1.a - Rainey Street Trailhead Project — original pdf

Backup

City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review Application The Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1. City projects (see page ii for process) The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 2. Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process) The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 3. Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process) The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/ Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6) Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile Site plan and landscape plan Ground level, basement plan, and typical floor plan Elevations and/or 3d views Any letters of support or findings by other commissions Staff reports, if any Records of public participation Design Commission - Project Review Application i  PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: CITY PROJECTS The Design Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site development projects to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 1. Applicants are encouraged to meet with the Office of the City Architect prior to submitting a Project Review Application, especially if seeking Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) under Subchapter E Design Standards. (See Staff Contacts on page iv.) 2. Applicant submits completed Project Review Application, including Exhibits, to Commission Liaisons a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the Design Commission meeting. (See and Calendar of Regular Meetings and "Exhibits to Present" on page i) 3. Commission Liaisons review Project Review Application for completeness. Once the Application is deemed complete, the project will be added to the agenda. (Agendas are posted online 72 hours prior to the meeting.) 4. Commission Liaisons post backup, including complete Project Review Application and letters/decisions from other Boards and Commissions, the Friday before the meeting. (See Meeting Documents website.) 5. Design Commission meets and hears a 15 minute presentation by the Owner/Applicant/Architect. The Commission asks questions and makes recommendations. At the end of the project review, the Design Commission may rely on the recommendations recorded in their meeting minutes or submit a Project Review Letter to City Staff in Development Services Department. 6. Design Commission may direct a Working Group to write the Project Review Letter. The Working Group will take comments from the full Design Commission meeting, add their comments, and coordinate with the Design Commission Chair to issue a Letter to applicable Development Services Department Staff. The Working Group shall meet prior to the next regularly-scheduled Design Commission to finalize comments on any project submittal. The goal is for this to happen in a one (1) month time frame. 7. Commission Liaisons will forward approved meeting minutes or Project Review Letters to applicable Development Services Staff. 8. Design Commission may request that an Owner/Applicant or City Staff submit an update report in the future so that the Commission can review progress as a project is further detailed. Design Commission - Project Review Application ii PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: DENSITY BONUS PROJECTS The Design Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 1. Six weeks prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Applicant will contact Density Bonus Liaison with intent to schedule project on the next Design Commission agenda. a. Density Bonus Liaison will provide application and submittal documentation to Applicant and notify Commission Liaisons. 2. Five weeks prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Density Bonus Liaison will contact Chair of Working Group to schedule a meeting, copying Commission Liaisons. 3. By the end of the fourth week (24 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: The Applicant will submit all completed application requirements to Density Bonus Staff Liaison. 4. By the end of the third week (17 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Design Commission Working Group will meet to review Project Review Application and evaluate Applicant’s presentation detailing substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. a. Working Group will provide Applicant comments and suggestions on improving presentation and issue a recommendation to the Design Commission on achieving substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. 5. By the end of the second week (10 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Chair of the Working Group will send the Density Bonus and Commission Liaisons the Working Group’s written recommendation to the Design Commission containing specific feedback given to the Applicant and, if lacking, detailing items to address to achieve substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. 