23 Working Group Adopted Amendments.pdf — original pdf

Backup

Amend Commissi Section Pg # Proposed Amendment 1 Azhar 25-8-Subchapter C Delay consideration of the Functional Green sub-item, contained in 25-8-Subchapter C, for Staff to provide the following to the Planning - Functional Green Commission: comments and response from Staff. - Provide results of additional formal engagement with community, industry, and other departments. Preferably, provide a summary of stakeholder - Work with City staff and stakeholders to provide an analysis of the impact of these provisions on developable space in CBD, DMU, VMU, UNO, TOD, MF-6, zoning districts and all -MU combining districts, including providing a minimum of two test cases for each zone to consider real-life Proposed Text Change References and Notes Strikethrough of relevant sections Text Yes Requires deeper understanding of planning impact and stakeholder engagment - Work with City staff and stakeholders to provide an analysis of a minimum of 2 test cases that apply to a scenario with small site less than 1 acre and less than 5,000 sq ft impervious cover, approved in the last 2 years. - Provide greater definition in the Affordability Impact Statement regarding anticipated costs and environmental benefits. - Work with City staff and stakeholders to provide test cases with financial modeling for different project sites in different zoning districts to understand the financial impact of these requirenents, both one-time capital costs and recurring O&M costs, including, but not limited to, assessing CBD, DMU, MF-6, and VMU projects. - Work with HPD staff to assess the utilization of bonus entitlements to incentivize these requirements and minimize cost and developable space - Work with staff from HPD, Corridor Program Office, and Project Connect Office to assess the implications of this requirement on the ETOD and other corridor planning processes currently underway, with the aim to ensure that housing capacity contiues to support mode shift goals. - Ensure that regular revisions to landscape design and plantings do not require a Site Plan Revision. - Provide the literature review conducted to define the multipliers for all allowable landcsape elements. - Provide the basis on which the 0.3 threshold requirement was set. - Explain how these requirements will converge with parkland dedication, Great Streets, UNO street design, landcaping, and other exisiting code - Assess and provide a data-based review of the environmental impact of these requirements on high water demand/use and carbon emissions from equipment needed to maintain landscape on rooftops, etc over the lifetime of projects (suggest using a tool like Pathfinder to assess carbon impact. impacts. requirements. impacts). 2 Azhar Throughout Delay adoption of the Missing Middle sub-item, contained in various subsections of the overall ordinance, for it to be considered through a seperate Strikethrough of Yes Requires deeper ordinance process that includes additional staff teams, including, but not limited to, HPD and ATD, along with conducting stakeholder engagement on the relevant sections item and an assessment of other code changes and department actions necessary to support missing middle projects understanding of planning impact and stakeholder engagment 3 Azhar § 25-2-1007 (F) (4) In parking lot design require that a minimum of 50% of stormwater runoff be flowed into landscaped area to meet environmental runoff goals, "(4) must have an edge- Yes This is to move policy while working with exisiting parking lot design standards of-pavement treatment forward while 4 5 Azhar Azhar Costs for Green Stormwater Infratructure requirements for developments with 10% or more income-restricted affordable units or more should be offset with development incentives Costs for Green Stormwater Infratructure requirements for Affordability Unlocked developments or any developments with 50% or more income- restricted affordable units should be offset with a Watershed Protection Department cost-sharing program 7 Shieh 25-8-281 1377 Add ability for Director to grant administrative variance to reduce CEF buffer based on a consideration of topography, geology, and ecology. that allows overland flow of a minimum 50% of stormwater runoff across the landscape No Cost mitigation suggested by HPD staff in Affordability Impact Cost mitigation No suggested by HPD staff in Affordability Impact Statement Working Group Adopted Amendments