06 SP-2023-0294C - 3 Men Movers; District 1 — original pdf

Backup

SITE PLAN REVIEW SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATION APPEAL ZONING & PLATTING COMMISSION DATE: June 18, 2024 AREA: 5.408 acres CASE: SP-2023-0294C PROJECT NAME: 3 Men Movers APPLICANT: 3 Men Movers AGENT: Hollis Scheffler, Westwood Professional Services ADDRESS OF SITE: 9989 E US 290 Hwy Sv Rd EB DISTRICT: 1 COUNTY: Travis WATERSHED: Gilleland Creek Suburban Watershed JURISDICTION: Full purpose EXISTING ZONING: CS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for limited warehousing and distribution. DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCES: Variance requests are as follows: 1. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-301 to allow driveway construction on slopes greater than 15%; 2. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302 to allow building and parking construction on slopes over 15%; 3. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut up to 12 feet; and 4. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill up to 15 feet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the variances, having found that the findings of fact have been met. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: Ryan Soutter PHONE: 974-1665 Ryan.Soutter@austintexas.gov CASE MANAGER: Christine Barton-Holmes christine.barton-holmes@austintexas.gov PHONE: 974-2788 ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA May 15, 2024 3 MEN MOVERS SP-2023-0294C COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: HOLLIS SCHEFFLER – WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LOCATION: 9989 E US 290 Hwy Service Road EB, Austin, TX 78744 COUNCIL DISTRICT: District #1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: Ryan Soutter, Environmental Review Specialist Senior, Development Services Department, (512) 974-1665, ryan.soutter@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: Gilleland Creek Watershed, Suburban, Desired Development Zone REQUEST: Variance requests are as follows: 1. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-301 to allow driveway construction on slopes greater than 15%; 2. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302 to allow building and parking construction on slopes over 15%; 3. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut up to 12 feet; and 4. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill up to 15 feet. Staff recommends these variances, having determined the findings of fact to have been met. • Terrace and vegetate steep slopes. • Provide enlarged parking lot islands (3) that are approximately 17 feet wide for improved tree growth. • Provide enhanced tree mitigation (5 additional trees). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONDITION: Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: 3 Men Movers Ordinance Standard: 25-8-301 Construction of a Roadway of Driveway Variance Request: Driveway construction on slopes greater than 15% A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege or the safety of property given to owners of other similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development; Yes Similarly situated properties with similar development type and subject to the same code requirements have received variances for grading in excess of four feet. These developments are all large developments located in the Desired Development Zone. Grading over four feet is necessary to create level finished-floor elevations and level loading docks and to maintain drives at minimal grades for maneuverability. Examples of similar projects include: Applied Materials Logistics Service Center, at 9614 US-290, Austin, TX 78724, (SP-2020-0321C), which was allowed cut to 12 feet for a 16-acre warehouse; Crossroads Logistics Center, at 8400 E Parmer Ln, Manor, TX 78653, (SP-2021-0015D), which was allowed cut to 14.3 feet and fill to 16.5 feet for three buildings totaling 11 acres of warehouse space; Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7, at 4800 Distribution Dr, Austin, TX 78744, (SP-2021-0072C), which was allowed fill to 17 feet for two four-acre warehouses; and Dalfen Industrial at 6106 Ross Rd, Del Valle, TX 78617, (SP-2020-0407D), which was allowed construction of a driveway on slopes with gradients exceeding 15 percent for two industrial buildings. The current project proposes one building on a 5.4-acre site. The total acreage of the building will be 1.7, with a truck loading dock on the south side of the building. The use of the building requires a uniform finished floor elevation similar to what is found in other industrial buildings. The building type, layout, and design features are based on the needs of the industrial building use, including shipping, and receiving. This layout is similar to other such facilities in the Austin Area. 2. The variance: a. Is not based on a condition caused by the method chosen by the applicant to develop the property, unless the development method provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; The