6. One week (7 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Once the Density Bonus Liaison receives the revised project submittal from the Applicant and the Commission Liaison receive the written recommendation from the Working Group Chair, the Commission Liaison will place project on Design Commission agenda for discussion and possible action. 7. Design Commission meeting: At the meeting, Design Commission will review the project for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin based on Working Group recommendations and issue a final recommendation detailing to Planning and Zoning Department Staff items needed to be addressed in order to achieve substantial compliance. 8. Within one week after Design Commission meeting: The Chair will issue a formal written recommendation based on the action taken by the by the Commission detailing to Planning and Zoning Department Staff items needed to be addressed in order to achieve substantial compliance. Design Commission - Project Review Application iii GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Incomplete Applications Should Commission Liaisons determine that the Project Review Application is incomplete, the Application shall be returned to the Applicant and the project will not be posted on the agenda for consideration by the Commission. Submissions without the required Adobe PDF electronic file shall be deemed incomplete. Public Notice Posting of public notices on the proposed project site or giving notice to adjacent property owners is not required by the enabling ordinance of the Design Commission. The posted agenda for the Design Commission meetings serves to inform the public of subjects considered by the Commission. The Applicant shall note that the concomitant regulatory procedures by other boards and commissions have legal public notice requirements. Actions taken by the Austin Design Commission shall be in respect of and in compliance with such local ordinances and project review procedures. Limits on Resubmissions Applicants are limited to two (2) resubmissions per design phase (as described herein) and shall notify Commission Staff of the intent and desire to resubmit project(s) for review within seven (7) days of the action vote by the Commission. The Commission shall consider such resubmissions prior to issuing the Project Review Letter. Rebuttal of Project Review Letter Since the Commission issues advisory recommendations only, there is no instance for appeals to the Commission. Rebuttals of such advisory recommendations may be made by the Applicant to the applicable city department, planning commission, or City Council in accordance with applicable standard processes and procedures. STAFF CONTACTS By appointment, City Staff is available for consultation on submittal requirements. To schedule a pre-submission conference or for information on any of the above submittal requirements, please contact: City of Austin, One Texas Center, 505 Barton Springs Rd., Austin, TX 78704 Commission Liaisons: Executive Liaison: Staff Liaison: jorge.rousselin@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-2975 aaron.jenkins@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-1243 Patrick.Colunga@austintexas.gov , (512) 974-2752 Urban Design Division, Planning and Zoning Department, 5th floor City Architect: Janice.White@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-7997 Office of the City Architect, Public Works Department, 9th floor Density Bonus Program Coordinator: jorge.rousselin@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-2975 Urban Design Division, Planning and Zoning Department, 5th floor Design Commission - Project Review Application iv A. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name The Death Star Project Type: Infrastructure Private project Other City building & site Density bonus Project Location/Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Galactic Empire, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Darth Vader, Sith Lord Property Owner Darth Vader, Sith Applicant Mailing Address 1Imperial Avenue Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Telephone Number 999-999-9999 Property Owner Mailing Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Austin, TX 78704  Property Owner Telephone Number 999-999-9999 Project Start Date January 2017 Project Completion Date March 2018 Applicant’s Architect Darth Vader, Sith Lord; ABC Architect Applicant’s Engineer Darth Vader, Sith Lord Engineering Company Design Commission - Project Review Application 1 of 6  1] Indicate if proposed Project is required by City Ordinance to be reviewed by the Design Commission. Yes, the project is required to be reviewed by the Design Commission. 2] Describe the recommendation that you are requesting from the Design Commission. We are looking for a recommendation of support from the Design Commission for the project as well as Alternative Equivalent Compliance for setbacks and missing sidewalks. 