Item B-02 (C814-88-0001.12 - Davenport West PUD Amendment 12; District 10).pdf — original pdf

Backup

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-88-0001.12 Davenport West PUD Amendment 12 DISTRICT: 10 ZONING FROM: PUD TO: PUD, to change conditions of zoning ADDRESS: 4417 Westlake Dr. SITE AREA: 5.30 acres (230,868 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: Michael & Susan Dell Foundation (Anand Srinivasan) AGENT: Metcalfe, Wolff, Stuart & Williams (Michele Rogerson Lynch) CASE MANAGER Mark Graham (512-974-3574, mark.graham@austintexas.gov ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the requested substantial amendment to the Davenport West PUD, Amendment 12, increasing allowable non-residential floor area by 29,090 square feet for the proposed office on Lot 17, Block E, Tract F. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 2. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Environmental Commission reviewed the Davenport West PUD Amendment 12 case on Wednesday, December 4, 2019 and approved a motion (attached) 10-0 to recommend the PUD Amendment with conditions. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: December 17, 2019 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: January 23, 2020 ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES Allowable non-residential floor area The applicant requests approval of Davenport West PUD Amendment 12 to permit building a 29,090 square foot office building and bridge linking it to their existing office building. This issue requires an amendment to the PUD. The rest of the listed issues explain how development will meet various inter-related standards such as impervious coverage, parking and height while addressing neighborhood concerns. 1 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 2 CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: Davenport Ranch developer Westview agreed to set aside over 100 acres of their land in the Wild Basin area along Loop 360 Highway in exchange for the City of Austin agreeing to allow the transfer of development rights for 100 residential units to nearby land in Davenport Ranch. The land donation was a significant step in creating the Wild Basin Wilderness Preserve. In 1989 Westview received zoning approval on their master planned Davenport Ranch West PUD covering 444.31 acres. The largest portion of the land, 182 acres, provides for detached residences. The second largest land use, about 104 acres, is the St Stephens School Campus. Offices are the third largest class of land use in the PUD, occupying about 86 acres. The subject case is focused on a lot within Tract F, a plan for 144.91 acres of the Davenport West PUD. The plan identified Blocks and Lots with associated land uses including detached residential, office and retail. Tract F is located west of and adjacent to Capital of Texas Highway (Loop 360) and accessed primarily from Westlake Drive. The PUD permits transfers of allowable building area, Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) and impervious coverage) between lots within Tract F. Total allowable non-residential building area for Tract F is 1,228,314 sq. ft. The Applicant represents property owner, Michael and Susan Dell Foundation (MSDF). Tract F, Block E, Lot 17, the subject lot, is a 5.30 acre parcel with an existing 38,875 square foot, two- story office building at 4417 Westlake Drive located on the southwest corner of Westlake Drive and Royal Approach Drive. Applicant requests an amendment to the land use plan of the Davenport West PUD that regulates the total amount of non-residential land available for Tract F. Land Development Code 25-2-192 Subpart C. 3.1.2 D. requires a major amendment with Council approval when amending a condition of approval of the PUD zoning district. Applicant requests that the Davenport West PUD be amended to permit an additional 29,090 sq. ft. of office, listed in the PUD as “allowable non-residential building area” to permit an expansion of their offices at the current location. The proposed increase of less than 3% of allowable non-residential area would allow the 29,090 square foot addition on Lot 17, Block E, Tract F for a total of 66,095 square feet. The new PUD total for non-residential development area for Tract F would be 1,257,404 sq. ft.. Parking The new office building will be sited on the existing parking area to avoid increasing impervious coverage. Additional parking is required for both the new building and to replace the parking covered by that building. The applicant will build a 3 level parking deck beneath the new building. The PUD parking rate for administrative offices is 1 space per 300 square feet. With a total of 66,090 square feet of office the minimum required parking is 220 spaces. They are providing 221. Building Height Davenport West PUD refers to Hill Country Roadways (HCR) standards to regulate building height. The lot is in the Loop 360/Moderate Intensity zone which limits heights to 40 feet unless performance incentive enhancements (development bonuses) are achieved. The applicant indicates they will build within the 40 foot height limit. 2 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 3 Neighborhood Concerns Neighbors are expressing concerns that the Public Notice signs were not maintained continuously. The signs were damaged by wind and weather so they became curled and detached from their posts. The staff at the MSDF office found the signs and re-posted them at one point. When signs went missing again, the City re-posted the signs. Neighbors to the 4417 Westlake Drive property have contacted Austin Planning and Zoning staff about their concerns with the proposed building. Many list increased traffic and the related delays for first responders serving residents and schools. Some noted that the intersection of Westlake and Loop 360 is already often gridlocked during the morning and evening peak traffic hours. Storm water runoff and water quality issues were raised in emails to staff. Many of the residences west of the subject property are in a flood zone and have experienced increasing water levels after storms. Some thought the project should provide additional detention or water quality measures. Because the development is not increasing impervious surface it is not required to add water quality or detention ponds to the existing facilities. The Villas at Davenport neighborhood is adjacent to the subject property on the south. Staff received emails from the Homeowner’s Association and residents urging opposition to the zoning measure based on their list of expected adverse effects: Property values diminished initially by construction noise and dust and eventually by operation impacts from building, parking lot and vehicle lights, glare, reflection and noise. Applicant modified the location of the vehicle entrance to the parking garage and made commitments regarding screening, lights and building materials to mitigate impacts. Neighborhood residents commented about the City-owned water quality and retention pond situated between the curb and sidewalk along Royal Approach Drive. Some observed that it never drained and is unattractive. City of Austin was aware of drainage issues with the pond and performed maintenance including changing a membrane. City and applicant monitored the pond after maintenance and it now functions as designed, detaining water for a few days and then drying. The pond is sized according to the standards in place when it was built. It is smaller than would be required with current specifications. Applicant and City of Austin staff are discussing alternatives that would increase capacity and enhance the appearance of the pond including options for a “bio filtration pond” or rain garden. 