Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for April 2, 2025 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Historic zoning applications 2. 1701 San Gabriel Street – Owner-initiated historic zoning. Historic landmark and historic district permit applications 503 E Mary Street – Mary Street Local Historic District – Addition to the rear. National Register district permit applications 1003 Maufrais Street – West Line National Register Historic District – Addition and remodel, new construction cabana and pool. (Postponed to May 7, 2025). 705 West Lynn Street – West Line National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 1820 W 10th Street – Clarksville National Register Historic District – Partial demolition, addition to existing building, and new construction two-story unit. 2307 Windsor Road Unit #2 – Old West Austin National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 1507 Lorrain Street – Old West Austin National Register Historic District – Remove carport and shed, new garage, rehabilitate and renovate exterior, revise and add windows. 1324 Alta Vista Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Demolition and relocation permit applications (all total demolitions unless otherwise noted) 10. 4901 Ridge Oak Drive – 78731 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 2307 Bridle Path – 78703 1307 Crestwood Road – 78722 4523 Avenue B – Partial demolition and addition – 78751 1301 Shoal Creek Boulevard – Repair grandstands, replace failing ADA infrastructure, demolish existing press box, and construct new press box – 78701 6004 Spancreek Circle – 78731 Commission Items 16. 17. Discuss nominations and possible action to approve a member to represent the Historic Landmark Commission on the Downtown Commission. Conduct officer elections for 2025. Determinations of Eligibility for Partial Ad Valorem Tax Relief 18. Consider the 2025 applications for partial ad valorem tax exemptions for historic properties and vote on recommending them for approval or disapproval.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, April 2nd, 2025 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Ben Heimsath, (D-8) Chair Roxanne Evans (D-2), Vice COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chair Jeffrey Acton (Mayor) Harrison Eppright (D-1) Kevin Koch (D-3) Raymond Castillo (D-4) Harmony Grogan (D-5) Carl Larosche (D-6) Jaime Alvarez (D-7) Bat Taniguchi (D-9) Trey McWhorter (D-10) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. March 5, 2025 – Offered for consent approval. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 2. C14H-2025-0022 – 1701 San Gabriel St. Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Whitehall Co-op City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to May 7, 2025. Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 3. HR-2025-026162 – 503 E Mary St. Mary Street Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Addition to the rear. Applicant: Miguel Cantu City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Approve the application. National Register District Permit Applications 4. HR-2024-123060 – 1003 Maufrais St. West Line National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Addition and remodel, new construction of a cabana and pool. (Postponed March 5, 2025) Applicant: Jennifer Hanlen City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to May 7, 2025. 5. PR-2024-159632 – 705 West Lynn St. West Line National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Total demolition. (Postponed March 5, 2025). Applicant: DAR Construction City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Comment on plans. 6. HR-2025-023066 – 1820 W 10th St. Clarksville National Register Historic …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APRIL 2, 2025 HR-2025-026162 MARY STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT 503 EAST MARY STREET 3.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a rear addition. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE Behind the existing house, construct a single-story addition that roughly doubles the size of conditioned space. The addition projects back from the original house and it slightly wider to one side. This single-story house located in the Mary Street Local Historic District is described a neoclassical in style and features a broad front porch that extends across the entire front elevation. The deep porch is supported by four modestly decorated wooden columns, which support a moderately-pitched side gable roof. A wide stair accesses the porch from the street, and a simple wood rail lines the perimeter. Two wide hung windows flank the front door, which is off-center from the stairs. The roof has been replaced since original construction, but otherwise the house retains its original integrity with modifications only occurring to finishes and the front entry. DESIGN STANDARDS The Mary Street Historic District Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Contributing Properties: Additions 1. Location By locating the addition at the rear, the front elevation, along with character-defining elements, are retained. The addition connects to the original building at the entirety of the rear wall, which includes a substantial amount of exterior wall area, but it will be minimally visible from the right of way and original architectural details are minimal at this elevation. The roof of the addition is hidden behind the front’s side gabled roof. 2. Height The maximum height of the addition is lower than the original, and it is obscured by the moderately-pitched side gable roof. 3. Design and Style Design details generally compliment the original house is size and form, without adding inappropriate decoration or complexity. Door and fenestration patterns are acceptable to differentiate addition from original while not looking out of place. The building’s shape, when viewed from the street, is minimally altered. 4. Exterior Walls Painted siding is proposed at the rear addition, similar to the original house. However, the boards are to be oriented vertically to differentiate. This vertical alignment is not board-and-batten and will not be read as such where visible from the right- of-way. 5. Porches No alteration to the existing porch, and no additional …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, March 5th, 2025 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Ben Heimsath, (D-8) Chair Roxanne Evans (Mayor), Vice COMMISSION MEMBERS: x x Chair x ab VACANT (D-1) VACANT (D-2) Kevin Koch (D-3) Raymond Castillo (D-4) x x x ab Harmony Grogan (D-5) Carl Larosche (D-6) Jaime Alvarez (D-7) VACANT (D-9) Trey McWhorter (D-10) DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. February 5, 2025 – Offered for consent approval. BRIEFINGS 2. CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Zoning Applications 3. C14H-2025-0022 – 1701 San Gabriel St. Briefing on Public Comment Period for Downtown Historic Resource Survey. Presenter: Sofia Wagner Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Whitehall Co-op City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to March 5, 2025. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to April 2, 2025, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Alvarez. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 6-0. The motion passed. Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 4. HR-2024-095142 – 2504 Bridle Path Culberson House Council District 10 Proposal: Addition, new doors and windows, new cabana, new siding. (Postponed February 5, 2025) Applicant: Minnie Webb City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Application withdrawn. Application withdrawn. 5. HR-2025-014398 – 4105 Avenue G Hyde Park Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Two-story addition, new roof, and restoration. Applicant: Max Hambly City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Comment on plans. 2 MOTION: Approve the application per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2024-159632; GF-2024-161879 WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 705 WEST LYNN STREET 5.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1895 house. ARCHITECTURE The house located at 705 West Lynn Street is a single-story, center passage house with a side gabled roof set at a moderate- to-high pitch. The single front door is centered on the house with one 2/2 window on either side. There is a front porch that extends across the entirety of the front façade, supported by four columns. Due to the elevation of the site, the porch sits nearly at grade towards the front of the lot, but at the rear of the property is a full height unconditioned crawlspace or basement. While the footprint of the building may read as a simple rectangular center hall design, the rear extends further back into the lot, including an enclosed porch. There is also a small frame shed on the site, which is also proposed to be demolished. The shed is not mentioned in the West Line National Register nomination. RESEARCH From its construction around 1895 until 1962, the property was owned by the Quick family. John Quick, a carpenter originally from Sweden, was the first listed owner, and later married a woman named Helen, who was also a first-generation Swedish immigrant. Newspaper records indicate that Helen’s sister immigrated to Texas around 1893, though it is unknown whether the sisters arrived together or separately. The Quicks were involved with the local Methodist Church, with the address on West Lynn hosting a circle of the Women’s Society of Christian Service. John Quick died of natural causes in 1945, and Helen occupied the house until her passing in 1962 at the age of 91. The house was left unoccupied for several years after, but by the 1970s, it was occupied by renters. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the West Line National Register district, and the nomination further lists the property as eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high-to-moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of a center-passage …
T E E R T S N N Y L T S E W 580 SF 695 SF 450 SF 450 SF 1345 SF FRONT UNIT AREA EXISTING ADDITION GARAGE SECOND FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA SQ. FT. 580 SF. 695 SF. 450 SF. 1,145 SF. 2,420 SF. REAR UNIT AREA FIRST FLOOR FRONT PORCH REAR PORCH SECOND FLOOR GARAGE SQ. FT. 1,345 SF. 64 SF. 142 SF. 1,551 SF. 450 SF. CONDITIONED AREA 2,896 SF.
T E E R T S N N Y L T S E W 1130 SF 1350 SF 1345 SF 1240 SF 450 SF 450 SF 450 SF 450 SF FRONT UNIT AREA FIRST FLOOR FRONT PORCH GARAGE SECOND FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA SQ. FT. 1130 SF. 104 SF. 450 SF. 1,684 SF. 2,814 SF. REAR UNIT AREA FIRST FLOOR FRONT PORCH REAR PORCH SECOND FLOOR GARAGE SQ. FT. 1,345 SF. 64 SF. 142 SF. 1,551 SF. 450 SF. CONDITIONED AREA 2,896 SF.
Steering Committee Members: Steve Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum, Meghan Yancy February 3, 2025 RE: 705 West Lynn - PR-2024-159632; GF-2024-161879 Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, OWANA, supports retaining contributing structures in our historic district and integrating existing building forms into the overall project for new development. In the case of 705 West Lynn, preserving the façade and front rooms of the existing house and adding on to the structure would have a significant impact toward that goal. The applicant met with the OWANA zoning committee and we suggested these two options for maximizing the square footage for two living units: 1. Add a second floor to a garage structure. 2. Remove a portion or all of the heritage tree on the lot to allow for a second unit. This particular case is one that is to decide on keeping a heritage tree or a contributing structure. OWANA will support the position of keeping the contributing structure. We hope that HLC can also recommend keeping the structure. We are aware that the city tree ordinance regarding heritage trees is very strict, it seems to us in this case that if both OWANA and the HLC supports this position there is the possibility of the city arborist accepting this solution. The potential Owner in today’s meeting said that he could keep the first 15 ft of the house and make the project work if the heritage tree in the back of the lot could be removed. The tree is so close to the rear structure that it might be damaged during construction. It could be the case that some mitigation is require to offset this lost. The United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Report “NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM” lists 705 West Lynn as a representative property to illustrate “the broad patterns of development, diverse range of resources, and salient features of the dominant types and styles present in the district. They have been selected on the basis of their geographic distribution, relationship to similar properties, and degree of integrity.” Listed as a contributing structure, 705 West Lynn is a Center-passage, Side Gable Classical Revival style, and individually eligible for National Register listing. Please consider our position in your decision process …
6.0 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-020446; HR-2025-023066 CLARKSVILLE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1820 WEST 10TH STREET PROPOSAL Build a rear addition and two-story detached structure. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct an addition at the rear of the existing contributing property. 2) Construct a two-story housing unit behind the main house at the rear of the property. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH This property, constructed around 1922, features a front porch that extends almost the entire width of the front elevation, which is covered by an ample gable end supported by four wood posts. The house is elevated on piers, and the porch is surrounded by a concrete skirt. A front door at the front wall is off center, along with three hung 1/1 wood windows. All exterior walls are clad in wood horizontal siding. The house retains good integrity. For the first few decades after its construction, the property was occupied by various renters and tenants. These individuals included Cora Clark, who worked at a cook at a university sorority and Jas and Louise Valdez, one of whom worked as a salesperson. By 1952, the house was owned by Mrs. Robbie Buford, with a previous resident, Pearl Allen, a widow, listed as a renter. Mrs. Buford worked in various jobs, including as a maid and a cook. In 1959, the property was acquired by E.A. Arnold. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location Addition is located at the rear of the contributing building. The physical connection and loss of historic material between existing and proposed only occurs at one room. 2. Scale, massing, and height Addition is a single-story, and the peak of the roof pitch is slightly lower than at the original house. The addition is offset slightly to differentiate it visually. 3. Design and style The design of the addition is simple and compatible with the historic. Some elements, such as roof form and window sizes, are slightly different in order to be read as not original. 4. Roofs Proposed roof is set at an equal pitch to the main house but is slightly shorter at maximum height and is hipped at the rear, which …
1820 W 10TH 6TH ST. Drawn by CAI Checked by Checker VICINTY MAP C A P O M L A K E A U S T I N B L V D . PROJECT DESCRIPTION NEW ADDITION TO EXISTING RESIDENCE (BUILDING 1) AND NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A 2- STORY SECOND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (BUILDING 2) IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 19 & 20, MALCOLM GRAHAM RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2 & 3, BLOCK 13, MAAS ADDITION, AN ADDITION IN TRAVIS CO., TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLATE THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 95, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TRAVIS CO., TEXAS, TOGETHER WITH 1/2 OF THE ADJACENT ALLEY VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5935, PAGE 2195 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TRAVIS CO., TEXAS, SAVE & EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOTS 19 & 20 CONVEYED BY STREET DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 6301, PAGE 1358, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TRAVIS CO., TEXAS (TCAD PARCEL #110227) ZONING SF-3 - SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (HOME INITIATIVE) GENERAL PROJECT NOTES PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODES, REGULATIONS & ORDINANCES DO NOT SCALE DRAWING, CONTACT ARCHITECT UPON DISCOVERY OF MISSING INFORMATION OR CONFLICTS IN DRAWINGS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR ALL PARTS OF THIS PROJECT TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS MECH, ELEC, PLUMB & FIRE ENGINEERING TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. MAY REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH ARCHITECT VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS PROR TO CONSTRUCTION START FIRE PROTECTION THIS PROJECT DOES EXCEED 3,600 SF (GROSS SF, INCLUDES BOTH BUILDINGS) AND THEREFORE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. FULL NFPA 13D SPRINKLER SYSTEM BY OTHERS TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL LEVELS PENDING RESULTS OF NEAREST HYDRANT FLOW TEST SHEET LIST NO. SHEET NAME Page# A0.0 A1.0 A1.1 A1.2 A1.3 A2.1 A2.2 A2.3 A2.4 A3.1 A3.2 A3.4 A3.5 A6.0 TOTAL PAGES: 14 COVER SHEET SITE PLAN AND AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING EXTERIOR IMAGES ORIGINAL SURVEY TREE PROTECTION PLAN DEMO PLAN FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 FLOOR PLANS BUILDING 2 ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I E C N E D S E R D R A N N E K 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A , T E E R T …
7 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-009478; GF-2025-017631 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 2307 WINDSOR ROAD #2 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1950 house and outbuilding. ARCHITECTURE 2307 Windsor Road #2 is a two-story Mid-century Modern house with a flat roof, rustic stone and board-and-batten cladding, expansive fixed windows, a substantial stone chimney, and an inset carport at the one-story portion of the house. The building is set back between Windsor and East Windsor Roads, accessible only by a steeply sloped drive behind two street-frontage houses and invisible from both Windsor and East Windsor. Its stepped-down form nestles into the hillside with a two-story bank of windows facing downtown. RESEARCH The house at 2307 Windsor Road #2, originally addressed as 2300 East Windsor Road, was constructed in 1950 for Judge Trueman O’Quinn and his family. O’Quinn, an attorney, graduated from the University of Texas after reporting and editing for the Beaumont Enterprise, the Austin American, and the Daily Texan.1 While still a student, he was elected to the 42nd Texas Legislature representing Jefferson County from 1931 to 1932. After a few years in private practice, O’Quinn worked as an Austin assistant city attorney and was appointed chief City Attorney in 1939, a position he held until 1950. During World War II, he worked as Staff Judge Advocate after the Allied invasion of Normandy and occupation of Germany.2 The Windsor Road house was constructed in 1950, the same year O’Quinn left city government for private practice. Throughout the 1960s and ‘70s, he held numerous public and political posts, including 14 years as Travis County’s Democratic Party Chairman and as the official legal counsel for the University of Texas. He was appointed to the Third Court of Civil Appeals in 1967 and served for thirteen years.3 O’Quinn was best known for his role as a prolific collector and prominent amateur historian of William Sydney Porter, the American author known as O. Henry. “For almost half a century he gathered first editions, photos, manuscripts, and other memorabilia. He donated the staggering collection to The O. Henry Resources at the Austin History Center in 1982, a contribution without parallel,” notes Britney Jeffrey in the Texas State Historical Association’s Handbook of Texas. “Throughout his adult life, O'Quinn wrote articles and delivered speeches.”4 He was instrumental in saving two O. Henry residences from demolition, though one burned in …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 2307 Windsor 2 and the Case Number: PR 25-009478 Sunday, February 23, 2025 3:24:03 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Landmark Commission, We have been residents of Old Enfield for fifteen years and live near 2307 Windsor 2. We support the demolition of the current structure as it is not sound and safe. We are very familiar with soil movement in the area and it is evident the current structure is highly affected. I considered purchasing the property and have been in the home. Due to the vacancy for so long, it would be challenging to remedy to a safe and long lasting solution. We have confidence in the Haley’s commitment to creating something that reflects the history and quality of the neighborhood. We are thrilled they purchased the property and have always been the most considerate neighbors. They have gone above and beyond to help with landscaping when the city made changes to our street and their current home is maintained honored the history of the neighborhood. We approve and encourage the demolition. Laura Spence Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 2307 Windsor 2 Case Number PR 25-009478 Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:12:10 AM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution As a neighbor of the Subject property, I appove the demolition and reconstruction of the historic landmark. Thank you, Peggy O'Shaughnessy CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 2307 Windsor 2 - Case Number: PR 25-009478 Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:45:09 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To Whom It May Concern, I wanted to let you know that I am very much in favor of Brian and Caroline Haley's complete demolition and subsequent single-family project at 2307 Windsor Rd. Thank you, Jennifer Skloss 2211 Windsor Rd E, Austin, TX 78703 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 2307 Windsor 2 and the Case Number: PR 25-009478. Thursday, February 27, 2025 1:39:13 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Sir/Madam, Please note my full support for the home project and the necessary demolition under Case Number: PR 25-009478. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Sam 1702 Windsor Road & 1507 Murray Lane Austin TX 78703 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 2307 Windsor Rd. 2 Friday, February 28, 2025 1:47:29 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution We are in support of the demolition permit for the property located at 2307 2 Windsor Rd.: Case # PR-009478. We have lived in Old Enfield for 45 years and are hesitant about disturbing the fabric of our historic neighborhood. The house on this property has always been hidden behind foliage so it has little street presence. Due to the slope of the property engineering the foundation is a difficult and expensive task. I understand the current dwelling does not have adequate structural integrity for these conditions. Therefore I support the proposed demolition. Best, Bill and Marianne Dorman 1505 West Lynn Austin, TX 78703 Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS APRIL 2, 2025 HR-2025-028113 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1507 LORRAIN STREET 8.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a side garage and stabilize the front porch. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish a non-historic side attached carport. 2) Construct an attached garage, set back slightly from the front house the original house. 3) Construct a rear deck covered with a low-pitch metal roof tied to the original house. 4) Stabilize and slightly alter the appearance of the front porch, including removal of metal rail and supports facing the street. ARCHITECTURE Described in the district’s National Register nomination as a Craftsman Bungalow in style, the property at 1507 Lorrain Street has a horizontal appearance despite being two stories in height. There is a deep front porch that spans the entire width of the front elevation, which is supported by two large stucco clad posts and the corners and two thin metal pillars at the center. These metal fixtures, along with a thin metal handrail, are likely to have been later additions to the porch. The porch is covered by an ample side-gable roof that features a smaller front gable projecting out towards the front which features two second-floor windows. At one end of the house is a chimney, and at the other a non-original two-car carport. The house is clad in buff stucco, except for the horizontal wood siding present at the side gable ends, and the roof is covered in orange composition shingles. RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The longtime owners of the property after initial construction were Jesse & Marie Rice, who lived in the house from 1947 until at least the 1960s. They had three daughters and one son who lived with them until marrying and moving out in the 1950s. During this time, both parents worked at various roles in the insurance and real estate industries. For a time, they both worked at a music instrument repair and piano tuning business. Marie Rice passed in 1965 at the age of 67 and was survived by her husband and children. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards Any architectural elements that are to be removed …
Tisha Ritta, Permit Consultant Pulley Studios, Inc February 19, 2025 City of Austin – Residential Plan Review / Historical Preservation Office Re: 1507 Lorrain St – Renovation Project Narrative Hello, The existing home, built in 1918, is a contributing property within the Old West Austin National Register Historic District. The homeowner’s goal is to rehabilitate the structure and property while preserving its historic character. Although properties within a National Register Historic District are not regulated by the Austin Landmark Commission, we have aligned our proposed scope with the City of Austin Historic Design Standards. While the proposed work falls under a New Construction application with the city, we want to clarify the intended scope to facilitate an expedited review process. Below is a detailed explanation of the proposed renovation for 1507 Lorrain St.: Interior Remodel The interior remodel will include framing for one new bedroom and bath, complete plumbing and electrical upgrades, installation of new insulation, and a new AC unit on the second floor. No square footage will be added or removed from the main home conditioned space, and the overall height of the structure will remain unchanged. The proposed new Garage is less than 20 feet tall. Rear Addition At the rear of the home, there is currently an uncovered concrete landing and stairs leading to an exit, situated on top of a rock patio that has become overgrown with dirt. We propose removing these existing elements and replacing them with a 156 sq. ft. wood porch with a low-pitched metal roof and wood steps to grade Carport/Shed Removal & Garage Addition The existing attached carport, shed and concrete slab are deteriorating and encroach on the 5-foot side building setback. We propose removing the carport and shed structure, replacing the concrete, and constructing a new 360 sqft attached garage set further back, fully within the setback lines. The new garage will feature a composition shingle roof that matches and integrates with the existing roof structure of the home, along with smooth stucco to complement, yet not copy, the existing rough textured exterior stucco. Front Porch The proposed modifications to the front porch include stabilizing the existing columns and adding a new beam. The existing metal pillars and railing will be removed to create a clear span between stucco columns. A low stucco wall, 30” high will be built at the west edge of the porch, with two low …
DIMENSIONS F L O O R P L A N S AUSTIN TEXAS DIMENSIONSFLOORPLANS.COM PHONE: (512) 342-0114 DIMENSIONS F L O O R P L A N S AUSTIN TEXAS DIMENSIONSFLOORPLANS.COM PHONE: (512) 342-0114 DIMENSIONS F L O O R P L A N S AUSTIN TEXAS DIMENSIONSFLOORPLANS.COM PHONE: (512) 342-0114 DIMENSIONS F L O O R P L A N S AUSTIN TEXAS DIMENSIONSFLOORPLANS.COM PHONE: (512) 342-0114
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-024836; GF-2025-027255 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1324 ALTA VISTA AVENUE 9.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1968 structure. ARCHITECTURE The property at 1324 Alta Vista Avenue was built in 1968 in a modern style, with a flat roof and stack bond masonry. The elevation on the site creates the appearance of a split-level residence, with the entry facing Alta Vista Avenue being the topmost floor, and the lower floor being accessed via driveway on Milam Street to the side. To the rear of the property, a rental unit and covered carport continue the floors at around the same height, though the main entry is now at the side street grade. The walls are largely clad in stylized and painted board and batten wood sheets, along with stack bond masonry at portions of the front and side. Windows are generally small in height and, on the front section of the house, are under overhangs from a metal mansard. The rear section of the house features a ground floor that is slightly recessed from the floor above. RESEARCH Little is known about the first residents at this property from the 1968 construction. The current owner acquired it in 1995. Numerous repair interventions had occurred by that time, and the current owner has documented much of the work that has been undertaken since acquiring the property. These can be read in the “Conditions Assessment” and “Applicant Letter” documents located in backup. Deterioration has occurred throughout the house, relating to drainage issues, outdated or flawed technology, and poor original construction quality. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a decent example of modern multi-level architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or …
Photos of Existing Duplex Structure – 1324 Alta Vista Ave. Front main house / uphill side of duplex, east view from Alta Vista Ave. North side of main house / uphill side of duplex; this is the north wall of the main house living room. Photos of Existing Duplex Structure – 1324 Alta Vista Ave. West view of main house / uphill side of duplex; these doors offer the only natural light in the living room. South side of main house / uphill side of duplex. Photos of Existing Duplex Structure – 1324 Alta Vista Ave. Downhill rental unit – south side. Photos of Existing Duplex Structure – 1324 Alta Vista Ave. Downhill rental unit – east side. Photos of Existing Duplex Structure – 1324 Alta Vista Ave. Downhill rental unit, north side. Photos of Existing Duplex Structure – 1324 Alta Vista Ave. Downhill rental, west side.
( A P P E A R S T O B E D E A D ) I 3 1 " C H N A B E R R Y N 5 9 * 0 1 1 1 " W ' 1 4 7 . 3 2 ' S35*00'00"E 74.82' O A K 2 5 " L I V E L I N E P R O P E R T Y O F F I C E S T O R A G E / D E T A C H E D S 5 9 * 0 2 0 1 " E ' 1 4 7 . 9 6 ' 11'-4" O A K 2 6 " L I V E O A K 2 7 " L I V E L I V E O A K 2 1 . 5 " S H E D S T O R A G E D E T A C H E D H A T C H E D A R E A S O N L Y ) D E M O L I T I O N ( B L U E S T R U C T U R E P R O P O S E D E X I S T I N G D U P L E X N34*30'26"E 74.75' I I E X S T N G S T R U C T U R E T O B E D E M O L S H E D I 1
1324 Alta Vista Avenue Demolition Permit Application Reasons for Needing to Demolish the Existing Duplex Structure at 1324 Alta Vista Ave. The 1968-built duplex structure has many major problems that cannot be resolved / repaired, despite now 30 years of costly efforts by the current owner, and reportedly major efforts also by previous owners. The downhill rental apartment is no longer inhabitable (vacant since 2021) due to building deficiencies and drainage issues that cannot be corrected. Water intrusion and mold / mildew a constant have been a worsening situation. Details of many of those issues are described below. The current owner has resided in the duplex at 1324 Alta Vista Avenue since early 1995. While some serious problems were revealed during the inspection performed prior to purchase, within a few months of residing in the main house, and responding to problems reported by the renters living there at that time, a number of major additional problems were revealed. One of the next door neighbors shared that the builder of the duplex did notoriously subpar work, and she wasn’t surprised by issues the owner was encountering. During the next 3 decades major repair work was done in efforts to correct those problems, but some of the most problematic conditions are simply not correctable. That determination was made over time through discussions with a number of builders /contractors (including one who previously lived in the main house), and many thousands of dollars in repairs. The 1968 –built duplex was constructed during a period when some construction practices were employed that were found over time to be problematic (e.g. aluminum wiring, cast iron sewer pipes having severe / sharp bends / mechanical joints under concrete foundations, and flat roofs). In a survey of buildings done in the neighborhood conducted by those working on historic preservation efforts this house was for reasons unknown categorized as “contributing”. Some key items of information noted for the house in the survey were in error, including “metal roof” and stucco. At no time did the house have stucco exterior (but rather inexpensive painted wood sheet siding with 2” painted cedar trim, with a portion of that replaced with cement board siding in 2014). The only metal portion of the roof was on the mansard trim areas that were installed in 2014 to replace the composite mansard roofing sections (see photo below). It is the owner’s and architect’s opinion …
SUSAN M. PARTEN, P.E. 1324 Alta Vista Avenue Austin, TX 78704 Ph: Email: HLC Board Members City of Austin, Texas March 17, 2025 Subject: Demolition permit application – 1324 Alta Vista Avenue Dear HLC Board Members: Hopefully you’ve had an opportunity to review the other information I’ve provided previously detailing and sharing photos for just some of the problems with the duplex structure at 1324 Alta Vista Avenue. I thought it might be useful to also provide some history, as related to the period during which I’ve owned the property, and efforts taken to try to mitigate problems and work with the existing structure. I know this is a lot of information to share with you, but I feel it’s important that the City understands the extent of the problems and major efforts and expenses undertaken to try to address those problems that have finally led to the decision that demolition is unavoidable. I purchased the property in early 1995, and it has been my primary residence since that time, which is at least about twice the tenure of any other owner. While the house was under contract for purchase, an inspection revealed many major problems, some of which hadn’t been disclosed in the real estate listing, and the purchase price was significantly reduced to try to cover at least some of those repair expenses. As a civil engineer who even then had substantial experience with surface runoff and groundwater intrusion management practices, as well as other types of construction repairs, I felt that the problems revealed with the structure could be managed and corrected. Those were things like rotted deck, aluminum wiring, leaking flat roofs(four flat roofs) needing repair/replacement, a very long and deep French drain needed uphill of the entire structure where moisture had been observed to be impacting the eastern wall of the lower level of the uphill side of the duplex (the portion buried into the hillside along Alta Vista), etc. Starting in 1995 I began making those major repairs to the structure. I had several French drains installed (four total, in various locations around the building), replaced the roof multiple times during the past 30 years, replaced the rotted deck, etc. etc. One of the previous residents is a local remodeling contractor who had worked with my brother to restore an old church that my brother had bought and donated to a meditation group near …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2024-008236 4901 RIDGE OAK DRIVE 10.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1951 house. ARCHITECTURE Believed to have been designed by Austin architect Barton Riley1, the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive was constructed around 1951 for Edgar Perry III, grandson of Edgar Howard “Commodore” Perry. The single-story house is set on a triangular parcel that slopes towards the east, offering an optimal view of downtown. Clad in a combination white stone, concrete, and vertical wood siding, the house emphasizes its horizontality with two long wings in an L-shape. The north side of the lot features a driveway that curves around the house and terminates at a carport. There is an entry to the kitchen in this location, indicating that the doorway in the middle of the house, facing Ridge Oak Drive and opening onto the foyer and living room of the house, was designed to be the main entry. Arranging two doors in this way indicates that the automobile entry may have been seen as more of a service entry. The longer of the two wings extends to the north and includes living areas and bedrooms and features a rear door from the dining room to a broad deck that provides a view of downtown Austin. It also features ample swimming pool, which abuts a retaining wall. A flat roof covers the entire house, with moderate overhangs on several sides. Fenestration is generally not large but is grouped in several areas to create a ribbon window appearance. At the rear of the house, near the deck, is a large brick chimney that extends above the flat roof by a few feet. From the street, the exterior walls, windows, and doors are weathered but appear to be in fair condition. RESEARCH The Perry family has a long history in Austin that stretches across the city, both architecturally and civically2. The house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive was constructed for Edgar and Kathleen Perry to live in after their 1951 marriage and was completed when Edgar Perry III was in his early 20s. In the short years after their moving in, Edgar was involved in several family business ventures, including Southwest Ledge Stone Company, Terminix Termite Control3, and, most recently, the Perry Manufacturing Company, which produced plastics and other newly developed materials for domestic use4. He also became involved in, and …
Dear Historical Review Committee, My husband Reagan and I own the home in question so we appreciate the volunteered time and expertise that has gone into the review of the property. We have presented to the Architectural/Historical Review Board in another community and it was a much different experience so we can appreciate and revere the process for Austin and those that are active participants in it. That being said, I am no architectural expert, I am a family medicine doctor and like most docs when we are trying to understand or face an issue what we know how to do is research it so that is what I have done here. Thank you in advance for reading this packet as truly this decision in regard to 4901 affects no one more than my husband and myself. In the packet provided by your staff it mentions this house is thought to be designed by Barton Riley. He graduated from UT in 1950 and initially worked for several large firms before joining Emil Niggli and later going on his own in 1963. This home would have been in the works and built when he was basically fresh out of school and working for someone else. I would question his specific stamp on the design. I searched for Barton Riley online and there is a website which features his works and even has homes listed for sale. Mentioned specifically on the website with available pictures were 4515 Balcones, 4610 Crestway, and 5405 Western Hills. See thumbnail photos below – these homes exhibit exposed beams, unique fireplaces, floor to ceiling windows, asymmetry, short choppy staircases, beautiful wood paneling, exposed natural stone walls. In short, they are well kept, subjectively attractive, inhabitable, nearby in location and what I would say classify as excellent examples of MCM. As above, I am no expert, so what constitutes midcentury modern design? According to Architectural Digest: clean lines, floor to ceiling windows, open floor plans, indoor-outdoor living, built-ins, functionality. According to Wikipedia: wide homes with partially brick/glass walls, low footprint with floor to ceiling windows, exposed ceilings and beams, open floor plans, ergonomically designed furniture, short staircases connecting rooms throughout the house. Ironically our home in Corpus Christi is a 1970 Midcentury Modern home so we have no negative bias against the design in whole, I would just contend that 4901 Ridge Oak is not an ‘excellent example’ …
T.B.P.E. Registration # F-9361 February 26, 2025 Mr. Travis Habersaat, Architect Jay Corder Architect 2700 W. Anderson Lane, Suite 309 Austin, TX 78757 RE: Visual Structural Assessment 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Austin, TX 78757 On February 25, 2025, Arch Consulting Engineers PLLC visited the above referenced project to assess the structural condition of the existing house and masonry retaining wall along the property line adjacent to Crestway Drive. Mr. Brad Farris, P.E. of Arch Consulting Engineers PLLC and Mr. Travis Habersaat of Jay Corder Architect were present at the site meeting. A home inspection report prepared by Power Check Inspections, PLLC dated February 21, 2025 was provided for our review. Structural drawings of the existing house were not available. It should be noted that the findings, opinions, and conclusions of this report are based on visual observations only and reflect only the accessible features of the property. Arch Consulting Engineers, PLLC has not performed any testing of the concrete or soils at the site which may or may not reveal defects that are not visible. Structural Systems Description: The existing structure of the single-family residence is a wood framed roof system supported by wood stud framed walls bearing on a concrete foundation. The foundation appears to be a combination of slab on grade and suspended concrete over a crawl space. The roof is flat with little to no slope. The exterior cladding consists of a combination of stone veneer and wood siding. General Evaluation: During the site visit, distress was noted in various locations including exterior stone veneer and interior flooring, walls, and ceilings. The cracking in the finish materials is likely a result of foundation movement. Additionally, there were various locations where the roof appears to be leaking as evidenced by wet spots in sheetrock ceilings and rotted exterior fascias and soffits. Response to Specific Areas of Concern: 1) Foundation Movement As noted above, various cracking at the interior and exterior walls, flooring, and ceilings were seen. Also, in numerous locations the existing soil appears to be higher than the foundation leading to rotten siding and possibly rotten wall framing. The soil should be lowered and graded away from the house to promote rapid drainage away from the house. In areas of rotted siding, the siding should be removed to expose the wall framing and determine the extent of necessary repairs and/or replacement. 2579 Western Trails Blvd. Suite 230 …
