BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: 20250326-006: Translation and Interpretation Services for Boards and Commissions WHEREAS, Imagine Austin is a 30-year plan that maps out a vision of Austin as a beacon of sustainability, social equity, and economic opportunity; where diversity and creativity are celebrated; where community needs and values are recognized; where leadership comes from its citizens; and where the necessities of life are affordable and accessible to all1; and WHEREAS, a City of Austin report identified that many non-English-speaking residents abstain from engaging in the community due to language barriers and the associated challenges with communicating2; and WHEREAS, a recent audit found the city is not adequately meeting the goals of the policy, established in 2014 to provide translation and interpretation services, intended to give people equitable access to programs and information, leaving people to try to navigate these systems alone3; and WHEREAS, according to City data at iSpeak Austin, 31% of Austinites speak a language other than English at home and 11.4% of Austinites speak English “less than very well”4; and WHEREAS, a recent experience by the Commission on Immigrant Affairs, while working to get live interpretation for a commissioner, highlighted concerns about the current funding practice(s) of language accessibility for Boards and Commissions to get these services in a timely fashion, as well as the support process for Commissioners with Limited English Proficiency who require live interpretation services during the application process, onboarding, training, and meetings; and WHEREAS, both the work of the Commission on Immigrant Affairs and the Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission were both recently impacted, attempting to obtain these services for active commissioners. Even after services were initially provided, there were inconsistencies in the provision of these services; and 1 City Embarks on Community-Wide Effort to Update Imagine Austin | AustinTexas.gov 2 https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/pio/document.cfm?id=367457 3 Austin is not doing enough to communicate with non-English speakers, audit finds | KUT Radio, Austin's NPR Station 4 iSpeak Austin | AustinTexas.gov 5 https://www.austintexas.gov/page/language-access-policy WHEREAS, in the few instances when interpretation services were provided for the Commission on Immigrant Affairs, the IT support provided when meeting at City Hall was transferred to the staff liaison, which delayed meetings and created a hardship on the staff liaison; and WHEREAS, the current funding practice for covering translation and interpretation services for Boards and Commissions was identified not sustainable. No department supporting Boards and Commissions allocates specific funds …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: 20250326-009: Development of the Immigrant Affairs Office WHEREAS, the City of Austin values inclusivity and recognizes the immense economic, social, and cultural contributions that people of all national origins and immigration statuses have made to this country1; and WHEREAS, the City Council declared Austin a Welcoming City through Resolution No. 20140320-049 to demonstrate that the City strives to include and support immigrants in all aspects of our city; and WHEREAS, we continue to hear appreciation for the creation of the Immigrant Affairs position, along with recognition that the scope of work required is too vast for one person to manage alone; and WHEREAS, the development of an Immigrant Affairs Office would ensure that the needs of Austin's immigrant community are recognized, supported, and effectively addressed, which would allow for stronger community engagement, more responsive services, as well as better coordination across city departments to close existing gaps; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive budget plan focused on expanding staff, services, and infrastructures will promote the immigrant community’s economic mobility, human services (health care/food/legal services), education, and civic participation; and WHEREAS, ensuring immigrant inclusivity will build stronger educated communities that can contribute to economic growth, creative potential, and innovation throughout Austin and its society; and WHEREAS, in Austin, more than 18% of the population are foreign-born2; and WHEREAS, Austin’s immigrant population comes from over 120 different countries3; and WHEREAS, according to City data at iSpeak Austin, more than 85 languages are spoken throughout the City, 31% of Austinites speak a language other than English at home and 11.4% of Austinites speak English “less than very well”4; and WHEREAS, According to “Advancing Immigrant Incorporation in Austin, TX,” a report on the state of immigrant affairs at the City states that Austin has made consistent improvements and has scored highly in areas such as Government Leadership, Community Collaboration, and Legal Support; the same report also highlights areas where the City falls short in achieving a “Government That Works for All,” identifying key gaps in Civic Participation, Livability, and Job Opportunities5; and WHEREAS, research indicates that immigrant integration policies lead to favorable outcomes for both native and foreign-born residents of a city5; and 1 CITY OF AUSTIN 2025 Federal Legislative Agenda 119th Congress 2 https://www.census.gov 3 Austin Population Change and Demographic Trends 4 iSpeak Austin | AustinTexas.gov 5 Advancing Immigrant Incorporation in Austin, TX Report WHEREAS, the report “Advancing …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-010): Expand the Equity Mini Grant Funds to $600,000 in support of Immigrant Inclusion, Solidarity with Unhoused People, and for Anti-displacement Prevention Efforts WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s Equity Office provides leadership, guidance, and insight on equity to improve the quality of life for all Austinites by working across City departments and with major institutions, non-profits, and grassroots organizations to advance racial