B-14 (SP-2021-0072C - Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7; District 2).pdf

Zoning and Platting Commission – Dec. 7, 2021

B-14 (SP-2021-0072C - Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7; District 2).pdf — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of 44 pages

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20211103 002a Date: November 3, 2021 Seconded by: Perry Bedford Subject: Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 (SP-2021-0072C) Motion by: Kevin Ramberg RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting a variance from 25-8-342 to allow fill over four feet to seventeen feet, and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff recommends these variances (with one condition) having determined the required Findings of Fact have been met. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the variance request with the following Staff Conditions: 1. Applicant will provide structural containment of fill with retaining walls. For: Bedford, Qureshi, Scott, Barrett Bixler, Bristol, Ramberg, Guerrero, and Brimer Against: None Abstain: None Recuse: None Absent: Thompson VOTE 8-0 Approved By: Linda Guerrero, Environmental Commission Chair 1 1 of 44B-14ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: 11/03/2021 Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 (SP-2021-0072C) Nick Brown, P.E., LDC COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4800 Distribution Drive & 7900 Industry Way NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: District 2 Tunde Daramola, Environmental Review Specialist Senior, DSD, 512-974-6316, Babatunde.Daramola@austintexas.gov Onion Creek Watershed, Suburban, Desired Development Zone Variance request is as follows: Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill over 4 feet up to 17 feet Staff recommends this variance, having determined the findings of fact to have been met. STAFF CONDITION: Provide structural containment of fill with retaining walls. 2 of 44B-14 Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance / Comprehensive Watershed Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 Variance Request: Ordinance / Other To allow for fill exceeding 4ft for building construction Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. 2. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes. The variance will not be providing a special privilege to the applicant. The proposed buildings are similar in size to similarly situated property. The style of the building proposes a single finished floor building with a 4 -foot loading dock and flat truck court. In order to facilitate this type of development, significant levelling is required to enhance maneuverability into the loading docks, allowing trucks to operate safely on site. The limits of the fill do extend beyond the building as shown in the cut/fill exhibit but is contained with retaining wall structures designed in conjunction with the building walls, so the building is supported. Prior projects in this industrial development zone had a similar situation. A prime example is Crossroads Logistics Center SP-2021-0015D. Land Use Commission variances were granted to LDC 25-8-341 and 342 to allow cut and fill up to 14.3 feet and 16.5 feet, respectively. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes. The industrial use for this project requires level loading docks, parking, and drive aisles. Effective accessibility to portions of the building would not be achievable without this variance. 3 of 44B-14b) Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes. There is significant fall across the property which poses challenges with cut/fill for a large single finished floor building. The development requires fill beyond 4ft for an efficient and operable building and site. In order to facilitate this type of development, a minimum deviation from code to allow fill up to 17ft is necessary. Structural containment will also be provided to contain and minimize the amount of fill. c) Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. Yes. The variance does not create a significant probability of harmful consequences. The variance is a minimum deviation from code to allow for reasonable use of the property. The fill will be minimized and structurally contained with retaining walls. Retaining walls will also reduce the amount of sloping required to return to existing grade. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes. The project is served by an existing water quality/wet pond designed to treat this development. All stormwater run from this site will be captured and conveyed to the existing pond. 3. 1. 2. 3. B. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Supply Suburban Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Supply Rural Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-482 (Barton Springs Zone Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long), or Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that:: The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; Yes / No [provide summary of justification for determination] The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; Yes / No [provide summary of justification for determination] The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. Yes / No [provide summary of justification for determination] Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following condition: 4 of 44B-14Provide structural containment of the fill with retaining walls. Environmental Reviewer (DSD) Date __ 10/21/2021 _____________________________ Environmental Review Manager (DSD) Mike McDougal Date 10-22-2021 Environmental Officer (WPD) _____________________________ Liz Johnston Date 10-22-2021 5 of 44B-14September 24, 2021 August 26, 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM Variance Request Letter Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 4800 Distribution Drive & 7900 Industry Way SP-2021-0072C §25-8-342 Fill Requirements Denise Lucas, Director Planning and Zoning Department City of Austin 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 RE: Dear Ms. Lucas: Please accept the following environmental commission variance application form and supporting materials as our request to allow for fill in excess of four (4) feet for the proposed development of the Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 site development permit (SP-2021-0072C) located at 4800 Distribution Drive and 7900 Industry Way. The subject project is a 19.128-acre tract of land located within the City of Austin Full Purpose Jurisdiction. The project is located within the Onion Creek Watershed classified by the City of Austin as a Suburban Watershed and is currently zoned LI-CO and is not located within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 site development permit proposes two (2) limited warehousing and distribution facilities totaling approximately 300,000 square feet with associated loading docks, surface parking, and utility connections. Water quality and detention is provided in the existing wet pond designed and constructed with SP- 2016-0360C, Park 183 – Building 2. We have analyzed the existing pond with Atlas 14 rainfall data and have determined the 100-year storm is contained within the pond walls and does not overtop the emergency