3 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 4 The Davenport West PUD The zoning process, standards and land plan for the Davenport West PUD were established February 2, 1989. Those standards are the baseline for staff’s analysis. There are 3 PUD amendments and a restrictive covenant amendment affecting Tract F. (see related cases). Amendment 8 changed the land plan uses for approximately 30 acres from office and retail to condo and multifamily residential including Block E, Lot 16 adjacent to the subject property on the south. The Restrictive Covenant was also modified at that time to permit multi-family residential where it was previously prohibited. The land in Davenport Ranch Tract F is mostly developed. In the current case, the limit on allowable non-residential area was reached for the Tract. The Davenport West PUD allows for the transfer of buildable non-residential area, Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) and Impervious Coverage area. Amendments to the PUD include tables showing, for example, transfers of impervious coverage, changes to permitted land use and dwelling unit counts. Staff calculated Tract F, non-residential building area based on site plan records. The Davenport West PUD permits developers to defer submitting many development plans and documents until they seek building permits. For the current request, Applicant provided historical PUDs, and a schematic site plan showing existing and proposed office buildings, connecting bridge and parking area. In addition, there are PUD sheets showing the extent of Tract F, and displaying Notes and Tables showing calculations of buildable area based on slopes, calculations for the allowed impervious cover, building and parking calculations. The Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of a nonresidential building in Davenport West PUD varies by slope: Slope Maximum FAR 0-15% 0.34 15-25% 0.22 25.35% 0.11 Net Site Area Calculations on Sheet 23 of 23 show 4.73 acres of the 5.3 acre lot have slopes less than 15%. 4.73 acres x (43,560 square feet/acre) =206,038.8 square feet x FAR of 0.34=70,053 square feet of allowable non-residential area for the subject property which is greater than the proposed 66,095 total for the existing building and proposed building. That means if the lot was not subject to the PUD provision to transfer buildable area within the Tract, by this measure the lot would qualify for the additional square footage. 4 of 39B-02 Environmental Issues Impervious Cover (IC) is being reduced with the new building. Owner did not build one approved parking area south and west of the building and the proposed design is to cover existing IC with the new building and parking deck so there is 0.36 acres (15,681 sq. ft.) of approved impervious coverage available which the applicant proposes to give up. That amounts to reducing the impervious area coverage. Rather than allowing that IC to transfer to another lot, they propose to give up that increment of IC. City staff views the concession of 0.36 acres of IC as an additional element of superiority. Retention pond in right-of-way: Applicant and City are coordinating to improve appearance and function of the retention pond. The City recently changed the type of membrane used in the pond and performed other maintenance and testing. The retention pond now functions as designed, which includes holding water for up to several days after a storm. Nevertheless the parties are exploring design alternatives that would potentially make the pond more attractive. A biofiltration pond also known as a rain garden feature would be an amenity. The pond is the City’s pond on City right-of-way, however, City representatives are discussing cost sharing with the applicant as an element of superiority. Existing on site detention pond may be modified to operate better and facilitate future maintenance. There was no requirement to enlarge that pond because there was no proposed increase in impervious coverage. Flood Plain: St. Stephens Creek flows through this lot west of the building. The current floodplain and proposed Atlas 14 bounds were considered when designing the building and amending the site plan. The proposed building would be built east of the existing building and does not encroach into the flood plain. Rainwater harvesting is not required in the PUD, yet the applicant is proposing to build a system with their new building to collect rainwater and use it to water landscaping before using a conventional system. Building Design and Landscape Plans The Davenport West PUD allows projects within the PUD to defer submitting studies and plans until they seek a building permit. They are not required to provide building elevations, a final site plan or landscape plans with a zoning request. Applicant is proposing to build a 2 star Green Building to achieve superiority. In this case the applicant may provide a landscape plan to demonstrate that they are fulfilling commitments made to the City and neighbors by providing landscape for screening and enhancing the site perimeter along Royal Approach Road, Westlake Blvd. and the southern property line. They are committed to exceeding requirements in this category to achieve superiority. Further, by restricting glass reflectivity to less than 15%, applicant exceeds standards in a restrictive covenant with Creek at Riverbend neighbors. 5 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 6 Applicant is reviewing Site lighting design, looking at available technologies and proposing to exceed Austin’s Dark Sky Initiatives. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. The purpose of the Davenport West PUD was to provide areas for residential, school and office land uses in locations and with design criteria that made them compatible. The subject site has Hill Country features such as moderate to steep slopes, a creek with a significant floodway, groves of native and cultivated trees and large yards to adjacent streets on two sides and to adjacent residences on the other two. Office uses are one of the top three land uses in the Davenport West PUD and the applicant is designing an office addition that meets the impervious coverage, FAR and parking criteria. Applicant is further enhancing the building with low reflectance glass and is making commitments for screening and streetscape treatments well beyond the requirements of the PUD. Although the total allowable non- residential limit has been reached in Tract F, the applicant is asking for an increase of less than 3% of the Tract F allowable area. The FAR for the property would permit in excess of 70,000 sq. ft. where 66,095 is proposed. 2. Public facilities and services should be adequate to serve the set of uses allowed by a rezoning. A new Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required with this application. The traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed the thresholds established in the Land Development Code and for the following rationale: The site is subject to the TIA completed with the Davenport West PUD. Additional technical memoranda dated November 9, 2011 and March 2, 2012 have been re-reviewed by ATD (Nate Aubert) and conclude this proposal is within the limits of the original TIA. There is no public transportation system serving the property. There are public sidewalks along both street frontages of the property. Loop 360 Highway that serves the Davenport West PUD. Tract F via Westlake Drive experiences morning and evening peak periods of heavy traffic congestion. 