Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for May 4, 2022 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register for remote participation: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Tuesday, May 3, 2022 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. • The live broadcast may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn- live A.1. A.2. A.3. A.4. B.1. B.2. B.3. Historic zoning applications 1505 Forest Trail – Commission-initiated historic zoning (postponed February 28, 2022) 1617 New York Avenue – Commission-initiated historic zoning (postponed March 28, 2022; applicant-requested postponement to June 1, 2022) 1403 E. Cesar Chavez Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning (postponed March 28, 2022) 301 W. 6th Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning 4314 Avenue H – Hyde Park Local Historic District – addition/remodel 2001 Rosewood – Rosewood Courts – Exterior restoration 2300 Windsor Road – McCrummen-Wroe House – side and rear addition/remodel Historic landmark and historic district applications National Register district permit applications C.1. C.2. C.3. C.4. C.5. C.6. C.7. C.8. C.9. D.1. D.2. D.3. D.4. D.5. D.6. D.7. D.8. 1411 Ethridge Avenue – Old West Austin National Register District – Demolish a contributing building (postponed November 15, 2021) 804 Rutherford Place – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register District – …
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting Wednesday, May 4, 2022, 6:00 PM Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation (Tuesday, May 3 by noon). To speak remotely at the Historic Landmark Commission Meeting, members of the public must: Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Tuesday, May 3rd (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion (4 de mayo, 2022) Se permitirán comentarios públicos en persona o de forma remota por teléfono. Se requiere registro a más tardar al mediodía del día anterior a la reunión para la participación remota. (Domingo 4 de mayo al mediodía). Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar ). Una vez que se haya realizado una solicitud para hablar con el enlace de la junta, la información para llamar …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MONDAY, February 28, 2022 – 6:00 PM CITY HALL - Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x Terri Myers, Chair x Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair x Anissa Castillo x Witt Featherston x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Kelly Little x Trey McWhorter x Blake Tollett x Beth Valenzuela x Caroline Wright DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Clifton Ladd spoke on the many demolitions happening in the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Susan Armstrong Fischer spoke on the notification process for public hearings for demolitions in the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. January 24, 2022 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. 1 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. No items. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. PR-2021-137925 – 1505 Forest Trl. – Consent postponement to April 25, 2022 Council District 10 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Carolina Escamilla City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s postponement request. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to April 25, 2022, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. A.2. PR-2021-195456 – 1617 New York Ave. – Consent postponement to March 28, 2022 Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Holly Arthur City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Committee Feedback: Relocate the chimney to avoid disrupting the existing gable end and window. Retain the historic-age window for later replacement. Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s postponement request. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to March 28, 2022, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. B. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Certificates of …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MONDAY, March 28, 2022 – 6:00 PM City of Austin Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Room 1405 Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x x x x x x Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Anissa Castillo Witt Featherston Kevin Koch Carl Larosche x x x x x Kelly Little Trey McWhorter Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Susan Armstrong Fischer spoke on the City of Austin notification policies and Austin History Center accessibility in reference to the Historic Landmark Commission document posting schedule. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 28, 2022 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. 1 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Revised 2022 Meeting Schedule Presenter: Elizabeth Brummett MOTION: Approve the revised 2022 meeting schedule, on a motion by Commissioner Heimsath. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. B. Briefing on Art in Public Places Presenter: Frank Wick 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. PR-2021-195456 – 1617 New York Ave. – Applicant-requested postponement (postponed February 28, 2022) Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Holly Arthur City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Committee Feedback: Relocate the chimney to avoid disrupting the existing gable end and window. Retain the historic-age window for later replacement. Staff Recommendation: Postpone the public hearing to the commission’s next meeting on May 4, 2022 at City Hall Council Chambers. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to May 4, 2022, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner Heimsath seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. A.2. PR-2021-014784 – 1403 E. Cesar Chavez Street. – Applicant-requested postponement Council District 3 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Robert Abbott City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-1801 Staff Recommendation: Postpone the public hearing to …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET A.1 – 1 CASE NUMBER: TBD HLC DATE: December 17, 2021 PC DATE: January 24, 2022 February 28, 2022 May 4, 2022 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Charles E. Green House (El Rancho Verde) WATERSHED: Johnson Creek NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: West Austin Neighborhood Group ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1505 Forest Trail ZONING CHANGE: MF-3-NP to MF-3-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the house meets the criteria for landmark designation for its unique architecture, landscape features, and historical association with Charles E. Green, editor of the Austin American-Statesman for over 30 years. The commission may want to consider the character of Green’s writings in making their recommendation. In consideration of the applicant’s withdrawal of the demolition permit application and intent to retain the historic house while constructing additional housing on site, staff recommends that the Commission not pursue historic zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, historical associations, and landscape feature HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: May 4, 2022: April 25, 2022: Meeting rescheduled. Case re-notified for May 4, 2022. February 28, 2022: Postpone the public hearing to April 25, 2022, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche; Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. January 24, 2022: Postpone the public hearing to February 28, 2022, on a motion by Commissioner Heimsath, seconded by Commissioner Tollett. Vote: 9-0, Commissioners Castillo and Little were absent. December 17, 2021: Initiate historic zoning based on architecture and historical associations, and reopen the public hearing, on a motion by Commissioner Koch, seconded by Commissioner Tollett. Vote: 10-0, Commissioner Wright was absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2011 MoPac reconnaissance survey report lists the property as contributing to a potential historic district. Note that the Historic Landmark Commission previously conducted a public hearing for demolition of this property but did not reach a resolution. The case was initially heard on January 23, 2017 (see staff report). After multiple applicant-requested postponements, the case did not reappear on the September 25, 2017 agenda. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Elizabeth Brummett PHONE: 512-974-1264 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Barton Creek Assn., Save Historic Muny District, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, TNR BCP – Travis County Natural Resources, Tarrytown …
A.3 – 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: TBD HLC DATE: February 28, 2022 PC DATE: March 28, 2022 May 4, 2022 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Tofie and Bertha Balagia House WATERSHED: Urban—Lady Bird Lake NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: East Cesar Chavez ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1403 E. Cesar Chavez St. ZONING CHANGE: CS-1-MU-CO-NP to CS-1-MU-CO-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the house meets the criteria for landmark designation for its unique architecture and historical association with Balagia Produce. Consider recommendation of the proposed zoning change from commercial liquor sales – mixed use – conditional overlay – neighborhood plan (CS-1-MU-CO-NP) to commercial liquor sales – mixed use – conditional overlay – historic landmark – neighborhood plan (CS-1-MU-CO-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: May 4, 2022: March 28, 2022: Postponed the public hearing at the owner’s request, by consent, on a motion by Commissioner Koch; Commissioner Heimsath seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. February 28, 2022: Initiated historic zoning based on architecture and historical associations with the public hearing open, on a motion by Commissioner Koch; Commissioner Castillo seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0, Commissioner Wright off the dais. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Survey report recommends that the property is eligible as a local landmark and contributes to a potential local historic district. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kimberly Collins PHONE: 512-974-1801 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, East Cesar Chavez IBIZ District, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Association, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, East Town Lake Citizens Neighborhood Association, El Concilio Mexican-American Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association, Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The house embodies the distinguishing characteristics and is an excellent example of Craftsman-style architecture. It is of single-story residential construction with cross gable roofline built circa 1925. The roof has one triangular knee brace in the apex of each gable. The porch supports are composed of brick masonry piers with sloping sides. A.3 – 2 On top of the piers rest the decorative wooden support columns which appear to take cues from Orientalist design principles. …
A.4 – 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: February 28, 2022; March 28, 2022; May 4, 2022 CASE NUMBER: TBD APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: TBD WATERSHED: Urban—Shoal Creek, Lady Bird Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 301 West 6th St. ZONING CHANGE: CBD to CBD-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Landmark Commissio consider recommendation of the proposed zoning change from central business district (CBD) to central business district-Historic Landmark (CBD-H) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: February 28, 2022: postpone (Koch, Larosche; 10-0-1, Wright off dais) March 28, 2022: initiate historic zoning based on community value and historical associations (Koch, Valenzuela; 11-0). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, City of Austin Downtown Commission, Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Old Austin Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, West Downtown Alliance, Inc. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. PHONE: 512-974-2727 301 W. 6th St. is a single-story brick warehouse with rhythmic fenestration, a corner entrance, and Art Deco cornice detailing. The building is a good example of early twentieth century industrial architecture and is named as a high- priority warehouse in a 2009 study by Historic Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky.1 It is associated with the earliest period of modern refrigeration in Austin, and, though some fenestration modifications have taken place over the years, it appears to be the only intact, purpose-built structure remaining of this type and era within the downtown 1 Sadowsky, Steve. 2009. “Austin’s Warehouse Districts: High Priority Buildings.” A.4 – 2 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 4, 2022 HR-2022-036714 HYDE PARK 4314 AVENUE H B.1 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a rear two-story addition with one-story back porch to one-story bungalow. Replace porch decking where deteriorated. 1) Replace rotted porch decking. 2) Demolish existing garage. 3) Construct a two-story addition with one-story rear porch at the rear wall of the house. New work is set back approximately 44 feet from the front wall of the house. The proposed addition has a cross-gabled roof clad in standing- seam metal to match the existing house, with flat-roofed porch below. It features lap siding throughout, and its first- floor porches are supported with squared columns with stylized brackets above; brackets and siding dimensions are distinct from existing elements. Fenestration includes 1:1 windows and multi-light French doors. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS 4314 Avenue H is a one-story Craftsman bungalow clad in wood teardrop siding. It has a compound gabled roof with extended sloped eaves at the entryway and triangular brackets at its gable ends. Its partial-width porch is supported by brick piers under a dentillated arched cornice. It has 1:1 windows and a partially glazed front door behind decorative screens. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 4. Residential Standards: Additions to Contributing Single Family and Multi-Family Structures 4.1: Preservation of Historic Character Construct additions so as to require the removal or modification of a minimum of historic fabric. Do not construct additions which will require the removal of any portion of the front façade. Design additions to existing residential buildings to reflect the form and style of the existing house. The proposed addition is constructed at the rear wall of the house and will require removal of only material at the back wall. It appears to reflect the house’s form and style. 4.2: Location. Locate new additions and alterations to the rear or rear side of the building so that they will be less visible from the street. See 4.1. 4.3: Roof, Fenestration, and Siding. 1. Make the pitch and height of the roof of the addition compatible to that of the existing house. 2. Make windows visible from the street on any addition compatible with those on the existing house in terms of sash configuration, proportion, spacing and placement. 3. Use exterior siding …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 4, 2022 C14H-2015-0008; HR-2022-049609 ROSEWOOD COURTS 2001 ROSEWOOD AVE. B.2 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Exterior restoration of the eight buildings designated as a historic landmark. 1) Replacement of all existing windows within the existing openings. The new windows will be aluminum in dark bronze anodized finish, fabricated to match the style, muntin pattern, and profiles of the original steel casement windows. Windows are Boyd Aluminum Windows Series 6400 (casement) and Series 6200 (fixed). 2) Replacement of all existing doors and screens with new stile and rail doors and screens in existing openings. The new doors and screens will be wood and match the style of the original doors and screens. 3) Chemical removal of paint to expose original masonry, using Prosoco paint stripper removed by brush or scrapers, with no abrasive cleaning or high-pressure water used. 4) Removal of the existing gabled roofs to return the buildings to the original flat roofed design, with insulation and TPO roofing membrane installed. Sheet metal rectangular gutters and downspouts will be added to match the style of the original gutters and downspouts. 5) Replication of the missing original lattice detail at the entries to match the original design and wrought iron materials. ARCHITECTURE Rosewood Courts is the first and oldest public housing project for African Americans in the United States. Page and Southerland were chosen as the architects for Rosewood Courts, with Hugo Kuehne serving as the supervising architect. Vincent Falgo and Sons was chosen as the contractor. The design for Rosewood Courts reflected the ideals of the public housing movement, stressing a clean, modern design. The architects designed Rosewood Courts in the International Style, popular at the time of its 1939 construction, and distinguished by clean lines, symmetry and order in its composition, and the use of durable materials. The first buildings were one-story, constructed of brick, and had flat roofs and large multi-light steel casement windows. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The Historic Design Standards indicate that if any aspect of a proposed project is not covered by the design standards, the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be used. In certain circumstances, use of the treatments other …