POWER CHECK INSPECTIONS, PLLC Http:www.pwrcheck.com COMPLETE HOME INSPECTION - POWER CHECK 4901 Ridge Oak Dr Austin, TX 78731 Inspector Chad Nemec TREC 24017 Certi ed Professional Inspector . . . PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT FORM Michael Dickson Name of Client 4901 Ridge Oak Dr, Austin, TX 78731 Address of Inspected Property Chad Nemec Name of Inspector 02/21/2025 12:30 pm Date of Inspection TREC 24017 Certified Professional Inspector TREC License # Name of Sponsor (if applicable) TREC License # PURPOSE OF INSPECTION A real estate inspection is a visual survey of a structure and a basic performance evaluation of the systems and components of a building. It provides information regarding the general condition of a residence at the time the inspection was conducted. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. Ask the inspector to clarify any items or comments that are unclear. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSPECTOR This inspection is governed by the Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) Standards of Practice (SOPs), which dictates the minimum requirements for a real estate inspection. The inspector IS required to: use this Property Inspection Report form for the inspection; inspect only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection; indicate whether each item was inspected, not inspected, or not present; indicate an item as Deficient (D) if a condition exists that adversely and materially affects the performance of a system or component OR constitutes a hazard to life, limb or property as specified by the SOPs; and explain the inspector’s findings in the corresponding section in the body of the report form. The inspector IS NOT required to: identify all potential hazards; turn on decommissioned equipment, systems, utilities, or apply an open flame or light a pilot to operate any appliance; climb over obstacles, move furnishings or stored items; prioritize or emphasize the importance of one deficiency over another; provide follow-up services to verify that proper repairs have been made; or inspect system or component listed under the optional section of the SOPs (22 TAC 535.233). RESPONSIBILTY OF THE CLIENT While items identified as Deficient (D) in an inspection report DO NOT obligate any party to make repairs or take other actions, in the event that any further evaluations are needed, it is the responsibility of the client to obtain further evaluations and/or cost estimates from qualified service professionals regarding any items reported as Deficient …
PID 124674 | 4901 RIDGE OAK DR Property Summary Report | 2024 Online Services | Travis Central Appraisal District 124674 0129040301 R SF3 CVENGROS JENNIFER A LOT 10 *LESS NE TRI & +SW TRI LOT 11 BLK W HIGHLAND PARK WEST 4901 RIDGE OAK DR, TX 78731 OWNER Name: THARP6 LLC Secondary Name: Mailing Address: 1037 N SUGARTREE LN GALLATIN TN 37066-8565 Owner ID: % Ownership: Exemptions: 1998528 100.00 GENERAL INFO ACCOUNT Property ID: Geographic ID: Type: Zoning: Agent: Legal Description: Property Use: LOCATION Address: Market Area: Market Area CD: Map ID: X6000 012608 PROTEST Protest Status: Informal Date: Formal Date: VALUES VALUE HISTORY $1,218,000 $0 $0 $1,218,000 $182,000 $0 $182,000 $1,400,000 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $1,400,000 CURRENT VALUES Land Homesite: Land Non-Homesite: Special Use Land Market: Total Land: Improvement Homesite: Improvement Non-Homesite: Total Improvement: Market: Special Use Exclusion (-): Appraised: Value Limitation Adjustment (-): Net Appraised: VALUE HISTORY Year 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 $1,218,000 $1,176,000 $1,176,000 $588,000 $588,000 $182,000 $510,638 $433,000 $486,600 $371,798 Land Market Improvement Special Use Exclusion Appraised Value Limitation Adj (-) Net Appraised $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $1,686,638 $1,609,000 $1,074,600 $959,798 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $1,686,638 $1,609,000 $1,074,600 $959,798 Page 1 of 3 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: February 26, 2025 Powered By: <True Prodigy> Tax Rate 0.950500 0.477600 0.344445 0.000000 0.107969 0.101300 Net Appraised Taxable Value $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 TAXING UNITS Unit Description 01 02 03 0A 2J 68 AUSTIN ISD CITY OF AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY TRAVIS CENTRAL APP DIST TRAVIS COUNTY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT AUSTIN COMM COLL DIST IMPROVEMENT DO NOT PAY FROM THIS ESTIMATE. This is only an estimate provided for informational purposes and may not include any special assessments that may also be collected. Please contact the tax office for actual amounts. Improvement #1: State Code: A1 1 FAM DWELLING Description: Improvement Value: N/A Main Area: Gross Building Area: 3,248 9,192 Type Description Class CD Exterior Wall Number of Units EFF Year Built 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Year 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 SQFT 3,248 1 1,012 648 3,248 450 196 1 140 50 2 126 70 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1951 1ST 604 061 512 095 612 581 522 011 011 251 SO …
STORAGE LAUNDRY / UTILITY RM #1 FAMILY ROOM CARPORT POWDER OFFICE KITCHEN CEDAR CLOSET T E S O L C UTILITY ROOM #2 BEDROOM #2 BATH #2 CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET ENTRY BREAKFAST PRIMARY BATHROOM CLOSET PRIMARY BEDROOM BATH #1 BEDROOM #1 T E S O L C DINING ROOM LIVING ROOM DECK PRIMARY WALK-IN #1 PRIMARY WALK-IN #2 1 EXISTING- FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
4901 Ridge Oak Drive, Austin Texas Building Code Analysis Current City Of Austin Building Codes International Residential Code - 2021 Edition International Building Code - 2021 Edition ● ● ● National Electrical Code - 2023 Edition ● Uniform Mechanical Code - 2021 Edition ● Uniform Plumbing Code - 2021 Edition ● ● ● ● ● International Wildland-Urban Interface Code - 2015 Edition International Existing Building Code - 2021 Edition International Energy Conservation Code - 2021 Edition International Fire Code - 2021 Edition International Pool And Spa Code - 2018 Edition International Residential Code - 2021 Edition - Non compliant Issues ● Grading of adjacent soils ○ Grade to be removed so that a minimum of 6” of exposed foundation is uncovered. Some of this removal may be within the ½ critical root zones of protected sized trees, which is not allowed per the City of Austin tree ordinance. ● Drip flashing at masonry ○ Install metal drip cap flashing at exposed masonry wall top and fascia connection ● Tree proximity to foundation ○ Trees to be removed and foundation to be evaluated by Structural Engineer and Foundation repair specialists. ● Window egress width - Current bedroom casement windows only allow for 14” of clear width opening, not the required 20” of clear width. ○ Windows to be replaced with historically accurate steel windows. Historic Permission will be required for alteration of existing window layout to meet egress width compliance requirements. ● Window egress sill located at 59” above finish floor ○ Historic permission will be required to remove a section of wall to lower the window sills to proper egress requirements of 42” max sill above finish floor. 1 ○ Windows to be replaced with historically accurate steel windows. Historic permission will be required for alteration of existing window layout to meet egress width compliance requirements. ● Guard rails missing or noncompliant ○ Property guard rails to replace existing non compliant rails or missing rails with adjacent vertical drops of 30” or more. ● Gutter drainage ○ Gutters are currently draining towards the foundation resulting in foundation and moisture issues ● Spawling of concrete joists leaving exposed rebar ○ Coordination w/ Structural Engineer and Foundation repair specialists to determine how to correct or replace ● Non ventilated crawl space ○ Cut through foundation walls underneath the Dining Room to install vented wall grills. Further study is required to determine how …
– JAY CORDER ARCHITECT – HLC Talking Points ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ● 31 years experience 10 historically significant projects of note: 1510 West Ave. 1209 Elm St. 804 W. 17th St. 3505 Mt. Barker (Stenger)-resto-mod 7 Sugar Shack (Stenger)-resto-mod 3703 Eastledge (Mckee)-remodel closer to original condition and intent 1700 West Ave. 1600 West Lynn 2403 Pemberton Place (either a fehr-granger or Riley)-resto-mod 2404 Pemberton Place (either a fehr-granger or Riley)-resto-mod ● The property has been vacant and unmaintained for many years, leaving it in a state of disrepair. The home's fundamental elements are beyond repair: Windows and frames would have to be completely rebuilt or restored Stone has been painted with lead paint. No suitable chemical solutions exist that would maintain integrity of the stone. Mechanical removal is also fatal to the original stone. Roof system is inadequate. It’s completely flat so it would have to be rebuilt including roof structural system most likely in order to provide adequate slope for drainage. Further, TPO, PVC, and rolled roofing are becoming problematic with insurance. I have personally had three recent projects with push back from insurance on this issue. Other architects I spoke with are starting to hear same. Foundation system is failing or has failed in several areas. Remediation is possible but incredibly time consuming and therefore costly All interior finishes are either in complete disrepair, riddled with mold. All exterior finishes would also have to be completely replaced due to leakage, rot, etc. Subsequently, it is highly likely that a good portion of the framing will need replacement Code issues exist in abundance: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Windows and doors do not meet current City standards Roof slopes etc are in adequate Electrical and plumbing systems are inadequate Wall sections are inadequate (R-value) Accessibility route does not currently exist ○ The building would essentially need to be rebuilt and would consequently truly be a new residence that is simply a replica of the original home. ● The guidelines and code explicitly require unique characteristics that go beyond a specific design. There are several more uniquely characteristic and better maintained residences by Riley in the area. This one is somewhat unremarkable in context: ○ Significant deficiencies in plan geometry exist: – JAY CORDER ARCHITECT – ■ ■ There is no view from this property on …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Please save 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Tuesday, March 4, 2025 1:56:11 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Hello, I am a resident of the beautiful neighborhood in Austin that’s home to 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. This house has served as a local landmark for me personally and my family for 15 years as we have lived in this area. We drive by the home and think what else could be done with this mid century time capsule? To honor and uphold and preserve our past is paramount to honoring our land and what it means to us. Because I live here, I matter, my voice matters. Thank you for reading this. Thank you for considering preserving and relegating historic status to the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. in Austin, Texas. Thank you in advance for preserving the beautiful home on the corner lot with all the beautiful trees it contains. What a treasure we have in that home in our beautiful neighborhood. I can only imagine what is possible for such a gem. Thank you for not demolishing it. All the best, Jenna Smith 3607 Lucas Drive Austin, TX 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
