Item 2c- Rainey Street Substation (Part 1)

Design Commission – June 24, 2019

Item 2c- Rainey Street Substation (Part 1) — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of None page

i City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review ApplicationThe Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1.City projects (see page ii for process)The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086).2.Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process)The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program.3.Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process)The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1)Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6)2)Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography3)Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile4)Site plan and landscape plan5)Ground level, basement plan, and typical floor plan6)Elevations and/or 3d views7)Any letters of support or findings by other commissions8)Staff reports, if any9)Records of public participationDesign Commission - Project Review Applicationii PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: CITY PROJECTS The Design Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site development projects to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 1.Applicants are encouraged to meet with the Office of the City Architect prior to submitting a Project Review Application, especially if seeking Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) under Subchapter E Design Standards.(See Staff Contacts on page iv.)2.Applicant submits completed Project Review Application, including Exhibits, to Commission Liaisons a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the Design Commission meeting. (See and Calendar of Regular Meetings and "Exhibits to Present" on page i)3.Commission Liaisons review Project Review Application for completeness. Once the Application is deemed complete, the project will be added to the agenda. (Agendas are posted online 72 hours prior to the meeting.)4.Commission Liaisons post backup, including complete Project Review Application and letters/decisions from other Boards and Commissions, the Friday before the meeting. (See Meeting Documents website.)5.Design Commission meets and hears a 15 minute presentation by the Owner/Applicant/Architect. The Commission asks questions and makes recommendations. At the end of the project review, the Design Commission may rely on the recommendations recorded in their meeting minutes or submit a Project Review Letter to City Staff in Development Services Department.6.Design Commission may direct a Working Group to write the Project Review Letter. The Working Group will take comments from the full Design Commission meeting, add their comments, and coordinate with the Design Commission Chair to issue a Letter to applicable Development Services Department Staff. The Working Group shall meet prior to the next regularly-scheduled Design Commission to finalize comments on any project submittal. The goal is for this to happen in a one (1) month time frame.7.Commission Liaisons will forward approved meeting minutes or Project Review Letters to applicable Development Services Staff.8.Design Commission may request that an Owner/Applicant or City Staff submit an update report in the future so that the Commission can review progress as a project is further detailed. Design Commission - Project Review Applicationiii PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS: DENSITY BONUS PROJECTS The Design Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program.1.Six weeks prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Applicant will contact Density Bonus Liaison with intentto schedule project on the next Design Commission agenda.a.Density Bonus Liaison will provide application and submittal documentation to Applicant and notify CommissionLiaisons.2.Five weeks prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Density Bonus Liaison will contact Chair of WorkingGroup to schedule a meeting, copying Commission Liaisons.3.By the end of the fourth week (24 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: The Applicantwill submit all completed application requirements to Density Bonus Staff Liaison.4.By the end of the third week (17 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: DesignCommission Working Group will meet to review Project Review Application and evaluate Applicant’s presentationdetailing substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin.a.Working Group will provide Applicant comments and suggestions on improving presentation and issue arecommendation to the Design Commission on achieving substantial compliance with the Urban DesignGuidelines for Austin.5.By the end of the second week (10 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Chair of theWorking Group will send the Density Bonus and Commission Liaisons the Working Group’s written recommendation tothe Design Commission containing specific feedback given to the Applicant and, if lacking, detailing items to address toachieve substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin.6.One week (7 calendar days) prior to the target Design Commission meeting: Once the Density Bonus Liaisonreceives the revised project submittal from the Applicant and the Commission Liaison receive the writtenrecommendation from the Working Group Chair, the Commission Liaison will place project on Design Commissionagenda for discussion and possible action.7.Design Commission meeting: At the meeting, Design Commission will review the project for substantial compliancewith the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin based on Working Group recommendations and issue a finalrecommendation detailing to Planning and Zoning Department Staff items needed to be addressed in order to achievesubstantial compliance.8.Within one week after Design Commission meeting: The Chair will issue a formal written recommendation based onthe action taken by the by the Commission detailing to Planning and Zoning Department Staff items needed to beaddressed in order to achieve substantial compliance.Design Commission - Project Review ApplicationBy appointment, City Staff is available for consultation on submittal requirements. To schedule a pre-submission conference or for information on any of the above submittal requirements, please contact:City of Austin, One Texas Center, 505 Barton Springs Rd., Austin, TX 78704 Commission Liaisons: Executive Liaison: Staff Liaison: City Architect: Density Bonus Program Coordinator: Benjamin.Campbell@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-7691 Nichole.Koerth@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-2752 Urban Design Division, Planning and Zoning Department, 5th floorJanice.White@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-7997 Office of the City Architect, Public Works Department, 9th floor Benjamin.Campbell@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-7691Urban Design Division, Planning and Zoning Department, 5th flooriv GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Incomplete Applications Should Commission Liaisons determine that the Project Review Application is incomplete, the Application shall be returned to the Applicant and the project will not be posted on the agenda for consideration by the Commission. Submissions without the required Adobe PDF electronic file shall be deemed incomplete. Public Notice Posting of public notices on the proposed project site or giving notice to adjacent property owners is not required by the enabling ordinance of the Design Commission. The posted agenda for the Design Commission meetings serves to inform the public of subjects considered by the Commission. The Applicant shall note that the concomitant regulatory procedures by other boards and commissions have legal public notice requirements. Actions taken by the Austin Design Commission shall be in respect of and in compliance with such local ordinances and project review procedures. Limits on Resubmissions Applicants are limited to two (2) resubmissions per design phase (as described herein) and shall notify Commission Staff of the intent and desire to resubmit project(s) for review within seven (7) days of the action vote by the Commission. The Commission shall consider such resubmissions prior to issuing the Project Review Letter. Rebuttal of Project Review Letter Since the Commission issues advisory recommendations only, there is no instance for appeals to the Commission. Rebuttals of such advisory recommendations may be made by the Applicant to the applicable city department, planning commission, or City Council in accordance with applicable standard processes and procedures. STAFF CONTACTS Design Commission - Project Review Application1 of 6 A.PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name The Death Star Project Type: Infrastructure City building & site Density bonus Private project Other Project Location/Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Galactic Empire, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Property Owner Darth Vader, Sith Lord Darth Vader, Sith Applicant Mailing Address Property Owner Mailing Address 1Imperial Avenue Austin, TX 78704 1 Imperial Avenue, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Telephone Number Property Owner Telephone Number 999-999-9999999-999-9999Project Start Date Project Completion Date January 2017March 2018 Applicant’s Architect Applicant’s Engineer Darth Vader, Sith Lord;Darth Vader, Sith Lord ABC ArchitectEngineering Company Design Commission - Project Review Application2 of 6 1]Indicate if proposed Project is required by City Ordinance to be reviewed by the Design Commission.Yes, the project is required to be reviewed by the Design Commission. 2]Describe the recommendation that you are requesting from the Design Commission.We are looking for a recommendation of support from the Design Commission for the project as well as Alternative Equivalent Compliance for setbacks and missing sidewalks. 3]Current Design Phase of Project (Design Commission prefers to see projects right after approved schematic design).Schematic design phase 4]Is this Project subject to Site Plan and/or Zoning application approvals? Will it be presented to Planning Commissionand/or City Council? If so, when?Yes, the project is subject to Site Plan approvals and Zoning approvals. We anticipate presenting to the Planning Commission in mid-May and City Council in late June. 5]Does this Project comply with Land Development Code Subchapter E? List specifically any Alternative EquivalentCompliance request if any. Please refer to website for Alternate Equivalent Compliance (AEC) requirements.https://www.municode.com/library/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH25-2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_EDESTMIUS Yes, the project generally complies with SubChapter E with 8 foot sidewalks, street trees, and street furniture. However, we need alterative Equivalent Compliance for encroachment into setbacks. Design Commission - Project Review Application3 of 6 B.PROJECT BACKGROUND6]Provide project background including goals, scope, building/planning type, and schedule. Broadly address each of the“Shared Values for Urban Areas” that are listed on Page 6 of the Urban Design Guidelines. Attach additional pages asneeded.