4 9 2 6 5 9 2 6 3 9 2 6 2 9 2 6 6 9 2 6 8 3 2 6 8 9 2 6 7 5 2 6 7 9 2 6 N A V N A V UNDER SEPARATE COVER G D L C B G D L B B 7 4 2 6 9 2 2 6 UNIT 102 0 3 2 6 UNIT 101 8 2 2 6 3 2 2 6 1 2 2 2 2 6 2 6 0 2 2 6 1919 CORNELL BUILDING TYPE F N A V N A V 1 3 2 6 UNDER SEPARATE COVER G D L A B 2 0 3 6 3 0 2 6 7 2 2 6 3 3 2 6 2 8 2 6 3 8 2 6 4 0 3 6 A 5 0 2 6 502 0 4 2 6 UNIT 104 4 4 2 6 T 7 1 2 6 2 4 2 6 1916 CORNELL BUILDING TYPE E UNIT 103 1 4 2 6 9 4 2 6 UNIT 102 C O R N UNIT 101 3 4 2 6 E L L S T . 1145 CHICON BUILDING TYPE D 2 5 2 6 3 5 2 6 2 1 6 6 1 2 UNIT 102 1915 CORNELL BUILDING TYPE F 6 2 UNIT 102 7 0 2 6 UNIT 101 4 1 2 3 1 2 6 6 UNIT 101 5 1 2 6 1913 CORNELL BUILDING TYPE F 8 0 2 6 9 0 2 6 6 0 2 6 01.01 10.01 1 6 O S P N S A T R C T 01 AH002 E E E T S T 8 4 2 6 4 7 2 6 3 7 2 6 UNIT 101 UNIT 102 0 8 2 6 UNIT 103 UNIT 104 1 8 2 6 8 7 2 6 6 0 3 6 7 0 3 6 0 1 3 6 8 0 3 9 6 0 3 6 UNIT 101 UNIT 102 UNIT 101 UNIT 102 UNIT 101 02.19 UNIT 102 8 1 2 6 1127 CHICON BUILDING TYPE F 9 1 2 6 CHICON ST. 1137 CHICON BUILDING TYPE G 1133 CHICON BUILDING TYPE G 9 9 2 6 0 0 3 6 1 0 3 6 01 Site Plan SCALE : 1" = 40'-0" KEYED …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 4TH, 2022 HR-2022-050309 McCrummen-Wroe House 2300 WINDSOR RD B.3 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Remove non-original porch & patio construction, doors, and windows from the addition and replace them with a new compatible design. 1) Remove the non‐historic semi-circular back porch and change doors on the non‐original wing (addition). a. New porch to be steel wood wrapped to minimize connections to the existing porch. The roof is to be tin. b. Replace existing doors on wing addition for steel doors painted white with true divided lights of compatible c. Light well on the rear elevation of house to be covered by new porch but remain accessible for grill pattern. maintenance. d. Railing around lightwell to be removed (not historic), but brick capping on light well to be left in place, and there will be a removable concrete pad placed over the light well to maintain access. 2) Remove the corner porch in the backyard. a. Corner porch does not match the historic design and is not original construction. b. Interior of the existing stone column is hollow and does not house original columns (per ARC request for internal column investigation). 3) Close off existing non-original door access to the back yard from entry at the back, corner porch. a. Historical Plan indicates a widow originally in the plan at this location. b. New window sill to match existing brick sills. c. Window to match the approved replacement wood, double-hung Marvin windows, and muntin pattern in historic application from window replacements done in 2012. 4) Open the bricked-off wall section under the corner porch to restore the original historic door opening. a. The historic plans for the house indicate a doorway to the backyard under this location. b. New door to be steel and painted white to match the color of existing windows. Lights will be true divided lights. Light proportion is designed to match existing light proportions. 5) Remove steps to the non‐original front patio addition and relocate access to the opposite side of the patio. (East elevation) a. Existing rectangular patio on the front of the house is non original and built after 1961. (see Sanborn map) b. Style of the wall does not match the original historic wall. See Appendix 5. c. Demo portion of existing low wall and replace with new steel iron gate to match back …
April 20, 2022 Windsor 2300 Request for respectful porch addition. We are writing to request permission to make the changes presented below, each followed with the reference information to support the request: (Architectural drawings contain historical and new drawings for review). 1) Identifying Historical portion of the house: a. North facing wing is a non‐historic addition. i. Re: Architectural Drawings A0.3 ii. Sanborn’s plan proves no addition prior to 1961. Re: Appendix 1 iii. Possible record of permit addition in the 80’s or 90’s. 2) Remove the non‐historic half round back porch and change doors on Non‐original wing. a. There seems to be a permit that indicates an addition to the ground floor and second floor in the 1980’s or 90’s. It would indicate the back half round porch is an addition which can be considered false historicism and therefore should be removed. i. Permit File needs to be requested. ii. RE: Architectural Drawings: A0.5 – Demo Plan, A3.0 Reference images, A3.2 b. New porch to be steel wood wrapped to minimize connections to existing porch. & A3.3 Elevations. Roof to be tin. i. Re Architectural Drawings: A3.3 Exterior Rear Elevation c. Replace Existing doors on wing addition for steel doors with true divided lights. i. Re Architectural Drawings: A0.5 Demo Plan, A1.1 Proposed Plan, A3.0 ‐ A3.3 Exterior Elevations & Reference Images ii. Refer to Appendix 4c. d. Light Well on rear elevation of house to be covered by new porch but remain accessible for maintenance. i. Top band of brick and railing to be removed as not historic: 1. Re. Architectural Drawings: A0.5 Demo Plan, A3.0 Reference historical drawing detail and close‐up image. ii. Emergency egress for basement maintained through other light well on South Elevation. 1. Re Architectural Drawings: A1.0 – Demo Plan 3) Remove corner porch in back yard. a. Corner porch does not match historic design. i. A0.5 – Demo Plan, A1.1 – Proposed Plan, A3.0 Reference images, A3.2 & A3.3 Elevations. b. Interior of existing stone column is hollow and does not house original columns. G R A S S O G A Y A R C H I T E C T S 1518 Blanco Rd., Suite #205, San Antonio Texas 78212 p. (512) 913-3057 ~ info@annagrassodesign.com 1 of 13 i. Re: Images below in Appendix 2. 4) Closing off existing access to back yard from entry at corner back porch. a. Historical …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 14, 2021 HR-2021-154877 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1411 ETHRIDGE AVENUE C.1 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a ca. 1939 contributing building and associated outbuildings. Two-story, symmetrical-plan, cross-gabled Classical Revival house with 6:6 and 9:9 wood windows, horizontal siding, and a full-width porch supported by boxed columns. Details include dentils at cornice, sidelights and transom at front door, Classical cornice returns at gable ends, and wood shutters. The house and outbuildings at 1411 Ethridge Avenue were built in 1939 for Claude A. and Clara Williams. Claude Williams served as Texas’ assistant Secretary of State at the time of the home’s construction. He went on to head the Texas Unemployment Commission. By 1949, Dr. Revace (called Sam) and Margaret Ann Swearingen had purchased the property. Dr. Sam Swearingen served as the chief of staff, chief of surgery, and chairman of the Board of Trustees at Brackenridge Hospital; he later became chief of staff at the Austin State Hospital, medical director of the Denton State School, and medical director of the San Angelo State Center. Toward the end of the historic period, in the late 1960s, the Villaseñor family moved into the house. Lois Villaseñor, along with her husband Charles, had opened Mission Funeral Home on East Cesar Chavez Street—the first funeral parlor that catered to Latinos in segregated Austin—in the 1950s. According to her obituary, Villaseñor “was one of only a handful of women to graduate from a mortuary college in Houston [in 1961]. She was the first Latino woman to serve on the Texas Funeral Service Commission as a 1989 appointee of Gov. Bill Clements. She also served on the boards of Catholic charities and Latino political groups, serving at one point as the president of the local LULAC council.”1 PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed in the Classical Revival style. b. Historical association. The property is associated with Lois and Charles Villaseñor, Claude A. Williams, and c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Chula Sims Tuesday, March 22, 2022 3:43 PM PAZ Preservation Re: Review Case Number: HR 22-001198 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attention: Amber Allen, Housing and Planning Department Case Number: HR 22‐001198 Applicant: Ryan Rodenberg Location: 804 Rutherford Place, Austin, TX 78704 I am in favor of this application proposing demolition and new construction. Catherine Sims 803 Avondale Road Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Vickey Kosarek Thursday, March 24, 2022 4:51 PM PAZ Preservation HR 22-001198 804 Rutherford Pl. Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Amber Allen Attached is my objection to the demolition of the duplex located at 804 Rutherford Pl. If you have problems reading it please call or email me, I would be glad to mail the original if needed. Thank you. Vickey Kosarek 1 2 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 3 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Tommy Kosarek Saturday, March 26, 2022 6:35 PM PAZ Preservation Fwd: Case Number: HR 22-001198; 804 Rutherford Place; OBJECTION *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ATTN.: Amber Allen Please find the attached information regarding my OBJECTION to the demolition of the home located at 804 Rutherford Place. If you have any issues with the files please let me know. If you require a mailed in original, also please let me know. Thank you, N. Thomas Kosarek, AIA Principal BarnesGromatzkyKosarekArchitects 1224 EAST 12th Street, Suite 320 Austin, TX 78702 1 2 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 3
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Donna Morrow Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:51 AM PAZ Preservation 512 E. Monroe Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case # GF 22‐001167‐512 E Monroe Attn: Amber Allen: I OBJECT to the demolition of this contributing bungalow structure. It is a good example of pre‐war houses in this National Register Historic District. I would like to see it rehabbed to remain a contributing structure. Donna Morrow 504 Terrace Dr. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Vickey Kosarek Thursday, March 24, 2022 3:53 PM PAZ Preservation 512 E Monroe St, GF 22-001167 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Amber Allen, Attaching my objection for the demolition of house located at 512 E Monroe St. If you are unable to open, please give me a call or email. Thank you. Vickey Kosarek 1 2 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 3 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Tommy Kosarek Saturday, March 26, 2022 6:33 PM PAZ Preservation Fwd: 512 Monroe St; Case No. GF 22-001167; OBJECTION *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ATTN.: Amber Allen Please find the attached information regarding my OBJECTION to the demolition of the home located at 512 E Monroe. If you have any issues with the files please let me know. If you require a mailed in original, also please let me know. Thank you, N. Thomas Kosarek, AIA Principal BarnesGromatzkyKosarekArchitects 1224 EAST 12th Street, Suite 320 Austin, TX 78702 1 2 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 3
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 4, 2022 HR-2022-016431; PR 2022-002618 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1803 KENWOOD AVE C.4 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a circa 1937 single-story residence and replace it with a new construction single-family residence. 1) Total demolition of existing contributing single-family residence built-in 1937. 2) Construction of new single-family residence with in-ground pool in rear, garage, and carport. The proposed primary building is a two-story minimalist style. It features a compound roofline, fixed-pane, and casement full-light fenestration in irregular pattern; dark grey brick on the first story and light-colored exterior stucco cladding on the slightly overhanging second story. The rear second-story elevation has a small rear balcony with a horizontal metal railing overlooking the pool. Designs indicate a side entry garage and direct neighboring carport located in front of the residence. A horizontal wood fence is situated directly in front of the carport, which shields the carport and garage from direct view from the street. The roofline was changed to a front-gabled form after meeting with the Architecture Review Committee on March 18, 2022. The windows were changed to a regular fenestration pattern on the front façade, a small covered front porch and additional brick were also added to the primary facade, and the wood fence and garage were removed. The carport was turned to face the street directly. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Wood frame, single-story, residential construction on pier and beam foundation. The structure is of the Minimal Traditional style with a side gable with a front-facing cross gable design. It is typical of Minimal Traditional design with horizontal wood siding, two sets of symmetrical multi-pane, 6:6 wood windows flanked by slim, simple shutters. There is a small, round gable vent in the front-facing gable façade. The single door entry has a concrete landing and is covered with a wooden awning supported by decorative wooden brackets. The awning is a continuation of the asphalt roof. There is a thin, slightly turned metal balustrade and railing on the front concrete steps and landing. 1803 Kenwood Avenue was likely built by the prominent dentist and civic activist Dr. R.L. Struhall in 1937. Dr. Struhall and his wife Lillian Parma had moved to 1805 Kenwood by 1942. According to City Directories, in 1941, 1803, Kenwood was owned by Raymond W., Jr. and his wife, Marjorie M. Ramsey. Raymond was employed at the R & R Service …