The Austin Historic Landmark Commission and City of Austin City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department To: Austin, TX Subject: Protest Against the Demolition of the Historic House at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Dear Members of the Austin Historic Landmark Commission and the City of Austin and to whom it may concern: I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed demolition of the house located at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive. As a resident of Austin and a passionate advocate for the preservation of our city’s rich architectural and cultural heritage, I believe this house should be preserved, not destroyed. The house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive, constructed around 1951, stands as a remarkable example of midcentury residential architecture, believed to have been designed by renowned Austin architect Barton Riley. This home is a testament to both the architectural vision of its time and the significant contributions of the Perry family to the development of Austin’s civic and cultural life. Edgar Perry III, a former City Council member and community leader, and his family are central to the history of this property, and the house has deep historical ties to both the Perry family and the evolution of the city. As a member of the neighborhood in which this house is a part, I have always admired its mid-century design and low-profile aesthetic. It serves as a sentry to our neighborhood - giving one a taste of how the neighborhood will look and feel beyond it. We all moved here for its interesting architecture, mid-century feel, trees, and proximity to downtown. This home serves as a sentinel for the entire neighborhood due to its historic and beautiful architecture and cultural relevance. Additionally, the significance of the Perry family’s involvement in Austin's business, political, and charitable sectors cannot be overstated. Edgar Perry III, a former Austin City Council member and mayor pro tempore, left an indelible mark on the city’s civic landscape. Demolishing the house erases a key piece of this history, one that is not only valuable for its architectural merit but also for its connection to the city’s political and social evolution. While I understand that new development is inevitable in a growing city like Austin, I urge the commission to consider the lasting impact of erasing such an important part of our city's history. Demolition would be a permanent loss to our cultural and architectural landscape. …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office In support of 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Historic Zoning Tuesday, March 4, 2025 2:51:45 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern, As a registered architect and a resident of the Highland Park Balconies West neighborhood, I would like to voice my support for designating the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive as "historic." The home anchors the prominent corner at Crestway Drive and Ridge Oak Drive, welcoming residents as they find their way home each evening. Even before moving to this neighborhood eight years ago, I recognized this house as among the most important in the neighborhood. In part, it was 4901 Ridge Oak that made me want to live in this neighborhood. It embodies the mid-century optimism upon which the neighborhood was founded. The long, low roof forms nestle comfortably beneath the prominent heritage oaks, while the home itself steps back respectfully from the street - acknowledging that this is an acute intersection demanding big, sweeping turns and long sight-lines for safety. The material palette is simple and native to central Texas: undressed limestone, wood siding and glass. It's unobtrusive scale is friendly, welcoming and utterly without pretention. Healthy cities and neighborhoods evolve, and our neighborhood is no different. New development in the neighborhood less attuned to the long-low structures of the mid-century modern movement. Not every older home in the neighborhood warrants historic designation. However, it would negatively impact the neighborhood to lose this gem at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive. The house is significant in what it represents to the history of the development of Austin as it slowly migrated out from the city center. To allow un-restricted development of the site could endanger the heritage trees on site and, more significantly, make the sightlines around this corner more difficult - jeopardizing pedestrian and vehicular safety. Thank you for your consideration, Talmadge Smith, AIA 3607 Lucas Dr. Austin, TX 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Demolition of 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Tuesday, March 4, 2025 3:54:31 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello I am writing regarding the potential demotion of the property at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive in Austin, 78731. I understand that there is a request to designate this a historic landmark based primarily on its relation to the Perry family in Austin and its mid-century modern architecture. Although the lot and overall appearance of the property is appealing, I do not believe that this house is unique, well-designed, or of high enough quality to receive a historic landscape designation. I’ve been inside and around that property on several occasions. The interior light fixtures, doors, cabinets and flooring appear to be standard builder’s grade - simple painted woodwork and carpeting typical of houses built before the 1970s. A previous owner described it as ‘living in a dorm’. The exterior of the house has had little to no maintenance for at least ten years. Without such maintenance, I’ve watched the exterior stone walls and deck slowly decay and fall apart. This house has been available for sale for some time with no buyers and has become an eyesore. I’m tired of looking out my window and watching it slowly decay further. Please approve the demolition permit. Thanks Melissa CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 4901 Ridge Oak Dr Tuesday, March 4, 2025 5:04:40 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution I understand there is consideration for historic zoning for 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. As someone who lives in this neighborhood, I would oppose such zoning. This house is aesthetically ugly and does not add any historic value to the neighborhood. I understand it was at one time owned by a descendant of Commodore Perry, however we are all grandchildren of someone, that does not make us the historically important. I would urge the city to allow this structure to be replaced with a modern, safe house or - even better - two houses as we could use the increased density. Sincerely, Ben Pasmore 5109 Lucas Lane Austin, TX 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. Wednesday, March 5, 2025 9:23:52 AM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Good Morning, I would like to let you know that there are many of us in our neighborhood that would like for 4901 Ridge Oak to have an historic zoning status. I have lived in this neighborhood for almost 20 years and walk my dog daily. This house and property are amazing. I love the trees, the bluebonnets that signal to the neighborhood that it is spring and that the midcentury look of the home. It would be heartbreaking to see a modern home at this site. Thank you, Shelly Russell 5013 Westview Austin, Tx 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Supporting Historic Designation for 4901 Ridge Oak Dr Wednesday, March 5, 2025 12:29:38 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon, I am in support of the historic designation of 4902 Ridge Oak Drive. It is my understanding that the house was … Designed by Austin architect Barton Riley, the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive was constructed around 1951 for Edgar Perry III, grandson of Edgar Howard “Commodore” Perry. My family & I have lived at 5013 Westview Dr, Austin TX 78731 for the past 18+ years. Destruction of the home at 4901 Ridge Oak would also fundamentally change the character of the neighborhood - especially at an extremely prominent and visible location. I appreciate your consideration of my concern and position. Dave David Knoll CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
Dear Historical Review Commitee, My name is Sandra Sahadi and my husband Dr Jack Sahadi and I live at 3408 Mt Bonnell Drive and have owned our home there since 1989. The home in ques�on (4901 Ridge Oak) belongs to my son and daughter in law. Both of these young professionals have spent much �me in Aus�n during their lives and have finally taken the leap to make a piece of Aus�n their own. Sadly, their plan to build a gorgeous home near my husband and I has been met with undue resistance. My neighbors and I have been avid walkers in the neighborhood in ques�on for years and are very familiar with this neighborhood and this home. We have seen changes in the neighborhood over the years but the home in ques�on has been abandoned. There was a similar such home maybe one block from my children’s home on 4620 Crestway Dr that was recently torn down. I contend that the home that was torn down had more curb appeal and had more architecturally dis�nct features than the house in ques�on. How do we pick and choose? It will be my son and daughter-in-law who will have to pay for any changes to the property now since they have purchased so how can we add incumbrances a�er the fact and canvas opinions from neighbors how they should spend their hard-earned funds? The MLS lis�ng for their home was posted as a tear-down, in fact the photos on the lis�ng are of a rendering of a home that ‘could be’. And the three photos that were posted of the exis�ng home must’ve been taken years ago as they do not accurately represent the current status inside that home. I feel terrible personally because being close to my husband and myself was their main catalyst in purchasing this property and it has been met with delays and overzealous neighbors rallying support in a neighborhood app to try and dictate what they do with the home. These two individuals have built and/or renovated numerous homes during their 15 years together and they are conscien�ous and intelligent adults who have lovely taste and will make this new home a show place that the neighborhood will be proud to have. What is currently there is not worth becoming a money pit and I hope you will vote to allow its demoli�on. Thank you for …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Thursday, March 20, 2025 9:54:46 AM You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To Whom It May Concern: My name is Patrick N. Dunn and I live at 4622 Lake View Drive, Austin, TX, 78731. I am writing to express my strong support for the demolition of the residence at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive. As a long-time resident of this neighborhood, I have personally observed the gradual deterioration of this property over the years. It is evident that the house has been vacant and unmaintained for many years, and key structural elements are visibly beyond repair. Furthermore, it is my understanding that the current guidelines and code require unique architectural characteristics for preservation. This property lacks any such unique or distinctive features; while it is a mid-century modern home, there are numerous other, far superior examples of this architectural style within the neighborhood. Additionally, my research indicates that the home has no significant historical associations. Edgar Perry III, the former resident, served only one term on the city council and made no noteworthy contributions to Austin. The multitude of existing markers honoring other individuals underscores their greater significance compared to Edgar Perry III, who achieved little of note. In summary, I believe there are better uses for this property than creating a replica of a lower-quality mid-century modern home. I urge you to approve the demolition. Sincerely, Patrick N. Dunn Homeowner, 4622 Lake View Drive CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-017540; GF-2025-021282 2307 BRIDLE PATH 11 – 1 Demolish a ca. 1941 house and outbuilding. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story house with Tudor Revival detailing, including catslide roof, arched entry, and central masonry chimney. The house at 2307 Bridle Path was constructed around 1941 as part of the Westfield subdivision. Its first occupants were Homer and Grace Williams. Homer Williams worked as a clerk at the local post office. During the 1940s, the house was rented to Air Force captain Fred Fenton and to Virginia and Donald Russell, students at the University of Texas. Subsequent owners Carroll and Ida Young lived in the home for around a decade. Carroll Young worked as a salesman at various auto sales companies during this time. From 1959 to around 1963, the home was rented by former San Antonio Express News Capitol Correspondent Roy Grimes, who left the paper in the early ‘50s to work as the publicity director for the Republican Party of Texas. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. Siding has been replaced. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is constructed with Tudor Revival and Minimal Traditional influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 11 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 11 – 3 11 – 4 Demolition application, 2025 Occupancy History City Directory Research, March 2025 Roy Grimes, owner 1959 1957 1955 1952 1949 1947 1941 1939 Carroll P. and Ida Young, owners - …
NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRON TO REMAIN EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED ALL EXISTING FLATWORK TO BE DEMOLISHED PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) FENCING TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) 26" POST OAK TO REMAIN W/ FULL PROTECTIONS PER COA GUIDELINES 8" MULCH W/ FULL CRZ AS PERMITTED BY WORK CHAINLINK TREE PROTECTION FENCE CARPORT STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED FENCING TO BE DEMOLISHED AND REPLACED; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 8" MULCH W/ FULL CRZ AS PERMITTED BY WORK TREE PROTECTION AS POSSIBLE: REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ALL EXISTING SITE WORK TO BE DEMOLISHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 8" MULCH W/ FULL CRZ AS PERMITTED BY WORK TREE PROTECTION AS POSSIBLE; REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS REAR ACCESSORY BUILDING SCALE: 1/16" F O R A B E T T E R A R C H I T E C T U R E & I N T E R I O R S 5 1 2 • 4 6 9 • 0 7 7 5 4 0 5 C u m b e r l a n d R o a d A u s t i n , T X 7 8 7 0 4 f a b a r c h i t e c t u r e. c o m 03-24-25 EXPIRES: 10/31/25 I G N D L I U B Y R O S S E C C A N O I T C U R T S N O C W E N 3 0 7 8 7 • X T , N I T S U A • H T A P E L D R B 1 0 3 2 I DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DATE: PERMIT SET 3/26/2025 REVISIONS: THESE DRAWINGS ARE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY ONLY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PROJECT CAUTION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS DEMOLITION PLAN D1.1 ATTSXETEFOSAPATRICK MARK OUSEY15695REGISTEREDARCHITECT
CONSIDERATION FOR DEMOLITION 2307 BRIDLE PATH, AUSTIN, TX 78703 Dear Historic Landmark Commissioners, I am writing to provide important context regarding the property at 2307 Bridle Path, which our client, who resides next door at 2301 Bridle Path, purchased in the fall of 2024 with the intention of expanding his yard and constructing a recreation structure for his family. Due to the presence of large heritage and protected trees on the combined site, the buildable area for this new structure is limited to the space surrounding the existing residence at 2307 Bridle Path. Unfortunately, this limitation requires the removal of the existing residence at 2307 Bridle Path to proceed with the desired development. We have consulted with Junior Brown and Sons House Movers, who have visited the site several times to assess the possibility of relocating the existing structure. Junior Brown has determined that moving the home would cause significant damage to low-hanging tree limbs along Bridle Path, especially as the route extends west to Exposition Boulevard. Additionally, Bridle Path is narrower than most roads, making it an inhospitable, but only, route for moving a structure of this size. During this consultation process, we discovered that the home at 2307 Bridle Path has suffered from prolonged neglect, resulting in significant water damage, wood rot, and termite damage. These issues are primarily the result of poorly executed and haphazard additions made by previous owners over the years. As a result, the structural integrity of the home has been severely compromised. We also explored the possibility of relocating a reduced portion of the existing structure (approximately 1,200 square feet). However, even this reduced relocation option was deemed unfeasible due to the same challenging path and the risk of significant damage to the surrounding tree branches along the path. It is important to note that the adjacent home is where our client lives, located at 2307 Bridle Path, which was recently fully renovated. Our client does not wish to unnecessarily demolish buildings, but the current condition of the structure and its limited viability, combined with the limitations posed by the heritage trees and the site’s configuration, have led to the conclusion that demolition is the only course of action in order to fulfill the goals for the property. We kindly request that the Commission take these circumstances into account when making their determination regarding this matter. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Patrick …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-022277; GF-2025-027244 1307 CRESTWOOD ROAD 12.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1947 house. ARCHITECTURE Described in the 2019 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek survey as being minimal traditional in style, the house at 1307 Crestwood Road also embodies ranch elements such as a broad front elevation of a single-story with a garage to one side. A front walkway leads to the front door, which is roughly at the center of the house, under a small front porch. To once side is a double window likely opening to the living room. This room also features a small front-facing gable roof, which projects out from the larger side gable of the overall house. The front of the house is clad in white stone, with all other exterior walls clad in horizontal wood siding. The house retains moderate integrity, though the original windows appear to be replaced. RESEARCH Built sometime in the late 1940s, the property was first occupied by renters, G.A. and Grace Tanner. Their ages and any occupation are unknown, but by 1955, the house was owned and occupied by Reverend J. Leonard & Vonnie Rea. Reverend Rea served as City Missionary to Austin, a role appointed by the Southwest Texas Methodist Conference. He previously served at the South Austin Methodist Church from 1934 to 1939, and the two moved to be closer to work in surveying locations for new Methodist missions. By 1959, the house was listed as being for rent, and an article from that year mentions the Reas celebrating their golden anniversary from their new home at 2615 Spring Lane. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2019 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek historic resource survey lists the property as a medium priority and retains sufficient integrity to contribute to a potential local historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate-to-high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of 1940s minimal traditional and ranch style residential. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. …
13 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-026197; GF-2025-029887 4523 AVENUE B PROPOSAL Partially demolish and construct a second-floor addition to a ca. 1923 one-story house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project removes a portion of the existing roof to construct a second-floor addition. Located approximately 12 feet from the front wall of the house, the addition is clad in horizontal fiber cement siding. It is roughly square in plan and capped with a hipped roof of similar slope to the existing roof. The proposed fenestration is regular in distribution and consists of 1:1 sash, casement, and fixed windows. ARCHITECTURE One-story masonry house with partial-width porch, pyramidal hipped roof with exposed rafter tails, and 1:1 arched windows and doors. RESEARCH Bricklayer and Swedish immigrant Axel Arnhamn constructed the home around 1923 after moving from a farm in Manor around 1919. Svenskarne i Texas i Ord Och Bild, 1838-1918 (Swedes in Texas in Words and Pictures, 1838-1918), compiled by Ernest Severin, describes the Swedish families immigrating to Texas over that period. Severin’s writeup on the Arnhamn family details their journey up to 1919: Among the emigrants who in recent years have come to New Sweden, Texas, and settled as farmers, is Axel Arnhamn. The son of master carpenter Anders William Arnhamn, he was born in Munkaljungby parish in Skåne in 1853 and came with his parents to Höja parish in 1859. He attended the parish's elementary school, then learned the bricklayer's trade from his uncle Wilson in Helsingborg, got America fever and landed in 1906 in the great city of New York. He worked there at his trade one year and then came to New Sweden to his sister and brother-in-law, Rev. Alfred L. Scott. He worked during his first years in New Sweden as a laborer. In later years he rented land and is at present farming Mrs. C.M. Nygren's beautiful homestead in New Sweden. He married Esther Larson in 1910. She was born in 1887 in Ljungarum parish, Småland, and emigrated in 1906 from Rogberga parish, the same county, to the United States, first coming to New Sweden, Texas, to her relatives the C.A. Gustafsons. The couple's sons, Fingal and Werner, were born in 1913 and 1917 … […] Uno Arnhamn emigrated to America in the fall of 1907 to his sister and brother-in-law, Pastor Alfred Scott in New Sweden. His traveling party from …
GENERAL NOTES: All dimensions shall be checked on site. NOTES: See drawing 011 for site and tree notes TREE LEGEND: Any discrepancies in the drawings shall be brought to the attention of the designer. Any variations from these drawings shall be approved by the designer. SITE INFORMATION: Site information taken from survey performed by Big Sky Surveying 07/19/23, Felix M Gonzalez 5418 Tree trunk Critical Root Zone 1/2 Critical Root Zone 1/4 Critical Root Zone Protective fencing Protective mulch LEGEND: Existing wall: New wall: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 7, Hyde Park, Vol 2, Page 130 PRTCT, City of Austin, County of Travis PROPOSED AREA CALCULATIONS: Proposed Gross Conditioned Space: 2,323ft2 First Floor: 1,493ft2 Second Floor: 884ft2 Proposed Gross Unconditioned Space: 231ft2 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER: Lot Area: 7,801ft2 Max Allowable Building Coverage @ 40%: 3,120ft2 Max Allowable Total Impervious Coverage @ 45%: 3,510ft2 Building Coverage: House: 1,439ft2 Front Porch: 157ft2 Garage: 231ft2 Shed: 162ft2 Total Building Coverage: 1,989ft2 25.5% lot coverage Impervious Coverage: Concrete Driveway: 864ft2 Concrete Walkway: 126ft2 Wood Deck @ 50%: 141ft2 A/C Pad: 9ft2 Total Impervious Coverage: 1,140ft2 14.6% lot coverage Total Building + Impervious Coverage: 3,129ft2 / 40.1% FRONT YARD IMPERVIOUS COVER: Front Yard Area: 1,246ft2 Max Allowable Coverage @ 40%: 498ft2 Impervious Coverage: Front Porch: 125ft2 Concrete Driveway: 241ft2 Concrete Walkway: 126ft2 Total Impervious Coverage: 492ft2 39.5% front yard coverage TREES: T1 Live Oak T2 Pecan T3 Pecan T4 Pecan T5 Ligustrum T6 Arizona Ash T7 Pecan T8 Pecan T9 Pecan T10 Pecan 19" diameter 31" diameter 23" diameter 25" diameter 18" diameter 18" diameter 20" diameter 16" diameter 30" diameter 25" diameter 10' setback line incoming overhead power line shed in place since at least 1958 20 01 3 62 7. 1 2 N G shed R5' 0"1/4CRZ R4' 0"1/4CRZ R10' 0" 1/2CRZ R8' 0" 1/2CRZ 2 R 0' 0 " R Z C R 1 6' 0 " R Z C T7 T8 20 2 62 7. 2 9 F N B1 N G 20 1 62 7. 4 8 F N B1 N G privacy fence property line 5' building setback line tent 2 low point 628.38' plywood placed over 8" of mulch 6 62 8. 2 5 C P T N S 6 0D R15' 0" 1/2CRZ R7' 6"1/4CRZ " 0 - ' 0 4 12 19 62 8. 4 1 F N B1 N G 0' 0 " R Z …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-142715; GF-2025-030365 HOUSE PARK 1301 SHOAL CREEK BOULEVARD 14 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Repair grandstands, make ADA improvements, and replace non-original press box at a ca.1936-39 playing field. 1) Repair failing concrete structural supports at east and west grandstands. 2) Repaint existing grandstands and walls at currently painted surfaces only. 3) Replace existing ramps at east and west grandstands with new ADA-compliant ramps in same location. 4) Demolish existing non-original press boxes (ca. 1960s; remodeled 1986) at east and west grandstands and construct a replacement freestanding press box at the east grandstand. The proposed press box is two stories in height, with a flat roof and vertical siding. Full-height fixed windows look onto the field, and a three-story staircase structure provides egress. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The existing press boxes are one-story structures with board-and-batten siding and shed roofs, attached to the east and west grandstands. House Park, originally a pasture donated to the City in 1903 by Colonel Edward House, made its official debut as the home of the Austin High Maroons in the 1930s after being used as baseball and football fields for decades. The grandstands, field house (now demolished) and ticket booth were constructed between 1936 and 19401 as part of a larger PWA-funded project initiated by AISD2, and the scoreboard and north grandstand (demolished) followed in 1947.3 The House Park grandstand and ticket booth were designed by Giesecke & Harris and built by J. R. Blackmore and Sons.4 The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at potential historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Institutional buildings 1.1 Ensure that the building’s historic character is preserved through careful repair and maintenance of historic materials. The proposed project includes repair and maintenance of historic concrete elements. 1.2 Additions to an institutional building may not be appropriate. The proposed new press box addition appears somewhat appropriate but may overwhelm the smaller-scale grandstands. 1.3 Locate additions to be subordinate to the historic building, keeping in mind that all sides of an institutional building may be significant. See 1.2. The size and scale of the new grandstand should be carefully considered to avoid excessive visibility, as the existing press boxes are unobtrusive in design and small in scale. …
