Public Safety CommissionSept. 8, 2025

Item #6 Draft Recommendation - Review of Office of Police Oversight’s Compliance with APOA and Resolution 99 — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION Recommendation 20250908-006: Date: September 8, 2025 Subject: Review of Office of Police Oversight’s Compliance with APOA and Resolution 99 Motioned by: Seconded by: WHEREAS, The Austin Public Safety Commission serves as an advisory body to the city council on all budgetary and policy matters concerning public safety; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Austin voted for the Austin Police Oversight Act in May of 2023; and WHEREAS, The City Council directed the City Manager to revise all internal policies with respect to the Office of Police Oversight (OPO) in order to comply with the amended City Code Chapter 2-151 and Ordinance No. 20230223-061 via Resolution 99 in September 2023;2 and WHEREAS, § 2-15-3(B)(8) of the Office of Police Oversight Ordinance states the office shall “at least once per year, provide both written and oral reports at an open session of the City Council regarding the results of office activities”;3 and 1 https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT2AD_CH2- 15POOV&showChanges=true 2 https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=417032 3 https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT2AD_CH2- 15POOV&showChanges=true WHEREAS, as of September 8, 2025 the Office of Police Oversight has only “presented the report to Mayor and Council via memo” with no oral report scheduled regarding the office’s activities;4 and WHEREAS, progress and implementation of the Austin Police Oversight Act and Resolution 99 is inextricably linked to the the Public Safety Commission’s mission; and WHEREAS, the Office of Police Oversight has refused to present and answer questions on the record at a Public Safety Commission meeting and/or provide updates on its compliance moving forward; and WHEREAS, § 2-15-3(B)(12) of the Office of Police Oversight Ordinance states the office shall “act as a central depository for documentation relevant to the mission of the office and make such information available to the public, including but not limited to: complaint outcomes; officer discipline; force incidents; and lawsuits against the City that allege officer misconduct, including the filings and the final settlement amount of any such suits;”;5 and WHEREAS, complaints posted to date to the Office of Police Oversight website are not searchable by keyword, complaint date, or complaint number; and WHEREAS Resolution 99 requires posting of Anonymized demographic information about the complainant, including, but not limited to race, ethnicity, age, gender identity, if provided, and Sector complaint originated; to its website concerning all complaints;6 and WHEREAS, sector and demographic data are not yet posted and no actionable plan has been put forth by the Office of Police Oversight for mitigating the deficiency;7 and WHEREAS, the 2023 Annual Report indicates an approximate 30% decrease in submitted complaints since 2021.8 WHEREAS, the Office of Police Oversight received 53 anonymous complaints in 2023 representing a 49% decrease since 2021.9 4 https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=454106 5 https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT2AD_CH2- 15POOV&showChanges=true 6 https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=417032 7 https://austintx.new.swagit.com/videos/348975 8 https://www.austintexas.gov/document/2023-annual-report 9 https://www.austintexas.gov/document/2023-annual-report WHEREAS, the most common classification issued for an initiated complaints in 2023 was a Supervisory Referral, a classification that has no investigation requirements; 10 11 and WHEREAS, in 2023, of the 103 individual APD officers receiving discipline only 14 were the subject of external complaints from Office of Police Oversight, raising questions about the effectiveness of the OPO’s current complaints process and referrals; 12 and WHEREAS, the standing up of the Community Police Review Commission, has been met with delays and has yet to review a case. 10 https://www.austintexas.gov/document/2023-annual-report 11 https://austintx.new.swagit.com/videos/348975 12 https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=454106 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Safety Commission recommends: • An immediate presentation of the last completed Annual Report to a publicly posted Austin City Council meeting as mandated by the ordinance; and • A documented and published plan for compliance with the Austin Police Oversight Act; and • A searchable database of complaints documentation in an accessible format that can be used in translation and accessibility software by the general public; and • Assignment of a staff liaison from the City Clerk’s office to the Community Police Review Commission to help alleviate strain on Office of Police Oversight staff resources while providing a level of consistency and expertise for open meetings that is consistent with city standards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Safety Commission recommends a full review and audit of the Office of Police Oversight’s compliance with the Austin Police Oversight Act and Resolution 99 and an audit of internal processes including but not limited to the complaint intake process, complaint review process, complaint referral process and documentation requirements/standards, training and qualifications required for complaints officers to ensure impartiality to complainants, follow up procedures for recommendations and referrals to track effectiveness and resolution for complainants, and supervisory referrals. Vote: For: Absent: Attest: