04. Beverly S. Sheffield Northwest District Park - Pool Renovation — original pdf

Backup

BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION AUSTIN, TEXAS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK– POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 2. | SITE DESIGN 3. | FLOOR PLAN 4. | ELEVATIONS 5. | PERSPECTIVES NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- ARCHITECT - REGISTRATION NUMBER XXXXX 01 – PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 History of Beverly S. Sheffield Northwest District Park - Pool On July 28, 1956, the Northwest Pool and Bathhouse opened to the public. The pool and bathhouse cost $200,000 to construct and were dedicated with great fanfare on August 9, 1956. The pool was the first 50-meter regulation Olympic-sized pool in Austin, which allowed the city to qualify for national swimming meets. The Northwest Park Bathhouse was a modern-design circular bathhouse with open-air dressing rooms. Also built-in 1956, the building is eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Northwest Park, which hosts the aquatic facility, proved to be extremely popular. In its first full month of operation in August 1956, attendance at the new Olympic-size pool eclipsed that of Barton Springs. The name of the park and pool was later changed to honor former Parks and Recreation Director Beverly S. Sheffield. NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 01 – PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 Community Engagement Community Meeting #1 June 28, 2022 Community Meeting #2 September 28, 2022 Final Concept Feedback October 29, 2022 Community feedback solicited through the following webpage: https://www.austintexas.gov/sheffieldNWpool NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 01 – PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 01 – PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 SITE DESIGN NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- ARCHITECT - REGISTRATION NUMBER XXXXX 02 - SITE DESIGN BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 02 - SITE DESIGN BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 02 - SITE DESIGN BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 Area Connections Duck Pond Baseball Field Project Site Pool Shoal Creek Duck Pond Baseball Field NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 02 - SITE DESIGN BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 02 - SITE DESIGN BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 FLOOR PLAN NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- ARCHITECT - REGISTRATION NUMBER XXXXX 03 - FLOOR PLANS BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 6 5 12 10 7 16 14 9 11 15 13 1 2 8 17 4 3 LEGEND 1 EXISTING LIFEGUARD OFFICE 2 RENOVATED WOMEN’S RESTROOM 3 RENOVATED MEN’S RESTROOM 4 RENOVATED FAMILY CHANGING ROOM 5 EXISTING PUMP HOUSE 6 SURGE TANK 7 50-METER LAP LANES 8 RENOVATED ADA RAMP 9 NEW STEPPED ENTRY AT POOL 10 NEW WING WALL AT DIVING WELL 11 ZERO DEPTH ENTRY 12 RECONFIGURED DIVING WELL 13 RENOVATED ENTRY PLAZA 14 IMPROVED ADA PARKING 15 NEW PEDESTRIAN SIDWALK 16 RENOVATED KIDDIE POOL 17 NEW RINSING SHOWERS AND DRINKING FOUNTAINS COA POOLS – NORTHWEST POOL FLOOR PLAN NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 03 - FLOOR PLANS BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 LEGEND 1 RECONFIGURED ADA TOILET STALL 2 ADULT CHANGING BENCH 3 ADA BENCH 4 BABY CHANGING STATION 5 RENOVATED ADA SHOWERS 6 NEW ADA SHOWER WOMEN’S CHANGING / RR 3 1 4 5 2 UNIV. FAMILY CHANGING STORAGE POOL FACILITY ENTRANCE UNIV. FAMILY CHANGING 5 LIFEGUARD 6 2 3 RENOVATED ENTRY PLAZA 4 MEN’S CHANGING / RR COA POOLS – NORTHWEST POOL RENOVATED CHANGING ROOMS NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 ELEVATIONS NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- ARCHITECT - REGISTRATION NUMBER XXXXX 04 - ELEVATIONS BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 EXISTING WOMEN’S CHANGING ROOM BUILDING – NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING MEN’S CHANGING ROOM BUILDING – NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING WOMEN’S CHANGING ROOM BUILDING – SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING MEN’S CHANGING ROOM BUILDING – SOUTH ELEVATION NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 PERSPECTIVES NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- ARCHITECT - REGISTRATION NUMBER XXXXX 05 - PERSPECTIVES BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 PLAZA ENTRY - VIEW TOWARDS SOUTHWEST NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 05 - PERSPECTIVES BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 LAP POOL ENTRY – VIEW TOWARDS SOUTHWEST NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 05 - PERSPECTIVES BEVERLY S. SHEFFIELD NORTHWEST DISTRICT PARK – POOL RENOVATION | DESIGN COMMISSION PRESENTATION | OCTOBER 23, 2023 DIVING WELL - VIEW TOWARDS NORTHEAST NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE- GREG HOUSTON - REGISTRATION NUMBER 10286 TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division Facility Name: Beverly S. Sheffield Northwest Municipal Pool Address: 7000 Ardath St, Austin, TX 78757 1 I Inspection Date: June 15, 2023 Note: This report has the scope to verify the degree of accessibility of the locations within the facility where programs are hosted, the path of travel to the location and their dedicated amenities. This report is not an official TAS inspection report. • Comment 1: At the dedicated compliant parking lot, the sign of the van accessible parking space is not provided. Code Reference: 502 Parking Spaces 502.6 Identification. Parking space identification signs shall include the International Symbol of Accessibility complying with 703.7.2.1. Signs identifying van parking spaces shall contain the designation "van accessible." Signs shall be 60 inches (1525 mm) minimum above the finish floor or ground surface measured to the bottom of the sign. Advisory 502.6 Identification. The required "van accessible" designation is intended to be informative, not restrictive, in identifying those spaces that are better suited for van use. Enforcement of motor vehicle laws, including parking privileges, is a local matter. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 2 I • Comment 2: On the sidewalk from the parking lot to the pool entrance, there is an excessive horizontal opening greater than ½ inch maximum allowed. Code Reference: 302 Floor or Ground Surfaces 302.3 Openings. Openings in floor or ground surfaces shall not allow passage of a sphere more than 1/2 inch (13 mm) diameter except as allowed in 407.4.3, 409.4.3, 410.4, 810.5.3 and 810.10. Elongated openings shall be placed so that the long dimension is perpendicular to the dominant direction of travel. Figure 302.3 Elongated Openings in Floor or Ground Surfaces Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 3 I • Comment 3: The ramp to access the facility presents the following violations: o The running slope is steeper than 8.33% (1:12) maximum allowed. o The top landing has an excessive slope, steeper than 2% (1:48) maximum allowed. o The handrails do not have compliant top extensions. They do not extend horizontally above the landing for 12 inches minimum required beyond the ramp run. Code Reference: 405 Ramps 405.2 Slope. Ramp runs shall have a running slope not steeper than 1:12. EXCEPTION: In existing sites, buildings, and facilities, ramps shall be permitted to have running slopes steeper than 1:12 complying with Table 405.2 where such slopes are necessary due to space limitations. Table 405.2 Maximum Ramp Slope and Rise for Existing Sites, Buildings, and Facilities Slope¹ Steeper than 1:10 but not steeper than 1:8 Steeper than 1:12 but not steeper than 1:10 1. A slope steeper than 1:8 is prohibited. Maximum Rise 3 inches (75 mm) 6 inches (150 mm) 405 Ramps 405.7 Landings. 405.7.1 Slope. Landings shall comply with 302. Changes in level are not permitted. Park Development Division  TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division EXCEPTION: Slopes not steeper than 1:48 shall be permitted. 4 I 505 Handrails 505.10 Handrail Extensions. 505.10.1 Top and Bottom Extension at Ramps. Ramp handrails shall extend horizontally above the landing for 12 inches (305 mm) minimum beyond the top and bottom of ramp runs. Extensions shall return to a wall, guard, or the landing surface, or shall be continuous to the handrail of an adjacent ramp run. Figure 505.10.1 Top and Bottom Handrail Extension at Ramps • Comment 4: In some areas of the facility, the walking surface presents some vertical changes in level and horizontal openings. Code Reference: 403 Walking Surfaces 403.4 Changes in Level. Changes in level shall comply with 303. 303 Changes in Level 303.1 General. Where changes in level are permitted in floor or ground surfaces, they shall comply with 303. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division EXCEPTIONS: 1. Animal containment areas shall not be required to comply with 303. 2. Areas of sport activity shall not be required to comply with 303. 303.2 Vertical. Changes in level of 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) high maximum shall be permitted to be vertical. 5 I Figure 303.2 Vertical Change in Level 303.3 Beveled. Changes in level between 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) high minimum and 1/2 inch (13 mm) high maximum shall be beveled with a slope not steeper than 1:2. Advisory 303.3 Beveled. A change in level of 1/2 inch (13 mm) is permitted to be 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) vertical plus 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) beveled. However, in no case may the combined change in level exceed 1/2 inch (13 mm). Changes in level exceeding 1/2 inch (13 mm) must comply with 405 (Ramps) or 406 (Curb Ramps). Figure 303.3 Beveled Change in Level 303 Changes in Level 303.4 Ramps. Changes in level greater than 1/2 inch (13 mm) high shall be ramped, and shall comply with 405 or 406. For Code 302.3 Openings see Comment 2. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division and cross slopes. • Comment 5: In some areas of the facility, the walking surface presents excessive running 6 I Code Reference: 403 Walking Surfaces 403.1 General. Walking surfaces that are a part of an accessible route shall comply with 403. 403 Walking Surfaces 403.2 Floor or Ground Surface. Floor or ground surfaces shall comply with 302. 403 Walking Surfaces 403.3 Slope. The running slope of walking surfaces shall not be steeper than 1:20. The cross slope of walking surfaces shall not be steeper than 1:48. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 7 I • Comment 6: The compliant picnic table is located in a way that it is considered a protruding object. Code Reference: 307 Protruding Objects 307.1 General. Protruding objects shall comply with 307. 307 Protruding Objects 307.2 Protrusion Limits. Objects with leading edges more than 27 inches (685 mm) and not more than 80 inches (2030 mm) above the finish floor or ground shall protrude 4 inches (100 mm) maximum horizontally into the circulation path. EXCEPTION: Handrails shall be permitted to protrude 4 1/2 inches (115 mm) maximum. Advisory 307.2 Protrusion Limits. When a cane is used and the element is in the detectable range, it gives a person sufficient time to detect the element with the cane before there is body contact. Elements located on circulation paths, including operable elements, must comply with requirements for protruding objects. For example, awnings and their supporting structures cannot reduce the minimum required vertical clearance. Similarly, casement windows, when open, cannot encroach more than 4 inches (100 mm) into circulation paths above 27 inches (685 mm). Figure 307.2 Limits of Protruding Objects Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division • Comment 7: The wading pool does not have any compliant means of entry. 8 I Code Reference: 242 Swimming Pools, Wading Pools, and Spas 242.2 Swimming Pools. At least two accessible means of entry shall be provided for swimming pools. Accessible means of entry shall be swimming pool lifts complying with 1009.2; sloped entries complying with 1009.3; transfer walls complying with 1009.4; transfer systems complying with 1009.5; and pool stairs complying with 1009.6. At least one accessible means of entry provided shall comply with 1009.2 or 1009.3. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 9 I • Comment 8: The restroom’s signage is not of a compliant type. Code Reference: 216 Signs 216.2 Designations. Interior and exterior signs identifying permanent rooms and spaces shall comply with 703.1, 703.2, and 703.5. Where pictograms are provided as designations of permanent interior rooms and spaces, the pictograms shall comply with 703.6 and shall have text descriptors complying with 703.2 and 703.5. EXCEPTION: Exterior signs that are not located at the door to the space they serve shall not be required to comply with 703.2. Advisory 216.2 Designations. Section 216.2 applies to signs that provide designations, labels, or names for interior rooms or spaces where the sign is not likely to change over time. Examples include interior signs labeling restrooms, room and floor numbers or letters, and room names. Tactile text descriptors are required for pictograms that are provided to label or identify a permanent room or space. Pictograms that provide information about a room or space, such as "no smoking," occupant logos, and the International Symbol of Accessibility, are not required to have text descriptors. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 10 I • Comment 9: In the restrooms/dressing rooms the following violations were found: o o o In the men’s single user restroom, there is no compliant toilet paper dispenser. In the men’s single user restroom, the flush control is not installed on the open side of the water closet. In the men’s and women’s restrooms the lavatories do not provide drainpipes insulation to protect against contact. o The soap dispensers over the lavatories are not installed at compliant reach range. o The mirrors over the lavatory are installed higher than 40 inches maximum allowed. o The complaint single user restroom does not have the 4th wall with door, so privacy is not provided, as it is provided for the other compartments. o The benches are not of a compliant type. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 11 I Code Reference: 603 Toilet and Bathing Rooms 603.3 Mirrors. Mirrors located above lavatories or countertops shall be installed with the bottom edge of the reflecting surface 40 inches (1015 mm) maximum above the finish floor or ground. Mirrors not located above lavatories or countertops shall be installed with the bottom edge of the reflecting surface 35 inches (890 mm) maximum above the finish floor or ground. 604 Water Closets and Toilet Compartments 604.2 Location. The water closet shall be positioned with a wall or partition to the rear and to one side. The centerline of the water closet shall be 16 inches (405 mm) minimum to 18 inches (455 mm) maximum from the side wall or partition, except that the water closet shall be 17 inches (430 mm) minimum and 19 inches (485 mm) maximum from the side wall or partition in the ambulatory accessible toilet compartment specified in 604.8.2. Water closets shall be arranged for a left-hand or right-hand approach. Figure 604.2 Water Closet Location 604 Water Closets and Toilet Compartments 604.6 Flush Controls. Flush controls shall be hand operated or automatic. Hand operated flush controls shall comply with 309. Flush controls shall be located on the open side of the water closet except in ambulatory accessible compartments complying with 604.8.2. Advisory 604.6 Flush Controls. If plumbing valves are located directly behind the toilet seat, flush valves and related plumbing can cause injury or imbalance when a person leans back against them. To prevent causing injury or imbalance, the plumbing can be located behind walls or to the side of the toilet; or if approved by the local authority having jurisdiction, provide a toilet seat lid. 604 Water Closets and Toilet Compartments 604.7 Dispensers. Toilet paper dispensers shall comply with 309.4 and shall be 7 inches (180 mm) minimum and 9 inches (230 mm) maximum in front of the water closet measured to the centerline of the dispenser. The Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 12 I outlet of the dispenser shall be 15 inches (380 mm) minimum and 48 inches (1220 mm) maximum above the finish floor and shall not be located behind grab bars. Dispensers shall not be of a type that controls delivery or that does not allow continuous paper flow. Advisory 604.7 Dispensers. If toilet paper dispensers are installed above the side wall grab bar, the outlet of the toilet paper dispenser must be 48 inches (1220 mm) maximum above the finish floor and the top of the gripping surface of the grab bar must be 33 inches (840 mm) minimum and 36 inches (915 mm) maximum above the finish floor. Figure 604.7 Dispenser Outlet Location 604 Water Closets and Toilet Compartments 604.8 Toilet Compartments. Wheelchair accessible toilet compartments shall meet the requirements of 604.8.1 and 604.8.3. Compartments containing more than one plumbing fixture shall comply with 603. Ambulatory accessible compartments shall comply with 604.8.2 and 604.8.3. 606 Lavatories and Sinks 606.5 Exposed Pipes and Surfaces. Water supply and drainpipes under lavatories and sinks shall be insulated or otherwise configured to protect against contact. There shall be no sharp or abrasive surfaces under lavatories and sinks. 803 Dressing, Fitting, and Locker Rooms 803.4 Benches. A bench complying with 903 shall be provided within the room. 903 Benches 903.1 General. Benches shall comply with 903. 903.2 Clear Floor or Ground Space. Clear floor or ground space complying with 305 shall be provided and shall be positioned at the end of the bench seat and parallel to the short axis of the bench. 903.3 Size. Benches shall have seats that are 42 inches (1065 mm) long minimum and 20 inches (510 mm) deep minimum and 24 inches (610 mm) deep maximum. 