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 7]Has this project conducted community/stakeholder outreach? If so, please provide documentation to demonstratecommunity/stakeholder support of this project.Yes, the project has conducted 6 months of community outreach including 4 workshops and 2 listening sessions. 8]Is this project submitting for the Downtown Density Bonus Program? If so, please provide a completed DowntownDensity Bonus Application.Yes, the project is submitting for Downtown Density Bonus program. See attached. 9]Has the project been reviewed by COA Department (i.e. DAC) Staff? If so, please describe and cite any relevantcomments or feedback that the Commission should be aware of.Yes, the project has been reviewed by COA staff. DSD staff mentioned wanting to see wider, straighter sidewalks. We are working with PAZ staff on the number and placement of new trees and preserving six heritage trees.10]Are there any limitations to compliance or planning principles due to the specific requirements of this project that theCommission should be aware of?Limitations include Design Commission - Project Review Application4 of 6 C.EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT11]Identify connectivity to public transportation including, bicycle and pedestrian routes and/or multi-modal transportation.Does the project comply with ADA requirements? Provide a site context map and attach additional pages as needed.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 12]Identify and describe any existing features that are required to be preserved and/or protected such as heritage trees,creeks or streams, endangered species (flora and/or fauna)? Attach additional site diagrams as needed.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 13]Is this project within any City of Austin planning district, master plan, neighborhood plan, regulatory district, overlay, etc.?If so, please illustrate how this project conforms to the respective plan. Attach additional pages as needed. (See below forrequirements.)The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 14]List any project program and/or site constraints that should be considered.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Design Commission - Project Review Application5 of 6 D.RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC REALMPublic realm is defined as any publically owned streets, pathways, right of ways, parks, publicly accessible open spaces and any public and civic building and facilities. The quality of our public realm is vital if we are to be successful in creating environments that people want to live and work in. 15]The shared values outlined in the Urban Design Guidelines include Human Character, Density, Sustainability, Diversity,Economic Vitality, Civic Art, A Sense of Time, Unique Character, Authenticity, Safety and Connection to the Outdoors.How is the project addressing these unique community characteristics? Is the project developing any public amenities forurban continuity and vital place making?The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 16]Does this project encourage street level activity to engage and respond to functional needs such as shade, rest areas,multi-modal transportation storage and paths?The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 17]How will the project be a good neighbor to adjacent properties? For example, describe the treatment of the transitionarea between properties, i.e. fence, landscape improvements, etc.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Design Commission - Project Review Application6 of 6 E.ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABLE ISSUESThe Austin Urban Design Guidelines set a goal that, "All development should take into consideration the need to conserve energy and resources. It should also strive for a small carbon footprint." 18]Please list any significant components of the project that contribute to meeting this goal. If the project has beendesigned to accommodate future inclusion of such components (for example, by being built "solar ready") please listthem.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 19]If the project is being designed to meet any sustainability/environmental standards or certifications (for example, LEEDSilver), please list them here and attach relevant checklists or similar documents that demonstrate how the standard orcertification will be achieved.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 20]If the project contains other significant sustainability components not included above that the Commission should note,please list them here.The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. Design Commission - Project Review Application0.2NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_FeetMiles0.2NotesLegendThis product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.0.0801:4,800Date Printed:C(cid:68)pit(cid:68)(cid:79) Metro R(cid:68)pid B(cid:88)s StopsC(cid:68)pit(cid:68)(cid:79) Metro B(cid:88)s StopsProte(cid:70)ted StreetsEAST AVERIVER STRAINEY STHOLLY ST1/4MILEProtectedBikeLanesSiteBoundaryVicinityPlanIH35BikeLanesGREATSTREETS:EASTAVE=MIXEDMODESTREETRIVERST=BICYCLE&PEDESTRIANDOMINANT0.1NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_FeetMiles0.1NotesLegendThis product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.0.0401:2,400Date Printed:JurisdictionFULL PURPOSELIMITED PURPOSEEXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENTOTHER CITY LIMITSOTHER CITIES ETJZoningSingle Family (SF)Multi-family (MF)LA, RRMobile Home (MH)Commercial (CH, CS, GR, LR, L)Office (GO, LO, NO)Industrial (IP, LI, MI, PDA, RD, W/LO)CBD, DMUTND, TOD, NBG, ERCPUDAG, DRAV, P, UNZCounty/Missing ValueZoning TextExisting Zoning LegendExisting ZoningProposed ZoningSOURCE: CODENEXT MAPSProposed Zoning LegendH1H2H3X1X2X3X0H1H2H3X1X2X3X0H1H2H3X1X2X3X0 EXISTINGFOC34' LIVE OAK36' LIVE OAK16' PECANEXISTING PARKINGEAST AVENUERIVER ST.LAMBIE ST.30' LIVE OAK44' LIVE OAK17' LIVE OAKSEAT WALLRAIN GARDEN7FTSIDEWALKWILDFLOWERS/NATIVE GRASSESON IH 35 FRONTAGEBOULDERSBOULDERSCHANGE ANGLE PARKING TO PARALLELPER GREAT STREETS GUIDELINESGRATE INLETSTORM MHGRATE INLETWATER QUALITYRAIN GARDENWATER QUALITYRAIN GARDENWATER QUALITYRAIN GARDENEXISTING POLERAINEY STREET SUBSTATIONSITE&LANDSCAPE PLANDATE:06/14/19D:\Brain\F_Roberto_042310\Roberto on '2800powerdrawings' (F)\Dandy-DYC\GREAT STREETS_PLAN-011019 - Standard\GREAT STREETS_PLAN-061019.dwg, 6/11/2019 12:43:17 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3PROJECT NAMEAEGB COMMERCIAL RATING STAR LEVELS1 StarBasic RequirementsTOTAL POINTS MARKED YES422 Stars35 - 44 pointsRATING ANTICIPATEDBasic Requirements Not Met3 Stars45 - 54 points4 Stars55 - 74 pointsTOTAL POINTS MARKED YES AND MAYBE515 Stars75 points or moreRATING ANTICIPATEDBasic Requirements Not MetPOINTS AVAILABLEYESMAYBENORESPONSIBLE PARTYReq'dYESCDA for security fencing, wall and GIS buildingReq'dYESCDA for security fencing, wall and GIS buildingReq'dReq'dYESCDA for security fencing, wall and GIS buildingReq'dYESGDIReq'dReq'dYESCDA for security fencing, wall and GIS buildingReq'dReq'dYESCDA for security fencing, wall and GIS buildingReq'd222002222INTEGRATED DESIGN SUBTOTALSSITE1. Environmental Sensitivity2. Desired Development4. Building Energy Performance5. Outdoor Water Use Reduction6. Indoor Water Use Reduction7. Low-Emitting Materials - Interior Paints & Coatings8. Storage & Collection of Recyclables9. Construction Waste ManagementINTEGRATED DESIGN1. Integrated Project Design10. Tenant Requirements2016 COMMERCIAL RATING SCORECARD PLANNER RAINEY STREET SUBSTATIONMEASUREBASIC REQUIREMENTS1. Plans & Specifications2. Current Codes & RegulationsNOTESSUMMARY3. Building Systems CommissioningVERSION 20161POINTS AVAILABLEYESMAYBENORESPONSIBLE PARTYMEASURENOTES201111111-301111111111101111118701-168CDA / SCI1-42CDA / SCI / AE1-3010202210The security wall face that provides for the best solar exposure is hampered by the required easement. The building roof could provide for westerly panels. South is hampered by heritage trees.2. Renewables3. Additional Commissioning4. Advanced Energy Metering5. Demand Response6. Green Energy7. District CoolingENERGY10. Electric Vehicle Charging Station11. Protect & Restore Habitat12. Beneficial Open Space13. Access to Local & Regional Produce14. Heat Island Reduction1. Building Energy PerformanceBy nature the building should not use much energy. He building envelope will designed to provided the optimal performance15. Light Pollution Reduction4. Diverse & Walkable Communities5. Brownfield Redevelopment6. Site Specific Design7. Public Transportation 8. Bicycle Use9. Parking Capacity16. Integrated Pest ManagementSITE SUBTOTALS 3. DensityVERSION 20162POINTS AVAILABLEYESMAYBENORESPONSIBLE PARTYMEASURENOTES10201-331-61-21-225001CDA / SCI11AE1111111CDA / SCI1CDA / SCI1CDA / SCI1CDA 1CDA 11-57. Low-Emitting MaterialsInterior Sealants & AdhesivesFlooring SystemsComposite Wood & Agrifiber ProductsInsulationCeiling & Wall SystemsFurnitureExterior Applied Products8. Moisture Protection1. Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control2. Green Housekeeping3. Daylighting - Design4. Daylighting - Controls5. Views to the Outside6. Individual ControllabilityThe building is not occupied1. Outdoor Water Use Reduction2. Building Water Use ReductionNo domestic water use is anticipated3. Process Water Use Reduction4. Stormwater ManagementWATER SUBTOTALSINDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (IEQ)ENERGY SUBTOTALSWATERVERSION 20163POINTS AVAILABLEYESMAYBENORESPONSIBLE PARTYMEASURENOTES11111CDA / SCI100011-32CDA 1-62CDA 1140022AE11AE3001111100010042901. Additional Construction Waste Management9. Acoustic Quality10. Outdoor Pollutant Control11. Construction Indoor Air QualityIEQ SUBTOTALSMATERIALS & RESOURCESGRAND TOTAL POINTSINNOVATION3. Innovation #34. Innovation #45. Innovation #5INNOVATION SUBTOTALSEDUCATION & EQUITY1. Educational Outreach2. Construction Worker EquityEDUCATION & EQUITY SUBTOTALS 1. Innovation #12. Innovation #22. Building Materials Use Reduction3. Sustainably Sourced Material4. Certified Wood5. PVC & Phthalate Free MaterialMATERIALS & RESOURCES SUBTOTALS VERSION 20164Brackenridge SubstationMLK JR. BLVD.I-35E. RIVERSIDE DR.Future DowntownSubstation00.15 miHOLLY ST.HOLLY ST.RAINEY ST.55 EASTAVENUEI-35REPOWERING DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN SUBSTATIONCOMMUNITYENGAGEMENT REPORTPrepared by CD&P – Updated May 2019 Table of Contents Community Engagement Report Community Engagement Phases & Timeline ..................................................................................... 