3. Zoning should allow for reasonable use of the property. The MSDF lot is 5.3 acres which can accommodate the 66,095 square foot office buildings while meeting required parking standards, complying with the limits on impervious cover, preserving natural areas, enhancing street frontages and bolstering buffers to adjacent residential land use. 6 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 7 EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: Zoning Land Uses Site PUD Office North PUD Royal Approach Dr. then undeveloped land, detached SF residences South PUD detached SF residences East PUD Westlake Dr. then parking deck and mid- rise office, retail West PUD detached SF residences NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: Not Applicable TIA: Existing TIA Reviewed/Approved WATERSHED: St. Stephens Creek - Water Supply Suburban OVERLAYS: Hill Country Roadways, Loop 360/Moderate Intensity SCHOOLS: Eanes ISD Schools Bridge Point Elementary Hill Country Middle School Westlake H.S. NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS Austin Lost and Found Pets (Bunny Run Nbhd) BRNA ASSOCIATION INC. Bike Austin City of Rollingwood Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Glenlake Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation SELTexas Save Our Springs Alliance Sierra Club Austin Regional Group TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources The Creek at Riverbend Neighborhood Assoc. 7 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 8 AREA CASE HISTORIES: Number Request Commission City Council C814-88-0001 Loop 360 and Westlake Drive unzoned to PUD To Grant Apvd 02/02/1989 C814-88-0001.08 Gables Westlake 3100-3320 North Capital of Texas Highway PUD to PUD Change land plan to allow multifamily residential use, SF- 6 regs, 323 units, 40’ height To Grant Apvd 08/25/2005 C814-88-0001(RCA) 3100-3320 North Capital of Texas Highway allow multi-family To Grant Apvd 08/25/2005 w/ RC 2005179919 to allow Multifamily residences C814-88-0001.09 3300-3328 Block of North Capital of Texas Highway 1.7 acre site, change IC, 0.11:1 FAR, 47’ max height, 8,000 max bldg. sq. ft. To Grant Apvd 03/22/2007 C814-88-0001.11 (case # changed from C814-2014-0160) 3600 North Capital of Texas Highway Restaurant add’n 393 sq. ft., add 6 parking spaces (administrative approval 11/05/2014) Not Applicable C814-88.0001.12 4417 Westlake Drive PUD to PUD Increase allowable non-commercial area by 29,090 sq. ft. for Tract F, Block E, Lot 17 Environmental Comm. Sched 12/04/2019 ZAP sched 12/17/2019 Sched 01/23/2020 RELATED CASES: C814-88-0001–Original Davenport Ranch West PUD–approved by City Council on February 2, 1989 8 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 9 OTHER STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan •Site plans will be required for any new development other than single-family or duplexresidential.•Any new development is subject to Subchapter E. Design Standards and Mixed Useunless indicated otherwise by the Davenport PUD. Additional comments will be madewhen the site plan is submitted.HILL COUNTRY ROADWAY A portion of the site is located within 1,200 feet of the Loop 360/Westlake Drive intersection and within a Hill Country Roadway Corridor. The site is located within the moderate intensity zone of Loop 360. The site may be developed with the following maximum floor-to-area ratio (FAR): Slope Maximum FAR 0-15% 0.34 15-25% 0.22 25-35% 0.11 >35% 0.11 •The allowable height is 40’ unless performance incentive enhancements (DevelopmentBonuses) outlined in § 25-2-1128/1129 are achieved.•SP5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed use, the site plan willneed to be approved by the Land Use Commission.•FYI: This reviewer strongly recommends that all past amendments to the PUD are putinto a single, typed, document that is organized by sections and clearly states whatchanges occurred with each amendment.•FYI: Additional design regulations will be enforced at the time a site plan is submitted.•FYI: A portion of your site is in the floodplainAustin Water Utility Note added to Sheet 23: THE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD WILL PROVIDE FOR RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION. POTABLE WATER SHALL NOT BE USED FOR IRRIGATION UNTIL RAINWATER HARVESTING SUPPLIES HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED. 9 of 39B-02C14-88-0001.12 10 Flood Plain Review Site has floodplain located on it – both a FEMA AE zone as well as an unstudied A zone, but the City of Austin has not studied this creek recently. PUD amendment is to allow a building to be built along Westlake Drive with a pedestrian bridge over the parking lot to get to the main building. No net increase in impervious cover, no size increase in detention pond, though improvements are to be completed to make maintenance easier. City Arborist Review Applicant committed to planting trees along both Royal Approach and Westlake Drive frontages and along the property line common to the MSDF office and Villas residences. INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW Exhibit A: Zoning Map Exhibit B: Aerial Map Exhibit C: Master Index Site Plan Map Exhibit D: Davenport West PUD – Tract F, Section 5 Exhibit E: Davenport West PUD, Sheet 23 - Lot 17, Block E, Tract Exhibit F: Landscape Plan - Trees Correspondence Received Exhibit H: Plantings PlanExhibit J: Environmental Commission Recommendation 10 of 39B-0212041111071-A16932139A45771986140304115751824311F12261913342-A2666A64362311281738A13265533851A601427211547D125935-A122081563117334214121881462233134741514651324316251123175491352595621611455A421A1836158211841-A164-A106883211103718834278797175441654A1323263581015E104893-A2925014C814-88-0001.12SF-1RRSF-1SF-2SF-1PUDLOSF-2SF-1SF-2SF-2PUDPUDPUDPUDI-RRPUDLASF-2BUNNY RUNPIXIE CVDOGWOODCREEK CVELFLAND DRGUN BOW CTMEANDERINGCREEK CVBUNNY RUNWESTLAKE DRNEEDLES DRHILLBILLY LNRIVERCREST DRROYAL APPROACH DRDOGWOODCREEK DRBUNNY RUNWESTLAKE DRHUNTERWOOD PTST STEPHENS DRN CAPITAL OFTEXAS HWY SBN CAPITAL OFTEXAS HWY NBF28E28F27E27 ±This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of thePlanning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is madeby the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:LOCATION:SUBJECT AREA:GRID:MANAGER:C814-88-0001.124417 WESTLAKE DR5.2950 ACRESF28MARK GRAHAM1'' = 400'ZONING BOUNDARYCREEK BUFFERPENDING CASE!!!!!!SUBJECT TRACTDavenport West PUD Amendment #12 (Michael & Susan Dell Foundation)Exhibit A11 of 39B-0212041111071-A16932139A45771986140304115751824311F12261913342-A2666A64362311281738A13265533851A601427211547D125935-A122081563117334214121881462233134741514651324316251123175491352595621611455A421A1836158211841-A164-A106883211103718834278797175441654A1323263581015E104893-A2925014C814-88-0001.12SF-1RRSF-1SF-2SF-1PUDLOSF-2SF-1SF-2SF-2PUDPUDPUDPUDI-RRPUDLASF-2BUNNY RUNPIXIE CVDOGWOODCREEK CVELFLAND DRGUN BOW CTMEANDERINGCREEK CVBUNNY RUNWESTLAKE DRNEEDLES DRHILLBILLY LNRIVERCREST DRROYAL APPROACH DRDOGWOODCREEK DRBUNNY RUNWESTLAKE DRHUNTERWOOD PTST STEPHENS DRN CAPITAL OFTEXAS HWY SBN CAPITAL OFTEXAS HWY NBF28E28F27E27Copyright nearmap 2015 ±This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of thePlanning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is madeby the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:LOCATION:SUBJECT AREA:GRID:MANAGER:C814-88-0001.124417 WESTLAKE DR5.2950 ACRESF28MARK GRAHAM1'' = 400'ZONING BOUNDARYCREEK BUFFERPENDING CASE!!!!!!SUBJECT TRACTDavenport West PUD Amendment #12 (Michael & Susan Dell Foundation)Exhibit B12 of 39B-02•I' . ';· -�­,.--.• f, •'• I I . '· ·,.I , I. 1· . �-'� I "· . ' . ,.._,, ' :f•'·'). -�)-�-.I. J}' ... ··•·... -� .. •·· .LOC A.TION MAP (not to scale)0. . I r_-... -:,;.