B-16 C14-85-288.23(RCA) - 7715 half West State Highway 71; District 8.pdf — original pdf

Backup

RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-85-288.23(RCA) – 7715 ½ West State Highway 71 DISTRICT: 8 ADDRESS: 7715 ½ West State Highway 71 SITE AREA: 13.367 acres EXISTING ZONING: LO-NP PROPERTY OWNER: Stephen Simon, John Simon, Barbara Simon Bierner AGENT: Drenner Group (Amanda Swor) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends amending the Restrictive Covenant as outlined in Exhibit D: Restrictive Covenant Amendment Redlines. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 6, 2022: APPROVED AN AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AS STAFF RECOMMENDED, WITH AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION TO LIMIT ACCESS TO LITTLE DEER CROSSING TO EMERGENCY VEHICLES ONLY, AS SHOWN IN ATTACHED MOTION NO. 20220406 003a [J. BRISTOL; P. BEDFORD – 2ND] (9-1) COMMISSONER THOMPSON VOTED NAY; ONE VACANCY ON THE COMMISSION March 2, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT TO A FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION DATE [K. RAMBERG; J. BRISTOL – 2ND] (8-0) R. SCOTT – ABSENT; TWO VACANCIES ON THE COMMISSION February 16, 2022: APPROVED A JOINT POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT AND NEIGHBORHOOD TO MARCH 2, 2022 [K. RAMBERG; R. BRIMER – 2ND] (9-0) TWO VACANCIES ON THE COMMISSION February 2, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO FEBRUARY 17, 2022 C14-85-288.23(RCA) 2 [K. RAMBERG; BRISTOL – 2ND] (6-0) BARRETT BIXLER, QURESHI, SCOTT – ABSENT; TWO VACANCIES ON THE COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO APRIL 26, 2022, BY CONSENT [R. SCHNEIDER; A. AZHAR – 2ND] (10-0) J. MUSHTALER – NOT PRESENT FOR PASSAGE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA; J. SHIEH, J. THOMPSON – ABSENT April 26, 2022: March 8, 2022: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: To be Scheduled ISSUES: The Applicant has entered into a private restrictive covenant with the adjacent property owner to east regarding building height of townhome structures, boundary fencing, emergency access and an impervious cover limit, among other items. Please refer to Exhibit E: Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Removal of Petition Signature at the back of the Staff backup material. Interested parties in the area have raised concerns about the proposed development and increasing the impervious cover currently on the site. This property is located within the Williamson Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as a Barton Springs Zone Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City’s Land Development Code. Due to the existing 1987 Restrictive Covenant, this property has additional permitted entitlements for development than what would be currently allowed under today’s Land Development Code (LDC). Staff has received comments in opposition of this Restrictive Covenant Amendment (RCA) request. For all written or emailed comments, please see Exhibit C: Correspondence Received. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The proposed Restrictive Covenant Amendment (RCA) area is approximately 13.367 acres and is part of a larger tract currenting being requested to be rezoned to GO-MU-NP, please see Zoning Case No. C14-2021-0130. This undeveloped property is located on the south side of W. SH 71 and is zoned LO-NP. Adjacent zoning consists of LR-MU-CO-NP, LO-MU-CO-NP and RR-NP to the east; SF-6-NP C14-85-288.23(RCA) 3 to the south and SF-6-NP, CS-NP and RR-NP to the west. To the north is W. SH 71 right-of-way and is not zoned. Please refer to Exhibit A: Zoning Map and Exhibit B: Aerial Map. The Applicant is requesting to amend the permitted site development standards, environmental requirements, and transportation requirements. Specifically, the amendment includes: 1) reducing the maximum impervious cover from 65% to 50%; 2) removing the maximum 146,000 square feet of building space and replacing it with a floor-to-area ratio of 1:1; 3) adding compliance with Section 1.6.9 of the Environmental Criteria Manual (Save Our Springs) and limiting cut and fill to 8 feet for site work and grading, with certain exceptions; and 4) removing the requirement to construct a “commercial loop” on the Property and in its place subjecting the property to current Code following completion of any multifamily residential development on the subject property. Please see Exhibit D: Restrictive Covenant Amendment Redlines for current RC and proposed revisions. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed amendments to the RC because much of it allows for development under a previous code and therefore is not up to date on newer and current standards. While the maximum impervious cover is greater than what would be allowed today with the current zoning, the majority of water quality requirements will be fulfilled under current Code instead of the City’s Code of 1981. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: Zoning Land Uses Site North South East LO-NP Not applicable SF-6-NP Undeveloped West SH 71 right-of-way Undeveloped LR-MU-CO-NP, LO-MU-CO-NP and RR-NP Undeveloped, vehicle storage, and bed and breakfast West SF-6-NP, CS-NP and RR-NP Undeveloped and convenience storage NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: Oak Hill Combined (West Oak Hill) TIA: Not required at this time WATERSHED: Williamson Creek – Barton Springs Zone (Contributing Zone) SCHOOLS: Patton Elementary, Small Middle and Bowie High Schools C14-85-288.23(RCA) 4 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Austin Lost and Found Pets Oak Hill Trails Association Aviara HOA City of Rollingwood Ridgeview Save Our Springs Alliance Covered Bridge Property Owners Scenic Brook Neighborhood Association Friends Of Austin Neighborhoods SELTexas Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group Oak Hill Association of Neighborhoods (Ohan) Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan - COA Liaison Thomas Springs / Circleville Alliance TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources AREA CASE HISTORIES: Number Request Commission City Council C14-2021-0088 7715 and 7809 Old Bee Caves Rd RR-NP, SF-3-NP and GR-NP to SF- 6-CO-NP Approved SF-6-CO-NP; CO was for a maximum of 25 residential units. RR-NP to SF-3- NP Approved SF-3-NP. C14-2016-0008 Old Bee Cave Rd Subdivision C14-05-0200 ROCKIN Y 7629, 7715 and 7739 W. SH 71 RR to LR-MU- CO Approved LR-MU-CO for Tract 1 and LO-MU-CO for Tract 2; CO includes limiting trips per day to 2,000, a 50- foot vegetative buffer along southeastern property (adjacent to SF-1 zoning) and limited building height to 1-story within 150 feet of SF-1 zoned property. Approved SF-6-CO- NP as Commission recommended (8/26/2021). Approved SF-3-NP as Commission recommended (4/14/2016). Approved LR-MU- CO for Tract 1 and LO-MU-CO for Tract 2 as Commission recommended with the addition of a set of prohibited uses on Tract 1 (4/27/2006). C14-85-288.23(RCA) 5 Number Request Commission City Council C14-85- 288.22(RCA) 7919 W SH 71 To amend an existing RC. Approved amending the RC as follows: Approved RCA as Commission recommended (5/4/2017). 1. Max. IC of 24%; 2. Max. 0.4:1 FAR; 3. Keep previous CWQZ provisions; 4. Allow development in the (WQTZ); 5. Allow access to State Highway 71; 6. One time use of the impervious cover, subsequent redevelopment will be subject to current code. Approved CS-1-CO; CO included prohibition of onsite consumption. C14-99-2123 GR to CS-1-CO Williamson Creek Plaza-Building I RELATED CASES: Approved CS-1-CO as Commission recommended (3/2/2000). NPA-2021-0025.02: This is the associated neighborhood plan amendment case from Single Family to Mixed Use / Office land use that is being considered with this rezoning request. C14-2021-0130: This is the associated rezoning case that is being considered with this restrictive covenant amendment case. For the area that is covered by this RC, the Applicant is requesting to rezone from LO-NP to GO-MU-NP. EXISTING STREET CHARACTERISTICS: Street ROW Pavement Classification Sidewalks Bike Route Capital Metro (within ¼ mile) West SH 71 77 feet Level 5 Yes 150 feet Wide Shoulder No C14-85-288.23(RCA) 6 OTHER STAFF COMMENTS: Inclusive Planning Imagine Austin The termination or amending of a Restrictive Covenant is not under the purview of the policies of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, which is broad in scope and therefore, no Imagine Austin compliance review comments are being submitted for this request. Environmental Review EV 1: DSD EV Review staff will support the amendment if the following is provided: • Project will provide SOS non-degradation water quality. • Project will delete 1(c) and 2(d) of the Restrictive Covenant and be reviewed under current environmental code at the time of site plan. Environmental Office Review EO 1: WPD staff will support the amendment if the following is provided: • Project will provide SOS non-degradation water quality. • Project will delete 1(c) and 2(d) of the Restrictive Covenant and be reviewed under current environmental code at the time of site plan. PARD Review PR 1: Parkland dedication will be required at the time of subdivision or site plan application for the proposed residential units resulting from the changes to the Restrictive Covenant, per City Code § 25-1-601, as amended. The proposed development meets the criteria for land dedication in City Code Title 25, Article 14. As such, a partial land dedication will be required, as well as any remaining fees in-lieu. The site is currently park deficient, defined as being outside walking distance to existing parks. The development as proposed will require parkland dedication for the new residential units that will serve this neighborhood through the additional park investment. The Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) would consider a pocket park with connections into the surrounding neighborhood toward satisfying the requirement at time of permitting (whether subdivision or site plan). Such a park would improve neighborhood park access, and satisfy a park need for this new development. Should there be any remaining fees in-lieu, those fees shall be used toward park investments in the form of land acquisition and/or park amenities within the surrounding area, per the Parkland Dedication Operating Procedures § 14.3.11 and City Code § 25-1-607 (B)(1) & (2). C14-85-288.23(RCA) 7 Should the applicant wish to discuss parkland dedication requirements in advance of site plan or subdivision applications, please