100 573' " 0 1 - ' 3 1 " 0 - ' 2 1 " 0 - ' 5 " 0 - ' 2 INTERVAL 3 LOW POINT 572'10" 101 HANDRAIL INTERVAL 2 LOW POINT 573'2" BLDG GRADE LOW POINT 574'2" K C A B T E S E D S I ' 5 5 7 4' I E N L Y T R E P O R P ' 0 2 . 0 4 1 E " 2 1 0 4 ° 2 6 S ' ) ' 0 0 . 0 4 1 ( INTERVAL 1 LOW POINT 575'0" 5 7 5 ' P AC PADS 13 SQ FT I ) L A T R A P ( 3 L A V R E T N I F R E T P A H C B U S 2 L A V R E T N I F R E T P A H C B U S 1 L A V R E T N I F R E T P A H C B U S " 4 / 3 6 - ' 9 3 " 0 - ' 0 4 " 0 - ' 0 4 S 1 6 ° 0 5 ' 3 4 " W 5 0 . 0 6 ' ( 5 0 . 0 0 ' ) P R O P E R T Y L I N E R E A R S E T B A C K 1 0 ' 24' - 0" 575'11.5" GRASS Q POOL COPING 68 SQ FT POWER POLE 574' 7' - 6" OVERHEAD POWERLINE INTERVAL 3 HIGH POINT 574'10" 575'11.5" 577'8.5" A 1ST FLOOR 1,249 SQ FT B 2ND FLOOR 1,468 SQ FT " 0 - ' 0 1 5' 7 5 J BALCONY 34 SQ FT K C A B T E S E D S I ' 5 I E N L Y T R E P O R P 5' - 2" O UNCOV DECK 319 SQ FT (50% of 638) 40' SUBCHAPTER F INTERVAL 3: MAX ALLOWABLE HGT: 32' 0" MAX HGT ELEV FROM AVG. GRADE: 24' 2" BUILDABLE AREA AVG GRADE: 575' 5-1/2" LVL 1 TOP OF SLAB: 577'-10" INTERVAL 3 HIGH POINT: 574'10" INTERVAL 3 LOW POINT: 572'10" LEVEL 2 OVERHANG 1.5" LEVEL 2 OVERHANG 6' 7 5 ' 0 4 . 0 4 1 W …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Frank Clark Tuesday, March 22, 2022 9:25 AM PAZ Preservation HR-22-016431 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear commissioners, I’m in opposition to the demolition of 1803 Kenwood Ave. The house is a beautiful example of a 1938 home and has stood here for 84 years. It is essential to the historic fabric of this historic community. There are many others who have decided to maintain the historic nature of their homes by adding to their needs. Its a very common practice! Individual rights do not supersede the community at large. We have designated Travis Heights worthy of a National Historic district for a reason. Anyone who is going to make an investment in our community should understand the need to maintain the intrinsic nature of the homes here and the long term value. Demolishing charming homes might pay off for speculators in the short term but at a cost to our community with irrevocable loss. Thank you for your time. Regards, Frank Clark CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Chula Sims < Saturday, March 19, 2022 11:51 AM PAZ Preservation Review Case Number: GF 22-016498 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attention: Amber Allen Regarding Case Number: GF 22‐016498 Applicant: Ricca Keepers Location: 1315 Newning Ave. Application for demolition permit: I am in favor of issuing this permit. Catherine Sims 803 Avondale Road Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Vickey Kosarek Thursday, March 24, 2022 4:32 PM PAZ Preservation GF 22-016498; 1315 Newning Ave. Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Amber Allen, I have attached my objection to the demolition of the two houses located at 1315 Newning Ave and 1317 Newning Ave. If you are unable to read the objections, please let me know by email or call. I will be glad to mail the original to you or resend. Thank you. Vickey Kosarek 1 2 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 3 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Tommy Kosarek Saturday, March 26, 2022 6:34 PM PAZ Preservation Fwd: Case Number: PR-2022-002404; 1F 22-016498; 1315 Newning Ave. and 1317 Newing Ave.; OBJECTION *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ATTN.: Amber Allen Please find the attached information regarding my OBJECTION to the demolition of these two homes located at 1315 Newning Ave. and 1317 Newning Ave. If you have any issues with the files please let me know. If you require a mailed in original, also please let me know. Thank you, N. Thomas Kosarek, AIA Principal BarnesGromatzkyKosarekArchitects 1224 EAST 12th Street, Suite 320 Austin, TX 78702 1 2 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 3
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 28, 2022 HR-2022-026102 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1205 ALTA VISTA AVENUE C.6 – 1 Demolish existing two-story duplex and secondary building and construct a new three-story single-family house. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS 1) Demolish existing house and rear garage apartment. 2) Construct a three-story house. The proposed building is flat-roofed and clad in stucco, board-and-batten, tongue-and- groove siding, and cedar slats. Fenestration includes fixed undivided windows and casement windows with irregular spacing, proportions, and orientation throughout; a front-facing garage; and sliding glass doors. The primary building at 1205 Alta Vista Avenue is a two-story cross-gabled duplex with horizontal siding, 6:6 wood windows, arched six-light accent windows, and composition shingle roof. 1205 Alta Vista Avenue was constructed around 1939 for Mary G. Sanders, along with a garage.1 A rear dwelling unit was constructed later. It appears to have been constructed as a duplex, and mostly housed two families in the main building and one in the rear unit. Renters were largely short-term and included a cattle buyer, a meat inspector, a bookkeepers, students, and oil company employees. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new building is set back approximately 25’, in line with historic-age buildings on the street. 2. Orientation The proposed new building’s orientation is consistent with the predominant orientation of contributing buildings on the same block. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed new building is three stories, while nearby contributing buildings are one and two stories; its floor-to-floor and foundation height does not appear consistent with nearby contributing buildings. Its monolithic massing is not compatible with the district. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions are not compatible with those of contributing buildings on the block. 5. Design and style The proposed building is differentiated from historic buildings and its details are consistent with its style, but its overall design is at odds with the historic district in terms of scale, massing, proportions, patterns, and some materials. 1 "Real Estate Transaction 1 -- no Title." The Austin American (1914-1973), Nov 06, 1938. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roof does not reflect the character of the roofs on contributing …
N 40' - 0" PORTION 1 A3.1 1 4 8 5 . 4 8 OVERHANG HIGHPOINT = 490' - 6" S 64°08'16"E 113.37' PROPERTY LINE 40' - 0" PORTION 2 HIGHPOINT = 498' - 0" 4 9 6 . 7 7 13' - 7 1/2" PORTION 3 HIGHPOINT = 499' - 0" 4 8 0 . 1 0 I N A L + B M 4 8 1 4 8 2 . 1 0 4 8 3 4 8 4 4 8 5 BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVE A/C PAD 4 8 8 HVAC 4 8 9 . 7 0 5' SIDE SETBACK BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVE 4 8 2 I A T S V A T L A 5 0 2 1 E U N E V A ENTRY 482' - 0" UP SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 482' - 0" K C A B T E S T N O R F ' 5 2 - - 1 0 . 3 A 4 9 1 4 9 0 4 8 8 4 8 9 NEW DRIVEWAY APRON ' 4 8 3 " 4 - ' 6 1 484 NEW DRIVEWAY STRIPS ATTACHED GARAGE 482' - 0" 4 9 9 4 9 8 5 0 0 . 2 1 3 . 3 A 1 ( 5 0 ' ) ' S 2 5 ° 5 6 2 5 " W 5 0 1 8 . ' E N I L Y T R E P O R P 4 9 2 493 K C A B T E S R A E R ' 0 1 4 9 6 4 9 7 4 9 5 4 8 5 . 2 3 486 4 8 9 . 3 5 1 A3.2 OVERHANG 5' SIDE SETBACK 4 9 4 N 64°00'46"W 116.91' PROPERTY LINE 4 9 4 . 4 6 4 9 8 . 0 8 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ' N 3 0 ° 0 0 0 0 " E 5 0 . 0 5 ( 5 0 . 1 ' ) 4 8 4 . 6 3 SITEPLAN - 1ST LEVEL 1 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1100 S LAMAR BLVD SUITE 1145 PROJECT: 1205 ALTA VISTA AVE AUSTIN, TX DATE: PROJECT NO: 02/01/22 KTN9501 REVISION DATE NOTES: T E S D C SITEPLAN - 1ST LEVEL A1.0 DRAWN BY: CHRIS ZUNIGA 484 485 486 487 488 …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Chula Sims Sunday, March 20, 2022 1:27 PM PAZ Preservation Review Case Number: HR 22-026102 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To: Amber Allen, Housing and Planning Department Regarding Case Number HR 22‐026102 1205 Alta Vista Ave, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant: Christopher Zuniga I am in favor of accepting this permit for demolition and new construction. Catherine Sims 803 Avondale Road Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Tommy Kosarek Saturday, March 26, 2022 6:47 PM PAZ Preservation 1205 Alta Vista Ave.; Case No. HR 22-026102; OBJECTION *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ATTN.: Amber Allen Attached please find information regarding my OBJECTION to the demolition of the home located at 1205 Alta Vista Ave. If you have any issues with the files please let me know. If you require a mailed in original, also please let me know. Thank you, N. Thomas Kosarek, AIA Principal BarnesGromatzkyKosarekArchitects 1224 EAST 12th Street, Suite 320 Austin, TX 78702 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Sunday, March 27, 2022 12:03 PM PAZ Preservation 1205 Alta Vista HR-2022-026102 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Commissioners, I oppose the demolition of 1205 Alta Vista on the basis of its contributing status to our National Register District. I’m a resident of the district and worked long and hard to achieve it. While it is not a landmark‐worthy structure, it is still part of our neighborhood’s history because it shows that we were/are a community that has always allowed for a variety of residents with different economic status. Rental properties’ existence in the neighborhood is an element that has brought many interesting residents into our community. It has been that way until recently. It DOES have community value in that regard. all our contributing structures obviously have value in terms of their relationship to their …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 4, 2022 HR-2022-045738 FAIRVIEW PARK-TRAVIS HEIGHTS 303 E. LIVE OAK C.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS New construction of a single-family residence on an open lot in the Fairview Park-Travis Heights NRHD. 1) New construction of two-story, single-family residence with attached side carport and pool in the rear 2) Exterior materials are white and charcoal stucco, wood siding, and black stone 3) Roof is a black metal seam roof with a rear hip form (changed from a shed after ARC meeting) The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in the Fairview Park-Travis Heights National Register district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction The size, scale, massing, height, proportions, materials, and design orientation were generally accepted at the ARC meeting on April 11, 2022, and are compatible with Design Guidelines. 6. Roofs The ARC requested that the design have a gable on the primary facade to add a more traditional profile to the street, particularly a center gable presence on the single-story if possoble. The design revision lost the shed roofline in favor of a hip form that is more compatible with the district. 7. Exterior walls The exterior walls are comprised of stucco, brick, and wood. Stucco is not generally a compatible material choice. However, brick and wood are appropriate. 8. Windows and doors The ARC suggested taking fenestration cues from 307 E. Live Oak street. The fenestration pattern was revised after the ARC meeting. The windows on both the first and second story were separated into separated vertical proportions similar to those at 307 E. Live Oak and are now more compatible with the design standards and contributing properties in the district. 9. Porches ARC found the porches generally acceptable but requested the 1st-floor porch be a more significant feature if possible. The design was revised from a flat porch awning to a more substantial angled awning design and the color was changed from light to dark giving the porch a heavier visual effect. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK The ARC found the carport and front porch compatible, but the rooflines did not blend. ARC requested if the design could have more of a gable on the facade facing …
303 E LIVE OAK 303 E LIVE OAK STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78704 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA CALCULATIONS: ABS 8 SUR 20 DECKER I ACR 0.2421 LOT SIZE: 10546 SF Project: 303 E LIVE OAK MTTR MGMT 213 590.2868 BEN@MA77ER.COM COA BUILDING COVERAGE: 3509 SF (MAX ALLOWABLE 40% = 4218 SF) COA IMPERVIOUS COVER: 4531 SF (MAX ALLOWABLE: 45% = 4746 SF) COA GROSS FLOOR AREA: 4213 SF (MAX ALLOWABLE 40% = 4218 SF) T E E R T S K A O E V I L E 3 0 3 4 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A DATE: 04/20/22 JOB #: 22.0225 SURVEY A0.0 SURVEY 1 24X36 SIZE SCALE: 1" = 15-0" (11X17 SIZE SCALE: 1" = 30'-0") All rights reserved. All designs, drawings, plans & specifications are the property of MTTR MGMT, LLC. Purchaser's rights are conditional & limited to a one-time use to construct a single project on the site & use is limited specifically to such property. The use or reproduction of these plans concerning any other construction is strictly prohibited without the written permission of MTTR MGMT, LLC (N30°E 150') N29°50'33"E 7 1 3 7 1 1 8 . 5 X 1 7 P A R K I N G S P A C E O F F S T R E E T 8 . 5 X 1 7 P A R K I N G S P A C E O F F S T R E E T 3 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 "3 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 6 " 3 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 "3 ' - 0 " 2 5 ' S E T B A C K 4'-7" 14'-9 1/2" 33'-0" 6'-0" 1 8 ' - 0 " P O O L ( V . I . F . 6 " A B O V E F F E : 6 7 9 ' - 6 " A N D R E G R A D E I F P E R I M E T E R O F S L A B G R A D E A L O N G H I G H E S T P O I N T O F S T A T E D H E I G H T …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 4, 2022 HR-2022-049637 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1707 ALTA VISTA AVENUE C.8 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish ca. 1938 garage and modify exterior of ca. 1938 house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish existing garage. 2) Relocate porch windows to center on gable. 3) Replace partially glazed front door with solid paneled door. 4) Replace all existing windows. Replacements include 1:1 sash windows, fixed undivided windows, and undivided casement windows. 5) Add trim and paint brick piers. 6) Replace existing shingle roof with standing-seam metal roof. 7) Replace siding and trim at gable ends, and repair damaged teardrop siding throughout. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 1707 Alta Vista Avenue is a one-story Craftsman bungalow clad in horizontal wood siding with a cross-gabled and hipped roof. Its partial-width porch is supported by short, tapered stucco columns atop brick piers. Its partially glazed front door is sheltered beneath a gabled hood with ornate trim and triangular brackets. 1:1 sash windows are found throughout at the original portion of the house. The rear garage is a simple gable-roofed structure clad in board-and-batten siding, with exposed rafter tails at eaves. The house and garage at 1707 Alta Vista Avenue were built by T. C. Steiner in 1938. The property’s earliest occupants, Mozelle and Arthur Green, owned the home only a year. By 1941, it had been purchased by Benjamin and Gladys Berry. Gladys Berry worked as a stenographer, while Benjamin Berry worked as a store manager before opening his own coffee shop. After the Berry family’s tenure at the home, Berry was shot and killed while working as a Travis County Sheriff’s Deputy. After the Berrys left Travis Heights in the early 1950s, the home passed to I. R. S. examiner E. Ruth Morgan. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes some historic material from the primary building’s exterior and demolishes the historic-age garage. 3. Roofs The proposed project replaces a shingle roof with a standing-seam metal roof. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs, rather than replaces, the house’s teardrop siding. However, it removes original molding from side elevations and applies additional trim to porch …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 4, 2022 HR-2022--051589 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1503 ALTA VISTA AVENUE C.9 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS The proposed new building is two stories in height. It has a compound gabled standing-seam metal roof and is clad in a combination of vertical wood siding and masonry veneer. Fenestration is mostly undivided and irregular throughout. A shed-roof dormer projects at the south elevation. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building appears to be appropriately set back from the street. 2. Orientation The proposed building and parking area appear to have consistent orientation with other buildings on the street. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale and height appear appropriate for the district, though its somewhat monolithic massing is not compatible with surrounding contributing buildings. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions are not consistent with surrounding contributing buildings. 5. Design and style The building’s design and style appear appropriately differentiated from historic-age buildings, though it does not appear compatible with the street. 6. Roofs The building’s gabled roof form is somewhat compatible, though the dormer at the south elevation is less compatible. 7. Exterior walls The building’s exterior masonry cladding is somewhat compatible. The vertical siding at the second floor may make the building appear more vertically oriented than it is, increasing the risk of potentially overwhelming its neighbors. 8. Windows and doors The proposed building’s undivided and irregular windows and full-pane front entry are not compatible with surrounding contributing buildings. 9. Porches The recessed partial-width porch is not a style that appears on contributing buildings in the district, and its cantilevered second floor may make the building appear top-heavy. Summary The project meets few applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The existing building was approved for relocation in 2021. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans. C.9 – 2 LOCATION MAP C.9 – 3
EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN EXIST. GAS METER LOCATION TO BE REMOVED CRZ EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN // // // // // // // // 549549 // // // // 550 // 551 // // // // // // // E V A A T S I V A T L A 543 543 544 544 EXISTING WW CLEANOUT NEW WW CLEANOUT NEW CURB WHERE EXISTING DRIVEWAY DEMOLISHED PROPOSED 4' SIDEWALK NEW PAVER WALKWAY EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING WATER METER & VALVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN G G G G G G G G NEW GAS METER LOCATION 546 8 4 5 " 8 5 3 - ' 9 547 STONE PAVER PORCH LINE OF 2ND FLOOR OVERHEAD 4 4 5 NEW CO CO EXISTING 6 6 4 4 5 5 " 0 - ' 0 3 E N I L K C A B T E S T N O R F 9 4 5 o o 5 4 5 o o oo ' . 1 9 9 4 E " 7 2 5 2 ° 9 2 N ' oo 7 4 5 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ o o 8 4 5 oo 19.5" CEDAR E N I L Y T R E P O R P oo o o W o o 5 4 5 o o 6 4 5 545545 TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE 24.5" RED OAK 1/4 CRZ 1/2 CRZ 547 / / PROPERTY LINE S62°24'49"E 140.08' 9 4 5 SIDE SETBACK LINE GN 48'-6" NEW HOUSE FFE 549'-8" GO o o LUMBER TREE PROTECTION 64" LIVE OAK 1 5 5 2 5 5 TREE PROTECTION FENCE FOR 64" LIVE OAK 1/2 CRZ 0 5 5 o o 8 " 7 5 o o o o 1/4 CRZ TREE PROTECTION FENCE FOR 64" LIVE OAK STONE RETAINING WALL LINE OF 2ND FLOOR OVERHEAD o o STONE RETAINING WALL STEPS & PAVING o o 1 5 5 o o oo oo 21'-10" oo NEW 7' WOOD FENCE EXISTING ELECTRIC METER & SERVICE LOCATION TO BE REMOVED STONE PAVING & STEPS TREE PROTECTION FENCE FOR 64" LIVE OAK oo oo o o " 8 5 9 - ' 0 1 o o 2 5 5 oo " 0 - ' 4 " 0 - ' 0 2 PARKING AREA WITH SEMI-PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE PARKING PAVERS 3 5 5 " …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 PR-2022-037465; GF-2022-047384 3412 FOOTHILL PARKWAY D.1 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1955 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION One-story masonry veneer house with multilight steel casement windows, an offset covered entryway, built-in planters, and a hipped roof with deep eaves. The house at 3412 Foothill Pkwy. was constructed in 1955 for Dr. John Howard and Betty Buaas. John Howard Buaas was a dentist who also lectured to medical students and hygienists.1 After serving in the Navy, Buaas practiced dentistry in Austin for nearly 50 years.2 His wife, Betty Buaas, was an active participant and board member in several charitable organizations, namely the Junior Helping Hands.3 Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Ranch-style architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not appear to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property does not appear to be a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 1 "Dental Diplomas to be Presented Night Scholars." 1953.The Austin Statesman (1921-1973), Apr 14, 8. 2 “J. Howard Buaas.” Legacy.com, accessed April 4, 2022, https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/houstonchronicle/name/j-buaas- obituary?id=26159597. 3 "Helping Hand Slates Program." 1974.The Austin American Statesman (1973-1980), Dec 08, 4. Galvin, Lois. 1962. "Program: Art, Ads, Work." The Austin American (1914-1973), Feb 18, 1. LOCATION MAP D.1 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos D.1 – 3 Demolition permit application, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, April 2022 1959 1957 Howard J. and Betty Buaas, owners Dentist, 1601 Colorado Howard J. and Betty Buaas, owners Dentist, 1601 Colorado 1955 Address not listed Permits Water service permit, 1955 Building permit, 1955 D.1 – 4 Historical information DR. J. HOWARD BUAAS, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 PR- 2002-032448 2002 SCENIC DR. D.2 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Total demolition of ca. 1940 residence and accessory structures. The primary building at 2002 Scenic Drive is a two-story Spanish eclectic residence with Modern and eclectic additions constructed during the historic period. It is clad in stucco and masonry and capped with a compound-hipped roof with deep eaves. Fenestration includes multi-light wood casement windows irregularly placed throughout. A cylindrical turret with a crenelated parapet and arched windows flanks an open masonry porch that leads to an expansive designed landscape. The secondary building is an eclectic Gothic Revival cottage. It is two stories in height with an arched palisade, cedar-shake roof, and masonry cladding. A two-story turret with faux chequerwork trim dominates the principal elevation. Each round arch includes a carved limestone keystone, imitative of English flush work. A renovation was designed circa 1946-47 for C.H. and Mildred Slator by prominent Austin architects Fehr & Granger. Officially established in 1946, Fehr & Granger was one of the first and possibly most influential mid-century modern architectural firms in Austin. The firm flourished and includes an extensive body of work consisting of both residential and commercial projects. They received multiple awards for their work in the magazine Progressive Architecture. Their Robert Mueller Airport received a Design Award in 1959 and another in 1961. The first of Arthur Fehr’s works to be published in a national magazine was the St. Elmo-Tel, on the highway to San Antonio south of Austin. It was an early example of the hallmark of Fehr and Granger’s work in the post-war years: a spare and “industrial” look, admitting abundant light and ventilation, and treating the economy of construction not as a limitation but as another design element. It essential to use local materials and local craftsmen, as well.i RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION Original residents appear to be William Foster and then Mr. and Mrs. K.D. Shoudy who lost a young son while living at the residence in 1945. Shortly thereafter the property was purchased by CH and Mildred Slator; after their marriage and they lived and owned the property from 1946, and it stayed in the Slator family until 2021, according to TCAD records. C.H. Slator was a prominent local attorney and co-owner of the Tavern circa 1953 and came from a prominent Llano family. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 PR-2022-033331; GF-2022-047410 902 EAST 7TH STREET D.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Relocate a ca. 1903-1906 house. ARCHITECTURE 902 E. 7th Street is a one-story L-plan Folk Victorian house clad in horizontal wood siding, with a metal cross-gabled roof and brick chimney. Its wood windows are 2:2 and transom, with operable shutters. Its door is also beneath a transom light. The partial width inset porch is supported by turned posts atop squared balusters and includes a jigsawn and turned frieze and matching jigsawn brackets. The lot is terraced, with a stone staircase matching the foundation skirting leads to a set of concrete steps to the street from atop the concrete retaining wall. RESEARCH The house was built between 1903 and 1906 by contractors Victor and Carl Carlson, Swedish immigrants to Texas.1Between 1906 and 1909, the property was rented to railway motorman August Lindahl, also of Swedish descent. The property was vacant in 1912, but by 1914, the Shipp family occupied the home. Jasper Shipp worked as a contractor, Dewey Shipp worked as a foreman, Nellie Shipp as a bookkeeper, and Madison Shipp as an insurance salesman; youngest sister Nina Shipp was a student. After the Shipps’ departure, a variety of short-term renters—most with middle- and working-class occupations—lived at 902 E. 7th. In the early 1930s, Librada Reyes Colunga began renting the house with her family. Daughters Noemi Colunga, listed as the property owner in City directories, and Genoveva Colunga Martinez lived there until at least 1970.2 Noemi Colunga worked as a laundress, maid, and public-school janitor. In the early twentieth century, the Colungas also hosted younger relatives Alicia and Berta while they attended the University of Texas. In 1943, Noemi Colunga filed a petition for U. S. citizenship, as she and her mother were originally Mexican citizens. Librada Reyes Colunga3 died shortly after in 1949. Genoveva Martinez Colunga passed in 1970,4 followed by Noemi Colunga in 1977.5 PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the property as eligible for designation as a local landmark, individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 DA-2022-040962; GF-2022-047912 310-312 COLORADO STREET D.4 a – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish ca. 1930-1933 commercial buildings. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish the building. No façade reconstruction is planned. 2) Construct a high-rise tower, with parking garage and building lobby entrances at this location. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The buildings at 310-312 Colorado Street are a single-story brick warehouses with stepped parapets. Modifications include a central tiled section with a raised parapet that interrupts the historic design, changes to fenestration patterns, non-original awnings, and rooftop additions including railings, a shed-roofed pavilion, and a tent. The Burkhalter Garage Building at 310-312 Colorado Street was built in stages between 1930 and 1933. The building at 310 Colorado St. was occupied throughout the historic period by Burkhalter Spring & Bumper Service, later named Burkhalter Spring & Alignment Service. The company was founded and owned by Earle E. Burkhalter, who also was a charter founder of the Texas Industrial Loan Company and a member of the Knights of Columbus, Austin Country Club, and Austin Lions Club. Puryear and Caswell relocated their OK Garage from the 200 block of Colorado to 312 Colorado St. by 1935. Burkhalter’s business occupied both buildings by 1937, where it remained until the 1970s when it became Capital Spring and Brake. By the mid-1980s, the building has been converted to restaurant use.1 PROPERTY EVALUATION The Historic Buildings in the Warehouse District Survey (ca. 2009) lists the property as medium priority for inclusion in a potential historic district and notes modifications. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building retains a low to moderate degree of integrity. Modifications include changes in material and design of a section of the façade, changes to window and door patterns, and open-air rooftop additions. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a modest example of a warehouse building with modifications. b. Historical association. The historic use of the building for automotive service and repair is typical of buildings within the downtown Warehouse District. The property does not appear to have individually significant associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 DA-2022-040962; GF-2022-047912 201-209 WEST 4TH STREET, 318 COLORADO STREET D.4 b – 1 Demolish a ca. 1936 commercial building and reconstruct a portion of the façade along W. 4th Street. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish the building. Reconstruct the portion of the building façade historically addressed as 207 and 209 W. 4th St., contiguous to reconstructed façades at 211 and 213 W. 4th St. (see separate staff reports). The character of the brickwork, particularly the banded pattern at the parapet, will be accurately reconstructed. Existing brick will be savaged and reused in the reconstruction, with paint removed or the bricks turned to reveal the unpainted side. The pattern of openings in this section of façade may have been modified; the reconstruction will establish a more regular rhythm of openings. 2) Construct an open-air plaza and recessed glass lobby at the corner of W. 4th and Colorado streets, occupying the area historically addressed at 316-318 Colorado St./201 W. 4th St. 3) Construct a high-rise tower with more than a 5’ setback from the building façade. Behind the parapet, the garage levels will be clad in a simple screen in a dark bronze color. The building at the corner of W. 4th and Colorado streets is a single-story brick warehouse. The building has three bays of storefront windows and doors between brick piers on the Colorado Street elevation and five bays on the W. 4th Street elevation. Some of the piers along W. 4th St. are tiled and may not be at original locations. Windows and doors are inconsistent in their design and appear to have been replaced at different times. Wrapping the building is a rowlock course of bricks at the window headers, above which the brickwork is punctuated by regularly spaced vertical bands. Rooftop additions include a barrel-vaulted structure and a tent. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The Jim’s Café Building/Rainbo Bread Warehouse was constructed ca. 1936. The portion at 201 W. 4th/318 Colorado St. replaced an earlier two-story building shown on the 1935 Sanborn map, which housed saloons from the mid-1880s through the 1910s before use as an office and warehouse. Jim Pachalos, a Greek-American restauranteur, had Jim’s Café in the corner space of the present building from 1936 through the mid-1940s; he also had a restaurant in the preceding two-story building. Jim’s Café was replaced by Pape’s Grill by the late …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 DA-2022-040962; GF-2022-047912 211 WEST 4TH STREET D.4 c – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a ca. 1936 commercial building and reconstruct the façade. 