Urban Forestry BoardMarch 18, 2015

H3 - City Arborist Program 2014 Annual Heritage Tree Report — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

2014 Heritage Tree Report Keith W. Mars City Arborist Program Planning and Development Review Department Overview of Presentation City Arborist Workflow 2014 Heritage Tree Review - Site Plan and Subdivision Permits - Heritage Tree TORA Permits - Dead, Diseased, or Hazard Permits The Big Picture Challenges and Opportunities Predevelopment Consultation Development Review Inspection Permit Data Analysis Work Flow Overview City Arborist Development Review, Inspection, and Permit Analysis Site Plan and Subdivision Review for Heritage Trees No Land Use Commission variances Reviewed 118 site plans and subdivisions 65% and 18% increase from 2013 in # of site plans and subdivisions reviewed ~18,000 inches surveyed ~17,000 inches preserved ~1000 inches removed (95% preservation of healthy heritage trees) 2014 Heritage Tree Permits 1083 heritage trees were reviewed on tree permits in 2014 33,340 inches of trees reviewed 35 healthy heritage trees allowed to be removed American Elm 13% Bald Cypress 1% Black Walnut 0% Bur Oak 0% Cedar Elm 8% Chinquapin Oak 0% Durand Oak 0% Live Oak 41% Pecan 23% Post Oak 6% Red Oak 7% Texas Ash 1% Heritage Trees by Species Reviewed on Tree Permits in 2014 Tree Condition Permits 350 dead, diseased, or imminent hazard heritage trees were reviewed on tree permits in 2014 10842.5, inches of dead, diseased, or imminent hazard trees permitted for removal Heritage Tree Mortality on Tree Permits Species 2014 Number Reviewed 2014 Dead, Diseased, or Hazardous 2014 % Mortality 2013 % Mortality 2012 % Mortality 2011 % Mortality American Elm 143 105 73% 78% 86% 85% Cedar Elm 80 37 46% 52% 47% 50% Live Oak 445 67 15% 20% 24% 26% Pecan 249 75 30% 33% 40% 31% Post Oak 67 22 33% 39% 50% 38% Red Oak 73 37 51% 57% 71% 71% Big Picture The ordinance is working (>95% preservation rate of heritage trees) Regulatory options for means to end Programmatic reorganzation Citizens and development community engaging earlier in development process Dynamic city, dynamic forest Ensuring community values are protected Urban Forest Challenges and Opportunities 4th year as fastest growing city in country while protecting the urban forest Protection of tree species less than 19” Fulfilling vision of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Urban Forest Plan CodeNext Questions? Keith W. Mars City of Austin Arborist Program Planning and Development Review Dept. 512-974-2755 keith.mars@austintexas.gov