Historic Landmark Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Upcoming meetings

March 4, 2026

Preview List original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATIONS UNDER REVIEW FOR MARCH 4, 2026 MEETING This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 3 business days prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. Speaker Registration will open once the formal agenda is posted. For questions, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Historic Landmark Commission regular meeting on February 4, 2026. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION ITEMS Historic Zoning 2. C14H-1987-0016 – 810 W. 10th St. Mayer-Howse House Council District 9 Proposal: Recommend ordinance cleanup via Commission-initiated historic zoning to Planning Commission and City Council. Applicant: Historic Landmark Commission City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 National Register Historic District Permit Applications 3. HR-2025-145729 – 2100 Barton Springs Rd. Zilker Park Barton Springs Bridge Council District 8 Proposal: Construct a new bridge, reconstruct trails, and restore the stream bank. (Postponed by HLC on February 4, 2026) Applicant: Paulinda Lanham City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 4. 5. 6. 7. LM-2025-155778; HR-2026-014183 – 617 Congress Ave. Congress Avenue National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Reconfigure the primary facade and construct a balcony. Applicant: Jeff Schindler; Jeb Barmish City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 HR-2026-014204 – 809 Congress Ave. Congress Avenue National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Demolish a compatible building, retaining the Congress Avenue facade. Applicant: Carson Nelson City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 HR-2026-010143 – 1611 Preston Ave. Old West Austin National Register Historic District Council District 10 Proposal: Reconfigure existing front wall and construct an addition. Applicant: Meegan Beddoe City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 PR-2026-015633 – 1508 Pease Rd. Old West Austin National Register Historic District Council District 10 Proposal: Construct a new residence. Applicant: Paul Zubeldia City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Demolition and Relocation Permit Applications 8. PR-2026-012921 – 844 Airport Blvd. Council District 3 Proposal: Demolish a restaurant. Applicant: Katie Congdon; Douglas Frey City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 9. 10. Approve budget …

Scraped at: Feb. 20, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
March 4, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 301 W. 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Historic Landmark Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please use the QR code or link at the end of this document. For questions, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS BEN HEIMSATH, CHAIR (D-8) CARL LAROSCHE (D-6) ROXANNE EVANS, VICE CHAIR (D-2) TREY MCWHORTER (D-10) JEFFREY ACTON (MAYOR) TONYA PLEASANT-WRIGHT (D-1) JAIME ALVAREZ (D-7) JUDAH RICE (D-4) HARMONY GROGAN (D-5) BAT TANIGUCHI (D-9) KEVIN KOCH (D-3) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Historic Landmark Commission regular meeting on February 4, 2026. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION ITEMS Historic Zoning 2. C14H-1987-0016 – 810 W. 10th St. Mayer-Howse House Council District 9 Proposal: Recommend ordinance cleanup via Commission-initiated historic zoning to Planning Commission and City Council. Applicant: Historic Landmark Commission City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from general office- equitable transit-oriented development-equitable transit-oriented density bonus (GO- ETODDBETOD) district zoning to general office-historic landmark-equitable transit-oriented development-equitable transit-oriented density bonus (GO-H-ETOD-DBETOD) district zoning as a means of correcting the existing administrative record. National Register Historic District Permit Applications 3. 4. HR-2025-145729 – 2100 Barton Springs Rd. Zilker Park Barton Springs Bridge Council District 8 Proposal: Construct a new bridge, reconstruct trails, and restore the stream bank. (Postponed by HLC on February 4, 2026) Applicant: Paulinda Lanham City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Comment on and release the plans, encouraging the applicant to comply with THC feedback when received. Request that the applicant follow the appropriate City process if other contributing structures are to be removed or modified. LM-2025-155778; HR-2026-014183 – 617 Congress Ave. Congress Avenue National Register …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.0 - 2100 Barton Springs Rd - Barton Springs Road Bridge original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2025-145729 Zilker Park National Register Historic District 2100 Barton Springs Road 3 – 1 Proposal Construct a new bridge in place of the existing contributing bridge. Reconstruct trails. Restore stream bank. Project Specifications The proposed new bridge will replace the existing 1925/1946 Barton Creek bridge at Barton Springs Road and Azie Morton Road. Extreme deterioration and deferred maintenance necessitate bridge removal, with structural elements’ degradation beyond repair and safety concerns, including flood control and pedestrian safety issues, driving Council approval in 2023. The selected design appears to be the most compatible of three options. Proposed materials will match the existing bridge’s concrete and asphalt construction. The proposed bridge utilizes a set of arched piers, reflective of the existing bridge’s design, oriented transverse to the superstructure of the bridge. This orientation provides a maximum amount of visibility through the bridge. The abutment at the park side has been pushed back to create open space accommodating the park train and pedestrian path. The handrail on the park side of the bridge utilizes a robust steel design with heavy concrete pilasters that pay homage to the existing bridge and divert debris during flood events. The bridge has been widened to accommodate two lanes of traffic, planters, and seating with shade devices on either side. Streetscape elements have been selected to blend with the bridge’s surroundings and will be minimally visible above the handrail. Proposed lighting is simple in design. The proposed stream bank and pedestrian pathways are supported by ashlar masonry and stone veneer retaining walls. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping 1.1 Do not grade, fill, or excavate unless it is to solve a drainage or flooding problem. 1.2 Retain permanent landscape features that define the character of the property and the district. Protect them when constructing new buildings or additions. The proposed project slightly changes the topography surrounding the bridge to alleviate flooding and allow for pedestrian use of the surrounding bank. No additional character-defining landscape features appear to be affected at this phase of the project. Changes to character-defining landscape features will require additional HLC review. …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.1 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part1 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 162 pages

This page intentionally left blank 2 BARTON SPRINGS ROAD BRIDGE OVER BARTON CREEK PROJECT Bridge Concept Engineering Report CIP ID #5873.031 AUSTIN, TEXAS OCTOBER 2023 PREPARED FOR The City of Austin PREPARED BY URS – an AECOM Company Texas P.E. Firm Registration No. F‐3162 13640 Briarwick Drive Suite 200 Austin, TX 78729 Telephone: 512‐454‐4797 Website: aecom.com 3 Date: October 26, 2023 This page intentionally left blank 4 Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................9 1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................11 1.1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................... 11 Project Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Description of the Bridge Project Process ............................................................................. 12 1.4 Project and Report Scope ........................................................................................................ 13 2 Project Area ..........................................................................................................................15 3 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................16 3.1 3.2 Bridge Cultural/Historical Conditions .................................................................................. 16 Bridge Structural Condition ................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 3.2.2 Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................................ 17 Preliminary Environmental Conditions ........................................................................ 18 4 Alternative Development and Selection Process .........................................................23 4.1 Initial Assessments (2018‐2019) .............................................................................................. 23 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 Early Geometric Concepts .............................................................................................. 23 Bridge Rehabilitation Feasibility .................................................................................... 24 Bridge Replacement Concepts ........................................................................................ 24 Design Reviews and Funding Pause ............................................................................. 24 4.2 Bridge Alternative Development (2021‐2022) ...................................................................... 24 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 Design Charrette .............................................................................................................. 25 City Department Vetting and Alternative Refinement ............................................... 25 Initial Agency Vetting ..................................................................................................... 25 Bridge Alternatives (Comparison of Options) ............................................................. 25 Additional Agency Vetting ............................................................................................. 32 4.3 Public Involvement .................................................................................................................. 32 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 Open House ...................................................................................................................... 32 Public Comment Summary ............................................................................................. 32 Post Open House Discussions ........................................................................................ 33 5 Proposed Improvements ...................................................................................................34 5.1 5.2 Bridge Cross‐Section ................................................................................................................ 37 Bridge Aesthetic Design .......................................................................................................... 37 5 5.3 5.4 Roadway Design ...................................................................................................................... 38 Park Area Design ..................................................................................................................... 39 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.4 Structure/Tree Protection and Mitigation ..................................................................... 39 Zilker Park – Zilker Eagle ............................................................................................... 40 Zilker Park Hike/Bike Trail ............................................................................................. 40 Umlauf Garden Retaining Wall ..................................................................................... 40 5.5 Structural Design ...................................................................................................................... 41 5.6 Utility Design ............................................................................................................................ 42 6 Construction Phases and Methods ..................................................................................44 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Construction Phases ................................................................................................................ 44 Foundation and Substructure Construction ......................................................................... 45 Superstructure Construction .................................................................................................. 46 Construction Sequence/Maintenance of Traffic ................................................................... 46 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4 Phase 1 ............................................................................................................................... 47 Phase 2 ............................................................................................................................... 48 Phase 3 ............................................................................................................................... 49 Final Construction ............................................................................................................ 50 7 Project Cost ..........................................................................................................................51 Appendices Appendix A ‐ Early Studies A‐1 ‐ Section 106 Report – Sept 2016 A‐2 ‐ Bridge Inspection Report – Jan 2017 A‐3 ‐ Traffic Memo – Jan 2018 Appendix B ‐ Bridge Initial Assessments B‐1 ‐ Initial Geometry ‐ Feb 2018 B‐2 ‐ Rehabilitation Feasibility …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.10 - 2100 Barton Springs Rd - presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 38 pages

