15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 10 - Staff Report — original pdf

Backup

PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: SPC-2026-0052A PC DATE: April 28, 2026 PROJECT NAME: Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit ADDRESS: 2007 McCall Road COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 NEIGBORHOOD PLAN: West Austin NP APPLICANT: Girls’ School of Austin AGENT: Thrower Design (A. Ron Thrower) CASE MANAGER: Heather Chaffin Heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov (512) 974-2140 AREA: WATERSHED: WATERSHED ORDINANCE: Comprehensive Watershed Ordinance T.I.A.: 2.31 Acres Johnson Creek (Urban) CAPITOL VIEW: A Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) has been submitted with this application. N/A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow Private Primary Educational Facilities and Private Secondary Educational Facilities, increasing from 150 to 200 students on the property. No improvements are proposed with this application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit (CUP), with the condition that any future site development application be required to comply with the NTA Memorandum prepared by Staff, dated April 7, 2026. (Please see Exhibit E – NTA Memorandum). Staff also recommends the following conditions be approved as part of the CUP: 1. Dumpster pick up times to be from 6am to 9pm. 2. Maintenance work will occur from 7am to 9am (except for emergencies). 3. Drop off and pick up times are to be staggered as much as possible. 4. Attendance is limited to 200 students. 5. Use is limited to Private Primary and Private Secondary Educational Use (K-8). SUMMARY COMMENTS ON SITE PLAN: Land Use: The subject property is located on the south side of Windsor Road and the east side of McCall Road. The property is zoned SF-3-NP, and the majority of the site is currently developed with the Girls’ School of Austin (“the School”), which includes Private Primary Educational Facilities and Private Secondary Educational Facilities land uses. The remainder of the property is a former single family lot at 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 101 of 63 Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit SPC-2026-0052A 2 1913 McCall Road that was acquired by the School. Properties to the north, south, west and east of the property are also zoned SF-3-NP and are developed with single family residential land uses. (Please see Exhibits A and B – Site Location Map and Aerial Exhibit). Environmental: The site is located in the Johnson Creek Watershed and subject to current watershed regulations. Transportation: Data was submitted by the applicant for a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) to determine transportation/traffic impact of the proposed CUP. A memorandum summarizing staff’s analysis and recommendations is attached as Exhibit E. Staff recommends that the conditions outlined in the memorandum be required as conditions to any future site improvements. Those conditions include: 1. During the site plan review, it is recommended the developer restripe the crosswalk at the intersection of McCall and Windsor Roads. 2. During the site plan review, it is recommended the developer restripe the crosswalk at the intersection of McCall and Horn Ln. 3. As per the ASMP, the required ROW for Windsor Rd is 72 feet. 4. As per the ASMP, the required ROW for McCall Rd is 58/64 feet. 5. If the number of units proposed in Table 1 is exceeded, the TDS division may be required to reassess the NTA. 6. This site will be subject to Street Impact Fee (SIF), which will help fund roadway capacity projects identified in RCP necessitated by new developments. The SIF collection amount will be calculated and collected at the time of building permit application. 7. This assessment is based on the proposed uses. Any changes in these assumptions may require an updated NTA. 8. This NTA does not grant nor guarantee approval of proposed driveway types or locations. Driveway types and locations will be reviewed with the site plan application. PROJECT INFORMATION: The subject property was previously owned by AISD and operated as a public school, Dill Elementary, until the early 2000s. AISD sold the property in 2002-2003, when it became a private elementary school. A CUP was approved at that time to allow Private Primary Educational Facilities on the site. In 2009, an additional property was incorporated into the campus, and a new CUP was issued to add Private Secondary Educational Facilities use to the site, with the following conditions: 1) Use is limited to Private Primary and Secondary Educational Facilities and is limited to Pre-K through 8th grade. No more than 50% of students will be in grades 5-8. 2) Screening for solid waste collection and loading areas shall be the same as, or of equal quality to, principal building materials. The CUPs approved for the property in 2003 and 2009 were for the change of use only; no site improvements were proposed with those applications. In 2012, a CUP was submitted in conjunction with a site development plan that included site improvements. The CUP was approved with the following conditions: 1) Dumpster pick up times to be from 6am to 9pm. 2) Maintenance workers from 7am to 9pm (except for emergencies). 3) Neighborhood notification of major events. 4) No unattended public recycling. 5) Drop off and pick up times to be staggered as much as possible. 6) Existing driveways on McCall Road and Windsor Road are to remain. 7) Parking spaces to have concrete curbs. 8) Attendance shall be limited to 150 students. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 102 of 63 Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit SPC-2026-0052A 3 9) Use is limited to Private Primary and Secondary Educational Facilities (K-8). 10) No more than 50% of students will be in grades 5-8. The CUP proposed with this 2026 application seeks to incorporate the property at 1913 McCall Road into the School campus, extending the Private Primary Educational Facilities and Private Secondary Educational Facilities land uses to the entire 2.31 acre property, as well as increase enrollment from 150 to 200 students on the property. The applicant also proposes incorporating the following conditions to the CUP: 1. Dumpster pick up times to be from 6am to 9pm. 2. Maintenance work will occur from 7am to 9am (except for emergencies). 3. Drop off and pick up times are to be staggered as much as possible. 4. Attendance is limited to 200 students. 5. Use is limited to Private Primary and Private Secondary Educational Use (K-8). No site improvements are proposed with this CUP request, but the applicant has provided a site plan exhibit showing future site improvements that may be proposed under a separate permit if the CUP is approved. (Please see Exhibits C and D – Applicant Summary Letter and Site Plan). Correspondence in support and in opposition to the proposed CUP is attached. (Please see Exhibit F – Correspondence) SURROUNDING CONDITIONS: Zoning/ Land Use Site: North: East: South: West: Primary Educational Facilities and Private Secondary Educational Facilities SF-3-NP, Single family residential SF-3-NP, Single family residential SF-3-NP, Single family residential SF-3-NP, Single family residential NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Save Barton Creek Assn. West Austin Neighborhood Group CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Austin Independent School District Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Preservation Austin TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources D. 25-5-145. A site plan may not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injure property. If the Land Use Commission determines that a site plan has an adverse effect or causes a material injury under this subsection, the Land Use Commission shall identify the adverse effect or material injury. § 25-5-146 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. (A) To make a determination required for approval under Section 25-5-145 (Evaluation Of Conditional Use Site Plan), the Land Use Commission may require that a conditional use site plan comply with a condition of approval that includes a requirement for: (1) a special yard, open space, buffer, fence, wall, or screen; 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 103 of 63 Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit SPC-2026-0052A 4 landscaping or erosion; a street improvement or dedication, vehicular ingress & egress, or traffic circulation; signs; characteristics of operation, including hours; a development schedule; or other measures that the Land Use Commission determines are required for (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) compatibility with surrounding uses or the preservation of public health, safety, or welfare. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW AND EVALUTATION CRITERA A. The following evaluation is included to provide staff position on each point of the conditional use permit criteria. Section 25-5-145 of the Land Development Code states: “The Planning Commission shall determine whether the proposed development or use of a conditional use site plan complies with the requirements of this section. A conditional use site plan must: B. 1. Comply with the requirements of this title; Staff Response: This site plan complies with all regulations and requirements of the Land Development Code. 2. Comply with the objectives and purposes of the zoning district; Staff Response: The proposed Primary Educational Facilities and Private Secondary Educational Facilities land uses are conditional uses in the SF-3-NP zoning district. 3. Have building height, bulk, scale, setback, open space, landscaping, drainage, access, traffic circulation, and use that is compatible with the use of an abutting site; Staff Response: The site plan complies with all requirements of the Land Development Code. 4. Provide adequate and convenient off-street parking and loading facilities; and Staff Response: Adequate parking and loading facilities are provided on-site. 5. Reasonably protect persons and property from erosion, flood, fire, noise, glare, and similar adverse effects. Staff Response: The site plan will comply with all requirements of the Land Development Code and reasonably protects the health, safety, and welfare of persons and property. 6. For conditional use located within the East Austin Overlay district, comply with the goals and objectives of a neighborhood plan adopted by the City Council for the area in which the use is proposed. Staff response: Not applicable. C. In addition, a conditional use site plan may not: 7. More adversely affect an adjoining site than would a permitted use; Staff Response: Primary Educational Facilities and Private Secondary Educational Facilities land use would not more adversely affect an adjoining use than would a permitted use. 8. Adversely affect the safety or convenience of vehicular or pedestrian circulation, including reasonably anticipated traffic and uses in the area; or Staff Response: The conditional use permit does not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular and pedestrian circulation. 9. Adversely affect an adjacent property or traffic control through the location, lighting, or type of 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 104 of 63 Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit SPC-2026-0052A 5 a sign. Staff Response: All signs and lighting will comply with the Land Development Code. EXHIBITS A – Site Location Map B – Aerial Exhibit C – Applicant Summary Letter D – Site Plan E – Neighborhood Traffic Analysis Memorandum F – Correspondence 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 105 of 63 Property Profile The Girls' School Zoning Map Legend Property Street Labels Review Cases Site Plan Review Cases- IN REVIEW Zoning Zoning 0 300 4/20/2026 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Notes AG AV CBD CH CR CS DMU DR ERC GO GR IP L LA LI LO LR MF MH MI NBG NO P PUD R&D RR SF TND TOD UNZ W/LO Zoning Text Jurisdiction Fill Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ OTHER CITIES ETJ 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL OUTOUTSIDE ANY CITIES JURISDICTION OUTOUTSIDE ANY CITIES JURISDICTION EXHIBIT A15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 106 of 63Property Profile The Girls' School of Austin Legend Property Street Labels Review Cases Site Plan Review Cases- IN REVIEW Jurisdiction Fill Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ OTHER CITIES ETJ 0 200 400 ft 4/19/2026 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Notes OUTOUTSIDE ANY CITIES JURISDICTION OUTOUTSIDE ANY CITIES JURISDICTION EXHIBIT B15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 107 of 63April 1, 2026 Mr. Keith Mars, Director Austin Development Services City of Austin P.O. Box 1088 Austin, Texas 78767-1088 RE: Girls’ School of Austin Conditional Use Permit – 2007 McCall Road Dear Mr. Mars, On behalf of our client, Girls’ School of Austin, we respectfully submit this Conditional Use Permit Site Plan to the City of Austin. The existing use of the property is Private Primary Education Facility and Private Secondary Education Facility, and this application herein proposes the same uses and includes modifications of conditions of the existing CUP approved in 2012, including expansion of the area to which the CUP applies. For context, it is important to understand the past pursuits and outcomes that have led to this present pursuit and anticipated outcome. 