contact this reviewer: thomas.rowlinson@austintexas.gov. At the applicant’s request, PARD has provided an early determination letter of the requirements as stated in this review. SP 1: Site Plan comments will be made at time of site plan submittal. Please note, large retail uses (over 50,000 sf for most retail uses, 100,000 sf for principal food sales use) are not permitted in the Barton Springs Zone per 25-2-651. Site Plan Transportation Austin Transportation Department does not object to the applicant’s proposed restrictive covenant amendment as the site will be required to comply with the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan and all applicable City code and criteria related to transportation design and mitigation. Austin Water Utility No comment for restrictive covenant amendment case. All existing easements must be retained. INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW: Exhibit A: Zoning Map Exhibit B: Aerial Map Exhibit C: Correspondence Received Exhibit D: Restrictive Covenant Amendment Redlines Exhibit E: Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Removal of Petition Signature ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20220406 003a Date: April 6, 2022 Subject: C14-85-288.23(RCA) – 7715 1⁄2 West State Highway 71 Restrictive Covenant Amendment Motion by: Jennifer Bristol Seconded by: Perry Bedford WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting to amend the Restrictive Covenant Amendment (RCA) which is approximately 13.367 acres and is part of a larger tract currently being requested to be rezoned to GO-MU-NP; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the property is located within the Williamson Creek Watershed in the Barton Springs Contributing Zone. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the request to amend the Restrictive Covenant Agreement with the following: Staff Conditions: 1. This application completes the project established by the Restrictive Covenant such that any further development or redevelopment is subject to current code at the time of site development permit application. This project shall comply with current code, including SOS non-degradation water quality treatment, except for the following exceptions: a. 50% impervious cover on a gross site area calculation shall be allowed rather than the 65% currently 2. b. Cut and fill shall not exceed 8 feet except for building foundations and stormwater control measures allowed, and appurtenances, c. Stormwater control facilities will be allowed within the Water Quality Transition Zone, d. LDC 25-8-301 and 25-8-302 related to construction on slopes does not apply. and the following Environmental Commission Conditions: The road will have gated access for emergency use only. 1. Vehicular access to Little Deer Crossing shall be limited to emergency vehicles entering and exiting the 2. facility, and that entry will be gated. 1  For: Qureshi, Scott, Barrett Bixler, Nickells, Bristol, Ramberg, Aguirre, Brimer, Bedford Abstain: None Recuse: None Against: Thompson VOTE 9-1 Approved By: Kevin Ramberg, Environmental Commission Chair 2 LR-CO-NP 1 2 SF-3-NP RR-NP CS-NP 3 1 2 GR-NP 3 W S H 7 1 3 CS-1-CO-NP 2 A 9 8 14 15 7 6 5 16 19 18 17 MH-NP 4 3 2 CS-NP 1 O C L A D V E B E E S R D 1 1 RR-NP 2 3 1 2 GO-CO-NP 3 TRACT TWO 1 6 5 LO-NP 4 3 2 LO-NP 1 MF-1-NP RR-NP A 20 MF-1-NP 19 18 17 16 7 15 SF-1-NP 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 8 SF-3-NP 4 3 SF-1-NP 5 4 12 11 10 9 D N B E L F I R 7 6 7 6 5 1 6 4 14 14 13 18 12 17 PAX DR 9 SF-1-NP 10 11 14 15 16 13 10 11 SF-1-NP 2 3 8 4 9 8 12 13 14 7 15 5 6 16 5 SF-1-NP MF-1-NP 19 20 SF-1-NP 21 22 23 1 CS-NP 24 25 4 20 21 26 27 19 18 R K D O O HIN C 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 2 7 8 SF-2-NP 2 3 4 LI T D T L E E E X I N R G 11 2 18 15 17 16 7 8 9 16 15 SF-1-NP 13 9 12 11 10 V C O T PIN PIN T O PAT 11 H 12-A 10 17 13-A 18 19 4 SF-2-NP 18 17 16 5 1 2 3 4 15 14-A 5 6 7 ST E AIL D RV A H TR 8 SF-1-NP 8 R 7 9 1 3 1 2 RR-NP B20 LO-NP A) C 3(R 8.2 8 5-2 4-8 1 C LR-MU-CO-NP LO-MU-CO-NP 1 LO-MU-CO-NP LR-CO-NP 51 2A 2B 50 52 GO-CO-NP 2 3 GO-NP 4 1 49 M E 53 54 48 A H D I L O L 3 55 39 40 47 SF-1-NP 41 NO-NP W D L O H I L D A R 2A LR-NP 5 W S H 7 1 W C I R 46 45 44-A E M 1 2 19 20 18 5 SF-1-NP 6 21 22 23 24 5 4 3 2 25 1 36 38 37 34 35 17 8 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 M E A O D A O K W 8 D R 10 9 7 6 16 17 15 SF-1-NP 14 13 12 WHISPERING CREEK DR 13 14 12 2 3 11 10 SF-1-NP 9 15 16 18 17 19 20 23 8 24 7 25 6 1 LR-NP 3 4 2B 6 9 7 8 SCENIC BROOK DR 7 8 9 11 1-A SF-3-NP 10 2 14 13 D U N K D R I R 20 21 11 K 12 SCENIC BROOK DR 31 16 1 15 14 37 SF-2-NP RR-NP 12 SF-1-NP 11 42 C ALA AIND M R 10 O SIK AR S E LN SF-6-NP 7 A C U R TA N L RR-NP 1 29 30 31 G R C R O V E E TCIR S I R D G E D R S T I L L 28 27 2 3 5 4 ST LN 42 41 K A O E R FO 40 39 30 32 29 28 33 34 27 26 35 36 25 24 10 S O 37 9 U T 8 H B 38 23 22 R O 39 7 6 O K D 40 37 38 36 35 STONE LEDGE CIR 26 34 33A 30A 31A 32A 28A 27A 24 23 22 26A 25A 24A 23A 22A 21 SCENIC BROOK DR 19 18 17 21 20 14 15 16 R D T S E R C E V O R G 13 12 11 12 4 9 10 11 5 PUD-NP 1 R 4 41 42 SF-1-NP 43 44 45 16 15 13 14 46 47 48 49 5 2 B19 SF-1-NP 2 1 ± 1'' = 400' SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE CREEK BUFFER SF-1-NP 17 16 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 1 7715 West State Highway 71 ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C14-85-288.23(RCA) 7715 West State Highway 71 13.367 Acres B20 KATE CLARK This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. LR-CO-NP 1 2 SF-3-NP RR-NP CS-NP 3 1 2 GR-NP 3 W S H 7 1 3 CS-1-CO-NP 2 A 9 8 14 15 7 6 5 16 19 18 17 MH-NP 4 3 2 CS-NP 1 O C L A D V E B E E S R D 1 1 RR-NP 2 3 1 2 GO-CO-NP 3 TRACT TWO 1 6 5 LO-NP 4 3 2 LO-NP 1 MF-1-NP RR-NP A 20 MF-1-NP 19 18 17 16 7 15 SF-1-NP 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 8 SF-3-NP 4 3 SF-1-NP 5 4 12 11 10 9 D N B E L F I R 7 6 7 6 5 1 6 4 14 14 13 18 12 17 PAX DR 9 SF-1-NP 10 11 14 15 16 13 10 11 SF-1-NP 2 3 8 4 9 8 12 13 14 7 15 5 6 16 5 SF-1-NP MF-1-NP 19 20 SF-1-NP 21 22 23 1 CS-NP 24 25 4 20 21 26 27 19 18 R K D O O HIN C 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 2 7 8 SF-2-NP 2 3 4 LI T D T L E E E X I N R G 11 2 18 15 17 16 7 8 9 16 15 SF-1-NP 13 9 12 11 10 V C O T PIN PIN T O PAT 11 H 12-A 10 17 13-A 18 19 4 SF-2-NP 18 17 16 5 1 2 3 4 15 14-A 5 6 7 ST E AIL D RV A H TR 8 SF-1-NP 8 R 7 9 1 3 1 2 RR-NP B20 LO-NP A) C 3(R 8.2 8 5-2 4-8 1 C LR-MU-CO-NP LO-MU-CO-NP 1 LO-MU-CO-NP LR-CO-NP 51 2A 2B 50 52 GO-CO-NP 2 3 GO-NP 4 1 49 M E 53 54 48 A H D I L O L 3 55 39 40 47 SF-1-NP 41 NO-NP W D L O H I L D A R 2A LR-NP 5 W S H 7 1 W C I R 46 45 44-A E M 1 2 19 20 18 5 SF-1-NP 6 21 22 23 24 5 4 3 2 25 1 36 38 37 34 35 17 8 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 M E A O D A O K W 8 D R 10 9 7 6 16 17 15 SF-1-NP 14 13 12 WHISPERING CREEK DR 13 14 12 2 3 11 10 SF-1-NP 9 8 7 15 16 18 17 19 Copyright nearmap 2015 24 25 20 23 6 1 LR-NP 3 4 2B 6 9 7 8 SCENIC BROOK DR 7 8 9 11 1-A SF-3-NP 10 2 14 13 D U N K D R I R 20 21 11 K 12 SCENIC BROOK DR 31 16 1 15 14 37 SF-2-NP RR-NP 12 SF-1-NP 11 42 C ALA AIND M R 10 O SIK AR S E LN SF-6-NP 7 A C U R TA N L RR-NP 1 29 30 31 G R C R O V E E TCIR S I R D G E D R S T I L L 28 27 2 3 5 4 ST LN 42 41 K A O E R FO 40 39 30 32 29 28 33 34 27 26 35 36 25 24 10 S O 37 9 U T 8 H B 38 23 22 R O 39 7 6 O K D 40 37 38 36 35 STONE LEDGE CIR 26 34 33A 30A 31A 32A 28A 27A 24 23 22 26A 25A 24A 23A 22A 21 SCENIC BROOK DR 19 18 17 21 20 14 15 16 R D T S E R C E V O R G 13 12 11 12 4 9 10 11 5 PUD-NP 1 R 4 41 42 SF-1-NP 43 44 45 16 15 13 14 46 47 48 49 5 2 B19 SF-1-NP 2 1 ± 1'' = 400' SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE CREEK BUFFER SF-1-NP 17 16 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 1 7715 West State Highway 71 ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C14-85-288.23(RCA) 7715 West State Highway 71 13.367 Acres B20 KATE CLARK This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Renee Vlahakis Sunday, January 9, 2022 1:14 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.  Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Renee Vlahakis  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: michael vlahakis Sunday, January 9, 2022 1:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Not to mention the traffic through 16’ wide county roads in our neighborhood to access from Little Deer and Scenic  Brook.  Will completely destroy the way of life for over 400 homeowners in this area.  Michael Vlahakis  6947 CHINOOK DR  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: DIANNE SUGGS Sunday, January 9, 2022 9:14 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Allie Brotherman Sunday, January 9, 2022 10:13 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  ‐ Allie Brotherman  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: karol goodwin Sunday, January 9, 2022 11:35 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  Please don’t allow this, there is no need to create so much density here When there are so many communities willing to  grow outside of Travis county why pack everyone in like sardines.  As a previous resident of Los Angeles California, I beg you not to make the same mistakes as California the dense living  followed by tent cities followed by traffic jams for hours and people living on top of each‐other it doesn’t have to be this  way.  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Nancy Lanier Sunday, January 9, 2022 11:48 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Proposed Apartments on Hwy 71 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to oppose the following rezoning applications: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) This is area is a critical Edwards Aquifer contributing zone that currently allows only 25% impervious cover. This sensitive ecological area should NOT allow such dense development with 65% impervious cover. Our neighbors were clear when drafting the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan. The entire development scheme is in direct contradiction to the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan and the FLUM (Future Land Use Map). If this proposed plan passes, many of our neighbors will have a massive apartment complex towering over their backyards. This proposed plan will allow for nearly 400 apartment units and 60 feet high on one of the tallest points in Oak Hill. The traffic and environmental impacts to our area will be significant. Oak Hill is one of the most targeted areas for developers in Austin, with over 7% of all apartment development that has taken place in Austin in the last 5 years. We are already being negatively impacted by the massive highway development on both Hwy. 71 and Hwy 290. The additional traffic, and environmental impact of such a massive apartment complex being built in our area is far more than we should be expected to tolerate. I have lived in this area since 1999, and feel as if the City of Austin is doing everything in it's power to take away any rights of the single family homeowners to live here. I moved here to have a safe, quiet place to raise my daughter, in a home I plan to keep. I do not want to be forced to sell and leave this area. Please vote against these rezoning changes, and prevent this apartment complex from being built. Thank you, 1 Nancy Lanier CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Michael McGhee Monday, January 10, 2022 10:32 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Terri Knox Monday, January 10, 2022 11:12 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   I have been a homeowner in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract for over 37 years.  