Austin Convention Center Expansion Recommendation Votes, May 2, 2017 — original pdf

Backup

YES -RECOMMENDATION –NOBREAKDOWNNoDon’t Agree, butNeutral, howeverAgree, ifYes5/2/2017AUSTIN CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSIONRecommendation BreakdownNo1-voteDon’t Agree, but1-voteNeutral, however0-votesAgree, if5-votesYes6-votes5/2/2017AUSTIN CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSIONRecommendation Breakdown5/2/2017•No CommentNo•No, But if it is going through, we should articulate the case against for the record.Don’t Agree, but•If, no 2% increaseAgree, if•If, Palm School, MACC, Red River district projects are included. (2% Ch 351 increase) Agree, if•-Urban design thought through –street, sidewalks, -access•-Save money, improve space through sharing buildingAgree ,if•If, there is a clear set of recs for the expansion of money dedicated to music, historically under replentedgroups and dupmnt. of tourist oppsin historically under represented districts.Agree, if•If, includes 2B & Public Realm well DesignedAgree, if•No commentYes•No commentYes•No commentYes•Yes, with 2BYes•Yes, with 2BYes•Yes, excess % of funds used to support other areas without decreasing funding already in placeYes