1 Phase 1: Outreach Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 Phase 2: Outreach Summary ................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix A: Phase 1 Materials and Comments ................................................................ 19 Appendix B: Phase 2 Materials and Comments ............................................................... 41 The Downtown Substation Community Engagement Report documents outreach and community input for all phases of the community engagement process. This report will continue to be updated throughout the course of the project. DOWNTOWN SUBSTATION Community Engagement Report Austin Energy is committed to active and engaging communication with residents, individuals, community leaders, businesses, and organizations to ensure that their preferences and opinions are heard and considered for inclusion in the substation design. A Community Engagement Plan was developed for the Downtown Substation that outlined goals of the engagement effort: • Create public awareness about the substation and public engagement process through a deliberative outreach effort • Provide an open and transparent process throughout the entire planning process • Provide a variety of accessible opportunities and options for all those interested to conveniently be involved and share input • Engage a diverse set of participants • Provide engaging interactions that facilitate collecting valuable input • Collect input on considerations and certain aspects of design A variety of tools will be used to reach these goals, including meetings with stakeholders, presence at community events, holding public meetings, conducting local business and civic group outreach, and providing opportunities to participate online such as an updated webpage and surveys. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PHASES & TIMELINE Community engagement will occur throughout this process in three phases. Each phase will encompass the entire effort to share information, collect input, and involve stakeholders and members of the community in the process. 1 PHASE 1: OUTREACH The purpose of the first outreach phase was to introduce the project and process, continue to build awareness in the community, and collect input on concerns, desires, and preferences. To engage the community during the first phase of outreach, several methods of engagement were employed. Outreach An initial contact list was developed representing interested citizens, neighborhood groups, local businesses, community and civic groups, and news media services. The project team proactively reached out to the list to share information about the opportunities to participate by sending email notifications and scheduling meetings with representatives from various groups, including the Rainey Neighbors Association, the Rainey Business Coalition, the Mexican American Cultural Center, and Towers of Town Lake HOA. Notification Promotional materials were prepared in English and Spanish and several methods were used to notify the public of the meeting, including: • A postcard was mailed to approximately 1,000 property owners within a ¼ mile radius of the substation site • 2 email notifications were sent to the Repowering Downtown database (5/24/18 sent to 171 email addresses; 6/12/18 sent to 197 email addresses) • A press release was distributed to media sources, other City Departments, and to elected officials • Attending key stakeholder meetings with the Mexican American Cultural Center, The Rainey Neighborhood Association, The Town Lake Neighbors Association, and the Towers of Town Lake HOA • A Univision segment recorded the week before the meeting • Key members of the Rainey Street Neighborhood emailed their groups and posted flyers in residential elevators • City Council and State legislators received personalized email invitations • Social media messages were posted on Facebook (reached 397 followers with 19 responses), Twitter, and NextDoor (reached 1,400 subscribers) • 24 signs were placed in the area around the substation location Following the meeting, notification materials were prepared in English and Spanish to notify the public of the survey and provide opportunities to participate, including: • 2 email notifications reminding recipients of the survey were sent to the Repowering Downtown database (6/14/18 sent to 209 email addresses; 7/5/18 sent to 239 email addresses) • An embedded survey link was included on a Towers.net article on the substation, pulling in 127 survey respondents 2 • Social media messages were posted on Facebook (reached 5,620 followers with 53 responses) and NextDoor (reached 1,400 subscribers) Public Meeting June 12, 2018 from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center 600 River Street, Austin, TX 78701 31 Attendees signed in Meeting Summary Attendees were invited to learn about the project and the public engagement process, visit with Austin Energy staff and project team members, and share input. Exhibit boards containing information about the project and process were displayed at the public meeting and made available online. The information shared on the boards included background information on power delivery, the downtown Austin electrical network, and the location site. They also outlined the project goals, timeline, and potential aesthetic themes. Attendees were encouraged to visit with team members and share their input by taking a survey or submitting general comments. 3 PUBLIC INPUT While public input is encouraged at any time, the comment period for Phase 1 lasted from June 12, 2018 through July 8, 2018. During this time, comments could be submitted in writing or through a survey developed in English or Spanish. 178 survey responses and 1 comment were received. Key themes from the first phase of community outreach include: 1. Aesthetics: A strong point of community interest was aesthetics. The most popular themes for the enclosure in order of weighted average preference were Colorful/Artistic, Nature-based, and Modern. Providing renderings of potential appearances of the substation and enclosure may help contextualize the design for the public and assuage concerns about final aesthetics. 2. Input on Site: • Approximately 27 comments focused on concerns about and suggestions for general aesthetics, with approximately 6 of those noting a desire to preserve the trees and incorporate landscaping into the site plans. “Adding lots of trees to this area and making it look like a park would attract locals and give back to the city.” • Approximately 19 comments noted concern for the impact the facility would have on the neighborhood and residents. “My primary concern is you are trying to pack too much into an already overcrowded area. How much more parking are we going to lose because of this project? It’s tough enough on the businesses in the area as it is.” 7456555320294439361938302828311624241733141518335901020304050607080Nature-basedColorful/ArtisticModernNotable AustinIconographyIndustrial# of Responses(on a scale from 1-5, with 5 indicating strong preference)543214 • Approximately 9 comments supported additional possible uses for the site, such as a dog park or music venue. “Please add more sidewalks to the area and have something the community can use instead of making it a dead block.” 3. Support for Project Goals: Input received indicates strong support for the goals of the project. The goal to ensure that energy downtown is reliable and resilient received the highest level of support with a weighted average of 3.9 and 95 respondents labeling it their highest level of support. “All of the goals identified for the new substation are vital.” There were also comments received that expressed concern over health and safety and requested additional clarifying information on the impact the substation would have on nearby residents. “I’d like to see more information about safety concerns, how we plan to minimize electrical fields and noise of operating the substation that has direct impact to the health and safe being of the residents.” 4. Local Interest: Although there was a diverse set of zip codes reported, most (58%) survey respondents lived in zip code 78701 or 78702, and 55% claimed to live near the project location. This suggests that most interest in the project is from the community that will be living directly near the project site. 5. Positive Response to Engagement: 67% of respondents are satisfied with the opportunities to provide input and report a better understanding of the importance of adding a new substation to the downtown network after reviewing the materials provided. 5 SURVEY RESULTS 175 English, 3 Spanish Graphs representing the collected survey data are included below. Comments for questions that provided an option for additional commentary for the first phase of public engagement are included in Appendix A. 275 respondents answered question 1. After question 1, the number of responses dropped to 178. 1. Do you prefer to respond to this survey in English or Spanish? 270 respondents preferred to answer in English, 5 preferred to answer in Spanish. 2. Which of the following best describes you? (select all that apply) Answered: 177 3. Please share your top 3 areas of interest for the project, with 1 being your top interest. Answered: 176 9638100898020406080100120I live near theproject locationI work near theproject locationI eat, shop, visitrecreationalestablishments nearthe project locationI am an interestedmember of thepublicOther (pleasespecify)# of Responses507316231023444642133927344023020406080Health andsafetyAestheticappearance andenhancementsEnvironmentalimpactFits in with theneighborhoodConstruction# of Responses1236 4. We have identified the following goals for the design and construction of the substation. Please indicate your level of understanding and support for these goals on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating strong preference (multiple answers can have the same rating). If you would like to suggest any additional goals, please do so below. Answered: 178 5. Below are possible themes for the substation’s outward aesthetics. Rate these on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating strong preference (multiple answers can have the same rating). Answered: 177 108959590203535382217201811813815201321020406080100120Ensure personal andpublic safetyMeet the current andfuture energy needs ofdowntownEnsure that energydowntown is reliable andresilientIncorporate communityinput into the aestheticsof the substation# of Responses543217456555320294439361938302828311624241733141518335901020304050607080Nature-basedColorful/ArtisticModernNotable AustinIconographyIndustrial# of Responses543217 67%9%24%67%9%24%6. After viewing the materials provided, I have a better understanding of the importance of adding a new substation to the downtown network. Answered: 175 7. I am satisfied with the opportunities that are available to provide input on the downtown substation. Answered: 174 8. Please share any additional comments here. Answered: 25 25 respondents shared their comments. Full comments for the first phase of community engagement are included in Appendix A. 9. How did you learn about this survey? Answered: 157 10. If you would like project updates, please share your email address. 