05.1 - 217 & 201 Red River St - Trask and Castleman-Bull - Rezoning Resolution — original pdf

Backup

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City owns the property located 201, 201 1/2, 205, and 217 Red River Street and 603 East 3rd Street (“City Property”); and WHEREAS, City Property is located across from the existing Austin Convention Center site located at 500 East Cesar Chavez Street; and WHEREAS, the City is currently working on the expansion and redevelopment of the Austin Convention Center (the “Project”) which will require a total demolition of the existing Austin Convention Center; and WHEREAS, prior to the commencement of the Project, the District Chilling Plant #4 that was previously located at the Austin Convention Center was decommissioned; and WHEREAS, the Project is planning to install a new stand-alone District Chilling Plant #4.1 on City Property to replace the decommissioned District Chilling Plant #4; and WHEREAS, City Property is the current location of the Castleman-Bull House and Trask House; and WHEREAS, the Project requires relocation of both the Castleman-Bull House and Trask House to accommodate the underground installation of the new Downtown District Cooling Plant #4.1 on City Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: Council initiates rezoning for City Property. Page 1 of 2 City of Austin Council Meeting Backup: June 5, 2025File ID: 25-113925 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The City Manager is directed to process the applications for rezoning of City Property, to recommend appropriate rezoning, and take necessary steps to ensure an efficient rezoning process to avoid unnecessary delay. ADOPTED: , 2025 ATTEST: _______________________ Erika Brady City Clerk Page 2 of 2 City of Austin Council Meeting Backup: June 5, 2025File ID: 25-1139ZONING APPLICATION FOR ZONING FILE NUMBER(S) TENTATIVE CC DATE CITY INITIATED YES NO YES NO ROLLBACK DEPARTMENT USE ONLY APPLICATION DATE TENTATIVE ZAP/PC DATE CASE MANAGER APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY PROJECT DATA OWNER’S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (or Range): ZIP COUNTY: If project address cannot be defined, provide the following information: ALONG THE SIDE OF APPROXIMATELY Frontage ft. (N,S,E,W) Frontage road FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH Distance Direction TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): Is Demolition proposed? Cross street If Yes, how many residential units will be demolished? Unknown Number of these residential units currently occupied**: Is this zoning request to rezone a parcel that contains an existing mobile home park with five or more occupied units?** If Yes, how many? Type of Residential Unit: SF, duplex, triplex, townhouse/condo, multi-family, manufactured home: Number of Proposed Residential units (if applicable): If Yes, how many of the following: 1 Bedroom Affordable 2 Bedroom Affordable 3 Bedroom Affordable 4 or more Bedroom Affordable Unknown ** If 5 or more, tenant notification may be required and a certified form may be required with your application (LDC 25-1-712). Tenants must receive notification at least 270 days before the application is eligible for final ordinance readings by City Council. AREA TO BE REZONED: ACRES OR SQ FT Existing Zoning ___________ ___________ ___________ Existing Use ___________ ___________ ___________ Tract # # of Acres/SF ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Max # of Res Units Per Acre ___________ ___________ ___________ Proposed Zoning ___________ ___________ ___________ Proposed Use ___________ ___________ ___________ Tract # ___________ ___________ ___________ Proposed # of Acres/SF ___________ ___________ ___________ Max # of Res Units Per Acre ___________ ___________ ___________ Proposed Total # of Units Per Acre ___________ ___________ ___________ Name of Neighborhood Plan: Page 7 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 RELATED CASES ZONING NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT (YES / NO) FILE NUMBER: ACTIVE ZONING CASE (YES / NO) FILE NUMBER: RESTRICTIVE COVENANT (YES / NO) FILE NUMBER: SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN (YES / NO) (YES / NO) FILE NUMBER: FILE NUMBER: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (For the portion affected by this application) Provide either subdivision reference OR metes & bounds description. 1. SUBDIVISION REFERENCE: Name: Block(s)_____________ 2. METES AND BOUNDS (Attach two copies of certified field notesFILE NUMBER: DEED REFERENCE OF DEED CONVEYING PROPERTY TO THE PRESENT OWNER: VOLUME: SQ. FT: PAGE: OR DOCUMENT # or ACRES Is this a SMART Housing Project? Yes No If residential, is there other Tax Credits or Local/State/Federal funding? Yes No OTHER PROVISIONS IS A VARIANCE TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE BEING REQUESTED? Yes IS PROPERTY IN A COMBINING DISTRICT / OVERLAY ZONE? Yes No No TYPE OF COMBINING DIST/OVERLAY ZONE (NP, NCC, CVC,WO, etc) NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT? URBAN RENEWAL ZONE? Yes No IS A TIA REQUIRED? Yes No TRIPS PER DAY: Yes No GRID NUMBER (S) WATERSHED: WATER UTILITY PROVIDER: WASTEWATER UTILITY PROVIDER: ELECTRIC UTILITY PROVIDER: SCHOOL DISTRICT: OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WS CLASS: TYPE OF OWNERSHIP SOLE If ownership is other than sole or community property, list the individuals, partners, principals, etc. below or attach a separate sheet. COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION PARTNERSHIP TRUST Page 8 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING OWNER INFORMATION SIGNATURE: NAME: FIRM NAME: TELEPHONE NUMBER: STREET ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP: AGENT / PRINCIPAL CONTACT (If applicable) SIGNATURE: NAME: FIRM NAME: TELEPHONE NUMBER: STREET ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP CONTACT PERSON: TELEPHONE NUMBER: Page 9 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING CITY OF AUSTIN TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) DETERMINATION WORKSHEET APPLICANT MUST FILL IN W ORKSHEET PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR TIA DETERMINATION PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: APPLICANT: TELEPHONE NO: APPLICATION STATUS: DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT: ZONING: SITE PLAN: EXISTING: TRACT NUMBER TRACT ACRES BLDG SQ.FT. ZONING LAND USE L.T.E CODE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY TRIP RATE TRIPS PER DAY PROPOSED TRACT NUMBER TRACT ACRES BLDG SQ.FT. ZONING LAND USE L.T.E CODE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY TRIP RATE TRIPS PER DAY ABUTTING ROADWAYS STREET NAME PROPOSED ACCESS? FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PAVEMENT W IDTH CLASSIFICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A traffic impact analysis is required. The consultant preparing the study must meet with a transportation planner to discuss the scope and requirements of the study before beginning the study. A traffic impact analysis is NOT required. The traffic generated by the proposal does not exceed the thresholds established in the Land Development Code. The traffic impact analysis has been waived for the following reason: A neighborhood traffic analysis will be performed by the City for this project. The applicant may have to collect existing traffic counts. See a transportation planner for information. REVIEW ED BY: DISTRIBUTION: DATE: FILE CAP. METRO TXDOT TRANS. REV. TRAVIS CO. TRANS DEPT. TOTALCOPIES: NOTE: A TIA determination must be made prior to submittal of any zoning or site plan application, therefore, this completed and reviewed form MUST ACCOMPANY any subsequent application for the IDENTICAL project. CHANGES to the proposed project will REQUIRE a new TIA determination to be made. Page 9 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING SUBMITTAL VERIFICATION My signature attests to the fact that the attached application package is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I understand that City staff review of this application is dependent upon the accuracy of the information provided and that any inaccurate or inadequate information provided by me/my firm/etc., may delay the review of this application. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NAME BELOW SIGNATURE AND INDICATE FIRM REPRESENTED, IF APPLICABLE. Signature Date Name (Typed or Printed) Firm INSPECTION AUTHORIZATION As owner or authorized agent, my signature authorizes staff to visit and inspect the property for which this application is being submitted. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NAME BELOW SIGNATURE AND INDICATE FIRM REPRESENTED, IF APPLICABLE. Signature Date Name (Typed or Printed) Firm Page 10 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM concerning Subdivision Plat Notes, Deed Restrictions Restrictive Covenants I, (Print name of applicant) have checked the subdivision plat notes, deed restrictions, and/or restrictive covenants prohibiting certain uses and/or requiring certain development restrictions i.e. height, access, screening etc. on this property, located at: (Address or Legal Description) If a conflict should result with the request I am submitting to the City of Austin due to subdivision plat notes, deed restrictions, and/or restrictive covenants, it will be m y responsibility to resolve it. I also acknowledge that I understand the implications of use and/or development restrictions that are a result of a subdivision plat notes, deed restrictions, and/or restrictive covenants. I understand that if requested, I must provide copies of any and al l subdivision plat notes, deed restrictions, and/or restrictive covenants as information which may apply to this property. (Applicant's signature) (Date) POSTPONEMENT POLICY ON ZONING HEARINGS (cid:168) Sets a postponement date and time at the City Council hearing so that renotification of residents and property owners is not necessary. (cid:168) Limits the time a hear ing can be pos tponed to two months for both proponents and opponent s, unless otherwise approved by Council so that renotification of residents and property owners is not necessary. (cid:168) Allows only one postponement for either side, unless otherwise approved by Council. (cid:168) Requires that all requests for postponements be submitted in writing to the director of the Planning and Zoning Department at least one week prior to the scheduled Council meeting. The written request must specify reasons for the postponement. (cid:168) The Director of the Planning and Zoning Department shall provide a recommendation regarding the validity of the postponement request as the Director deems appropriate. (cid:168) Eliminates the automatic granting of a postponement of the first request. (cid:168) Authorizes Council to consider requests that are not submitted timely. Council action December 12, 1996 Page 11 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS General Overview Planned Unit Development district zoning is intended to produce development that implements the goals of preserving the natural environment, encouraging high quality development and innovative design, and ensuring adequate public facilities and services. The City Council intends PUD district zoning to