2003 Conditional Use Permit The property located at 2007 McCall Road was owned by Austin Independent School District and was the former Dill Elementary School which was a Public Primary Education Facility use operating as a Permitted Use of the SF-3 zoning district. In the early 2000’s, AISD determined the school should close and the property be sold. In 2003, a Conditional Use Permit was filed by AISD for Girls’ School of Austin and that CUP was approved by Planning Commission on February 11, 2003. The 2003 CUP retained the original school buildings constructed for AISD decades prior and changed the use from Public Primary Education to Private Primary Education Facility. P . O . B O X 4 1 9 5 7 , A U S T I N , T E X A S 7 8 7 0 4 1 5 0 7 I N G L E W O O D S T . , A U S T I N , T E X A S 7 8 7 4 1 EXHIBIT C15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 108 of 63 2009 Conditional Use Permit Girls’ School of Austin acquired an additional, adjacent lot fronting Windsor Road, requiring a subsequent CUP to incorporate the new land area, allowing for Girls’ School of Austin to operate the school within the existing house on the newly acquired property. The CUP sought a change of use from Single-Family to Private Primary Education Facility and Private Secondary Education Facility and was approved by Planning Commission on September 22, 2009, with the following conditions: 1) Use is limited to Private Primary and Secondary Educational Facilities and is limited to Pre-K through 8th grade. No more than 50% of students will be in grades 5-8. 2) Screening for solid waste collection and loading areas shall be the same as, or of equal quality to, principal building materials. 2012 Conditional Use Permit This CUP application involved demolition of the original school buildings and construction of new school facilities sought to provide a modern and improved school environment for the students, teachers and faculty. The existing single-family house fronting Windsor Road was retained. The CUP was approved by the Planning Commission on December 11, 2012, with the following conditions: 1) Dumpster pick up times to be from 6am to 9pm. 2) Maintenance workers from 7am to 9pm (except for emergencies). 3) Neighborhood notification of major events. 4) No unattended public recycling. 5) Drop off and pick up times to be staggered as much as possible. 6) Existing driveways on McCall Road and Windsor Road are to remain. 7) Parking spaces to have concrete curbs. 8) Attendance shall be limited to 150 students. 9) Use is limited to Private Primary and Secondary Educational Facilities (K-8). 10) No more than 50% of students will be in grades 5-8. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 109 of 63 2026 Conditional Use Permit Girls’ School of Austin has purchased an adjacent lot fronting on McCall Road to the south of the existing school property. The CUP requested herein incorporates this newly acquired property into the school campus and proposes construction of an additional building, modifications to a portion of an existing school building, as well as modifying conditions of the prior CUP. The proposed conditions with this application are as follows: 1. Dumpster pick up times to be from 6am to 9pm. 2. Maintenance work will occur from 7am to 9am (except for emergencies). 3. Drop off and pick up times are to be staggered as much as possible. 4. Existing driveways on McCall Road and Windsor Road are to remain. 5. Parking spaces are to have concrete curbs. 6. Attendance is limited to 200 students. 7. Use is limited to Private Primary and Private Secondary Educational Use (K-8). Most of the existing improvements remain intact with exception of removal of a classroom building and adjacent multifunction building at the center of the existing campus, to be replaced with a single, moderately sized Multi-Activity Center. A new 2-story classroom building and 5-space parking lot is proposed on the newly incorporated land area and includes a covered walkway connecting to the existing school facilities. Other internal modifications or improvements include walking trails connecting various areas of the campus, additional outdoor play equipment and a dedicated vehicular by-pass, drop-off zone at the front of the school to improve the efficiency of traffic flow onto and through the site during drop-off and pick-up operations, as well as trails and playground areas. All development proposed herein complies with the site development regulations of the SF-3 zoning district. Trees In 2025, during the pursuit to purchase the adjacent lot at 1913 McCall Road, Girls’ School of Austin identified many trees on the residential lot that were in very poor health and condition. The existing, mature canopy had been severely damaged by ice and windstorms in the last 5 years 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1010 of 63 with no maintenance of trees or property in general. GSA requested of the seller trim, maintain, and remove broken limbs and failing trees prior to finalizing the sale of the property. The seller could not accommodate the request. After the sale was finalized, GSA hired a Certified Arborist of Good Guys Tree Service to visit the site and evaluate the trees. The Arborist recognized many trees in a dead, diseased or dying condition as well as trees that were determined to be of imminent destruction of property warranting removal, permitted by the City of Austin Land Development Code. The trees were photographed documenting the poor health and condition and a permit for one qualifying tree was issued, followed by trimming of and removal of trees in December 2025. Through a request by the City of Austin, the Arborist filed for an additional, retroactive tree permit for another qualifying tree. The City of Austin allows removal of trees under these circumstances and conditions without requiring prior authorization or permits. Therefore, the removal of trees was justified and legal. Because the trees removed were dead, diseased, dying or with high potential of harm, the City of Austin will not and cannot require mitigation of the landowner for removal. Traffic A TIA Determination Worksheet for the proposed CUP was submitted to the City of Austin and staff determined that neither a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) nor a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) was required. However, after communicating with City Staff re: concerns about traffic flow and function of the general area, Staff agreed that an NTA is necessary and required specified traffic counts to be collected at three (3) locations, across (3) three consecutive days. To ensure a broader view of traffic conditions, GSA chose to expand the traffic counts to a total of 8 locations, across four consecutive days to capture traffic conditions (quantity, direction, speeds) of vehicles around a wider area than just the perimeter of the school. The data collected has been provided to Austin Transportation Department for them to perform their analysis associated with the CUP request. Additionally, GSA hired DKS Associates, a traffic engineering firm, to analyze the existing school conditions, understand the proposed school conditions and provide alternatives to address issues associated with traffic. Their report and findings are included as supporting documentation of the CUP application. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1011 of 63 Environmental Resource Inventory An Environmental Resource Inventory has been completed which finds the site suitable for development as proposed and no environmental limitations impeding development. That ERI is attached. Please contact me or my office should you have questions regarding the request or the documentation submitted. Sincerely, A. Ron Thrower 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1012 of 63 OWNER/DEVELOPER OWNER/DEVELOPER OWNER'S REP FOR PLAN ALTERATIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTION RELATED CASE NO. LOCATION INFO WATERSHED STATUS FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION CONDITIONS OF CUP APPROVAL NOTES GIRLS' SCHOOL OF AUSTIN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO CONSTRUCTION IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PART A LAND USE PERMIT. A SUBSEQUENT PART B SITE PLAN WILL BE FILED FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 2007 MCCALL ROAD SITE LOCATION MAP N.T.S. CITY OF AUSTIN REVISIONS/CORRECTIONS TABLE Correction/ Revision No. Description Revise (R) Replacement (RP) Add (A) Void (V) Sheet No.'s Total # Sheets in Plan Set Net Change Imp. Cover (SF) Total Site Imp. Cover (SF and %) City of Austin Signature City of Austin Approval Date SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/24/26 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BY: CHRIS MCCOMB, P.E. SHEET INDEX SHEET 1 SHEET 2 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 SHEET 6 SHEET 7 COVER SHEET SITE PLAN CONCEPT STORM & UTILITY PLAN OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND TREE LIST BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEET 1 OF 2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEET 2 OF 2 APPROVALS C M A f o y t r e p o r p l a i t n e d i f n o c d n a e v i s u l c x e e h t s i l a i r e t a m r e h t o r o c i h p a r g s i h T © A D G MC ESIGN ROUP ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O. BOX 303086 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 512-385-2911 TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1708 S R E N N A L P D N A L D A O R L L A C C M 7 0 0 2 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A n g i s e D r e w o r h T 6 5 4 4 - 6 7 4 ) 2 1 5 ( 4 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A 7 5 9 1 4 X O B . O P . . c n I , p u o r G n g i s e D C M A f o t n e s n o c n e t t i r w r o i r p e h t f o e c n e s b a e h t n i r e n n a m y n a n i d e s u r o d e h s i l b u p , d e t u b i r t s i d , d e c u d o r p e r e b t o n t s u m d n a . c n I , p u o r G n g i s e D r e h t o N I T S U A F O L O O H C S ' S L R G I T I M R E P E S U L A N O I T I D N O C Know what's below. Call before you dig. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CASE NUMBER: APPROVED ON SPC-2026-0052A APPLICATION DATE: 2/24/26 ☐​ADMINISTRATIVELY ​☐​BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION ​☐​112 ​☐​142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE (25-5-81, LDC) CASE MANAGER H. CHAFFIN COVER SHEET DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT RELEASED FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE: ZONING: SF-3-NP APPROVAL STAMPS: 1 of 7 SPC-2026-0052A EXHIBIT D15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1013 of 63 M C C A L L R O A D SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WINDSOR ROAD D O R M A R O N L A N E I SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SCALE: 1" = 20' A D G MC ESIGN ROUP ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O. BOX 303086 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 512-385-2911 TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1708 DROPOFF ZONE COVERED ENTRANCE BUILDING 3 FINE ARTS CENTER SF-3-NP PRIVATE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES BUILDING 1A OFFICE/CLASSROOMS EXIST RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK CLASSROOMS (BLDG 1B) SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL M c C A L L R O A D EXISTING PLAYGROUND CANOPY NEW PLAYGROUND CANOPY COVERED ENTRANCE OUTDOOR SEATING MULTI-ACTIVITY CENTER (BLDG 1D) CLASSROOMS (BLDG 1C) PLAYGROUND Y A W K L A W D E R E V O C OUTDOOR SEATING OUTDOOR SEATING BUILDING 2 OFFICE/CLASSROOMS CLASSROOMS (BLDG 2) RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK PLAYGROUND RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HORN LANE SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-3-NP SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LEGEND NOTES TREE INDEX TREE LIST SITE CALCS C M A f o y t r e p o r p l a i t n e d i f n o c d n a e v i s u l c x e e h t s i l a i r e t a m r e h t o r o c i h p a r g s i h T © S R E N N A L P D N A L D A O R L L A C C M 7 0 0 2 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A n g i s e D r e w o r h T 6 5 4 4 - 6 7 4 ) 2 1 5 ( 4 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A 7 5 9 1 4 X O B . O P . . c n I , p u o r G n g i s e D C M A f o t n e s n o c n e t t i r w r o i r p e h t f o e c n e s b a e h t n i r e n n a m y n a n i d e s u r o d e h s i l b u p , d e t u b i r t s i d , d e c u d o r p e r e b t o n t s u m d n a . c n I , p u o r G n g i s e D r e h t o N I T S U A F O L O O H C S ' S L R G I T I M R E P E S U L A N O I T I D N O C SITE PLAN 2 of 7 SPC-2026-0052A 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1014 