Austin Independent School District: House Park West Grandstand 1936 Baseball Stand and Diamond pre- date football stadium North Grandstand estimated 1947 West Grandstand & tennis courts 1938/39 Field House 1940 House Park Aerial 1937 House Park Aerial 1952 Baseball Stand and Diamond demoed and relocated 38/39 Austin Independent School District House Park Stadium North Grandstands demo unknown date Press Boxes estimated 60/70s Tennis Courts 1977 Baseball stands and diamond removed Parking added between 1973 & 1981 New Field House 2009 Field House Demolished 2009 House Park 1985 House Park 2011 Field Turfed 2008 Austin Recreation Center 1986 Austin Independent School District House Park Stadium House Park Stadium Improvements 3 New Freestanding Press Box East side ADA Ramps East & West Grandstand Concrete repair and repainting Easts & West Grandstand Concrete Repairs 4 • Concrete patch repairs of slabs, beams, walls, risers, and columns • Concrete repairs are only for the structural integrity of the grandstand ADA Access Ramp Improvements 5 • The existing ramps to the East and West grandstands currently do not meet ADA requirements • Existing ramps will be replaced with new ADA compliant ramps Existing East Grandstand Ramp Existing West Grandstand Ramp Grandstand Painting 6 • Existing painted surfaces of perimeter grandstand and walls to be repainted East Grandstand Ramp West Grandstand Ramp East & West Press Boxes 7 • AISD House Park Stadium Improvements includes removal of existing East and West Press Boxes • Press Boxes added to grandstands estimated 1960s (date to be verified) • Press boxes renovation 1986 • Existing press boxes do not have ADA access • Existing press boxes do not have emergency exit outside of the floodplain • Structural assessment completed 2016 identified multiple structural deficiencies to existing press boxes East Grandstand Ramp West Grandstand Ramp House Park Site 8 • The House Park site lies within a floodplain • The existing press boxes do not allow for egress out of the flood plain • The newly designed Freestanding Press Box allows for egress out of the floodplain East Grandstand Ramp West Grandstand Ramp Existing East Grandstand Press Box East Press Boxes 9 Conceptual Freestanding East Grandstand Press Box East Grandstand Ramp West Grandstand Ramp AISD: House Park East Press Box 1 0 • New press box honors the legacy of the House Park Stadium, while providing an opportunity for 21st century use and learning opportunities for staff and students • …
15TH STREET . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N S H O A L C R E E K B L V D . W 15TH STREET W 13TH STREET E V T A S E W W 15TH STREET E V T A S E W W 14TH STREET W 13TH HALF STREET N SITE PLAN APPROVAL SP-2023-XXXXC CASE NUMBER ________________ APPLICATION DATE:____________ APPROVED ON ____________ ADMINISTRATIVELY BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 112 142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE (LDC 25-5-81) ____________ CASE MANAGER __________ 03/28/2024 _______________________________________ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT RELEASED FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE __________ ZONING ______________ SF-3, P 21 SHEET ____ OF ____ BM-104 CHISELED SQURE IN CURB ELEVATION = 476.61' 15TH STREET . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N S H O A L C R E E K B L V D . BM-103 CHISELED SQURE IN CURB ELEVATION = 471.91' W 15TH STREET W 15TH STREET W 13TH STREET W 13TH STREET E E V V T A T A S S E E W W W 15TH STREET W 15TH STREET E E V V T A T A S S E E W W W 14TH STREET W 14TH STREET W 13TH HALF STREET W 13TH HALF STREET N SITE PLAN APPROVAL SP-2023-XXXXC CASE NUMBER ________________ APPLICATION DATE:____________ APPROVED ON ____________ ADMINISTRATIVELY BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 112 142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE (LDC 25-5-81) ____________ CASE MANAGER __________ 03/28/2024 _______________________________________ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT RELEASED FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE __________ ZONING ______________ SF-3, P 21 SHEET ____ OF ____ . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N S H O A L C R E E K B L V D . BM-103 CHISELED SQURE IN CURB ELEVATION = 471.91' NOTE: UNDERGROUND MAINS SUPPLYING NFPA 14 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13, AND THE FIRE CODE, BY A LICENSED SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR WITH A PLUMBING PERMIT. THE ENTIRE MAIN MUST BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT ONE TIME, UNLESS ISOLATION VALVES ARE PROVIDED BETWEEN TESTED SECTIONS N SITE PLAN APPROVAL SP-2023-XXXXC CASE NUMBER ________________ APPLICATION DATE:____________ APPROVED ON ____________ ADMINISTRATIVELY BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 112 142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE …
. 3 7 5 1 7 8 4 3 1 7 . : f 3 8 5 1 . 7 8 4 . 3 1 7 : p 2 0 0 7 7 s a x e T , n o t s u o H , 0 0 3 1 e t i u S , m a l i M 0 0 7 . 3 5 4 6 4 2 2 0 1 2 . : f 2 3 0 6 . 4 2 2 . 0 1 2 : p 9 0 2 8 7 s a x e T , i o n o t n A n a S , 0 0 3 e t i u S , y a w d a o r B 0 4 0 4 . 1 4 4 7 8 7 4 2 1 5 . : f 6 8 2 7 . 8 7 4 . 2 1 5 : p 4 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A , 0 0 9 e t i u S , d a o R s g n i r p S n o t r a B 1 1 8 n i t s u A n o t s u o H i o n o t n A n a S S T N E M E V O R P M I I M U D A T S K R A P E S U O H , 1 0 7 8 7 , X T , N I T S U A , D V L B K E E R C L A O H S 1 0 3 1 K P E S H 4 3 0 0 - 1 2 . D . S . I N I T S U A S1 1" (CL OF BEAM) 21' - 10" 1 EOD = 7" 2 3 3.2 4 5 6 7 20' - 1" 17' - 9 1/2" 19' - 11" 12' - 8" 9' - 1" EOD = 7" 82' - 8 1/2" 2' - 0" S2 1" (CL OF BEAM) 9' - 4 7/8" S3 R) E G RIN T F S L O " (C 1 SA SA.1 SB " 4 " 4' - 3 SC " 1 …
1/2" TYP. SUPPORTING MEMBER . I N M " 2 / 1 E P O C O T 2" 3 1/2" MIN. 1/4 STEEL BEAM - SEE PLAN BEAM "N" "L" (INCHES) WELD SIZE PLATE THICKNESS " 2 / 1 1 " 2 / 1 1 S T L O B " N " S W O R . . C O " 3 @ " L " " 2 / 1 1 VIEW A-A 3/8" SHEAR PLATE W/ 3/4" Ø A325N THRU BOLTS WITH STD. HOLES - SEE NOTE 6 MINIMUM REQUIRED BOLT ROW SCHEDULE W8 - W10 W12 - W14 W16 - W18 W24 - W27 W21 W30 W30 - W36 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6" 9" 12" 15" 18" 21" 24" 3/8" 3/8" 3/8" 3/8" 5/16" 5/16" 5/16" CAPACITY (LRFD) 24.8 KIPS 43.4 KIPS 62.5 KIPS 81.3 KIPS 89.1 KIPS 108 KIPS 127 KIPS 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" NOTES: 1. THIS CONNECTION DETAIL IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST THE DETAILER WHERE THIS CONNECTION DETAIL IS USED. NO CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, PROVIDED THAT ALL ASPECTS OF THE CONNECTIONS CONFORM TO THIS DETAIL. 2. ALL CONNECTIONS IN THE DRAWINGS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED BY THIS CONNECTION DETAIL MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE DETAILER. SIGNED AND SEALED DESIGN CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER FOR SUCH CONNECTION CONDITIONS. 3. AT THE DETAILER'S OPTION, ALTERNATE CONNECTION DETAILS MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT. ALTERNATE CONNECTION DETAILS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY DESIGN CALCULATIONS THAT ARE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. 4. THE TABULATED CAPACITIES ARE FACTORED LOADS (LRFD) 5. THE TABULATED CAPACITIES ARE BASED ON GRADE 50 BEAMS, A36 PLATES AND ANGLES, A325N BOLTS, AND E70XX ELECTRODES. 6. HORIZONTALLY SHORT SLOTTED HOLES MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF STANDARD HOLES EXCEPT FOR BEAMS WITHIN BRACED FRAMES, AT MOMENT CONNECTIONS, OR WITH HORIZONTAL FORCES NOTED ON PLAN. WF BEAM - SEE PLAN HSS COLUMN - SEE PLAN W/ 3/8" CAP PLATE WF BEAM COPED AS NECESSARY- SEE PLAN SEE TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION DETAIL WF BEAM - SEE PLAN SEE TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION DETAIL 1 TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" TYPICAL WIDE FLANGE BEAM TO WIDE FLANGE BEAM SHEAR CONNECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 TYPICAL BEAM TO HSS COLUMN CONNECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 TYPICAL BEAM TO BEAM …
TYP ACCESSIBLE SINGLE OCCUPANT TOILET ROOM CONFIGURATIONS TOILET TYPES TOILET ACCESSORY LEGEND TA-1 GRAB BAR TA-7 SOAP DISPENSER- WALL MOUNT TA-8 FRAMED MIRROR TA-12 SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL - WALL MOUNT TA-14 ROBE HOOK TA-15 UTILITY SHELF TA-17 SURFACE-MOUNTED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER TA-25 TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER - TWIN JUMBO ROLL C.F.C.I. O.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. O.F.C.I. O.F.C.I. 2'-3" 5'-0" 5'-0" " 0 - ' 5 TA-14 <T1> 4'-0" " 5 - ' 1 17" " 7 - ' 4 " 6 - ' 7 R A E L C N M I " 5 - ' 1 " 7 - ' 4 " 6 - ' 7 R A E L C N M I " 0 - ' 3 " 6 FLOOR PLAN DESIGNATIONS <WS1> 8'-0" MIN CLEAR DOOR SWING IN FRONT OF LAVATORY <TR1> I N M " 5 1 " 5 X A M 4'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 4'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-3" 1'-3" " 0 - ' 2 X A M " 7 - ' 1 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE STANDING LOCATION STANDING LOCATION " 6 - ' 1 A L C O V E 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE PLACE WATER FOUNTAIN FIXTURES IN AN ALCOVE TO PROVIDE FOR CANE DETECTION OR PROVIDE A CANE DETECTION SKIRT PLAN ACCESSIBLE RECESSED WATER FOUNTAIN <EWC1> <EWC3> PLAN ACCESSIBLE WALL MOUNTED WATER FOUNTAIN <EWC2> <EWC4> Has Bottle Filler <WS1> LAVATORY AND SINK NOTE: LAVATORY AND SINK ACCESSORIES MOUNTED TO WALL PERPENDICULAR TO PLUMBING WALL SHALL NOT EXTEND PAST LEADING EDGE OF SINK OR MORE THAN 4" INTO THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. 6'-10" MIN CLEAR IN SINGLE OCCUPANT TOILET ROOMS, THE DOOR SWING IS ALLOWED TO OVERLAP ALL CLEARANCES IF A 30X48 CLEAR AREA IS PROVIDED OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR SWING - TDLR TAS 603.2.3 EXCEPTION 2 3" MIN 1'-3" 1'-3" 1'-2" " 5 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 4 " 5 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 4 " 4 / 1 6 - ' 1 TA-8 TA-7 TA-17 " 4 / 1 6 - ' 1 TA-7 TA-8 TA-17 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE ACCESSIBLE LAVATORY WITH ADJACENT WALL ACCESSIBLE LAVATORY 40" MAX. FOR MIRRORS INSTALLED ABOVE LAVATORIES OR COUNTERTOPS. 35" MAX. FOR MIRRORS NOT INSTALLED ABOVE LAVATORIES OR COUNTERTOPS. 1'-4" TA-15 TA-15 " 4 - ' 2 " 4 - ' 1 1'-0" 2'-4" " …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-025231; GF-2025-027260 6004 SPANCREEK CIRCLE X – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1961 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 6004 Spancreek Circle is a one-story residence constructed with Mid-century Modern and Ranch stylistic influences. It is clad in board-and-batten siding and is capped with a low-slope roof with an irregular roofline and deep eaves supported by exposed rafter tails. An original attached carport has been enclosed, though its flat-roofed form remains the same, and though some original windows appear to have been replaced by incompatible vinyl units, the openings appear unaltered. The house at 6004 Spancreek Circle was constructed in 1961 by builder Lloyd McLean for the 1961 Parade of Homes. In her National Register nomination for another Northwest Hills model home, Karen Twer discusses the importance of the Parade of Homes in Austin’s development history: By building model houses for events like the Parade of Homes, builders and developers could highlight the attractive and livable qualities of their volume-built houses and market new suburban developments to masses of potential homebuyers. As a kind of conceptual show window, their model houses needed to be centrally located…Not bounded by the existing urban landscape, developers could create the kind of neighborhoods second-time middle-class homebuyers were seeking. By hosting Parade of Homes events in outlying areas of growing cities, developers and builders were influential in shaping the suburban development of expanding cities like Austin. […] Builders and developers relied on architects to design the kind of distinctive houses that would rival custom-built houses…Model houses built for the Parade of Homes were collaborative interpretations of the kind of modern domestic lifestyle homebuyers dreamt of…In the 1960s, [Austin’s] Parade of Homes events continued focusing on largely undeveloped areas south and northwest of the city. In 1961, it was in Highland Hills, a neighborhood nestled between what is today the Mopac Expressway and Northwest Hills…In addition to the spectacle the events provided Austinites, Austin builders and developers understood the mass-marketing opportunity the Parade of Homes offered.1 “Perched near the crest of a scenic Northwest hill, on a level, landscaped homesite…nothing quite like it has been seen in Austin before, because it is a practical product of fertile imagination and skilled homebuilding,” extols the Austin-American Statesman. “Every room at 6004 Spancreek Circle is a dream of tomorrow that’s here today.”2 Despite its glowing reputation, the home’s first occupants, Cynthia and …