1) Demolish and reconstruct building façade. The character of the brickwork, opening patterns, and other design details will be accurately reconstructed. Existing brick will be savaged and reused in the reconstruction, with paint removed or the bricks turned to reveal the unpainted side. An original steel window will be evaluated for repair and reinstallation based on its condition. 2) Reinstall Oilcan Harry’s signage on the adjacent façade at 213 W. 4th Street. 3) Construct a high-rise tower with more than a 5’ setback from the building façade. Behind the parapet, the garage levels will be clad in a simple screen in a dark bronze color. The building at 211 W. 4th Street is a single-story brick warehouse with a curvilinear stepped parapet that exhibits modest Mission Revival stylistic influences. Decorative elements include diagonal tiles at the raised central portion and ends of the parapet and a rowlock course as coping. The building retains its original window and door openings with soldier course headers. At the left end of the façade is an original multi-light steel window with a central awning sash. The adjacent door opening has been infilled with a flat panel. At the right end of the façade, paired doors flanked by windows fill an overhead door opening. The brick has been painted and a black tile wainscot added. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The Lightsey-Carroll-Firestone (Oilcan Harry’s) Building was constructed around 1936 as the home of Leggett W. Carroll’s Lightsey-Carroll Company, local distributors for Magnolia Beer. The Lower Colorado River Authority had an office in this building in the early 1940s and expanded into the adjacent building at 213 W. 4th Street by 1942. The Firestone Retread Shop opened here around 1946; the building served as a tire retread business shop until the early 1960s. Two businesses servicing automobile transmissions were located here in the mid-1970s; the building was converted to a nightclub use in the late 1980s. Oilcan Harry’s expanded into the space formerly known as 209 W. 4th Street when it opened at this location in 1990.1 Gay bars are broadly acknowledged as a place for grassroots organization and safe space for the LGBTQIA+ community. With over 30 years in operation, Oilcan Harry’s is Austin’s oldest …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Jessica Schanzer Thursday, April 14, 2022 3:23 PM PAZ Preservation AGAINST Item A1 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi there, I'm writing to express that I am strongly AGAINST Item A1. I am saddened and furious that this demolition is being considered by a city that continues to prioritize the wealthy few over inclusion and equity for many. As a member of the queer community, we have very few safe spaces left in this city and I will do all that I can to speak out against this demolition decision. Please send me information on how I can join on May 4th via phone or in‐person. Really hoping to make a difference on this item. My full name is Jessica Schanzer. Best, Jessica CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Brittany Cordero Thursday, April 14, 2022 3:27 PM PAZ Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is brittany cordero . I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th RECORDED BY EMAIL. You can reach me by phone at Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. and by email at 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Shannon Plunkett Thursday, April 14, 2022 4:48 PM PAZ Preservation Opposition to Item A1 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern, I am a lifelong Austinite and member of the LGBTQ+ community, and I am writing to express my opposition to item A1. Safe spaces for the LGBTQ+ community, particularly bars are in fairly small supply here for a city as large as Austin. the 3 bars affected by this …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Joshua Melton Friday, April 8, 2022 5:52 PM PAZ Preservation April 11th Meeting - PLEASE save 201-213 W. 4th St Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, Although I am unable to attend Monday's meeting, I would like to voice my concerns/ pleads to not allow for the demolition of 201‐213 W.4th Street which is slated to be discussed at the Monday, April 11th meeting. Architecturally, these buildings are some of the last remaining warehouses in Austin's historic Warehouse District. I personally worked at 207 W 4th St for the architect Dick Clark while studying architecture at the University of Texas at Austin. This location and its neighbor Neon Grotto (formerly Hangar Lounge) even received AIA design awards, and these landmarks were influential in Dick being awarded the most prestigious "Fellow" status with the American Institute of Architects. Prior to moving offices in 2020, Dick Clark + Associates had previously occupied that space for over three decades. From that office, Dick and his team transformed the warehouse district creating many of the restaurants, bars, and cultural institutions that paved the way to the boom and development Austin is experiencing now. This historic building stock, once demolished, can never be rebuilt to the same charm, presence, and character as the existing structures. These former warehouses turned cultural institutions are the backbone of Austin's structured and experienced landscape. Aside from their architectural significance, and arguably more importantly, this block, specifically these few buildings, are Austin's main hub for the LGBT community. A community which I am also a member of. It was in these bars, lounges, and queer spaces that often go unnoticed or unappreciated to the general public where I was able to find my community and become my authentic self after work and on the weekends. In a study conduced in 2020 the Trevor Project in collaboration with the CDC discovered that every 45 sec. in the US an LGBT youth between the agest of 13‐24 attempts suicide in the United States. Now more than ever we need to protect the LGBT community and the public spaces they occupy, as they may not have the same community, love, and support at home. Demolishing these buildings, or even demolishing them, rebuilding their facades, and allowing the same businesses to occupy the ground floor space would be …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: noreply@coadigital.onbehalfof.austintexas.gov on behalf of City of Austin <noreply@coadigital.onbehalfof.austintexas.gov> Friday, April 15, 2022 9:55 AM PAZ Preservation NO TO ITEM A1 This message is from Steven Hernandez. I'm expressing my extreme disapproval of item A1 on the agenda for May 4th City Hall hearing. The demolition of Coconut Club, Neon Grotto, and Oilcan Harry's would damage the LGBTQ+ community's presence in Austin and remove vital spaces for community members to thrive. With plans to build living spaces above these areas, they are even more at risk at further plans to get rid of these businesses entirely just like every other part of Austin that's been "built on". Leave LGBTQ+ spaces ALONE, and move to another street. This is a targeted effort to diminish what little presence we have in this city and this just encourages more pollution, crime, and overcrowding in an urban area. Build spaces on top of bars on 6th street instead and leave LGBTQ+ people alone FOR ONCE. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Kim Borchert Friday, April 15, 2022 9:57 AM PAZ Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Kim Borchert. I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th by email. You can contact me by phone at As the parent of 5 Queer children, it is imperative to me that my children have places they can go and be safe and with their community. My oldest is a senior in high school and my youngest is still in elementary school; however knowing that there are spaces where Queer people can be together and not be afraid gives me peace of mind for them entering adulthood. Destroying these buildings takes away not only important Austin history, but eliminates the future memories and safe spaces for generations of LGBTQIA+ people to come. Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. Kim Borchert Kim Borchert (she/her),CD(DTI), CCE(BFW) Owner, Birth and Postpartum Doula Childbirth Mentor Austin Doula Care www.austindoulacare.com CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Kimmi Duong Friday, April 15, 2022 4:04 PM PAZ Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Kimmi Duong. I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th recorded by email. You can reach me by phone at As a small business owner in Austin, I am appalled at the disregard of safe spaces for marginalized communities. Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. Kimmi Duong Café Crème Coffee, Crêpes & Treats. Nom Appétit! CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Ivy Friday, April 15, 2022 4:11 PM PAZ Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Ivy Pritchard and I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th RECORDED BY EMAIL. You can reach me by email at Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. Thank you, Ivy Pritchard Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Katherine N Enders Friday, April 15, 2022 4:26 PM PAZ Preservation Expressing Strong Disapproval of the 4th Street Demolition Request *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Katie Enders and I am a resident of Austin. My phone number is I'm reaching out in response to the Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th Street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am strongly against Item A1 and would like to speak about this at …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Patrick Pinnell Monday, April 18, 2022 3:18 PM PAZ Preservation May 4th, Item A1 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Please relay my comment to the HLC on item A1 at the May 4th, 2022 meeting. Name: Patrick Pinnell Residence: Austin, TX ‐ 78745 Comment: There are so few LGBT+ spaces in Austin that losing OCH (Oil Can Harry's) is unthinkable. This is effectively tearing out the heart of what we all think of as the 'gay district' in Austin. Doing so mere months after FINALLY recognizing this space with a plaque and some (very nice) rainbow crosswalks is a face slap to the entire LGBT+ community of Austin. This city has a culture of inclusion and is seen as the one city in Texas where anyone can live regardless of color, creed or belief. Any action to diminish or uproot the very small LGBT+ space acts against our beloved city's identity. Thank you. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Helen Chavez Monday, April 18, 2022 3:53 PM PAZ Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Helen Chavez. I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th RECORDED BY EMAIL. You can reach me by phone at As a gay person living in Austin there is nothing better than spending time on 4th street between Colorado and Lavaca street. This is THE ONLY place in Austin where my friends and I feel safe to be ourselves. The 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca should be made a LGBTQIA+ historical landmark in Austin. Please do not touch this wonderful area. Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. ‐‐ Best, Helen Chavez (she/her) CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Lia Politi Wednesday, April 13, 2022 12:35 PM PAZ Preservation Coconut Club Demolition *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern, Whatever happened to Keep Austin Weird? When did that change to Keep Austin Sold To The Highest Bidder? Coconut Club and Neon Grotto may be relatively new but they instantly became iconic places that are havens for unique people. Not to mention OCH and the demise of the "gay district". This seems like a personal attack, and I'm not even gay. Have you been to Coconut Club and Neon Grotto? Have you seen the amazing and unique things they have done and are doing there? They are easily the two best spots in Austin! There is no way they should be replaced with a high rise, it is just wrong. Rainey is already getting bad enough being replaced with high rises, destroying everything that brought people there in the first place. What's next, Red River?! We need to protect what gives Austin its charm and personality otherwise it will be full of a bunch of uptight rich bros and we have enough of that already. Find another place for your high rise or everything Austin stands for is at stake. Don't get greedy. KEEP AUSTIN WEIRD. ‐‐ Lia Politi CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Jamie Holt Wednesday, April 13, 2022 12:52 PM PAZ Preservation Item A1 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Hello, my name is Jamie Holt. I am emailing to speak on ITEM A1. I am against this item. I will not be able to attend the May 4th meeting and would like my comment to be recorded via email. Thank you, Jamie Holt CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Margaret Grayson Wednesday, April 13, 2022 1:17 PM PAZ Preservation 4th Street *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Hi there, My name …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 DA-2022-040962; GF-2022-047417 213 WEST 4TH STREET D.5 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1928 commercial building and reconstruct the façade. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish and reconstruct building façade. The character of the brickwork, opening patterns, and other design details will be accurately reconstructed. Existing brick will be savaged and reused in the reconstruction, with paint removed or the bricks turned to reveal the unpainted side. Transom windows will be retained or replicated, and storefront windows and doors will be fabricated to complement the design and era of the building. 2) Reinstall Oilcan Harry’s signage from the adjacent façade at 211 W. 4th Street. 3) Construct a high-rise tower with more than a 5’ setback from the building façade. Behind the parapet, the garage levels will be clad in a simple screen in a dark bronze color. The building at 213 W. 4th St. is a one-story brick commercial building with a symmetrical façade surmounted by a stepped parapet. Brick columns divide the building into five bays. Four of the columns appear original, with a narrower second bay from the left as the building entrance. A secondary entrance at the rightmost bay appears to be a modification. Storefront windows and door openings have been modified, including two recessed bays to create outdoor seating. Transom windows appear original. Decorative brickwork includes a soldier course above the transoms, raised friezes, and corbelling at the parapet. The building has a glass-enclosed rooftop structure. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The Patton-Eichenbaum Building was built ca. 1928 as the Southland-Red Ball Motor Bus Company offices and garage. The depot for the bus company was at 605 Brazos Street near the Driskill Hotel. Patton Transfer Company used this building as their garage in the early 1930s; by the mid-1930s, it was functioning as a bus garage again, for the Bowen Motor Coaches and the Kerrville Bus Company. The Lower Colorado River Authority used the building as their Operations Division in the early 1940s; Dill’s, a manufacturer of Venetian blinds and window shades, moved here from 404 Colorado Street by the end of 1944. Harold Eichenbaum, who crafted window displays, had his business here from the late 1940s through the early 1980s.1 Harold Eichenbaum’s Displays, the largest decorations manufacturing firm of its kind in Texas, was known for its flocked Christmas trees.2 The building was converted to cocktail lounge uses beginning …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 DA-2022-011968; GF-2022-050219 209 WEST 5TH STREET D.6 a – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolition of a ca. 1918 warehouse building. 