equity; and WHEREAS, the inaugural Equity Mini Grant Fund was established in 2018 in response to Ordinance 20170913-001, which directed the Equity Office, to develop a funding framework for quality-of-life initiatives by allocating $75,000 to the Equity Mini Grant Fund; and WHEREAS, the Equity Office successfully implemented a more approachable and accessible granting framework, awarding the first round of grants in April 2018, and has since expanded its grant programs, including the Reentry Services Grant, which supports organizations transforming outcomes for formerly incarcerated individuals through The Hub Award ($200,000 for 501(c)(3) non-profits providing wrap- around services) and The Spoke Award ($50,000 for direct service providers); and WHEREAS, additional funding opportunities, such as the Reimagining Public Safety Grants and potential future grants focused on immigrant and refugee support, underscore the City’s commitment to addressing systemic inequities through community-driven solutions; and WHEREAS, the Equity Mini Grant Fund has played a critical role in supporting grassroots and volunteer- led efforts addressing significant challenges, including COVID-19 recovery, public safety, homelessness response, and immigrant inclusion, demonstrating its value as a flexible and responsive funding mechanism; and WHEREAS, the FY25 Equity Mini Grant Fund prioritizes support for grassroots efforts organizing community-centered solutions in the areas of immigrant inclusion, solidarity with unhoused people, and Page 1 of 2 anti-displacement/displacement prevention, recognizing these as urgent and critical equity issues in Austin; and WHEREAS, since the inception in 2018, the Equity Mini Grant Fund has supported 87 organizations with a total of $1,495,000 in funding, growing from an initial $75,000 in total grants to $450,000 in FY24-25; however, despite this growth, the fund remains insufficient to fully address the scale and scope of community needs; increasing the fund to $600,000 would enable great investment in grassroots initiatives working to address systemic inequities; and WHEREAS, an expansion of the Equity Mini Grant Fund would provide additional unrestricted funding at various award levels ($10,000, $20,000, and $30,000), enabling a broader and deeper investment in community-driven initiatives that address disparities and uplift historically …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: 20250326-011: Family Stabilization Program as a Mechanism for Promoting Housing Stability WHEREAS, affordability continues to be one of the most common issues expressed by residents. The Family Stabilization Program offers more flexible access to housing support, accords more choice and dignity, reduces discrimination, and offers more efficient and cost-effective housing; and WHEREAS, at the Community Voices & Choices: Joint Inclusion Committee FY26 Budget Input Sessions, several residents expressed support again for the ongoing funding of this program; and WHEREAS, according to findings from the Urban Institute’s report titled Evaluation of the Austin Guaranteed Income Pilot, it can be very difficult for cities like Austin to meet their residents’ needs through subsidized house programs, as federal housing programs have limited reach and limited funding; and WHEREAS, even Austin residents that are lucky enough to receive federal housing assistance continue to struggle with housing issues, and about 40% of households nationally that receive a voucher never successfully lease a unit; and WHEREAS, in Austin, most voucher holders were only able to move to less desirable housing on the outskirts of the city, which may cause additional burdens like poor transportation options, limited access to healthy foods, limited access to medical care, and employment and caregiving challenges. WHEREAS, ot her forms of housing assistance provide specific housing units; however, this comes with its own problems. Residents have limited options, if any. Buildings are only required to keep their rents affordable for a certain period of time, and then they can increase rent, these units are set up to be affordable based on the area median income (AMI), and they do not provide the deep affordability that residents need; and WHEREAS, according to the report, Austin’s local affordable housing inventory lists six times the number of units with rents set to be affordable at 80 percent of AMI as units with rents set to be affordable at 30 percent of AMI, Additionally, these units offer set rental prices, and the person is still responsible for paying the full rent even if they experience job insecurity; and WHEREAS, according to findings from the Urban Institute’s report titled Evaluation of the Austin Guaranteed Income Pilot, participants reported spending, on average, more than 50% of their pilot cash to cover housing costs, and the average share participants spent on housing was more than twice as much spending in any other …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-012): Quality of Life Studies for Commissions WHEREAS, the Joint Inclusion Committee is currently made up of eleven commissions each representing a specific demographic; and WHEREAS, each of the member commissions of the Joint Inclusion Committee is tasked with representing their specific demographic and information, such as is contained in a thorough Quality of Life Study is vital to such representation; and WHEREAS, results from Quality of Life studies can have significant impact on the work of Joint Inclusion Committee member commissions, as it may take months or years to implement the issues that surface from these studies; and WHEREAS, the African American Resource Advisory Commission had a quality of life study that was completed 2006; and WHEREAS, the Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Resource Advisory Commission had a quality of life study that was completed 2013; and WHEREAS, the Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission had a quality of life study that was completed 2015; and WHEREAS, the Commission on Immigrant Affairs has not had a quality of life study; and