-.-.. --.-,-·--------------. ) ' f, .... . DJ,.V !fl'O.RT L\HCH WZ:S1' l',U.D. . . 111,& D•v•npqrt Banch Vost f.U.D. con•l•t• of approki••toly ttt,81Ac;n• al 1.ernt depleted o,i qonceptu.d alt• pl•aa H Tract• B, c_, c-J, D, r and o. &ucb land and Tract·• uo depictod h•teon •• Bo-c0.lon• OO• thtollgh-Seun, •If ·•.._•tlp4 bdowr any 'pOrtion of •uctt l,and ••Y be und•t aopuat• ovn•r•hip Ud/Or roat�lctlv■ covnant� frora ti•• ta ti•• �tc":� Coa■ht• of Tract D la porticm of D_av•nport. H .. t �hH• 11, to -boOWIUl4 by D•\f•hport J.i•i t•d• lic2'10H. 'li& COQ■t.t• ot Tract c-J 40.v_enport ••t Jl,hu• UI}, to be ·o,md by Du.npert Llidtod, • Con-•t• of·��•ct CC• portion ot D&�enpoct .,..t Ph••• lJ, to bf# owa•4 b' t� Prot••t•nt lplaco�l Chui-ch Counoll of th• Dto .. ae ofh••• SSCTIOH f(JUR Cont; •t• ·of t.h• pO.r�lon ct r . f Phu. II)� to be owo•.d 'J tho .••.tant ·l_ph a). Ch�n:b Co'1noU �of .... ,_ .... TOXU> Ott, \"\"S. � � ee �-..o fa.'S, AN V ... . ·, . . . . . -·:-. .I . .; • ... !!!,11 .. FIJ!. . 't-;;�-���-';:;;;:-:;";;::::;;;m:"11:� .... ----""''--,"'Con•;•t• or the porUon of 1'raot· ·r fa portion Of bav•npor •t f'hu. l·U, to r. Oli(ned by D.v_eoport Llah:•d• 8&gl9! _£Ij _CoQ.iat:• o-t' Tr.ct 1 (a portion Or oavepport Ja,u:h, PhHe U, to be OWOll♦by O.V•nport Li■ited. UC'l'I'JJI 8£Yflll Conalata of trut G <• pa.rtlan of oaV•nport RaQch, �b••• 7)1 ta be own.d by Davenport Llal ted". . ( . . ' .•• , ......PUD APPROVAL CaseNumber:ce1t1:-i�'-OWl,IO-C�nyons@ eoei �Approved by Plannlng Commission.goning and Platting Commission}n: PEC • !I(date), 2 QI!) (year). · Approved by Council on· t1AR.CI{ /a (date), 2.0IL\, . (year), under Sections 401, 402,421,422,423,144,392,411, and .:::_of Chapter 25-2 of the City�-�dt�.! W�ent\. ·•. NOTE: THI FOLLOWING VARIANCES, WAIVERS AND BONUSES HAVE BEENAPPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT BY THE CITY COUN<;IL OF THE CITY OFAUSTIN ON DECEMBER 15, 1988. 1. 2, 3 4. S, 6. 7. 8, 9. 10, •Exceed statutory impervious cover and cut and fill on roadways onSections 1,2, 4 t'!d S. Provide a second stream crossing oo Sections 4 and S.Reduce downstream burrer on Block A Lot I and Block ii Lot 33,Section I • Reduce setback (rom a Critical Environmental Feature on Section S.Establish double frontage lots on Sections I, 4 and 5,Reduce rlght-.or-way width (or Bunny Run on Seclio.ns 4 and S, Exceed statutory maximum block length on Sections I, 4 and S.Exceed statutory maximum cui-d�•sac length on SecUon, I, 2 and 5,Delete sidewalks alone · both . sides. ot St. Stephens School Road, St.Stephens Cove, Pascal Lane, Pascal Lano Court, and_ Pase,! Cove;delete ildewal�s along one side of Capitol of Texas H1ahway North, Hillbilly. Lane, Bunny Run Road, Royal . A1111rnaoh Drh-c, H•rnerChase. Toon Town Cove, Roser Rabbll Cove, Rabbit Ears Cove,FJopsy Cove and Bunny Run Cove • Delete balance of property between and adjoining Section 3 andSection 4 froill prcllmlnary planning, • •.• :::-.,, , 11, ,,Reduce the Highway Yeaetative Buffer on Block B Lot 33, Section l. SHEET 18 OF t't ' '"'-"'.l;..;;:. .. 12, ,.;i;, thci. pertor•l\ce incentive provisions of tho Hill, Country. •. ~..._; \·1tcw1-, Ordillanal' th•. non-resl.dential portions of Secuon I for. -ii-� in F.A.R. d: building hclsltl. ---.:.!..__ I � ,, � . . �:: ,. . . .. -. � .. .....,_ .:.� ' .... ;.;.. ' . , .... �· .... · ..... _ -·-. "••·-·SHEET 2, 7, 11, AND 14 OF 18ARE COVER / CALCU�A1ION SHEETS .TJ,l1 P,U.D, l1 ••bJecl lo tho re1lrlct_loa1lillpo1e<I by Rntrlclhe Conaaatt, filed at . the City of A■stl■ Pla-■1■1 OUlce, cue numberCJ14-88..000t. ·, -' • ~,.,,,.,,_,..,-..�).""!l.1!141"'_,111.f•A.lllll!Pl,.-illl_"·:111,'!'. •atlllll«�. ,i"!\•illll'lli•lltfp,-.1��• . .,.4t. ,. . aoenpor Secllon 1 (Tract D} Secllon2 (TraotC-3) • 200 0 . Lill land Ilse ·AfA·I Olllce -IYI; ed IA5e.9 y B 1-�l Single-family . B 30 Cc,nserv. Exmt 1333 rntwe 834 OHlce R.O.W. RoadW&y Tolal l.lll LaQdUsa A 1 17 Slngle-famlfy R.O.W. Roadway 800 16 18, 68.73 ac.1.53 ac.10.00 .c. 7.41 ac .3,02 ac.113.48 ac .Ac[lla1111 32.47 ac. 1.56 ac. 34.03 ac ..Sectlon3 (T1&ctC). Lill 835 l �nd lJso -Arreaga ·.St. Stephens School 104,84 ac. Seel!Qn 4 & 6 I.QI Land Ilsa(Tra.ct F) A 1·18 Slrigle-famlly B 1-36 Sl119ie-famlly 8 37 Office B 38 OfficeB 39. Office B 40 Office ·B41 J A1ifeag& 20.20 sc.11.45 ac.10.5@ 80, 1.83 ac. 4,56 ac.3,78 ac. 8ll lie. I> • l.. Ml>L 't'1 I" i..-., 1. '/ t, • ::l,A, 0,..Mi;.<U!,IA,L ·e -I'.<> "'n>NN� / (.,.;.1-Jt>bl"IIN\U!'-\/. �.-:\f<::" i.. 1£> {"' (-,'>'ill ,J . ( F 1-11 s1ng1e-ranjliy G 1•14 Slngie-fa�lly R.O.W. Roadway . Total .c.8.42 ac.4.97 ac.15.59 ac. y,..._,,, __ , -.......,_...., Secllon7(Tract G) Lon Enllte Land Ilsa·Lill µmdllae Ph 7, CondomlnlUm (70 uni Sac 1, Slngle-famlfy J.oi 1 _Conse,v. Exmt R.O.W. RoadWay Total . 144.91 ac. M•eag@ 3,37 ac. Am'lliiaa 17.84 ac.23.54 ac.1:09 ac.1.43 at. 43.90 !!Cl' --�•y .v" ·,,,......"."-...,_OVERALL SUMMARY av GENERAL LAND u�...-......_8flH ..,,,..,.. d::1" ill�.-,0 Bih 9Me.rtalall io 74 ae Condominium � > " /!·107,,IW ac. Single-family 182.10 DC. 81. Sl91111l!na School use 104 .fl4 DC, Coneerlall.on Easement 2,82 DC. Right-of-way · 21.60 ac. TQlal project acr'lage 444,31 aa. ---'.""-.-<,.____..,...__,)"' . \.... .. • I �NNIN(} ORIGINJY..ut;l'.tllll'¥lLY��-lC!EU.U BURKS DEVELOIP.MENT-iNC-:1 R�ptographlcsI • q· :,-0... ' r V1 u.J s '.,,.. I u .. z.l<C. • u.J • 0,::) 0 >< u..J •I•' • --·o··· z-.SHEF.T10 . ' .. '"" " . ' , Exhibit C - Case C814-88-0001.1213 of 39B-02Exhibit D -Case C814-88-0001.1214 of 39B-02Revision 4:Revision 3:Revision 2:Revision 1:Checked By:Scale (Hor.): File:Date:Job No.SHEETofDrawn By:Snapshot:Scale (Vert.):JAMISON CIVIL ENGINEERING LLCJCE(TX. PE FIRM REG. #F-17756)13812 RESEARCH BLVD. #B-2AUSTIN, TEXAS 78750OFFICE: (737) 484-0880INFO@JAMISONENG.COMH:\DAVENPORT WEST C\DWG\HPE FILES\HPE-BASE.DWG232310/29/191"=40'SITE PLANLOT 17 - BLOCK EDAVENPORT WEST P.U.D.SECTION 5TRACT FFILE NUMBER: C814-88-0001.12APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION / ZONING & PLATTING COMMISSION ON:Rev. 1Rev. 2Rev. 3FOR THE DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DEPARTMENTP.U.D. APPROVALSheet 23 OF 23 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON:(DATE)(DATE)UNDER SECTION(S) OF CHAPTER 25-2 OF COA LDC.FINAL ORDINANCE READING:NOTES:1.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD SHALLCOMPLY WITH A 2-STAR AEGB REQUIREMENT.2.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD SHALLPROVIDE FOR RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPEIRRIGATION. POTABLE WATER SHALL NOT BE USED FOR IRRIGATIONUNTIL RAINWATER HARVESTING SUPPLIES HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED.3.SUBMISSION OF DETAILED SITE PLANS, LANDSCAPE PLANS, ANDHERITAGE TREE SURVEYS ARE REQUIRED WITH THE SITE PLAN FORPERMITTING PER THE FIRST PUD AMENDMENT.4.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLREQUIRE 427 INCHES OF TREES TO BE PLANTED.5.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLPERMIT AND RECONSTRUCT THE CITY OF AUSTIN WATER QUALITYPOND SERVING ROYAL APPROACH THROUGH A COST SHARINGAGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN.6.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLUTILIZE FULLY SHIELDED AND HOODED LIGHTING TO COMPLY WITHDARK SKIES INITIATIVE.7.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A PARKING GARAGE FOR ANADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDING WITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOTE-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALL HAVE GREEN SCREEN FOR VINES ONTHE SOUTH, NORTH AND EAST SIDES THAT ARE EXPOSED.8.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLHAVE GLASS REFLECTIVITY LESS THAN 15%.9.