1. All trees and natural areas shown on plan to be preserved shall be protected during construction with temporary fencing. 2. Protective fences shall be erected according to City of Austin Standards for Tree Protection. 3. Protective fences shall be installed prior to the start of any site preparation work (clearing, grubbing or grading), and shall be maintained throughout all phases of the construction project. 4. Erosion and sedimentation control barriers shall be installed or maintained in a manner which does not result in soil build-up within tree drip lines. 5. Protective fences shall surround the trees or group of trees, and will be located at the outermost limit of branches (drip line) , for natural areas, protective fences shall follow the Limit of Construction line, in order to prevent the following: A. Soil compaction in the root zone area resulting from vehicular traffic or storage of equipment or materials; B. Root zone disturbances due to grade changes (greater than 6 inches cut or fill), or trenching not reviewed and authorized by the City Aborist; C. Wounds to exposed roots, trunk or limbs by mechanical equipment; D. Other activities detrimental to trees such as chemical storage, cement truck cleaning, and fires. 6. Exceptions to installing fences at tree drip lines may be permitted in the following cases: A. Where there is to be an approved grade change, impermeable paving surface, tree well, or other such site development, erect the fence approximately 2 to 4 feet beyond the area disturbed; B. Where permeable paving is to be installed within a tree's drip line, erect the fence at the outer limits of the permeable paving area (prior to site grading so that this area is graded separately prior to paving installation to minimized root damage); C. Where trees are close to proposed buildings, erect the fence to allow 6 to 10 feet of work space between the fence and the building; D. Where there are severe space constraints due to tract size, or other special requirements, contact the City Arborist at 974-1876 to discuss alternatives. Special Note: For the protection of natural areas, no exceptions to installing fences at the Limit of Construction line will be permitted. 7. Where any of the above exceptions result in a fence being closer than 4 feet to a tree trunk, protect the trunk with strapped-on planking to a height of 8 ft (or to the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2022-002112 ROBERTSON/STUART & MAIR HISTORIC DISTRICT 1104 E. 10TH STREET B.5 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an accessory dwelling unit. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed ADU is two stories in height, with a covered porch and balcony. It is located behind the contributing main house at 1104 E. 10th Street. It is clad in smooth-finish horizontal fiber cement siding and board-and-batten siding. Fenestration includes mulled and single 1:1 windows, fixed two-panel windows, sliders, and glazed metal entry doors. The proposed plan is canted so that the front-facing balcony and porch are directly behind the main house. A spiral staircase allows access to the second floor. DESIGN STANDARDS 1.4. New Construction The Robertson/Stuart & Mair Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: New construction shall have the same street-front orientation and distance from adjacent buildings as the contributing buildings in the same block. The proposed ADU is oriented toward the south, as is the main house. Setbacks for new construction shall be consistent with setbacks of the district’s contributing buildings by taking the average of the existing setbacks of contributing buildings on the same block face, or by aligning with the setback of one adjacent contributing building; this may allow setbacks that are shallower than the base zoning. The proposed building is located at the rear of the lot. Design new buildings so that they are compatible with and differentiated from historic buildings in the district. If designing an addition in a contemporary style, reflect the scale, massing, and/or materials of the historic building; if designing an addition in a style that reflects a style borrowed from surrounding historic buildings, differentiate the scale, massing, and/or materials. The proposed ADU is differentiated from the main house by its two-story height, irregular shape, irregular shed roof, and modern fenestration and cladding materials. While the exterior cladding and fenestration is mostly compatible, the building’s projecting eave at the main elevation, the spiral staircase, and the shed roofline are less compatible. New construction should have floor-to-floor heights and roof heights that are the same or similar to those on contributing buildings throughout the district. The proposed ADU features similar floor-to-floor heights as the contributing house. Select materials for new construction that are the same as or similar to those found on contributing buildings …
SITE INFORMATION 1104 E. 10th Street, Austin, TX 78702 SITE ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: West 53' of Lot #10, Block 7, Division B, Geo. L. Robertson Subdivision, A subdivision is Travis County Texas, Recorded in Vol. 1, Page 4. LAND STATUS DETERMINATION: C8I-2011-0149 ZONING: NEIGHBORHOOD: Central East Austin, Subdistrict 1 LAND USE: Single-Family Residence PROPOSED LAND USE: Two-Family Residence Scope Of Work: Construction of a 1 bedroom, 1 bathroom, second floor Accessory Dwelling Unit on top of an Accessory Structure of 1 bathroom and studio. SF-3-NP SITE AREA: 7,457 s.f. NOTE: Areas are measured to the outside of finished surface per C.O.A. Requirements for Building Coverage and FAR. GFA EXISTING HOUSE: 2,115 s.f. Front Covered Porch: Back Covered Porch: Uncovered Deck: Open Stairs: Lower GFA Accessory: Upper GFA ADU: Covered Front Porch: Covered Balcony Above: A/C pads: Storage room stoop: Front Paved Walkway: Total Building Cover: Total Impervious Cover: TOTAL GFA: TOTAL ALLOWED: PROVIDED PARKING: ADU Exempt due to reduced parking requirement. No Changes to primary residence NONE 38 s.f. (calc. at 19 s.f.) 77 s.f. (calc. at 38.5 s.f.) 228 s.f. 130 s.f. 424 s.f. 419 s.f. 82 s.f. 82 s.f. 27 s.f. 9 s.f. 55 s.f. 2,979 s.f. (39.9%) 3,127.5 s.f. (41.9%) 2,958 s.f. (.397) 2,982 s.f. (.4) GENERAL NOTES 1. THESE DRAWINGS ARE BASED UPON THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, AND THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS OR DRAWINGS AND MANUFACTURERS' INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLARIFICATION. THESE DRAWINGS MAY NOT INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL THE WORK REQUIRED FOR FULL COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY. THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE THE NECESSARY ELEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. 3. ALL VERTICAL DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, BUILDING SECTIONS, DETAILS AND INTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARE NOMINAL. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATE EITHER FACE OF FRAMING, FACE OF MASONRY OR CENTERLINE OF ROUGH OPENING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DO NOT SCALE MEASUREMENTS FROM DRAWINGS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT WITH ANY DIMENSIONAL QUESTIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE WORK 4. COORDINATE LOCATION, SIZE AND CONFIGURATION OF PLUMBING VENTING AT ROOF WITH PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. 