10.0 - 2006 Maple Ave — original pdf

Backup

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness June 3, 2026 HR-2026-056957 Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District 2006 Maple Avenue 10 – 1 Proposal Demolish a rear, non-original addition at a contributing property, and construct a new addition in a similar location. Project Specifications 1) Demolish the rear portion of the property behind what is understood to be the original structure on the site, which is a two-bedroom section and rectangular in form. This front section will be retained. 2) Construct a new rear addition behind the original house that will connect only where the above demolition occurs. Addition will be a single-story, rectangular in plan, and will not exceed the width of the original house footprint. 3) Alter the driveway to terminate near the original house and construct a carport. Existing curb cut location will be retained. Architecture The existing building at 2006 Maple Avenue is a single-story, rectangular structure that is set above grade at its front and accessed by a concrete stair, which leads to a front porch facing the street. The house is clad on all sides by tile siding, though the exact material is unknown. To the left of the front door is a set of paired, 1-over-1 windows, and to the right is a large picture window overlooking the street. To the rear of the property, the house extends beyond the rectangular footprint towards the northwest, which was once a garage that has since been enclosed. Though the house does not feature many stylistic embellishments, it fits well with the form, scale, and experience of other contributing properties in the Rogers Washington Holy Cross neighborhood, for which it is a contributing property. Design Standards The Rogers Washington Holy Cross Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: General Standards 1. Protected Facades The front and sides of the originally constructed building are to be retained. Siding material on this portion of the building is to be replaced, due to deterioration and the possibility of hazardous materials present. The application lists the new material as “New Hardie Siding,” but it is highly recommended that, when a specific product is selected, that information is shared with the Historic Preservation Office staff to ensure it is an accurate and appropriate match to existing material. Additionally, a stone material cladding is proposed at the existing concrete skirt, which shows cracking and requires repair. HPO requests further information on what the appearance of this stone would be, so as to ensure it will not negatively affect the overall appearance from the street. 2. Lot Configuration Significant regrading of the property is not proposed. No replatting or additional housing units are proposed in this application. Site and Site Elements 3.1. Sidewalks/Walkways No alterations are proposed to the sidewalks or walkways. The existing curb cut is to be retained and the sidewalk will not be affected. 10 – 2 3.2. Driveways While the driveway is to remain in the same general location, it will be reconstructed to reduce its size and impermeability. Standard 3.2.4 calls for historic driveways to be retained and repaired, so this proposal does not entirely meet district requirements. However, the retention of the driveway location, removal of impermeable surface, and no work affecting the existing curb cut reduces the gravity of not meeting this Standard. 3.4. Retaining Walls The small retaining wall at the front of the property is in good condition and is to remain without alteration. Alterations to Contributing Properties 4.1. Exterior Walls The demolition of non-original material will affect roughly half of the rear exterior wall. As described in more detail below, the new addition will only affect areas of this wall that are part of this demolition, and further removal of the original rear wall material will not be included as part of the new construction. Additions to Contributing Properties 5.1. Design of Additions Addition is compatible in size and scale of the original building. Where it will be minimally visible from the street, the details and materials are compatible with the front section of the house. By utilizing only the portion of the rear wall that served as connection to the current addition, the design will create a hyphen that designates clearly the original house from the new addition. Finally, the addition will be a single-story and will not exceed the height of the original building. 5.2. Location of Additions Proposed addition is located to the rear of the main house, and will not extend out to either side. This reduces overall visibility from the street and makes the addition more visually compatible in the district. As mentioned above, the addition will be a single story and not visible above and behind the main house. Demolition and Relocation Only sections not original to the property are proposed to be demolished. These sections were confirmed by HPO staff through permit records where possible, and additional visual inspection of material or construction technique changes. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. Department Comments Note: In backup documentation, the site plan on Sheet A.100 indicates two new dwelling units that may be planned as part of a future development, with the applicant currently exploring feasibility through the city’s HOME program. At this time, this new construction is not being proposed and this work is not included in this application or review. Any proposal for such work will require an additional review by HLC. This application will time out on August 17, 2026. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District. Staff Recommendation Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness. Location Map 10 – 3 Property Information Photos 10 – 4 Google Streetview, 2022 Closer view of existing house, permit application, 2026 Historical Information 10 – 5 The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Austin, Tex.. 04 Mar 1953: 2. The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Austin, Tex.. 14 Oct 1964: A18. Permits 10 – 6 Sewer tap permit type, 1953 Permit for rear addition, 1956