I would like to  strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in  density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft  allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in  the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an  environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what  the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak  Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Terri Knox   7001 Chinook Drive  Austin, TX 78736  Sent from Mail for Windows  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Terri Knox Monday, January 10, 2022 11:36 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Ellis, Paige Oppose rezoning case #C14-2021-0130 RCA case#C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  I own a home in close proximity to the proposed development of a massive apartment complex at 7715 W. SH 71.  I  oppose this rezoning request.  It is an environmentally sensitive area located over the Edwards Aquifer contributing zone  and the plan calls for too much impervious cover.  I have owned this home for over 37 years.  This neighborhood has  always been single family residence and a high density apartment complex would significantly alter the feel of this older,  established neighborhood.  Traffic issues are already an issue, and this development would compound the problem.    Houston Developers should not be allowed to contradict the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan.  I am strongly opposed to this request for a zoning change.  Terri Knox  7001 Chinook Drive  Austin, Texas 78736  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Keely Rizzato Monday, January 10, 2022 1:38 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  I strongly oppose this rezoning. I am a licensed landscape architect and very familiar with the development process.  Please do not allow this to go forward. It is not an appropriate land use and not compatible with the adjacent tracts.  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank you for representing my objections to the rezoning.  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Dennis McGregory Monday, January 10, 2022 1:59 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gary Rizzato  Gary Rizzato Monday, January 10, 2022 4:48 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Wesley Hopkins Monday, January 10, 2022 9:20 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Wesley Hopkins  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:22 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***    Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Shannon Stavinoha    Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Rhonda Hudson Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:45 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   Tim & Rhonda Hudson CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Joy Hernandez Tuesday, January 11, 2022 7:45 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning Case Nos. RCA C14-2021-0130 & C14-85-288.23 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello. My name is Joy Hernandez, and I'm a longtime resident of Valley View/Scenic Brook. I STRONGLY oppose rezoning of the small piece of land. THERE IS ENOUGH TRAFFIC IN OAK HILL!!! KB Homes has already come through and destroyed the homes of the local coyotes, foxes, rabbits, roadrunners, opossums, and owls. They've also ruined our neighborhood streets. Please wait until the 290/71 road construction is completed to try to smash more people into tiny boxes. Thank You, Joy Hernandez CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Amy Jackson Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:19 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Alter, Alison; Kitchen, Ann; Casar, Gregorio; Tovo, Kathie; Pool, Leslie; Kelly, Mackenzie; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Ellis, Paige; Renteria, Sabino; Adler, Steve; Fuentes, Vanessa Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi all,     We do not support the rezoning of this property. We do not want high rise apartments in our neighborhood. They are  not an appropriate project for our rural snd single family neighbohood and will increase light pollution, bring more  traffic and create more impervious cover and bring further harm to an ecologically sensitive zone.   This area is quickly becoming inundated by construction and development which is causing a negative impact on the  quality of life as well in this community.   People are moving to Austin to have a good quality of life and live in a sustainable way. This is not a sustainable project  and is not the “Austin” people are moving here for.   Outside developers do not get the say so, the residents directly impacted by their huge and inappropriate projects get  the say so.   Please, support us by not allowing this rezoning to happen,  Amy Jackson  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Rita Berry Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:56 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Rita Berry  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Dorothy Caldwell Tuesday, January 11, 2022 4:28 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department,  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You!  ‐ Dorothy G Caldwell  Sent from my tiny handheld computer that also makes calls.  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Crystal Bomer Tuesday, January 11, 2022 8:14 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You ,   Crystal Bomer  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Connie Justice Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:37 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You‐  I’m a 23 year Scenic Brook home owner. Please stop the destruction.    Connie Justice  8301 Farmington Ct  78836  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: ML Collins Wednesday, January 12, 2022 8:21 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of  7715 ½ W SH 71 to multifamily. I believe it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR,  which is  directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially  considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the  restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer  contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract  and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  M Collins  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Cynthia L. Miller Wednesday, January 12, 2022 10:42 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Cindy L. Miller  512.466.7721  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Deborah Rich Wednesday, January 12, 2022 12:34 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Rodrigo Solis Wednesday, January 12, 2022 2:41 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sean D. Johnson Wednesday, January 12, 2022 3:19 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Sean Johnson  6929 Scenic Brook Dr.  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Desiree Coleman Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Desiree Coleman  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Heidi Juliar Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:19 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Tatiana Bobbitt Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:42 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of  7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is  directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially  considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the  restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer  contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract  and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Tatiana Bobbitt  Texas law requires all licensees to provide the information in these links:  Texas Real Estate Commission Information About Brokerage Services  Texas Real Estate Commission Consumer Protection Notice  To help protect y our priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gauri Iyengar Thursday, January 13, 2022 9:30 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Alejandro Verduzco Friday, January 14, 2022 5:40 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Alex Verduzco | 512‐913‐7062  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Suzi Lindsay Friday, January 14, 2022 6:36 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Susan Lindsay  11012 Swelfling Ter.  