Barton Springs Road Bridge Capital Delivery Services | 04 Feb 2026 Project Project Background Background Project History About the Bridge Nearly 100years old built in 1926 20,000 Vehicles per day 1946 Bridge Expansion Key Entrance to Zilker Park and for Major City Events 3 Project Site Protect Park Monuments Bridge Site Challenge and Constraint Categories: Park and Historic Environmental Roadway Intersection Bridge 4 Project Purpose and Need Project Needs Project Goals / Outcomes Age of Structure  100 yrs old, Associated structural degradation Safety  Barton Springs roadway not aligned  Hillside instability at Umlauf Gardens  Provide 75 Year Bridge Service Life  Improve Safety  Stabilize Umlauf Gardens Insufficient Paths  Not enough bike or pedestrian paths on bridge  Add Multi-modal and Connect with Park Trails Intersection Congestion  At Barton Springs / Azie Morton intersection  Reduce Congestion with addition of right turn 5 Project Purpose and Need Roadway Alignment Issues 6 Project Purpose and Need Goal During Construction  Maintain two-way traffic during construction  Maintain the Azie Morton / Barton Springs intersection during construction 20,000 Vehicles per day on Barton Springs Road (cid:127) Important commuter route (cid:127) Key access to Zilker Park (cid:127) Access to many special events (Trail of Lights, Austin City Limits, Blues on the Green, Zilker Park) 7 Project Options Project Options Rehabilitation or Replacement Options 9 Project Elements Elements Required for Rehabilitation or Replacement Bike Lanes Sidewalk / Path Shared Use Path Proposed Bridge  Widened Bike Lane  Accommodates  Accommodate hiking Trails  Wider Ped. Paths off-road biker trail users  Accommodates Pedestrians for Special Events  Multimodal areas to accommodate off-road hike and bike trail users  Longer service life length  Wider bridge  Better alignment for safety  Dedicated bike lanes 10 Bridge Inspection Bridge Inspection Findings  Deck (with integral longitudinal joint), floor beams, and spandrel columns exhibited the most degradation.  All structural components exhibited some degradation. Degraded Concrete Spandrel Column Spalling Exposed and Corroded Rebar Exposed and Corroded Rebar 11 Rehabilitation Options Spandrel Columns Arch Ribs Bridge Inspection Findings Rehabilitation for increased service life requires removal of deck, floor beams, and spandrel columns  Demolish the structure to the arch ribs.  Significant work is needed: major rehabilitation or bridge replacement. Do Nothing is not an option 1 Preserve Rehabilitation Option 1 is not feasible 12 Rehabilitation Options Improve Paths Arch ribs …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.2 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 91 pages

C-2 - Draft Interim Bridge Status Memorandum – Feb 2022 Barton Springs Rd. Bridge over Barton Creek Interim Bridge Status REVISIONS Project: City of Austin – Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek Document: Interim Bridge Status Memorandum Revision Date of Issue Description D0 D1 D2 01/17/19 01/25/19 02/24/22 Draft Issue for Internal Comment Draft Issue for City Management Team Review/Comment Draft Issue for City Management Team Review/Comment Statement of Limitations This report is intended for the City of Austin and is not to be distributed to third parties outside the City’s organization. This interim memo provides an update regarding the status of the conceptual design work performed by URS for the proposed facility. This work is ongoing and not complete. Information included in this memo is subject to change prior to release of the Final Bridge Conceptual Engineering Report. Page ii Barton Springs Rd. Bridge over Barton Creek Interim Bridge Status CONTENTS PAGE 1. 2. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Objectives .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Bridge Engineering Process ...................................................................... 2 1.3 1.3.1 Preliminary Selection and Concept Engineering – Process Phase 1 ...... 2 1.3.2 Preliminary Selection and Concept Engineering – Process Phase 2 ...... 3 1.3.3 Preliminary Selection and Concept Engineering – Process Phase 3 ...... 3 2.4 2.5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ................................................................................. 4 Bridge Cultural/Historical Background ....................................................... 4 2.1 Barton Springs/Azie Morton Road Intersection Assessment .......................... 4 2.2 Roadway Alignment Concepts (Rehabilitation vs Replacement) .................... 4 2.3 2.3.1 Rehabilitation Option .................................................................... 4 2.3.2 Replacement Option ..................................................................... 5 Maintenance of Traffic / Construction Phasing ............................................ 5 2.4.1 Phase 1 (Figure 2-3) ..................................................................... 5 2.4.2 Phase 2 (Figure 2-4) ..................................................................... 6 2.4.3 Phase 3 (Figure 2-5) ..................................................................... 6 2.4.4 Final Tasks – Complete Construction............................................... 7 Bridge Rehabilitation Summary ................................................................ 7 2.5.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 7 2.5.2 Bridge Rehabilitation Feasibility ...................................................... 7 2.5.3 Description of Existing Condition .................................................... 7 2.5.4 Service Life Estimates ................................................................... 8 2.5.5 Existing Structure - Load Capacity Estimates ................................... 9 2.5.6 Rehabilitation Concept and Components ........................................ 10 2.5.7 Rehabilitation Renderings ............................................................ 11 2.5.8 Estimated Costs ......................................................................... 11 Bridge Replacement Summary ............................................................... 12 2.6.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 12 2.6.2 Bridge Replacement Feasibility ..................................................... 12 2.6.3 Replacement Concept and Components ......................................... 12 2.6.4 Estimated Costs ......................................................................... 13 Conceptual Zilker Park/Pedestrian Opportunities ...................................... 13 2.7.1 Structure/Tree Protection and Mitigation ....................................... 14 2.7.2 Zilker Park – Zilker Zephyr .......................................................... 14 2.7.3 Zilker Park Hike/Bike Trail ........................................................... 14 2.7.4 Barton Springs Road ................................................................... …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.3 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part3 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 112 pages

C-4 - Rehabilitation vs Replacement Memo – September 2022 City of Austin Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek Rehabilitation vs. Replacement Memorandum CIP ID 5873.031 URS Corporation 9400 Amberglen Blvd. Austin, TX 78729 (512) 419-5897 TX Firm F-3162 7650 W. Courtney Campbell Cswy. Tampa, FL 33607-1462 (813) 286-1711 September 28, 2022 Final (F1) This document is released under the authority of Robert B. Anderson Texas PE No. 111066 Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek Rehab vs. Replacement Memo REVISIONS Project: City of Austin – Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek Document: Rehab vs. Replacement Memo Revision Date of Issue Description D0 D1 D2 F1 08/22/2022 Draft Issue for Internal Comment 09/12/2022 Revised Draft Issue post PWD comments 09/19/2022 Revised Draft Issue cost table and replacement comparison 09/28/2022 Final Issue Contents 1. 2. 3. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 3 Purpose and Need .................................................................................. 3 1.1 Bridge Cultural / Historical Background / Existing Condition ......................... 3 1.2 DESIGN CONCEPTS ....................................................................................... 5 Design Elements Common to Both Rehabilitation and Replacement .............. 5 2.1 Rehabilitation Option .............................................................................. 5 2.2 Replacement Option ............................................................................... 7 2.3 COMPARISON OF PRELIMINARY REPLACEMENT / REHABILITATION CONCEPTS .................................................................................................. 10 4. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... 12 Statement of Limitations This report is intended for the City of Austin and is distributed to third parties outside the City’s organization, with their consent. This interim memo provides a direct comparison between the rehabilitation and replacement options for the Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek and provides a recommendation from the design team. This report is intended to outline the current design approach and highlight the pros and cons associated with the rehabilitation and replacement concepts. To limit the size and focus of this memo, the detailed work associated with existing bridge inspection and preliminary concept development and analysis are incorporated by reference. Page 2 of 13 Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek Rehab vs. Replacement Memo 1. INTRODUCTION This section of the report summarizes the purpose and need for the project and provides some Cultural and Historical Background. 1.1 Purpose and Need The purpose and need for this project is centered on safety-related bridge improvements that address the following items: Insufficient bike / pedestrian paths (functionally obsolete);  Age of structure / structural degradation;   Bridge roadway lanes not aligned with lanes east of Azie Morton;  Hillside instability (rock fall) and obsolete retaining wall on Azie Morton east side …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.4 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part4 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 110 pages