produce development that achieves these goals to a greater degree than, and is therefore superior to, development under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (cid:168) A Development Assessment must be submitted, a Master Staff Report received, and a Council briefing must occur prior to submittal of a PUD application. (cid:168) Eighteen (18) copies of a 24 x 36 i nch generalized land use map which shall include the following: project name, legal description, boundary lines with bearings and dimensions, total acreage, north arrow, scale and location map. (cid:168) Existing topography using USGS or City datum at two (2) foot intervals for the property and adjacent property with 100 feet of the project boundary. (cid:168) A Mylar will be required prior to finalization of ordinance. (cid:168) Eighteen (18) copies of the proposed site development regulations to be established by the Land Use Plan. Maps, exhibits and support materials, clearly indicating the following, shall be included in either or both of the above: A. Existing and/or proposed land uses. Identify for each phase and for the total development: 1. Residential: Maximum density, total number and type(s) of unit(s)*, minimum lot size, building height, minimum setbacks and maximum impervious coverage. For multifamily uses, also show maximum FAR. If structures are proposed in excess of sixty (60) feet in height, schematic drawings shall be provided which illustrate the height, bulk and location of such buildings and line-of-sight analyses from adjoining properties and/or rights-of-way. 2. Non-Residential: Type of uses*, maximum FAR, total square footage, maximum impervious coverage, minimum setbacks and maximum building height. If structures are proposed in excess of sixty (60) feet in height, schematic drawings shall be pr ovided which illustrate the height, bulk and l ocation of such buildings and line-of-sight analyses from adjoining properties and/or rights-of-way. 3. Parkland/Open Space: Location and acreage of land proposed to be dedicated to the public and/or private parks, open space or buffer areas. 4. Civic Uses: Types of uses*, maximum FAR, total square footage, maximum impervious coverage, maximum building height and minimum setbacks.  Uses shall be listed at a level of detail sufficient for Traffic Impact Analysis review as required in Article III, Section 25-6 of the Land Development Code. C. Environmental characteristics of the site, such as, but not limited to, 100-year and 25 -year floodplains, slopes, environmentally sensitive areas and protected areas as defined in applicable watershed ordinances. D. The phasing of the development and t he manner in which each phase can exist as a s table independent unit consistent with the provision of adequate public facilities and services. E. The location of collector and arterial roadways proposed within the development, right-of-way widths, the location of access points to abutting streets and roadways and a Traffic Impact Analysis, if required by Article III of Chapter 25-6. (The number of copies of the required TIA will be determined by Transportation Review.) F. Identification of existing major street setbacks and planned right-of-way lines as required in the Austin Roadway Plan. G. Proposed method of providing the following services: 1. W ater service including gallons per day requirement. 2. W astewater disposal including gallons per day generated. 3. Preliminary stormwater management analysis. 4. Location of all required or proposed public facilities. H. Identification of any waivers from City ordinances or development standards pursuant to Chapter 25-2-402. Page 12 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING I. Copies of all covenants and restrictions which provide for the maintenance and taxation of all common areas. ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A written description describing how the proposal meets the intent and purposes of the PUD Zoning District, including Tier One and Tier Two Requirements, and Development Bonuses, as outlined in City Code Chapter 25-2, Subchapter B, Article 2, Division 5, Section 1.1 through Section 2.5.7 and defined below: § 2.3. TIER ONE REQUIREMENTS. 2.3.1. Minimum Requirements. All PUDs must: A. meet the objectives of the City Code; B. C. provide for development standards that achieve equal or greater consistency with the goals in Section 1.1 (General Intent) than development under the regulations in the Land Development Code; provide a total amount of open space that equals or exceeds 10 percent of the residential tracts, 15 percent of the industrial tracts, and 20 percent of the nonresidential tracts within the PUD, except that: 1. 2. a detention or filtration area is excluded from the calculation unless it is designed and maintained as an amenity; and the required percentage of open space may be reduced for urban property with characteristics that make open space infeasible if other community benefits are provided; D. comply with the City's Planned Unit Development Green Building Program; E. F. be consistent with applicable neighborhood plans, neighborhood conservation combining district regulations, historic area and landmark regulations, and compatible with adjacent property and land uses; provide for environmental preservation and protection relating to air quality, water quality, trees, buffer zones and greenbelt areas, critical environmental features, soils, waterways, topography, and the natural and traditional character of the land; G. provide for public facilities and services that are adequate to support the proposed development including school, fire protection, emergency service, and police facilities; H. exceed the minimum landscaping requirements of the City Code; I. J. K. L. provide for appropriate transportation and mass transit connections to areas adjacent to the PUD district and mitigation of adverse cumulative transportation impacts with sidewalks, trails, and roadways; prohibit gated roadways; protect, enhance and preserve areas that include structures or sites that are of architectural, historical, archaeological, or cultural significance; and include at least 10 acres of land, unless the property is characterized by special circumstances, including unique topographic constraints. 2.3.2. Additional Requirements. In addition to the requirements contained in Section 2.3.1 (Minimum Requirements), a PUD containing a retail, commercial, or mixed use development must: A. B. comply with Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards And Mixed Use). inside the urban roadway boundary depicted in Figure 2, Subchapter E, Chapter 25-2 (Design Standards and Mixed Use), comply with the sidewalk standards in Section 2.2.2., Subchapter E, Chapter 25-2 (Core Transit Corridors: Sidewalks And Building Placement); and C. contain pedestrian-oriented uses as defined in Section 25-2-691(C)(Waterfront Overlay District Uses) on the first floor of a multi-story commercial or mixed use building Page 13 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING § 2.4. TIER TWO REQUIREMENTS. This section contains criteria for determining the extent to which development proposed for a PUD district would be superior to that which would occur under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations as required under Section 1.1 (General Intent). A proposed PUD need not address all criteria in this section to achieve superiority, and the council may consider any other criteria the council deems appropriate. Open Space Provides open space at least 10% above the requirements of Section 2.3.1.A. (Minimum Requirements). Alternatively, within the urban roadway boundary established in Figure 2 of Subchapter E of Chapter 25-2 (Design Standards and Mixed Use), provide for proportional enhancements to existing or planned trails, parks, or other recreational common open space in consultation with the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department. Environment Does not request exceptions to or modifications of environmental regulations. Provides water quality controls superior to those otherwise required by code. Uses innovative water quality controls that treat at least 25 percent additional water quality volume and provide 20 percent greater pollutant removal, in addition to the minimum water quality volume required by code. Provides water quality treatment for currently untreated, undeveloped off-site areas with a drainage area of at least 25 percent of the subject tract. Reduces impervious cover or single-family density by five percent below the maximum otherwise allowed by code or includes off-site measures that lower overall impervious cover within the same watershed by five percent below that allowed by code. Provides minimum 50-foot setback for unclassified waterways with a drainage area of five acres or greater. Provides at least a 50 percent increase in the minimum waterway and critical environmental feature setbacks required by code. Clusters impervious cover and disturbed areas in a manner that preserves the most environmentally sensitive areas of the site that are not otherwise protected. Provides pervious paving for at least 50 percent or more of all paved areas in non-aquifer recharge areas. Prohibits uses that may contribute to air or water quality pollutants. Employs other creative or innovative measures. Austin Green Builder Program Provides a rating under the Austin Green Builder Program of three stars or above. Art Provides art approved by the Art in Public Places Program in open spaces, either by providing the art directly or by making a contribution to the City’s Art in Public Places Program or a successor program. Page 14 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING Great Streets Complies with City’s Great Streets Program, or a successor program. Applicable only to commercial, retail, or mixed-use development that is not subject to the requirements of Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards and Mixed Use). Community Amenities Provides community or public amenities, which may include spaces for community meetings, day care facilities, non-profit organizations, or other uses that fulfill an identified community need. Transportation Provides bicycle facilities that connect to existing or planned bicycle routes or provides other multi-modal transportation features not required by code. Building Design Exceeds the minimum points required by the Building Design Options of Section 3.3.2. of Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards and Mixed Use). Parking Structure Frontage In a commercial or mixed-use development, at least 75 percent of the building frontage of all parking structures is designed for pedestrian-oriented uses as defined in Section 25-2-691(C) (Waterfront Overlay District Uses) in ground floor spaces. Affordable Housing Provides for affordable housing or participation in programs to achieve affordable housing. Historic Preservation Preserves historic structures, landmarks, or other features to a degree exceeding applicable legal requirements. Accessibility Local Small Business Provides for accessibility for persons with disabilities to a degree exceeding applicable legal requirements. Provides space at affordable rates to one or more independent retail or restaurant small businesses whose principal place of business is within the Austin metropolitan statistical area. § 2.5. DEVELOPMENT BONUSES. 