903.4 Back Support. The bench shall provide for back support or shall be affixed to a wall. Back support shall be 42 inches (1065 mm) long minimum and shall extend from a point 2 inches (51 mm) maximum above the seat surface to a point 18 inches (455 mm) minimum above the seat surface. Back support shall be 2 1/2 inches (64 mm) maximum from the rear edge of the seat measured horizontally. Advisory 903.4 Back Support. To assist in transferring to the bench, consider providing grab bars on a wall adjacent to the bench, but not on the seat back. If provided, grab bars cannot obstruct transfer to the bench. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 13 I Figure 903.4 Bench Back Support 903.5 Height. The top of the bench seat surface shall be 17 inches (430 mm) minimum and 19 inches (485 mm) maximum above the finish floor or ground. 903.6 Structural Strength. Allowable stresses shall not be exceeded for materials used when a vertical or horizontal force of 250 pounds (1112 N) is applied at any point on the seat, fastener, mounting device, or supporting structure. 903.7 Wet Locations. Where installed in wet locations, the surface of the seat shall be slip resistant and shall not accumulate water. Park Development Division TAS Assessment Report Parks and Recreation Development Division 14 I If any clarification or information is required for a specific issue, please contact us prior to performing the correction. Contact Information George Maldonado Project Manager Office: 512/ 974-9525 Mobile: 512/ 461-4380 Email: George.maldonado@austintexas.gov Marilu Tavagna, Project Coordinator - ADA Office: 512/9749441 Mobile: 737/202-1774 Email: marilu.tavagna@austintexas.gov Park Development Division C i t y o f A u s t i n Design Commission Project Review Application Photo courtesy of Jorge E. RousselinC i t y o f A u s t i n Design Commission Project Review Application The Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1. City projects (see page 3 for process) The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 2. Density Bonus projects (see page 4 for process) The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 3. Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page 3 for process) The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. Page 2 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationPhoto courtesy of Jorge E. RousselinThis Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/ Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission’s review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1. Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6) 2. Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography 3. Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile 4. Site plan and landscape plan 5. Ground level, basement plan, and typical floor plan 6. Elevations and/or 3d views 7. Any letters of support or findings by other commissions 8. Staff reports, if any 9. Records of public participation Page 3 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationPROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: CITY PROJECTS The Design Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site development projects to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 1. Applicants are encouraged to meet with the Office of the City Architect prior to submitting a Project Review Application, especially if seeking Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) under Subchapter E Design Standards. (See Staff Contacts on page 5.) 2. Applicant submits completed Project Review Application, including Exhibits, to Commission Liaisons a minimum of (10) Business days prior to the Design Commission meeting. (See Meeting Schedule and “Exhibits to Present” on page 1) 3. Commission Liaisons review Project Review Application for completeness. Once the Application is deemed complete, the project will be added to the agenda. (Agendas are posted online 72 hours prior to the meeting.) 4. Commission Liaisons post backup, including complete Project Review Application and letters/decisions from other Boards and Commissions, the Thursday before the meeting. (See Meeting Documents website.) 5. Design Commission meets and hears a 15 minute presentation by the Owner/Applicant/Architect. The Commission asks questions and makes recommendations. At the end of the project review, the Design Commission may rely on the recommendations recorded in their meeting minutes or submit a Project Review Letter to City Staff. 6. Commission Liaisons will forward approved meeting minutes or Project Review Letters to applicable Staff. Page 4 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationPhoto courtesy of Jorge E. RousselinPROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: DENSITY BONUS PROJECTS The Design Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 1. Six weeks prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Applicant will contact Density Bonus Staff with intent to schedule project on the next Design Commission agenda. a. Density Bonus Staff will provide application and submittal documentation to Applicant and notify Commission Liaisons. 2. Five weeks prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Density Bonus Staff will contact Chair of Working Group to schedule a meeting, copying Commission Liaisons. 3. By the end of the fourth week (24 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: The Applicant will submit all completed application requirements to Density Bonus Staff. 4. By the end of the third week (17 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Design Commission Working Group will meet to review Project Review Application and evaluate Applicant’s presentation detailing compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. a. Working Group will provide Applicant comments and suggestions on improving presentation and issue a recommendation to the Design Commission on achieving compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. 5. By the end of the second week (10 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Chair of the Working Group will send the Density Bonus and Commission Liaisons the Working Group’s written recommendation to the Design Commission containing specific feedback given to the Applicant and, if lacking, detailing items to address to achieve compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. 