C.3.2 - 1415 W 10th St - plans-applicant presentation — original pdf

Backup

01 1415 W 10th Street Residence HLC PRESENTATION | CLARK RICHARDSON ARCHITECTS | 7.09.2021 02 1415 W 10th | Site Survey (1415 W 10th Street) (1417 W 10th Street) 03 1415 W 10th | Street View Looking South 04 Existing Structure: Photo from Front of Property Existing Structure: Photo from Middle of Property 05 Existing Structure: Photo Looking South at Structure Existing Structure: Photo Looking East at Structure 06 96 FT Proposed Project: Site Plan 07 Proposed Project: Site Axonometric 09 10 11 12 OWANA Zoning Committee & Neighborhood Outreach Summary: 13 9.24.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting: Ed Richardson | CRA presents existing site conditions and proposed design to OWANA Zoning Committee. 10.13.2020: Meeting with Adjacent Neighbors: Ed Richardson | CRA meets all directly adjacent neighbors at 1415 W 10th to review proposed design. Topics included: - Reviewed Existing and Proposed Drainage on site with east neighbor. - Reviewed Height and Location of proposed structures. Reviewed what each neighbor with views into the lot could expect to see from their homes. - Discussed Fence Heights and Location. We will have lowered the fence along W 10th St. - Reviewed Second Floor Window Alignments: Between the proposed structure and the existing home to the east. - Clark Richardson field surveyed the window locations - and mapped them on the survey and reviewed with property owner. There are no direct window alignments. 10.22.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting II: Ed Richardson | CRA presented our responses to the comments / concerns from the previous meeting Shoring: The noise and disruption from potential shoring for the construction of the basement was a primary concern for neighbors. CRA recommends no driven piles be used for shoring and instead drilled piers be used in any temporary shoring required. The structural work for the shoring will be part of the means and methods for construction of the basement by the contractor and therefore while it will be engineered. The precise drawings will not be included in the architectural drawings. Street Façade: We’re proposing a specimen tree be added in front of the street façade complimenting the window located towards the west side of the façade (see 9). Site Drainage: We’ve sketched in the proposed French drain system for the lot and plan to use the front yard to filter run off from the southside of the lot. Not mentioned in the previous meeting, the second-floor roofed areas on the project are Green Roofs (about 32% of the total roof area) which will help mitigate water run off on the site and to neighborhood stormwater systems (see 8). We will add down leaders at the east façade (see 10). Alley Access: We continue to recommend that the alley not be used for construction access due to its minimal clearance (10’) and distance 06.24.2021: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting III: Ed Richardson | CRA joined OWANA again with an update on the status of the project in advance of the HLC Meeting. Fence: CRA adjusted the lowered front fence behind a planter based on community feedback. Responses to Preservation Staff Comments at the Previous HLC Meeting: Staff Comments: Consider referral to the Architectural Review Committee. Otherwise, comment on and release the plans, encouraging the applicant to relocate the garage to the rear of the main building, omit the painted steel accents, and reduce the roofline’s complexity. 13 CRA Response: Garage: The owner prefers access to the property from W 10th street and not the alley – frankly, this is more neighborly too. We intentionally disconnected the garage from the house so entry to the house at the front door was visible from the street. It is not feasible to relocate the garage to the rear of the main building given the other restrictions including: - Rear Electrical Easement - Protected Post Oak Heritage Tree to the rear. Steel Accents: While there are steel fascia at the structures, they are painted and not reflective. In appearance they will be similar to traditionally constructed roof fascia with wood or other cladding- cement board for example. Roof Complexity: The roofline is considerably simplified and has less visual impact as a flat roof than a pitched roof. The top of roof material is different between applications but that difference in not visible from grade. 14 1415 W 10th Street Residence HLC PRESENTATION | CLARK RICHARDSON ARCHITECTS | 6.28.2021