Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for October 2, 2024 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Historic zoning applications Historic landmark and historic district applications 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 9037 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail – Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to November 6, 2024) 1308 Springdale Road – Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to November 6, 2024) 900 Spence Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning. 1205 Cotton Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning. 7304 Knox Lane – Commission-initiated historic zoning. 4310 Avenue H – Owner-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to November 6, 2024) 1807 E Cesar Chavez Street – Berner-Clark-Mercado House – Repair and replace deck and rails, and paint exterior. (Postponed to November 6, 2024) 2504 Bridle Path – Culberson House – Addition, new doors and windows, new construction cabana, and new siding. (Postponed to November 6, 2024) 701 Baylor Street – Castle Hill Local Historic District – Third-story addition and replace deck. 1003 E 8th Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – New construction rear unit. 1901 Cliff Street – Thomas Cranfill house – Deck installation and window replacement. 2 Green Lanes – Graves House – Rehabilitation and addition. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. National Register district permit applications 312 ½ Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register Historic District – Construct a sign. 312 ½ Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register Historic District – Construct a sign. 1703 Newning Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – New construction. 810 W 11th Street – West Downtown National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 1703 W 32nd Street – Old West Austin National Register Historic District – Second- story addition, addition of covered back patio. 2510 Wooldridge Drive – Old West Austin National Register Historic …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, October 2nd, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair Witt Featherston, Vice Chair Kevin Koch Carl Larosche Trey McWhorter Harmony Grogan Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. September 4, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 2. 9037 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail Council District 9 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed September 4, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024. 3. 1300 Springdale Rd. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed September 4, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024. 4. PR-2024-026690 – 900 Spence St. Council District 3 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed September 4, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Consider historic zoning. Alternately, postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024, to invite the applicant to the next meeting of the Architectural Review Committee to discuss alternatives to demolition. 5. PR-2024-042274 – 1205 Cotton St. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed September 4, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Recommend the proposed zoning change from family residence- neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. Should the Commission decide against recommendation of historic zoning to Planning …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, September 4th, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x x x ab x x Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. August 7, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. BRIEFINGS 2. Briefing on the Heritage Preservation Grant Launch Presenter: Kristina Koufos, Parks and Recreation Department CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Zoning Applications 3. 9037 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail Council District 9 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed August 7, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the October 2, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to October 2, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. 4. 1300 Springdale Rd. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed August 7, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the October 2, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to October 2, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. Item 5 was pulled for discussion. Item 6 was pulled for discussion. Item 7 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-095214 CASTLE HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT 701 BAYLOR STREET 10.0 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a second-floor addition at the center-to-rear of the house, projecting above the existing roofline. Construction of a rooftop addition containing a bedroom and bathroom, to be accessed from within at a stairway from the ground floor residence. Addition will also feature a flat side terrace at the south half of the house, removing the existing side-gabled roof. The second-floor addition will have a roof sloping to the side that projects above the peak of the historic roof assembly by roughly five feet. The addition will be clad in steel and glass, and the wood cladding will be vertical, rather than horizontal, in orientation. Most windows are proposed to be removed at the ground floor of the southeast and northeast elevations, to be replaced with various styles of windows, most of which are steel framed. At the rear of the property, the ground floor deck is proposed to be extended, with a glass paneled handrail replacing the wood picket system. Below, the lower floor rear deck will be visually enclosed by a vertical slat assembly. Lower floor is proposed to be converted from one unit into two and would see one exterior door at the rear of the building removed. This would result in the property becoming a three-unit development. ARCHITECTURE The asymmetrical bungalow at 701 Baylor Street appears to be one-story from the front of the property, but due to the sloping elevation, there is a full lower floor that can be accessed from the side and rear. The house features an ample front gable with a smaller inset gable serving as cover over the front porch, which is supported by three ample brick and wood support posts. This porch extends across the southern two-thirds of the front façade. Four large windows are also present, two in each side of the front door. A slender chimney is located at the north side of the house, which extends above the moderately-pitched roof. The side of the house facing an alley features a privacy wall constructed of stone, brick, ceramic tile, and is capped with salvaged bowling balls. DESIGN STANDARDS General Design Standards The Castle Hill Historic District Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the …
M P 8 1 : 0 4 : 2 1 4 2 0 2 / 8 1 / 7 t v r . t e S t i m r e P \ t e e r t S l r o y a B - A P D C - 9 4 3 2 P \ s t c e o r j P t n e r r u C + \ : E T7 1 / PS-11 S 62°00'00" E 137.73' (137.65') STONE WALL MULCH " 0 - ' 1 / " 6 GRAVEL T2 PAVERS WM BM WOOD STEPS . C N O C 9 - S P / 1 PLANTER GRASS ( ' N 2 7 ° 5 8 0 4 " E 5 0 . 0 0 ' ) ' N 2 8 ° 1 1 3 1 " E 5 0 . 1 5 ' CONC. GRASS T3 MULCH GRAVEL ( 6 0 ' R O W ) B A Y L O R S T R E E T " 0 - ' 1 / " 6 " 0 - ' 1 / " 6 CONC. C E L E . . H O E L E C S E R V I C E O.H. ELEC 1 EXISTING PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" " 0 - ' 1 / " 6 EXISTING DWELLING FFE = 523.50' FFE = 513.17' 6" / 1'-0" 2-STORY WOOD DECK GM GRAVEL 6" / 1'-0" N 62°02'07" W 137.73' (S 62°00'39" E 137.02') 1 / PS-12 A L L E Y W A Y (20' ROW) T6 STONE WALL 5 0 . 0 7 ' ( 4 9 . 9 8 ' ) S 2 8 ° 1 1 3 1 " ' W 0 1 - S P / 1 GROUND COVERING WOOD STEPS PAVERS GRASS T1 GRASS DRIVEWAY STONE WALL LOT INFORMATION PLOT PLAN LEGEND: W 138 FT OF LOT 11 BLK C OLT 2 DIV Z RAYMOND SUBDIVISION AN ADDITION IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN IN TRAVIS COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS PARCEL #: 0109010801 ALSO KNOWN AS: 701 BAYLOR STREET B/L BUILDING LINE PERMEABLE AREA ESMT EASEMENT CONCRETE A/C PAD EXISTING BUILDING WATER METER PROPERTY COR. AC WM GM U/L GAS METER UTILITY LINE EXISTING TREE TREE LIST T1 T2 T3 T6 T7 42.9" OAK 30" OAK 43.1" OAK 34" OAK 34.9" …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-111352 ROBERTSON/STUART & MAIR HISTORIC DISTRICT 1003 EAST 8TH STREET 11.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a second housing unit. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS Construction of a detached housing unit at the rear of the property to create a two-unit development on the plot. The second unit has a two-story design and is proposed to be located at the rear of the driveway at the southeast corner of the lot. The Robertson/Stuart & Mair Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction The design of the proposed second housing unit is contemporary, and generally blends well with the main house, which was constructed outside the period of significance for the neighborhood. Its location is at the rear corner of the lot, which creates a larger setback than its neighbors, but the proximity from building to building is a far enough distance to allow each to be read as separate, distinct and also does not read as an attached addition. Though the design can’t be described as compatible with historic resources in the district in terms of setback or material cladding, it does fit with the non-contributing main house. The second housing unit closely aligns with the ceiling height of the main house at both floors. The grade changes in this section of the district make it difficult to read even one-story contributing structures as being level, but the proposed floor grades are typical of neighboring properties. The cladding material is set at a vertical orientation, which is not typical among the surrounding properties. For entry and orientation, the unit faces the street, like the main house, and features a side porch that does not seek to inappropriately emulate a front porch that would be more fitting closer to the street. Summary The project mostly meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Per the local district design guidelines, a contemporary appearance is permitted, and, in this case, fits well with the main house currently on site. The design appears to be slightly tall, but it conforms to the 32-foot maximum height allowed by the design standards. Overall, a compatible design for this lot and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 11.0 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 11.0 – 3 Google Streetview, 2024
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-122011 THOMAS CRANFILL HOUSE 1901 CLIFF STREET 12 – 1 Construct a rear deck, fireplace, and pergola. Infill one rear window. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Expand existing wood deck at south (rear) elevation. 2) Construct new metal pergola and outdoor fireplace at rear of house. 3) Infill existing window at south elevation. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS One-story Modern house with compound hipped roof, stained cedar board-and-batten siding, and undivided picture and casement windows of varying horizontally oriented configurations. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project infills one historic-age window and replaces another with doors and a central full-height window. 4. Exterior walls and trim Proposed infill material will match the existing vertical siding. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project infills one rear casement window, a modification which does not appear to be required by the deck addition. A previously approved window modification at the south elevation compatibly converts a window to an access point for the deck, which enhances functionality while retaining the existing window rhythm of the house. Non-destructive, removable enclosure of the remaining window from the inside of the building should be considered if feasible. Residential additions 7. Porches and Decks The proposed deck is low in profile and will not be visible from the street. The proposed metal trellis does not appear to be visible from the street or above the house’s roofline. The proposed fireplace is detached and appears to be an easily removable site appurtenance. Summary The project mostly meets the applicable standards, except for the window infill. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application but strongly encourage retention and/or non-destructive, removable enclosure of the rear window from the inside of the building rather than infill. LOCATION MAP 12 – 2
UNABLE TO SET S 10° 00' 00" W 150.00' UNABLE TO SET 16' ALLEY LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT 13 ' 0 0 . 0 7 1 E " 0 0 ' 0 0 ° 0 8 S 19.6' ' 0 . 3 9.0' 24.6' GM ' 7 . 4 2 ONE STORY FRAME ' 0 12.5' 3 . ' 1 . 4 2 5.9' 6 ' . 0 27.0' ' 7 . 7 5 LOT 10, BLOCK 3 CARRINGTON SUBDIVISION E OF OUT-LOTS NO. N I 26, 27, 28, DIVISION D L T O L L A N G R O I I 4' 6 . 4 7 1 ) . 5') 7 1 = T A L P ( E U N E V A W A . O . I R L 0' 5 O ( N G A M W " 4 3 5' 4 ° 6 6 N '13.0' 0 . 9 ' 0 . 5 1 9.0' ' 0 . 0 1 18.0' 30.0' ' . 0 '3.0'3 9 . 9 '3.0' 0 6.0'3 . 16.8' EM A/ C '3.0' 5 . 6 3.0' . 5 1 9.0' E T C E N Y E E R R SID O T F S T E S E E R LIF N 1 C O M A 0 R 9 F 1 0 ' ' 1 . 4 2 6.0' ' 2 . 0 3 ' 4 . 6 2 ' 0 . 2 2 ' 1 . 4 2 13.0' E N I L T O L L A N G R O I I SS SS CM 2" IPF 50.00' 1/2" IRF 135.00' N 10° 00' 00" E CM FENCE CORNER 10.00' 40.00' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 50.00' 20.00' UNABLE TO SET N 10° 00' 00" E 110.00' (ASSUMED REF. BEARING) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CLIFF STREET (50' R.O.W.) LEGEND: BARBWIRE FENCE CHAINLINK FENCE WROUGHT IRON FENCE WOOD FENCE VINYL FENCE ELECTRIC LINE ASPHALT = CONCRETE = GRAVEL = TILE = WOOD = GM = GAS METER EM = ELECTRIC METER IPF = IRON PIPE FOUND IRS = IRON ROD SET WITH "PREMIER" CAP IRF = IRON ROD FOUND CM = CONTROLLING MONUMENT (WOOD) RAILROAD TIE = STONE = BRICK = NOTES: BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING LOTS 10, 11, AND THE SOUTH 40' OF LOT 12, BLOCK 3, CARRINGTON SUBDIVISION OF OUT-LOTS NO. …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-121988 GRAVES HOUSE 2 GREEN LANES 13.0 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS wraparound porch. ARCHITECTURE Construct a rear addition, restore fixtures to historic appearance, remove second floor addition and create balcony at front. 1) Demolish southwest corner of ground floor and rebuild with expanded footprint, creating a kitchen, family room, and 2) Demolish non-historic second floor addition above current garage. 3) Recreate elements of the 1937 design and construct a second-floor space at the front that adheres to historic drawings. 4) Restore all wood windows. 5) Replace garage doors with assemblies more aligned with original drawings. The Graves House is a 1938 Colonial Revival House designed by local architect H.F. Kuehne in the Old West Austin Historic District. Original drawings show a main symmetrical house with a center door along with a garage wing with a two-car garage and second floor featuring dormer windows above it. Later alterations saw a second floor constructed above the garage that eliminated the dormers and created a front facing gable, which is the current appearance. The main house has remained largely the same, with the center door bracketed by columns and shuttered windows. The second-floor features three windows matching those below. Exterior cladding is brick, and the main house has a side gabled roof clad in composition shingle. At the rear, a sunroom is present and in the original drawings, though the sunroom’s windows appear different and may have been replaced. The Graves House was designated historic by the City of Austin in 2004. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards Alterations are proposed to the second floor of the garage wing’s front elevation, which are based off original design drawings from the architect. Aside from this major alteration, work proposed in this section is largely repair or replacement of non-original material with a more appropriate appearance. 3. Roofs Current roof is composition shingle, and the application proposes replacement in-kind due to deterioration. Replacement of roof eaves, where needed, are in-kind and will not change their appearance. 4. Exterior walls and trim Brick is proposed to be patched and repointed, in keeping with Standards …
SYMBOL LEGEND FFE 0" FFE OR GRADE ELEVATION AS NOTED EXTERIOR ELEVATION A-211 101 DOOR NUMBER 101 WINDOW NUMBER A WALL TYPE CL CENTERLINE 1 N S 1 A-211 1 A-211 W E 1/A-401 INTERIOR ELEVATION SECTION PLAN/ELEVATION DETAIL ABBREVIATIONS & # @ And Pound At Air Conditioning A/C ACOUST Acoustical Additional ADD'L Adjacent ADJ Above Finish Floor AFF Authority Having Jurisdiction AHJ AHU Air Handling Unit APPROX Approximately ARCH ASTM American Society for Testing Architect & Materials Bottom of Rafter BOR Board BRD BLDG Building BDRM Bedroom BTM BTWN Between Bottom Cabinet Cubic Feet Control Joint Centerline Ceiling Closet Clear Column Composite Concrete CAB CF CJ CL CLG CLO CLR COL COMP CONC CONST Construction CONT COORD Coordinate, Coordination Critical Root Zone CRZ Cover CVR Cold Water CW Continuous Deep, Depth, Dryer Double D DBL DEMO Demolish, Demolition Double Hung DH Diameter DIA Diagonal, Diagonally DIAG Down DN Downspout DS Dishwasher DW Drawing DWG Drawer DWR East Each Expansion Joint Electric Meter Equal Spacing, Equivalent Equipment E EA EJ EM EQ EQUIP EXST'G Existing Exterior EXT Equal Spacing, Equivalent EQ Equipment EQUIP EXH Exhaust EXST'G Existing Exterior EXT FAR FF(E) FIN FIXT FLR FT FTG FV FV HT Floor-Area Ratio Finished Floor (Elevation) Finish(ed) Fixture Floor Feet, Foot Footing Field Verify Field Verify Height Gauge GA Galvanized GALV General Contractor GC Ground Fault Circuit Interrupt GFCI Glass GL GM Gas Meter GPM Gallons Per Minute GR GRND Ground GSF GYP BD Gypsum Wall Board Gross Square Feet Grade Hose Bib Header HB HDR HDWR Hardware HORIZ Horizontal HR HT HTG HVAC Hour Height Heating Heat/Ventilation/ Air Conditioning Id Est (That Is) Inches Inaccessible Including Information Insulation Interior Joint Joist Kitchen I.E. IN INAC INCL INFO INSUL INT JNT JST KIT L LAM LAV LB(S) LF LP LT LVR Length Laminated Lavatory Pound(s) Linear Foot Light Pole or Lightning Protection Light Louver Maximum MANUF Manufacturer MAX MECH Mechanical M/E MEP Mechanical/Electrical Mechanical, Electrical, & Plumbing Minimum MIN MISC Miscellaneous MTD MTL Mounted Metal N NA NIC NO NSF NTS North Not Applicable Not in Contract Number Net Square Feet Not to Scale OC On Center OCEW On Center Each Way OP'G OVHD Overhead OZ Opening Ounce P&I PC PG PL Provide & Install Photo Cell Page Plate or Plateline PR PSF PSI PT PTD PVC PVMT PWD Pair Pounds Per Square Foot Pounds Per Square Inch Pressure Treated Painted Polyvinyl …
Ireland and Mary Graves House 1938 Lisa and Nicholas Miller, Owners Replace composition shingle roof Restore shutters, columns, historic windows North Elevation Ireland and Mary Graves House 2 Green Lanes Replace second-floor bedrooms with new addition Add family room addition Relocate HVAC, add side entry porch Repoint deteriorated mortar joints as needed to match historic West elevation Ireland and Mary Graves House 2 Green Lanes Replace windows above sun room Add porch along back façade of kitchen Replace windows with larger windows South Elevation Ireland and Mary Graves House 2 Green Lanes Restore wood windows, shutters, columns, railing, and roof eaves East Elevation Ireland and Mary Graves House 2 Green Lanes Remove second floor mass, replace with side gable and 2 dormers similar to original design, set back to recede from front of house Replace garage doors in keeping with original design GARAGE MODIFICATIONS Ireland and Mary Graves House 2 Green Lanes
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2204 SB-2024-086522 / SB-2024-086516 CONGRESS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT 312 ½ CONGRESS AVENUE 14.0 – 15.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Install several types of signage on a contributing building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install signage on the Congress Avenue-facing elevation of a two-story commercial building that contributes to the district. The signage types and locations are the following: 1) Cabinet sign above the ground floor and between medallions, installed into masonry. Non-illuminated. 2) Blade sign at ground level, installed at transom height and projecting out towards Congress Avenue. Non-illuminated. 3) Vinyl signage attached to all second-floor windows, fit around muntins. 4) Vinyl signage attached to storefront and transom window on one bay of ground-floor. ARCHITECTURE The Downtown Austin historic resource survey calls the building at 310-312 Congress Avenue an Italianate commercial structure and part of a two-part commercial block. The design is simple and straightforward, with façade split into three bays. The middle bay serves as a recessed entry with large, glazed storefront windows on either side. Above, the second- floor features three large 4/4 windows that appear to be operable and likely either original or based heavily on an original design. The cornice line features modest dentils and brick patterns that very slightly project from the rest of the façade below. Between the two floors, metal medallions in the shape of lion’s heads are present that may have previously anchored an awning or sidewalk covering. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin Signage Guidelines are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The Commission and HPO allow one sign per building unless there are multiple tenants. The two-story design of this building implies a two tenant, upstairs/downstairs type of use, so more than one sign may be approvable. However, all signage proposed is for one tenant. While two of the signage types are vinyl and attached to the windows, the cabinet and blade signs are proposed to …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-097641 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1703 NEWNING AVENUE 16.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a residence on a currently empty lot. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposal is construction of a new, single-family residence on a previously subdivided lot. RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The lots now listed as 1701 and 1703 Newning Avenue were subdivided in 2010 for the purpose of constructing two single- family houses. Previously, a single residence was constructed in the mid-1940s, and demolished in 2006. Since that time, the land has remained undeveloped, with remnants of the original slab foundation present. There are records of renters living at this address as early as 1916, but no record could be found about buildings or structures on the site. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The street setback is generally consistent with the neighborhood, and although several structures on the street in the immediate vicinity are non-contributing newer builds, the proposed structure is in line with them. 2. Orientation Proposed construction is oriented towards the street, similar to contributing buildings in the neighborhood. The front door faces the street, though it is inset from the front carport, which dominates the right half of the front elevation. 3. Scale, massing, and height Many of the structures on the block, which are recent construction or are non-contributing, are two stories in height, like the proposed design. However, this height is not consistent with the larger neighborhood, which is largely single-story. Contributing houses are generally simple and rectangular in plan, often with rear additions for additional square footage. Due to the elevation changes in the neighborhood, second floors aren’t uncommon, but they are commonly found in the form of basements or lower floors at the back of a property. The design of the proposed project is not consistent with this, with the two-story section projecting towards the frontmost part of the house. An attached carport is attached to the side, and a rooftop shade assembly increases the maximum project height further. 4. Proportions District character is horizontal in detail, with lapped siding and wide front elevations with modestly pitched gable- or hipped- roofs are typical. The …
