Resource Management Commission - June 18, 2024

Resource Management Commission Regular Meeting of the Resource Management Commission

Multifamily & Commercial Project Pipeline Monthly Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

Multifamily & Commercial Project Pipeline – Monthly Report 06/07/2024 Figure 1: Commercial and Multifamily Project Pipeline Commercial and Small Business Multifamily 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 t n u o C t c e o r P j 74 105 7 7 Pre-Approval in Progress Approved: Installation and Verification 18 Pre-Approval in Progress Approved: Installation and Verification Multifamily Multifamily Income Qualified 1. Figures includes all leads and applications, regardless of estimated rebate amount. In coordination with the customer and contractor, Austin Energy periodically removes leads and new applications that do not proceed to Installation. a. “Pre-Approval in Progress” includes: 1) customer/contractor submitted leads; 2) applications in development but not yet submitted to Austin Energy; and 3) applications submitted to Austin Energy that are under review for eligibility and approval of project scope. b. “Approved: Installation and Verification” includes projects: 1) approved with installation underway; and 2) where installation is complete and final inspection and quality review are ongoing. c. Paid projects are listed on the preceding RMC summary table in this report. 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 t n u o C t c e o r P j 145 Project Pipeline Notes: 2. Pipeline Definitions Multifamily & Commercial Project Pipeline – Monthly Report 06/07/2024 Table 1: Multifamily and Multifamily Income Qualified – Estimated RCA Project Pipeline (for estimated rebates >$72k) Program Latest Workflow Enrollment (s) # Location Name Installation Address Council District Estimated kW savings Estimated kWh savings Estimated $ Incentive Installation Lincoln Oaks 263.3 766,330 $257,806 11700 Metric Blvd 1266038, 1279735, 1292608, 1292617 Measures Planned Phase 1 (Complete): Water Saving Devices, Phase 2 (In Progress): LED Lighting, Plenum Remediation & Seal, HVAC Tune-Up, Smart Thermostats Total # of Units 296 Installation 1277574 Buckingham Place Duplexes 743 YARSA BLVD Installation 1301882 West Koenig Flats 5608 Avenue F 34.2 159,495 $74,700 HVAC Tune-Ups, Smart Thermostats 166 39.0 185,377 $109,200 HVAC Tune-up, Smart Thermostats 210 Installation 1299361 79.6 286,993 $151,432 HVAC Tune-Ups, Smart Thermostats, LED Lighting 292 Installation 1303113 53.5 256,991 $124,640 HVAC Tune-Ups, Smart Thermostats 304 Multifamily Income Qualified Multifamily Income Qualified Multifamily Income Qualified Multifamily Income Qualified Multifamily Income Qualified Multifamily Installation 1301185 Elan East 59.0 327,616 $121,687 HVAC Tune-Ups, Smart Thermostats, Water Saving Devices, ECAD Multifamily Installation 1300529 34.1 143,396 $100,399 HVAC Tune-Ups, Smart Thermostats, Attic Insulation Multifamily Installation 1301881 71.8 336,393 $205,412 HVAC Tune-Ups, Smart Thermostats 356 …

Scraped at: June 13, 2024, noon

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION June 18, 2024 6:00 p.m. Austin Energy Headquarters; 1st Floor; Shudde Fath Conference Room 4815 Mueller Blvd, Austin, Texas 78723 Some members of the Resource Management Commission maybe participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register contact Natasha Goodwin, at Natasha.Goodwin@austinenergy.com or 512-322-6505. AGENDA GeNell Gary Shane Johnson Dino Sasaridis Chelsey Scaffidi Members: Louis Stone, Chair Paul Robbins, Vice Chair Charlotte Davis Trey Farmer CALL MEETING TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 5 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Alison Silverstein Vacant Vacant 1. Approve the minutes of the Resource Management Commission Regular Meeting on May 21, 2024. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Recommend approval of the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for approval to include in the 5-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8. 3. Recommend approving amendments to the Resource Management Commission bylaws to include advising on all matters related to natural gas companies that serve customers within the City of Austin, including franchise agreements, rates, and conservation programs. STAFF BRIEFINGS The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Natasha Goodwin at Austin Energy, at (512) 322-6505 or email Natasha.Goodwin@austinenergy.com for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Resource Management Commission, please contact Natasha Goodwin at Austin Energy, at 512-322- 6505 or email Natasha.Goodwin@austinenergy.com . 4. Staff briefing regarding the Single Family Residential Landscape Transformation Activities by Kevin Critendon, Assistant Director, Environmental, Planning and Development Services and Christopher Charles, Water Conservation Coordinator. 5. Discussion regarding a review of Austin Energy solar & battery deployment policies, with improvements identified. Part 2: …