spillway. City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 1 6 of 44B-14September 24, 2021 The property is zoned LI-CO and proposes limited warehousing and distribution facilities. Projects surrounding this development, Park 183 Buildings 1, 2, 3, 5 and Park 183 Fedex, are developed with similar sized buildings ranging between 115,000 SF to 160,000 SF. This project requires a variance for the following code section: Division 5. – Cut, Fill, and Spoil. §25-8-342 – Fill Requirements (A) Fill on a tract of land may not exceed four feet of depth, except: (1) in an urban watershed; (2) in a roadway right-of-way; (3) under a foundation with sides perpendicular to the ground, or with pier and beam construction; (4) for construction of a water quality control or detention facility and appurtenances for conveyance such as swales, drainage ditches, and diversion berms, if: (a) the design and location of the facility within the site minimize the amount of fill over four feet; (b) the fill is the minimum necessary for the appropriate functioning of the facility; and (c) the fill is not located on a slope with a gradient of more than 15 percent or within 100 feet of a classified waterway; (5) for utility construction or a wastewater drain field; or (6) in a state-permitted sanitary landfill located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction, if: (a) the fill is derived from the landfill operation; (b) the fill is not placed in a critical water quality zone or a 100-year floodplain; (c) the landfill operation has an erosion and restoration plan approved by the City; and (d) all other applicable City Code provisions are met. (B) A fill area must be restored and stabilized. (C) Fill for a roadway must be contained within the roadway clearing width described in Section 25-8- 322 (Clearing For A Roadway). The City of Austin Land Development Code allows Land Use Commission Variances per the following: Division 3. – Variances §25-8-41 Land Use Commission Variances. (A) It is the applicant's burden to establish that the findings described in this Section have been met. Except as provided in Subsections (B) and (C), the Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of this subchapter after determining that: (1) the requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of other similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements; (2) the variance: City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 2 7 of 44B-148 of 44B-14September 24, 2021 City State ZIP Code Work Phone E-Mail Address Austin, Texas 78727 512-872-6696 Nick.brown@ldcteams.com Variance Case Information Case Name Case Number Park 183 Buildings 6 & 7 SP-2021-0072C 4800 Distribution Dr. & 7900 Industry Way Babatunde Daramola Address or Location Environmental Reviewer Name Environmental Resource Management Reviewer Name Applicable Ordinance Watershed Protection Ordinance (WPO) Watershed Name Onion Creek Watershed Classification ☐Urban X Suburban ☐Water Supply Suburban ☐Water Supply Rural ☐ Barton Springs Zone Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone ☐ Barton Springs Segment ☐ Northern Edwards Segment X Not in Edwards Aquifer Zones Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Distance to Nearest Classified Waterway ☐ Yes X No 0.25 Miles Water and Waste Water service to be provided by Austin Water Utility Request Impervious cover square footage: acreage: percentage: The variance request is as follows (Cite code references: 25-8-342 Existing 0 0 0 Proposed 666,468 15.3 80 City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 4 9 of 44B-14The site generally slopes from South to North ranging between +/-525 to 503. Slopes vary but do not exceed 15% in any direction except for a man-made drainage swale on the north side of the property. September 24, 2021 Provide general description of the property (slope range, elevation range, summary of vegetation / trees, summary of the geology, CWQZ, WQTZ, CEFs, floodplain, heritage trees, any other notable or outstanding characteristics of the property) 0-15% slopes; 19.13 acres 15-25% slopes; 0 acres 25-35% slopes; 0 acres Over 35% slopes; 0 acres Site vegetation generally consists of tall grasses, weeds, and tree cover. The tree cover is mostly hackberry, mesquite, and chinaberry less than 19-inches in diameter mixed with some dead trees. Soils are composed of surface clays then lean clays, sands and gravels, then Austin Group limestone The site does not have CWQZ, WQTZ, CEF’s, or floodplain identified City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 5 10 of 44B-14The site complies with all applicable code except fill exceeding 4-feet depicted on the exhibit included September 24, 2021 Clearly indicate in what way the proposed project does not comply with current Code (include maps and exhibits) FINDINGS OF FACT Project: Ordinance: A. 1. As required in LDC Section 25-8-41, in order to grant a variance the Land Use Commission must make the following findings of fact: Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes / No This project lay within an industrial park zoned LI-CO with similar warehouse buildings ranging between 115,000 SF to 160,000 SF in size. The style of building proposes a single finished floor building with a 4-foot loading dock and relatively flat truck court where semi-trucks can maneuver into loading docks. These criteria are necessary for an efficient and operable building and site. Existing slopes on the property eliminate the ability to develop this property with an industrial warehouse building. As noted above, this type of development requires significant leveling to allow trucks to operate on the site. 2. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 6 11 of 44B-14September 24, 2021 Yes / No b) c) The industrial user for this project requires level loading docks, parking, and drive aisles. Without the variance, the property would not be reasonably developed to comply with the LI-CO zoning and uses. It is also noted, accessible access to portions of the building would not be achievable without this variance. The structural engineer has also provided a letter stating the proposed structural system is safer and more reliable. Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes / No The project is zoned LI-CO and the proposed use is allowed in this zoning classification. The proposed buildings are similar in size to the adjacent developments permitted in this industrial park and designed to limit the departure from the code. It is not possible to design a project with 4-foot loading docks and large single floor buildings without exceeding the allowable fill. The building is supported by the structural design as well as the surrounding retaining walls. These retaining walls are designed to limit the extents of fill and reduce the limits in which fill would otherwise be required to return to existing grade. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. Yes / No The proposed design limits the amount of fill in lieu of earth slopes. By retaining the fill, this will reduce the amount of sloping required to return to existing grade and limit the fill to 8-feet or less. Please reference the previously mentioned structural letter explaining the benefit to the proposed design as support. 3. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 7 12 of 44B-14September 24, 2021 Yes / No B. N/A 1. 