building placement on the property was constrained by the location of steep slopes that traverse the site derived from previous use as a spoils site for road development. The development meets design guidelines for roadway construction, connections, parking areas, and drainage that any development on the site would require. Working around these considerations dictated the buildable area for the footprint of the building. Yes b. Is the minimum change necessary to avoid the deprivation of a privilege given to other property owners and to allow a reasonable use of the property; and Yes Yes Large, commercial warehouses are a reasonable use for this property, as it is located within the Desired Development Zone along a growing corridor. The variance is the minimum deviation necessary to properly situate a warehouse on this site. The proposed construction on slopes has been minimized to an extent that still provides appropriate areas for truck maneuverability and to allow for truck courts / loading dock areas to maintain a level surface between the truck trailers and the finished floor elevations of the buildings. c. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences; and The southern area of development with steep slopes has been terraced to enhance stability, and the storm water for the site is channeled through storm sewers to the water quality pond to reduce the effect of runoff erosion caused by the proposed impervious cover. 3. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes The variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. The project proposes two biofiltration ponds in a single basin designed in accordance with the City of Austin water quality regulations. The water quality ponds each provide 6,646.00 cubic feet of filtration storage and 4,882.50 cubic feet of sedimentation storage. The water quality facilities provide 8.6% more volume than the minimum required volume. No heritage trees will be impacted, and no environmentally sensitive Critical Water Quality Zones exist on site. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that: B. Additional Land Use Commission variance determinations for a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions): 1. The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; N/A N/A 2. 3. N/A The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: • Terrace and vegetate steep slopes. Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: 3 Men Movers Ordinance Standard: LDC 25-8-302 Construction of a Building or Parking Area Variance Request: Building and parking area on slopes greater than 15% A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege or the safety of property given to owners of other similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development; Yes Similarly situated properties with similar development type and subject to the same code requirements have received variances for grading in excess of four feet. These developments are all large developments located in the Desired Development Zone. Grading over four feet is necessary to create level finished-floor elevations and level loading docks and to maintain drives at minimal grades for maneuverability. Examples of similar projects include: Applied Materials Logistics Service Center, at 9614 US-290, Austin, TX 78724, (SP-2020-0321C), which was allowed cut to 12 feet for a 16-acre warehouse; Crossroads Logistics Center, at 8400 E Parmer Ln, Manor, TX 78653, (SP-2021-0015D), which was allowed cut to 14.3 feet and fill to 16.5 feet for three buildings totaling 11 acres of warehouse space; Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7, at 4800 Distribution Dr, Austin, TX 78744, (SP-2021-0072C), which was allowed fill to 17 feet for two four-acre warehouses; and Dalfen Industrial at 6106 Ross Rd, Del Valle, TX 78617, (SP-2020-0407D), which was allowed construction of a driveway on slopes with gradients exceeding 15 percent for two industrial buildings. The current project proposes one building on a 5.4-acre site. The total acreage of the building will be 1.7, with a truck loading dock on the south side of the building. The use of the building requires a uniform finished floor elevation similar to what is found in other industrial buildings. The building type, layout, and design features are based on the needs of the industrial building use, including shipping, and receiving. This layout is similar to other such facilities in the Austin Area. 2. The variance: a. Yes Is not based on a condition caused by the method chosen by the applicant to develop the property, unless the development method provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; The building placement on the property was constrained by the location of steep slopes that traverse the site derived from previous use as a spoils site for road development. The development meets design guidelines for roadway construction, connections, parking areas, and drainage that any development on the site would require. Working around these