3] Current Design Phase of Project (Design Commission prefers to see projects right after approved schematic design). Schematic design phase 4] Is this Project subject to Site Plan and/or Zoning application approvals? Will it be presented to Planning Commission and/or City Council? If so, when? Yes, the project is subject to Site Plan approvals and Zoning approvals. We anticipate presenting to the Planning Commission in mid-May and City Council in late June. 5] Does this Project comply with Land Development Code Subchapter E? List specifically any Alternative Equivalent Compliance request if any. Please refer to website for Alternate Equivalent Compliance (AEC) requirements. https://www.municode.com/library/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH25- 2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_EDESTMIUS Yes, the project generally complies with SubChapter E with 8 foot sidewalks, street trees, and street furniture. However, we need alterative Equivalent Compliance for encroachment into setbacks. Design Commission - Project Review Application 2 of 6  B. PROJECT BACKGROUND 6] Provide project background including goals, scope, building/planning type, and schedule. Broadly address each of the “Shared Values for Urban Areas” that are listed on Page 6 of the Urban Design Guidelines. Attach additional pages as needed. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 7] Has this project conducted community/stakeholder outreach? If so, please provide documentation to demonstrate community/stakeholder support of this project. Yes, the project has conducted 6 months of community outreach including 4 workshops and 2 listening sessions. Is this project submitting for the Downtown Density Bonus Program? If so, please provide a completed Downtown 8] Density Bonus Application. Yes, the project is submitting for Downtown Density Bonus program. See attached. 9] Has the project been reviewed by COA Department (i.e. DAC) Staff? If so, please describe and cite any relevant comments or feedback that the Commission should be aware of. Yes, the project has been reviewed by COA staff. DSD staff mentioned wanting to see wider, straighter sidewalks. We are working with PAZ staff on the number and placement of new trees and preserving six heritage trees. 10] Are there any limitations to compliance or planning principles due to the specific requirements of this project that the Commission should be aware of? Limitations include Design Commission - Project Review Application 3 of 6  C. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Identify connectivity to public transportation including, bicycle and pedestrian routes and/or multi-modal transportation. 11] Does the project comply with ADA requirements? Provide a site context map and attach additional pages as needed. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Identify and describe any existing features that are required to be preserved and/or protected such as heritage trees, 12] creeks or streams, endangered species (flora and/or fauna)? Attach additional site diagrams as needed. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Is this project within any City of Austin planning district, master plan, neighborhood plan, regulatory district, overlay, etc.? 13] If so, please illustrate how this project conforms to the respective plan. Attach additional pages as needed. (See below for requirements.) The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 14] List any project program and/or site constraints that should be considered. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Design Commission - Project Review Application 4 of 6  D. RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC REALM Public realm is defined as any publically owned streets, pathways, right of ways, parks, publicly accessible open spaces and any public and civic building and facilities. The quality of our public realm is vital if we are to be successful in creating environments that people want to live and work in. 15] The shared values outlined in the Urban Design Guidelines include Human Character, Density, Sustainability, Diversity, Economic Vitality, Civic Art, A Sense of Time, Unique Character, Authenticity, Safety and Connection to the Outdoors. How is the project addressing these unique community characteristics? Is the project developing any public amenities for urban continuity and vital place making? The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 16] Does this project encourage street level activity to engage and respond to functional needs such as shade, rest areas, multi-modal transportation storage and paths? The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 17] How will the project be a good neighbor to adjacent properties? For example, describe the treatment of the transition area between properties, i.e. fence, landscape improvements, etc. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Design Commission - Project Review Application 5 of 6  E. ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABLE ISSUES The Austin Urban Design Guidelines set a goal that, "All development should take into consideration the need to conserve energy and resources. It should also strive for a small carbon footprint." 