Project No. 0121-014 15 ft 2 ft 8 ft 18.5 ft 33.5 ft 40 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-1 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 1 of 2 40 ft – Del Rio Clayshale Project No. 0121-014 44 ft – Georgetown Limestone 45 ft 50 ft 55 ft 50 ft 60 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-1 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 2 of 2 Project No. 0121-014 15 ft 2 ft 7 ft 18.5 ft 33.5 ft 39 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-2 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 1 of 2 40 ft – Del Rio Clayshale 41.5 ft – Georgetown LS Project No. 0121-014 45 ft 55 ft 50 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-2 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas 50 ft 60 ft Sheet 2 of 2 1 ft 7 ft 18.5 ft 28.5 ft Project No. 0121-014 15 ft 34.3 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-3 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 1 of 2 35 ft – Del Rio Clayshale Project No. 0121-014 39 ft – Georgetown Limestone 40 ft 45 ft 45 ft 50 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-3 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 2 of 2 0 ft 6 ft – Buda Limestone Project No. 0121-014 5.5 ft 10 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-4 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 1 of 6 10 ft 20 ft Project No. 0121-014 15 ft 20 ft 23 ft – Del Rio Clayshale 25 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-4 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas 30 ft Sheet 2 of 6 30 ft 40 ft 35 ft 45 ft Project No. 0121-014 40 ft 50 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-4 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 3 of 6 Project No. 0121-014 55 ft 60 ft 50 ft 60 ft Core loss due to core barrel jam - 65 to 70 ft 65 ft 70 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-4 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas Sheet 4 of 6 Core loss due to core barrel jam - 70 to 72 ft 70 ft Project No. 0121-014 75 ft 80 ft 80 ft – Georgetown Limestone 85 ft SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS – W-4 Barton Springs Road Bridge Improvements Austin, Texas 90 ft Sheet 5 of 6 Project No. 0121-014 95 ft 100 ft 90 ft 100 ft 105 ft …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.5 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part5 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 84 pages

D-2 - Initial US Army Corps of Engineers Meeting – Nov. 2022 D-3 - Section 106 Evaluation – January 2023 SECTION 106 EFFECTS ASSESSMENT OF THE BARTON SPRINGS ROAD BRIDGE CITY OF AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS January 2023 Section 106 Effects Assessment of the Barton Springs Road Bridge, Austin, Travis County, Texas Prepared by: Kurt Korfmacher Architectural Historian and Principal Investigator And Erica Koteras Historian Consulting Firm: AmaTerra Environmental, Inc. Contact Information: 11842 Rim Rock Trail Austin, TX 78737 Telephone: (512) 329-0031 January 2023 Barton Springs Road Bridge Section 106 Evaluation ABSTRACT At the request of URS Corporation and on behalf of the City of Austin (City), AmaTerra Environmental, Inc. (AmaTerra) conducted an assessment of effect to the Barton Springs Road Bridge in Austin, Travis County, Texas. Barton Springs Road Bridge is a contributing resource to the Zilker Park Historic District, a property listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The City proposes improvements to Barton Springs Road that would necessitate changes to the bridge, potentially including replacement of the existing bridge with a new structure. As the proposed undertaking would require permitting from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), it is subject to the requirements of Section 106 (36 CFR Part 800) of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). As the City is a political entity of the State of Texas, the Antiquities Code of Texas (Texas Natural Resources Code, Title 9, Chapter 191) and its associated regulations (13 TAC 26) also apply. In October 2022, professional historians meeting the Secretary of Interior Standards conducted an evaluation of the proposed project and its potential for effect on the NRHP-listed bridge and related contributing resources to the Zilker Park Historic District per Section 106 guidelines. Zilker Park Historic District is listed in the NRHP under Criteria A and C at the local level in the areas of Architecture, Conservation, Entertainment/Recreation, and Landscape Architecture, with a period of significance of 1917-1947. Both Barton Springs Road Bridge and the Main Entrance Piers (contributing) are within the project area. The proposed bridge improvements are associated with a larger overall plan for Zilker Park known as the Zilker Park Vision Plan. This ambitious multi-year proposal would make major changes to large sections of Zilker Park to improve pedestrian flow and access, improve safety, restore and protect the natural environment, and make general improvements to how the park is accessed and …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.6 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part6 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 72 pages

E-1 - Open House Boards E-2 - Public Comments – April 2023 Barton Springs Road Bridge Over Barton Creek Project Public Meeting Summary (April 2023) Contents Public Engagement Process ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Public Comment Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Overall Sentiment Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Public Comments ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 No Changes to Bridge ‐ roughly 20% ........................................................................................................................ 3 Against Replacement ‐ roughly 5% ........................................................................................................................... 3 In Favor of Rehabilitation ‐ roughly 30% .................................................................................................................. 3 In Favor of Replacement – 30% .................................................................................................................................. 3 Undetermined/Miscellaneous – 10% ......................................................................................................................... 3 Results for Optional Demographic Questions ................................................................................................................. 3 Appendix: All Comments ................................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Public Engagement Process On April 4, 2023, the Austin Transportation & Public Works Department (TPW) conducted its first in‐person public meeting on the Barton Springs Road Bridge Project. Although this meeting was postponed from March 2, 2023, due to local weather conditions, the virtual public meeting went online on March 2 as planned and remained live through April 18 when all public comments were due. The purpose of this in‐person and virtual meeting was to present the project and to gather community feedback on various alternatives for improving safety and mobility for the Barton Springs Road Bridge. Many of the existing bridge’s features are functionally obsolete and require rehabilitation or replacement to ensure safety and longevity. Promotion of the public meeting (both in‐person and virtual) included a flyer mailout to the project stakeholder list of individuals and organizations; placement of meeting signs in the neighborhoods in and around the project area; postings on social media sites (NextDoor, Facebook, and Twitter); and a media advisory. Public Comment Results Public comments were gathered in two ways: on paper during the in‐person public meeting on April 4, 2023 and online as part of the virtual public meeting that started on March 2. All comments were due on April 18. Both in‐person and online, meeting participants were asked to share their feedback in one open‐ended question: Do you have any comments or questions for the project team? The online version also included optional demographic questions. The online survey was open from March 2 – April 18 whereas the in‐person public meeting took place on one evening (April 4). A total of 187 comments were received during the comment period; 11 of those comments were gathered during the in‐person meeting while the remainder were submitted online. Overall there were 1,677 views of the virtual public meeting, 189 participated in …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.7 - BSRB BCER Public Release Redacted 2023.12.08_Part7 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 20 pages

E-3 - Mobility Committee Presentation - May 2023

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.8 - 2100 Barton Springs Rd - 2023 RCA original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

City of Austin 301 W. Second Street Austin, TX Recommendation for Action File #: 23-3600, Agenda Item #: 79. 12/14/2023(cid:4) Posting Language Conduct a public hearing and approve the recommended alternative in the Preliminary Engineering Report to replace the Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek. Lead Department Capital Delivery Services. Fiscal Note This item has no fiscal impact. For More Information: James Snow, Director, Capital Delivery Services, 512-974-9795; Eric Bailey, Interim Deputy Director, Capital Delivery Services, 512-974-7713; Paulinda Lanham, Capital Delivery Project Manager, Capital Delivery Services, 512-974-7974. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: November 10, 2022 - Update on the Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek project to the Mobility Committee. Update only, no action taken. May 11, 2023 - Briefing on the Barton Springs Road Bridge project and mobility elements of the Zilker Park Vision Plan to the Mobility Committee. Briefing only, no action taken. October 27, 2023 - Briefing on the Barton Springs Road Bridge project to the Mobility Committee. Additional Backup Information: The Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek is located near the intersection of Azie Morton Road and Barton Springs Road. The location of the bridge, at the entrance to Zilker Park, is a focal point of key community events such as Austin City Limits Musical Festival, South-By-Southwest (SXSW) Conference and Music Festival, Barton Springs, Trail of Lights, and Blues on the Green. Barton Springs Road and the associated bridge is also a key connection for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access linking Mopac to downtown and the South Lamar/Congress Avenue corridors, as well as providing the primary northern entrance to the Zilker and Barton Hills neighborhoods via Azie Morton Road, located immediately east of the bridge. The full bridge replacement option provides the most cost-effective and the longest useful life The Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek requires rehabilitation or replacement. It was originally built in 1925 and was expanded on one side in 1946. Structurally it is in fair condition, however, the existing bridge dimensions, sidewalks, and bike lanes do not meet with current design standards. The roadway west of Azie Morton Road is not aligned with the roadway east of Azie Morton Road. The project will reduce congestion and provide benefits to the local neighborhoods, commuters (all travel modes), and local businesses, as well as Zilker Park users and event attendees. City of Austin Page 1 of 2 Printed on …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
March 4, 2026

03.9 - 2100 Barton Springs Rd - drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