2.5.1. Limitation on Development. Except as provided in Section 2.5.2 (Requirements for Exceeding Baseline), site development regulations for maximum height, maximum floor area ratio, and maximum building coverage in a PUD with residential uses may not exceed the baseline established under Section 1.3.3 (Baseline for Determining Development Bonuses). 2.5.2. Requirements for Exceeding Baseline. Development in a PUD with residential uses may exceed the baseline established under Section 1.3.3 (Baseline for Determining Development Bonuses) for maximum height, maximum floor area ratio, and maximum building coverage if: A. the application for PUD zoning includes a report approved by the Director of the Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Department establishing the prevailing level of affordability of housing in the vicinity of the PUD, expressed as a percentage of median family income in the Austin metropolitan statistical area; and B. the developer either: 1. provides contract commitments and performance guarantees that provide affordable housing meeting or exceeding the requirements of Section 2.5.3 (Requirements for Rental Housing) and Section 2.5.4 (Requirements for Ownership Housing); or 2. makes donations for affordable housing under Section 2.5.6 (Alternative Affordable Housing Options). Page 15 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING 2.5.3. Requirements for Rental Housing. If rental housing units are included in a PUD, at least 10 percent of the rental units or rental habitable square footage within the PUD must: A. B. C. be affordable to a household whose income is less than the affordability level established under Section 2.5.5 (Affordability Levels); remain affordable for 40 years from the date a certificate of occupancy is issued; and be eligible for federal housing choice vouchers. 2.5.4. Requirements for Ownership Housing. If owner occupied housing is included in a PUD, at least five percent of the owner occupied units or owner occupied habitable square footage within the PUD must be: A. B. affordable to a household whose income is less than the affordability level established under Section 2.5.5 (Affordability Levels); and transferred to the owner subject to a shared equity agreement approved by the Director of the Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Department. 2.5.5. Affordability Levels. For purposes of this subchapter, the affordability level is: A. B. C. for a portion of a PUD within the urban roadway boundary depicted in Figure 2 of Subchapter E of Chapter 25-2 (Design Standards and Mixed Use), 80% of the median family income in the Austin metropolitan statistical area; for a portion of a PUD outside the urban roadway boundary depicted in Figure 2 of Subchapter E of Chapter 25-2 (Design Standards and Mixed Use), 60% of the median family income in the Austin metropolitan statistical area; or if the Council finds that the prevailing level of affordability of housing in the vicinity of the PUD is lower than the level applicable under Paragraph A or B, any lesser percentage of the median family income in the Austin metropolitan statistical area established by the Council. 2.5.6. Alternative Affordable Housing Options. Development within a PUD may exceed baseline standards as provided in Section 2.5.2.B.2 (Requirements for Exceeding Baseline) if the developer: A. B. donates to the Austin Housing Finance Corporation land within the PUD that is appropriate and sufficient to develop 20 percent of the residential habitable square footage planned for the PUD, as determined by the Director of the Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Department; or subject to approval by the city council, donates the amount established under Section 2.5.7 (In Lieu Donation) for each square foot of climate controlled space within the PUD to a Housing Assistance Fund to be used for producing or financing affordable housing, as determined by the Director of the Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Department. 2.5.7. In Lieu Donation. The amount payable under Section 2.5.6.B (Alternative Affordable Housing Options) shall be 60 percent of the fee established under Section 25-2-586(I) (Affordable Housing Incentives in a Central Business District or Downtown Mixed Use Zoning District) or any successor fee established under the Austin Downtown Plan. Page 16 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 EXHIBIT VIII EDUCATIONAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) DETERMINATION PART A If your project is located in one or more of the following school districts, and requires Land Use Commission review; and meets one of the requirements listed below, an Educational Impact Statement is required. □ YES □ NO 100 or more single family units are proposed □ YES □ NO 200 or more multifamily units are proposed □ YES □ NO □ YES □ NO 100 or more multifamily units are proposed and a tax credit is requested project will demolish more than 50 residential existing units in a structure more than 20 years old Please check the appropriate school district(s).  Austin Independent School District  Leander Independent School District  Pflugerville Independent School District  Hays County Independent School District  Del Valle Independent School District  Round Rock Independent School District  Manor Independent School District If an Educational Impact Statement (EIS) is required, please complete the Educational Impact Analysis (EIA) Part B. Page 17 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 ZONING EDUCATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FORM Part B OFFICE USE ONLY CASE MANAGER: APPLICANT / AGENT: CASE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPOSED USE: EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS Existing number of Residential Units: Number of existing residential units to be demolished: Age of units to be demolished: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Gross Project Acreage: Number of l ots: Lots per acre: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNITS Proposed number : of Residential Units: Size of proposed units in square feet (specify range): to Number of bedrooms per unit: Page 18 of 19 rev 11/21/2016 ZONING ESTIMATED SELLING / RENTAL PRICE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) Estimated selling price of units (specify range): Estimated rental rates (if applicable): Range of monthly rental rates to be demolished: to to Estimated i ncrease in rental rates (specify percentage of i ncrease): If project is multifamily, will a tax credit be applied for as part of the Smart HousingTM Program? Number of Certified Affordable Dwelling Units (Proposed or Existing) OFF-SITE FAMILY AMENITIES EXISTING WITHIN ONE MILE OF PROJECT (Open to the public – attach location plan) Parks / Greenbelts: Recreation Centers: Public Schools: PARKLAND DEDICATION Parkland dedication required? □ YES □ NO If yes, please indicate if applicant plans to request fee in lieu or provide parkland: Fee: □ YES Land: □ YES □ NO □ NO ON-SITE FAMILY AMENITIES PROPOSED Will space be provided for childcare services? YES □ □ NO □ Unknown at this time Amount of open space required in acres: Amount of open space provided in acres: Other proposed amenities (pools, clubhouse, recreation area): TRANSPORTATION LINKAGES Closest Public Transit Location: Pedestrian / Bike Routes: Page 19 of 19 rev 05/12/2023 Determination of Commission Assignment Planning or Zoning & Platting DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment I, _____________________________________, owner or authorized agent for the following project Project Name: ___________________________________________________________________ Project Street Address: ____________________________________________________________ Case Number: ___________________________________________________________________ Check one of the following: I have verified that this project does fall within the boundaries of an approved neighborhood plan as defined in the City of Austin Land Development Code Section 25-1-46(D) (see back of this page and page which includes map of planning areas), and therefore may require a Neighborhood Plan Amendment. Please contact Maureen Meredith in the Planning Department at (512) 974-2695 or at maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov so she can determine if a plan amendment application is required with your rezoning case. Name of the Neighborhood Plan: __________________________________________________ Commission assigned: Planning Commission I have verified that this project falls within the East Riverside Corridor Plan. Zoning changes in this area do not require a plan amendment application. Commission assigned: Planning Commission I have verified that this project falls within the boundaries of an IN PROCESS neighborhood plan, which does not require a plan amendment application. Commission assigned: Planning Commission I have verified that this project does not fall within the boundaries of an approved neighborhood plan OR a neighborhood plan IN PROCESS. Commission assigned: Zoning and Platting Commission I I understand if I have not accurately determined if my project falls inside or outside the boundaries of an approved neighborhood plan, I may experience delays in processing my project through the appropriate commission. Owner or Agent Signature: _____________________________________________________ Date: __________ City of Austin | Determination of Commission Assignment 6/20/24 | Page 1 of 3  § 25-1-46 - LAND USE COMMISSION (A) The Planning Commission or the Zoning and Platting Commission may act as the Land Use Commission, as prescribed by this section. (B) A determination of which commission shall act as the land use commission to consider a particular application is made on the date that the application is filed. After the determination is made, the designated commission continues to act as the land use commission until the application is approved or denied. (C) The Zoning and Platting Commission shall act as the Land Use Commission for all applications, except as provided in Subsection (D). (D) The Planning Commission shall act as the land use commission for property that is wholly or partly within: (1) the boundaries of a neighborhood plan that the council has adopted as a component of the comprehensive plan; (2) the former Robert Mueller Municipal Airport site; (3) a transit oriented development (TOD) district; (4) the old Enfield neighborhood planning area; or (5) the boundaries of a proposed neighborhood plan that the Planning Commission is considering as an amendment to the comprehensive plan. In this subsection, Planning Commission consideration of a proposed neighborhood plan: (a) begins on the effective date of a council resolution or ordinance directing the Planning Commission to consider a neighborhood plan for an identified area; and (b) ends on the date that the council adopts or rejects the proposed neighborhood plan or withdraws its directive to the Planning Commission to consider a neighborhood plan for the area. (E) A liaison committee of the Planning Commission and the Zoning and Platting Commission is established. The chair of each commission