Item 3a - Street Impact Fee Study Report — original pdf

Backup

CITY(cid:1)OF(cid:1)AUSTIN,(cid:1)TEXAS(cid:1)(cid:1) STREET(cid:1)IMPACT(cid:1)FEE(cid:1)STUDY(cid:1)(cid:1) FINAL(cid:1)DRAFT(cid:1) (cid:1) January(cid:1) 2020 Prepared(cid:1)for(cid:1)the(cid:1)City(cid:1)of(cid:1)Austin(cid:1) Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Jeff Whitacre, P.E., AICP, PTP 10814 Jollyville Rd, Suite 300 Austin, TX 78759 Phone 512 418 1771 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 064424307 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas i Final Draft January 2020 FOREWORD Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. The primary purpose of the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study is to determine the maximum assessable impact fee per unit of new development as allowed by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The maximum assessable fee is a technical calculation that represents the demand that new development places on the street infrastructure and quantifies the cost for growth to pay for growth. This technical document does not consider policy decisions that might be used to further other City goals beyond street infrastructure. Those policy decisions would set the effective Street Impact Fee. These decisions include, but aren’t limited to, the following: Rate Setting: The study calculated the maximum assessable street impact fee per service area. This fee could be discounted by a wide variety of options. These options include: Vary by Service Area: Use a different collection option by Service Area. Vary by Land Use: Use a different rate or percentage for different land uses (e.g. residential and non-residential). Phased-In Approach: Start with one option in year 1 and transition to another option in the future. Offsets: Fees would be offset by system improvements that are built by development. The implementation of offsets will be outlined in the ordinance. Discounts: Additional discounts for different development types that further other City objectives, such as affordable housing and transit-oriented development could be included in the rate setting. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas ii Final Draft January 2020 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................1 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................7 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................................................8 A. Introduction and Purpose .................................................................................................................. 8 B. Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 9 C. Land Use Assumptions Methodology ............................................................................................ 10 D. Street Impact Fee Service Areas................................................................................................... 16 E. Land Use Assumptions Summary.................................................................................................... 18 ROADWAY CAPACITY PLAN ............................................................................................20 METHODOLOGY FOR STREET IMPACT FEES .....................................................................63 A. Service Areas .................................................................................................................................... 63 B. Service Units ...................................................................................................................................... 63 C. Cost Per Service Unit ....................................................................................................................... 66 D. Cost of the RCP ................................................................................................................................ 66 1. Overview of Street Impact Fee RCP Costing Worksheets .............................................................. 68 2. Project Information ................................................................................................................................. 69 3. Construction Pay Items ........................................................................................................................... 69 4. Construction Component Allowances ................................................................................................... 70 5. Summary of Cost and Allowances ....................................................................................................... 71 E. Summary of Street Impact Fee RCP Costs ................................................................................... 71 F. Service Unit Calculation .................................................................................................................. 98 STREET IMPACT FEE CALCULATION............................................................................... 105 A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit ................................................................. 105 B. Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit ............................................................... 109 C. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination .................................................................... 110 D. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development ........................................................................ 114 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS ............................................................................................... 120 ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF STREET IMPACT FEES ..................................... 121 A. Adoption Process ........................................................................................................................... 121 B. Collection and Use of Street Impact Fees ................................................................................ 121 VIII. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 122 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 123 A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections ................................................................................ 123 B. Street Impact Fee RCP Service Units of Supply ...................................................................... 123 C. Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Summary ................................................. 123 D. Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits ................................ 123 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas iii Final Draft January 2020 List of Exhibits 1 Citywide Future Land Use Map ........................................................................................................ 13 2 Emerging Projects ................................................................................................................................. 14 3 Proposed Service Areas ..................................................................................................................... 17 4 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 24 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 26 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 28 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 31 Service Area DT ........................................................................................................................... 33 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 35 Service Area F .............................................................................................................................. 37 Service Area G ............................................................................................................................. 39 Service Area H ............................................................................................................................. 41 Service Area I ............................................................................................................................... 44 Service Area J .............................................................................................................................. 47 Service Area K .............................................................................................................................. 49 Service Area L .............................................................................................................................. 52 Service Area M ............................................................................................................................. 54 Service Area N ............................................................................................................................. 57 Service Area O ............................................................................................................................. 60 Service Area P .............................................................................................................................. 62 5 High Frequency Transit and High Capacity Transit Routes ........................................................ 102 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas iv Final Draft January 2020 List of Tables 1 2 3 Residential and Employment 10-Year Growth Projections .......................................................... 18 Desired Turn Lanes at Intersections ................................................................................................... 22 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 23 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 25 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 27 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 29 Service Area DT ........................................................................................................................... 32 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 34 Service Area F .............................................................................................................................. 36 Service Area G ............................................................................................................................. 38 Service Area H ............................................................................................................................. 40 Service Area I ............................................................................................................................... 42 Service Area J .............................................................................................................................. 45 Service Area K .............................................................................................................................. 48 Service Area L .............................................................................................................................. 50 Service Area M ............................................................................................................................. 53 Service Area N ............................................................................................................................. 55 Service Area O ............................................................................................................................. 58 Service Area P .............................................................................................................................. 61 5 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 72 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 73 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 74 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 76 Service Area DT ........................................................................................................................... 78 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 79 Service Area F .............................................................................................................................. 80 Service Area G ............................................................................................................................. 81 Service Area H ............................................................................................................................. 83 Service Area I ............................................................................................................................... 84 Service Area J .............................................................................................................................. 86 Service Area K .............................................................................................................................. 88 Service Area L .............................................................................................................................. 89 Service Area M ............................................................................................................................. 91 Service Area N ............................................................................................................................. 93 Service Area O ............................................................................................................................. 95 Service Area P .............................................................................................................................. 97 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas v Final Draft January 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction to Street Impact Fees Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks, schools, roads and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for water, wastewater, roadway and drainage facilities. Since 1990, they have been used to fund public water and wastewater improvements in the City of Austin. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating new infrastructure needs. In the case of Street Impact Fees, the infrastructure need is the increased capacity on arterial and collector roadways that serve the overall transportation network. The purpose of the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study is to identify the fee per unit of new development necessary to fund these improvements in accordance with the enabling legislation, Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This draft of the Study Assumptions enumerates the 10-year projected growth and Roadway Capacity Plan assumptions used in the development of the fee. Street Impact Fee Study Assumptions Street Impact Fees are determined by several key variables, each described below in greater detail. The study looks at a period of 10 years to project new growth and corresponding capacity needs, as required by state law. Service Areas and Land Use Assumptions A Service Area is a geographic area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All fees collected within the Service Area must be spent on eligible improvements within the same Service Area. For Street Impact Fees, the Service Area may not exceed 6 miles. In Austin, this restriction necessitated the creation of 17 separate Service Areas. A map of the Service Areas can be found on Page 17. In defining the Service Area boundaries, the project team considered the corporate boundary (including full and limited purpose jurisdiction), required size limit, adjacent land uses, and 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 1 Final Draft January 2020 topography. Since each Service Area has a unique maximum impact fee, the per-unit maximum fee for an identical land use will vary from one Service Area to the next. For this reason, the team avoided drawing a Service Area boundary through uniform land uses where possible. The Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window. This study considers the years 2017-2027. Acknowledging that the parameters of the study (the corporate boundaries, Transportation Plan, Comprehensive Plan, zoning maps, platting history, etc.) are dynamic, this study is based on conditions as they were on April 11, 2019. One of the key elements in the determination of the impact fee is the amount of new development anticipated over 10 years. In order to arrive at a reasonable projection of growth, staff worked with the City Demographer and Austin Water staff working on the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee update study, which was finalized in 2018. The residential and non-residential growth projections were performed using the Future Land Use Map, the Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map, current growth trends, emerging projects, location of vacant land, physical restrictions, and carrying capacity of the City of Austin. Finally, tables were created to compare existing residential and employment data to the ultimate residential and employment figures developed in alignment with Imagine Austin and in alignment with the City Demographer’s forecasts. The effort described above generated a percentage of the ultimate residential and employment figures anticipated within each service area by the year 2027. These projections can be found in the Residential and Employment Projections tables beginning on Page 18. The Residential and Employment Projections were converted to vehicle-miles. The vehicle- mile projections were reduced to account for transit proximity. Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan (RCP) The Roadway Capacity Plan is the required capital improvement plan for the study. The RCP is the list of projects eligible for funding through street impact fees. Capacity improvements included in the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 2 Final Draft January 2020 City’s Street Network Map and Table, a component of the ASMP, are included in the RCP. Capacity improvements may include the addition of lanes, some substandard street reconstruction, two-way street conversions, access management median installation, or the extension of a new road. Resurfacing or other maintenance activities do not qualify as capacity improvements under impact fee law in Texas. Intersection improvements were also identified and are included in the RCP, but not included in maps in the ASMP Street Network Map and Table. These improvements were developed based on signal requests made to the City, staff-identified improvements, and some newly identified capacity improvements as part of the Street Impact Fee study. Intersection improvements were presented to the public and comments were taken during the ASMP Phase 3 engagement. Only those projects listed in the RCP are eligible to utilize impact fee funds. To optimize future flexibility, all capacity improvements included in the Street Network Map and Table are included in the RCP, including TxDOT improvements that the City estimates contributing funds toward, and will be eligible to utilize impact fee funds. As costing for specific projects is finalized, TxDOT projects that have a 0% anticipated City contribution may be removed. Section III of this report provides a listing of the 10-Year Roadway Capacity Plan by service area in Tables 3.A – 3.P and maps of the RCP by service area in Exhibits 4.A – 4.P. RCP Costing Methodology The cost of the RCP is one of the fundamental factors in the calculation of the per-unit maximum impact fee. Only the costs associated with providing the additional capacity necessitated by 10 years of growth can be used to calculate the maximum impact fee. The RCP’s cost will be calculated through systematic evaluation of each eligible project. The project team visited each project site to determine the project scope, the presence of any special conditions (such as the need for significant drainage improvements or railroad crossings) and whether various additional construction costs would be applicable (such as costing for significant grades). In determining project limits, the team identified roadway segments with uniform need. For example, Anderson Mill Rd is separated into several projects in the RCP. From Research Blvd to 420’ west of Research Blvd, Anderson Mill Rd is an access management project from a 5-lane undivided facility to 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 3 Final Draft January 2020 a 4-lane divided facility, and from 420’ west of Research Blvd to 100’ east of Spicewood Pkwy, Anderson Mill Rd is a widening project from a 4-lane undivided facility to a 4-lane divided facility. The team has developed a standard methodology for estimating construction costs. Referencing cost estimating standards from the Public Works Department, uniform costs are determined for the major items of work, additional construction items, and project delivery costs. In order to calculate the maximum impact fee, the total cost of the RCP at build-out will be reduced to account for (1) the portion of new capacity that will address existing needs, and (2) the portion of new capacity that will not be necessitated until beyond the 10-year growth window. A ratio that compares 10 years’ demand for capacity to the net supply of capacity (total new capacity in the RCP minus existing needs) can be calculated. That ratio, which may not exceed 100%, is then applied to the cost of the net capacity supplied. The result is a determination of the costs attributable to the next 10 years’ growth, which is then used to calculate the maximum impact fee in accordance with state law. The result is known as the recoverable cost of the RCP. Impact Fee Calculation In simplest terms, the maximum impact fee allowable by law is calculated by dividing the recoverable cost of the RCP by the number of new service units of development. In accordance with state law, both the cost of the RCP and the number of new service units of development used in the equation are based on the growth and corresponding capacity needs projected to occur within a 10- year window. This calculation is performed for each service area individually; each service area has a stand-alone RCP and 10-year growth projection. In practice, there are many factors that complicate this calculation. The maximum impact fee allowable by law for each service area is calculated in Table 9. A detailed discussion of the calculation precedes Table 8, found on Pages 105-112. Collection and Use of Street Impact Fees Street Impact fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Street Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 4 Final Draft January 2020 funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Street Impact Fees. An Advisory Committee is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and RCP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This Advisory Committee also reviews the Street Impact Fee ordinance and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the Advisory Committee is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions, RCP and Impact Fee Ordinance. Two public hearings are required for the 2019 Street Impact Fee study, one for Land Use Assumptions and RCP boundaries, and another for the Impact Fee Calculation and Ordinance. In Austin three public hearings are being held, one for the Service Area and Land Use Assumptions, one for the RCP, and a final one for the Impact Fee Calculation and Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the Advisory Committee is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the RCP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the Advisory Committee oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 5 Final Draft January 2020 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Results Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): Below is the listing of the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study’s Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Area Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (per Vehicle-Mile) A B C D DT E F G H I J K L M N O P $1,472 $4,479 $3,642 $2,218 $1,361 $2,043 $1,604 $3,071 $1,543 $1,712 $3,724 $5,752 $2,520 $2,415 $1,507 $3,921 $3,011 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 6 Final Draft January 2020 I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure political subdivisions must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) amended Chapter 395 in 2001 to define an Impact Fee as “a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development.” Chapter 395 mandates that impact fees be studied at least every five (5) years. Accordingly, the City of Austin has developed its Land Use Assumptions and RCP with which to implement Street Impact Fees. The City has retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study. This report includes the applicable Land Use Assumptions and development of the Street Impact Fee RCP. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 7 Final Draft January 2020 II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS A. Introduction and Purpose Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by growth. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development growth creating new infrastructure needs. In the case of Street Impact Fees, the infrastructure need is increased capacity on the street network. The purpose of the Street Impact Fee Study is to identify the fee per unit of new development necessary to fund these improvements in accordance with the enabling legislation, Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. In order to assess an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for residential and employment (non-residential) growth projections within a municipality. As defined by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, these assumptions include a description of changes in land uses, densities, and development in the service area. The growth projections are then used in determining the need and timing of transportation improvements to serve future development. This section of the report documents the process used to develop the Land Use Assumptions (Growth Projections) for the City of Austin’s Street Impact Fee (SIF) study. In accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, street impact fees must be calculated based on reasonable expectations for residential and employment growth within a ten-year period. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 8 Final Draft January 2020 B. Overview This Land Use Assumptions Summary includes the following components: · Land Use Assumptions Methodology – An overview of the general methodology used to generate the land use assumptions (growth projections). · Street Impact Fee Service Areas – Explanation of the division of Austin into service areas. · Residential and Employment Growth – Data on residential and non-residential (employment growth) within the service area over ten years (2017 – 2027). · Land Use Assumptions Summary Table – A synopsis of the projected 10-year growth. Information from the following sources was compiled to complete the Land Use Assumptions: · Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Growth Concept Map (Center and Corridors) · City of Austin Development Services Department’s Emerging Projects dataset · City of Austin 2014 Land Use Inventory; Multi-Family Inventory; and Affordable Housing · City of Austin’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) · Travis and Williamson County Appraisal Districts Inventory · 2009 – 2016 City of Austin Building Permit Data · City of Austin staff including City Demographer · City of Austin Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 2015-2025 Land Use Assumptions · CAMPO 2040 Plan · Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics Employment Data · State of Texas Master Facilities Plan Report 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 9 Final Draft January 2020 C. Land Use Assumptions Methodology The residential and non-residential growth projections formulated in this report were performed using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections: · Character, type, density, and quantity of existing development; Future Land Use Map and Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map; Emerging Projects; · Growth trends; Location of vacant land; · · · · Physical constraints (i.e. flood plains, railroads); and · Carrying Capacity (Growth Potential) of the City of Austin. The residential and employment estimates and projections were compiled in accordance with the following categories: Residential Units: Number of dwelling units, both single and multi-family. Non-Residential Units: Square feet of building area based on three (3) different classifications. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics. Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods which primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as grocery stores and restaurants (higher traffic generators). Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services, such as government and other professional offices (medium traffic generators). 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 10 Final Draft January 2020 Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those which are exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses (lower traffic generators). The above categories in the Land Use Assumptions match those used to develop travel demand modeling and are the broader land use categories that are used in the development of the assumptions for impact fees. In the calculation of the specific Street Impact Fee for an individual development, a more specific and expanded classification based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual will be utilized. Determination of the ten-year growth within the Street Impact Fee study area was accomplished through three general steps: Step 1: Determine Base Year (2017) · · · Step 2: Determine Carrying Capacity (Growth Potential) Step 3: Determine 10-Year Growth Projections Step 1: Determine Base Year (2017) Property data obtained from Travis and Williamson County Appraisal Districts (CADs) was used to determine the 2015 residential units and employment square footage. This data contained detailed information on the following property attributes: Built year Land area · · · · · Livable building square footage Property land use Improvement type (Travis CAD only) 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 11 Final Draft January 2020 For single-family residential units, the number of units were simply counted. For multi-family, the number of units was derived from the multi-family inventory provided by the City Demographer. However, if data was not available through the inventory, a density calculation was performed based on the Appraisal District’s livable building square footage. A conversion of square footage per unit was utilized to determine the number of units. To estimate employment square footage, the livable building square footage data was utilized. Building footprint data and aerials were utilized to supplement the building square footage if the CAD data lacked square footage information. Finally, for state facilities, building square footage came from the State’s Master Facilities Plan Report. These estimates for 2015 were scaled up to 2017 and validated through 2019 using building permit data, adding units/square footage for new construction and subtracting demolished units/square footage for parcels as needed. Step 2: Determine Carrying Capacity (Growth Potential) For undeveloped areas and potential redevelopment areas, assumptions based upon the City’s Future Land Use Map (Exhibit 1), Emerging Projects (Exhibit 2), or Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map were used to estimate the carrying capacity or growth potential of land within the Street Impact Fee study area for both residential and employment land uses. The carrying capacity was calculated in three basic steps. 1) Determine the future land use for study area parcels based on previous planning efforts completed by the City. development types. 2) Determine the amount of dwelling units and employment building space that could occupy every parcel – i.e. the parcel’s “Carrying Capacity” – based on the future land use 3) Identify parcels that are either vacant or candidates for redevelopment based on emerging projects, market value and age of property. These parcels were aggregated with the existing dwelling units and employment space on the remaining parcels to generate an estimated growth potential to compare to the 10-year growth forecast. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 12 Final Draft January 2020 Exhibit 1 – Future Land Use Map 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 13 Final Draft January 2020 Exhibit 2 – Emerging Projects, 2017 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 14 Final Draft January 2020 Step 3: Determine 10-Year Growth Projections The City of Austin Demographer utilizes small areas called DTI-polygons to allocate growth. The DTI (Delphi, Trends, and Imagine Austin) polygons are roughly analogous to census tracts. Austin Water provided 2025 employment (job) and dwelling unit projections that were generated for the Water/Wastewater Impact Fee land use study for DTI polygons within the city. Dwelling unit and employment growth rates were calculated based on the DTI polygon dwelling unit and employment projections. Growth rates for employment were converted to square footage using typical figures for employees per 1,000 square feet for each employment type. The growth rates were then applied to the 2017 base year estimates and projected 10 years into the future to 2027. Finally, the 2027 projections were compared to the carrying capacity growth potential to validate the 10-year growth assumptions. This methodology to determine 10-year growth projections meets reasonable expectations for growth as required by Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. Resolution use assumptions remain consistent. On August 22, 2019 a resolution was passed to accept the Land Use Assumptions. The land 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 15 Final Draft January 2020 D. Street Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for transportation facilities is shown in Exhibit 3. The City of Austin is divided into seventeen (17) service areas, each based upon the six (6) mile limit, as required in Chapter 395. For transportation facilities, the service areas as required by state law are limited to areas within the current corporate City limits. In defining the Service Area boundaries, the project team considered the corporate boundary, required six (6) mile size limit, adjacent land uses, and topography. In addition, the strategy for defining Service Areas included creating a Downtown area and creating distinctive inner loop and outer loop Service Areas based on highway boundaries. Areas were defined for inner loop and outer loop due to differences in travel lengths reported in these different parts of the city. Trip length is an important determinant of service units for each land use defined later in the study, and was thus considered for Service Area boundaries. Since each Service Area will have a unique maximum impact fee, the per-unit maximum fee for an identical land use will vary from one Service Area to the next. For this reason, the team kept areas of uniform land use within the same Service Area where possible. It should be noted that at locations where Service Area boundaries align with a City roadway, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the street, unless otherwise noted. This allows two or more Service Areas to contribute to a capacity improvement for that roadway. In cases where a Service Area boundary follows the City Limits, only those portions of the transportation facility within the City Limits are included in the Service Area. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 16 Final Draft January 2020 Exhibit 3 – Proposed Service Areas 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 17 Final Draft January 2020 E. Land Use Assumptions Summary Table 1 summarizes the residential and employment 10-year growth projections. Table 1. Residential and Employment 10-Year Projections Dwelling Units Employment (SqFt) Service Area City Single Family Multi-Family Total Basic Service Retail Total 179,259 212,913 224,030 315,313 403,289 72,017,000 125,112,000 79,359,000 276,488,000 528,226 84,503,000 158,956,000 109,182,000 352,641,000 33,654 91,283 124,937 12,486,000 33,844,000 29,823,000 76,153,000 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth A B C D E F G H 4,876 5,645 769 7,556 9,743 2,187 10,743 11,384 641 9,909 15,456 5,547 14,944 16,753 1,809 14,467 14,803 336 3,516 9,147 5,631 2,937 3,603 666 5,380 10,211 4,831 15,272 23,294 23,932 29,245 5,313 10,930 16,013 13,744 18,234 4,490 13,954 19,534 5,580 1,222 5,971 4,749 1,520 2,204 684 10,256 15,856 52,000 1,358,000 3,220,000 4,630,000 79,000 2,814,000 4,669,000 7,562,000 5,600 27,000 1,456,000 1,449,000 2,932,000 22,828 5,365,000 7,829,000 4,852,000 18,046,000 33,037 6,141,000 9,011,000 7,208,000 22,360,000 8,022 10,209 776,000 1,182,000 2,356,000 4,314,000 34,675 13,556,000 8,192,000 11,651,000 33,399,000 40,629 13,745,000 10,442,000 13,212,000 37,399,000 5,954 189,000 2,250,000 1,561,000 4,000,000 20,839 16,863,000 8,339,000 3,925,000 29,127,000 31,469 22,140,000 11,633,000 6,899,000 40,672,000 5,083 10,630 5,277,000 3,294,000 2,974,000 11,545,000 28,688 3,046,000 6,283,000 4,523,000 13,852,000 34,987 3,135,000 7,243,000 5,444,000 15,822,000 6,299 89,000 960,000 921,000 1,970,000 28,421 1,514,000 10,986,000 8,725,000 21,225,000 34,336 1,751,000 12,518,000 10,121,000 24,390,000 5,915 237,000 1,532,000 1,396,000 3,165,000 4,738 4,042,000 848,000 144,000 5,034,000 15,118 5,702,000 4,357,000 2,110,000 12,169,000 10,380 1,660,000 3,509,000 1,966,000 7,135,000 27,000 2,266,000 129,000 2,422,000 16,000 3,721,000 133,000 3,870,000 (11,000) 1,455,000 4,000 1,448,000 4,457 5,807 1,350 18 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas Final Draft January 2020 Service Area Single Family Multi-Family Total Basic Service Retail Total Dwelling Units Employment (SqFt) I J K L M N O P DT 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 2017 2027 10-Year Growth 13,769 14,481 712 18,145 20,861 2,716 6,091 6,711 620 10,644 11,619 975 18,359 20,981 2,622 27,160 28,806 1,646 12,347 16,239 3,892 3,686 6,587 2,901 110 95 (15) 27,721 35,710 7,989 19,619 29,539 9,920 3,191 3,925 734 39,842 50,564 10,722 9,573 14,216 4,643 19,860 26,926 7,066 8,655 5,263 224 2,623 2,399 9,391 13,188 3,797 41,490 50,191 348,000 14,213,000 5,855,000 20,416,000 395,000 15,550,000 7,260,000 23,205,000 8,701 47,000 1,337,000 1,405,000 2,789,000 37,764 5,065,000 9,174,000 6,174,000 20,413,000 50,399 5,182,000 10,171,000 7,333,000 22,686,000 12,635 117,000 997,000 1,159,000 2,273,000 9,282 10,636 28,000 4,973,000 2,130,000 7,131,000 47,000 5,299,000 2,405,000 7,751,000 1,354 19,000 326,000 275,000 620,000 50,486 4,551,000 11,539,000 6,109,000 22,199,000 62,183 4,933,000 13,391,000 7,650,000 25,974,000 11,697 382,000 1,852,000 1,541,000 3,775,000 27,932 2,086,000 5,133,000 2,940,000 10,159,000 35,197 2,634,000 7,029,000 4,990,000 14,653,000 7,265 548,000 1,896,000 2,050,000 4,494,000 47,020 3,172,000 3,799,000 8,412,000 15,383,000 55,732 3,413,000 7,390,000 11,202,000 22,005,000 8,712 241,000 3,591,000 2,790,000 6,622,000 21,002 11,772,000 3,679,000 3,065,000 18,516,000 9,155 1,524,000 200,000 4,003,000 5,727,000 252,000 788,000 316,000 1,356,000 1,642,000 1,794,000 3,043,000 6,479,000 5,300 1,390,000 1,006,000 2,727,000 5,123,000 278,000 25,713,000 7,189,000 33,180,000 252,000 32,714,000 8,435,000 41,401,000 3,910 9,210 9,501 13,283 3,782 (26,000) 7,001,000 1,246,000 8,221,000 13,918 30,157 13,296,000 3,879,000 7,068,000 24,243,000 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 19 Final Draft January 2020 III. ROADWAY CAPACITY PLAN Through the development of the ASMP, the City has identified the transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. All roadway facilities identified are included in the Street Network Map and Table in the ASMP. The Roadway Capacity Plan (RCP) consists of four categories of roadway projects. They are as follows: · Widening – Existing roadways that need to be expanded according to the cross section identified in the ASMP. · Access Management – Existing 5 lane or 7 lane undivided roadways identified for median construction in the existing center turn lane for access management purposes. · New - All new connection projects needed to complete the Street Network Map and Table. · Two-Way Conversions – Existing one-way streets that are planned for two-way conversion which will require revision of existing traffic signal equipment and other capacity improvements on the street. Major intersection improvements were also identified at an individual level based on the Street Network Map and Table classification of the intersecting roads, the current traffic control, and the existing traffic volumes. Improvements were categorized as follows: · Signalize – either a new signal or modification to an existing signal due to construction of a new roadway approach to an existing signalized intersection. · Roundabout – construction of a roundabout. · Extend Turn Lane – extension of an existing turn lane to be consistent with ASMP, TxDOT, and NCHRP Report 780 turn lane length recommendations. In many cases, this was recommended where an existing channelized right turn did not have any storage space. · Intersection Improvements – a catch-all for other improvements, limited to new turn lanes, bond project recommendations not in the other 3 categories, removing split 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 20 Final Draft January 2020 phasing at intersections, and special intersections (Continuous Flow Intersections (CFI), Diverging Diamond Intersections (DDI), or grade separation improvements). The sources of major intersection improvements were categorized as follows: · Bond Project (2010, 2012, 2016, and/or 2018) – Improvements identified in previously approved bond packages. Costs will be taken directly from bond financing information or from cost estimates on completed corridor studies when available. For incomplete studies, assumptions will be made based on engineering judgment for capacity projects. · City Identified – Improvements identified by Austin Transportation as candidates for removing split phasing from intersections. Costs are available for some of the projects. In cases where costing information is not available, a methodology will be used to approximate improvements consistent with costing of roadway capacity and costs to construct or replace signal poles based on the number of entering approaches to the intersection. · Intersection Newly Identified – Improvements identified during the Street Impact Fee Study for new signals, modification of existing signals due to new roadway construction, roundabouts (where deemed appropriate), innovative intersections (CFI, DDI, etc.), and turn lane improvements (new or extending existing). Turn lane improvements were based on the desired number of turn lanes associated with each combination of intersecting streets. The desired number of turn lanes for each combination are shown in Table 2. New signals were identified either through 1) city signal requests based on the latest database of requests from the city dated March 29, 2019 or 2) through engineering judgment based on the function and context of entering roadways to an intersection. In some cases, where conditions were favorable, roundabouts were recommended in place of an existing signal or stop-controlled intersection. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 21 Final Draft January 2020 Table 2. Desired Turn Lanes at Intersections Intersecting Levels Major Street Turn Lanes 2 & 3 2 & 4 1 Left Turn (LT) (onto Level 2) 1 LT, 1 Right Turn (RT) Lane (if <3 Through Lanes (TL)) 1 LT Lane, 1 RT Lane (if <3 TL) 2 LT Lanes, 1 RT Lane (if <3 TL) 2 LT Lanes, 1 RT Lane (if <3 TL) 3 & 3 3 & 4 4 & 4 Minor Street Turn Lanes 1 Turn Lane 1 Turn Lane 1 LT Lane, 1 RT Lane 1 LT Lane, 1 RT Lane 2 LT Lanes, 1 RT Lane All intersection improvement recommendations are recommended to undergo a design level evaluation before implementation to ensure the most appropriate improvements are made. In the case where a design level evaluation determines improvements contrary to the Impact Fee RCP, such as turn lane improvements in place of a roundabout, the impact fee RCP cost allocated to the intersection may still be applied to the alternate improvements. The proposed RCP is listed in Tables 3.A – 3.P and mapped in Exhibits 4.A – 4.P. The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility’s typology. The RCP was developed with input from City of Austin staff and the community, and represents projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in the Land Use Assumptions section of this report. Resolution and Revisions On August 22, 2019 a resolution was passed to accept the Roadway Capacity Plan. The RCP remains consistent with minor modifications based on recent signal/intersection requests and minor comments to Roadway Segments. These modifications include: · · Intersection Projects – 28 intersections were added to 14 of the 17 Service Areas based on signal requests identified for construction after the July version of the report Segment Projects – 2 segment projects were identified for inclusion based on some minor comments 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 22 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.A. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area A Proj. # IF Class Street Limits L4-6D-154-TxDOT W PARMER LN SH 45 WB SVRD TO CITY LIMITS N. NORTH LAKE CREEK PKWY AVERY RANCH BLVD TO N OF LAKELINE BLVD DUNHAM FOREST RD-LAKELINE BLVD CONNECTOR S CANOA HILLS TRL-LAKELINE BLVD CONNECTOR CASSANDRA DR EXTENSION DUNHAM FOREST RD TO LAKELINE BLVD S CANOA HILLS TRL TO LAKELINE BLVD LAKELINE BLVD TO PARMER LN LAKELINE BLVD NEENAH AVE SPECTRUM DR RUTLEDGE SPUR RUTLEDGE SPUR NEENAH AVE TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR NEENAH AVE TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR SPECTRUM DR TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR SPECTRUM DR TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR 485' W OF LYNDHURST ST TO 1337' W OF PARMER LN OLIVE HILL DR TO 1450' E OF SOLERA DR LAKELINE BLVD TO SPECTRUM DR NEENAH AVE TO 580' S OF NEENAH AVE 335' N OF N FM 620 RD TO N FM 620 RD LAKELINE MALL DR TO SPECTRUM EXTENSION LAKELINE MALL RD TO SH 45 WB SVRD SPECTRUM DR TO 375' S OF SPECTRUM DR 370' N OF N FM 620 RD TO N FM 620 RD A-15, E-1 L4-6D-154-TxDOT N RM 620 RD DEERBROOK TRL TO 600' E OF RIDGELINE BLVD Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvments Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection AVERY RANCH BLVD AND QUARRY OAKS TRL AVERY RANCH BLVD AND CANOA HILLS TRL W PARMER LN AND AVERY RANCH BLVD AVERY RANCH BLVD AND AVERY CLUB RD AVERY RANCH BLVD AND LOXLEY LN AVERY RANCH BLVD AND DOUBLE EAGLE PASS AVERY RANCH RD AND PEARSON RANCH RD S LAKELINE BLVD AND RIDGELINE BLVD S LAKELINE BLVD AND PECAN PARK BLVD W PARMER LN AND LAKELINE BLVD W PARMER LN AND SPECTRUM DR N FM 620 RD AND DEERBROOK TRL N FM 620 RD AND RIDGELINE BLVD N FM 620 RD AND W PARMER LN N FM 620 RD AND SH 45 S O'CONNOR DR AND SH 45 Service Area A A S A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A-11 A-12 A-13 A-14 AI-1 AI-2 AI-3 AI-4 AI-5 AI-6 AI-7 AI-8 AI-9 AI-10 AI-11 AI-12, EI-2 AI-13, EI-1 AI-14, BI-1 AI-15, BI-2 AI-16, BI-3 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L3-3U-92 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-53 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. Length (mi) 2.00 0.57 0.60 0.59 1.16 1.01 0.57 0.39 0.11 0.06 0.17 0.27 0.07 0.07 0.32 % In Service Area 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% % In Service Area 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 23 Final Draft January 2020 A E B F §¨¦35 £¤79 A-2¬«A-1 AI-2 ¬«A-4¬«A-3 A-2 A-3 AI-1 R D S N I A L P D E K STA AI-6 AI-5 AI-3 AI-4 P E A AI-7 R S O N R A N C H R D AI-10 A-5¬«A-5 ¬«A-6 A-1 A-5 ¬«A-7 A-5¬«A-13 AI-11 A-5¬«A-8 SPECTRUM D R A-7¬«A-11 ¬«A-12 ¬«45 A-7 AI-14, BI-1 A-5¬«A-9 A-5¬«A-10 A-5¬«A-14 A A-2¬«A-2 AI-9 AI-8 P E C A N E L I N E K A L L Y N D R D H U R S T S T L L M A AI-12, EI-2 P A R K BLVD AI-13, EI-1 ¬«A-15, A-6, E-1 E-1 £¤183 AI-15, BI-2 AI-16, BI-3 C R 1 7 2 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 24 ¬«1 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area A 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles January 2020 Table 3.B. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area B Se rvice Are a Proj. # IF Class Stree t Limits Length (mi) US 183 TO TURTLE ROCK RD / BROADMEADE AVE US 183 TO TURTLE ROCK RD / BROADMEADE AVE 150' EAST OF W PARMER LN TO 1405' EAST OF W PARMER LN 1405' EAST OF W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO MCNEIL RD L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L4-4D-104 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-130 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-70 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-130 L4-6D-130 L4-6D-130 L4-6D-130 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-116 L4-4D-0 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14 B-15 B-16 B-17 B-18 B-19 B-20 B-21 B-22 B-23 B-24 B-25 B-26 B-27 B-28 B-29 B-31 B-32 B-33 B-34 B-35 B-36 B-37 B-38 B-39 B-40 B-41 B-42 B-43 B-44 BI-5 BI-6 BI-7 BI-8 BI-9 BI-10 BI-11 BI-12 BI-13 BI-14 BI-15 BI-16 BI-17 BI-18 BI-19 BI-20 BI-21 BI-22 BI-23 BI-24 BI-25 BI-28 BI-29 BI-30 BI-31 BI-32 B-30, C-24 AI-14, BI-1 AI-15, BI-2 AI-16, BI-3 BI-4, EI-11 BI-26, CI-4 BI-27, CI-11 N MOPAC EXPY SVRD NB-FM 1325 RD CONNECTOR SH 45 - MCNEIL RD CONNECTOR SH 45 - MERRILTOWN DR CONNECTOR ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ROBINSON RANCH RD GRAND AVENUE PKWY GRAND AVENUE PKWY DALLAS DR CONNECTOR CORPUS CHRISTI DR SHORELINE DR MC NEIL DR MELROSE TRL ROBINSON RANCH RD MC NEIL DR W HOWARD LN MC NEIL DR MC NEIL DR EUROPA LN DESTINY GATE DR ADELPHI LN ADELPHI LN WATERS PARK RD W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO SH 45 TO MCNEIL RD CONNECTOR PEARSON RANCH RD TO CITY LIMITS SH 45 TO MCNEIL RD SH 45 TO MERRILLTOWN DR MCNEIL RD TO MOPAC (SL 1) LOOP 1 TO 480' W OF BURNET RD W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO CITY LIMITS SHORELINE DR TO W HOWARD LN FM 1325 TO LOOP 1 FRONTAGE RD US 183 TO AVERY ISLAND AVE ROBINSON RANCH RD TO PARMER LN CITY LIMITS TO MCNEIL DR W HOWARD LN TO MCNEIL DR MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO MOPAC SVRD SB ROBINSON RANCH RD TO MCNEIL RD EXTENSION MCNEIL DR TO MOPAC W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO DESITY GATE DR EUROPA LN TO COUNCIL BLUFF DR W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO W HOWARD LN AMHERST DR TO WATERS PARK RD ADELPHI LN TO MOPAC SB FRONTAGE RD MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO SH 45 TO MERRILTOWN RD CONNECTION MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO 1270' W OF MCNEIL MERRILLTOWN RD MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD / MC NEIL DR MOPAC EXPY SVRD-W BALCONES CENTER DR CONNECTOR GREAT HILLS TRL-W BLACONES CENTER DR CONNECTOR MOPAC EXPY SVRD TO BALCONES CENTER DR GREAT HILLS TRL TO W BALCONES CENTER DR W BALCONES CENTER DR YORK BLVD-LONGHORN BLVD CONNECTOR @ MOPAC POND WOODS RD TO POND SPRINGS RD CONNECTOR POND WOODS RD TO POND SPRINGS RD CONNECTOR MC NEIL DR MC NEIL DR / HOWARD LN W BRAKER LN TO MOPAC SVRD YORK BLVD TO LONGHORN BLVD POND SPRINGS TO 500' E OF POND SPRINGS 500' E OF POND SPRINGS TO POND WOODS PARMER LN TO CITY LIMITS 735' W OF MCNEIL RD TO 4400' W OF SHORELINE DR EXT MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO MOPAC W HOWARD LN MC NEIL RD CR 172 FM 1325 RD BURNET RD SHORELINE DR Type Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Siganlize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Modify Right Turn Lane Signalize Signalize 800' N OF SHORELINE DR TO 800' N OF MERRILTOWN DR SH 45 TO W HOWARD LN SH 45 TO FM 1325 CR 172 TO 1300' S OF CR 172 MOPAC TO FM 1325 465' W OF MOPAC TO MOPAC US 183 TO MCNEIL DR MCNEIL DR TO OAK KNOLL DR Interse ction N FM 620 RD AND W PARMER LN N FM 620 RD AND SH 45 S O'CONNOR DR AND SH 45 ANDERSON MILL RD AND N US 183 HWY ANDERSON MILL RD AND BROADMEADE AVE ANDERSON MILL RD AND MORRIS RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND W PARMER LN ANDERSON MILL RD AND ROBINSON RANCH RD N 620 RD AND ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND SH 45 TO MC NEIL MERRILTOWN CONNECTION MC NEIL DR AND SH 45 TO MC NEIL MERRILTOWN CONNECTION MC NEIL RD AND ANDERSON MILL RD GRAND AVENUE PKWY AND MOPAC W PARMER LN AND TAMAYO DR SHORELINE DR AND MOPAC W PARMER LN AND DALLAS DR SH 45 TO MCNEIL DR CONNECTOR AND MC NEIL DR SHORELINE DR AND SH 45 TO MC NEIL MERRILTOWN CONNECTION MC NEIL DR AND AVERY ISLAND AVE MC NEIL DR AND W PARMER LN MC NEIL RD AND W HOWARD LN SHORELINE DR AND W HOWARD LN W HOWARD LN AND MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD RIATA TRACE PKWY AND RIATA VISTA CIR W PARMER LN AND ADELPHI LN W PARMER LN AND N MOPAC EXPY N MOPAC EXPY AND PARK BEND DR W BRAKER LN AND STONELAKE BLVD GREAT HILLS TRL AND STONELAKE BLVD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND RESEARCH BLVD DUVAL RD AND MUSTANG CHASE DUVAL RD AND SANTA CRUZ DR L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT B A S MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD TECHNOLOGY BLVD POND SPRINGS RD-OAK KNOLL CONNECTOR HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD CONNECTOR HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 0.87 0.24 2.48 2.26 2.17 2.56 0.58 0.38 1.49 0.31 1.34 0.14 1.06 0.38 1.94 1.15 0.24 0.17 1.12 0.35 0.20 0.14 0.33 1.33 0.51 0.48 0.56 0.21 0.33 0.29 0.14 0.10 0.51 0.80 0.58 2.28 0.41 0.27 0.74 0.23 0.08 0.56 0.62 0.05 % In Se rvice Area 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% % In Se rvice Area 50% 50% 25% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 25 Final Draft January 2020 F AI-14, BI-1 ¬«45 N PARK A C E P B L V D M E A D O W H E A T H D R B-1¬«B-31 O W R D D A Y M E H B-1¬«B-32 BI-4, EI-11 ¬«B-1 B-1 BI-5 ¬«B-2 B-2 BI-7 BI-6 BI-13 AI-15, BI-2 AI-16, BI-3 R O B I N S O N R A N C H R D BI-8 ¬«B-4 B-4 ¬«B-5 B-5 BI-9 ¬«B-3 B-3 ¬«B-6 B-6 BI-10 B-1¬«B-36 ¬«B-7 B-7 BI-11 BI-12 BI-14 BI-15 B-1¬«B-37 ¬«B-8 B-8 B-1¬«B-38 25RD 13 M F B-1¬«B-40 LOOP 1 N B-1¬«B-39 ¬«B-12 B-12 L R MOUNTAIN T E L K H O R N R D E S A H C H U N T E R S B-1¬«B-44 N FELIPEB A S L V D BI-19 ¬«B-13 B-13 R D OLL N K K A O B-1¬«B-42 B-1¬«B-43 BI-16 C O R P BI-20 T I D R B-10 U S C H R I S ¬«B-10 R O S L M E D A L L A S D R B-1¬«B-33 L B-14 E T R ¬«B-14 B A VISTA T RIA CIR BI-24 RIATA TRACE PKWY ¬«B-9 B-9 B-1¬«B-34 ¬«B-15 B-15 BI-17 BI-21 ¬«B-11 B-11 BI-22 ¬«B-16 B-16 MC NEIL DR BI-18 B-17 D N R W O ¬«B-18 RILLT ¬«B-17 ¬«B-19 ER EIL M C N M B-19 BI-23 ¬«B-24 B-23 B-22 ¬«B-23 ¬«B-22 DESTINYGATEDR B-21 BI-25 B-1¬«B-41 B-1¬«B-35 ¬«1 ¬«B-20 B-20 B-21¬«B-21 A E B C F BI-26, CI-4 R ST D R E H M A A DELP HILN RD PARK S R E AT W ¬«B-25 B-24 ¬«B-26 B-25 BI-27, CI-11 BI-32 BI-31 D R C R UZ T A N A S £¤183 ¬«B-27 B-26 BI-29 BI-30 BI-28 ¬«B-29 B-28 B-27 ¬«B-28 YORKBLVD T U D O R BLVD ¬«B-30, C-25 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets !( ") ¬«360 Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 26 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area B 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles January 2020 Table 3.C. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area C Service Are a Proj. # IF Class Stre e t Limits Le ngth (mi) BURNET RD CONNECTOR BURNET RD TO GRACY FARMS TO KRAMER LN CONNECTOR GRACY FARMS LN-KRAMER LN CONNECTOR ESPERANZA XING-STONEHOLLOW DR CONNECTOR METROPOLITAN DR BROCKTON DR-W BRAKER LN CONNECTOR UNITED DR MC KALLA PL READ GRANBERRY TR READ GRANBERRY TRL-BURNET RD CONNECTOR HARRY RANSOM TR RUTLAND DR-SAUNDERS LN CONNECTOR B-30, C-24 YORK BLVD-LONGHORN BLVD CONNECTOR @ MOPAC CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY-READ GRANBERRY TRL CONNECTOR CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY TO READ GRANBERRY TRL C A S L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-1O-130 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L3-6D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-4D-90 L2-4D-90 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-4D-116 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L2-3U-74 L2-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L4-4D-104 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-11 C-12 C-13 C-14 C-15 C-16 C-17 C-18 C-19 C-20 C-21 C-22 C-23 C-25 C-26 C-27 C-28 C-29 C-30 C-31 C-32 C-33 C-34 C-35 C-36 C-37 C-38 C-39 C-40 C-41 C-42 C-43 C-44 C-45 C-46 C-47 C-48 C-49 C-50 CI-1 CI-3 CI-5 CI-6 CI-7 CI-8 CI-10 CI-12 CI-13 CI-14 CI-15 CI-16 CI-17 CI-18 CI-19 CI-21 CI-22 CI-23 CI-24 CI-25 CI-26 CI-27 CI-28 CI-29 CI-31 CI-32 CI-34 CI-35 CI-36 CI-37 CI-2, DI-3 BI-26, CI-4 CI-9; DI-11 BI-27, CI-11 CI-20; DI-20 CI-30, FI-10 CI-33, FI-25 ESPERANZA LN TO KRAMER LN CONNECTOR W HOWARD LN WINWICK WAY N LAMAR BLVD CEDAR BEND DR CEDAR BEND DR CEARLEY DR OLD CEDAR LN N LAMAR BLVD W YAGER LN BURNET RD UNITED DR W RUNDBERG LN W RUNDBERG LN BUSINESS DR REID DR MC NEIL RD INDUSTRIAL TERR UNITED DR REID DR MC NEIL RD GUADALUPE ST ALTERRA PKWY GAULT LN DUVAL RD GRACY FARMS LN STONEHOLLOW DR BROCKTON DR RUTLAND DR LONGHORN BLVD LONGHORN BLVD PARKFIELD DR PARKFIELD DR RUTLAND DR RUTLAND DR OHLEN RD W BRAKER LN Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize IDA RIDGE TO AVENUE K SINGLETREE AVE TO HARROWDEN DR HOWARD LN TO PARMER LN RUNNING BIRD LN TO TANGLEWILD DR CEDAR BEND CV TO SCOFIELD FARMS DR CEDAR BEND DR TO OLD CEDAR LN END TO N LAMAR BLVD ANDERSON LN TO PARMER LN LAMAR BLVD TO IH 35 SVRD GAULT LN TO RESEARCH BLVD GRACY FARMS LN TO KRAMER LN ESPERANZA XING TO STONEHOLLOW DR STONEHOLLOW DR TO METROPOLITAN DR BROCKTON DR TO W BRAKER LN HARRY RANSOM TRL TO EXPLORATION WAY END TO RUTLAND DR CREATIVITY TR TO HARRY RANSOM TR READ GRANBERRY TRL TO BURNET RD READ GRANBERRY TR TO UNITED DR RUTLAND DR TO SAUNDERS LN INDUSTRIAL TERRACE TO HARRY RANSOM TRL YORK BLVD TO LONGHORN BLVD BURNET RD TO RUNDBERG LN 250' N OF METRIC BLVD TO END LONGHORN BLVD TO INDUSTRIAL TERR LONGHORN BLVD TO INDUSTRIAL TERR MCNEIL RD TO W RUNDBERG LN NEILS THOMPSON DR TO REID DR RESEARCH BLVD TO INDUSTRIAL TERR WATERFORD CENTRE BLVD TO END WATERFORD CENTRE BLVD TO BURNET RD SAN JOSE ST TO BOLLES CIR MOPAC TO DOMAIN DR ALTERRA PKWY TO HOBBY HORSE CT GRACY FARMSM LN TO GAULT LN BURNET RD TO METRIC BLVD METRIC BLVD TO METRIC BLVD ESPERANZA LN TO KRAMER LN BURNET RD TO BROCKTON DR BURNET RD TO 2300' E OF METRIC BLVD NEILS THOMPSON TO REID DR REID DR TO BURNET RD MEARNS MEADOW BLVD TO N OF RUTLAND DR RUTLAND DR TO W RUNDBERG LN W OF PARKFIELD TO E OF PARKFIELD W OF LAMAR BLVD TO LAMAR BLVD RESEARCH BLVD TO PAYTON GIN RD N LAMAR BLVD TO INTERSTATE 35 Inters ection SCOFIELD RIDGE PKWY AND W HOWARD LN W HOWARD LN AND N IH 35 METRIC BLVD AND CUTTING HORSE LN W PARMER LN AND N MOPAC EXPY PARMER LN AND LIMERICK AVE METRIC BLVD AND W PARMER LN W PARMER LN AND ROLLING HILL DR W PARMER LN AND N LAMAR BLVD W PARMER LN AND N IH 35 CEDAR BEND DR AND TOMANET TRL N MOPAC EXPY AND PARK BEND DR N LAMAR BLVD AND WALNUT PARK XING METRIC BLVD AND STONEHOLLOW DR W BRAKER LN AND METRIC BLVD W BRAKER LN AND DOMAIN DR METRIC BLVD AND KRAMER LN W BRAKER LN AND N LAMAR BLVD E BRAKER LN AND N IH 35 W BRAKER LN AND BURNET RD BURNET RD AND READ GRANBERRY TRL PARKFIELD DR AND MEARNS MEADOWS BLVD N LAMAR BLVD AND W LONGSPUR BLVD METRIC BLVD AND W RUNDBERG LN W RUNDBERG LN AND NORTHGATE BLVD N LAMAR BLVD AND RUTLAND DR HUNTERS TRCE AND COLONY CREEK DR N LAMAR BLVD AND PAYTON GIN RD FAIRFIELD DR AND RESEARCH BLVD N LAMAR BLVD AND THURMOND ST GEORGIAN DR AND W POWELL LN N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN N LAMAR BLVD AND POWELL LN N LAMAR BLVD AND FAIRFIELD DR W BRAKER LN AND BITTERN HOLLOW W BRAKER LN AND SWEARINGEN DR 0.88 0.12 1.22 0.07 0.11 0.24 0.12 4.53 0.37 2.18 0.23 0.58 0.43 0.85 0.15 0.16 0.25 0.17 0.31 0.29 0.11 0.09 0.40 0.29 0.20 0.28 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.39 0.28 0.09 0.16 0.06 0.08 0.35 0.18 0.89 0.92 0.21 0.22 0.96 0.41 0.11 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.22 0.18 0.64 % In Service Are a 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Service Are a 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% N LAMAR BLVD AND 11850 BLK N LAMAR BLVD (BRENTWOOD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL) N LAMAR BLVD AND 11700 BLK N LAMAR BLVD (RESTAURANT DWY) Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 27 Final Draft January 2020 F B F C D J £¤183 ¬«360 C-11!(B-30, C-24 C-11!(C-35 PALM W AY R AIN D M O D BI-27, CI-11 C-11!(C-37 C-11!(C-36 !(C-11 C-11 C-11!(C-40 !(C-12 C-12 C-13 !(C-13 !(C-14 C-14 R D N POLITA C-11!(C-41 !(C-15 C-15 !(C-10 C-10 CI-21 !(C-20 C-21 CI-17 A D R C-20 C-19 C-17 !(C-16!(C-18 !(C-19 !(C-21 !(C-23 C-24 C-22 C-11!(C-43 C-31 C-28 !(C-27 !(C-30 !(C-31 C-32 !(C-28 C-29 !(C-22 C-23 CI-22 C-11!(C-44 C-30 !(C-29 !(C-32 C-33 C-26 !(C-25 !(C-33 C-34 O R ET M DENTON DR !(C-17 C-11!(C-42 !(C-26 C-27 C-18 CI-25 D ATE BLV CI-26 C O L O N Y HG RT NO ¬«1 O H L E N R D CI-30, FI-10 !(C-1 C-1 CI-1 CI-2, DI-3 CI-3 !(C-3 C-3 S HIEL NORTH !(C-2 C-2 MAGAZINE ST AVE RT ST PA M RA S C O F I E L D L N D S DR E G LA VIL T H LIG P M A L CI-6 !(C-5 C-5 CI-7 !(C-6 C-6 B E N D DR !(C-4 C-4 BI-26, CI-4 TRL ANET CI-5 M TO CI-10 CEDAR PARKBENDDR C-11!(C-38 C-11!(C-39 CI-13 CI-14 HOLW BITTERN CI-36 CI-18 C CI-37 CI-8 !(C-7 C-7 CI-9; DI-11 !(C-9 C-9 W ALNUT P A R K CI-12 X I N G CI-15 CI-16 CI-19 C-11!(C-50 CI-20; DI-20 !(C-8 C-8 M E A R N S DR M E A D O W B L V D C-11!(C-45 D L FIE K R A P CI-23 C-11!(C-47 C-11!(C-46 CREEK DR CI-28 C-11!(C-49 PAYTONGINRD FAIRFIELD DR DR JAMESTOWN R D COLLINFIELD CI-29 D E E CI-35 N A V E W P O CI-34 CI-31 !(C-34 C-35 W E LL CI-32 LN E W E PO WELL LN ONSLEY DR C-11!(C-48 CI-24 CI-27 §¨¦35 E RUNDBERG LN R D GEORGIAN Legend Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments New Access Management !( Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Impact Fee Eligible Intersections ") Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 28 Street Impact Fee Study CI-33, FI-25 Service Area C 0 0.25 0.5 January 2020 1 Miles £¤290 Table 3.D. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area D Service Area Proj. # IF Clas s D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 D-5 D-6 D-7 D-8 D-9 D-10 D-11 D-12 D-13 D-14 D-15 D-16 D-17 D-18 D-19 D-20 D-21 D-22 D-23 D-24 D-25 D-26 D-27 D-28 D-29 D-30 D-31 D-32 D-33 D-34 D-35 D-36 D-37 D-38 D-39 D-40 D-41 D-42 D-43 D-44 D-45 D-46 D-47 D-48 D-49 D-50 D-51 D-52 D-53 D-54 D-55 D-56 D-57 D-58 D-59 D-60 D-61 D-62 D-63 D-64 D-65 D-66 D-67 D-68 D-69 L3-4U-88 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L4-6D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L4-6D-142 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-142 L4-6D-142 L4-6D-142 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L4-6D-154-TxDOT L3-3U-80 L1-2U-OP-60 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L1-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-96 L3-4D-116 L4-4D-120 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-96 WELLS BRANCH PKWY-SCOBEE ST CONNECTOR WELLS BRANCH PKWY JOSH RIDGE BLVD CONNECTOR JOSH RIDGE BLVD CONNECTOR E HOWARD LN-E PARMER LN CONNECTOR HICKORY GROVE DR CONNECTOR PARMER LN-SAMSUNG BLVD CONNECTOR BLUE GOOSE RD-MACIVER DR CONNECTOR SH 130 SVRD-GILES LN CONNECTOR BLUE GOOSE RD-PARMER LN CONNECTOR APPLEGATE DR-WHITAKER DR CONNECTOR SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD Street VISION DR FM 1825 RD CADENCE LN FISH LN DESSAU RD DESSAU RD DESSAU RD DESSAU RD E HOWARD LN SILICON DR E PARMER LN E PARMER LN E YAGER LN CAMERON RD CAMERON RD E PARMER LN E BRAKER LN ARTERIAL A CAMERON RD CAMERON RD E BRAKER LN BLUE GOOSE RD BLUE GOOSE RD BLUE GOOSE RD BLUFF BEND DR RUBY DR RUBY DR E APPLEGATE DR BROWN LN SPRINKLE RD SPRINKLE RD TAEBAEK DR DUNGAN LN BROWN LN BROWN LN E RUNDBERG LN E HOWARD LN FERGUSON LN SANSOM RD SANSOM RD BRATTON LN CENTER RIDGE DR CENTER RIDGE DR CENTER LAKE DR HARRIS RIDGE BLVD E HOWARD LN E BRAKER LN TUSCANY WAY TUSCANY WAY EXCHANGE DR WALL ST CROSS PARK DR SPRINGDALE RD CROSS PARK DR E YAGER LN L2-2U-OP-70 WALL ST-PROFIT CENTRE DR CONNECTOR Limits FM 1825 RD TO THREE POINTS RD W WELLS BRANCH TO W PECAN ST W WELLS BRANCH PKWY TO SCOBEE ST FM 1825 TO 1560' E OF HEATHERWILDE BLVD OBLIQUE DR TO BAUHAUS BND HARRISGLEN DR TO DESSAU RD HOWARD LN TO CITY LIMITS HARRIS RIDGE BLVD TO 575' E OF HARRIS RIDGE BLVD 305' E OF HARRISGLEN DR TO 1035' E OF HARRISGLEN DR 620' N OF DESSAU RIDGE LN TO 338' N OF E HOWARD LN 1250' N OF W PARMER LN TO 620' N OF DESSAU RIDGE LN W PARMER LN TO 1250' N OF W PARMER LN 445' W OF KEARNS DR TO 1845' E OF CANTARRA DR TITANIUM DR TO PARMER LN TO HOWARD LN CONNECTION E HOWARD LN TO E PARMER LN INTERSTATE 35 TO 1160' E OF SAMSUNG BLVD 3003' W OF HARRIS BRANCH PKWY TO 2844' E OF HARRIS BRANCH PKWY 350' W OF NATURES BEND TO E PARMER LN HICKORY GROVE DR TO PLAZA LN PARMER LN TO SAMSUNG BLVD 420' E OF YAGER LN TO 2925' E OF YAGER LN 2925' E OF YAGER LN TO E PARMER LN 1230' E OF SH 130 NB SVRD TO US 290 WB SVRD 175' W OF DAWES PL TO 950' W OF SAMSUNG BLVD E PARMER LN TO 820' N OF E BRAKER LN 1561' N OF BLUE GOOSE RD TO 3735' N OF BLUE GOOSE RD BLUE GOOSE RD TO 1128' N OF BLUE GOOSE RD CAMERON RD TO 2211' E OF CAMERON RD BLUE GOOSE RD TO MACIVER DR (FUTURE) CAMERON RD TO BLUE GOOSE RD-MACIVER DR CONNECTOR GILES LN TO CITY LIMITS SH 130 SVRD TO GILES LN CONNECTION TO CITY LIMITS BLUE GOOSE RD TO PARMER LN HARRIS BRANCH PKWY TO US 290 COLLINWOOD DR TO E BRAKER LN INTERSTATE 35 SVRD TO JOSEPH CLAYTON DR JOSEPH CLAYTON DR TO BLUFF BEND DR DESSAU RD TO WARRINGTON DR APPLEGATE DR TO WHITAKER DR 160' S OF TRAIL WEARY DR TO 1646' N OF SPRINKLE RD SPRINKLE RD TO 1646' N OF SPRINKLE RD 379' S OF DUNGAN LN TO 1007' N OF FERGUSON LN 1144' N OF CRISWELL RD TO 1970' N OF CRISWELL RD SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD TO 1147' W OF SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD E BRAKER LN TO TAEBAEK DR DESSAU RD TO BROWN LN FERGUSON LN TO 1007' N OF FERGUSON LN DUNGAN LN TO 379' S OF DUNGAN LN CAMERON RD TO FERGUSON LN DESSAU RD TO HARRIS BRANCH PKWY E RUNDBERG LN TO SANSOM RD WALL ST TO PROFIT CENTRE DR FERGUSON LN TO 1722' S OF FERGUSON LN SPRINGDALE RD TO 772' W OF SPRINGDALE RD MICHAEL ANGELO WAY TO SCARBROUGH DR IH 35 SVRD TO 555' E OF IH 35 SVRD 555' E OF IH 35 SVRD TO MC CALLEN PASS W PARMER LN TO MC CALLEN PASS E HOWARD LN TO E PARMER LN DESSAU RD TO HARRIS BRANCH PKWY IH 35 SVRD TO BLUFF BEND DR FERGUSON LN TO EXCHANGE DR EXCHANGE DR TO US 290 HWY SVRD TUSCANY WAY TO CROSS PARK DR CROSS PARK DR TO FERGUSON LN FUTURE DR TO FORBES DR SANSOM RD TO US 290 HWY SVRD CAMERON RD TO FUTURE DR TECH RIDGE BLVD TO NATURES BND Length (mi) % In Service Area 0.22 0.59 0.41 1.32 0.20 0.26 0.68 0.11 0.14 0.23 0.89 0.24 0.61 0.69 0.54 3.79 1.07 1.19 0.09 1.59 0.47 0.51 0.62 0.90 0.80 0.41 0.21 0.42 0.65 0.53 0.52 0.40 0.72 0.76 0.31 0.13 0.10 0.16 0.39 1.05 0.31 0.17 0.16 0.22 0.06 0.33 0.19 0.07 0.55 0.50 1.12 0.62 0.33 0.15 0.31 0.10 0.52 0.50 0.76 0.24 0.21 0.38 0.85 0.63 0.68 1.05 0.09 0.05 0.14 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% D A S Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 29 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.D. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area D Service Area Proj. # CI-2, DI-3 CI-9; DI-11 D A S CI-20; DI-20 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I DI-1 DI-2 DI-4 DI-5 DI-6 DI-7 DI-8 DI-9 DI-10 DI-12 DI-13 DI-14 DI-15 DI-16 DI-17 DI-18 DI-19 DI-21 DI-22 DI-23 DI-24 DI-25 DI-26 DI-27 DI-28 DI-29 DI-30 DI-31 DI-32 DI-33 DI-35 DI-36 Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Siganlize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection W WELLS BRANCH PKWY AND DRUSILLAS DR W WELLS BRANCH PKWY AND S HEATHERWILDE BLVD W HOWARD LN AND N IH 35 W HOWARD LN AND S HEATHERWILDE BLVD/MC CALLEN PASS E HOWARD LN AND GREINERT DR E HOWARD LN AND HOWARD LN TO MC CALLEN PASS CONNECTION/CAPE HORN E PARMER LN AND HARRIS RIDGE BLVD/TECH RIDGE BLVD E HOWARD LN AND HARRIS RIDGE BLVD HOWARD LN AND HARRISGLENN DR E HOWARD LN AND DESSAU RD MC CALLEN PASS AND CENTER RIDGE DR W PARMER LN AND N IH 35 E PARMER LN AND MC CALLEN PASS E PARMER LN AND HARRISGLENN DR DESSAU RD AND PEARL RETREAT DR E PARMER LN AND E YAGER LN DESSAU RD AND E PARMER LN HARRIS BRANCH PKWY AND E PARMER LN E BRAKER LN AND N IH 35 E BRAKER LN AND MUSKET VALLEY TRL E PARMER LN AND SAMSUNG BLVD TO E PARMER LN CONNECTION E BRAKER LN AND SAMSUNG BLVD TO E PARMER LN CONNECTION E BRAKER LN AND SAMSUNG BLVD HARRIS BRANCH PKWY AND FARMHAVEN RD SAMSUNG BLVD TO E PARMER LN CONNECTION AND SAMSUNG BLVD GILES LN AND BLUE GOOSE RD HARRIS BRANCH PKWY AND BLUE GOOSE RD DESSAU RD AND E APPLEGATE DR DESSAU RD AND MEADOWMEAR DR DESSAU RD AND CHILDRESS DR DESSAU RD AND DUNGAN LN TUSCANY WAY AND EXCHANGE DR RUTHERFORD LN AND CENTRE CREEK DR N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN DESSAU RD AND BRADBURY LN DESSAU RD AND DESSAU RIDGE LN % In Service Area 100% 75% 50% 50% 50% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% DI-34; JI-1 Intersection Improvements Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 30 Final Draft January 2020 F C D F GJ ¬«45 N N L O T AT R B D-1¬«D-55 GRAND AVEN UE P K W Y ¬«D-1 D-1 ¬«D-2 D-2 D 25 R M 18 F D V L H EATH ER WILD EB S DI-1 DI-2 ¬«D-3 D-3 ¬«D-4 D-4 CI-9; DI-11 CI-2, DI-3 D-1¬«D-56 CENTERRID D-1¬«D-58 G EDR S S A P E LIN DI-4 R E T N E C D-1¬«D-57 DI-10 E DI-5 H O W A R D DI-6 L N D-1¬«D-59 ¬«D-8 D-8 S S A C ALLE NP C M DI-12 R IS DI-13 R A H BLVD DI-14 LN DI-16 D-16 ¬«D-16 ¬«D-12 D-12 TECH R I D G E Y A G E R E ¬«D-18 D-18 D-1¬«D-69 §¨¦35 R D S KIN P M O H T D-5 ¬«D-5 ¬«D-7 D-7 DI-8 DI-7 R D N N L E G D-9 ¬«D-9 ¬«D-11 D-11 DI-9 ¬«D-10 D-10 DI-36 D R U A S S E D DI-35 DI-17 DI-15 DI-18 D-6 ¬«D-6 D-1¬«D-60 ¬«1 ¬«D-13 D-13 G RE G G LN ¬«130 ¬«D-14 D-14 SILICON DI-19 DR ¬«D-15 D-15 ¬«D-23 D-23 ¬«D-32 D-33 D W B R V 0 H W Y S 9 S 2 E U DI-21 S P R I N DI-22 K L E C U T O F F R D D-17 D-22 ¬«D-17 ¬«D-22 C A M E R O N R D ¬«D-29 H A R RIS D-30 B R D-21 ¬«D-21 ¬«D-28 D-29 E PA R M E R LN ¬«D-25 D-25 D-46 D-20 D-24 ¬«D-20 ¬«D-24 ¬«D-45 ¬«D-41 ¬«D-44 DI-25 S A M S U N G D-42 DI-23 D-27 ¬«D-26 BLVD ¬«D-27 ¬«D-30 D-31 D-28 A N C H DI-24 P K W Y D-1¬«D-61 ¬«D-35 ¬«D-36 ¬«D-37 D-38 E D-36 D-37 P P A ¬«D-19 D-19 CI-20; DI-20 R D D N E B FF RUBY DR LU B E DR L E G A T ¬«D-38 D-39 R D D R SFO N A H DI-31 D-47 D-41 D-40 DI-28 DI-30 DI-29 ¬«D-40 ¬«D-39 ¬«D-46 ¬«D-48 ¬«D-42 ¬«D-52 RINKLER D D-1¬«D-62 D-43 D-49 D-53 P S E G N A H DI-32 R D D-54 ¬«D-53 D-1¬«D-63 FERGUSONLN D-48 ¬«D-47 D-1¬«D-66 C X E D-1¬«D-64 D-51 D-50 ¬«D-49 ¬«D-50 D-1¬«D-68 RUTHERFORD LN D-1¬«D-65 £¤183 D N R O R E M A C DI-33 D-44 D-45 ¬«D-43 ¬«D-51 ¬«D-54 D-1¬«D-67 D-52 D M R O S N A S D-55 DI-27 ¬«D-34 D-35 D-34 ¬«D-33 DI-26 BLUE G O O S E R D ¬«D-31 D-32 S LN GILE £¤290 DI-34; JI-1 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 31 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area D 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles January 2020 Table 3.DT. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area DT Service Area Proj. # IF Clas s Street Limits W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD SAN JACINTO BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO CESAR CHAVEZ ST T D A S L3-2U-80 L3-5U-80 L3-4D-100 L2-2U-OP-80 L2-2U-OP-80 L2-2U-OP-80 L3-3O-80 L3-3O-80 L3-3U-78 L3-4D-80 L3-4D-80 L3-3U-78 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L2-4U-80 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L3-4O-82 L2-2U-OP-92 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I DT-1 DT-2, I-21 DT-3, I-20 DT-10, I-34 DT-11, I-25 DT-4 DT-5 DT-6 DT-7 DT-8 DT-9 DT-12 DT-13 DT-14 DT-15 DT-16 DT-17 DT-18 DT-19 DT-20 DTI-2 DTI-3 DTI-4 DTI-5 DTI-6 DTI-7 DTI-8 DTI-9 DTI-10 DTI-11 DTI-12 DTI-13 DTI-14 DTI-15 DTI-16 DTI-17 DTI-18 DTI-19 DTI-20 DTI-21 DTI-23 DTI-24 DTI-25 DTI-26 DTI-27 DTI-22, II-39 RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD W 18TH ST E 17TH ST W 16TH ST TRINITY ST RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD N LAMAR BLVD RED RIVER ST BRAZOS ST E 10TH ST W 9TH ST E 9TH ST E 9TH ST E 8TH ST W 7TH ST RAINEY ST Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements DAVIS ST TO END IH-35 SVRD SB TO PEARL ST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO 15TH ST GUADALUPE ST TO TRINITY ST SAN ANTONIO ST TO TRINITY ST SAN ANTONIO ST TO SAN JACINTO BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO E 6TH ST E 18TH ST TO E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD PARKFIELD TO 15TH ST 6TH ST TO PARKWAY (184' N OF 12TH ST) E 15TH ST TO E 12TH ST 11TH ST TO 8TH ST GUADALUPE ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR GUADALUPE ST TO SAN JACINTO BLVD SAN JACINTO TO TRINITY ST TRINITY ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR GUADALUPE ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR GUADALUPE ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR E CESAR CHAVEZ ST TO DRISKILL ST Inters ection SAN JACINTO BLVD AND E 17TH ST W 12TH ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 14TH ST AND GUADALUPE ST W 14TH ST AND LAVACA ST W 13TH ST AND GUADALUPE ST SAN JACINTO BLVD AND 13TH ST E 12TH ST AND TRINITY ST WEST AVE AND W 8TH ST RED RIVER ST AND E 11TH ST RED RIVER ST AND E 9TH ST W 6TH ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 5TH ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 3RD ST AND NUECES ST W 3RD ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 2ND ST AND NUECES ST SAN JACINTO BLVD AND 4TH ST TRINITY ST AND 4TH ST SAN JACINTO BLVD AND 3RD ST TRINITY ST AND 3RD ST TRINITY ST AND 2ND ST N LAMAR BLVD AND SANDRA MURAIDA WAY W CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND GUADALUPE ST SABINE ST AND E 11TH ST SABINE ST AND E 12TH ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 18TH ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 16TH ST Length (mi) 0.18 1.02 0.19 0.44 0.51 0.44 1.25 0.91 0.07 0.11 0.53 0.22 0.34 0.71 0.37 0.07 0.27 0.71 0.93 0.08 % In Service Area 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Service Area 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% DTI-1, II-35 Intersection Improvements W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND NUECES ST Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 32 Final Draft January 2020 F §¨¦35 ¬«1 J I DT L N L A M S S H H O O A A L L I-23¬«DT-3, DT-1, I-20 A R B L V D C C R R E E E E K K B B L L V V D D WMARTINLUTHERKINGJRBLVD DT-4¬«DT-4 DTI-1, II-35 I-26¬«DT-10, DT-4, I-34 ¬«DT-11, DT-4, I-26 I-25 D LV B R A M A L N DT S H O A L C R E E K B L V D T S E P U L A D A U G DTI-4 T S A C A V A L W 12TH ST DTI-3 W 11TH ST T S E D N A R RIO G W 10TH ST DTI-9 W 9TH ST DTI-5 T O S D A R O L O C W 11TH ST DT-4¬«DT-5 DT-6¬«DT-6 W 15TH ST DTI-26 E V S A S E R G N O C DTI-27 DTI-2 I-24 DT-2, I-21 ¬«DT-2, DT-4¬«DT-8 EMARTINLUTHERKINGJRBLVD DT-4¬«DT-7 D V L B O T CIN A J N A S T S Y RINIT T T S R E IV R D E R DT-4¬«DT-9 ¬«DT-14 DT-5 DT-5¬«DT-13 E 11TH ST DT-5¬«DT-15 DTI-7 DTI-8 E 12TH ST DT-3¬«DT-16 E 11TH ST E 10TH ST DTI-10 E 9TH ST DTI-11 DTI-24 E15THST ¬«DT-12 DT-3 DTI-25 DT-3¬«DT-17 DT-3¬«DT-18 DT-3¬«DT-19 T O S D A R O L O C E V S A S E R G N O C T S S O Z A R B DTI-17 E 8TH ST E 7TH ST E 6TH ST T S R E IV R D E R E 5TH ST DTI-18 E 3RD ST E 4TH ST E 2ND ST DTI-19 DTI-20 DTI-21 E CESAR CHAVEZ ST DTI-22, II-39 D V L R B A M A S L T S S E C E U N W 8TH ST W 7TH ST E V A T S E W W 6TH ST W 5TH ST T S DTI-12 NIO O T N DTI-13 A N A S DTI-14 W 4TH ST DTI-15 W 2ND ST WCESARCHAVEZST DTI-16 W 3RD ST W 2ND ST DTI-23 T T S S S 1 DT-7¬«DT-20 HOLLY ST DT-7¬«DT-1 RIVER ST E V T A S A E E A S T A V E Legend Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments !( ") Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Two-way Conversion Regulating Plans Other Roadways Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain New Widening Major Streets Local Streets 33 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area DT 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles January 2020 Table 3.E. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area E Proj. # IF Class Stre et Limits Service Are a A-15, E-1 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L5-6D-154-TxDOT N RM 620 RD N RM 620 RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD BULLICK HOLLOW RD DEERBROOK TRL TO 600' E OF RIDGELINE BLVD DEERBROOK TRL TO FM 2222 420' W OF RESEARCH BLVD TO RESEARCH BLVD 100' E OF SPICEWOOD PKWY TO 420' W OF RESEARCH BLVD 100' E OF SPICEWOOD PKWY TO SPICEWOOD PKWY CROSSTIMBER DR TO CENTENNIAL TRL FM 620 TO FM 2769 HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD CONNECTOR HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD E-9, H-3 L4-6D-147-TxDOT RM 2222 RD RM 2222 TO FOUR POINTS DR CONNECTOR FOUR POINTS TO MCNEIL DR CONNECTOR YAUPON DR-BLUFFSTONE DR CONNECTOR OLD LAMPASAS TRL TEXAS PLUME RD SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD JOLLYVILLE RD OAK KNOLL DR ARBORETUM BLVD L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L3-3U-S-100 L4-4D-0 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-94 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I E A S E-7, H-1 E-2 E-3 E-4 E-5 E-6 E-8 E-10 E-11 E-12 E-13 E-14 E-15 E-16 E-17 E-18 E-19 AI-13, EI-1 AI-12, EI-2 EI-3 EI-4 EI-5 EI-6 EI-7 EI-8 EI-9 EI-10 EI-12 EI-13 EI-14 EI-17 EI-18 EI-19 BI-4, EI-11 EI-15; HI-1 EI-16; HI-2 EI-20; HI-4 EI-21, FI-1 EI-22, FI-2 EI-23, FI-3 EI-24; FI-4 EI-25 EI-26, FI-5 EI-27 EI-28 Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Length (mi) 0.32 5.09 0.10 0.87 0.03 0.23 3.08 0.05 1.32 0.30 0.72 0.47 0.34 3.49 0.45 0.57 3.24 0.06 0.06 % In Service Area 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Service Area 50% 25% 50% 50% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 200' N OF CAPITAL TEXAS HWY TO CAPITAL TEXAS HWY FM 620 BYPASS TO RIBELIN RANCH RD RM 2222 TO FOUR POINTS DR FOUR POINTS TO MCNEIL DR TALLEYRAN DR TO SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD TO D K RANCH RD LAMPASAS TRL TO CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY YAUPON DR TO BLUFFFSTONE DR CHANCELLROY DR TO RESEARCH BLVD BARRINGTON WAY TO GREAT HILLS TRL JOLLYVILLE RD TO RESEARCH BLVD Inte rsection N FM 620 RD AND RIDGELINE BLVD N FM 620 RD AND DEERBROOK TRL N FM 620 RD AND LAKE CREEK PKWY N FM 620 RD AND HATCH RD N FM 620 RD AND EL SALIDO PKWY N FM 620 RD AND ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND CENTENNIAL TRL ANDERSON MILL RD AND RANDY RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND TATERWOOD DR ANDERSON MILL RD AND MILLWRIGHT PKWY ANDERSON MILL RD AND N US 183 HWY N FM 620 RD AND HEB DRIVEWAY N FM 620 RD AND BOULDER LN N FM 620 RD AND 8400 N BLOCK N FM 620 RD AND FM 2222 RD FM 2222 RD AND RIVER PLACE BLVD RAIN CREEK PKWY AND LOST HORIZON DR DUVAL RD AND JOLLYVILLE RD JOLLYVILLE RD AND OAK KNOLL DR FM 2222 RD AND JESTER BLVD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND LAKEWOOD DR N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND GREAT HILLS TRL GREAT HILLS TRL AND JOLLYVILLE RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND RESEARCH BLVD ANDERSON MILL RD AND PECAN CREEK RD JOLLYVILLE RD AND TAYLOR DRAPER LN Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 34 Final Draft January 2020 F A E B H F ¬«45 D 9 R 6 7 M 2 F EI-12 EI-13 N L B O U L D E R AI-12, EI-2 ¬«A-15, A-6, E-1 E-1 AI-13, EI-1 ¬«E-2 E-2 EI-3 P E C A N P A R K D V L B EI-5 EI-4 LAKE C R E K P K E Y W E L EI-6 Y W K P SALIDO P K W Y CREEK EI-7 N A C E P EI-27 E-4¬«E-5 EI-10 ¬«E-4 E-4 EI-8 BI-4, EI-11 ¬«E-3 E-3 SPICEWOOD P K W Y EI-9 ¬«E-6 E-6 E S P I C E W O O D C L U B D R A S H T O N RID G E ¬«E-12 E-10 A M P A L D O L L R T S S A EI-14 ¬«E-7, E-5, H-1 H-1 WILSON PARKE AVE V I S T A PA R KE DR B U L L I C K H O L L O W RD EI-15; HI-1 FOUR FOUR P OIN T S D R P O I N T S D R ¬«E-10 E-12 ¬«E-9, E-8, H-3 H-3 ¬«E-11 E-9 EI-16; HI-2 FM 2222 RD ¬«E-8 E-7 F O U R I R O N D R E-14¬«E-16 RIN R A B W AY N G T O ¬«E-13 TEXASPLUME E-11 RD E-14¬«E-17 EI-19 A R L D L P O N K K A O E-14¬«E-18 BLVD V IL I O N ¬«E-14 E-13 S P I C E W O O D S P R I N G S RD DR K A O E FIR Y A U P O N D R DUVAL RD O J L EI-18 L Y V I L L E R D EI-28 AL PA R K DR FLO R R AIN C R E E K P KW Y M O R A D O CIR EI-25 W BRAKERLN £¤183 EI-26, FI-5 EI-17 R D S S A R G E U L B ¬«E-15 E-14 EI-23, FI-3 EI-22, FI-2 E-14¬«E-19 EI-24; FI-4 ¬«1 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area E 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles January 2020 ¬«360 L A K E W O O D DR EI-20; HI-4 EI-21, FI-1 D V L B JESTER Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 35 Table 3.F. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area F Service Area Proj. # IF Class Street Limits SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY TO 1600' W OF MESA DR MESA DR TO BUSINESS PARK DR 1000' N OF LAKEMOORE DR TO CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NB 500' N OF LAKEMOORE DR TO 630' S OF DRIFTWOOD DR W KOENIG LN TO 730' N OF POLARIS AVE ODELL ST-AIRPORT BLVD CONNECTOR LAMAR BLVD-GUADALUPE ST CONNECTOR MARCELL ST TO ODELL ST TO AIRPORT BLVD CONNECTOR BURNS ST-SHIRLEY AVE CONNECTOR N LAMAR BLVD TO 440' N OF WB FRONTAGE RD US 290 F-26, I-27 L4-4D-104-TxDOT MOPAC SVRD NB RAMP TO SHOAL CREEK BLVD L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-96 L3-4D-96 L3-4D-116 L2-3U-96 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 F-8 F-9 F-10 F-11 F-12 F-13 F-14 F-15 F-16 F-17 F-18 F-19 F-20 F-21 F-22 F-23 F-24 F-25 F-27 F-28 F-29 FI-6 FI-7 FI-8 FI-9 FI-11 FI-12 FI-13 FI-14 FI-15 FI-16 FI-17 FI-18 FI-19 FI-20 FI-21 FI-22 FI-23 FI-24 F A S EI-21, FI-1 EI-22, FI-2 EI-23, FI-3 EI-24; FI-4 EI-26, FI-5 CI-30, FI-10 CI-33, FI-25 FI-26, JI-2 FI-27, II-2 FI-28; II-3 FI-29; II-4 FI-30; II-5 FI-31; II-6 FI-32 FI-33 FI-34 FI-35 JOLLYVILLE RD LAKEWOOD DR LAKEWOOD DR BURNET RD WOOTEN DR W ANDERSON LN N LAMAR BLVD WILD ST WALLINGFOR BEND DR PAYNE AVE ODELL ST KAWNEE DR MARCELL ST SWANEE DR CANION ST SHIRLEY AVE SKYVIEW RD AIRPORT BLVD ROLAND JOHNSON DR FAR WEST BLVD FAR WEST BLVD NORTHLAND DR STECK AVE SHOAL CREEK BLVD MORROW ST Type Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add U-turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add Turn Lanes Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Length (mi) 0.87 0.62 0.37 0.39 2.65 0.01 1.11 1.42 0.23 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.26 0.16 0.07 0.24 0.02 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.02 1.17 0.16 0.30 0.67 0.13 0.12 0.56 0.06 % In Service Area 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% % In Service Area 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% WOOTEN DR TO WOOTEN DR BURNET RD TO US 183 W KOENIG LN TO MORROW ST WILD ST TO END (RAILROAD) WALLINGFORD BEND TO WILD ST WILD ST TO LAMAR BLVD LAMAR BLVD TO ODELL ST ODELL ST TO AIRPORT BLVD LAMAR BLVD TO GUADALUPE ST LAMAR BLVD TO GUADALUPE ST MARCELL ST TO SWANEE DR N LAMAR BLVD TO SHIRLEY AVE CANION ST TO WILLIAMS ST BURNS ST TO SHIRLEY AVE SKYVIEW RD TO SKYVIEW RD MARTIN AVE TO ST JOHNS AVE FAR WEST BLVD TO FM 2222 RD MESA DR TO HART LN FM 2222 RD TO BALCONES DR STECK AVE TO FOSTER LN LAMAR BLVD TO PAXTON ST Inters ection N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND LAKEWOOD DR N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND GREAT HILLS TRL N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND RESEARCH BLVD STECK AVE AND GREENSLOPE DR BURNET RD AND STECK AVE OHLEN RD AND PUTNAM DR OHLEN RD AND CONTOUR DR FAIRFIELD DR AND RESEARCH BLVD MESA DR AND GREYSTONE DR FAR WEST BLVD AND HART LN SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD AND HART LN W ANDERSON LN AND N MOPAC EXPY SHOAL CREEK BLVD AND FOSTER LN NORTHCROSS DR AND FOSTER LN W ANDERSON LN AND ANDERSON SQUARE ANDERSON LN AND WATSON ST MORROW ST AND WOODROW AVE YATES AVE AND JUSTIN LN JUSTIN LN AND WOODROW AVE N LAMAR BLVD AND CRESTLAND DR N LAMAR BLVD AND W ST JOHNS AVE AIRPORT BLVD AND N LAMAR BLVD N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN E ST JOHNS AVE AND N IH 35 FM 2222 RD AND MOUNT BONNELL RD FM 2222 RD AND HIGHLAND HILLS CIR FM 2222 RD AND NORTHLAND DR W KOENIG LN AND N LAMAR BLVD W KOENIG LN AND GUADALUPE ST AIRPORT BLVD AND HUNTLAND DR AIRPORT BLVD AND CLAYTON LN MIDDLE FISKVILLE RD AND CLAYTON LN FAR WEST BLVD AND AUSTIN CENTER BLVD Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 36 Final Draft January 2020 E B H C D F I J ¬«360 EI-21, FI-1 ¬«F-3 F-3 DR D O O W E K A L ¬«F-4 F-4 £¤183 C F Lamar - Justin Regulating Plan R D D WIN Y S A E M ORR O W ST SUGAREE AVE FI-22 F-12¬«F-29 ¬«F-12 F-12 ¬«F-13 F-13 JUSTIN LN E R AV E V O R G O D E L L ST FI-23 FI-24 F-9 F-14 ¬«F-9 ¬«F-14 ¬«F-10 ¬«F-18 ¬«F-8 F-10 F-18 F-8 E AV Y E HIRL S C A N I O N S T ¬«F-19 F-19 T D S WIL PAYNE AVE ¬«F-11 LAM D F-11 R BLV A M A N L AR PL ¬«F-20 F-20 T E S P U L A D A U G T S S N R U B JOHNS AVE ¬«F-15 F-15 W ST F-16 ¬«F-16 ¬«F-17 KENNISTON DR F-17 A I R P O R T B L V D W HUNTLAND DR ¬«F-22 F-22 W CRESTLAND D R TBLVD S E R C TH R O N OLD KOENIG LN DENSON DR EI-26, FI-5 J O L L Y V I L L E ¬«F-2 F-2 R D EI-24; FI-4 O F L A P I T A C N EI-22, FI-2 Y N B W H T E X A S EI-23, FI-3 S P I C E W O O D S P ¬«F-1 F-1 R IN G S S T E C K R D A V E FI-6 F FAR WEST B L V D F-3¬«F-24 FI-11 R D A S E M F-3¬«F-25 G R E Y ST O N E D R T LN R A H FAR WEST BLVD SIE R R A D R N ORTH FI-12 R D W O L L O H H I L L S D R D O O W DRY CREEK D R R D B M I L C N I A T N U O M R S D E N O C AL B F-3¬«F-26 N O RTH LA N D DR FI-28; II-3 FI-29; II-4 FI-35 D V L N B R E H T R O T N A E R G D V L B K E E R C L A O H S R D D R A L L U B FM 2222 RD FI-27, II-2 CROSSCREEKD R F-3¬«F-27 STECK AVE FI-13 FI-14 F-3¬«F-28 D LN O O W K C O R W TEAKWOODD LN ON FOSTERLN FI-15 FI-16 ANDERS ¬«F-5 F-5 G REENLA W N PK W Y FI-7 FI-9 D OHLEN R ¬«F-6 F-6 R FI-8 CI-30, FI-10 M ORR E V S A E YAT O W ST FI-19 FI-20 O S E C FI-21 See Inset FI-18 D BLV R A M LA N FI-22 FI-23 ¬«F-7 F-7 FI-17 FI-24 D R T E N R U B JUSTINLN N T L E N R U B O Y O R R A H A L L S T ¬«1 W K OENIG LN ¬«F-8 F-8 FI-30; II-5 FI-32 F-22 ¬«F-22 ¬«F-21 F-21 FI-31; II-6 E KOENIG LN CI-33, FI-25 BLVD N ORTHCREST ¬«F-23 F-23 E ST JOHNS E HUNTLANDD R AVE A I R P O R T B L V D FI-26, JI-2 D R KVILLE FIS E L D MID FI-34 FI-33 §¨¦35 £¤290 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area F 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles January 2020 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 37 Table 3.G. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area G Service Area Proj. # IF Class Street Limits Length (mi) COLONY PARK DR-VALLEYFIELD DR CONNECTOR COLONY PARK DR TO VALLEYFIELD DR VALLEYFIELD DR TO OVERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DWY G A S L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-116-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-200-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L3-4D-116 L4-4D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-0 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-116 L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-130-TxDOT L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116-TxDOT L2-2U-78 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I G-1 G-2 G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-8 G-9 G-10 G-11 G-12 G-13 G-14 G-15 G-16 G-17 G-18 G-19 G-20 G-21 G-22 G-23 G-24 G-25 G-26 G-27 G-28 G-29 G-30 G-31 G-32 G-33 G-34 G-35 G-36 G-37 G-38 G-39 G-40 G-41 G-42 G-43 G-44 G-45 G-46 G-47 G-48 G-49 G-50 G-51 G-52 G-53 Proj. # GI-1 GI-2 GI-3 GI-4 GI-5 GI-6 GI-7 GI-8 GI-9 GI-10 GI-11 GI-12 GI-13 GI-14 GI-15 GI-16 GI-17 GI-18 GI-19 GI-20 GI-21 GI-22 WILDHORSE CONNECTOR FERGUSON CTOF FERGUSON CTOF OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD DAFFAN LN JOHNNY MORRIS RD JOHNNY MORRIS RD JOHNNY MORRIS RD COLONY LOOP DR WILMINGTON DR DECKER LN DECKER LN DECKER LN DECKER LN LINDELL LN LINDELL LN BLUE BLUFF RD E PARMER LN BLUE BLUFF RD BLUE BLUFF RD BLOOR RD BLOOR RD BRAKER LN BLOOR RD N FM 973 RD N FM 973 RD FM 973 TAYLOR LN E BRAKER LN DECKER LAKE RD DECKER LAKE RD DECKER LAKE RD N FM 973 RD N FM 973 RD JOHNNY MORRIS RD FM 969 RD DECKER LN FM 969 RD HESTER RD TUSCANY WAY MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD DECKER LN N FM 973 RD FM 969 RD TAYLOR LN DECKER LN SMITH RD Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Decker Lake Rd at Blue Bluff Rd Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements US 290 TO 565' N OF OLD MANOR RD 565' N OF OLD MANOR RD TO OLD MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD TO FERGUSON CUTOFF FERGUSON CUTOFF TO 2595' E OF FERGUSON CUTOFF 2595' E OF FERGUSON CUTOFF TO 470' W OF KARLING DR 470' E OF KARLING DR TO 725' W OF KARLING DR 725' W OF KARLING DR TO 170' W OF DAFFAN LN OLD MANOR RD TO JOHNNY MORRIS RD 3394' N OF BREEZY HILL DR TO DAFFAN LN 430' N OF BREEZY HILL DR TO 3394' N OF BREEZY HILL DR LOYOLA LN TO POINT NORTH DR LOYOLA LN TO COLONY LOOP DR 1520' S OF LARICAL TRL TO 840' S OF LOYOLA LN W CREST LN TO 540' S OF LARICAL TRL DAFFAN LN (N) TO W CREST LN LINDELL LN TO DAFFAN LN (N) 1710' E OF DECKER LN TO DECKER LN BLUE BLUFF RD TO 1710' E OF DECKER LN LINDELL LN TO 1015' S OF SH 130 SB SVRD 1015' S OF SH 130 SB SVRD TO 675' N OF SH 130 NB SVRD BLUE BLUFF TO FM 973 711' S OF LINDELL LN TO LINDELL LN BLOOR RD TO 711' S OF LINDELL LN BLUE BLUFF RD TO 3150' E OF BLUE BLUFF RD 3150' E OF BLUE BLUFF RD TO 1796' W OF SH 130 DECKER LN TO BLOOR RD 1796' W OF SH 130 TO 552' W OF SH 130 SVRD SB MANOR CITY LIMITS TO 5860' S OF MANOR CITY LIMITS 1050' N OF E BRAKER LN TO 1500' S OF E BRAKER LN E BRAKER LN TO 4400' S OF BRAKER LN 2500' S OF GLASS RD TO E BRAKER LN PETRICHOR BLVD TO TAYLOR LN DECKER LN TO 1015' E OF DECKER LN 1410' W OF IMPERIAL DR TO HOG EYE RD BLUE BLUFF RD TO FM 973 DECKER LAKE RD TO 2400' N OF DECKER LAKE RD 2400' N OF DECKER LAKE RD TO 770' W OF SH 130 SBFR LOYOLA LN TO FM 969 US 183 TO DECKER LN FM 969 TO 846' N OF FM 969 DECKER LN TO 235' E OF BANTAM WOODS BOLM RD TO SMITH RD US 290 TO 720' S OF US 290 ED BLUESTEIN BLVD TO ANDTREE BLVD COMMERCIAL PARK DR TO US 290 846' N OF FM 969 TO 1850' N OF FM 969 3170' S OF DECKER LAKE RD TO DECKER LAKE RD DECKER LN TO 235' E OF BANTAM WOODS E BRAKER LN TO 3200' N OF E BRAKER LN 540' S OF LARICAL TRL TO 1520' S OF LARICAL TRL ED BLUESTEIN BLVD TO ALLEYTON DR Inters ection DECKER LN AND LINDELL LN BLUE BLUFF RD AND DECKER LN-BLOOR RD CONNECTOR E PARMER LN / BLUE BLUFF AND SH 130 E PARMER LN AND WILDHORSE RANCH TRL E PARMER LN AND NEW CONNECTION E PARMER LN AND OLD HWY 20 N FM 973 RD AND WILDHORSE RANCH TRL N FM 973 RD AND E BRAKER LN E BRAKER LN AND FM 973-E BRAKER LN CONNECTOR E BRAKER LN AND TAYLOR LN JOHNNY MORRIS RD AND LOYOLA LN LOYOLA LN AND SENDERO HILLS PKWY DECKER LN AND COLONY LOOP LN DECKER LN AND LOYOLA LN DECKER LAKE RD AND BLUE BLUFF RD N FM 973 RD AND DECKER LAKE RD FM 969 RD AND CRAIGWOOD DR FM 969 RD AND JOHNNY MORRIS RD FM 969 RD AND NIXON LN FM 969 RD AND DECKER LN FM 969 RD AND PARK AT WOODLANDS DR LOYOLA LN AND COLONY LOOP DR/CIELO VISTA DR 0.31 0.11 0.52 0.49 0.23 0.22 0.11 0.52 0.37 0.56 0.61 0.93 0.39 0.49 1.02 0.17 0.39 1.15 0.32 0.98 0.18 0.42 0.92 0.13 0.68 0.60 0.51 2.57 0.24 1.11 0.48 1.00 1.30 1.44 0.19 0.58 0.68 0.48 1.24 1.33 1.80 0.16 0.31 0.66 0.13 0.53 0.32 0.20 0.59 0.19 0.57 0.19 0.31 % In Service Area 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% % In Service Area 25% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 50% 50% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 38 Final Draft January 2020 F D P J G §¨¦35 B D E R V Y S W 0 H 9 S 2 E U O L D H W Y 2 0 GI-1 G-19 ¬«G-19 ¬«G-18 G-18 7 7 1 M 3 F GI-6 GI-5 E P A R M E R L N ¬«G-21 G-21 E C K D E R GI-4 ¬«G-22 G-20 L N - B GI-3 GI-2 L O O R R D G-28 ¬«G-28 ¬«G-26 G-26 C O N N E C T O R BLO OR RD ¬«G-27 G-27 ¬«G-29 G-29 LN LN G-24 G-20 LINDELL LINDELL ¬«G-20 ¬«G-24 ¬«G-25 UFF LN E BL BLU G-25 G ¬«G-39 G-39 G-23 ¬«G-23 W I L D H O R S E C O N N E C T O R GI-7 D R 3 7 9 M F N ¬«G-30 G-30 ¬«G-31 G-31 GI-8 D R 3 7 9 FM N ¬«G-32 G-32 G-5 G-1 ¬«G-1 £¤290 ¬«G-5 ¬«G-6 ¬«G-4 ¬«G-10 G-11 G-4 G-7 D A F F A N G-8 G-9 G-10 ¬«G-7 ¬«G-9 ¬«G-8 LNEXTENSION D R RIS R O M G-12¬«G-45 ¬«G-2 G-2 F E R G-12¬«G-47 G U S O N C T O F D R R N O G-3 ¬«G-3 O OK D M A O L P E C A N BR G-12¬«G-46 DR R D K O O R B L A T S Y R C ¬«G-11 G-12 Y N N H O J ¬«G-12 G-13 C O LO N YL O N R L E K C E D G-33¬«G-52 ¬«G-13 G-13 LOYOLA L N GI-11 ¬«G-40 G-40 GI-22 Y PKW GI-12 LOYOLA O P D R ¬«G-14 G-6 LN GI-14 GI-13 HILLS O R E D N E S GI-17 R R D D E E E E B B C C M M GI-18 TRACORL N £¤183 G-12¬«G-48 G-35 ¬«G-35 ¬«G-42 G-42 GI-21 G-41 ¬«G-41 FM969RD GI-19 GI-20 ¬«G-43 G-43 G-12¬«G-50 ¬«G-17 G-17 G-16¬«G-16 ¬«G-15 G-15 G-37¬«G-36 GI-15 ¬«G-38 G-38 D 73 R N FM 9 LAKE GI-16 RD G-37 ¬«G-37 DECKER G-12¬«G-49 ¬«130 GI-9 G-33¬«G-51 ¬«G-34 G-34 GI-10 E B R A K E R LN R LN LO TAY ¬«G-33 G-33 BOLM RD G-45¬«G-53 D R R E T S E H ¬«G-44 G-45 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 39 ¬«71 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area G 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles January 2020 Table 3.H. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area H Proj. # IF Class Stre et Se rvice Are a H A S E-7, H-1 L3-3U-S-100 E-9, H-3 L4-3U-125-TxDOT L4-6D-147-TxDOT L3-3U-S-100 L3-3U-S-100 L5-6D-125-TxDOT L5-6D-125-TxDOT H-2 H-4 H-5 H-6 H-7 n o i t c e s r e t n I s t n e m e v o r p m I EI-15; HI-1 EI-16; HI-2 HI-3 EI-20; HI-4 HI-5, II-1 BULLICK HOLLOW RD RR 2222 TO RM 620 BYPASS RM 2222 RD CITY PARK RD CITY PARK RD N RM 620 RD N RM 620 RD Type Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Limits FM 620 TO FM 2769 FM 2222 TO FM 620 FM 620 BYPASS TO RIBELIN RANCH RD FM 2222 TO 185' E OF WEST COURTYARD DR 185' E OF WEST COURTYARD DR TO 870' W OF BRIDGE POINT PKWY FM 2222 RD TO MARSHALL FORD RD MARSHALL FORD RD TO LOW WATER CROSSING RD Intersection N FM 620 RD AND FM 2222 RD FM 2222 RD AND RIVER PLACE BLVD RIVER PLACE BLVD AND 6570 BLOCK FM 2222 RD AND JESTER BLVD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND COURTYARD DR Length (mi) 3.08 0.42 1.32 0.41 0.69 2.23 1.37 % In Service Are a 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% % In Service Are a 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 40 Final Draft January 2020 FM 2769R D B U L L I C K H O L L O W H E - ¬«E-7, H-1 , - 1 5 R D D R K R A P N A L N U Q N I N F M 620 R D 4¬«H-7 H - F M 2 2 2 2 R D 4¬«H-6 H - BYPASS N F M 6 2 0 R D D V L B H C N A R STEINER H EI-15; HI-1 H-2 ¬«H-2 ¬«E-9, BLVD E-8, H-3 H-3 E C A L P R E RIV EI-16; HI-2 HI-3 R D VIEW BIG F ¬«45 £¤183 4¬«H-5 H - CITY PARK R D EI-20; HI-4 W E S T ¬«H-4 COURTYARD H - 4 D R HI-5, II-1 ¬«360 H E K F I RD PARK N LA UIN Q S Legend New Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments !( ") Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets ¬«71 Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 41 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area H 0.5 1 2 Miles January 2020 0 B S Y W H S A X E T F O L A T P A C S I L1-2U-OP-60 SHOALWOOD AVE-SHOAL CREEK BLVD CONNECTOR SHOALWOOD AVE TO SHOAL CREEK BLVD Table 3.I. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area I Se rvice Are a Proj. # IF Class Stre et Limits I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 I-5 I-6 I-7 I-8 I-9 I-10 I-11 I-12 I-13 I-14 I-15 I-16 I-17 I-18 I-19 I-22 I-23 I-26 I-28 I-29 I-30 I-31 I-32 I-33 I-35 I-36 I-37 I A S DT-3, I-20 DT-2, I-21 I-24, K-2 DT-11, I-25 DT-10, I-34 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4U-110 L3-4D-96 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-3U-80 L3-4D-100 L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L3-5U-80 L3-3U-80 L3-4D-116 L3-3U-100 L3-4D-80 L3-3U-74 L2-2U-60 L3-3U-74 L3-4D-94 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-110 L3-4D-80 L3-3U-78 L2-2U-92 L2-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 F-26, I-27 L4-4D-104-TxDOT N LAMAR BLVD AIRPORT BLVD W 51ST ST W 45TH ST W 45TH ST W 45TH ST W GUADALUPE ST N LAMAR BLVD W 43RD ST W 38TH ST GUADALUPE ST W 35TH ST CTOF E 41ST ST W 35TH ST W 38TH ST W 38TH ST RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD N LAMAR BLVD ENFIELD RD LAKE AUSTIN BLVD REDBUD TRL N LAMAR BLVD PRESSLER ST NORTHLAND DR HANCOCK DR BRUNING AVE EXPOSITION BLVD N LAMAR BLVD NUECES ST RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD RED RIVER ST PRESSLER ST E 41ST ST W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD KOENIG LN TO 200' S OF CAPITOL CT 450' N OF MIDDLE FISKVILLE RD TO 45TH ST LAMAR BLVD TO GUADALUPE ST ROSEDALE AVE TO MAYBELLE AVE MAYBELLE AVE TO MARATHON BLVD MARATHON BLVD TO AVENUE A GUADALUPE ST TO 47TH ST 30TH ST TO 45TH ST GUADALUPE ST TO N LAMAR BLVD AVENUE B TO SPEEDWAY 29TH ST TO W GUADALUPE ST PECK AVE TO RED RIVER ST JEFFERSON LN TO 35TH ST CUTOFF W 35TH ST TO W 38TH ST 35TH ST CUTOFF TO MEDICAL PKWY LAMAR BLVD TO AVENUE B DEEN KEATON TO MLK JR BLVD MLK JR BLVD TO 24TH ST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO 15TH ST IH-35 SVRD SB TO PEARL ST EXPOSITION BLVD TO LAKE AUSTIN BLVD VETERANS DR TO ENFIELD RD LAKE AUSTIN BLVD TO STRATFORD DR 6TH ST TO PARKWAY (184' N OF 12TH ST) PRESSLER ST TO RESERVE RD FM 2222 RD TO BALCONES DR WEST FRANCES PL TO BULL CREEK RD DUVAL ST TO CLARKSON AVE W 35TH ST TO ENFIELD RD W 29TH ST TO SHOAL CREEK BLVD GUADALUPE ST TO 24TH ST E 32ND ST TO 31ST ST PARKFIELD TO 15TH ST Length (mi) % In Service Are a 0.60 1.07 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.47 0.25 0.04 1.14 0.34 0.19 1.26 0.27 0.09 0.11 0.29 0.46 0.27 0.36 0.19 1.02 0.80 1.20 0.54 0.53 0.06 0.13 0.32 0.26 1.53 0.60 0.47 0.07 0.11 0.26 0.08 0.29 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. ROBERT DEDMAN TO E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD 5TH ST TO END RED RIVER ST TO INTERSTATE 35 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 42 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.I. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area I Intersection Improvements N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND COURTYARD DR I A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Proj. # HI-5, II-1 FI-27, II-2 FI-28; II-3 FI-29; II-4 FI-30; II-5 FI-31; II-6 II-7 II-8 II-9 II-10 II-11 II-12 II-13 II-14 II-15 II-16 II-17 II-18 II-19 II-20 II-21 II-22 II-23 II-24 II-25 II-26 II-27 II-28 II-29 II-30 II-31 II-32 II-33 II-34 II-36 II-37 II-38 II-40 II-41 DTI-1, II-35 DTI-22, II-39 Type Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add Turn Lanes Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Inters ection FM 2222 RD AND MOUNT BONNELL RD FM 2222 RD AND HIGHLAND HILLS CIR FM 2222 RD AND NORTHLAND DR W KOENIG LN AND N LAMAR BLVD W KOENIG LN AND GUADALUPE ST BULL CREEK RD AND HANCOCK DR BURNET RD AND HOUSTON ST W NORTH LOOP BLVD AND WOODROW AVE W NORTH LOOP BLVD AND GROVER AVE BURNET RD AND W 49TH ST N LAMAR BLVD AND W 51ST ST W 51ST ST AND GUADALUPE ST E 51ST ST AND BRUNING AVE/DUVAL ST W 45TH ST AND BULL CREEK RD BURNET RD AND W 45TH ST N LAMAR BLVD AND W 45TH ST RED RIVER ST AND E 41ST ST W 35TH ST AND JACKSON AVE W 38TH ST AND MEDICAL PKWY W 38TH ST AND SPEEDWAY RED RIVER ST AND E 38TH HALF ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 34TH ST N LAMAR BLVD AND W 29TH ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 30TH ST ENFIELD RD AND PECOS ST WINDSOR RD AND HARTFORD RD 24TH ST AND HARRIS BLVD 24TH ST AND WINDSOR DR W 24TH ST AND SAN GABRIEL ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 24TH ST RED RIVER ST AND CLYDE LITTLEFIELD DR ENFIELD RD AND HARTFORD RD ENFIELD RD AND WEST LYNN ST W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND NUECES ST RED RIVER ST AND ROBERT DEDMAN DR EXPOSITION BLVD AND LAKE AUSTIN BLVD 6TH ST AND PATTERSON AVE N LAMAR BLVD AND SANDRA MURAIDA WAY BALCONES DR AND PARKCREST DR W 5TH ST AND WEST LYNN ST % In Service Are a 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 43 Final Draft January 2020 F £¤183 B N Y W H S A X TE F O L HI-5, II-1 PITA N A C B S Y W H S A X TE OF L PITA A C N ¬«360 S B H W Y TEX AS H K F I DT L J FM 2222 RD FI-27, II-2 M O U N T B O N N E L L R D FI-28; II-3 FI-29; II-4 DR ES II-40 BALCON THL N O R I-1¬«F-26, I-27 A N DDR PER RY LN NORTHLAND DR S H O A L HANCOCK DR I-1¬«I-28 D K R E E R L C L U B II-7 II-8 C R E E K B L V D B U R N E T R D H A N C O C K D R W 49TH II-15 E V A N O S K C A J W 45TH ST I-9 ¬«I-8 ¬«I-15 I-16 ¬«I-5¬«I-4 I-5 I-6 II-16 II-17 W K E W AV O R D O O W E V O R G II-9 E OENIG LN R AV ¬«I-1 I-2 ST II-11 II-10 II-12 I-8 I-4 I-7 W 51ST ST ¬«I-3 ¬«I-6 ¬«I-7 W 46TH ST W 43RD ST ¬«I-10 ¬«I-12 ¬«I-11 40TH I-13 I-11 I-11 ST W W 38TH ST II-21 II-19 W 35THST ¬«1 T S N O S R E F F JE ¬«I-14 I-15 ¬«I-16 I-17 II-20 ¬«I-9 I-10 I-18 ¬«I-17 W 34TH ST II-23 W ESTOVER RD B A L C O N E S D R W 3 5 T H S T T S S O C E P I-1¬«I-30 D LV N B SITIO II-24 W 29TH ST D LV RIS B I-1¬«I-31 R A H II-28 W 26TH ST II-29 W 24TH ST II-25 W 30TH ST I-1¬«I-32 T S S E C E U N II-31 II-30 W 22ND ST AY W D E E P S E 38TH ST E 32ND ST I-1¬«I-33 E DEAN KEETON ¬«I-18 I-19 II-32 ST T S R E IV R D V L B O T N I E 21ST ST ¬«DT-2, DT-2, I-21 I-22 C A J RED I-19¬«I-35 EMARTINLUTHERKING JR BLVD SA N II-36 I-1¬«DT-10, I-34 DTI-1, II-35 O P X E W IN II-27 D S O R D R RD D R O F T R A H E NFIELD R D II-33 W I-20 II-34 ¬«I-19 I-1¬«DT-3, I-20 12THST ¬«DT-11, DT-4, I-26 I-25 I-19¬«I-36 W 5TH ST T S N N LY T S E W W 6TH ST W 15TH ST D V L B R A M A L N DTI-22, II-39 CESAR C H A V E ZST II-38 II-41 ¬«I-26 I-27 W ¬«I-24, I-25, K-2 K-2 D TRL U B D E R II-26 I-25 ¬«I-22¬«I-23 I-24 L A K E II-37 A U S T I N B L V D FI-30; II-5 FI-31; II-6 E KOENIG LN £¤290 I-1¬«I-29 I-3 ¬«I-2 E 53RD HALF ST E 51ST S T E V A N O S K R A L C §¨¦35 E 46TH ST E N O R T HLOOPBLVD II-13 E 51ST ST II-14 I T S L VA U D E 45TH ST ¬«I-13 I-14 E V A TT E N N E B E 41ST ST II-18 II-22 I-37¬«I-37 Legend Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments !( ") Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Two-way Conversion Regulating Plans Other Roadways Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain New Widening Major Streets Local Streets 44 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area I 0 0.5 1 2 Miles January 2020 Table 3.J. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area J Se rvice Area Proj. # IF Class Street Limits L1-2U-OP-60 SPRINGDALE RD-WALDEN CIR CONNECTOR E 51ST-BUNDYHILL DR CONNECTOR E 51ST ST-NORTHDALE DR CONNECTOR ALEXANDER AVE TO REAL ST CONNECTION REAL ST-E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD CONNECTOR HARGRAVE ST-SOL WILSON AVE COLLECTOR HARGRAVE ST TO SOL WILSON AVE HARGRAVE ST TO SOL WILSON AVE CONNECTION TO BEDFORD ST MANOR RD RANGOON RD ROGGE LN E 51ST ST E 51ST ST PECAN SPRINGS RD NORWOOD HILL RD ROGGE LN OLD MANOR RD REAL ST BEDFORD ST SOL WILSON AVE MC CLAIN ST AIRPORT BLVD TRACOR LN HUDSON ST HAROLD CT JAIN LN AIRPORT BLVD E 7TH ST SAN MARCOS ST ONION ST CHALMERS AVE GONZALES ST E 7TH ST MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD BERKMAN DR CAMERON RD E 51ST ST MANOR RD E 7TH ST SHADY LN J A S E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AXEL LN-BLUESTEIN DR CONNECTOR MANSELL AVE-E 7TH ST CONNECTOR E CESAR CHAVEZ ST L3-4D-140-TxDOT E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD J-1 J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J-31 J-32 J-33 J-34 J-35 J-36 J-37 J-38 J-39 J-40 J-41 J-42 J-43 J-44 J-45 J-46 J-47 J-48 J-49 L3-4D-130 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L3-3U-100 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-60 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-64 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-130 L3-4D-104 L2-3U-74 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-96 L3-3U-80 L3-4D-94 L2-3U-100 L3-3U-74 L3-3U-80 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 US 183 TO ROCKHURST LN E 51ST ST TO SPRINGDALE RD 320' W OF CHADWYCK DR TO SPRINGDALE RD INTERSTATE 35 NB SVRD TO MUELLER BLVD ALDRICH ST TO BERKMAN DR MANOR RD TO E 51ST ST SPRINGDALE RD TO 51ST ST MANOR RD TO GLOUCESTER LN 51ST ST TO MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD TO WALDEN CIR E 51ST ST TO BUNDYHILL DR 51ST ST TO NORTHDALE DR ALEXANDER AVE TO REAL ST ALEXANDER AVE TO RAILROAD REAL ST TO MLK JR BLVD MCCLAIN ST TO END OAK SPRINGS DR TO SOL WILSON AVE MANOR RD TO 230' S OF SPRINGDALE RD AIRPORT BLVD TO PEREZ ST PEREZ ST TO EASTDALE DR TANNEHILL LN TO US 183 SB SVRD AXEL LN TO BLUESTEIN DR DELANO ST TO ED BLUESTEIN BLVD (US 183) HAROLD CT TO HAROLD CT STUART CIR TO SHADY LN 250' N OF BOLM RD TO LEVANDER LOOP ATTAYAC ST TO N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E 5TH ST TO E 4TH ST E 5TH ST TO ONION ST 5TH ST TO 6TH ST RAMOS ST TO TILLERY ST ALLEN ST TO LEVANDER LOOP MANSELL AVE TO E 7TH ST PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO E 5TH ST ROCKHURST TO KINGS PT NORTHEAST DR TO MANOR RD GLENVALLEY DR TO CHATHAM AVE US 290 TO 51ST ST SPRINGDALE RD TO RANGOON RD EEASTDALE DR TO US 183 DEAN KEETON TO CHESTNUT AVE INTERSTATE 35 NB TO ATTAYAC ST E 7TH ST TO E 5TH ST Length (mi) % In Service Area 0.28 1.02 0.19 0.47 0.13 0.46 0.31 0.15 0.21 0.07 0.06 0.37 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.18 1.63 0.66 1.36 0.33 0.23 0.57 0.16 0.17 0.54 1.21 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.64 0.04 0.96 0.06 0.15 0.10 1.16 0.81 0.22 0.14 0.32 0.09 1.41 0.39 1.09 0.08 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% E CESAR CHAVEZ ST N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E 5TH ST N PLEASANT VALLEY RD SAN MARCOS ST TO N PLEASANT VALLEY RD WEBBERVILLE DR TO E 7TH ST ONION ST TO N PLEASANT VALLEY DR CANTERBURY ST TO LAKE Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 45 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.J. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area J J A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Proj. # DI-34; JI-1 FI-26, JI-2 JI-3 JI-4 JI-5 JI-6 JI-7 JI-8 JI-9 JI-10 JI-11 JI-12 JI-13 JI-14 JI-15 JI-16 JI-17 JI-18 JI-19 JI-20 JI-21 JI-22 JI-23 JI-24 JI-25 JI-26 JI-27 JI-28 JI-29 JI-30 JI-31 JI-32 JI-33 JI-34 JI-35 JI-36 JI-37 JI-38 JI-39 JI-40 JI-41 JI-42 JI-43 JI-44 JI-45 JI-46 JI-47 JI-48 JI-49 JI-50 JI-51 JI-52 JI-53 Type Intersection Improvements Add U-turn Lane Intersection Improvements Roundabout Roundabout Signalize Roundabout Signalize Signalize Signalize Roundabout Signalize Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Roundabout Roundabout Roundabout Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN E ST JOHNS AVE AND N IH 35 CAMERON RD AND E US 290 HWY GASTON PL DR AND BRIAR CLIFF DR NORTH HAMPTON DR AND GASTON PLACE DR NORTHEAST DR AND N HAMPTON DR MANOR RD AND SPRINGDALE RD BARBARA JORDAN BLVD AND MUELLER BLVD E 51ST ST AND VAUGHAN ST 51ST ST AND TILLEY ST OLD MANOR RD AND WESTMINSTER DR SPRINGDALE RD AND NORWOOD HILL RD AIRPORT BLVD AND WILSHIRE BLVD MANOR RD AND ZACH SCOTT ST AIRPORT BLVD AND MANOR RD MANOR RD AND ANCHOR LN E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND COMAL ST E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND CHICON ST E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND CHESTNUT AVE E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND CEDAR AVE E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND ALEXANDER AVE AIRPORT BLVD AND E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND SPRINGDALE RD MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND OLDFORT HILL DR WEBBERVILLE RD AND TANNEHILL LN ROSEWOOD AVE AND HARGRAVE ST SPRINGDALE RD AND E 12TH ST HARGRAVE ST AND E 12TH ST ROSEWOOD DR AND WEBBERVILLE RD AIRPORT BLVD AND OAK SPRINGS DR 6TH ST AND SAN MARCOS ST 7TH ST AND WALLER ST E 7TH ST AND ATTAYAC ST AIRPORT BLVD AND SPRINGDALE RD SPRINGDALE RD AND GOVALLE AVE E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND SAN MARCOS ST E 6TH ST AND ROBERT T MARTINEZ JR ST E 7TH ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD AIRPORT BLVD AND SHADY LN GARDNER RD AND JAIN LN E 5TH ST AND PEDERNALES ST E 5TH ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E 2ND ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD SPRINGDALE RD AND E CESAR CHAVEZ ST E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND LINDEN ST AIRPORT BLVD AND LEVANDER LOOP BOLM RD AND GARDNER RD AIRPORT BLVD AND PARKWOOD RD/CRESTWOOD RD E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND CHALMERS AVE ROSEWOOD AVE AND ANGELINA ST BERKMAN DR AND PATTON LN MANOR RD AND ALEXANDER AVE % In Service Area 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 46 Final Draft January 2020 F £¤290 F I DT L C D J G P ¬«1 DI-34; JI-1 E T AV ET N N E B E G AV SIN S BLE FI-26, JI-2 E STJOHNS AVE C A M I N O ATKINSON R D LA COSTA CLAYTON LN J-1¬«J-40 REINLI ST D R JI-52 JI-3 CAMERON J-1¬«J-39 BRIARCLIFF BLVD §¨¦35 BARBARA R D N A M K R E B J-5 ¬«J-4 51ST ST ¬«J-5 J-6 R ND A M K R E B JI-4 J THH A M P T O NDR R O N JI-5 RO G J-9 ¬«J-8 GE LN L O Y O L A L N ¬«J-1 J-1 J-1¬«J-37 JI-6 N O R T H E A S T JI-7 L O Y O L A L N ¬«J-2 J-3 DR J-1¬«J-38 ¬«J-3 J-4 D LE R A D G RIN P S RO G GE LN S P RIN G S R D NORWOOD JI-11 HILL R JI-12 J-7 ¬«J-6 ¬«J-10 J-11 ¬«J-22 J-24 L N R D H EF LIN JI-25 JI-23 E L V I L R E B B E W R A N G O O N R D J-3¬«J-41 D J-8 ¬«J-7 51ST ST ¬«J-11 ¬«J-12 J-12 J-13 JI-24 J-3¬«J-42 J-25 ¬«J-23 TRACOR LN TRACOR LN ¬«J-24 J-27 H U DSO N ST H A R OLD CT ¬«J-26 J-29 JI-40 J-28 ¬«J-25 £¤183 JORDAN D LV B R E L L E U M JI-49 WILSHIRE BLVD JI-13 BLVD JI-8 JI-9 JI-10 PECAN T T S S TILLEY TILLEY ¬«J-9 J-10 RD R O N A M E 51ST ST ZACH SCOTT ST JI-14 V A U G H A N S T B E R K M A N D R SIMOND AVE ANTO NE ST ANCHOR LN JI-16 T I L L E Y S T JI-15 A I R P O R JI-22 JI-21 T B L V D E F N A R M E M A R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R B L V D J-24¬«J-21 JI-27 A V E K N L I E 38TH H ALF ST E AV EDEAN E T T E Y FA A L E 32ND ST KE ET O N S T ¬«J-13 J-14 JI-53 ¬«J-14 J-15 M A N O R R D J-24¬«J-43 C JI-20 JI-19 C E D A R A V E M I R I A M A V E H E S T N U T A V E JI-18 C O M A L C H I C O N S T S T JI-28 J-16 J-19 ¬«J-15 ¬«J-17 ¬«J-16 J-18 JI-30 E 1 2 T H S T JI-29 J-20 ¬«J-18 O A K S P R I N G S D R ¬«J-20 J-23 JI-26 T S E AV R G R A H J-21 ¬«J-19 D E R L VIL R GOVALLE AVE E B B E W JI-35 LYONS RD J-38 ¬«J-33 GONZALES ST JI-38 JI-42 JI-43 E 5TH ST JI-51 T N S O HIC C T O S H C N O C R O S E W O O D A V E ¬«J-29 J-34 JI-37 E 7TH ST T S R J Z E TIN E 2ND ST R A M T T R E B O R J-38¬«J-46 J-38¬«J-49 J-38¬«J-47 D R Y E L L A V T N A S A E L P N JI-41 ¬«J-34 J-39 JI-39 ¬«J-35 J-40 ¬«J-36 J-42 JI-46 JI-45 JI-44 REDBLUFFRD REDBLUFFRD J-33¬«J-45 D LE R A D G RIN P S JI-34 L N Y D A H S JI-17 E 15TH ST J-24¬«J-44 T S S O T C S R R A E M JI-31 L L N A A W S E 3RD ST E 6TH ST JI-33 ¬«J-30 J-35 JI-36 EAST A V E T S R E L L A W J-37 J-36 ¬«J-31 ¬«J-32 J-38¬«J-48 E CESAR CHAVEZ ST HOLLY ST JI-50 T S L A M O C J-32 ¬«J-27 ¬«J-28 B B OLM OLM J-33 JI-47 RD RD JAIN L N JI-48 D R R E N D R A G Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain Street Impact Fee Study Service Area J 0 0.5 1 2 Miles January 2020 47 ¬«71 Table 3.K. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area K Proj. # IF Class Stree t Limits Se rvice Area K A S I-24, K-2 L3-3U-S-100 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-80 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-80 L3-3U-S-100 K-1 K-3 K-4 K-5 K-6 K-7 K-8 KI-1 KI-2 KI-3 KI-4 KI-5, MI-1 KI-6, MI-2 KI-7, MI-3 KI-8, MI-4 KI-9 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I WESTLAKE DR REDBUD TRL STRATFORD DR BARTON CREEK BLVD FOSTER RANCH RD FOSTER RANCH RD WESTLAKE DR REDBUD TRL Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Dual Left Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements LAKEPLACE LN TO 750' S OF THE HIGH RD LAKE AUSTIN BLVD TO STRATFORD DR MOPAC BRIDGE TO ELGIN AVE 1400' N OF SOUTHWEST PKWY TO 1300' N OF HENRY MARX LN TRAVIS COUNTRY CIR TO 650' N OF SOUTHWEST PKWY 650' N OF SOUTHWEST PKWY TO SOUTHWEST PKWY LONG CAMP DR TO CITY LIMITS STRATFORD DR TO 280' E OF WESTLAKE DR Inte rse ction N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND WESTLAKE DR REDBUD TRL AND STRATFORD DR CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND PARKSTONE HEIGHTS DR WALSH TARLTON LN AND THOUSAND OAKS COVE HWY 71 AND SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHWEST PKWY AND TRAVIS COOK RD SOUTHWEST PKWY AND BELGRADE DR SOUTHWEST PKWY AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR WALSH TARLTON LN AND TAMARRON BLVD Le ngth (mi) 3.17 0.54 0.37 0.55 0.34 0.12 0.57 0.45 % In Se rvice Are a 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Se rvice Are a 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 48 Final Draft January 2020 F N F M 6 2 0 R D H K M N I L B S Y W H S A X E T F O L KI-1 A C N PITA B N Y W H S A X TE OF L ¬«360 PITA A C N K-6¬«K-7 K-1 ¬«K-1 WESTLAKE DR F M 2244 RD K B L V D E E R C T S O L S C A P I T A L K-6¬«K-8 R E D B U D TRL KI-2 ¬«I-25, I-25, K-2 K-2 S T R A T F O R D D R ¬«K-3 K-3 K B E E C A V E S R D O F T E X A S H W Y KI-3 S B S C A P I T A L O F KI-9 T E X A S H W Y N B KI-4 LN RLTON TA H S L A W B E E C A V E S RD O-P A C E X P Y M W S H 7 1 KI-5, MI-1 D V L B K E E R C N O T R A B ¬«K-4 K-4 KI-6, MI-2 KI-7, MI-3 ¬«71 R D R O D A R I M KI-8, MI-4 E V A ¬«K-5 K-5 A G E V T R A V I S COUNTRYCIR SOUTHWEST R E P U B L I C ¬«K-6 K-6 PK W Y O F TEXAS B L V D £¤290 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 49 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area K 0 0.5 1 2 Miles January 2020 ¬«1 §¨¦35 Table 3.L. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area L Se rvice Area Proj. # IF Class Stree t Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Se rvice Are a L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L3-4D-120-TxDOT STRATFORD DR AZIE MORTON RD S LAMAR BLVD DEL CURTO RD LIGHTSEY RD LIGHTSEY RD-BARTON SKWY CONNECTOR BARTON SPRINGS RD MOPAC TO LOU NEFF RD BARTON SPRINGS RD TO BARTON HILLS DR BARTON SPRINGS RD TO S LAMAR SVRD BLUEBONNET LN TO LIGHTSEY RD LIGHTSEY RD TO LIGHTSEY RD LIGHTSEY RD TO BARTON SKWY DAWSON DR TO W RIVERSIDE DR BARTON SPRINGS RD-CONGRESS AVE CONNECTOR BARTON SPRINGS RD TO CONGRESS AVE S 1ST ST CONNECTOR S 1ST ST TO BARTON SPRINGS TO CONGRESS CONNECTION L A S LAKESHORE BLVD-E RIVERSIDE CONNECTOR PLEASANT VALLEY DR-ELMONT DR CONNECTOR L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 L-8 L-9 L-10 L-11 L-12 L-13 L-14 L-15 L-16 L-17 L-18 L-19 L-20 L-21 L-22 L-23 L-24 L-25 L-26 L-27 L-28 L-29 L-30 L-31 L-32 L-33 L-34 L-35 L-36 L-37 L-38 L-39 L-40 L-41 L-42 L-43 L-44 L-45 L-46 L-47 L-48 L-49 L-50 L-51 L-52 L-53 L-54 L-55 L-56 L-57 L-58 L-59 L-60 L-61 L-62 L2-2U-OP-70 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L3-6D-140 L3-4D-80 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-70 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-104 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-100 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-64 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L1-2U-60 L1-2U-60 L2-2U-78 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT LOCAL ST 1 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT LOCAL ST 2 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT LOCAL ST 3 BARTON SPRINGS RD CONGRESS AVE-BARTON SPRINGS RD CONNECTOR E RIVERSIDE DR CONNECTOR S 1ST ST W RIVERSIDE DR E RIVERSIDE DR S CONGRESS AVE ST EDWARDS DR E ALPINE RD BLUEBONNET LN ELMONT DR WILLOW HILL DR WILLOW HILL DR PAYLOAD PASS-E ALPINE RD CONNECTOR PARKER LN-BURTON DR CONNECTOR BURTON DR-WILLOW CREEK DR CONNECTOR BARTON SPRINGS RD TO END BARTON SPRINGS RD TO END BARTON SPRINGS RD TO END CONGRESS AVE TO W RIVERSIDE DR CONGRESS AVE TO BARTON SPRINGS RD E RIVERSIDE TO END RIVERSIDE DR TO BARTON SPRINGS RD 170' W OF S 1ST ST TO S CONGRESS AVE S CONGRESS AVE TO 240' W OF NEWNING AVE BARTON SPRINGS RD TO BEN WHITE BLVD SVRD S CONGRESS AVE TO 165' W OF CARNARVON LN E ALPINE RD TO 200' E OF WAREHOUSE ROW PAYLOAD PASS TO E ALPINE RD S LAMAR BLVD TO DEL CURTO RD TOWN CREEK TO TINNIN FORD DR PARKER LN TO BURTON DR BURTON DR TO WILLOW CREEK DR WILLOW CREEK DR TO WILLOW HILL DR PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO WICKERSHAM LN S PLEASANT VALLEY RD 440' S OF CANTERBURY RD TO 525' N OF E RIVERSIDE DR FARO DR-MONTOPOLIS DR CONNECTOR FARO DR TO FARO DR TO MONTOPOLIS CONNECTION S PLEASANT VALLEY RD-SUNRIDGE DR CONNECTOR FRONTIER VALLEY DR-BASTROP HWY CONNECTOR E BEN WHITE BLVD-THRASHER LN CONNECTOR ELMONT DR E OLTORF ST S PLEASANT VALLEY RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD BURLESON RD WOODWARD ST SUNRIDGE DR FARO DR RIVERS EDGE WAY FARO DR GROVE BLVD VARGAS RD CARSON RIDGE BARTON SPRINGS RD BARTON SPRINGS RD W OLTORF ST W OLTORF ST W OLTORF ST E OLTORF ST LIGHTSEY RD CLAWSON RD MANCHACA RD S 1ST ST BARTON SPRINGS RD COUNTRY CLUB RD GROVE BLVD CONNECTOR FARO DR-MONTOPOLIS DR CONNECTOR 280' S OF OLTORF RD TO 1160' S OF GEORGIA MEADOWS DR LAKESHORE BLVD TO E RIVERSIDE DR PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO ELMONT DR WICKERSHAM LN TO CROSSING PL INTERSTATE 35 TO MONTOPOLIS DR BURLESON RD TO S PLEASANT VALLEY RD SANTA MONICA DR TO BEN WHITE BLVD INTERSTATE 35 TO BEN WHITE BLVD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO SUNRIDGE DR SUNRIDGE DR TO E BEN WHITE BLVD SVRD FARO DR TO OLTORF ST RIVERS EDGE WAY TO OLTORF ST FARO DR TO MONTOPOLIS DR GROVE BLVD TO MONTOPOLIS DR FRONTIER VALLEY TO BASTROP HWY RIVERSIDE DR TO CARSON RIDGE DR THRASHER LN TO MAXWELL LN E BEN WHITE BLVD TO THRASHER LN S LAMAR BLVD TO LEE BARTON DR LEE BARTON DR TO DAWSON RD S 2ND ST TO DURWOOD ST EUCLID AVE TO COLLEGE AVE COLLEGE AVE TO S CONGRESS AVE S CONGRESS AVE TO REBEL RD DEL CURTO RD TO CLAWSON RD BARTON SKYWY TO FORT VIEW RD FORT VIEW RD TO BEN WHITE BLVD FORT MCGRUDER LN TO BEN WHITE BLVD LEE BARTON DR TO DAWSON RD E RIVERSIDE DR TO PENICK DR GROVE BLVD TO END END TO MONTOPOLIS DR 0.25 0.46 2.76 0.37 0.06 0.04 0.46 0.21 0.11 0.05 0.13 0.14 0.33 0.16 0.07 0.11 0.26 0.26 2.70 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.28 0.08 0.12 0.25 1.18 0.65 0.45 0.20 2.28 0.45 0.14 0.33 0.51 0.44 0.20 0.58 0.68 0.45 0.31 0.47 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.43 0.04 0.13 0.17 0.12 0.04 0.22 0.16 0.80 0.05 0.05 0.14 0.07 0.23 0.19 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 50 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.L. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area L Type Inte rsection L A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Proj. # LI-1 LI-2, NI-1 LI-3 LI-4 LI-5 LI-6 LI-7 LI-8 LI-9 LI-10 LI-11 LI-12 LI-13 LI-14 LI-15 LI-16 LI-17 LI-18 LI-19 LI-20 LI-21 LI-22 LI-23 LI-24 LI-25 LI-26 LI-27 LI-28 LI-29 LI-30 LI-31 LI-32 LI-33 LI-35 LI-36 LI-37 LI-39 LI-40 LI-41 LI-34, OI-1 LI-38, PI-2 Extend Turn Lane Signal Modifications Signalize Intersection Improvements Signalize Extend Turn Lane Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements BARTON SPRINGS RD AND STRATFORD DR S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND WEST GATE BLVD ROBERT E LEE RD AND RABB RD S LAMAR BLVD NB AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S LAMAR BLVD AND COLLIER ST S LAMAR BLVD AND W OLTORF ST S LAMAR BLVD AND BARTON SKWY MANCHACA RD AND BARTON SKWY BARTON SPRINGS RD AND DAWSON RD S 1ST ST AND W RIVERSIDE DR W RIVERSIDE DR AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S CONGRESS AVE AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S 1ST ST AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S CONGRESS AVE AND W RIVERSIDE DR W OLTORF ST AND THORNTON RD W OLTORF ST AND S 5TH ST W OLTORF ST AND S 1ST ST W OLTORF ST AND WILSON ST S CONGRESS AVE AND W OLTORF ST E OLTORF ST AND EAST SIDE DR WOODLAND AVE AND PARKER LN E OLTORF ST AND PARKER LN BURLESON RD AND S PLEASANT VALLEY RD EXT S LAKESHORE BLVD AND TINNIN FORD RD E RIVERSIDE DR AND WICKERSHAM LN E RIVERSIDE DR AND CROSSING PL E RIVERSIDE DR AND KENNETH AVE E OLTORF ST AND FARO ST EXT MONTOPOLIS DR AND HOGAN AVE E RIVERSIDE DR AND MONTOPOLIS DR GROVE BLVD AND MONTOPOLIS DR MONTOPOLIS DR AND FARO DR-MONTOPOLIS DR CONNECTION E OLTORF ST AND MONTOPOLIS DR E BEN WHITE BLVD AND MONTOPOLIS DR E RIVERSIDE DR AND FRONTIER VALLEY DR E RIVERSIDE DR AND ANISE DR RIVERSIDE DR AND CORIANDER DR KINNEY ST AND BARTON SPRINGS RD AZI MORTON RD AND BARTON HILLS DR BARTON SPRINGS RD AND STERZING ST BASTROP HWY AND OLD BASTROP HWY SVRD CONNECTION % In Se rvice Are a 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 51 Final Draft January 2020 W RIV E R SID E D R ¬«1 F LI-10 ¬«L-16 L-19 ¬«L-7 L-10 LI-13 B A R T O N ¬«L-9 L-12 S P R I N G S T O T T S S S 1 L ¬«L-10 L-13 L 1 A C O D L S R G RIN P N S O T R A B L 2 A C O D L S R G RIN P N S O T R A B L-14 ¬«L-11 ¬«L-14 L-17 G S R R I N ¬«L-15 L-18 D C O N ¬«L-12 L-15 3 L A C O L D R S G RIN P S N O T R A B D S R G RIN N S O T R A B P N E C TI O N ¬«L-13 L-16 ¬«L-18 L-21 R E S S A V E T O B LI-14 A R T O N S P N TIO C E N N O E C SID R E E RIV LI-11 L-20¬«L-59 LI-12 ¬«L-17 L-20 C O N G C O N G R E S S L-11 ¬«L-8 CONNECTION E V S A S E R G N O C K J I DT L N O P B E E C A V E S R D DR HILL S N O T R A B B RD RAB ¬«L-1 L-1 S T R A T F O R D D R LI-1 LI-40 LI-3 L-2 ¬«L-2 AZIEM O O L LIE R C T LN ¬«L-3 L-3 E N N O B E BLU LI-41 W C E B A R T O N CHAVEZST R A S L-54¬«L-49 SPRINGS RD LI-9 RIV E R N O LI-39 T R SID E D R W D R N O S W A D L-54¬«L-50 DIN AV E LI-4 E AV Y E N KIN ¬«360 L LI-2, NI-1 P A N T H E B A R T O N S K W Y LI-7 LI-8 R T R L R D Y R O T VIC A C A H C N A M A R L-4 L-26 E AV ¬«L-23 R A E DELL B L V D ¬«L-4 S L A M LIGHTSEY R ¬«L-5 CLAWSON L-26¬«L-56 L-5 D R D R D D D U RTO R L-54¬«L-55 EL C ¬«L-6 L-9 M ORG L-26¬«L-57 AN LN N L LA VIL N E D R A G L-26¬«L-58 H ST S 5T L U O B S T LI-6 LI-5 LI-16 LI-17 LI-15 T S H T 5 S W MARY ST T ST L-54¬«L-51 S 1S L-54¬«L-52 CUMBERLAND RD BARTON SK LI-18 ST ED WY ¬«L-19 L-22 ERIVERSIDED R E V A S S E R G N O C S EMONROEST EANNIEST L-54¬«L-54 LIVE LI-19 E S K A O T W L-54¬«L-53 ARDS DR ¬«L-20 L-23 ST E W OOD R E D LI-20 T SID S A E D W A R D S D R W O O DLA N D LI-21 LN R E K R PA A E V L-28 ¬«L-25 ¬«L-26 D R R BURTON K D E E R W C LO WIL L-29 B U R LI-22 EOLTORFS T PAYLOA D £¤290 ¬«L-21 L-24 PASS-E WARD ST ALPINE ¬«L-29 L-32 LI-24 ¬«L-30 S LAKESHORE BLVD L-33 EL M L-27 ¬«L-24 ¬«L-27 L-30 O NT D R LI-25 L-34 ¬«L-31 ¬«L-32 L-35 ¬«L-44 L-46 GROVE B L V D L P G LN SIN OS M A CR H S R E K C WI LI-27 R O D R FA L-42 ¬«L-40 ¬«L-43 ¬«L-41 L-43 L-45 ¬«L-28 L-31 D R Y LE L VA T N A S A E PL S L-36 ¬«L-34 L-36¬«L-33 ¬«L-38 L-40 ¬«L-39 L-41 R E D G RID N U S LI-28 ¬«71 E V O R G LI-26 L-46¬«L-60 H O G A N D LV B AVE R LIS D O P O NT O M LI-30 L-44 AY W E G D E S R E RIV ¬«L-42 L-46¬«L-62 LI-33 L-46¬«L-61 LI-31 ¬«L-47 L-53 L-51 LI-32 ELL LN ¬«L-46 MAXW ¬«L-48 L-54 LI-34, OI-1 LI-29 AS RD VARG L-48 ¬«L-45 FRO NTIER VALLEY DR LI-36 LI-35 LI-37 L-37 ¬«L-35 ¬«L-36 L-38 LI-23 L E S O N R D N D L D TO LI-38, PI-2 £¤183 C ON NE R D ¬«L-22 L-25 CTOR ¬«L-37 L-39 §¨¦35 Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections 0 0.5 1 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets !( ") Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 52 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area L 2 Miles January 2020 Table 3.M. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area M Se rvice Area Proj. # IF Class Stre et Limits BOSTON LN-REPUBLIC OF TEXAS LN CONNECTOR REPUBLIC OF TEXAS BLVD TO BOSTON LN MOUTAIN SHADOWS DR-W SH 71 CONNECTOR W SH 71-MURMURING CREEK DR CONNECTOR MURMURING CREEK DR W SH 71-MOWINKLE DR CONNECTOR L2-2U-60 L2-2U-68 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-80 L3-4U-80 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-130 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-96 L3-4D-120-TxDOT M-34, N-17 M-35 Right-of-Way M A S Proj. # KI-5, MI-1 KI-6, MI-2 KI-7, MI-3 KI-8, MI-4 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I MI-23, NI-28 MI-24, NI-33 MI-27, NI-39 M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6 M-7 M-8 M-9 M-10 M-11 M-12 M-13 M-14 M-15 M-16 M-17 M-18 M-19 M-20 M-21 M-22 M-23 M-24 M-25 M-26 M-27 M-28 M-29 M-30 M-31 M-32 M-33 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 MI-8 MI-9 MI-10 MI-11 MI-12 MI-13 MI-14 MI-15 MI-16 MI-18 MI-19 MI-20 MI-21 MI-22 MI-25 MI-26 MI-28 MI-29 MI-30 MI-31 WIER HILLS RD TRAVIS COOK RD VEGA AVE INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD BOSTON LN OLD BEE CAVES RD OLD BEE CAVES RD FLETCHER LN THOMAS SPRINGS RD SILVERMINE DR CIRCLE DR SCENIC BROOK DR MC CARTY LN BECKETT RD CONVICT HILL RD BRUSH COUNTRY RD MOUNTAIN SHADOWS DR CONVICT HILL RD FM 1826 RD FM 1826 RD WESTCREEK DR LATTA DR BRUSH COUNTRY RD W SLAUGHTER LN FM 1826 RD ESCARPMENT BLVD OLD FREDERICKSBURG RD BRODIE LN US 290 / SH 71 Type Dual Left Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement MI-17, NI-18 Intersection Improvements RIALTO BLVD TO OLD BEE CAVES RD OLD BEE CAVES RD TO SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHWEST PKWY TO EIGER RD SOUTHWEST PARKWAY TO INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD 920' N OF SH 71 SVRD WB TO SH 71 SVRD WB BOSTON LN TO US 290 370' N OF US 290 TO SH 71 US 290 TO 370' N OF US 290 MOUNTAIN SHADOWS DR TO W SH 71 OLD BEE CAVES RD TO SH 71 SH 71 TO CIRCLE DR W SH 71 TO MURMURING CREEK DR MURMERING CREEK DR TO MOWINKLE TO SH 71 CONNECTION W SH 71 TO MOWINKLE DR 160' N OF RED WILLOW DR TO 500' N OF RACCOON RUN THOMAS SPRINGS RD TO WILLIAMSON CREEK DR US 290 TO 126' S OF FENTON DR W WILLIAM CANNON DR TO US 290 REYNOLDS RD TO MCCARTY LN WOODCREEK RD TO BRUSH COUNTRY RD CONVICT HILL RD TO 300' S OF WILLIAM CANNON DR OLD BEE CAVES RD TO END 515' W OF VERMILLION DR TO LOCKINVAR ST 526' N OF SUMMERVALE DR TO US 290 370' N OF BELLA VISTA TRL TO 526' N OF SUMMERVALE DR CANA CV TO BRUSH COUNTRY RD ISLANDER DR TO NAIRN DR SUMMERSET TRL TO MONTEREY OAKS BLVD MOPAC EXPWY TO BRODIE LN 4000' S OF APPALOOSA RUN TO 1800' S OF LEWIS MOUNTAIN DR SH 45 WB TO LA CROSSE AVE US 290 HWY TO 350' E OF SMITH OAK TRL GRAYBUCK RD TO 350' N OF BRODIE SPRINGS TRL RM 1826 / SILVERMINE DR TO MONTEREY OAKS BLVD Inte rse ction HWY 71 AND SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHWEST PKWY AND TRAVIS COOK RD SOUTHWEST PKWY AND BELGRADE DR SOUTHWEST PKWY AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR TERRAVISTA DR AND RIALTO BLVD W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND RIALTO BLVD HWY 71 AND MIDWOOD PKWY SH 71 AND 8660 BLK W SH 71 W SH 71 AND FLETCHER LN OLD BEE CAVES RD AND FLETCHER LN WILLIAM CANNON DR AND VEGA AVE VEGA AVE AND EIGER RD W SH 71 AND HEB ACCESS US 290 AND OLD BEE CAVES RD ESCARPMENT BLVD AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR WILLIAM CANNON DR AND BANNOCKBURN DR BRODIE LN AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR BECKETT RD AND CONVICT HILL RD ESCARPMENT BLVD AND DAVIS LN DAVIS LN AND S MOPAC DAVIS LN AND COPANO DR DAVIS LN AND CORRAN FERRY DR BRODIE LN AND DAVIS LN ESCARPMENT BLVD AND W SLAUGHTER LN SLAUGHTER LN AND ZUNIGA DR BRODIE LN AND W SLAUGHTER LN SPRUCE CANYON DRIVE AND FM 1826 RD SH 45 AND SPRUCE CANYON DR SH 45 AND ESCARPMENT BLVD DAVIS LN AND LATTA DR BRODIE LN AND VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA & RIDGEVIEW APTS Length (mi) 0.53 0.48 0.62 0.22 0.17 0.10 0.13 3.05 0.07 0.18 0.23 1.59 0.66 0.23 0.66 0.41 0.65 0.28 0.93 0.16 0.57 0.46 0.27 0.53 0.46 0.72 0.04 0.28 0.32 1.55 2.27 1.23 0.31 0.34 4.49 % In Se rvice Are a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% % In Se rvice Are a 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 53 Final Draft January 2020 F KI-5, MI-1 RD SPRINGS M-12 ¬«M-12 THOMAS ¬«M-17 M-17 C I R C L E D R KI-6, MI-2 ¬«M-8 M-8 ¬«M-2 M-2 MI-7 ¬«M-13 M-13 ¬«M-23M-23 ¬«71 MI-8 ¬«M-14 M-14 ¬«M-10 M-10 M-15 ¬«M-15 WILLOW DR D E R ¬«M-18 M-18 FEN TO N D R KI-7, MI-3 MI-10 ¬«M-11 M-11 DR MI-9 I E N M R E V L I S M-16 ¬«M-16 S C E N I C BROOK D O L M-1 ¬«M-1 M-33¬«M-35 M-9¬«M-8 R MI-13 £¤290 ¬«360 K M N KI-8, MI-4 RIALTO MI-5 B LV D MI-6 D B E E CAVESR D ¬«M-9 M-9 MI-14 MI-15 ¬«M-3 M-3 E A AV G E V MI-11 MI-12 M-5 M-4 ¬«M-4 ¬«M-5 ¬«M-27 M-26 ¬«M-33 M-33 M-19 ¬«M-19 M C C A ¬«M-20 M-20 R T Y L N C ONVICT HILL RD W WILLIAMC ¬«M-21 M-21 ¬«M-22 M-22 R D MI-18 M-27 ¬«M-28 LATTA C O P A N O DR MI-22 D T R ET K C E B MI-20 ¬«1 MI-31 MI-21 MI-26 MI-24, NI-33 M-29 ¬«M-30 W S L A U G H T E R L N MI-27, NI-39 ¬«M-34, M-37, N-15 N-17 ¬«M-7 M-7 ¬«M-6 M-6 STAGGERBRUSH R D ¬«M-29 M-28 R N D R U B K C O N N A B A N N O N D R M-23 ¬«M-24 MI-16 MI-17, NI-18 ESKEW D R DIE LN O R B MI-23, NI-28 M-24 ¬«M-25 ¬«M-26 M-25 M E V A BARSTO W MI-19 D AVIS L N MI-25 MI-28 S P R U C E ¬«M-31 M-31 D R 6 82 1 M F C A N Y O N D R ¬«45 LA CROSSE A V E ESCARPMENT B L V D S O U T H ¬«M-32 M-32 BAY L N MI-29 MI-30 Legend Impact Fee Eligible Roadways New Access Management Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Impact Fee Eligible Segments !( ") Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain Street Impact Fee Study Service Area M 0 0.5 1 January 2020 2 Miles §¨¦35 54 Table 3.N. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area N Service Area Proj. # IF Class Stre et Limits M-34, N-17 N A S N-1 N-2 N-3 N-4 N-5 N-6 N-7 N-8 N-9 N-10 N-11 N-12 N-13 N-14 N-15 N-16 N-18 N-19 N-20 N-21 N-22 N-23 N-24 N-25 N-26 N-27 N-28 N-29 N-30 N-31 N-32 N-33 N-34 N-35 N-36 N-37 N-38 N-39 N-40 N-41 N-42 N-43 N-44 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L3-4D-130 L4-6D-120 L3-3U-92 L3-3U-74 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-140-TxDOT L3-4D-140-TxDOT L3-4D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-78 L2-3U-78 L2-2U-64 L3-3U-96 L3-3U-96 L2-2U-68 L2-2U-68 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-3U-96 L3-3U-96 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-94 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-68 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-64 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-120 WEST GATE BLVD MANCHACA RD S CONGRESS AVE W WILLIAM CANNON DR DAVIS LN DAVIS LN MANCHACA RD MATTHEWS LN COOPER LN S CONGRESS AVE S CONGRESS AVE CIRCLE S RD RALPH ABLANEDO DR RALPH ABLANEDO DR PEACEFUL HILL LN CULLEN LN BRODIE LN BRODIE LN RIDDLE RD MANCHACA RD MANCHACA RD MANCHACA RD MANCHACA RD BRODIE LN BRODIE LN WAYNE RIDDELL LOOP W FM 1626 RD E FM 1626 RD OLD SAN ANTONIO RD OLD SAN ANTONIO RD OLD SAN ANTONIO RD ONION CREEK PKWY ONION CREEK PKWY OLD SAN ANTONIO RD MANCHACA RD MATTHEWS LN LONGVIEW RD CAMERON LOOP GUIDEPOST TRL FOREST WOOD RD LEO ST S 1ST ST FRATE BARKER RD WESTERN TRAILS BLVD TO US 290 EB SVRD STASSNEY LN TO WILLIAM CANNON DR BEN WHITE BLVD TO WASSON DR BRODIE LN TO MANCHACA RD BRODIE LN TO GUIDEPOST TRL LEO ST TO MANCHACA RD WILLIAM CANNON DR TO SLAUGHTER LN MOUNT CARRELL DR TO COOPER LN DITTMAR RD TO MATTHEWS LN WASSON DR TO NORTH BLUFF DR NORTH BLUFF DR TO W SLAUGHTER LN WASSON DR TO NORTH BLUFF DR SHALLOT WAY TO S 1ST ST CONGRESS AVE TO SHALLOT WAY DITTMAR RD TO RALPH ABLANEDO DR RALPH ABLANEDO DR TO W SLAUGHTER LN GRAYBUCK RD TO 350' N OF BRODIE SPRINGS TRL 350' N OF BRODIE SPRINGS TRL TO SQUIRREL HOLLOW SLAUGHTER LN (E.) TO SLAUGHTER LN (W.) 560' S OF SLAUGHTER LN TO 1100' S OF OLD MANCHACA DR 1100' S OF OLD MANCHACA DR TO 280' S OF MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD RAVENSCROFT DR TO 280' S OF MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD 280' S OF MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD TO 350' S OF MORNINGSIDE LN 300' S OF TWILIGHT TRAIL TO SULLY CREEK DR SULLY CREEK DR TO FM 1626 LORD DERBY ST TO S 1ST ST 160' W OF ASHBROOK DR TO SAN LEANNA DR IH 35 SVRD TO 160' W OF ASHBROOK DR IH 35 SVRD TO E FM 1626 IH 35 SVRD TO E FM 1626 E FM 1626 TO 1700' S OF ONION CREEK PKWY OLD SAN ANTONIO RD TO 100' W OF FARRAH LN 100' W OF FARRAH RD TO 700' E OF FARRAH LN 1400' N OF ESTANCIA PKWY TO 750' S OF PURYEAR RD BEN WHITE BLVD EB SVRD TO REDD ST CHERRY MEADOW DR TO MEADOW RUN HARPERS FERRY LN TO CAMERON LOOP DAVIS LN TO LEO ST DAVIS LN TO LEO ST CAMERON LOOP TO GUIDEPOST TRL MATTHEWS DR TO DITTMAR RD RALPH ABLANDEDO DR TO W SLAUGHTER LN BUCKINGHAM GATE RD TO 330' E OF JIM THORPE LN Length (mi) % In Se rvice Are a 0.21 1.07 0.91 1.60 0.74 0.62 2.26 0.23 0.58 0.48 2.28 1.76 0.59 0.24 0.67 0.50 0.34 0.39 0.64 0.21 0.98 0.52 0.10 0.14 1.26 0.27 0.18 0.16 0.77 1.13 0.78 0.63 0.07 0.15 1.59 0.11 0.35 0.62 0.94 0.21 0.30 0.78 0.13 0.73 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% OLD MANCHACA RD RIDDLE RD TO DREW LN Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 55 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.N. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area N N A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Proj. # LI-2, NI-1 NI-2 NI-3 NI-4 NI-5 NI-6 NI-7 NI-8 NI-9 NI-10 NI-11 NI-12 NI-13 NI-14 NI-15 NI-16 NI-17 NI-19 NI-20 NI-21 NI-22 NI-23 NI-24 NI-25 NI-26 NI-29 NI-30 NI-31 NI-32 NI-34 NI-35 NI-36 NI-37 NI-38 NI-40 NI-41 NI-42 NI-43 NI-44 NI-45 NI-46 NI-47 NI-48 NI-49 MI-17, NI-18 NI-27; OI-13 MI-23, NI-28 MI-24, NI-33 MI-27, NI-39 NI-50, OI-35 Signal Modifications Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signalize Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Roundabout Intersection Improvements Signal Modifications Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signal Modification Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Inte rse ction S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND WEST GATE BLVD MANCHACA RD AND LANSING DR MANCHACA RD AND JONES RD VINSON DR AND CARDIFF DR S 1ST ST AND W ST ELMO RD S 1ST ST AND ORLAND BLVD S CONGRESS AVE AND RADAM LN SHERATON AVE AND SUBURBAN DR W STASSNEY LN AND CHERRY CREEK DR MANCHACA RD AND W STASSNEY LN W STASSNEY LN AND S 1ST ST E STASSNEY LN AND APARTMENT DRIVEWAY STASSNEY LN AND STASSNEY LN (MIRA DR) WEST GATE BLVD AND BLARWOOD DR WEST GATE BLVD AND DEATONHILL DR MANCHACA RD AND BERKELEY AVE S CONGRESS AVE AND LITTLE TEXAS LN BRODIE LN AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR WILLIAM CANNON DR AND DEATONHILL DR WEST GATE BLVD AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND WHISPERING OAKS DR MANCHACA RD AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND S 1ST ST W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND LUNAR DR S CONGRESS AVE AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND CIRCLE S RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND S IH 35 WEST GATE BLVD AND MANASSAS DR WEST GATE BLVD AND CAMERON LOOP MANCHACA RD AND SHILOH DR COOPER LN AND MATTHEWS LN BRODIE LN AND DAVIS LN MANCHACA RD AND DAVIS LN MANCHACA RD AND CROWNSPOINT DR S 1ST ST AND GREAT BRITAIN DR S 1ST ST AND HYDE PARK PL S CONGRESS AVE AND DITTMAR RD BRODIE LN AND W SLAUGHTER LN MANCHACA RD AND W SLAUGHTER LN W SLAUGHTER LN AND CULLEN LN S CONGRESS AVE AND W SLAUGHTER LN MANCHACA RD AND REDWATER DR S 1ST ST AND SOUTHPARK MEADOWS DR TAFT LN AND ALICE MAE LN BRODIE LN AND FRATE BARKER RD MANCHACA RD AND MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD 1ST ST AND 1ST ST (AKINS HS MAIN ENTRANCE) E FM 1626 RD AND OLD SAN ANTONIO RD INTERSTATE 35 AND ONION CREEK PKWY BRODIE LN AND VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA & RIDGEVIEW APTS % In Se rvice Are a 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 50% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 56 Final Draft January 2020 F ¬«71 O L D B E E C A V E S R D E A AV G E V K M L W W I L L I A M N C AN N ON O D R D V L B T N E M P R A C S E D A V I S L N W SLAUGHTER L N ¬«360 LI-2, NI-1 £¤290 ¬«1 NI-9 NI-14 MI-17, NI-18 ¬«N-1 N-1 BLVD ATE G T S E W ¬«N-2 N-3 N-32¬«N-36 NI-2 NI-10 NI-3 NI-4 W STASSNEYLN NI-15 NI-16 NI-11 ¬«N-4 N-5 NI-20 NI-19 NI-21 N-32¬«N-38 NI-29 ¬«N-6 N-7 NI-30 CAMERON LO OP T S O E L N-32¬«N-41 N-32¬«N-40 RIDDLE R D NI-40 N-18 ¬«N-21 MANCHACA RD NI-43 ¬«N-7 N-8 NI-31 NI-34 N NI-22 N-32¬«N-37 D R D O O W T S E R O F N-9 ¬«N-9 N-32¬«N-42 N L R E P O O C ¬«N-8 N-2 NI-32 NI-23 NI-24 NI-38 N-13¬«N-15 ¬«N-14 N-14 D R S E CL CIR ¬«N-11 N-10 NI-36 ¬«N-13 N-13 N-32¬«N-43 R ALPH ABLANEDODR N-14¬«N-16 NI-41 NI-44 NI-42 NI-35 NI-37 NI-5 T ST S 1S ¬«N-3 N-4 NI-6 NI-7 NI-8 E AV S S E R G N O C S NI-17 NI-12 NI-13 NI-27; OI-13 ¬«N-10 N-12 NI-26 NI-25 ¬«N-12 N-11 MI-23, NI-28 MI-24, NI-33 N-32¬«N-39 ¬«N-5 N-6 MI-27, NI-39 ¬«M-35, M-37, N-17 N-15 ¬«N-18 N-16 N-17 ¬«N-19 N-18¬«N-20 ¬«N-22 N-19 ¬«N-23 N-22 ¬«N-25 N-20 N-22¬«N-44 B R O D I E L N NI-46 FRATE BARKER RD N-20¬«N-26 NI-47 ¬«N-24 N-24 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways Impact Fee Eligible Segments Access Management Impact Fee Eligible Intersections !( ") Legend New Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain ¬«45 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area N 0 0.5 1 2 Miles January 2020 NI-45 ¬«N-30 §¨¦35 N-27 N-26¬«N-27 ¬«N-28 N-25 ¬«N-29 N-26 F M 1626RD W ¬«N-32 N-29 NI-48 ¬«N-31 N-28 NI-49 EFM1626 RD ¬«N-33 N-31 ¬«N-34 N-30 NI-50, OI-35 ¬«N-35 N-32 O L D S A N A N T O N I O R D 57 Table 3.O. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area O Se rvice Are a Proj. # IF Class Stree t Limits O A S L2-2U-OP-78 O-1 O-2 O-3 O-4 O-5 O-6 O-7 O-8 O-9 O-10 O-11 O-12 O-13 O-14 O-15 O-16 O-17 O-18 O-19 O-20 O-21 O-22 O-23 O-24 O-25 O-26 O-27 O-28 O-29 O-30 O-31 O-32 O-33 O-34 O-35 O-36 O-37 O-38 O-39 O-40 O-41 O-42 O-43 O-44 O-45 O-46 O-47 O-48 O-49 O-50 O-51 O-52 O-53 O-54 O-55 O-56 O-57 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-140 L3-4U-92 L3-4U-88 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-68 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L4-6D-140 L4-6D-140 L4-6D-142 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-64 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L1-2U-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-68 E RIVERSIDE DR METRO CENTER DR DIME CIR METROPOLIS DR BURLESON RD E ST ELMO RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD TERI RD MEADOW LAKE BLVD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD FM 1625 RD FM 1625 RD MC KENZIE RD E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN FM 1625 RD SASSMAN RD SASSMAN RD FM 1625 RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD BRANDT RD BRANDT RD OLD LOCKHART RD BRADSHAW RD BRADSHAW RD BRADSHAW RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD THAXTON RD SALT SPRINGS DR ALUM ROCK DR COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD ALUM ROCK DR E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN BLUFF SPRINGS RD OLD LOCKHART RD OLD LOCKHART RD OLD LOCKHART RD E MAIN ST E MAIN ST S TURNERSVILLE RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD MAUFRAIS LN BUTTON BEND RD COPPERBEND BLVD METRO CENTER DR TO US 183 METRO CENTER DR TO DIME CIR BURLESON RD TO END METROPOLIS DR TO BURLESON RD 250' S OF US 290 TO US 183 S PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO NUCKOLS CROSSING RD ST ELMO RD TO E STASSNEY LN INTERSTATE 35 TO FREIDRICH LN BLUE MEADOW DR TO QUICKSILVER BLVD ONION CREEK DR TO PEREZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DWY RUNNING WATER DR TO MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY TO 5460' E OF MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY 5460' E OF MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY TO US 183 MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY TO FM 1625 RD MCKENZIE RD TO E SLAUGHTER LN US 183 TO MCKENZIE RD FM 1625 RD TO US 183 HWY 1760' E OF THAXTON RD TO 3775' E OF THAXTON RD FM 1625 RD TO 4500' W OF FM 1625 RD FM 1625 RD TO US 183 E SLAUGHTER LN TO 1685' S OF SLAUGHTER LN 917' W OF THAXTON RD TO 2754' W OF THAXTON RD FM 1625 RD TO 5445' W OF FM 1625 RD 1685' S OF SLAUGHTER LN TO 655' S OF RODRIGUEZ RD PEREZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DWY TO NUCKOLS CROSSSING RD GRELLE LN TO 850' E OF GRELLE LN 850' E OF GRELL LN TO 2560' W OF VERTEX BLVD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD TO E SLAUGHTER LN INTERSTATE 35 NB SVRD TO 975' W OF BRENTS ELM DR 975' W OF BRENTS ELM DR TO 660' E OF SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN TO 1615' S OF E SLAUGHTER LN 590' W OF OLD LOCKHART HWY TO 430' W OF MATTHEW ST 430' W OF MATTHEW ST TO KLEBERG TRL KLEBERG TRL TO 1000' S OF RIVER PLANTATION DR BRADSHAW RD TO TURNERSVILLE RD 560' N OF TEE DR TO 2560' W OF VERTEX BLVD 560' N OF TEE DR TO SALT SPRINGS RD THAXTON RD TO RINGSBY RD COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD TO 672' S OF COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD SPRINGTIME TRL TO MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY THAXTON DR TO CITY LIMITS OLD LOCKHART HWY TO 4985' E OF OLD LOCKHART HWY 4985' E OF OLD LOCKHART HWY TO CITY LIMITS WINTER HAVEN DR TO 430' E OF DERBY DOWNS DR WILLIAM CANNON DR TO CITY LIMITS 270' W OF CHERYL LYNN RD TO 1615' S OF E SLAUGHTER LN 425' W OF GERTRUDIS LOOP TO 2000' E OF RUBY HILLS RD 2000' E OF RUBY HILLS RD TO 3285' E OF RUBY HILLS RD CITY LIMITS TO 3000' W OF S TURNERSVILLE RD 3000' W OF S TURNERSVILLE RD TO S TURNERSVILLE RD TURNERSVILLE RD TO CITY LIMITS BEN WHITE BLVD EB SVRD TO 970' S OF ST ELMO RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD TO COPPERBEND BLVD EXT BUTTON BEND RD TO MAUFRAIS RD COPPERBEND BLVD TO MAUFRAIS RD INTERSTATE 35 NB SVRD TO FREIDRICH LN PARELL PATH TO S PLEASANT VALLEY RD Le ngth (mi) % In Se rvice Are a 0.48 0.82 0.26 1.57 3.53 0.53 0.75 0.28 0.23 0.08 0.70 0.84 1.17 2.08 0.76 0.34 0.20 0.38 0.85 0.64 0.31 0.35 1.03 0.91 0.80 0.16 0.24 0.40 0.48 0.55 0.31 0.14 0.07 1.06 0.05 0.70 0.32 0.15 0.13 0.68 0.21 0.66 0.28 0.27 1.27 0.14 0.55 0.24 0.84 0.61 0.82 0.82 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.28 0.54 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. S IH 35 SVRD NB-FREIDRICH LN CONNECTOR NUCKOLS CROSSING RD 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 58 Final Draft January 2020 Table 3.O. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area O O A S Proj. # LI-34, OI-1 OI-6, PI-1 NI-27; OI-13 OI-2 OI-3 OI-4 OI-5 OI-7 OI-8 OI-9 OI-10 OI-11 OI-12 OI-14 OI-15 OI-16 OI-17 OI-18 OI-19 OI-20 OI-21 OI-22 OI-23 OI-24 OI-25 OI-26 OI-27 OI-28 OI-29 OI-30 OI-31 OI-32 OI-33 OI-34 OI-36 OI-37 NI-50, OI-35 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvement Roundabout Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Interse ction E BEN WHITE BLVD AND MONTOPOLIS DR RIVERSIDE DR AND METRO CENTER DR MONTOPOLIS DR AND TRADE CENTER DR BURLESON RD AND BRECKENRIDGE DR BURLESON RD AND MC KINNEY FALLS PKWY S US 183 HWY AND BURLESON RD ST ELMO RD AND SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DR FREIDRICH LN AND PONCIANA DR TERI RD AND NUCKOLS CORSSING RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD AND E STASSNEY LN E STASSNEY LN AND NUCKOLS CROSSING RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND S IH 35 E STASSNEY LN AND BURLESON RD TO MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY CONNECTION E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND BLUFF SPRINGS RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD AND E WILLIAM CANNON DR VOUGEOT DR AND WILLIAM CANNON DRIVE E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND SPRINGFIELD DR OLD LOCKHART HWY/BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND QUICKSILVER BLVD COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND SALT SPRINGS DR MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY AND COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY AND COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND ALUM ROCK DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND US 183 HWY COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND FM 1625 RD MCKENZIE RD AND US 183 HWY NUCKOLS CROSSING RD AND S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD AND S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD AND VERTEX BLVD THAXTON RD AND PANADERO DR E SLAUGHTER LN AND OLD LOCKHART RD E SLAUGHTER LN AND THAXTON RD TO OLD LOCKHART RD CONNECTION FM 1625 RD AND E SLAUGHTER LN US 183 HWY AND E SLAUGHTER LN FM 1625 RD AND SASSMAN RD INTERSTATE 35 AND ONION CREEK PKWY METROPOLIS DR AND BURLESON RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND RUNNING WATER DR % In Se rvice Are a 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 75% 25% 75% 100% 75% 100% 50% 100% 75% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 59 Final Draft January 2020 ¬«1 ¬«360 L O N P F £¤290 TE RI R D TE RI R D ¬«O-8 O-6 OI-9 O-6¬«O-56 OI-8 D R Y E L L A V T N A S A E L P S OI-11 OI-2 E D R S I D R E E R I V ¬«O-1 O-1 R LIS D O P O NT O M O-10 ¬«O-3 DIME CIR DIME CIR LI-34, OI-1 O O R T R T E E M M OI-36 B U R N D L D TO ¬«71 BURLESON RD BURLESON RD OI-3 N D L D TO O-4¬«O-54 O-4 O-4¬«O-52 ¬«O-6 ¬«O-7 O-4¬«O-55 E STASSNEY E STAS O-5 OI-10 O-4¬«O-53 OI-7 N L N L SNEY D R C E N T E R L I S D R O P O-2 ¬«O-2 M E T R O P O L I S D R ¬«O-4 O-3 L E S O N R D OI-5 S PKWY OI-4 L L A KIN NEY F O-3¬«O-5 M C B U R L E S O N R D OI-6, PI-1 B U R L E S O N R D NI-27; OI-13 E S TAS S N EY L N OI-12 OI-14 EWILLIAM C A N N O N D R R D S G N I R P S F F U L B OI-18 D R S G N R P S I F F U L B D R G SIN S O R C O-6¬«O-57 K C U N S L O O E W I L L I A M C A N N O N D R OI-16 OI-15 O-11 ¬«O-9 ¬«O-10 O-12 Y W K P S L L A F Y E N N I K C M OI-26 OI-29 ¬«O-45 O-48 ¬«O-27 O-29 ¬«O-26 O-28 D Y R E L L T VA ¬«O-36 O-39 OI-28 ¬«O-25 O-27 N A S A E L S P OI-27 O-30 ¬«O-28 ¬«O-31 ¬«O-32 O-34 O-33 E S L AU GHTERLN OI-30 ¬«O-42 O-45 ¬«O-46 O-49 O L D L ¬«O-43 O-46 ¬«O-33 O-35 O C K H A R T R D ¬«O-47 O-50 ¬«O-48 O-51 OI-19 OI-17 ¬«O-37 O-40 O-42 ¬«O-39 ¬«O-38 O-41 OI-22 ¬«O-40 O-43 E W IL LIA M ¬«O-12 O-14 OI-20 C A N N O NDR ¬«O-11 O-13 OI-37 OI-21 ¬«O-41 O-44 OI-31 ¬«O-44 O-47 E S L AU GH T E R L N O-16 ¬«O-14 ¬«O-18 O-20 E S L A U G H SASSM SASSM A T E R N RD LN N RD A ¬«O-22 O-24 ¬«O-23 O-25 ¬«O-29 O-31 ES L A U G H T E R L N B R A N D T R D ¬«O-30 O-32 BRANDT RD §¨¦35 NI-50, OI-35 ¬«O-34 O-36 D W R A H S D A R B ¬«O-35 O-37 ¬«O-13 O-15 EW IL L I A M C A N N O N OI-23 1625R D DR M F O-18 ¬«O-16 ¬«O-17 O-19 OI-25 D 25 R £¤183 FM 16 ¬«O-20 O-22 OI-33 OI-24 ¬«O-15 O-17 ¬«O-19 O-21 ¬«O-21 O-23 OI-34 ¬«O-24 O-26 ESLAUGHTERLN SASSMAN RD OI-32 S A S S M A N RD D D 25 R FM 16 25 R FM 16 D 25 R FM 16 Impact Fee Eligible Segments Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Legend !( ") ¬«45 ¬«O-50 O-53 ¬«O-49 O-52 E MAIN S T E MAIN ST ST S T U R N E R S V I L L E R D E M AIN ¬«O-51 O-54 Impact Fee Eligible Roadways New Access Management Widening Other Roadways S T U R N E R S V I L L E R D Major Streets Regulating Plans Local Streets Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain 60 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area O 0 0.5 1 January 2020 2 Miles ¬«130 Table 3.P. 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan – Service Area P Se rvice Area Proj. # IF Class Street Limits FM 973-SH 71 FR-FM 973 CONNECTOR CONNECTOR SH 71 FR-FM 973 CONNECTOR SH 71-PEARCE LN CONNECTOR FOUR DAUGHTERS RD L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-78 L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-3U-92 L4-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 P-16 P-17 P-18 P-19 P-20 P-21 P-22 P-23 P-24 P-25 P-26 P-27 P-28 P-29 P-30 P-31 P-32 P-33 P-34 P-35 P-36 P-37 PI-3 PI-4 PI-5 PI-6 PI-7 PI-8 PI-9 PI-10 PI-11 PI-12 PI-13 L4-4D-120-TxDOT Proj. # OI-6, PI-1 LI-38, PI-2 HERGOTZ LN THOMPSON LN DALTON LN FALLWELL LN S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD FM 812 RD MC ANGUS RD PEARCE LN ROSS RD PEARCE LN PEARCE LN WOLF LN ROSS RD HEINE FARM RD HEINE FARM RD ROSS RD HEINE FARM RD HEINE FARM RD MC ANGUS RD MAHA LOOP RD MAHA LOOP RD FOUR DAUGHTERS RD ELROY RD ELROY RD ELROY RD FM 812 RD Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement 1050' W OF THOMPSON LN TO THOMPSON LN BASTROP HWY TO HERGOTZ LN BASTROP HWY SVRD TO CITY LIMITS SH 71 TO GUERRERO DR BILL PRICE RD TO 680' S OF BILL PRICE RD 680' S OF BILL PRICE RD TO 489' S OF FINCHER RD 489' S OF FINCHER RD TO BURLESON RD BURLESON RD TO 614' S OF LINDA VISTA DR 614' S OF LINDA VISTA DR TO FM 812 RD CITY LIMITS TO 400' S OF S FM 973 RD FM 973 RD TO 89' W OF FM 973 RD FM 973 TO SH 71 SVRD TO FM 973 SH 71 SVRD TO FM 973 PIMILCO DR TO ROSS RD (WEST) PEARCE LN TO CITY LIMITS ROSS RD (WEST) TO 822' E OF WELSH WAY 2463' E OF KELLAM RD TO 1809' W OF KELLAM RD PEARCE LN TO 2748' N OF PEARCE LN PEARCE LN TO 9014' S OF SH 71 PEARCE LN TO 1215' S OF MEURER LN PEARCE LN TO HEINE FARM RD ROSS RD TO 409' E OF ROSS RD PEARCE LN TO 426' N OF FAGERQUIST RD 346' W OF KELLAM RD TO 3658' W OF KELLAM RD 346' W OF KELLAM RD TO 499' E OF KELLAM RD 499' E OF KELLAM RD TO FAGERQUIST RD 670' W OF COTA BLVD TO 1057' E OF COTA BLVD Intersection FM 973 RD AND SH 71 TO FM 973 CONNECTION S FM 973 RD AND PEARCE LN FM 973 RD AND BURLESON RD/ELROY RD PEARCE LN AND SH 130 PEARCE LN AND ROSS RD ELROY RD AND ROSS RD PEARCE LN AND KELLAM RD ELROY RD AND KELLAM RD FM 812 RD AND CIRCUIT OF THE AMERICAS BLVD PEARCE LN AND WOLF LN P A S FOUR DAUGHTERS RD-HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR HEINE FARM RD TO 3928' E OF HEINE FARM RD 322' N OF FERRYSTONE GLEN TO 409' E OF ROSS RD APPERSON ST TO MCANGUS RD 453' S OF STONEY MEADOW DR TO 322' N OF FERRYSTONE GLEN MCANGUS RD TO 1585' N OF MCANGUS RD ELROY RD TO 2880' S OF ROSS RD CITY LIMITS TO FOUR DAUGHTERS RD TO HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR PEARCE LN TO 2400' S OF PEARCE LN FOUR DAUGHTERS RD-HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR FOUR DAUGHTERS RD-HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR 1970' W OF MAHA LOOP RD TO 335' E OF MAHA LOOP RD FOUR DAUGHTERS RD TO 2052' W OF FOUR DAUGHTERS RD Intersection Improvement S US 183 HWY AND BURLESON RD BASTROP HWY AND OLD BASTROP HWY SVRD CONNECTION S FM 973 RD AND SH 71 TO FM 973 CONNECTION TO FM 973 CONNECTION Note: The 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP is not in a prioritized order. For projects that have “TxDOT” in IF Class, only the City’s contribution will be included. Length (mi) 0.20 0.78 0.77 0.35 0.13 0.63 1.56 0.50 0.72 0.48 0.02 0.57 1.33 0.70 0.83 0.91 0.34 0.52 1.27 1.25 0.79 0.08 0.08 0.44 0.34 0.30 0.90 0.74 0.45 0.30 0.44 0.39 0.85 0.63 0.14 0.42 0.33 % In Service Are a 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% % In Service Are a 25% 50% 75% 100% 50% 75% 50% 75% 100% 50% 100% 50% 25% 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 61 Final Draft January 2020 F £¤183 ¬«P-1 P-1 H E R G O T Z L N P-2 ¬«P-2 THO MPSON LN LI-38, PI-2 DALTO N LN P-4 ¬«P-3 DALTON LN DALTO N LN GJ P L O ¬«P-4 P-5 ¬«P-12 P-9 P PI-3 9 7 3 P-8 P-6 P-7 S F M ¬«P-13 ¬«P-5 ¬«P-6 SH 71FR-FM 9 7 3 C ONNECTOR ¬«P-14 P-14 PI-5 PI-4 R D PEA RCE LN ¬«P-7 P-10 OI-6, PI-1 B U RL E S O N RD BURLESONRD RD S F M 973 R D S F M 973 PI-6 ¬«P-8 P-11 E L R O Y R D R O Y R D D R EL 973 M F S ELR OY RD P-3 ¬«P-10 FM 812 RD D P-12 ¬«P-9 73 R S FM 9 ¬«P-11 P-13 PI-7 PEARCE LN ¬«P-21 P-23 P-27 RD S S O R ¬«P-23 ¬«P-25 ¬«P-26 P-26 P-28 ¬«P-22 P-24 D R M R FA E EIN H ¬«P-15 P-15 D S R S O R D R P-16 OSS R ¬«P-16 PEARCE LN P-16¬«P-17 ¬«P-29 P-38 PI-8 ¬«P-28 P-30 P-35 ¬«P-34 OY RD ELROY RD ELR ¬«P-35 P-36 PI-11 ELR OY R D ¬«P-36 P-37 PI-10 PEARCE LN D R KELLA M ¬«P-30 P-32 ¬«P-31 P-31 PI-9 D R S S O R P-25 ¬«P-24 ¬«P-27 AN GUS P-29 M C D R FM 812 RD FM 812 R D PI-12 P-41 ¬«P-37 FM 812 R D Legend Impact Fee Eligible Roadways New Access Management Widening Other Roadways Major Streets Local Streets Impact Fee Eligible Segments !( ") Impact Fee Eligible Intersections Regulating Plans Railroads 2017 100-Year FEMA Floodplain ¬«130 62 ¬«71 ¬«P-19 P-20 D D D AUG HTERS R DAUGHTERS R R U O F R OU F PE AR PEARCE CE L N L N ¬«P-18 P-18 D P R O O A L H A M PEARCE LN D SR R E T H G U A D R U O F D SR R E T H G U A D R U O F ¬«P-33 P-34 ¬«P-32 P-33 LF LN O W LF LN O W ¬«P-20 P-22 P E A R C E L N P-13 Street Impact Fee Study Service Area P 0 0.5 1 2 Miles January 2020 IV.METHODOLOGY FOR STREET IMPACT FEES A. Service Areas The seventeen (17) service areas used in the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study are shown in the previously referenced Exhibit 3. These service areas cover the entire corporate area of the City of Austin (both limited and full purpose jurisdictions). Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” The service areas in the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study are consistent with the specification of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. B. Service Units The “service unit” is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. Below is the definition for vehicle-mile. Vehicle-Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Total Vehicle-Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour) provided by the Street Network Plan (see Appendix B). Total Vehicle-Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections (Pg. 103). The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles). The capacity values used in the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study are based upon Capacity Criteria published by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and modified to accommodate different contexts within the City of Austin corporate limits. Table 4A and 4B show the service volumes as a function of the facility classification and type. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 63 Final Draft January 2020 Corridors with High Capacity Transit (as shown on the Project Connect System Vision Plan and Exhibit 5) include a 10% increase in capacity for anticipated transit priority treatments for outside lanes on several corridors in the City. This 10% increase is based on the hourly capacity of curb bus lanes in Exhibit 6-34 of the Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB). Table 4A. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities (used in Appendix B – Street Impact Fee RCP Service Units of Supply) Facility Classification Lanes Median Configuration Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility High Capacity Transit Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility Level 4 Level 3 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 6 4 3 2* 2 Divided Divided Undivided Undivided Undivided 900 810 510 410 330 990 890 N/A N/A N/A * Indicates that left turn lanes should be provided at intersections with other Level 2, 3 and 4 facilities. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 64 Final Draft January 2020 Table 4B. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities Roadway Type Description Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility Outside No Curbs (Shoulders) 2U-G 2U-H 2U-N 3U-N 2U 2D 2U-OP 2U-S 3U 3U-H 3U-OP 3U-S 4U 4U-OP 4D 5U 5U-OP 5U-S 6U 6D 6D-OP 7U 8D 1O 2O 3O 4O 5O Rural Cross-Section (i.e., gravel, dirt, etc.) Two lane undivided – rural setting, high speed Two lane undivided – substandard non-rural Three lane undivided – substandard non-rural Two lane undivided – built-out Two lane divided Two lane undivided with on-street parking Two lane undivided with shoulders Three lane undivided (two-way, left-turn lane) Three lane undivided – rural setting, high speed Three lane undivided with on street parking Three lane undivided with shoulders Four lane undivided with on street parking Four lane undivided Four lane divided Five lane undivided Five lane undivided with on street parking Five lane undivided with shoulders Six lane undivided Six lane divided Six lane divided with on street parking Seven lane undivided Eight lane divided One lane one-way street Two lane one-way street Three lane one-way street Four lane one-way street Five lane one-way street 4D-OP Four lane divided with on street parking Inside Loop 90 690 300 300 370 480 300 560 460 730 370 590 610 500 730 590 690 560 590 690 810 650 770 810 730 730 730 730 730 Loop 100 770 330 330 410 535 330 620 510 810 410 650 680 550 810 650 770 620 650 770 900 720 860 900 810 810 810 810 810 80 620 260 260 330 430 260 500 410 650 330 520 540 440 650 520 620 500 520 620 720 580 690 720 650 650 650 650 650 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 65 Final Draft January 2020 C. Cost Per Service Unit A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the Street Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle-mile of travel. Thus, it is the cost to construct a roadway (lane-mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle-mile of travel. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the roadway projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the ten-year period. D. Cost of the RCP All of the project costs for an arterial or collector facility which serves the overall transportation system are eligible to be included in the Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are “…including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision.” The engineer’s opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the Street Impact Fee RCP is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The cost for location specific items such as bridges, highway ramps, drainage structures, and any other 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 66 Final Draft January 2020 special components are added to each project, as appropriate. The following is a detailed description of the costing worksheet/methodology for the Street Impact Fee RCP. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 67 Final Draft January 2020 1. Overview of Street Impact Fee RCP Costing Worksheets For each project a specific costing worksheet was developed (see Appendix A). Each worksheet contained the following four (4) main components: · Project Information, · Construction Pay Items, · Construction Component Allowances and · Summary of Costs and Allowances Project Information Construction Pay Items Construction Component Allowances Summary of Costs and Allowances 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 68 Final Draft January 2020 2. Project Information In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified: · Project Number – Identifies which Service Area the project is in with a corresponding number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects. For example, Project A-9 is in Service Area A and is the 9th project on the list. the project name. · Name – A unique identifier for each project. In some cases, abbreviations are used for · · · · · · Limits – Represents the beginning and ending location for each project. Service Area(s) – Represents the service areas where the project is located. Multiple service areas will be listed if the project lies along a service area boundary. Exist. Pavement Status – The existing cross section; descriptions of each are in Table 3B. Prop. Classification – The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable, based on the Street Network Plan classification of the roadway. The explanation of the Street Network Plan classification codes, representing the road cross section. Modification to street element widths are utilized in cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be widened, or where the road is planned to be widened to an interim configuration. Examples of these are access management projects, median widening projects (widening that occurs in an existing median), and are designated in the summary sheets at the beginning of each service area’s Conceptual Level Cost Projections in Appendix A. Other specialized cases are noted in the short description box located in this section Length (ft) – The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project. Roadway Characteristics – each costing sheet has the ability to customize the width of the various street elements (motor vehicle zone, # roadbeds, pedestrian zone, bicycle facility, buffer zone, width of median, sidewalk width, number of bicycle lanes and sidewalks) · Description – A long form of the shorthand proposed classification, e.g. “3, Suburban” 3. Construction Pay Items 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 69 Final Draft January 2020 A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including the following: planning, survey, design engineering, permitting, right-of way acquisition, and construction and inspection. While the construction cost component of a project may actually consist of approximately 100 various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. The pay items used in the 2019 Street Impact Fee RCP are as follows: · Unclassified street excavation; · · Earthwork / Top Soil Subgrade stabilization; · Concrete curb and gutter; · Concrete bicycle facility; · Concrete sidewalks; · Concrete pavement; · HMAC Surface courses (asphalt, in depth); and · Flexible roadway base. 4. Construction Component Allowances A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include mobilization, preparation of right-of-way, water and sewer adjustments, roadway drainage, ADA ramps and modifications, pavement markings and signage, traffic control, illumination, establish turf/erosion control, and basic landscaping. These allowance percentages are also based on historical data. In addition, lump sum dollar allowances are provided for special drainage structures (bridges and culverts), railroad crossings, and turn lanes on collector facilities. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a fifteen percent (15%) contingency. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 70 Final Draft January 2020 5. Summary of Cost and Allowances To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, eighteen percent (18%) of the construction cost total is added for engineering, surveying, and geotechnical and an addition six (6%) for construction inspection and testing. The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is then the Construction Cost Total plus engineering, surveying, and geotechnical; plus construction inspection and testing; and plus contingency, assumed to be fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Cost Total. In some cases, a study cost from a previous bond was included at the end in addition to all other costs as a recoverable cost for debt service payment. E. Summary of Street Impact Fee RCP Costs Tables 5.A – 5.P are the 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP project lists for each service area with planning level project costs. Individual project cost worksheets can be seen in Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual-level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be predicted. The Street Impact Fee RCP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Projects not included in the Street Impact Fee RCP are not eligible to receive impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City’s construction CIP. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 71 Final Draft January 2020 A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A-11 A-12 A-13 A-14 Proj. # AI-1 AI-2 AI-3 AI-4 AI-5 AI-6 AI-7 AI-8 AI-9 AI-10 AI-11 AI-12, EI-2 AI-13, EI-1 AI-14, BI-1 AI-15, BI-2 AI-16, BI-3 A A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Table 5.A – 10-Year Street Impact Fee RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area A Service Area Proj. # Class Street Limits Length (mi) Total Project Cost in Service Cost Are a L4-6D-154-TxDOT W PARMER LN SH 45 WB SVRD TO CITY LIMITS N. L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L3-3U-92 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-53 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 NORTH LAKE CREEK PKWY AVERY RANCH BLVD TO N OF LAKELINE BLVD DUNHAM FOREST RD-LAKELINE BLVD CONNECTOR S CANOA HILLS TRL-LAKELINE BLVD CONNECTOR DUNHAM FOREST RD TO LAKELINE BLVD S CANOA HILLS TRL TO LAKELINE BLVD CASSANDRA DR EXTENSION LAKELINE BLVD TO PARMER LN LAKELINE BLVD NEENAH AVE SPECTRUM DR RUTLEDGE SPUR RUTLEDGE SPUR NEENAH AVE TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR NEENAH AVE TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR SPECTRUM DR TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR SPECTRUM DR TO N FM 620 RD SB CONNECTOR 485' W OF LYNDHURST ST TO 1337' W OF PARMER LN OLIVE HILL DR TO 1450' E OF SOLERA DR LAKELINE BLVD TO SPECTRUM DR NEENAH AVE TO 580' S OF NEENAH AVE 335' N OF N FM 620 RD TO N FM 620 RD LAKELINE MALL DR TO SPECTRUM EXTENSION LAKELINE MALL RD TO SH 45 WB SVRD SPECTRUM DR TO 375' S OF SPECTRUM DR 370' N OF N FM 620 RD TO N FM 620 RD A-15, E-1 L4-6D-154-TxDOT N RM 620 RD DEERBROOK TRL TO 600' E OF RIDGELINE BLVD 2.00 0.57 0.60 0.59 1.16 1.01 0.57 0.39 0.11 0.06 0.17 0.27 0.07 0.07 0.32 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 18,740,000 3,224,000 3,567,000 3,478,000 6,833,000 11,500,000 742,000 3,080,000 1,216,000 702,000 1,442,000 1,785,000 493,000 491,000 1,022,000 Intersection Improvements W PARMER LN AND AVERY RANCH BLVD Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvments Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Total Project Cost in Service Cost Are a AVERY RANCH BLVD AND QUARRY OAKS TRL AVERY RANCH BLVD AND CANOA HILLS TRL AVERY RANCH BLVD AND AVERY CLUB RD AVERY RANCH BLVD AND LOXLEY LN AVERY RANCH BLVD AND DOUBLE EAGLE PASS AVERY RANCH RD AND PEARSON RANCH RD S LAKELINE BLVD AND RIDGELINE BLVD S LAKELINE BLVD AND PECAN PARK BLVD W PARMER LN AND LAKELINE BLVD W PARMER LN AND SPECTRUM DR N FM 620 RD AND DEERBROOK TRL N FM 620 RD AND RIDGELINE BLVD N FM 620 RD AND W PARMER LN N FM 620 RD AND SH 45 S O'CONNOR DR AND SH 45 359,000 359,000 1,161,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 1,260,000 401,000 253,000 300,000 201,000 401,000 602,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. % In Service Are a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% % In Service Are a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 18,740,000 3,224,000 3,567,000 3,478,000 6,833,000 11,500,000 742,000 3,080,000 1,216,000 702,000 1,442,000 1,785,000 493,000 491,000 511,000 359,000 359,000 1,161,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 1,260,000 401,000 63,250 150,000 100,500 200,500 301,000 57,804,000 5,782,250 83,109 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 72 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.B – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area B Service Are a Proj. # Clas s Stre e t Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Se rvice Are a Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cos t Are a US 183 TO TURTLE ROCK RD / BROADMEADE AVE US 183 TO TURTLE ROCK RD / BROADMEADE AVE 150' EAST OF W PARMER LN TO 1405' EAST OF W PARMER LN 1405' EAST OF W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO MCNEIL RD MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO SH 45 TO MERRILTOWN RD CONNECTION MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD / MC NEIL DR MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO MOPAC SVRD SB MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO 1270' W OF MCNEIL MERRILLTOWN RD L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L4-4D-104 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-130 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-70 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-130 L4-6D-130 L4-6D-130 L4-6D-130 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-116 L4-4D-0 L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14 B-15 B-16 B-17 B-18 B-19 B-20 B-21 B-22 B-23 B-24 B-25 B-26 B-27 B-28 B-29 B-31 B-32 B-33 B-34 B-35 B-36 B-37 B-38 B-39 B-40 B-41 B-42 B-43 B-44 BI-5 BI-6 BI-7 BI-8 BI-9 BI-10 BI-11 BI-12 BI-13 BI-14 BI-15 BI-16 BI-17 BI-18 BI-19 BI-20 BI-21 BI-22 BI-23 BI-24 BI-25 BI-28 BI-29 BI-30 BI-31 BI-32 B-30, C-24 Proj. # AI-14, BI-1 AI-15, BI-2 AI-16, BI-3 BI-4, EI-11 BI-26, CI-4 BI-27, CI-11 SH 45 - MCNEIL RD CONNECTOR SH 45 - MERRILTOWN DR CONNECTOR N MOPAC EXPY SVRD NB-FM 1325 RD CONNECTOR MOPAC EXPY SVRD-W BALCONES CENTER DR CONNECTOR GREAT HILLS TRL-W BLACONES CENTER DR CONNECTOR W BALCONES CENTER DR YORK BLVD-LONGHORN BLVD CONNECTOR @ MOPAC POND WOODS RD TO POND SPRINGS RD CONNECTOR POND WOODS RD TO POND SPRINGS RD CONNECTOR ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ROBINSON RANCH RD GRAND AVENUE PKWY GRAND AVENUE PKWY DALLAS DR CONNECTOR CORPUS CHRISTI DR SHORELINE DR MC NEIL DR MELROSE TRL ROBINSON RANCH RD MC NEIL DR W HOWARD LN MC NEIL DR MC NEIL DR EUROPA LN DESTINY GATE DR ADELPHI LN ADELPHI LN WATERS PARK RD MC NEIL DR MC NEIL DR / HOWARD LN W HOWARD LN MC NEIL RD CR 172 FM 1325 RD BURNET RD SHORELINE DR Type Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Siganlize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Modify Right Turn Lane Signalize Signalize W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO SH 45 TO MCNEIL RD CONNECTOR PEARSON RANCH RD TO CITY LIMITS SH 45 TO MCNEIL RD SH 45 TO MERRILLTOWN DR MCNEIL RD TO MOPAC (SL 1) LOOP 1 TO 480' W OF BURNET RD W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO CITY LIMITS SHORELINE DR TO W HOWARD LN FM 1325 TO LOOP 1 FRONTAGE RD US 183 TO AVERY ISLAND AVE ROBINSON RANCH RD TO PARMER LN CITY LIMITS TO MCNEIL DR W HOWARD LN TO MCNEIL DR ROBINSON RANCH RD TO MCNEIL RD EXTENSION MCNEIL DR TO MOPAC W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO DESITY GATE DR EUROPA LN TO COUNCIL BLUFF DR W PARMER LN (FM 734) TO W HOWARD LN AMHERST DR TO WATERS PARK RD ADELPHI LN TO MOPAC SB FRONTAGE RD MOPAC EXPY SVRD TO BALCONES CENTER DR GREAT HILLS TRL TO W BALCONES CENTER DR W BRAKER LN TO MOPAC SVRD YORK BLVD TO LONGHORN BLVD POND SPRINGS TO 500' E OF POND SPRINGS 500' E OF POND SPRINGS TO POND WOODS PARMER LN TO CITY LIMITS 735' W OF MCNEIL RD TO 4400' W OF SHORELINE DR EXT MCNEIL MERRILTOWN RD TO MOPAC 800' N OF SHORELINE DR TO 800' N OF MERRILTOWN DR SH 45 TO W HOWARD LN SH 45 TO FM 1325 CR 172 TO 1300' S OF CR 172 MOPAC TO FM 1325 465' W OF MOPAC TO MOPAC US 183 TO MCNEIL DR MCNEIL DR TO OAK KNOLL DR Inte rse ction N FM 620 RD AND W PARMER LN N FM 620 RD AND SH 45 S O'CONNOR DR AND SH 45 ANDERSON MILL RD AND N US 183 HWY ANDERSON MILL RD AND BROADMEADE AVE ANDERSON MILL RD AND MORRIS RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND W PARMER LN ANDERSON MILL RD AND ROBINSON RANCH RD N 620 RD AND ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND SH 45 TO MC NEIL MERRILTOWN CONNECTION MC NEIL DR AND SH 45 TO MC NEIL MERRILTOWN CONNECTION MC NEIL RD AND ANDERSON MILL RD GRAND AVENUE PKWY AND MOPAC W PARMER LN AND TAMAYO DR SHORELINE DR AND MOPAC W PARMER LN AND DALLAS DR SH 45 TO MCNEIL DR CONNECTOR AND MC NEIL DR SHORELINE DR AND SH 45 TO MC NEIL MERRILTOWN CONNECTION MC NEIL DR AND AVERY ISLAND AVE MC NEIL DR AND W PARMER LN MC NEIL RD AND W HOWARD LN SHORELINE DR AND W HOWARD LN W HOWARD LN AND MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD RIATA TRACE PKWY AND RIATA VISTA CIR W PARMER LN AND ADELPHI LN W PARMER LN AND N MOPAC EXPY N MOPAC EXPY AND PARK BEND DR W BRAKER LN AND STONELAKE BLVD GREAT HILLS TRL AND STONELAKE BLVD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND RESEARCH BLVD DUVAL RD AND MUSTANG CHASE DUVAL RD AND SANTA CRUZ DR 201,000 201,000 609,000 802,000 71,000 71,000 743,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 477,000 359,000 359,000 477,000 182,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 1,067,000 142,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 10,000,000 201,000 142,000 10,000 201,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 50% 50% 25% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.87 0.24 2.48 2.26 2.17 2.56 0.58 0.38 1.49 0.31 1.34 0.14 1.06 0.38 1.94 1.15 0.24 0.17 1.12 0.35 0.20 0.14 0.33 1.33 0.51 0.48 0.56 0.21 0.33 0.29 0.14 0.10 0.51 0.80 0.58 2.28 0.41 0.27 0.74 0.23 0.08 0.56 0.62 0.05 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,207,000 2,627,000 28,639,000 26,637,000 29,617,000 33,371,000 7,144,000 4,221,000 13,820,000 1,910,000 15,113,000 965,000 1,267,000 2,711,000 23,089,000 9,323,000 4,007,000 892,000 6,412,000 7,995,000 6,919,000 937,000 2,085,000 15,972,000 3,580,000 884,000 3,443,000 2,565,000 3,879,000 15,429,000 974,000 764,000 7,030,000 10,930,000 7,915,000 31,107,000 4,227,000 74,000 189,000 318,000 859,000 696,000 6,512,000 5,336,000 % In Se rvice Are a Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cos t Are a $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,207,000 2,627,000 28,639,000 26,637,000 29,617,000 33,371,000 7,144,000 4,221,000 13,820,000 1,910,000 15,113,000 965,000 1,267,000 2,711,000 23,089,000 9,323,000 4,007,000 892,000 6,412,000 7,995,000 6,919,000 937,000 2,085,000 15,972,000 3,580,000 884,000 3,443,000 2,565,000 3,879,000 7,714,500 487,000 764,000 7,030,000 10,930,000 7,915,000 31,107,000 2,113,500 37,000 94,500 318,000 429,500 696,000 6,512,000 2,668,000 100,500 100,500 152,250 401,000 71,000 71,000 371,500 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 477,000 179,500 359,000 477,000 91,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 800,250 142,000 359,000 179,500 300,000 359,000 5,000,000 100,500 142,000 10,000 201,000 300,000 300,000 340,047,000 13,498,500 83,109 B A S MC NEIL MERRILLTOWN RD TECHNOLOGY BLVD POND SPRINGS RD-OAK KNOLL CONNECTOR HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD CONNECTOR HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 73 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.C – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area C Service Area Proj. # Class Street Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost in Se rvice Cost Area BURNET RD CONNECTOR BURNET RD TO GRACY FARMS TO KRAMER LN CONNECTOR CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY-READ GRANBERRY TRL CONNECTOR CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY TO READ GRANBERRY TRL GRACY FARMS LN-KRAMER LN CONNECTOR ESPERANZA XING-STONEHOLLOW DR CONNECTOR METROPOLITAN DR BROCKTON DR-W BRAKER LN CONNECTOR UNITED DR MC KALLA PL READ GRANBERRY TR READ GRANBERRY TRL-BURNET RD CONNECTOR HARRY RANSOM TR RUTLAND DR-SAUNDERS LN CONNECTOR B-30, C-24 YORK BLVD-LONGHORN BLVD CONNECTOR @ MOPAC C A S W HOWARD LN WINWICK WAY N LAMAR BLVD CEDAR BEND DR CEDAR BEND DR CEARLEY DR OLD CEDAR LN N LAMAR BLVD W YAGER LN BURNET RD UNITED DR W RUNDBERG LN W RUNDBERG LN BUSINESS DR REID DR MC NEIL RD INDUSTRIAL TERR UNITED DR REID DR MC NEIL RD GUADALUPE ST ALTERRA PKWY GAULT LN DUVAL RD GRACY FARMS LN STONEHOLLOW DR BROCKTON DR RUTLAND DR LONGHORN BLVD LONGHORN BLVD PARKFIELD DR PARKFIELD DR RUTLAND DR RUTLAND DR OHLEN RD W BRAKER LN ESPERANZA LN TO KRAMER LN CONNECTOR C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-11 C-12 C-13 C-14 C-15 C-16 C-17 C-18 C-19 C-20 C-21 C-22 C-23 C-25 C-26 C-27 C-28 C-29 C-30 C-31 C-32 C-33 C-34 C-35 C-36 C-37 C-38 C-39 C-40 C-41 C-42 C-43 C-44 C-45 C-46 C-47 C-48 C-49 C-50 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-1O-130 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L3-6D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4U-OP-116 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4U-OP-116 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-4D-90 L2-4D-90 L2-4D-116 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L2-3U-74 L2-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L4-4D-104 a. b. L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-OP-92 IDA RIDGE TO AVENUE K SINGLETREE AVE TO HARROWDEN DR HOWARD LN TO PARMER LN RUNNING BIRD LN TO TANGLEWILD DR CEDAR BEND CV TO SCOFIELD FARMS DR CEDAR BEND DR TO OLD CEDAR LN END TO N LAMAR BLVD ANDERSON LN TO PARMER LN LAMAR BLVD TO IH 35 SVRD GAULT LN TO RESEARCH BLVD GRACY FARMS LN TO KRAMER LN ESPERANZA XING TO STONEHOLLOW DR STONEHOLLOW DR TO METROPOLITAN DR BROCKTON DR TO W BRAKER LN HARRY RANSOM TRL TO EXPLORATION WAY END TO RUTLAND DR CREATIVITY TR TO HARRY RANSOM TR READ GRANBERRY TRL TO BURNET RD READ GRANBERRY TR TO UNITED DR RUTLAND DR TO SAUNDERS LN INDUSTRIAL TERRACE TO HARRY RANSOM TRL YORK BLVD TO LONGHORN BLVD BURNET RD TO RUNDBERG LN 250' N OF METRIC BLVD TO END LONGHORN BLVD TO INDUSTRIAL TERR LONGHORN BLVD TO INDUSTRIAL TERR MCNEIL RD TO W RUNDBERG LN NEILS THOMPSON DR TO REID DR RESEARCH BLVD TO INDUSTRIAL TERR WATERFORD CENTRE BLVD TO END WATERFORD CENTRE BLVD TO BURNET RD SAN JOSE ST TO BOLLES CIR MOPAC TO DOMAIN DR ALTERRA PKWY TO HOBBY HORSE CT GRACY FARMSM LN TO GAULT LN BURNET RD TO METRIC BLVD METRIC BLVD TO METRIC BLVD ESPERANZA LN TO KRAMER LN BURNET RD TO BROCKTON DR BURNET RD TO 2300' E OF METRIC BLVD NEILS THOMPSON TO REID DR REID DR TO BURNET RD MEARNS MEADOW BLVD TO N OF RUTLAND DR RUTLAND DR TO W RUNDBERG LN W OF PARKFIELD TO E OF PARKFIELD W OF LAMAR BLVD TO LAMAR BLVD RESEARCH BLVD TO PAYTON GIN RD N LAMAR BLVD TO INTERSTATE 35 0.88 0.12 1.22 0.07 0.11 0.24 0.12 4.53 0.37 2.18 0.23 0.58 0.43 0.85 0.15 0.16 0.25 0.17 0.31 0.29 0.11 0.09 0.40 0.29 0.20 0.28 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.39 0.28 0.09 0.16 0.06 0.08 0.35 0.18 0.89 0.92 0.21 0.22 0.96 0.41 0.11 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.22 0.18 0.64 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,268,000 693,000 15,777,000 434,000 797,000 1,221,000 855,000 13,552,000 2,327,000 25,859,000 1,444,000 3,908,000 3,237,000 5,760,000 1,035,000 1,348,000 2,011,000 1,989,000 3,006,000 2,800,000 778,000 606,000 2,694,000 15,077,000 2,160,000 3,313,000 539,000 947,000 1,147,000 2,648,000 1,911,000 536,000 1,053,000 244,000 736,000 3,272,000 112,000 9,251,000 2,827,000 1,175,000 2,261,000 1,238,000 4,312,000 358,000 837,000 418,000 351,000 674,000 1,655,000 1,940,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,634,000 693,000 15,777,000 434,000 797,000 1,221,000 855,000 13,552,000 2,327,000 25,859,000 1,444,000 3,908,000 3,237,000 5,760,000 1,035,000 1,348,000 2,011,000 1,989,000 3,006,000 2,800,000 778,000 606,000 2,694,000 7,538,500 2,160,000 3,313,000 539,000 947,000 1,147,000 2,648,000 1,911,000 536,000 1,053,000 244,000 736,000 3,272,000 112,000 9,251,000 2,827,000 1,175,000 2,261,000 1,238,000 4,312,000 358,000 837,000 418,000 351,000 674,000 1,655,000 1,940,000 These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 74 Final Draft January 2020 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I C A S CI-20; DI-20 Proj. # CI-2, DI-3 BI-26, CI-4 CI-1 CI-3 CI-5 CI-6 CI-7 CI-8 CI-9; DI-11 CI-10 BI-27, CI-11 CI-12 CI-13 CI-14 CI-15 CI-16 CI-17 CI-18 CI-19 CI-21 CI-22 CI-23 CI-24 CI-25 CI-26 CI-27 CI-28 CI-29 CI-31 CI-32 CI-34 CI-35 CI-36 CI-37 CI-30, FI-10 CI-33, FI-25 Table 5.C – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area C Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize N LAMAR BLVD AND 11850 BLK N LAMAR BLVD (BRENTWOOD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL) N LAMAR BLVD AND 11700 BLK N LAMAR BLVD (RESTAURANT DWY) Intersection SCOFIELD RIDGE PKWY AND W HOWARD LN W HOWARD LN AND N IH 35 METRIC BLVD AND CUTTING HORSE LN W PARMER LN AND N MOP AC EXPY PARMER LN AND LIMERICK AVE METRIC BLVD AND W PARMER LN W PARMER LN AND ROLLING HILL DR W PARMER LN AND N LAMAR BLVD W PARMER LN AND N IH 35 CEDAR BEND DR AND TOMANET TRL N MOPAC EXPY AND PARK BEND DR N LAMAR BLVD AND WALNUT PARK XING METRIC BLVD AND STONEHOLLOW DR W BRAKER LN AND METRIC BLVD W BRAKER LN AND DOMAIN DR METRIC BLVD AND KRAMER LN W BRAKER LN AND N LAMAR BLVD E BRAKER LN AND N IH 35 W BRAKER LN AND BURNET RD BURNET RD AND READ GRANBERRY TRL PARKFIELD DR AND MEARNS MEADOWS BLVD N LAMAR BLVD AND W LONGSPUR BLVD METRIC BLVD AND W RUNDBERG LN W RUNDBERG LN AND NORTHGATE BLVD N LAMAR BLVD AND RUTLAND DR HUNTERS TRCE AND COLONY CREEK DR N LAMAR BLVD AND PAYTON GIN RD FAIRFIELD DR AND RESEARCH BLVD N LAMAR BLVD AND THURMOND ST GEORGIAN DR AND W POWELL LN N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN N LAMAR BLVD AND POWELL LN N LAMAR BLVD AND FAIRFIELD DR W BRAKER LN AND BITTERN HOLLOW W BRAKER LN AND SWEARINGEN DR % In Service Area Total Project Cost in Se rvice Cost Area $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 300,000 477,000 359,000 10,000,000 359,000 401,000 359,000 684,000 25,000,000 300,000 201,000 300,000 300,000 465,000 300,000 300,000 182,000 142,000 1,120,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 300,000 359,000 642,000 465,000 359,000 25,000 359,000 142,000 71,000 142,000 359,000 1,000,000 418,000 1,109,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA C $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 300,000 238,500 359,000 5,000,000 359,000 401,000 359,000 684,000 12,500,000 300,000 100,500 300,000 300,000 465,000 300,000 300,000 182,000 142,000 1,120,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 300,000 359,000 642,000 465,000 359,000 25,000 359,000 142,000 35,500 142,000 359,000 500,000 418,000 1,109,000 300,000 300,000 148,218,500 39,524,500 83,109 187,826,109 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 75 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.D – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area D E HOWARD LN-E PARMER LN CONNECTOR E HOWARD LN TO E PARMER LN INTERSTATE 35 TO 1160' E OF SAMSUNG BLVD 3003' W OF HARRIS BRANCH PKWY TO 2844' E OF HARRIS BRANCH PKWY HICKORY GROVE DR CONNECTOR PARMER LN-SAMSUNG BLVD CONNECTOR Se rvice Area Proj. # Class WELLS BRANCH PKWY-SCOBEE ST CONNECTOR WELLS BRANCH PKWY JOSH RIDGE BLVD CONNECTOR JOSH RIDGE BLVD CONNECTOR D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 D-5 D-6 D-7 D-8 D-9 D-10 D-11 D-12 D-13 D-14 D-15 D-16 D-17 D-18 D-19 D-20 D-21 D-22 D-23 D-24 D-25 D-26 D-27 D-28 D-29 D-30 D-31 D-32 D-33 D-34 D-35 D-36 D-37 D-38 D-39 D-40 D-41 D-42 D-43 D-44 D-45 D-46 D-47 D-48 D-49 D-50 D-51 D-52 D-53 D-54 D-55 D-56 D-57 D-58 D-59 D-60 D-61 D-62 D-63 D-64 D-65 D-66 D-67 D-68 D-69 L3-4U-88 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L4-6D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L4-6D-142 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-142 L4-6D-142 L4-6D-142 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L4-6D-154-TxDOT L3-3U-80 L1-2U-OP-60 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L1-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-96 L3-4D-116 L4-4D-120 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-96 Stre et VISION DR FM 1825 RD CADENCE LN FISH LN DESSAU RD DESSAU RD DESSAU RD DESSAU RD E HOWARD LN SILICON DR E PARMER LN E PARMER LN E YAGER LN CAMERON RD CAMERON RD E PARMER LN E BRAKER LN ARTERIAL A CAMERON RD CAMERON RD E BRAKER LN BLUE GOOSE RD BLUE GOOSE RD BLUE GOOSE RD BLUFF BEND DR RUBY DR RUBY DR E APPLEGATE DR BROWN LN SPRINKLE RD SPRINKLE RD TAEBAEK DR DUNGAN LN BROWN LN BROWN LN E RUNDBERG LN E HOWARD LN FERGUSON LN SANSOM RD SANSOM RD BRATTON LN CENTER RIDGE DR CENTER RIDGE DR CENTER LAKE DR HARRIS RIDGE BLVD E HOWARD LN E BRAKER LN TUSCANY WAY TUSCANY WAY EXCHANGE DR WALL ST CROSS PARK DR SPRINGDALE RD CROSS PARK DR E YAGER LN L2-2U-OP-70 WALL ST-PROFIT CENTRE DR CONNECTOR Limits FM 1825 RD TO THREE POINTS RD W WELLS BRANCH TO W PECAN ST W WELLS BRANCH PKWY TO SCOBEE ST FM 1825 TO 1560' E OF HEATHERWILDE BLVD OBLIQUE DR TO BAUHAUS BND HARRISGLEN DR TO DESSAU RD HOWARD LN TO CITY LIMITS HARRIS RIDGE BLVD TO 575' E OF HARRIS RIDGE BLVD 305' E OF HARRISGLEN DR TO 1035' E OF HARRISGLEN DR 620' N OF DESSAU RIDGE LN TO 338' N OF E HOWARD LN 1250' N OF W PARMER LN TO 620' N OF DESSAU RIDGE LN W PARMER LN TO 1250' N OF W PARMER LN 445' W OF KEARNS DR TO 1845' E OF CANTARRA DR TITANIUM DR TO PARMER LN TO HOWARD LN CONNECTION 350' W OF NATURES BEND TO E PARMER LN HICKORY GROVE DR TO PLAZA LN PARMER LN TO SAMSUNG BLVD 420' E OF YAGER LN TO 2925' E OF YAGER LN 2925' E OF YAGER LN TO E PARMER LN 1230' E OF SH 130 NB SVRD TO US 290 WB SVRD 175' W OF DAWES PL TO 950' W OF SAMSUNG BLVD E PARMER LN TO 820' N OF E BRAKER LN 1561' N OF BLUE GOOSE RD TO 3735' N OF BLUE GOOSE RD BLUE GOOSE RD TO 1128' N OF BLUE GOOSE RD CAMERON RD TO 2211' E OF CAMERON RD BLUE GOOSE RD TO MACIVER DR (FUTURE) CAMERON RD TO BLUE GOOSE RD-MACIVER DR CONNECTOR GILES LN TO CITY LIMITS BLUE GOOSE RD TO PARMER LN HARRIS BRANCH PKWY TO US 290 COLLINWOOD DR TO E BRAKER LN INTERSTATE 35 SVRD TO JOSEPH CLAYTON DR JOSEPH CLAYTON DR TO BLUFF BEND DR DESSAU RD TO WARRINGTON DR APPLEGATE DR TO WHITAKER DR 160' S OF TRAIL WEARY DR TO 1646' N OF SPRINKLE RD SPRINKLE RD TO 1646' N OF SPRINKLE RD 379' S OF DUNGAN LN TO 1007' N OF FERGUSON LN 1144' N OF CRISWELL RD TO 1970' N OF CRISWELL RD SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD TO 1147' W OF SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD E BRAKER LN TO TAEBAEK DR DESSAU RD TO BROWN LN FERGUSON LN TO 1007' N OF FERGUSON LN DUNGAN LN TO 379' S OF DUNGAN LN CAMERON RD TO FERGUSON LN DESSAU RD TO HARRIS BRANCH PKWY E RUNDBERG LN TO SANSOM RD WALL ST TO PROFIT CENTRE DR FERGUSON LN TO 1722' S OF FERGUSON LN SPRINGDALE RD TO 772' W OF SPRINGDALE RD MICHAEL ANGELO WAY TO SCARBROUGH DR IH 35 SVRD TO 555' E OF IH 35 SVRD 555' E OF IH 35 SVRD TO MC CALLEN PASS W PARMER LN TO MC CALLEN PASS E HOWARD LN TO E PARMER LN DESSAU RD TO HARRIS BRANCH PKWY IH 35 SVRD TO BLUFF BEND DR FERGUSON LN TO EXCHANGE DR EXCHANGE DR TO US 290 HWY SVRD TUSCANY WAY TO CROSS PARK DR CROSS PARK DR TO FERGUSON LN FUTURE DR TO FORBES DR SANSOM RD TO US 290 HWY SVRD CAMERON RD TO FUTURE DR TECH RIDGE BLVD TO NATURES BND Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cos t in Service Cost Are a 0.22 0.59 0.41 1.32 0.20 0.26 0.68 0.11 0.14 0.23 0.89 0.24 0.61 0.69 0.54 3.79 1.07 1.19 0.09 1.59 0.47 0.51 0.62 0.90 0.80 0.41 0.21 0.42 0.65 0.53 0.52 0.40 0.72 0.76 0.31 0.13 0.10 0.16 0.39 1.05 0.31 0.17 0.16 0.22 0.06 0.33 0.19 0.07 0.55 0.50 1.12 0.62 0.33 0.15 0.31 0.10 0.52 0.50 0.76 0.24 0.21 0.38 0.85 0.63 0.68 1.05 0.09 0.05 0.14 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,791,000 152,000 2,491,000 12,864,000 1,225,000 1,667,000 8,008,000 716,000 887,000 2,713,000 10,540,000 2,792,000 856,000 4,059,000 3,242,000 9,267,000 3,728,000 9,881,000 327,000 17,547,000 2,838,000 5,887,000 1,517,000 10,116,000 8,574,000 2,472,000 1,324,000 4,695,000 4,048,000 2,991,000 5,645,000 2,558,000 4,338,000 8,226,000 1,439,000 830,000 656,000 1,014,000 2,318,000 6,286,000 2,423,000 951,000 3,422,000 1,313,000 333,000 2,044,000 1,247,000 576,000 6,641,000 704,000 12,402,000 3,330,000 2,244,000 848,000 3,343,000 980,000 1,571,000 711,000 7,082,000 353,000 314,000 504,000 7,987,000 825,000 884,000 1,346,000 834,000 444,000 203,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 895,500 76,000 2,491,000 12,864,000 1,225,000 1,667,000 4,004,000 716,000 887,000 2,713,000 5,270,000 2,792,000 856,000 4,059,000 1,621,000 9,267,000 3,728,000 9,881,000 327,000 17,547,000 1,419,000 5,887,000 758,500 10,116,000 4,287,000 1,236,000 662,000 4,695,000 2,024,000 1,495,500 2,822,500 1,279,000 4,338,000 8,226,000 1,439,000 830,000 656,000 1,014,000 2,318,000 6,286,000 1,211,500 951,000 1,711,000 656,500 333,000 2,044,000 1,247,000 288,000 6,641,000 704,000 6,201,000 3,330,000 1,122,000 424,000 3,343,000 980,000 1,571,000 711,000 7,082,000 353,000 314,000 504,000 7,987,000 825,000 884,000 1,346,000 834,000 444,000 203,000 BLUE GOOSE RD-MACIVER DR CONNECTOR SH 130 SVRD-GILES LN CONNECTOR SH 130 SVRD TO GILES LN CONNECTION TO CITY LIMITS BLUE GOOSE RD-PARMER LN CONNECTOR D A S APPLEGATE DR-WHITAKER DR CONNECTOR SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD SPRINKLE CUTOFF RD a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 76 Final Draft January 2020 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I D A S CI-20; DI-20 Proj. # CI-2, DI-3 CI-9; DI-11 DI-1 DI-2 DI-4 DI-5 DI-6 DI-7 DI-8 DI-9 DI-10 DI-12 DI-13 DI-14 DI-15 DI-16 DI-17 DI-18 DI-19 DI-21 DI-22 DI-23 DI-24 DI-25 DI-26 DI-27 DI-28 DI-29 DI-30 DI-31 DI-32 DI-33 DI-35 DI-36 Table 5.D – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area D Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Siganlize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Inters ection Total Project Cos t in Service Cost Are a W WELLS BRANCH PKWY AND DRUSILLAS DR W WELLS BRANCH PKWY AND S HEATHERWILDE BLVD W HOWARD LN AND N IH 35 W HOWARD LN AND S HEATHERWILDE BLVD/MC CALLEN PASS E HOWARD LN AND GREINERT DR E HOWARD LN AND HOWARD LN TO MC CALLEN PASS CONNECTION/CAPE HORN E PARMER LN AND HARRIS RIDGE BLVD/TECH RIDGE BLVD E HOWARD LN AND HARRIS RIDGE BLVD HOWARD LN AND HARRISGLENN DR E HOWARD LN AND DESSAU RD MC CALLEN PASS AND CENTER RIDGE DR W PARMER LN AND N IH 35 E PARMER LN AND MC CALLEN PASS E PARMER LN AND HARRISGLENN DR DESSAU RD AND PEARL RETREAT DR E PARMER LN AND E YAGER LN DESSAU RD AND E PARMER LN HARRIS BRANCH PKWY AND E PARMER LN E BRAKER LN AND N IH 35 E BRAKER LN AND MUSKET VALLEY TRL E PARMER LN AND SAMSUNG BLVD TO E PARMER LN CONNECTION E BRAKER LN AND SAMSUNG BLVD TO E PARMER LN CONNECTION E BRAKER LN AND SAMSUNG BLVD HARRIS BRANCH PKWY AND FARMHAVEN RD SAMSUNG BLVD TO E PARMER LN CONNECTION AND SAMSUNG BLVD GILES LN AND BLUE GOOSE RD HARRIS BRANCH PKWY AND BLUE GOOSE RD DESSAU RD AND E APPLEGATE DR DESSAU RD AND MEADOWMEAR DR DESSAU RD AND CHILDRESS DR DESSAU RD AND DUNGAN LN TUSCANY WAY AND EXCHANGE DR RUTHERFORD LN AND CENTRE CREEK DR N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN DESSAU RD AND BRADBURY LN DESSAU RD AND DESSAU RIDGE LN % In Service Area 100% 75% 50% 50% 50% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 359,000 748,000 477,000 377,000 359,000 359,000 607,000 359,000 725,000 359,000 25,000,000 359,000 401,000 15,000 359,000 371,000 201,000 359,000 1,244,000 10,000,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 561,000 238,500 188,500 179,500 179,500 455,250 359,000 725,000 359,000 12,500,000 359,000 401,000 15,000 179,500 371,000 201,000 359,000 1,244,000 5,000,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100,000 300,000 300,000 10,000,000 359,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA D 100,000 300,000 300,000 5,000,000 179,500 150,000 198,920,000 33,735,250 83,109 232,738,359 DI-34; JI-1 Intersection Improvements a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 77 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.DT – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area DT Service Area Proj. # Clas s Street Limits Length (mi) Total Project Cost in Service Cost Area RED RIVER ST W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD DAVIS ST TO END IH-35 SVRD SB TO PEARL ST N LAMAR BLVD MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO 15TH ST SAN JACINTO BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO CESAR CHAVEZ ST GUADALUPE ST TO TRINITY ST SAN ANTONIO ST TO TRINITY ST SAN ANTONIO ST TO SAN JACINTO BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO E 6TH ST E 18TH ST TO E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD PARKFIELD TO 15TH ST 6TH ST TO PARKWAY (184' N OF 12TH ST) E 15TH ST TO E 12TH ST 11TH ST TO 8TH ST GUADALUPE ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR GUADALUPE ST TO SAN JACINTO BLVD SAN JACINTO TO TRINITY ST TRINITY ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR GUADALUPE ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR GUADALUPE ST TO INTERSTATE 35 SBFR E CESAR CHAVEZ ST TO DRISKILL ST Intersection 0.18 1.02 0.19 0.44 0.51 0.44 1.25 0.91 0.07 0.11 0.53 0.22 0.34 0.71 0.37 0.07 0.27 0.71 0.93 0.08 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,035,000 2,980,000 255,000 384,000 741,000 383,000 4,671,000 2,532,000 557,000 160,000 696,000 1,958,000 1,434,000 2,517,000 2,141,000 379,000 1,077,000 3,575,000 3,927,000 274,000 Total Project Cost in Service Cost Area DTI-1, II-35 Intersection Improvements W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND NUECES ST % In Service Area 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Service Area 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,035,000 1,490,000 127,500 384,000 741,000 383,000 4,671,000 2,532,000 557,000 80,000 348,000 1,958,000 1,434,000 2,517,000 2,141,000 379,000 1,077,000 3,575,000 3,927,000 274,000 521,500 300,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 150,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 31,630,500 8,584,500 83,109 40,298,109 SAN JACINTO BLVD AND E 17TH ST W 12TH ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 14TH ST AND GUADALUPE ST W 14TH ST AND LAVACA ST W 13TH ST AND GUADALUPE ST SAN JACINTO BLVD AND 13TH ST E 12TH ST AND TRINITY ST WEST AVE AND W 8TH ST RED RIVER ST AND E 11TH ST RED RIVER ST AND E 9TH ST W 6TH ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 5TH ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 3RD ST AND NUECES ST W 3RD ST AND SAN ANTONIO ST W 2ND ST AND NUECES ST SAN JACINTO BLVD AND 4TH ST TRINITY ST AND 4TH ST SAN JACINTO BLVD AND 3RD ST TRINITY ST AND 3RD ST TRINITY ST AND 2ND ST N LAMAR BLVD AND SANDRA MURAIDA WAY W CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND GUADALUPE ST SABINE ST AND E 11TH ST SABINE ST AND E 12TH ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 18TH ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 16TH ST $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,043,000 300,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA DT DT-1 DT-2, I-21 DT-3, I-20 L3-2U-80 L3-5U-80 L3-4D-100 L2-2U-OP-80 L2-2U-OP-80 L2-2U-OP-80 DT-10, I-34 DT-11, I-25 L3-3O-80 L3-3O-80 L3-3U-78 L3-4D-80 L3-4D-80 L3-3U-78 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L2-4U-80 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L3-4O-82 L2-2U-OP-92 DT-4 DT-5 DT-6 DT-7 DT-8 DT-9 DT-12 DT-13 DT-14 DT-15 DT-16 DT-17 DT-18 DT-19 DT-20 Proj. # DTI-2 DTI-3 DTI-4 DTI-5 DTI-6 DTI-7 DTI-8 DTI-9 DTI-10 DTI-11 DTI-12 DTI-13 DTI-14 DTI-15 DTI-16 DTI-17 DTI-18 DTI-19 DTI-20 DTI-21 DTI-23 DTI-24 DTI-25 DTI-26 DTI-27 DTI-22, II-39 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I T D A S W 18TH ST E 17TH ST W 16TH ST TRINITY ST RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD N LAMAR BLVD RED RIVER ST BRAZOS ST E 10TH ST W 9TH ST E 9TH ST E 9TH ST E 8TH ST W 7TH ST RAINEY ST Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 78 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.E – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area E Se rvice Area Proj. # Class A-15, E-1 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L5-6D-154-TxDOT E-7, H-1 E-2 E-3 E-4 E-5 E-6 E-8 E-10 E-11 E-12 E-13 E-14 E-15 E-16 E-17 E-18 E-19 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L3-3U-S-100 L4-4D-0 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-94 Stree t N RM 620 RD N RM 620 RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD BULLICK HOLLOW RD OLD LAMPASAS TRL TEXAS PLUME RD SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD JOLLYVILLE RD OAK KNOLL DR ARBORETUM BLVD E-9, H-3 L4-6D-147-TxDOT RM 2222 RD FM 620 BYPASS TO RIBELIN RANCH RD HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD CONNECTOR HUNTERS CHASE DR TO OCEANAIRE BLVD RM 2222 TO FOUR POINTS DR CONNECTOR FOUR POINTS TO MCNEIL DR CONNECTOR RM 2222 TO FOUR POINTS DR FOUR POINTS TO MCNEIL DR YAUPON DR-BLUFFSTONE DR CONNECTOR YAUPON DR TO BLUFFFSTONE DR Limits Length (mi) Total Project Cost in Service Cost Area DEERBROOK TRL TO 600' E OF RIDGELINE BLVD DEERBROOK TRL TO FM 2222 420' W OF RESEARCH BLVD TO RESEARCH BLVD 100' E OF SPICEWOOD PKWY TO 420' W OF RESEARCH BLVD 100' E OF SPICEWOOD PKWY TO SPICEWOOD PKWY CROSSTIMBER DR TO CENTENNIAL TRL FM 620 TO FM 2769 TALLEYRAN DR TO SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD TO D K RANCH RD LAMPASAS TRL TO CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY CHANCELLROY DR TO RESEARCH BLVD BARRINGTON WAY TO GREAT HILLS TRL JOLLYVILLE RD TO RESEARCH BLVD 200' N OF CAPITAL TEXAS HWY TO CAPITAL TEXAS HWY 0.32 5.09 0.10 0.87 0.03 0.23 3.08 0.05 1.32 0.30 0.72 0.47 0.34 3.49 0.45 0.57 3.24 0.06 0.06 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,022,000 20,585,000 658,000 6,016,000 66,000 315,000 22,901,000 768,000 5,689,000 2,376,000 6,885,000 3,168,000 1,822,000 36,249,000 5,150,000 803,000 4,025,000 105,000 551,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 511,000 20,585,000 658,000 6,016,000 66,000 315,000 11,450,500 384,000 2,844,500 2,376,000 6,885,000 3,168,000 1,822,000 18,124,500 5,150,000 803,000 4,025,000 105,000 551,000 Total Project Cost in Service Cost Area Proj. # Type Intersection E A S Signalize BI-4, EI-11 I n o i t c e s r e t n I s t n e m e v o r p m Extend Turn Lane EI-12 EI-13 EI-14 Intersection Improvements AI-13, EI-1 AI-12, EI-2 EI-15; HI-1 EI-16; HI-2 Signalize Signalize Signalize N FM 620 RD AND HATCH RD N FM 620 RD AND EL SALIDO PKWY ANDERSON MILL RD AND RANDY RD N FM 620 RD AND LAKE CREEK PKWY N FM 620 RD AND ANDERSON MILL RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND TATERWOOD DR ANDERSON MILL RD AND CENTENNIAL TRL ANDERSON MILL RD AND MILLWRIGHT PKWY EI-3 EI-4 EI-5 EI-6 EI-7 EI-8 EI-9 EI-10 Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements N FM 620 RD AND RIDGELINE BLVD N FM 620 RD AND DEERBROOK TRL Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements 150,000 25,000 200,500 100,500 200,500 588,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000 401,000 2,500 94,000 300,000 291,500 250,000 359,000 245,000 245,000 75,000 4,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 50,000 100,000 162,000 359,000 359,000 85,839,500 17,457,500 83,109 103,380,109 These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity 300,000 100,000 401,000 201,000 401,000 784,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000 802,000 5,000 94,000 300,000 583,000 500,000 359,000 245,000 245,000 150,000 9,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 100,000 100,000 324,000 359,000 359,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA E Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD ANDERSON MILL RD AND PECAN CREEK RD JOLLYVILLE RD AND TAYLOR DRAPER LN N FM 620 RD AND BOULDER LN N FM 620 RD AND 8400 N BLOCK EI-20; HI-4 EI-21, FI-1 EI-22, FI-2 EI-23, FI-3 EI-24; FI-4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND GREAT HILLS TRL N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND RESEARCH BLVD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND LAKEWOOD DR RAIN CREEK PKWY AND LOST HORIZON DR ANDERSON MILL RD AND N US 183 HWY GREAT HILLS TRL AND JOLLYVILLE RD JOLLYVILLE RD AND OAK KNOLL DR FM 2222 RD AND RIVER PLACE BLVD N FM 620 RD AND HEB DRIVEWAY DUVAL RD AND JOLLYVILLE RD FM 2222 RD AND JESTER BLVD N FM 620 RD AND FM 2222 RD EI-17 EI-18 EI-19 Signalize Signalize EI-27 EI-28 EI-26, FI-5 Signalize Signalize EI-25 a. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Projects within the City of Austin. % In Se rvice Are a 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Se rvice Are a 50% 25% 50% 50% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 79 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.F – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area F Service Area Proj. # Class Street Limits Length (mi) Total Project Cost in Service Cost Area SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY TO 1600' W OF MESA DR MESA DR TO BUSINESS PARK DR 1000' N OF LAKEMOORE DR TO CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NB 500' N OF LAKEMOORE DR TO 630' S OF DRIFTWOOD DR W KOENIG LN TO 730' N OF POLARIS AVE WALLINGFOR BEND DR WALLINGFORD BEND TO WILD ST ODELL ST-AIRPORT BLVD CONNECTOR LAMAR BLVD-GUADALUPE ST CONNECTOR LAMAR BLVD TO GUADALUPE ST MARCELL ST TO ODELL ST TO AIRPORT BLVD CONNECTOR BURNS ST-SHIRLEY AVE CONNECTOR N LAMAR BLVD TO 440' N OF WB FRONTAGE RD US 290 WOOTEN DR TO WOOTEN DR BURNET RD TO US 183 W KOENIG LN TO MORROW ST WILD ST TO END (RAILROAD) WILD ST TO LAMAR BLVD LAMAR BLVD TO ODELL ST ODELL ST TO AIRPORT BLVD LAMAR BLVD TO GUADALUPE ST MARCELL ST TO SWANEE DR N LAMAR BLVD TO SHIRLEY AVE CANION ST TO WILLIAMS ST BURNS ST TO SHIRLEY AVE SKYVIEW RD TO SKYVIEW RD MARTIN AVE TO ST JOHNS AVE FAR WEST BLVD TO FM 2222 RD MESA DR TO HART LN FM 2222 RD TO BALCONES DR STECK AVE TO FOSTER LN LAMAR BLVD TO PAXTON ST 0.87 0.62 0.37 0.39 2.65 0.01 1.11 1.42 0.23 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.26 0.16 0.07 0.24 0.02 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.02 1.17 0.16 0.30 0.67 0.13 0.12 0.56 0.06 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 17,000,000 6,131,000 1,947,000 2,987,000 7,760,000 437,000 1,321,000 4,282,000 1,560,000 1,321,000 330,000 360,000 1,110,000 675,000 307,000 1,034,000 420,000 563,000 276,000 321,000 802,000 3,537,000 1,018,000 1,724,000 5,308,000 37,000 162,000 795,000 510,000 F-26, I-27 L4-4D-104-TxDOT MOPAC SVRD NB RAMP TO SHOAL CREEK BLVD Type Intersection Total Project Cost in Service Cost Area % In Service Area 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% % In Service Area 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 17,000,000 6,131,000 1,947,000 2,987,000 7,760,000 437,000 1,321,000 4,282,000 1,560,000 1,321,000 330,000 360,000 1,110,000 675,000 307,000 1,034,000 420,000 563,000 276,000 321,000 802,000 3,537,000 1,018,000 1,724,000 5,308,000 18,500 162,000 795,000 510,000 4,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 50,000 162,000 359,000 1,421,000 300,000 300,000 35,500 359,000 94,000 300,000 171,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 59,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 150,000 150,000 206,000 118,000 29,500 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 64,016,500 38,777,000 83,109 102,876,609 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND LAKEWOOD DR N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND GREAT HILLS TRL N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND RESEARCH BLVD STECK AVE AND GREENSLOPE DR BURNET RD AND STECK AVE OHLEN RD AND PUTNAM DR OHLEN RD AND CONTOUR DR MESA DR AND GREYSTONE DR FAR WEST BLVD AND HART LN SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD AND HART LN W ANDERSON LN AND N MOPAC EXPY SHOAL CREEK BLVD AND FOSTER LN NORTHCROSS DR AND FOSTER LN W ANDERSON LN AND ANDERSON SQUARE ANDERSON LN AND WATSON ST MORROW ST AND WOODROW AVE YATES AVE AND JUSTIN LN JUSTIN LN AND WOODROW AVE N LAMAR BLVD AND CRESTLAND DR N LAMAR BLVD AND W ST JOHNS AVE AIRPORT BLVD AND N LAMAR BLVD N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN E ST JOHNS AVE AND N IH 35 FM 2222 RD AND MOUNT BONNELL RD FM 2222 RD AND HIGHLAND HILLS CIR FM 2222 RD AND NORTHLAND DR W KOENIG LN AND N LAMAR BLVD W KOENIG LN AND GUADALUPE ST AIRPORT BLVD AND HUNTLAND DR AIRPORT BLVD AND CLAYTON LN MIDDLE FISKVILLE RD AND CLAYTON LN FAR WEST BLVD AND AUSTIN CENTER BLVD $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 100,000 324,000 359,000 1,421,000 300,000 300,000 71,000 359,000 94,000 300,000 171,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 59,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 300,000 300,000 412,000 236,000 59,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA F Proj. # EI-21, FI-1 EI-22, FI-2 EI-23, FI-3 EI-24; FI-4 EI-26, FI-5 F A S L3-4D-120 L3-4D-104 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-96 L3-4D-96 L3-4D-116 L2-3U-96 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 F-8 F-9 F-10 F-11 F-12 F-13 F-14 F-15 F-16 F-17 F-18 F-19 F-20 F-21 F-22 F-23 F-24 F-25 F-27 F-28 F-29 FI-6 FI-7 FI-8 FI-9 FI-11 FI-12 FI-13 FI-14 FI-15 FI-16 FI-17 FI-18 FI-19 FI-20 FI-21 FI-22 FI-23 FI-24 CI-33, FI-25 FI-26, JI-2 FI-27, II-2 FI-28; II-3 FI-29; II-4 FI-30; II-5 FI-31; II-6 FI-32 FI-33 FI-34 FI-35 JOLLYVILLE RD LAKEWOOD DR LAKEWOOD DR BURNET RD WOOTEN DR W ANDERSON LN N LAMAR BLVD WILD ST PAYNE AVE ODELL ST KAWNEE DR MARCELL ST SWANEE DR CANION ST SHIRLEY AVE SKYVIEW RD AIRPORT BLVD ROLAND JOHNSON DR FAR WEST BLVD FAR WEST BLVD NORTHLAND DR STECK AVE SHOAL CREEK BLVD MORROW ST Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add U-turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add Turn Lanes Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize CI-30, FI-10 Intersection Improvements FAIRFIELD DR AND RESEARCH BLVD a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 80 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.G – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area G Se rvice Area Proj. # Clas s Stree t Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Se rvice Area Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cost Area COLONY PARK DR-VALLEYFIELD DR CONNECTOR COLONY PARK DR TO VALLEYFIELD DR VALLEYFIELD DR TO OVERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DWY G A S G-1 G-2 G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-8 G-9 G-10 G-11 G-12 G-13 G-14 G-15 G-16 G-17 G-18 G-19 G-20 G-21 G-22 G-23 G-24 G-25 G-26 G-27 G-28 G-29 G-30 G-31 G-32 G-33 G-34 G-35 G-36 G-37 G-38 G-39 G-40 G-41 G-42 G-43 G-44 G-45 G-46 G-47 G-48 G-49 G-50 G-51 G-52 G-53 L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-116-TxDOT L3-4D-116-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-200-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120 L4-6D-154-TxDOT L3-4D-116 L4-4D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-0 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-116 L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-130-TxDOT L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116-TxDOT WILDHORSE CONNECTOR FERGUSON CTOF FERGUSON CTOF OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD OLD MANOR RD DAFFAN LN JOHNNY MORRIS RD JOHNNY MORRIS RD JOHNNY MORRIS RD COLONY LOOP DR WILMINGTON DR DECKER LN DECKER LN DECKER LN DECKER LN LINDELL LN LINDELL LN BLUE BLUFF RD E PARMER LN BLUE BLUFF RD BLUE BLUFF RD BLOOR RD BLOOR RD BRAKER LN BLOOR RD N FM 973 RD N FM 973 RD FM 973 TAYLOR LN E BRAKER LN DECKER LAKE RD DECKER LAKE RD DECKER LAKE RD N FM 973 RD N FM 973 RD JOHNNY MORRIS RD FM 969 RD DECKER LN FM 969 RD HESTER RD TUSCANY WAY MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD DECKER LN N FM 973 RD FM 969 RD TAYLOR LN DECKER LN SMITH RD US 290 TO 565' N OF OLD MANOR RD 565' N OF OLD MANOR RD TO OLD MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD TO FERGUSON