60 respondents shared their email address. 38%, 5933%, 5218%, 2812%, 196%, 104%, 63%, 421010203040506070EmailSocial MediaNewsPublic MeetingFriends or FamilyFlyer/SignageMailOther (pleasespecify)# of RespondentsYes No I don’t know 8 Male,102, 61%Female, 52, 31%Prefer not to answer,13, 8%11. What is your zip code? Answered: 165 12. What is your race/ethnicity? Answered: 162 13. What is your age? Answered: 166 14. What is your gender? Answered: 16776837361080102030405060708024 oryounger25-3940-5455-7071+Prefer not toanswer# of Respondents110291126180204060801001209 PHASE 2: OUTREACH The purpose of the second outreach phase was to present aesthetic and layout concepts for the substation for public input. Outreach The project team continued to add interested stakeholders and contacts to the original database. Notification Promotional materials were prepared in English and Spanish. Methods used to notify the public of the meeting included: • A postcard was mailed to over 1,200 properties within a ¼ mile radius of the project site • 3 email notifications were sent to the Repowering Downtown database (12/24/18 sent to 252 email addresses; 2/19/19 sent to 244 email addresses; 2/25/19 sent to 237 email addresses) • Presentations given at stakeholder meetings with the Rainey Neighborhood Association on 10/17/2019 and the Mexican American Cultural Center on 12/5/2019 • Contacted key members of the Rainey Street Neighborhood to distribute flyers and post them in residential elevators • Social media messages were posted on Facebook (posts reached 966 followers with 25 responses and event page reached 1,658 followers with 35 interested responses), Twitter (reached 12.806 followers with 20 link clicks), and NextDoor (reached 1.052 subscribers) • 24 signs were placed in the area around the substation location Following the meeting, additional notifications were made to share details and the survey. • 2 email notifications reminding recipients of the survey were sent to the Repowering Downtown database (3/1/19 sent to 274 email addresses; 3/18/19 sent to 325 email addresses) • An embedded survey link was included on a Towers.net article on the substation, resulting in 78 survey respondents • Social media messages were posted on Facebook (post reached 417 followers with 8 responses), Twitter (reached 2.661 followers with 10 link clicks) and NextDoor (reached 3.390 subscribers) • A presentation was given at a stakeholder meeting with the Towers of Town Lake on 3/25/2019 and additional surveys were distributed 10 Public Meeting February 28, 2019 from 4:00 to 6:30 p.m. Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center 600 River Street, Austin, TX 78701 45 attendees signed in Meeting Summary Background information from the first public meeting was available for attendees who were unfamiliar with the project. Exhibit boards were shared, including: • General project information • Process updates • Next steps • Results from the previous round of community engagement • Site information • Name, landscape, and enclosure considerations, parameters, and options Attendees were invited to view aesthetic and layout concepts for the substation, visit with Austin Energy staff and project team members, and share feedback. 11 PUBLIC INPUT The survey and comment period for Phase 2 lasted from February 28 through March 31, 2019. Input was collected in a survey available online and in paper form, and through general comments that could be submitted in writing via mail or email in English & Spanish. reported that they were satisfied with the opportunities to provide public input 98% 440 Surveys Received Most Preferred Design Theme: Modern Most Preferred Name Most Preferred Landscaping Native Grasses & Wildflowers Natural Boulders Rainey Street Substation 12 SURVEY RESULTS 1. Which of the following best describes you? (select all that apply) Answered: 437 2. What is your zip code? Answered: 434 2282201858011050100150200250I am an interestedmember of thepublicI eat, shop, visitrecreationalestablishments nearthe project locationI live near theproject locationI work near theproject locationOther (fullresponses inAppendix B)# of ResponsesAll zip codes # of respondents for each zip code 78701 132 78702 70 78704 48 78741 22 78751 14 78745 13 78703; 78705 12 78723 9 78721; 78722; 78731; 78749 7 78744; 78758 6 78759 5 78746; 78752 4 78729; 78753; 78756 3 78613; 78660; 78732; 78735; 78737; 78739; 78747 2 11226; 33305; 76574; 78212; 78641; 78645; 78653; 78681; 78724; 78725; 78727; 78728; 78733; 78738; 78742; 78748; 78750; 78754; 79741; 80127 1 13 3. To receive project updates, share your email address. 130 respondents shared their email address. 4. Please share your top three choices for a name for the substation site. (NOTE: select only one name for each category, or your answers cannot be counted!) Answered: 423 5. Plant Options Along I-35 Frontage Road Answered: 436 6. Boulder Options for Decoration & Seating Answered: 436 208673847451581100767041235153109784825050100150200250Rainey StreetSubstationLady BirdSubstationDowntown EastSubstationCesar ChavezSubstationLambie SubstationPalm SchoolSubstation# of Responses281145159243991631179424747031122737726263050100150200250300Native Grasses & WildflowersEvergreen ShrubsSucculents & CactiCombination of These# of ResponsesLove itLikeNeutralDislikeHate it180118110129172114748671334082111239050100150200Natural BouldersCut Limestone BlocksArtificial Boulders# of ResponsesLove itLikeNeutralDislikeHate itFavorite Second Favorite Third Favorite 14 31617614498Hate itDislikeNeutralLikeLove itRank the options from your favorite to least favorite. Answered: 416 162178771678915788145175050100150200Metal Cutout PanelsLimestone, Glass, & Tile ElementsConcrete Artwork# of ResponsesFavoriteSecond FavoriteLeast FavoriteRank the options from your favorite to least favorite. Answered: 417 7. In a previous survey, community members identified three preferred design themes: Colorful/Artistic, Nature-Based, and Modern. Share your preferences on each overall theme and its different style options. Colorful/Artistic Answered: 410 Nature-Based Answered: 411 156141114105136171149139121050100150200Colorful Tile ElementsColorful MetalColorful Concrete or Metal# of ResponsesFavoriteSecond FavoriteLeast Favorite336367124124Hate itDislikeNeutralLikeLove it15Rank the options from your favorite to least favorite. Answered: 420 10.How did you learn about thissurvey?Answered: 375 9.Are you satisfied with theopportunities to provide inputand community engagement?Answered: 414 362271810100200300Very DissatisfiedDissatisfiedSatisfiedVery satisfiedModern Answered: 419 8.Share any additional comments on the substation aesthetics or site here.88 respondents shared their comments. Full comments for the second phase ofcommunity engagement are included in Appendix B. 209961146322212814391178050100150200250Metal or Concrete WaveColorful Metal ElementsTextured Metal# of ResponsesFavoriteSecond FavoriteLeast Favorite255370124147Hate itDislikeNeutralLikeLove it# of Responses 71611303939143143050100150200Other (full responsesin Appendix B)MailFlyer/SignagePublic MeetingFriends or FamilyNewsSocial MediaEmail# of Responses16Appendices Appendix A: Phase 1 Promotion and Figures Meeting Flyer .........................................................................................................................................19 Meeting Postcard ............................................................................................................................... 20 Contact Card .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Promotional Sign ................................................................................................................................. 22 Fact Sheet .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Meeting Boards ................................................................................................................................... 24 Survey ...................................................................................................................................................... 29 Comment Card .................................................................................................................................... 33 Comments Survey Comments ..............................................................................................................................35 Written Comment Card .................................................................................................................. 40 Appendix B: Phase 2 Promotion and Figures Meeting Flyer ........................................................................................................................................ 41 Meeting Postcard ............................................................................................................................... 42 Promotional Sign ................................................................................................................................ 43 Fact Sheet ............................................................................................................................................. 44 Meeting Boards ................................................................................................................................... 46 Survey ....................................................................................................................................................... 52 Comment Card .................................................................................................................................... 