considerations dictated the buildable area for the footprint of the building. b. Is the minimum change necessary to avoid the deprivation of a privilege given to other property owners and to allow a reasonable use of the property; and Yes Yes Large, commercial warehouses are a reasonable use for this property, as it is located within the Desired Development Zone along a growing corridor. The variance is the minimum deviation necessary to properly situate a warehouse on this site. The proposed construction on slopes has been minimized to an extent that still provides appropriate areas for truck maneuverability and to allow for truck courts / loading dock areas to maintain a level surface between the truck trailers and the finished floor elevations of the buildings. c. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences; and The southern area of development with steep slopes has been terraced to enhance stability, and the storm water for the site is channeled through storm sewers to the water quality pond to reduce the effect of runoff erosion caused by the proposed impervious cover. 3. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes The variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. The project proposes two biofiltration ponds in a single basin designed in accordance with the City of Austin water quality regulations. The water quality ponds each provide 6,646.00 cubic feet of filtration storage and 4,882.50 cubic feet of sedimentation storage. The water quality facilities provide 8.6% more volume than the minimum required volume. No heritage trees will be impacted, and no environmentally sensitive Critical Water Quality Zones exist on site. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that: B. Additional Land Use Commission variance determinations for a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions): 1. The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; N/A N/A 2. 3. N/A The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: • Terrace and vegetate steep slopes. • Provide enlarged parking lot islands (3) that are approximately 17 feet wide for improved tree Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: 3 Men Movers Ordinance Standard: 25-8-341 Cut Requirements Variance Request: Cut up to 12 feet A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege or the safety of property given to owners of other similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development; Yes / No Similarly situated properties with similar development type and subject to the same code requirements have received variances for grading in excess of four feet. These developments are all large developments located in the Desired Development Zone. Grading over four feet is necessary to create level finished-floor elevations and level loading docks and to maintain drives at minimal grades for maneuverability. Examples of similar projects include: Applied Materials Logistics Service Center, at 9614 US-290, Austin, TX 78724, (SP-2020-0321C), which was allowed cut to 12 feet for a 16-acre warehouse; Crossroads Logistics Center, at 8400 E Parmer Ln, Manor, TX 78653, (SP-2021-0015D), which was allowed cut to 14.3 feet and fill to 16.5 feet for three buildings totaling 11 acres of warehouse space; Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7, at 4800 Distribution Dr, Austin, TX 78744, (SP-2021-0072C), which was allowed fill to 17 feet for two four-acre warehouses; and Dalfen Industrial at 6106 Ross Rd, Del Valle, TX 78617, (SP-2020-0407D), which was allowed construction of a driveway on slopes with gradients exceeding 15 percent for two industrial buildings. The current project proposes one building on a 5.4-acre site. The total acreage of the building will be 1.7, with a truck loading dock on the south side of the building. The use of the building requires a uniform finished floor elevation similar to what is found in other industrial buildings. The building type, layout, and design features are based on the needs of the industrial building use, including shipping, and receiving. This layout is similar to other such facilities in the Austin Area. 2. The variance: a. Is not based on a condition caused by the method chosen by the applicant to develop the property, unless the development method provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes / No Cut over 4 feet is necessary due to previous use as a spoils site for road development. The development meets design guidelines for roadway construction, connections, parking areas, and drainage that any development on the site would require. Working around these considerations dictated the buildable area for the footprint of the building. b. Is the minimum change necessary to avoid the deprivation of a privilege given to other property owners and to allow a reasonable use of the property; and Large, commercial warehouses are a reasonable use for this property, as it is located within the Desired Development Zone along a growing corridor. The variance is the minimum deviation necessary to properly situate a warehouse on this site. The cut and fill have been averaged to create a level area for development providing the least amount of deviation from existing contours. c. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences; and Yes / No Yes / No The southern area of development with steep slopes has been terraced to enhance stability, and the storm water for the site is channeled through storm sewers to the water quality pond to reduce the effect of runoff erosion caused by the proposed impervious cover. 3. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes / No The variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. The project proposes two biofiltration ponds in a single basin designed in accordance with the City of Austin water quality regulations. The water quality ponds each provide 6,646.00 cubic feet of filtration storage and 4,882.50 cubic feet of sedimentation storage. The water quality facilities provide 8.6% more volume than the minimum required volume. No heritage trees will be impacted, and no environmentally sensitive Critical Water Quality Zones exist on site. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that: B. Additional Land Use Commission variance determinations for a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions): 1. The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; N/A N/A 2. 3. N/A The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: • Terrace and vegetate steep slopes. • Provide enlarged parking lot islands (3) that are approximately 17 feet wide for improved tree Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: 3 Men Movers Ordinance Standard: 25-8-342 Fill Requirements Variance Request: Fill up to 15 feet A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege or the safety of property given to owners of other similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development; Yes Similarly situated properties with similar development type and subject to the same code requirements have received variances for grading in excess of four feet. These developments are all large developments located in the Desired Development Zone. Grading over four feet is necessary to create level finished-floor elevations and level loading docks and to maintain drives at minimal grades for maneuverability. Examples of similar projects include: Applied Materials Logistics Service Center, at 9614 US-290, Austin, TX 78724, (SP-2020-0321C), which was allowed cut to 12 feet for a 16-acre warehouse; Crossroads Logistics Center, at 8400 E Parmer Ln, Manor, TX 78653, (SP-2021-0015D), which was allowed cut to 14.3 feet and fill to 16.5 feet for three buildings totaling 11 acres of warehouse space; Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7, at 4800 Distribution Dr, Austin, TX 78744, (SP-2021-0072C), which was allowed fill to 17 feet for two four-acre warehouses; and Dalfen Industrial at 6106 Ross Rd, Del Valle, TX 78617, (SP-2020-0407D), which was allowed construction of a driveway on slopes with gradients exceeding 15 percent for two industrial buildings. The current project proposes one building on a 5.4-acre site. The total acreage of the building will be 1.7, with a truck loading dock on the south side of the building. The use of the building requires a uniform finished floor elevation similar to what is found in other industrial buildings. The building type, layout, and design features are based on the needs of the industrial building use, including shipping, and receiving. This layout is similar to other such facilities in the Austin Area. 2. The variance: a. Yes Is not based on a condition caused by the method chosen by the applicant to develop the property, unless the development method provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Fill over 4 feet is necessary due to the previous use as a spoils site for road development. The development meets design guidelines for roadway construction, connections, parking areas, and drainage that any development on the site would require. Working around these considerations dictated the buildable area for the footprint of the building. b. Is the minimum change necessary to avoid the deprivation of a privilege given to other property owners and to allow a reasonable use of the property; and Yes Yes Large, commercial warehouses are a reasonable use for this property, as it is located within the Desired Development Zone along a growing corridor. The variance is the minimum deviation necessary to properly situate a warehouse on this site. The cut and fill have been averaged to create a level area for development providing the least amount of deviation from existing contours. c. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences; and The southern area of development with steep slopes has been terraced to enhance stability, and the storm water for the site is channeled through storm sewers to the water quality pond to reduce the effect of runoff erosion caused by the proposed impervious cover. 3. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes The variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. The project proposes two biofiltration ponds in a single basin designed in accordance with the City of Austin water quality regulations. The water quality ponds each provide 6,646.00 cubic feet of filtration storage and 4,882.50 cubic feet of sedimentation storage. The water quality facilities provide 8.6% more volume than the minimum required volume. No heritage trees will be impacted, and no environmentally sensitive Critical Water Quality Zones exist on site. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that: B. Additional Land Use Commission variance determinations for a requirement of Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions): 1. The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; N/A N/A 2. 3. N/A The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: • Terrace and vegetate steep slopes. OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEER Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR 3 MEN MOVERS 9989 E US 290 HWY SVRD EB CITY OF AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TX oll Fre T e CITY OF AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 5.415 ACRES RELEASE OF THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A VERIFICATION OF ALL DATA, INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY AND ADEQUACY OF HIS/HER SUBMITTAL, WHETHER OR NOT THE APPLICATION IS REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY CITY ENGINEERS. WAIVERS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 690 SUR 54 SANDERS W H ACR 5.408 (DOC. NO.2022101147) FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION: PER FEMA FIRM PANEL NO. 48453C0480J, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS IN THE MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD, ZONE X WATERSHED STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE GILLELAND WATERSHED WHICH IS CLASSIFIED AS A SUBURBAN WATERSHED. THIS PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED ON THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE, TRANSITION, AND CONTRIBUTING ZONE ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND THE CITY OF AUSTIN. THIS SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED, CONSTRUCTED, AND MAINTAINED IN CONFORMATION WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AS OF THE PROJECT APPLICATION DATE. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NOTE: THIS NOTE IS BEING PLACED ON THE PLAN SET IN ABSENCE OF A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL STRATEGY WITH THE FULL UNDERSTANDING THAT, AT A MINIMUM OF 6 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT DIVISION. STANDARD DETAILS ARE NOT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE FURTHER RECOGNIZES THAT A REVIEW FEE, AS PRESCRIBED BY THE MOST CURRENT VERSION OF THE CITY'S FEE ORDINANCE, SHALL BE PAID EACH TIME A PLAN OR PLAN REVISION IS SUBMITTED TO RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT DIVISION FOR REVIEW. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN DEVELOPING FUTURE TRAFFIC CONTROL STRATEGIES. 1.1 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAFFIC ACCESS MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT. 1.2 NO LONG-TERM LANE CLOSURES WILL BE AUTHORIZED, UNLESS RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT DETERMINES THAT ADEQUATE ACCOMMODATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC IMPACT. 1.3 PROJECT SHOULD BE PHASED SO THAT UTILITY INSTALLATION MINIMALLY IMPACTS EXISTING OF TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS ONLY. APPROVAL BY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHAT ADDITIONAL APPROVALS MAY BE NECESSARY. 2. WATER QUALITY POND IS TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED 3. DETENTION FOR THIS SITE IS BEING PROVIDED ON-SITE. 4. NO STRUCTURE SHALL BE OCCUPIED UNTIL THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL AND DETENTION FACILITY HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED, INSPECTED, AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN. 5. PHASED PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION SITES GREATER THAN 25 ACRES ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW PHASING OF DISTURBANCE TAILORED TO THE SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS. ONLY ONE PORTION OF THE SITE MAY BE DISTURBED AT A TIME. SUBSEQUENT PHASES MAY NOT BE STARTED UNTIL EARLIER PHASES ARE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE AND EXPOSED SOILS ARE STABILIZED. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIVERSAL RECYCLING ORDINANCE IS MANDATORY FOR MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEXES, BUSINESSES AND OFFICE BUILDINGS. ANY RELOCATION OF ELECTRIC FACILITIES SHALL BE AT LANDOWNER'S/DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. 7. 8. DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES THAT REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT WITHIN THIS SITE PLAN, OR REVISIONS THEREOF, ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN STREET IMPACT FEE ORDINANCES, AS APPLICABLE, AND MUST BE PAID UPON COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING PERMIT PLAN REVIEW FOR EACH BUILDING. THE CITY SHALL START COLLECTING STREET IMPACT FEES WITH ALL BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED ON OR AFTER JUNE 21, 2022. IF AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) IS FOUND, CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA MUST STOP UNTIL A CITY OF AUSTIN UST CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR AND APPROVED. ANY UST REMOVAL WORK MUST BE CONDUCTED BY A UST CONTRACTOR THAT IS REGISTERED WITH THE TEXAS COMMISION ON ENIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ). CONTACT ELIZABETH SIMMONS AT ELIZABETH.SIMMONS@AUSTINTEXAS.GOV IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS [COA TITLE 6] 9. 10. A FEE IN LIEU OF PARKLAND DEDICATION AND PARK DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN PAID FOR 5,415 SQ FT OF INDUSTRIAL SPACE. 11. FOR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PLAN, SEE AGREEMENT FILED IN DOCUMENT NO. ________, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. REVISIONS/CORRECTIONS PREPARED BY Phone Toll Free (cid:11)(cid:24)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:12) (cid:23)(cid:27)(cid:24)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:22)(cid:20) (cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:19)(cid:20) (cid:49)(cid:17) (cid:48)o(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70) (cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:83)(cid:92)(cid:15) (cid:54)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:87)e (cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:19) (cid:11)(cid:27)(cid:27)(cid:27)(cid:12) (cid:28)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:24)(cid:20)(cid:24)(cid:19) (cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)n(cid:15) T(cid:59) (cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:24)(cid:28) westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-11756 TBPLS FIRM REGISTRATION NO. LS-10074301 PROJECT LOCATION TRAVIS MAPSCO COUNTY APPROVED FOR ACCEPTANCE VICINITY MAP U.I.R REVIEW STATUS SUBMITTAL DATE: XX/XX/XXXX U.I.R. #: AUSXXXXXXXXXXXX APPROVAL DATE: PROJECT ZONING: LAND STATUS DETERMINATION: PROJECT ADDRESS: SUBMITTAL DATE: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE INDUSTRIAL WASTE DATE CITY OF AUSTIN FIRE DEPARTMENT AUSTIN WATER UTILITY DEPARTMENT DATE DATE AUSTIN FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE DESIGN CODES 2021 EDITION OF INTERNATIONAL FIRE DESIGN CODE EDITION WITH CITY OF AUSTIN LOCAL AMENDMENTS FIRE FLOW DEMAND @ 20 PSI (GPM) INTENDED USE CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION BUILDING FIRE AREA (S.F.) AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE (IF APPLICABLE) REDUCED FIRE FLOW DEMAND @ 20 PSI FOR HAVING A SPRINKLER SYSTEM (GPM) (IF APPLICABLE) (75% REDUCTION) AFD FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST LOCATION HIGH-RISE ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE CODE 3,750 WAREHOUSE TYPE IIIA 72,277 NFPA 13 1,000 GPM NO NO AFD FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATE 01/14/2023 BENCH MARK LIST ( ( 2015 INTERNATIONAL WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE CODE (IWUIC) WITH CITY OF AUSTIN LOCAL AMENDMENTS. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE WUI PROXIMITY CLASS B IGNITION RESTRAINT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE HIGH PILED STORAGE WILL BE PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. Final plat must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date, if applicable. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and all required Building Permits and/or a notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. SP-2023-0294C DESIGN DRAWN DATE SHEET NO. 1 1 OF 48 (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:22) e (cid:87) (cid:76) (cid:88) (cid:54) (cid:15) (cid:92) (cid:83) (cid:91) (cid:40) (cid:70) (cid:68) (cid:83) o (cid:48) (cid:17) (cid:49) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:28) (cid:24) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:26) (cid:59) T (cid:15) n (cid:76) (cid:87) (cid:86) (cid:88) (cid:36) m o c . s p d o o w t s e w (cid:20) (cid:22) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:24) (cid:27) (cid:23) (cid:12) (cid:21) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:11) (cid:19) (cid:24) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:16) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:28) (cid:12) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:11) e n o h P 1 0 3 4 7 0 0 1 S L - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F S L P B T 6 5 7 1 1 F - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F E P B T . c n I , s e c i v r e S l a n o i s s e f o r P d o o w t s e W X T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A F O Y T I C B E D R V S Y W