Animal Advisory Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Jan. 13, 2020

APA! 2019 Q4 Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Animal Advisory Commission Report Q4 2019 This report is intended to give a high level overview of Austin Pets Alive!’s lifesaving operations each quarter, with a focus on APA!’s impact on Travis county through our partnership with Austin Animal Center. Intakes​ - Compared to Q4 2018, APA transfers from AAC were up 18% overall in Q4 2019, with a 74% increase in cat transfers and a 12% decrease in dog transfers. Total Cat Transfers from AAC Total Dog Transfers from AAC Total Transfers from AAC Q4 2019 388 366 754 Q4 2018 223 415 638 % Change '19 v '18 74% -12% 18% Detailed Breakdown of APA Intakes from AAC AAC - Cat Behavior AAC - Cat Bottle Baby (Includes BIC) AAC - Cat Maternity AAC - Cat Medical AAC - Cat Space AAC - Dog BIC AAC - Dog Behavior Large/Medium AAC - Dog Behavior Small AAC - Dog Bottle Baby AAC - Dog Maternity AAC - Dog Medical AAC - Dog Parvo Transfer AAC - Dog Space Large/Medium AAC - Dog Space Small Total AAC Travis - PASS Travis - Parvo OS/PASS Total Travis 1 of 5 Reserved Oct 2019 10 118 8 74 16 19 7 3 5 2 17 1 76 15 371 25 0 396 Nov 2019 4 48 9 41 34 6 5 0 12 1 23 5 32 10 230 16 0 246 Dec 2019 6 6 0 14 0 42 5 0 5 2 23 4 40 6 153 12 0 165 Q4 2019 20 172 17 129 50 67 17 3 22 5 63 10 148 31 754 53 0 807 © 2019 Austin Pets Alive! All Rights 2 of 5 © 2019 Austin Pets Alive! All Rights Reserved The first chart shows AAC to APA transfers as a percentage of total AAC Intakes for Q4 2019 compared to Q4 2018 as a way of gauging how APA is responding to increased AAC intakes. The second chart shows AAC to APA transfers as a percentage of total AAC Intakes for the last four quarters (Q1 of 2019 through Q4 of 2019). 3 of 5 © 2019 Austin Pets Alive! All Rights Reserved Q4 2019 November 2019 December 2019 Dog Total Cat Dog Total Cat Dog Total Cat 5 0 0 3 13 1 October 2019 Cat 136 1 0 0 0 2 0 139 197 3 0 0 3 3 1 …

Scraped at: Jan. 19, 2020, 8:50 p.m.
Jan. 13, 2020

Code Revision ASO Proposed Language original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Jan. 19, 2020, 8:50 p.m.
Jan. 13, 2020

Code Revision Proposed Language Item 4b original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Jan. 19, 2020, 8:50 p.m.
Jan. 13, 2020

Dec 2019 Animal Services Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

December 2019 November 2019 Animal Services Report ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT Animal Services News Adoption Promotions Animal Protection December.  The live outcome rate for December was 98.9 percent.  A total of 866 animals were adopted (519 dogs, 347 cats).  A total of 228 dogs and cats were returned to their owners (RTOs).  Home for the Pawlidays adoption promotion ran from December 16 through 23. Adoption fees were $10 for all pets at the shelter. During that time, 230 animals were adopted (97 cats and 133 dogs).  Animal Protection Officers returned 106 animals to their owners in the field during the month of  Officers handed out 31 fencing assistance applications, implanted four microchips and impounded 70 injured animals.  A total of 28 animals were transferred to Austin Wildlife Rescue.  Officers entered 192 rabies exposure reports and submitted 26 specimens for rabies testing. One bat tested positive.  Wildlife APO had another month of record breaking coyote complaints at 147: o 100 sightings o 16 wild sick reports of possible mange o 6 encounters o 6 incidents o 6 wild injured reports o 6 observations o 1 public assist (yard audit)  Out of 147 coyote related reports, 112 fell within the reported behavior types (sighting, encounter, and incident). Incidents: Pets and livestock were a factor in five of the six verified actives  o One incident included a coyote suspected of killing a dog that escaped the backyard. The attack was not seen or heard, but the dog was found in the greenbelt. o One incident included a coyote suspected of killing a dog in a fenced backyard. The attack was not seen or heard. o One incident included a coyote suspected of taking a dog out of a backyard. The attack was not seen or heard but blood was found in the backyard. November 2019 Animal Services Report o One incident included a coyote that grabbed an unattended cat, but a neighbor hazed the coyote to drop the cat. The cat had minor injuries. o One incident included a coyote that killed an unattended cat. The attack was not seen or heart, but was caught on a security camera. o One incident included a coyote that ran toward a car. The citizen was not able to determine if the coyote was crossing the street, or being aggressive. The citizen did not see any …

Scraped at: Jan. 19, 2020, 8:50 p.m.
Jan. 13, 2020

20200113-4B: Recommendation re Code Revisions 3-1-1 (20) original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

Recommendation

Scraped at: Feb. 11, 2020, 4:50 p.m.
Jan. 13, 2020

Approved Minutes January 13 2020 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Approved Minutes

Scraped at: Feb. 12, 2020, 9:50 p.m.