Scraped at: June 14, 2024, 2:30 a.m.

Customer Energy Solutions FY 24 Savings Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Energy Efficiency Services EES- Appliance Efficiency Program EES- Home Energy Savings - Rebate EES- AE Weatherization & CAP Weatherization - D.I. * EES- School Based Education * EES- Strategic Partnership Between Utilities & Retailers * EES- Multifamily Rebates EES- Multifamily WX-D.I.+ EES- Commercial Rebate EES- Small Business Energy Efficiency TOTAL Demand Response (DR) - Annual Incremental DR- Power Partner DR- Commercial Demand Response (frmly Load Coop) Demand Response (DR) TOTAL Green Building GB- Residential Ratings GB- Residential Energy Code GB- Multifamily Ratings GB- Multifamily Energy Code GB- Commercial Ratings GB- Commercial Energy Code Green Building TOTAL CES MW Savings Grand TOTAL Residential Totals Commercial Totals Non-Public - AE # Customer Energy Solutions FY24 YTD MW Savings Report As of April 2024 Participant Type Participants To Date MWh To Date MW Goal 2.60 0.90 0.44 0.30 1.75 0.65 1.00 6.00 2.00 15.64 MW Goal 6.40 2.00 8.40 MW Goal 0.26 1.63 3.00 6.00 4.20 3.90 19.00 MW To Date 1.16 0.18 0.25 0.07 0.82 1.64 0.72 1.84 0.46 7.14 MW To Date 3.33 3.33 MW To Date 0.22 0.92 1.20 3.22 2.89 1.86 10.31 Percentage 45% 20% 57% 23% 47% 252% 72% 31% 23% Percentage 52% 0% Percentage 84% 56% 40% 54% 69% 48% Customers Customers Customers Products Products Apartments Apartments Customers Customers Devices Customers Customers Customers Dwellings Dwellings 1,000 sf 1,000 sf Participant Type Participants To Date MWh To Date Participant Type Participants To Date MWh To Date Rebate Budget Spent to Date 2,186.36 251.52 474.27 358.00 2,096.00 4,055.61 1,756.49 4,556.20 1,014.64 16,749.09 0 0.00 259 1,269 3,043 4,832 5,011 6,154 20,568 Rebate Budget $ 1,500,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,577,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 900,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 13,327,000 Spent to Date $ 707,183 $ 345,346 $ 2,437,783 $ 78,745 $ 431,293 $ 2,337,725 $ 1,056,077 $ 1,231,780 $ 402,755 $ 9,028,687 Rebate Budget $ 1,600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,600,000 $ 254,230 $ 254,230 $ 9,300 $ - $ 47,000 $ - $ 56,300.00 $ - 1,624 176 356 1,595 94,865 5,245 3,355 70 61 12,482 2,344 2,344 271 1,155 3,108 6,426 2,290 6,191 10,960 0 MW Goal 43.04 MW To Date 20.78 Percentage Participant Type Participants To Date MWh To Date 25,786 37,317.31 Rebate Budget $ 16,983,300 Spent to Date $ 9,282,917 15.93 19.11 9.31 17.17 58% 90% 110,986 18,016 12706.09 19171.39 $ $ 11,577,000 2,061,871 $ $ 7,648,382 3,350,000 Thermal Energy Storage TOTAL …

Scraped at: June 14, 2024, 2:30 a.m.