2. 3. This development is served by an existing water quality/wet pond designed and constructed under SP-2016-0360C to treat this development. All storm water runoff from this site will be captured and conveyed to the existing pond. Additional Land Use Commission variance determinations for a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Quality Transition Zone), Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions), or Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long): The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; N/A The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. N/A **Variance approval requires all above affirmative findings. City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 8 13 of 44B-14September 24, 2021 A Exhibits for Commission Variance o Aerial photos of the site o Site photos o Aerial photos of the vicinity o Context Map—A map illustrating the subject property in relation to developments in the vicinity to include nearby major streets and waterways o Topographic Map - A topographic map is recommended if a significant grade change on the subject site exists or if there is a significant difference in grade in relation to adjacent properties. o For cut/fill variances, a plan sheet showing areas and depth of cut/fill with topographic elevations. o Site plan showing existing conditions if development exists currently on the property o Proposed Site Plan- full size electronic or at least legible 11x17 showing proposed development, include tree survey if required as part of site or subdivision plan o Environmental Map – A map that shows pertinent features including Floodplain, CWQZ, WQTZ, CEFs, Setbacks, Recharge Zone, etc. o An Environmental Resource Inventory pursuant to ECM 1.3.0 (if required by 25-8-121) o Applicant’s variance request letter City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 9 14 of 44B-1415 of 44B-14A L C O N D D E V GN N I N SU L T 0 500' 1,000' SCALE: 1" = 500' PROJECT LOCATION B U R L E S O N R D E RIV N D UTIO DISTRIB IN D U ST R Y W A Y 3 8 1 W H S U TBPE NO: 16384 ∙ TBPLS NO: 10194101 4201 W. PARMER LANE, SUITE C-100 AUSTIN, TX 78727 512.872.6696 LDCTEAMS.COM PARK 183 BUILDINGS 6 & 7 AERIAL LOCATION MAP y a k c m r , M P 4 3 : 4 , 1 2 0 2 , 4 2 t s u g u A , g w d . o t o h p - e t i s - l a i r e a \ s t i b h x E D A C A _ 3 0 \ 7 & 6 s g n d \ i i l i u B - 3 8 1 k r a P 3 5 0 . 2 0 3 4 0 2 \ s 0 0 0 0 2 \ : Q 16 of 44B-14A L C O N D D E V GN N I N SU L T 0 600' 1,200' SCALE: 1" = 600' PARK 183 BUILDING 1 PROJECT LOCATION B U R L E S O N R D PARK 183 BUILDING 2 E RIV N D UTIO DISTRIB PARK 183 BUILDING 5 IN D U ST R Y W A Y 3 8 1 W H S U PARK 183 FEDEX PARK 183 BUILDING 3 TBPE NO: 16384 ∙ TBPLS NO: 10194101 4201 W. PARMER LANE, SUITE C-100 AUSTIN, TX 78727 512.872.6696 LDCTEAMS.COM PARK 183 BUILDINGS 6 & 7 CONTEXT MAP y a k c m r , M P 1 3 : 4 , 1 2 0 2 , 4 2 t s u g u A , g w d . p a m i \ - t x e t n o c \ s t i b h x E D A C A _ 3 0 \ 7 & 6 s g n d i l i u B - 3 8 1 k r a P 3 5 0 . 2 0 3 4 0 2 \ s 0 0 0 0 2 \ : Q 17 of 44B-14REMOVE EX. BARBED WIRE FENCE 205 LF CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED FOR DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION REMOVE EX. PIPE UP TO EX. MH REMOVE EX. HEADWALL REMOVE EX. BARBED WIRE FENCE 75 LF CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED FOR DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION 55 LF CURB & BUTER TO BE REMOVED FOR DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION REMOVE EX. BARBED WIRE FENCE y a k c m r , M P 2 0 : 4 , 1 2 0 2 , 4 2 t s u g u A , 1 t u o y a L , g w d . D N O C X 3 5 2 0 0 2 h s \ s n a P D A C A _ 3 0 7 & 6 \ \ l s g n d i l i u b - 3 8 1 k r a p 3 5 0 . 2 0 3 4 0 2 \ s 0 0 0 0 2 \ : Q T W D . 0 2 0 2 D 3 C _ C D L : e t a p m e T l l b t c . l a b o G v e D d n a L : e y t S l t o P l REMOVE 2,253 SF OF EX. CONCRETE & CURB REMOVE EX. BARBED WIRE FENCE 110 LF CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED FOR DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION POINT TABLE POINT DESCRIPTION REMOVE POINT TABLE POINT TABLE POINT DESCRIPTION REMOVE POINT DESCRIPTION REMOVE 0 50' 100' 17941 HB 12 DEAD 17999 18000 HB 11 HB 10 X X 17612 HB 10 9 17616 CB 14 10 17767 MSQ 8 6 5 17768 MSQ 11 8 5 17803 MSQ 8 DEAD 17804 MSQ 10 17805 MSQ 8 6 DEAD 17806 MSQ 9 17807 MSQ 9 9 7 6 17808 MSQ 9 8 6 6 4 4 17814 MSQ 12 8 6 17818 CB 11 DEAD 17819 MSQ 8 DEAD 17919 CB 14 11 HB 8 HB 8 HB 9 HB 9 HB 8 CB 8 8 CB 8 HB 10 HB 8 CB 8 CB 8 HB 9 HB 14 MSQ 8 HB 12 MSQ 8 HB 10 HB 9 CB 8 HB 10 HB 9 CB 15 CB 14 HB 10 CDR 10 CB 12 HB 10 HB 8 CDR 8 MSQ 10 HB 8 MSQ 11 HB 8 HB 8 HB 9 HB 13 HB 11 HB 9 LO 8 HB 8 HB 12 HB 8 HB 13 HB 11 HB 9 HB 11 17601 17602 17603 17604 17605 17606 17607 17608 17609 17610 17611 17613 17614 17615 17769 17771 17801 17802 17809 17810 17811 17812 17813 17815 17816 17817 17820 17821 17822 17917 17922 17923 17924 17925 17927 17928 17929 17930 17931 17932 17933 17934 17935 17936 17937 17938 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17949 HB 9 DEAD 17950 HB 14 17951 MSQ 11 10 17939 17940 17942 17943 17944 17945 17946 17947 17948 17952 17953 17954 17955 17956 17957 17958 17959 17960 17961 17962 17963 17964 17965 17966 17967 17968 17969 17972 17973 17974 17975 17976 17977 17978 17980 17981 17982 17983 17984 17986 17987 17988 17989 17990 17992 17993 17994 17995 17996 17997 17998 HB 9 HB 10 HB 11 HB 8 HB 10 HB 8 HB 8 HB 13 HB 10 HB 9 MSQ 13 CB 10 HB 11 HB 9 HB 10 HB 9 HB 9 HB 10 HB 11 HB 11 HB 9 MSQ 9 HB 8 CB 15 HB 10 HB 8 HB 9 CE 8 HB 10 HB 9 HB 9 HB 8 HB 8 HB 8 HB 10 HB 10 HB 8 HB 10 HB 13 HB 8 HB 11 HB 8 HB 8 HB 10 HB 8 HB 8 HB 9 CB 16 CB 9 HB 9 HB 8 17970 HB 10 DEAD 17971 HB 10 17979 HB 10 DEAD 17985 CDR 10 17991 MSQ 9 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE TREE INDEX CRITICAL ROOT ZONES (TREE CIRCLES) ARE SHOWN USING THE COA FORMULA FOR SINGLE AND MULTI TRUNK TREES. NOTE ABOUT DEAD TREES: IF THE TREE APPEARED TO BE DEAD, THEN IT HAS BEEN NOTED AS DEAD; HOWEVER, SUCH DETERMINATION IS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY A QUALIFIED ARBORIST. TREE SURVEY DATE: APRIL 2018 WATER METER VAULT (SIZE VARIES) N A L D D E V N G N I T C ON S U L SCALE: 1" = 50' LEGEND EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 834 835 BOUNDARY EASEMENT FLOODPLAIN CREEK CENTERLINE TREE TO REMAIN (XXX) E TMH WTRMH CMKR GMKR UGTM GRSR TRSR SPC TV E EM G G TCB TSP SS W WW G UE OE UT UC TC WWMH SSMH TMH CO X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED RECORD INFORMATION LIGHT POLE GROUND LIGHT POWER POLE DOWN GUY TELEPHONE MANHOLE WATER MANHOLE WATER LINE MARKER UNDERGROUND CABLE MARKER UNDERGROUND GAS LINE MARKER UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER GAS RISER TELEPHONE RISER SPRINKLER CONTROL BOX SWITCH GEAR & PAD TRANSFORMER (SIZE VARIES) FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER METER CABLE TV RISER ELECTRIC BOX ELECTRIC METER GAS METER GAS VALVE TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL POST GRATE INLET CURB INLET (SIZE VARIES) STORMSEWER LINE WATER LINE FIRE LINE WASTEWATER LINE SINGLE WATER SERVICE EMH ELECTRIC MANHOLE (SIZE VARIES) GAS LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CABLE AND INTERNET TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINE WASTEWATER MANHOLE (SIZE VARIES) STORMSEWER MANHOLE (SIZE VARIES) TELEPHONE MANHOLE (SIZE VARIES) WASTEWATER CLEANOUT WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE CURB & GUTTER EDGE OF PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALKS NOTES: 1. REMOVE EXISTING BARBED WIRE FENCING ON ALL FOUR SIDES OF PROPERTY. 