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLBE NO CLOSER THAN 100 FEET FROM THE SOUTHERNMOST PROPERTYLINE OF THE SITE.10.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLMODIFY THE EXIT MEDIAN ONTO ROYAL APPROACH TO BETTER DIRECTTRAFFIC TOWARDS WESTLAKE DRIVE.11.THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGWITH THE 12TH AMENDMENT ON LOT E-17, TRACT F OF THE PUD, SHALLHAVE NO BUILDING SIGNAGE.Exhibit F15 of 39B-020: Ll o_ -0 0 ru <D "" Cri -Aj -ru ru .D w "-=> = >--= :< u -a u m '° <D C> ,,-0 C> ' --co ~ '-m a. _,,-Ll _,,-c "' ~ a. w .,_, ~ I/) ,,-"' "" 0 ~ m co UJ ~ C> C> ~ ' -"" "' ,,-"" "" 0 ~ "" L I I I I I \/VIRE & !Cit\ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ • 187 P.0.B. TRACT 1-E· / CJ 0 <{ () E "-<t m \ ---/ •s I I I I I I I _/ I APPENDIX P-1 ·EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1, . Th.e contractor shall install erosion/sedimentation controls arid tree/natural ·area protective fencing prior to any site preparation work (clearing, grubbing or excavation). 2. The placement of erosion/s~dimentation controls shall be in accordance with the Environmental Criterta Manual and the approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. 3. The Placement of tree/natural area protective fencing shall be in accordance with the City of -Austin standard Notes for Tree and Natural Area Protection and the approved GradingfTree and . Natura! Area Plan. 4. A pre.construction conference shall be held on·site with the contractor, design Engineer/permit applicant and Environmental Inspector after installation of the erosion/sedimentation controls and tree/natural area protection. measures and prior to beginning any site preparation work. The contractor shall notify the Environmental and Conservation Service Department, 499·2278, at least three days prior to the meeting date. 5. Any major variation in mat"erials or locations of controls or fences from those shown on the approved plans will require a revision and must be approved by the reviewing Engineer, Environmental Specialist or City Aborist aS appropriate. Major revisions must be approved by the Planning and Development Department and the Watershed Protection Department. Minor changes to be made as field revisions to the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan may be required by the Environmental Inspector during the course of construction to correct control inadequacies. 6. The contractor is required to inspect the controls and fences at weekly intervals and after · significant rainfall events to insure that they are functioning properly. The person(s) responsible for maintenance of controls and fences shall immediately make any necessary repairs to damaged areas. Silt accumulation at controls must be removed when the depth reaches six (6) lnches. 7. Prior to final acc~ptance by the City, haul roads and wateiway crossings constructed for temporary contractor access must be removed, accumulated sediment removed from the waterway and the area· restored to the original grade and revegetated. All land clearing debris shall be disposed of in approved spoil disposal sites. 8. All work must stop if a void in the rock substrate is discovered which is; one square foot in total area; blows air from within the substrate and/or consistently receives water during any rain event At this time it is the responsi'1ility of the· Project Manager to immediately contact a City of Austin Environmental Inspector forfrther investigation. I I ' / I I I I I I I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 62 TR.EE LEGEND ~~ NON-PROTECTED TREE TO BE RETAINED / '1 NON-PROTECTED TREE ( . \ s2 J TO BE REMOVED ,_/ PROTECTED TREE TO BE RETAINED _DESCF;(ifTION QT'( 0 STREETYARD/SUFFER CANOPY TREE ~I <;& STREETYARD/SUFFER ORNAMENTAL TREE 57 G STREETYARD/SUFFER S~RUS 60 (};J PARKING LOT TREE I~ 0 SCREENING CANOPY TREE @ SCREENING ORNAMENTAL TREE 20 0 SCREENING SHRUB 42 fl) REPLACEMENT TREE 23 0 ADDITIONAL 10% REPLACEMENT TREES f~~ ~~ ,~---~ -~--1 :.:...: --: ., -~-· ':. ~ ; . ' :.:--=--~--· _-,_-~ r;-c------l;;::~i.-"' . ---~ -UNDISTURBED NATURAL AREA RESTORED REVEGETATION AREA LOW INTENSITY REVEGETATION (RESTORATION) WITH THE INCLUSION OF 1REES AND SHRUBS AS SHOWN ON PLAN I ~;-. ............ ~! 40 30 20 10 0 40 80 1 20 1 " 40' SITE PLAN RELEASE """"'5' •• ;;.-r FILE NUMBER,Sf'· QQ • d4it 30 EXPIRATION DATE' 3 / 2-/ 1~_;_ _ CASE MANAGER, T. &21 l--¥P!CATION DATE, , a 1" r i?D APPROVED ADMINSTRATIVELY ON'·-~3"-+Jl-~'-t-O~f _________ _ APPROVED BY PLANNING COMlllSION ON:·_---~---~------~ APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON:=~=-------------~~ ZG~~OFTimCOACOD~ ZONJNG,,_ ~f)~?t~f] __ SP-00-2463B DATE OF REWSllJ~ 0 I ti1 IQ~ """-'" LMWJ44 1l>o1L. REV. 2= . ' • ""'· ,, ________ _ --I I SHEE"~~ 5 OF 2'7 Exhibit F - Case C814-88-0001.1216 of 39B-02From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Attachments:Vincent LambiaseGraham, MarkRE: Villas at Davenport - Zoning OppositionWednesday, September 25, 2019 5:09:15 PM2019-09-25 Letter protesting Dell Foundation Expansion.docx*** External Email - Exercise Caution ***From:  Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 4:22 PMTo: Subject: Villas at Davenport - Zoning OppositionProfessionally Managed by Goodwin & CompanyVillas at DavenportVillas at Davenport Owners,Everyone should have received the official notice from the City of Austin that the Dell Foundation (adjacent to the Villas) is requesting a zoning change in order to build a second office building. Your Board has been working for several months to understand the proposal and its impact on the Villas. There are many reasons why we feel this would be a detriment to our community with the most obvious being the potential negative impact on our property values. It is imperative that each of us notifies the city of our position and urges them to reject the application. Attached is the original notice for your reference and a suggested template for you to use to draft your own letter. It can be sent via email or USPS. In addition to your personal reasons for requesting denial of the application, we suggest some of the following; the Foundation was aware of the zoning/restrictions when they purchased the property and now want a change which will adversely affect us; we purchased our homes at a high price point with the understanding that this property was "built out"; another building with a larger and taller profile will dramatically change the neighborhood from residential to commercial; the sky bridge connecting the buildings is on the Villas side; there would be a dramatic increase in traffic and density, which the small streets cannot handle; the environment will be compromised i.e. traffic, noise, lighting, water quality, aesthetics; and this zoning change does not serve the public, only thewww.goodwintx.cominfo@goodwintx.com17 of 39B-02 Foundation. Your board welcomes any feedback, suggestions, or offers of assistance as we move forward. Please feel free to contact any of us for further information. Debbie Novelli Greg Hooser Dean Truitt Copyright 2019CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov.18 of 39B-02 9/25/19 Mr. Mark Graham City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department 505 Barton Springs Road Austin, TX 78704 Via email: Mark.Graham@austintexas.gov RE: Case Number C814-88-0001.12 NOTICE OF FILIING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Graham, I have received the attached notice of Case Number C814-88-0001.12 as the owner of property located within 500’ of the proposed rezoning. I urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject and deny the request of Applicant for the above referenced amendment. 