WHEREAS, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Transgender, and Queer Quality of Life Advisory Commission and the Mayor's Committee for People with Disabilities each had a quality of life study that was completed 2021; and WHEREAS, there was a recent study completed at the state level on Veterans Affairs that was completed in 2024; and WHEREAS, the Human Rights Commission had funds approved for a quality of life study, initially expected to be spent in 2022 or 2023, but ended up not having the study; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the Early Childhood Council, the Commission for Women, and the Commission on Aging all have quality of life studies in progress; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee encourages the Austin City Council to fund Quality of Life studies for the Commission on Immigrant Affairs, the African American Resource Advisory Commission, the Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Resource Advisory Commission, the Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission, at an approximate cost of $800K each in the upcoming budget cycle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee encourages the Austin City Council to fund a quality of life study for the Commission on Veterans Affairs, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Transgender, and Queer Quality of Life Advisory Commission, the Mayor's Committee for People with Disabilities, in …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-013): Expansion of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Outreach WHEREAS, there is increased awareness and anxiety about the potential risk of wildfires in Austin1 2; and WHEREAS, according to FEMA National Risk Index3, the natural hazard risk for Travis County is relatively high4; and WHEREAS, four years after the deadly blackout in the Austin area due downed power lines and the power grids’ reliability remains in question5 and outages continue6 7; and WHEREAS, while power outages impact the entire population, studies confirm that children, non-English speakers, racial/ethnic minorities, and older adults are at greater risk during power outages than the general population8; and WHEREAS, most Austinites are not aware of the potential risks of different types of natural disasters in their geographic area, such as wildfires, flood, ground water contamination, and wind damage, etc.; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management already has an extensive plan involving City, County, and Police, Fire, and Sherrif departments9; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee encourages the Austin City Council to expand the groups included in the Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Team to include the following: 1 As wildfire anxiety grows, Austin plans to designate half the city as at risk of fire damage - Austin MonitorAustin Monitor 2 First Warning: Extreme wildfire risk on Tuesday | KXAN Austin 3 National Risk Index | FEMA.gov 4 Community Report - Travis County, Texas | National Risk Index 5 Four years after deadly blackout, doubts remain over reliability of Texas’ power grid : NPR 6 Power outages slam Central Texas due to high winds 7 Ice storm, wild weather reveals vulnerability of Austin's power grid - CSMonitor.com 8 Understanding the social impacts of power outages in North America: a systematic review - IOPscience 9 basic_plan_update_10-24.pdf Page 1 of 2 • • Inclusion of a broad spectrum of grass roots community organizations in the notification and reporting of incidents as they are best positioned to reach out to their respective demographics, Inclusion employers in the notifications of emergencies and additional of as many people are likely to be in touch with their employers during these events. Contacting employers could be coordinated with the Secretary of State who has records of organizations doing business in the area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee 202503026-014: Extend the deadline f or the Joint Inclusion Co mmittee to submit their budget recommendations to April 30 of each budget cycle WHEREAS, budget recommendations timeline calls by March 31 of each year; and the current budget process for all Boards and Commissions to finalize their WHEREAS, the Joint Inclusion recommendations integrating and groups; Committee from 11 Commissions represented is one such Commission (JIC) charged with giving voice to and on it that touch underrepresented WHEREAS, December, January, many of the Boards and Commissions and February of each year; and have ongoing discussions during of budget priorities WHEREAS, to complete staff work; and those discussions are essential elements in gathering community input and allowing City Staff WHEREAS, boards it is problematic and commissions to request that the JIC be required to gather and integrate eleven different at the same the eleven commissions their input. are consolidating NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint recommendations JIC to submit their budget the deadline Committee for the year. to April 30 of each budget recommends be extended Inclusion Date of Approval: March 26, 2025 Record of the vote: 9-0 , Motion Commissioner Ortega Abstaining Commissioner Sin , Second Commissioner Chang, Attest: Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-015): Increase Funding for Homeless Strategy Office WHEREAS, the City of Austin Demographer has provided information that the aging population in Austin is the fastest growing segment of our city, currently representing 10.8% of our population1; and WHEREAS, in 2024 over 27.6% of our unhomed population in Austin was 50 years of age or older2; and WHEREAS, homelessness decreases a person’s life expectancy and unhouse people over 50 tend to present as much older medically and have a greater need for social services than other unhomed populations3; and WHEREAS, while Austin leads the nation in new affordable housing construction4, in order to address the dynamic and multifaceted natures of poverty, homelessness, and housing instability as well as to accelerate access to concrete supports, dismantle systemic inequities, and mitigate barriers to healthy living, individuals and families, especially older adults and their caregivers with low incomes need access to safe, stable, and affordable housing bolstered by wraparound supportive services5; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee encourages the Austin City Council to approve additional funds and explore all available means to provide additional social services funding for the Homeless Strategy Office to allow them to better serve homeless people over 50 years of age in Austin. Date of Approval: _________________________ Record of the vote: 10-0, Motion Commissioner Afifi, Second Commissioner Davis 1 “Age of Change, Austin’s Transforming Demographics 2010-2010”, City of Austin Planning Department, Published September 2023 and Updated August 2024. 