shall appoint two commission members to serve on the committee. The committee shall meet regularly to exchange information relating to the commissions and make recommendations to the commissions on common policies, objectives, issues, and activities. (F) Reserved. Source: Ord. 010607-8; Ord. 011129-79; Ord. 031211-11; Ord. 20060309-057; Ord. 20060622-128; 20090806-068; Ord. 20120524-083; Ord. 20121018-104; Ord. No. 20140626-113, Pt. 2, 7-7-14. City of Austin | Determination of Commission Assignment 6/20/24 | Page 2 of 3 City of Austin | Determination of Commission Assignment 6/20/24 | Page 3 of 3 I N O S V E R I EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION LEGEND . O N E T A D · · · 3RD STREET 3RD STREET 3RD STREET (80' R.O.W.) (80' R.O.W.) (80' R.O.W.) AUSTIN CONVENTION AUSTIN CONVENTION AUSTIN CONVENTION CENTER CENTER CENTER BLOCK 14 BLOCK 14 BLOCK 14 ZONING: CBD ZONING: CBD ZONING: CBD T T T E E E E E E R R R T T T R S R S R S E E E D RIV D RIV D RIV E E E R R R 0' R.O.W.) 0' R.O.W.) 0' R.O.W.) (8 (8 (8 W A L L E R C R E E K W A L L E R C R E E K W A L L E R C R E E K THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CONFIDENTIAL 2 9 5 2 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( x a F 4 8 2 3 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( . l e T 5 2 0 2 t h g i r y p o C © C L L , C M E a z r a G 9 2 6 4 1 - F # E P B T 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A 5 2 1 e t i u S l , . d v B o t l a R 8 0 7 7 i I N O T A C O L E R G N D L I U B I T E E R T S D R 3 E 1 0 6 I N T S U A F O Y T C I M P 0 4 : 3 5 2 , 1 1 n u J n o a z u o b p l y b d e i f i d o m g w d . E P S n o i t a c o e R e s u o H - 1 8 0 0 0 - 6 4 7 2 0 1 \ T E S O M E D \ 1 . 4 P C D D A C - 0 0 \ l i \ i v C \ 1 8 0 0 0 - 6 4 7 2 0 1 \ : V - - - - : . O N T C E J O R P 2 : Y B D E N G S E D I : C Q / A Q SHEET 01 OF ---- I S N O T A C O L E R G N S U O H 1 . 4 P C D I : Y B N W A R D BOARDS FENCE LOCATION PRIOR TO CLEARING, GRADING AND PAVING X X X X X X X X C.R.Z. BOARDS WOOD CHIP MULCH AREA 100 mm-150 mm (4''-6'') DEPTH X X TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD, EXISTING ROADWAY OR EASEMENT AS APPROVED X X X X X X X X X X PERMEABLE PAVING AREA CURB X X X FENCE LOCATION DURING PERMEABLE PAVING INSTALLATION C.R.Z. LINEAR CONSTRUCTION THROUGH TREES TREES IN PAVING AREA LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION LINE AS SHOWN ON PLAN NATURAL AREAS CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (C.R.Z.) RADIUS = 12 mm PER mm (1 FT. PER INCH) OF TRUNK DIAMETER X X X X X X X MINIMUM NESESSARY WORK AREA (WOOD CHIP MULCH 100 TO 150 mm (4'' TO 6'' DEPTH) BLDG. X X X X X X X X X X X C.R.Z. ADD BOARDS STRAPPED TO TRUNK DUE TO CLOSENESS OF FENCE LESS THAN 1.5 m (5') FROM TRUNK. TREES NEAR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY X X X X X X X X X 3 m (10'-0'') MAX. DRIPLINE (VARIES) FENCE LOCATION (LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE) RADIUS=12 mm PER mm (1 ft PER in) OF TRUNK DIAMETER CHAIN LINK FENCE 950 mm (38'') 150 mm (6'') 1.5 m (5'-0'') 1.5 m (5') 900 mm (3') CRITICAL ROOT ZONE DRIPLINE TREE PROTECTION FENCE 2.4 m (8') MAX. DRIPLINE (VARIES) FENCE LOCATION (LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE) RADIUS=12 mm PER mm (1 ft PER in) OF TRUNK DIAMETER NOMINAL 50 mm x 100 mm (2'' x 4'') STRINGERS NOMINAL 100 mm x 100 mm (4'' x 4'') POSTS 1.5 m (5') CRITICAL ROOT ZONE DRIPLINE TREE PROTECTION FENCE 6.O m FOR 500 mm DIA. TREE (20'-0'' FOR 20'' DIA. TREE) 6 m FOR 500 mm DIA. TREE (20'-0" FOR 20'' DIA. TREE) INDIVIDUAL TREE GROUP OF TREES CITY OF AUSTIN CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCE LOCATIONS CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT TREE PROPTECTION FENCE TYPE A - CHAIN LINK CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCE TYPE B - WOOD RECORD COPY SIGNED BY J. PATRICK MURPHY 11/15/99 ADOPTED THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THIS STANDARD. STANDARD NO. 610S-1 RECORD COPY SIGNED BY J. PATRICK MURPHY 11/15/99 ADOPTED THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THIS STANDARD. STANDARD NO. 610S-2 RECORD COPY SIGNED BY J. PATRICK MURPHY 11/15/99 ADOPTED THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THIS STANDARD. STANDARD NO. 610S-3 24 m (8') 1.5 m (5')* 24 m (8') OR AS REQUIRED FOR MAXIMUM TREE PROTECTION 1.5 m (5')* SILT FENCE FABRIC STEEL OR WOOD FENCE POSTS MAX. 2.4 m (8') SPACING 2" x 4" WELDED WIRE BACKING SUPPORT FOR FABRIC (12.5 GA. WIRE) 600 mm (24'') 150 mm (6'') MIN. FLOW FABRIC TOE-IN TRENCH (BACKFILLED) LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE VARIES WOOD CHIP MULCH 150 mm (6'') DEPTH RADIUS=12 mm PER mm (1 ft PER in) OF TRUNK DIAMETER LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE VARIES RADIUS=12 mm PER mm (1 ft PER in) OF TRUNK DIAMETER WOOD CHIP MULCH 150 mm (6'') DEPTH STANDARD SYMBOL FOR SILT FENCE (SF) SF L= 150 mm (6'') MIN. TRENCH CROSS SECTION *AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE MINIMUM NECESSARY WORK SPACE. IF LESS THAN 1.5 m (5'), THEN ADD BOARDS STRAPPED TO TRUNK. *AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE MINIMUM NECESSARY WORK SPACE. IF LESS THAN 1.5 m (5'), THEN ADD BOARDS STRAPPED TO TRUNK. X X X X BUILDING TREE PROTECTION FENCE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 6 m FOR 500 mm DIA. TREE (20'-0'' FOR 20'' DIA. TREE) X X X DRIPLINE X X WOOD CHIP MULCH AREA 100 mm-150 mm (4''-6'') DEPTH X X X TREE PROTECTION FENCE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 6 m FOR 500 mm DIA. TREE (20'-0'' FOR 20'' DIA. TREE) X X X X X X DRIPLINE X X WOOD CHIP MULCH AREA 100 mm-150 mm (4''-6'') DEPTH 1. STEEL OR WOOD POSTS WHICH SUPPORT THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A SLIGHT ANGLE TOWARD THE ANTICIPATED RUNOFF SOURCE. POST MUST BE EMBEDDED A MINIMUM OF 300 mm (12 INCHES). IF WOOD POSTS CANNOT ACHIEVE 300 mm (12 inches) DEPTH, USE STEEL POSTS. 2. THE TOE OF THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE TRENCHED IN WITH A SPADE OR MECHANICAL TRENCHER, SO THAT THE DOWNSLOPE FACE OF THE TRENCH IS FLAT AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINE OF FLOW. 3. THE TRENCH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 150 mm (6 inches) DEEP AND 150 mm (6 inches) WIDE TO ALLOW FOR THE SILT FENCE FABRIC TO BE LAID IN THE GROUND AND BACKFILLED WITH COMPACTED MATERIAL. X X X BUILDING 4. SILT FENCE FABRIC SHOULD BE SECURELY FASTENED TO EACH STEEL OR WOOD SUPPORT POST OR TO WOVEN WIRE , WHICH IS IN TURN ATTACHED TO THE STEEL OR WOOD FENCE POST. 5. INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE WEEKLY OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT AND REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE PROMPTY AS NEEDED. 6. SILT FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED SO AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. 7. ACCUMULATED SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF 150 mm (6 inches). THE SILT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ON AN APPROVED SITE AND IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE TO ADDITIONAL SILTATION. CITY OF AUSTIN CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCE MODIFIED TYPE A - CHAIN LINK CITY OF AUSTIN CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCE MODIFIED TYPE B - WOOD CITY OF AUSTIN WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT SILT FENCE RECORD COPY SIGNED BY J. PATRICK MURPHY 11/15/99 ADOPTED THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THIS STANDARD. STANDARD NO. 610S-4 RECORD COPY SIGNED BY J. PATRICK MURPHY 11/15/99 ADOPTED THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THIS STANDARD. STANDARD NO. 610S-5 RECORD COPY SIGNED BY MORGAN BYARS 09/01/2011 ADOPTED THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THIS STANDARD. STANDARD NO. 642S-1 2 9 5 2 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( x a F 4 8 2 3 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( . l e T 5 2 0 2 t h g i r y p o C © C L L , C M E a z r a G 9 2 6 4 1 - F # E P B T 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A 5 2 1 e t i u S l , . d v B o t l a R 8 0 7 7 i I N O S V E R I . O N E T A D I S L A T E D T E E R T S D R 3 E 1 0 6 I N T S U A F O Y T C I M P 4 4 : 3 5 2 , 1 1 n u J n o a z u o b p y b d e i f i d o m g w d . n o i t I S N O T A C O L E R G N S U O H 1 . 4 P C D I THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CONFIDENTIAL - - - - : . O N T C E J O R P 2 : Y B D E N G S E D I : Y B N W A R D : C Q / A Q SHEET 02 OF ---- i l a c o e R g n s u o h - L T D - 1 8 0 0 0 - 6 4 7 2 0 1 \ T E S O M E D \ 1 . 4 P C D D A C - 0 0 \ l i \ i v C \ 1 8 0 0 0 - 6 4 7 2 0 1 \ : V Existing Use Tract # # of Acres/SF AREA TO BE REZONED: ACRES OR SQ FT Existing Zoning 17,712 SQ FT CBD-H Tract 1 17, 712 SQ FT Lots 7 and 8 5,520 SQ FT CBD Tract 2 5,520 SQ FT Vacated Alley 8,856 SQ FT CBD Tract 3 8,856 SQ FT 2,917 SQ FT CBD Tract 4 2,917 SQ FT Triangular Area Castleman-B Home Proposed Zoning Proposed Use Tract # Proposed # of Acres/SF 17,712 SQ FT CBD Tract 1 17,712 SQ FT Lots 7 and 8 5,520 SQ FT CBD Tract 2 5,520 SQ FT Vacated Alley 8,856 SQ FT CBD Tract 3 8,856 SQ FT Triangular Area 2,917 SQ FT CBD-H Tract 4 2,917 SQ FT Castleman-B Home EXISTING SITE TRASK HOUSE HISTORIC ZONING CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - May 14th, 2025 Date: CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE ACC CHILLER PLANT BELOW GRADE EXTENTS RELOCATED CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE* WALLER CREEK EASEMENT *NOTE: CONCEPTUAL PROPOSED LOCATION Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - May 14th, 2025 Date: 0205020706 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 7 0 7 8 0 7 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 9 0 7 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 0205020710 C O N G 0 2 0 5 4 R 0 T E 2 S 0 H S 7 1 3 A T 0 2 8. 2 1 90.52 0206032701 46.15 5TH & BRAZOS CONDO 139.41 0 2 8. 2 1 0206031609 0206031611 0206031612 0206031613 0206031614 0206031602 0206031617 8 1 6 1 3 0 6 0 2 0 5 1 6 1 3 0 6 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 0206040106 8 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 0206040107 9 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 0206040606 KAHAN SUBD 43.84 0206041109 7 1 1 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 4 1 1 1 5 3 1 1 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 3 2 8. 2 1 2 1 1 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 8 1 8. 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 6 1 1 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 44.03 0206040609 0206040607 0206040608 15.13 0206040516 5 9 9 6 3. 3. 