5. VERIFY AND PROVIDE …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2022-009524 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4300 SPEEDWAY B.6 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Renovate ca. 1967 former post office to become a shell structure for multiple tenants, with exterior alterations including new entrances, canopies, parapet, and an addition consisting of enclosure of a loading dock. 1) Remove clear anodized aluminum storefront and windows, including limestone trim, on the main (east) elevation. 2) Install new paired storefront doors at three recessed entrances on the east elevation. Install new single and paired storefront doors on the north elevation. Install new divided-light storefront windows. Doors and windows will have black anodized aluminum frames. 3) Construct an addition within the footprint of the loading dock on the south elevation. Brick will match the existing building. Paired doors and divided-light windows will match those used elsewhere on the building. 4) Install a new roof canopy along the east and south elevations. 5) Reroof the building. Extend the height of the parapet using matching brick. Install new painted metal coping. Remove plywood fascia at the existing north canopy and reclad with metal fascia. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS One-story, flat-roofed brick post office building with Modern stylistic influences. The L-shaped building faces east toward Speedway. At the corner of the ell, the main entrance consists of paired glazed doors with a transom and sidelights within limestone trim. The adjacent wall has a section of coursed ashlar limestone next to a long ribbon window set within a limestone frame. The remaining walls are unadorned brick with limited doors and no windows; the rear wall is built of concrete masonry units. A canopy extends along the north wall, and a loading dock abuts the building to the south. The building at 4300 Speedway is noncontributing to the Hyde Park Historic District, as it was less than 50 years of age at the time of the district’s designation in 2010. While most noncontributing buildings do not require historic review, the Hyde Park Preservation Plan and Design Standards specifically address how this building should be treated. In “The Parts of the Hyde Park Preservation Plan,” Section 1.D.2 states: D. Previous Agreements about Specific Properties in the District 2. For the property located at 4300 Speedway, no shed roofs shall be permitted. Otherwise, the standards established for that property by Ordinance No. 0201131-20 [sic], which created the Hyde Park Neighborhood Conservation …
SOUTH ELEVATION (LOADING DOCK) EAST ELEVATION (STOREFRONT) EAST ELEVATION (WITH NORTH COVERED WALKWAY) EAST DETAIL (STOREFRONT - 2 BRICK TYPES) NORTH DETAIL (COVERED WALKWAY) NORTH DETAIL (COVERED WALKWAY) SOUTH - CONCRETE STAIR AND RAMP BRICK 2 - NORMAN BRICK BRICK 1 - STANDARD BRICK SPEEDWAY E ELEVATION SATELLITE VIEW - SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS (GOOGLE MAPS) VIEW FROM 43RD ST - SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS (GOOGLE MAPS) VIEW FROM SPEEDWAY - SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS (GOOGLE MAPS) VIEW FROM SPEEDWAY - EAST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS (GOOGLE MAPS) COVERED WALKWAY I N O T A V E L E N CLR ANOD. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT & DOORS W/ LIMESTONE TRIM E ELEVATION 4300 SPEEDWAY SINGLE STORY STRUCTURE TO BE RENOVATED 9,842 SF NON-SPRINKLERED W ELEVATION (NO ALTERATION) H T R O N N A L P 1 EXISTING PLAN - PHOTOS KEY SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" T E E R T S D R 3 4 I N O T A V E L E W LOADING DOCK I I I I N O S S M R E P N E T T R W T U O H T W D E S U R O D E C U D O R P E R E B T O N Y A M D N A N R A B T H G U O H T F O Y T R E P O R P E H T S I I G N W A R D S H T I M P 8 5 : 7 2 : 2 2 2 0 2 / 1 2 / 1 C L L N R A B T H G U O H T I Y B T C E J O R P G N T C X E R E H T O N A I DESIGN THOUGHTBARN LLC 4805 RED BLUFF RD / STUDIO A AUSTIN TX 78702 O: 512 386 1579 INFO@THOUGHTBARN.COM WWW.THOUGHTBARN.COM THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTERIM REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF LUCY BEGG TX REG ARCH #26395 ON THE DATE SHOWN ON THE DATE STAMP. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR PERMITTING PURPOSES. PROJECT SPEEDWAY COMMERCIAL 4300 SPEEDWAY AUSTIN, TX 78751 STAGE 75% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DRAWING EXISTING BUILDING PHOTOS DATE As indicated 01/21/22 PAGE NUMBER G4.00 LEGEND OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD PARKING AREA OFF STREET …
SITE PLAN NOTES 2. 3. 5. 7. 8. 1. REFER TO G1.0 FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. REFER TO G2.0 FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES. SITE INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED FROM SURVEY DATED JUNE 17, 2020 PREPARED BY WATERLOO SURVEYORS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY JOB CONDITIONS AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DEFECTS IN THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION ARE UNCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION WORK SO NECESSARY REPAIRS CAN BE MADE. REPORT ANY CONDITIONS THAT MAY DICTATE UNFORESEEN CHANGES IN THE WORK TO BE PROVIDED. 6. DEMOLITION SITE PLAN IS FOR GUIDANCE ONLY. ANY ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION WORK REQUIRED TO FULLY COMPLETE WORK, BUT NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN OR DESCRIBED IN THE DEMOLITION DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE CONTRACT. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS INDICATING SIZE, TYPE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND, SURFACE AND AERIAL UTILITIES OR OTHER EXISTING FEATURES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE EXACT OF COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE AUSTIN AREA "ONE CALL" SYSTEM (1-800-344-8377) FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION, IN ORDER TO AVOID DAMAGING THOSE UTILITIES, AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY ARRANGE FOR REPAIR AND RESTORATION OF CONTRACTOR-DAMAGED UTILITIES, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UTILITY COMPANY, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. WHERE A SEAMLESS PATCH BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW SURFACES AND/OR ITEMS IS NOT POSSIBLE OR PRACTICAL, REMOVE EXISTING SURFACE AND/OR ITEM BACK TO NEAREST JOINT AND REPLACE WITH NEW TO MATCH. 10. ALL HAULING AND DISPOSAL OF DEMOLISHED ITEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. TREE LIST 0 0 . 4 1 1 0 0 . 3 1 1 ) ' 0 0 . 0 6 E " 0 0 0 0 ° 0 6 ' S ( ' 5 0 . 0 6 W ' " 3 1 4 1 ° 0 6 S Y E L L A ) W O R T F 0 1 ( 0 0 . 4 1 1 LEGEND AND SCALE // // // // // EXISTING FENCE LINE OH EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY LINE EXISTING ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE SET BACK LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE 8' 4' 0' 10' 20' FULL SIZE SCALE : 1" = 10'-0" OR 1:120 (HALF SIZE SCALE: …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 C14H-2006-0031; HR-2022-015467 STANLEY AND EMILY FINCH HOUSE 3312 DUVAL STREET B.8 – 1 PROPOSAL Remodel house and enlarge kitchen. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Rebuilding of the one-story connector between the original historic home (ca. 1928) and an adjacent addition (ca. 2003). Recladding of the hyphen’s wall and roof with standing-seam zinc. Removal of Palladian window at the hyphen and entry door at the addition; replacement with a new divided-light steel door with an awning at the hyphen and a window at the addition. 2) Addition of a third window to an existing pair of mulled windows on the north elevation. 3) Removal of the side entry door and gabled hood on the north elevation. 4) Enlargement of the kitchen to the south, involving removal of a portion of the rear (west) elevation. The addition will have steel windows and zinc cladding. ARCHITECTURE Two-story Colonial Revival house with a side-gabled roof, wood siding, and multi-light double-hung wood windows. The house is on a corner lot and is visible from both Duval and 34th streets. Elements on the 34th St. (north) elevation proposed for modification include paired 6:6 light windows and a small gabled roof with an arched underside and decorative brackets that shelters a multi-light door. The house became a City of Austin Landmark in 2006, after the addition had been constructed. The Recorded Texas Historic Landmark file from 1999 includes photographs of all sides of the house prior to the addition’s construction.1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 4. Exterior walls and trim Standard 4.2 indicates that, when patching is required, new siding should have a matching profile. Elevation drawings indicate limited replacement of siding to match existing only in the areas to be modified by proposed work. The project meets this standard. 5. Windows, doors, and screens Standard 5.13 establishes requirements for historic landmarks. It states that window and door openings should not be enlarged, moved, or enclosed except as required by an addition. On the west elevation, a limited area of wall including two windows will be removed to accommodate the addition. These are not significant elements and are on the …
600' 599' 598' 597' 596' 595' 594' E 34th St PP PP 601' 602' WV W WV 4 5 CO CO CO G 603' E 6 " 0 - ' 5 1 k c a b t e s t e e r t s e d i s SITE PLAN NOTES 1 2 3 DI 10' - 0" rear setback 25' - 0" front yard setback Section A high point: 604' - 0" Section A high point: 603' - 8 7/16" Section B high point: 601' - 11 1/4" Section A high point: 599' - 6 13/16" E " 0 - ' 5 d r a y e d i s k c a b t e s PP N 1 Site Plan 1/8" = 1'-0" KEYNOTES 1 Critical Root Zone (CRZ) 2 1/2 CRZ 3 1/4 CRZ 4 Property line 5 Limits of work 6 New addition footprint contained within this area; does not impact CRZ of adjacent tree WV WV FH WW PP t S l a v u D IMPERVIOUS COVER AND BUILDING AREA Site Area Allowable Impervious Area (45%) Allowable Floor-to-Area Ratio (40%) Proposed Impervious Cover Area: Main House Building Garage and Pool House Building Driveway Patio and Pool Coping Walkways Proposed Floor-to-Area Ratio (F.A.R.): First Floor Main Building Second Floor Main Building Basement Attic First Floor Garage Building Second Floor Garage Building 16,952 SF 7,628 SF 6,781 SF 1,901 SF 957 SF 1,507 SF 2,005 SF 758 SF 1,901 SF 1,686 SF 388 SF 510 SF 957 SF 575 SF Total Impervious Cover: 7,128 SF (42.0%) Total F.A.R.: 6,017 SF (35.5%) LEGEND PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION Copyright: These drawings are property of the architect and may not be reproduced, distributed, published, or used in any way without written consent of the architect. L E D O M E R N E H C T I K t e e r t S l a v u D 2 1 3 3 5 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A Historic Review Package February 2, 2022 Drawn by: CG, EK Checked by: CS Revisions: Site Plan G1.10 9 3 4 Limits of work 7 3 6 11 13 12 10 14 3 1 2 9 15 3 5 Existing Den Existing Outdoor Patio 8 Existing Kitchen Existing Dining Room N 1 …
Existing 34th Street frontage (above) Proposed 34th Street frontage (below) PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION Copyright: These drawings are property of the architect and may not be reproduced, distributed, published, or used in any way without written consent of the architect. L E D O M E R N E H C T I K t e e r t S l a v u D 2 1 3 3 5 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A Historic Review Package February 2, 2022 Drawn by: CG, EK Checked by: CS Revisions: Existing and Proposed Views A5.01 Existing 34th Street frontage (above)Proposed 34th Street frontage (below)
9 3 4 Limits of work 7 3 6 11 13 12 10 14 3 1 2 9 15 3 5 Existing Den Existing Outdoor Patio 8 Existing Kitchen Existing Dining Room N 1 Level 1 - Demo Plan 3/8" = 1'-0" KEYNOTES 1 Demo brick patio and fountain to prepare for new 2 Remove hose and spigot and move to new location; foundation ref. plumbing to be demolished 3 Existing wall, including any windows and doors within, 4 Existing wall finishes to be demolished; utilize existing framing for new construction 5 Keep existing wall and door and tie in with new construction 6 Demo all kitchen millwork, finishes, appliances, and coordinate electrical with new construction 7 Existing windows to remain; coordinate extent of demo to allow for new window at edge of existing 8 Existing millwork to remain; coordinate extent of wall demolition accordingly 9 Existing awning to be demolished 9 Existing eyebrow to be demolished 10 Existing planter to be demolished 11 Existing mechanical chase to remain 12 Plug and seal existing electrical in chase wall, to be covered in new construction 13 Remove refrigerator; store for reuse 14 Remove wine cooler and associated doors/trim; store for reuse 15 Existing door to be demolished 15 Existing front door DEMO PLAN NOTES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Refer to architectural drawings prior to demolition to understand the scope of work. Re: sheet A1.01 for the architectural floor plan. All existing electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems to be removed. Contractor to take care removing doors and systems in aluminum storefront systems. All existing glass panel windows to be removed and replaced. Remove all ceiling finishes and insulation. Expose all structural framing and ceilings. 15 LEGEND PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION Copyright: These drawings are property of the architect and may not be reproduced, distributed, published, or used in any way without written consent of the architect. L E D O M E R N E H C T I K t e e r t S l a v u D 2 1 3 3 5 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A Historic Review Package February 2, 2022 Drawn by: CG, EK Checked by: CS Revisions: Demolition Plan D1.01 11 " 5 7 . Up 101b 9 DS 10 11 Refrigerator/Freezer Pantry Baking Area 1 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2021-205974 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 804 RUTHERFORD PLACE C.1– 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a contributing duplex and detached carport. Construct a new single-family residence with pool and two-story cabana. 1) Total demolition of existing contributing duplex and detached carport. 2) Construction of new single-family residence with pool and two-story cabana. The proposed primary building is two stories with a habitable attic and roof deck. It features an irregular flat, gabled, and shed roofline; fixed-pane and casement full-light fenestration in irregular pattern; stucco cladding; and a front-facing garage. The pool cabana is two stories in height with stucco cladding, a gabled roofline, and fixed-pane windows on two elevations; the west and south secondary elevations are windowless. ARCHITECTURE The 2020 Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Nomination lists 804 Rutherford Place as the only example of a representative domestic property constructed with a “mixed” architectural style. This unique eclecticism includes Mission, Tudor Revival, and Swiss influences. The nomination’s description is as follows: The small apartment building at 804 Rutherford Place is a good example of an eclectic, mixed design that draws from three styles, in this case Mission Revival, Tudor Revival, and Swiss. The building is two stories in height, with buff- and tan-colored brick walls and a flat roof. The front elevation has a symmetrical arrangement, with a one-story, partial-width entrance volume extending from the rectangular main building volume. The projecting entrance has Tudor Revival details including an arched entrance door, arched hood molding over the door, narrow windows with decorative shutters, and flared wrought iron stair railings. The main two-story volume has little decoration. It has single 1/1 windows on the first floor and two sets of paired 1/1 windows on the second floor. Its modest Mission Revival details are limited to a narrow, divided light, arched window in the center of the upper floor, and a stepped parapet. The Swiss detailing includes the scalloped bargeboard. All window openings have brick sills, and the parapet coping is brick.1 Notably, the building at 806 Rutherford Place is constructed with a similar plan, form, and fenestration pattern, though 806 Rutherford shows only Mission influences. 806 Rutherford was constructed in 1925 by the Austin Real Estate Abstract Company. 803 E. Riverside Drive, constructed by the same company in 1925 and displaying similar Mission styling to 806 Rutherford, is located immediately behind 804 …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Thomas Blank Sunday, January 16, 2022 11:09 AM PAZ Preservation HR 22-001198. 804 Rutherford Pl *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am in favor of the proposed development at 804 Rutherford Place. I live at 1205 Bickler Rd, Austin TX 78704, witching the 500 foot radius for notice. This development will be an investment in needed housing capacity in the neighborhood. I believe that this type of construction is valuable. Plus, the property belongs to Mr. Rodenberg and he should be able to do what he wants with it. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Friday, January 21, 2022 11:10 AM PAZ Preservation Permit application # HR22-001198 This message is from Catherine Sims. I live at 803 Avondale Road, Austin, TX 78704. I recently received a notice of public hearing for case # HR 22‐001198, Ryan Rodenberg, 804 Rutherford Place. The permit requested is for a demolition permit for the property. I support this permit being approved. I am in favor of Mr. Rodenberg's petition. I do not want to attend a public hearing because I am over 70 years old. Doing so is not advisable for my age group, or health status, due to Covid protocols. I do want to register my support, however. Thank you, Catherine Sims 803 Avondale Road Austin, TX 78704 1
From: Cc: Subject: Date: Allen, Amber Objections, 2/28/2022 Monday, February 21, 2022 1:09:57 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Liaison, Chair and Vice Chair of the Landmark Preservation Commission, I reside within the Travis Heights Fairview Park National Historic District. These applicants are aware of the significance of the neighborhood and property or their cases would not be coming before the Historic Landmark Commission. I have been active in the neighborhood although I am not aware of the any of below applicants contacting or presenting to the membership of the South River City Citizens Neighborhood Association, the organization that supported the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Historic District, or the Historic Preservation Committee that successfully applied for the designation. Until these properties are fully documented and archived at the Austin History Center, I object to the demolition of the following agenda items and cases in the Travis Heights-Fairview Historic District being heard by the Historic Landmarks Commission at the 2/28/2022 meeting: C.1. 804 Rutherford Place – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction (postponed January 24, 2022) C.2. 512 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing house and build new construction (postponed January 24, 2022) C.8. 700 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.9. 1505 Alameda Drive - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.10. 1803 Kenwood Avenue - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.11. 1315 & 1317 Newning Avenue - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building As you may be aware from earlier correspondence, several houses in the Sherwood Oaks subdivision were recently demolished without a hearing although the properties met the requirements of being more the 50 years old and having noteworthy occupants and hosting events of historic significance. Moving forward, how can our community do better to engage and recognize the importance of our shared mission? Thank you for your consideration and service, Wendy Price Todd CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2022-016431; PR 2022-002618 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1803 KENWOOD AVE C.10. 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a circa 1937 single-story residence and replace it with a new construction single-family residence. 1) Total demolition of existing contributing single-family residence built in 1937. 2) Construction of new single-family residence with in-ground pool in rear, garage, and carport. The proposed primary building is a two-story minimalist style. It features a compound roofline; fixed-pane and casement full-light fenestration in irregular pattern; dark grey brick on the exterior first story and light-colored exterior stucco cladding on the slightly overhanging second story. The rear second-story elevation has a small rear balcony with a horizontal metal railing overlooking the pool. Designs indicate a side entry garage and direct neighboring carport located in front of the residence with a horizontal wood fence located directly in front of the carport which shields the carport and garage from direct view from the street. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Wood frame, single-story, residential construction on pier and beam foundation. The structure is of the Minimal Traditional style with a side gable with a front-facing cross gable design. It is typical of minimal traditional design with horizontal wood siding, two sets of symmetrical multi-pane, 6:6 wood windows flanked by slim, simple shutters. There is a small, round gable vent in the front-facing gable façade. The single door entry has a concrete landing and is covered with a wooden awning supported by decorative wooden brackets. The awning is a continuation of the asphalt roof. There is a thin, slightly turned metal balustrade and railing on the front concrete steps and landing. Likely built by the prominent dentist and civic activist, Dr. R.L. Struhall in 1937. Dr. Struhall and wife Lillian Parma moved to 1805 Kenwood by 1942. According to City Directories, in 1941, 1803 Kenwood was owned by Raymond W., Jr. and his wife, Marjorie M. Ramsey. Raymond was employed at the R & R Service Station and they lived in the home until at least 1944. The house continued to be occupied short-term according to City Directory records until it was purchased by Donald B. and Elsie A. Ezell who lived in the home till Mr. Ezell’s death in 1961. The Ezell’s owned and operated The Chicken House Café, a restaurant located at 4201 Alice Avenue. Elsie Ezell was also a local high school …