H 0 9 2 S U E 9 8 9 9 S R E V O M N E M 3 R E V O C NOTES: (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:22) e (cid:87) (cid:76) (cid:88) (cid:54) (cid:15) (cid:92) (cid:83) (cid:91) (cid:40) (cid:70) (cid:68) (cid:83) o (cid:48) (cid:17) (cid:49) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:28) (cid:24) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:26) (cid:59) T (cid:15) n (cid:76) (cid:87) (cid:86) (cid:88) (cid:36) m o c . s p d o o w t s e w (cid:20) (cid:22) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:24) (cid:27) (cid:23) (cid:12) (cid:21) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:11) (cid:19) (cid:24) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:16) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:28) (cid:12) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:11) e n o h P e oll Fre T 1 0 3 4 7 0 0 1 S L - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F S L P B T 6 5 7 1 1 F - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F E P B T . c n I , s e c i v r e S l a n o i s s e f o r P d o o w t s e W X T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A F O Y T I C B E D R V S Y W H 0 9 2 S U E 9 8 9 9 S R E V O M N E M 3 N A L P E T I S L L A R E V O PARKING PROVIDED ADA CAR BICYCLE LOADING SPACE 57 57 2 2 6 6 8 8 BUILDING BUILDING 1 TOTAL SP-2023-0294C DESIGN DRAWN DATE SHEET NO. 9 9 OF 48  (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:22) e (cid:87) (cid:76) (cid:88) (cid:54) (cid:15) (cid:92) (cid:83) (cid:91) (cid:40) (cid:70) (cid:68) (cid:83) o (cid:48) (cid:17) (cid:49) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:28) (cid:24) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:26) (cid:59) T (cid:15) n (cid:76) (cid:87) (cid:86) (cid:88) (cid:36) m o c . s p d o o w t s e w (cid:20) (cid:22) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:24) (cid:27) (cid:23) (cid:12) (cid:21) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:11) (cid:19) (cid:24) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:16) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:28) (cid:12) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:11) e n o h P e oll Fre T 1 0 3 4 7 0 0 1 S L - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F S L P B T 6 5 7 1 1 F - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F E P B T . c n I , s e c i v r e S l a n o i s s e f o r P d o o w t s e W X T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A F O Y T I C B E D R V S Y W H 0 9 2 S U E 9 8 9 9 S R E V O M N E M 3 N A L P G N I D A R G DESIGN DRAWN DATE SHEET NO. 17 17 OF 48 BENCH MARK LIST ( ( SP-2023-0294C  (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:22) e (cid:87) (cid:76) (cid:88) (cid:54) (cid:15) (cid:92) (cid:83) (cid:91) (cid:40) (cid:70) (cid:68) (cid:83) o (cid:48) (cid:17) (cid:49) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:28) (cid:24) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:26) (cid:59) T (cid:15) n (cid:76) (cid:87) (cid:86) (cid:88) (cid:36) m o c . s p d o o w t s e w (cid:20) (cid:22) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:24) (cid:27) (cid:23) (cid:12) (cid:21) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:11) (cid:19) (cid:24) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:16) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:28) (cid:12) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:11) e n o h P e oll Fre T 1 0 3 4 7 0 0 1 S L - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F S L P B T 6 5 7 1 1 F - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F E P B T . c n I , s e c i v r e S l a n o i s s e f o r P d o o w t s e W X T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A F O Y T I C B E D R V S Y W H 0 9 2 S U E 9 8 9 9 S R E V O M N E M 3 P A M L L I F T U C - BENCH MARK LIST ( ( SP-2023-0294C DESIGN DRAWN DATE SHEET NO. 18 18 OF 48  (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:22) e (cid:87) (cid:76) (cid:88) (cid:54) (cid:15) (cid:92) (cid:83) (cid:91) (cid:40) (cid:70) (cid:68) (cid:83) o (cid:48) (cid:17) (cid:49) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:28) (cid:24) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:26) (cid:59) T (cid:15) n (cid:76) (cid:87) (cid:86) (cid:88) (cid:36) m o c . s p d o o w t s e w (cid:20) (cid:22) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:24) (cid:27) (cid:23) (cid:12) (cid:21) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:11) (cid:19) (cid:24) (cid:20) (cid:24) (cid:16) (cid:26) (cid:22) (cid:28) (cid:12) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:11) e n o h P e oll Fre T 1 0 3 4 7 0 0 1 S L - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F S L P B T 6 5 7 1 1 F - . O N N O I T A R T S I G E R M R I F E P B T . c n I , s e c i v r e S l a n o i s s e f o r P d o o w t s e W X T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A F O Y T I C B E D R V S Y W H 0 9 2 S U E 9 8 9 9 S R E V O M N E M 3 P A M E P O L S SP-2023-0294C DESIGN DRAWN DATE SHEET NO. 19 19 OF 48