6. One week (7 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Once the Density Bonus Liaison receives the revised project submittal from the Applicant and the Commission Liaison receive the written recommendation from the Working Group Chair, the Commission Liaison will place project on Design Commission agenda for discussion and action. 7. Design Commission meeting: At the meeting, Design Commission will review the project for compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin based on Working Group recommendations and issue a recommendation detailing to Staff items needed to be addressed in order to achieve substantial compliance. 8. Within one week after Design Commission meeting: The Chair will issue a formal written recommendation based on the action taken by the by the Commission detailing to Staff items needed to be addressed in order to achieve compliance. Page 5 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationPROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: DENSITY BONUS PROJECTS 1. S ix w eeks prior: C ontac t Den sit y B on us Sta ff 2. F ive wee ks prior: D ens ity Bonus Sta ff sc hedul es m eet in g 3. En d of f ou r th week prior : Appl ic ant s ubmi ts a p pl ic ati on 4. En d of third week prior: Wo rkin g G rou p meets to r ev iew ap pli ca ti on 5. En d of the secon d w eek prior : Worki ng Group p rov ide s recommenda ti on 6. On e week prior: Projec t pla ced on D es i g n C om mis si on a gen da 7. Desi g n C om mis sio n meets to r evi ew p roj ec t 8. On e week af ter: Cha ir i ss ues fo rma l r eco mmenda tion Page 6 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationGENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Incomplete Applications Should Commission Liaisons determine that the Project Review Application is incomplete, the Application shall be returned to the Applicant and the project will not be posted on the agenda for consideration by the Commission. Submissions without the required Adobe PDF electronic file shall be deemed incomplete. Public Notice Posting of public notices on the proposed project site or giving notice to adjacent property owners is not required by the enabling ordinance of the Design Commission. The posted agenda for the Design Commission meetings serves to inform the public of subjects considered by the Commission. The Applicant shall note that the concomitant regulatory procedures by other boards and commissions have legal public notice requirements. Actions taken by the Austin Design Commission shall be in respect of and in compliance with such local ordinances and project review procedures. Limits on Resubmissions Applicants are limited to two (2) resubmissions per design phase (as described herein) and shall notify Commission Staff of the intent and desire to resubmit project(s) for review within seven (7) days of the action vote by the Commission. The Commission shall consider such resubmissions prior to issuing the Project Review Letter. Rebuttal of Project Review Letter Since the Commission issues advisory recommendations only, there is no instance for appeals to the Commission. Rebuttals of such advisory recommendations may be made by the Applicant to the applicable city department, planning commission, or City Council in accordance with applicable standard processes and procedures. STAFF CONTACTS By appointment, City Staff is available for consultation on submittal requirements. To schedule a pre- submission conference or for information on any of the above submittal requirements, please contact: City Of Austin, Street Jones Building, 1000 E 11th St, Austin, TX 78702 Executive Liason: Jorge E. Rousselin jorge.rousselin@austintexas.gov (512) 974-2975 Staff Liason: Nicole Corona nicole.corona@austintexas.gov (512) 974-3146 Density Bonus Program Staff: Jorge E. Rousselin jorge.rousselin@austintexas.gov (512) 974-2975 Page 7 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationA. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME PROJECT T YP E Infrastructure Private project PROJECT LOCATIO N/ ADDR ESS PROJECT LOCATIO N/ ADDR ESS City building & site Other Density Bonus A PPLICANT PROPE RT Y O WN ER A PPLICANT MAILI NG A DDRESS PROPE RT Y O WN ER MAI LING AD DR ESS A PPLICANT TELEP HONE N UM BE R PROPE RT Y O WN ER TEL EPHONE NUMBER PROJECT START DATE PROJECT CO MPL E TION DATE A PPLICANT’S ARCHI TE CT A PPL IC ANT’S ENGI NEER Page 8 Design Commission - Project Review Application1. Indi cate if propo se d Pro jec t is re q u ir e d by City Ordinance to be reviewed by the Design Commiss ion . 2. D escribe the r ec omm end atio n t h at yo u a re requesting from the Desig n Com mission. 3. Current De sig n P hase o f Pro jec t ( D e s ign C o mmission prefers to see pro jec ts right aft er ap proved conceptual, sc he m atic, d esign d ev e lo pm e nt ) . 4. Is thi s Proje ct su bjec t to Site Pl an an d /o r Zonin g application ap provals? Will it b e p rese nt e d to Plann ing Commission and/o r City Co uncil? I f s o , wh en? 5. D o es t his P roj ect c om ply with L an d D ev e l opment Code Subchapter E? List specific ally an y Alternative E quiva lent Comp lianc e r equ est if any. Ple ase refer to website for Alternate Equivalent Com plia nce ( AEC) requirements. Page 9 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationB. PROJECT BACKGROUND 6. Prov ide proj ec t b ackgro u nd inc lu d ing go als , scope, building/planning type, and sc hedule. Broadly addre ss e ach of the “Shar ed Value s fo r Ur ban A re as ” t hat are listed on Page 6 o f the Ur ban Design Guidelines . 7. Has this proje ct c ondu cted co m mu n it y/ s t ak eholder out reach? If so, please provide do c ume ntation to d emonstrate c ommunity/ stakeho ld e r su ppor t of this project. 8. Is thi s proj ect sub mitting fo r t h e D o wntown Density Bonus Prog ram? If so , pleas e p rovide a completed Down town Dens it y Bonu s App lica t io n . 