SITE INFORMATION EXISTING TREE LEGEND (P) PORTION OF CRZ COVERED TOTAL AREA CRZ COVERED EXISTING TREE A 16" LIVE OAK 106 SF (DRIVEWAY + CAR PULL OFF) 804 SF EXISTING TREE B 22" LIVE OAK EXISTING TREE C 21" LIVE OAK EXISTING TREE D 24" LIVE OAK 737 SF (NEW RESIDENCE + NEIGHBOR RESIDENCE) 594 SF (NEW RESIDENCE + POOL + DECK + NEIGHBOR RESIDENCE) 437 SF (POOL + NEIGHBOR RESIDENCE) EXISTING TREE E 24" LIVE OAK 183 SF (NEIGHBOR RESIDENCE) 1,521 SF 1,385 SF 1,810 SF 1,412 SF 13 % 48 % 43 % 24 % 13 % BARRIER SHOULD EXTEND FULL DIAMETER OF THE TREE CROWN NOTE: SITE PLAN BASED FROM SURVEY DATED JUNE 26, 2024 PREPARED BY ALL POINTS SURVEYING LOCATED AT: 1714 FORTVIEW ROAD - SUITE 200, AUSTIN, TX 78704. P - 512.440.0071 NOTE: ALL STRUCTURES MUST MAINTAIN 7'-6" CLEARANCE FROM AE ENERGIZED DISTRIBUTION POWER LINES. ENFORCED BY AE AND NESC CODES-THIS REVIEW DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSMISSION POWER LINES NOTE: PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, PROTECTIVE FENCING IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL PROTECTED TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. FENCING SHOULD BE INDICATED TO PROTECT THE ENTIRE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OR AS MUCH OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AS IS PRACTICAL. WHEN THE PROTECTIVE FENCING CANNOT INCORPORATE THE ENTIRE 1/2 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE, AN 8" LAYER OF MULCH WITHIN THE ENTIRE AVAILABLE ROOT ZONE AREA IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES WHICH HAVE ANY DISTURBANCE INDICATED WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. NOTE: IT IS THE ARCHITECT'S AND OWNER'S INTENT TO PROTECT ALL TREES IN PROXIMITY TO CONSTRUCTION AREA FROM DAMAGE OR INJURY DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. THE SUGGESTIONS FOR TREE PROTECTION PROVIDED ABOVE ARE EXPLICITLY NOT GUARANTEED TO FULLY PROTECT THE TREES. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT A TREE SPECIALIST BE HIRED AND THAT SUCH COST BE REVIEWED WITH OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OF TREE SPECIALIST SERVICES. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT REVIEW WITH OWNER HIS OR HER WILLINGNESS OR NON-WILLINGNESS TO HIRE SUCH SPECIALIST, THEN IT WILL BE CONSTRUED AS CONTRACTOR'S WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR PROTECTING THE TREES FROM ANY DAMAGE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. INFORMATION BASIC REQUIREMENTS PROPERTY ADDRESS 1703 NEWNING AVENUE, AUSTIN TX, 78704 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY ZONING SF-3-NP LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE 8,772 SF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 3,919 SF (44.7%) BUILDING COVERAGE 3,108 SF (35.4%) FLOOR AREA RATIO 3,479 SF (39.7%) NOTE: CONCRETE TRUCK: IF HEAVY EQUIPMENT WILL BE ROLLING OVER ANY AREA …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Fahnestock, Sam; Historic Preservation Office #HR–2024-097641 Monday, September 23, 2024 9:50:43 PM Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Hello Historic Landmark Commissioners, My husband and I, Marc St Raymond, wanted to write to you in support of the project that has been proposed on the vacant lot at 1703 Newning Avenue. Several years ago we bought a home on Academy Drive, one of the cross street’s with Newning. While we appreciate many of the historic properties within Travis Heights, we were attracted to the Travis neighborhood in part due to its mix of residential styles and evident investment that people are putting into this community. We believe that the mix of old homes and new, with varying styles of each, adds to the visual character of the neighborhood and serves it better than lots sitting empty or older homes being neglected. With respect to the new homes, we much prefer the unique styles this builder has taken with each of their projects we have seen within the neighborhood. We have no doubt that the quality of their projects contributes positively to the value of surrounding homes. Although not an historic design, we believe this project would be a welcome addition to the area and see no reason why it should see any delay in being built, especially given it sits on an empty lot between other new homes. We’d much rather have their beautiful new design as a neighborhood than an empty construction site. Thank you for your consideration, please let us know if you have any questions! Sincerely, Evan Alicia Skiera-St Raymond (She/her) 607 Academy Drive 512.744.3522 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Fahnestock, Sam #HR–2024-097641 Monday, September 23, 2024 9:39:27 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Historic Landmark Commissioners, We live on Alta Vista Avenue, just a few blocks east of Newning. While our street contains some of the most historic homes within Travis Heights, it also includes several contemporary homes, most of which add to the character of the street and neighborhood. One of these was constructed by the same builder proposing to develop on the lot at 1703 Newning Avenue. A modern home with some similar design elements would be a perfect addition to this particular area, as it would sit amongst several other newer builds and has no nearby historical homes that it would detract from. As such, we are in full support of your allowing this project to move forward. Thank you, Zach Dell CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: Subject: Date: #HR–2024-097641 Monday, September 23, 2024 11:44:26 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Historic Landmark Commissioners, We live on Alta Vista Avenue, just a few blocks east of Newning. While our street contains some of the most historic homes within Travis Heights, it also includes several contemporary homes, most of which add to the character of the street and neighborhood. One of these was constructed by the same builder proposing to develop on the lot at 1703 Newning Avenue. A modern home with some similar design elements would be a perfect addition to this particular area, as it would sit amongst several other newer builds and has no nearby historical homes that it would detract from. As such, we are in full support of your allowing this project to move forward. Thank you, Emily Koufakis CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 DA-2024-089522 WEST DOWNTOWN AUSTIN HISTORIC DISTRICT 810 WEST 11TH STREET 17.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a contributing property. ARCHITECTURE A wide, double-pitch side-gabled roof dominates the front façade of the house. A dormer vent is present at the center located above and behind a small gable overhang above the front door, which features a modest pair of brackets on either side of it. There are windows on either side of the brackets, and, while similar in size and material, do not match and provide a small amount of asymmetry to the elevation. The windows have been replaced with newer units and feature nonfunctional shutters. There is a concrete porch held two steps above ground in front of the door, with a simple metal handrail all around. The foundation is pier-on-beam, with a vented crawlspace underneath the floor. The house is almost entirely clad in buff brick in good condition, except for the side dormers, which are clad in wood lap siding with vents also present. RESEARCH The house at 810 West 11th Street was built in the early-to-mid 1930s, and the long-term owners for over 20 years were Joseph & Ida Kasper. The former was a furrier and owned a business at 109 East 9th Street in downtown Austin. While living at the address, they housed their children while they studied at the University of Texas. The son, Albert, was a dentistry student who left school to serve in World War II and finished his degree upon his return, graduating in 1945. Their daughter, Beatrice, graduated from university and became a teacher at Baker Junior High School in Hyde Park. She married Stewart Barnett in 1947 and they lived together in the house before moving out sometime after 1949. In 1987, the residence was converted to office use, and has continued in this function to present day. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the West Downtown Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of an intact minimal traditional bungalow in the district. b. Historical association. The property does …
810 W 11th Street Historic Landmark Commission September 4, 2024 1 Site Aerial Improvement: •Constructed: Circa 1938 •Age: Approx. 86-years-old •Use: Office 2 Street View 3 Side View 4 Rear View 5 City of Austin Historic Designation Criteria A property must meet at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature 6 Request We respectfully request your approval for the release of the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 7 8 1935 Sanborn Map 9 1961 Sanborn Map 10 1938 Water Service Permit 11 Neighborhood Character 810 1938 808 Cir. 1910 806 Cir. 1920 821 Cir. 1907 819 ½ Cir. 1915 819 Cir. 1925 817 Cir. 1917 813 Cir. 1917 12 Neighborhood Character 13
TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS T. J. CHAMBERS SURVEY, A-7 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY W/ TREES 0.153 ACRE (6,678 SF) OF LAND, BEING A PORTION OF OUTLOT 5, DIVISION "E" OF THE GOVERNMENT OUTLOTS ADJOINING THE ORIGINAL CITY OF AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT ON FILE AT THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS D R A V E L U O B K E E R A L C O H S WEST 12TH STREET SITE E U N E V T A S E W WEST 11TH STREET VICINTY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL VOL. 10078, PG. 19 R.P.R.T.C.T. CALLED 0.555 ACRE TDC WEST TWELFTH LP DOC. #2019150413 O.P.R.T.C.T. 0 20 40 SCALE: 1" = 20' UTILITY AND IMPROVEMENT NOTE: ONLY SURFACE EVIDENCE OF UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. BEARING BASIS & HORIZONTAL DATUM: TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM, GRID NAD '83 (CENTRAL ZONE 4203) PORTION OF OF OUTLOT 5, DIVISION "E" 809 WEST 12TH STREET LLC DOC. #2019185329 O.P.R.T.C.T. (S70° 26'E 46') S73° 13' 42"E 46.00' OHE OHE ASPHALT PP OHE (S70° 26'E 50') S73° 13' 42"E 50.00' // FROM WHICH A PINCHED 1/2" IRON PIPE FOUND BEARS S73° 13' 42"E, 0.49' NG FROM WHICH A 1/2" IRON ROD FOUND BEARS S15° 39' 19"E, 0.23' E H O BRICK PARKING [CALLED 0.405 ACRE] CJI PROPERTIES INC. VOL. 11554, PG. 1380 R.P.R.T.C.T. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 0.5' CONC. CURB ASPHALT PARKING 0.5' CONC. CURB 1851 E H O 1850 E H O 4.7' 18.1' ' 1 . 8 0.3' ' 1 . 8 EM 12.4' 10.9' 1849 / / AC ) ' 2 . 5 4 1 W ° 9 1 S ( ] ' 2 2 . 5 4 1 ' W 6 0 ° 9 1 S [ ' 2 1 . / / 5 4 1 E " 1 5 ' 8 0 ° 6 1 N / / NG / / ' 5 . 9 3 0.153 ACRE 6,678 SF A 5 . 9 3 ' 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING ' 1 0 . 5 4 1 W " 2 5 ' 6 0 ° 6 1 S ) ' 5 0 . 5 4 1 E ° 9 1 N ( T L A H P S A Y A W E V R D I …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-102958 OLD WEST AUSTIN HISTORIC DISTRICT 1703 WEST 32ND STREET 18.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a second story addition at rear of house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Limit demolition to interior walls on the first floor, as well as a portion of the roof. Construct a second-floor addition set at the back half of the existing house, approximately 1100 square feet in size, including a rear overhang covering a porch. The proposed addition will not exceed the current width of the house. The addition is proposed to have a front facing, standing seam gabled roof set at a matching pitch to the current house. The walls of the addition feature vertical cement fiber siding, roughly matching the existing gable at the front entry of the house. Fenestration at the side and rear matches the existing in size and style, with the front of the second-floor addition featuring five horizontal windows that will have little-to-no visibility from the street. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Existing house is a single-story ranch that is features a broad, low-angled front gable at the right three quarters of the front elevation, clad in non-original standing seam metal roofing. The walls are mostly clad in horizontal wood siding, except for the front gable, which has a board-and-batten design. None of the windows, front door, or garage door appear to be original. Despite this, the spatial arrangement of the original design, including front door location, front windows, and front porch are all in their original location and the house retains this integrity. The property at 1703 West 32nd Street had several owners since its construction, including Raymond & Marjorie Burdett, and Steven Marcus, with both families residing in the house for over a decade each. The Burdetts were the original owners, with Raymond Burdett working as an electrician in numerous positions from the 1950s through the 1970s. Steven Marcus owned the house from 1980 through the 1990s, at which time he worked as an associate professor at the University of Texas. Between these two owners, Joseph and Theresa Carter rented the house for a brief period of the late 1970s. Joseph Carter was an examiner for the State Board of Water Engineers in Austin. While he was featured as a guest speaker for events and had numerous mentions in local newspapers, these were from earlier in his career, prior to …