Barton Springs Road Bridge Preliminary Design - Bridge Architecture Design Report 12 August 2025 Contents This PDF is an interactive document. Click on each number to navigate to the corresponding section. The menu icon on the bottom left returns you to this Table of Contents Introduction Design Concept Cut Sheets About the Bridge Site Context About Austin Project Needs & Goals Overall Bridge Concept Details Lighting Concept Lighting Equipment Surface Material Wall Finish INTRODUCTION 01 Prepared for Ramsey CountyBarton Springs RoadBarton SpringsRoad BridgeZilker ParkColorado RiverBarton CreekBartonSpringsPoolDowntownAustin 01 / Introduction Barton Springs Bridge Background Built in 1925, the Barton Springs Road Bridge provides access over Barton Creek along Barton Creek Road at the entrance to Zilker Park. The bridge was widened to its current form in 1946, which includes two traffic lanes in each direction. The bridge also features narrow sidewalks along each side, guard rails and a sidewalk underneath. While the existing bridge is structurally in fair condition, many of its features are functionally obsolete and it requires replacement to ensure safety and longevity. Given that the existing bridge present mobility challenges for vehicles, bikes and pedestrians, this project will provide needed mobility enhancements for all users. Intersection improvements to nearby Barton Springs Road and Azie Morton Drive are necessary as part of this project. In November 2020, Austin voters approved $102 million for major infrastructure projects, with the possibility of allocating a portion of that funding to address the Barton Springs Road Bridge. In December 2023, Austin City Council officially recommended replacing the bridge and advanced the project to the design phase. The City of Austin received a $32 million grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation in November 2024 to help fund construction of the new bridge. 4 AECOMPrepared for The City of Austin Longitudinal Beam - Exposed Rebar Spandrel Column - Spalling 01 / Introduction Condition Assessment • Deck (with integral longitudinal joint), floor beams, and spandrel columns exhibited the most degradation. • All structural components exhibited some degradation. • Rehabilitation for increased service life would need to remove deck, floor beams, and spandrel columns, stripping structure to arch ribs as a starting point. • These results remove Rehabilitation Option 1 as feasible alternative since that option was the “low-impact”, “preserve-structure” option. • Based on the above, we are now focused on Rehabilitation Option 2 and on potential bridge replacement options. 5 Longitudinal Beam - Exposed Rebar …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
March 4, 2026

04.0 - 617 Congress Ave original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2026-014183 Congress Avenue Historic District 617 Congress Avenue 4 – 1 Proposal Rehabilitate a primary elevation on an altered compatible building. Project Specifications 1) Remove existing stucco slipcover at streetfacing façade. Retain general layout of ground floor entry. 2) Install new windows in historic locations at second floor, with the center bay becoming a french door. 3) Construct a balcony over the sidewalk, to be accessed from the proposed second floor doorway. Architecture The existing building at 617 Congress is a three bay, two-story commercial structure that has been heavily altered from its original design. Historic photos show this address as being the middle of three matching properties along this block of Congress Avenue. Its neighbor to the north has been demolished and the property to the south has been altered, but not as much as 617 Congress. The ground floor currently has two windowed bays facing the sidewalk, with the southern bay recessed with a doorway for entry. The second floor is covered by stucco, possibly a structured slipcover, which removed the three windows originally there. There are two signs that are installed directly into the stucco cover. The condition or presence of any historic material underneath the stucco is currently unknown. Research Upon its first listing in city directories in the 1910s, the property was occupied by J.A. Jackson Jewelers through the 1930s, with occasional other tenants. After a brief period of being used by a shoe shop and cleaners, Leutwyler Jewelers took over the building and remained for almost 20 years, before becoming a menswear shop. The current use as a theatre and coffee shop began around 1999. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards Removal of material from the front façade is proposed to be non-original only, specifically the stucco coating. If, during the process of removing this material, evidence of original materials, openings, or fenestration details are discovered, it is highly recommended that these guide and refine the proposed design of the project. There are general concerns about the proposal incorporating elements that were either never present historically or more decorative than …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
March 4, 2026

04.1 - 617 Congress Ave - Drawings & Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

ELEVAITON PROPOSED TO BE MODIFIED & DETAILED VIEW OF AREA TO BE MODIFIED PHOTOGRAPH OF THE 600 BLOCK OF CONGRESS ca. 1877-1878. Please note location of the building with its "twins" to either side. The intent isto remove the stucco added sometime in the 1950-60s, repair and paint the brick, reintroduce the windows and cornice elements and add anoccupiable balcony to the front of the building. PHOTOGRAPH OF THE 600 BLOCK OF CONGRESS ca. 1960s. Please note the removal of the windows and the addition of the stucco facade,masking the original elements of the building. For reference, the building to the right in this image still has the original facade with painted brick, and anadded awning (which remains today). The matching building to the left was removed as part of the construction of the Caroline Hotel. THIS CADD FILE IS ON GRID COORDINATES INT: 135 SITE NOTE LEGEND: Ⓐ BALCONY (OVERHANG) AND RAILING Ⓑ BALCONY COLUMNS AND 2'X2' FOOTING Ⓒ EXTERIOR LIGHTS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ATTACHED TO BUILDING) Ⓐ 13.54' 12.00' WL WL WL Ⓑ WL 2 5 . 0 0 ' 2 3 . 6 6 ' Ⓑ ±R3.63' 0 4.0 9 4 Ⓑ ' 0 0 . 3 2 ' E " 3 1 5 3 ° 6 1 N 8.20' WL WL 8.13' Ⓒ 8.08' Ⓑ 8.02' 12.34' 13.19' ±R3.88' Ⓐ 1.03' 0.96' 2 5 . 0 0 ' 0.91' 0.85' Ⓓ ADA ROUTE WL WL WL 0 4.0 9 4 0 4.0 9 4 Ⓐ WL ± R 1 . 3 WL 4' WL WL 494.00 LICENSE AGREEMENT BOUNDARY 7' 1.0 R ± ±R9.43' EXISTING BUILDING 1616 W. 5TH STREET (1-STORY / 3,677 SF) ROW LINE N O R T H L A R U T C U R T S & L I V C I I G N R E E N G N E I 0 5 7.5 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 5' 10 2 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION S 45°56'24" W 526.54' S 45°56'24" W 526.54' LOC ELEC TELE COMM WL WWL E WW S CO SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES BUILDING SETBACK EASEMENT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ELECTRIC BOX ELECTRIC METER GAS METER GAS VALVE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINE GAS LINE LIGHT POLE POWER POLE / DOWN GUY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER METER WATER LINE WASTEWATER LINE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WASTEWATER MANHOLE STORMSEWER …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
March 4, 2026

05.0 - 809 Congress Ave original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2026-014204 Congress Avenue Historic District 809 Congress Avenue 5 – 1 Proposal Demolish a building behind the front wall at an existing compatible property. Project Specifications 1) Demolish existing two-story building behind streetfacing wall, which had been covered by stucco, and since uncovered. 2) Stabilize historic sections of the front wall facing Congress Avenue, including removal of nonhistoric CMU above the brick storefront. Existing storefront features, also not of historic age, are to be removed. 3) Install temporary security walls at front storefront and rear alley. Architecture Initially built as a single-story commercial storefront, the building at 809 Congress had three bays with large display windows, an ample awning, and transom windows above. At the top of the façade was brick oriented in a decorative pattern that terminated at a triangular peak. Currently, that shape is no longer present and was replaced with a concrete masonry unit wall, which extended the overall height of the front façade and housed a second story behind it. The entire storefront has been altered and original material removed, but the overall size of the opening has not changed, allowing for a matching replacement storefront if proposed. Research This property saw many tenants and uses since it first appeared in city directories, including a beauty salon, a millinery, a cafeteria, a saloon (which became a purveyor of soft drinks during Prohibition), but its longest and most notable tenant was Stelfox Jewelers, who became a tenant in the 1940s. The most dramatic of alterations appear to have occurred in the early 2000s when it became a sandwich shop. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed demolition calls for all non-historic material to be removed, with the remaining brick façade to remain. Though there is little of this material that is left intact, including the loss of the triangular peak above the storefront, what little remains is being retained and meets the design standards in these circumstances. 4. Exterior walls and trim Appropriate repair or treatment of remaining exterior material is recommended based on further exploration of existing conditions. It is recommended …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
March 4, 2026

05.1 - 809 Congress Ave - Drawings & Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

- 809 CONGRESS AVE HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION Austin, TX 6 2 0 2 Y R A U R B E F . M O C S R E N T R A P N E S L E N SURVEY NTS 2 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE EXISTING FACADE TO BE PRESERVED CMU ABOVE FACADE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PARTY WALL TO REMAIN TEMP WALL TO SECURE SITE EXISTING TWO STORY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING PARTY WALL TO REMAIN DEMOLITION PLAN NTS 3 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE " 4 - ' 7 " 2 - ' 6 " 6 - ' 2 1 EXISTING CMU BLOCK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING FACADE TO BE PRESERVED EXISTING STOREFRONT OPENING TO BE REMOVED TEMPORARY WALL TO BE INSTALLED FOR SECURITY WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE HISTORIC PHOTO NTS Stelfox Fine Jewelry Jan 1, 1946 CURRENT PHOTO NTS 5 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
March 4, 2026