9. Has the p roje c t bee n rev iewed by C OA D e par tment (i. e. DAC) S taff? If so, please desc ribe and cite any relevant comme nts o r feed back th at t h e C o mmission should be aw ar e o f. 10. Are ther e any lim itations to c o m plia n ce or planning principles due to the spec if ic require men ts of t his proj- e ct that the C om mission sh o uld b e awa re o f? Page 10 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationC. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT 11. Iden tify conne ctiv ity to pu blic t rans po r t at i on including, bicycle and pedestr ian routes and/or multi- mod al transpor tation . Do es the p ro j e ct c om ply with AD A requirements? Provide a site co ntext map an d attach ad ditional page s as need ed . 12. Iden tify and de sc ribe any e xist in g fe at u re s that are required to be prese r ved an d/or protected such as h eritage tree s, c r eek s o r str eam s, e n da nge r ed species (flora and/o r fauna)? Attach additional site diagrams as needed. 13. Is t his projec t with in any City o f Au st in planning district, master plan, ne ighbo rhood plan, regulatory dis- t rict, overlay, e tc .? If so, ple ase il lu st ra t e h o w this project confor ms to the r espec tive plan. Attach addition al pages as ne ede d. ( See below fo r re q u ire m e nt s.) 14. L ist any proj ec t p ro gram and / o r s it e c on st raints that should be co nsidered. Page 11 Design Commission - Project Review Application1 2 3 4 5 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR N: 10101183.55 E:3114573.98 ADA A ADA ADA A D A N: 10101218.96 E:3114507.84 EXISTING SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP TO REMAIN 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING RE: C500 GRADING PLAN ENTRY/EXIT TO POOL FACILITY EXISTING (4) BIKE RACKS TO BE RELOCATED THIS AREA REGULATORY 100-YR FLOODPLAIN PROPERTY LINE A D A LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC C O L LOC C O L C O L W W D S D S D S D S D S PROPOSED 5.0' ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE RAMP WITH HANDRAILS RE: C500 GRADING PLAN A D A L O C A D A L O C PROPOSED PRIVATE 6" SDR26 PVC WASTEWATER SERVICE RE: C701 6" CONCRETE WW SERVICE LINE EXISTING PUBLIC WASTEWATER MANHOLE #55306 PUBLIC MH AW WW 55306 LOC EXISTING PUBLIC 6" CONCRETE WASTEWATER LINE ADA LOC LOC ADA ADA ADA WW ADA WW ADA ADA W W LOC W W LOC LOC W W PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING & SIGNAGE SD RE: C800 SD E X I S W A G T I N D I N O O P G L SD SD SD ACCESSIBLE ENTRY TO POOL FACILITY LOC ADA WW LOC ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA W A W D L O A C W W A D A A E G O M & D A 2 . 7 8 R 6 R 0 T I N O R A U F ± X I S T S E E E G F R L I F W W W W C O L G O M 2 . 7 6 T I N R O 8 6 X I S T S E F ± F E R ELECTRICAL MAIN CONDUIT STUB-UP MAIN ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION SD SD SD D S L O C G O L T I N O P P E X I S A L S D ALT#1: CONSTRUCT 40 LF OF 4" C900 PVC WATER LINE. ALL JOINTS ARE TO BE RESTRAINED. CONNECT RECONSTRUCTED 4" LINE TO EXISTING 4" POOL FILL LINE PROPOSED PRIVATE 48" DIAMETER WASTEWATER MANHOLE RE: C701 E X I S P G S T I N U M P U O H E SD E SD LOC LOC E W W W W E C LO EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER UNDERGROUND 275-350-305 EXISTING MAIN DISCONNECTS 2-225A-1PH W W E S D C O L W W C O L L O C RELOCATED POOL DECK DRAIN RE: C500 ALT#1: CONSTRUCT 4" RPZ THIS LOCATION. RE:C703 (RELOCATED FROM BASE BID LOCATION) R R I R E T 4 " W A C LO IRR LOC L D O O W A R A I N 5 " ) S 1 LOC O H 8 " P S S F 1 R D LOC F O 8 L O 4 C E ( R PROPOSED PRIVATE 6" SDR 26 PVC WASTEWATER PIPE WITH CONNECTION TO EXISTING 6" WWL RE: C701 W C O L L O C W C O L L O C ADA C O L W L O C AREA OF REVEGETATION FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE E W W L O C W W E PROPOSED 10' CONCRETE MAINTENANCE DRIVE RE: C800 L O C R E T C W A V 2 " P E E C O L C O L C O L R E T C 2 " W A O L C O L C O L C O L C O L C O L A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A A D A ENTRY/EXIT TO POOL FACILITY EXISTING POOL DECK AREA TO BE GRADED TO ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS RE: ARCH. PROPOSED NON-CLIMBABLE FENCE RE: ARCH. EXISTING PRIVATE 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE LINE TO RESTROOM BUILDING TO REMAIN PROPOSED 2" RPZ ON 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE LINE TO RESTROOM BUILDING RE: C703 PROPOSED 4" RPZ TO REPLACE EXISTING UNDERGROUND 4" DCDA RE: C703 ALT#1: CONSTRUCT 460 LF OF 4" C900 PVC WATER LINE. ALL JOINTS ARE TO BE RESTRAINED 0 15 30 60 NORTH SCALE 1" = 30' LEGEND: LOC LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION R.O.W. LINE/PROPERTY LINE ACCESSIBLE PATH EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING WASTEWATER LINE (48" OR LARGER) EXISTING WASTEWATER LINE EXISTING STORM WATER LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL ADA W W WW SD W WW X X PROPOSED FENCING PROPOSED WATERLINE PROPOSED WASTEWATER LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT E R G S E C R N A K 4 C O G . 3 L K . 4, P E B B 3 3 2 T 1 O E I P N C . M R E T T O 1 & L T 1 A E R & J O F L E T T O N O T I O S C . P R O P A M O H T R E G A 2 T 1 E E T Y 7 9 N U E 4 E R V 8 6 3 1 1 0 4 0 5 O F L A S G 0 4 A A 7 5 3 2 E 1 R T R A A 0 7 7 8 D 0 C E O N O T I O K 4 C N A R & M E O . 2 C . N B L 0 A 1 O B R L E R G O 6 2 A C T G A D E 3 & P T 1 O L V I D Y A D IC IC IC W W W W 7 . 9 U O T U T 8 P = 6 O O L S 8 " F L S 8 " F 7 2 . 0 2 . 0 8 2 2 H T 8 T = 6 T = 6 S S A E H W E WW ALBATA AVENUE (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) WW W F ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST HAVE CROSS-SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 1:50 [ANSI 403.3]. ACCESSIBILITY NOTE: APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS ONLY. APPROVAL BY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHAT ADDITIONAL APPROVALS MAY BE NECESSARY. SLOPES ON ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MAY NOT EXCEED 1:20 UNLESS DESIGNED AS A RAMP. [ANSI 403.3]. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE LOCATED ON A SURFACE WITH A SLOPE NOT EXCEEDING 1:50. [ANSI 502.5] THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF A RAMP IN NEW CONSTRUCTION IS 1:12. THE MAXIMUM RISE FOR ANY RAMP RUN IS 30". THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL PROJECTION IS 30 FEET OF RAMP WITH A SLOPE BETWEEN 1:12 AND 1:15, AND 40 FEET FOR A RAMP WITH A SLOPE BETWEEN 1:16 AND 1:20. [ANSI 405.2 - 405.6]. 