B-05 (C8-2020-0141 - Velocity Preliminary Plan; District 2).pdf — original pdf

Backup

SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8-2020-0141 COMMISSION DATE: April 19, 2022 SUBDIVISION NAME: Velocity Preliminary Plan ADDRESS: 3848 ½ E SH 71 Service Road APPLICANT: Market Place Real Estate Group (Karl Koebel) AGENT: Kimley-Horn and Associates (Justin Kramer) ZONING: LI-PDA AREA: 270 acres COUNTY: Travis NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: NA LOTS: 19 DISTRICT: 2 WATERSHED: Onion Creek JURISDICTION: Full Purpose SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be constructed along the proposed streets of Sky Park Commons, World Drive, Velocity Crossing, Spirit Drive, S FM 973 RD, SH71 EB, Toll 130, and Momentum Way VARIANCE: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The request is for the approval of the Velocity Preliminary Plan. This plan proposes 3 commercial- office lots; 2 commercial-retail lots, 7 multifamily lots, and 7 greenbelt lots on approximately 270 acres. The plan does not comply with the criteria for approval in LDC 25-4-84(B) and staff recommends disapproval for the reasons listed in the attached comment report. Staff recommends disapproval of the plan for the reasons listed in the comment report dated April 14, 2022, and attached as Exhibit C. CASE MANAGER: Amy Combs PHONE: 512-974-9002 E-mail: amy.combs@austintexas.gov ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Proposed preliminary plan Exhibit C: Comment report dated April 14, 2022 Exhibit A: Vicinity Map VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SH-71 AND SH-130 AUSTIN, TEXAS C8-2020-0141 VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 COVER SHEET GENERAL NOTES OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 6) PRELIMINARY PLAN (SHEET 2 OF 6) PRELIMINARY PLAN (SHEET 3 OF 6) PRELIMINARY PLAN (SHEET 4 OF 6) PRELIMINARY PLAN (SHEET 5 OF 6) PRELIMINARY PLAN (SHEET 6 OF 6) STREET CROSS-SECTIONS H W Y-71 F M-973 PROJECT LOCATION 0 3 X-1 T VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2,000' NORTH COA GRID: P15, P16 DECEMBER 2021 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING 270.93 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE SANTIAGO DEL VALLE LEAGUE ABSTRACT NUMBER 24, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN 385.684 ACRE TRACT, CONVEYED TO SH 71-130 HOLDINGS, LP., IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2014189945 OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS., AND ALL OF THAT CERTAIN 4.886 ACRE TRACT, CONVEYED TO SH 71-30 HOLDINGS, LP, IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2014189949, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. OWNER/DEVELOPER MARK BULMASH VC HOLDINGS QOZ, LP 1601 RIO GRANDE, SUITE 300 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 TEL: (512) 494-4224 SURVEYOR JOHN GREGORY MOSIER, RPLS, PG KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 601 NW LOOP 410, SUITE 250 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78216 TEL: (210) 321-3402 ENGINEER JUSTIN J, KRAMER, P.E. #122309 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC, 10814 JOLLYVILLE ROAD AVALLON IV, SUITE 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 TEL: (512) 418-1771 STATE OF TEXAS REGISTRATION NO. F-928 BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 1 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I C8-2020-0141 © T E E H S R E V O C N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 1 GENERAL NOTES: CONSTRUCTION. 1. THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY OF AUSTIN, FULL PURPOSE JURISDICTION. 2. WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE FOR VELOCITY CROSSING WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN. 3. THE WATER, RECLAIMED, AND WASTEWATER UTILITY SYSTEM SERVING THIS SUBDIVISION MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN UTILITY DESIGN CRITERIA. THE WATER, RECLAIMED, AND WASTEWATER UTILITY PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY AUSTIN WATER. ALL WATER, RECLAIMED, AND WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN. THE LANDOWNER MUST PAY THE CITY INSPECTION FEE WITH THE UTILITY 4. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DRAINAGE PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY. 5. ALL STREETS, DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORM SEWER LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY STANDARDS. 6. ELECTRIC SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY AUSTIN ENERGY. THE CITY OF AUSTIN. 7. NO OBJECTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BUILDINGS, FENCES, OR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE ALLOWED IN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY 8. PROPERTY OWNER AND/OR HIS/HER ASSIGNS SHALL PROVIDE FOR ACCESS TO THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS MAY BE NECESSARY AND SHALL NOT PROHIBIT ACCESS BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN FOR INSPECTION OR MAINTENANCE OF SAID EASEMENT. 9. ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND/OR HIS/HER ASSIGNS . 10. PARTICIPATION IN THE REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGH PAYMENT HAS BEEN CONDITIONALLY APPROVED FOR A PORTION OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR ON NOVEMBER 30, 2021 (DATE). THE RSMP CASE NUMBER FOR THIS CONDITIONAL APPROVAL IS ONI-RS-2021-0054R. PAYMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL OF PARTICIPATION WILL OCCUR WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR PUBLIC ROW AND WITH SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE REMAINING AREA. REFER TO THE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL LETTER FOR CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION. 11. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS, BUILT TO CITY OF AUSTIN STANDARDS, ARE REQUIRED ALONG SKY PARK COMMONS, WORLD DRIVE, VELOCITY CROSSING, SPIRIT DRIVE, S FM 973 RD, SH 71 EB, TOLL 130, MOMENTUM WAY AND ALL IDENTIFIED JOINT USE ACCESS EASEMENTS AS SHOWN BY A DOTTED LINE ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. THE SIDEWALKS ALONG S FM 973 RD, E SH 71 EB, AND TOLL 130 ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AT THE SITE PLAN PHASE. THE REQUIRED SIDEWALKS SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE LOT BEING OCCUPIED. FAILURE TO CONSTRUCT THE REQUIRED SIDEWALKS MAY RESULT IN THE WITHHOLDING OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY, BUILDING PERMITS, OR UTILITY CONNECTIONS BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR UTILITY COMPANY. 