Item 2- DWPZ CIP Memo original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Memorandum To: Boards and Commissions From: Shay Ralls Roalson, Director, Austin Water Date: March 30, 2024 Subject: Board and Commission and Citizen Review of new Growth-related Capital Improvement Projects in Drinking Water Protection Zone The Austin City Council approved an amendment to Austin Water’s (AW) Financial Policy No. 8 to provide for enhanced Board and Commission and citizen reviews of AW’s new growth-related capital improvement projects (CIP) located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ). The previous ordinance (No. 20130117-017) took effect on January 28, 2013 and on August 11, 2021 ordinance (No. 20210811-001) amended the DWPZ financial policy. AW is presenting the new growth-related projects to Boards and Commissions as set forth in the ordinance. The revised Financial Policy No. 8 reads as follows: Capital improvement projects for new water and wastewater treatment plants, capital expansions, and growth-related projects that are located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ) will be identified and submitted, as part of the annual budget process, to the following Boards and Commissions: Water and Wastewater Commission, Resource Management Commission, and the Environmental Board. These Boards and Commissions will review growth-related DWPZ capital projects spending plans, obtain Board and Commission and citizen input, review consistency with Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, review effect on growth within the DWPZ, and make recommendations on project approval for inclusion in Austin Water's five-year capital spending plan. This summer, AW representatives will be distributing a brief report to the Commissions on the CIP projects located in the DWPZ related to the financial policy. Attachments: CIP Subprojects Summary CIP Subprojects Supplemental Information and Map The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Austin Water Infrastructure Management Financial Policy No. 8 Drinking Water Protection Zone Projects Summary FY25-29 CIP Plan Development Each year, as part of the City of Austin Budget approval process, Austin Water submits a plan for the capital improvements program (CIP) spending for the upcoming five-year period. Austin Water’s FY25-29 CIP Plan includes projects located across the Austin metropolitan area, including the Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ). In compliance with Austin Water’s Financial Policy No. 8, the capital improvement projects for new water and wastewater treatment plants, capital expansions, and growth related projects that are located in the DWPZ are presented below for consideration by City of Austin Boards and Commissions. …

Scraped at: June 14, 2024, 2:30 a.m.

Item 3- Proposed Resource Management Commission Bylaw Changes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Proposed Resource Management Commission Bylaw Changes BYLAWS OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE AND DUTIES. The purpose of the commission is to: (A) Maintain an overview of all programs, studies and proposals concerning the efficient use of energy, alternate energy technologies, renewable energy resources, including solar and wind, and the conservation of energy, excluding the use of conventional coal, nuclear, natural gas, or petroleum technologies. (B) Serve as a liaison with other city commissions and commissions, including the Electric Utility Commission. (C) Receive public input on alternate energy technologies, renewable energy sources, and on energy conservation. (D) Review and analyze: (1) energy conservation technologies and renewable energy sources as to their short-term and long-term feasibility in the city; (2) energy conservation policies, alternate energy technologies, and renewable energy projects in other cities and states; (3) water conservation policies, alternate technologies, and water conservation projects in other cities and states; and (4) the City Code to identify potential amendments that encourage the use of alternate energy technologies and renewable energy sources, and the conservation of energy. (5) issues concerning natural gas utilities in Austin, including fair and equitable rates and bills, energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, environmental issues related to utility system operation, assistance to low-income customers, progress on the City of Austin’s Climate Equity Plan, and franchise negotiations. (E) Advise the city council: (1) in the developing and reviewing city plans and programs in the area of alternate energy technologies, renewable energy sources, and energy conservation. (2) as to available funding from private and public sources which are available to the city for alternate energy technologies and renewable energy, and for the conservation of energy; (3) on energy conservation, on alternate energy technologies, and on renewable energy sources and report to city council on the status of its activities at least annually; (4) in developing and reviewing city plans and programs that encourage water conservation as it relates to water consumption from the tap to customer and within structures or building; and (5) regarding appropriate City Code amendments that encourage the use of alternate energy technologies and renewable energy sources, and the conservation of energy; (6) natural gas utility matters, including: fair and equitable rates and bills that minimize consumer costs, cost-effective energy efficiency programs; cost-effective renewable energy programs; research and development of new technologies for energy efficiency and renewable energy; programs that reduce the burden on …

Scraped at: June 14, 2024, 2:30 a.m.