CUTOFF FERGUSON CUTOFF TO 2595' E OF FERGUSON CUTOFF 2595' E OF FERGUSON CUTOFF TO 470' W OF KARLING DR 470' E OF KARLING DR TO 725' W OF KARLING DR 725' W OF KARLING DR TO 170' W OF DAFFAN LN OLD MANOR RD TO JOHNNY MORRIS RD 3394' N OF BREEZY HILL DR TO DAFFAN LN 430' N OF BREEZY HILL DR TO 3394' N OF BREEZY HILL DR LOYOLA LN TO POINT NORTH DR LOYOLA LN TO COLONY LOOP DR 1520' S OF LARICAL TRL TO 840' S OF LOYOLA LN W CREST LN TO 540' S OF LARICAL TRL DAFFAN LN (N) TO W CREST LN LINDELL LN TO DAFFAN LN (N) 1710' E OF DECKER LN TO DECKER LN BLUE BLUFF RD TO 1710' E OF DECKER LN LINDELL LN TO 1015' S OF SH 130 SB SVRD 1015' S OF SH 130 SB SVRD TO 675' N OF SH 130 NB SVRD BLUE BLUFF TO FM 973 711' S OF LINDELL LN TO LINDELL LN BLOOR RD TO 711' S OF LINDELL LN BLUE BLUFF RD TO 3150' E OF BLUE BLUFF RD 3150' E OF BLUE BLUFF RD TO 1796' W OF SH 130 DECKER LN TO BLOOR RD 1796' W OF SH 130 TO 552' W OF SH 130 SVRD SB MANOR CITY LIMITS TO 5860' S OF MANOR CITY LIMITS 1050' N OF E BRAKER LN TO 1500' S OF E BRAKER LN E BRAKER LN TO 4400' S OF BRAKER LN 2500' S OF GLASS RD TO E BRAKER LN PETRICHOR BLVD TO TAYLOR LN DECKER LN TO 1015' E OF DECKER LN 1410' W OF IMPERIAL DR TO HOG EYE RD BLUE BLUFF RD TO FM 973 DECKER LAKE RD TO 2400' N OF DECKER LAKE RD 2400' N OF DECKER LAKE RD TO 770' W OF SH 130 SBFR LOYOLA LN TO FM 969 US 183 TO DECKER LN FM 969 TO 846' N OF FM 969 DECKER LN TO 235' E OF BANTAM WOODS BOLM RD TO SMITH RD US 290 TO 720' S OF US 290 ED BLUESTEIN BLVD TO ANDTREE BLVD COMMERCIAL PARK DR TO US 290 846' N OF FM 969 TO 1850' N OF FM 969 3170' S OF DECKER LAKE RD TO DECKER LAKE RD DECKER LN TO 235' E OF BANTAM WOODS E BRAKER LN TO 3200' N OF E BRAKER LN 540' S OF LARICAL TRL TO 1520' S OF LARICAL TRL 0.31 0.11 0.52 0.49 0.23 0.22 0.11 0.52 0.37 0.56 0.61 0.93 0.39 0.49 1.02 0.17 0.39 1.15 0.32 0.98 0.18 0.42 0.92 0.13 0.68 0.60 0.51 2.57 0.24 1.11 0.48 1.00 1.30 1.44 0.19 0.58 0.68 0.48 1.24 1.33 1.80 0.16 0.31 0.66 0.13 0.53 0.32 0.20 0.59 0.19 0.57 0.19 0.31 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,254,000 691,000 3,705,000 4,427,000 1,649,000 1,224,000 711,000 3,110,000 4,001,000 6,005,000 6,490,000 5,248,000 3,183,000 2,965,000 144,000 347,000 99,000 2,407,000 1,914,000 5,797,000 1,873,000 4,961,000 19,365,000 846,000 4,080,000 3,374,000 3,233,000 26,791,000 2,101,000 2,766,000 1,354,000 2,392,000 13,887,000 15,027,000 2,063,000 6,203,000 7,233,000 1,373,000 3,091,000 14,718,000 8,082,553 1,706,000 120,000 6,629,000 700,000 1,645,000 460,000 295,000 1,413,000 476,000 6,050,000 672,000 1,763,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,254,000 345,500 3,705,000 2,213,500 1,649,000 612,000 355,500 3,110,000 2,000,500 6,005,000 6,490,000 5,248,000 3,183,000 2,965,000 144,000 173,500 49,500 1,203,500 957,000 5,797,000 1,873,000 4,961,000 19,365,000 846,000 2,040,000 1,687,000 3,233,000 26,791,000 1,050,500 1,383,000 677,000 2,392,000 6,943,500 15,027,000 2,063,000 3,101,500 3,616,500 1,373,000 1,545,500 14,718,000 8,082,553 1,706,000 120,000 6,629,000 700,000 822,500 460,000 147,500 706,500 476,000 3,025,000 336,000 1,763,000 a. b. L2-2U-78 These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. ED BLUESTEIN BLVD TO ALLEYTON DR 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 81 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.G – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area G G A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Proj. # GI-1 GI-2 GI-3 GI-4 GI-5 GI-6 GI-7 GI-8 GI-9 GI-10 GI-11 GI-12 GI-13 GI-14 GI-15 GI-16 GI-17 GI-18 GI-19 GI-20 GI-21 GI-22 Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Decker Lake Rd at Blue Bluff Rd Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Interse ction DECKER LN AND LINDELL LN BLUE BLUFF RD AND DECKER LN-BLOOR RD CONNECTOR E PARMER LN / BLUE BLUFF AND SH 130 E PARMER LN AND WILDHORSE RANCH TRL E PARMER LN AND NEW CONNECTION E PARMER LN AND OLD HWY 20 N FM 973 RD AND WILDHORSE RANCH TRL N FM 973 RD AND E BRAKER LN E BRAKER LN AND FM 973-E BRAKER LN CONNECTOR E BRAKER LN AND TAYLOR LN JOHNNY MORRIS RD AND LOYOLA LN LOYOLA LN AND SENDERO HILLS PKWY DECKER LN AND COLONY LOOP LN DECKER LN AND LOYOLA LN DECKER LAKE RD AND BLUE BLUFF RD N FM 973 RD AND DECKER LAKE RD FM 969 RD AND CRAIGWOOD DR FM 969 RD AND JOHNNY MORRIS RD FM 969 RD AND NIXON LN FM 969 RD AND DECKER LN FM 969 RD AND PARK AT WOODLANDS DR LOYOLA LN AND COLONY LOOP DR/CIELO VISTA DR Cost Total Proje ct % In Se rvice Area 25% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 50% 50% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 300,000 359,000 477,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 283,000 300,000 300,000 925,000 359,000 359,000 201,000 484,000 300,000 1,120,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA G $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Cost in Se rvice Area 75,000 359,000 477,000 359,000 359,000 225,000 179,500 150,000 300,000 269,250 283,000 300,000 300,000 925,000 89,750 269,250 201,000 484,000 300,000 1,120,000 300,000 300,000 188,121,053 7,624,750 83,109 195,828,912 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 82 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.H – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area H Se rvice Area Proj. # Clas s Stre et E-7, H-1 L3-3U-S-100 BULLICK HOLLOW RD RR 2222 TO RM 620 BYPASS Limits FM 620 TO FM 2769 FM 2222 TO FM 620 L4-3U-125-TxDOT L4-6D-147-TxDOT L3-3U-S-100 L3-3U-S-100 L5-6D-125-TxDOT L5-6D-125-TxDOT n o i t c e s r e t n I s t n e m e v o r p m I E-9, H-3 H-2 H-4 H-5 H-6 H-7 Proj. # EI-15; HI-1 EI-16; HI-2 HI-3 EI-20; HI-4 HI-5, II-1 H A S RM 2222 RD CITY PARK RD CITY PARK RD N RM 620 RD N RM 620 RD Type Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements FM 620 BYPASS TO RIBELIN RANCH RD FM 2222 TO 185' E OF WEST COURTYARD DR 185' E OF WEST COURTYARD DR TO 870' W OF BRIDGE POINT FM 2222 RD TO MARSHALL FORD RD PKWY MARSHALL FORD RD TO LOW WATER CROSSING RD Inte rsection N FM 620 RD AND FM 2222 RD FM 2222 RD AND RIVER PLACE BLVD RIVER PLACE BLVD AND 6570 BLOCK FM 2222 RD AND JESTER BLVD N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND COURTYARD DR Le ngth (mi) Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cost Area 3.08 0.42 1.32 0.41 0.69 2.23 1.37 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 22,944,000 1,811,000 5,689,000 2,271,000 3,799,000 6,063,000 3,723,000 Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cost Area % In Se rvice Area 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% % In Se rvice Area 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11,472,000 1,811,000 2,844,500 2,271,000 1,899,500 6,063,000 3,723,000 291,500 250,000 359,000 75,000 7,000,000 30,084,000 7,975,500 83,109 38,142,609 $ $ $ $ $ 583,000 500,000 359,000 150,000 14,000,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA H a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 83 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.I– 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area I Service Are a Proj. # Class Stree t Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Service Are a Total Project Cos t in Service Cos t Are a L1-2U-OP-60 SHOALWOOD AVE-SHOAL CREEK BLVD CONNECTOR SHOALWOOD AVE TO SHOAL CREEK BLVD I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 I-5 I-6 I-7 I-8 I-9 I-10 I-11 I-12 I-13 I-14 I-15 I-16 I-17 I-18 I-19 I-22 I-23 I-28 I-29 I-30 I-31 I-32 I-33 I-35 I-36 I-37 I A S DT-3, I-20 DT-2, I-21 I-24, K-2 DT-11, I-25 DT-10, I-34 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4U-110 L3-4D-96 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-3U-80 L3-4D-100 L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L3-5U-80 L3-3U-80 L3-4D-116 L3-3U-100 L3-4D-80 L3-3U-74 L2-2U-60 L3-3U-74 L3-4D-94 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-110 L3-4D-80 L3-3U-78 L2-2U-92 L2-4D-120 I-26 L2-2U-OP-92 F-26, I-27 L4-4D-104-TxDOT N LAMAR BLVD AIRPORT BLVD W 51ST ST W 45TH ST W 45TH ST W 45TH ST W GUADALUPE ST N LAMAR BLVD W 43RD ST W 38TH ST GUADALUPE ST W 35TH ST CTOF E 41ST ST W 35TH ST W 38TH ST W 38TH ST RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD N LAMAR BLVD ENFIELD RD LAKE AUSTIN BLVD REDBUD TRL N LAMAR BLVD PRESSLER ST NORTHLAND DR HANCOCK DR BRUNING AVE EXPOSITION BLVD N LAMAR BLVD NUECES ST RED RIVER ST N LAMAR BLVD RED RIVER ST PRESSLER ST E 41ST ST KOENIG LN TO 200' S OF CAPITOL CT 450' N OF MIDDLE FISKVILLE RD TO 45TH ST LAMAR BLVD TO GUADALUPE ST ROSEDALE AVE TO MAYBELLE AVE MAYBELLE AVE TO MARATHON BLVD MARATHON BLVD TO AVENUE A GUADALUPE ST TO 47TH ST 30TH ST TO 45TH ST GUADALUPE ST TO N LAMAR BLVD AVENUE B TO SPEEDWAY 29TH ST TO W GUADALUPE ST PECK AVE TO RED RIVER ST JEFFERSON LN TO 35TH ST CUTOFF W 35TH ST TO W 38TH ST 35TH ST CUTOFF TO MEDICAL PKWY LAMAR BLVD TO AVENUE B DEEN KEATON TO MLK JR BLVD MLK JR BLVD TO 24TH ST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD TO 15TH ST EXPOSITION BLVD TO LAKE AUSTIN BLVD VETERANS DR TO ENFIELD RD LAKE AUSTIN BLVD TO STRATFORD DR 6TH ST TO PARKWAY (184' N OF 12TH ST) PRESSLER ST TO RESERVE RD FM 2222 RD TO BALCONES DR WEST FRANCES PL TO BULL CREEK RD DUVAL ST TO CLARKSON AVE W 35TH ST TO ENFIELD RD W 29TH ST TO SHOAL CREEK BLVD GUADALUPE ST TO 24TH ST E 32ND ST TO 31ST ST PARKFIELD TO 15TH ST 0.60 1.07 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.47 0.25 0.04 1.14 0.34 0.19 1.26 0.27 0.09 0.11 0.29 0.46 0.27 0.36 0.19 1.02 0.80 1.20 0.54 0.53 0.06 0.13 0.32 0.26 1.53 0.60 0.47 0.07 0.11 0.26 0.08 0.29 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,823,000 3,179,000 220,000 184,000 1,378,000 1,399,000 3,165,000 146,000 1,476,000 2,467,000 1,746,000 3,741,000 2,847,000 275,000 350,000 874,000 1,360,000 821,000 475,000 276,000 3,042,000 7,376,000 14,557,000 53,300,000 682,000 1,745,000 38,000 2,214,000 1,123,000 10,513,000 6,034,000 386,000 599,000 161,000 1,863,000 1,308,000 3,562,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,823,000 3,179,000 220,000 184,000 1,378,000 1,399,000 3,165,000 146,000 1,476,000 2,467,000 1,746,000 3,741,000 2,847,000 275,000 350,000 874,000 1,360,000 821,000 475,000 138,000 1,521,000 7,376,000 14,557,000 26,650,000 341,000 1,745,000 19,000 2,214,000 1,123,000 10,513,000 6,034,000 386,000 599,000 80,500 1,863,000 1,308,000 3,562,000 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. ROBERT DEDMAN TO E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD 5TH ST TO END RED RIVER ST TO INTERSTATE 35 W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD IH-35 SVRD SB TO PEARL ST 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 84 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.I– 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area I Intersection Improvements N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND COURTYARD DR s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I I A S Proj. # HI-5, II-1 FI-27, II-2 FI-28; II-3 FI-29; II-4 FI-30; II-5 FI-31; II-6 II-7 II-8 II-9 II-10 II-11 II-12 II-13 II-14 II-15 II-16 II-17 II-18 II-19 II-20 II-21 II-22 II-23 II-24 II-25 II-26 II-27 II-28 II-29 II-30 II-31 II-32 II-33 II-34 II-36 II-37 II-38 II-40 II-41 DTI-1, II-35 DTI-22, II-39 Type Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add Turn Lanes Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Inters ection Cos t in Service Are a FM 2222 RD AND MOUNT BONNELL RD FM 2222 RD AND HIGHLAND HILLS CIR FM 2222 RD AND NORTHLAND DR W KOENIG LN AND N LAMAR BLVD W KOENIG LN AND GUADALUPE ST BULL CREEK RD AND HANCOCK DR BURNET RD AND HOUSTON ST W NORTH LOOP BLVD AND WOODROW AVE W NORTH LOOP BLVD AND GROVER AVE BURNET RD AND W 49TH ST N LAMAR BLVD AND W 51ST ST W 51ST ST AND GUADALUPE ST E 51ST ST AND BRUNING AVE/DUVAL ST W 45TH ST AND BULL CREEK RD BURNET RD AND W 45TH ST N LAMAR BLVD AND W 45TH ST RED RIVER ST AND E 41ST ST W 35TH ST AND JACKSON AVE W 38TH ST AND MEDICAL PKWY W 38TH ST AND SPEEDWAY RED RIVER ST AND E 38TH HALF ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 34TH ST N LAMAR BLVD AND W 29TH ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 30TH ST ENFIELD RD AND PECOS ST WINDSOR RD AND HARTFORD RD 24TH ST AND HARRIS BLVD 24TH ST AND WINDSOR DR W 24TH ST AND SAN GABRIEL ST GUADALUPE ST AND W 24TH ST RED RIVER ST AND CLYDE LITTLEFIELD DR ENFIELD RD AND HARTFORD RD ENFIELD RD AND WEST LYNN ST W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND NUECES ST RED RIVER ST AND ROBERT DEDMAN DR EXPOSITION BLVD AND LAKE AUSTIN BLVD 6TH ST AND PATTERSON AVE N LAMAR BLVD AND SANDRA MURAIDA WAY BALCONES DR AND PARKCREST DR W 5TH ST AND WEST LYNN ST Cos t Total Project % In Service Are a 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 14,000,000 300,000 642,000 412,000 236,000 59,000 118,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 236,000 271,000 389,000 312,000 500,000 118,000 118,000 236,000 100,000 153,000 236,000 200,000 59,000 118,000 1,043,000 359,000 118,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 418,000 100,000 236,000 236,000 1,043,000 300,000 118,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA I $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,000,000 150,000 321,000 206,000 118,000 29,500 118,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 236,000 271,000 389,000 312,000 500,000 118,000 118,000 236,000 100,000 153,000 236,000 200,000 59,000 118,000 1,043,000 359,000 118,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 418,000 100,000 236,000 236,000 521,500 300,000 118,000 359,000 150,000 300,000 300,000 107,955,500 17,265,000 83,109 125,303,609 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 85 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.J– 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area J Service Area Proj. # Class Street Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost in Se rvice Cost Are a L1-2U-OP-60SPRINGDALE RD-WALDEN CIR CONNECTOR SPRINGDALE RD TO WALDEN CIR E 51ST-BUNDYHILL DR CONNECTOR E 51ST ST-NORTHDALE DR CONNECTOR REAL ST-E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD CONNECTOR REAL ST L1-2U-OP-60ALEXANDER AVE TO REAL ST CONNECTION L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92HARGRAVE ST-SOL WILSON AVE COLLECTOR L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 SOL WILSON AVE MC CLAIN ST BEDFORD ST L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 AIRPORT BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD J A S L2-2U-OP-70 AXEL LN-BLUESTEIN DR CONNECTOR AXEL LN TO BLUESTEIN DR L3-4D-120-TxDOT AIRPORT BLVD MANOR RD RANGOON RD ROGGE LN E 51ST ST E 51ST ST PECAN SPRINGS RD NORWOOD HILL RD ROGGE LN OLD MANOR RD TRACOR LN HUDSON ST HAROLD CT JAIN LN E 7TH ST SAN MARCOS ST ONION ST CHALMERS AVE GONZALES ST E 7TH ST MANOR RD SPRINGDALE RD BERKMAN DR CAMERON RD E 51ST ST MANOR RD E 7TH ST SHADY LN HARGRAVE ST TO SOL WILSON AVE CONNECTION TO REAL ST TO MLK JR BLVD US 183 TO ROCKHURST LN E 51ST ST TO SPRINGDALE RD 320' W OF CHADWYCK DR TO SPRINGDALE RD INTERSTATE 35 NB SVRD TO MUELLER BLVD ALDRICH ST TO BERKMAN DR MANOR RD TO E 51ST ST SPRINGDALE RD TO 51ST ST MANOR RD TO GLOUCESTER LN 51ST ST TO MANOR RD E 51ST ST TO BUNDYHILL DR 51ST ST TO NORTHDALE DR ALEXANDER AVE TO REAL ST ALEXANDER AVE TO RAILROAD HARGRAVE ST TO SOL WILSON AVE BEDFORD ST MCCLAIN ST TO END OAK SPRINGS DR TO SOL WILSON AVE MANOR RD TO 230' S OF SPRINGDALE RD AIRPORT BLVD TO PEREZ ST PEREZ ST TO EASTDALE DR TANNEHILL LN TO US 183 SB SVRD DELANO ST TO ED BLUESTEIN BLVD (US 183) HAROLD CT TO HAROLD CT STUART CIR TO SHADY LN 250' N OF BOLM RD TO LEVANDER LOOP ATTAYAC ST TO N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E 5TH ST TO E 4TH ST E 5TH ST TO ONION ST 5TH ST TO 6TH ST RAMOS ST TO TILLERY ST ALLEN ST TO LEVANDER LOOP ROCKHURST TO KINGS PT NORTHEAST DR TO MANOR RD GLENVALLEY DR TO CHATHAM AVE US 290 TO 51ST ST SPRINGDALE RD TO RANGOON RD DEAN KEETON TO CHESTNUT AVE INTERSTATE 35 NB TO ATTAYAC ST E 7TH ST TO E 5TH ST 0.28 1.02 0.19 0.47 0.13 0.46 0.31 0.15 0.21 0.07 0.06 0.37 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.18 1.63 0.66 1.36 0.33 0.23 0.57 0.16 0.17 0.54 1.21 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.64 0.04 0.96 0.06 0.15 0.10 1.16 0.81 0.22 0.14 0.32 0.09 1.41 0.39 1.09 0.08 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 843,000 6,095,000 921,000 1,409,000 410,000 2,153,000 1,932,000 661,000 2,024,000 273,000 405,000 2,196,000 471,000 239,000 269,000 230,000 527,000 190,000 661,000 4,892,000 469,000 3,399,000 1,969,000 1,188,000 2,437,000 701,000 789,000 735,000 3,578,000 239,000 121,000 263,000 1,038,000 7,406,000 153,000 11,099,000 756,000 1,489,000 970,000 12,801,000 7,584,000 481,000 1,250,000 3,517,000 860,000 13,011,000 3,633,000 7,987,000 285,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 843,000 6,095,000 921,000 1,409,000 410,000 2,153,000 1,932,000 661,000 2,024,000 273,000 405,000 2,196,000 471,000 239,000 269,000 230,000 527,000 190,000 661,000 4,892,000 469,000 3,399,000 1,969,000 1,188,000 2,437,000 701,000 789,000 735,000 3,578,000 239,000 121,000 263,000 1,038,000 7,406,000 153,000 11,099,000 756,000 1,489,000 970,000 12,801,000 7,584,000 481,000 1,250,000 3,517,000 860,000 13,011,000 3,633,000 7,987,000 285,000 J-1 J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 J-10 J-11 J-12 J-13 J-14 J-15 J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J-31 J-32 J-33 J-34 J-35 J-36 J-37 J-38 J-39 J-40 J-41 J-42 J-43 J-44 J-45 J-46 J-47 J-48 J-49 L3-4D-130 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L3-3U-100 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-64 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-70 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-104 L3-4D-130 L3-4D-104 L2-3U-74 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-96 L3-3U-80 L3-4D-94 L2-3U-100 L3-3U-74 L3-3U-80 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120 L1-2U-OP-60 MANSELL AVE-E 7TH ST CONNECTOR MANSELL AVE TO E 7TH ST E CESAR CHAVEZ ST PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO E 5TH ST L3-4D-140-TxDOT E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD EEASTDALE DR TO US 183 E CESAR CHAVEZ ST SAN MARCOS ST TO N PLEASANT VALLEY RD N PLEASANT VALLEY RD WEBBERVILLE DR TO E 7TH ST E 5TH ST ONION ST TO N PLEASANT VALLEY DR N PLEASANT VALLEY RD CANTERBURY ST TO LAKE c. d. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 86 Final Draft January 2020 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I J A S Proj. # DI-34; JI-1 FI-26, JI-2 JI-3 JI-4 JI-5 JI-6 JI-7 JI-8 JI-9 JI-10 JI-11 JI-12 JI-13 JI-14 JI-15 JI-16 JI-17 JI-18 JI-19 JI-20 JI-21 JI-22 JI-23 JI-24 JI-25 JI-26 JI-27 JI-28 JI-29 JI-30 JI-31 JI-32 JI-33 JI-34 JI-35 JI-36 JI-37 JI-38 JI-39 JI-40 JI-41 JI-42 JI-43 JI-44 JI-45 JI-46 JI-47 JI-48 JI-49 JI-50 JI-51 JI-52 JI-53 Table 5.J– 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area J Type Inte rse ction Cost in Se rvice Are a Intersection Improvements AIRPORT BLVD AND WILSHIRE BLVD Intersection Improvements Add U-turn Lane Intersection Improvements Roundabout Roundabout Signalize Roundabout Signalize Signalize Signalize Roundabout Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Roundabout Roundabout Roundabout Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize N IH 35 AND E ANDERSON LN E ST JOHNS AVE AND N IH 35 CAMERON RD AND E US 290 HWY GASTON PL DR AND BRIAR CLIFF DR NORTH HAMPTON DR AND GASTON PLACE DR NORTHEAST DR AND N HAMPTON DR MANOR RD AND SPRINGDALE RD BARBARA JORDAN BLVD AND MUELLER BLVD E 51ST ST AND VAUGHAN ST 51ST ST AND TILLEY ST OLD MANOR RD AND WESTMINSTER DR SPRINGDALE RD AND NORWOOD HILL RD Cost Total Project % In Service Area 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 10,000,000 10,000,000 255,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 300,000 2,300,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 2,300,000 359,000 236,000 300,000 988,000 625,000 418,000 418,000 418,000 418,000 418,000 949,000 354,000 300,000 300,000 2,300,000 595,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 118,000 359,000 359,000 595,000 118,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 118,000 150,000 300,000 359,000 418,000 418,000 713,000 300,000 654,000 118,000 359,000 418,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA J $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ MANOR RD AND ZACH SCOTT ST AIRPORT BLVD AND MANOR RD MANOR RD AND ANCHOR LN E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND COMAL ST E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND CHICON ST E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND CHESTNUT AVE E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND CEDAR AVE E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND ALEXANDER AVE AIRPORT BLVD AND E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND SPRINGDALE RD MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD AND OLDFORT HILL DR WEBBERVILLE RD AND TANNEHILL LN ROSEWOOD AVE AND HARGRAVE ST SPRINGDALE RD AND E 12TH ST HARGRAVE ST AND E 12TH ST ROSEWOOD DR AND WEBBERVILLE RD AIRPORT BLVD AND OAK SPRINGS DR 6TH ST AND SAN MARCOS ST 7TH ST AND WALLER ST E 7TH ST AND ATTAYAC ST AIRPORT BLVD AND SPRINGDALE RD SPRINGDALE RD AND GOVALLE AVE E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND SAN MARCOS ST E 6TH ST AND ROBERT T MARTINEZ JR ST E 7TH ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD AIRPORT BLVD AND SHADY LN GARDNER RD AND JAIN LN E 5TH ST AND PEDERNALES ST E 5TH ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E 2ND ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD SPRINGDALE RD AND E CESAR CHAVEZ ST E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND N PLEASANT VALLEY RD E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND LINDEN ST AIRPORT BLVD AND LEVANDER LOOP BOLM RD AND GARDNER RD E CESAR CHAVEZ ST AND CHALMERS AVE ROSEWOOD AVE AND ANGELINA ST BERKMAN DR AND PATTON LN MANOR RD AND ALEXANDER AVE 5,000,000 5,000,000 255,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 300,000 2,300,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 2,300,000 359,000 236,000 300,000 988,000 625,000 418,000 418,000 418,000 418,000 418,000 949,000 354,000 300,000 300,000 2,300,000 595,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 118,000 359,000 359,000 595,000 118,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 118,000 150,000 300,000 359,000 418,000 418,000 713,000 300,000 654,000 118,000 359,000 418,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 117,009,000 43,038,000 83,109 160,130,109 Intersection Improvements AIRPORT BLVD AND PARKWOOD RD/CRESTWOOD RD a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 87 Final Draft January 2020 BARTON CREEK BLVD 1400' N OF SOUTHWEST PKWY TO 1300' N OF HENRY MARX LN Table 5.K– 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area K Proj. # Clas s Stre e t Limits Le ngth (mi) Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cos t Area Service Are a K A S I-24, K-2 L3-3U-S-100 K-1 K-3 K-4 K-5 K-6 K-7 K-8 L2-2U-80 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-80 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-80 L3-3U-S-100 Proj. # KI-1 KI-2 KI-3 KI-4 KI-5, MI-1 KI-6, MI-2 KI-7, MI-3 KI-8, MI-4 KI-9 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I WESTLAKE DR REDBUD TRL STRATFORD DR FOSTER RANCH RD FOSTER RANCH RD WESTLAKE DR REDBUD TRL Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Dual Left Turn Lane Intersection Improvements LAKEPLACE LN TO 750' S OF THE HIGH RD LAKE AUSTIN BLVD TO STRATFORD DR MOPAC BRIDGE TO ELGIN AVE TRAVIS COUNTRY CIR TO 650' N OF SOUTHWEST PKWY 650' N OF SOUTHWEST PKWY TO SOUTHWEST PKWY LONG CAMP DR TO CITY LIMITS STRATFORD DR TO 280' E OF WESTLAKE DR 3.17 0.54 0.37 0.55 0.34 0.12 0.57 0.45 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 16,501,000 53,300,000 1,916,000 4,120,000 1,904,000 776,000 4,320,000 2,633,000 Inte rse ction Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cos t Area REDBUD TRL AND STRATFORD DR CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND PARKSTONE HEIGHTS DR WALSH TARLTON LN AND THOUSAND OAKS COVE HWY 71 AND SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHWEST PKWY AND TRAVIS COOK RD SOUTHWEST PKWY AND BELGRADE DR $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 14,000,000 300,000 477,000 359,000 201,000 150,000 300,000 1,605,000 359,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA K $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 16,501,000 26,650,000 1,916,000 4,120,000 1,904,000 776,000 4,320,000 2,633,000 14,000,000 300,000 477,000 359,000 100,500 75,000 150,000 802,500 359,000 58,820,000 16,623,000 83,109 75,526,109 % In Se rvice Are a 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% % In Se rvice Are a 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% Intersection Improvements N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND WESTLAKE DR Intersection Improvements SOUTHWEST PKWY AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR WALSH TARLTON LN AND TAMARRON BLVD a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 88 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.L – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area L Service Are a Proj. # Class Stree t Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Service Are a Total Project Cos t in Service Cos t Are a L2-2U-80 L2-2U-80 L3-4D-120-TxDOT STRATFORD DR AZIE MORTON RD S LAMAR BLVD DEL CURTO RD LIGHTSEY RD LIGHTSEY RD-BARTON SKWY CONNECTOR BARTON SPRINGS RD MOPAC TO LOU NEFF RD BARTON SPRINGS RD TO BARTON HILLS DR BARTON SPRINGS RD TO S LAMAR SVRD BLUEBONNET LN TO LIGHTSEY RD LIGHTSEY RD TO LIGHTSEY RD LIGHTSEY RD TO BARTON SKWY DAWSON DR TO W RIVERSIDE DR BARTON SPRINGS RD-CONGRESS AVE CONNECTOR BARTON SPRINGS RD TO CONGRESS AVE S 1ST ST CONNECTOR S 1ST ST TO BARTON SPRINGS TO CONGRESS CONNECTION SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT LOCAL ST 1 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT LOCAL ST 2 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT LOCAL ST 3 BARTON SPRINGS RD TO END BARTON SPRINGS RD TO END BARTON SPRINGS RD TO END BARTON SPRINGS RD CONGRESS AVE TO W RIVERSIDE DR CONGRESS AVE-BARTON SPRINGS RD CONNECTOR CONGRESS AVE TO BARTON SPRINGS RD E RIVERSIDE DR CONNECTOR E RIVERSIDE TO END PAYLOAD PASS-E ALPINE RD CONNECTOR PARKER LN-BURTON DR CONNECTOR BURTON DR-WILLOW CREEK DR CONNECTOR BURTON DR TO WILLOW CREEK DR L A S LAKESHORE BLVD-E RIVERSIDE CONNECTOR PLEASANT VALLEY DR-ELMONT DR CONNECTOR S PLEASANT VALLEY RD 440' S OF CANTERBURY RD TO 525' N OF E RIVERSIDE DR S 1ST ST W RIVERSIDE DR E RIVERSIDE DR S CONGRESS AVE ST EDWARDS DR E ALPINE RD BLUEBONNET LN ELMONT DR WILLOW HILL DR WILLOW HILL DR ELMONT DR E OLTORF ST S PLEASANT VALLEY RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD BURLESON RD WOODWARD ST SUNRIDGE DR FARO DR RIVERS EDGE WAY FARO DR GROVE BLVD VARGAS RD CARSON RIDGE BARTON SPRINGS RD BARTON SPRINGS RD W OLTORF ST W OLTORF ST W OLTORF ST E OLTORF ST LIGHTSEY RD CLAWSON RD MANCHACA RD S 1ST ST RIVERSIDE DR TO BARTON SPRINGS RD 170' W OF S 1ST ST TO S CONGRESS AVE S CONGRESS AVE TO 240' W OF NEWNING AVE BARTON SPRINGS RD TO BEN WHITE BLVD SVRD S CONGRESS AVE TO 165' W OF CARNARVON LN E ALPINE RD TO 200' E OF WAREHOUSE ROW PAYLOAD PASS TO E ALPINE RD S LAMAR BLVD TO DEL CURTO RD TOWN CREEK TO TINNIN FORD DR PARKER LN TO BURTON DR WILLOW CREEK DR TO WILLOW HILL DR PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO WICKERSHAM LN LAKESHORE BLVD TO E RIVERSIDE DR PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO ELMONT DR WICKERSHAM LN TO CROSSING PL INTERSTATE 35 TO MONTOPOLIS DR BURLESON RD TO S PLEASANT VALLEY RD SANTA MONICA DR TO BEN WHITE BLVD INTERSTATE 35 TO BEN WHITE BLVD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO SUNRIDGE DR SUNRIDGE DR TO E BEN WHITE BLVD SVRD FARO DR TO OLTORF ST RIVERS EDGE WAY TO OLTORF ST FARO DR TO MONTOPOLIS DR 280' S OF OLTORF RD TO 1160' S OF GEORGIA MEADOWS DR RIVERSIDE DR TO CARSON RIDGE DR THRASHER LN TO MAXWELL LN E BEN WHITE BLVD TO THRASHER LN S LAMAR BLVD TO LEE BARTON DR LEE BARTON DR TO DAWSON RD S 2ND ST TO DURWOOD ST EUCLID AVE TO COLLEGE AVE COLLEGE AVE TO S CONGRESS AVE S CONGRESS AVE TO REBEL RD DEL CURTO RD TO CLAWSON RD BARTON SKYWY TO FORT VIEW RD FORT VIEW RD TO BEN WHITE BLVD FORT MCGRUDER LN TO BEN WHITE BLVD LEE BARTON DR TO DAWSON RD E RIVERSIDE DR TO PENICK DR GROVE BLVD TO END END TO MONTOPOLIS DR S PLEASANT VALLEY RD-SUNRIDGE DR CONNECTOR FARO DR-MONTOPOLIS DR CONNECTOR FRONTIER VALLEY DR-BASTROP HWY CONNECTOR FRONTIER VALLEY TO BASTROP HWY FARO DR TO FARO DR TO MONTOPOLIS CONNECTION GROVE BLVD TO MONTOPOLIS DR E BEN WHITE BLVD-THRASHER LN CONNECTOR L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 L-8 L-9 L-10 L-11 L-12 L-13 L-14 L-15 L-16 L-17 L-18 L-19 L-20 L-21 L-22 L-23 L-24 L-25 L-26 L-27 L-28 L-29 L-30 L-31 L-32 L-33 L-34 L-35 L-36 L-37 L-38 L-39 L-40 L-41 L-42 L-43 L-44 L-45 L-46 L-47 L-48 L-49 L-50 L-51 L-52 L-53 L-54 L-55 L-56 L-57 L-58 L-59 L-60 L-61 L-62 L2-2U-OP-70 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-116 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L3-6D-140 L3-4D-80 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-70 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-104 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-OP-92 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-100 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-64 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-94 L1-2U-60 L1-2U-60 L2-2U-78 0.25 0.46 2.76 0.37 0.06 0.04 0.46 0.21 0.11 0.05 0.13 0.14 0.33 0.16 0.07 0.11 0.26 0.26 2.70 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.28 0.08 0.12 0.25 1.18 0.65 0.45 0.20 2.28 0.45 0.14 0.33 0.51 0.44 0.20 0.58 0.68 0.45 0.31 0.47 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.43 0.04 0.13 0.17 0.12 0.04 0.22 0.16 0.80 0.05 0.05 0.14 0.07 0.23 0.19 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,301,000 2,595,000 8,480,000 2,294,000 427,000 630,000 1,365,000 878,000 402,000 177,000 494,000 517,000 2,153,000 672,000 302,000 333,000 784,000 328,000 8,046,000 1,033,000 1,030,000 690,000 868,000 411,000 1,881,000 550,000 770,000 2,369,000 3,571,000 4,270,000 2,993,000 2,023,000 2,731,000 5,603,000 1,485,000 3,672,000 5,935,000 2,910,000 1,209,000 3,840,000 4,502,000 3,262,000 2,070,000 5,532,000 4,638,000 2,014,000 799,000 2,865,000 155,000 1,218,000 534,000 1,340,000 159,000 2,426,000 921,000 3,683,000 93,000 163,000 1,315,000 258,000 853,000 948,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,301,000 2,595,000 8,480,000 2,294,000 427,000 630,000 1,365,000 878,000 402,000 177,000 494,000 517,000 2,153,000 672,000 302,000 333,000 784,000 328,000 8,046,000 1,033,000 1,030,000 690,000 868,000 411,000 1,881,000 550,000 770,000 2,369,000 3,571,000 4,270,000 2,993,000 2,023,000 2,731,000 5,603,000 1,485,000 3,672,000 5,935,000 2,910,000 1,209,000 3,840,000 4,502,000 3,262,000 2,070,000 5,532,000 4,638,000 2,014,000 799,000 2,865,000 155,000 1,218,000 534,000 1,340,000 159,000 2,426,000 921,000 3,683,000 93,000 163,000 1,315,000 258,000 853,000 948,000 BARTON SPRINGS RD COUNTRY CLUB RD GROVE BLVD CONNECTOR FARO DR-MONTOPOLIS DR CONNECTOR a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 89 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.L – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area L Intersection Improvements S LAMAR BLVD NB AND BARTON SPRINGS RD s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I L A S Proj. # LI-1 LI-2, NI-1 LI-3 LI-4 LI-5 LI-6 LI-7 LI-8 LI-9 LI-10 LI-11 LI-12 LI-13 LI-14 LI-15 LI-16 LI-17 LI-18 LI-19 LI-20 LI-21 LI-22 LI-23 LI-24 LI-25 LI-26 LI-27 LI-28 LI-29 LI-30 LI-31 LI-32 LI-33 LI-35 LI-36 LI-37 LI-39 LI-40 LI-41 LI-34, OI-1 LI-38, PI-2 Type Extend Turn Lane Signal Modifications Signalize Signalize Extend Turn Lane Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Extend Turn Lane Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Inte rse ction BARTON SPRINGS RD AND STRATFORD DR S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND WEST GATE BLVD ROBERT E LEE RD AND RABB RD S LAMAR BLVD AND COLLIER ST S LAMAR BLVD AND W OLTORF ST S LAMAR BLVD AND BARTON SKWY MANCHACA RD AND BARTON SKWY BARTON SPRINGS RD AND DAWSON RD S 1ST ST AND W RIVERSIDE DR W RIVERSIDE DR AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S CONGRESS AVE AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S 1ST ST AND BARTON SPRINGS RD S CONGRESS AVE AND W RIVERSIDE DR W OLTORF ST AND THORNTON RD W OLTORF ST AND S 5TH ST W OLTORF ST AND S 1ST ST W OLTORF ST AND WILSON ST S CONGRESS AVE AND W OLTORF ST E OLTORF ST AND EAST SIDE DR WOODLAND AVE AND PARKER LN E OLTORF ST AND PARKER LN BURLESON RD AND S PLEASANT VALLEY RD EXT S LAKESHORE BLVD AND TINNIN FORD RD E RIVERSIDE DR AND WICKERSHAM LN E RIVERSIDE DR AND CROSSING PL E RIVERSIDE DR AND KENNETH AVE E OLTORF ST AND FARO ST EXT MONTOPOLIS DR AND HOGAN AVE E RIVERSIDE DR AND MONTOPOLIS DR GROVE BLVD AND MONTOPOLIS DR MONTOPOLIS DR AND FARO DR-MONTOPOLIS DR E OLTORF ST AND MONTOPOLIS DR CONNECTION E BEN WHITE BLVD AND MONTOPOLIS DR E RIVERSIDE DR AND FRONTIER VALLEY DR E RIVERSIDE DR AND ANISE DR RIVERSIDE DR AND CORIANDER DR Cos t Total Project % In Service Are a 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 59,000 170,000 300,000 300,000 595,000 221,000 212,000 300,000 59,000 212,000 54,000 150,000 418,000 212,000 300,000 595,000 595,000 359,000 212,000 595,000 359,000 10,000 300,000 300,000 4,500,000 315,000 300,000 300,000 118,000 418,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 171,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 477,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA L $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ BASTROP HWY AND OLD BASTROP HWY SVRD CONNECTION KINNEY ST AND BARTON SPRINGS RD AZI MORTON RD AND BARTON HILLS DR BARTON SPRINGS RD AND STERZING ST Cos t in Service Are a 59,000 85,000 300,000 300,000 595,000 221,000 212,000 300,000 59,000 212,000 54,000 150,000 418,000 212,000 300,000 595,000 595,000 359,000 212,000 595,000 359,000 10,000 300,000 300,000 4,500,000 315,000 300,000 300,000 118,000 418,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 85,500 359,000 359,000 359,000 238,500 300,000 300,000 300,000 121,770,000 15,754,000 83,109 137,607,109 c. d. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 90 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.M – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area M Service Are a Proj. # Class Stre e t Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Se rvice Area Total Proje ct Cost in Service Cost Are a BOSTON LN-REPUBLIC OF TEXAS LN CONNECTOR REPUBLIC OF TEXAS BLVD TO BOSTON LN MOUTAIN SHADOWS DR-W SH 71 CONNECTOR MOUNTAIN SHADOWS DR TO W SH 71 W SH 71-MURMURING CREEK DR CONNECTOR W SH 71 TO MURMURING CREEK DR MURMURING CREEK DR MURMERING CREEK DR TO MOWINKLE TO SH 71 CONNECTION W SH 71-MOWINKLE DR CONNECTOR W SH 71 TO MOWINKLE DR M A S M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6 M-7 M-8 M-9 M-10 M-11 M-12 M-13 M-14 M-15 M-16 M-17 M-18 M-19 M-20 M-21 M-22 M-23 M-24 M-25 M-26 M-27 M-28 M-29 M-30 M-31 M-32 M-33 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-68 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-80 L3-4U-80 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-S-80 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-6D-130 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-3U-96 L2-2U-OP-92 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT M-34, N-17 M-35 Right-of-Way WIER HILLS RD TRAVIS COOK RD VEGA AVE INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD BOSTON LN OLD BEE CAVES RD OLD BEE CAVES RD FLETCHER LN THOMAS SPRINGS RD SILVERMINE DR CIRCLE DR SCENIC BROOK DR MC CARTY LN BECKETT RD CONVICT HILL RD BRUSH COUNTRY RD MOUNTAIN SHADOWS DR CONVICT HILL RD FM 1826 RD FM 1826 RD WESTCREEK DR LATTA DR BRUSH COUNTRY RD W SLAUGHTER LN ESCARPMENT BLVD OLD FREDERICKSBURG RD BRODIE LN US 290 / SH 71 RIALTO BLVD TO OLD BEE CAVES RD OLD BEE CAVES RD TO SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHWEST PKWY TO EIGER RD SOUTHWEST PARKWAY TO INDUSTRIAL OAKS BLVD 920' N OF SH 71 SVRD WB TO SH 71 SVRD WB BOSTON LN TO US 290 370' N OF US 290 TO SH 71 US 290 TO 370' N OF US 290 OLD BEE CAVES RD TO SH 71 SH 71 TO CIRCLE DR 160' N OF RED WILLOW DR TO 500' N OF RACCOON RUN THOMAS SPRINGS RD TO WILLIAMSON CREEK DR US 290 TO 126' S OF FENTON DR W WILLIAM CANNON DR TO US 290 REYNOLDS RD TO MCCARTY LN WOODCREEK RD TO BRUSH COUNTRY RD CONVICT HILL RD TO 300' S OF WILLIAM CANNON DR OLD BEE CAVES RD TO END 515' W OF VERMILLION DR TO LOCKINVAR ST 526' N OF SUMMERVALE DR TO US 290 370' N OF BELLA VISTA TRL TO 526' N OF SUMMERVALE DR CANA CV TO BRUSH COUNTRY RD ISLANDER DR TO NAIRN DR SUMMERSET TRL TO MONTEREY OAKS BLVD MOPAC EXPWY TO BRODIE LN SH 45 WB TO LA CROSSE AVE US 290 HWY TO 350' E OF SMITH OAK TRL GRAYBUCK RD TO 350' N OF BRODIE SPRINGS TRL RM 1826 / SILVERMINE DR TO MONTEREY OAKS BLVD 0.53 0.48 0.62 0.22 0.17 0.10 0.13 3.05 0.07 0.18 0.23 1.59 0.66 0.23 0.66 0.41 0.65 0.28 0.93 0.16 0.57 0.46 0.27 0.53 0.46 0.72 0.04 0.28 0.32 1.55 2.27 1.23 0.31 0.34 4.49 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,287,000 2,576,000 6,682,000 2,472,000 1,908,000 650,000 848,000 23,482,000 8,000,000 1,103,000 1,494,000 8,388,000 3,498,000 1,210,000 3,480,000 2,350,000 3,419,000 1,407,000 6,505,000 1,015,000 3,468,000 4,062,000 1,222,000 4,055,000 1,018,000 1,595,000 168,000 1,940,000 4,113,000 22,951,000 5,005,000 14,328,000 1,806,000 2,697,000 9,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,287,000 2,576,000 6,682,000 2,472,000 1,908,000 650,000 848,000 23,482,000 8,000,000 1,103,000 1,494,000 4,194,000 1,749,000 1,210,000 3,480,000 2,350,000 1,709,500 1,407,000 6,505,000 1,015,000 3,468,000 4,062,000 1,222,000 4,055,000 1,018,000 797,500 168,000 1,940,000 4,113,000 22,951,000 2,502,500 14,328,000 1,806,000 1,348,500 9,000,000 L3-4D-120-TxDOT FM 1826 RD 4000' S OF APPALOOSA RUN TO 1800' S OF LEWIS MOUNTAIN DR a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 91 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.M – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area M Intersection Improvements SOUTHWEST PKWY AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR Proj. # KI-5, MI-1 KI-6, MI-2 KI-7, MI-3 KI-8, MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 MI-8 MI-9 MI-10 MI-11 MI-12 MI-13 MI-14 MI-15 MI-16 MI-18 MI-19 MI-20 MI-21 MI-22 MI-25 MI-26 MI-28 MI-29 MI-30 MI-31 MI-23, NI-28 MI-24, NI-33 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Dual Left Turn Lane Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signalize Inte rse ction HWY 71 AND SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHWEST PKWY AND TRAVIS COOK RD SOUTHWEST PKWY AND BELGRADE DR TERRAVISTA DR AND RIALTO BLVD W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND RIALTO BLVD HWY 71 AND MIDWOOD PKWY SH 71 AND 8660 BLK W SH 71 W SH 71 AND FLETCHER LN OLD BEE CAVES RD AND FLETCHER LN WILLIAM CANNON DR AND VEGA AVE VEGA AVE AND EIGER RD W SH 71 AND HEB ACCESS US 290 AND OLD BEE CAVES RD BECKETT RD AND CONVICT HILL RD ESCARPMENT BLVD AND DAVIS LN DAVIS LN AND S MOPAC DAVIS LN AND COPANO DR DAVIS LN AND CORRAN FERRY DR BRODIE LN AND DAVIS LN ESCARPMENT BLVD AND W SLAUGHTER LN SLAUGHTER LN AND ZUNIGA DR BRODIE LN AND W SLAUGHTER LN SPRUCE CANYON DRIVE AND FM 1826 RD SH 45 AND SPRUCE CANYON DR SH 45 AND ESCARPMENT BLVD DAVIS LN AND LATTA DR MI-27, NI-39 Intersection Improvements BRODIE LN AND VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA & RIDGEVIEW APTS M A S MI-17, NI-18 Intersection Improvements BRODIE LN AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR Intersection Improvements ESCARPMENT BLVD AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR WILLIAM CANNON DR AND BANNOCKBURN DR Total Proje ct Cost in Service Cost Are a % In Se rvice Area 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 201,000 150,000 300,000 1,605,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 750,000 300,000 501,000 300,000 100,000 359,000 283,000 300,000 666,000 359,000 142,000 418,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 283,000 1,600,000 300,000 401,000 300,000 300,000 401,000 300,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100,500 75,000 150,000 802,500 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 750,000 300,000 501,000 300,000 100,000 359,000 283,000 300,000 333,000 359,000 142,000 418,000 359,000 359,000 179,500 141,500 1,600,000 300,000 200,500 150,000 300,000 401,000 300,000 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA M 147,901,000 10,881,500 83,109 158,865,609 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 92 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.N – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area N Service Area Proj. # Class Stre et Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Service Are a Total Project Cost in Se rvice Cost Area M-34, N-17 N A S N-1 N-2 N-3 N-4 N-5 N-6 N-7 N-8 N-9 N-10 N-11 N-12 N-13 N-14 N-15 N-16 N-18 N-19 N-20 N-21 N-22 N-23 N-24 N-25 N-26 N-27 N-28 N-29 N-30 N-31 N-32 N-33 N-34 N-35 N-36 N-37 N-38 N-39 N-40 N-41 N-42 N-43 N-44 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-100 L3-4D-130 L4-6D-120 L3-3U-92 