12. PRIOR TO THE RECORDING OF ANY FINAL PLAT OF ALL OR A PORTION OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN, FISCAL SECURITY SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC §25-1-112 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS: A. STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE, INCLUDING PAVING, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS, WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER COLLECTION, FOR THE FOLLOWING STREETS: VELOCITY CROSSING, SKY PARK COMMONS (OR NEW NAME FOR ROAD SINCE YOU CAN'T USE PARK), WORLD DRIVE, AND SPIRIT DRIVE FISCAL SECURITY IS NOT REQUIRED FOR STREETS NOT LISTED IN SUBSECTION (A). B. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY CONTROLS, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS (E.G., EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS, RESTORATION, CHANNEL WORK, PIPE IN EASEMENTS, DETENTION, WATER QUALITY PONDS, ETC.) AS DETERMINED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. THE RESTORATION COST ESTIMATE WILL BE BASED ON DISTURBED AREAS INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING STREETS: VELOCITY CROSSING, SKY PARK COMMONS (OR NEW NAME FOR ROAD SINCE YOU CAN'T USE PARK), WORLD DRIVE, AND SPIRIT DRIVE 13. EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION OF EACH LOT, INCLUDING SINGLE-FAMILY AND DUPLEX CONSTRUCTION, 14. WATER QUALITY CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITH IMPERVIOUS COVER IN EXCESS OF 20% OF THE NET SITE AREA OF EACH LOT, PURSUANT PURSUANT TO LDC AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA MANUAL. TO LDC AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA MANUAL. 15. NO LOT SHALL BE OCCUPIED UNTIL THE STRUCTURE IS CONNECTED TO THE CITY OF AUSTIN WATER, RECLAIMED, AND WASTEWATER UTILITY SYSTEM. 16. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE ONION CREEK AND COLORADO RIVER WATERSHEDS, WHICH ARE CLASSIFIED AS SUBURBAN WATERSHEDS. 17. THIS SITE IS NOT OVER THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE. 18. THE DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THIS PROJECT SHALL BE REVEGETATED AND ALL PERMANENT EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF FISCAL SURETY FOR THAT PHASE. TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED PRIOR TO THIS RELEASE TO ENSURE THAT SUBSEQUENT PHASE DISTURBED AREAS ARE ADEQUATELY COVERED. ANY AREA WITHIN THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE OF THE PROJECT WHICH IS NOT ADEQUATELY REVEGETATED SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF THE FINAL PHASE. 19. A PORTION OF THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FIRM MAP. NO. 48453C0620K AND #48453C06210L TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS DATED JANUARY 22, 2020. 20. THERE ARE NO KNOWN CEF'S ON OR WITHIN 150 FEET OF THIS PROPERTY. 21. ROADWAY DESIGN SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN DESIGN STANDARDS AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE DEDICATED AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT. 22. ALL ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CEF BUFFERS MUST COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE AND CRITERIA. THE NATURAL VEGETATIVE COVER MUST BE RETAINED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT. PRACTICABLE; CONSTRUCTION IS PROHIBITED; AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL OR IRRIGATION IS PROHIBITED. 23. THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA MANUAL (ECM) SECTIONS 2.4.1.D AND 2.4.2.C STATE, "IN AREAS WHERE UTILITY LINES ARE PRESENT OR PROPOSED ONLY TREES FROM THE UTILITY COMPATIBLE SHADE TREES LIST (SEE APPENDIX F) SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN....B) 30 TO 40 LATERAL FEET FROM ANY OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION CONDUCTOR, UNLESS MORE RESTRICTIVE DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED...VARIATIONS TO THESE PLANTING DISTANCES AND SPECIES MAY BE MADE ONLY WITH THE EXPLICIT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF AUSTIN ENERGY OR THE AFFECTED UTILITY OWNER 24. PARKLAND REQUIREMENTS WILL BE SATISFIED AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN. 25. WITHIN A SIGHT LINE EASEMENT ANY OBSTRUCTION OF SIGHT LINE BY VEGETATION, FENCING, EARTHWORK, BUILDINGS, SIGNS OR ANY OTHER OBJECT WHICH IS DETERMINED TO CAUSE A TRAFFIC HAZARD IS PROHIBITED AND MAY BE REMOVED BY ORDER OF THE TRAVIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS TO MAINTAIN AN UNOBSTRUCTED VIEW CORRIDOR WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUCH EASEMENT AT ALL TIMES. 26. APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS WHERE PROPOSED ROADWAYS OR UTILITIES CROSS THEIR EXISTING EASEMENTS. A REVISION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE EVENT THAT THE UTILITY COMPANIES DO NOT APPROVE OF THE 27. LOTS LOCATED WITHIN FLOODPLAIN IN BLOCKS D, E, G, H, AND I TO BE MASS GRADED AND REMOVED FROM FLOODPLAIN AT TIME OF SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED DESIGNS. PLANS. REFERENCE EXHIBIT - N FOR ROUGH MASS GRADING. 28. EACH LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL HAVE SEPARATE SEWER TAPS, SEPARATE WATER METERS, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE PRIVATE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE POSITIONED OR LOCATED IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT CROSS LOT LINES 29. A PERSON WHO SEEKS TO CONVEY A LOT CONTAINING A RESTRICTED PIPELINE AREA SHALL, BEFORE TITLE IS TRANSFERRED, DELIVER TO THE PROPOSED GRANTEE A DOCUMENT DESCRIBING THE RESTRICTED PIPELINE AREA, THE LIMITATIONS ON ITS DEVELOPMENT, AND THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PIPELINE OWNER OR OPERATOR. 30. WITHIN A CEF BUFFER THE NATURAL VEGETATIVE COVER MUST BE RETAINED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE; CONSTRUCTION IS PROHIBITED; AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL OR IRRIGATION IS PROHIBITED. DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [LDC 25-8-281] BLOCK LOT LOT AREA (AC) B C D E F G H I 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 1 2 10.59 22.08 0.25 16.38 1.47 14.52 79.05 12.60 1.47 26.38 0.75 15.71 7.88 14.25 11.07 2.62 3.48 3.55 2.02 RIGHT-OF-WAY 24.38 I, JUSTIN J. KRAMER, AM AUTHORIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS TO PRACTICE THE PROFESSION OF ENGINEERING AND HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS FEASIBLE FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT AND COMPLIES WITH THE ENGINEERING RELATED PORTIONS OF TITLE 25 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I, JOHN G. MOSIER, AM AUTHORIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS TO PRACTICE THE PROFESSION OF SURVEYING AND HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE SURVEYING RELATED PORTIONS OF TITLE 25 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, AND WAS PREPARE FROM AN ACTUAL ON