2. A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE. 6 46 E T A D Y B I N O S I V E R . O N Know what's below. Call be(cid:73)ore you dig. R - 0 0 1 C E T I U S , E N A L R E M R A P T S E W 1 0 2 4 c l l , g n i t l u s n o c 7 2 7 8 7 ∙ 6 9 6 6 . 2 7 8 . 2 1 5 X T , N I T S U A : E C I F F O 4 8 3 6 1 . O N M R I F 8/24/2021 7 & 6 G D L B 3 8 1 K R A P E V I R D N O I T U B R T S D 0 0 8 4 I I Y A W Y R T S U D N I 0 0 9 7 & S A X E T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A & S N O I T I D N O C G N I T S I X E N A L P N O I T I L O M E D DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: RM ah NB NB SHEET of 46 6 SP-2021-0072C 18 of 44B-14L F L F L F L F L F F L F L L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F F L F L F L F L FL FL F L F L F L L F F L FL y a k c m r , M P 7 5 : 3 , 1 2 0 2 , 4 2 t s u g u A , N A L P L L I F & T U C , g w d . L P F C 3 5 2 0 0 2 h s \ s n a P D A C A _ 3 0 \ 7 & 6 s g n d \ l i l i u b - 3 8 1 k r a p 3 5 0 . 2 0 3 4 0 2 \ s 0 0 0 0 2 \ : Q . T W D 0 2 0 2 D 3 C _ C D L l : e t a p m e T b t c . l l a b o G v e D d n a L l : e y t S t o P l I 6 G N D L I U B F S 0 0 5 , 7 5 1 ' 0 5 . 1 2 5 = E F F I 7 G N D L I U B F S 0 6 1 , 6 4 1 ' 0 3 . 0 2 5 = E F F F L FL FL FL FL E RIV N D TIO U RIB DIS T ) 7 6 0 0 0 7 1 0 0' R.O.W. 2 6 ( DRAINAGE SWALE W. DOC NO: 2017042943 TO BE FILLED TO ALLOW STORM SEWER INSTALLATION. FL F L F L L F L F L F L F L F F L FL F L F L FL FL FL L F DRAINAGE SWALE W. C8-2016-0146.01.1B TO BE FILLED TO ALLOW STORM SEWER INSTALLATION. T T F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F T T L F F L L F F L L F F L FL F L FL L F FL L F INDUSTRY WAY (60' R.O.W.) F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L L F L F FL L F L F N A L D D E V N G N I T L C O N S U 0 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' NUMBER MINIMUM ELEVATION MAXIMUM ELEVATION COLOR Elevations Table 1 2 3 4 5 6 -8.00 -4.00 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 -4.00 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.26 E T A D Y B I N O S I V E R . O N (cid:46)now what's below. Call be(cid:73)ore you dig. R - 0 0 1 C E T I U S , E N A L R E M R A P T S E W 1 0 2 4 c l l , g n i t l u s n o c 7 2 7 8 7 ∙ 6 9 6 6 . 2 7 8 . 2 1 5 X T , N I T S U A : E C I F F O 4 8 3 6 1 . O N M R I F 8/24/2021 7 & 6 G D L B 3 8 1 K R A P E V I R D N O I T U B R T S D 0 0 8 4 I I Y A W Y R T S U D N I 0 0 9 7 & S A X E T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A N A L P L L I F & T U C DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: RM ah NB NB SHEET of 46 17 SP-2021-0072C FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL 17 46 19 of 44B-141 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 R K 1 3 - P 8 H A S E 1, A R E S U B 8 D O DIVISIO N O C. N L F A P O T 1, B O. 2 O R 0 L TIO 1 O 7 C 0 N O 0 K " 0 6 A F L 7 " O T 1, S U N D B E R G E S T A T E S A13/A-011 T A13/A-011 T UP 8' 31.5 6 31°33'00"W S 9.65' 62 0"E 33'0 31° N DISTRIBUTION DRIVE L 4 ADA ROUTE B 8' 8.6 3 6 B UILDIN G SIX A13/A-011 T A13/A-011 T 0.0' 6 G A S PIP ELIN E S ET B A C K 2 9 0.3 8' G A S PIP ELIN E S ET B A C K N 6 0 ° 3 4'2 7 " W 6 1 5.6 6' IN D UST RY W A Y N 6 0 ° 3 4'2 7 " W 6 6 0.1 4' 3 2 5.2 8' L K J H G F E D C B A t v r . s o i s t a k a _ ) 9 1 0 2 l a r t n e C ( R A - 7 0 B _ 6 0 B _ 3 8 1 k r a P \ s l e d o M l a c o L 9 1 0 2 t i v e R G T S \ s t n e m u c o D \ s o i s t a k a \ s r e s U \ : C : h t a P e l i F l a c o L ) 9 1 0 2 l a r t n e C ( R A - e l i F w e N \ t i v e R 0 1 4 \ s g n i w a r D 0 0 4 \ t c e j o r P w e N # # - # # # # # - # # \ # # o i d u t S \ : S : h t a P e l i F l a r t n e C M A 0 2 : 4 0 : 1 1 1 2 0 2 / 6 2 / 8 : e t a D t o l P ADA ROUTE 0' 4.0 6 B UILDIN G SEVE N 7 C 6 0.0' 6 C Park 183 Building 6 7900 Industry Way Austin, TX 78744 6" GALV. PTD. STEEL PIPE BOLLARD W/ CONCRETE FILL ENCASED IN CONCRETE FOOTING 3/4" SEALANT JT. ALL AROUND www.stgdesign.com © STG Design, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED STG Design, Inc. 828 West 6th Street Suite 300 Austin, TX 78703 512.899.3500 TRUE NORTH 3 0 PR1 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION Issues 08/23/21 06/01/21 Project Number: 16.21242.00 Project Lead: MJ ARCHITECTURAL SITE REFERENCE PLAN A-011 " 0 - ' 4 " 0 - ' 4 " 8 D13 BOLLARD DETAIL BOLLARD DETAIL 1/2" = 1'-0" 4' - 8" TO BUILDIN G T 4' - 0" MAX. TRANSFORMER; REF. ELECTRICAL GALVANIZED & PAINTED STEEL BOLLARDS LOCATED PER AUSTIN ENERGY REQUIREMENTS: REF. D14/ A-011 A13 TRANSFORMER PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" A1 ARCHITECURAL SITE PLAN ARCHITECURAL SITE PLAN 1" = 60'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 of 44B-14LI-CO (WAREHOUSE / OFFICE) 239.4' AMENDMENT NO.1 DOC NO:___________ TO DOC NO: 2017042943 C.O. C . O . . O C . WW C.O. 4' . 0 8 WW C.O. FL F L F L C.O. L F WW C.O. 8' . 9 8 L F L F L F WW L F F L FL F L LI-CO (WAREHOUSE / OFFICE) WW C.O. 342.4' WW C.O. 210.0' 210.0' C.O. T EMH H M E EMH T WL LI-CO PHASE II PHASE I PROPOSED FIRELANE F L I 6 G N D L I U B F S 0 0 5 , 7 5 1 ' 0 5 . 1 2 5 = E F F ' 0 . 0 5 7 GAS GAS L W D S L F PROPOSED FIRELANE L F GAS GAS EMH RESTRICTED ZONE SIGN, TYPE I PER DETAIL (901S-5) I 7 G N D L I U B F S 0 6 1 , 6 4 1 ' 0 3 . 0 2 5 = E F F F L D S FL FL FL FL 6 9 4 . 3 ' PROPOSED FIRELANE T EMH WW C.O. WW C . O . F L FL FL L F D S W W F L W W W W C . O . F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L FL L W L F L F L F L F L F L F L W L F L F L L F W L F L F L W L F L F L F L W L W L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L W L F L F L W L F L F L F L W L F L F L L F W L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L LI-CO RESTRICTED ZONE SIGN, TYPE I PER DETAIL (901S-5) GAS GAS L W L F G A S F L 133.7' L F L F GAS FL L F L F ' 0 . 1 4 EMH E M H H M E L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F D S L F L F S D D S L F F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L S A G S A G F L S A G S A G F L S A G S A G F L S A G S A G S A G L F L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L F FL L F EMH T F L FL F L FL L F F L E M H E M H EMH L F F L ENTERPRISE GAS LINE CROSSING RESTRICTED ZONE SIGN, TYPE I PER DETAIL (901S-5) L F L F L F L F L F F L F L D S L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L F L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W LI-PDA NEW 5-STRAND BARBED WIRE FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINE CITY OF AUSTIN - ETJ y a k c m r , M P 1 0 : 4 , 1 2 0 2 , 4 2 t s u g u A , 1 t u o y a L , g w d . V O P S 3 5 2 0 0 2 h s \ s n a P D A C A _ 3 0 \ 7 & 6 s g n d \ l i l i u b - 3 8 1 k r a p 3 5 0 . 2 0 3 4 0 2 \ s 0 0 0 0 2 \ : Q . T W D 0 2 0 2 D 3 C _ C D L l : e t a p m e T b t c . l l a b o G v e D d n a L l : e y t S t o P l 126.5' FL FL F L F L F L F L 1 4 3 . 