1. Traffic at the intersection of 360 and Westlake Drive is beyond gridlock between the hours of 8:00 – 9:00am and 4:00 – 6:00pm Monday thru Friday 2. Traffic on Westlake Drive (east of Hwy 360) reaching over capacity during these same hours. 3. The noise and pollution caused by this traffic has severely impacted our community 4. The addition of this building will place our community of 31 homes in the middle of an industrial park Sincerely Vincent Lambiase 4501 Westlake Drive #19 Austin, TX 78746 19 of 39B-0220 of 39B-0221 of 39B-0222 of 39B-0223 of 39B-02September 23, 2019 Mr. Mark Graham City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department Via email: Mark.Graham austintexas. ov City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department 505 Barton Springs Road Austin, Texas 78704 RE: Case Number: C814-88-0001.12 NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT [the "Notice'1 Dear Mr. Graham: I have received the attached notice of Case Number: C814-88-0001.12. My residence is within 500 feet. This entire process has been so incredibly frustrating and the Applicant is just using their weight to try to totally minimalize the impact of this request. But, it is not a simple deal. They want to throw out existing zoning, tear up earth and build an entirely new building of 3 or 4 stories. Oh, and add a luxury sky bridge... Never mind they already leave their water ponds unkept and often broken. Never mind that school busses and children have to use the very thin 1 lane Westlake Drive. Never mind they don't need the space and "are planning for the next 10 years". Never mind that they don't seem to have a care about traffic worries or water quality issues. I'm not a land expert -but would be very curious to see where Applicant has shown any benefit to anything of what they are requesting? Have they submitted any plans showing where they plan to pay for or improve roads or access? Have they offered to re-do and add to water· filtration systems that already don't seem to work. I've had to call Code Compliance on them several times [records available]. Please do the right things for our environment, safety and our children. I urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject and deny the request of Applicant for the above and declinin Case Number: C814-88-0001.12 Thank you, ~{J~ Alyson Perrine 4501 Westlake Drive #1, Austin, TX 78746 cc: Mr. Greg Guernsey, Director [US mail] Mr. Jerry Rusthoven; Assistant Director [US mail] 24 of 39B-02CITY OF AUSTIN -JNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT P.O BOX 1088 ~USTIN, TEXAS 78767 -1088 PERRINE, ALYSON OR CURRENT RESIDENT 4501 WESTLAKE DR APT 1 AUSTIN TX 78746-1511 NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZIP 78754 $ 000.50() O?. 4V'I oooo3'.'i1!joG~3EP 1:.i 2orn Mailing Date: September 13, 2019 Case Number: C814-88-0001.12 Este aviso le informa de una audiencia publica tratando de un cambio de zonificacion dentro de una distancia de 500 pies de su propiedad. Si usted desea recibir informacion en e panol, por favor Harne al (512 974-3531. You are being notified because City Ordinance requires that all property owner within 500 feet, those who have a City utility service address within 500 feet, and registered environmental or neighborhood organizations who e declared boundaries are within 500 feet be notified when an application has been received. The rezoning of a property requires approval by a Land Use Commission and final approval by theiCity Council. When scheduled, you will receive a notice for each public bearing that will provide the date, time, and location of the public hearing. You are encouraged to paiticipate in thi process. If you have any questions concerning this application, please contact Mark Graham of the Planning and Zoning Department at 512-974-3574 or at Mark.Graham@austintexas.gov and refer to the Case Number at the top right of this notice. However, you may also find i11formation on this case at our web site: h tt1>s ://a be.a us tin texas.gov /web/perm it/public-search-other Applicant: Metcalfe, Wolff, Stuart & Williams, LLP, Michele Roirerson Lynch, (512) 404-2251 Owner: Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, (512) 600-5525 Location: 4417 Westlake Drive (see attached map) Name of Planned Unit Davenport West PUD Amendment #12 Development: (Michael & Susan Dell Foundation) Nature of Amendment: The Applicant is proposing to amend a previously approved land use plan. to allow for additional office square footage. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our web site \AJU.T\hl !lll~t.fntPV4'.lC rTA-,;r/nln"f".,...,_;..,.,~ 25 of 39B-02 September 30, 2019 Mr. Mark Graham City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department 505 Barton Springs Road Austin, TX 78704 Via email: Mark.Graham@austintexas.gov RE: Case Number C814-88-0001.12 NOTICE OF FILIING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Graham, I have received the attached notice of Case Number C814-88-0001.12 as the owner of property located within 500’ of the proposed rezoning. As President of the Villas at Davenport HOA, I am submitting our unanimous request that the Planning and Zoning Commission reject and deny the request of Applicant for the above referenced amendment for the following reasons: • The adjacent Villas at Davenport is a 32 home community of $1m+ homes. This community was developed based on the knowledge that the property at 4417 Westlake Drive was ‘built out’, and no additional structures were allowed. The map sent with the notice is misleading as it does not show these homes and presents the tract as one large property. • The proposed office building and garage are much larger profile than the existing structure and will basically be in our backyards. (the parking lot is now at the property line). There is no doubt this construction will have a significant negative impact on our property values and ability to enjoy our homes. • When the subject property was purchased, the owners were aware of the existing PUD agreement and its limitations. Now they want to modify the zoning “so the foundation can continue to operate in Westlake close to their home”. • The surrounding area is primarily residential and only accessed by the two small roads of Royal Approach and Westlake Drive. Additional traffic will have an extremely negative impact on our environment and create safety issues with the ability of 1st responders to timely service us. • Primary points of access to the two neighborhood schools (Bridgepoint Elementary and St Stephens) are off Royal Approach and Westlake Drive. We cannot afford to further congest these roads. • The creek behind the property is becoming compromised and has flooded homes in recent years as more and more construction has occurred. • Changing zoning WILL hurt our environment—traffic density, air quality, nuisance lighting, water quality, noise, and aesthetics • A change in zoning will NOT result in a condition superior to the status quo. • A change in zoning WILL detrimentally impact the neighborhood character. While we all appreciate and applaud all the good work the Dell Foundation does for our community, we recognize they have the resources to relocate if their current facility does not meet their needs. The concerns noted above are long term and do not begin to address the nightmare that construction of an office building would create in an environment so close to residences. Thank you for this consideration of declining Case Number C814-88-0001.12 Sincerely, Deborah Novelli 4501 Westlake Drive #17, 78746 26 of 39B-02From:Tom