2 “State of the HRS, A Report on the State of the Homelessness Response System in Austin/Travis County,” ECHO, August 2024, p. 11. 3 “State of the HRS, A Report on the State of the Homelessness Response System in Austin/Travis County,” ECHO, August 2024, p. 11. 4 https://www.kut.org/housing/2025-02-18/austin-tx-affordable-housing-construction-study 5 https://acf.gov/ocs/programs/ahssd March 26, 2025 Attest: _____________________________________________ Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-016): Funds for Senior Transportation Programs WHEREAS, the City of Austin Demographer has provided information that the aging population in Austin is the fastest growing segment of our city, currently representing 10.8% of our population1; and WHEREAS, according to the National Aging and Disability Transportation Center, as the nation’s aging population continues to rise – with 1 in every 5 Americans expected to be 65+ by 2020 – the provision of safe and accessible transportation options remains a top concern of older adults, caregivers and the communities where they live2; and WHEREAS, older adults and those with a disability who cannot secure rides to social events can feel isolated from their communities, which puts them at risk for depression and cognitive decline3; and WHEREAS, according to City of Austin transportation data in 2022, less than 50% of our population has access to innovative public transit service or is within one quarter mile of regular fixed route transit4, lack of access is even more difficult for older adults and people with disabilities as they often need door to door services; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee encourages the Austin City Council to fund $250,000 in Austin Public Health’s Social Services grant funds annually specifically for older adult transportation programs, to insure our older adults and those with disabilities have access to medical appointments, food and necessities as well as social interaction to prevent isolation. 1 “Age of Change, Austin’s Transforming Demographics 2010-2010”, City of Austin Planning Department, Published September 2023 and Updated August 2024. 2 https://www.nadtc.org/about/transportation-aging-disability/unique-issues-related-to-older-adults-and- transportation/ 3 “How Access to Affordable Transportation Leads to Better Health Outcomes for Older Adults”, National Council on Aging, June 17, 2024. 4 https://data.austintexas.gov/Transportation-and-Mobility/M-C-3_Percentage-of-population-that-has-access-to- /p3t8-4eip Page 1 of 2 Date of Approval: _____________________________ Record of the vote: 10-0, Motion Commissioner Sin, Second Commissioner Chang Attest: _____________________________________________ Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair Page 2 of 2 March 26, 2025
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: 20250326-018: Home Delivered Meals for Older Adults WHEREAS, in fiscal year 2023/2024 the City of Austin removed funding for home delivered meals from the Safety Net Funding; and WHEREAS, prior to that, the City of Austin had consistently funded home delivered meals for older adults and people with disabilities since the 1970’s; and WHEREAS, Austin’s older adult population represents 10.8% of the total population1 and the median age of Austin’s older adults is 72.7 years2; and WHEREAS, greater than 30% of Austin’s older adult population include groups that are historically underserved: • Asian older adults represent 7.4% of 105,467 Austin’s older adults, • Black older adults represent 8.6% of 105,467 Austin’s older adults, • Hispanic older adults represent 20.5% of 105,467 Austin’s older adults, • Non-Hispanic or White older adults represent 60.8% of 105,467 Austin’s older adults3; and WHEREAS, of Austin’s older adults, 27.6% are individuals living with a disability and 9.5% are living below poverty.4 WHEREAS, despite Austin’s increase in the older adult population, increasing at a growth rate of 64.7% between 2010 and 2020 (from 55,695 in 2010, or 7.0% of population to 91,733 in 2020, or 9.5% of the population)5 City funding of older adult programs is less than of other cities of comparable size; and 1 U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2022 1-year estimates and 2020 decennial census. 2 Ibid. 3 Ibid. 4 U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2022 1-year estimates 5 https://demographics-austin.hub.arcgis.com/apps/a4e31fc68d37449b8e3c044e249699bc/explore WHEREAS, people who are unable to prepare their own meals or are enduring economic hardships, home delivered meals are an upstream solution, helping them to stay in their homes, living with dignity and independence. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committeeencourages the Austin City Council to fund home delivered meals in the amount of $700,000. Date of Approval: ________________________ Record of Vote: 9-0 (Commissioner Bondi Abstained) Motion Commissioner Benson, Second Commissioner McIllwain Attest: _____________________________________ Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair March 26, 2025