2 2 1 1 7 1 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 9 0 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 0205022401 1 1 2 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 0205021212 1 0 7 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 7 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 7 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 4 0 7 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 0205021711 0206042301 0206040507 13.35 E 5TH ST 0206040503 0206040502 0206040501 0206040514 LINAM NO 1 0204040501 BRUSH SQUARE T S S E H C E N NECHES HOTEL CONDOS AMD & FIVE FIFTY FIVE CONDOS AMD 0204042001 T S R E D RIV E R 0 2 0 6 0 4 1 0 0 1 EAST SIXTH STREET PID 1 1 5 0 4 0 6 0 2 0 F IF T K E E R R C E L L A W 0206041601 2 1 6 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 4 1 6 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 E 6TH ST 2 0 6 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 4 1 6 1 3 1 1 6 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 0206041606 20.0420.04 0 9 1 0 6 6 1 6 1 4 .1 4 0 2 9 0 6 6 0 0 2 2 0 0 20.04 20.04 38.00 8 0 6 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 38.00 50.00 7 0 6 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 50.00 6 .1 2 9 1 0 5 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 9 1 5 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 2 0 5 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 4 0 5 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 0206041503 0 .0 27.95 0 2 5 2 . 0 2 5 0 5 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 23.50 6 0 5 1 1 9 4 2. 0 0 1 6 0 2 0 23.00 8 0 1 9 5 2. 1 0 4 1 0 6 0 2 0 23.83 7 7 1 0 5 5 1 1 4 1 1 0 4 9 .2 4 9 .3 2. 0 0 2. 0 0 7 0 6 0 7 1 6 1 0 0 2 2 0 22.82 0 4 4 .3 23.50 .3 2 23.00 0206041518 2 3 3 0 1 5 1 0 4 7 2. 0 0 6 1 0 2 0 25.07 9 0 8. 2 1 THE SABINE MASTER CONDO AMD & THE SABINE ON 5TH RESIDENTIAL CONDO AMD 69.00 69.00 1 0 2 2 4 0 6 0 2 0 57.62 6 7 . 0 3 1 0 2 0 6 0 AMD 4 1 5 2 0 5 3 N I 9 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 CONNERS ADDN 1 1 5 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 6 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 0205022301 0205021102 GOCHER,S SUR 5 ABS 316 0205020509 T S S O Z A R B 0205021001 0205021002 8 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 0205021005 D V L B O T IN C A N J A S 0205022201 0205021604 E 3RD ST 3 0 6 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 6 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 5 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 5 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 0205021503 0205021507 E 4TH ST THE RAILYARD WALLER CREEK TIFF F IF T K E E R R C E L L A W 4 0 5 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 T S E BIN A S 1 .4 9 7 1 0 9 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 217.61 0204041903 217.62 7 0 9 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 22.00 3 .9 5 7 0 2 8 1 8. 3 1 0204041909 KUYKENDALL ADDN 108.14 0 4 0 4 1 130.22 9 0 8 4 .2 2 6 87.53 0204041906 F F TI K E 4 E .4 9 7 R C R E L L A W D I P N W O T N W O D 0 .3 2 6 0204041401 87.58 5 0 4 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 4 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 4 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 0204041810 0206050229 0206050223 E 7TH ST 0206050111 0206050701 8 8.1 64.41 1 1 0206050110 SIXTH & BRUSHY 1 0 4 1 5 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 5 1 0 0 1 T Y S H S U R B 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 5 1 6 0 1 0 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 9 0 0 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 0204051007 E 5TH ST 453.69 7 0 9. 6 1 0 5.7 1 0204052301 0 8.2 3 8.01 17.77 8 5 . 3 1 PLAZA SALTILLO TOD CONDOMINIUM 72.47 60.00 0205020901 0205020907 1 0 4 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 E 2ND ST 0205021402 0205021408 283.17 0 2 0 5 0 1 6 2. 1 1 8 2 . 5 0 T O W N C L O A K N E D R O E A S 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 8 1 1 5 9.5 9.13 116.20 107.36 5 9.5 9.13 SAN JACINTO CENTER 3 .3 4 8 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 8 1 3 3 0 5.1 4 6 .9 3 5 44.25 6 .9 3 5 29.58 1 8 6. 1 1 M I D D E 2 2 0 0 1 N C E S 6 9 5. 8 2 165.51 76.81 0 .1 9 2 33.73 0 33.73 3 .1 .5 9 2 4 2 9 .3 4 2 35.09 8 35.09 .8 3 1 9 .9 3 43.54 1 43.54 13.98 T S Y IT RIN F IF T K E E R R C T E L L A W 02030 2040 1 59.66 6 3 . 2 5 59.52 7 . 7 7 7 . 7 4 4.63 F K TIF E E R R C E L L A W Lady Bird Lake HANCOCK G D SUR 0 ABS 7 8 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 0204041307 3 0 3 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 3 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 6 0 3 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 0204041305 9 1 8. 2 1 276.23 0204040101 276.23 40.00 3 0 8. 3 1 7 .0 2 8 73.79 5 .9 1 8 0 .0 0 1 40.00 0204040108 6 . 9 7 5 0204040107 32.21 9.97 8 3 . 0 5 3 .0 0 1 10.01 D 3 2.0 I 8 P N W O T N W O D 0 4 5. 2 1 7 3 . 2 5 64.17 3 0 7. 3 1 2 4 5. 2 1 5 1 8 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 40.01 1 2.1 1.24 4 8 . 8 0 2 5 . 0 5 8 3 . 4 8 9 6 . 1 8 0203020605 6 2 6 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 WILLOW ST 13.42 3 0 8. 6 1 4 1 0. 5 2 3 0 4. 2 5 93 RED RIVER MASTER CONDOS 1 0 2 2 3 0 3 0 2 0 9 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 158.52 1 8 . 8 5 83.09 DOWNTOWN PID 128.34 WALLER PARK PLACE SUBD 0 1 1 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 0 9 1. 9 1 2 7 . 6 8 119.95 8 8 3. 5 1 118.71 129.30 276.03 0 2 0 4 0 4 1 2 0 4 258.94 0204041111 5 0 7. 7 2 1 0 6 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 PALM SCHOOL E CESAR CHAVEZ ST DRISKILL ST DOWNTOWN PID 0204041108 0203030705 0203030706 3 1 0. 5 2 0203030707 8 0 5. 2 1 127.84 0203033201 8 0 5. 2 1 T S Y E N AI R DRISKILL & RAINEY SUBD 0203031014 F IF T K E E R C R E L L A W 1 1 9 . 8 6 193.33 128.08 0203030627 25.86 80 RED RIVER CONDOS 7 3 2. 5 2 0203033101 THE WATERFRONT MASTER CONDO AMD & THE SHORE CONDO 50.15 AMD 50.13 2 .9 9 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 1 5 0 1 MODERN AUSTIN MASTER CONDOS & MODERN DAVIS ST AUSTIN 128.02 0203030609 0203030610 0203030601 4 4 5. 1 2 1 0 7 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 F IF T K E E R R C E L L A W 1 2.8 7 E 3RD ST 0404 1 R P H 0 1 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 271.83 E 4TH ST 3 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 7.3 5 7 3.32 2.6 1 0 3 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 3 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 2 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 0204051204 6 0 2 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 SUBDIVISION 0F SOUTH HALF OF OUTLOT NO 1 6 1 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 4 1 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 1 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 1 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0204050811 1 R P H 8 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 E 3RD ST 2 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 1 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 9 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 8 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 E 2ND ST 8 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0204050601 3 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 6 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 9 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 8 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 6 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0204050807 8 1.4 5 59.00 0204050705 3 1.9 5 59.00 0 4.5 4 0204050713 59.00 5 4.0 4 2 1.0 4 0204050712 2 1.0 4 59.00 T S S O C R A N M A S 7 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 6 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 1 2 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 1 2 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 T Y S H S U R B 2 1 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 1 R P H 0203040504 7 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 8 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 5 3 H I 0 1 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 9 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 8 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 9 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 0203040511 N G SHELLEY SUBD 0204051105 0204051101 2 1 1 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 9 0 1 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 7 0 1 1 5 0 4 0 2 0 A DIN E M 0204051612 8 1 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 7 1 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 47.00 0 8.5 3 1 1 0 0 2 4 0 3 0 2 0 0 8.5 3 1 902 WILLOW ST SITE CONDOS 47.00 WILLOW ST 0203040405 M K T ADDN 5 1 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 4 1 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 3 1 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 0203040523 0203040524 0203041010 0203041025 0203041023 0203041024 0203041022 0203041021 t c i r t s D i l i a s a r p p A l a r t n e C s v a r T i 2 1 0 9 4 1 x o B . O P . 4 1 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A e n a L n o s r e d n A E 0 5 8 2 5 7 8 7 X T , n i t s u A g r o . d a c s v a r t . i w w w 7 1 3 9 - 4 3 8 - ) 2 1 5 ( r e b m u N e n o h p e e T n a M l i . t n e m u c o d l a g e l a . D A C T f o e s u e h t r o f l y e o s l d e l i p m o c s a w p a m x a t i s h T , e t i a m x o r p p a e r a s t c u d o r p l a t i g d i e s e h t y b d e t c p e d i s a e r A r o i g n y e v r u s i , g n p p a m o t e t a r u c c a y l i r a s s e c e n t o n e r a d n a t l t t _ e n a P e a S _ 3 8 9 1 _ D A N I e e F _ 3 0 2 4 _ S P F _ a r t n e C _ s a x e T l n o i t a m r o f n i i s h t m o r f n w a r d i s n o s u c n o C l . s d r a d n a t s g n i r e e n g n e i , s m a c l i o n s e k a m D A C T e h T . r e s u e h t f o y t i l i i b s n o p s e r e h t e r a r o f y t i l i b a i l i s m a c s d i l l y s s e r p x e d n a n o i t a m r o f n i i s h t f o y c a u q e d a r o s s e n e t e p m o c l , y c a r u c c a e h t t u o b a s e e t n a r a u g r o i s e s m o r p e t u t i t s n o c t o n s e o d a t a d d e p p a m e h T i . s n o s s m o i d n a s r o r r e y n a i c n o C _ a m r o l f n o C _ t r e b m a L : n o i t c e o r P j ³ Italic = 120 scale map Thin = 100 scale map Bold = 400 scale map 20601 20603 20604 20605 20805 20806 20501 20502 20201 20404 20405 20406 20300 20302 20200 20101 0 20303 20304 20205 120 Feet Revision Date: 4/7/2025 20404 Property Profile Legend Property Addresses Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE Jurisdictions Fill Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE 0 50 100 ft 6/9/2025 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Notes 0.0670 Ac. T.J. Chambers Survey, Abstract No. 7 City of Austin, Travis County, Texas Project No. 1025095504 FN 51468 Page 1 of 3 PARCEL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF A 0.0670 ACRE (2,917 SQ. FT.) PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE T.J. CHAMBERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 7, CITY OF AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 13, OF THE ORIGINAL CITY OF AUSTIN, WHOSE MAP IS ON FILE IN THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AS DESCRIBED IN A QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 12144, PAGE 2179, REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS (R.P.R.T.C.TX.); SAID 0.0670 ACRE (2,917 SQ. FT.) PARCEL, AS SHOWN ON A PLAT PREPARED BY SAM, LLC, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING at a chiseld “X” in concrete found for the southwest corner of said portion of Lots 1 & 2, Block 13, being a point on the southeast right-of-way line of Red River Street, a 80 foot width right-of-way (R.O.W.); THENCE, North 16°33’52” East, along the northwest line of said portion of Lots 1 & 2, Block 13, same being the southeast R.O.W. line of said Red River Street, a distance of 65.00 feet, to a calculated point and the POINT OF BEGINNING and west corner of the parcel described herein; THENCE, North 16°33’52” East, continuing along the northwest line of said portion of Lots 1 & 2, Block 13, same being the southeast R.O.W. line of said Red River Street, a distance of 41.00 feet, to a calculated point and the north corner of the parcel described herein, from which a 1/2-inch iron rod with red cap, same being a corner of said bears North 16°33’52” East, a distance of 170.78 feet; THENCE, departing southeast R.O.W. line of said Red River Street, over and across said Lots 1 & 2, Block 13, the following three (3) courses and distances: 1) South 73°30’47” East, a distance of 90.90 feet to a calculated point and the east corner of the parcel described herein, from which a 1/2-inch iron rod with illegible plastic cap found, same being an interior corner of portion of Lots 1 & 2, Block 13, bears North 81°03’07” East, a distance of 52.16 feet; 2) South 60°31’49” West, a distance of 57.12 feet to a calculated point, for the south corner of the parcel described herein; INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FN 51468 SAM Job No. 95504 0.0670 Ac. T.J. Chambers Survey, Abstract No. 7 City of Austin, Travis County, Texas Project No. 1025095504 FN 51468 Page 2 of 3 3) North 73°26’40” West, a distance of 51.