From: Cc: Subject: Date: Allen, Amber Objections, 2/28/2022 Monday, February 21, 2022 1:09:57 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Liaison, Chair and Vice Chair of the Landmark Preservation Commission, I reside within the Travis Heights Fairview Park National Historic District. These applicants are aware of the significance of the neighborhood and property or their cases would not be coming before the Historic Landmark Commission. I have been active in the neighborhood although I am not aware of the any of below applicants contacting or presenting to the membership of the South River City Citizens Neighborhood Association, the organization that supported the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Historic District, or the Historic Preservation Committee that successfully applied for the designation. Until these properties are fully documented and archived at the Austin History Center, I object to the demolition of the following agenda items and cases in the Travis Heights-Fairview Historic District being heard by the Historic Landmarks Commission at the 2/28/2022 meeting: C.1. 804 Rutherford Place – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction (postponed January 24, 2022) C.2. 512 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing house and build new construction (postponed January 24, 2022) C.8. 700 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.9. 1505 Alameda Drive - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.10. 1803 Kenwood Avenue - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.11. 1315 & 1317 Newning Avenue - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building As you may be aware from earlier correspondence, several houses in the Sherwood Oaks subdivision were recently demolished without a hearing although the properties met the requirements of being more the 50 years old and having noteworthy occupants and hosting events of historic significance. Moving forward, how can our community do better to engage and recognize the importance of our shared mission? Thank you for your consideration and service, Wendy Price Todd CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Ulla Florholmen Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:01 PM PAZ Preservation Please save 1803 Kenwood Ave. Case# HR 22-016431 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Amber Allen, Please save this historical building which adds to our neighborhoods historic character. Kind regards, Ulla Florholmen 1506 Travis Heights Blvd CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
From: Cc: Subject: Date: Allen, Amber Objections, 2/28/2022 Monday, February 21, 2022 1:09:57 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Liaison, Chair and Vice Chair of the Landmark Preservation Commission, I reside within the Travis Heights Fairview Park National Historic District. These applicants are aware of the significance of the neighborhood and property or their cases would not be coming before the Historic Landmark Commission. I have been active in the neighborhood although I am not aware of the any of below applicants contacting or presenting to the membership of the South River City Citizens Neighborhood Association, the organization that supported the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Historic District, or the Historic Preservation Committee that successfully applied for the designation. Until these properties are fully documented and archived at the Austin History Center, I object to the demolition of the following agenda items and cases in the Travis Heights-Fairview Historic District being heard by the Historic Landmarks Commission at the 2/28/2022 meeting: C.1. 804 Rutherford Place – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction (postponed January 24, 2022) C.2. 512 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing house and build new construction (postponed January 24, 2022) C.8. 700 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.9. 1505 Alameda Drive - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.10. 1803 Kenwood Avenue - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building and build new construction C.11. 1315 & 1317 Newning Avenue - Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – DEMOLISH a contributing building As you may be aware from earlier correspondence, several houses in the Sherwood Oaks subdivision were recently demolished without a hearing although the properties met the requirements of being more the 50 years old and having noteworthy occupants and hosting events of historic significance. Moving forward, how can our community do better to engage and recognize the importance of our shared mission? Thank you for your consideration and service, Wendy Price Todd CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2022-009233 OLD WEST AUSTIN 2507 HARTFORD ROAD C.12 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a noncontributing garage and construct a new accessory dwelling unit. 1) Demolish existing garage (ca. 1999). 2) Construct a new ADU. The proposed building is two stories in height, with a compound hipped roof clad in composition shingles to match the main house. The ADU’s exterior is clad in fiber-cement siding and features 1:1 mulled and single aluminum-clad wood windows, as well as fixed windows and a front-facing garage door. RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The house at 2507 Hartford Road was built around 1951 with an attached garage. It was built for John and Elsie Clemens and their family. John E. Clemens, a CPA, worked as the business manager for the Austin Independent School District. He was also president of Austin’s chapter of the American Kennel Club.1 Permit history shows several remodels to the house and garage during the 1990s and early 2000s, including reworking the home’s parking structure. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed ADU is constructed in roughly the same location as the existing garage, at the side and rear of the main house. 2. Orientation The proposed ADU’s orientation is consistent with the existing garage’s orientation, as well as the orientations of other detached garages in the district. 3. Scale, massing, and height While the proposed building is two stories in height, its location at the rear of the lot will likely mitigate its impact to the one-story front house. The applicant may wish to consider removing the projecting bay from the front elevation for enhanced compatibility. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions appear compatible with the existing house and the district as a whole. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s design is relatively simple and appears mostly compatible with the main house. 6. Roofs With the exception of the projecting bay, the house’s hipped roof is compatible with the main house. 7. Exterior walls The proposed horizontal siding is understated and appropriate. 8. Windows and doors The proposed wood-clad aluminum windows and painted garage door appear appropriate. "Clemens 1 https://atxlibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/clemens-heads-kennel- club/docview/1559220216/se-2?accountid=7451. …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2022-012669 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 2108 KENWOOD AVENUE C.13 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an accessory dwelling unit. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS The proposed ADU is two stories, with an attached carport, uncovered wood deck, and roof deck. It is clad in fiber-cement siding with metal cable railings at the roof deck and stairwell. Windows are fixed, with varying proportions at each elevation. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed ADU is located at the rear of the lot, behind the contributing house. 2. Orientation The proposed ADU’s orientation of the entrance and the carport matches the orientation of contributing buildings and outbuildings in the district. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed ADU is located behind a substantial two-story addition to the original main house, so its two-story height is not obtrusive; however, the roof deck adds an element of height that may be visible from the street. The building’s massing is simple, with a small step-down between floors at the main elevation. 4. Proportions The building’s proportions are somewhat compatible with its surroundings—though its massing is strongly vertical, design elements help to reduce its impact. 5. Design and style Though the proposed building’s overall design is somewhat incompatible with the surrounding district, its position at the rear of the lot renders its overall impact minimal. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roof and roof deck are not compatible with the main house. 7. Exterior walls The proposed fiber-cement horizontal siding is compatible with the main house. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fixed windows and fully-glazed doors are mostly incompatible, though their rhythmic placement somewhat echoes the main house’s design. 11. Attached garages and carports The proposed carport is compatible; though it is not set back from the front wall of the ADU, it is placed far back on the lot and does not affect the view of the contributing house from the street. 9. Porches See 6. Summary The project meets some of the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The primary building contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans. C.13 – …
HLC D ESIGN R EVIEW ZILKER METRO PAR K ZILKER CLUBHOUSE R E H A B I L I T A T I O N P R O J E C T April 12, 2021 1 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | April 12, 2021Zilker Clubhouse Rehabilitation 2 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | April 12, 2021Zilker Clubhouse Rehabilitation Chronology • 1917 — Barton Springs Park given to City of Austin • 1932 — Remainder of Zilker Park, large tract north and west of original gift, given to City of Austin • 1934 — Boy Scout Lodge (now known as Zilker Clubhouse) built by the CWA, CCC • 1934 — Lookout Point built by the CCC • 1940 — Addition to north wing built by the NYA, for use as a • 1956 — Paved terrace added to the east of the Clubhouse, • 1963 — PARD facilities officially integrated • 1994 — New restrooms added north of main room, accessible • 1997 — Clubhouse and Point listed on National Register under caretaker’s residence built by the Jaycees parking and entry route the Zilker Park NRHD by UT SOA • 2006 — HABS drawings and documentation completed • 2012 — Zilker Park Cultural Landscape Report completed by UT SOA MSHP student Boy Scout Clubhouse construction, ca. 1934, Austin History Center 3 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | April 12, 2021Zilker Clubhouse Rehabilitation LEGEND 1934 1940 1994 OFFICE 2 BREAK RM. OFFICE 1 BATH STOR. STOR. KITCHEN KITCHEN STORAGE OFFICE 3 MAIN ROOM VEST. WOMEN MEN 4 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | April 12, 2021Zilker Clubhouse Rehabilitation Zilker Clubhouse, ca. 1940s, Foster, William Hague. University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary Photo courtesy gypc.girl.photography 5 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | April 12, 2021Zilker Clubhouse Rehabilitation Lookout Point construction, 1934, Austin History Center Lookout Point, 1934, Austin History Center Lookout Point, 1937, Austin History Center Lookout Point, 2020 6 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | April 12, 2021Zilker Clubhouse Rehabilitation Scope Summary • Preservation and restoration of building • Programmatic priority for event use • Restore infilled original windows and doors • Restore the connection of main hall to cottage Modest formalizing elements to parking Landscape plan, drip irrigation Wayfinding and interpretive signage Study HVAC system, water heater relocation, gas service Replace electrical and data systems, improve lighting Window and door restoration, roof replacement, masonry cleaning, ironwork restoration 7 HLC DESIGN REVIEW | …
CITY of AUSTIN C I P I D # 6066.052 CSP# CLM B339 ZILKER METRO PARK - ZILKER CLUBHOUSE REHABILITATION 2 0 0 A R N U L F O A L O N Z O W A Y A U S T I N , T E X A S 7 8 7 0 4 Consultants Owner Location Map Index of Drawings ARCHITECTS Limbacher & Godfrey Architects, Inc. 2124 East Sixth Street, Suite 102 Austin, Texas 78703 Ph: 512-450-1518, Fax: 512-320-1916 email: info@limbacher-godfrey.com STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Sparks Engineering, Inc. 933 North Flores Street San Antonio, Texas 78212 Ph: 210-229-0669 email: pat@sparksengineering.com MEP ENGINEER ACR Engineering, Inc. 3001 S. Lamar, Suite 210 Austin, Texas 78704 Ph: 512-440-8333 email: rtroncoso@acreng.com CIVIL ENGINEER Doucet & Associates 7401B Highway 71 West, Suite 160 Austin, Texas 78735 Ph: 512-583-2622 email: zxing@doucetengineers.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Asakura Robinson 1224 E. 12th Street, #310 Austin, Texas 78702 Ph: 512-351-9601, Fax: 832-201-7198 email: brendan@asakurarobinson.com GRAPHIC DESIGN/INTERPRETIVE fd2s 1634 E. Cesar Chavez Austin, Texas 78702 Ph: 512-476-7733 email: croberts@fd2s.com CITY of AUSTIN SPONSORING DEPARTMENT Parks and Recreation Department Kimberly McNeeley, Director MANAGING DEPARTMENT Parks and Recreation Department Kimberly McNeeley, Director PROJECT MANAGER Parks and Recreation Department Ellen Colfax 919 West 28 1/2 Street Austin, Texas 78705 Ph: 512-974-9506 email: ellen.colfax@austintexas.gov CITY COUNCIL Mayor Steve Adler Council Member Natasha Harper-Madison Council Member Vanessa Fuentes Council Member Sabino Renteria Council Member Gregorio Casar Council Member Ann Kitchen Council Member Mackenzie Kelly Council Member Leslie Pool Council Member Paige Ellis Council Member Kathie Tovo Council Member Alison Alter City Manager Spencer Cronk . D V L B C A P - O M . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N EAST SIXTH STREET EAST FIFTH STREET C E S A R C H A V E Z BARTON S P R I N G S ROAD RIVERSIDE DRIVE ZILKER CLUBHOUSE TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH T1.01 T1.02 C101 C102 C103 C200 C201 C202 C203 C204 C300 C301 C302 C400 C401 C500 L1.00 L1.01 L1.02 L1.03 L3.00 L3.01 L4.00 L4.01 L4.02 L4.03 L5.00 COVER COVER, Index of Drawings Design Data CIVIL DRAWINGS General Notes Overall Existing Conditions Exstg Clubhouse Site and Demolition ES Control Overall Sheet ES Control Plan Sheet 1 ES Control Plan Sheet 2 ES Control Plan Sheet 3 Overall Site Plan Site Plan Sheet 1 Site Plan Sheet 2 ES Control Detail and Tree List …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28TH, 2022 PR-2022-010250; GF-2022-017172 OLD WEST AUSTIN 1510 PEASE ROAD C.15 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a ca. 1936 multifamily (duplex) residence and detached metal frame covered carport. The structure is a Tudor-style brick construction residence that was built circa 1936 as a multi-family residence (duplex). The residence has a simple side-gabled design easily visible behind two smaller asymmetrical front-facing gables with a 1- unit entrance located on the front facade with an arched door containing a small circular quarter-divided window. The second unit is accessed via a matching door located beneath the side gable on the east elevation where there is a covered porch and decorative metal railing. There is a prominent front-facing chimney with an inward swooping detail above the firebox, flanked by quarter-shaped gable vents. The windows are simple 1:1 wood single pane. Each unit has a rear-covered porch. There is also a rear-covered metal frame carport which is not of significance. This property was built as a multi-family duplex circa 1936 and therefore has a history of tenants although none appeared to live in the property for more than a couple of years. The longest tenant appears to be Donald L. and Donna Hoskins. According to City Directory records, Donald was an Architect for Southerland & Page in 1955 and 1957 when he lived at the duplex. Of historical significance are tenants Juan A. and Carolina R. Merigo-Aza. Juan Antonio Merigo-Aza was the Vice Consular officer at the Mexican Consulate and was a delegate at the Mexico City conference that led to a new International Agreement for Migratory workers in 1951. The Agreement improved living and working conditions for migratory farmers but also provided legislation for the punishment of harboring or concealing those who enter the country without documentation. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: architectural significance. a. Architecture. The building is a good example of a Tudor-style multi-family residence and does appear to convey b. Historical association. The property does not have significant historical associations. Juan Antonio Merigo-Aza was a prominent local …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Stef Schrader Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:55 AM PAZ Preservation Case #PR-2022-010250; GF-2022-017172 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To whom it may concern: I am writing against the demolition of the contributing home at 1510 Pease Road (GF 22‐017172). In my short time living a street over, I have noticed the Historic Landmark Commission approve too many demolitions of contributing structures in this area. At this rate, there be little left that defines this historic district! You can stop the bleeding now by denying some permits. Construction—especially the construction at 1601 Woodlawn and 1602 Pease—has made my life an absolute living hell. I have recorded jackhammering loud enough to violate race track sound limits on my front porch. My whole home shakes whenever they're banging on things or operating heavy machinery. Frankly, I have concerns about the build quality of the home going up next to mine as well as a number of their framing boards are ones I'd have left at Home Depot—but that's another story. Noise starts promptly at 7 AM and continues throughout my work day, which has not just interrupted my ability to work from home. Debris from the construction zone has also fallen onto my yard numerous times as well. Does that sound like life in a peaceful historic district to you? One where I can't bear to live in my own home based on the jackhammering nextdoor? Or where I'm constantly worried about nails in my tires? Furthermore, it is my understanding that 1510 Pease is a multifamily structure—the likes of which we need more of to meet Austin's housing needs. I have not seen 1510 Pease's specific plans, but demolishing it for a single‐family home would be a further slap in the face for a community that is in desperate need of enough housing to meet demand. Having lived through two such demolitions nearby already, I have also been appalled at the incredible amount of waste that gets sent to the landfill from the demolition of just one home. We have to be more mindful of the environmental impact of these teardowns as well. It is deeply irresponsible to throw that much away without a good reason, particularly from a livable structure. If the home is repairable or can be renovated, I'm fine with that—make it livable and enjoy! However, I firmly believe that this …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Donna Morrow Thursday, January 20, 2022 9:13 AM PAZ Preservation 512 East Monroe St. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case # GF 22‐001167`512 E. Monroe St Attn: Amber Allen I object to the demolition of the house at 512 East Monroe St. This bungalow is a well‐designed, attractive, and contributing example of 1930s pre‐war houses prevalent in this historic neighborhood. It could be upgraded and enlarged without losing the original 1930s character and style. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW DEMOLITION OF THIS HOUSE. Donna Morrow 504 Terrace Drive 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Thomas Blank Friday, January 21, 2022 7:23 AM PAZ Preservation Case GF 22-001167 - 512 E Monroe St *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am in favor of approving Ms. Allen’s demolition permit application at 512 E Monroe. This property belongs to her and she should be able to do with it as she pleases. Thank you, Tom Blank 1205 Bickler Rd, Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: CLIFTON LADD Sunday, January 23, 2022 6:13 PM PAZ Preservation brenda Ladd Case number PR-2021-200516; GF 22-001167 for Demolition of 512 E Monroe; public hearing MONDAY, 1-24-22 at 6:00 PM Public Hearing Form Ladd.pdf; Untitled attachment 00035.htm; 512_E_Monroe_20220120-00 copy.jpeg; Untitled attachment 00038.htm; 512_E_Monroe_20220120-01 copy.jpeg; Untitled attachment 00041.htm Dear Ms. Allen ‐ I just left you a phone message a little while ago and would appreciate it if you could call me tomorrow. We received a notice of public hearing for an application for a demolition permit for 512 East Monroe St. while we were out of town January 16‐19, and I didn’t see it until Thursday the 20th. I don’t understand how the City of Austin could give less than one week notice before a public hearing for a demolition. I have made several attempts to find information about this proposed demolition at https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/permit/public‐search‐other using the case numbers listed in the notice (PR‐2021‐ 200516; GF 22‐001167), but it only returns the answer “No rows returned.” The sign announcing the public hearing was not posted on the property, as it was laying on the ground in the front yard when I went by to look on Thursday the 20th (see attached photo). This house is a good example of the architecture of the Travis Heights‐Fairview Park National Historic District. It is in very good condition and should be preserved as an important part of the neighborhood (see attached photo). I oppose the demolition of this valuable part of our historic neighborhood. Please contact me before the public hearing tomorrow night at 6:00. Thank you, Clifton Ladd 1509 Newning Avenue Please let me know if you have any information about this. ‐‐‐‐ Clif Ladd 1
