I have personally waited through several signal cycles just to exit the neighborhood, and I am deeply concerned about how emergency responders or evacuating residents would safely navigate Lost Creek Boulevard under heavier traffic conditions — particularly given current speeds, limited sidewalks, and minimal crossing infrastructure. I am not opposed to responsible growth, but growth must be data-driven and prioritize public safety, especially in a neighborhood with documented fatalities, limited pedestrian infrastructure, and constrained access. At a minimum, a full Traffic Impact Analysis and cumulative safety review should be completed and publicly reviewed before this case proceeds. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed until this essential analysis is conducted. Our community deserves a transparent and thorough evaluation of traffic, pedestrian safety, and emergency access impacts before any rezoning decision is made. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kerri Baldwin 1343 Lost Creek Blvd CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 16 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8128 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Deborah Castro Sunday, February 8, 2026 3:24 PM Villela, Beverly SUBJECT: Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Dark Skies & Compatibility Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Deborah Castro and I live at 5800 Sedgefield in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. Our neighborhood is a designated Dark Skies Development of Distinction (formerly known as International Dark Skies Development of Distinction) achieved in 2015. We are one of only two neighborhoods in Austin, one of three in the state of Texas and one of six in the United States who have successfully achieved this designation. This project involved not only the Lost Creek neighborhood but the surrounding office buildings. Many chose to discontinue bright outdoor lighting to help with our Dark Skies designation. The City View application includes no detailed outdoor lighting plan and no acknowledgment or mention of our Lost Creek Dark Skies Development of Distinction. This property is currently low-rise office space that blends into the Hill Country landscape. A 90-foot tower is fundamentally incompatible with the character of this area and would cast light pollution below, above and beyond the perimeter. The starry night sky is one of Lost Creek’s most precious assets and the City of Austin and Travis County honored our Dark Skies designation in 2021, 2022 and 2023 with the October Night Skies proclamations. Please postpone until the impact on our Dark Skies Development of Distinction and neighborhood compatibility has been studied and discussed with our neighborhood association and the residents. Thank you, Deborah Castro 5800 Sedgefield Dr. Austin, TX 78746 17 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8129 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: ReAnn Boss Sunday, February 8, 2026 3:10 PM Villela, Beverly Comments for Consideration Case Number C14-2025-0089 Public Hearing Information Sheet.pdf; Opposition to Rezoning.pdf Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Case Number C14-2025-0089 Contact: Beverly Villela Public Hearing: February 17, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission Please see the attached comments for consideration by the Commission. Respectfully, ReAnn Boss ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case Number: C14-2025-0089 Contact: Beverly Villela, 512-978-0740 Public Hearing: February 17, 2026 Zoning and Platting Commission Subject: Opposition to Proposed Redistricting and Development Access Dear Members of the Zoning Commission, I am writing to formally oppose the proposed redistricting and development plan as currently presented, due to significant safety, environmental, and property value concerns that directly impact my family and our home. Our residence is the first house in the neighborhood and sits at a particularly vulnerable location. We already experience frequent illegal U-turns, vehicles pulling into our driveway to turn around, and unsafe traffic behavior. Alarmingly, we have already had one vehicle leave the roadway and crash into our fence. These are not hypothetical risks—they are existing, documented safety issues that will only be intensified by additional development. 19 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8130 of 327 From a safety and community welfare standpoint, I strongly urge the Commission to consider the following: 1. Traffic Study Required A comprehensive traffic impact study must be conducted before any approval. The proposed development could introduce an estimated additional 1,000 vehicles with access to Lost Creek Boulevard. This increase would place our home—and more importantly, our young children—at heightened and unacceptable risk. 2. No Access to Lost Creek Boulevard The development should not be permitted access to Lost Creek Boulevard. All access should be limited to Highway 360 to prevent increased traffic, dangerous turning movements, and cut- through driving directly in front of our property. 3. Reduction in Number of Residences The density of the proposed development should be significantly reduced to lessen traffic volume, noise, and overall impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. Environmental Impact Study An environmental study is necessary to identify what substances, dust, chemicals, or pollutants may be released during construction. We have toddlers who spend time outdoors, and the potential health impacts during prolonged construction must be fully disclosed and mitigated. 5. Physical Safety Barrier If the development proceeds in any form, a minimum 10-foot concrete block wall should be required to separate our property from the development to provide a critical safety buffer, noise reduction, and privacy. 6. Loss of Property Value and Compensation The construction and resulting traffic will negatively impact our property value. The Commission should address what compensation or remediation will be provided to homeowners whose property values are diminished as a direct result of this development. We respectfully ask the Commission to prioritize the safety of existing residents—especially families with young children—over development convenience. As currently proposed, this redistricting creates serious and foreseeable risks that should not be ignored. Thank you for your time, consideration, and commitment to public safety and responsible planning. Sincerely, ReAnn Boss CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 20 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8131 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Julia Keenan Sunday, February 8, 2026 7:55 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Dark Skies & Compatibility Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, My name is Julia Keenan, and I live at 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 in the Lost Creek area. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing for Case C14-2025-0089 be postponed. The Dark Skies movement throughout Central Texas is important to us. Ever since we moved to Texas and Lost Creek in 1987, we have enjoyed not having street lights. This makes the skies themselves light up with the natural beauty of the moon and the stars when we go outside at night. It is a beauty that we and our neighbors cherish. We are also careful with our home’s lighting for safety using Dark Skies compliant fixturing. Our neighborhood is a dark skies community – one of the few left near Austin. A 90-foot building with 475 apartments would introduce massive light pollution from hundreds of windows, parking areas, and exterior lighting. The application includes no lighting plan and no acknowledgment that this is a dark skies area. This property is currently low-rise office space that blends into the Hill Country landscape. A 90-foot tower is fundamentally incompatible with the character of this area. Please postpone until the impact on our dark skies community and neighborhood compatibility has been studied. Thank you, Julia Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 22 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8132 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Doug Keenan Sunday, February 8, 2026 7:42 AM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns Categories: C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital Tx You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Beverly, My name is Douglas Keenan, and I live at 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746, next to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. That is not acceptable. The application also ignores the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. Even today we are experiencing heavy traffic at this intersection at a variety of times throughout the day, particularly early in the morning when I travel to get in my recreation at the gym or the City’s golf course facilities. It often takes multiple traffic light changes for me to get on the road instead of being stuck at the intersection of Loop 360 and Lost Creek Boulevard. Please postpone this hearing until a Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Douglas Keenan, 2001 Port Royal Dr., Austin, TX 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " . 23 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8133 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Jill Monday, February 9, 2026 2:34 PM Villela, Beverly please delay the process of case #: C-14-2025-0089 You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution board or commission's name: Zoning and platting commission. date of public hearing: Feb 17, 2026 at 6pm. case number: C14-2025-0089 contact person: Beverly Villela, 512-9780740 Dear Beverly: I live within the zoning project of "1120 1/2 south capital of Tx Hwy SB, 1120 outh capital of Tx Hwy Sb, 1122 South Capital of Tx Hwy SB, 1220 South Capital of Tx Hwy SB". I'd like to ask for a postpone the public hearing for the case of C14-2025-0089 for several reasons. 1. Environmental damage- Wilson Height Dr. and Thaddeus Cv are in the immediate contact with the Hill of life and the barton creek wilderness park. With all the construction, what will it be the cost for the environment and wild life? 2. traffic study? 3. school capacity? Are EANES ISD ready for such a big number of potential students? 4. Safety of the neighborhood? As a neighborhood, we are not ready for such construction. Please don't destroy such a beautiful neighborhood. Thank you! Sincerely, Jill CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 1 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8134 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Elton Monday, February 9, 2026 2:25 PM Villela, Beverly Postponement Request – Case C14-2025-0089 – Traffic Concerns You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is Richard Elton and I live at 6309 Indian Canyon Drive in Lost Creek, near the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am requesting that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already handles 8,000–10,000 car trips per day through the only entrance to the Lost Creek neighborhood from Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection this past year. The application says no Traffic Impact Analysis is needed – for a project that would increase traffic by 30–40%. As a long term Lost Creek resident (>30 years) I that position neither reasonable or acceptable. The application also ignores several other major development projects on-going or planned in the area. These include the Marshall development (48 homes), the Stratus development (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 project – all happening in the same area and on-going time-frame. Our neighborhood has limited roads in and out, which is also a serious wildfire evacuation concern. I have personally witnessed numerous crashes and near crashes at the Loop 360 entrance to Lost Creek as well as along Loop 360 just south of Lost Creek Blvd where commercial traffic merges from the existing building drives. This will only get worse with increased commercial and now, residential density. Please postpone this hearing until a thorough Traffic Impact Analysis is completed. Our community deserves that basic safety review. Thank you, Richard Elton 6309 Indian Canyon Dr Austin, TX. 78746 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 2 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8135 of 327 Villela, Beverly From: Sent: To: Subject: John Newton Monday, February 9, 2026 1:33 PM Villela, Beverly I respectfully ask that the hearing be postponed You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Zoning and Platting Commission, My name is John Newton, and I live at 1209 Wilson Heights, adjacent to the property proposed for rezoning under Case C14-2025-0089. I am writing to respectfully request that the February 17 hearing be postponed. This project would add approximately 475 apartments to Lost Creek Boulevard, which already carries an estimated 8,000–10,000 vehicle trips per day through a single left-turn lane at Loop 360. A fatality occurred at this intersection within the past year. Despite this, the application indicates that no Traffic Impact Analysis is required for a project that could increase traffic volume by an estimated 30–40%. That raises serious safety concerns. The application also does not account for other significant nearby developments, including the Marshall project (48 homes), the Stratus project (600+ homes and apartments), and the TxDOT Loop 360 improvements currently underway. Our neighborhood has limited points of entry and exit, which adds additional concern regarding emergency and wildfire evacuation capacity. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that the hearing be postponed until a full Traffic Impact Analysis is completed and reviewed. Our community deserves that basic level of safety evaluation before moving forward. Thank you for your consideration. John Newton 1209 Wilson Heights CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at " ". 5 02 C14-2025-0089 - 1120 and 1122 S Capital of Texas Highway; District 8136 of 327