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-019): Native American & Indigenous Community Commission WHEREAS, out of the sixty-seven City of Austin Boards and Commissions, none are focused on representing the needs of Native Americans and Indigenous communities1; and WHEREAS, all the City of Austin land was originally populated by local tribes, particularly the Coahuiltecan peoples and later the Chickasaw, Cherokee, Comanche, Delaware, Lipan Apache and Tonkawa with the acknowledgement that many tribes, known and unknown have resided and migrated on these lands and region over time; and WHEREAS, the local group, Great Promise for Native Americans has identified local members of the Native American & Indigenous Community interested in serving on such a commission; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission on Aging encourages the Austin City Council to create a Native American & Indigenous Community Commission, comprised of eleven members for the purpose of advising and consulting with City Council on all matters that impact the Native American and Indigenous community, including preserving culture, economic development, education, and health & wellness. The commission shall evaluate and recommend programs, policies, and practices that create a positive impact; determine the needs of Native Americans and the Indigenous community in Austin and advise Council regarding these needs; and promote the contributions of Native Americans and the Indigenous community to the cultural, economic, and historical value of Austin. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission on Aging requests the Austin City Council to direct that commissioners are representatives from any of these groups, as well as federally and state recognized tribal members: • Great Promise for American Indians, • Central Texas Cherokee Township, • Chickasaw Community Council of Central Texas, • Native American HEART, and • Native American and Indigenous Collective. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee requests that the Austin City Council allows the commission to review its membership and community participation after the first 1 Boards and Commissions | AustinTexas.gov two years of operation and determine if additional representation from the Native American and Indigenous community groups is required. Date of Approval: _____________________________ Record of the vote: 10-0, Motion Commissioner McIllwain, Second Commissioner Chanag Attest: _____________________________________________ Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair March 25, 2025
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee 20250326-020:Fami ly Stabilization and Equity Office WHEREAS, in the City of Austin, 32% of children under age 6 live in households with low income; and WHEREAS, 94% of the children in households with low income under age 6 are children of color; and WHEREAS, decades of research world because weight, or with chronic school; and born into poverty illnesses, children prove that disadvantages and children begin the moment children of color are disproportionately than their peers to be ready for, or successful come into the at low born early, at and are less likely WHEREAS, work; and Up Together has had proven social and economic outcomes from their recent City of Austin WHEREAS, most families supported by the Up Together project are families ; and with young children WHEREAS, the Equity Office has managed and supported ongoing investment with UpTogether. NOW, THEREFORE, Austin make the $1.3 million path to expandin g the investment to $3 million annually. BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee that the City of recommends investment in the Family Stabilization Grant permanent and create a clear BE IT FURTHER sustain inves that the Joint Inclusion Committee tment in the Office of Equity and Inclusion, Equity encourages Division RESOLVED the Austin as a vital City of Austin function. City Council to Date of Approval: March 26, 2025 Record of the vote: 10-0, Motion Commissioner Ortega, Second Commissioner Benson Attest: - Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair
BOARD/COMMIISSION RECOMMENDATION JointI lnclusion Committee 20250326-022 Family, Friend, and Neighbor (FFN) Childcare Providers WHEREAS, in the City of Austin, 32% of children under age 6 live in households with low income; and WHEREAS, 94% of the children in households and with low income under age 6 are children of color; decades of research prove that disadvantages begin the moment children come into the children born into poverty illnesses, at low born early, at and are less likely than their peers to be ready for, or successful and children of color are disprop ortionately or with chronic WHEREAS, world because weight, school; and WHEREAS, state, systems and programs have expired many of the federal, economic in 2025; and or are expiring and local recovery funds invested in early childhood Child Care Scholarship programs through Workforce Solutions at this time, and as of December 2024, the estimated Capital Area are at capacity, amount of time a family no WHEREAS, new funding applying outreached is available for a scholarship for enrollment at that time will likely is 24 months; and remain on a waitlist before they could expect to be WHEREAS, or trusted neighbors and Neighbor) who provide home-based care typically childcare aunts, for three or fewer unrelated grandparents, and FFN (Family, involves Friend, children; close friends, Family, WHEREAS, culturally and linguistically parents community; relevant to entrust their child's and Friend, and Neighbor {FFN) early education, care is often chosen and the personal for its flexibility, affordability, connection it provides-allowing learning and care to someone they already know and trust within their WHEREAS, of FFN service there are legal issues providers; and to be resolved regarding direct financial support to the broad spectrum WHEREAS, the Early Childhood and GO! Austin/iVAMOS! Austin investment in the Childcare sector; and Council has had input from the community's (GAVA), all calling for significantly increased By 6 Coalition Success local government {SX6) WHEREAS, GAVA has requested $350,000 for programs to provide providers and $200,000 a mobile lending to help develop a pipeline of FFN service library for home-based family childcare providers . NOW, THEREFORE, Austin direct other BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Ilnclusi and the Economic Development Austin Public Health on Committee Department recommends the City of to work with GAVA and during input sources community Family, Friends, • Resolves • Finalizes allow, and Neighbor support that: potential around providing budget any new FFN-related financial items that …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: (20250326-017): In Home Care for Older Adults WHEREAS, 9.5% of Austin’s population are 65 years of age or over (91,033) and 19.3% of Austin’s population are 55 years or over (185,570)1; and WHEREAS, most Americans want to age in their homes. In fact, in a survey from 2024, 75 percent of U.S. adults aged over 50 years said they would like to reside in their current residence for as long as possible2; and WHEREAS, in home care for older adults is an effective upstream solution for older adults, often preventing them from being unhoused. WHEREAS, in home care is typically less expensive than assisted living if the older adult needs 40 hours or less of paid home care each week3; and WHEREAS, nationwide over 3 million people received home health care in 20204; and WHEREAS, Austinites can expect to pay an average of $4,576 per month for home health care5; and WHEREAS, compared to the other three major Texas cities, the cost of home health care in Austin is higher6; and WHEREAS, Medicaid reimbursement for in home health care in Austin is $10.60 per hour, which is not a living wage; and WHEREAS, starting salary at McDonald’s in Austin is $11.00 per hour7; and 1 Austin Demographic Data Hub | Open Data | City of Austin Texas 2 Home care in the U.S. - Statistics & Facts | Statista 3 In-Home Care vs. Assisted Living Costs | Seniors Guide 4 FastStats - Home Health Care 5 Cost of Long Term Care by State | Cost of Care Report | Carescout 6 Home Care in Austin, TX | HomeCare.org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Inclusion Committee encourages the Austin City Council to fund and explore all available means to provide reimbursement for in home care for older adults in Austin, including but not limited to adding applicable coverage provisions on in home care to City employee assistance programs or insurance plans. Record of the vote: 9-0, Commissioner Bondi Abstained, Motion Commissioner Chang, Second Date of Approval: ________________ ____________ Commissioner Ortega Attest: ___________________ Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair 7 McDonald's salaries in Austin, TX: How much does McDonald's pay? | Indeed.com March 26, 2025
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Committee Joint Inclusion Current 202so326.021: Ea rty Childhood Investments WHEREAS, in the City of Austin, 32% of children under age 6 live in households with low income; and WHEREAS, 94% of the children in households with low income under age 6 are children of color; and decades WHEREAS, prove that disadvanta of research world because children born into poverty and children weight, school; and or with chronic illnesses, and are less likely ges begin the moment children of color are disproportionately come into the at low born early, at than their peers to be ready for, or successful current City investments County Success WHEREAS, the Austin/Travis designed to coordinate coordinated improve access; and for equitable efforts, systems By 6 Strateg in early childhood programs align with the goals and strategies of ic Plan - a robust, data-driven community strategic plan child and family outcomes as well as build more effic ient and WHEREAS, systems and programs have expired or are expiring in 2025; and many of the federal, state, and local economic recovery funds invested in early childhood Child Care Scholarship programs through Workforce WHEREAS, new funding applying outreached is available for a scholarship for enrollment at that time will likely is 24 months; and at this time, and as of December Capital Solutions 2024, the estimated no amount of time a family Area are at capacity, remain on a waitlist before to be they could expect WHEREAS, region's the skilled skilled and the City of Austin's trade sector trades; recently announced Infrastructure and access to childcare is an obstacle Academy to expand the is intended for the existing workforce, including the Early Childhood WHEREAS, and GO! Austin/iVAMOS! Austin (GAVA), in the Childcare investment Council sector. has had input from the community's for significantly Success local government increased By 6 Coalition all calling (SXG) NOW, THEREFORE, Austin maintain to: not limited BE IT RESOLVED all current investments that the Joint Inclusion Committee recommends including programs and infrastructure, that the City of but in early childhood •Sustaining below) Maintain programs, FY25 budget and agencies levels listed for the projects, investments: below: for FY26 (subject to other recommendations Afterschool and Summer Programs: Maintain all programs currently funded by the City of Austin. Implement matching Grown. network a comprehensive and resource hub for home-based providers: funds of $75,000 for the Building Comprehensive Networks implementation city Maintain grant from Home ARPA Roll-Off: …