THE GROUND SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION. CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA TANGENT C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 1043.35' 367.80' N12°39'43"W 365.90' 20°11'53" 185.83' 12.50' 19.28' N15°35'04"W 17.42' 88°21'22" 12.15' 2100.00' 389.33' S37°20'59"W 388.78' 10°37'21" 195.23' 1345.00' 126.67' S50°01'29"E 126.62' 5°23'45" 1345.00' 126.67' S55°25'14"E 126.62' 5°23'45" 63.38' 63.38' 26189.53' 1012.01' N23°43'13"E 1011.95' 2°12'50" 506.07' LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 376.45 N17°19'47.68"E 150.03 N5°28'47.68"E 94.73 N22°13'12.32"W 70.54 N51°08'12.32"W 83.54 N13°56'12.32"W 136.69 N0°59'12.32"W 133.61 N9°29'12.32"W 150.69 N25°14'12.32"W 134.78 N3°14'47.68"E 99.95 N24°01'47.68"E 119.69 N54°08'47.68"E 128.33 N74°09'47.68"E 128.28 S85°24'12.32"E 291.29 N65°34'50.64"W 66.75 N32°13'30.26"W 148.74 N12°05'37.70"E 390.57 N34°02'31.38"E 256.97 S65°23'28.51"E 141.58 S79°17'37.18"E 114.98 N87°16'19.59"E 88.08 N79°20'55.94"E 313.32 S89°31'00.66"E 130.91 S85°15'40.08"E 161.06 S81°34'54.85"E 147.55 S77°42'13.61"E 134.32 S80°36'03.13"E 180.92 N23°06'12.35"E © S E T O N L A R E N E G N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 2 BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 2 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ TOTAL NO. OF LOTS EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ NO. OF BLOCKS: 8 TOTAL NO. OF LOTS: 19 CASE MANAGER: TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF STREETS: 14,332 _____________________________________________ I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I AMY COMBS, FOR: DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. M M O C E SH 71 EB (VARIABLE WIDTH) E R T D D EE WW EE D EE WW T T W T W U W T F WW CBL T T C B L T T F F WW W WW M M O WW C T F COMM COMM EE COMM WW COMM COMM WW COMM COMM WW COMM COMM T WW COMM WW T T C T B L T T T C B T T L W U WW F LOT 1, BLOCK A VELOCITY CROSSING GROCERY/RETAIL DOC# 201600260 Y A W M U T N E M O M ) . . W O R . ' 3 7 ( TRAVIS COUNTY TRUSTEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 24 DEL VALLE S 128.38 ACRES C B L T F W SPIRIT DRIVE (96' R.O.W.) WW C B L F W C B L WW F F C B L WW BLOCK B 1 10.59 ACRES C OLO R A D O RIVE R W ATE R S H E D O NIO N C R EEK W ATE R S H E D PLATTED, NOT PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN LOT 2B, BLOCK A DOC# 202100273 1 22.08 ACRES BLOCK C WORLD DRIVE (73.0' R.O.W.) 1 1.47 ACRES 2 14.52 ACRES BLOCK E I G N S S O R C Y T I C O L E V ) . . . W O R ' 0 . 0 9 ( VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN 00 200' 400' GRAPHIC SCALE 200' E SH 71 EB (VARIABLE WIDTH) S N O M M O C K R A P Y K S ) . . W O R . ' 0 . 3 7 ( 1 16.38 ACRES BLOCK D 1 3.55 ACRES BLOCK I S P I R I T D R I V E 3 . 0 ' R . O . W . ) 7 ( 1 3.48 ACRES WORLD DRIVE (73.0' R.O.W.) B L O C K H 2 2.02 ACRES ( V A R I A B L E T O L L 1 3 0 W I D T H ) D R 3 7 9 M F S ) H T D I W E L B A I R A V ( C B L WW F U C B L F U U W C B L F C B L W U W C B L F C B L C B L F 1 11.07 ACRES BLOCK G S E R C 2 2 A 2 . 6 2 0.25 ACRES PHASE 3 2 0.75 ACRES S K Y P A ( 7 R 3 K . 0 ' C R . O O . M W . ) M O N S 3 15.71 ACRES G S I N S O R Y C 3 . 0' R . O . W .) C I T ( 7 O L E V 4 12.60 ACRES BLOCK E 1 26.38 ACRES 1 E S A H P 2 E S A H P BLOCK F PLATTED, NOT PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN LOT 1 VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY CENTER DOC# 201600296 4 7.88 ACRES BLOCK F 5 14.27 ACRES 5 1.47 ACRES ) . G N I S S O R C Y T I C O L E V W . O . R 0' . 3 7 ( AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 24 DEL VALLE S (1-D-1) 124.06 ACRES 3 79.06 ACRES KEVIN & DEBORAH ROLLINS DOCUMENT NO. 2002179240 40.62 ACRES CARR FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD DOCUMENT NO. 2009092279 19.99 ACRES TRAVIS COUNTY DOCUMENT NO. 2008135595 87.02 ACRES © I Y R A N M I L E R P L L A R E V O N A L P LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 3 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT KEVIN & DEBORAH ROLLINS DOCUMENT NO. 2002244156 84.14 ACRES Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 3 C8-2020-0141 COMM WW COMM COMM COMM COMM T COMM COMM COMM WW REFERENCE SHEET 10 FOR PUBLIC STREET CROSS SECTIONS E SH 71 EB (VARIABLE WIDTH) 1 1.47 ACRES ' 1 4 . 3 7 4 I G N S S O R C Y T C O L E V I ) . . W O R . ' 0 . 0 9 ( R = 6 4 0 . 0 0 ' 1 16.38 ACRES BLOCK D 1 ' 2 . 0 7 3 S N O M M O C K R A P Y K S ) . . W O R . ' 0 . 3 7 ( ' 9 5 . 4 1 0 1 5 T E E H S E E S : E N I L H C T A M R = 7 6 0 . 0 0 ' 4 9 5 . 0 0 ' R = R = 3 3 6 . 5 0 ' 6 6 6.4 6'16.4 '16.4 '16.4 6' 1 1 2 5 . 2 0 ' 5 6 . 3 5 ' 19.64' 7' 1 . 6 7 7 19.63' 6' 2 . 5 0 4 6' 4 . 5 0 4 M A T C H L I N E : S E E S 2 0.25 ACRES 1 22.08 ACRES BLOCK C H E E T 6 6' 2 . 5 0 4 6 8 . 8 0 ' 9 9 5 . 0 6 ' 1 ' 7 . 7 4 7 1 3.48 ACRES BLOCK H 518.38' 1 11.07 ACRES BLOCK G 2 14.52 ACRES BLOCK E 2 5 . 0 0 ' 5 R = 1 3.55 ACRES BLOCK I R = 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' 2 2.02 ACRES 2 3 4 . 5 3 ' 102.05' R = 1 0 2 0 . 0 0 ' MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 7 2 14.52 ACRES BLOCK E ' 0 0 . 0 2 5 = R VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN 00 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN ( V A R I T O L L A B L E W I 1 3 0 D T H ) 3 79.05 ACRES © BENCHMARKS 50.0' PIPELINE ESMT VOL. 12054, PG. 239 BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 4 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. N A L P Y R A N M I L E R P I ) 6 F O 1 T E E H S ( I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 4 C8-2020-0141 WW CBL CBL F W WW M M O C WW T F COMM WW COMM COMM COMM COMM WW EE COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM WW COMM COMM COMM COMM WW COMM COMM COMM COMM T COMM WW © COMM M M O C M M O C T T W T U W W CBL T F T T C B L T T C B L T T PLATTED, NOT PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN Y A W M U T N E M O M ) . . W O R . ' 3 7 ( R E V I R O D A R O L O C D E H S R E T A W K E E R C N O I N O D E H S R E T A W LOT 1, BLOCK A VELOCITY CROSSING GROCERY/RETAIL DOC# 201600260 LOT 2B, BLOCK A DOC# 202100273 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 6 VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN 00 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN S N O M M O C K R A P Y K S 4 T E E H S E E S : E N I L H C T A M BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 5 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. N A L P Y R A N M I L E R P I ) 6 F O 2 T E E H S ( I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 5 C8-2020-0141 SPIRIT DRIVE (96' R.O.W.) MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 5 SPIRIT DRIVE (96' R.O.W.) RIVER W ATERSH ED C REEK C OLO RAD O W ATERSH ED O NIO N BLOCK B Y A W M U T N E M O M ) . . W O R . ' 0 . 