Austin 78737  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Robbie Lueth Friday, January 14, 2022 8:15 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Robbie Lueth  5900 Blanco River Pass  Austin 78749  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Henry Hodes Friday, January 14, 2022 1:15 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Diane Powers Saturday, January 15, 2022 11:23 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Elizabeth Bellanti From: To: Subject: Date: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Saturday, January 15, 2022 12:35:47 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** GREETINGS, I come to you as a concerned resident of the Scenic Brooke neighborhood in Oak Hill. 78736. We are already experiencing the destruction of so much natural beauty in our neighborhood due to the new highway flyover construction, and these additional apartment plans and clearings are additionally upsetting, destructive and a betrayal of why we chose to move here in the first place. Thank you for your consideration in helping us preserve what is left. There is a serious collective grief for us. TOO MUCH IMPERVIOUS COVER FOR THE ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE EDWARDS AQUIFER CONTRIBUTING ZONE. This is area is a critical Edwards Aquifer contributing zone that currently allows only 25% impervious cover. This sensitive ecological area should NOT allow such dense development with 65% impervious cover. THIS PROPOSAL IS IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO THE OAK HILL COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. Our neighbors were clear when drafting the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan. The entire development scheme is in direct contradiction to the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan and the FLUM (Future Land Use Map). TOO ABRUPT A CHANGE FOR RURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. If this proposed plan passes, many of our neighbors will have a massive apartment complex towering over their backyards. TOO DENSE AND TOO HIGH. This proposed plan will allow for nearly 400 apartment units and 60 feet high on one of the tallest points in Oak Hill. The traffic and environmental impacts to our area will be significant. Beth Bellanti Tito's Handmade Vodka @bebellanti CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Melissa Garner Saturday, January 15, 2022 2:33 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Melissa Thornell Garner  7121 Silvermine Drive  Austin, Texas 78736‐1758  Sent from Mail for Windows  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Julie Campbell  Julie Campbell Saturday, January 15, 2022 3:42 PM Clark, Kate Oak Hill Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Ms Clark,  I strongly oppose this 400 unit project moving forward.  Do not allow this to impact the recharge zone and place this in  the middle of single family residences.  Please maintain the integrity left to Oak Hill.  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Patty Koeninger Saturday, January 15, 2022 7:17 PM Clark, Kate rezoning *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Please no rezoning for 7715 1/2 W. SH 71  Thanks,  Patty Koeninger  8101 current circle  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Ross Tomlin Saturday, January 15, 2022 7:25 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Ross Tomlin  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Keri4me Saturday, January 15, 2022 8:52 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sarah Walters Saturday, January 15, 2022 9:38 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Penny Dedman Saturday, January 15, 2022 11:46 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Penny Dedman  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gina Reed Lacey Sunday, January 16, 2022 5:39 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident of the  Oak Hill area for many years, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think  that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting  to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments  would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much  impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and  FLUM are CLEAR on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in  the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Marti Sunday, January 16, 2022 7:30 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Staci Snell Sunday, January 16, 2022 8:16 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: John Paul Sunday, January 16, 2022 9:44 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Re: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am a homeowner in 78736 writing to object to the rezoning 77151/2 W. SH 71 and the proposed building of another  massive apartment complex in our neighborhood.   The current 2 year construction on Little Deer is constant noise pollution and shakes my home from 6am to 8pm 5 days  a week.  Respectfully,  John Paul Patterson  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sunday, January 16, 2022 10:59 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; RE: Ecological and Unethical Destruction of Community ~ Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft. allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO MOVE FORWARD AS PLANNED BY THE DEVELOPERS IN QUESTION. Far too often in our world today, those with enough money and persistence can push forward plans to make even more money by circumventing the wishes of ordinary citizens who have less access than they to authority figures in government. None of us in this part of Austin wants this kind of development in our neighborhood and elected officials such as yourselves are sworn to stand by us and our collective wishes – especially when these wishes greatly impact the future of our lives here in Austin. Please do your duty and make sure we and our sensitive environment are not pushed aside in favor of this toxic business plan. Thank You   Randol Bass 6818 Kenosha Pass Austin, TX 78749 1 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Saad Altai Sunday, January 16, 2022 12:19 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Saad Altai  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Mindi Orth Sunday, January 16, 2022 1:20 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Thank you,  Mindi  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Team, Thaddeus Zaharas Sunday, January 16, 2022 3:37 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live in Oak Hill. We've done our part by accepting the 14 lane concrete monstrosity with flyovers that is now under construction. I don't also support this 400 unit apartment complex in my neighborhood. I am all for balanced development, but enough is enough. This project should go somewhere else nearby, but outside of Oak Hill. Thank you for your consideration, Thaddeus Zaharas CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sue Wendelin Sunday, January 16, 2022 4:49 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  Sue Wendelin  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Gabrielle Moraes Chueh Sunday, January 16, 2022 5:39 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department,  *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. This change would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR, which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.  The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract, and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. When the people of this neighborhood chose to purchase property in the Oak Hill suburban area, we did so seeking peace, tranquility and distance from the common issues one faces while living in highly populated areas. Oak Hill is already Austin's biggest sought area for apartment development - unsustainable! This not only elevates density and brings all the kinds of troubles that come with excess population, but forces residents into facing the misery of long-term construction - its nuisances and noises. Rezoning all the outskirts of our beautiful (and once tranquil) neighborhood goes directly against the idea of preserving our areas' identity and character. All of us only purchased expensive property here because we knew it to be a single-family housing zone. Rezoning and seeking apartment building at this stage is extremely unfair to the already established single-family owners who live here. We urge you not to let the profits of big corporations be prioritized in opposition to the environment and to the will of thousands of people who already reside here.   I'd be thankful if you can add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates about this topic.  Respectfully,  Gabrielle Chueh Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Ashley Ahlgren Sunday, January 16, 2022 9:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wayne Long Sunday, January 16, 2022 10:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning  tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily.   PLEASE KEEP it AS SINGLE FAMILY. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is  directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned.     The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of  the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area.   The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious  coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.   The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area  want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the  representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any  hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  The Long Family,  S. Austin, 78749  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Priscilla Rossi Monday, January 17, 2022 7:45 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department,  *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. This change would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR, which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.  The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract, and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. When the people of this neighborhood chose to purchase property in the Oak Hill suburban area, we did so seeking peace, tranquility and distance from the common issues one faces while living in highly populated areas. Oak Hill is already Austin's biggest sought area for apartment development - unsustainable! This not only elevates density and brings all the kinds of troubles that come with excess population, but forces residents into facing the misery of long-term construction - its nuisances and noises. Rezoning all the outskirts of our beautiful (and once tranquil) neighborhood goes directly against the idea of preserving our areas' identity and character. All of us only purchased expensive property here because we knew it to be a single-family housing zone. Rezoning and seeking apartment building at this stage is extremely unfair to the already established single-family owners who live here. We urge you not to let the profits of big corporations be prioritized in opposition to the environment and to the will of thousands of people who already reside here.   I'd be thankful if you can add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates about this topic.  