9 ' F L F L F L ENTERPRISE GAS LINE CROSSING L F F L FL RESTRICTED ZONE SIGN, TYPE I PER DETAIL (901S-5) N A L D D E V N G N I T L C O N S U 0 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' LEGEND EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR BOUNDARY EASEMENT RETAINING WALL CURB/EOP SIDEWALK (BY BUILDER) ADA RAMP CURB INLET AREA INLET GRATE INLET YARD INLET CONCRETE HEADWALL FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE STORM SEWER JUNCTION BOX SD STORM SEWER MAHNOLE WW C.O. WASTEWATER MANHOLE WASTEWATER CLEANOUT 961 TREES TO REMAIN-HERITAGE PHASE LINE ACCESSIBILITY NOTES: 1. SLOPES ON ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MAY NOT EXCEED 1:20 UNLESS DESIGNED AS A RAMP. [TAS 4.3.7] 2. GROUND SURFACES ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST BE STABLE, FIRM, AND SLIP RESISTANT. [TAS 4.5.1] 3. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF A RAMP IN NEW CONSTRUCTION IS 1:12. THE MAXIMUM RISE FOR ANY RAMP RUN IS 30 IN.. [TAS 4.8.2] 4. ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST HAVE A CROSS-SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 1:50. [TAS 4.3.7] 5. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS ONLY. COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS SUCH AS THE 2010 STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN OR THE 2012 TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS WAS NOT VERIFIED. THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO CURBS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL RADII PARKING DIMENSIONS ARE 2.50' TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REFERENCE MASTER SITE & PAVING PLAN FOR SITE PLAN NOTES. 4. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE PER ORDINANCE NUMBER 980430-P. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS ONLY. COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS SUCH AS THE 2010 STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN OR THE 2012 TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS WAS NOT VERIFIED. THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. 6. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITY TRANSFORMERS AND MAIN SWITCHBOARDS WITH AUSTIN ENERGY AND CITY OF AUSTIN INSPECTIONS ON SITE AND IN WRITING PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE FULL CUT-OFF AND FULLY SHIELDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUBCHAPTER E 2.5 AND WILL BE REVIEWED DURING BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. ANY CHANGE OR SUBSTITUTION OF LAMP/LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DIRECTOR FOR APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.5.2.E. THE SITE IS COMPOSED OF 2 LOTS/TRACTS. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED AS ONE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT. IF PORTIONS OF THE LOTS/TRACTS ARE SOLD, APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED. 5. 7. 8. E T A D Y B I N O S I V E R . O N Know what's below. Call be(cid:73)ore you dig. R - 0 0 1 C E T I U S , E N A L R E M R A P T S E W 1 0 2 4 c l l , g n i t l u s n o c 7 2 7 8 7 ∙ 6 9 6 6 . 2 7 8 . 2 1 5 X T , N I T S U A : E C I F F O 4 8 3 6 1 . O N M R I F 8/24/2021 7 & 6 G D L B 3 8 1 K R A P E V I R D N O I T U B R T S D 0 0 8 4 I I Y A W Y R T S U D N I 0 0 9 7 & S A X E T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A N A L P E T I S L L A R E V O DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: RM ah NB NB SHEET of 46 9 SP-2021-0072C FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL WL FL WL FL WL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL ' 5 . 9 0 1 FL GAS GAS FL FL WL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL WL GAS FL WL GAS WL GAS FL WL GAS ' GAS 8 . 8 0 1 FL 9 46 136.4' 274.3' 21 of 44B-14City of Austin Environmental Resource Inventory ~95 Acre Tract – Burleson Road Austin, Travis County, Texas April 11, 2016 Terracon Project No. 96167242 Prepared for: TC Austin Industrial Development, Inc. Trammell Crow Company Austin, Texas Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Austin, Texas 22 of 44B-1423 of 44B-14 Case No.: (City use only) Environmental Resource Inventory For the City of Austin Related to LDC 25-8-121, City Code 30-5-121, ECM 1.3.0 & 1.10.0 The ERI is required for projects that meet one or more of the criteria listed in LDC 25-8-121(A), City Code 30-5-121(A). 1. SITE/PROJECT NAME: 2. COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PROPERTY ID (#’s): 3. ADDRESS/LOCATION OF PROJECT: 4. WATERSHED: 5. THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE (Check all that apply) Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone* (See note below) .................. YES No Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone*.................................. YES No Edwards Aquifer 1500 ft Verification Zone* ....................... YES No Barton Spring Zone* .......................................................... YES No *(as defined by the City of Austin – LDC 25-8-2 or City Code 30-5-2) Note: If the property is over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge zone, the Hydrogeologic Report and karst surveys must be completed and signed by a Professional Geoscientist Licensed in the State of Texas. 6. DOES THIS PROJECT PROPOSE FLOODPLAIN MODIFICATION?.......YES** NO If yes, then check all that apply:  (1) The floodplain modifications proposed are necessary to protect the public health and safety;  (2) The floodplain modifications proposed would provide a significant, demonstrable environmental benefit, as determined by a functional assessment of floodplain health as prescribed by the Environmental Criteria Manual (ECM), or  (3) The floodplain modifications proposed are necessary for development allowed in the critical water quality zone under LDC 25-8-261 or 25-8-262, City Code 30-5-261 or 30-5-262.  (4) The floodplain modifications proposed are outside of the Critical Water Quality Zone in an area determined to be in poor or fair condition by a functional assessment of floodplain health. ** If yes, then a functional assessment must be completed and attached to the ERI (see ECM 1.7 and Appendix X for forms and guidance) unless conditions 1 or 3 above apply. 7. IF THE SITE IS WITHIN AN URBAN OR SUBURBAN WATERSHED, DOES THIS PROJECT PROPOSE A UTILITY LINE PARALLEL TO AND WITHIN THE CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE? ......................................................... YES*** NO ***If yes, then riparian restoration is required by LDC 25-8-261(E) or City Code 30-5-261(E) and a functional assessment must be completed and attached to the ERI (see ECM1.5 and Appendix X for forms and guidance). 8. There is a total of (#’s) Critical Environmental Feature(s)(CEFs) on or within150 feet of the project site. If CEF(s) are present, attach a detailed DESCRIPTION of the CEF(s), color PHOTOGRAPHS, the CEF WORKSHEET and provide DESCRIPTIONS of the proposed CEF buffer(s) and/or wetland mitigation. Provide the number of each type of CEFs on or within 150 feet of the site (Please provide the number of CEFs ): ~95 Acre Tract - Burleson Road8016258219 Burleson RoadOnion Creek444444 224 of 44B-14 (#’s) Spring(s)/Seep(s) (#’s) Point Recharge Feature(s) (#’s) Bluff(s) (#’s) Canyon Rimrock(s) (#’s) Wetland(s) Note: Standard buffers for CEFs are 150 feet, with a maximum of 300 feet for point recharge features. Except for wetlands, if the standard buffer is not provided, you must provide a written request for an administrative variance from LDC 25-8-281(C)(1) and provide written findings of fact to support your request. Request forms for administrative variances from requirements stated in LDC 25-8-281 are available from Watershed Protection Department. 