1 0 0 - Y R 1 0 0 - Y R 1 0 0 - Y R R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 IC R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 D S D S E D S D S D S W D S D S D S D S D S D S D S R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 R Y - 0 0 1 F I E F E H S K 9 1 S R A T P R Y T I N - 0 G . 7 0 1 1 0 3 0 T R I C E R C F A 1 6 D 0 S U 2, P 6 3 2 6 3 L D D I S 4 A 1.1 Y O C I T L. 1 V A C O T W W W W W W W W W W E U N E V A H T A D R A ) Y A W - F O - T H G I R ' 0 5 ( W W W W W W W W 2 5 5 0 - 7 5 W W W A . C N O W C W " 8 EXISTING 4" WATER LINE FOR POOL FILL TO REMAIN 2 8 5 1 9 2 L W W A I C " 6 PROPOSED 2" WATER METER RE: C703 EXISTING WATER METER TO REMAIN IC R Y - 0 0 1 W W LOC D W S D S LOC E W W W T 5 5 5 N 0 E 3 V 0 2 A A 0 4 0 5 3 2 EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOTE: E U ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE FULL CUT-OFF AND FULLY SHIELDED IN COMPLIANCE 2 3 WITH SUBCHAPTER E 2.5 AND WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. ANY CHANGE OR SUBSTITUTION OF LAMP/LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DIRECTOR FOR APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.5.2.E. 4 R O P T I O B 2 S S T 1 E U 2 T R 0 R A D 0 E N O O F L K 5 C C N A E E LI U T O . 2 C . N B L 9 A 0 H L 6 O A G D R T 2 O C E T R G S E C R N A K 5 C O G . 3 L K . 4, P E B B 3 3 CITY OF AUSTIN LDC 25-2 SUBCHAPTER E - SECTION 2.5 - FIGURE 34 T 1 O F L E A 0 S R 2 0 E A Y 0 V O N O T I O · K 5 C R C N A N & K 0 O . 2 LI S · L E E S C . N 8 E 0 R L O B E N 6 R E O 2 T 1 O L 3 & P G L J D U A P SITE PLAN RELEASE NOTES: · H ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELEASED SITE PLAN. ANY ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS WILL REQUIRE SITE PLAN REVISION OR CORRECTION AND 4 APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE BUILDING M I T N S AND FIRE CODE APPROVAL NOR BUILDING PERMIT 5 0 0 5 U APPROVAL. N ALL SIGNS MUST COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 25-10). ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED AT A LATER DATE. E E · WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES WILL BE PROVED BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHOWN TO BE REMOVED WILL REQUIRE DEMOLITION PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF AUSTIN DSD. A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MUST BE ISSUED PRIOR TO AN APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT FOR NON-CONSOLIDATED OR PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED SITE PLANS. FOR DRIVEWAYS: THE OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS FOR RELOCATION OF, DAMAGE TO UTILITIES. FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, A ROW EXCAVATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. · · · · · GUY WIRE E E W W 6" C O N C. A E A D A A D A ADA A D A ADA EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING & ACCESS AISLES TO REMAIN W W L 3 2 6 5 8 2 L O C W C O L E E C O L C O L C LO E C O L C LO E A D A A D A E SD E A D A A D A A E D A SD L O C C O L E A D A ADA EXISTING PUBLIC 6" CONCRETE WASTEWATER LINE A-4167 A D A E E ADA E A D A A D A E H E O W W W W W A4267 NEW METER AND A D A POINT OF SERVICE EXISTING OHE A D A A D A NEW POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS E SD E E SD E E H E O W W SD 4 1 9 4 W A W W W C . A W N O 1 0 " C H E O W W W W W W E PUBLIC MH AW WW 55306 C O WW L W W W L O C WW 10" CONC. AW WW A4194 WW WW WW WW 10" CONC. AW WW A4195 WW WW LOC W LOC LOC W LOC LOC W LOC LOC W LOC LOC LOC W LOC LOC LOC W LOC LOC W LOC LOC W LOC W W W W E O H EXISTING PUBLIC 10" CONCRETE WASTEWATER MAIN A-4194 S D S D EXISTING PUBLIC WASTEWATER MANHOLE #55303 S D S D EXISTING 72" STORM PIPE TO REMAIN PROPOSED 2" WATER SERVICE TO EXISTING RESTROOM & LIFEGUARD AREA RE: C703 S D 100-YR D S R Y - 0 0 1 6" CI A W 2 8 5 6 2 3 L W W A I C " 6 R Y - 0 0 1 7 3 . 1 3 . 1 7 3 . 3 7 4 0 7 T = 6 T = 6 S T = 6 S W W R Y - 0 0 1 S H W E H W E T A E H T 0 T R R W W U O O 1 . 2 8 P = 6 O L S C 0 " F L N 0 " F L N O 1 8 " F L O 1 T L O C W WW W W D S R Y - 0 0 1 W D S W W W R Y - 0 0 D 1 S E A D A E E E A D A WATER METER AW SERVICE 1033893 PUBLIC MH AW WW 55307 9 . 0 6 T = 6 9 . 1 7 WW T = 6 9 . 2 7 T = 6 S S W W 7 9 6 1 8 T W 5 7-0 5 5 2 5 . 9 P = 6 U O O L S O 8 " F L N 8 " F L S 8 " F T R O H W E E H T H T U A E S A EXISTING PUBLIC WASTEWATER MANHOLE #55671 D S D S E D S W W W N C . A D S 8" C W O PUBLIC MH AW WW 55671 WW ELLISE AVENUE (FOSTER AVENUE) (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) W W F 2 T 1 E E 2 N L 7 5 U N 5 0 4 9 3 O E 0 T 3 V 7 3 5 O F L S E O E L 1 N O T I O K 6 C R C N A Y A D & C 0 4 0 O . 2 E A LI S L 5 7 8 7 2 D 0 O O C . N 1 E 1 A C T R L O B E 6 R W O 2 G D D 3 & P T 1 O L E A R C C E B E R S LI P H IL O P 7 G S E R K 6 G . 3 3 3 E R E B C N A C O L K . 4, P B L O C L O C L O C L O C L O C L O C L O C L O C W W W W W W 7 6 2 4 A W W W A . C N O C " 6 W W W W W W W W LOC W W S D S D S D S D S D S D S D S D S D A D A B C E E E D E E I N G S E D % 0 0 1 T N E M P O L E V E D E R A S T N E M U C O D E S E H T I M R E T N I R O F D N A E T E L P M O C N I E B O T T O N E R A Y E H T . Y L N O W E V E R I , L A V O R P P A Y R O T A L U G E R R O F D E S U . I N O T C U R T S N O C R O G N T T M R E P I I I N O T A R T S G E R I . E P . , Y E R F N N E L G 6 5 8 3 2 1 . O N 3 2 / 7 0 / 7 0 L O O P T S E W H T R O N I S N O T A V O N E R . T S H T A D R A 0 0 0 7 7 5 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A c 2023 Marmon Mok, LLP Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. Drawn AV/GF Checked GF Date 05/10/2023 Project No. 12345 Revisions SHEET TITLE CIVIL SITE PLAN SHEET NO. C400 2103707/07/2023D. RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC REALM Publi c realm is def ined as any pu bli ca lly o wne d st reets, pathways, r ig ht of ways, par ks, pub lic ly acces sible open space s and an y pu blic and c iv ic bu ild in g and facilities. The quality o f o ur public realm is vital if we are to be s uccessful in cr eating e nv iron me nt s t h at p eople want to live and wo rk in. 16. The shar e d value s o u tline d in t h e Ur ban D esign G uidelines inc lude Human Charac ter, Dens ity, S us tainability, Diversity, Ec onomic V itality, C iv ic A r t , A S e ns e of Time, Unique Charac ter, Aut henticity, Safety and Conn ection to the Outdoor s. How is th e pro je ct ad dr e s si n g these unique community c harac ter istic s? Is the projec t develop- ing any public ame nities f or u rba n c on t in u i t y and vital place making ? 