of 63 M C C A L L R O A D ±35 L.F. OF 18" RCP STORM SEWER TIE IN FOR NEW IMPROVEMENTS D O R M A R O N L A N E I WINDSOR ROAD 4' STORM MANHOLE PUBLIC/PRIVATE INTERFACE SCALE: 1" = 20' A D G MC ESIGN ROUP ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS P.O. BOX 303086 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 512-385-2911 TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1708 LEGEND EXISTING WATER METER TO REMAIN LOCATION OF NEW WW SERVICE PER #2023-0022 HORN LANE LOCATION OF NEW WATER METER PER #2023-0022; WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED AND RELOCATED DUE TO PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION. DROPOFF ZONE BUILDING 1A OFFICE/CLASSROOMS COVERED ENTRANCE BUILDING 3 FINE ARTS CENTER EXISTING PLAYGROUND CANOPY NEW PLAYGROUND CANOPY COVERED ENTRANCE OUTDOOR SEATING EXIST RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK CLASSROOMS (BLDG 1B) M c C A L L R O A D MULTI-ACTIVITY CENTER (BLDG 1D) CLASSROOMS (BLDG 1C) PLAYGROUND Y A W K L A W D E R E V O C OUTDOOR SEATING OUTDOOR SEATING BUILDING 2 OFFICE/CLASSROOMS CLASSROOMS (BLDG 2) RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK PLAYGROUND RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK ±357 L.F. OF 12" STORM SEWER (PRIVATE) (4) 3' GRATE INLETS (PRIVATE) NOTES DETENTION VIA RAINWATER COLLECTION TANKS, (2) 10'Ø, WITH 10' OVERFLOW EXISTING WASTEWATER SERVICE TO REMAIN PER #2023-0022 S R E N N A L P D N A L D A O R L L A C C M 7 0 0 2 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A n g i s e D r e w o r h T 6 5 4 4 - 6 7 4 ) 2 1 5 ( 4 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A 7 5 9 1 4 X O B . O P . . c n I , p u o r G n g i s e D C M A f o t n e s n o c n e t t i r w r o i r p e h t f o e c n e s b a e h t n i r e n n a m y n a n i d e s u r o d e h s i l b u p , d e t u b i r t s i d , d e c u d o r p e r e b t o n t s u m d n a . c n I , p u o r G n g i s e D C M A f o y t r e p o r p l a i t n e d i f n o c d n a e v i s u l c x e e h t s i l a i r e t a m r e h t o r o c i h p a r g s i h T © r e h t o N I T S U A F O L O O H C S ' S L R G I T I M R E P E S U L A N O I T I D N O C CONCEPT STORM & UTILITY PLAN 3 of 7 SPC-2026-0052A 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1015 of 63 WINDSOR ROAD EXISTING PARKING TO REAMIN COVERED ENTRANCE, REF. ARCH. BIKE RACKS, REF. CIVIL P1 TYP. WALL, REF. CIVIL F1 TYP. E(cid:59)ISTING FINE ARTS CENTER (cid:11)BLDG (cid:22)(cid:12) E(cid:59)ISTING BLDG OFFICE(cid:18)CALSSROOMS (cid:11)BLDG (cid:20)(cid:12) COVERED ENTRANCE, REF. ARCH. PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (PLAYGROUND): 2,348 SQFT PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (OUTDOOR SEATING): 168 SQFT 6' EXISTING PARKING TO REAMIN F1 TYP. PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (AMENITY TERRACE): 825 SQFT PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING): 1,635 SQFT D O A R L L A C C M PROPERTY LINE, TYP. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN, TYP. 5'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT MULTI(cid:16)ACTIVITY CENTER (cid:11)BLDG (cid:20)(cid:12) PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (PLAYGROUND): 640 SQFT E(cid:59)ISTING CLASSROOMS (cid:11)BLDG (cid:20)(cid:12) 7'-11" E2 P1 TYP. F4 SY STREET YARD COVERED WALKWAY, REF. ARCH. SY/P SY SY E1 E3 TYP. F3 ' 5 PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (OUTDOOR SEATING): 210 SQFT CLASSROOMS (cid:11)BLDG (cid:21)(cid:12) RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK, REF. CIVIL OFFICE(cid:18)CLASSROOMS (cid:11)BLDG (cid:21)(cid:12) 5'-9" E2 RAINWATER COLLECTION TANK, REF. CIVIL HORN LANE 25'-0" BUILDING SETBACK LINE 50'-0" BUILDING SETBACK LINE " 1 6'- E1 F2 PROPERTY LINE, TYP. M1 TYP. E2 PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE (PLAYGROUND): 1,134 SQFT 5'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT F2 STREET YARD TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL STREET YARD AREA STREET YARD LANDSCAPE (20% OF STREET YARD MINUS DRIP LINE CREDIT) DRIP LINE CREDIT (0 SF X 1.25 = 0 ) REQUIRED PROVIDED 100,449 7,398 4,015 S.F. S.F. S.F. 1,480 S.F. REQUIRED PROVIDED 7 TREES 8 TREES 7,398 S.F. STREET YARD 1,000 S.F. = 1 TREES 7,398 S.F. = 2 TREES EXISTING TREE CREDIT 2" DIAMETER TO 6" DIAMETER 6" DIAMETER OR GRATER TOTAL TREES PROVIDED 0 TREES X 1=0 TREES 4 TREES X 2=8 TREES 0 TREES 8 TREES 8 TREES TREE SURVEY INFORMATION TREES SURVEYED TOTAL INCHES SURVEYED TOTAL APPENDIX F TREE INCHES SURVEYED TOTAL HERITAGE TREE INCHES SURVEYED NON-APPENDIX F TREE INCHES SURVEYED INVASIVE TREE INCHES SURVEYED TREES REMOVED TREES 24" OR GREATER REMOVED (HERITAGE) TREES 19" OR GREATER REMOVED (IN APP. F) TREES 8"-18.9" REMOVED (IN APP. F) TREES 19" OR GREATER REMOVED (NOT APP. F) TREES LESS THAN 19" REMOVED (NOT. APP. F) TREES 8" OR GREATER REMOVED DDI TREES REMOVED 1,172.00 1,114.00 218.00 58.00 58.00 0.00 86.00 167.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 17.00 INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES URBAN FORESTRY INFORMATION 1. TOTAL TREE INCHES SURVEYED 2. TOTAL APPENDIX F TREE INCHES REMOVED 3. TOTAL NON-APPENDIX F TREE INCHES REMOVED 4. TOTAL INVASIVE TREE INCHES REMOVED 5. TOTAL DDI TREE INCHES REMOVED 6. TOTAL REPLACEMENT INCHES REQUIRED 7. TOTAL MITIGATION INCHES PLANTED ON SITE 8. TOTAL REMAINING MITIGATION INCHES 1,172.00 1,114.00 218.00 58.00 17.00 INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES SEE NOTE SEE NOTE SEE NOTE NOTE: ALL TREES NOTED TO BE REMOVED WERE REMOVED UNDER A SEPARATE CITY OF AUSTIN RESIDENTIAL TREE PERMIT NORTH SCALE 1" = 20' 0 10 20 40 CONSTRUCTION KEY KEY NOTE SYM DESCRIPTION P1 E1 E2 E3 F1 F2 F3 F4 M1 CONCRETE PAVEMENT, FINISH:LIGHT BROOM, REF. CIVIL FOR DEPTH AND REINFORCEMENT 9" CONCRETE MOW BAND 6" CONCRETE MOW BAND 18" CONCRETE STEPOUT EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN PROPOSED WOOD PRIVACY FENCE PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL SECURITY FENCE X X1 4'-0" MAINTENANCE GATE HARDWOOD MULCH AT 3" DEPTH LANDSCAPE LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL REF. CIVIL 4/L101 4/L101 2/L101 REF. CIVIL EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 50' RADIUS FROM CENTER OF TREE TO PARKING SPOT (P) PARKING LOT TREE SY P STREET YARD TREE PARKING LOT TREE PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE TOTAL SITE AREA 100,449 SQFT (2.3 ACRES) PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (5%) 5,023 SQFT PRIVATE COMMON OPEN SPACE PROVIDED 6,960 SQFT PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT HEIGHT 4 4 SOUTHERN LIVE OAK QUERCUS VIRGINIANA YAUPON HOLLY ILEX VOMITORIA 100 GAL 12'-14' HT. 65 GAL 7'-8' HT. SHRUBS GM DY 21 24 GULF MUHLY MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 'REGAL MIST' DWARF WAXMYRTLE MYRICA CERIFERA 5 GAL 36" o.c. 5 GAL 36" o.c. SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SEED/SOD PER PLANS BERMUDA SOD 'TIF 419' CYNODON DACTYLON 'TIF 419' CONT SOD LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATION I, MARISSA MCKINNEY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT 2007 MCCALL RD, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703, SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LDC-25-2 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND ALL AMENDMENTS. MARISSA MCKINNEY DATE 02/18/2026 COLEMAN & ASSOCIATES ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OF THESE PLANS REMAINS WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WHO PREPARED THEM. IN REVIEWING THESE PLANS, THE CITY OF AUSTIN MUST RELY ON THE ADEQUACY OF THE WORK OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. Landscape Architecture Environmental Design 9890 Silver Mountain Drive Austin, Texas 78737 Ph: 512-476-2090 F: 512-476-2099 CAANDS LD EP RE A R STE ISSA A. MCKIN C HI T I G E E C R T N E Y R A M S TA 33 22 ET OF S A X ET FOR PERMIT USE ONLY © 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1016 of 63 TREE LIST NOTE(S): 1. 2. PRUNE DEAD OR BROKEN BRANCHES ONLY BRANCHES TO BE 80"AFF AT ACCESSIBLE AREAS. ALIGN STAKING OF TREES IDENTICALLY WHEN IN LINES OR GROUPS. PLAN VIEW TREE CANOPY TREE BACKFILL MIX TREE ROOTBALL TREE TRUNK TREE TIE WEBBING AND METAL T-POST PLASTIC CAP AT END OF T-POST. COLOR:WHITE METAL T-POSTS, 8' LONG-3 PER TREE. COLOR:GREEN DO NOT DRIVE STAKES THROUGH ROOT BALL GUYING MATERIAL BY ARBORBRACE TREE-TIE WEBBING. WWW.TREESTAKING.COM IDENTIFY ROOT FLARE AND SET TOP OF ROOT BALL 4" ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3" DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH. INSTALL MULCH RING OVER SEAM OF EXISTING GRADE LEAVING 6" RADIUS OF BARE SOIL AROUND BASE OF TREE 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE SHOVEL CUT EDGE REMOVE PLASTIC CONTAINER, PRUNE GIRDLING ROOTS AND LOOSEN BOUND ROOTS TREE BACKFILL MIX, REF. SPECS SHADE TREE SECTION 1 PLAN VIEW TREE TRUNK TREE ROOTBALL TREE BACKFILL MIX TREE TIE WEBBING AND METAL T-POST WITH PLASTIC CAP, ALIGN PERP. TO WALK TREE CANOPY NOTE: 1. PRUNE DEAD OR BROKEN BRANCHES ONLY. REMOVE SUCKERS 2. ALIGN STAKING OF TREES IDENTICALLY WHEN IN LINES OR GROUPS. METAL T-POSTS PAINTED GREEN 8' LONG 2 PER TREE TO 18" BELOW BOTTOM OF TREE PIT. DO NOT DRIVE STAKES THROUGH BALL IDENTIFY ROOT FLARE AND SET TOP OF ROOT CROWN 4" ABOVE ADJACENT FINISH GRADE TREE BACKFILL MIX CUT AND/OR REMOVE PLASTIC CONTAINER, PRUNE GIRDLING ROOTS EXISTING SUBGRADE ORNAMENTAL TREE SECTION 2 6" ' 5 " 6 " 0 - 8 ' HOLE WIDTH=2X ROOTBALL N.T.S. . I N M " 0 - 4 ' " 0 - 8 ' T POST SAFETY CAPS, CZ ENG OR EQ. GUYING MATERIAL BY ARBORBRACE TREE-TIE WEBBING. WWW.TREESTAKING.COM 3" DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH. INSTALL MULCH RING OVER SEAM OF EXISTING GRADE LEAVING 6" RADIUS OF BARE SOIL AROUND THE BASE OF TREE " 4 " 6 - 1 ' HOLE WIDTH= 2X ROOTBALL Landscape Architecture Environmental Design 9890 Silver Mountain Drive Austin, Texas 78737 Ph: 512-476-2090 F: 512-476-2099 CAANDS LD EP A R C HI T E C T RE STE I G E R S TA 33 22 ET OF S A X ET FOR PERMIT USE ONLY APPENDIX O COA IRRIGATION NOTES: AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH TCEQ CHAPTER 344 AS WELL AS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTION: A. B. C. D. E. F. THE SYSTEM MUST PROVIDE A MOISTURE LEVEL ADEQUATE TO SUSTAIN GROWTH OF THE PLANT MATERIALS. THE SYSTEM DOES NOT INCLUDE SPAY IRRIGATION ON AREAS LESS THAN (10) FEET WIDE (SUCH AS MEDIANS, BUFFER STRIPS, AND PARKING LOT ISLANDS). CIRCUIT REMOTE CONTROL VALVES HAVE ADJUSTABLE FLOW CONTROLS. SERVICEABLE IN-HEAD CHECK VALVES AREA ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS WHERE ELEVATION DIFFERENCES MAY CAUSE LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. A MASTER VALVE INSTALLED ON THE DISCHARGE SIDE OF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER. ABOVE-GROUND IRRIGATION EMISSION DEVICES ARE SET BACK AT LEAST SIX (6) INCHES FROM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. G. AN AUTOMATIC RAIN SHUT-OFF DEVICE SHUTS OFF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY AFTER MORE ONE-HALF INCH (1/2") RAINFALL. THAN A H. NEWLY PLANTED TREES SHALL HAVE PERMANENT IRRIGATION CONSISTING OF DRIP OR BUBBLERS. A. A. 2. 3. 4. THE IRRIGATION INSTALLER SHALL DEVELOP AND PROVIDE AN AS-BUILT DESIGN PLAN TO THE CITY AT THE TIME THE FINAL IRRIGATION INSPECTION IS PERFORMED. UNLESS FISCAL SECURITY IS PROVIDED TO THE CITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE SYSTEM, IT MUST BE OPERATIONAL AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. THE IRRIGATION INSTALLER SHALL ALSO PROVIDE EXHIBITS TO BE PERMANENTLY INSTALLED INSIDE OR ATTACHED TO THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER, INCLUDING: A LAMINATED COPY OF THE WATER BUDGET CONTAINING ZONE NUMBERS, PRECIPITATION RATE, GALLONS PER MINUTE AND THE LOCATION OF THE ISOLATION VALVE, AND AN AS BUILT PLAN. THE IRRIGATION INSTALLER SHALL PROVIDE A REPORT TO THE CITY ON A FORM PROVIDED BY THE AUSTIN WATER UTILITY DEPARTMENT CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION 1 WHEN THE FINAL PLUMBING INSPECTION IS PERFORMED BY THE CITY. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ON AISD-OWNED FACILITIES MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. IF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT DOES NOT COMPLETE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING WITHIN THIS TIMEFRAME, A WRITTEN NOTICE OF FAILURE-TO-COMPLY MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY LIAISON WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS OF SUCH OCCURRENCE. NOTE(S): 1. 2. PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS IN CONCRETE MOW BAND EVERY 5' O.C. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 25' O.C. FINISH: MEDIUM BRUSH BROOM 3" DEPTH MULCH, REF. SPECS CONCRETE MOW BAND VARIES, REF. PLANS SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO BE PROTECTED BY 6 INCH CURBS, WHEEL-STOPS OR OTHER APPROVED BARRIERS AS PER ECM 2.4.7(A). 2. THE OWNER WILL CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC 25-2-984. 3. EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FENCING BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. NO EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED OR OPERATED WITHIN THE FENCED-IN AREAS. FENCES SHALL BE AT THE DRIP LINE AND COMPLETELY SURROUND THE TREE OR CLUSTERS OF TREES. NO BURNING OF DEBRIS, CLEANING FLUIDS, CONCRETE SPILLS, ETC. WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THESE AREAS. 4. BUFFERING OF THE STREET YARD WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH THE COMBINATION OF TREES, SHRUBS, GRADE CHANGES, AND FENCES. 5. GRADE CHANGES THAT DO NOT APPEAR ON THE SITE PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. TRENCHING SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCED DRIP LINE AREAS OF EXISTING TREES. 7. SHRUB MATERIAL NOT TO EXCEED 36" O.C. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. GROUNDCOVERS NOT TO EXCEED 18" O.C. DURING THE TIME OF MARCH 15-OCTOBER 15 INSTALLATION OF HYDROMULCH SHALL BE COMMON BERMUDA OR SAHARA BERMUDA FOR OCTOBER 16 -MARCH 14 INSTALLATION OF HYDROMULCH SHALL BE ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL RYE WITH A SPRING APPLICATION OF COMMON BERMUDA OR SAHARA BERMUDA. 8. EDGING SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL GROUNDCOVER BEDS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO LAWNS. 9. ALL LAWN AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH BERMUDA SOD OR RYE UNLESS NATIVE RESTORATION MIX IS SPECIFIED. 10. NOT MORE THAN 50% OF THE TREES AND 50% OF SHRUBS PROPOSED WILL BE OF THE SAME SPECIES. 11. AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED, UNLESS TEMPORARY IRRIGATION IS SPECIFIED. SEE IRRIGATION NOTES IN THESE DRAWINGS FOR REQUIREMENT. 12. IF ESTABLISHING VEGETATION DURING ANY STAGE OF DROUGHT, SECTION 6-4-30 MAY REQUIRE A VARIANCE. CONTACT AUSTIN WATER CONSERVATION STAFF AT (512-974-2199 OR AT WATERUSECOMPVAR@AUSTINTEXAS.GOV. 13. SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES ECM 3.5.4(D) PRIOR TO EXCAVATION WITHIN TREE DRIPLINES OR THE REMOVAL OF TREES ADJACENT TO OTHER TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN, MAKE A CLEAN CUT BETWEEN THE DISTURBED AND UNDISTURBED ROOT ZONES WITH A ROCK SAW OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE. IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREAS THAT CANNOT BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH FENCING AND WHERE HEAVY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS ANTICIPATED, COVER THOSE AREAS WITH A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF ORGANIC MULCH TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. IN AREAS WITH HIGH SOIL PLASTICITY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, PER STANDARD SPECIFICATION 620S, SHOULD BE PLACED UNDER THE MULCH TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE MIXING OF THE SOIL AND MULCH. ADDITIONALLY, MATERIAL SUCH AS PLYWOOD AND METAL SHEETS, COULD BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ARBORIST TO MINIMIZE ROOT IMPACTS FROM HEAVY EQUIPMENT. ONCE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED, ALL MATERIALS SHOULD BE REMOVED, AND THE MULCH SHOULD BE REDUCED TO A DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. PERFORM ALL GRADING WITHIN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREAS BY HAND OR WITH SMALL EQUIPMENT TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE. WATER ALL TREES MOST HEAVILY IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DEEPLY ONCE A WEEK DURING PERIODS OF HOT, DRY WEATHER. SPRAY TREE CROWNS WITH WATER PERIODICALLY TO REDUCE DUST ACCUMULATION ON THE LEAVES. 14. WHEN INSTALLING CONCRETE ADJACENT TO THE ROOT ZONE OF A TREE, USE A PLASTIC VAPOR BARRIER BEHIND THE CONCRETE TO PROHIBIT LEACHING OF LIME INTO THE SOIL. 15. IF ESTABLISHING VEGETATION DURING ANY STAGE OF A DROUGHT, SECTION 6-4-30 MAY REQUIRE A VARIANCE. CONTACT AUSTIN WATER CONSERVATION STAFF AT WATERUSECOMPVAR@AUSTINTEXAS.GOV OR CALL (512) 974-2199. 16. THE OWNER WILL CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC 25-2-984. 17. FINISHED ELEVATIONS FOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS, MEDIANS, PENINSULAS, AND SIMILAR LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST BE AT LEAST SIX (6) INCHES BELOW THE FINISHED PARKING LOT ELEVATION TO ALLOW FOR PLACEMENT OF SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL (LDC 25-2-1007(F)(4)). 18. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY 6" WHEEL CURBS, WHEELSTOPS, OR OTHER APPROVED BARRIERS AS PER ECM 2.4.7. NOTES: 1. CONCRETE STEP-OUT SHALL BE 3500 PSI. SLOPE TOP OF CONCRETE TOWARD ADJACENT GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE AREA |" PER FOOT MAX. MEDIUM BROOM FINISH. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS 5' O.C. AND EXPANSION JOINTS 25' O.C. CONCRETE STEP-OUT SHALL BE FLUSH WHERE IT MEETS ADJACENT PAVING/ CURB. TOP OF MULCH ADJACENT TO CONCRETE STEP-OUT TO BE 1/2" BELOW TOP OF STEP-OUT. 2. 3. 4. CONCRETE STEP-OUT REINFORCED WITH 2-#4's, CONTINUOUS. PROVIDE 2" LEVELING BASE COURSE BELOW CONCRETE CURB, REF. CIVIL EXPANSION JOINT, REF. CIVIL SUBGRADE 1'-6" ADJACENT TURF AREA, REF. PLAN " 6 " 3 2" LEVELING ROAD BASE UNDER CONCRETE MOW BAND, CONTINUOUS SUBGRADE PLANTING BED MIX, REF. SPECS 18" CONCRETE STEP OUT SECTION 3 N.T.S. CONCRETE MOW BAND SECTION 4 N.T.S. N.T.S. © 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1017 of 63 CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" " 8 / 5 2 - ' 3 2 " 0 - ' 4 1 " 8 / 7 8 - ' 7 2 ELEV - MAC - WEST 08 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SALVAGED & REINSTALLED EXISTING FOLDING GLASS DOOR c KINNEY M YORK architects 1301 E. 7th Street Austin, TX 78702 ph: 512 476 0201 fx: 512 476 0216 www.mckinneyyork.com CONTACT: NAVVAB TAYLOR NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION MICHELLE ROSSOMANDO 02/24/26 I N T S U A F O L O O H C S ' I S L R G E H T I T M R E P E S U L A N O T D N O C I I 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A , D R L L A C C M 7 0 0 2 " 6 - ' 8 1 MAC F.F. 100'-5 3/4" MAC - SOUTH 07 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NEW WINDOWS STAINED VERTICAL WD SIDING MURAL/STUDENT ARTWORK/ BANNER ON RECESSED PANEL, TYP " 3 - ' 3 2 " 0 - ' 4 1 STAINED HORIZONTAL WD SIDING NEW WINDOWS MAC F.F. 100'-5 3/4" MAC - NORTH 05 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF 135'-0" PAINTED VERTICAL WD SIDING LEVEL 2 119'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" # REVISION DATE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE 02/24/26 PROJECT NUMBERS OWNER: MYA: N/A 2507 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 6 of 7 " 4 / 1 0 1 - ' 5 1 " 0 1 - ' 5 1 MAC - EAST 06 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PAINTED STL COLUMNS " 0 - ' 0 3 PTD MTL SUNSHADE PANEL MTL SCREEN PANEL/ GUARDRAIL MS CLASSROOM BLDG - NORTH 04 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" MS CLASSROOM BLDG - EAST 03 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PLEASE RECYCLE " 0 - ' 7 2 ROOF 135'-0" LEVEL 2 119'-0" " 0 - ' 0 3 " 1 - ' 7 2 PAINTED WD PANEL, TYP (ACCENT COLOR) PAINTED MTL SUNSHADE, TYP (ACCENT COLOR) PAINTED WD PANEL (ACCENT COLOR) - TYP MS CLASSROOM BLDG - SOUTH 02 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" MS CLASSROOM BLDG - WEST 01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" " 9 - ' 7 2 MAC F.F. 100'-5 3/4" ROOF 135'-0" " 0 - ' 0 3 LEVEL 2 119'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" ROOF 135'-0" " 0 - ' 0 3 LEVEL 2 119'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" t v r . 4 2 R _ H C R A _ A S G - 7 0 5 2 n / i t s u A f o l o o h c S s l r i G e h T - 7 0 5 2 / / : s c o D k s e d o u A t : : M P 3 3 7 1 1 6 2 0 2 / 3 / 2 I 5 2 0 2 S T C E T H C R A K R O Y Y E N N K C M © I 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1018 of 63 ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF PAINTED WD SIDING SINGLE-HUNG WINDOWS FAC LEVEL 1 96'-10 1/4" " 0 - ' 9 1 FAC LEVEL 1 96'-10 1/4" NEW WINDOWS c KINNEY M YORK architects 1301 E. 7th Street Austin, TX 78702 ph: 512 476 0201 fx: 512 476 0216 www.mckinneyyork.com CONTACT: NAVVAB TAYLOR NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION MICHELLE ROSSOMANDO 02/24/26 PAINTED MTL VERTICAL SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING " 5 - ' 0 3 LEVEL 2 119'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" FINE ARTS CENTER - WEST 8 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FINE ARTS CENTER - SOUTH 7 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PAINTED MTL VERTICAL SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW WINDOWS EXST BLDG ADDITIONS - WEST 6 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PAINTED MTL SUNSHADE (ACCENT COLOR) NEW WINDOWS " 1 1 - ' 9 2 LEVEL 2 119'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" FAC LEVEL 1 96'-10 1/4" FINE ARTS CENTER - NORTH 4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PAINTED MTL SUNSHADE (ACCENT COLOR) NEW WINDOW PAINTED MTL VERTICAL SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING " 5 - ' 0 3 LEVEL 2 119'-0" CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" NEW WINDOWS PAINTED MTL VERTICAL SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING COVERED ENTRY CANOPY " 8 - ' 6 3 COVERED ENTRY CANOPY W/ VERTICAL SCREEN EXST BLDG ADDITIONS - EAST 3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ADMIN LEVEL 100'-0" PAINTED MTL VERTICAL SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW WINDOWS I N T S U A F O L O O H C S ' I S L R G E H T EXIST BLDG ADDITIONS - SOUTH 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ADMIN LEVEL 100'-0" I T M R E P E S U L A N O T D N O C I I 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A , D R L L A C C M 7 0 0 2 NEW WINDOW LEVEL 2 119'-0" " 8 - ' 9 2 CLASSROOMS FF 105'-0" EXIST BLDG ADDITIONS - NORTH 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ADMIN LEVEL 100'-0" PLEASE RECYCLE # REVISION DATE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE 02/24/26 PROJECT NUMBERS OWNER: MYA: N/A 2507 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 of 7 FAC LEVEL 1 96'-10 1/4" FINE ARTS CENTER - EAST 5 SCALE: NTS t v r . 4 2 R _ H C R A _ A S G - 7 0 5 2 n / i t s u A f o l o o h c S s l r i G e h T - 7 0 5 2 / / : s c o D k s e d o u A t : : M P 0 0 9 1 1 6 2 0 2 / 3 / 2 I 5 2 0 2 S T C E T H C R A K R O Y Y E N N K C M © I 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1019 of 63 To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Ben Wallach, P.E. (DKS Associates) Austin Jones, P.E. April 7th, 2026 2007, 1913 McCall Road, and 2807 Windsor Rd School NTA | SPC-2026- 0052A The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an overview of the proposed development and present the findings of the Neighborhood Traffic Analysis (NTA) conducted by the Austin Transportation and Public Works (ATPW). The proposed development includes an increase in the number of students from 150 to 200. The site is a 2.3-acre tract located at 2007, 1913 McCall Road and 2807 Windsor Road as shown in Figure 1 below. The site proposes access to McCall Rd and Windsor Rd, which are level 1 and Level 2 streets respectively. ATPW has reviewed the development and offers the following comments. Figure 1: Site location EXHIBIT E15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1020 of 63 Date: Subject: April 7, 2026 2007, 1913 McCall Road, and 2807 Windsor Rd School NTA | SPC-2026-0052A Roadways McCall Rd: The ASMP designates McCall Rd as a Level 1 road. The pavement width of McCall Rd along the site frontage is approximately 27 feet. There are two unstriped travel lanes with curb and gutter along the site frontage of McCall Rd. There is an existing sidewalk along the site frontage on the east side of McCall Rd. It functions as a 25-mph street. According to the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP), the required right-of-way of McCall Rd in the vicinity of the site is 58/64 feet. Windsor Rd: The ASMP designates Windsor Rd as a Level 2 road. The pavement width of Windsor Rd along the site frontage is approximately 40 feet. There are two striped travel lanes with curb and gutter along the site frontage of Windsor Rd. There are striped bike lanes in the vicinity of the site on Windsor Rd. There is an existing sidewalk along the site frontage on the south side of Windsor Rd. It functions as a 30-mph street. ATPW has identified Windsor Rd for traffic calming improvements, as part of the 2020 Mobility Bond program, including the installation of speed cushions on the segment adjacent to the site frontage. Construction is expected to start in March 2026. According to the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP), the required right-of-way of Windsor Rd in the vicinity of the site is 72 feet. Trip Generation and Traffic Analysis Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, the proposed development will generate 190 vehicle trips per day. See Table 1 for a detailed breakdown of the existing and proposed land uses and trip generation. Land Use Type Table 1. Net Daily Trip Generation ITE Code Existing Units Private School (K-8) Single-Family Housing 530 210 150 Students 1 Private School (K-8) 530 200 Students Proposed Net Trips Daily Trip Generation 617 15 822 190 24-hour traffic volumes were collected