3 7 ( ' 0 8 . 6 3 5 1 22.08 ACRES 3 E S A H P BLOCK C 1 10.59 ACRES C B L 166.03' W O R L D D R I V E ( 7 3 . 0 ' R . O . W . ) R=5 0 0.0 0 ' R = 5 0 0 . 0 0 ' 3 0 1 . 6 4 ' WORLD DRIVE (73.0' R.O.W.) 1580.52' 1 E S A H P 2 E S A H P 1 26.38 ACRES BLOCK F MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 9 C B L C B L C B L C B L I D R 3 7 9 M F S ) H T D W E L B A I R A V ( C B L C B L C B L C B L C B L 00 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN M A T C H L I N E : S E E S H E E T 4 R = 5 0 0 . 0 0 ' M A T C H L I N E : S E E S H E E T 7 4 7.88 ACRES BLOCK F © N A L P Y R A N M I L E R P I ) 6 F O 3 T E E H S ( I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 6 BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 6 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. C8-2020-0141 VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN 00 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN 2 14.52 ACRES BLOCK E 2 0.25 ACRES 1 22.08 ACRES BLOCK C R = 3 3 6 . 5 0 ' 7' 1 . 6 7 7 4 9 5 R = MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 4 1 11.07 ACRES BLOCK G ' 0 0 . 0 2 5 = R S E R C 2 2 A 2 . 6 G S I N S O R Y C 0 . 0' R . O . W .) C I T ( 9 O L E V 3 79.05 ACRES BLOCK E R = 5 0 0 . 0 0 ' M A T C H L I N E : S E E S H E E T 6 4 7.88 ACRES BLOCK F CWQZ 4 7.88 ACRES 0 ' = 5 0 0 . 0 R CURRENT 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY TO BE REPLACED AS SHOWN HEREON 366.30' 2 0.75 ACRES 3 15.71 ACRES G S I N S O R Y C 3 . 0' R . O . W .) C I T ( 7 O L E V 9 9 5 . 0 6 ' S K Y P A ( 7 R 3 K . 0 ' C R . O O . M W . ) M O N S 3' 7 . 2 1 9 4 12.60 ACRES BLOCK E © N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I ) 6 F O 4 T E E H S ( I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M I L E R P I 7 C8-2020-0141 BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 7 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 8 0 ' = 5 0 0 . 0 R MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 7 12.60 ACRES BLOCK E 4 12.60 ACRES BLOCK E DRAINAGE EASEMENT CURRENT 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY TO BE REPLACED AS SHOWN HEREON 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 366.30' 0' 0.0 0 5 = R 5 1.47 ACRES BLOCK E CURRENT 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY TO BE REPLACED AS SHOWN HEREON KEVIN & DEBORAH ROLLINS DOCUMENT NO. 2002179240 40.62 ACRES 9' 1 . 4 5 4 9 T E E H S E E S : E N I L H C T A M 3 79.06 ACRES KEVIN & DEBORAH ROLLINS DOCUMENT NO. 2002244156 84.14 ACRES VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN 00 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN TRAVIS COUNTY DOCUMENT NO. 2008135595 87.02 ACRES © BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 8 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I ) 6 F O 5 T E E H S ( I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M I L E R P I 8 C8-2020-0141 126.67' 126.67' 966.58' MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET 6 966.58' 8' 3 . 2 0 2 4 7.88 ACRES BLOCK F LOT 1 VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY CENTER DOC# 201600296 BLOCK F 4' 2 . 4 3 0 ' R = 5 0 0 . 0 PLATTED, NOT PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN 6' 1 . 1 5 0 1 5 14.27 ACRES AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 24 DEL VALLE S (1-D-1) 124.06 ACRES 560.88' VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN 00 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 100' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT LINE EX. RIGHT OF WAY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE PR. SIDEWALK STREET CENTERLINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE FULLY DEVELOPED 100-YR FLOODPLAIN 366.30' 5 1.47 ACRES BLOCK E 0' 0.0 0 5 = R 9' 1 . 4 5 4 8 T E E H S E E S : E N I L H C T A M ) . . G N I S S O R C Y T I C O L E V W O . R 0' . 3 7 ( BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 9 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: _____________________________________________ KEVIN & DEBORAH ROLLINS DOCUMENT NO. 2002179240 40.62 ACRES AMY COMBS, FOR: DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. C8-2020-0141 © N A L P Y R A N M I L E R P I ) 6 F O 6 T E E H S ( I Y T C O L E V I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 9 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT MOMENTUM WAY (73' R.O.W.) 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY 34.0' FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB SKY PARK COMMONS (73' R.O.W.) 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY 34.0' FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB VELOCITY PRELIMINARY PLAN WORLD DRIVE (73' R.O.W.) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC AND TELECOM OPTION 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY 34.0' FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB ℄ 7.0' SIDEWALK 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' BIKE LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 11.3' TWO-WAY TURN LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' BIKE LANE 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' SIDEWALK 7.0' SIDEWALK 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' BIKE LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 11.3' TWO-WAY TURN LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' BIKE LANE 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' SIDEWALK 7.0' SIDEWALK 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' BIKE LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 11.3' TWO-WAY TURN LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' BIKE LANE 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' SIDEWALK 3.0' BUFFER 3.0' BUFFER 1.0' 3.0' BUFFER 3.0' BUFFER 1.0' 3.0' BUFFER 3.0' BUFFER 1.0' 13.0' 13.5' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 6.0' 13.0' 13.5' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 6.0' 13.0' 13.5' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 6.0' GAS WASTEWATER STORM WATER RECLAIMED WATER GAS WASTEWATER STORM WATER RECLAIMED WATER ELECTRIC AND TELECOM DUCT BANKS ELECTRIC AND TELECOM DUCT BANKS GAS STORM WATER WASTEWATER RECLAIMED WATER ELECTRIC AND TELECOM DUCT BANKS OPTION VELOCITY CROSSING (73' R.O.W.) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC AND TELECOM 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY 34.0' FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT SPIRIT DRIVE (73' R.O.W.) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC AND TELECOM 73.0' RIGHT OF WAY 34.0' FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT ℄ ℄ ℄ ℄ 7.0' SIDEWALK 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' BIKE LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 11.3' TWO-WAY TURN LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' BIKE LANE 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' SIDEWALK 7.0' SIDEWALK 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' BIKE LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 11.3' TWO-WAY TURN LANE 11.3' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' BIKE LANE 9.5' LANDSCAPE/ FURNITURE 7.0' SIDEWALK 3.0' BUFFER 3.0' BUFFER 3.0' BUFFER 3.0' BUFFER 13.0' 13.5' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 13.0' 13.5' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' GAS GAS STORM WATER STORM WATER WASTEWATER RECLAIMED WATER WASTEWATER RECLAIMED WATER 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION, TELECOMMUNICATION, AND FIBER EASEMENT VELOCITY CROSSING (90' R.O.W.) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC AND TELECOM 90.0' RIGHT OF WAY 36.0' FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB ℄ 8.0' LANDSCAPE 8.0' BIKE LANE 12.5' TRAVEL LANE 12.5' TRAVEL LANE 8.0' BIKE LANE 8.0' LANDSCAPE 11.0' TWO-WAY TURN LANE 7.0' SIDEWALK 4.0' BUFFER 4.0' BUFFER 7.0' SIDEWALK 19.0' 16.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' GAS STORM WATER WASTEWATER RECLAIMED WATER BENCHMARKS BENCHMARKS: TBM #1 TBM #3 "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 107.93' FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =452.68 FEET (AS SHOWN) "(" SET ON HEADWALL LOCATED 1,107.52'' FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK "A", ELEVATION =439.44 FEET (AS SHOWN) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHEET _____ OF _____ 26 10 FILE NUMBER _______________ APPLICATION DATE _______________ C8-2020-0141 10/14/2020 APPROVED BY LAND USE COMMISSION ON _______________ EXPIRATION DATE LDC 25-4-62 _______________ CASE MANAGER: AMY COMBS, FOR: _____________________________________________ DENISE LUCAS, DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Final plats must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date. Subsequent Site Plans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and require Building Permits or notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also be approved prior to the Project Expiration Date. NOTE: 1. THE PROPOSED WATER, RECLAIMED WATER, AND WASTEWATER ALIGNMENT AND SIZING SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY AUSTIN WATER. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON CROSS SECTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY AUSTIN WATER. 2. CROSS-SECTIONS PROVIDED HEREON PREVIOUSLY COORDINATED WITH ATD, SUMMER 2020 © T E E R T S I S N O T C E S S S O R C - I N T S U A F O Y T C I S A X E T , Y T N U O C S V A R T I I Y T C O L E V N A L P Y R A N M L E R P I I 10 C8-2020-0141 CITY OF AUSTIN –DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVISION #: CASE MANAGER: C8-2020-0141 00 UPDATE: Amy Combs PHONE #: U1 (512) 974-2786 PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: Velocity Preliminary Plan 3848-1/2 E SH 71 SVRD EB SUBMITTAL DATE: April 4, 2022 FINAL REPORT DATE: April 14, 2022 STAFF REPORT: This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent subdivision application submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated submittal. The subdivision application will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. If you have any questions, concerns or if you require additional information about this report, please contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by using the contact information listed for each reviewer in this report. Any change to the plan/plat shall not cause noncompliance with any applicable code or criteria. In addition, any change to the plat may trigger new comments. UPDATE DEADLINE INFORMATION (LDC 25-4-56; 25-4-82): All comments must be addressed by filing an updated submittal prior to the update deadline of April 3, 2022. Otherwise, the application will expire. If this date falls on a weekend or City of Austin holiday, the next City of Austin workday will be the deadline. Extension of Review Period, Extension of Update Deadline and Tolling of Application Period do not apply to applications for preliminary plan, plat or subdivision construction plans (LDC 25-1-88; 25-1-89; 25-1- 90). REVIEWERS: Planner 1: Chima Onyia 911 Addressing: Jorge Perdomo ATD Engineering: Amber Mitchell Environmental: Pamela Abee-Taulli Regional Stormwater Management: Emily Booth Subdivision: Amy Combs 911 Addressing Review - Jorge Perdomo - 512-974-1620 AD1. Not Cleared. SKY PARK COMMONS – Park is on the do not use list NOTE1: Use of the COMMONS street type should be utilized in a high-density area surrounded by grassy knolls or grassy areas as stated in street name reservation standards §25-4-155 ATD Engineering Review - Amber Hutchens - 512-974-5646 ATD1. On preliminary plans, provide a plat note stating that streets will be constructed to City of Austin standards and dedicated as public right-of-way with the final plat. LDC 25-6-171(a). Update Note 22 for this purpose. U1: Comment addressed. ATD2. Block lengths may not exceed 1200 feet in length. LDC 25-4-153. Revise the plat to provide for the required block length for Blocks C, D, and E, or submit a waiver for ATD to review. U1: Response noted; waiver fee has been added in AMANDA and can be paid in Austin Build + Connect. Waiver approval memo will be issued as soon as the fee is paid. Add a note the General Notes section identifying the waiver approval specifying code and blocks. ATD3. Provide the following plat note: "Public sidewalks, built to City of Austin standards, are required along Sky Park Commons, World Drive, Velocity Crossing, Spirit Drive, S FM 973 RD, SH 71 EB, Toll 130, Momentum Way and all identified Joint Use Access Easements as shown by a dotted line on the face of the plat. The sidewalks along S FM 973 RD, E SH 71 EB, and Toll 130 are subject to the approval of the Texas Department of Transportation at the site plan phase. The required sidewalks shall be in place prior to the lot being occupied. Failure to construct the required sidewalks may result in the withholding of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, or utility connections by the governing body or utility company." LDC 25-6-351. Update Note 43 for this purpose. U1: Comment addressed. ATD4. Remove Note 45; fiscal surety will not be allowed for site plans adjacent to required street construction. LDC 25-1-83. U1: Comment addressed. ATD5. Update Note 12 to include “and all identified Joint Use Access Easements”. LDC 25-6-351 and LDC 25-4-153. U1: Comment addressed. ATD6. Cul-de-sac and single-outlet streets with lengths exceeding 2,000 feet require approval by the Planning Commission. LDC 25-4-152 TCM, 1.3.2.E. Redesign the subdivision to provide a second outlet for Velocity Crossing or request a variance. U1: Response noted; waiver fee has been added in AMANDA and can be paid in Austin Build + Connect. Waiver approval memo will be issued as soon as the fee is paid. Add a note the General Notes section identifying the waiver approval specifying code and street being granted the variance. ATD7. Maximum length of cul-de-sac or single-outlet Street between turnaround bubbles is 1000 ft. (700 ft. desirable). TCM, Fig. 1-40. U1: Response noted; update plans to depict temporary turnaround/cul-de-sac on all applicable preliminary plan pages, not just a sheet in the exhibits file. Environmental Review - Pamela Abee-Taulli - 512-974-1879 EV1. Provide an exhibit showing grading proposed as part of the subdivision application for:  Cut from 4 to 8 feet;  Cut over 8 feet;  Fill from 4 to 8 feet; and  Fill over 8 feet. Exclude grading within the ROW and for proposed ponds. Grading must comply with limits in LDC 25-8 Subchapter A. U1. Comment pending.  