9. The following site maps are attached at the end of this report (Check all that apply and provide): All ERI reports must include:  Site Specific Geologic Map with 2-ft Topography  Historic Aerial Photo of the Site  Site Soil Map  Critical Environmental Features and Well Location Map on current Aerial Photo with 2-ft Topography Only if present on site (Maps can be combined):  Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone with the 1500-ft Verification Zone   (Only if site is over or within 1500 feet the recharge zone)  Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone  Water Quality Transition Zone (WQTZ)  Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ)  City of Austin Fully Developed Floodplains for all water courses with           up to 64-acres of drainage 10. HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORT – Provide a description of site soils, topography, and site specific geology below (Attach additional sheets if needed): Surface Soils on the project site is summarized in the table below and uses the SCS Hydrologic Soil Groups*. If there is more than one soil unit on the project site, show each soil unit on the site soils map. Soil Series Unit Names, Infiltration Characteristics & Thickness *Soil Hydrologic Groups Definitions (Abbreviated) Soil Series Unit Name & Subgroup** Group* Thickness (feet) A. Soils having a high infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. **Subgroup Classification – See Classification of Soil Series Table in County Soil Survey. WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 2 of 6 - - - - 2Altoga Series - AgC2B0 to 2.00Lewisville Series - LcAB0 to 2.42Lewisville Series - LcBB0 to 2.42Mixed Alluvial LandD0 to 3.67Continued in Appendix A...444444425 of 44B-14Description of Site Topography and Drainage (Attach additional sheets if needed): List surface geologic units below: Group Formation Member Geologic Units Exposed at Surface Brief description of site geology (Attach additional sheets if needed): Wells – Identify all recorded and unrecorded wells on site (test holes, monitoring, water, oil, unplugged, capped and/or abandoned wells, etc.): There are (#) wells present on the project site and the locations are shown and labeled (#’s)The wells are not in use and have been properly abandoned. (#’s)The wells are not in use and will be properly abandoned. (#’s)The wells are in use and comply with 16 TAC Chapter 76. There are (#’s) wells that are off-site and within 150 feet of this site. WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 3 of 6 This site is located within the Onion Creek Watershed. The site is not located within the EdwardsAquifer Recharge or Contributing Zones as mapped by the 1998 City of Austin Watershed RegulationAreas Map. Based on a review of the USGS Montopolis, Texas 7.5 minute topographic map, the siteranges from approximately 480 to 515 feet above mean sea level, with the site sloping toward thesouth. Onion Creek (mapped as perennial or ponded by solid blue shading) is located to the adjacentsouth of the site and a pond is indicated in the central portion of the site. No other potential surfacewaters are mapped on the site.Continued in Appendix A...Taylor--A review of existing literature shows that the site is entirely underlain by is underlain by the Taylor Group(Kta), which is typified as dark gray to green-gray, calcareous, montmorillonitic clay which is generallymore calcareous in mid-portion of unit. The underlying formation is not known to form caves and voidssuitable for usage by Terrestrial Karst Invertebrates (TKIs). No faults, fractures, caves, voids, orsignificant recharge features were observed during the field reconnaissance. 0 0 - - 026 of 44B-1411. THE VEGETATION REPORT – Provide the information requested below: Brief description of site plant communities (Attach additional sheets if needed): There is woodland community on site …………………….YES  NO (Check one). If yes, list the dominant species below: Woodland species Common Name Scientific Name There is grassland/prairie/savanna on site……………..YES  NO (Check one). If yes, list the dominant species below: Grassland/prairie/savanna species Common Name Scientific Name There is hydrophytic vegetation on site ………………..YES  NO (Check one). If yes, list the dominant species in table below (next page): WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 4 of 6 The site is located within the Live Oak-Mesquite Savanna region of the Edwards Plateauphysiographic province (Amos and Gehlbach, 1988). Dominant vegetation associated with thisregion includes Texas oak (Quercus texana), live oak (Q. virginiana), plateau live oak (Q.fusiformis), honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), littlebluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), wild rye (Elymus sp.), and buffalograss (Buchloëdactyloides).Continued in Appendix A...nmesquiteProsopis glandulosalive oakQuercus virginianacedar elmUlmus crassifoliahackberryCeltis laevigatapecanCarya illinoinensisnTexas wintergrassNassella leucotrichabermudagrassCynodon dactylonsilver bluestemLupinus texensisdewberryRubus trivialisn27 of 44B-14 Hydrophytic plant species Common Name Scientific Name Wetland Indicator Status A tree survey of all trees with a diameter of at least eight inches measured four and one- half feet above natural grade level has been completed on the site.  YES  NO (Check one). 12. WASTEWATER REPORT – Provide the information requested below. On-site system(s) Wastewater for the site will be treated by (Check of that Apply):    City of Austin Centralized sewage collection system Other Centralized collection system Note: All sites that receive water or wastewater service from the Austin Water Utility must comply with City Code Chapter 15-12 and wells must be registered with the City of Austin The site sewage collection system is designed and will be constructed to in accordance to all State, County and City standard specifications.  YES  NO (Check one). Calculations of the size of the drainfield or wastewater irrigation area(s) are attached at the end of this report or shown on the site plan. YES  NO  Not Applicable (Check one). Wastewater lines are proposed within the Critical Water Quality Zone?  