06.0 - 1611 Preston Ave original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2026-010143 Old West Austin Historic District 1611 Preston Avenue 6 – 1 Proposal Alter existing front elevation and construct a second-story addition. Project Specifications 1) Renovation of existing contributing property, including window and door replacement, front porch alteration, and replacement of exterior finishes. 2) Construction of a second floor addition, approximately 879 square feet. Architecture The house is a single-story asymmetrical design with a front porch at one side covered by an ample overhanging roof supported by wood posts. Its foundation is elevated on piers, and two pairs of large windows face the street. The roof is set at a moderate pitch, and the overall structure reads as horizontal, like other contributing properties in the neighborhood. Research For approximately the first two decades after its construction, the house was owned by the McCrummen family. Hugh and Mary McCrummen lived together at the address with at least one daughter until Hugh’s passing after 1952. Mary McCrummen continued to live at the address and worked as a dietitian. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The alterations in this proposal call for the removal of intact historic material, though it is not determined how much of the siding was replaced since original construction. Views of the building from the 2000s show different windows were present, making the current fixtures replacements. The size and location of the addition allows approximately half the existing house to retain its form. 3. Roofs The second floor addition will remove a portion of the roof form that is visible from the street, but will retain the current form above the porch. 4. Exterior walls and trim Brick veneer is proposed at the front wall and at locations around the side and back of the existing house. 5. Windows, doors, and screens Front windows are to be replaced. However, these fixtures are not original and appear to have been replaced around 2011-2013. 6. Porches The present form of the front porch was created around the same time as the window replacements described above. Proposed alterations closer resemble the previous, possibly original, assembly. 6 – 2 …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
March 4, 2026

06.1 - 1611 Preston Ave - Drawings & Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

PRESTON RESIDENCE 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 GENERAL SHEET # G0.00 SHEET NAME COVER PAGE ARCHITECTURE SHEET # D1.11 A0.01 A0.02 A0.03 A1.01 A1.11 A1.21 A1.31 A2.01 A3.01 SHEET NAME DEMO PLAN SURVEY UTILITY PLOT PLAN SUBCHAPTER F DIAGRAMS SITE PLAN GROUND FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 02 - FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS OWNER CHRIS & REBEKAH MCWHORTER 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78703 T. 281-468-3587 ARCHITECT GOOD PARTNERS STUDIO, LLC 5707 A WILLIAM HOLLAND AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78756 T. 918-640-2001 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ARCH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC 9901 BRODIE LANE, SUITE 160 PMB 297, AUSTIN, TX 78748 T. 512-328-5353 CONTRACTOR HILLTOWN BUILDING CO. MAX HAMBLY, ROW ID #5587740 2108 WESTOVER RD. AUSTIN, TX 78703 T. 512-748-5833 PROJECT NO. 2501 PERMIT SUBMITTAL 18 DEC 2025 SITE DIAGRAM - SEE SHEET A1.01 FOR COMPLETE SITE PLAN PROJECT DATA PRESTON AVE OWNER PROJECT ADDRESS: CHRIS & REBEKAH MCWHORTER 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78703 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE JURISDICTION: ZONING: AUSTIN FULL PURPOSE SF-3-NP FIRE SUPRESSION: NOT REQUIRED; FIRE AREA UNDER 3,600 SF LOT COVERAGE LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. COVERAGE: MAX. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 8,408.40 SF 3,363.36 SF (40%) 3,783.78 SF (45%) PPSD. BLDG. COVERAGE: PPSD. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 2,627.00 SF (31.2%) 3,418.50 SF (40.6% VICINITY MAP H T R O N N A L P 1 SITE DIAGRAM 1" = 20'-0" G O O D P A R T N E R S A D (E) GAS METER TO BE RELOCATED; APPROXIMATE LOCATION (E) PVC CLEAN-OUT; TO BE RELOCATED AS REQUIRED CO G 6' - 9" W/D 1.5 3 (E) RIBBON DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED 4 GENERAL NOTES - DEMO 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES & IF ANY DEVIATIONS FROM ANTICIPATED CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. 2. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING WORK THAT IS TO REMAIN OR BECOMES EXPOSED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. 3. SALVAGE ALL STONE PAVERS ON SITE FOR USE 4. ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE REPLACED; REF. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR WINDOW SIZES. NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION G O O D P A R T N E R S G O O D P A R T N E R S . S T U D I O PRESTON RESIDENCE PROJECT NO. 2501 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 ISSUE DATE : Δ REVISIONS 18 DEC 2025 PERMIT SUBMITTAL ARCHITECT: MEEGAN BEDDOE …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
March 4, 2026

06.2 - 1611 Preston Ave - Revised Drawings & Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

I G N R O B H G E N I ) E ( Y A W E V R D I 31' - 6" CRZ 15' - 9" N O B B R I ) E ( Y A W E V R D I 3000 31.5" LIVE OAK 5'-0" K C A B T E S ' 5 601'-0" W/D I G N R O B H G E N I ) E ( " 0 - ' 5 2 K C A B T E S T N O R F 602'-0" 5'-0" K C A B T E S ' 5 Y A W E V R D I LEGAL DESCRIPTION E 15FT OF LOT 2 & W 45’ OF LOT 3, BLOCK 26 PEMBERTON HEIGHTS SECTION 9 GROSS FLOOR AREA: GSF GSF W/ EXEMPTION 1,978 GROUND FLOOR: SECOND FLOOR: 879 (E) ACCESSORY BLDG: 449 COVERED PATIO*: 200 1,978 879 449 0 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 3,506 SITE AREA: 3,036 GSF 8,408.4 GSF *PORCH EXEMPTION PER SUBCHAPTER F 3.3.3.A FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.36 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE F.A.R. IS 0.40 IMPERVIOUS COVER: BLDG. COVERAGE: BLDG. COVERAGE OTHER: COVERED PATIO: UNCOVERED WOOD DECK**: SF W/ EXEMPTION 1,978 1,978 449 449 200 200 365 182.5 FLATWORK: DRIVEWAY: TOTAL AREA: SITE AREA: 163 163 446 446 3,601 3,418.5 SF 8,408.4 SF **UNCOVERED WOOD DECK WITH DRAINAGE SPACES OVER PERVIOUS SURFACE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER: 40.6% MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVER IS 45% NEW CONSTRUCTION LEGEND: INDICATES LINE OF EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT INDICATES NEW CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION G O O D P A R T N E R S G O O D P A R T N E R S . S T U D I O PRESTON RESIDENCE PROJECT NO. 2501 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 ISSUE DATE : Δ REVISIONS 26 JAN 2026 GENERAL NOTES - SITE PLAN 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROLS, TREE/NATURAL AREA FENCING, AND CONDUCT ‘PRE-CONSTRUCTION’ TREE FERTILIZATION (IF APPLICABLE) PRIOR TO ANY SITE PREPARATION WORK, INCLUDING CLEARING, GRUBBING, OR EXCAVATION, PER CITY OF AUSTIN ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA MANUAL. 2. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF BUILDING WITH ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SITE PREPARATION AND FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. UTILITIES: PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXTENT OF UTILITY WORK WITH OWNER AND GP. GC SHALL LOCATE EXISTING GAS AND WATER METERS …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:39 p.m.
March 4, 2026

07.0 - 1508 Pease Rd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 PR-2025-015633; GF-2026-017650 Old West Austin Historic District 1508 Pease Road 7 – 1 Proposal Construct a new two-story residence on site of a previously approved relocation. Research From staff report presented at October 1, 2025 HLC, when the relocation application was heard: When first constructed in the 1930s, the house was owned by William & Kay Ransom. William Ransom worked in the family’s drug store business as a salesman. After they moved, the house was occupied for over three decades by Matthew and Ethel Balagia. During this time, Matthew Balagia worked several jobs, including as a butcher and a clerk. In their ownership of the property, there was also a garage apartment at the rear of the house that was constructed and often housed students and workers. After her husband’s passing sometime after 1977, Ethel Balagia lived at the house for several more years. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location Proposed setback from the street is 36 feet, which is less than the previously relocated structure on site. The neighboring properties on the block have varying setbacks, ranging from 25 feet to over 50 feet, so this proposed location fits within the neighborhood context. 2. Orientation Like other properties in this section of the district, the design is oriented towards the street with the front door and driveway facing the right of way. 3. Scale, massing, and height Unlike the previously relocated structure, the proposed building is a full two stories in height and, at its highest point, is slightly above 35 feet tall. There are no stepdowns as the building gets closer to the street, with the wall closest to the street being fully two stories in height. However, while the relocated structure was the shortest or least imposing on the block, the proposed design is not wholly out of scale with surrounding contributing properties. The roof pitch may create the appearance of excessive height, but the side gabled roof allows that maximum height to be located far from the street. 4. Proportions As mentioned above, neighboring contributing properties are generally tall and two stories in …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:40 p.m.
March 4, 2026