Mass grading is not permitted with a commercial subdivision plan. Grading of individual lots will be done with the site plans for their individual development. Roadways, detention & water quality ponds, and other infrastructure may be developed with a commercial subdivision. Please remove the mass grading plan from the exhibits for the preliminary plan. Please revise the cut/fill exhibit to include only the grading necessary for construction of the roadways, ponds, and other infrastructure.  FYI: There is an impervious cover tracking table on the impervious cover exhibit. Please be advised that each site plan will be required to comply with the appropriate watershed impervious cover on its own. The impervious cover will not be averaged across the subdivision. The only exception will be for two or more lots that are tied together through a unified development agreement due to sharing of drainage infrastructure. Flood Plain Review - Katina Bohrer - 512-974-3558 Reviewer notes: SW corner of 71 @ 130. Side channel is being permitted under SP-2021-0153D. Project Assessment case: C8-2020-0141PA. This is for Prelim Plan. Exhibits include rough grading which has not been reviewed/approved for compliance with floodplain regulations (prelim plans do not provide approval of grading as that is done through site plan or subdivision construction, and as the applicant proposes to dedicate a drainage easement to the full extent of the pre-project FEMA 500-yr floodplain, the plan is compliant with code at this time). It is expected that as the applicant proves refined grading is compliant with floodplain regulations (via subdivision construction or site plan) that an easement release will be pursued to allow development of the lots which are currently shown as being fully in the floodplain. Current prelim plan shows the entirety of the regulatory floodplain contained to a proposed drainage easement. Notice to applicant: Applicant must remedy all compliance issues without creating additional compliance issues with the LDC and/or Criteria manuals. A response that fails to correct an issue, or which creates other issues does not comply with the LDC and is insufficient to address the comments. The comments provided describe an issue that must be remedied in order for the application to be approved. Any specific examples are provided as a courtesy and are not intended as an exhaustive list, especially as the site may be updated to have additional compliance issues. Contact this reviewer if you have any questions Katina.Bohrer@austintexas.gov Because so many FYI comments are interspersed here, I’ve gone ahead and BOLDED the comments and detailed information which must be cleared prior to prelim approval. FP1. The site, as shown on the plan provided, may not be in compliance with the following sections of the Land Development Code. Please correct your application to be in compliance with Code (see Detailed Information sections of comments below). a) 25-7-3 – Obstruction of Waterways Prohibited (FYI only) b) 25-7-31 – Director Authorized to Require Drainage Studies (FYI only) c) 25-7-33 – Floodplain Maps, Delineation, and Depiction d) 25-7-61 – Criteria for Approval of Development Applications (FYI only) e) 25-7-62 – Certificate of Professional Engineer Required for Certain Alterations and Improvements (FYI only) f) 25-7-152 – Dedication of Easements and Rights-of-Way FP2. The site, as shown on the plan provided, does not meet requirements set in the Drainage Criteria Manual Section 1 “Drainage Policy.” Please correct your application to be in compliance with Criteria Detailed Information: a. As there is a current approved CLOMR through FEMA (16-06-1425R). The Subdivision Reviewer/Case Manager has asked that an exhibit be included showing the CLOMR floodplain extents in order to prove that it is conceivably possible to alter the floodplain in such a way that the proposed lots within the current floodplain are able to be developed while being compliant with code and criteria. UPDATE 1: Cleared b. FYI: Modeling has not been provided for the Mass Grading Exhibit included in the “Prelim Plan exhibits” submittal. Approval of prelim plan does not include approval of mass grading exhibit. Applicant will need to prove during subdivision construction or via site plan that proposed grading is compliant with No Adverse Impact requirements as outlined in the DCM. c. FYI: A Letter of Map Revision will be required to be completed prior to CO for any buildings which are proposed to be in the current regulatory floodplain. d. FYI: As mentioned in Reviewer Notes, it is understood that the applicant plans to submit plans in the future to show compliance with floodplain regulations to reclaim floodplain area on Block E Lot 2 and Block I Lots 1 & 2 to make the lots developable. A drainage easement release is expected to be processed for those lots once compliance has been proven. FP3. The modeling provided does not meet requirements set in the Drainage Criteria Manual Section 2 “Determination of Storm Run Off.” Modeling must be in compliance with criteria prior to approval. Detailed Information: a. FYI: Depending on the amount of fill proposed to reclaim the floodplain area along Onion Creek, be aware that routing may need to be updated in the HMS model to adequately ascertain the impact of the fill on the floodplain (especially if compensatory cut is not provided). It is expected that this will be addressed at Subdivision Construction or Site Plan stage. FP4. The modeling provided does not meet requirements set in the Drainage Criteria Manual Section 6 “Open Channels.” Modeling must be in compliance with criteria prior to approval. Detailed Information: a. FYI: Updated RAS modeling is expected to be provided at development stage (i.e. Subdivision