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 0.0670 acre (2,917 sq. ft.) of land. Bearing Basis: All bearings shown are based on NAD83/2011 Texas Coordinate System, Central Zone (4203). All distances shown are grid. Project units are in U.S. Survey Feet. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: § That I, Mark A. Mercado, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein was determined by a survey made on the ground under my direction and supervision. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, on the date shown below. SURVEYING AND MAPPING, LLC 4801 Southwest Pkwy Mark A. Mercado Date Building Two, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78735 TX. Firm No. 10064300 Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 6350 – State of Texas ________________________________ FN 51468 SAM Job No. 95504 6/6/2025 6/6/2025HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT FOR SAINT DAVID'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH History of Fontaine House r HISTORICAL NARRATIVE The house known today as Fontaine House was built by Austin merchant R. M. Castleman for his family more than 125 years ago. The masonry residence was home to four generations of the Castleman family before St. David's Episcopal Church acquired it in 1963. The house is a surviving example of the nineteenth century residential structures once found throughout downtown Austin. CASTLEMAN'S EARLY YEARS R. M. Castleman came to Texas at the age of four. His father Andrew Castleman moved his family, including six year old Margaret and two year old Robert, from Nashville,'Tennessee to Bastrop County in 1840. The 1850 Texas census lists the Castleman family, with the addition of the Texas born son Richard, as residents of Bastrop County. The entry for Andrew E. Castleman states he is a 47 year old fanner with $1000 of real estate. Another group of Bastrop County settlers, the Smith family, was to become well known to the Castlemans over the coming years. Alfred Smith was born in North Carolina in 1815, and moved to Bastrop County as a young man in the 1830's. He was a farmer and owned a sawmill business, having contracted with the town of Bastrop for the sole right to cut timber in the Pinery for a period of ten years. His wife Ann, who was about ten years his junior, came to Texas from Tennessee. Their daughter Amelia E. was born in 1842 in Texas. By the time of the 1850 census, the Smiths had moved to land outside Austin, near Webberville. The entry listed Alfred Smith as a farmer with real estate valued at $6,000. Living with them was James W. Smith, Alfred's younger brother. He was born in North Carolina in 1830 and came to Texas in 1838. His entry in the 1850 census notes he was a 19 year old resident with Alfred, Ann and Amelia Smith. He attended college in Kentucky and studied law in Tennessee, where he got a license to practice law 1852. He returned to Texas and was admitted to the Texas bar in 1853. He and Margaret E. Castleman, Andrew Castleman's oldest child, were married in 1854 and moved to Austin. By the time of the 1860 census, Andrew Castleman and his two younger sons, Robert and Richard, had moved from Bastrop County to Coryell County. Andrew was still a farmer, but had improved bis lot considerably as evidenced by his $4,000 of real estate and $2,000 personal estate. His son Robert, age 21 at the time, was a herdsman, with a $100 personal estate. Richard, age 18, had no occupation. R. M. Castleman, Andrew's oldest son, had remained in Bastrop County, his place of residence in the 1860 census. He was a 25 year old man, occupied as a claims agent, with a personal estate of $2,000. During the 1850's, R. M. worked as a country school teacher and served as Deputy Sheriff of Bastrop County. A legal advertisement in the Bastrop Advertiser of March 14, 1857, offered his services as a collector and agent, as follows: The undersigned, Deputy Sheriff of Bastrop Countr, tenders his services to the public as a Collector and GENERAL AGENT for non-residents. Persons residing at a distance, having business of this character to transact in this or the neighboring counties can save time and expense by entrusting the same to his charge and may rely in all cases upon his prosecuting their claims to a final settlement with promptness and dispatch. R. M. Castleman Bastrop, Nov. 1st, '56. In August of 1858, be ran for and won re-election to the office of Assessor and Collector of Bastrop County, beating his opponent George All~ 376 to 300 votes. CASTLEMAN IN AUSTIN R. M. Castleman moved to Austin shortly before enlisting in the Confederate Army in 1861. Before he left for the war, he sold all his possessions, earning several thousand dollars. He - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - converted it to US twenty-dollar gold coins, put the coins in pickle jars, and buried them on the Webberville farm of Alfred Smith, to be stored until his return. (His grandson, A. C. Bull, said Castleman believed in the Southern cause enough to fight for it, but he was dubious of the ultimate outcome of the struggle.) Attaining the rank of major, he was seriously wounded during the Battle of Chickamauga Creek, September 19-20, 1863, and was furloughed home. He returned destitute and in poor health, but his planning before the war served him well. He found his gold stake intact, at a time when Confederate currency was useless, and was able to start his own mercantile busin~ in Austin. He was also able to invest in Austin real estate. He made his first recorded purchase together with Alfred Smith, his old friend and neighbor, in November · 1865. The two men bought a half lot on the west side of Congress Avenue between Pecan (6th) and Bois D'Arc (7th) Streets from Abner H. Cook for $2,000. .- Austin was established as the capital of the Republic of Texas in 1839. Judge Edwin Waller and a team of surveyors laid out the city that same year. The original city plan was a simple grid of 179 business and residential blocks, four public squares, and designated areas for public buildings and institutions. They sited the city on the north bank of the Colorado River, situated between Waller Creek on the east and Shoal Creek on the west Waller named streets running east to west for trees found in Texas and those running north to south for rivers in the state. The earliest structures were built of logs, but later decades saw the construction of masonry buildings in a range of fashionable architectural styles. The onset of the Civil War slowed building and development, but the city grew quickly with the end of the war. The arrival of the railroad in 1871 encouraged more development. In 1866 Castleman married Amelia E. Smith, the daughter of Alfred and Ann Smith. Their first child, Margaret, was born on April 17, 1867. Castleman set about arranging for a house for his growing family, setting his sights on land fronting on East Bois D'Arc Street, just east of St. David's Episcopal Church. In 1867 he a uired of Block 86, p ay~ f o r the 66' ~ 128' lot._ In 1868 he bou $137. , Althoug as 1873 when the construction took place. Daily Statesman editions of August 187 two references to a handsome two story house being built by Mr. Castleman. t 6, the comer lot at Bois D'Arc and Trini ,was purchased m 1870 for $500:- o Block 86, the adjacent ot o e west, for uy 1s onans p ace e construction o as late include e ouse m t , ~ THE HOUSE AT 308 E. BOIS D'ARC STREET The house Castleman built at 308 East Bois D'Arc Street was a two story rectangular structure, with a half basement below following the natural slope of the lot The walls were load bearing masonry, limestone at the basement and foundation level and brick at the two floors above. The house had elements of the Italianate style - low pitched roof, widely oved:langing eaves set on decorative brackets, tall narrow windows with arched heads and hooded trim, one story porch across the front facade - that had become popular in the United States in the years leading up to the Civil War. Introduced in Austin in several buildings constructed in the late 1850's, including the State Lunatic Asylum and the Institute for the Blind, the Italianate style was still quite popular in the 1870's. The house was symmetrical in plan, each floor having a center hall flanked by two square rooms with fireplaces in the interior walls. The room on the east end of the first floor, probably the parlor, had a large bay window in the east wall. Early, perhaps original, addition to the house was an ell-wing, constructed at the east side of the back of the house. The wing was originally one story, frame construction with a shingle roof, as shown in nineteenth century Sanborn maps of Austin. In later years, the wing was replaced with a two story, masonry addition that remains today. Early maps and photographs also show several different one story, frame construction outbuildings on the site, located on the alley, that were probably for the storage of vehicles, livestock and household goods. During the time of the planning and construction of the house, Castleman's business interests le of rize-win_ning prospered. bl9lices posted in the Dailyjitatesmau-altHted--readets. s~wing machines at Castleman's store on the avenue. His annual buying trip to New York was reported in the Local Matters column each year. The first city directory published for Austin in 1872-73 listed R. M. Castleman as a dealer in dry goods. The business was located on Congress Avenue netween Pecan and Bois D'Arc Streets, probably on the land Castleman and Smith bought from Abner Cook in 1865. In August of 1874, the Daily Statesman reported that an extension to Castleman's large store was almost complete. Business continued to grow, as evidenced by the expanding listing given for the shop in the city directories. The 1877-78 entry included "d!Y goods, clothing,_boots, etc." and the 1879-80 entry was "dry goods, c!