L3-3U-74 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-140-TxDOT L3-4D-140-TxDOT L3-4D-130-TxDOT L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-78 L2-3U-78 L2-2U-64 L3-3U-96 L3-3U-96 L2-2U-68 L2-2U-68 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-3U-96 L3-3U-96 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-94 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-68 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-60 L2-2U-64 L3-4D-94 L3-4D-120 OLD MANCHACA RD RIDDLE RD TO DREW LN WEST GATE BLVD MANCHACA RD S CONGRESS AVE W WILLIAM CANNON DR DAVIS LN DAVIS LN MANCHACA RD MATTHEWS LN COOPER LN S CONGRESS AVE S CONGRESS AVE CIRCLE S RD RALPH ABLANEDO DR RALPH ABLANEDO DR PEACEFUL HILL LN CULLEN LN BRODIE LN BRODIE LN RIDDLE RD MANCHACA RD MANCHACA RD MANCHACA RD MANCHACA RD BRODIE LN BRODIE LN WAYNE RIDDELL LOOP W FM 1626 RD E FM 1626 RD OLD SAN ANTONIO RD OLD SAN ANTONIO RD OLD SAN ANTONIO RD ONION CREEK PKWY ONION CREEK PKWY OLD SAN ANTONIO RD MANCHACA RD MATTHEWS LN LONGVIEW RD CAMERON LOOP GUIDEPOST TRL FOREST WOOD RD LEO ST S 1ST ST FRATE BARKER RD WESTERN TRAILS BLVD TO US 290 EB SVRD STASSNEY LN TO WILLIAM CANNON DR BEN WHITE BLVD TO WASSON DR BRODIE LN TO MANCHACA RD BRODIE LN TO GUIDEPOST TRL LEO ST TO MANCHACA RD WILLIAM CANNON DR TO SLAUGHTER LN MOUNT CARRELL DR TO COOPER LN DITTMAR RD TO MATTHEWS LN WASSON DR TO NORTH BLUFF DR NORTH BLUFF DR TO W SLAUGHTER LN WASSON DR TO NORTH BLUFF DR SHALLOT WAY TO S 1ST ST CONGRESS AVE TO SHALLOT WAY DITTMAR RD TO RALPH ABLANEDO DR RALPH ABLANEDO DR TO W SLAUGHTER LN GRAYBUCK RD TO 350' N OF BRODIE SPRINGS TRL 350' N OF BRODIE SPRINGS TRL TO SQUIRREL HOLLOW SLAUGHTER LN (E.) TO SLAUGHTER LN (W.) 560' S OF SLAUGHTER LN TO 1100' S OF OLD MANCHACA DR 1100' S OF OLD MANCHACA DR TO 280' S OF MARCUS ABRAMS RAVENSCROFT DR TO 280' S OF MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD 280' S OF MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD TO 350' S OF MORNINGSIDE BLVD LN 300' S OF TWILIGHT TRAIL TO SULLY CREEK DR SULLY CREEK DR TO FM 1626 LORD DERBY ST TO S 1ST ST 160' W OF ASHBROOK DR TO SAN LEANNA DR IH 35 SVRD TO 160' W OF ASHBROOK DR IH 35 SVRD TO E FM 1626 IH 35 SVRD TO E FM 1626 E FM 1626 TO 1700' S OF ONION CREEK PKWY OLD SAN ANTONIO RD TO 100' W OF FARRAH LN 100' W OF FARRAH RD TO 700' E OF FARRAH LN 1400' N OF ESTANCIA PKWY TO 750' S OF PURYEAR RD BEN WHITE BLVD EB SVRD TO REDD ST CHERRY MEADOW DR TO MEADOW RUN HARPERS FERRY LN TO CAMERON LOOP DAVIS LN TO LEO ST DAVIS LN TO LEO ST CAMERON LOOP TO GUIDEPOST TRL MATTHEWS DR TO DITTMAR RD RALPH ABLANDEDO DR TO W SLAUGHTER LN BUCKINGHAM GATE RD TO 330' E OF JIM THORPE LN 0.21 1.07 0.91 1.60 0.74 0.62 2.26 0.23 0.58 0.48 2.28 1.76 0.59 0.24 0.67 0.50 0.34 0.39 0.64 0.21 0.98 0.52 0.10 0.14 1.26 0.27 0.18 0.16 0.77 1.13 0.78 0.63 0.07 0.15 1.59 0.11 0.35 0.62 0.94 0.21 0.30 0.78 0.13 0.73 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 635,000 10,715,000 2,856,205 15,691,000 5,727,255 4,420,000 1,498,000 933,000 3,472,000 1,323,000 820,000 5,169,000 3,612,000 536,000 3,073,000 1,139,000 3,484,000 1,122,000 3,332,000 1,370,000 324,000 1,139,000 220,000 438,000 10,860,000 2,346,000 1,007,000 434,000 2,061,000 6,643,000 4,582,000 7,243,000 753,000 1,620,000 17,055,000 345,000 1,604,000 3,233,000 5,501,000 895,000 1,289,000 3,555,000 392,000 989,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 635,000 10,715,000 2,856,205 15,691,000 5,727,255 4,420,000 1,498,000 933,000 3,472,000 1,323,000 820,000 5,169,000 3,612,000 536,000 3,073,000 1,139,000 1,742,000 561,000 3,332,000 1,370,000 162,000 1,139,000 110,000 219,000 10,860,000 1,173,000 1,007,000 217,000 2,061,000 6,643,000 4,582,000 3,621,500 753,000 1,620,000 8,527,500 345,000 1,604,000 3,233,000 5,501,000 895,000 1,289,000 3,555,000 392,000 989,000 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 93 Final Draft January 2020 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I N A S NI-27; OI-13 MI-23, NI-28 Proj. # LI-2, NI-1 MI-17, NI-18 NI-2 NI-3 NI-4 NI-5 NI-6 NI-7 NI-8 NI-9 NI-10 NI-11 NI-12 NI-13 NI-14 NI-15 NI-16 NI-17 NI-19 NI-20 NI-21 NI-22 NI-23 NI-24 NI-25 NI-26 NI-29 NI-30 NI-31 NI-32 NI-34 NI-35 NI-36 NI-37 NI-38 NI-40 NI-41 NI-42 NI-43 NI-44 NI-45 NI-46 NI-47 NI-48 NI-49 MI-24, NI-33 MI-27, NI-39 NI-50, OI-35 Table 5.N – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area N Intersection Improvement WEST GATE BLVD AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR Signal Modifications Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signalize Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Roundabout Intersection Improvements Signal Modifications Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Signal Modification Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Interse ction S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY AND WEST GATE BLVD MANCHACA RD AND LANSING DR MANCHACA RD AND JONES RD VINSON DR AND CARDIFF DR S 1ST ST AND W ST ELMO RD S 1ST ST AND ORLAND BLVD S CONGRESS AVE AND RADAM LN SHERATON AVE AND SUBURBAN DR W STASSNEY LN AND CHERRY CREEK DR MANCHACA RD AND W STASSNEY LN W STASSNEY LN AND S 1ST ST E STASSNEY LN AND APARTMENT DRIVEWAY STASSNEY LN AND STASSNEY LN (MIRA DR) WEST GATE BLVD AND BLARWOOD DR WEST GATE BLVD AND DEATONHILL DR MANCHACA RD AND BERKELEY AVE S CONGRESS AVE AND LITTLE TEXAS LN BRODIE LN AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR WILLIAM CANNON DR AND DEATONHILL DR W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND WHISPERING OAKS DR MANCHACA RD AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND S 1ST ST W WILLIAM CANNON DR AND LUNAR DR S CONGRESS AVE AND W WILLIAM CANNON DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND CIRCLE S RD BRODIE LN AND VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA & RIDGEVIEW E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND S IH 35 APTS WEST GATE BLVD AND MANASSAS DR WEST GATE BLVD AND CAMERON LOOP MANCHACA RD AND SHILOH DR COOPER LN AND MATTHEWS LN BRODIE LN AND DAVIS LN MANCHACA RD AND DAVIS LN MANCHACA RD AND CROWNSPOINT DR S 1ST ST AND GREAT BRITAIN DR S 1ST ST AND HYDE PARK PL S CONGRESS AVE AND DITTMAR RD BRODIE LN AND W SLAUGHTER LN MANCHACA RD AND W SLAUGHTER LN W SLAUGHTER LN AND CULLEN LN S CONGRESS AVE AND W SLAUGHTER LN MANCHACA RD AND REDWATER DR S 1ST ST AND SOUTHPARK MEADOWS DR TAFT LN AND ALICE MAE LN BRODIE LN AND FRATE BARKER RD MANCHACA RD AND MARCUS ABRAMS BLVD 1ST ST AND 1ST ST (AKINS HS MAIN ENTRANCE) E FM 1626 RD AND OLD SAN ANTONIO RD INTERSTATE 35 AND ONION CREEK PKWY Cost in Se rvice Area Cost Total Project % In Service Are a 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 50% 88,000 442,000 642,000 300,000 642,000 300,000 245,000 359,000 100,000 642,000 701,000 300,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 1,209,000 642,000 666,000 300,000 583,000 300,000 1,728,000 1,043,000 300,000 1,043,000 324,000 201,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,300,000 283,000 182,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 401,000 1,043,000 142,000 543,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 477,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 44,000 442,000 642,000 300,000 642,000 300,000 245,000 359,000 100,000 642,000 701,000 300,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 1,209,000 642,000 333,000 300,000 583,000 300,000 1,728,000 1,043,000 300,000 1,043,000 324,000 100,500 179,500 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,300,000 141,500 182,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 200,500 1,043,000 142,000 543,000 179,500 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 269,250 238,500 129,122,459 22,718,250 83,109 151,923,818 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 94 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.O – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area O Se rvice Area Proj. # Clas s Stre et Limits Le ngth (mi) % In Se rvice Area Total Proje ct Cost in Se rvice Cost Area O A S L2-2U-OP-78 O-1 O-2 O-3 O-4 O-5 O-6 O-7 O-8 O-9 O-10 O-11 O-12 O-13 O-14 O-15 O-16 O-17 O-18 O-19 O-20 O-21 O-22 O-23 O-24 O-25 O-26 O-27 O-28 O-29 O-30 O-31 O-32 O-33 O-34 O-35 O-36 O-37 O-38 O-39 O-40 O-41 O-42 O-43 O-44 O-45 O-46 O-47 O-48 O-49 O-50 O-51 O-52 O-53 O-54 O-55 O-56 O-57 L2-2U-OP-92 L3-4D-140 L3-4U-92 L3-4U-88 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-116 L2-2U-68 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L4-6D-140 L4-6D-140 L4-6D-142 L2-2U-OP-78 L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L3-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-90 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-64 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-64 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L4-6D-154 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L1-2U-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L1-2U-OP-60 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-68 E RIVERSIDE DR METRO CENTER DR DIME CIR METROPOLIS DR BURLESON RD E ST ELMO RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD TERI RD MEADOW LAKE BLVD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD FM 1625 RD FM 1625 RD MC KENZIE RD E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN FM 1625 RD SASSMAN RD SASSMAN RD FM 1625 RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD BRANDT RD BRANDT RD OLD LOCKHART RD BRADSHAW RD BRADSHAW RD BRADSHAW RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD THAXTON RD SALT SPRINGS DR ALUM ROCK DR COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD ALUM ROCK DR E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN BLUFF SPRINGS RD OLD LOCKHART RD OLD LOCKHART RD OLD LOCKHART RD E MAIN ST E MAIN ST S TURNERSVILLE RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD MAUFRAIS LN BUTTON BEND RD COPPERBEND BLVD FM 1625 RD TO US 183 BURLESON RD TO END US 183 TO MCKENZIE RD 250' S OF US 290 TO US 183 FM 1625 RD TO US 183 HWY METRO CENTER DR TO US 183 METRO CENTER DR TO DIME CIR METROPOLIS DR TO BURLESON RD GRELLE LN TO 850' E OF GRELLE LN FM 1625 RD TO 5445' W OF FM 1625 RD FM 1625 RD TO 4500' W OF FM 1625 RD BLUE MEADOW DR TO QUICKSILVER BLVD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD TO E SLAUGHTER LN E SLAUGHTER LN TO 1685' S OF SLAUGHTER LN 850' E OF GRELL LN TO 2560' W OF VERTEX BLVD RUNNING WATER DR TO MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY 1760' E OF THAXTON RD TO 3775' E OF THAXTON RD 917' W OF THAXTON RD TO 2754' W OF THAXTON RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO NUCKOLS CROSSING RD 1685' S OF SLAUGHTER LN TO 655' S OF RODRIGUEZ RD ONION CREEK DR TO PEREZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DWY MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY TO 5460' E OF MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY PEREZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DWY TO NUCKOLS CROSSSING RD ST ELMO RD TO E STASSNEY LN INTERSTATE 35 TO FREIDRICH LN 5460' E OF MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY TO US 183 MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY TO FM 1625 RD MCKENZIE RD TO E SLAUGHTER LN 0.48 0.82 0.26 1.57 3.53 0.53 0.75 0.28 0.23 0.08 0.70 0.84 1.17 2.08 0.76 0.34 0.20 0.38 0.85 0.64 0.31 0.35 1.03 0.91 0.80 0.16 0.24 0.40 0.48 0.55 0.31 0.14 0.07 1.06 0.05 0.70 0.32 0.15 COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD TO 672' S OF COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD 0.13 0.68 0.21 0.66 0.28 0.27 1.27 0.14 0.55 0.24 0.84 0.61 0.82 0.82 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.28 0.54 270' W OF CHERYL LYNN RD TO 1615' S OF E SLAUGHTER LN 425' W OF GERTRUDIS LOOP TO 2000' E OF RUBY HILLS RD 2000' E OF RUBY HILLS RD TO 3285' E OF RUBY HILLS RD INTERSTATE 35 NB SVRD TO 975' W OF BRENTS ELM DR 975' W OF BRENTS ELM DR TO 660' E OF SLAUGHTER LN BEN WHITE BLVD EB SVRD TO 970' S OF ST ELMO RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD TO COPPERBEND BLVD EXT 4985' E OF OLD LOCKHART HWY TO CITY LIMITS WINTER HAVEN DR TO 430' E OF DERBY DOWNS DR INTERSTATE 35 NB SVRD TO FREIDRICH LN PARELL PATH TO S PLEASANT VALLEY RD BUTTON BEND RD TO MAUFRAIS RD COPPERBEND BLVD TO MAUFRAIS RD 590' W OF OLD LOCKHART HWY TO 430' W OF MATTHEW ST OLD LOCKHART HWY TO 4985' E OF OLD LOCKHART HWY 3000' W OF S TURNERSVILLE RD TO S TURNERSVILLE RD KLEBERG TRL TO 1000' S OF RIVER PLANTATION DR E SLAUGHTER LN TO 1615' S OF E SLAUGHTER LN CITY LIMITS TO 3000' W OF S TURNERSVILLE RD SPRINGTIME TRL TO MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY 560' N OF TEE DR TO 2560' W OF VERTEX BLVD 430' W OF MATTHEW ST TO KLEBERG TRL WILLIAM CANNON DR TO CITY LIMITS BRADSHAW RD TO TURNERSVILLE RD 560' N OF TEE DR TO SALT SPRINGS RD TURNERSVILLE RD TO CITY LIMITS THAXTON RD TO RINGSBY RD THAXTON DR TO CITY LIMITS 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,477,000 2,095,000 2,185,000 8,180,000 4,578,000 5,884,000 4,264,000 391,000 1,888,000 1,332,000 15,708,000 17,080,000 18,721,000 12,480,000 1,873,000 968,000 1,136,000 6,617,000 13,910,000 9,946,000 668,000 1,967,000 5,916,000 2,174,000 16,095,000 998,000 3,636,000 4,327,000 2,697,000 3,636,000 3,296,000 780,000 368,000 11,690,000 503,000 4,047,000 1,796,000 1,108,000 2,028,000 3,845,000 2,075,000 2,972,000 4,398,000 4,125,000 15,875,000 1,589,000 6,080,000 2,700,200 9,303,000 6,730,000 8,971,000 10,370,000 949,000 35,000 200,000 1,566,000 3,426,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,477,000 2,095,000 2,185,000 8,180,000 4,578,000 5,884,000 4,264,000 391,000 1,888,000 1,332,000 15,708,000 17,080,000 9,360,500 12,480,000 1,873,000 484,000 568,000 6,617,000 13,910,000 4,973,000 334,000 983,500 5,916,000 1,087,000 16,095,000 499,000 3,636,000 2,163,500 2,697,000 1,818,000 1,648,000 390,000 184,000 11,690,000 503,000 4,047,000 1,796,000 1,108,000 2,028,000 3,845,000 1,037,500 2,972,000 4,398,000 2,062,500 15,875,000 794,500 6,080,000 1,350,100 4,651,500 6,730,000 4,485,500 10,370,000 949,000 35,000 200,000 1,566,000 3,426,000 S IH 35 SVRD NB-FREIDRICH LN CONNECTOR NUCKOLS CROSSING RD a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 95 Final Draft January 2020 O A S s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I Proj. # LI-34, OI-1 OI-6, PI-1 NI-27; OI-13 OI-2 OI-3 OI-4 OI-5 OI-7 OI-8 OI-9 OI-10 OI-11 OI-12 OI-14 OI-15 OI-16 OI-17 OI-18 OI-19 OI-20 OI-21 OI-22 OI-23 OI-24 OI-25 OI-26 OI-27 OI-28 OI-29 OI-30 OI-31 OI-32 OI-33 OI-34 OI-36 OI-37 NI-50, OI-35 Table 5.O – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area O Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Extend Turn Lane Intersection Improvement Roundabout Intersection Improvements Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Inte rs ection E BEN WHITE BLVD AND MONTOPOLIS DR RIVERSIDE DR AND METRO CENTER DR MONTOPOLIS DR AND TRADE CENTER DR BURLESON RD AND BRECKENRIDGE DR BURLESON RD AND MC KINNEY FALLS PKWY S US 183 HWY AND BURLESON RD ST ELMO RD AND SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DR FREIDRICH LN AND PONCIANA DR TERI RD AND NUCKOLS CORSSING RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD AND E STASSNEY LN E STASSNEY LN AND NUCKOLS CROSSING RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND S IH 35 E STASSNEY LN AND BURLESON RD TO MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY CONNECTION E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND BLUFF SPRINGS RD S PLEASANT VALLEY RD AND E WILLIAM CANNON DR VOUGEOT DR AND WILLIAM CANNON DRIVE E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND SPRINGFIELD DR OLD LOCKHART HWY/BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND QUICKSILVER BLVD COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND SALT SPRINGS DR MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY AND COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD MCKINNEY FALLS PKWY AND COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND ALUM ROCK DR E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND US 183 HWY COLTON BLUFF SPRINGS RD AND FM 1625 RD MCKENZIE RD AND US 183 HWY NUCKOLS CROSSING RD AND S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD AND S PLEASANT VALLEY RD NUCKOLS CROSSING RD AND VERTEX BLVD THAXTON RD AND PANADERO DR E SLAUGHTER LN AND OLD LOCKHART RD E SLAUGHTER LN AND THAXTON RD TO OLD LOCKHART RD CONNECTION FM 1625 RD AND E SLAUGHTER LN US 183 HWY AND E SLAUGHTER LN FM 1625 RD AND SASSMAN RD INTERSTATE 35 AND ONION CREEK PKWY METROPOLIS DR AND BURLESON RD E WILLIAM CANNON DR AND RUNNING WATER DR Cost Total Proje ct % In Se rvice Area 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 75% 25% 75% 100% 75% 100% 50% 100% 75% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 201,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 465,000 583,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 465,000 71,000 201,000 201,000 902,000 1,020,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 1,500,000 418,000 359,000 359,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 359,000 477,000 300,000 300,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA O $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Cost in Se rvice Area 100,500 300,000 359,000 359,000 232,500 291,500 359,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 465,000 71,000 100,500 201,000 902,000 1,020,000 359,000 150,000 300,000 300,000 359,000 1,500,000 209,000 269,250 89,750 225,000 300,000 225,000 300,000 179,500 359,000 269,250 179,500 179,500 238,500 300,000 300,000 244,778,100 12,370,250 83,109 257,231,459 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 96 Final Draft January 2020 Table 5.P – 10-Year Street Impact RCP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area P Se rvice Are a Proj. # Class Stre et Limits Length (mi) Total Project Cost in Se rvice Cost Area FM 973-SH 71 FR-FM 973 CONNECTOR CONNECTOR SH 71 FR-FM 973 CONNECTOR SH 71-PEARCE LN CONNECTOR PEARCE LN TO 2748' N OF PEARCE LN FOUR DAUGHTERS RD L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-OP-78 L2-2U-78 L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L4-4D-120-TxDOT L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-116 L3-4D-120 L3-3U-92 L4-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L2-2U-78 L2-2U-78 L4-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 L3-4D-120 s t n e m e v o r p m I n o i t c e s r e t n I P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 P-16 P-17 P-18 P-19 P-20 P-21 P-22 P-23 P-24 P-25 P-26 P-27 P-28 P-29 P-30 P-31 P-32 P-33 P-34 P-35 P-36 P-37 PI-3 PI-4 PI-5 PI-6 PI-7 PI-8 PI-9 PI-10 PI-11 PI-12 PI-13 Proj. # OI-6, PI-1 LI-38, PI-2 HERGOTZ LN THOMPSON LN DALTON LN FALLWELL LN S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD S FM 973 RD FM 812 RD MC ANGUS RD PEARCE LN ROSS RD PEARCE LN PEARCE LN WOLF LN ROSS RD HEINE FARM RD HEINE FARM RD ROSS RD HEINE FARM RD HEINE FARM RD MC ANGUS RD MAHA LOOP RD MAHA LOOP RD ELROY RD ELROY RD ELROY RD FM 812 RD Type Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize Signalize P A S FOUR DAUGHTERS RD-HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR FOUR DAUGHTERS RD-HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR FOUR DAUGHTERS RD-HEINE FARM RD CONNECTOR FOUR DAUGHTERS RD 1050' W OF THOMPSON LN TO THOMPSON LN BASTROP HWY TO HERGOTZ LN BASTROP HWY SVRD TO CITY LIMITS SH 71 TO GUERRERO DR BILL PRICE RD TO 680' S OF BILL PRICE RD 680' S OF BILL PRICE RD TO 489' S OF FINCHER RD 489' S OF FINCHER RD TO BURLESON RD BURLESON RD TO 614' S OF LINDA VISTA DR 614' S OF LINDA VISTA DR TO FM 812 RD CITY LIMITS TO 400' S OF S FM 973 RD FM 973 RD TO 89' W OF FM 973 RD FM 973 TO SH 71 SVRD TO FM 973 SH 71 SVRD TO FM 973 PIMILCO DR TO ROSS RD (WEST) PEARCE LN TO CITY LIMITS ROSS RD (WEST) TO 822' E OF WELSH WAY 2463' E OF KELLAM RD TO 1809' W OF KELLAM RD PEARCE LN TO 9014' S OF SH 71 PEARCE LN TO 1215' S OF MEURER LN PEARCE LN TO HEINE FARM RD ROSS RD TO 409' E OF ROSS RD 322' N OF FERRYSTONE GLEN TO 409' E OF ROSS RD APPERSON ST TO MCANGUS RD 453' S OF STONEY MEADOW DR TO 322' N OF MCANGUS RD TO 1585' N OF MCANGUS RD FERRYSTONE GLEN ELROY RD TO 2880' S OF ROSS RD HEINE FARM RD TO 3928' E OF HEINE FARM RD PEARCE LN TO 2400' S OF PEARCE LN CITY LIMITS TO FOUR DAUGHTERS RD TO HEINE 1970' W OF MAHA LOOP RD TO 335' E OF MAHA LOOP FARM RD CONNECTOR FOUR DAUGHTERS RD TO 2052' W OF FOUR RD PEARCE LN TO 426' N OF FAGERQUIST RD DAUGHTERS RD 346' W OF KELLAM RD TO 3658' W OF KELLAM RD 346' W OF KELLAM RD TO 499' E OF KELLAM RD 499' E OF KELLAM RD TO FAGERQUIST RD 0.20 0.78 0.77 0.35 0.13 0.63 1.56 0.50 0.72 0.48 0.02 0.57 1.33 0.70 0.83 0.91 0.34 0.52 1.27 1.25 0.79 0.08 0.08 0.44 0.34 0.30 0.90 0.74 0.45 0.30 0.44 0.39 0.85 0.63 0.14 0.42 0.33 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,124,000 4,438,000 5,073,000 1,984,000 307,000 1,507,000 3,710,000 1,193,000 1,721,000 1,147,000 95,000 6,134,000 14,238,000 7,339,000 10,083,000 9,492,000 1,823,000 6,009,000 17,594,000 1,782,000 8,667,000 523,000 446,000 5,368,000 2,000,000 1,782,000 5,608,000 6,454,000 4,857,000 3,181,000 2,638,000 2,282,000 10,177,000 10,920,000 1,455,000 4,452,000 786,000 1,124,000 4,438,000 5,073,000 1,984,000 153,500 1,507,000 1,855,000 1,193,000 860,500 573,500 95,000 6,134,000 14,238,000 3,669,500 10,083,000 9,492,000 911,500 6,009,000 17,594,000 891,000 4,333,500 523,000 223,000 2,684,000 1,000,000 891,000 2,804,000 3,227,000 4,857,000 3,181,000 1,319,000 1,141,000 5,088,500 5,460,000 1,455,000 2,226,000 393,000 % In Service Area 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% % In Service Area 25% 50% 75% 100% 50% 75% 50% 75% 100% 50% 100% 50% 25% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ L4-4D-120-TxDOT 670' W OF COTA BLVD TO 1057' E OF COTA BLVD Interse ction Total Project Cost in Se rvice Cost Area Intersection Improvement S US 183 HWY AND BURLESON RD BASTROP HWY AND OLD BASTROP HWY SVRD S FM 973 RD AND SH 71 TO FM 973 CONNECTION TO FM CONNECTION FM 973 RD AND SH 71 TO FM 973 CONNECTION 973 CONNECTION Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement S FM 973 RD AND PEARCE LN FM 973 RD AND BURLESON RD/ELROY RD Intersection Improvement PEARCE LN AND SH 130 PEARCE LN AND ROSS RD ELROY RD AND ROSS RD PEARCE LN AND KELLAM RD ELROY RD AND KELLAM RD FM 812 RD AND CIRCUIT OF THE AMERICAS BLVD PEARCE LN AND WOLF LN $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 583,000 477,000 300,000 300,000 583,000 324,000 477,000 300,000 359,000 925,000 359,000 300,000 359,000 Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Street Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA P 145,750 238,500 225,000 300,000 291,500 243,000 238,500 225,000 359,000 462,500 359,000 150,000 89,750 128,684,500 3,327,500 83,109 132,095,109 a. b. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Roadway Capacity Projects within the City of Austin. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 97 Final Draft January 2020 F. Service Unit Calculation The basic service unit for the computation of Austin’s Street Impact Fees is the vehicle-mile of travel during the afternoon peak-hour (as explained on Pg. 63). To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle-miles of travel for the service area for the ten-year period. The growth in vehicle-miles from 2017 to 2027 is based upon projected changes in residential units and employment for the period. To determine this growth, estimates of residential units, basic employment, service employment, and retail employment for 2017 were made, along with growth projections for each of these demographic statistics through 2027. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report details the growth estimates used for impact fee determination. For the purposes of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-residential. For residential land uses, the existing and projected number of dwelling units are estimated. The number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor (discussed in more detail below) to compute the vehicle-miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor indicates the average amount of demand created by the residential land uses in the service area. For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report provides existing and projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of employment – basic, service, and retail. These categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non-residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of employees, because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 98 Final Draft January 2020 is known at the time of application for any development that would require the assessment of an impact fee. The existing and projected land use assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle-miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle-miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources – the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition and the National Household Travel Survey performed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. For example, a stop at a nearby supermarket on the way home from work does not create a new trip onto the roadway network. These trips are called pass-by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail trip generation rates to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) long-range transportation model and supplemented with the National Household Travel Survey conducted by the FHWA. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 99 Final Draft January 2020 The computation of the transportation demand factor is based on the following equation: Variables: TDF = T 1(* - P b *) L max where... L max = *(min L OD )6or TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), T Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips), Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) = Average Trip Length (miles), and The maximum trip length was limited to six (6) miles based on the maximum trip length within each service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles, and the service areas within Austin are closely approximated with a six (6) mile distance. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin-destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Street Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Austin to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips twice as both residential and non-residential trips, a 50% origin-destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is assessed to each land use, and the total trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the National Household Travel Survey. To further characterize trip lengths, separate trip lengths were developed for each land use both within and outside “the loop” that highways form around Austin, defined by the boundary of US 183, SH 71 (Ben White Blvd), and SH 360 (Capital of Texas Highway). These lengths were developed based on the CAMPO long-range transportation model. Service Areas considered inside “the loop” are Service Areas F, I, J, DT, and L. All other Service Areas are considered outside “the loop”. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 100 Final Draft January 2020 Table 6 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Table 6. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Residential, Single Family Residential, Multifamily Service Retail T Pb Linside Loutside Lmax, inside* Lmax, outside* TDF, inside TDF, outside 0.99 0% 5.81 8.59 2.90 4.30 2.87 4.26 0.56 0% 5.81 8.59 2.90 4.30 1.62 2.41 Basic 0.63 0% 6.15 12.89 3.07 6.00 1.93 3.78 1.15 0% 7.42 6.76 3.71 3.38 4.27 3.89 3.81 34% 5.82 6.35 2.91 3.18 7.30 7.98 * Lmax is less than 6 miles for residential and retail land uses; therefore this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for these land uses. Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), T = Pass-By Discount (% of trips), Pb Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) = Average Trip Length (miles), and The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 7. This table shows the growth in total vehicle-miles by service area between the years 2017-2027. To align with the mode shift goals of the ASMP (50% of trips my other methods than driving alone), a reduction was applied to transportation demand to reflect the mode shift goals of the City by applying a 50% reduction factor (the goal of the ASMP) to areas that are within a walkable distance of existing or proposed Transit in each service area. A ratio was calculated to determine the percentage of land in each Service Area within 1/8 mile of High Frequency Transit (corresponding to Capital Metro’s 15-minute routes) and within ¼ mile of High Capacity Transit (routes defined in Project Connect’s System Vision Plan). Adjusted Demand is calculated as Unadjusted Demand minus a portion of Unadjusted Demand near transit (Unadjusted Demand * Near Transit % * 50%). Exhibit 5 shows transit routes used. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 101 Final Draft January 2020 Exhibit 5 – High Frequency Transit and High Capacity Transit Routes 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 102 Final Draft January 2020 ) ) % 0 5 ( r o t c a F n o i t c u d e R * t i s n a r T r a e N a e r A * d n a m e D d e t s u d a n U j ( j - d n a m e d d e t s u d a n U = d n a m e D d e t s u d A j l : e b a T n i l s e u a v m o r f d e t a u c a c n o i t a u q E l l . P M S A n i n w o h s s a t i s n a r T y c n e u q e r F h g H i f o e l i / m 8 1 d n a t i s n a r T y t i c a p a C h g H i f o e l i / m 4 1 n h i t i w a e r a e c v r e S n i i a e r a d n a l l l t y b d e a u c a c d n a m e d d e t s u d A j . t i s n a r t r a e n s a e r a n i s a e r a e c v r e s f i o n o i t r o p o r p e h t r o f d n a m e d n i n o i t c u d e r % 0 5 a s t c e l f e r . d n a m e d d e j t s u d a n u m o r f g n i t c a r t b u s d n a r o t c a f n o i t c u d e r y b d n a t i s n a r t r a e n a e r a e h t y b d n a m e d d e j t s u d a n u g n y p l i i t l u m e s u d n a l h c a e r o f t e e f e r a u q s d n a s u o h t f o r e b m u n e h t y b r o t c a F d n a m e D n o i t a t r o p s n a r T g n y p l i i t l i a e r A e c v r e S h c a e r o f l s a o t t e l i l m - e c h e v i l a i t i n e d s e r - n o n s u p l l a i t t e a r n o i t a r e n e g p i r t d n a e s u d n a l i g n s u o H d e h c a e D y t l i i i l m a F e g n S g n s u ) T E M V U L m o r f ( r o t c a F d n a m e D n o i t t e a r n o i t a r e n e g p i r t d n a e s u d n a l ) e s R i - w o L ( g n s u o H y i l i m a f i t l i u M g n s u ) T E M V U L m o r f ( r o t c a F d n a m e D n o i t s e e F t c a p m I t e e r t S r o f s n o i t p m u s s A e s U d n a L 7 1 0 2 n i t s u A f o y t i e s u d n a l h c a e r o f T E M V U L m o r f s r o t c a F d n a m e D n o i t a t r o p s n a r T d n a t e a r n o i t t e a r n o i t a r e n e g p i r t d n a e s u d n a l l a i r t s u d n I t h g L i l a r e n e G o t s d n o p s e r r o c ' i c s a B ' t e a r n o i t a r e n e g p i r t d n a e s u d n a l e c i f f O l a r e n e G o t s d n o p s e r r o c ' i e c v r e S ' t e a r n o i t a r e n e g p i r t d n a e s u d n a l t r e n e C g n p p o h S o i t s d n o p s e r r o c ' l i t a e R ' s e e F t c a p m I t e e r t S r o f s n o i t p m u s s A e s U d n a L 7 1 0 2 n i t s u A f o y t i s t i n u g n i l l e w d f o r e b m u n e h t y b F D T g n y p l i i t l u m y b d e a u c a C 4 t l l a t r o p s n a r T 2 a t r o p s n a r T 3 C m o r F 1 : s e t o N a r e n e g p i r T 6 C m o r F 5 7 8 9 t u m y b d e a u c a C 0 1 l l f t o e g a n e c r e P 2 1 t n e m t s u d A 3 1 j i n e d s e R 1 1 s n o i t c e j o r P t h w o r G r a e Y - 0 1 . 7 e l b a T I T S N A R T E T S U J D A R A E N A E R A - H E V D I 2 1 T S N A R T L A T O T I E L C H E V 1 1 S E L M I 3 1 I M 8 4 2 2 3 , 2 8 9 4 5 , 8 2 0 1 3 , 9 5 1 5 8 , 7 4 9 9 2 , 0 1 0 5 2 , 3 4 1 7 6 , 6 3 1 0 1 , 6 3 3 4 2 , 5 2 6 6 2 , 8 3 9 7 , 0 3 1 1 3 , 5 9 8 6 4 , 1 6 2 2 5 , 8 1 8 2 6 , 3 2 8 8 4 , 9 5 2 5 2 , % 0 % 0 % 4 3 % 6 1 % 0 % 6 1 % 1 1 % 0 % 3 4 % 5 5 % 0 % 5 4 % 5 % 9 2 % 5 1 % 1 % 8 8 8 4 2 2 3 , 2 8 9 4 5 , 9 5 4 7 3 , 4 7 3 2 9 , 7 4 9 9 2 , 4 9 1 7 2 , 7 4 0 1 7 , 6 3 1 0 1 , 3 4 0 1 3 , 9 0 8 6 3 , 5 4 9 7 , 2 6 0 0 4 , 4 6 1 8 4 , 5 8 1 1 6 , 7 4 7 7 6 , 8 6 0 9 4 , 8 4 0 5 4 , 9 2 3 7 1 , 2 3 3 6 2 , 4 2 9 1 2 , 4 9 4 6 5 , 0 2 4 1 1 , 0 9 1 7 1 , 4 1 6 5 3 , 0 5 6 5 , 7 5 0 6 1 , 4 4 9 2 1 , 5 3 5 3 , 4 9 8 9 1 , 5 0 8 5 2 , 4 4 1 7 3 , 3 8 4 8 3 , 8 2 9 0 3 , 0 4 9 8 3 , 3 6 5 1 1 , 1 0 8 8 1 , 7 5 4 2 1 , 3 3 7 3 2 , 0 5 3 7 , 1 9 1 0 1 , 9 8 6 5 1 , 2 3 7 5 2 0 1 , 1 6 4 8 , 5 9 1 2 , 9 4 2 1 1 , 9 5 3 6 1 , 4 6 2 2 2 , 4 4 9 1 3 , 1 6 7 1 2 , 4 6 6 5 , 8 9 5 4 , 3 5 7 8 , 4 3 7 3 , 2 4 5 6 , 0 6 6 5 , 9 0 7 5 , 7 5 2 4 , 8 6 2 1 , 8 0 9 7 , 5 7 3 7 , 9 6 9 3 1 , 8 7 7 3 1 9 3 , 6 9 0 9 , 4 9 8 9 2 , 2 0 1 3 3 9 2 , 4 1 7 6 3 3 7 5 4 2 4 - 1 9 6 2 2 2 7 7 3 7 1 7 0 2 , 1 1 9 1 6 7 5 , 4 5 2 5 , 0 5 - 4 1 8 2 1 , 7 4 9 9 1 , 0 5 6 3 1 , 5 7 2 6 , 1 8 3 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 0 3 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 0 3 7 . 0 3 7 . 8 9 7 . 0 3 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 0 3 7 . 5 1 1 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 7 2 4 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 7 2 4 . 7 2 4 . 9 8 3 . 7 2 4 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 9 8 3 . 7 2 4 . 3 6 0 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 3 9 1 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 3 9 1 . 3 9 1 . 8 7 3 . 3 9 1 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 3 9 1 . , 0 0 0 9 4 4 1 , , 0 0 0 6 5 4 1 , , 0 0 0 6 5 3 2 , , 0 0 0 2 8 1 1 , , 0 0 0 1 6 5 1 , , 0 0 0 0 5 2 2 , 0 0 0 7 2 , 0 0 0 6 7 7 , 0 0 0 9 8 1 , , 0 0 0 4 7 9 2 , , 0 0 0 4 9 2 3 , , 0 0 0 7 7 2 5 , 0 0 0 1 2 9 , , 0 0 0 0 6 9 , 0 0 0 6 9 3 1 , , 0 0 0 2 3 5 1 , 0 0 0 9 8 , 0 0 0 7 3 2 , , 0 0 0 6 6 9 1 , , 0 0 0 9 0 5 3 , , 0 0 0 0 6 6 1 , , 0 0 0 5 0 4 1 , , 0 0 0 7 3 3 1 , 0 0 0 4 , , 0 0 0 5 5 4 1 , , 0 0 0 9 5 1 1 , 0 0 0 5 7 2 , , 0 0 0 7 9 9 , 0 0 0 6 2 3 , 0 0 0 1 4 5 1 , , 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 , , 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 , , 0 0 0 6 9 8 1 , , 0 0 0 0 9 7 2 , , 0 0 0 1 9 5 3 , 0 0 0 1 1 - , 0 0 0 7 4 , 0 0 0 7 1 1 , 0 0 0 9 1 , 0 0 0 2 8 3 , 0 0 0 8 4 5 , 0 0 0 1 4 2 , , 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 , , 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 4 2 5 1 , , 0 0 0 7 2 7 2 , , 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 , , 0 0 0 0 9 3 1 , , 0 0 0 6 4 2 1 , , 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 6 2 - , L A T O T I L A T E R I E C V R E S I C S A B I 9 L A T E R I 8 E C V R E S I 7 C S A B I L A T E R I E C V R E S I C S A B 4 S E L M I 9 1 9 4 1 , 0 5 6 8 2 , 5 3 5 5 1 , 0 8 8 5 3 , 7 2 5 8 1 , 4 0 0 0 1 , 3 3 4 5 3 , 6 8 4 4 , 6 8 9 4 1 , 5 6 8 3 2 , 0 1 4 4 , 8 6 1 0 2 , 9 5 3 2 2 , 1 4 0 4 2 , 4 6 2 9 2 , 0 4 1 8 1 , 8 0 1 6 , 3 F D T 6 5 0 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 2 6 1 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 2 6 1 . 2 6 1 . 1 4 2 . 2 6 1 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 1 4 2 . 2 6 1 . s t i n U 1 3 8 4 , 2 2 0 8 , 3 1 3 5 , 3 8 0 5 , 0 9 4 4 , 0 8 5 5 , 9 4 7 4 , 4 8 6 9 8 9 7 , 0 2 9 9 , 4 3 7 2 2 7 0 1 , 3 4 6 4 , 6 6 0 7 , 3 6 2 5 , 9 9 3 2 , 7 9 7 3 , 5 8 2 1 9 , I I - 0 1 S E L M E L C H E V L A T N E D S E R N O N - I I 6 R O T C A F D N A M E D . S N A R T 5 T E E F E R A U Q S L A T N E D S E R N O N - I I I I - S E L M E L C H E V L A T N E D S E R I I I E L C H E V e t a R p i r T y l i m a F - i t l u M e t a R p i r T l e g n S i s t i n U y l i m a F I E C V R E S A E R A j 1 s n o i t c e o r P h t w o r G 7 2 0 2 - 7 1 0 2 7 3 7 1 6 6 , , 7 5 4 2 4 7 , 3 8 6 5 1 4 2 0 4 3 3 2 , 6 8 4 6 3 1 , 5 9 7 5 4 , , 0 0 0 3 2 8 9 2 , , 0 0 0 4 4 8 3 3 , , 0 0 0 6 8 4 2 1 , 4 7 7 6 2 3 , 5 5 6 , 3 3 l s a t o T 2 F D T 9 9 0 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 7 8 2 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 7 8 2 . 7 8 2 . 6 2 4 . 7 8 2 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 7 8 2 . 8 4 2 2 3 , 2 8 9 4 5 , 8 2 0 1 3 , 9 5 1 5 8 , 7 4 9 9 2 , 0 1 0 5 2 , 3 4 1 7 6 , 6 3 1 0 1 , 6 3 3 4 2 , 5 2 6 6 2 , 8 3 9 7 , 0 3 1 1 3 , 5 9 8 6 4 , 1 6 2 2 5 , 8 1 8 2 6 , 9 6 7 7 8 1 2 , 1 4 6 7 4 5 5 , 9 0 8 1 , 6 3 3 1 3 6 5 , 6 6 6 2 1 7 6 1 7 2 , 0 2 6 5 7 9 2 2 6 2 , 6 4 6 1 , 2 9 8 3 , 1 0 9 2 , 5 1 - 8 4 2 , 2 3 2 8 9 , 4 5 9 5 4 , 7 3 4 7 3 , 2 9 7 4 9 , 9 2 4 9 1 , 7 2 7 4 0 , 1 7 6 3 1 , 0 1 3 4 0 , 1 3 9 0 8 , 6 3 5 4 9 7 , 2 6 0 , 0 4 4 6 1 , 8 4 5 8 1 , 1 6 7 4 7 , 7 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P T D A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O ) 7 2 0 2 - 7 1 0 2 ( E S A E R C N I I F O S E L M E L C H E V - I I T S N A R T D E T S U J D A I S E L M H E V - I S E L M H E V - I E C V R E S A E R A 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 103 Final Draft January 2020 Table 7 (Continued). 10-Year Growth Projections Vehicle Miles of Increase (2017-2027) 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 104 Final Draft January 2020 V. STREET IMPACT FEE CALCULATION A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Pe r Service Unit This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Street Impact Fee RCP costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 8 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for each service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. The calculation of the maximum assessable impact fee is shown in Table 9. The Street Impact Fee RCP consists of both roadway segment and intersection improvements. The roadway segment component is referred to as the “Roadway Impact Fee RCP,” while the intersection component is referred to as the “Intersection Impact Fee RCP.” Line 1 Table 8. Maximum Assessable Street Impact Fee Computation Title Description Total Vehicle-Miles of Capacity Added by the Street Impact Fee RCP The total number of vehicle-miles added to the service area based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Appendix B – RCP Units of Supply) Each project identified in the RCP will add a certain amount of capacity to the City’s roadway network based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within each service area. 2 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Demand A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities upon which capacity is being added. (from Appendix B – RCP Units of Supply) A number of facilities identified in the RCP have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 105 Final Draft January 2020 3 Net Amount of Vehicle- Miles of Capacity Added A measurement of the amount of vehicle-miles added by the Street Impact Fee RCP that will not be utilized by existing demand (Line 1 – Line 2) This calculation identifies the portion of the Street Impact Fee RCP (in vehicle-miles) that may be recoverable through the collection of impact fees. Total Cost of the 4 Roadway Impact Fee RCP within the Service Area The total cost of the roadway projects within each service area (from Table 5: 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections) This line simply identifies the total cost of all the roadway projects identified in each service area. Cost of Net Capacity Supplied The total Roadway Impact Fee RCP cost (Line 4) prorated by the ratio of Net Capacity Added (Line 3) to Total Capacity Added (Line 1). [(Line 3 / Line 1) * (Line 4)] Using the ratio of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee RCP available to serve future growth to the total vehicle-miles added, the total cost of the RCP is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding existing usage and deficiencies). Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage The difference between the Total Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee RCpP (Line 4) and the Cost of the Net Capacity supplied (Line 5). (Line 4 – Line 5) This line is provided for information purposes only – it is to present the portion of the total cost of the Street Impact Fee RCP that is required to meet existing demand. Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand over Ten Years Based upon the growth projection provided in the Land Use Assumptions, an estimate of the number of new vehicle-miles within the service area over the next ten years. (from Table 6) This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle-miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next ten years. Percent of Service Area within Transit walking distance A ratio was calculated for each Service Area to represent the percent of land within walking distance of existing or proposed Transit. (from Table 7) This line presents the ratio of land within a service area within walking distance of existing or proposed transit. Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand over Ten Years Transit Adjusted Based upon the growth projection provided in the Land Use Assumptions, an estimate of the number of new vehicle-miles within the service area over the next ten years, adjusted to reflect mode shift to transit trips. (from Table 7) 5 6 7 8 9 This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle-miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next ten years, adjusted to reflect anticipated mode shift to transit. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 106 Final Draft January 2020 10 11 Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth Chapter 395 Check The result of dividing Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand (Line 9) by the Net Amount of Capacity Added (Line 3), limited to 100% (Line 11). This calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is attributable to new growth. In order to ensure that the vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee RCP do not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the amount of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee RCP exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next ten years, the Roadway Impact Fee RCP cost is reduced accordingly. Cost of Roadway Impact Fee RCP Attributable to 12 New Growth The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 5) by the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100% (Line 11). This value is the total Roadway Impact Fee RCP project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. 13 Total Cost of the Intersection Impact Fee RCP within the Service Area The total cost of the intersection projects within each service area (from Table 4: 10-Year Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections) This line simply identifies the total cost of all the intersection projects identified in each service area. Percent of Intersection Capacity Added Attributable to New 14 Growth The result of dividing Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Transit Adjusted (Line 9) by the transit adjusted vehicle-mile carrying capacity in each service area. In order to ensure that the capacity added by the Intersection Impact Fee RCP does not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, the anticipated vehicle mile growth in each service area is calculated as a percentage of the vehicle-mile carrying capacity. 15 Cost of Intersection Impact Fee RCP Attributable to New Growth The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 11) by the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth (Line 12). (Line 11 * Line 12) This value is the total Intersection Impact Fee RCP project cost (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. 16 Cost of Street Impact Fee RCP Attributable to New Growth The result of adding the Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee RCP Attributable to new growth (Line 10) to the Cost of the Intersection Impact Fee RCP Attributable to new growth (Line 13). (Line 10 + Line 13) This value is the total Street Impact Fee RCP project cost (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 107 Final Draft January 2020 17 Existing Escrow Fund Balance The available escrow funds in each service area as of November 1, 2019. This line represents the credit given for developer contributions and is a cash balance for all funds available to the City of Austin. 18 Cost of the Street Impact Fee RCP Attributable to New Growth less Developer Contributions The sum of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, less developer contributions. (Line 16 – Line 17 + Study Cost per Service Area) This line identifies the portion of the cost for identified Street Impact Fee eligible projects that are attributable to new growth (less developer contributions. This is the amount used to divide by the total new demand over ten years (transit adjusted) to determine the pre-credit, pre-financing maximum fee per service unit. The cost of the study, divided evenly over the 17 Service Areas, is included in this cost as a recoverable cost as allowed per Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code 19 Pre-Credit, Pre-Financing Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Cost of the RCP Attributable to New Growth less Developer Contributions (Line 18) by the Transit Adjusted Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 9). (Line 18 / Line 9) This line represents the maximum fee assessable by state law prior to credits given for ad valorem taxes and for additional cost of financing less interest earnings on debt. It is anticipated that these maximum fees per service unit will increase following this calculation. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 108 Final Draft January 2020 B. Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan for Street Impact Fees to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code requires: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the transportation improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the transportation improvements plan…” The plan is summarized, as prepared by NewGen Strategies in Appendix C and Appendix D, Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit. The following table summarizes the portions of Table 8 that utilize this credit calculation. Line 20 21 22 23 24 Title Financing Costs Interest Earnings Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes Recoverable Cost of the Street Impact Fee RCP and Financing Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit Description (from Appendix C – Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit) (from Appendix C – Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit) A credit for the portion of ad valorem taxes projected to be generated by the new service units, as per Section 395.014 of the Local Government Code. (from Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit) The Cost of the RCP Attributable to New Growth (Line 18) plus the Financing Costs (Line 20) and the difference from Interest Earnings (Line 21) and the Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes (Line 22). (Line 18 + Line 20 + Line 21 + Line 22) Found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of the RCP and Financing (Line 23) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 9). (Line 23 / Line 9) 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 109 Final Draft January 2020 C. Maximum Assessable Impa ct Fee Determination The impact fee determination method employed by NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC is developed through a financial based model, which fully recognizes the requirements of Chapter 395, including the recognition of cash and/or debt financing, interest earnings, fund balances, and applicable credits associated with the use of ad valorem taxes. In developing the components of the financial model several assumptions must be made, including the following: · Financing o Method of financing (i.e. cash or debt financing) o The level of financing (e.g. 100% debt) o Cost of financing o Debt repayment structure Timing and Level of Expenditures and Revenues · · · Interest Earnings · Annual Vehicle Mile Growth Portion of Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Used to Fund Impact Fee Street Improvements The assumptions employed in the maximum assessable impact fee determination provide a reasonable basis for forecasting; however, it must be emphasized that these assumptions may not necessarily reflect actual future conditions. To address this, Chapter 395 requires the monitoring of impact fees through the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and allows for the option to update or revise impact fees to reflect the actual implementation of the impact fee program. Once the cost of capacity added that is attributable to growth (Table 9 - line 18) is determined, it must then be decided how the cost will be financed: cash and/or debt. For any previously funded projects, whether partially funded or in full, actual costs of capital have been included. Based on discussions with City staff, unless specific funding has already been determined, it is assumed that the City will debt finance 80% of the future project costs, and the remaining 20% with cash. For debt financing, the cost of financing is based on the City 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 110 Final Draft January 2020 staff estimates of future debt costs for bonds issued with 20-year terms, as shown in Appendix D. Debt service payments for each future debt issue are assumed to remain constant over the issue’s term. Currently, the exact timing and annual level of cash capital expenditures over the forecast period is indeterminate; therefore, it is assumed that capital expenditures will occur in equal amounts over the 10-year program period. It is also assumed that for debt-financed capital projects, the City will expend debt proceeds over a 3-year timeframe. For the calculation of the maximum assessable impact fee, debt is assumed to be issued in equal amounts for each year. In order to recognize the full amount of debt to be issued for the cost of capacity added that is attributable to growth during the 10-year period, a portion of years 8, 9, and 10 are assumed to be spent in the final 3 years. Because debt is issued over 20-year terms and impact fees developed herein are to be charged over a 10-year period, sufficient fund balance must be generated to meet the future debt service obligations. Fund balances were identified for each service area as a potential source for the current Impact Fee CIP. Because of the generation of the fund balance, excess monies will be available for interest earnings. Chapter 395 states that interest earnings are funds of the impact fee account and are to be held to the same restrictions as impact fee revenues. Therefore, in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund only impact fee eligible improvements, interest earnings are credited against the costs recoverable through impact fees. It should be noted that Chapter 395 does not require the upfront recognition of interest earnings in the impact fee determination; however, in an effort to acknowledge the time value of the impact fee payers’ monies, interest earnings have been credited. Interest is assumed to be earned at an annual rate of 1.44% per City staff. As with the timing and level of the capital expenditures over the 10-year forecast, the timing and annual level of vehicle mile growth over the 10-year program period is indeterminate at 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 111 Final Draft January 2020 the present time. As such, it is assumed that vehicle mile growth will be consistent over the 10- year forecast. Chapter 395 requires a plan for awarding either a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and/or utility service revenues generated by new vehicle miles during the program period that are used for payment of improvements that are included in the Street Impact Fee CIP. As an alternative, a credit equal to 50% of the total cost of implementing the Street Impact Fee CIP may be used. The City has elected to pursue the determination of a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax revenues generated by new vehicle miles during the program period that are used for payment of improvements that are included in the Street Impact Fee CIP. It should be noted that the credit is not a determination to recognize the total ad valorem tax revenue generated by new vehicle miles, but is only a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax revenue that is used for payment of improvements that are included in the Street Impact Fee CIP. Theoretically, the credit determination could be zero ($0) if the City does not utilize any of the new vehicle mile ad valorem tax revenue to fund improvements that are included in the Street Impact Fee CIP. However, to be conservative and recognize potential cash flow issues that can occur with the funding of major capital improvement projects, it is assumed that the debt-funded projects (80% of the improvement costs included in the Street Impact Fee CIP but not otherwise funded) could potentially be funded by ad valorem tax revenue. Since payments made through ad valorem tax revenue will consist of not only the revenue generated by new vehicle miles in the defined service area, but also existing property owners throughout the City, the portion attributable to the new vehicle miles in the defined service area must be isolated, as illustrated in the credit calculation in Appendix D. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 112 Final Draft January 2020  $ 57,804,000 $ 340,047,000 $ 148,218,500 $ 198,920,000 $ 85,839,500 $ 64,016,500 $ 188,121,053 $ 30,084,000 $ 107,955,500 $ 117,009,000 $ 58,820,000 $ 121,770,000 $ 147,901,000 $ 129,122,459 $ 244,778,100 $ 128,684,500 $ 31,630,500 $ 34,294,593 $ 301,047,978 $ 90,286,222 $ 139,462,847 $ 50,377,833 $ 25,912,852 $ 155,865,563 $ 9,680,221 $ 35,317,564 $ 71,098,762 $ 35,142,504 $ 58,571,610 $ 85,330,564 $ 58,267,358 $ 203,493,968 $ 112,157,224 $ 26,701,097 $ 23,509,407 $ 38,999,022 $ 57,932,278 $ 59,457,153 $ 35,461,667 $ 38,103,648 $ 32,255,490 $ 20,403,779 $ 72,637,936 $ 45,910,238 $ 23,677,496 $ 63,198,390 $ 62,570,436 $ 70,855,101 $ 41,284,132 $ 16,527,276 $ 4,929,403 20,629 8,390 12,239 32,248 0.0% 32,248 263.4% 100.0% B 98,930 11,346 87,584 54,982 0.0% 54,982 62.7% 62.7% C 54,557 21,324 33,233 37,459 34.3% 31,028 93.3% 93.3% D 82,623 24,696 57,927 92,374 15.6% 85,159 147.0% 100.0% E 57,594 23,793 33,801 29,947 0.0% 29,947 88.5% 88.5% Table 9. Maximum Assessable Street Impact Fee F 31,313 18,638 12,675 27,194 16.1% 25,010 G 70,599 12,105 58,494 71,047 11.0% 67,143 H 26,643 18,070 8,573 10,136 0.0% 10,136 I 35,791 24,082 11,709 31,043 43.2% 24,336 J 42,672 16,743 25,929 36,809 55.3% 26,625 K 5,351 2,154 3,197 7,945 0.2% 7,938 L 49,742 25,816 23,926 40,062 44.6% 31,130 M 33,414 14,136 19,278 48,164 5.3% 46,895 N 62,193 34,128 28,065 61,185 29.2% 52,261 197.3% 114.7% 118.2% 207.8% 102.6% 248.5% 167.4% 243.2% 186.2% 140.7% 189.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% $ 34,294,593 $ 188,757,082 $ 84,237,045 $ 139,462,847 $ 44,584,382 $ 25,912,852 $ 155,865,563 $ 9,680,221 $ 35,317,564 $ 71,098,762 $ 35,142,504 $ 58,571,610 $ 85,330,564 $ 58,267,358 $ 189,249,390 $ 112,157,224 $ 26,701,097 $ 5,782,250 $ 13,498,500 $ 39,524,500 $ 33,735,250 $ 17,457,500 $ 38,777,000 $ 7,624,750 $ 7,975,500 $ 17,265,000 $ 43,038,000 $ 16,623,000 $ 15,754,000 $ 10,881,500 $ 22,718,250 $ 12,370,250 $ 3,327,500 $ 8,584,500 33% 26% 10% 30% 15% 12% 64% 28% 11% 13% 10% 14% 24% 17% 29% 68% 12% $ 1,908,143 $ 3,509,610 $ 3,952,450 $ 10,120,575 $ 2,618,625 $ 4,653,240 $ 4,885,315 $ 2,233,140 $ 1,899,150 $ 5,594,940 $ 1,662,300 $ 2,205,560 $ 2,611,560 $ 3,862,103 $ 3,587,373 $ 2,262,700 $ 1,030,140 $ 36,202,736 $ 192,266,692 $ 88,189,495 $ 149,583,422 $ 47,203,007 $ 30,566,092 $ 160,750,878 $ 11,913,361 $ 37,216,714 $ 76,693,702 $ 36,804,804 $ 60,777,170 $ 87,942,124 $ 62,129,461 $ 192,836,763 $ 114,419,924 $ 27,731,237 $ 48,700 $ 423,748 $ 1,342,833 $ 1,354,645 $ 231,362 $ 233,022 $ 49,535 $ 111,153 $ 4,425,879 $ 244,622 $ 164,468 $ 345,445 $ 497,635 $ 951,069 $ 1,045,666 $ 105,763 $ 1,221,282 P 39,803 5,112 34,691 49,068 1.0% 48,823 DT 15,830 2,467 13,363 45,048 87.9% 25,259 O 81,211 13,697 67,514 67,747 14.6% 62,818 93.0% 93.0% LESS DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS $ 36,237,145 $ 191,926,053 $ 86,929,771 $ 148,311,886 $ 47,054,754 $ 30,416,179 $ 160,784,452 $ 11,885,317 $ 32,873,944 $ 76,532,189 $ 36,723,444 $ 60,514,834 $ 87,527,597 $ 61,261,501 $ 191,874,206 $ 114,397,269 $ 26,593,063 $ 1,124 $ 3,491 $ 2,802 $ 1,742 $ 1,571 $ 1,216 $ 2,395 $ 1,173 $ 1,351 $ 2,874 $ 4,626 $ 1,511 $ 1,866 $ 1,172 $ 3,054 $ 2,343 $ 1,053 $ 17,294,189 $ 92,977,385 $ 41,831,530 $ 71,838,599 $ 22,646,115 $ 14,446,143 $ 77,703,743 $ 5,679,082 $ 14,084,230 $ 36,988,626 $ 14,056,137 $ 29,205,014 $ 42,143,241 $ 29,641,833 $ 92,742,375 $ 55,411,082 $ 12,879,607 $ (5,614,948) $ (34,683,805) $ (14,744,421) $ (26,518,054) $ (8,004,583) $ (4,458,423) $ (28,218,241) $ (1,879,175) $ (5,015,887) $ (13,609,161) $ (5,019,008) $ (10,577,007) $ (14,887,289) $ (10,945,446) $ (33,796,761) $ (20,679,444) $ (4,833,906) $ (435,791) $ (3,969,579) $ (1,010,670) $ (4,750,699) $ (528,076) $ (282,897) $ (4,055,190) $ (44,956) $ (288,599) $ (765,463) $ (101,613) $ (707,069) $ (1,538,578) $ (1,203,524) $ (4,528,108) $ (2,100,837) $ (252,644) $ 47,480,594 $ 246,250,054 $ 113,006,209 $ 188,881,732 $ 61,168,209 $ 40,121,002 $ 206,214,764 $ 15,640,268 $ 41,653,689 $ 99,146,191 $ 45,658,960 $ 78,435,772 $ 113,244,972 $ 78,754,364 $ 246,291,711 $ 147,028,071 $ 34,386,120 $ 1,472 $ 4,479 $ 3,642 $ 2,218 $ 2,043 $ 1,604 $ 3,071 $ 1,543 $ 1,712 $ 3,724 $ 5,752 $ 2,520 $ 2,415 $ 1,507 $ 3,921 $ 3,011 $ 1,361 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED BY THE STREET IMPACT FEE RCP (FROM STREET IMPACT FEE RCP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND (FROM STREET IMPACT FEE RCP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) SERVICE AREA: A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED (LINE 1 - LINE 2) TOTAL COST OF THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE RCP WITHIN SERVICE AREA (FROM TABLES 4A TO 4P) COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED (LINE 3 / LINE 1) * (LINE 4) COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE (LINE 4 - LINE 5) TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS UNADJUSTED (FROM TABLE 7 AND LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS) TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS TRANSIT ADJUSTED % SERVICE AREA NEAR TRANSIT (FROM TABLE 7) (FROM TABLE 7) PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 9 / LINE 3) IF LINE 9 > LINE 3, REDUCE LINE 10 TO 100%, OTHERWISE NO CHANGE COST OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE RCP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH TOTAL COST OF THE INTERSECTION IMPACT FEE RCP (LINE 5 * LINE 11) WITHIN SERVICE AREA (FROM TABLES 4A TO 4P) PERCENT OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (TRANSIT ADJUSTED NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS / 2027 DEMAND) COST OF INTERSECTION IMPACT FEE RCP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 13 * LINE 14) COST OF TOTAL STREET IMPACT FEE RCP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 12 + LINE 15) EXISTING ESCROW FUND BALANCE COST OF THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE RCP ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH (LINE 16 - LINE 17 + STUDY COST PER SERVICE AREA) PRE-CREDIT, PRE-FINANCING MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT (LINE 18 / LINE 9) FINANCING COSTS (FROM APPENDIX C) INTEREST EARNINGS (FROM APPENDIX C) CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES (FROM APPENDIX C) RECOVERABLE COST OF STREET IMPACT FEE RCP AND FINANCING (LINE 18 + LINE 20 + LINE 21 + LINE 22) MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT (LINE 23 / LINE 9) 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 113 Final Draft January 2020 D. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Street Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City will utilize the Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 10. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Austin. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development’s magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of local uses are found in this table. The descriptions for each land use are presented in Table 11. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip-making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, industrial, and institutional. The trip rates presented for each land use is a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column in Table 10, if applicable to the land use, presents the percentage of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass-by trips, as previously discussed. The definitive source of the trip generation and pass-by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the latest edition. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. However, for land uses not contained within the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, an alternative service unit demand could be calculated by completing a trip generation study based on the procedure identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle-miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The trip length values are based on the CAMPO long range transportation model and supplemented by the National Household Travel Survey performed by the FHWA. A separate trip length is 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 114 Final Draft January 2020 calculated if the service area is inside or outside the “loop”, formed by US 183, SH 71 (Ben White Blvd) and SH 360 (Capital of Texas Highway) around Austin. The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin-destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. At this stage, another important aspect of the state law is applied – the limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above six (6) miles, the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to six (6) miles. This reduction, as discussed previously, limits the maximum trip length to the approximate size of the service areas. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle-miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 115 Final Draft January 2020 Table 10. Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) Land Use Category Development Unit Trip Gen Pass- Rate (PM) by Rate Pass-by Source Trip Rate Trip Length Inside Loop (mi) Trip Length Outside Loop (mi) Adj. For O-D Adj. Trip Length Inside Loop (mi) Adj. Trip Length Oustide Loop (mi) Max Trip Length Inside Loop (mi) Max Trip Length Oustide Loop (mi) Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Inside Loop Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Outside Loop PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial Industrial Park Manufacturing Warehousing Mini-Warehouse RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing Townhomes / Duplexes / Triplexes / 4-Plexes Mid-Rise Apartments or Condominiums High-Rise Apartments or Condominiums Mobile Home Park Senior Adult Housing-Detached Senior Adult Housing-Attached Assisted Living LODGING Hotel Motel / Other Lodging Facilities RECREATIONAL Golf Driving Range Golf Course Recreational Community Center Ice Skating Rink Miniature Golf Course Multiplex Movie Theater Racquet / Tennis Club INSTITUTIONAL Church Day Care Center Primary/Middle School (1-8) High School Junior / Community College University / College MEDICAL Clinic Hospital Nursing Home Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic ITE Land Use Code 030 110 130 140 150 151 210 220 221 222 240 251 252 254 310 320 432 430 495 465 431 445 491 560 565 522 530 540 550 630 610 620 640 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Beds Room Room Tee Acre 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA Hole Screens Court 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA Students Students Students Students 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA Beds 1,000 SF GFA 1.87 0.63 0.40 0.67 0.19 0.17 0.99 0.56 0.44 0.36 0.46 0.30 0.26 0.26 0.60 0.38 1.25 0.28 2.31 1.33 0.33 13.73 3.82 0.49 11.12 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.15 3.28 0.97 0.22 3.53 1.87 10.70 10.70 50% 5.35 10.00 10.00 0.63 0.40 0.67 0.19 0.17 0.99 0.56 0.44 0.36 0.46 0.30 0.26 0.26 0.60 0.38 1.25 0.28 2.31 1.33 0.33 13.73 3.82 0.49 6.23 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.15 3.28 0.97 0.22 2.47 6.15 6.15 6.15 6.15 6.15 5.81 5.81 5.81 5.81 5.81 5.81 5.81 5.81 5.41 5.41 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 6.30 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 7.42 7.42 7.42 7.42 12.89 12.89 12.89 12.89 12.89 8.59 8.59 8.59 8.59 8.59 8.59 8.59 8.59 5.41 5.41 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.30 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 6.76 6.76 6.76 6.76 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.70 2.70 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 3.15 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 5.35 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 2.71 2.71 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.15 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 5.35 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.70 2.70 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 3.15 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 5.35 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 2.71 2.71 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.15 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 1.93 1.23 2.06 0.58 0.52 2.87 1.62 1.28 1.04 1.33 0.87 0.75 0.75 1.62 1.03 3.64 0.81 6.72 3.87 0.96 39.95 11.12 1.54 10.53 0.29 0.24 0.19 0.25 12.17 3.60 0.82 9.16 3.78 2.40 4.02 1.14 1.02 4.26 2.41 1.89 1.55 1.98 1.29 1.12 1.12 1.63 1.03 3.98 0.89 7.35 4.23 1.05 43.66 12.15 1.54 10.59 0.29 0.24 0.19 0.26 11.09 3.28 0.74 8.35 44% B 30% B Ke y to Source s of Pass-by Rate s: A: IT E T rip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (August 2014) B: Estimated by Kimley-Horn based on IT E rates for similar categories C: IT E rate adjusted upward by KHA based on logical relationship to other categories 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 116 Final Draft January 2020 Table 10 (Cont’d). Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) Land Use Category Development Unit Trip Gen Pass- Rate (PM) by Rate Pass-by Source Trip Rate Trip Length Inside Loop (mi) Trip Length Outside Loop (mi) Adj. For O-D Adj. Trip Length Inside Loop (mi) Adj. Trip Length Oustide Loop (mi) Max Trip Length Inside Loop (mi) Max Trip Length Oustide Loop (mi) Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Inside Loop Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Outside Loop OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building General Office Building Medical-Dental Office Building Single Tenant Office Building Office Park COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center Automobile Parts Sales Gasoline/Service Station Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market New Car Sales Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop Self-Service Car Wash Tire Store Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant Quality Restaurant Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store Nursery (Garden Center) Home Improvement Superstore Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window Shopping Center Supermarket Toy/Children's Superstore Department Store SERVICES Walk-In Bank Drive-In Bank Hair Salon ITE Land Use Code 714 710 720 715 750 934 933 932 931 937 815 817 862 880 881 820 850 864 875 911 912 918 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 942 843 944 Vehicle Fueling Position 945 Vehicle Fueling Position 840 941 947 848 Servicing Positions 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA Stall 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GLA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA Drive-in Lanes 1,000 SF GLA 0.60 1.15 3.46 1.71 1.07 3.11 4.91 14.03 13.99 2.43 4.85 5.54 3.98 32.67 28.34 9.77 7.80 43.38 4.83 6.94 2.33 8.51 10.29 3.81 9.24 5.00 1.95 12.13 27.15 1.45 40% 43% 42% 56% 20% 40% 40% 28% 50% 50% 43% 44% 70% 30% 30% 48% 53% 49% 34% 36% 30% 30% 40% 35% 30% B A A B B B B A A B A A A C B A A A A A B B B A B 0.60 1.15 3.46 1.71 1.07 1.87 2.80 8.14 6.16 1.94 2.91 3.32 2.87 16.34 14.17 5.57 4.37 13.01 3.38 4.86 1.21 4.00 5.25 2.51 5.91 3.50 1.37 7.28 17.65 1.02 7.42 7.42 7.42 7.42 7.42 5.41 5.41 1.20 1.20 5.41 5.41 1.20 5.41 3.39 3.39 5.41 5.41 1.20 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 3.39 3.39 3.39 6.76 6.76 6.76 6.76 6.76 5.41 5.41 1.20 1.20 5.41 5.41 1.20 5.41 3.39 3.39 5.41 5.41 1.20 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35 3.39 3.39 3.39 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 2.70 2.70 0.60 0.60 2.70 2.70 0.60 2.70 1.69 1.69 2.70 2.70 0.60 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 1.69 1.69 1.69 Key to Source s of Pass-by Rates: A: IT E T rip Generation Handbook 3rd Edit ion (August 2014) B: Est imated by Kimley-Horn based on IT E rat es for similar categories C: IT E rate adjust ed upward by KHA based on logical relationship t o ot her categories 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 2.71 2.71 0.60 0.60 2.71 2.71 0.60 2.71 1.70 1.70 2.71 2.71 0.60 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 1.70 1.70 1.70 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 2.70 2.70 0.60 0.60 2.70 2.70 0.60 2.70 1.69 1.69 2.70 2.70 0.60 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 1.69 1.69 1.69 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 3.38 2.71 2.71 0.60 0.60 2.71 2.71 0.60 2.71 1.70 1.70 2.71 2.71 0.60 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 3.18 1.70 1.70 1.70 2.23 4.27 12.84 6.34 3.97 5.05 7.56 4.88 3.70 5.24 7.86 1.99 7.75 27.61 23.95 15.04 11.80 7.81 9.84 14.14 3.52 11.64 15.28 7.30 17.20 10.19 3.99 12.30 29.83 1.72 2.03 3.89 11.69 5.78 3.62 5.07 7.59 4.88 3.70 5.26 7.89 1.99 7.78 27.78 24.09 15.09 11.84 7.81 10.75 15.45 3.85 12.72 16.70 7.98 18.79 11.13 4.36 12.38 30.01 1.73 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 117 Final Draft January 2020 Land Use Category Land Use Description Table 11. Land Use Descriptions ITE Land Use Code 030 Point of good transfer between trucks or between trucks and rail 110 Emphasis on activities other than manufacturing; typically employing fewer than 500 workers 130 Area containing a number of industries or related facilities 150 Devoted to storage of materials but may included office and maintenance areas 151 Facilities with a number of units rented to others for the storage of goods Single-Family Detached Housing Townhomes / Duplexes / Triplexes / 4-Plexes Mid-Rise Apartments or Condominiums High-Rise Apartments or Condominiums Senior Adult Housing-Detached Senior Adult Housing-Attached Assisted Living 210 Single-family detached homes on individual lots 220 One or two levels (floors) per building such as duplex, townhomes, and single family houses <1,200 SF 221 Mult-family housing between three and ten levels (floors) per building 222 Mult-family housing more than ten levels (floors) per building 251 Consists of detached independent living developments that include amenities such as golf courses and swimming pools 252 Consists of attached independent living developments that include limited social or recreation services 254 Residential settings that provide either routine general protective oversight or assistance with activities. Motel / Other Lodging Facilities 320 Lodging facilities that may have small on-site restaurant or buffet area but little or no meeting space 310 Lodging facilities that typically have on-site restaurants, lounges, meeting and/or banquet rooms, or other retail shops and services Recreational Community Center Ice Skating Rink 495 Category includes racquet clubs, health/fitness clubs, can include facilities such as YMCA's 465 Rinks for ice skating and related sports; may contain spectator areas and refreshment facilities 432 430 Facilities with driving tees for practice; may provide individual or group lessons; may have prop shop and/or refreshment facilities May include municipal courses and private country clubs; may have driving ranges, pro shops, and restaurant/banquet facilities 431 One or more individual putting courses; category should not be used when part of a larger entertainment center(with batting cages, video game centers, etc) 445 Movie theater with audience seating, minimum of ten screens, lobby, and refreshment area. 491 Indoor or outdoor facilities specifically designed for playing tennis 560 Churches and houses of worship 565 Generally includes facilities for care of pre-school aged children, generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds 522 Serves students who have not yet entered high school 530 Serves students who have completed middle or junior high school 540 Two-year junior, community, or technical colleges 550 Four-year universities or colleges that may or may not offer graduate programs 630 Facilities with limited diagnostic and outpatient care 610 Medical and surgical facilities with overnight accommodations 620 Rest and convalescent homes with residents who do little or no driving 640 Rest and convalescent homes with residents who do little or no driving 714 Office building housing corporate headquarters of a single company or organization 710 Office buildings which house multiple tenants 720 Multi-tenant building with offices for physicians and/or dentists 715 Single tenant office buildings other than corporate headquarters 750 Office buildings (typically low-rise) in a campus setting and served by a common roadway system PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial Industrial Park Warehousing Mini-Warehouse RESIDENTIAL LODGING Hotel RECREATIONAL Golf Driving Range Golf Course Miniature Golf Course Multiplex Movie Theater Racquet / Tennis Club INSTITUTIONAL Church Day Care Center Primary/Middle School (1-8) High School Junior / Community College University / College MEDICAL Clinic Hospital Nursing Home Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building General Office Building Medical-Dental Office Building Single Tenant Office Building Office Park 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 118 Final Draft January 2020 Land Use Category Land Use Description Table 11 (Cont’d). Land Use Descriptions ITE Land Use Code COMMERCIAL Automobile Relate d Automobile Care Center Automobile Parts Sales Gasoline/Service Station Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market and Car Wash946 Gasoline sales with convenience store and car washes where the primary business is gasoline sales New Car Sales Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop Self-Service Car Wash Tire Store 840 New car dealerships, typically with automobile servicing, part sales, and used car sales 941 Primary business is to perform oil changes and fluid/filter changes with other repair services not provided 947 Has stalls for driver to park and wash the vehicle 848 Primary business is sales and installation of tires; usually do not have large storage or warehouse area 942 Automobile repair and servicing including stereo installations and upholstering 843 Retail sale of auto parts but no on-site vehicle repair 944 Gasoline sales without convenience store or car wash; may include repair Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 933 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers, but without a drive-thru window High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant Quality Restaurant Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 932 Restaurants with turnover rates less than one hour; typically includes moderately-priced chain restaurants 931 Restaurants with turnover rates of one hour or longer; typically require reservations 937 Coffee and Donut restaurants with drive-through windows, hold long store hours and have limited indoor seating 934 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers with a drive-thru window Othe r Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 815 Category includes free-standing stores with off-street parking; typically offer a variety of products and services with long store hours Nursery (Garden Center) 817 Building with a yard of planting or landscape stock; may have office, storage, shipping or greenhouse facilities Home Improvement Superstore 862 Warehouse-type facilities offering a large variety of products and services including lumber, tool, paint, lighting, and fixtures, among other items. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window Shopping Center 880 Facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription drugs without a drive-through window 881 Facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription drugs with a drive-through window 820 Integrated group of commercial establishments; planning, owned, and managed as a unit Supermarket Toy/Children's Superstore Department Store SERVICES Walk-In Bank Drive-In Bank Hair Salon 850 Primary business is sale of groceries, food, and household cleaning items; may include photo, pharmacy, video rental, and/or ATM 864 Businesses specializing in child-oriented merchandise 875 Free-standing stores that specialize in the sale of apparel, footwear, bedding, home products, jewelry, etc. 911 Banks with their own parking lots, no drive-in lanes but contain non-drive-through ATMs 912 Banking facilities to conduct financial transactions from the vehicle; also usually apart of walk-in bank 918 Facilities that specialize in cosmetic and beauty services including hair cutting and styling 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 119 Final Draft January 2020 VI.SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Street Impact Fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single-Family Housing in Service Area G Street Impact Fee Calculation Steps – Example 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 9 [Land Use – Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single-Family Detached Housing Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 4.26 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 8, Line 19 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area G: $3,071 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 1 * 4.26 * $3,071 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $13,082.46 Example 2: Development Type – 125,000 square foot Home Improvement Superstore in Service Area I Street Impact Fee Calculation Steps – Example 2 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 9 [Land Use – Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 125,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.52 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 8, Line 19 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area I: $1,712 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 125 * 3.52 * $1,712 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $753,280 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 120 Final Draft January 2020 VII. ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF STREET IMPACT FEES A. Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Street Impact Fees. An Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Street Impact Fees RCP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This IFAC also reviews the Street Impact Fee ordinance and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the IFAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a first public hearing on the Street Impact Fee Study and a second public hearing on the Street Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the IFAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Street Impact Fees RCP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the IFAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. B. Collection and Use of Street Impact Fees Street Impact Fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Street Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 121 Final Draft January 2020 VIII. CONCLUSIONS The City of Austin has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of Street Impact Fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable Street Impact Fee that could be assessed by the City of Austin, as shown in the previously referenced Table 9. This document serves as a guide to the assessment of Street Impact Fees pertaining to future development, and the City’s need for transportation improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an impact fee amount to be collected, up to the calculated maximum and establish the Street Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this analysis are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Street Impact Fee Roadway Capacity Plan are appropriately incorporated into the development of the maximum assessable Street Impact Fee. Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): Below is the listing of the 2019 Street Impact Fee Study’s Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Service Area Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (per Vehicle-Mile) Service Area Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (per Vehicle-Mile) A B C D DT E F G H $1,472 $4,479 $3,642 $2,218 $1,361 $2,043 $1,604 $3,071 $1,543 I J K L M N O P $1,712 $3,724 $5,752 $2,520 $2,415 $1,507 $3,921 $3,011 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 122 Final Draft January 2020 APPENDICES A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections SERVICE AREA A SERVICE AREA B SERVICE AREA C SERVICE AREA D SERVICE AREA DT SERVICE AREA E SERVICE AREA F SERVICE AREA G SERVICE AREA H SERVICE AREA I SERVICE AREA J SERVICE AREA K SERVICE AREA L SERVICE AREA M SERVICE AREA N SERVICE AREA O SERVICE AREA P B. Street Impact Fee RCP Service Units of Supply Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Summary C. D. Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits 2019 Street Impact Fee Study City of Austin, Texas 123 Final Draft January 2020