Item 4- Briefing Single Family Residential Landscape Transformation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

Landscape Transformation Activities Resource Management Commission | June 18, 2024 Kevin Critendon P.E., Assistant Director, Environmental, Planning & Development Ser vices Christopher Charles, Water Conser vation Coordinator Why New Water Conservation Measures?  Lakes are 50% full  Highland Lakes inflow • 2022 - record low • 2023 – 4th lowest  El Niño will shift to La Niña  Drought Stage 2 restrictions  Per-person use has declined but plateaued 2 Landscape Transformation Strategy  From traditional landscaping to plants with reduced water needs  New single-family residential  Potential limits on turf and irrigation  Savings goal of 2,490 AF (811 MG) by 2040 3 Public Engagement & Input  Public and stakeholder meetings • February, May, June, & November 2022 • August 2023  Smaller stakeholder group meetings  Speak Up Austin! page • 2 surveys (256 and 303 responses) • Majority of local responses favored regulating landscape transformation 4 Internal City Stakeholders  Watershed Protection Department (WPD)  Development Services Department (DSD)  Austin Energy (AE) – Green Building  Office of Sustainability  Equity Office  Planning and Housing Department  Wildlife Austin (PARD)  Austin Fire Department – (Wildland-Urban Interface) 5 Stakeholder Meetings  Home Builders Association of Greater Austin (HBA) • Concern about project delays  Central Texas Professional Irrigation Association - • Supported increased enforcement • Supported high-efficiency irrigation system components  Association of Professional Landscape Architects (CTPIA) (ASLA)  Texas Nursery and Landscape Assoc. 6 (TNLA – Region 8) Additional Meetings  Other utilities in Texas • New Braunfels • City of Frisco • Model homes with 50% turf reduction • Post-installation inspections (within 1-2 days) • Irrigation check-up • Georgetown • Residential landscape ordinance 7 Steps to Transform Landscapes Build with savings Set customers up for success Encourage alternative water 8 Build with Savings  Enhanced Soil Inspections • A minimum of 6 inches of topsoil • Topsoil mix composed of 20% compost • Estimated Water Savings: 10% reduction 9  Required residential plant list • Apply commercial plant requirements to residential • Grow Green Plant Guide as a model Build with Savings  Limit irrigation area • Up to 50% of landscape area; front yard or back • Estimated Water Savings: 35% annually per home 10 Set Customers Up for Success Est. Water Savings Potential Cost 22% savings $543 plus labor 10% savings Austin Water inspection 5% savings Austin …

Scraped at: June 14, 2024, 2:30 a.m.

Item 5- AE Solar and Storage Policy - Part 2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