Construction or Site Plan) to prove that there are no adverse impacts to other properties due to the proposed reclamation of the floodplain area along Onion Creek. FP5. The exhibits as provided are not be in compliance with LDC 25-7-3 Detailed Information: a. FYI: the current exhibits submittal includes a grading exhibit which shows proposed grading in the Onion Creek floodplain without compensatory cut. This would be considered an obstruction to flow and will not be allowed without proof that the fill meets No Adverse Impact requirements. It is expected that this will be cleared during a site development process (e.g. Subdivision Construction or Site Plan) FP6. The exhibits as provided are not in compliance with LDC 25-7-31 Detailed Information a. FYI: the current exhibits submittal includes a grading exhibit which shows proposed grading in the Onion Creek floodplain to reclaim floodplain area. This will not be allowed without proof that the fill meets No Adverse Impact requirements. It is expected that this will be cleared during a site development process (e.g. Subdivision Construction or Site Plan) FP7. The Preliminary Plan, as provided, is not in compliance with LDC 25-7-33. Detailed Information a. As there is a current approved CLOMR through FEMA (16-06-1425R). The Subdivision Reviewer/Case Manager has asked that an exhibit be included showing the CLOMR floodplain extents in order to prove that it is conceivably possible to alter the floodplain in such a way that the proposed lots within the current floodplain are able to be developed while being compliant with code and criteria. UPDATE 1: Cleared b. The floodplain on the unstudied tributary does not match the approved floodplain from SP-2021- 0153D. Please update floodplain delineation appropriately. UPDATE 1: The floodplain delineated on the exhibits is correct. Per conversation with case manager, floodplain is to be only delineated in associated exhibits. Comment Cleared. c. The drainage easement on the unstudied tributary does not match the approved drainage easement from SP-2021-0153D. Please update the drainage easement delineation appropriately. UPDATE 1: The drainage easement is delineated on the exhibits and contains the regulatory floodplain. Per conversation with case manager, easements to be delineated only on associated exhibits. Comment Cleared. FP8. The exhibits, as provided are not in compliance with LDC 25-7-61 Detailed Information: a. FYI: the current exhibits submittal includes a grading exhibit which shows proposed grading in the Onion Creek floodplain to reclaim floodplain area. This will not be allowed without proof that the fill meets No Adverse Impact requirements. It is expected that this will be cleared during a site development process (e.g. Subdivision Construction or Site Plan) FP9. The exhibits, as provided, are not in compliance with LDC 25-7-62. Detailed Information: a. FYI: the current exhibits submittal includes a grading exhibit which shows proposed grading in the Onion Creek floodplain to reclaim floodplain area. This will not be allowed without proof that the fill meets No Adverse Impact requirements. It is expected that this will be cleared during a site development process (e.g. Subdivision Construction or Site Plan) FP10. The Preliminary Plan, as provided, is not in compliance with LDC 25-7-152. Detailed Information: a. The drainage easement shown on the unstudied tributary does not contain the floodplain as determined by SP-2021-0153D. Please update drainage easement to contain the approved floodplain. UPDATE 1: The proposed easement shown on the exhibits contains the regulatory floodplain. Comment Cleared. b. The drainage easement shown on the unstudied tributary does not match the approved drainage easement as shown on SP-2021-0153D. Please update drainage easement delineation appropriately. UPDATE 1: the proposed drainage easement shown on the exhibits contains the regulatory floodplain. Comment Cleared. Regional Stormwater Management Review - Emily Booth - RSMP@austintexas.gov Kimley-Horn general note to reviewer: The RSMP Report/documents (05_EmilyBooth_RSMP_C8-2020- 0141 ) have been included with this submittal. No updates were made to the RSMP Report /documents from the last submittal. Kimley-Horn did confirm that the Prelim Plan exhibits were solely referenced and not duplicated in the report but no alterations have been made from the previous submittal. The Prelim Plan plan sheets and exhibits were updated with this submittal to address the comments provided. Please see subsequent responses for how comments have been addressed. U1: this general note directly contradicts the response to RS3 RS1. The tables on the plat indicating site areas appear to be added incorrectly to get a total site area of 24.40 acres rather than 270.93 acres. Please provide updated documents reflecting the correct acreages. For simplicity and to minimize versions, the preliminary plan sheets should not be duplicated within the RSMP documents. Referring to the applicable preliminary plan sheets is best practice (LDC 25-7-61) Response: The table on the Preliminary Plan has been updated, 24.38 Ac is the ROW area, and this has been added/clarified on the plans. Kimley-Horn has confirmed duplicate plans/exhibits have been removed from the RSMP Report with this submittal, and that the report refers to applicable Preliminary Plan plansheets or exhibits. U1: The impervious cover tracking table is not acceptable. For blocks that have “partial” participation, the acres of RSMP participation and impervious cover WITHIN the block must be provided. This is a tracking table for RSMP purposes and impervious cover purposes since both are important to track. See also RS2 RS2. It appears that all of the exhibits except for the impervious cover and RSMP exhibits have Blocks and Lots identified per the preliminary plan but the impervious cover exhibit has different naming and the RSMP one don’t have any designation of blocks or lots. The impervious cover tracking table is not helpful if it cannot be used to track actual lots and blocks. Please update the naming convention and designation of areas to match the overall preliminary plan on the impervious cover exhibit. It would also be helpful to add a column to that table indicating which Blocks and lots are within the RSMP participation area, and which are detaining all storm events. Either that edit or adding the blocks and lots information to the RSMP exhibit should be provided with the next update (LDC 25-7-61) Response: Block lettering has been added to the RSMP Impervious Cover Exhibit and matches up with the Preliminary Plan block lettering convention. Additionally, the status of RSMP participation has been added to the table, and the areas not participating