18] Please list any significant components of the project that contribute to meeting this goal. If the project has been designed to accommodate future inclusion of such components (for example, by being built "solar ready") please list them. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 19] If the project is being designed to meet any sustainability/environmental standards or certifications (for example, LEED Silver), please list them here and attach relevant checklists or similar documents that demonstrate how the standard or certification will be achieved. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 20] If the project contains other significant sustainability components not included above that the Commission should note, please list them here. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Design Commission - Project Review Application 6 of 6  APPENDIX A INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Design Commission - Project Review Application APPENDIX B DENSITY-BONUS PROJECTS Design Commission - Project Review Application APPENDIX C IMAGINE AUSTIN RELATED POLICIES Land Use and Transportation Building Block LUT P30: Protect and enhance the unique qualities of Austin’s treasured public spaces and places such as parks, plazas, and streetscapes; and, where needed, enrich those areas lacking distinctive visual character or where the character has faded. LUT 31: Define the community’s goals for new public and private development using principles and design guidelines that capture the distinctive local character of Austin. LUT P35: Infuse public art into Austin’s urban fabric in streetscapes along roadways and in such places as parks, plazas, and other public gathering places. LUT P41: Protect historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the City. LUT P43: Continue to protect and enhance important view corridors such as those of the Texas State Capitol District, Lady Bird Lake, and other public waterways LUT P44: Preserve and protect historic parks and recreation areas. Economy Building Block E P6: Support up-to-date infrastructure, flexible policies, and programs, and adaptive reuse of buildings, so that local, small, and creative businesses thrive and innovate. Conservation and Environment Policies Building Block CE P3: Expand the City’s green infrastructure network to include such elements as preserves and parks, trails, stream corridors, green streets, greenways, and agricultural lands. CE P11: Integrate development with the natural environment through green building and site planning practices such as tree preservation and reduced impervious cover and regulations. Ensure new development provides necessary and adequate infrastructure improvements. City Facilities and Services Building Block CFS P14: Integrate erosion, flood, and water quality control measures into all City of Austin capital improvement projects. CFS P24: Increase the share of renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and biomass, used by Austin Energy to generate electricity, including infrastructure for on-site sources throughout the City. CFS P29: Increase the use of joint or shared facilities between public safety and other service providers, when possible, to provide residents with efficient services, reduce costs, and maintain public safety infrastructure. CFS P35: Distribute public buildings where neighborhood services are located and other accessible locations throughout the City. Design Commission - Project Review Application CFS P36: Improve multimodal public transportation access to the City’s public buildings and facilities, including the Austin- Bergstrom International Airport. CFS P37: Integrate public buildings and facilities into active, walkable, mixed use neighborhoods and complete, healthy communities. CFS P38: Reduce energy consumption and waste generation in all public buildings to meet the City’s greenhouse gas reduction and zero waste goals. CFS P39: Develop public buildings and facilities that create healthy work environments and educate the public about energy-efficient, sustainable building, and greening best practices. CFS P44: Feature superior design in parks and recreational facilities and include opportunities for public art and sustainable design solutions. S P14: Locate emergency services within close proximity to all neighborhoods and continue to improve community outreach and relationships between police and neighbors S P25: Increase sidewalks and bicycle lanes in neighborhoods to create safer routes to schools, parks, and transit stops. Society Building Block Creativity Building Block C P16: Increase the availability of significant public art to designate districts and/or their entrances and to assist visitors in navigating the area. C P17: Define Austin’s sense of place through high standards for architecture and urban design, public art, public spaces and parks, and arts education. Design Commission - Project Review Application Design Commission Rainey Street Trailhead February 2022 Project Team: Civil Engineer: Garza EMC Landscape Architect: dwg. Structural Engineer: Structures MEP Engineer: Encotech Ecologist: Siglo Group Nature Play: Blackland