209 W. 5th St. is a single-story brick masonry commercial building constructed ca. 1918. Its stepped parapet features an ornamental cornice with stylized waterfall brick patterns, diagonal white tiles bookending the central parapet, and geometric brick patterns below. A decorative brick band across the primary façade and decorative header course above the window and door voids complete the Art Deco details. The façade is symmetrical, containing a central entrance opening with an inset porch flanked by two window openings typical of commercial storefronts from the time. Fenestration has been replaced and modified. Historic awning hardware provides evidence of an original awning structure over the storefront. RESEARCH This building was constructed around 1918. Its first known occupant was A.P. Robinson’s auto garage; he shared the space in the 1920s with Patrick J. McDonald’s Lone Star Supply Company, which dealt in automobile and dairy supplies. Lone Star Supply Company became the sole occupant of the building in the early 1930s and stayed there until the late 1970s. Lone Star dropped the dairy supply portion of their business in the mid-1940s when J.H. Green and Marvin Uzzell took over the company. They concentrated on auto supplies, especially brake and clutch parts and repairs. By the early 1980s, Ramon Galindo had opened Ace Custom Tailors here, which remained until the late 1990s. The building was remodeled in the late 1990s for a nightclub and renovated again in the early 2000s for the Red Fez and Lucky Lounge.1 Few of Austin’s historic-aged warehouse and commercial buildings retain a high degree of architectural integrity, with most of the modifications addressing storefronts, windows, and doors. Only the Nelson Davis Warehouse (now the Spaghetti Warehouse) at W. 4th and Colorado Streets has been listed as a local historic landmark. The primary historical significance of the buildings is their connection with Austin’s railroad and urban history. While it is clear that none of the surviving buildings date from the earliest railroad period in Austin, many were built in the 1900s and 1910s and reveal interesting facts about the day-to-day life of the growing city during the early and mid-20th century. Many of the largest wholesale businesses were run by recently migrated families of varying cultural backgrounds. These industrial buildings speak …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 DA-2022-011968; GF-2022-050219 213 WEST 5TH STREET D.6 b – 1 Demolition of a single-story commercial building circa 1919 (213 W. 5th). PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE 213 W. 5th St. is a single-story brick masonry commercial building on the corner of 5th and Lavaca Streets. The original design of the building had an open front for drive-in service accessible from both street frontages. It originally had a relatively elaborate and symmetrical parapet roofline composed of steps, scrolls, and central circular elements on both facades. Original brick with masonry quoining on the rear corner walls can still be seen beneath the newer layers of construction and could be restored. The building was remodeled as Jellyroll’s Nightclub in 1995 and again as Antone’s in 1999 with the enclosure of the front area. In 2017, Spin, a sports and entertainment venue, undertook an extensive rehabilitation of the building, attempting to replicate the original 1919 parapet roofline and installing windows that re-established some of the lines of the curved bay openings. The exterior is currently an art installment by Samson Barboza including a guitar player- a nod to the site’s history in Austin’s live music scene. RESEARCH Its first major use was from 1922 to 1929 as a service station and distributor for Exide brand automotive batteries. The Warehouse District in downtown Austin used to be dominated by auto repair shops and car dealerships, which is why the original design of the building had an open front for drive-in service, as seen in the historic photo. The address housed filling stations, car dealers, tire shops, and most automotive-related businesses until 1981 when it was converted into a financial investment firm. In 1995, the building was remodeled into a bar known as Jellyroll’s Nightclub, laying the foundation for Antone’s to take over the space in 1997, when the front was enclosed. Spin, a sports and entertainment venue, rehabilitated the building in 2017. Antone’s opened in 1975 at 6th and Brazos, now demolished. The club then moved to Anderson Lane in 1980, where James Brown and Ray Charles played. It then moved to an old Shakey’s Pizza Parlor at 2915 Guadalupe in 1981. From ’81 until 1996, hundreds of thousands of fans found their way to the club. The Fabulous Thunderbirds and Stevie Ray Vaughan & Double Trouble exploded nationally during the club’s Guadalupe era. It stayed at the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 GF-2022-050222 1100 EAST 5TH STREET D.7 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolish a compound Quonset hut warehouse erected on or moved to the lot ca. 1948. 1100 East 5th Street is an example of a rare multiple Quonset hut composed of five connected barrel-arch units, all of corrugated steel paneling. Roll-up metal bay doors provide access at the vault ends. A corrugated metal hood protects the western entrance, while the eastern portion of the site has been redeveloped into outdoor event space. Quonset huts are generally accepted as a historically significant building typology within preservation industry standards. An example context statement from The City of Los Angeles describes Quonsets “as an important World War II-era building type and method of construction, notable for its simple construction, distinctive shape, and use of prefabricated materials, and flexible interior plan. Intact examples represent the design and development of a low-cost and highly-versatile structure by the U.S. Navy for military use during World War II, and its adaptive reuse for housing and other uses during the postwar years.”1 In a 2003 historic thematic resource survey for the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, principal historian Adam Thomas notes that “[The Quonset hut] is one of the most unique American building forms ever created.” 2 “[It] was an engineering marvel,” asserts John Vara in the Journal of Light Construction. “It could be shipped anywhere and…assembled by a 10- man crew in one day, using only hand tools. Throughout World War II, the Quonset became the standard military utility building of all regions and climates…At the end of the war, […] Quonsets were everywhere, from homes to churches and auto dealerships […] Quonsets are now a rarity.”3 In 2015, Preservation Austin honored 1100 East 5th Street with a Merit Award for outstanding rehabilitation and adaptive reuse by Thoughtbarn and Delineate Studio. “Austin's most iconic Quonset hut on East Fifth might well have been demolished for parking, or an apartment complex had not a development team led by Richard Kooris and Dennis McDaniel stepped in to transform it into Fair Market, hands down one of the most stunning event spaces in the city.”4 RESEARCH The warehouse at 1100 East 5th Street was constructed in 1948-1949 by Ben H. Powell, Jr. Powell purchased the land from the nearby railway, which had previously used the lot for storage,5 and rented it …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MAY 4, 2022 PR-2022-045223; GF-2022-050228 2905 STRATFORD DRIVE D.8 – 1 Demolish a ca. 1955 house and 1965 carport. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story masonry veneer house with single and mulled three-light casement windows, side-gabled roof with deep eaves, and double-width masonry chimney. The house at 2905 Stratford Drive was constructed in 1955. Its most notable occupant was Colonel Vance Murphy, director of Bergstrom Air Force Base and the Austin Municipal Airport. Murphy enlisted in 1927 and served in the Southwest Pacific Theater during World War II. He became commander of Bergstrom AFB in 1954.1 After retiring from the military in 1958,2 Murphy took a position as Director of Aviation for the City of Austin, placing him at the helm of the airport’s modernization project.3 Murphy served as an officer, chairman, and board member in several civic organizations, including the United Fund, Red Cross, Girl Scouts of America, American Legion, and Armed Forces Club. 4 5 6 7 8Cora Murphy, Colonel Murphy’s wife, also served as chairman of nursing services with the Red Cross.9 Vance Murphy retired in 1973 and died in 1979.10 PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate to high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear architecturally significant. b. Historical association. The property is associated with Colonel Vance Murphy. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 1 "Lichty Says Goodby, Murphy Takes Over." 1954.The Austin Statesman (1921-1973), Mar 31, 17. 2 "Col. Murphy Honored at Bergstrom Review." 1958.The Austin American (1914-1973), Sep 28, 1. 3 "Murphy Takes Control Over Austin's Airport." 1958.The Austin Statesman (1921-1973), Sep 05, 9. 4 "Col. Murphy Named to …
Application for Tax Abatement for Rehabilitation of Property in a Local Historic District City of Austin Historic Preservation Office Austin, Texas 512-974-2727 Adopted December 2012 City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement To encourage preservation and maintenance of the architectural character of local historic districts, the City makes available property tax abatements to the owners of contributing and potentially contributing properties who have completed substantial rehabilitation or restoration projects. The program abates 100% of the city property taxes assessed on the added value of a property that results from the rehabilitation or restoration project for a designated number of years. Improvements must comply with the local historic district’s preservation plan. ABATEMENT AVAILABLE BY PROPERTY TYPE: Category of property Duration of abatement Ownership type Amount of abatement Residential Owner occupied Residential located within Revitalization Area** Owner occupied Commercial Income- producing property Commercial located within Revitalization Area** Income- producing property Minimum % that must be spent on exterior improvements 5% 5% 5% 5% Required minimum expenditure Equal to 25% of pre- restoration value* of structure Equal to 10% of pre- restoration value * of structure Equal to 40% of pre- restoration value * of structure Equal to 30% of pre- restoration value * of structure 100% of the city taxes assessed on the added value of the property 100% of the city taxes assessed on the added value of the property 100% of the city taxes assessed on the added value of the property 100% of the city taxes assessed on the added value of the property Frequency abatement may be granted 7 years Once every 10 years 10 years Once every 15 years 10 years Once every 15 years 10 years Once every 15 years *Pre-restoration value means the most recent appraisal of the value of the property by the appraisal district before an application is submitted for abatement. **Revitalization Area is the area bounded by Interstate 35 from Manor Road to Riverside Drive, Riverside Drive from Interstate 35 to Highway 71, Highway 71 from Riverside Drive to Highway 183, Highway 183 from Highway 71 to Manor Road, and Manor Road from Highway 183 to Interstate 35. APPLICATION PROCESS: The program involves a three (3) step application process that requires approval by the Historic Landmark Commission and the Historic Preservation Office. Approval of Part I is required prior to starting any work. Part I – Application for Certification of Eligibility …
Application for Tax Abatement for Rehabilitation of Property in a Local Historic District City of Austin Historic Preservation Office Austin, Texas 512-974-2727 Adopted December 2012 City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility PART I - APPLICATION CHECK LIST: ___ Completed Application for Certificate of Eligibility signed by owner. ___ Estimate of costs for eligible work. ___ Completed Certificate of Appropriateness Application signed by owner. ___ Proof of pre-rehabilitation value from the Travis County Appraisal District. ___ Signed authorization for City Officials to inspect the property, and affidavit stating all property taxes are current and no city fees, fines, or penalties are owed on property owned by a business association in which the applicant has an ownership interest. ___ Current tax certificate providing proof no property taxes or City fees, fines, or penalties are delinquent on the property. ___ Proforma and development budget, if an estimated abatement is over $100,000. ___ Letter of intent from a financial institution or potential investors, if applicable. City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012 N/AN/A City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility Address of property: ______________________________________________________________ Name of Local Historic District:______________________________________________________ (cid:0) Contributing property (cid:0) Non-contributing property Legal Description of Property: _______________________________________________________ Tax Parcel ID Number:____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT: Name:____________________________ ____________ Telephone: (____) _________________ Mailing Address:_________________________________ Mobile phone: ( ____ City:___________________ State: ____ Zip:__________ Email: OWNER: Name:_________________________________________ Telephone: Mailing Address:_________________________________ Mobile phone: City:___________________ State: ____ Zip:__________ Email: _ _ Proposed Use of the Property:_______________________________________________________ Proposed Scope of Work: _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Projected Construction Schedule:______________________________________________ Has the property received any other property tax relief under § 11.24 of the Texas Tax Code?: _____________________________________________________________________________ Describe all City Code violations, if any, on the property within the previous five years: _______________________________________________________________________________ For Historic Preservation Office use only: ____ Property is not a contributing or potentially contributing structure ____ Certificate of Eligibility approved by Historic Landmark Commission ____ Certificate of Eligibility not approved by Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________________________ Historic Preservation Officer ________________ Date City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012 1105 Castle Court Austin, TX 78703Castle Hill Local Historic DistrictLOT 7 LESS N 5FT OLT 5 DIV Z CASTLE COURT0109010708512 751-13743908 Avenue B, Room 309Austin78751TXPeter Pincoffsp221 W. 6th Street, Suite 1400AustinTX78701Commercial OfficeNoneN/ASpring 2021O'Connell Architecture, LLC/Tere O'Connell, AIASite work to …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 4, 2022 – 11:00 A.M. Street-Jones Building, Room 400A 1000 E. 11th Street Austin, Texas COMMISSION MEMBERS: Beth Valenzuela, Chair Ben Heimsath Terri Myers AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 8, 2022 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. B. Draft recommendations on process and fees, protection and enforcement Outreach, education, and engagement Debrief from April working group meeting: Protection and enforcement Input on discussion points for May working group meeting: Timing Future committee meetings Next Commission update on the preservation plan C. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-1686 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. 1 1. 2. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron, Senior Planner, at 512-974-1446. 2