_othing, boots, shoes, hats, caps ana gents' furnishing goods." He also gave time to civic duties and other causes. When the Texas Central Railroad demanded payment in gold instead of currency in 1872, he led a coalition of over fifty merchants in action against the policy. He was elected the First Assistant Foreman of the Washington Steam Fire Engine Company No. 1 in 1873. H~ continued to buy land in the city, sometimes in partnership with his father-in-law Alfred Smith and his brother-in-law James W. Smith. James W. Smith had attained his own position in the city, serving several terms as Mayor in the 1860's and as Chief Justice and County Judge of Travis County through the 1870's. Castleman's family also grew, but not as he might have wished. Three sons and a daughter were b9m between 1870 and 1878, but three of these children passed away at young ages. Daughter Amelia L. was born in 1872 and died in April 1875, suffering critical injuries in an accident involving fire. The newspaper reported that "friends and acquaintances of Mr. and Mrs. R. M. Castleman were pained to learn yesterday morning that their sweet little girl, whose clothes caught on fire the day before, had died during the night." Son Reburn M., born in 1874, died before he reached the age of two. Son Alfred, born in 1870 died as a young man in 1886. Only Margaret and Richard lived to be adults. <;.@stleman's wife, Amelia E., was apparentJ)' a frail woman. In July 1873, Castleman advertised for a woman to cook, wash and iron and a girl to nurse, noting that Swedes were preferred. Despite the help the family put on, Amelia was struck ill with consumption and became an invalid for several years. They sought relief in other locations, including West Texas and Colorado, but she could not recover. ~he died on Spetember 5, 1879._!t the family home. The Daily Statesman described her as theaaughter of an old and respecteo citizen of Aiisrtn, a zealous member of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, a woman of many lovable qualities and with many devoted friends. Eight months before Amelia's death, Castleman entered into a venture that would occupy him until the end of his life. He began to acquire farm land southeast of Austin. In the early years he had a partner in the venture, but in 1887 he bought out his partner's interest in the farm and became the sole owner. The improvements on the farm included a gin and barns for livestock. !}y the early 1890's, Castleman had retired from the dry goods business he had o_p Congress Avenue. His listing in die 1893-94 city dtrectory 1s as a farmer and stock rdiser, and he kept an office in the building at 606 Congress. By 1898, his son Richard was a farmer as well, and may have assisted his father with the fann affairs. MARGARET CASfLEMAN BULL Margaret Castleman attended the B. J. Smith school for women, at the comer of West 6th and Rio Grande, and the Bickler School, at 11th and Congress. She was also active in the Ladies Aid Society of the First Cumberland Presbyterian Church, serving as the secretary for many years. Perhaps through the church or the activities of the Ladies Aid Society she met R. P. f!ull, who would become her husband in 1891. ' Richard Platt Bull was born in Mobile, Alabama in 1848. He served in the Civil War, worked for a time in Galveston in the cotton business, then went to New York City and came to Austin in about 1888. He worked as the steward and bookkeeper at the State Lunatic Asylum, at the north edge of the city, where he also lived. Iq_ 1891, he and Margaret Castleman were married and he moved to the Castleman house at 308 E. 7th Street. He w rked ~_bookkeeper-for pen en accountant. His offices were next to those of the =--- - -----'.--- - -- - -- - /)1 ~ p,,ct-- {q<;f1--01t1,-, 1- (<, P. ~Jl t , I' R. P. and Margaret Bull had five children, born between the years of 1893 and 1903, and they all lived in the house at ~08 East Ttn. In fact, the city directory for 1903-1904 lists eleven people at the house - R. M. Castleman, his daughter Margaret, husband R. P. and their five children, and his son Richard, wife Lena and their son. Sadly, the number of occupants was reduced through the death of several family members. One of R. P. and Margaret Bull's children died in infancy and Richard Castleman died in 1906 at the age of 28. His wife Lena and son moved soon afterwards. At some point between..1?00 aod 193S, the most significant architecturaJ change to the house was made. The one story frame wing at the back of the house, shown on the early Sanborn maps, was removed and replaced with a two story masonry wing. This addition provided a great deal of new space, probably needed since severaJ families occupied the house in the early twentieth century. The new addition included two rooms at the basement level. At the first floor a back hall was added, as well as a room opening to the parlor, possibly a dining room, a kitchen and pantry. At the second floor a back hall and a large room for sleeping were added. (In later years, this sleeping room was divided into three rooms, one of which was a bathroom.) A two story frame element was added at the northwest comer of the addition and the center section of the front porch was enclosed at the second story, these additions being possible storage or bath elements. During World War I, the two oldest Bull sons, A. C. (Alfred Castleman) and.Richard, left home to join the armed forces. · A. C. had completed his degree at Texas A&M College in 1916, and Richard left the college after two years of study to join the army. While both sons were away, their father was suddenly stricken with influenza on October 6, 1918, and died immediately. A newspaper article about his passing describes the incident: R. P. Bull, an old and respected citizen of Austin, died suddenly at his home, 308 East Seventh Street, at 7:15 o'clock Friday evening. He returned to his home about 6 p.m. apparently in his usual good health expressing no feelings of approaching illness to anyone and when at 7 o'clock the evening meal was announced he went to the table and was in the midst of the meal when at 7:15 he became faint and began to gasp for breath with a suddenness characteristic of heart failure. Members of the family rushed to Mr. Bull's assistance and the family physician immediately summoned, but the sufferer passed away before the physician amved. Thirteen days later, his son Richard died at home followin~ an attack of Spanish influenza and pneumonia. He had returned from army radio school m Virginia the week before to visit his family and was already sick at the time of his arrival. The famil continued to live in the house at 308 E. 7th Street The city directory for 1920 I ts five occupants: Castleman Bull, recently widowed, and her three remaining children: A. C., listed as a farmer, Margaret A., listed as a student at the University of Texas and Howard, the youngest child. . ast eman, w o was approac e age of 84, Margaret . On May 7, 1920, Major R. M. Castleman died and the house passed to Margaret Castleman Bull, his only surviving child. Mrs. Bull and her children continued to live at the house, even as the children became adults. In 1922, A. C. Bull became a partner in the general insurance firm of Bull & Deviney. He married Edna Hazlewood in 1924 and moved out of the family home. He later worked as a bank executive and was the chairman of the board of the American National Bank. Howard Bull was a student at the University of Texas in 1922, but continued to live at the house, even after he married. He joined his brother in the insurance business in 1932. Young Margaret joined her mother in charity activities and church work. Mrs. Bull was the president of the Senior Helping Hand for many years and Margaret was the president of the Junior Helping Hand; both were involved with the Children's Home run by the organization. MARGAREf BULL MOORE Mrs. Bull died on June 27, 1934, and the home eventually passed to her daughter Margaret. Within a few years of her mother's death, Margaret married Herschel T. Moore, a man about three years older than she. Moore was a deputy collector with the Internal Revenue Service, living in a rooming house in downtown Austin in 1935. How the two met is uncertain, but it may have had something to do with the rooming house. It was the same location Margaret's cousin had lived in while attending classes at the University of Texas 12 years earlier. The Moores left Austin after their marriage, and the only occupants of the house at 308 E. 7th were Howard Bull and his wife. However, Herschel Moore died in late 1940 and Margaret Moore and her son, Herschel, Jr., returned to Austin soon after. The city directory for 1942 lists Margaret Moore as the homeowner and Herschel Moore, Jr. as a resident of 308 E. 7th. Howard Bull and his wife moved to a home on Preston A venue. By the time Mrs. Moore returned to the house, the transformation from nineteenth century residential district to modem day commercial area had begun. Several houses across the alley were converted to apartments, and a large house on the block was removed. Although the entire neighborhood was changing, St. David's Episcopal Church was a direct force of change on this block. The church had acquired the house between it and Mrs. Moore's house and replaced it with a Sunday school building, which appears on the 1935 Sanborn map of the block. The church needed more space and expansion room and began to inquire about the availability of adjacent property in 1946. The rector, Rev. Sumners, approached Mrs. Moore about the possibility of selling the house to the church. She replied that she could not sell at that time. She noted: I am sure it would be wise, from a business standpoint, to sell my home and get further out into the residential district, but my heart tells me that I could never be really happy any where else exrept in this old house that holds so many happy associations and memories and which has sheltered four generations of our family. Rev. Sumners then approached the owner of the property at 307 E. 8th Street, who also would not sell. By 1954, the church succeeded in acquiring the property at 305 E. 8th Street and converted the house to educational and nursery use. By the early 1960's, the question of a plan for the future of St. David's was again under consideration. The church had identified new classroom and fellowship space and an enlarged sanctuary as critical issues for their future. They began to work: with Brooks & Barr Architects to develop a master plan for future use and development of the church. The church needed more land and tried to acquire the northwest comer of the block, two cleared residential lots in use as surface parking. They were unable to persuade the owner to sell on terms they could agree to and were running out of options. Almost in desperation, they approached Mrs. Moore and her brothers in April 1963 about the house at 308 E. 7th. A. C. and Howard Bull both favored the proposal, out of concern for their sister's future and safety in the changing neighborllood. Mrs. Moore, however, still did not want to sell the house. Apparently, her brothers counseled her and she