Respectfully,  Priscilla Rossi   Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Denise Valliant Monday, January 17, 2022 8:18 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Denise Valliant  512‐923‐4587  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Robin ZumBerge Monday, January 17, 2022 9:34 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  TrDear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in  close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71  to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Robin ZumBerge  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Marsha Hughes Monday, January 17, 2022 11:41 AM Clark, Kate Re: Rezoning case # C14-2021-0130 and RCA case # C14-85-288.23 (RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** This is to let you know that I strongly oppose to the rezoning of 7715 1/2 West SH 71. With the highway development of Hwy 290/Sh 71 giving our community much disruption, this rezoning would add just that much more disruption to our community. After the completion of the highway, we need to have some open land to enjoy on our way down the road. Oak Hill is no longer a "sleepy little community". We are far from it because of developments like this being able to use their money to get cases like this pushed through. Somewhere all of this needs to stop and let us enjoy what scenic views we have left. Marsha Hughes - 8209 Pax Dr. - Austin - 78736 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Eve Wieand Monday, January 17, 2022 5:11 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½  W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You   Eve Wieand   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Mia Dance Monday, January 17, 2022 5:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  I bought my first home in Oak Hill last year. I loved the quiet and quaint older neighborhood lined with oaks. Building a  massive apartment in the neighborhood will cause too much impervious cover for the ecologically sensitive edward’s  aquifer contribution zone. The apartments would also go against our neighborhood plan and negatively affect many of  my neighbors who would have towering apartments on the hill behind their houses. Lastly, the proposed plan is too  dense and tall. 400 new apartment units will cause significant traffic and negative environmental impacts to our area.  Thank you,  Mia Dance  (7209 Silvermine Drive Austin TX 78736)  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: John DiGaetano Monday, January 17, 2022 5:37 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Best regards  John DiGaetano  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sunny Hunt Tuesday, January 18, 2022 7:52 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Scenic Brook High Density Housing - Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live in Scenic Brook and I'm OPPOSED to rezoning this plot of land for the planned high‐density housing project.   This neighborhood was designed to support detached homes with pervious ground cover to protect the area from  flooding and damage.   Even I, as a homeowner, have to ensure that any impervious cover is less than 45% of my lot but this developer gets a  pass for 65% impervious cover? Are you kidding me?  Aren't we done giving a pass to big‐ticket corporations who talk big and leave messes behind for residents to clean up?  Do we need more housing in Austin? Yes. Do we need more luxury, high‐density, high‐rent (unaffordable) apartments  that pose an environmental risk to the rest of the established neighborhood and area? Absolutely not. We already have  enough of that in Scenic Brook.  We've had over 2235 apartment units built in our neighborhood in the past 5 years alone. Enough.  Sonia Hunt  7000 Whispering Creek Drive  Austin, TX 78736  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gustavo Nieto Tuesday, January 18, 2022 8:20 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.    Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Gustavo Nieto  (512) 731 ‐3399 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Tejas Patwa Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:04 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You ,  Tejas Patwa  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kathy Morgan Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:17 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You very much for your work on this!  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Forwarding email  Yvonne Davis Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:01 AM Clark, Kate Fwd: Rezoning Case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA Case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Yvonne Davis < Date: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:58 AM  Subject: Rezoning Case No. C14‐2021‐0130 and RCA Case No. C14‐85‐288.23(RCA)  To: <kate.clark@austi.texas.gov>, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov <maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov>  >  We are residents of the Scenic Brook subdivision and we are writing to you to document our strong objection to the  rezoning of 7715 1/2 SH 71 West which we believe will lead to the destruction of our neighborhood and property values.  Scenic Brook does not need or desire another large apartment complex in our area.    Thank you!  James & Yvonne Davis  8108 Red Willow Dr, Austin, TX 78736  ‐‐   Yvonne Massey Davis  ‐‐   Yvonne Massey Davis  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Katie Reissman Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:08 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Katharine Reissman  6909 Grove Crest Dr  Austin, TX 78736  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Jay McArdle Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:38 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from Mail for Windows  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Vicki Garcia Tuesday, January 18, 2022 2:00 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily.   In addition to the stated reasons below, the occupants of these multi family units will have entry/exit point only on  the free lanes of the coming Hwy71 toll road and/or Scenic Brook Drive. Such a large increase in traffic on the only  free lanes will increase wait times at the “Y” for current residents who will also use these free lanes.The whole  purpose of the toll road is to reduce congestion at the “Y” but new multi family units with no access to the toll road is  in direct conflict with that purpose and keeps the congestion problem for residents using the free lanes.   I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract  attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the  apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far  too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Vicki Garcia  From my iPhone Vicki Garcia  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Vinod Singh Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:10 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen I Object Rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi,  I am writing this email regarding the Rezoning case No. C14‐2021‐0130 and RCA Case No . C14‐85‐288.23(RCA). I object  to this rezoning in our neighborhood. We already have enough urbanization and we do not need more building and  construction which destroys the green space, and also affects the climate   around it.   I strongly Oppose this rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and development of another massive apartment complex in our  neighborhood.  Regards   VINOD SINGH  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Maria Ragozina Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:16 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Walters, Mark I Object Rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71, Save Scenic Brook *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi,  I am writing this email regarding the Rezoning case No. C14‐2021‐0130 and RCA Case No . C14‐85‐288.23(RCA). I object  to this rezoning in our neighborhood. We already have enough urbanization and we do not need more building and  construction which destroys the green space, and also affects the climate around it.   I strongly oppose this rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and the development of another massive apartment complex in our  neighborhood.  Maria Singh  8817 Moccasin Path, Austin, TX 78736  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen Galecki Tuesday, January 18, 2022 4:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Kate and Maureen, West Oak Hill was quiet and peaceful.. now, we have a giant project by KB Homes that has covered our neighborhood in silt, have heard jackhammering 12/hrs day 6 days/week for two months, along with giant construction trucks going up and down Scenic Brook- where people go for walks on their own, with babies/kids, and dogs. Looking at the project it's really sad that no green space was preserved at all- how does this help us, the environment, or wildlife? Now there is a rezoning request for a huge apartment complex near the same area. How much can one area take? What about water run off? More construction trucks destroying the roads? I strongly oppose this.. traffic here will already increase due to the other development project going on (on top of people using it as a cut through due to the 290 project). Our neighborhood wasn't built for this much traffic and capacity. Please consider the residents here and the negative impact it would have on us. Sincerely, -Karen Galecki "The hope for the animals of tomorrow is to be found in a humane culture which learns to feel beyond itself. We must learn empathy, we must learn to see into the eyes of an animal and feel that its life has value because it is alive. Nothing less will do." - Kenneth White CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Olga Nieto Tuesday, January 18, 2022 5:38 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily.   I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract  attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the  apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area.  The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally  sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of  the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.   Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.   