1. 2. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Friday, April 8, 2022 – 11:00 A.M. Street-Jones Building, Room 400A 1000 E. 11th Street Austin, Texas COMMISSION MEMBERS: X X Beth Valenzuela, Chair Ben Heimsath Terri Myers DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 5, 2022—Previously approved on March 8, 2022 March 8, 2022 March 25, 2022 MOTION: Approve the minutes from March 8 and March 25 by Heimsath, Valenzuela seconds. Vote: 2-0. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Debrief from March working group meeting: Processes and fees Working group provided direction on processes and fees in March The working group will focus on incentives recommendations in April The Drafting Committee will develop recommendations on processes, fees, protection, and enforcement for consideration by the working group in May B. Input on discussion points for April working group meeting: Protection and enforcement (discussion) and incentives (draft recommendations) Mention specific figures for enforcement and demolition by neglect: number of cases, penalties charged Include state provisions for historic building maintenance How often do other cities follow through with enforcement? 1 C. Consider how to work with existing staff in Austin Code and Development Services Department Commissioners provided feedback on draft recommendations on incentives Preparation for May working group meeting on outreach, education, and engagement What questions should we be sure to research? What examples of best practices should we be sure to include? Commissioners will provide feedback via email. MOTION: Adjourn the meeting by Heimsath, Valenzuela seconds. Vote: 2-0. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-1686 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron, Senior Planner, at 512-974-1446. 2
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: James Barr Friday, April 29, 2022 2:35 PM HPD Preservation Attn: Amber Allen, Re: Case No. HR 22-036714, 4314 Ave H Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** My name is James Barr. I am the owner of the property at 4110 Ave H. I am in favor of the applicant’s request. I’m an Architect and have practiced for 41 years in Austin. I’ve lived at this address for 25 years. More than half of my time in practice has been in Historic Preservation, both on my own and working for Bell, Klein and Hoffman, Sheffelman and Nix, Page Southerland Page, The Barr Company and Travis County Facilities Management Department. I believe that in order for Hyde Park Neighborhood to flourish we must allow and even encourage additions, remodels and, where appropriate, allow demolition/replacement. There are certainly exceptions for some of the structures that have social or physical historic significance. Sincerely, James Barr CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Ila Falvey Monday, May 2, 2022 8:22 AM HPD Preservation Case number: GF22-047398-2002 Scenic Dr *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attn: Amber Allen Thank you for your research on the property. In addition to the attributes that you mentioned, this building contributes to the neighborhood of rock houses that are common in the area and represent an era of Austin's past. This neighborhood's importance was emphasized as it and several of the rock houses were included on Preservation Austin's Home Tour in 2010. I strongly oppose destroying an historic house, the long two story rock house with the whimsical carved keystones, and the bridges and paths that meander through the property. This property is a treasure and should be respected for its beauty not destroyed to maximize wealth. Ila Falvey CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Laura Des Enfants 3706 Stevenson Avenue Austin TX 78703 x During this period of rapid growth Austin needs to be vigilant and preserve its architectural history or risk losing both its character and history. 5.2.2022
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Nabil Rahman Sunday, May 1, 2022 10:08 PM HPD Preservation 1100 E 5th St demolition *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live on 1109 E 5th St, Austin, TX 78702 and I object to this request. This neighborhood is being fully wiped out of anything with any historical significance and this change is absurd. There is currently a wedding happening in this venue and it is an example of how viable this space is for events in the area. Thanks! Nabil Rahman Chief Product Officer Spot Insurance CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
ROSEWOOD COURTS U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e 05/04/2022 LOCATION G G D E ROSEWOOD HISTORIC DISTRICT RC F F F F U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e HISTORY 1 2 RC ORIGINAL DESIGN ORIGINAL DESIGN U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e HISTORY RC ORIGINAL DESIGN U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e CURRENT CONDITION BLDG D BLDG D BLDG E RC BLDG F BLDG G BLDG G U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e SITE WORK HVI UNIT F NEW RAMP FULLY ACCESSIBLE UNIT RC NEW RAIN GARDENS U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e PROPOSED WORK BUILDING D BUILDING E U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e PROPOSED WORK BUILDING F BUILDING G U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e PROPOSED WORK *No addition is being proposed BUILDING D BUILDING F RC BUILDING G U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e PROPOSED WORK *No addition is being proposed BUILDING F RC BUILDING E BUILDING G U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e PROPOSED WORK BUILDING F BUILDING F RC *No addition is being proposed BUILDING G BUILDING G U r b a n F o u n d r y A r c h i t e c t u r e DOORS ORIGINAL DOOR TYPES PROPOSED DOOR TYPES WINDOWS BUILDING F BUILDING G U r b a n F o u n d r …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Meredith Dreiss Monday, May 2, 2022 2:07 PM HPD Preservation case # GF22-047398-2002 Scenic Dr *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case # GF 22‐047398‐2002 Scenic Dr Dear Amber Allen, I am writing in hopes that a hold can be put on demolition plans for 2002 Scenic Drive, Austin, TX 78703 until further research can be completed by the city’s historic preservation department. I currently live down the street from 2002 Scenic Dr at 3002 Scenic, but before moving I lived across the street from 2002 Scenic at 3805 Stevenson Avenue for 29 years. I’ve been inside 2002 on a number of occasions during the years that Whit and Allison Hanks rented the house from owners C.H. and Mildred Slator. 2002 Scenic is extremely unique with whimsical nooks and crannies, spectacular stone fireplaces and a stone façade that seems more “rustic stone vernacular” than Spanish Colonial revival. What’s more important to think about is its contextual setting: Where Stevenson Avenue dead ends into Scenic Drive right at the cliff overlooking Lake Austin, there are 7‐8 adjacent stone house built in the 1930s and early 40s that are similar and may have been designed by the same architect. For example, I know the fireplaces at both 2002 Scenic and 3805 Stevenson (across the street) were probably built by the same stone mason, both are highly unusual and quirky with similar elements. I believe this grouping of houses could be considered an historic district and should be assessed accordingly. Having walked Scenic Drive for 43 years I’ve also noticed traces of archaeological chert‐working where Scenic and Stevenson streets meet. I know this kind of evidence does not necessarily halt demolition permits, but just wanted to mention it. I’ve read that the earliest city records date to 1946 when the architectural firm of Fehr and Granger were hired by the Slators for renovations. I’ve had trouble finding out who the original architect was and what the house may have looked like before renovations, but tax records indicated construction date may be 1930. Arthur Fehr worked for architect Harvey P. Smith of San Antonio during this time. Smith was renowned for mission and restoration work and some of Smith’s Spanish Colonial style architecture is reminiscent of 2002 Scenic and also next door at 2008 Scenic (built in 1935) as well as across the street at 2005 Scenic …
To: Amber Allen, Historic Preservation Office, City of Austin Re: Demolition of 2002 Scenic Drive (GF22-047398) Dear Ms. Allen 2 May 2022 As a former resident across the street from 2002 Scenic Drive, I would like to write a letter protesting its proposed demolition. While the building complex has fallen into disrepair in recent years, it is a unique surviving element of a small 1930s neighborhood anchored around what is today the corner of Scenic and Stevenson. While some of the early buildings are now gone or heavily remodeled, portions still remain of this once vibrant little block of dwellings. Built mostly in a rustic, limestone-based style, those remains are quite distinctive from the more recent contemporary styles being erected around it. The houses of that early era in West Austin had a warm, charming and almost magical feel to them, in direct contrast to the harder lines of the newer surrounding structures, and they bring a feeling to the little neighborhood that will be lost when 2002 Scenic and its still surviving early twentieth century neighbors are removed. I understand that 2002 Scenic was remodeled by Fehr and Granger in the late 1940s, a fact that supports its importance, and the need for preservation. Undertaken by two well-known veterans of Depression-era National Park Service construction, the 2002 Scenic remodel incorporates elements of Fehr’s earlier work at Bastrop State Park and seems to represent a stage in the transition of his own career from a more historical beaux arts/eclectic style to his later mid-century modern designs. Born in Austin, Fehr was important in introducing the mid-century modern design into Texas, and aspects of his historical oeuvre of structures should be considered important for protection in our rapidly changing world. I am an archaeologist with considerable experience in the historical era and some knowledge of historic structures. Though retired, I am still a research fellow at UT Austin. I have worked with the documentation and preservation of early buildings in Austin for decades and have sadly seen so many fine examples of past architectural styles demolished. We are too rapidly losing the anchor of our historic, architectural past, and it would be sad to see these once elegant structures removed. I am strongly in favor of refusing the demolition permit and seeking preservation partners to protect these impressive buildings. Thank you for your consideration in the matter. Sincerely, David O. Brown, …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: t wise Monday, May 2, 2022 5:07 PM HPD Preservation 2002 Scenic *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms Allen, Thank you for your work in assessing the historical/architectural significance of this beautiful property. Please count me, neighbor since 1989, as one who strongly supports saving the home. Sincerely, Tracy Wise CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
2002 Scenic Drive The original house (not the 1940s renovation portion) is a stone structure with many wonderful stone carvings. The construction and stone carvings are similar (but much more elaborate) than the other remaining stone “fishing cabins” built at the same period. The photos below show some of this beautiful work on the exterior of the home. 2002 Scenic Drive case # PR-2022-032448 2002 Scenic Drive Photos of some of the stone work in the interior of the home. Carvings are placed randomly throughout the stone portions of the home. 2002 Scenic Drive case # PR-2022-032448 2002 Scenic Drive Photos of some of the stone work in the auxiliary building. 2002 Scenic Drive case # PR-2022-032448
Peer 1 Safe Fencing Regulations Resolution No. 20211104-039 May 4, 2022 Resolution No. 20211104-39 • Initiated code amendments to address dangerous fence design including spiked elements that protrude above the top horizontal bar of a fence • Directed the City Manager to evaluate: - Requiring fIat top styles on new fences of all lengths - Applying flat top fence requirements to all new fences of six feet tall or - Applying flat top fence requirements to substantial fence repairs or remodeling of 50% or more of an existing fence lower 2 Resolution Findings • City Code currently allows some spiked fence styles that can pose significant risk to humans and animals, including: - Entrapment and impalement of children - Workers performing roof and gutter maintenance - Pets or wildlife that jump over fences • Purpose of the meeting is to obtain commission feedback on proposed amendments 3 Options • Requiring fIat top styles on new fences of all lengths • Applying flat top fence requirements to all new fences of six feet tall or lower • Applying flat top fence requirements to substantial fence repairs or remodeling of 50% or more of an existing fence • Other considerations 4 Engagement Once engagement concludes: • Develop recommendations based on stakeholder feedback • Move amendments forward for Board/ Commission/ Council review Internal Engagement Series: 04.26.22 DSD Divisions 04.27.22 Partner Departments 04.27.22 Building and Standards Commission 05.04.22 Historic Landmark Commission External Engagement Series: 04.25.22 – 06.05.22 05.07.22/ 05.26.22 05.10.22 / 05.16.22 SpeakUp Austin Platform In-Person Public Engagements Virtual Public Engagements 5 Outreach Broad Outreach • Boosted Social Media • NextDoor • El Mundo • Austin American Statesman • Austin Chronicle • DSD Newsletter 6 Targeted Outreach • American Fence Association • American Institute of Architects • American Society of Landscape Architects • Asian Contractor’s Association • Associated General Contractors • Austin Apartment Association • Austin Association of Builders • Austin Board of Realtors • Austin Contractors and Engineers Association • Austin Home Builders Association • Austin Hotel and Lodging Association • Austin Infill Coalition • Austin Tenant’s Association • Black Contractor’s Association • Capital Metro • Certified Building Designers • Community Registry Fence Contractors/ Companies • Fence/ Pool permit applicants • • Hispanic Contractor’s Association • Historic Preservation stakeholders • Habitat for Humanity • Housing Authority of the City of Austin • National Association of Remodeling Industry Pool Contractors/ Companies • Pool and …
3 0 3 A 1 3 0 3 A 2 maximum building envelope maximum building envelope 12 8.5 12 2 SOLAR READY ROOF 8" 4'-63 METAL ROOF METAL GUTTER O STAINED WOOD SIDING CLAD WOOD WINDOWS DEEP PORCH A B ROOF HEIGHT: 4 ' - 6 3 8 " ATTIC 5 ' - 1 0 " 45° 1 0 ' - 5 3 8 " 1 1 ' - 0 3 8 " I BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOW SECOND FLOOR N G I L A SubCh F PARTITION 1 HIGH POINT: 552'-2" GROUND FLOOR FFE: 550'- 8" BASE ELEV FOR ZONING HEIGHT 550'- 2" 01 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" ON 22" X 34" SHEET WEST - STREET - ELEVATION EXHIBIT 1: REVISED WEST ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS . 0 0 3 3 2 7 4 2 1 5 . 2 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A T E E R T S H T 6 T S A E 0 1 0 2 S T C E T I H C R A D E E R + A R E T O C ALTA VISTA RESIDENCE 1503 ALTA VISTA AUSTIN, TEXAS 78704 3/8/2022 COTERA+REED ARCHITECTS, LLC All rights reserved. All designs, drawings, plans & specifications are the property of COTERA+REED.