Collaborative Project Manager: Square One 1 CapMetro Bus Stop 10 min walk Waller Creek 5 min walk ATX MetroBike Station Miro Rivera Restroom Cummings St B u tl e B ik r e T r H ik a il e a n d Limit of Construction E a s t A v e Lady Bird Lake Festival Beach 5 min walk Existing Conditions Vicinity Map Existing Conditions - view from East Ave looking west Existing Conditions and Vicinity Map 2 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionTRAILHEAD Community Engagement 1: In-person event on Sep 28, 2019 WHAT WE HEARD: Community Engagement 2: In-person event on Nov 9, 2019 Community Engagement 3: In-person event on Dec 14, 2019 How would you make this park better? TREE PLANTING / SHADE SHORELINE RESTORATION BETTER NEIGHBORHOOD & TRAIL CONNECTIONS REST / RELAXATION AREAS GATHERING SPACES ACTIVITY AREAS 155 147 101 87 238 206 “Undisturbed areas for biodiversity.” “The trail needs to be more child and family friendly.” “Preserve the ecosystem and nature while accommodating our recreational needs.” “I love the Hike and Bike Trail.” What is important for the community? Community Engagement 1 NATIVE PLANTING “Exercise and play areas for families!!! ” 3 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionACTIVITY AREAS 87 Hike and Bike Trail.” What is important for the community? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NATIVE PLANTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WATER ACCESS POINT NATURE PLAY ENHANCED CROSSWALK EXERCISE STATIONS OPEN LAWN PICNIC AND GATHERING AREAS EVENT SPACE “Exercise and play areas for families!!! ” “River dockage with cleats to tie up canoes, kayaks and paddle boards...” “Enjoying the park for a picnic or just to be outside.” “Austin would not be the same without the trail.” “Water fountains, gathering and stretching areas, seating or picnic areas.” PROJECT GOAL: improve and enhance the ecological function of the site while providing spaces for recreational use and improved trail connectivity for the growing area. Community Engagement SOURCE : Rainey St. Trailhead Survey #1 Summary, October 2019 4 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionCONCEPT 1 t e e r t S y e n a R i Cummings Street 10 4 7 5 1 6 2 3 12 11 4 5 11 12 E a st A v e n u e 8 5 9 Community Engagement Concept 1 0 40’ Comments: CONCEPT 1 WHAT WE HEARD 5 2 3 4 LEGEND 1 trail head lawn nature play native meadow native riparian planting native pecan grove trail paths existing hike & bike trail existing pedestrian bridge existing restroom gravel water access picnic area 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HOW WELL DID THIS CONCEPT ALIGN WITH THE PROJECT VISION? 3% 4% 22% 35% 35% “ The trail currently lacks children’s play area. The nature play area is a great idea! “ not appropriate excessive or lacking adequate good wonderful “ More structured and appropriate landscape features will help activate the area and naturally divide it into places for multiple activities and groups to gather. “ “ The native pecan grove is a lovely touch! “ 5 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionRainey St. Trailhead Survey #2 feedback - November 9, 2019 CONCEPT 2 CONCEPT 1 t e e r t S y e n a R i Cummings Street 6 1 7 3 10 2 4 5 LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 trail head lawn nature play native planting native riparian planting picnic deck trail paths existing hike & bike trail existing pedestrian bridge existing restroom shoreline access exercise area 8 12 4 not appropriate excessive or lacking adequate good wonderful 4 11 E a st A v e n u e 9 Community Engagement Concept 2 HOW WELL DID THIS CONCEPT ALIGN WITH THE PROJECT VISION? 2% 1% 18% “ I’m not a huge fan of the exercise equipment on trails, looks a bit unsightly and takes away form the natural beauty. “ 39% 40% “ I really like the picnic area and better access to the water for kayaks, SUPs, canoes. The combination of shading and open space lawn is important. “ “ I like the picnic deck and the preserving of many trees. “ 6 0 40’ Comments: CONCEPT 2 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design Commissionmings Street Cum Seating Area E a st A v e n u e Nature Play Neighborhood Lawn Existing Miro Rivera Restroom Native Restoration Planting Existing Butler Hike and Bike Trail Site Plan Native Restoration Planting Native Restoration Planting Seating Area Water Access 7 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionView looking south down existing Butler Trail towards Lady Bird Lake Perspective Renderings View looking north across seating area and Cummings Ave 8 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design Commissionsecret paths sitting post circle boulders stepping stones loose parts moveable stumps sand pit pollinator beds stage stationary logs turf hillside grass maze log tunnel loose parts Rainey Street Trailhead | Nature Play Area | Site Use diagram | 12.07.2021 9 Nature Play Types Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design Commission(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:3) Community Gathering (cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:3) Community