Thank You ,   Olga Nieto  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 From: To: Subject: Date: k c Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Save Scenic Brook Wednesday, January 19, 2022 7:25:32 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, I’m writing to inform you that I am not in favor of the following two cases that have been brought to my attention: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) This proposed rezoning will allow nearly 400 apartments in over 8 buildings up to 60 feet in height. The Houston apartment developer is attempting to take advantage of a Restrictive covenant placed on the property of the 1980’s which allowed for a maximum 65% impervious coverage for a LO (Limited Office) zoned construction of a maximum of 146,000 square ft. The rezoning request wants to change the use AND increase the maximum square footage by nearly threefold. THIS PROPOSAL IS IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO THE OAK HILL COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. Please help speak up for our community by voicing our opposition and supporting our efforts in stopping this project. Thank you, Keri Cardenas Chinook Dr, 78736 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Natalie Galletti Wednesday, January 19, 2022 11:49 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a nearby homeowner (7004 Chinook Drive) and the owner of several nearby rental properties (7002 Chinook Drive, 7003 Chinook Drive, 8103 Little Deer Crossing) I strongly feel that the rezoning of this land in question is inconsistent with the zoning of nearby properties. The adjoining land that is currently being developed that is being used as an example of similar use HAS NOT been approved for multi-family apartment-style buildings and CAN NOT be considered as existing zoning/buildings. I, and many others, worked hard on the FLUP and FLUM to make sure that NONE of this land was developed as office or high-density multi-family use. Single- family, duplex or quadplex multi-family are the only acceptable land uses for these lots. Additionally, the extra impervious cover limits will only contribute to the flooding that already happens downstream along Williamson Creek – specifically at the Oak Hill Youth Sports Association Baseball/ Softball Fields located at 290 & Joe Tanner Lane. Please do not allow this rezoning to be approved. Thank you, Natalie Uzoff Galletti & Joseph Galletti 7004 Chinook Drive, Austin, 78736-1840 512-301-1170 As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You   1 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Natalie Galletti Wednesday, January 19, 2022 11:58 AM Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison; HPD; Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Refuse the Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Dear Council Members, Mayor, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a long-time nearby homeowners (7004 Chinook Drive since 1995) and the owner of several nearby rental properties (7002 Chinook Drive, 7003 Chinook Drive, 8103 Little Deer Crossing) we strongly feel that the rezoning of this land in question is inconsistent with the zoning of nearby properties. The adjoining land that is currently being developed that is being used by the applicants as an example of similar use HAS NOT been approved for multi-family apartment- style buildings and CAN NOT be considered as existing zoning/buildings. We, and many others, worked hard on the FLUP and FLUM to make sure that NONE of these land parcels would ever be developed as office or high-density multi-family use. Single-family, duplex or quadplex multi- family are the only acceptable land uses for these lots. Additionally, the extra impervious cover limits will only contribute to the flooding that already happens downstream along Williamson Creek – specifically at the Oak Hill Youth Sports Association Baseball/ Softball Fields located at 290 & Joe Tanner Lane. Please do not allow this rezoning to be approved. Thank you, Natalie Uzoff Galletti & Joseph Galletti 7004 Chinook Drive, Austin, 78736-1840 512-301-1170 As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and 1 FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Alix Vargo Wednesday, January 19, 2022 3:04 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Rezoning Case No. C14-2021-0130, RCA Case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern, I want to go on record formally opposing the rezoning laws. We rent a home in Oak Hill, and the whole reason we moved to this neighborhood was because of the location relative to the city, and how quiet and beautiful it is with that. We like that there aren't many apartment complexes, and the wildlife component is great. The new proposed apartments will disrupt the wildlife further than it is already being disrupted - driving animals into the streets and people's yards, creating conflict with their pets and even potential dangers for them. For example, since the construction on 290 has started, Coral snakes have been showing up in my yard on a regular basis. The apartments should not be built on such a sensitive aquifer area. They will also majorly disrupt the flow of traffic, which we are already having a problem with, and they will ruin the appeal of the area for many homeowners. Cheers,  Alix  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Peggy Cooper Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:27 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Margaret (Peggy) Cooper  Resident on Sage Mountain Trail  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Paul Merryman Wednesday, January 19, 2022 5:51 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen ; Julie Nicole; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As homeowners on Scenic Brook Dr and residents in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract we would  like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. My wife and I just purchased our home here  last summer, particularly because it backs up to a creek and also because of the dense foliage all around. We do not  want our creek to dry up nor have tall apartment buildings in our horizon nor added congestion to the area (we are  already experiencing enough disruption with the Oakhill Parkway project).  We think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract  attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the  apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area.  The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally  sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of  the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.  Please add us to the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Paul Merryman and Julie Holtzman  7119 Scenic Brook Dr  Austin, TX 79736  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: James Cain Wednesday, January 19, 2022 8:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) ; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You Representative Ellis needs to listen to the folks of district 8 and help the residents vote against this proposal. This complex will be built in my backyard; a single family home neighborhood. I strongly oppose this rezoning of my neighborhood, James Cain 26 year homeowner, Chinook Dr. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:31 AM Meredith, Maureen; Clark, Kate; I oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Pl,    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily.     The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one  of the tallest hills in the area.     Traffic in this area has reached its peak under current circumstances.  Adding hundreds of people to a small condensed  area would only exasperate the traffic problems.  In addition, construction has begun on the 290/71 Super HWY causing  its own amount of delays.  I don’t see how we can allow more construction to commence in this very tight quadrant.      The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally  sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone which has already been disturbed by the building of the Super HWY.      The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing  anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any  hearing, meetings and updates.    Thank You,    Susan Shipp Robison  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: jmac Thursday, January 20, 2022 11:21 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kris Donley Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:04 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kris Donley Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:04 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Mark Knox Thursday, January 20, 2022 1:45 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Anne Hawken Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:35 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Anne Hawken    512‐351‐5008 (cellular‐text only)  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Mary Taylor Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:29 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident since  1976 in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½  W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You Sent from Mail for Windows CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: said less Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:29 PM Clark, Kate Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am opposed to this development proposal on SH 71.  Thank you,  Rick Jenkins  7311 Oak Meadow Drive  Austin, TX  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kenneth McMinn Thursday, January 20, 2022 8:12 PM Clark, Kate SAVE SCENIC BROOK & LITTLE DEER CROSSING *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attention: Kate.clark@austintexas.gov RE: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-03130 Including RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) From: Ken & Fun McMinn Residence: 8008 Little Deer Crossing Oak Hill, TX 78736 Dear Kate, Please add us to the record OPPOSING the rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and the development of another Massive apartment complex in our neighborhood. This project faces Scenic Brook and our neighborhood on Little Deer Crossing, which has been a peaceful, low traffic street of single family home sites. If this high density apartment project goes through we would directly be affected with high traffic on a street only 16' wide. We recommend that our street be blocked with a locked gate and sign saying " For Construction Use Only". Thank you for your support. Ken & Fun Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Melinda Kilian Friday, January 21, 2022 4:20 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Alexis Peterson Friday, January 21, 2022 11:55 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: David Gignac Friday, January 21, 2022 11:59 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; re: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** There are more apartment buildings than hills in Oak Hill.   