at eight points, see Figure 2 below, on McCall Rd, Windsor Rd, Vista Ln, Bremen St, Sharon Ln, Griswold Ln and Forest Trl on January 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th, 2026. Page 2 of 6 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1021 of 63 Date: Subject: April 7, 2026 2007, 1913 McCall Road, and 2807 Windsor Rd School NTA | SPC-2026-0052A Figure 2: Tube count locations Table 2 provides the expected trip distribution for the proposed land use. The site will take access via McCall Rd and Windsor Rd. The trip distribution reflects pick-up and drop-off operations and follows the recommended routing shown in the parent-distributed flyer (Appendix A). Table 2. Trip Distribution Street McCall Rd (Location 1) Windsor Rd, West of McCall Rd (Location 2) Windsor Rd, East of McCall Rd (Location 3) Vista Ln (Location 4) Bremen St (Location 5) Griswold Ln (Location 7) Forest Trl (Location 8) Expected Site Trip Distribution (%) 75% 25% 50% 25% 50% 25% 25% Page 3 of 6 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1022 of 63 Date: Subject: April 7, 2026 2007, 1913 McCall Road, and 2807 Windsor Rd School NTA | SPC-2026-0052A Table 3 represents a breakdown of traffic on McCall Rd, Windsor Rd, Vista Ln, Bremen St, Griswold Ln, Forest Trl, and Sharon Ln: existing traffic, proposed site traffic, and total traffic after development measured in vehicles per day (vpd). Table 3. Trip Summary Street Width McCall Rd Windsor Rd, West of McCall Rd Windsor Rd, East of McCall Rd Vista Ln Bremen St Griswold Ln Forest Trl Sharon Ln 27’ 40’ 40’ 24’ 27’ 27’ 28’ 22’ Existing (vpd) 406 7,504 8,199 268 248 108 1,069 450 Site Traffic added to Roadway (vpd) 143 48 95 48 95 48 48 0 Total Future Traffic (vpd) 549 7,552 8,294 316 343 156 1,117 450 According to Section 25-6-116 of the Land Development Code (LDC), residential local or collector streets with a pavement width under 30 feet are considered to operate at a desirable level if their average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed 1,200 vehicles per day. Based on this criterion, McCall Rd, Vista Ln, Bremen St, Griswold Ln, Forest Trl, and Sharon Ln are currently operating within the desirable range and are expected to continue doing so with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed development. According to Section 25-6-116 of the Land Development Code (LDC), residential local or collector streets that have 40 feet or wider pavement width are operating at a desirable level if the average daily traffic volume for such a roadway does not exceed 4,000 vehicles per day. Based on the LDC criteria, existing traffic volume(s) exceed(s) the LDC’s desirable volume thresholds for Windsor Rd, and the addition of traffic generated by the proposed development is expected to exceed the LDC’s desirable volume thresholds for Windsor Rd. However, the combined traffic from the proposed development and existing vehicles will not exceed the Windsor roadway's capacity. This capacity is determined by standard transportation engineering principles and the residential street capacity levels outlined in the nationally recognized Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Recommendations and Conclusions Based on the results of the NTA, ATPW has the following recommendations and conclusions: 1. During the site plan review, it is recommended the developer restripe the crosswalk at the intersection of McCall and Windsor Roads. Page 4 of 6 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1023 of 63 Date: Subject: April 7, 2026 2007, 1913 McCall Road, and 2807 Windsor Rd School NTA | SPC-2026-0052A 2. During the site plan review, it is recommended the developer restripe the crosswalk at the intersection of McCall and Horn Ln. 3. As per the ASMP, the required ROW for Windsor Rd is 72 feet. 4. As per the ASMP, the required ROW for McCall Rd is 58/64 feet. 5. If the number of units proposed in Table 1 is exceeded, the TDS division may be required to reassess the NTA. 6. This site will be subject to Street Impact Fee (SIF), which will help fund roadway capacity projects identified in RCP necessitated by new developments. The SIF collection amount will be calculated and collected at the time of building permit application. For more information on website the Fees, (https://www.austintexas.gov/department/street-impact-fee). Impact please Street City’s visit SIF 7. This assessment is based on the proposed uses. Any changes in these assumptions may require an updated NTA. 8. This NTA does not grant nor guarantee approval of proposed driveway types or locations. Driveway types and locations will be reviewed with the site plan application. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Austin Jones, Supervising Engineer of ATPW at austin.jones2@austintexas.gov or (512)-978-1671. cc: Renee Johns, Program Manager Mustafa Wali, P.E., Development Review Engineer Cynthia Hadri, Zoning Case Manager Page 5 of 6 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1024 of 63 Date: Subject: April 7, 2026 2007, 1913 McCall Road, and 2807 Windsor Rd School NTA | SPC-2026-0052A Appendix A Flyer distributed to parents Page 6 of 6 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1025 of 63 4/17/2026 Planning Commission City of Austin P.O. Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 Dear Planning Commission, Please accept this letter of opposition to the Conditional Use Permit (Case #: SPC-2026-0052A) to allow for an expansion of the Girls’ School of Austin (GSA). The expansion includes an additional building and an increase in students from 150 to 200 at 2007 McCall Road, located in the fabric of our residential community. At the outset, I want to be clear: I value the Girls’ School of Austin and the important educational mission it serves. My concerns below are not opposition to education or to the school’s programs. They are focused narrowly on the scale of the proposed expansion and why the application does not address the traffic and safety impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood and our resident’s quality of life. Safety during drop-off/ pick-up time is an ongoing issue in our neighborhood. Importantly, this neighborhood has no sidewalks--the streets themselves serve as our sidewalks. Families with children, students of AISD Casis & O’Henry, dog walkers, joggers, and cyclists all share the road with moving vehicles. When there are no sidewalks to retreat to, every additional vehicle into this network increases risk to pedestrians and cyclists, of which there are many. Our neighborhood’s quality of life is greatly impacted daily. GSA parents begin lining up over half an hour before Middle School dismissal, creating a queuing line which extends well beyond what is identified in the traffic study provided by the applicant (Exhibit A). GSA parents block resident’s driveways (Exhibit B), park in no-parking zones (Exhibit C), use private driveways to turn around, block the roadway completely creating gridlock (Exhibit D), and generally do not appear to follow a standardized traffic pattern. Under the current enrollment, the safety issues and quality of life for our neighborhood are strained on a daily basis. Additionally, GSA has failed to develop and enforce an effective transportation management program that mitigates these concerns as they currently exist. An increase in enrollment without a comprehensive, enforceable and legally binding traffic solution will worsen these conditions and further erode the safety and quality of life of the adjacent residential community. For these reasons, I request that the Planning Commission deny the request for a CUP to increase the student enrollment to 200 students. Thank you for your consideration and attention to this matter. Best, Sarah Coleman 2200 Griswold Lane (corner of McCall) CC: Heather Chafin, Case Manager 1 EXHIBIT F15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1026 of 63 Exhibit A: Normal extent of queuing during pick-up and drop-off times End of line by McCall and Griswold and extending on other side of McCall 2 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1027 of 63 Vehicles parked across private driveways, blocking residential access Exhibit B: Example 1: Vehicles parked across private driveways, blocking residential access Example 2: Vehicles parked across private driveways, blocking residential access 3 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1028 of 63 Exhibit C: Vehicles are routinely parked in clearly posted No Parking zones Feb 13, 7:59 AM — Parent Vehicles parked in No Parking zone during posted AM restriction hours . Feb 10, 4:00 PM — Parent Vehicles parked illegally during posted PM restriction hours 4 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1029 of 63 Exhibit D: GSA school Vehicle blocking the roadway from southbound traffic during school dismissal 5 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1030 of 63 6 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1031 of 63 April 14, 2026 Ms. Heather Chaffin Mr. Erik Holden Planning Commissioners City of Austin P.O. Box 1088 Austin, Texas 78767 RE: Support for The Girls’ School of Austin Conditional Use Permit – SPC-2026-0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holder, and Members of Planning Commission, We reside at 1902 Sharon Lane in Austin since 2007 at a time when The Girls’ School of Austin was located in the old Dill Elementary School. Through the years we have watched the school expand to the current improvements on their property and are aware of the quality of the school and the students that learn in this established environment. Our understanding is that The Girls’ School of Austin has purchased additional land and the proposal is to expand the school from 150 students to 200 students. We STRONGLY SUPPORT the request associated with the permits to allow for this expansion. Schools within the community are part of the vibrancy of the community. The plans we have seen appear well thought out and mindful of the neighborhood and traffic concerns. Respectfully submitted, Scott Sams and Sha McBurney 1902 Sharon Lane Austin, Texas 78703 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1032 of 63 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1033 of 6315 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1034 of 6315 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1035 of 63From: Rebecca Paricio Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:33 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I am writing to express my strong support for the Girls' School of Austin’s Conditional Use Permit application, specifically the proposal to increase student capacity from 150 to 200. As a member of the school community since 2018, I have seen firsthand how my children have thrived within this environment. The school provides a rigorous academic curriculum that effectively balances social and emotional learning, fostering resilience and leadership in its students. The requested increase of 50 students is a modest adjustment for an institution that already operates responsibly within the neighborhood. Expanding enrollment will allow more local families to access this educational model without compromising the school’s mission or the surrounding area. I urge the Commission to approve this request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Dr. Todd and Rebecca Paricio From: Adam Falla Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:12 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1036 of 63 The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Adam Falla, GSA Parent, Founder of Lonestar Field Hockey Club From: Emma Bowmer Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:29 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1037 of 63 Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Emma Bowmer GSA MS Math Department, Educator, and Community Member Stay Thinking! Emma Bowmer (she/her) Middle School Math From: Lorna Torrado Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:54 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lorna Torrado, PhD she/ella Director of Future Thinking and 21st Century Skills The Girls’ School of Austin www.thegirlsschool.org 512.478.7827 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1038 of 63 From: Catalina Limongelli Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:51 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Catalina Limongelli From: Crystal C. Wu Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:25 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1039 of 63 Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. We learned of the GSA through our friends and were convinced to apply because of their passion for the school. When we started our daughter in kindergarten at the GSA, we noticed how easily she absorbed the values for which the GSA stands. She is thriving at the school, and we are so proud of the child that she is now and already proud of the woman we know she will become. The school has taught her strength, collaboration, independence, and smart decision- making (and she is only in first grade)! It is such a gift to know that such a school and organization exists and such an honor to be a part of that community. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Crystal Wu (parent of a GSA first grader) From: Eileen Smith Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:17 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: Rebecca Yacono ; Robyn Burchfiel Subject: In Support: Girls' School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Dear Heather, Erik and members of the Planning Commission, Our daughter has attended GSA since kindergarten and is now in sixth grade. During that time, the school has provided an excellent academic, cultural and social environment where girls truly thrive under strong leadership and guidance of amazing teachers. We are writing today to express our support of GSA's conditional use permit application to increase enrollment by 50 additional students. We believe this thoughtful expansion will strengthen the school's impact for years to come, allowing more girls to benefit from this empowering educational experience. The Girls' School has consistently demonstrated care and respect for surrounding neighborhoods and families. We are confident it will continue to do so as it grows. We respectfully urge you to approve this permit and expand access to this incredible school. Thank you, Eileen Smith and Freddy Marichal 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1040 of 63 From: Anne Baker Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:09 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Anne Baker Director of Instructional Technology The Girls’ School of Austin From: Robbie Reed Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:03 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1041 of 63 Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. As a parent of 2 girls who attend the school, I have seen firsthand how conscientious the school is about being a good neighbor and these values are further instilled in the students. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robbie Reed From: Soraiya Nagree Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:00 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: Robyn Burchfiel ; Rebecca Yacono ; Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1042 of 63 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Soraiya Nagree (4th grade GSA Mom) From: Stephanie Scherzer Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:52 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Members of the Review Committee, I am writing to express my strong support for the Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in enrollment from 150 to 200 students. The Girls' School of Austin provides something truly valuable in our community: an academically challenging environment that also places equal emphasis on social and emotional development. The school helps students build confidence, resilience, empathy, and leadership skills alongside strong academic foundations. Those qualities are essential in preparing young people to thrive and contribute meaningfully to the world around them. It is also important to recognize the scale of this request. This is an increase of 50 students—not a large commercial project or disruptive development, but an opportunity for 50 more children to benefit from a school that has already demonstrated it can operate thoughtfully and responsibly within the neighborhood. Approving this request would allow more Austin families access to an outstanding educational option while preserving the school’s mission, character, and positive community presence. I respectfully urge you to support this application. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Stephanie Scherzer Parent of a Student at Girls' School of Austin From: Brittany Johansen Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:47 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1043 of 63 Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Brittany Johansen Brittany Johansen Proud parent to a GSA student From: Sydney McQuade Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:33 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: Robyn Burchfiel ; Rebecca Yacono ; rnguyen Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. We love our school and believe in their small expansion mission. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1044 of 63 Sincerely, Jonathan and Sydney McQuade Boyce Wealth Associate / Counterbalance Counseling & Psychiatry Supportive GSA Parents From: Adrienne Domas Goldsberry Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:28 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission: Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. The school works continuously with the surrounding neighborhood to mitigate any impacts of its activities on the area, and it will continue to do so in the future. I am 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1045 of 63 confident the school administration and parents will carefully follow conditions and guidelines for continuing to mitigate impacts so that the Conditional Use Permit can be approved. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Adrienne Goldsberry Parent of 3rd Grade student From: Jana Rundle Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:25 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I’m writing in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin’s Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. We chose The Girls' School of Austin for our girls because it truly is a unique gem in the community. It prioritizes academics, free play for social development, and creates an environment where girls can be themselves, try new things, build confidence, and develop leadership. It's the only school of this nature in the Austin area. I understand that neighbors have raised concerns, particularly around traffic. From our experience, the school has been thoughtful in how it manages drop-off and pick-up, and it’s clear they care about being a good neighbor. This proposed increase feels measured and consistent with how the school already operates within the community. The school is seeking to expand enrollment so that more families can access this kind of unique and supportive environment, allowing more girls to grow into confident, capable leaders. I hope you will consider supporting this request. -- Jana Rundle, Psy.D. Licensed Clinical Psychologist From: Lindsey Heddleston Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:24 AM 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1046 of 63 To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: Robyn Burchfiel Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lindsey Heddleston, LCSW -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Gleich Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:13 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1047 of 63 The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that equally prioritizes social and emotional learning—cultivating resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. These are not extras; they are the foundation of students who become thoughtful, engaged citizens. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dr. Joshua Gleich From: Brad Heffern <brad.heffern@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 9:56 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden and Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Girls School of Austin's application for a conditional use permit, which includes increasing the student capacity from 150 to 200. I am the proud parent of two girls (first and third grades) who attend GSA. I can state unequivocally that the school is a magical place. My girls are not only getting an amazing education, but are being shaped into confident future leaders. My only regret about the school is its small size and the limited number of girls who can access it. The upsized permit and middle school expansion would help solve that issue. I respect some of the concerns that neighbors have about traffic. I live across from a school myself (Rosedale School), and while traffic can be annoying, every school in the city deals with that. It is a small sacrifice for the greater good, and of the schools that my girls have attended or where I regularly observe traffic, GSA has the least disruptive carpool line. The site has also been a school since well before the GSA was located there. When it was Dill Elementary School from the 1950s to early 2000s, there were roughly 150 students, but there was no parking for teachers or staff. This pushed traffic onto the local streets. With the GSA having added staff 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1048 of 63 parking and an interior drop-off lane, I suspect that it can operate with 200 students at the same level of traffic that Dill had with 150 students. I also want to emphasize that the GSA parents care deeply about minimizing the impact on the surrounding community to the extent possible. I encourage you to support the new CUP. Thank you for your consideration. Brad Heffern From: Michelle Nguyen Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:22 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. As a former resident neighbor of the school, I appreciated the joy and positive impact the school has on the neighborhood. The Girls’ School of Austin offers something rare: a rigorous academic environment that prioritizes social and emotional learning. GSA graduates demonstrate resilience, empathy, and leadership alongside intellectual growth. This foundation supports future generations of thoughtful, engaged citizens and Austinites. The school’s central location in Tarrytown provides access to students from every district in the city. It has been a part of the neighborhood for over 20 years. The school has submitted a plan to the city developed by professionals who have thoughtfully considered neighborhood impact and the school stands by the designs that were created by architects, land use experts, civil engineers, and traffic engineers in compliance with city regulations and backed by data. I urge you to support this request. A modest and responsible expansion of 50 students will allow the school to deliver on its mission and continue to be a vibrant member of a thriving community in the heart of our city. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Michelle Nguyen Michelle Nguyen Former resident of Bremen Street near the GSA and aunt to 2 former students. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1049 of 63 From: Liana Rao Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 9:09 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. I am a proud parent of a sixth grader who attends The Girls’ School of Austin. My husband and I have experienced firsthand the thoughtful educational experience our daughter has been fortunate to receive from the dedicated teachers and leadership at the GSA. We are grateful for both the academic rigor as well as the focus on fostering our daughter’s growth as a whole person, as she moves from being a young girl to a confident young lady who is curious and committed to helping the world around her. She loves her teachers, who make learning fun, rigorous, and interesting all at the same time. She loves the rich arts programs offered, including the experience of learning viola from a young age. She loves that the school is Kinder through 8th grade, with opportunities such as “sister groups” that span grades. When she was young, her “big sisters” were people she looked up to. Now, as a “big girl” herself, she gets opportunities to mentor and support young girls. I strongly support the addition of 50 students to allow more girls to benefit from the educational experience at The Girls’ School of Austin while still keeping the school small. I strongly believe that 50 more students will also be manageable for us to continue to operate responsibly in the neighborhood. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Liana Rao From: Reagan Ward Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:26 AM 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1050 of 63 To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. The Girls’ School of Austin plays a unique and important role in supporting the education and empowerment of young women. Through a blend of rigorous academics and a deep commitment to social and emotional learning, students are encouraged to develop confidence, resilience, empathy, and leadership. Spaces like this matter, and we need them to help girls grow into capable, engaged members of their communities. It is places like this that help make Austin such a special city and a great place for families raising children. For perspective, this expansion represents about 50 additional students, a relatively small increase for a school that has long been a responsible member of the neighborhood. Expanding enrollment extends this proven model to more Austin families without compromising the school's mission or integrity. I urge you to support this request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Reagan Ward she/her/hers (916) 303-3464 From: Drew Carman Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2026 1:41 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1051 of 63 Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. As a licensed landscape architect and urban planner, I understand how critical it is to have context-sensitive use in our urban neighborhoods. The increase from 150 to 200 students is a modest intensification that aligns with the City of Austin’s goals of efficient land use and supporting community-serving facilities. By leveraging existing infrastructure and consolidating growth within the adjacent and current campus footprint the project avoids the need for a wholly separate off-site facility that could introduce greater impacts elsewhere. Additionally, I understand that traffic and circulation impacts are expected to remain manageable, particularly with the measures of staggered pick-up/drop-off times, carpooling, and the local routing plan for the school community’s vehicles. Importantly, as a community-serving educational institution, the Girls School of Austin provides the very meaningful public benefit of educating young women of the next generation. This proposal allows the school to expand its reach while maintaining compatibility with the local context and advancing broader planning objectives related to sustainability, and access to education. For these reasons, the requested Conditional Use Permit should be viewed as an appropriate and supportable action, not only from an urban planning standpoint but from a cultural perspective; as an institution where young women can learn to become confident, engaged citizens and live intellectually vibrant and fulfilling lives. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Drew Carman — Drew Carman, PLA principal ph: 859.338.0885 From: Robyn Burchfiel Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2026 8:57 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Girls’ School of Austin - Conditional Use Permit Application, SPC-2026- 0052A 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1052 of 63 Dear Ms. Chaffin, Mr. Holden, and Members of the Planning Commission, Re: Girls' School of Austin – 2007 McCall Road, Conditional Use Permit, SPC-2026-0052A I write in strong support of the Girls' School of Austin's Conditional Use Permit application, including the proposed increase in student capacity from 150 to 200. Let's put this in perspective: we are talking about 50 additional students. Not a stadium. Not a development. Not a highway. Fifty children, in a school that already operates responsibly within this neighborhood. The opposition to this modest expansion deserves scrutiny. Austin prides itself on being a city that invests in people; in equity, in education, in the next generation. Blocking 50 additional seats at a school that teaches girls to think critically, lead courageously, and build something larger than themselves sends the wrong message about whose future this city is willing to prioritize. These are not abstract values. The return on 50 additional seats is immeasurable—fifty more young women prepared to shape the communities they'll one day lead, to show up for their neighbors, and to carry this city forward. Austin needs more of them, not fewer. This Commission has an opportunity to make a decision that is both reasonable today and meaningful for decades to come. I hope you will seize it. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robyn Burchfiel GSA Parent (Class of 2022) & District 10 Constituent From: Blake Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2026 5:07 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: WANG ExCom Subject: Re: CORRECTION! RE: The Girls' School Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Public hearing update Dear City of Austin, As an interested party, thank you for the hearing notice. I have represented West Austin Neighborhood Group before city boards and commissions for over 20 years. In all that time, I have yet to see a controversial hearing pushed forward in this manner. Basically, if interested neighbors did not have edresses on file with you, they would still be unaware of the hearing that will occur in 12 days, the evening of the seventh business day from this electronic notification. And folks that depend on regular mail, if formal notice is placed in the mail tomorrow, Friday the 17th, they will not receive notice no earlier than Monday the 20th. And folks have lives and obligations outside this issue. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1053 of 63 Optically, that is ridiculous. Optically, it would appear you are following a timeline dictated by the applicant and their representatives. In my opinion, through the perception of unnecessary haste, you have engendered a distrust of the process. And that is unfortunate. I cannot send my regards, Blake Tollett, Secretary Land Matters West Austin Neighborhood Group From: Michael Said Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2026 1:56 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: Andrea Said Subject: Girls School of Austin Expansion Concerns Hi Heather, My wife, Andrea, and I live at 2302 Griswold Ln along with our two daughters. We are less than 500 ft from the school and experience constant traffic from the school. Parents are driving up and down our street everyday for dropoff and pickup as well as sitting outside our house waiting for school to end. This expansion is only going to make things worse. WE oppose the expansion of the school to 200 students. WE are open to working with the school but have been unsuccessful so we are now reaching out to the city for assistance. Best regards, Michael and Andrea Said From: Kirsten L Matetich Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2026 6:10 PM To: Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov>; Joe Matetich < Cc: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: IP NOTICE: SPC-2026-0052A Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit External Email - Exercise Caution Hi Erik and Heather, 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1054 of 63 Thanks for this. We just had a short but intense rainstorm. We are already very concerned about Drainage because we live in Tarrytown and it’s unexpectedly hilly in certain places. We are now extra concerned about it due to the potential of a large building going right behind part of our house and yard. Two of our neighbors - including the property that the Girls’ School has purchased - already have a significant water that flows directly into our backyard. Their lots are several feet higher than us in elevation even though eyeballing it you wouldn’t be able to tell or realize how significant of an impact it has during a rain storm. We’ve already had flooding to our property from water that comes from our neighbors and have had to spend significant money to put in Drainage systems to mitigate it. We’re now going to have to do more we believe because of this potential new building. So something very specific we’d like to understand is if that large building is approved, what are the drainage requirements and what happens if their water flows onto our property even more significantly than it does today? Thanks, Kirsten Matetich From: Louis Granger Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 4:08 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Subject: Opposition to the Girls' School of Austin Expansion Hello Ms. Chaffin, My name is Louis Granger and I recently purchased a property on McCall Street between Windsor Road and Griswold Lane. I plan to start construction on the property this summer and the new neighbors have informed me of that the traffic from pick up line for the Girls' School of Austin is already and issue and the school recently announced plans to expand. I was shown a picture earlier this week of cars parked all down the east side (my side) of McCall Street including blocking my driveway. I have two young children and I have concerns of the safety impact all of the cars on a daily basis could create in addition to the potential accessibility problems of my new property that could arise. Admittedly, I am new to the neighborhood and need to be brought up to speed, but as things stand, I am vehemently opposed to anything that will cause the current issue to worsen. I would be very happy to visit with you to gain some insight and perspective on the school's plans and potential neighborhood impact. Thank you very much & Happy Easter Louis Granger 512-423-2794 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1055 of 63 From: Kirsten L Matetich Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2026 11:19 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: FW: INTERESTED PARTY FOR THE GIRLS SCHOOL AUSTIN Hi Heather, Thanks that’s interesting. I didn’t realize it was broken into two parts. To me, this amplifies the issue of where they’re going to fit those additional people in a reasonable way, including accommodating parking and traffic, to both be reasonable comfortable and safe in their school and to not further impact the neighborhood. It’s a really sweet school but as it is today with the smaller number of students, they have nowhere to eat lunch so they have to sit outside, they have to store library books and instruments outside in lockers because there’s no room for them. They simply don’t have the space for what they want it to be. And because it’s in the middle of a residential neighborhood, even the new land which is maybe a quarter acre is not going do much to alleviate the crowding in their space, plus cars and traffic in the neighborhood. If I were them and I got approval to increase enrollment, I would do that as soon as it’s approved to help fund the expansion! We have to expect that if they get approval, they will increase enrollment asap prior to any extra facilities, parking, etc. I’m new to this so there is probably some additional context I don’t have. I just don’t want to see further issues introduced into our neighborhood without fully considering the impact. Thanks, Kirsten Matetich On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 10:36 AM Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> wrote: Good morning, Kirsten, Erik passed your email along to me to help answer your question. The site plan that is currently under review is to allow the school to expand the campus for private primary and secondary school facilities. They also propose changing the maximum number of students from 150 to 200. This is a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) site plan only and doesn’t include any proposed construction. The applicant is requesting the CUP first, with future site development plans to be reviewed under a separate site plan. We call this a “Part A site plan” for the CUP and a “Part B site plan” 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1056 of 63 for the construction element. This way, the applicant can verify that the use is permitted before investing the significant engineering, architectural, etc. costs involved in a construction set of plans. The plans that have been submitted for the CUP site plan do show building additions to the site that would be reviewed as part of a Part B site plan if the Part A is approved. If you would like to view the plans, please contact Erik Holden (above), or if you have other questions, please let me know. Heather Heather Chaffin Planning Officer, Land Use Review Austin Development Services 512-974-2140 heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov From: Taylor Logan Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 10:54 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: The Girls School Traffic Pattern Hi Heather, My name is Taylor Logan and I live at 2201 Griswold Lane, Austin TX 78703 which is at the intersection of McCall and Griswold. As I am sure you are aware, The Girls School has purchased a lot next door to their existing campus. This is of specific interest to me as the traffic pattern the school CURRENTLY has, is not working and I am not sure how they expect to add more students and staff while keeping their existing parking/pick up strategies. We have had MUCH more traffic along our street, that does not seem to understand how stop signs or neighborhood speed limits work. I have 2 young sons and we are very careful about being in our front yard/street outside our house for this exact reason. • The current queueing on McCall creates a traffic flow and safety issue in our neighborhood. • Expansion of the school will exacerbate the already problematic concern. We oppose the expansion of the school to 200 students. • We are open to working with the school in finding solutions, but they do not have a very good track record or rapport in addressing these issues with the neighborhood based on past experience. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1057 of 63 Thank you for time and attention to this matter. Taylor Logan (512)921-8227 From: Elena McGinnis Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 12:48 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: Davin McGinnis Subject: Girls School Expansion Dear Ms Chaffin- Thank you for the notification mailing about 2006-022693 SP. My name is Elena McGinnis , and I own 2812 Windsor, which is directly across the street from the Girls School of Austin. I am writing to share my concerns regarding the proposed expansion of GSA to 200 students, and to ask that the City carefully consider the traffic and safety impacts on our neighborhood before approving this project. I want to be clear from the outset: our neighborhood values education and we genuinely want to work collaboratively with both the school and the City toward solutions that work for everyone. However, we have real, lived concerns that we believe deserve a serious response. Existing Traffic and Safety Concerns The current drop-off and pick-up operations along Windsor and McCall already create significant traffic congestion and safety hazards for our neighborhood. On a typical school day, the queuing of parent vehicles and school vehicles backs up well beyond the school entrance, blocking driveways, reducing visibility at intersections, and creating dangerous conditions for pedestrians — including children walking to and from school.These are not occasional inconveniences — they are a daily reality for residents on this block, and they raise genuine public safety concerns. Opposition to the Proposed Expansion We are opposed to the expansion of GSA to 200 students in its current form. More students will mean more vehicles, more queuing, and more strain on a traffic pattern that is already failing. Without a credible, enforceable plan to address these impacts, approving this expansion would be irresponsible to the surrounding community. We are hopeful that with the City's involvement, we can arrive at a solution that allows the school to use their newly acquired property to enhance the current student experience while protecting the safety and quality of life of the families who live here. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please ensure this letter is included in the official hearing file. Respectfully, Elena and Davin McGinnis 2812 Windsor Road 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1058 of 63 From: Maria McGivney Arrellaga Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 11:42 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: GSANeighbors ; Maria Arrellaga Subject: Comments about Girls School Expansion Dear Heather (with cc to Erik): Thank you for your prompt responses to my questions regarding the requested expansion plans of the Girls’ School of Austin (GSA) (CUP-SPC-2026-0052A). As an interested party and also a homeowner within 500 feet of the school, I share here my comments and concerns about the expansion and I appreciate the Planning Commission taking these comments into serious consideration in review of the GSA CUP. I would first like to state that I fully support the mission of GSA and am happy to live close to an educational institution focused on empowering girls for their future. With that said, there should be limits to the impact the school has on the neighborhood regarding traffic flow, idling cars and parking. Bigger is not always better for all involved. I have lived in my home at 2002 Bremen St. for 35 years and watched the transitions of the property from Dill Elementary School to GSA. Dill Elementary was created as a neighborhood school to which students would mostly walk and bike to. In contrast, GSA boasts an enrollment that draws from almost every zip code in the greater Austin area — meaning everyone is driving to campus. When GSA opened 24 years ago there were traffic flow issues. It took several years for the school to work out challenges and kept the neighbors informed. Over the years, enrollment has steadily grown and the school has increased the number of grades it serves. GSA has not efficiently addressed the increasing traffic flow issues that happen at peak times of drop off and pick up. The current state of traffic on Bremen St. in front of my home is clogged with cars turning south off Windsor on to Bremen to circle around either at Horn Lane or Griswold to access the drop off line between 7:20 am and 8:10 am or so. It is very challenging for my husband and I to get out of our driveway to go to work at that time. This current situation will only get worse once GSA fulfills its expansion plans of adding 50 more students to enrollment. The afternoon pick up flow is also challenging between 2:30 pm and 4:15 pm. Bremen St. is not wide. Many Bremen St. residents park their cars against the curb on both sides of the street which makes it impossible for more than one car to pass in between the parked cars. Then add to that pedestrians who are out walking their dogs and GSA parents who park on Bremen and walk to the school to pick up their kids. It’s chaos at peak times. It is important to note that in the GSA expansion plans there has been no mention of how to address the traffic issues. The school leadership has not shared any strategies with the neighborhood to alleviate the current traffic issues and the additional traffic that will be caused 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1059 of 63 by the enrollment expansion. One neighbor even offered an alternative plan but there was no comment about that. It is our impression that while GSA pays lip service to the issues, there have been no impactful efforts to address the neighborhood’s concerns. As one example, other private schools in Austin utilize buses to transport their students to campus to offload traffic issues. Where are GSA’s real solutions? I appreciate the opportunity to share my concerns and frustrations. I am happy to answer any questions. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Maria Arrellaga 2002 Bremen St. From: Pamela Uglietta Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 5:27 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Subject: The Girls School Traffic Dear Ms. Heather, My husband and I have lived at 1904 Bremen Street for the past 13 years where we have not had issues with the Girls School traffic until this school year. This problem is serious at 7:45 AM when turning west from Bremen to Windsor and at 3:40/4:00 PM. and in the PM when McCall street is backed up and impassable. Addressing the morning issue: the GS traffic cuts the corner as they fly thru to Bremen and the up Horn Lane which then backs up Bremen. Addressing the afternoon issue: travel on McCall is impossible which requires a detour to the adjacent streets plus blocking the residents driveways on McCall for hours. Please consider our suggestions to restrict the traffic flow of the Girls School to Windsor only and putting a traffic signal at Windsor and Bremen Street. Sincerely, Pamela Uglietta From: K Mason Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 10:21 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Subject: Girls' School Expansion Hi Heather, My name is Kirsten Mason, and I live at 1908 Bremen Street. I’m reaching out about the proposed expansion of the Girls’ School of Austin. I want to start by saying that I know several families with daughters there, and I’m not opposed to the school growing. That said, I do have some concerns about safety and how this has been handled with the neighborhood. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1060 of 63 I have three young kids—10 months, 3, and 6—and we’re often outside in front of our house. It’s pretty common to see cars speeding during school drop-off, sometimes going 50 mph or more. Just this past week, I stood outside during drop-off and saw several cars well over the speed limit. I even left a message with the school, but didn’t hear back. A few things that are especially concerning to me: • The current traffic on Bremen, Sharon, and the queue on McCall already creates congestion and safety issues. • Expanding to 200 students will only add to this problem, and it’s hard to imagine how the streets will safely handle the increased traffic from both additional families and staff. • We would absolutely be open to working with the school on solutions, but based on past experience, there hasn’t been much communication or follow-through with neighbors. This situation is disappointing given the school’s role in caring for children. It is difficult to reconcile that mission with what appears to be a lack of concern to the safety of children living in the surrounding community. Thank you for taking the time to read this. I really appreciate you listening, and I’m happy to provide more detail or talk further if helpful. Sincerely, Kirsten Kirsten Roberts Mason, PharmD, BCPS 865.776.2610 From: Avva Bassiri Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 12:42 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: Jason Azar Subject: The Girls School Expansion - Concerned Neighbor Dear Ms. Chaffin, I hope you are doing well. I am writing as a resident of the neighborhood where The Girls School is located, regarding the proposed expansion currently under review. First, I want to emphasize that I genuinely value The Girls School and the role it plays in our community. It is a special and well-loved institution, and I support its continued success and growth. At the same time, I hope to share some concerns about how the expansion may impact the surrounding neighborhood, particularly in terms of traffic and safety. As it stands, our area already experiences significant congestion during school drop-off and pick-up times. The proposed site plan does not appear to include additional parking or clear accommodations for the increased traffic that would likely accompany a larger student body. This raises concerns about how the surrounding residential streets will absorb that additional volume. 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1061 of 63 On a personal note, I often walk in the neighborhood with my stroller, and I have found it especially difficult to safely cross the street during peak school hours. There have been multiple occasions when traffic has been so heavy and continuous that I’ve had to wait several minutes just to find a safe moment to cross. With an increase in traffic, I worry that these conditions could become even more challenging, and potentially unsafe, for families, pedestrians, and residents. I would respectfully ask that, as part of the approval process, the school be encouraged to address these concerns. Thoughtful solutions, such as improved traffic flow planning, designated drop-off areas, or other mitigation measures, could go a long way toward ensuring that both the school and the neighborhood can continue to thrive together. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I appreciate the work you are doing to balance the needs of the community, and I hope these concerns can be taken into account as the process moves forward. Warm regards, Avva Bassiri & Jason Azar 2810 Windsor Road From: Jill Jaimes Sent: Friday, March 27, 2026 4:47 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Subject: Concerns regarding expansion of the Girls School Dear Ms. Chaffin - I am writing to express my concern regarding the current traffic and safety conditions associated with school queueing on McCall. The existing pickup and drop-off pattern already creates significant traffic flow problems and poses a safety issue for residents, pedestrians, and drivers in our neighborhood. We have also experienced cars zooming down our street, as well as discourteous driving behaviors such as not taking turns properly and not allowing residents to turn into or out of the neighborhood safely. We are also concerned that expanding the school to 200 students will only worsen an already problematic situation. For this reason, we oppose the proposed expansion. Increasing enrollment without first resolving the existing traffic and safety issues would place an even greater burden on the neighborhood. While we are open to working with the school to find practical solutions, past experience has made it difficult to have confidence in that process. Unfortunately, the school has not established a strong track record or rapport with the neighborhood in addressing these concerns. We ask that these issues be taken seriously and that no expansion move forward unless and until meaningful, effective solutions are in place. Sincerely, Jill Jaimes 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1062 of 63 2110 Griswold Ln Austin, TX 78703 From: Kirsten L Matetich Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 4:47 PM To: Holden, Erik <Erik.Holden@austintexas.gov> Cc: Subject: Re: INTERESTED PARTY FOR THE GIRLS SCHOOL AUSTIN Thank you, Erik. I’ve already seen the site plan and had a call with the firm that is managing their permit request. Out of everything that I laid out, I have a really basic question of where they’re going to fit all those people - not just the 50 extra students - but the extra staff associated with increasing enrollment by 50 kids. I don’t recall the exact amount, but I think it was 15 to 20 additional adults for the 50 additional students. Thanks, Kirsten Matetich 15 SPC-2026-0052A - Girls' School of Austin Conditional Use Permit; District 1063 of 63