Exhibit B.2: SITES THAT ARE DESIGNATED AS HISTORICALLY OR ARCHEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES IN NEED OF TAX RELIEF TO ENCOURGE THEIR PRESERVATION RECEIVING THE PARTIAL EXEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 Parcel Number Landmark Name 0205020506 0206051208 Pearl House Bar Bailetti House Address 221 Congress Avenue 1006 Waller Street Zoning Case Number FY25 Inspection Result C14H-1986-0040 C14H-1988-0022 Pass Pass
5450 Bee Caves Rd. Ste. 4B Austin, TX 78746 To whom it may concern, Opinion- The structure/house located at 2307 Bridle Path has multiple poorly executed additions. There is visible evidence of foundation deficiencies along with visible evidence of termite infestation. The siding on the front of the house is not original and has been replaced with Hardie cement siding. There have been many changes to the original house that are not congruent with the original architecture. It would be cost prohibitive to save this structure in its current condition. Donald Berry Senior Project Manager David Wilkes Builders LLC DW Residential LLC 5450 Bee Caves Rd., Suite 4B Austin, Texas 78746 davidwilkesbuilders.com
Steering Committee Members: Steve Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum, Meghan Yancy March 28, 2025 RE: 705 West Lynn - PR-2024-159632; GF-2024-161879 Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, OWANA, supports retaining contributing structures in our historic district and integrating existing building forms into the overall project for new development. In the case of 705 West Lynn, preserving the façade and front rooms of the existing house and adding on to the structure would have a significant impact toward that goal. We support the HLC’s Architectural Review Committee’s recommended exploration in elevation and section of a second story at the rear of the front housing unit and exploring the possibility of widening the proposed rear parking structure to add desired interior floor area. The applicant has not meet with the OWANA with any updated elevations and sections and it is difficult to support demolition of a contributing structure without seeing more descriptive two dimensional drawings of how successful the massing would be with an addition to the original structure. Rehabilitation, remodel and addition to contributing structures in our historic district versus demolition maintains the vitality of the district. If piecemeal destruction of these historic homes continues, our district will cease to exist and its sense of historic narrative and charm will no longer be visible. This devalues our unique pocket of history in an increasingly dynamic city. Let’s continue to respect and appreciate the reason so many people want to live in our neighborhood. The United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Report “NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM” lists 705 West Lynn as a representative property to illustrate “the broad patterns of development, diverse range of resources, and salient features of the dominant types and styles present in the district. They have been selected on the basis of their geographic distribution, relationship to similar properties, and degree of integrity.” Listed as a contributing structure, 705 West Lynn is a Center-passage, Side Gable Classical Revival style, and individually eligible for National Register listing. Please consider our position in your decision process as we welcome new development while struggling to maintain the essence of our neighborhood. Sincerely, Steve Amos OWANA Chair
C20-2024-010 UNO Update Proposal Public Review Paul Books, Principal Planner Content Background Process Proposed Changes Next Steps Background Subdistrict Outer West Inner West Guadalupe Dobie Background UNO: A Brief History – Established in 2004 (Updated: 2014, 2019) – Overlay district for the West University area designed to promote high-density and pedestrian-oriented redevelopment that maintains the existing character of the area – Helped to facilitate population growth to over 28,000 residents in the West Campus area 4 City Council Resolution Resolution No. 20240418-077 – Adopted on April 18, 2024 – Includes 29 distinct items for further investigation – Initiated updates to the Land Development Code & Building Criteria Manual – Requested programmatic updates – Land Development Code changes to be considered in Spring 2025 5 Resolution Goals Provide quality, safe, affordable living for all, especially for students attending colleges and universities by: Supporting the implementation of light rail and mobility enhancements Ensuring the area provides daily needs and services Increasing housing capacity, quality, and affordability 6 Land Development Code Council Direction Height limits achievable with participation in the University Neighborhood Overlay (UNO) density bonus program in alignment with the Planning Commission's recommendation to remove height limits for Inner West Campus and Dobie Height limits that are similar to what can be achieved with participation in the ETOD overlay, at minimum Expansion of UNO boundaries Subdistrict boundaries that expand Inner West Campus An appropriate step down of heights within expansion areas Modifying development requirements to discourage above-ground parking and encourage shared parking and underground parking Stakeholder and community engagement 7 Process How it Works 3-Step Process for Code Amendments: Initiation Development & Engagement Review & Adoption 9 Rezoning Process To update the regulations, staff proposes to create a new zoning district that incorporates the existing overlay with requested updates Rezoning requires notice to impacted properties and review by the Planning Commission and City Council at public hearings 10 Plan Amendment Process UNO is part of the Central Austin Combined Neighborhood Plan, an element of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Current Future Land Use Map 11 Plan Amendment Process Mixed use land use designation allows up to 3:1 floor-to-area ratio High density mixed use is appropriate for areas with 3:1 FAR or (FAR) greater Staff propose updating the Central Austin Combined Neighborhood Plan to ensure that the …
Perry Named Chairman Of Cystic Fibrosis Fund The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); A Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. u g 1 6 , 1 9 6 2 ; P r o Q u e s t H i s t o r i c a l N e w s p a p e r s : T h e A u s t i n A m e r i c a n S t a t e s m a n p g . B 1
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Case # PR 25-008236, Sam Fahnestock Tuesday, April 1, 2025 3:11:34 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Mr, Sam Fahnestock, I have been in this neighborhood for over 25 years and wish to vote in favor of demolition of property at 4901 Ridge Oak Dr, Austin, TX 78731. I recognize the property is Mid Century Architecture but feel the neighborhood will be better served redeveloped to current owners desire and design. Thank you for your consideration. -- Marty Richardson CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Comment for Hearing PR-25-008236 - 4901 Ridge Oak Drive, Austin Tuesday, April 1, 2025 11:18:05 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution As a neighbor of this property with a hearing tomorrow (Weds April 2nd), I want to voice support for the new owner to be able to demolish this property and move forward with building a new dwelling. I live three houses down from the property, and while I understand the mission of the preservation society, and for Austin, I feel this property does not qualify and the process should have been started before a seller purchased the property. This property has been in total disrepair since our neighbor Roy (a former UT chemistry professor) moved out several years ago. Nothing has been taken care of, and when the property was being sold, not one person in the neighborhood came forward to speak about it being covered as historical. From my perspective, while there are certainly houses that should be covered by preservation plans, this one does not seem to most neighbors like it should be in the same category as those. In speaking with neighbors surrounding the property, we are all in favor of the plans we've seen for the new dwelling by the new owners. They're planning in building a dwelling that will fit the neighborhood (unlike some of the ones we've seen go up) and it will be a great upgrade to that corner of our street. It also does not seem fair that someone purchases a property, moves forward with millions of dollars and then someone comes out of nowhere stopping the progress once they're ready to get underway. The house as it stands now has been an eyesore, and a place where people have gathered to drink, sit out back and generally not add value to our corner. I do hope my vote is registered on the " approve for removal" side of the vote log . I do not have the letter that some people were submitting, but I wanted to make sure to vote anyway. Appreciate the work your team does, and do look forward to many other houses that do have true historical value being preserved. Elizabeth Whitney Zoller-Hyde 4704 Crestway Drive - corner of Ridge Oak and Crestway Dr CAUTION: This is …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Case PR 25-008236 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Tuesday, April 1, 2025 7:56:12 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Case PR 25-008236 My name is Annell Bay, and I live at 4604 Ridge Oak Drive, Austin, TX, 78731. I am writing to express my support for the demolition of the residence at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive. This property has been vacant and unmaintained for at least the decade I have lived here. All in the neighborhood have observed the continued deterioration of the integrity of this abandoned structure. And now, a sudden claim for historical review AFTER the property was finally sold is both an unprofessional and improper process and grossly unfair to the new buyer. If this home is of such historical value, then why hasn’t it been designated so prior to now ? Perhaps if historic value of this property had been identified sooner, it would have been better maintained. At the very least, the long-term abandonment and deterioration of the integrity of the current property at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive should override an arbitrary and sudden new ruling of building requirements. I and many other neighbors welcome finally, the new ownership and investment in this long-neglected property. I urge you approve the demolition. Regards, Annell Bay CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20250402-019 Date: 04/02/2025 Subject: FY 2025-26 Budget Recommendation Motioned By: Commissioner Heimsath Seconded By: Commissioner Eppright Recommendation FY 2025-26 Budget Recommendations WHEREAS the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS the purpose of the Historic Landmark Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preservation Plan recently updated in 2024; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan outlines historic preservation policies for the City of Austin to preserve and interpret historic resources in Austin for residents and visitors, with goals including 1) the inventory and protection of historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the city; and 2) the retention of the character of locally designated historic districts and National Register districts by ensuring development is compatible with the historic character of the districts; and WHEREAS Strategic Direction 2023 includes the honoring and preservation of historical and ethnic heritage as an indicator category, with strategies that include protecting places that reflect Austin’s diverse history and broadening support for and participation in preserving underrepresented histories and resources; and WHEREAS the City Council adopted the Equity-Based Preservation Plan, a historic preservation plan, as an element of the City’s comprehensive plan by ordinance on Dec. 2, 2024; and WHEREAS the City Manager is directed to identify funding to implement the Plan, including but not limited to these near-term items: (1) Evaluation of historic preservation incentives and any changes needed to make them more effective, building on the exploration of TDR; (2) Ready access to professional archaeological and engineering expertise for City staff and the Historic Landmark Commission; (3) Two additional staff members for the Historic Preservation Office to assist with Plan implementation; and 1 of 2 (4) A cultural mapping program to identify significant places, businesses, and other resources, prioritizing communities that have historically been marginalized and neighborhoods where longtime residents face a high risk of displacement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Historic Landmark Commission recommends that the Council allocate …