Gathering (cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:90)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:86) Seating (cid:52)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:3) (cid:43)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86) (cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3) Features Seating Community Gathering (cid:51) (cid:68) (cid:87) (cid:75) (cid:90) (cid:68) (cid:92) (cid:86) (cid:68) (cid:51) (cid:86) (cid:92) (cid:75) (cid:90) (cid:68) (cid:87) Quiet Spaces Seating (cid:52)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:3) (cid:43)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86) (cid:52)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:3) (cid:43)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86) (cid:41)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:3) Unstructured play Individual (cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92) Cooperative (cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92) Dramatic (cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92) Gross Motor Gross Motor Individual (cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:18) Fine Motor Individual (cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92) Individual (cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92) City of Austin Connecting Children to Nature (CCN) Goals Rainey Street Trailhead | Nature Play Area | Types of Play | 12.07.2021 Increase connection to nature • • Provide non-traditional play opportunities • Activate underutilized park space • Invest in underserved communities Nature Play Area | Space Definition | 12.07.2021 Nature Play Zones 10 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionNature Play Enlargement 11 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionEXAMPLE IMAGERY SECTION 429 LADY BIRD LAKE WATER ELEVATION SECTION 429 LADY BIRD LAKE WATER ELEVATION D R A O B E E R F ' 1 D R A O B E E R F ' 1 BUTLER TRAIL GRAVEL LANDING BOARDWALK SHORELINE GANGWAY WITH HANDRAIL PADDLE DOCK WITH 12" FREEBOARD L . O . C . REGULATORY WATER ELEVATION 5 0 ' BUTLER TRAIL GRAVEL PLAN VIEW LANDING BOARDWALK SHORELINE GANGWAY WITH HANDRAIL BUTLER TRAIL GRAVEL LANDING PADDLE DOCK WITH 12" FREEBOARD BOARDWALK L . O . C . SHORELINE GANGWAY WITH HANDRAIL PADDLE DOCK WITH 12" FREEBOARD L . O . C . FLOATING PADDLE DOCK 8' CONCRETE BEAM BOARDWALK LANDING FOR DOCK/GANGWAY 5' ATTACHMENT, REF. STRUCTURAL SHORELINE CONCRETE BEAM FOR DOCK/GANGWAY ATTACHMENT, REF. STRUCTURAL SHORELINE SECTION SHORELINE TO OUTER EDGE OF DOCK MAX. 30' SHORELINE TO OUTER EDGE OF DOCK MAX. 30' REGULATORY WATER ELEVATION 5 0 ' GANGWAY WITH HANDRAIL 20'-9" VIF. BOARDWALK LANDING 5' SLOPE 1 FLOATING PADDLE DOCK 8' GANGWAY WITH HANDRAIL 20'-9" VIF. BOARDWALK LANDING 5' SLOPED BOARDWALK 16'-1" VIF. GRAVEL LANDING 5' EXISTING TRAIL SHORELINE TO OUTER EDGE OF DOCK MAX. 30' FLOATING PADDLE DOCK 8' GANGWAY WITH HANDRAIL 20'-9" VIF. 429 LADY BIRD LAKE WATER ELEVATION D R A O B E E R F ' 1 MAX. 2% 4% 2% MAX. 2% TO TO BO TOP OF BOARDWALK CURB TOP OF BOARDWALK BOARDWALK FRAMING, REF. STRUCTURAL SLOPED BOARDWALK 16'-1" VIF. GRAVEL LANDING 5' FINISHED GRADE CONCRETE BEAM FOR DOCK/GANGWAY ATTACHMENT, REF. STRUCTURAL SHORELINE EXISTING TRAIL MAX. 2% 4% 2% Water Access TOP OF BOARDWALK CURB TOP OF BOARDWALK BOARDWALK FRAMING, REF. STRUCTURAL FINISHED GRADE 12 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionPreserved 19”+ Tree, Typ. Preserved 0”-18.9” Tree, Typ. Poor Health 26” Mesquite Proposed Tree, Typ. Poor Health 21” Chinkapin Oak Dead 43” Bald Cypress Tree Preservation Exhibit Trees 19”+ 13 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionLighting Diagram 14 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionThank you for your time! Questions? 15 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionEXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION LEGEND dwg. 7708 Rialto Blvd., Suite 125 Austin, Texas 78735 Tel. (512) 298-3284 Fax (512) 298-2592 TBPE # F-14629 Garza EMC, LLC © Copyright 2021 11.22.2021 M A 2 2 : 0 1 1 2 , 2 2 v o N n o a r y e v l i s m y b d e i f i d o m g w d . S E - 3 0 0 0 0 - 1 3 7 3 1 1 \ D A C - 0 0 \ l i i v C \ 3 0 0 0 0 - 1 3 7 3 1 1 \ : V · · · Appendix Sheets Permit Drawings 16 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionEXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION LEGEND dwg. 7708 Rialto Blvd., Suite 125 Austin, Texas 78735 Tel. (512) 298-3284 Fax (512) 298-2592 TBPE # F-14629 Garza EMC, LLC © Copyright 2021 11.22.2021 ACCESSIBILITY NOTES SITE NOTES M A 3 2 : 0 1 1 2 , 2 2 v o N n o a r y e v l i I s m y b d e i f i d o m g w d . E T S - 3 0 0 0 0 - 1 3 7 3 1 1 \ D A C - 0 0 \ l i i v C \ 3 0 0 0 0 - 1 3 7 3 1 1 \ : V Appendix Sheets Permit Drawings 17 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design CommissionTREE CARE PLAN FOR TREES: 764, 773, 771 PROVIDE THE EXECUTED TREE CARE PLAN TO THE CITY ARBORIST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION AIR SPADING TO A DEPTH OF 4-6" IN PRESERVED, PERMEABLE CRZ AREAS, WITH 1" 1. ORGANIC