decided to sell the next month. They quickly completed the negotiations, although Mrs. Moore would not budge from her original asking price of $150,000 for her three lots and house. The Vestry considered the cost and found it fair, since they had been prepared to pay $125,000 for the two lots of the parking area they bad set out to buy. Mrs. Moore moved out in September 1963, and the house that was home to four generations of the Castleman/BulVMoore family passed to its new owner. ST. DAVID'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH When St. David's bought the house, the added land and building relieved critical crowding for both the immediate and the long term. The land, located east of the church, allowed the building committee to complete a master plan and construction work for a substantial addition to the east of the sanctuary. The new parish building, Sumners Hall, remains in use today. Later, the Edens Center was constructed on land that was originally part of Lots 5 and 6 of Block 86, owned by R. M. Castleman a hundred years earlier. The house itself was put to use immediately. It was renovated in the first phase of the 1960's era expansion, and used as transitional space for offices displaced by the construction work. In preparation for this, the basement level was remodeled by the addition of a concrete floor and new ceiling. A three level addition was made at the northwest comer of the-house to provide restrooms at each level.. New kitchen equipment was installed for use by the church school. The house was named Fontaine House in 1965 at ~e suggestion of Rev. Sumners, who felt it would be a fitting tribute to the founding Rector" Edward Fontaine. By 1966, the construction of the new parish hall was complete and Fontaine House was used as church school and youth group space on Sundays. There was a desire to put the house to use during the week and when the possibility of a federally funded daycare facility in the house was proposed in 1968, the Vestry approved. The entire basement level was used by the daycare, as well as a classroom on the first floor of the parish hall. The yard on the east side of Fontaine House was fenced for use as an outdoor play area. Minor improvements were made in the house for the new tenant, including installation of additional kitchen equipment, space heaters, new stair carpet and window repairs. The following year, Caritas approached St. David's about space for their organization. Caritas was founded six years earlier. They would soon have to vacate their space on Brazos Street. The Vestry approved the use of the first floor of Fontaine House by Caritas, which allowed for the church to use the rooms on Sunday for classes. Air conditioning was installed in the house, both for Caritas and for the church school. In 1971, Caritas converted a second floor storage room into a small dental examining room as part of a dental referral service they operated in the house. In later years, the daycare center moved out of the building, Caritas took over their space in the basement. Caritas still occupies the basement and first floors of Fontaine House. St. David's church offices are on the second floor. The southeast comer room on the second floor is used by a youth group as a classroom. LANDMARK STATUS OF FONTAINE HOUSE The Fontaine House is not a designated historic structure at either the city, state or national level. The St David's sanctuary building was designated and zoned as a historic building by the City of Austin in 1976, but the designation applies only to the sanctuary and Lots 1 and 2 of the block. A church became a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark in 1966, but the designation applies to the sanctuary building only. The church was entered in the National Register of Historic Places in 1978. Although the extent is somewhat vague, Fontaine House is mentioned in only one sentence of the nomination text and the designation seems to apply only to the sanctuary building itself. The house is listed in historic building inventories and research files maintained by the Austin History Center of the Austin Public Library and by the Austin Heritage Foundation of the ~erita;: Society of Austin. These entities have no regulato!)' au!hori!,Y over the use and d1Spos1t1on of the structures they have catalogued. They exist pnmanly as resources and repositories of infonnation about the cultural and built heritage of the city. As an artifact, the house is remarkably intact, having been protected and preserved by the four generations of the original builder's family who continuously occupied the house for almost one hundred years. The historic porch, interior doors, windows, millwork, trim and fireplaces are, for the most part, intact. When the church acquired the house, they were able to use the building almost as it was, without major modification of the interior or the principal facades. The most extreme changes, which were the f arish hall and youth building additions constructed next to the house, occurred at the back o the building. The changes made to the interior of the building are largely reversible. Floor coverings and dropped ceilings can be easily removed to reveal the historic elements below or above. New partition walls are not of permanent construction and can be easily removed to reveal the historic spaces. In evaluating the significance of historic properties for eligibility for landmark designation, a range of criteria are considered. Properties nominated to the National Register are evaluated for significance at a national, state or local level in terms of one or more of four criteria. , Eligible properties: • • • are associated with historical events. are associated with the lives of significant people in our past. embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represent the work of a master. · • have or may be likely to yield archaeological information important in prehistory and/or history. In order to be designated to the Register, properties must also by at least 50 years old and must have maintained their historical integrity in terms of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. Pro~erties considered for Landmark designation by the City of Austin are evaluated using simtlar criteria, as well as a few points that allow a broader interpretation. Included are consideration of: character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the city, state or country. embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on architectural, historic or cultural motif. • portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an area of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. exemplification of the cultural, economic, social, ethnic or historical heritage of the city, state or country. a building that because of its location has become of value to a neighborhood, community, area or the city. • • • • • value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride. In considering the significance of Fontaine House, several of the above criteria are applicable. The individuals and families who built and occupied the house were prominent citizens of the city, and their story is an interesting one. The house is an example of a popular style of residential architecture and represents a building type. The building as a surviving example of nineteenth century, residential downtown Austin is also of significance. On all of these bases the Fontaine House would be eligible for historic designation at the local, state and national levels. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Austin American, Austin, Texas. Austin American Statesman, Austin, Texas. Austin City Directory, 1872-1942 Austin Heritage Foundation, Heritage Society of Austin, files. Austin-Travis County Collection, Austin Public Library, files and indexes. Bastrop Advertiser, Bastrop, Texas. Biographical Encyclopedia of Texas. New York: Southern Publishing Company, 1880. Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin, files and indexes. City of Austin Cemetery System Interment Report Daily Democratic Statesman, Austin, Texas. Daily State Gazette, Austin, Texas. Hafertepe, Kenneth, Abner Cook, Master Builder on the Texas Frontier. Austin: Texas State Historical Association, 1992. Historic Landmark Commission, City of Austin, files. lmle, Edgar F., An Abstract of Biographical Data in the Texas Supreme Court Rg,orts, 1840- 18.ll. Austin: Thesis, Master of Arts, 1937. - McBee, Sue Brandt. Austin. The Past Still Present. Austin: Heritage Society of Austin, 1975. McAlester, Virginia and Lee, A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1990. National Register Department, Texas Historical Commission, files. St. David's Episcopal Church, Austin, files. Smith, Hank Todd, ed. Austin: Its Architects and Architecture 0836-1986). Austin: Austin Chapter, American Institute of Architects, 1986. Sowell, A. J., Early Settlers and Indian Fighters of Southwest Texas. Austin: Ben C. Jones & Co., 1900. Steely, James Wright, ed. A Catalog of Texas Properties in the National Register of Historic Places. Austin: Texas Historical Commission, 1984. Texas Census Records. Texas State Times, Austin, Texas. The Statesman, Austin, Texas. Travis County Deed Records Tyler, Ron, ed. The New Handbook of Texas. Austin: The Texas State Historical Association, 1996. -·~ • ,I. ~·. l· View of St David's Episcopal Church in 1881. R. M. Castleman's house at 308 E. Bois D'Arc is seen at the right of the church. (PICA 03354, Austin History Center, Austin Public Library) Block 86, original plan of the city of Austin. Sanborn Map Co., Austin, 1885. Castleman's house at 308 E. Bois D'Arc is on the lower right comer of the block. Rectangle rendered in pink is masonry construction, rectangles rendered in yellow are frame construction. (Courtesy Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin) Detail from aerial view map of Austin, drawn by Augustus Koch in 1887. R. M. Castleman's house at 308 E. Bois D'Arc is seen in the lower right of the image. (Austin History Center, Austin Public Library) Block 86, original plan of the city of Austin. Sanborn Map Co., Austin, 1894. Castleman's house at 308 E. 7th street is on the lower right comer of the block. No changes from the 1889 map are shown. (Courtesy Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin) Block 86, original plan of the city of Austin. Sanborn Map Co., Austin, 1900. Castleman's house at 308 E. 7th street is on the lower right comer of the block. No changes from the 1889 and 1894 maps are shown. (Courtesy Center for American History, Univenity of Texas at Austin) View of East 7th Street in 1923, after the street was widened. Margaret Bull's house at 308 E. 7th is at the right front of the image. (PICA CO2313, Austin History Center, Austin Public Library) . . Block 86, original plan of the city of Austin. Sanborn Map Co., Austin, 1935. Margaret Moore's house at 308 E. 7th street is on the lower right comer of the block. The wing at the back of the house, originally one story frame construction, has been replaced with two story masonry construction. (Courtesy Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin) View of St David's Episcopal Church in 1965. Fontaine House is in the lower right of the image. (PICA 03552, Austin History Center, Austin Public Library)