BOARD/COMMIISSION RECOMMENDATION JointI lnclusion Committee 20250326-022 Family, Friend, and Neighbor (FFN) Childcare Providers WHEREAS, in the City of Austin, 32% of children under age 6 live in households with low income; and WHEREAS, 94% of the children in households and with low income under age 6 are children of color; decades of research prove that disadvantages begin the moment children come into the children born into poverty illnesses, at low born early, at and are less likely than their peers to be ready for, or successful and children of color are disprop ortionately or with chronic WHEREAS, world because weight, school; and WHEREAS, state, systems and programs have expired many of the federal, economic in 2025; and or are expiring and local recovery funds invested in early childhood Child Care Scholarship programs through Workforce Solutions at this time, and as of December 2024, the estimated Capital Area are at capacity, amount of time a family no WHEREAS, new funding applying outreached is available for a scholarship for enrollment at that time will likely is 24 months; and remain on a waitlist before they could expect to be WHEREAS, or trusted neighbors and Neighbor) who provide home-based care typically childcare aunts, for three or fewer unrelated grandparents, and FFN (Family, involves Friend, children; close friends, Family, WHEREAS, culturally and linguistically parents community; relevant to entrust their child's and Friend, and Neighbor {FFN) early education, care is often chosen and the personal for its flexibility, affordability, connection it provides-allowing learning and care to someone they already know and trust within their WHEREAS, of FFN service there are legal issues providers; and to be resolved regarding direct financial support to the broad spectrum WHEREAS, the Early Childhood and GO! Austin/iVAMOS! Austin investment in the Childcare sector; and Council has had input from the community's (GAVA), all calling for significantly increased By 6 Coalition Success local government {SX6) WHEREAS, GAVA has requested $350,000 for programs to provide providers and $200,000 a mobile lending to help develop a pipeline of FFN service library for home-based family childcare providers . NOW, THEREFORE, Austin direct other BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Ilnclusi and the Economic Development Austin Public Health on Committee Department recommends the City of to work with GAVA and during input sources community Family, Friends, • Resolves • Finalizes allow, and Neighbor support that: potential around providing budget any new FFN-related financial items that …
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Joint Inclusion Committee RECOMMENDATION: 20250326-023: Family Stabilization Program as a Mechanism for Promoting Housing Stability and financing Immigrant Legal Services Motioned by: Commissioner Benson Seconded by: Commissioner McIllwain Vote: 10-0. Commissioner Ortega Recused. Date: March 26, 2025 Attest: __________________________ Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair As in previous years, affordability continues to be one of the most common issues expressed by residents. The Family Stabilization Program offers more flexible access to housing support, accords more choice and dignity, reduces discrimination, and offers more efficient and cost- effective housing. The current pilot funds are primarily helping people of color, including Hispanic or Latino/a/x families. Additionally, over half of the participants identify as African American or Latina women. Last year, the Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Resource Advisory Commission recommended ongoing funding of $3 million for the Family Stabilization Program; however, it was not included in the final budget. At the Community Voices & Choices: Joint Inclusion Committee FY26 Budget Input Sessions in the fall of 2024, several residents expressed support again for the ongoing funding of this program. Description of Recommendation to Council ● Provide ongoing funding for the Family Stabilization Grants ● Expand ongoing funding to $3 million Rationale According to findings from the Urban Institute’s report titled Evaluation of the Austin Guaranteed Income Pilot, it can be very difficult for cities like Austin to meet their residents’ needs through subsidized house programs, as federal housing programs have limited reach and limited funding. Even Austin residents that are lucky enough to receive federal housing Page 1 of 5 assistance continue to struggle with housing issues, and about 40% of households nationally that receive a voucher never successfully lease a unit. In Austin, most voucher holders were only able to move to less desirable housing on the outskirts of the city, which may cause additional burdens like poor transportation options, limited access to healthy foods, limited access to medical care, and employment and caregiving challenges. Other forms of housing assistance provide specific housing units; however, this comes with its own problems. Residents have limited options, if any. Buildings are only required to keep their rents affordable for a certain period of time, and then they can increase rent. The units are set up to be affordable based on the area median income (AMI), and they do not provide the deep affordability that residents need. According to the report, “Austin’s local affordable housing …
Joint Inclusion Committee RECOMMENDATION 20250326-25 Date: March 26, 2025 Subject: Expansion of Senior Programming Language Access Motioned by: Commissioner Sin Seconded by: Commissioner Ortega Parks and Recreation Expansion of Senior Programming Description Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department’s (PARD) Senior Programs are housed in the 3 Senior Activity Centers and various recreation facilities such as the Gus Garcia Recreation, Lorraine Camacho Activity Center, Pickfair Activity Center, and more. Senior programs also are supplemented by Congregate Meal Programs (administered by Meals on Wheels) and Senior Transport Program both funded by the Capitol Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG). With the move of the Old Bakery & Emporium, the Asian American Resource Center, and the Mexican American Culture Center into the new Office of Arts, Culture, Music, and Entertainment (ACME), the majority of Parks and Recreation’s Senior Programs with significant translated materials and programs with language interpretation will leave the department. However, there are still significant opportunities for PARD to increase language access along with an expansion in senior programs to facilities underused during daytime programming hours like Montopolis Recreation Center, Northwest Recreation Center, and more. Additionally, areas like the Gus Garcia Recreation Center and the Pickfair Activity Center are fast outgrowing demand for senior activities due to space and staffing constraints. Seniors in the areas Northeast and Northwest of the City are lacking dedicated senior centers, the last