YES  NO (Check one). If yes, then provide justification below: WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 5 of 6 spikerushEleocharis sp.FACbald cypressTaxodium distichumOBLEmory's sedgeCarex emoryiOBLfalse indigo bushAmorpha fruiticosaFACWbox elderAcer negundoFACWnnnnn28 of 44B-1429 of 44B-14City of Austin Environmental Resource Inventory - Critical Environmental Feature Worksheet Project Name: Project Address: Site Visit Date: Environmental Resource Inventory Date: 1 2 3 4 9 5 6 7 8 Primary Contact Name: Phone Number: Prepared By: Email Address: FEATURE TYPE FEATURE ID FEATURE LONGITUDE (WGS 1984 in Meters) (WGS 1984 in Meters) FEATURE LATITUDE WETLAND DIMENSIONS (ft) RIMROCK/BLUFF DIMENSIONS (ft) coordinate notation coordinate notation X Y Length Avg Height {Wetland,Rimrock, Bluffs,Recharge Feature,Spring} (eg S-1) RECHARGE FEATURE DIMENSIONS Y Z Trend X Springs Est. Discharge cfs City of Austin Use Only CASE NUMBER: For rimrock, locate the midpoint of the segment that describes the feature. For wetlands, locate the approximate centroid of the feature and the estimated area. For a spring or seep, locate the source of groundwater that feeds a pool or stream. DMS DD YES NO Wetland Rimrock Recharge Feature Spring Seep Please state the method of coordinate data collection and the approximate precision and accuracy of the points and the unit of measurement. Method Accuracy GPS Surveyed Other sub-meter □ □ □ Professional Geologists apply seal below □ □ □ > 1 meter meter WPD ERM ERI-CEF-01 Page 7 of 8 ~95 Acre Site - Burleson Road Arthur D. Potts 8219 Burleson Road (512) 442-1122 April 8, 2016 Arthur D. Potts April 11, 2016 arthur.potts@terracon.comWetlandW-130.179932N-97.695233W1752700WetlandW-230.181285N-97.696307W15516530 of 44B-14APPENDIX A ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION 31 of 44B-14Description of Site Surface Soils Continued…  Patrick Series – PaE: Group B; Depth: 0 to 1.83 feet  Gravel Pits: An area mapped as Gravel Pits (GP) is mapped in the southeastern portion of the site. Description of Site Topography and Drainage Continued… According to the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map (prepared by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]), two wetlands classified as a riverine – lower perennial – unconsolidated shore – temporarily flooded (R2USA) are mapped within the Onion Creek channel to adjacent south. No other potential wetlands were indicated in the site vicinity. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) indicates that the southern portion of the site is mapped as Zone AE (areas within the floodway), Zone A (areas within the 100-year floodplain), and as Zone X-shaded (areas within the 500-year floodplain). The eastern portion of the site is mapped as Zone X-shaded, while the remaining areas of the site are mapped as Zone X-unshaded (areas outside of the 100- or 500-year floodplain). Review of historical aerials indicates that gravel pits appear to have operated on the southern portion of the site in the past, and a quarry was observed to the adjoining southwestern during the field investigation. Ponding was observed in this area during the site investigation; however, due to steep gradients, field delineation was not feasible. The ponding area is identified as W-2 on Exhibit 2 in Appendix B. Additionally, Onion Creek was observed along the southern site boundary. The stream was flowing at the time of the investigation, and due to steep gradient, water depth, and abundant vegetation, the stream was unable to be fully delineated. Onion Creek is identified as W-1 on Exhibit 2 in Appendix B. The pond mapped on the USGS topographic map in the central portion of the site was not observed during the site investigation. It appears that the pond may have been previously filled in. Description of Site Plant Communities Continued… Common species include Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), and tall dropseed (Sporobolus asper). The TPWD’s Vegetation Types of Texas maps the site within the “Other Native and/or Introduced Grasses”. This vegetation type is described as being a mix of native or introduced grasses and forbs on grassland sites or mixed herbaceous communities resulting from the clearing of woody vegetation. This vegetation type is also associated with the clearing of forests and may portray early stages of “Young Forest” vegetation type. Dominant species observed on the site included mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa), live oak illinoinensis), Texas (Quercus virginiana), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), pecan (Carya 32 of 44B-14wintergrass (Nassella leucotricha), and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), and bluebonnet (Lupinus texensis). Additionally, hydrophytic vegetation was observed along the corridor of Onion Creek. Dominant species included bald cypress (Taxodium distichum - OBL), Emory’s sedge (Carex emoryi - OBL), false indigo bush (Amorpha fruiticosa - FACW), box elder (Acer negundo - FACW), and spikerush (Eleocharis sp. - FACW). 33 of 44B-14 APPENDIX B EXHIBITS 34 of 44B-14520 5 2 4 5 2 4 522 5 2 6 5 1 6 5 1 6 52 0 5 1 8 506 508 5 0 6 50 2 5 0 4 6 50 5 0 4 8 0 5 5 0 6 4 1 5 512 0 51 5 1 8 4 1 5 5 1 6 504 508 5 0 6 6 0 5 504 506 508 5 0 8 4 0 5 5 0 6 5 0 4 4 5 0 5 0 6 4 0 5 5 0 6 5 1 0 8 0 5 2 1 5 510 Qt 2 0 5 518 5 2 0 5 1 8 520 Ko 8 2 5 526 524 526 5 0 4 5 0 8 5 0 6 494 4 9 0 4 9 4 4 9 0 5 0 8 524 6 2 5 5 1 6 520 5 2 2 6 9 4 2 9 4 0 9 4 8 8 4 6 8 4 8 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 8 486 484 4 8 8 6 8 4 8 8 4 486 4 8 8 4 9 6 4 9 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 2 8 4 4 8 6 486 4 8 6 6 8 4 486 6 8 4 4 8 6 482 484 466 460 514 472 474 516 498 5 0 0 5 0 4 476 5 0 0 5 0 0 460 460 458 462 464 476 470 486 506 5 1 4 482 478 472 470 466 460 458 456 460 5 1 0 480 6 8 4 478 456 4 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 8 8 4 2 8 4 4 8 4 4 7 0 492 5 0 8 5 0 2 5 0 4 Qt 4 9 0 4 8 4 4 5 4 458 45 2 480 470 468 488 462 458 46 8 466 480 474 476 478 456 454 452 458 8 4 4 4 5 2 458 450 458 456 450 448 6 5 4 6 5 4 8 5 4 454 458 452 4 5 4 456 474 464 464 482 472 462 468 460 4 9 4 500 250 4 8 6 0 0 9 4 4 8 2 484 470 466 500 474 6 9 4 0 9 4 4 8 8 4 9 SCALE IN FEET 2 490 4 8 4 4 8 6 4 9 0 4 7 8 48 8 Sources: Austintexas.gov GIS Department, USDA WSS, FEMA FIRM Panel No. 48453C0615H (Effective September 26, 2008), TNRIS, TWDB, USGS, USGS MR OSD, Service Layer Credits: 6 9 4 8 2 4 4 8 496 5 0 0 2 50 8 9 4 6 9 4 0 9 4 484 0 8 8 4 Site Specific Geologic Map with 2-ft Topography EXHIBIT Consulting Engineers & Scientists 5307 INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD. - #160 AUSTIN, TX 78735 PH. (512) 442-1122 FAX. (512) 442-1181 4 3 5 5 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 6 53 4 0 53 5 3 4 5 0 2 5 1 2 5 3 8 510 494 532 5 3 6 532 518 528 4 9 4 4 9 4 524 4 8 2 0 7 4 2 9 4 486 490 4 7 8 4 8 6 0 9 4 0 0 5 4 9 8 50 4 4 9 2 498 496 5 0 2 4 9 4 5 2 0 4 6 8 468 490 490 492 4 6 8 468 4 7 4 6 6 4 490 484 486 6 7 4 4 7 0 4 8 4 486 488 4 7 6 4 8 8 4 8 0 50 0 52 4 470 4 9 2 0 8 1 5 1 5 5 1 2 6 1 5 522 5 2 8 Legend 5 3 4 Project Boundary COA 2-ft Topography 2 2 5 RockUnit 2 3 5 5 2 0 0 3 5 Ko Qt Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: AP JC JC HJ Project No. 96167242 Scale: AS SHOWN File No.: 96167242 Date: Apr. 6, 2016 484 5 1 6 512 Geologic Atlas of Texas Geology Formation 5 2 6 4 1 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 8 9 4 6 9 4 4 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 1 35 of 44B-14W-2 W-1 Legend Project Boundary Critical Envirometnal Feature W-1 Critical Envirometnal Feature W-2 Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: AP JC JC HJ Project No. 96167242 Scale: AS SHOWN File No.: 96167242 Date: Apr. 6, 2016 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 5307 INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD. - #160 AUSTIN, TX 78735 PH. (512) 442-1122 FAX. (512) 442-1181 500 250 0 500 SCALE IN FEET Sources: Austintexas.gov GIS Department, USDA WSS, FEMA FIRM Panel No. 48453C0615H (Effective September 26, 2008), TNRIS, TWDB, USGS, USGS MR OSD, Service Layer Credits: Site 2014 Historic Aerial Photo and CEFs EXHIBIT 2 36 of 44B-14LcB GP GP