TraweekTo:Graham, MarkSubject:proposed zoning changes by Dell FoundationDate:Thursday, October 03, 2019 12:41:18 PM*** External Email - Exercise Caution ***October 3, 2019Mr. Mark GrahamCity of Austin Planning and Zoning Department505 Barton Springs RoadAustin, TX 78704 Via email: Mark.Graham@austintexas.govRE: Case Number C814-88-0001.12NOTICE OF FILIING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Mr. Graham,We have received the notice of Case Number C814-88-0001.12, and as owners of a property located within 500’ of the proposed rezoning, we urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject and deny the request for the above referenced amendment, as written.When we purchased our home five years ago, we were specifically informed that the Dell Foundation property was “built out”, and any expansion was specifically restricted by zoning regulations. This was important to us, as Westlake Drive in our area already serves as an access and egress point for St. Stephen’s School, numerous homes in the Aqua Verde, Lakeside and Rivercrest communities, as well as the commercial buildings at the corner of Loop 360 and Westlake Drive. Without a concurrent expansion in capacity for Westlake Drive, the traffic congestion in our neighborhood would clearly be further increased by an expanded Dell facility.The increased traffic creates both environmental and property value issues. The additional noise and congestion associated with more vehicles will adversely affect the aesthetics or our neighborhood, which in turn will negatively impact our property27 of 39B-02 values. This proposed zoning change does nothing to benefit the communities affected by it, but instead only benefits the Dell Foundation.Again, we urge you preserve our neighborhoods by denying the proposed zoning change. There are lots of others places around Austin or Round Rock that the Dell Foundation can expand without adversely affecting so many families.Please so not hesitate to contact us if we can be of help with this decision or if you have any additional questions Sincerely,Stephen and Jane Traweek4501 Westlake Dr. #13Austin, TX 78746 cc: Mr. Greg Guernesey, Director (US mail)Mr. Jerry Rusthoven, Asst. Director (US mail)CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov.28 of 39B-02ANNE BRENNAN4501 Westlake Drive #14Austin, Texas 78746-l5Ll(5L2) er4-s514 October 5,2019Mr. Mark GrahamCity of Austin Planning and Zoning Department505 Barton Springs RoadAustin, TX78704Via email: Mark.Graham@austintexas.govRE: Case Number C814-88-0001.12; NOTICE OF FlLllNG OF APPLICATION FOR ANAMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Susan and Michael DellFoundation)Dear Mr. Graham:My husband, Greg Hooser, and I are residents of The Villas at Davenport Ranch andtherefore owners of real property located within 500' of the above-referenced proposedrezoning for property of the Dell Foundation. We respectfully but strongly urge the Planningand Zoning Commission to deny the referenced application.We purchased our home as The Villas were being built, carefulto considerthe surroundingneighborhoods and properties, including the current Dell Foundation property. We (and wesuspect most, if not all, of our neighbors) purchased our home in reliance on the fact thatany further expansion of the Dell Foundation property was specifically restricted by existingzoning regulations. Approval of this rezoning application means our reliance on the City'szoning regulations was, at best, misplaced.Approval of this rezoning proposal will have a substantial adverse impact on The Villasresidents and the surrounding neighborhoods, and especially on the property values in TheVillas itself. Even during the construction phase of the proposed expansion, the alreadyheavy traffic on Westlake Drive west of Loop 360 will likely increase exponentially, asWestlake Drive serves as the access street for large commercial buildings and businessesnear Loop 360, for St. Stephen's School, and for the adjacent neighborhoods of Rivercrest,29 of 39B-02Lakeside and Aqua Verde. lt is even likely to increase traffic on Cedar, which runsbetween Riverbend Church and Bridgepoint Elementary School.The additional noise and congestion associated with heavier traffic loads will alsonegatively impact our neighborhood's environment and aesthetics. The Villas is now arelatively quiet and peaceful place during most of the day and night, with heavy trafficduring extended morning and evening rush hours. That would change with the additionaltraffic load throughout the day from the additional office and parking capacity. Ourresidential neighborhoods would simply become more surrounded by commercial activity.Approval of this rezoning application would represent yet another expansion of commercialactivity away from along Loop 360 and into the surrounding residential neighborhoods.We, of course, recognize the contributions Dell and the Dell Foundation have made to ourlarger community and wish we weren't forced to oppose the Foundation's plans. Yes, weknow that the proposal represents a substantial expansion of the facilities to the immediatebenefit of the Foundation. But we also know of no reason why such benefits wouldn't alsobe attractive to a non-Dell, non-foundation, 24-hour-a-day entirely commercial subsequentowner. That possibility poses an even greater threat to the welfare of our neighborhoods.Again, we respectfully urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to preserve ourresidential neighborhoods by denying the proposed zoning change. There are plenty ofmore appropriate alternative locations in Travis and Williamson Counties for a DellFoundation expansion that would not so seriously and adversely affect so many families.Thank you for your consideration of our opposition to the proposed zoning change.Sincerely,;fuGregcc: Mr. Greg Guernesey, Director (US mail)Mr. Jerry Rusthoven, Asst. Director (US mail)30 of 39B-02From:Debbie NovelliTo:Graham, MarkSubject:Case # C814-88-0001.12Date:Saturday, October 05, 2019 11:18:05 AM*** External Email - Exercise Caution ***Attached are photos of the signage regarding the proposed zoning change. I am not sure of the specific requirements for signage, but would imagine that signage should be at each entrance to the property (currently only at one), should be on display 24 x 7 (has been removed on weekends), should be in a somewhat prominent position to be read by passerby's (currently positioned as far from street as possible), and most importantly should be readable (not the case as you can see from the photos). There was an additional sign at the intersection of Royal Approach and Westlake Drive which was removed after a few days? I am assuming that this signage does not meet required guidelines. Deborah Novelli, Broker AssociateRealty Austin(512) 699-0856 mobileCAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov.31 of 39B-02 October 8, 2019 Mr. Mark Graham via email: mark.graham@austintexas.gov City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department 505 Barton Springs Road Austin, Texas 78704 Re: Case No. C814-88-0001.12: Davenport West PUD Zoning Dear Mr. Graham: Our firm represents Ms. Leta Scherer, who owns a home in the Villas at Davenport at 4501 Westlake Drive, Austin, Texas. As you know, the Villas at Davenport are within 500 feet of the proposed rezoning of the Davenport West PUD that would allow the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation to build a second office building on their tract located at 4417 Westlake Dr, Austin, TX 78746. On behalf of Ms. Scherer, we urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject and deny the requested amendment, which would dramatically alter the nature and character of the neighborhood and the value and enjoyment of our client’s home. We are very concerned about many aspects of the proposed amendment and the outcomes it will produce for its residential neighbors like Ms. Scherer, including but not limited to increased traffic and population density, diminished water quality, noise and light pollution, and loss of privacy and security, not only during the building phase but indefinitely into the future. Ms. Scherer recently purchased her home with the understanding that the adjoining Foundation tract was completely built-out and no further buildings or modifications would occur. Her expectation should be met and respected, and changes to the current zoning and building should not be allowed. We appreciate your consideration of this matter. Please feel free to contact me if you need further information. 