54 Comments Survey Comments ............................................................................................................................. 56 REPOWERING DOWNTOWN | REPOTENCIACIÓN DEL CENTRO DE LA CIUDADPublic Meeting | Reunión públicaDowntown Substation | Subestación del centroTuesday, June 12th, 2018 | Martes, 12 de junio de 20184 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Auditorium600 River StreetAustin, TX 78701The City of Austin is proud to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you require special assistance for participation in our programs or use of our facilities please call (512) 974-7225.La Cuidad de Austin se enorgullese en cimplir con la Ley para Estadounidenses con Descapacidades. Si necesitas asistencia especial para participar en nuestros programas o para utilizer nuestras instalaciones por favor llama al (512) Can’t attend the meeting? | ¿No puede asistir a la reunión?Materials will be available online.Los materiales estarán disponibles en línea. (512)505-7919communications@austinenergy.comaustinenergy.com/go/repowering/austinenergy@austinenergyHOLLY ST.RAINEY ST.RIVER ST.Meeting | ReuniónI-35Austin Energy is Repowering Downtown to increase capacity, resiliency, and reliability to meet the needs of our growing city. This initiative includes building a new substation near 55 East Avenue in the Rainey Street District. Please join us to learn about the substation project, visit with the team, and share your input. This meeting will be in an open house format, please visit at your convenience. Austin Energy está repotenciando el centro para incrementar la capacidad, resiliencia y ﬁabilidad para satisfacer las necesidades de nuestra creciente ciudad. Esta iniciativa incluye la construcción de una nueva subestación cercana a 55 East Avenue en el distrito de Rainey Street.Por favor, únase a nosotros para aprender sobre el proyecto de la subestación, pase tiempo con el equipo, y comparta sus contribuciones. Esta reunión será en el formato de “casa abierta”, por favor visite a su conveniencia.MEETING FLYERAppendix A: Phase 1Promotion & Figures 19REPOWERING DOWNTOWN | REPOTENCIACIÓN DEL CENTRO DE LA CIUDADPublic MeetingDowntown SubstationAustin Energy is Repowering Downtown to increase capacity, resiliency, and reliability to meet the needs of our growing city. This initiative includes building a new substation near 55 East Avenue in the Rainey Street District. Please join us to learn about the substation project, visit with the team, and share your input. This meeting will be in an open house format, please visit at your convenience. Reunión pública Subestación del centroAustin Energy está repotenciando el centro para incrementar la capacidad, resiliencia y ﬁabilidad para satisfacer las necesidades de nuestra creciente ciudad. Esta iniciativa incluye la construcción de una nueva subestación cercana a 55 East Avenue en el distrito de Rainey Street.Por favor, únase a nosotros para aprender sobre el proyecto de la subestación, pase tiempo con el equipo, y comparta sus contribuciones. Esta reunión será en el formato de “casa abierta”, por favor visite a su conveniencia.Tuesday, June 12th, 2018 | Martes, 12 de junio de 20184 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Auditorium600 River Street, Austin, TX 78701Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural CenterAuditorium600 River StreetAustin, TX 78701The City of Austin is proud to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you require special assistance for participation in our programs or use of our facilities please call (512) 974-7225.La Cuidad de Austin se enorgullese en cimplir con la Ley para Estadounidenses con Descapacidades. Si necesitas asistencia especial para participar en nuestros programas o para utilizer nuestras instalaciones por favor llama al (512) 974-7225. Can’t attend the meeting? Materials will be available online.¿No puede asistir a la reunión? Los materiales estarán disponibles en línea. (512) 505-7919communications@austinenergy.comaustinenergy.com/go/repowering/austinenergy@austinenergyHOLLY ST.RAINEY ST.RIVER ST.Meeting | ReuniónI-35721 Barton Springs Road Austin, TX 78704MEETING POSTCARD20CONTACT CARD 21DOWNTOWN SUBSTATIONPublic Meeting June 12th, 20184 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Auditorium600 River StreetAustin, TX 78701(512)505-7919austinenergy.com/go/repoweringcommunications@austinenergy.comSUBESTACIÓN DEL CENTROReunión pública12 de junio de 20184 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Auditorium600 River StreetAustin, TX 78701(512)505-7919austinenergy.com/go/repoweringcommunications@austinenergy.comPROMOTIONAL SIGN22REPOWERING DOWNTOWNDOWNTOWN SUBSTATIONAustin Energy is Repowering Downtown to increase capacity,resiliency, and reliability to meet the needs of our growing city.This initiative includes upgrading transmission lines, improvingthe two existing downtown substations, and building a newsubstation near 55 East Avenue in the Rainey Street District.Design for the new substation is underway, and we will be working closely with the community throughout this process.The new substation will:• Provide increased electrical capacityto meet downtown growth • Allow Austin Energy to continue toprovide reliable power downtown LOCATION•Selected in 1999 for the futureelectric needs of downtown •Geographically located to meet electrical requirements•Access to existingelectrical transmissionand distributionBrackenridge SubstationSeaholmSubstationMLK JR. BLVD.W. 15th ST.N. LAMAR BLVD. I-35BARTON SPRINGS RD.E. RIVERSIDE DR.HOLLY ST.HOLLY ST.RIVER ST.RAINEY ST.HHHOHOLLYST.T.TT.T.55 EASTAVENUEI-35oFuture DowntownSubstationCOMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTAustin Energy values community participation. We believe that byworking together we can provide safe and reliable services that also reﬂect the values of the community.Get involved. Share your input and stay updated by attendinga public meeting, visiting with us at community events, or by participating online.CONTACT INFORMATIONAustin Energy’s mission is to safely deliver clean, affordable, reliable energy and excellent customer service.(512) 505-7919communications@austinenergy.comaustinenergy.com/go/repoweringaustinenergy @austinenergyDOWNTOWN NETWORK SUBSTATION LOCATIONSWhat is a substation?Electricity is generated from power generation plants and renewable energy, such as wind and solar. It is then transmitted at high voltages across transmission lines. Substations receive the high-voltage energy, and transformers reduce the energy down to a voltage level that can be safely delivered to customers. Energy is then delivered to homes and businesses through a network of above ground and underground distribution circuits. Austin Energy is modernizing the grid beyond the traditional power delivery model by focusing on energy that can be generated here in our community. Advancements in rooftop solar and battery storage means some energy is generated and stored locally. Modern substations must be capable of distributing energy generated from anywhere.The new downtown substation will be a modern substation built to serve a Smart City like Austin. It is being designed as a gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) substation. GIS reduces the footprint of a traditional substation by as much as 70% and is ideal for urban locations.POWER DELIVERY MODELGENERATIONTRANSMISSIONDISTRIBUTIONWhy is a new substation needed downtown? Downtown Austin has experienced tremendous growth. The downtown electrical utilities system was built in the 1930’s for a smaller population than it serves today. The new substation will strengthen the downtown network along with the entire Repowering Downtown initiative. Building the new substation will also enable upgrades to the other two existing downtown network substations.DOWNTOWN SUBSTATION ANTICIPATED TIMELINESUBSTATIONPOWER PLANTLOCAL GENERATIONSUMMER2018FALL2018WINTER/SPRING 2019SPRING/SUMMER 2019SUMMER2019COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:Collect community input on concerns, desires, and preferencesPreliminary engineering and design beginsCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:Share aesthetic design concepts for enclosure and work with the public to reﬁne themSite preparation begins with water and wastewater line relocationCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:Present draft plan, collect feedback, and incorporate features into designSubstationconstructionSPRING2018SUBSTATIONENERGIZATIONFALL 2020FACT SHEET (INSIDE)FACT SHEET (BACK)FACT SHEET (FRONT)23DOWNTOWN SUBSTATIONCity-Owned Utility •Provides safe, reliable energy to 486,000 customers•8th largest publicly-owned utility in the U.S.Nationally Recognized as a Leader in Energy Innovation•40% renewable energy today; 65% by 2027•U.S. Dept. of Energy partner on SHINES battery storage program•Customer choice for 100% solar or 100% wind energyOperates Under Strict Regulatory Requirements •Austin City Council•Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)•Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC)•Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)•North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)•Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Who is Austin Energy?Mission: To safely deliver clean, affordable, reliable energy and excellent customer service.MEETING BOARDS24•Electricity is generated from power generationplants and renewableenergy, such as wind and solar.•It is then transmitted at high voltages across transmissionlines.•Substationsreceive the high-voltage energy, and transformers reducethe energy down to a voltage level that can be safely delivered tocustomers.