07.1 - 1508 Pease Rd - Drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 16 pages

26'-2" " 2 / 1 1 7'- NEW BURIED ELEC. LINE POOL EQUIPMENT LOCATION " 1 4'- E D LIN UIL 0' B 1 1 2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 5' BUILD LINE " 7 3'- PROVIDE 8" LAYER OF MULCH WITHIN ENTIRE AVAILABLE ROOT ZONE " 2 / 1 1 5'- 156 36'-4 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 567.8' LOWEST ADJACENT NATURAL GRADE 260 PROPOSED POOL AUTO FILLED & HEATED 567 56'-11" 274 568 " 1 1 5'- RESIDENCE FIN. FLR. ELEV=571.5' 5 6 9 5 7 0 272 " 2 / 8 1 4'- 5' BUILD LINE E D LIN UIL 6' B 3 570.8' HIGHEST ADJACENT NATURAL GRADE " 0 3'- " 0 2'- " 0 3'- " 0 3'- " 0 3'- " 0 2'- " 0 3'- TREE PROTECTION CONC. STRIP DRIVE 24" SQ. x 5' H. BRICK COL. E T A RIC G T C E L E R 5 ' - 0 " E T U O S R S E C C A 5 7 2 " 0 9'- 1 R5'-0" 233 " 2 / 7 1 3'- DUMPSTER 5 7 1 PORT-A-POT " 2 / 2 1 5'- 36'-0" PAINTWASHOUT SPOILS CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER TRENCH WM SEWER TRENCH GAS TRENCH E C N E L F A T E 4' H. M CITY OF AUSTIN - GROSS FLOOR AREA AREA UNIT 1 - 1ST FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) UNIT 1 - 2ND FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) GARAGE UNIT 2 - 1ST FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) UNIT 2 - 2ND FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING/ REMODELED NEW/ ADDITION 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 2,585` 1,053` 563` 0` 987` 5,188` TOTAL 2,585` 1,053` 563` 0` 987` 5,188` 9,437` UNIT 1 3,638` / 9,437` x 100 = 38.5% FLOOR-TO-AREA RATIO (FAR) UNIT 2 1,550` / 9,437` x 100 = 16.4% FLOOR-TO-AREA RATIO (FAR) ALLOWABLE FAR: 9,437` x 55% = 5,190` CITY OF AUSTIN - BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 1ST FLOOR AREA GARAGE/CARPORT ACCESSORY BUILDING (DETACHED) COVERED PORCHES TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING/ REMODELED NEW/ ADDITION 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 2,585` 563` 0` 471` 3,619` 3,619`/ 9,437` x 100 = 38.3% PERCENTAGE OF LOT ALLOWABLE BUILDING COVERAGE: 9,437` x 40% = 3,774` CITY OF AUSTIN - IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE DRIVEWAY SIDEWALKS/WALKWAYS UNCOVERED PATIOS UNCOVERED WOOD DECKS (0` @ 50%) AC/ POOL EQUIP PADS OTHER: …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:40 p.m.
March 4, 2026

08.0 - 844 Airport Blvd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits March 4, 2026 PR-2026-012921; GF-2026-016460 844 Airport Boulevard 8 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1976 restaurant. Architecture This commercial structure is rectangular in plan and a single story, though the side gabled roof adds additional height, with a short wall projecting at the peak that includes signage facing Airport Boulevard. The exterior walls are clad in wood board paneling. The front dining room features large windows across the entire front elevation. At one side is a brick chimney that projects above the highest point of the roof. Research Opened in 1977 as the third location of Dan’s Hamburgers, the restaurant featured a large amount of indoor seating and coincided with an expanded menu, which included breakfast, across all locations. As with the other locations, this Dan’s was partially staffed by family as the business grew. The current appearance is relatively unchanged and, unlike some locations after 1990, it did not change names to Fran’s Hamburgers. Department Comments This application times out on May 18, 2026. Property Evaluation Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a decent example of 1970s roadside restaurant architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, or deconstruction and salvage over demolition, but approve the demolition permit application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. Location Map 8 – 2 Property Information Photos 8 – 3 Dan’s Hamburger’s Airport Boulevard location, 1977. Source: https://www.kut.org/austin/2019-05-29/whats-the- real-story-behind-dans-and-frans-hamburgers Demoliton application, 2026 Occupancy History City Directory Research, February 2026 1959 Address not listed Historical Information 8 – 4 …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:41 p.m.
March 4, 2026

08.1 - 844 Airport Blvd - Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
March 4, 2026

10.0 - Thompson House - Historic Zoning Initiation Letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Austin Lukes Historic Preservation Office City of Austin January 24, 2026 RE: Request to consider initiation of historic zoning, Hill-Thomson House (1906 Maple Ave.) Dear Mr. Lukes, I would like to express my strong support to include the Hill-Thomson House, located at 1906 Maple Avenue, on the Historic Landmark Commission’s February agenda for consideration of initiation of historic zoning. The owner, Marilynn Poole Bailey, fully supports this request. This property demonstrates significance in accordance with the criteria of historical association and community value. It is a great cultural asset to the history of the City of Austin and contributes to the Rogers- Washington-Holy Cross Historic District (RWHC), which honors Austin’s Black heritage. Historic Association: The Hill-Thompson House, completed in 1963, is the first residential commission by John S. Chase, the first Black graduate of the University of Texas School of Architecture, and first licensed Black architect in the state of Texas. The home serves as an intact example of Chase’s first commission, influenced by the Usonian constructions of Frank Lloyd Wright and the personal touches of Mrs. Irene Hill Thompson. The home is characterized by strong horizontal massing, a connection between the indoor and outdoor environment, and understated materiality. Mr. Chase maintained a relationship with the RWHC and made further contributions including the Colored Teachers State Association of Texas headquarters (1191 Navasota St); the Della Phillips House (2310 E MLK, Jr Blvd); David Chapel Missionary Baptist Church (2211 E MLK, Jr Blvd); and Olivet Baptist Church (1179 San Bernard St). Mr. Chase then went on to grow his practice through offices in Houston, Dallas, and Washington DC, eventually becoming a founding member of the National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA). The Hill Thompson House represents an early part of his enduring architectural legacy. Community Value: The Hill Thompson House also served as a beacon of Black civic engagement led by Irene Hill Thompson. The house served as a meeting place for political organizing and community gatherings that reflected her deep commitment to public service and civic participation. Ms. Thompson hosted numerous political events at her home for President Lyndon B. Johnson, U.S. Congressmen Lloyd Doggett, East Texas Black Republican operative Ernest Sterling, J.J. “Jake” Pickle, and Texas State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos. Throughout these activities, the house functioned not only as a private residence but also as an important site of grassroots political participation, further reinforcing its historical and cultural significance. …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
March 4, 2026

13.0 - Historic Landmarks Inspection List original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 13 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK INSPECTION RESULTS MARCH 4, 2026 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Certify the historic landmarks noted as passing their inspections in the following exhibit as eligible for the partial ad valorem tax exemption granted by Title 11, Article 2 (Partial Exemption for Historic Landmarks) of the Code of Ordinances, adopted under the authority provided in Article 8, Section 1-f (Ad Valorem Tax Relief) of the Texas Constitution and Section 11.24 (Historic Sites) of the Texas Tax Code. Exhibit B.1: CITY LANDMARK SITES THAT ARE ALSO RECORDED TEXAS HISTORIC LANDMARKS (RTHL) or STATE ARCHEOLOGICAL LANDMARKS (SAL) RECEIVING THE PARTIAL EXEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 Parcel Number Landmark Name Address Zoning Case Number FY26 Inspection Result RTHL/SAL 0206040514 0423060302 0206041611 0219060509 0208051017 0208090601 0205070505 0402012601 0107000501 0206050915 0303000805 0210000322 0105020308 0206031709 0220061601 0206031808 0208011103 0108031175 0210022508 0206050212 0408020104 0206031501 0206010904 0206011001 0206011006 0206011007 0113000502 0206011002 0206011005 0206010501 0206011004 0206040606 0211010506 0210041802 0208001508 0205010509 0206040906 0206031017 0422050214 0206040109 0208030201 0210040214 0210040214 0208111801 0208030110 0205020211 0104040616 0206030312 0107060101 0107060101 0400040209 0109010611 0215020302 0207080601 0242120316 0212010301 0218030712 0206040104 0211010307 0208000808 0206030701 0206030803 0219060821 0220060607 0122000825 0119080320 0210022507 0118060112 0208011801 0204041405 0108031527 0402030237 Depot Hotel Horton - Duval House Walton - Joseph Building Mansbendel - Williams House Jeremiah Hamilton Building Southgate - Lewis House Majors-Butler-Thomas House Stanley Homestead - Outbuilding Gilfillan House Johnson (Alfrida) House Walter Tips House Daniel Caswell House Paggi House St. Charles House Ney Museum St. David's Church Hirshfeld House And Cottage Smoot Family Home Goodman Building French Legation St. Edwards Main Building & Holly Cross Hall St. Mary'S Cathedral B. J. Smith House Catherine Robinson House Pierre Bremond House Eugene Bremond House Neill-Cochran House Walter Bremond House John Bremond House North - Evans Chateau Phillips - Knudsen House E. H. Carrington Store West Hill Scholz Garten Boardman - Webb House J. P. Schneider Store German Free School Millett Opera House Onion Creek Masonic Lodge Paggi Carriage Shop Land Office Building Carrington - Covert House Gethsemane Lutheran Church Madison Log Cabin Lundberg Bakery Southwestern Telephone & Telegraph Building I. V. Davis Homestead Walter Tips Building Swedish Log Cabin Esperanza School Millbrook Texas Military Institute Castle Beriah Grahman House Thompson House Edward E. Zimmerman Stone House Gerhard - Schoch House Leser House Buass Building Denny - Holliday House Burlage - Fischer House Littlefield Building Paramount Theatre Shipe House Kopperl House Radkey House Swisher - Scott House Hancock House Donnan …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
March 4, 2026