1703 W. 32nd St. Jones House Addition 1703 W. 32nd St. Austin, TX 78703 Owner: Frank Jones Designer: Jason Drews, RA jason@jdad.co 281.797.4230 Structural Engineer: TBD General Contractor : TBD 9 2 . 5 0 . 4 2 0 2 / D A D J | T E E H S R E V O C 0 . 0 A C L L P , D A D J F O Y T R E P O R P . t S d n 2 3 W 3 0 7 1 Sheet Index Sheet Name COVER SHEET ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1+2 ROOF PLAN RCP - LEVEL 1+2 EXISTING ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS 3D REFERENCE VIEWS EXISTING + DEMO PLAN - LEVEL 1 Sheet Number A0.0 A1.0 A1.1 A1.2 A3.1 A6.0 A6.1 A6.2 A6.3 A11.1 AD1 3/A6.0 BACK PORCH 1/A6.1 4 0 . 6 A / 2 MECH. BEDROOM 1 T E S O L C BATHROOM 0 . 6 A / 1 2 . 6 A / 1 T E S O L C BEDROOM 2 CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM 3 MASTER BATHROOM CLOSET SHOWER SITTING ROOM GARAGE KITCHEN . F E R LIVING/DINING 2 FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 PHASE 1 DEMO - LEVEL 1 1/8" = 1'-0" 2/A6.1 FRONT PORCH 4/A6.0 Demolition Legend + Keynotes Area Not in Scope Existing Wall to Remain New Wall to Remain Existing Wall to be Demolished 1 2 3 4 5 Completely remove existing interior wall, prep adjacent walls, floors and ceilings for patching as needed Completely remove existing exterior window/door. Prep for new window/door installation, or New infill framed new exterior wall, to match adjacent existing. Completely remove existing interior door. Prep for new infill of new interior wall, match adjacent existing wall. Completely remove existing decking and framing Remove existing Elec. Meter and Connection, relocate per new plans. 5 1 2 3 1 1 3 2 . 6 A / 2 . F E R 9 2 . 5 0 . 4 2 0 2 / D A D J | 1 L E V E L - N A L P O M E D + G N T S X E I I C L L P , D A D J F O Y T R E P O R P 1 D A . t S …
VIEW OF EXISTING FRONT SOUTH OF HOUSE FROM 32nd ST. VIEW OF EXISTING FRONT SOUTH AND EAST SIDE OF HOUSE FROM FRONT YARD VIEW OF EXISTING NORTH BACK PORCH OF HOUSE FROM BACKYARD VIEW OF EXISTING BACK NORTH AND WEST SIDE OF HOUSE FROM BACK YARD 4 2 / 2 1 / 8 0 / D A D J | S O T O H P G N T S X E I I 2 . 1 1 A C L L P , D A D J F O Y T R E P O R P . t S d n 2 3 W 3 0 7 1
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 1703 W 32 2024-102958 HR Monday, August 26, 2024 3:59:16 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Commission Members: The Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association’s Historic Review Committee has studied the plans to add an addition to 1703 W 32nd St., and consulted with the owners. We do not object to this addition (by way of information, we do not “support” projects in the neighborhood). We understand this will come before the HLC on October 2, 2024. Thank you Bill Woods, Chair BWNA HRC --Bill W Living on Earth is expensive but it does include a free trip around the Sun. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient, please notify the sender. All comments are the sender’s personal opinion unless otherwise noted. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-111332 OLD WEST AUSTIN HISTORIC DISTRICT 2510 WOOLDRIDGE DRIVE 19.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a second-floor addition. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Create an addition above a guest bedroom and carport at the side of the house, which will be visible from the street. The addition is not proposed to exceed the current ground-story footprint and will be clad in matching materials to the existing. A front balcony is also proposed which will not match the second-floor gallery present at the opposite side of the house. Roof structure and cladding are to match the existing, though the overall height will be slightly taller. A rear exterior stair is to be built to for access. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The property at 2510 Wooldridge Drive is a two-story L-shaped house with minor Italianate features, such as a second-floor gallery, large operable shutters, and modest overhangs. The roof is a moderately pitched front and side gable that follows the L-shape of the footprint. The second floor is slightly shorter on one end, and the ground floor features an additional wing for a carport and ground floor guest bedroom. The ground floor is brick in construction and the second floor is clad in wide horizontal wood siding. Both floors are painted in a cream color. Upon construction in 1941, the house was owned by Jack & Frances Ritter. Jack Ritter worked as an agent for several oil companies, but soon sold the house to Elmer & Virginia Baum, who owned the house for around 50 years into the 1990s. Elmer Baum worked as a physician at Austin Osteopathic Clinic, but his additional service on the state health board brought him recognition across Texas. In 1952 to 1953, he served as president of the Texas Association of Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons, which also included giving lectures, attending national conferences, and advocacy of the public health across the state. In 1969, Baum was selected to be the Chairman of the Texas State Democratic Party, a role that he was nominated for by then-governor Preston Smith. The Baum family continued to own the home after Elmer’s retirement at the end of the 1980s. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-106503 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1106 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD 20.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a rear two-story addition and detached guest house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Remodel interior of main one-story house, retaining the front half of the exterior intact. 2) Construct a two-story rear addition along with a roof deck. Two decks and a screened porch are also included. 3) Demolish existing garage and rebuild as a one-story guest house. 4) Construct an at-grade basement at the rear slope of the addition. ARCHITECTURE The house at 1106 Travis Height Boulevard is a one-story symmetrical bungalow of modest size. The concrete front porch is set above the already elevated plot of land that slopes down significantly towards the street and sidewalk. A projecting front gable covers the middle third of the porch and is supported by decorated wood posts resting on two concrete bases. The decoration at these posts matches the wood handrail that is present around the remainder of the porch. Two pairs of windows, one on each side of the front door, are present and are covered with what appear to be original screens over windows. Behind the projection over the porch is a side gabled roof featuring a brick chimney at one side, along with an obscured front gable facing the street and featuring an attic vent. All architectural features at the front of the house appear to be original or highly appropriate replacements. RESEARCH Beginning with its construction sometime prior to 1920, the property had frequent turnover of owners and renters until the late 1940s. This included a second address, 1106½ Travis Heights Boulevard, on the property, which housed various tradespeople during the Great Depression. In 1949, the property was purchased by Jesse & Emma Raven, who were owners and operators of Raven’s Garage, a local auto repair business. They held the property for several decades, until the mid- 1980s, at which point they were retired. The secondary unit was lost or converted at some point during the Raven’s ownership. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location The addition is located at the rear of the main …
21 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-110759 WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1106 ELM STREET Construct a second-story addition, replace windows and doors, replace balcony guardrail at non-historic addition PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 1) Construct a second-story addition in front of the existing non-historic addition. The proposed addition is located in front of the existing roof peak, approximately 2’ from the front wall of the house. It is clad in horizontal fiber cement siding and capped with a composition shingle roof. 2) Replace windows and doors at the non-historic addition and the southwest corner of the original house. Proposed replacements include 1:1 double-hung wood windows and patio door. 3) Replace guardrail at non-historic addition with new steel cable guardrail. The house at 1106 Elm Street is a one-story Craftsman bungalow with a 1994 two-story rear addition behind the original roof peak. It is clad in fiber cement siding and capped with a clipped-gable roof of composition shingles. The house at 1106 Elm Street, originally addressed as 1016 Elm Street, was built in 1926 by T. P. Beverly. The Beverlys sold the home to Hulda Anderson, a widow, after the death of her husband in 1932. Anderson, whose daughter eventually married city manager Walter Seaholm, lived in the home for several years before renting it out to tenants. By the early 1960s, she resumed residence at 1106 Elm Street with her son Carl. Thirty years after fatally shooting his father at the family’s previous home, Carl Anderson Jr. took his own life in 1961. Despite the tragic events of her life, Hulda Anderson lived to age 90. After Anderson’s death in 1967, the home was let to several short-term renters before Dr. Robert Vallarino purchased it around 1970. Vallarino was an author and University of Texas professor who was active in community theater. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed alterations are limited mainly to the non-historic addition. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed replacement windows and patio door appear appropriate. Residential additions 1. Location The proposed addition is located roughly in the location of the 1994 addition; …
22.0 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-055618 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1607 KENWOOD AVENUE PROPOSAL Construct a side addition to a ca. 1940 house, enclosing a detached studio building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Combine 1-story, single-family house and detached studio building. The extended front wall will be flush with the original house, extending to the footprint of the patio at the side and the studio at the rear. The proposed design changes the house from a 2-bedroom, 1-bathroom to a 3-bedroom, 2-bathroom. 2) Partially demolish roofs of both structures and build new roof connecting them and over new construction. The side gable at the front of the house will be extended with matching dimensions, with two gables projecting to the rear at the existing house and remainder of the studio roof system. 3) Remove front window and door & install new fixtures. 4) Move driveway & install a new path to front entry. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register nomination describes the house as an intact, contributing example of the Minimal Traditional style built in a rectangular plan. The front elevation features a door at center, with a 1/1 window on either side. A side gable roof is present, with a front gable projecting outwards, covering the front entryway. To the southeast of the main house is a small, detached studio space with a front gable roof extending towards the front of the property. The southwest corner of the property is enclosed by a wood fence that forms a patio space behind it. The house at 1607 Kenwood Avenue was constructed around 1938, and was advertised as a 5-room bungalow rental for $32.50 a month. No records are present indicating who occupied the property until 1941, when it housed Roy & Ruth Krezdorn. Mr. Krezdorn worked as an electrical engineer at the Lower Colorado River Authority at this time, and Mrs. Krezdorn was active in Austin social groups, including Junior Helping Hand and St. Martin’s Lutheran Church. Later Roy worked in a managerial role, as well as an adjunct professor for engineering, and Ruth gave birth to three children. By this time they were no longer listed as residing at the modest bungalow on Kenwood Avenue, and listings had the Curtis family occupying the space, who would later appear on a notice for delinquent taxes. At some point …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Re: signed up to speak against 1607 Kenwood but I was passed oveR!!!!! Wednesday, August 7, 2024 9:27:58 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Had I had the opportunity to speak, I would have said: I am VP of the SRCC Neighborhood Organization, which encompasses the subject property. The subject property is a contributing structure to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District. The original structure was modified dramatically in negation of its historical elements and this modification was done without a permit. I realize the owner says she didn’t know a permit was required but I can’t imagine that anyone expects to build in an urban area without a permit. Certainly her contractor would have known about permitting requirements but somehow worked without a permit without consequence. Regardless, her variances were, for reasons unknown to me, granted. Now she has a new request: to add an addition to the side of the original structure. Despite her representation that she has been down a long road trying to learn her way through a maze of permitting requirements, this is the first time this request for an addition has come before you. It fails to meet several of the City’s Historic Design Standards, including set-back from main structure, subordinate to original structure, emphasizing separate roof design from original structure, cladding is not historically compatible and windows are not historically compatible, either. We strongly urge you to deny this request. Commitments to minimize damage to the original structure have not been completed. Further, the fencing (items 22-6, photos 3-5) is ghastly—of various media and heights-- and apparently designed to hide the work occurring inside, Imagine how adjoining neighbors must feel! And the set- backs from houses on either side appear inadequate. We believe the proper course of action is to deny the request at this time and require submission of an addition design that meets City Historic Design Standards. As submitted, this is not an addition consistent with a historical structure but merely an expansion of the existing structure from a 2/1 to a 3/2 with no differentiation between the historic structure and the addition. This applicant has not earned the trust of the Commission or the neighborhood and should be required to submit a compliant design. Thank you. > On Aug 7, 2024, at 9:11 PM, Historic Preservation Office <Preservation@austintexas.gov> wrote: > > …
23 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-114445 WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1116 WEST SIXTH STREET PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Revise an HLC-approved plan to reconstruct the façade of a ca. 1927 store building. Façade retention and rehabilitation was previously approved in 2022. 1) Document existing conditions with photos, measured drawings, and 3D scans. 2) Deconstruction and store all salvageable existing material, including original bricks (pavers and ties), doors, and ornamentation (coping stones, metalwork, etc.). 3) Reconstruct the façade using original salvaged bricks and ornamentation, save for portions of the lower canopy, terracotta roofing tiles and upper canopy structure, and window frames that are deteriorated beyond repair. Where deteriorated beyond repair, replace materials in-kind. 4) Consider replacing lower canopy and signage with designs reflecting historic photographs of the building. ARCHITECTURE The 2005 West Line National Register Historic District nomination describes 1116 W. 6th Street as follows: One of a number of Mission Revival-style commercial buildings on the north side of W. Sixth Street, this brick two- part commercial block was built in 1927. A three-bay storefront on the ground floor consists of central double doors flanked by expansive plate-glass windows; an additional door at the end of the facade leads to stairs to the upper floor. The second-story facade, punctured by paired and triple double-hung wood windows, terminates in a shaped parapet. A suspended metal awning covers the sidewalk, and a canted clay tile roof below the parapet shades the second-floor windows. To the east side of the building, a recessed porte-cochere is surmounted by a one-room wing. Centered on the stuccoed front elevation of the wing is a cluster of three windows, and wood stairs lead to an adjacent exterior door sheltered by a metal awning.1 RESEARCH From 1927-1944, the building housed a grocery run by Alexander (Alex) and Annie Junck Fischer, who lived on the upper floor. The Fischers sold the building to Raymond Campi, who also owned the cluster of small commercial buildings on the other corner of the block. Campi operated Capitol Floors until 1955. The building was then occupied by Bill Bunch Flowers, a florist shop run by Gus T. Bunch. The Bunch family lived either in the upstairs half of the commercial building or in the rear house, addressed alternately as 1114, 1114 ½, and 1116-B throughout the historic period, until at least 1968. The …
Building Diagnostics 835 W 6th Street, Suite 1410 Austin, Texas 78703 (512) 474-0400 www.BuildingDX.com An ABB Company August 14, 2024 Flintco LLC 317 Grace Lane, Suite 150 Austin, Texas 78746 Attention: Mr. Lance Larson, DBIA Subject: Project Director REPORT OF FINDINGS Clarks Village – Masonry Façade Shoring Site: 1116 W. 6th Street, Austin, Texas ABB Project No. 23-8401.01 Building Diagnostics, an ABB Company (ABB) is pleased to present this report of our findings regarding the above referenced project in Austin, Texas. The existing mortar at 1116 W. 6th Street is in poor condition making the masonry unsuitable for shoring and the future use as an entry façade to the new development. We recommend deconstructing the wall, removing the existing mortar from the brick, and rebuilding the wall with units from the existing building. 1. On August 6, 2024 we probed the mortar with a hammer drill and found mortar with the consistency of powder within the joints. The shoring design and future use relies on a code minimum bond strength of 30 psi. The existing mortar provides insufficient bond strength. 2. The masonry was installed with poor workmanship. Many of the head joints observed are not filled; the head joints only have a face shell of mortar. Additionally, the bed joints are underfilled and lacking mortar across the full width of the masonry units. 3. The masonry units used at the time of construction are known as pavers, because they lack the holes found in traditional brick. Due to the lack of holes, the bond strength between the mortar and brick is critical. Consultants Specializing in Durable Performance of Buildings and Materials Flintco LLC August 14, 2024 Page 2 We look forward to continuing to serve as your consultant. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. We will follow up with you soon on this report. Sincerely, Building Diagnostics, Inc, An Allana Buick & Bers Inc Company Brett T. Fagan, P.E. (Texas) Principal BTF 8/14/2024 This document contains an electronically-applied seal, authorized by Brett T. Fagan Texas P.E. #90932. Texas Cert. of Reg. No. F-10471.
1 1 1 6 W E S T 6 T H S T R E E T EXISTING CONDITION 1124 W 6th St PRESENTED TO ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE 7/8/22 1. Existing structures 2. Disassembly 3. Reconstruction • Disassemble entire structure • Reconstruct front facade with a contemporary interpretation of the existing building (material choice TBD) • Use building as a portal and passageway into project Deconstructed Reconstruction 35% of original Infill PRESENTED TO HLC 8/3/22 1. Existing structure +/- 4’ 2. Proposal Maintain existing front facade • Preserve existing front facade materials and details • Active 6th Street facade with commercial and/or F+B program • Create partially indoor/exterior anchor space inside building Maintain as is Addition Restaurant Outdoor Seating (partly covered) Retail 1116 West 6th Street Bar Seating F+B Existing Facade W 6th St Drop OffEntry Shading Structure Existing Facade 1116 Court F+B W 6th Street Existing Building Depth
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum September 18, 2024 Re: 2024-114445 HR – 1116 W 6th Street Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) fully supports the request for approval of the deconstruction and reconstruction of the structure at 1116 W. 6th Street as a modification of the 2022 HLC approval. The Zoning Committee has met with the applicant along with the brick and construction specialist that investigated the condition of the existing façade and agree that restoration over preservation will be required in this situation. The applicant has agreed to amend the Restrictive Covenant between OWANA and the applicant with the following conditions. • Maintain the integration of the existing building form into the overall project in its current location and physical design. and 3D scanning). • Survey and document the existing structure (photos, construction details, physical measurements, • Deconstruction and storage of salvageable existing material. Salvageable materials will be reconstructed in a manner that matches the original façade as closely as possible. Any materials that need to be replaced will be in kind and match the existing material. • Original Brick. Use only original, salvaged bricks to rebuild the front facade. • Ornament, Etc. Salvage and reuse as much as possible the unique ornament, coping stones, canopy metalwork, etc. There are portions of the canopy structure that are either unstable or structurally unsound to be reused • Preservation Architect. Hire a preservation architect to consult on the restoration. Please approve the request for approval of the deconstruction and reconstruction of the structure at 1116 W. 6th Street. The applicant has made every effort to ensure the Sixth & Blanco project fits into our historic neighborhood. The OWANA neighborhood is excited about this notable project moving forward and construction getting started soon. Sincerely, Christopher Hurst, AIA OWANA Steering Committee Chair
Site Visit Report Brett Fagan, P.E August 6, 2024 Met on site with Corey McNabb, Flintco. 1116 W. 6th Street Austin, TX We used a drill to evaluate the mortar today at 1116 W. 6th Street. We found the mortar crumbles easily when probed with a drill. The mortar has little resistance and falls apart into powder. The mortar lacks the cement content and bond needed to implement the shoring we designed for 1116 W. 6th Street. Bond strength in the mortar is needed to keep the wall from collapsing during the construction project. We considered remedial techniques for the mortar to maintain the wall. Tuckpointing is a common method to repair mortar joints. This involves raking out ¾” of mortar on the exterior face of the brick and installing new mortar. Even if this was done on both sides of the masonry, the center portion of the mortar is compromised due to the lack of cement. Removing the outer ¾” of mortar would expose the powdery interior of the joint and not provide a viable joint for repointing. The exterior is solid while the interior is a powder consistency. The drill easily penetrates the mortar with little resistance. There is very little material in the head joints. The material from the joint was collected as if fell out during drilling. The largest piece was removed by hand from the interior side of the wall. Most of the chunks are smaller than a nickel. The interior side of the wall shows poor installation. The head joints are open, with only a face shell of mortar on the exterior. The bed joints were not completely filled. The mortar droppings can be broken o(cid:51) by hand. For comparison we drilled holes at Swedish Hill to test the resistance of the mortar. The mortar has more consistency and was installed with better workmanship. This type of mortar is necessary to implement the shoring design we proposed for 1116.