in RSMP have been hatched and added to the legend. U1: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED: It appears that all of the exhibits except for the impervious cover and RSMP exhibits have Blocks and Lots identified per the preliminary plan but the impervious cover exhibit has different naming and the RSMP one don’t have any designation of blocks or lots. The impervious cover tracking table is not helpful if it cannot be used to track actual lots and blocks. Please update the naming convention and designation of areas to match the overall preliminary plan on the impervious cover exhibit. It would also be helpful to add a column to that table indicating which Blocks and lots are within the RSMP participation area, and which are detaining all storm events. Since the ROW areas will be paid for with the plat, those need to be called out separately for tracking purposes. So, to be very clear, the tracking table needs to have BOTH naming conventions (lots/blocks and drainage areas), area in acres, impervious cover in acres and in percentage, RSMP participation status and for “partial” in the current table there needs to be two rows one for all of the above for the RSMP area of that lot and one for the non-RSMP area of that lot. SO, for every area, designated with both the block and the drainage area naming, RSMP status is EITHER participating or detention (or yes/no or full/none) but there is NO “partial” RSMP status. Drainage Block/Lot Area Name Impervious cover (%) RSMP Status Area (acres) Impervious Cover (acres) Full None Full None D-A D-D1 D-D1 D-C D-D1 B C D E F G H Connect the Proposed Drainage Area Map with drainage area naming to the block naming. The drainage areas is what all the analysis and other reviewed information from the PA was based on but now everything is labeled with Blocks and since there are splits in participation for multiple blocks (which is ridiculous and which is going to make the site plans complicated assuming each Block will be a site plan), we need to connect the two so that we can actually track the impervious cover and RSMP assumptions but also so that we can make sure that the future developments follow the analysis that is based on assumptions that are not currently reflected in the “tracking table” that was provided. TAKE THE RSMP NOTE POINTING TO THE DOCUMENT FROM JUNE 2021 OFF OF THE RSMP IMPERVIOUS COVER EXHIBIT (or else update it to reflect the correct version of the document dated November 2021…) RS3. The engineering report correctly describes the partial RSMP participation, but it would be helpful to call out the acreage that is not participating so that totals can be checked (LDC 25-7-61) Response: The engineering report has been updated to include the acreage of area not participating in RSMP. Please refer to the “Detention / Water Quality Section, paragraph 2. U1: The engineer report states 207 acres area is participating in RSMP with 61.7% impervious cover included in that area. The “tracking table” indicates over 67% impervious cover with more that 90% impervious for two of the blocks that have “full” RSMP participation. Refer to other comment about the tracking table. This table and the report need to be consistent and correct and fall within the assumptions of the analysis provided for the PA. RS4. Plat note number 11 wording should not refer to Exhibit L. Please replace this note with the following language: “Participation in the Regional Stormwater Management Program through payment has been conditionally approved for a portion of this preliminary plan by the City of Austin Watershed Protection Department, Office of the Director on _________(date). The RSMP case number for this conditional approval is ____________. Payment and final approval of participation will occur with the final plat for public ROW and with subsequent site development plans for the remaining area. Refer to the conditional approval letter for conditions of participation.” The blanks should be filled in upon receipt of the conditional approval letter (DCM 8.2.2) Response: Kimley-Horn has revised note 10 on the Preliminary Plan to the note provided above. U1: The conditional approval letter has NOT been issued. Thus, the blanks in this note should not yet be filled out. The information you used in the note is from the PA recommendation letter which is only for getting into formal review. RS6. A conditional approval letter will be issued via email. At final plat, public ROW will be finalized and a formal agreement, approval letter, and payment will be completed for that area. At the time of each site development application, site area, impervious cover, and other details will be finalized with total impervious cover not to exceed 127.7 acres across the 207 participating acres as outlined in the comprehensive drainage analysis completed with this preliminary plan. At final plat, an RSMP tracking table will be established and carried through each site development plan to ensure that proposed impervious cover assumed in the drainage analysis is not exceeded. Any exclusions of drainage easements or other area from the RSMP participation payment calculation(s) will be documented and finalized at the time of approval for the applicable site plan(s). (DCM 8.2) Response: Comment noted. An impervious tracking table for the RSMP area will be added at the time of Final Plat submittal. U1: Conditional approval letter issuance is pending resolution of other comments. Subdivision Review - Amy Combs - (512) 974-2786 SR1. Please clearly label all lots and blocks, it is unclear what land is a lot. For instance, in Phase 1 is the property to the northeast a lot? (25-1-83) SR13. Please update note 12 B. on sheet 2 to reflect the following- updating Skypark Commons to a revised street name: B. Environmental and safety controls, and other related items (e.g., erosion and sedimentation controls, restoration, channel work, pipe in easements, detention, water quality ponds, etc.) as determined prior to final plat approval. The restoration cost estimate will be based on disturbed areas including the following streets: Velocity Crossing, Skypark Commons, World Drive, and Spirit Drive” Wetlands Biologist Review - John Clement - 512-974-1475 WBR1. All wetland comments cleared. WPD staff performed a site visit on 4/11/22 and the feature does not possess the hydrologic or vegetative characteristics of a wetland CEF. No protection or mitigation is required. ERM Review - John Clement - 512-974-1475 All ERM comments cleared. Site Plan Plumbing - Cory Harmon - 512-974-2882 The proposed preliminary plan (C8-2020-0141) is cleared from a plumbing code perspective. Electric Review - Cody Shook - Cody.Shook@austinenergy.com All electric review comments cleared End of Master Comment Report