A review of Austin Energy solar & battery deployment policies, with improvements identified Part 2: The AE solar rebate and Inspection D. SASARIDIS 18 JUNE 2024 AE Solar Rebate Australia enjoys fully installed solar, on homes, at 1/3 the cost of the USA. Why? Deployment “friction”, reverse incentives, & regional rule variation High Costs Complicated installations Low volume, high profit business model, targeting rich customers Inadequate competition among installers AE Solar Rebate - $2500 Fixed (single family), $ 0.60 / W (multi family) Source: https://austinenergy.com/-/media/project/websites/austinenergy/green-power/res-solar-pv-guidelines.pdf RequirementsProblem with RequirementCustomers must pass and take a quiz about solarUseless friction. Customers don't need to memorize / deeply understand solar, they need a few key pieces of information available for reference.Systems must be 3 kW or larger for single family home residentialNo issue with this, for a fixed rebate.Total solar resource fraction (TSRF) must be 75% for entire system. TSRF = how much sun the panels get, all things considered (shade, angle).Key problem - a 10 kW system with 74% TSRF would receive no rebate, and this has more value than a 3 kW system at 75% TSRF.Customer forfeits renewable energy credits generated by systemThis takes advantage of customers ignorance - no reason that a small rebate should entitle AE to all future value generated by REC's.Systems over 110% of historical usage need an exceptionCounterproductive . Having a larger than historical system might mean simply planning for an EV or heat pump, and building your solar to support that.Roof penetrations must be flashed, or a pre-approved typeUseless friction. AE is not a test lab and is not qualified to require this- there are UL standards all solar panel mounting systems.Must be approved by AEIdentify subcontractors to AEBe able to provide a shade reportMarginally useful, but still friction.Provide 10-year warrantyHaving 10-year warranty provides customers with false sense of security and requires contractors to hold those costs on their books. Massive barrier to competition! Contractors can compete on warranty as well as price, for customers. ContractorSystemContractor friction decreases competition among contractors. AE Solar Rebate – an alternative strategy Solution Rewrite solar rebate rules, eliminating all non-value add rules, particularly: • Remove the requirement to take a quiz. Instead, provide customers with up-to-date quick reference guide for useful facts ($/W, system types, tradeoffs), and detailed example quotes. • Change the requirements for whole system at 75% TSRF to minimum 3 kW at 75% TSRF. • Give REC …

Scraped at: June 14, 2024, 2:30 a.m.

Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, June 18, 2024 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, June 18, 2024 The Resource Management Commission convened in a Regular Called meeting on Tuesday, June 18, 2024, at Austin Energy Headquarters 4815 Mueller Blvd, Austin, TX 78723. Chair Louis Stone called the Resource Management Commission meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. in Attendance: Commissioner Louis Stone, Chair; Board Members/Commissioners Commissioner Paul Robbins, Vice Chair; Commissioner Charlotte Davis; Commissioner Trey Farmer; Commissioner GeNell Gary; Commissioner Dino Sasaridis; Commissioner Alison Silverstein. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: None PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL • Al Braden- Spoke in favor of Item #3. • Dan O’Brien- Streetlighting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Resource Management Commission Regular Meeting on May 21, 2024. The motion approving the minutes of the Resource Management Commission meeting of May 21, 2024 was approved on Commissioner Silverstein’s motion, Vice Chair Robbins second on a 6-0-1 vote with Commissioner Gary abstaining, Commissioners Johnson and Scaffidi absent, and two vacancies. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Recommend approval of the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for approval to include in the 5-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8. The motion to approve a recommendation approving the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone was approved on Commissioner Silverstein’s motion, Commissioner Farmer’s second on a 6-0-1 vote with Commissioner Gary abstaining, Commissioners Johnson and Scaffidi absent, and two vacancies. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, June 18, 2024 3. Recommend approving amendments to the Resource Management Commission bylaws to include advising on all matters related to natural gas companies that serve customers within the City of Austin, including franchise agreements, rates, and conservation programs. The motion to approve a recommendation approving amendments to the Resource Management Commission bylaws to include advising on all matters related to natural gas companies was approved on Vice Chair Robbins motion, Commissioner Silverstein’s second on a 6-1 vote with Commissioner Gary voting against, Commissioners Johnson and Scaffidi absent, and two vacancies. STAFF BRIEFINGS DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Staff briefing regarding the Single Family Residential Landscape Transformation Activities by Kevin Critendon, Assistant Director, Environmental, Planning and Development Services and Christopher Charles, Water Conservation Coordinator. The briefing was presented by Kevin Critendon, Assistant Director, Environmental, Planning and Development Services and Christopher Charles, Water Conservation Coordinator. 5. Discussion regarding …

Scraped at: July 17, 2024, 10:30 p.m.