H L C O cto b er 2, 2024 578 SIXTH & BLANCOAustin, TX 1 . A P P R O V E D P R E S E N TAT I O N T O H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M S S I O N A U G U S T 3 , 2 0 2 2 By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 Note: No changes to request for 1124 West 6th St 1 1 2 4 W E S T 6 T H S T R E E T By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 1 1 1 6 W E S T 6 T H S T R E E T By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 EXISTING CONDITION 1124 W 6th St By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 PRESENTED TO ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE 7/8/22 1. Existing structures 2. Disassembly 3. Reconstruction • Disassemble entire structure • Reconstruct front facade with a contemporary interpretation of the existing building (material choice TBD) • Use building as a portal and passageway into project Deconstructed Reconstruction 35% of original Infill By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 PRESENTED TO HLC 8/3/22 1. Existing structure +/- 4’ 2. Proposal Maintain existing front facade • Preserve existing front facade materials and details • Active 6th Street facade with commercial and/or F+B program • Create partially indoor/exterior anchor space inside building Maintain as is Addition By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 1116 West 6th Street Restaurant Outdoor Seating (partly covered) Retail Bar Seating F+B Existing Facade W 6th St Drop OffEntry By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 Shading Structure Existing Facade 1116 Court F+B W 6th Street Existing Building Depth By Amber Allen at 11:58 am, Aug 11, 2022 2 . I N V E S T I G AT I O N A N D D I A G N O S T I C S O F E X I S T I N G M A S O N R Y F A C A D E AT 1 1 1 6 W 6 T H S T 1. Mortar is the consistency of powder and provides insufficient strength for shoring 2. Masonry was poorly installed …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-109691 CLARKSVILLE HISTORIC DISTRICT 1105 TOYATH STREET 24.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a rear and side addition. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE Construct a one-story addition to the rear and side of the existing house. Relocate the front entry to the side addition, and screen in the existing front porch. Construct a screened porch at the rear of the new addition. Remove non-historic cladding material at walls of original house. Property is a single-story asymmetrical house with a porch at half the front façade, recessed under the front right corner of the structure. The roof is a simple front facing gable featuring three brackets to support a small overhang. Two windows appear on the front elevation, which appear to be metal or vinyl replacement units. The front door, likely not in its original location, is set at the side wall of the front porch. A five-pane attic window is present underneath the peak of the gable, under the center bracket. The porch features a simple wood post at the corner with a matching wood handrail that terminates at the front stair, indicating a slightly raised foundation. A side driveway is present, and the house is set for enough to the right side of the lot to be able to allow two cars to park side-by-side at the left. RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The first owner of the house at 1105 Toyath Street was Squire Johnson, who occupied the house when it was first constructed around 1926. Shortly after, in 1930, Johnson married Lola Mae Harrison and both lived in the house from that time on until her death in 1971. During this time, Squire worked as a janitor at the Breckenridge Hospital near downtown Austin, a job he held from around 1935 until his retirement shortly after 1965. After retirement, he continued to live in the house until the 1990s. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 4. Exterior walls and trim Removal of existing siding is to reveal previous material that was present during the period of significance. Any siding discovered is to be salvaged or patched to match. 5. Windows, doors, and screens Existing windows …
July 7, 2023 RE: Ruiz Residence 1105 Toyath St Austin, TX 78703 To Whom it May Concern, This letter is being submitted to bring attention to the structural condition of the residence referenced above. An on-site observation of the structural elements was conducted by this office producing some key take aways as follows: 1. Foundation: The footings observed consist of cedar stumps at the interior and unreinforced grouted masonry at the perimeter all bearing on the surface of the existing grade. Large deflections were observed in the wood floor beams and joists with large fluctuations in the levelness of the floor throughout the house. 2. Load Bearing Walls: The majority of the perimeter walls were observed to be 2x2 studs which are insufficient for gravity or lateral loads posing a life safety risk in the event high roof live loads and/or wind loads. The door and window headers were not able to be observed, however it is reasonable to assume those would be insufficient as well given there is only a 2 inch width for the beams, trimmers and king studs. 3. Lateral bracing elements: The sheathing type and attachment, top plates and roof diaphragm attachment are not up to code. The structure is also not properly anchored to the ground, not having proper footings or hold downs. 4. Roof framing: While the roof framing has been replaced since the initial construction of the home, the rafters which are 2x4’s at 24” o.c., are still insufficient for the spans and would need to be reinforced with tie downs to the top plate. max@statixeng.com Page 2 July 7, 2023 Ruiz Residence In conclusion, the vast majority of this home’s structure does not meet the provisions of the International Residential Code and potentially poses a safety risk to occupants. In light of these findings, I recommend the following course of action: 1. Complete Demolition: The existing residence should be carefully demolished in accordance with City of Austin regulations and The Historical Commissions guidelines to ensure the preservation of any salvageable historical elements. 2. Structural Replacement: A new structure should be designed and constructed in compliance with current building codes and standards, ensuring the incorporation of appropriate historical architectural elements to maintain the district's character. Respectfully, statix ENGINEERING LLC Maxim Shorey, P.E. Principal 07/07/23
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 PR-2024-108905; GF-2024-122676 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1407 GASTON AVENUE 25 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1950 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story hipped-roof early Ranch house with steel casement ribbon windows, painted masonry cladding, and an integrated garage. The house at 1407 Gaston Avenue was constructed in 1950 for Charles Nash and his family. Nash was a prominent Austin businessman who worked as vice-president of Capital Chevrolet, founded by his father John Harvey Nash, for more than 60 years. He purchased the Von Boeckmann-Jones Printing Company and the Stephen F. Austin Hotel (as part of the Seventh and Congress Corporation, which included Austin’s then-mayor Roy Butler, Nash’s father, and Robert Mueller, a businessman and supporter of the 1928 City Plan). He was a director of Austin National Bank and chaired the board of trustees of both the Headliners Club and the Texas Automobile Dealers Association. According to his 2011 obituary, Nash’s legacy as an advocate for the Texas Auto Dealers Association was pivotal to the organization’s success over the years.1 Nash also served as president of the Chamber of Commerce and chairman of the Austin Stock Show. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property is associated with businessman Charles Nash. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. Demolition permits in National Register districts may not be pulled until new construction plans have been reviewed by the Historic …
26 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-113685 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD PROPOSAL Construct new rear unit and a new pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a guest house. The proposed new unit will be located behind the main house. The proposed building is one story in height and clad in stucco. It is capped by a cross-gabled roof. Fenestration includes an arched entryway with divided-light windows, full-height divided light windows, and French doors. 2) Construct a pool. The pool will be located between the main house and the guest house. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new unit’s location is appropriate for the site and for the district. 2. Orientation The proposed new unit’s orientation is appropriate. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed scale, massing, and height are appropriate; the new building does not overwhelm the contributing main house and will be minimally visible from the street. 4. Proportions The new building’s proportions appear compatible. 5. Design and style The building’s design and style appear compatible with the main house and with the district. 6. Roofs The simple roofline is compatible with the main house and with the district. It does not compete with the more dramatic Tudor stylistic influences at the main house. 7. Exterior walls The proposed stucco is compatible. 8. Windows and doors Windows and doors appear compatible. Though the expansive glazing in the arched entry is not generally reflective of the window pattern at the main house, it is appropriate for a secondary building not visible from the street, and offers a beneficial degree of transparency. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consider changing bracket style at front elevation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on plans. LOCATION MAP 26 – 2
Project Proposal: 1611 Travis Heights Blvd Date: August 28, 2024 Project Overview This proposal outlines the scope of work for the property located at 1611 Travis Heights Blvd. Current Scope Objective: Addition of second unit and modifications to the landscape. 1. Addition of Second Unit (Guest House) o Size: 1,017 square feet o Location: Positioned behind the existing primary dwelling unit along the back fence o Purpose: Provide additional living space for guests 2. Deck 3. Pool o Size: 469 square feet o Dimensions: 12 feet x 24 feet 4. Landscaping Modifications o Scope: To be determined based on the integration of new structures and overall site design 5. Existing Primary Dwelling Unit o No modifications or work to be undertaken at this time 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. SOUTH (SIDE) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. NORTH (STREET SIDE) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. GRAVEL AREAS TO REMAIN. EAST (REAR) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS SECOND UNIT LOCATION SECOND UNIT
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 2, 2024 PR-2024-096343; GF-2024-101131 5303 SAMUEL HUSTON AVENUE 30 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1963 church. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The main sanctuary is an A-frame structure with vertical stained glass, stacked-limestone cladding, and a central entrance beneath a simple gabled portico. The attached fellowship hall is a one-story extension with a compound hipped and gabled roof and limestone cladding over CMU. Rehoboth Primitive Baptist Church was founded in 1962, according to the Church history archived on the congregation’s website. A group of church elders from two different worship groups met at what was likely the Giese-Stark Store on San Bernard Street to discuss their vision, and by July of 1962, they had broken ground on a new church building at 5303 Samuel Huston Avenue. After the first pastor, Reverend R. H. Howard, left the church in 1967, Reverend R. D. Reese led the congregation until his death in 2005.1 In a 2019 writeup on Mid-Century Modern churches across the state, Preservation Texas defined these structures’ importance to our built environment: In the years following World War II, a mobile and growing population in Texas found the need to build new churches and synagogues in urban, suburban, and even small rural communities across the state. Texas architects designed new structures that reflected a modern age, employing innovative construction methods and new materials resulting in striking progressive sacred places. But in recent years, urban populations have changed, and the demands of 21st- century congregations often cannot be contained in the buildings of the mid-twentieth century. As a result, Midcentury Modern Sacred Places are threatened with destruction as congregations relocate or consolidate and their often-valuable property is sold for redevelopment.2 As a neighborhood-scale place of worship built during this age of evolving modernism, the Rehoboth Primitive Baptist Church’s Mid-Century Modern design language of sweeping eaves and dramatically tapering roofline reflects its founding congregation’s innovation in their desire to unite and uplift their community. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of mid-century Modern ecclesiastical architecture on a neighborhood scale. b. Historical association. The property is …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Fahnestock, Sam; Historic Preservation Office Review Case Number: GF 24-101131; PR-2024-096343, 5303 Samuel Huston Ave Wednesday, September 4, 2024 10:27:36 AM image.png [Some people who received this message don't often get email from important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Hello, Sam, I'm writing in regard to the demolition permit for a property that is next to mine at 1730 Bunche Road Unit B. I am not protesting the demo in of itself, but I did notice that the demo plans neglected to include our three heritage pecan trees that sit between our property and the site that is being demoed. It stood out particularly since our elm tree that is behind our property and nowhere near the demo site IS on the demo plan. It is unlikely that our pecan trees' CRZs are in the demo area but without them being considered on the plan, there really is no way for us to know for sure. One of the tree's canopy does extend at least 6' over the demo site, so I do truly believe it should at least be a documented part of the plan. Is this something that can be reviewed and added to the plan before it moves forward to ensure that the trees will not be endangered or let me know who I should reach out to? See attached for screenshot of demo plan with my approximate drawings of our pecan trees. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Lora Lee Tucker Owner of 1730 Bunche Rd Unit B (512) 350-6967 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: PR-2024-026690; GF-2024-043975 HLC DATES: May 1, 2024; June 5, 2024; July 3,2024; August 7, 2024; September 4, 2024; October 2, 2024 PC/CC DATES: TBD APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Romo-Johnson House WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 900 Spence Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP, East Cesar Chavez NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consider historic zoning. Alternately, postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024, to invite the applicant to the next meeting of the Architectural Review Committee to discuss alternatives to demolition. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the building as meeting the criteria for architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: June 5, 2024 – postpone the public hearing. July 3, 2024 – initiate historic zoning (9-0). September 4, 2024 – postpone the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Association, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, East Town Lake Citizens Neighborhood Association, El Concilio MexicanAmerican Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association , Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town, Waterloo Greenway, Willow Spence Historic District Neighborhood Assn. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the building as eligible for designation as a local landmark, contributing to a potential local historic district, and individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The survey notes that it is significant as an exemplar of Austin’s residential development at the start of the twentieth century, though the property does not appear to be associated with significant individuals, and the house’s occupancy history is a good example of the overall settlement patterns of the district. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: PR-2024-021145; GF-2024-043942 HLC DATE: May 1, 2024 (Commission postponement); June 5, 2024 (applicant postponement); July 3, 2024 (applicant postponement); August 7, 2024 (applicant postponement); September 4, 2024 (Commission initiation) PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Holly Arthur HISTORIC NAME: Effie Esler Yerwood House WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1205 Cotton Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP (Central East Austin NP: Subdistrict 1) COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF- 3-NP) to family residence-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. Should the Commission decide against recommendation of historic zoning to Planning Commission and Council, strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, and release the demolition permit only upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture, community value, and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: May 1, 2024 – postpone the public hearing to June 5, 2024. September 4, 2024 – initiate historic zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods, Preservation Austin, Robertson Hill Neighborhood Association, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The East Austin Historic Resource Survey (2016) lists the property as not eligible for individual local or national designation; however, no occupancy research was completed for the property at that time and the association with Mrs. Yerwood was not evaluated. The East Austin Historic Resource Survey notes that the building does not appear to convey architectural significance; however, it is an intact example of a modest Craftsman bungalow. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular …
August 26, 2024 Historic Land Commission City of Austin 301 W 2nd Street Austin TX 78701 Re: Ownership Opposition to Historic Zoning – PR-2024-042274 – 1205 Cotton St. Dear Commissioners, As the owner of 1205 Cotton Street, Austin TX 78702, we hereby object to the staff recommendation to initiate historic designation, zoning or otherwise require documentation package before issuing the demolition permit for case PR-2024-042274 – 1205 Cotton St. We have enclosed with this letter a package supporting this opposition and demolition. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Enclosure Very truly yours, Sara D’Agostini Structural Engineering Evaluation Report Property Address: 1205 Cotton St., Austin, TX Prepared by: Aaron Weaver Date: 07-22-2024 Prepared for: Sara Dagostini 1. Introduction This report presents an evaluation performed by TCB Structural, LLC of the structural integrity and safety of the property located at 1205 Cotton St., Austin, TX. Our objective is to assess whether the property should be preserved or demolished, focusing on the severe safety concerns and structural deficiencies identified during our inspection. Based on our findings, we strongly recommend the demolition of the existing structure to allow for the construction of a new residence, as this is the most practical and safest solution, meeting contemporary performance expectations and building codes. 2. Property Description 3. Methodology The subject property is an older residential home with various additions made over the years. Both the main structure and the rear addition exhibit significant structural issues that compromise their integrity and safety. The property's age and the cumulative impact of inadequate maintenance have led to numerous critical concerns that would demand immediate attention. Our evaluation was conducted through an extensive visual inspection of both external and internal areas of the property, including the foundation, attic, and structural framing. Photographs and detailed notes were documented to support our findings. The inspection methodology included: • Comprehensive visual assessment of the foundation, including the pier and beam foundation system. • Detailed examination of the structural framing, focusing on the floor and ceiling joists and girders and roof and wall framing in both the main house and the rear addition. • • In-depth inspection of the roof and attic, noting any deterioration or structural deficiencies. Evaluation of the exterior walls and overall structural integrity. • Assessment of the interior condition, including electrical wiring, ventilation, and other critical systems. Mailing: 5900 Balcones Drive STE 16692 Austin, TX 78731 Phone # …
1205 COTTON STREET APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N 1 2 0 5 C O T T O N S T R E E T . A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 0 2 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | O C T O B E R 2 0 2 4 | 1 of 13 1205 Cotton - The property owners’ intention is to build a 2-story single family home with a detached garage. They bought the property for the size of the lot and its location. FRONT YARD SIDE YARD CONTEXT PLAN NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BUILDING BUILT IN 1932, WITH LATER ADDITIONS. GARAGE (NOT ORIGINAL) SIDE YARD PROJECT OVERVIEW H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N 1 2 0 5 C O T T O N S T R E E T . A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 0 2 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | O C T O B E R 2 0 2 4 | 2 of 13 The East Austin Historic Resource Survey (2016) lists the property as not eligible for individual local or national designation as a historic landmark. The survey found that the home lacks noteworthy architectural attributes. 2016 EAST AUSTIN HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N 1 2 0 5 C O T T O N S T R E E T . A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 0 2 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | O C T O B …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, September 4th, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x x x ab x x Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. August 7, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. BRIEFINGS 2. Briefing on the Heritage Preservation Grant Launch Presenter: Kristina Koufos, Parks and Recreation Department CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Zoning Applications 3. 9037 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail Council District 9 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed August 7, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the October 2, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to October 2, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. 4. 1300 Springdale Rd. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed August 7, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the October 2, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to October 2, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. Item 5 was pulled for discussion. Item 6 was pulled for discussion. Item 7 …
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum September 29, 2024 HR-2024-095214 - 701 Baylor Street - Castle Hill Local Historic District Council District 9- Agenda Item 10 Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners. The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) supports the second-floor addition at the center-to-rear of the house located at 701 Baylor Street. Considering the small lot size, heritage live oak tree, and being respectful of neighbors views the design has done its best to meet the design standards of the Castle Hill Local Historic District. Sincerely, Christopher Hurst, AIA OWANA Steering Committee Chair
1703 Newning Avenue Respectfully request that you approve the application • General agreement an historic home would be out of place on this lot o Surrounded by modern homes, multi-unit STR, & non-contributing townhomes • SRCC Neighborhood Association sent letter stating not opposing o Recognizing vacant lot in section with atypical, non-contributing properties • Several emails were sent in support of project • Neighbors in vicinity would like to see this completed as soon as practical o Have endured 5+ years of construction with neighboring properties o Negative impact on several short-term rental businesses o Fenced in site more desirable than land under excavation with porta potty Prior Travis Heights Projects that went to HLC (Addressing Commissioner Koch’s question @ 9/4 Meeting) HR-2021-000075: 1311 Alta Vista Avenue Proposal: Demolish a ca. 1957 contributing duplex and construct a new house Staff Recommendation: Approved by staff in advance of March meeting - Was scheduled for canceled February - Did not meet criteria for landmark designation Public: No comments HLC Action: Minutes noted that permit was released administratively HR-2022-011680: 700-702 E. Monroe Street Proposal: Demolish a ca. 1956 contributing duplex and construct a new house Staff Recommendation: Comment on & release the plans Public: SRCC Neighborhood Association objection & 3 comments - One to replace w/duplex of low-income housing; second to “save the tree” HLC Action: Released plans after discussion 1311 Alta Vista Ave 700 E. Monroe Street
September 30, 2024 To: City of Austin, Historic Landmark Commission Re: PR-2024-096343 – 5303 Samuel Huston Ave, District 1 From: EMLK Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Hi Sam Fahnestock, Kalan Contreras, Witt Featherston and Commissioners, This letter is in reference to a case at the Historic Landmark Commission, PR-2024-096343 – 5303 Samuel Huston Ave in Council District 1. One of our Co Chairs, Dianna Dean, has been in contact with DAR Construction, Mike Speciale. Dianna attended the Historic Landmark Commission meeting on Sept 4, 2024. The item was postponed during that meeting and is expected to be on the Oct 2 meeting. During the Sept 15, 2024 EMLK Contact Team meeting, we discussed this case. We had no objections to the proposal to approve demolition of the church building, as long as the following requests are both met: ● Save the historic oak tree on the property and incorporate it into the new structure’s layout. ● The community would like reuse of the cornerstone. A community member can pick up the cornerstone once it is detached from the building. Thank you for considering our input, EMLK Contact Team