2.0 - C14H-1987-0016 - 810 W 10th St - Mayer-Howse House original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H- 1987-0016 HLC DATE: March 4, 2026 PC DATE: CC Date: APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-supported) HISTORIC NAME: Mayer-Howse House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 810 W. 10th Street ZONING CHANGE: GO-ETOD-DBETOD to GO-H-ETOD-DBETOD COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from general office- equitable transit-oriented development-equitable transit-oriented density bonus (GO-ETOD- DBETOD) district zoning to general office-historic landmark-equitable transit-oriented development-equitable transit-oriented density bonus (GO-H-ETOD-DBETOD) district zoning as a means of correcting the existing administrative record. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: November 23, 1987 – public hearing occurs. No minutes available. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 1988 minutes unavailable. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1988 ordinance missing. CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The building has been a landmark since the late 1980s; it has received a City of Austin Landmark medallion and has filed Certificates of Appropriateness for all work done on the property exterior. However, the building’s original paper landmark casefile is largely missing, with original copies of the HLC, PC, and Council minutes and ordinance apparently lost before the era of digitization. Thus, the Historic Preservation Office seeks to correct this administrative oversight in obtaining a new valid ordinance for its designation. NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Neighborhoods Council, City of Austin Downtown Commission, Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Historic Austin Neighborhood Association, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Old Austin Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, Shoal Creek Conservancy BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: See original application in backup. PARCEL NO.: 0208000814 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 46 X 138 FT OLT 4 DIVISION E ESTIMATED ANNUAL TAX EXEMPTION (non-homestead, not capped): AISD $1,425.74 COA $1,769.13 TC $1,158.36 TC Health $363.75 Total $4,716.99 APPRAISED VALUE: Land: 634,800; Improvement: 299,004; Total: 933,804 PRESENT USE: Office DATE BUILT/PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE: ca. 1885; 1885-1937 (calculated from 1987 application date) INTEGRITY/ALTERATIONS: High PRESENT OWNERS: Mayer-Howse House LP ORIGINAL OWNER(S): Ernst and Anna Mayer OTHER HISTORICAL DESIGNATIONS: None Source: Certificate of Appropriateness for repair, 1999. Source: H-H-M, Inc., 2019 Location Map

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
March 4, 2026

2.1 - C14H-1987-0016 - 810 W 10th St - Mayer-Howse House - original original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
March 4, 2026

9.0 - Budget recommendation for FY2026-27 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Date: March 4, 2026 Subject: FY 2026-27 Budget Recommendation Motioned By: RECOMMENDATION Seconded By: WHEREAS the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS the purpose of the Historic Landmark Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preservation Plan recently updated in 2024; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan outlines historic preservation policies for the City of Austin to preserve and interpret historic resources in Austin for residents and visitors, with goals including 1) the inventory and protection of historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the city; and 2) the retention of the character of locally designated historic districts and National Register districts by ensuring development is compatible with the historic character of the districts; and WHEREAS the City Council adopted the Equity-Based Preservation Plan, a historic preservation plan, as an element of the City’s comprehensive plan by ordinance on November 21, 2024; and WHEREAS the City Manager is directed to identify funding to implement the Plan, including but not limited to these near-term items: (1) Evaluation of historic preservation incentives and any changes needed to make them more effective, building on the exploration of TDR; (2) Ready access to professional archaeological and engineering expertise for City staff and the Historic Landmark Commission; (3) Two additional staff members for the Historic Preservation Office to assist with Plan implementation; (4) A cultural mapping program to identify significant places, businesses, and other resources, prioritizing communities historically marginalized communities and neighborhoods where longtime residents face a high risk of displacement; and 1 of 2 (5) Resources to develop a deconstruction program for demolished historic buildings to preserve and recycle materials in an environmentally-sensitive way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Historic Landmark Commission recommends that the Council allocate additional funds to Austin Planning for FY2026-27 for permanent staffing in the Historic Preservation Office to manage and coordinate implementation of the preservation plan. The two additional staff positions are essential …

Scraped at: Feb. 25, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
Feb. 18, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Judah Rice, Chair Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order or, for remote participation, no later than noon the day before the meeting, will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on September 15, 2025. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on December 18, 2025. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Discussion of ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion and possible action on Historic Sign Standards. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Cara Bertron at Austin Planning at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Operations Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Feb. 11, 2026, 10:15 a.m.
Feb. 18, 2026

1. Minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on September 15, 2025 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Monday, September 15, 2025 – 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center Conference Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, TX 78752 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: x x x Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter Judah Rice DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Operations Committee purview, as outlined in Historic Landmark Commission bylaws • Review of Committee purview 2. Equity-Based Preservation Plan progress dashboard and implementation plan • Review of progress dashboard and progress database for the Equity-Based Preservation Plan • Explanation of how Plan recommendations were prioritized for implementation 3. Feedback on list of potential educational and outreach materials • Recommendation that materials from other departments reflect preservation good practices • Request to develop use cases and user personas to identify gaps in existing materials • Discussion of proactive outreach out to historic property owners about historic review requirements and good practices (e.g., via real estate agents) 4. Possible changes to historic preservation sections of the Land Development Code • Overview of code change process 5. Proposed near-term items for Committee review and input • Committee members can suggest items for future agendas ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974- 3393 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Operations Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at 512- 974-1446.

Scraped at: Feb. 11, 2026, 10:15 a.m.
Feb. 18, 2026

2. Minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on December 18, 2025 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Thursday, December 18, 2025, at 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Judah Rice, Chair Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on July 22, 2024. MOTION: Approve the minutes from July 22, 2024 on a motion by Commissioner Rice, Commissioner Acton seconding. Vote: 3-0. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on November 19, 2025. MOTION: Approve the minutes from November 19, 2025 on a motion by Commissioner Acton, Commissioner McWhorter seconding. Vote: 3-0. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Discussion of Historic Sign Standards. • Commissioners reviewed photographs of existing signs and discussed how they relate to the Historic Sign Standards. • Commissioners discussed different approaches to existing historic-age signs and new signs. • Commissioners discussed potential revisions to the Historic Sign Standards, including the need for greater accessibility with examples. 4. Discussion of ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings. Not discussed. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT

Scraped at: Feb. 11, 2026, 10:15 a.m.
Feb. 13, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2026, AT 9 A.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1203 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DR. AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Historic Landmark Commission may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please use the QR code or link at the end of this document. For questions, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS BEN HEIMSATH, CHAIR (D-8) CARL LAROSCHE (D-6) ROXANNE EVANS, VICE CHAIR (D-2) TREY MCWHORTER (D-10) JEFFREY ACTON (MAYOR) TONYA PLEASANT-WRIGHT (D-1) JAIME ALVAREZ (D-7) JUDAH RICE (D-4) HARMONY GROGAN (D-5) BAT TANIGUCHI (D-9) KEVIN KOCH (D-3) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Presentation and discussion on architectural styles in Austin Presenter: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Hunter Sturgill at Austin Planning, at 512-974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov, to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Historic Landmark Commission, please contact Hunter Sturgill at 512- 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov. REGISTER TO SPEAK https://forms.office.com/g/AH2zdpcC8W