COMPOST INCORPORATED INTO TOPSOIL PROFILE. WORK SHALL OCCUR DURING TREE DORMANCY; IF NOT, WORK SHALL INCLUDE WATERING 2-3X DURING THE 7-10 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING THE WORK IF NO RAIN. INSTALL SHREDDED, DECOMPOSED HARDWOOD MULCH TO DEPTH OF 3" WITHIN 1. AVAILABLE CRZ AREAS. DEEP ROOT WATER IN IN 2022 3X EACH FROM MAY-OCT (RATE OF 1/2 GAL EVERY 2-3 2. FEET WITHIN PRESERVED PERMEABLE CRZS) 3. DEEP ROOT FERTILIZATION NEAR END OF CONSTRUCTION (LATE 2022). dwg. DECOMPOSED AGGREGATE, TYP. HATCH MIT.MIT. MIT.MIT. MIT.MIT. LOC PLANTING AREA LO C + MIT.MIT. + PLANTING AREA + + + NATURE PLAY AREA 04 13 PLANTING AREA + + + MIT. + PLANTING AREA LOC + + PLANTING AREA + PLANTING AREA + + MIT.MIT. + TURF CONCRETE WALK, TYP. CONCRETE CURB + + MIT.MIT. + + DECOMPOSED AGGREGATE, TYP. HATCH PLANTING AREA + + PLANTING AREA + + + + + + + + + MIT.MIT. MIT. L O C PLANTING AREA CONCRETE WALK, TYP. + + MIT.MIT. + + + PLANTING AREA + + MIT.MIT. + L O C + + + + + + PLANTING AREA C O L + + THIS AREA REQUIRES NATIVE GRASSLAND SEEDING AND PLANTING PER COA STANDARD SPECIFICATION 609s.6, INCLUDING TOPSOIL AND SEED BED PREPARATION, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AND WEED MAINTENANCE EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN DECOMPOSED AGGREGATE + C O L BOARDWALK FLOATING DOCK CEF BUFFER CEF BUFFER WETLAND RESTORATION AREA 05 13 0' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20' - 0" L O C LIGHT STATION, TYP. TWO-BULB FIXTURE, 112-400 LUMENS S H D I S O R E F R T A O N M C 1 9 ' - 5 " E L I N E E Q . E Q . - 0 " 4 0 ' S H O R E L I N E F R O N T A G E TREE DESIGNATION: SYMBOL LEGEND: "MIT" Designation represents trees (or cali[er inches) counted towards mitigation measures per ECM 3.5.4 "+" Designation represents trees funded by the 90 Rainey Development (SP-2019-0093C). Per referenced site plan, owner shall contribute one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) to The Trail Foundation, or its successor organization, for tree plantings associated with the Rainey Street Trailhead Park Project Existing tree to remain Heritage tree Existing tree to be removed 5" Monterrey Oak Quercus polymorpha Qty: 2 3" Mexican Plum Prunus mexicana Qty: 9 MIT. MIT. + + 3" Anacacho Orchid Bauhinia lunarioides Qty: 14 3" Texas Everbering Fig Ficus carica Qty: 8 3" Texas Redbud Cercis canadensis 'Texensis' Qty: 9 3" Yaupon Ilex vomitoria Qty: 16 Turf Lawn + + Landscape Area: Planting to be native and adapted to the Central Texas region: to be selected from the City of Austin Grow Green Manual or approved equal as determined by COA Reviewer and/or Landscape Architect. Landscape Area within CWQZ: THis area requires native grassland seeding and planting per City of Austin Standard Specification 609S.6, including topsoil and seed bed preparation, temporary irrigation and weed maintenance. I, Daniel Woodroffe, a registered landscape architect No. 2285 with the State of Texas, certify that these plans meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 25-2, Article 9 of the Land Development Code of the City of Austin. All responsibility for the adequacy of these plans remains with the landscape architect who prepared them. In approving these plans, the City of Austin must rely upon the adequacy of the work of the landscape architect. SITE PLAN APPROVAL Sheet of SPC-2021-0286C FILE NUMBER: APPROVED BY COMMISSION ON: CHAPTER EXPIRATION DATE (25-5-81,LDC) PROJECT EXPIRATION DATE (ORD.#970905-A) 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE. APPLICATION DATE: CASE MANAGER DWPZ DDZ UNDER SECTION 112 OF The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, P.O. Box 12337, Austin, Texas 78711-2337, telephone (512) 305-9000, has jurisdiction over individuals licensed under the Landscape Architects Registration Law Article 249c, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. Rev. 1 Rev. 2 Rev. 3 Correction 1 Correction 2 Correction 3 Director, Planning and Development Review Department RELEASED FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE: ZONING: DANIEL WOODROFFE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #2285 August 06, 2021 FINAL PLAT MUST BE RECORDED BY THE PROJECT EXPIRATION DATE, IF APPLICABLE. SUBSEQUENT SITE PLANS WHICH DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE CODE CURRENT AT THE TIME OF FILING, AND ALL REQUIRED BUILDING PERMITS AND/OR A NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION (IF A BUILDING PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED), MUST ALSO BE APPROVED PRIOR TO THE PROJECT EXPIRATION DATE. d a e h l i a r T t e e r t S y e n i a R 1 0 7 8 7 X T , n i t s u A . e v A t s a E 6 3 Project Number: 21_019 Issue For: 2021-08-06 - ISSUE FOR COMPLETENESS 2021-09-10 - ISSUE FOR FORMAL SUBMITTAL 2021-11-19 - UPDATE 1 CA A NDS WOO EP D R L L D RE STE I G E R E I N A D S T 52 2 8 A T E O F T A R C H I T E C T O F F E S A X E November 19, 2021 Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN Sheet Number: 11 12 SPC-2021-0286C Appendix Sheets Permit Drawings 18 Rainey Street TrailheadFebruary 2022Design Commission