EQUITY-BASED PRESERVATION PLAN RECOMMENDATION Historic Landmark Commission Recommenda(cid:415)on 20241002-31 WHEREAS, the City of Aus(cid:415)n Historic Landmark Commission (the Commission) was established in 1974 to promote historic preserva(cid:415)on ac(cid:415)vi(cid:415)es in Aus(cid:415)n and advise the Aus(cid:415)n City Council on ma(cid:425)ers related to historic preserva(cid:415)on; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designa(cid:415)on as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Plan, last adopted in 1981; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designa(cid:415)on and make recommenda(cid:415)ons on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS, since its establishment the Commission has successfully recommended designa(cid:415)on of 676 historic landmarks and 8 historic districts, stewarded changes to those proper(cid:415)es through administra(cid:415)ve and Commission review, partnered with historic landmark and historic district owners to maintain the integrity of individual proper(cid:415)es and historic districts, overseen historic resource surveys to iden(cid:415)fy poten(cid:415)al historic resources, and recommended heritage tourism grants for projects benefi(cid:427)ng tourists and conven(cid:415)on delegates; and WHEREAS, the Commission has increasingly recognized the limita(cid:415)ons of exis(cid:415)ng programs and tools to accomplish its mission; and WHEREAS, City preserva(cid:415)on efforts, in spite of many successes, have historically not reflected the full history of the city and its many diverse communi(cid:415)es; and WHEREAS, the Commission’s work has largely been reac(cid:415)ve to development pressures, a rising number of demoli(cid:415)on applica(cid:415)ons, and increasing displacement of long(cid:415)me communi(cid:415)es; and WHEREAS, na(cid:415)onal preserva(cid:415)on efforts and best prac(cid:415)ces in other ci(cid:415)es have grown to emphasize the value of historic and cultural resources that reflect more diverse histories and communi(cid:415)es, tools to recognize and support cultural heritage such as legacy businesses, preserva(cid:415)on’s contribu(cid:415)ons to environmental sustainability and affordability, and more expansive and inclusive community engagement; and WHEREAS, the Commission and the Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Office seek to respond to 21st- century challenges with improved and new policies, programs, and tools, including transparent and accessible historic review processes, inclusive community outreach, and incen(cid:415)ves that meet both historic preserva(cid:415)on and equity goals; and 1 WHEREAS, the Commission created a 26-member community working group, the Preserva(cid:415)on Plan Working Group (the Working Group), on June 28, 2021, to develop a dra(cid:332) of an equity-based historic preserva(cid:415)on plan between July 2021 and June 2022 (phase 1 of the planning process); and WHEREAS, Working Group members are representa(cid:415)ve of Aus(cid:415)n’s racial …
GUIDELINES FOR SIGNS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OR AT A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK The Historic Landmark Commission and City Historic Preservation Office consider the following guidelines in reviewing sign applications. Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off- premise, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. Sign Size: The maximum size for signs depends on the sign type: 1. 2. Projecting (blade) signs: Flush-mounted signs: 6 square feet 7% of the overall façade area, with a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet The lesser of 20% of the window or 8 square feet The lesser of 20% of the awning panel or 8 square feet. Window signs: Awning signs: 3. 4. Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. A license agreement may be required for any signs or awnings which project over city right-of-way. Please call 974-8091 for more information. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials: Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces are not allowed. Limit the colors used in a sign to no more than three. For sites with multiple signs, all signs should have corresponding or matching designs, coloring and materials. Signs should match or complement the existing color scheme of the building to the maximum extent feasible. Lettering: No more than two typefaces are allowed. Avoid lettering which appears too contemporary in the sign. …
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum September 24, 2024 1106 Elm Street -2024-110759 HR RE: 1106 Elm Street Dear Chair Heimsath and Historic Landmark Commissioners, OWANA supports the second floor addition and renovations to 1106 Elm Street. It is a delightful example of Bungalow architecture and the second floor addition will enhance the massing of street elevation removing elements added in the 1994 addition. The applicant met with the OWANA zoning committee in August. As a contributing structure, retaining the front hip roof and matching it on second floor won the support of OWANA. Sincerely, Donna Osborn OWANA Zoning Committee
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Fahnestock, Sam Re: 1611 Travis Heights Blvd Tuesday, October 1, 2024 1:02:39 PM image001.png You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Sam Fahnestock, Attention; October 2, 2024 Historic Landmark PUBLIC HEARING-.AGENDA ITEMS: 26.0 and 26.1 Re: HR 24-113685 -1611 Travis Heights Blvd Comments to be Read at Public Hearing National Register Historic District I sm an owner with my husband of a house within 500 Ft of the proposed development at 1611 Travis Heights. Blvd. ( 1507 Travis Heights Blvd) I have four concerns that I would like to have adequately addressed beforea vote in favor is given. I would re serve my vote in favor until I receive responses.on guest house and pool. se 1) Deed Issue of Guest House: The Guest House would need special deeding to be considered attached to the the existing house this is to ensure that later it can not be sold as a separate property to make two houses on the same property. Is there a way to have some bridge attachment between the two buildings to avoid this? RATIONALE: Even though the current owners may want to use it as a guest house for their relatives, they may not stay in this house forever. Without a special joint deed then each house ( particularly the guest house) cant be sold separately as independent house. and the main house another independent property on the same singular house land location.. We do not want to increase the density of home properties inthe historic neighborhood of Travis Heights. 2) Physical adjustment of pool location: House structure and architecture are appropriate and compatible. maybe the pool would need to be re adto be linked to original house. 3) Pool location; Has the drainage been checked and terraces been designed. Did not see in the drawings. There is sloping at this location. we do not want unstable foundations or land instability. Can this be verified by the ity technical physical and land engineers 4. Protected trees: There are small trees to be removed where the guest house is being built and there are (i think) about six large protected trees. How will the root systems be protected and trees will not be harmed by pool drainage .or other possible construction complications. . I did talk with Matt Garcia, Architect, and mentioned …
October 2, 2024 RE: 1205 Cotton Street Historic Zoning Dear Chair Heimsath, Vice Chair Featherston, and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, Preservation Austin exists to empower Austinites to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and meaningful community culture through preservation. We write to you today in support of historic zoning for 1205 Cotton Street for its Architecture, Historic Association, and Community Value. As demolitions in East Austin continue to displace its historic Black communities, 1205 Cotton Street embodies the resilience of Black Austinites in the face of segregation and the contributions of Black women to our city’s civic life. This is an important story of Austin’s racial past that we believe must be preserved. The residence at 1205 Cotton Street is a testament to the incredible life of its longtime owner, Mrs. Effie Esler White Yerwood, an educator and civic leader who served East Austin’s Black community during the Jim Crow era. Mrs. Yerwood and her Husband Edward “Eddie” T. Yerwood, principal at West Austin High School, purchased the property together in 1912. Mrs. Yerwood taught at L.C. Anderson, Austin’s only high school for Black students, from 1917 to 1954, overcoming systemic barriers that denied Black teachers and students opportunities to learn and thrive. Mr. Yerwood passed away in 1917 and Mrs. Yerwood redeveloped the property with the house currently seen today. Constructed between 1923 and 1932, the residence embodies distinguishing characteristics of the Craftsman style typical of this era. In her later years, Mrs. Yerwood displayed remarkable resilience, transforming her property into a source of income by adding an addition to the home and converting it into a rental unit for multiple tenants. A charter member of the Austin Retired Teachers’ Association and a leader in various charitable and civic organizations, Mrs. Yerwood’s influence over the civic life of East Austin extended far beyond the classroom. We ask the Historic Landmark Commission to support historic zoning for 1205 Cotton Street and preserve the story of Mrs. Yerwood’s indomitable spirit for generations to come. We thank you for your consideration and your service to the City of Austin. Sincerely, Melissa Barry, President
Historic Landmark Commission Recommendation Recommendation Number 20241002-31: Adoption of the Equity-Based Preservation Plan WHEREAS, the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission (the Commission) was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preservation Plan, last adopted in 1981; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS, since its establishment the Commission has successfully recommended designation of 676 historic landmarks and 8 historic districts, stewarded changes to those properties through administrative and Commission review, partnered with historic landmark and historic district owners to maintain the integrity of individual properties and historic districts, overseen historic resource surveys to identify potential historic resources, and recommended heritage tourism grants for projects benefitting tourists and convention delegates; and WHEREAS, the Commission has increasingly recognized the limitations of existing programs and tools to accomplish its mission; and WHEREAS, City preservation efforts, in spite of many successes, have historically not reflected the full history of the city and its many diverse communities; and WHEREAS, the Commission’s work has largely been reactive to development pressures, a rising number of demolition applications, and increasing displacement of longtime communities; and WHEREAS, national preservation efforts and best practices in other cities have grown to emphasize the value of historic and cultural resources that reflect more diverse histories and communities, tools to recognize and support cultural heritage such as legacy businesses, preservation’s contributions to environmental sustainability and affordability, and more expansive and inclusive community engagement; and WHEREAS, the Commission and the Historic Preservation Office seek to respond to 21st- century challenges with improved and new policies, programs, and tools, including transparent and accessible historic review processes, inclusive community outreach, and incentives that meet both historic preservation and equity goals; and WHEREAS, the Commission created a 26-member community working group, the Preservation Plan Working Group (the Working Group), on June 28, 2021, to develop a draft of an equity-based historic preservation plan between July 2021 and June 2022 (phase 1 of the planning process); and WHEREAS, Working Group members are representative …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, October 2nd, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x ab x x x ab Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley APPROVED MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. September 4, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0. The motion passed. CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Zoning Applications (September 4, 2024) 2. C14H-2024-0102 – 9307 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail Council District 9 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed September 4, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner McWhorter. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0. The motion passed. 3. C14H-2024-0103 – 1308 Springdale Rd. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed September 4, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner McWhorter. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0. The motion passed. Item 4 was pulled for discussion. …