Phil Gilbert 3805 Stevenson Ave. Austin, Texas 78703 May 3, 2022 City of Austin Residential Permitting To Whom It May Concern, Re: Objection to Complete Demolition of 2002 Scenic Drive, Austin, Texas I am opposed to the complete demolition of the house at 2002 Scenic Drive, Austin. I live across the street and while a complete demo and new build would no doubt be quicker, it is worth the time and effort to see that the essence of the beautiful, important structure(s) be built upon, not completely torn down. Austin offers a lot to the imagination. It’s that mythology, if you will, that is fueling our growth; it’s enticing hundreds of thousands to become new Austinites. That’s good. Bob Dylan wrote: “He not busy being born is busy dying.” Austin is constantly being born — from the 70’s “outlaws” that turned us into “the live music capital of the world” through to the 21st century technologists we are home to today. Change is good. But we must direct that change into something that is authentic. Something of Austin, not just in Austin. Change for change sake is childish… and change for convenience sake is even worse: it threatens the essence of the Austin ethic that is the wellspring for each renewal. The house at 2002 Scenic Drive is a great example of that weird, wonderful Austin ethic. It may be one of only a handful of remaining properties with this aesthetic. In fact, Scenic Drive itself is an Austin icon… and on Scenic there's only one other house that achieves the result of the house at 2002 Scenic — and it’s The Rock House, right next door. (It also has a colorful history… no doubt when Robert Redford was coming to play at his grandparents’ Rock House in those 1950’s summers he played with friends next door!) 1 2 of I won’t speak much about the specific architectural and design elements that can never be recreated except to say: why would we destroy these last of a kind works when there is no need? The exterior easily displays its uniqueness. But inside is where the magic truly happens. There are literally dozens of one-of-a-kind design elements that would be destroyed forever, if we allowed a total demolition. If you question their value, then go to the property to see them yourself! While we want growth, we surely don’t want indiscriminate …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Ben Noelke Tuesday, May 3, 2022 3:13 PM HPD Preservation Case number: GF22-047398-2002 Scenic Dr *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** We oppose the demolition. It would be a real shame to lose it. Please at least consider saving the structure to the north (non main house). Ben Noelke 2107 Scenic Drive Sent from my iPad CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: birgit birgite.com Tuesday, May 3, 2022 4:03 PM HPD Preservation birgit birgite.com Case number: GF 22-047389 (2002 Scenic Drive) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Preservation Team ‐ A neighbor from my previous neighborhood of Matthews and Stevenson alerted me to the request to demolish 2002 Scenic. This property was the location for several neighborhood Holiday parties when the property was rented to Whit and Allison Hanks. Whit was friends with one of the Slator's and was able to rent it. What a historic location for neighborhood events!! It was at this location in 1997 or so that I had a conversation with Tito Beveridge about his plans for the future. He said "I"m starting a vodka company." My response "Good luck with that!" The rest is history. The wonderful Scottie Stevenson was in attendance at these Holiday parties. Dressed to the nines and every bit the former First Lady of Texas, Mrs. Stevenson was a delight to talk to and learn about her fascinating life. We'd all walk the one block to our houses together after the party concluded. https://www.dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/austin‐tx/edith‐stevenson‐8213422 My son, who is a stone carver, woodworker and artist commented that many of the staircases on the property are carved into the rocks cascading down the hill. Very unusual to see that quality of workmanship these days. The entire property, with the triangular pool, changing rooms, greenhouse, stone bridge, pathways and numerous stone buildings, is a community treasure. Please do not grant the demolition permit. The property should be restored and preserved. Thank you for your consideration. Birgit Enstrom CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
902 E 7th St. P R O P O S A L F O R H O U S E R E- L O C AT I O N F R A N C I S C O R E S E N D I Z , D E S I G N E R A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A S S O C I AT E . Existing Condition Conditions Existing Condition 2016 2017 2018 Relocation Map 700 Bunton Masterplan Community Brewery & Restaurant Proposed Community
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged noreply@coadigital.onbehalfof.austintexas.gov on behalf of City of Austin <noreply@coadigital.onbehalfof.austintexas.gov> Wednesday, May 4, 2022 12:22 PM HPD Preservation GF22-047398-2002ScenicDr. This message is from Alison Hanks. [ ] To: AMBER ALLEN Attn: Amber Allen Re: 2002 Scenic Dr. Case GF22‐047398‐2002ScenicDr. Greetings. I'm Alison Hanks and I lived at 2002 Scenic from 1996‐2004. Debbie Slator Gillan, landlady, grew up there and told me many things about the house. I also conducted oral histories with the owners of the other 'rock houses' in the area. C.H. and Mildred Slator bought the house in 1947. It remained in the Slator family until sold last year. The house was built by Raymond Maurice Delisle in the 1920s. (Wife‐Ammon McGaughey Delisle.) His artistry can be seen in exterior and interior carvings of animals, clowns, shamrocks, elephant, box of matches and cigar, nude woman, and a mural covering all the walls of the upstairs bathroom with a nude woman reclining on a beach. Weigl interior gates in the living rom are worthy of a 1920s black and white movie. Entry was from the lake, the only way to reach the house as 'River Avenue' as Scenic Dr. was than called, was a dirt path. The metal spider web, with spider, sprawling across the exterior of the front entry window is the reward for climbing the zillion steps from the dock to the 'front door'. Stones used in the building were leftovers from the dam collapse, or from the quarry near what is now Cherry and Rockmoor. The architecture of the house uses many styles . Something that I think gives it a delightfully quirky quality. I don't know of another house in Austin with the same structural enchantment. On to the surrounding area which contributes to the cultural/historical associations. 2002 Scenic has the house, side building, glasshouse, (where Debbie's mother grew prize roses), pool with dressing cabanas, terraced gardens, stone bridge leading to the gardners' cottage‐ 2000 Scenic. An entire estate, relatively untouched for 100 years. Other rock houses were occupied by UT art professors, (1st UT art classroom was at 2105 Scenic), executive editor of newspaper lived at 2005 Scenic, ( built by Raymond Delisle), Commodore Edgar Perry built home at 3810 Kennelwood for Edgar, Jr. and Julie Matthews Perry. Kennelwood Clubhouse, for those of you who may remember Kennelwood Boat Docks, was at …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Adam T. Blanton < Wednesday, May 4, 2022 12:36 PM HPD Preservation Case number: GF22-047398-2002 Scenic Dr > Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Amber, I'd like to express some concern over the demo of 2002 Scenic drive. It's hard to imagine a complete demo of all structures on the property as there are so many unique features in the structure, the history and the style of this space. I don't want to impede the new owner's plans but would like to encourage them to please consider keeping some or part of the history and of the structure that stands today with their plans for the lot. Thank you for your time. -Adam Blanton 3801 Stevenson Ave CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Laney Bevill Wednesday, May 4, 2022 2:53 PM HPD Preservation Case number: GF22-047398-2002 Scenic Dr *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case number: GF22‐047398‐2002 Scenic Dr I oppose ! thank you ! ‐‐ "Fear does not prevent death. It prevents life" Naguib Mahfouz CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Harper Ray Wednesday, May 4, 2022 2:56 PM HPD Preservation Case number: GF22-047398-2002 Scenic Dr *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** I oppose demolition. So much a part of neighborhood. At least save structure to north. Harper Ray 2107 Scenic dr Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Sierra R Friday, April 29, 2022 11:30 AM HPD Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Sierra Richardson. I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th recorded by email. You can reach me by phone at Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. Sincerely, Sierra Richardson CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged noreply@coadigital.onbehalfof.austintexas.gov on behalf of City of Austin <noreply@coadigital.onbehalfof.austintexas.gov> Friday, April 29, 2022 11:51 AM HPD Preservation No demo to 4th Street This message is from Leah Bostwick. I'm writing to oppose the demolition of historic LGBTQI+ institutions on 4th street. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Josue Gonzalez Friday, April 29, 2022 12:08 PM HPD Preservation URGENT: Public Comment for May 4th Hearing Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, My name is josue gonzalez, I'm reaching out in response to The Hanover Co's demolition request of the 4th street block between Colorado and Lavaca. I am STRONGLY AGAINST Item A1 and want my comment made public on May 4th {IN PERSON, VIA PHONE, OR RECORDED BY EMAIL}. You can reach me by phone at {YOUR PHONE NUMBER} and by email at {YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS}. {DELETE THIS IF NOT USING {INSERT RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL BODY TEXT ‐ PERSONAL STORIES, BEING QUEER, TEXAS/GOV. ABBOTT ATTACKING QUEER RIGHTS, ETC}} Please respond as soon as possible with the next steps and additional information. Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Forest Miller Friday, April …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, May 4, 2022 – 6:00 PM CITY HALL - Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x Terri Myers, Chair x Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair x Anissa Castillo ab Witt Featherston x Kevin Koch ab Carl Larosche x Kelly Little x Trey McWhorter x Blake Tollett ab Beth Valenzuela x Caroline Wright APPROVED MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. There were no speakers for Public Communication. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 28, 2022 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, on a motion by Commissioner Heimsath. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 8-0. March 28, 2022 – Offered for consent approval B. MOTION: Approve the minutes, on a motion by Commissioner Heimsath. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 8-0. 1 Flat Top Fences – City of Austin Community Engagement Office Presenter: Mayra Rivera Proposed rehabilitations in Sixth Street National Register district Presenter: Richard Suttle 2. BRIEFINGS A. B. A. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. PR-2021-137925 – 1505 Forest Trl. – Discussion (postponed February 28, 2022) Council District 10 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Owner’s agent: Carolina Escamilla City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Staff Recommendation: In consideration of the applicant’s withdrawal of the demolition permit application and intent to retain the historic house while constructing additional housing on site, staff recommends that the Commission not pursue historic zoning. Michael Leary spoke in favor of historic zoning. Carolina Escamilla spoke in opposition. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing indefinitely and invite the applicant to the Architectural Review Committee, on a motion by Commissioner Heimsath. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 8-0. A.2. PR-2021-195456 – 1617 New York Ave. – Consent postponement to June 1, 2022 (postponed March 28, 2022) Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Owner’s agent: Holly Arthur City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Committee Feedback: Relocate the chimney to avoid disrupting the existing gable end and …