•Energy is delivered to homes and businesses through a network ofabove ground and underground distribution circuits.Power Delivery ModelPower DeliveryAustin Energy is modernizing the grid beyond the traditional power delivery modelby focusing on energy that can be generated here in our community. Advancements in rooftop solar andbattery storage means some energy is generated and stored locally. Modern substations must be capable of distributing energy generated from anywhere. Downtown Network Substation Locations$60M initiative to increase capacity, resiliency, and reliability to meet the needs of our growing city. •Increase Distribution Tie Circuits•Add 70 MVA to Seaholm Substation•Build New Downtown Substation•Rebuild Brackenridge Substation•Upgrade Network Distribution Feeder Circuits•Convert 69kV Transmission Lines to 138kVRepowering Downtown25Austin Energy operates 77 substations across 437 square miles of service area. The downtown substation is being designed as a gas-insulated switchgear substation, which is ideal for densely-populated urban locations. Downtown SubstationGas-Insulated Switchgear (GIS) Compared to Air-Insulated Switchgear (AIS) Compact Design Significant footprint reduction (approximately 70% smaller)Capital CostsApproximately 2x moreO&MLower maintenance costsAestheticsGIS portion in a building and station surrounded by enclosureReliabilityGIS is less susceptible to faultsInstallationFaster site assembly with pre-assembly and testing completed at manufacturer EquipmentStandard power transformers and enclosed medium voltage utilized to reduce cost and increase maintainability Housed EquipmentDesign Considerations•Safety•Security•Footprint•Equipment needs•Access for maintenance•Clearance•Maintainability•Environmental impacts•Existing trees, infrastructure,and utilities•AestheticsEquipment and Design3-70 MVA 138/35 kV Power Transformers138 kV GIS3 Switchgear UnitsOpen Air EquipmentAll equipment enclosed by a decorative wall.26•Selected in 1999 for thefuture electric needs ofdowntown•Geographically located tomeet electrical requirements•Access to existing electricaltransmission and distributioncircuitsLocationPreliminary Layout •Total site: 1.46 acres•Usable space: 1.18 acres(Accounting for potential TxDOT right of way)•Space available forsubstation: 0.67 acres(Accounting for setbacks and trees) 27Aesthetic ElementsNature-basedModernColorful/ArtisticNotable Austin IconographyIndustrialPotential themes to incorporate are: Austin Energy wants to partner with the community on the aesthetic elements of the substation.•Collect community input on desires and preferences.•Share concepts for the enclosure and other aesthetic considerations and workwith the public to refine them.•Present a draft plan to the community and collect feedback.•Incorporate features into final design.ScheduleNext Steps:•Final zoning•Collect community input -survey open through July 8, 2018•Share report of community input•Engineering and design•Schedule next public meeting (fall 2018) to get input on potential design andaesthetic elements28□ □ □ □ □ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□SURVEY (ENGLISH)2930□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□SURVEY (SPANISH)3132COMMENT CARD33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34Survey Comments 175 English, 3 Spanish Respondents Survey questions that included an option for additional comments are included below. 2. Which of the following best describes you? (select all that apply) Other Connections to the Project Location Downtown Austin Alliance - Operations Own property nearby I am the Property Manager at SkyHouse Austin - neighbor to the project site Live downtown, and have rental at Milago as well Where is the new downtown location? Own property adjacent Engineer on local projects 3. Please share your top 3 areas of interest for the project, with 1 being your top interest. Other Areas of Interest No interest Is this going to cost taxpayers any money? Noise? Location is a bit strange with the old Holly street plant site just a few blocks away and not in as much of a congested area. Parking (1) Whether or not private developers persuaded council members to add the topic of a new substation to City of Austin agenda. Capacity This neighborhood needs a dog park. Build the project as much underground and add a dog park with a water installation or pond and install lots of trees. It is the entry to Rainey neighborhood and MACC and needs to be designed with least impact visually. What about electromagnetic radiation Involving young adults/opportunity youth in phases of construction and landscaping that make a difference in their lives while helping Austin Energy. American YouthWorks has teams of young people that can help with landscaping and trails around the facility. Young people would gain skills and experience, and a deeper connection to Austin’s infrastructure. Health and safety shouldn't even be up for debate. It should be a given. I'm most interested in the energy distribution improvements and maintenance cost reductions that could impact AE and its customers. Probably the impact on power generation and transmission. Not sure if that fits in one of the above categories. Construction timing and synching neighboring work 354. We have identified the following goals for the design and construction of the substation. Please indicate your level of understanding and support for these goals on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating strong preference (multiple answers can have the same rating). If you would like to suggest any additional goals, please do so below. Other Goals Where is the location for this substation? Represent a best and highest use of a city owned parcel in the specific location. You’re not going to appeal to everyone’s personal tastes, especially people in the Rainey neighborhood. This questions needs to be split apart into 2 in order to get an accurate reading. For example, I may fully support 5 the personal and public safety goal but have 0 information on how it is to be achieved 1. Also the 2nd and 3rd look like near duplicates of each other. Other goals I would tie to the interest areas above: to ensure environmental safety and minimize impact; minimize construction impact on surrounding businesses and homes (i.e., traffic, congestion, noise). Architecturally the building must create a focal point along i_35 and act as an important "gateway" structure for Austin - specifically downtown. 1. City of Austin should look more into meeting energy needs via utilizing renewable energy resources like Solar, by building a solar farm like in California. 2. City of Austin should encourage and impose on new buildings and architectures to utilize cheaper solar panels to be installed on their rooftops (if rooftops are not utilized) to cut down the demand. that location will make downtown look terrible. If we cannot continue to approve large projects/ high-rises into the city if a nice aesthetic is not possible all around. noise Have a build out that includes trail connectivity and native and drought tolerant plants and trees in the landscape. Engage Youth in the process. Please don't make it an ugly eyesore like Seaholm substation. 5. Below are possible themes for the substation’s outward aesthetics. Rate these on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating strong preference (multiple answers can have the same rating). Other Possible Themes Just build "it" This facility is incompatible with the current land use. The only acceptable method to build is sub-grade, with zero impact at the surface. This is feasible and has been done in other cities. Substation is yucky. No one wants it "in their backyard." However, if it's going to be here, putting an emphasis on Nature (surrounding plants, trees, greenery) will both be aesthetically pleasing and combat perception that living near such a monstrosity has detrimental impacts on health. Mid century modern design Most be iconic and represent a gateway for the city. Adding lots of trees to this area and making it look like a park would attract locals and gives back to the city. Consider indoor substation option for Lambie Street and Seaholm substation. 36Other Possible Themes Personally I don't think aesthetics are that important, I would rather that we spend more time into educating us about the different engineering and technical challenges that can influence the environment (health and safety) and the cost. I think it can be industrial if you add some interesting lighting like the SteelStacks Arts & Cultural Campus in Pennsylvania. Just don't cover it with a big box, we don't need more ugly, boring buildings in Austin! Make it unique, please. Seattle Denny Substation is a great example in an urban dense environment 8. Please share any additional comments here. Additional Comments I don't think this is such a great survey. It would have helped to have a picture or drawing of proposed use. With this survey we have no idea what the plant will comprise of Due to the growth of Austin this is a must, Should have already been started. Seems like they could locate it at the old power plant site just a few blocks further down Holly Street ...rather than near Rainey street and the residential areas. high voltage transmission lines may cause health issues to ppl near it. how deeply has this been looked at? Burying it should be an option, and is the forward thinking choice given the quickly-rising value of the land. It does not appear that the entire project scope is shared with the community. In addition, representatives continue to say they have no money for this project - they are not like the state of Washington. I find this difficult to understand - that limitations on this project are already in place, given the rapid planned growth in Austin for the next 10+ years. I don't want this facility in my neighborhood. It is incompatible with the current land use, and will negatively impact the aesthetics of the neighborhood. My primary concern is you are trying to pack too much into and already overcrowded area. How much more parking are we going to lose because of this project? It’s tough enough on the businesses in the area as it is. No location options were offered. It's always the most important stuff that the public doesn't have input on. 6. No materials were shared directly with me. 7. Just found the RNA Facebook page so no time yet to fully digest what opportunities there are to provide input. Make it walkable, attractive and integrative with the neighborhood. Let food trucks come in, perhaps an event space for SWSX. austin need to be fun to drive through make something that makes people say wow. More slugs The new substation has the potential to become a new Austin landmark - it would be great to see something beautiful, innovative and uniquely Austin. It would also be fantastic if design design coordinates with the MACC, either structurally or thematically. Consider indoor substation option for Lambie Street and Seaholm substation. Want to be able to vote on the top finalist design aesthetics Any chance of taking the existing high wires underground along the Lake trail from Congress to Rainey? The substation plan was done prior to Rainey becoming a super populated area. I'd like to see more information about safety concerns, how we plan to minimize electrical fields and noise of operating the substation that has direct impact to the health and safe being of the residents. 