HnB HnB LcA LcB PaE PaC AgC2 AgC2 PaE GP PaE LcA Md AgC2 GP LcB LcA HnB HfB Legend Project Boundary HfC USDA WSS Map Unit Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: AP JC JC HJ Project No. 96167242 Scale: AS SHOWN File No.: 96167242 Date: Apr. 6, 2016 PaC LcB Consulting Engineers & Scientists 5307 INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD. - #160 AUSTIN, TX 78735 PH. (512) 442-1122 FAX. (512) 442-1181 500 250 0 500 PaC SCALE IN FEET Sources: Austintexas.gov GIS Department, USDA WSS, FEMA FIRM Panel No. 48453C0615H (Effective September 26, 2008), TNRIS, TWDB, USGS, USGS MR OSD, Service Layer Credits: LcA LcB GP Site Soil Map Fr LcA EXHIBIT 3 37 of 44B-14520 5 2 4 5 2 4 522 5 2 6 5 1 6 5 1 6 52 0 5 1 8 506 508 5 0 6 50 2 5 0 4 6 50 5 0 4 8 0 5 5 0 6 4 1 5 512 0 51 5 1 8 4 1 5 5 1 6 5 1 0 2 1 5 8 0 5 4 0 5 5 0 6 504 508 5 0 6 6 0 5 504 506 510 Onion Creek 518 5 2 0 5 1 8 520 8 2 5 526 524 526 4 0 5 5 0 6 5 0 4 4 5 0 5 0 6 5 0 4 5 0 8 5 0 6 2 0 5 494 4 9 0 4 9 4 4 9 0 524 6 2 5 5 0 8 5 1 6 520 5 2 2 6 9 4 2 9 4 0 9 4 8 8 4 6 8 4 8 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 8 486 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 8 9 4 6 9 4 4 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 484 4 8 8 6 8 4 8 8 4 486 4 8 8 6 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 2 8 4 4 8 6 486 4 8 6 6 8 4 486 6 8 4 4 8 6 4 9 6 4 9 4 6 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 8 8 4 2 8 4 4 8 4 482 484 466 460 484 5 1 6 514 472 474 516 498 5 0 0 5 0 4 476 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 480 6 8 4 478 456 460 460 458 462 464 476 470 486 506 5 1 4 482 478 472 470 466 460 458 456 460 4 7 0 492 5 0 8 5 0 2 5 0 4 4 8 6 2 9 4 4 9 0 4 8 8 Cottonmouth Creek 4 5 4 458 45 2 480 470 468 488 462 458 46 8 466 480 474 476 478 456 454 452 458 8 4 4 4 5 2 458 450 458 456 450 448 6 5 4 6 5 4 8 5 4 454 458 452 4 5 4 456 474 464 464 482 472 462 468 460 4 9 4 500 250 4 8 6 0 0 9 4 4 8 2 484 470 466 500 474 6 9 4 0 9 4 4 8 8 4 9 SCALE IN FEET 2 490 4 8 4 4 8 6 4 9 0 4 7 8 48 8 Sources: Austintexas.gov GIS Department, USDA WSS, FEMA FIRM Panel No. 48453C0615H (Effective September 26, 2008), TNRIS, TWDB, USGS, USGS MR OSD, Service Layer Credits: 9 6 4 8 4 2 4 8 496 5 0 0 2 50 8 9 4 6 9 4 0 9 4 484 0 8 8 4 Two Foot Topography and Wells EXHIBIT 4 Project Boundary Texas Water Development Board Well 0 3 5 COA 2-ft Topography 5 2 6 2 2 5 4 1 5 COA Watershed Onion Creek 5 2 0 2 3 5 Cottonmouth Creek 512 Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: AP JC JC HJ Project No. 96167242 Scale: AS SHOWN File No.: 96167242 Date: Apr. 6, 2016 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 5307 INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD. - #160 AUSTIN, TX 78735 PH. (512) 442-1122 FAX. (512) 442-1181 4 3 5 5 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 6 53 4 0 53 5 3 4 5 0 2 5 1 2 5 3 8 510 494 532 5 3 6 532 518 528 4 9 4 4 9 4 524 4 8 2 0 7 4 2 9 4 486 490 4 7 8 4 8 6 0 9 4 0 0 5 4 9 8 50 4 4 9 2 498 496 5 0 2 4 9 4 5 2 0 4 6 8 468 490 490 492 4 6 8 468 4 7 4 6 6 4 490 484 486 6 7 4 4 7 0 4 8 4 486 488 4 7 6 4 8 8 4 8 0 50 0 52 4 470 4 9 2 0 8 1 5 1 5 5 1 2 6 1 5 522 5 2 8 Legend 5 3 4 38 of 44B-14X C AE AE AE C Legend Project Boundary FEMA Floodplain Zone X Floodway 100 Year 500 Year X Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: AP JC JC HJ X Project No. 96167242 Scale: AS SHOWN File No.: 96167242 Date: Apr. 6, 2016 500 250 0 500 SCALE IN FEET Sources: Austintexas.gov GIS Department, USDA WSS, FEMA FIRM Panel No. 48453C0615H (Effective September 26, 2008), TNRIS, TWDB, USGS, USGS MR OSD, Service Layer Credits: FEMA Floodplain Map EXHIBIT 5 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 5307 INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD. - #160 AUSTIN, TX 78735 PH. (512) 442-1122 FAX. (512) 442-1181 39 of 44B-148473 22064 22077 35718 12086 26211 25529 3032 54636 22084 1593 25530 47128 54637 7541 45665 45990 10018 9523 Legend Project Boundary COA Stream Centerline Segment COA Water Quality Creek Buffers Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zones Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zones Edwards Aquifer 1,500-ft Verification Zone 500 250 0 500 8472 SCALE IN FEET Sources: Austintexas.gov GIS Department, USDA WSS, FEMA FIRM Panel No. 48453C0615H (Effective September 26, 2008), TNRIS, TWDB, USGS, USGS MR OSD, Service Layer Credits: Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: AP JC JC HJ Project No. 96167242 Scale: AS SHOWN File No.: 96167242 Date: Apr. 6, 2016 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 5307 INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD. - #160 AUSTIN, TX 78735 PH. (512) 442-1122 FAX. (512) 442-1181 Water Quality Zones EXHIBIT 6 40 of 44B-14 APPENDIX C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 41 of 44B-14Project No. 96167242 Date Photos Taken: April 8, 2016 Photo 1 Typical site view Photo 2 Typical site view ~95 Acre Tract – Burleson road ■ Austin, Travis County, Texas 42 of 44B-14Project No. 96167242 Date Photos Taken: April 8, 2016 Photo 3 Onion Creek to the adjacent south (W-1) Photo 4 View toward ponded area in former quarry (W-2) ~95 Acre Tract – Burleson road ■ Austin, Travis County, Texas 43 of 44B-14The City of Austin (COA) Environmental Resource Inventory (ERI) was performed in accordance with generally accepted scientific and engineering evaluation practices of this profession undertaken in similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. The limitations of this ERI should be recognized. In conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and public records were not reviewed. The scope of this ERI was conducted in general accordance with the City of Austin’s Land Development Code (LDC), Section 25-8-121 (A), and the City of Austin Title 30-5. The service’s scope is not intended to be compliant or consistent with the State of Texas Edwards Aquifer Rule (30 TAC 213, Subchapter B; pertaining to Travis County, Texas) or the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Edwards Aquifer Protection Program. Field identification of Critical Environmental Features (CEFs) as defined by the COA can be seasonally influenced. Due to seasonal changes, Terracon cannot guarantee areas to exhibit or not to exhibit CEF characteristics at all times of the year. CEF wetlands were evaluated using the USACE 1987 Manual and Great Plains Regional Supplement. The manuals provide assistance for identifying wetlands based on the three criteria discussed. However, the manuals alone may not have provided enough information to document whether or not the three criteria were met. Various physical properties or other visual signs used to evaluate whether the three wetland identification criteria areas were satisfied may not be straightforward, especially in disturbed or problem areas. The manuals also allow the user to visually estimate certain indicators, such as the percentage of area covered by dominant species for the entire community. Terracon did not attempt to identify every possible plant species and did not classify soil types by laboratory methods. This report is for the exclusive use of the client and any relying government entities for the project being discussed. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or made. 44 of 44B-14