Scraped at: Feb. 6, 2026, 8:43 a.m.
Feb. 11, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2026, AT 4:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, CONFERENCE ROOM 1401 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DR AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Historic Landmark Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please use the QR code or link at the end of this document. For questions, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. KEVIN KOCH JAIME ALVAREZ HARMONY GROGAN CURRENT COMMISSIONERS AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Architectural Review Committee Regular meeting on January 14, 2026. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. C14H-1978-0038 – 713 Congress Ave. Paramount Theatre Council District 9 Proposal: Remodel the exterior doors. Applicant: Ashley Knight 4010 Avenue B Hyde Park Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Repair and renovate a contributing building. Construct a new separate residence. Applicant: John C. Rosato ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Hunter Sturgill at Austin Planning, at 512-974-3393, preservation@austintexas.gov , to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Historic Landmark Commission, please contact Hunter Sturgill at 512- 974-3393, preservation@austintexas.gov. REGISTER TO SPEAK https://forms.office.com/g/BmdRDJ3yvu Historic Landmark Commission Architectural Review Committee 2026 Meeting Schedule Wednesday, January 14th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, February 11th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, March 11th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, April 8th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, May 13th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, June 10th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, July 8th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, August 12th, 2026 at 4:00PM Thursday, September 10th, 2026 at 4:00PM Wednesday, …

Scraped at: Feb. 6, 2026, 8:43 a.m.
Feb. 11, 2026

0.0 - ARC 01_14_26 Draft Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2026, AT 4:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, CONFERENCE ROOM 1401 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DR AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Historic Landmark Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live _X__KEVIN KOCH _X__JAIME ALVAREZ _AB_HARMONY GROGAN CURRENT COMMISSIONERS DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: 4:01PM PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Architectural Review Committee Regular meeting on December 10, 2025. MOTION: Approve the December 10, 2025 meeting minutes. Motion by Commissioner Alvarez. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote 2-0. The motion passed. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. 4. HR-2025-158169; C14H-1986-0003 – 3710 Cedar St. Confederate Woman's Home Council District 9 Proposal: Construct additions and replace windows. Applicant: Abby Penner The applicant presented their proposal. The committee provided feedback. 702 Winflo Dr. West Line National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: New construction. Applicant: Roy Jensen The applicant presented their proposal. The committee provided feedback. PR-2025-103903 – 1513 Murray Ln. Old West Austin National Register Historic District Council District 10 Proposal: Demolish a contributing building and construct a new building. Applicant: Clean Tag Permits The applicant did not attend. ADJOURNMENT: 4:55PM The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Hunter Sturgill at Austin Planning, at 512-974-3393, preservation@austintexas.gov , to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Historic Landmark Commission, please contact Hunter Sturgill at 512- 974-3393, preservation@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Feb. 6, 2026, 8:43 a.m.
Feb. 11, 2026

02.0 - 713 Congress Ave - Paramount Theatre original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

PARAMOUNT THEATRE AUSTIN, TEXAS 11 February 2026 ARC Presentation 1976 Photograph of West Facade c. 1935 Photograph of West Facade 1979 Photograph of West Facade Paramount Theatre | ARC PRESENTATION 11 January 2026 The original 1915 lobby was set back from the CongressAve. sidewalk, was narrower, and was a two-story highspace, as seen in the original Eberson plans. There werethree pairs of main entry doors that were locatedon-center with the three pairs of doors from the Lobby tothe Foyer.The theater was first renovated in the 1930s, to convertthe supported program from primarily vaudeville toprimarily movies. Any work to the lobby space in thatrenovation is unknown.It is believed that the major renovation to the outer lobbyhappened as a part of the 1957 renovation, includingincreasing the lobby to its current width, infilling thesecond floor, adding the concessions stand to the lobbyand changing the wood entry doors with aluminumstorefront. The national register nomination form alsomentions that the lobby wall finish was updated to tile inthe 1957 renovation.WOOD DOORS, TRANSOMS,AND FRAMES REPLACED WITHALUMINUM BUT REMAIN INORIGINAL LOCATIONALUMINUM STOREFRONTREPLACED WITH WOOD,MOVED TO CURRENTLOCATION (+/-18" FROMSIDEWALK) AND FLANKINGDOORS SEPERATEDORIGINAL STOREFRONTSET BACK FROMSIDEWALK APPROX 7'-0"ORIGINAL ENTRY DOORSON-CENTER WITH DOORS TOINNER LOBBY (FOYER)AREA OF WORKAREA OF WORK Contemporary Photograph of West Facade AREA OF WORK Paramount Theatre | ARC PRESENTATION 11 January 2026 DEMOLISH EXISTING NON- HISTORIC WOOD STOREFRONT FRAMING, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DOORS AND PREP FOR REINSTALLATION DEMOLITION ELEVATION RE-INSTALLED WOOD DOORS NEW WOOD STOREFRONT FRAMING, TYP. - PAINT FINISH 1" TEMPERED INSULATED GLAZING UNIT, TYP. POWDER-COATED BOLLARD WITH ADA OPERATOR PUSH-BUTTON STONE SILL " 0 1 - ' 2 EQ2 EQ1 EQ1 EQ1 EQ1 EQ1 EQ2 EXISTING TO REMAIN NEW STOREFRONT ELEVATION Paramount Theatre | ARC PRESENTATION 11 January 2026 I N A M E R O T G N T S X E I I I N A M E R O T G N T S X E I I INNER LOBBY LEVEL 3' - 6" OUTER LOBBY LEVEL 1' - 8 3/4" INNER LOBBY LEVEL 3' - 6" OUTER LOBBY LEVEL 1' - 8 3/4" FLANKING ENTRANCE DOORS MOVED TO ALIGN WITH INNER LOBBY DOORS:- BETTER MATCHES HISTORIC LOCATION- IMPROVES CIRCULATION IN LOBBY

Scraped at: Feb. 11, 2026, 10:16 a.m.
Feb. 11, 2026

03.0 - 4010 Avenue B original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Feb. 11, 2026, 10:16 a.m.
Feb. 10, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Tuesday, February 10, 2026, at 4 p.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Carl Larosche, Chair Roxanne Evans CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Bat Taniguchi AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order or, for remote participation, no later than noon the day before the meeting, will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on November 12, 2025. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding implementation of the Equity-Based Preservation Plan. Presentation by Cara Bertron, Program Manager II, Austin Planning, and Annie Flom, Senior Planner, Austin Planning. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. 5. Preservation Plan Summit debrief. Discussion of Historic Preservation Office annual report. Committee meeting schedule for 2026. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Cara Bertron at Austin Planning at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974- 1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Feb. 3, 2026, 11:19 p.m.
Feb. 10, 2026

Agenda Addendum original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Tuesday, February 10, 2026, at 4 p.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Carl Larosche, Chair Roxanne Evans Bat Taniguchi DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS AGENDA ADDENDUM 6. FY27 budget recommendation for consideration by the full Commission at its March 4, 2026 meeting. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Cara Bertron at Austin Planning at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974- 1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Feb. 6, 2026, 8:43 a.m.
Feb. 10, 2026

1. Minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on November 12, 2025 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 12, 2025, at 4 p.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Bat Taniguchi DRAFT MINUTES CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Carl Larosche, Chair Roxanne Evans CALL TO ORDER at 4:08 p.m. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. 3. 4. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on January 18, 2023. MOTION: Approve the minutes by Commissioner Taniguchi. Commissioner Evans seconded the motion. Vote: 2-0. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on December 16, 2024. MOTION: Approve the minutes by Commissioner Taniguchi. Commissioner Evans seconded the motion. Vote: 2-0. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on January 9, 2025. MOTION: Approve the minutes by Commissioner Taniguchi. Commissioner Evans seconded the motion. Vote: 2-0. Approve the minutes of the Preservation Plan Committee regular meeting on October 17, 2025. MOTION: Approve the minutes by Commissioner Taniguchi. Commissioner Evans seconded the motion. Vote: 2-0. STAFF BRIEFINGS 5. Staff briefing regarding implementation of the Equity-Based Preservation Plan. Presentation by Cara Bertron, Program Manager II, Austin Planning, and Annie Flom, Senior Planner, Austin Planning. • Staff provided updates on the Progress Dashboard for the Plan, metrics collection, joint projects with ATXN (Your Austin Landmarks, We Saved You a Place), efforts to make Historic Preservation Office materials more accessible and useful, a Transfer of Development Rights analysis, a deconstruction forum and workshop, a Certified Local Government Grant application, and an Undertold Marker application. DISCUSSION ITEMS 6. 7. Discussion of Preservation Plan Summit agenda and attendees. • The Summit will be a special called committee meeting. • Commissioners discussed the agenda content and provided feedback on timing. Discussion of Equity-Based Preservation Plan annual report. • Commissioners suggested ideas for annual report content, including examples of work and metrics and the goals and focuses for the coming year. • Prioritize making the report concise and easy for the public to understand. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT

Scraped at: Feb. 6, 2026, 8:43 a.m.