37Additional Comments Please add more sidewalks to the area and have something the community can use instead of making it a dead block. First I’ve heard of this While I realize one of the heritage trees is in TxDOT land, I really want to save the large trees. All of the goals identified for the new substation are vital. If an additional electric substation is required to keep downtown energy reliable and resilient and meet downtown energy needs, then it must be built. If it must be built, you MUST ensure the safety of those in its proximity (especially intoxicated people). And you must make it palatable to the surrounding community because the location is not isolated from people. This area is very visible, please use this as an opportunity to make something great for the community. Please don't build an ugly substation. Think Central Library, not Fiesta Mart on I35. Make it look like a building not an eyesore. 9. How did you learn about this survey? Other Sources NextDoor Neighbor Building manager emailed me. Towers.net blog towers.net RNA RNA Facebook page Email from Building General Manager Austin.towers Building manager emailed this to us Downtown Austin Association Austin Tower's newsletter towers.net Towers.net blog austin.towers.net Towers article Blog Towers Blog austin.towers.net client 10. If you would like project updates, please share your email address. 60 respondents shared their email address. 11. What is your zip code? Other Zip Codes (not mapped) Number of Respondents 78704 9 78741 7 78748 6 78757 5 78739, 78723, 78745, 78751 3 78724, 78749, 78754 2 78212, 78660, 78676, 78710, 78721, 78727, 78733, 78746, 78747, 78750, 78752, 78958, 78758 1 3812. What is your race/ethnicity? Other humn Persian Why would the city ask this? Swede = Norwegian second generation I'm Hispanic but not sure about the Latin x?! 39Written Comment Card 40MEETING FLYER Appendix B: Phase 2 Promotion & Figures 41MEETING POSTCARD (FRONT) MEETING POSTCARD (BACK) 42PROMOTIONAL SIGN 43ENGLISH FACT SHEET (OUTSIDE) ENGLISH FACT SHEET (INSIDE) 44SPANISH FACT SHEET (OUTSIDE) SPANISH FACT SHEET (INSIDE) 45MEETING BOARDS 46 47 48 49 50 51ENGLISH SURVEY 52SPANISH SURVEY 53COMMENT CARD (FRONT) 54COMMENT CARD (BACK) 55Survey Comments 440 Respondents Survey questions that included an option for additional comments are included below. 1. Which of the following best describes you? (select all that apply) Other Connections to the Project Location Downtown Austin Alliance - Operations 78701 I am the Director of Operations for Downtown Austin Alliance I am a professional in the art and design community responsible making sure individuals and companies look legitimate and worth every penny they wish to charge for whatever it is they do. I live downtown, and I'm often in the area around the station. I work for Austin Energy I bike commute past this location daily. Former resident of Austin, but still care about the city. Urban studies student at UT I have a professional design background and interested in the aesthetics of public design. I also work downtown but not real near the site. N/A 4. Please share your top three choices to name the substation. Other Names (subject to Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, approval) Ali Khan Substation Ali Khan Substation Ali Khan Substation Austin Public Library Substation Austin Weird Substation Bat City Substation Downtown Substation East Ave Substation East Ave. Substation East Avenue Art wall East Avenue Substation East Avenue Substation East Avenue Substation East Avenue Substation East Avenue Substation Elm Grove Substation “Go back to California”, “Don’t Dallas My Austin”, “Make Austin Small Again”, “Fire Steve Adler” Holly West MACC Substation 56Other Names (subject to Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, approval) MACC Substation MACC Substation Macc Substation Make Austin Great Again Substation Make Rainey Street Powered Again Robert Cullick Memorial Substation Side Tracks Substation Sparky McSparkface Subby McSubstation The Ohm Depot The Thing Substation Urban stupid location substation Volty McVoltface Waterloo Substation Waterloo Substation Willie Nelson Substation 8. Share any additional comments on the substation aesthetics or site here. Additional Comments Will be one of the most visible signs in Austin - once planned for welcome center I would like to see another survey on the final choices. Prefer a natural Gaudi like aesthetic if creative but otherwise if skewing modern it should be more timeless minimal and relaxing to the eye not wavy metal. We do not need more concrete downtown. We need to preserve green space. There is no way to make a substation pretty. It’s just lipstick on a pig. Please hire artists not just builders Murals are always a big hit, and we can incorporate local artists I truly hate the Limestone, Glass, & Tile Elements rendering but overall like the idea of something nature based. Bright colors should be avoided in keeping with the outstanding natural beauty of Lady Bird Lake. Please add as much street/sidewalk lighting on East & Lambie as possible for pedestrian safety and discouraging car break-ins. I'm concerned that metal wall elements could cause a lot of glare in direct sunlight. I live in Towers of Town Lake in a north-facing unit that will overlook this site. Please consider modeling of reflectivity of the materials throughout the year (different sunlight angles) in selecting final choices. (You probably already are!) Widen East Ave & Lambie St. by taking ~15ft of substation property along these streets. This is in addition to eliminating back-in parking. Keep trees The Rainey Street crowd will throw bottles, etc over wall!? Need lots of street lights for security It is a very expensive project that appears to not provide enough positive for the future. $30M put in another location that is large enough for future growth makes more sense. The City of Austin can come up with a better location! No ugly tile please! 57Additional Comments 1. Consider wall height greater than 12'. Substation so close to Rainey Street night life, need to consider prevention of items thrown over the wall 2. Please place East Street - street lighting, as safety prevention 3. Please place safety lighting on exterior of wall throughout 4. Please light the heritage trees to prevent shadows from occurring - safety issue, and to prevent tent cities under each heritage tree 5. Discuss with APD the amount of tent cities under I35 around this new substation - and begin NOW, to repeatedly take down the tent cities. There were significant problems at the vacant Villas on the Lake, foresee more problems for all at this site. 6. Use a product that is most resilient to graffiti and that when graffiti has to be removed that the wall still looks good. Please keep it traditional, easiest to clean graffiti Could Austin Energy release estimates for the cost of each aesthetic option? All of the walls look like a canvas for graffiti tagging. Will any of these surfaces have a protective coating so that graffiti can be removed easily? Metal gets very hot and feels less inviting I'm interested in getting information about the EMF impact this will have in the neighborhood...like testing results of how much and how far they travel All materials should be eco and recycled, local This substation is going to be a tremendous eyes sore and a public safety risk. The site selection is not compatible with the surrounding setting. If it is to be built, it should be constructed sub-grade to minimize aesthetic impacts on the adjacent community. If you end up using the native plants for this area, please email me at [redacted] for free native plants from one of our sites in Pflugerville. I have an informal list of a native plant survey that we did. The boulders are a terrible idea. Since it's an electrical station I'm more interested in durability and electrical shielding from the enclosure. I'd like it to not stand out too much so that we do not need to refresh it too often based on design trends. Rusted metal would look good. Avoid color- why attract attention to a substation? Below ground would have been preferred. The only thing I couldn't live with here is the artificial boulders. Native boulders are easy to come by and cheaper as well. Artificial boulders wont age well. Would love smooth and colorful concrete, with a mix of stone and a blue ribbon wave as in the nature-based rendering. The nature-based rendering looks as if Waller Creek has designed it and does not have a neighborhood feel at all. I'd don't see it here but would also love a modern wall with straight lines, edges, angles in a mix of smooth shiny concrete, limestone, and straight line metal wave instead of curvy on top and bottom. Don't add expense. Keep it natural looking and not something that will get outdated, need cleaning or too distracting. Don't make it comfortable for camping. Make it nice! It would be ideal if the wall could interact with the landscape a bit more - for example, a slight vertical garden (using succulents that don't need water), or at a minimum, vines on the wall, perhaps with seating (on the boulders?). Right now seems like a barrier rather than an activated space in the middle of an area that is soon to have many more people. Should the wall have any windows, or, opportunities to view the infrastructure beyond? Like an open kitchen in a restaurant, ex. Top choice combo: The black metal trees panel with smooth, white artificial boulders and native grasses and flowers! Awesome! 58Additional Comments Thanks for taking so much time & effort to get community input!! Landscaping options: I would like edible herbs for foraging and cooking Enclosure wall options: I would like kids and graffiti artist to decorate the outside as a community art project Build something that are easy to maintain in long term! Fancy design looks good initially. But they are costly and they look terrible after they get tagged or damaged. Build something that can be easy to clean, repair, replace and maintainable!!!!!! Just do your best to pick a timeless design. Several of these options seem like they'll look quite dated in 20 years. Will the chosen aesthetics look outdated in 20 years? Something to think about. I like the Nature Based wall option best because it is representative of the naturalness of the area. It looks nice. Too bad a dog park (dog run) can not be incorporated into the remaining open park area I like all of these elements *most favorite (Comment written on Enclosure Walls section. Respondent ranked all Nature-Based options as 1, and starred Limestone, Glass, & Tile. Would be better to provide "green" buffer between East Ave & Fence. ALSO...the most attention should be placed on the walkable sidewalks, which are Cesar Chavez & East Avenue...that might be let to an "Arts in Public Places" competition. I'm worried about tagging. What are plans to keep clean? Written in landscaping section: Skateboarders will abuse [cut limestone blocks]. Please no rain garden unless maintenance is included. Rain garden at East Ave. near the Holiday Inn looks messy most of the year. Please don't make rain garden as the one at Holiday Inn Honestly, I don’t feel a strong dislike toward any of the 3 designs—more just feel a preference toward the Nature-based Design. Also, trying to consider how it will wear (materials and aesthetics) over time. You should definitely pick the Modern blue wave one. Make it look rich and modern like the Domain. Would love to see something colorful, fun, and -- importantly -- well lighted. (Good lighting would help make this area feel safer when walking from Rainey under the overpass to the Eastside.) Create mind-bending wall sculptures that play with perspective to create unbelievable optical illusions. consider sound absorption - always helpful wherever we can get it in city I’d love a modern art look The blue modern is not only visually appealing, it brings to mind the river flowing through town. Water is also calming, as is the color blue, which is great for people in a rush. It’s a great fit. It should match current and new development going up, which is modern or artistic. Don’t pretend it is a nature park. wall w/great streets rendering is the best and could be enhanced w/ the landscaping. Wall would be more discrete. Select something that is durable & will continue to look good over the long term w/easy maintenance. Please be unique to Austin/Texas and not something you could find in any city. Safe lightning and other elements as this could be a spot for predators after bar hours. Maybe Uber/taxi line up area. Photo back drop worthy for tourism. 