32 of 39B-02 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, D’Ana H. Mikeska DHM/laa cc: Mr. Greg Guernsey, Director (greg.guernsey@austintexas.gov) Mr. Jerry Rusthoven, Director (jerry.rusthoven@austintexas.gov) Ms. Leta Scherer 33 of 39B-02From:Dean TruittTo:Graham, MarkCc:Brian MooreSubject:Villas at Davenport - Zoning OppositionDate:Wednesday, October 09, 2019 9:50:36 AM*** External Email - Exercise Caution ***DateMr. Mark GrahamCity of Austin Planning and Zoning Department505 Barton Springs RoadAustin, TX 78704 Via email: Mark.Graham@austintexas.govRE: Case Number C814-88-0001.12NOTICE OF FILIING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Mr. Graham,We have received the notice of Case Number C814-88-0001.12, and as owners of a property located within 500’ of the proposed rezoning, we urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject and deny the request for the above referenced amendment, as written.When we purchased our home six years ago, we were specifically informed that the Dell Foundation property was “built out”, and any expansion was specifically restricted by zoning regulations. This was important to us, as Westlake Drive in our area already serves as an access and egress point for St. Stephen’s School, numerous homes in the Aqua Verde, Lakeside and Rivercrest communities, as well as the commercial buildings at the corner of Loop 360 and Westlake Drive. Without a concurrent expansion in capacity for Westlake Drive, the traffic congestion in our neighborhood would clearly be further increased by an expanded Dell facility.The increased traffic creates both environmental and property value issues. The34 of 39B-02 additional noise and congestion associated with more vehicles will adversely affect the aesthetics or our neighborhood, which in turn will negatively impact our property values. This proposed zoning change does nothing to benefit the communities affected by it, but instead only benefits the Dell Foundation.Again, we urge you preserve our neighborhoods by denying the proposed zoning change. There are lots of others places around Austin or Round Rock that the Dell Foundation can expand without adversely affecting so many families.Please so not hesitate to contact us if we can be of help with this decision or if you have any additional questionsDean B Truitt4501 Westlake Dr. # 12Austin TX 78746832 721-7491CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov.35 of 39B-02NOTICE OF FILIING OF APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Graham, We have received the attached notice of Case Number C814-88-0001.12 as the owner of property located within 500’ of the proposed rezoning. We urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject and deny the request of Applicant for the above referenced amendment. Just SOME of the reasons we would like the request denied include increased traffic on Westlake Drive, dust and construction detritus, noise pollution, decrease in our property value, and locating a business directly next to our homes. Joe and Daniela Knight 4501 Westlake Drive, #26 Austin, TX 78746 36 of 39B-02TBG1705 Guadalupe St.Suite 500Austin, Texas 78701[512] 327 1011tbgpartners.comThe information shown is based on the best information available and is subject to change without notice.Austin, TX11/15/2019schematic landscapeplanting plan Michael & Susan Dell Foundation 010’20’40’1Mexican Bush Sage Salvia leucanthaCherry SageSalvia greggiiBlonde AmbitionBouteloua gracilis Fountain GrassPennisetum setaceum Soft Leaf YuccaYucca recurvifoliaGulf MuhlyMuhlenbergia capillarisAmerican AgaveAgave americanaTexas SedgeCarex texensisNative Seed MixNative American Seed Golden ShowersThyrallis Galphimia glauca ‘golden showers’LawnBuffalo HydromulchLindheimer’s MuhlyMuhlenbergia lindheimeriStar Jasmine Trachelospermum jasminoides Sandankwa ViburnumViburnum suspensum Mountain Laurel/ EvergreenSophora secundifloraDesert Willow / DeciduousChilpopsis linearisLegenda_ existing desert willowsb_ existing trees to remainc_sidewalkd_seating areae_flexible lawn spacef_proposed rain gardenYaupon Holly / Evergreenlex vomitoriaMexican White Oak / Semi-evergreenQuercus polymorphaArizona Cypress / EvergreenCupressus arizonicaCedar Elm / EvergreenUlmus crassifoliaMexican Sycamore / DeciduousPlatanus mexicanaLive Oak / EvergreenQuercus virginiana01010707070202020203020207070508060606060306080808080806060601010106080808080505030505050101010101030101010102030405060708planting conceptBold swaths of native and adapted plants buffer unwanted views and open to reveal usable lawn and seating areas. Dependable evergreens are layered with flowering perennials and native grasses and wildflowers, composing a dynamic place. Through planting form and species, this schematic creates a physically comfortable and visually pleasing neighborhood facing landscape.0101010101010602020204020206010101010106060606010107040204040606060806abcdebbccff5’ sidewalk 7’ off curb3’ between sidewalk and rain gardens on either sidebbbbbbbbb023’3’5’rain garden 060606Exhibit H 37 of 39B-021 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20191204 008c Date: December 4, 2019 Subject: Davenport West Planned Unit Development Amendment 12 Motion by: Kevin Ramberg Seconded by: Mary Ann Neely RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting a substantial amendment to the Davenport West Planned Unit Development (PUD) increasing the allowable non-residential floor area by 29,090 square feet for the proposed office on Lot 17, Block E, Tract F; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that City of Austin Staff recommends the PUD amendment at this location. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends approval of the requested PUD amendment for the above noted project with the following staff conditions: 1.The project shall cap the impervious cover for this lot to a maximum of 1.98 acres,2.the applicant shall permit and rebuild the existing undersized water quality pond located in the right-of-way along Royal Approach Drive through a cost sharing agreement with the City of Austin,3.project shall utilize fully hooded and shielded lights to comply with Dark Sky Initiatives,4.garage shall be screened on the south, east and north sides with climbing vines,5.project shall use captured rainwater to irrigate proposed landscape,6.the reflectivity of the building glass shall be less than 15% to deter bird collision, and7.the project applicant will prepare an Environmental Resource Inventory at time of site plan review.VOTE 10-0 For: Bedford, Smith, Creel, Thompson, Ramberg, Guerrero, Coyne, Nill, Neely, and Maceo Against: None Abstain: None Recuse: None Absent: Gordon Exhibit J38 of 39B-022 Approved By: Linda Guerrero, Environmental Commission Chair 39 of 39B-02