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28, 2022 HR-2021-207618 SIXTH STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 320 E. 6TH STREET C.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Exterior work to the storefront and entry vestibule; new signage. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Restore paired multi-light doors at the storefront entrance on the west end of the building. The doors are designed to match a historic photograph but be of code-compliant width, resulting in four rather than five doors within the existing masonry opening. Replace the canopy above the entrance on the existing frame. 2) Install a roll-down gate at the entry vestibule. The gate will mount into the concrete columns at either side of the vestibule and will not disturb the historic canopy. 3) Remove existing non-historic signage, patch and repaint stucco wall above the entrance. Install new sign to screen the roll-down gate. The sign will be approximately 16’ wide by 2’-10” in height. Three options are presented: a. Painted aluminum sign with bulbs to match underside of canopy; b. Painted aluminum sign with flat-cut aluminum letters and indirect lighting; or c. Painted aluminum sign with double-stroke neon to match neon on the canopy perimeter. 4) Replace non-original black tile at the recessed theater entrance with new patterned tile. 5) Replace one entry door with a Dutch door to match existing. Movie theater with three-story brick façade spanning two lots. The section at 320 E. 6th St. contains the theater entrance, recessed beneath a projecting metal canopy with rounded corners, studded on the underside with lights and ringed with neon. Above is a blade sign with lighted letters and neon perimeter. To the west at 318 E. 6th is a storefront entrance flush with the façade, consisting of paired glass doors and stucco infill. At the upper levels, picture windows have replaced the historic multi-light double-hung and casement windows. Window openings are set within recessed brick bands. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Jay J. Hegman opened the Ritz Theatre in 1929 at 320 E. 6th St. and expanded the theater to its current configuration encompassing 318 E. 6th St. in 1937. Architect Hugo Kuehne designed the 1937 theater. It was the first in Austin planned specifically for talking pictures. The theater originally served only white customers; later, it became the first integrated theater in Austin, though Black patrons were restricted to the balcony.1 It continued in operation as a movie theater until 1964, after …
320 EAST 6TH ST- THE RITZ The Ritz was built in 1929 by J.J. Hegman, who owned several movie theaters in Austin, Texas. It was the first theater in Austin to be built specifically for the talkies. The architect was Hugo Kuehne, the founding dean of the University of Texas School of Architecture, who also designed the Austin History Center (originally the Austin Public Library). The Ritz was originally a long narrow space, and was segregated like most movie theaters in Texas and other southern states at that time; there was a separate entrance leading to a balcony reserved for people of color.[1] The theater opened on 6th Street on October 13, 1929. It showed primarily first-run westerns with a lower ticket price than any other theater in town and frequently brought in stars like Wild Bill Elliott and Dub Taylor, along with country music acts who performed before the movies.[2] In 1937, Hegman's son Elmo took over management and expanded the theater to 800 seats by widening the theater by 25 feet. He continued showing Westerns until television siphoned off the audience; Elmo closed the theater in 1964.[1] Cary White, the production designer for The Faculty and Spy Kids, amongst other movies, was the projectionist and janitor at the Ritz during some of its last days as a movie house.[3] The theater remained shuttered until 1970, when it re-opened for three years as an adult theater. In October 1974, entrepreneurs Jim Franklin (artist) and Bill Livinggood renovated the theater and opened the doors as a music venue, offering an eclectic mix of programming from classical to rock and including live theater and movies. This was also short-lived, and the club closed in 1975.[4] Several other groups moved in over the years. The Center Stage theater group took it over in 1977, closing off the balcony to make a second, separate theater. Again, the venue didn't last long and the late 1970s saw a serious decline in the theater's fortunes, including another stint into porn exhibition.[5] In 1981, Shannon Sedwick and Michael Shelton took out a lease and turned management over to Craig Underwood, who began running the venue as a punk rock club. Shows such as Black Flag, which inaugurated the punk era on May 7, 1982, The Misfits, Hüsker Dü, The Circle Jerks, The Dead Kennedys, Minor Threat and others showed that there was an audience for hardcore …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 28TH, 2022 HR-2021-202873 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1410 ALAMEDA DR. C.4 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Replace existing wood windows and wood siding on the front and left side of the house on contributing residence built circa 1936 in the Travis Heights Fairview Park National Register District. 1) Replace existing wood windows, and wood siding on the front and left side of contributing residence built circa 1936 in the Travis Heights Fairview Park National Register District. 2) Windows: Design proposal includes replacing original wood windows with Andersen 100 Series fiberglass windows: single-hung, equal sash, no flange, with a white exterior frame, white sash/panel, and white interior frame, with interior sash/panel. The replacement windows will also have dual-pane, low-E argon fill, and ¾” white muntins, between-the- glass, of a 3 wide x 2 high, colonial pattern. Replacement of windows is needed due to: “energy efficiency (existing windows are leaky and have single-pane glass). Windows don't open and close properly.” (applicant) Replacements will be the 5 front facade windows and the seven windows along the south elevation (left side viewed from the street) as demonstrated in the plan photos. 3) Siding: The design proposal includes replacing all original wood siding from the original part (front façade and sides) with Hardie board to match Hardie siding on later additions to the property. Replacement is needed due to “rot and water damage, flaking and missing siding.” (applicant) ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Wood construction residence of Minimal Traditional style with asymmetrical cross-gabled roof and horizontal wood siding, with significant alterations and additions including 6:6 replacement windows, and additions of entry bay on the front side and rear two-story construction. The home appears to have been built in 1936 by A.R. McTee a journalist for the Austin American Statesman in the early 1930s. The house was then purchased and sold by several owners including Hurley and Alice E. Griffith, owners and manager of the Griffith Wallpaper & Paint Co. circa 1941-1944; Girvin H. and Ethel M. Sanderson, circa 1947-1949, a Professor at the University of Texas; and Charles G. and Vivian Puryear from 1952-1957, owners of Bradshaw & Puryear. Mr. Puryear was a Master Plumber and helped to organize the Mechanical Contractors Association of Austin and the Mechanical Contractor’s Association of Texas which he was a member of for 25 years till his death in 1979. DESIGN STANDARDS The …