59Additional Comments I like color, but I like the prefabricated tiles of concrete artwork on the nature based design. Could you add shard of colored glass into the mixture? Must be blue please Do something subtle that just works and has a nice texture to it, whether concrete or metal. Do not try too hard, it’s not meant to be ‘capital A’ architecture. It will get tagged, so material should be easy to clean - remove graffiti. The modern design will look great against the backdrop of the high rise buildings going in (which are all glass / exposed concrete). This should help meld it into the look of the area. It should be left open to expose the eyesore. Everyone should see how they have ruined Austin I'm typically on a bike when I'm in this area. The East Avenue cross-section shows car parking on both sides of the street, two wide car travel lanes, an 18'-wide Pedestrian Zone, and not 1 inch for bikes. Why is our utility's design so car-dominant? The 2014 Austin Bike Master Plan calls for a bike lane here. I wish "nature-based" meant a wall meant to look like it was formed by nature, not a wall with cartoon nature stuck on it for decoration. Please don't put any black or off white painted surfaces - those colors will not age well. Rain garden?? Not like Holiday Inn native and adapted vine collection growing up and around wall panels Rendering of a cattle drive. Something Texas! I wish you put this much effort into Seaholm. Can you combine the landscape and walls and have green screen walls with native plants and vines? The "Natural" concept will be the most visually appealing and will seamlessly blend in to the neighborhood. Trying to made the substation visually interesting with the more highly visual and bright elements does not seem like the right move here. Bright colors just draw attention & doesn't fit in with Rainey. Metal that rusts is my preferred choice - as an example - the new building just north of Saltillo on the east side of 35. I think you should have rotating art murals. The walls will more than likely get graffiti’d so why not get in front of that? It will make the area a tourist attraction! You can hold a contest for best designs! consider space for murals/street artist. What can be done to prevent this area from becoming a area for homeless to sleep and defecate? Would there be any wood + metal enclosure wall options? Can the textured tiles be colored? Please just make sure it is an accessible, pedestrian friendly environment! I have no objections to calling something "nature-based", but that design is ugly. Be thinking about how it will become a part of the urban fabric and character of the Rainey Street district. Keep in mind the new towers that will be across the street 44 East and 48 East. The walls should have different intensities on each side - the east ave and 35 frontage are highest priority. There needs to be a greater separation between the wall and the sidewalk. At least 10' - the scale of the wall is imposing and foreboding for the neighborhood. This is right by I-35 in an expanding area, I think it should look as interesting as humanly possible. Why not make it an attraction? This should be the Walt Disney Concert Hall of substations. 60Additional Comments While I admire Lady Bird very much she never wanted Town Lake named for her. Her daughter did. Let's respect her. The nature-based one offers a lot of fantastic opportunities. Red colorful/artful is by far the best Make it WEIRD please. Could HOPE outdoor gallery have a presence here? I love the metal and concrete wave with the bold ombré colors. A substation is not ideal so this should be treated as a bold art project. Being downtown, it would look dull having a nature theme to it. It’s not located in a green belt environment. like the idea of seating for people. Highly concerned about the vagrants right under i35, that they will migrate over to this area. Please place some sort of grated air flow cover over the open air station area - something to cover the open air station 9. Are you satisfied with the opportunities to provide input and community engagement? Additional Comments on Community Engagement 1. Protect all trees 2. More lighting on both East Ave & Lambie 3. Widen Lambie - we use the street to go south on 35 (to go north - we use East Ave to River St. 4. Graffiti-proof fencing Cost estimates, otherwise great. Very dissatisfied because when Dan Smith came to our TLNA meeting a year ago he assured us that it would not look like Seaholm because of new equipment that could have a roof over it...I came to the MACC a few weeks ago and there was no mention of a roof...I continue to feel that I am wasting my time to come to these meetings because no one listens or cares what the community has to put up with on a daily basis. There should be more food and drink at events. Would like an open air cover to be addressed; as well as how the prevention of homeless / vagrants can be discouraged from coming to this new location - given the current homeless tent city that continually reappears at Cesar Chavez IH35 underpass. A roof with adequate ventilation would improve the appearance of the substation. I am not yet satisfied but will continue to create opportunities until residents feel they have been heard. I am disappointed that we did not hear from Austin Energy for a few months and in this time renderings were created and with some collaboration with Waller Creek. There should have been an invitation to at least the neighborhood association to look at materials, colors, etc. The residents live near the substation, not Waller Creek and as far as I know they will not be paying for the substation. Would have preferred to be involved at an earlier stage, feels like this "engagement" is pretty cosmetic, since that is really all you are asking about. Definitely take input from the community, but also put some thoughts to long term integrity/maintenance/operation of the substation! How tall is this substation? It looks like this wall is not tall enough and most of the substation will still be visible. On site is always helpful description of the need to replace an aging station. Most I speak to say it is not worth their time because you are doing what you want to with little regard to input. I love community involvement and the opportunity to participate in selective voting from my smartphone. Thank you for offering this as an opportunity to participate instead of 61Additional Comments on Community Engagement having to attend a boring council meeting or TX Dot meeting at a middle school in some random part of town on a night that you already have plans or work obligations so you end up missing the meeting or get stuck in legendary traffic on Lamar or in the 35 parking lot. I would love to vote more like this on multiple occasions and projects. Thank you! Provide a buffer of vegetation between pedestrian sidewalk and street - make walkers feel safe rather than exposed to high traffic. Provide some kind of concrete assurance that the "opportunities to provide input and community engagement" is legitimate and use some kind of 3rd party to handle and publicize the data collected, that way we know whether or not the engagement is actually engaging something. I do not like the overall location of this plant. CD&P rocks!! I don't think that attention should be drawn to the station. Rusty metal is interesting, aesthetically, and doesn't draw attention. Homewood Suites is an example of a colorful design on East that does not work. Thanks for staying committed to public engagement :) wish there was more effort to make public aware of these efforts. Trees should have superior soil volumes (1000cu yd of soil per tree) Extreme care should be taken while working around the massive heritage tree in the AE easement - consult with Keith Mars for boring techniques. please have more communication, be more active with the city in getting rid of the tent cities continually popping up. 10. How did you learn about this survey? Other Sources A neighbor in my building (Austonian) posted it on our internal intranet. Nextdoor As a Board member of the RNA. NextDoor Austin energy website Nextdoor Austin Towers NextDoor Austin Towers (Website) nextdoor Austin Towers blog Nextdoor Austin towers blog Nextdoor Austin Towers blog Nextdoor austin.towers.com Nextdoor Austin.Towers.net NextDoor Austin.Towers.net Nextdoor posting austin.towers.net Online article on website austin.towers.net austin.towers.net RNA Austintowers.net Sign Blog (Austin Towers) Sign on Rainey St. Building link Signs building management tower.net Condo bldg newsletter TOWERS Condo new - Towers of Townlake Towers blog 62Other Sources co-worker sent me an email Towers blog Downtown Austin Alliance Towers Blog Facebook Towers blog Facebook Towers email Facebook towers Towers of Town Lake Board From building lobby (The Shore) Towers Website https://austin.towers.net Towers.com https://austin.towers.net/ Towers.net internet towers.net Neighborhood newsletter. Nextdoor.com Towers.net Next door towers.net Nextdoor Towers.net Nextdoor Towers.net NextDoor Towers.net NextDoor Towers.net email. Following the process because of Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association. Nextdoor website Website: Austin Towers 63