16. Does this projec t enco u rage st re e t lev e l activity to engage and r esp ond to f unc tional needs s uc h as shade, res t areas, multi -modal transpo r t at io n sto rage and paths? 17. H ow will the p roje ct be a g oo d ne igh bo r to adjacent proper ties? Fo r exam ple, desc ribe the t reatmen t of the t ransiti on ar ea be twe en pro per tie s, i. e . fe n c e , landscape improvem ents, etc . Page 12 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationE. ENVIRONMENTAL / SUSTAINABLE ISSUES The Austin Ur ban Design Guid elin e s s e t a goa l that, “All development s ho uld t ake into c onside ration the nee d to conser ve ene r gy and r eso u rces. I t sh o u ld a lso strive for a small c arbo n f oo tpr int.” 18. Pl ease lis t any signif ic ant co m pone nt s of the project th at contr ibute to meeting this go al. If the projec t has been designe d to acc om mo date f u t u re in c l u sion of such components (fo r example, by b ein g b uilt “s olar ready”) please list them. 19. If the proj ect is b eing d esigne d to m e e t any sust ainability/enviro nmental standards o r cer tifications (for example, LEE D Silve r), p lease li st t h e m h ere and attach relevant c hec klist s or sim ilar do c umen ts that d emonstrate how th e standard o r ce r t ifi ca t io n will be achieved. 20. If the proj ect co ntains o th er s ign i fic a n t s ust ainability components no t inc luded ab ove that the Commiss ion sh ou ld note, please list th em h er e . Page 13 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationAPPENDIX A IMAGINE AUSTIN RELATED POLICIES Land Use and Transportation Building Block LUT P30: Protect and enhance the unique qualities of Austin’s treasured public spaces and places such as parks, plazas, and streetscapes; and, where needed, enrich those areas lacking distinctive visual character or where the character has faded. LUT 31: Define the community’s goals for new public and private development using principles and design guidelines that capture the distinctive local character of Austin. LUT P35: Infuse public art into Austin’s urban fabric in streetscapes along roadways and in such places as parks, plazas, and other public gathering places. LUT P41: Protect historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the City. LUT P43: Continue to protect and enhance important view corridors such as those of the Texas State Capitol District, Lady Bird Lake, and other public waterways LUT P44: Preserve and protect historic parks and recreation areas. Page 14 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationEconomy Building Block E P6: Support up-to-date infrastructure, flexible policies, and programs, and adaptive reuse of buildings, so that local, small, and creative businesses thrive and innovate. Conservation and Environment Policies Building Block CE P3: Expand the City’s green infrastructure network to include such elements as preserves and parks, trails, stream corridors, green streets, greenways, and agricultural lands. CE P11: Integrate development with the natural environment through green building and site planning practices such as tree preservation and reduced impervious cover and regulations. Ensure new development provides necessary and adequate infrastructure improvements. City Facilities and Services Building Block CFS P14: Integrate erosion, flood, and water quality control measures into all City of Austin capital improvement projects. CFS P24: Increase the share of renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and biomass, used by Austin Energy to generate electricity, including infrastructure for on-site sources throughout the City. CFS P29: Increase the use of joint or shared facilities between public safety and other service providers, when possible, to provide residents with efficient services, reduce costs, and maintain public safety infrastructure. CFS P35: Distribute public buildings where neighborhood services are located and other accessible locations throughout the City. CFS P36: Improve multimodal public transportation access to the City’s public buildings and facilities, including the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport. CFS P37: Integrate public buildings and facilities into active, walkable, mixed use neighborhoods and complete, healthycommunities. Page 15 Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationCFS P38: Reduce energy consumption and waste generation in all public buildings to meet the City’s greenhouse gasreduction and zero waste goals. CFS P39: Develop public buildings and facilities that create healthy work environments and educate the public about energy-efficient, sustainable building, and greening best practices. CFS P44: Feature superior design in parks and recreational facilities and include opportunities for public art and sustainable design solutions. Society Building Block S P14: Locate emergency services within close proximity to all neighborhoods and continue to improve community outreach and relationships between police and neighbors S P25: Increase sidewalks and bicycle lanes in neighborhoods to create safer routes to schools, parks, and transit stops. Creativity Building Block C P16: Increase the availability of significant public art to designate districts and/or their entrances and to assist visitors in navigating the area. C P17: Define Austin’s sense of place through high standards for architecture and urban design, public art, public spaces and parks, and arts education. Page 16 Design Commission - Project Review Application