of which was built in 1992. Recommendation The Joint Inclusion Committee recommends more dedicated Senior Programming Specialists and Coordinators within Recreation and Activity Centers in the Parks and Recreation Department. Additionally, Marketing Representatives or staff with Language Access experience are needed to do a review and make recommendations to improve processes for signing up and participating in Senior Programs, Congregate Meals at PARD sites, and Senior Transportation for those who are Limited English Proficient (LEP). Department Parks and Recreation Department Alignment with Council Strategic Priorities Culture & Lifelong Learning: Quality, accessibility, and diversity of civic and cultural venues, events, programs, and resources; Quality of lifelong learning opportunities. Health & Environment: Accessibility to quality parks, trails, and recreational opportunities Government That Works for All: Condition of City facilities and technology; Public engagement and participation; Equity of City programs and resource allocation. Vote For: 10-0 Attest: Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair
Joint Inclusion Committee RECOMMENDATION 20250326-026 Date: March 26, 2025 Subject: Funding Culturally Appropriate and Medically Necessary Foods during Emergency Operations Motioned by: Commissioner Sin Seconded By: Commissioner Benson Culturally Appropriate and Medically Necessary Foods during Emergency Operations Description Over the last twenty years, the City of Austin has experienced an unprecedented number of crises whether it’s pandemics, power outages, storms, or wildfires. In these challenging moments, Austin needs reliable food sources that can be distributed and used by all community members. As highlighted by Winter Storm Uri, current emergency food and inventory distribution systems do not adequately address the diverse dietary needs and medically necessary foods (e.g., halal, kosher, diabetic, vegetarian, low-sodium, allergen-free options) of the Asian community and the community at large. In the most recent census, the Asian American population is one of the fastest-growing demographic groups in the Greater Austin region. The 2024 Austin/Travis County Food Plan, adopted by the City of Austin, emphasizes equitable access to nutritious and culturally relevant food, particularly during emergencies. This recommendation aims to ensure that emergency food provisions include culturally relevant options that reflect the diverse culinary traditions within the Asian American population in Austin/Travis County. This will involve partnerships with community organizations, cultural centers, and local businesses to identify and provide suitable food items. Recommendation The Joint Inclusion Committee recommends that the City of Austin allocate funding and resources to develop and implement a program for culturally appropriate and medically necessary emergency food provisions for all, with attention to gaps identified for serving Asian American communities. This program should: ● Reference the Austin-Travis County Food Plan to identify specific dietary needs and cultural food preferences within the Asian communities. ● Prioritize the incorporation of culturally relevant foods and preferences of Asian communities in the Disaster Food and Drinking Water Access Plan along with developing language access protocols to ensure the swift distribution of food and water during climate-related and other disasters to Asian communities. ● Partner with Asian community organizations, cultural centers, and local Asian-owned businesses to source and distribute culturally appropriate food items during disasters. ● Train emergency response personnel on language access needs, cultural sensitivity, and dietary needs of Asian American communities. ● Establish culturally competent distribution sites, potentially within existing Resiliency Hubs, or through partnerships with existing community centers. ● Create a list of approved vendors, who can provide culturally relevant food in the event of an …
Joint Inclusion Committee RECOMMENDATION 20250326-027 Date: March 26, 2025 Subject: Funding and Expanding Equity & Inclusion Trainings Motioned by: Commissioner Ortega Seconded By: Commissioner McIllwain Expanding Equity & Inclusion Trainings Description The City continues to see an increase in reported hate crimes and hate incidents year to year since 2021. Currently, City initiatives around anti-hate are housed in a variety of different offices and departments. The We All Belong Campaign is housed in the Corporate Public Information Office, the Safe Place program is housed in the Austin Police Department, and Undoing Racism trainings are housed in the Office of Equity & Inclusion. While each program has varying degrees of public engagement and participation, City staff and public citizens would benefit from expanded access and visibility about these services. Additionally, the commission would like to suggest the addition of training around Bystander Intervention that equips staff and citizens on how to safely intervene and respond in situations of hate-based discrimination or violence. Recommendation The Joint Inclusion Committee recommends that Anti-hate campaigns and programs are adequately funded to have a hub for staff and citizens to easily access information about reporting hate-based incidents, current program offerings, and trainings the public can attend. Additionally, along with an expansion to the Undoing Racism training available to the public, we recommend that staff and citizens have access to Bystander Intervention training. Department Office of Equity & Inclusion, Communications & Public Information, Human Resources Alignment with Council Strategic Priorities Culture & Lifelong Learning: Appreciation, respect, and welcoming of all people and cultures; Lifelong Learning Opportunities Safety: Emergency Prevention, Preparedness, and Recovery Government that Works for All: Employee engagement; Stakeholder engagement and participation; Equity of City programs and resource allocation; Transparency and ethical practices Vote For: 10-0 Attest: Commissioner Bondi, Vice Chair