The current plan will remove the hills from sight and will be  left without a landscape.   Breaks my head and my heart.  I will vote accordingly.   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Amy Schippers Saturday, January 22, 2022 11:08 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Rezoning case C14-2021-0130 & RCA case C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the attention of  Ms Clark and Ms Meredith:   My name is Amy Schippers and I live at 6943 Chinook Dr., Austin, TX 78736.  Please except this email as my objection  to the rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 development.  Many Thanks!   ‐Amy SCHIPPERS  5127867937  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Kate,  Emily Glennon Sunday, January 23, 2022 1:32 PM Clark, Kate Rezoning case No c14-2021-0130 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  We are residents off 71 and OPPOSE the rezoning of 7715 1/2 of W SH71 and another massive apartment complex.  Please let your voice and not your pockets be heard‐ and oppose it as well  Emily Glennon  ‐‐  813‐390‐4589    CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Bess Long Sunday, January 23, 2022 3:42 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Re:Rezoning Case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23 (RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a resident of the Scenic Brook Neighborhood I oppose the rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and the development of another massive apartment complex in our neighborhood! ‐‐   Elizabeth (Bess) Long  Instructional Materials Development Advisor  Uzbekistan Education for Excellence Program, Based in Austin, Texas  Phone, WhatsApp and Telegram: 512-922-1963  Skype: besslongtx56  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Katie Davies Monday, January 24, 2022 10:21 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Katie Davies Monday, January 24, 2022 10:25 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Re: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) ; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Austin City Council Members, Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a  homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the  rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and  RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall,  especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of  the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on  the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Katie Newell   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Patrica Lang Monday, January 24, 2022 5:41 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Pat Lang  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Melida82 Monday, January 24, 2022 7:15 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Melida mathews  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Denise Tucker Monday, January 24, 2022 8:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,    Denise Tucker  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Candi Diebel Tuesday, January 25, 2022 5:45 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   Sent from my LG K92 5G, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Michelle Gaines Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:03 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***    Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I strongly object to the rezoning  of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily.    This would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to  be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would  be on one of the tallest hills in the area.    Further, the amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an  environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.    The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing  anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.    Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.    Thank you,    Michelle Gaines  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Jonathan Walker Wednesday, January 19, 2022 7:14 PM Clark, Kate Re: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***    Dear Ms. Clark,    My husband and I have lived in Austin since 1972.  We moved to the Scenic Brook area in question 16 years ago. We love  it here!     We moved here to have more quiet, fewer people,  and less traffic than in Austin proper.  We just paid off our mortgage  last year and plan to be here for the rest of our lives.    We greatly oppose the proposed rezoning of our area.  I ask you to please do all you can to prevent this rezoning.    Thank you so much,  Marsha Walker  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Denise Tucker Thursday, January 20, 2022 9:31 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***    Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You      Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Meghann Pfeiffer Thursday, January 27, 2022 10:24 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:      As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned.     The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one  of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage  in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.     The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing  anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.    Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.    Thank You.   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate Rhoades, Wendy FW: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Monday, January 31, 2022 12:21:13 PM From: To: Subject: Date: Hi Wendy, -Kate Please see the comment below. From: Carli Rene Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2022 6:39 AM To: Clark2, Kate <Kate.Clark@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; savescenicbrook Subject: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You sending so much light, carli rene 512.789.1206 carli's calendar: book a shoot/meeting CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. ​ I am forwarding your concerns to the case manager, Wendy Rhoades in the Housing and Planning Department. She is the best person to contact regarding this case and is copied on this email. Champlin, Kaela Rhoades, Wendy RE: (7715 1/2 West State Highway 71, C14-85-288.23(RCA)) Thursday, February 3, 2022 10:03:23 AM From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Desiree, Thank you, Kaela Champlin Environmental Program Coordinator Watershed Protection Department | City of Austin 512.974.3443 She | Her | Hers -----Original Message----- From: Desiree Coleman Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:58 AM To: Champlin, Kaela <Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov> Subject: (7715 1/2 West State Highway 71, C14-85-288.23(RCA)) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, My name is Desiree Coleman and I have lived at 7121 Scenic Brook Dr. for 30 years. I am strongly opposed to the request, being made by the developer. In the 30 years I have lived in my home, I have seen drag racing, speeding cars and increased traffic, especially if Scenic Brook is used as a detour. I was a big proponent to have the speed humps added, due to the aforesaid. In addition, I have a video of a woman who was almost plowed down on her morning jog. The driver went up the curb at my house, mowed down the trash cans, my mail box and the next neighbor's mail box. It is a miracle this woman is alive as she had the incentive to jump out of the way. I believe this request will undoubtedly increase the traffic on our street. There are numerous families who have children that live on Scenic Brook, that like to play out front, and their safety is at risk, not to mention those who take their families and pets for a walk at any give time of the day. We have no side walks to protect these people. When vehicles are parked in the street, this limits the width of the road, making this narrow for walkers or joggers to safely go around the parked vehicle. I am pleading with all, to not allow such progress to be developed at 7715 1/2 W St Highway 71, as I believe Scenic Brook will be used as an alternative entrance. I thank you for your time, understanding, consideration, and your vote of NO, for the sake of a safe place to live for Oak Hill/Scenic Brook residents. Sincerely, Desiree Coleman 512-750-8365 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Clark, Kate Rhoades, Wendy FW: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Wednesday, February 9, 2022 10:34:51 AM From: To: Subject: Date: Wendy, Please see email below relating to this rezoning case. Kate Clark, AICP Project Manager, Redevelopment Division City of Austin | Economic Development Department kate.clark@austintexas.gov From: Greg Richter Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 10:33 AM To: Clark, Kate <Kate.Clark@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 foot allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Thank You Greg Richter 7004 Bright Star Lane Austin, TX 78736 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. From: To: Subject: Date: Clark, Kate Rhoades, Wendy FW: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Friday, February 18, 2022 12:10:50 PM Afternoon Wendy, Please see email below for comment. Hope you have a nice long weekend. Kate Clark, AICP Project Manager, Redevelopment Division City of Austin | Economic Development Department kate.clark@austintexas.gov -----Original Message----- From: Laura Klopfenstein > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 11:02 AM To: Clark, Kate <Kate.Clark@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Subject: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You, Laura Klopfenstein 7122 S. Brook Drive CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. From: To: Subject: Date: Clark, Kate Rhoades, Wendy FW: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Wednesday, March 2, 2022 7:20:54 AM Please see below for public comment. Kate Clark, AICP Project Manager, Redevelopment Division City of Austin | Economic Development Department kate.clark@austintexas.gov -----Original Message----- From: Ted Tran Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:16 PM To: Clark, Kate <Kate.Clark@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Subject: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You Ted CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Clark, Kate Rhoades, Wendy FW: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Tuesday, March 22, 2022 9:10:45 AM From: To: Subject: Date: Wendy, Please see below for email. Kate Clark, AICP Project Manager, Redevelopment Division City of Austin | Economic Development Department kate.clark@austintexas.gov From: Eve Wieand Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 8:58 AM To: Clark, Kate <Kate.Clark@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Please see email below about comment for zoning case. They do not mention which one, but I would guess it is for the SH71 cases. Clark, Kate Rhoades, Wendy FW: Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan Wednesday, March 23, 2022 10:32:11 AM From: To: Subject: Date: Wendy, Kate Clark, AICP Project Manager, Redevelopment Division City of Austin | Economic Development Department kate.clark@austintexas.gov From: Lindsay Ellis Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:43 AM Subject: Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** WE DO NOT SUPPORT THIS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! 1. TOO MUCH IMPERVIOUS COVER FOR THE ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE EDWARDS AQUIFER CONTRIBUTING ZONE. This is area is a critical Edwards Aquifer contributing zone that currently allows only 25% impervious cover. This sensitive ecological area should NOT allow such dense development with 65% impervious cover. 2. THIS PROPOSAL IS IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO THE OAK HILL COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. Our neighbors were clear when drafting the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan. The entire development scheme is in direct contradiction to the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan and the FLUM (Future Land Use Map). 3. TOO ABRUPT A CHANGE FOR RURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. If this proposed plan passes, many of our neighbors will have a massive apartment complex towering over their backyards. 4. TOO DENSE AND TOO HIGH. This proposed plan will allow for nearly 400 apartment units and 60 feet high on one of the tallest points in Oak Hill. The traffic and environmental impacts to our area will be significant. -- Lindsay Ellis Onboarding Advisor Direct: (972) 472-2656 Company: (800) 214-4426 Watch our overview video From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Rhoades, Wendy; Meredith, Maureen C14-2021-0130 & C14-85-288.23(RCA), NPA-2021-0025.02 Monday, January 31, 2022 9:24:15 AM Save Scenic Brook Petition (Responses) - Form Responses 1.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** MS. Rhoades and Meridith, Please find a petition attached signed by 267 neighbors who live in close proximity of the above referenced cases. There is not one person in the neighborhood who is in favor of allowing this zoning change. The height and density is not compatible with the single family neighborhood on all three sides. The Flum and neighborhood plan both prohibit this rezoning and must be followed. There is no point in getting community input on the future vision of our neighborhoods only to disregard those wishes. What are the next steps of the rezoning process and the approximate dates? Additionally the developer has stated that putting the development down by the highway by trading impervious cover entitlements is impossible due in part of the existence of legacy trees. Would it be possible to get a map of the tree inventory for the subject tracts. Putting the development by the highway would be the best accommodation to the neighborhood and still provide the developer with a viable project. I appreciate your help on this matter. Regards Eric Yerkovich 512 799 6240 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Timestamp Email Address Full Name Address Would you like to receive updates from Save Scenic Brook? 1/9/2022 13:15:03 renmeier@gmail.com Renee Vlahakis 6947 Chinook Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/9/2022 13:15:32 flymikeyfly@gmail.com Michael Vlahakis 6947 Chinook Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/9/2022 15:41:19 txknox@gmail.com Mark Allen Knox 7001 Chinook Drive Austin, Texas 78736 1/9/2022 17:49:46 nuzoff@galletti.us Natalie Galletti 7004 Chinook Drive, Austin, TX 78736 1/9/2022 19:35:02 krisdonley71@gmail.com Kris Donley 6906 Chinook Dr 1/9/2022 20:13:28 kpakola@gmail.com Kathryn Ford 6934 Chinook Dr, Austin, TX 78736 1/9/2022 21:16:27 diannehhs@gmail.com Dianne Hruska-Suggs 1/9/2022 22:14:09 allie.broman@gmail.com Allie Brotherman 8100 Pinto Path 1/9/2022 23:22:01 debroxtex@gmail.com Debbie Dieterich 8105 Pinto Path 6939 Thomas Springs Road Austin, Texas 78736 1/9/2022 23:29:33 sabrinajasmeenlotfi@gmail.comSabrina J. Lotfi 8317 Roan LN, Austin, TX 78736 1/9/2022 23:30:47 karol.a.goodwin@gmail.comKarol goodwin 6904 chinook dr austin tx 78736 1/9/2022 23:37:21 nlanier@sbcglobal.net Nancy Lanier 8317 Roan LN, Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 6:41:19 vitalemazo@gmail.com Vitale mazo 8729 fenton drive 1/10/2022 7:36:09 kcaviness@austin.rr.com Kay Caviness 8917 A Mountain Shadows cove 1/10/2022 7:58:43 mystichealer2@sbcglobal.netDiana McManus 8003 Williamson Creek Drive. Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 8:06:06 scunningham202@gmail.comStephen Cunningham 8314 Hanbridge Lane 1/10/2022 9:01:57 hpaigerussell@gmail.com Heather Russell 8519 Selway Dr, 78736 1/10/2022 9:17:40 inezcavallaro@gmail.com Inez Cavallaro 8504 C Red Willow Drive 1/10/2022 9:35:00 sabduza@yahoo.com Sayeed Badrudduza 7606 Crackling Creek dr, Austin, Tx, 78736 1/10/2022 10:36:22 mikemcghee63@gmail.comMichael F. McGhee 8307 Hanbridge Ln. Austin Tx. 78736 1/10/2022 10:49:46 jonibee2003@yahoo.com Joni Bumgarner 7012 Grove Crest Dr 1/10/2022 10:56:13 terriknox52@gmail.com Terri Knox 7001 Chinook Drive, Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 11:57:40 ecommerce@daveread.comDavid M. Read 8925 Towana Trl, Austin TX 78736 1/10/2022 12:14:42 the1ramv@hotmail.com Ramiro Villanueva 6945 Chinook Drive 1/10/2022 13:00:29 hstamatis@icloud.com Harry Stamatis 7704 Covered Bridge Drive 1/10/2022 13:41:38 krizzato@icloud.com Keely Rizzato 8202 Little Deer Xing 1/10/2022 15:11:17 metonsager@gmail.com Mary Tonsager 9519 Anchusa Trl, Austin, TX. 78736 1/10/2022 15:12:45 mmart32@gmail.com Matt Martina 8308 Hanbridge lane 1/10/2022 15:15:20 barbaradaughteroflucille@gmail.com Barbara A Peters 7127 Scenic Brook Drive Austin Texas 78736 1/10/2022 15:24:13 amypjackson@gmail.com Amy Jackson 7506 Dawn Hill Circle Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 15:42:15 sfairchild2606@gmail.comSiobhan Fairchild 7213 oak meadow drivr 1/10/2022 16:48:20 garyrizzato@icloud.com Gary Rizzato 8202 Little Deer Xing, Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 17:24:42 annehawken@austin.rr.comAnne Hawken 6700 Midwood Parkway, Austin, Texas 78736 1/10/2022 17:30:39 langpatrica@yahoo.com Pat Lang 8204 Mescalero Drive 1/10/2022 18:11:30 pandaa2007@yahoo.com amanda solis 6916 Chinook Dr 78736 1/10/2022 18:11:45 msolis@intertechflooring.comMark J Solis 6916 Chinook dr 1/10/2022 18:15:56 utzman5@gmail.com Jimmy 7109 harvest trail 78736 1/10/2022 19:16:56 keyesme@msn.com Marian Keyes 10200 Thomaswood Lane Austin 78736 1/10/2022 19:21:07 karengalecki@yahoo.comKaren Galecki 7106 Stone Ledge Circle 1/10/2022 20:03:38 bhightower1127@gmail.comBrandon Hightower 6000 Oakclaire dr, Austin, TX, 78735 1/10/2022 20:32:55 audra.shugart@yahoo.comAudra Shugart 7002 Smokey Hill Rd 1/10/2022 20:35:41 lar465.2000@gmail.com Laura Rodriguez 6718 Silvermine Drive #1703 Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 20:43:37 igleharth@yahoo.com Haley Iglehart 6718 Silvermine Drive 1/10/2022 20:47:44 ryankrszjzaniek@yahoo.comRyan Krszjzaniek 8917 Dorella Lane, Austin, TX 78736 1/10/2022 21:03:40 msbrack08@gmail.com Amanda Brack 6107 Oakclaire Dr, Austin, TX 78735 1/10/2022 21:12:30 mhughes8209@yahoo.comMarsha Hughes 8209 Pax Dr. 1/10/2022 21:17:57 hopkins.wesley@gmail.comWesley Hopkins 8404 Bargamin Drive, Austin, Texas 78736 1/10/2022 21:20:01 byrnmd@gmail.com Mark Byrn 8404 Bargamin Dr 1/10/2022 21:24:06 sls3284@gmail.com Shannon Stavinoha 7000 Grove Crest Dr, Austin, Tx 78736 1/10/2022 21:27:31 lilliehodges@austin.rr.comLillie Hodges 7127 Southbrook Drive, Austin, Texas 78736 1/10/2022 21:32:01 accounts@alexiles.cvom Alexander Iles 6912 Chinook Drive 1/10/2022 23:22:33 pratik.patel@ittechsystems.comPratik Patel 7625 crackling creek dr 1/11/2022 6:15:53 joe.rodela@yahoo.com Joe Rodela 8200 Southwest Pkwy #403, Austin 78735 1/11/2022 6:44:37 hudsonn@mac.com rhonda hudson 6718 silvermine dr 1/11/2022 7:43:17 shawnmpatterson@gmail.comShawn Patterson 8403 sage mountain trail 1/11/2022 7:59:05 KZeakes@gmail.com Katrin Zeakes 5812 Medicine Creek Dr., Austin 78735 1/11/2022 7:59:54 Jason.Zeakes@gmail.comJason Zeakes 5812 Medicine Creek Dr., Austin 78735 1/11/2022 8:19:17 skwroeuh@gmail.com Joy Hernandez 8109 Pinto Path 78736 1/11/2022 9:08:37 ddw5280@gmail.com Denise Wilkinson 6718 silvermine drive #1004, austin tx 78736 1/11/2022 10:48:38 ruthie.howard@gmail.comRuth M Howard 4900 Interlachen Ln 1/11/2022 11:02:43 albert.valdes@hotmail.comAlberto A Valdes 7106 Stone Ledge Cir., Austin, TX 78736 1/11/2022 11:39:03 vivian@caputoimages.comVivian Caputo 9930 Ledgestone Terrace Austin TX 78737 1/11/2022 11:49:33 bearsam1234@gmail.comSteven Amsbury 8731 Thunderbird RdAustin, TX 78736 1/11/2022 13:00:30 dalomala@me.com Daloma Armentrout 6700 Midwood Pkwy Austin TX 78736 1/11/2022 13:07:05 jacque15@sbcglobal.net Jacque Faulkner 6718 Silvermine Drive, Unit 902, Austin,Tx 78736 1/11/2022 13:28:22 trepweed@gmail.com Shelley J. Weedon Trepanier6902 Hill Meadow Drive Austin 78736 1/11/2022 13:50:20 michael_ikeya@hotmail.comMichael Ikeya 6802 Raccoon Run, Austin, TX 78736 1/11/2022 13:53:17 rabberry21775@gmail.comRita Berry 5414 Wolf Run, Austin, Texas 78749 1/11/2022 13:56:49 jsherman1548@gmail.comJim Sherman 8500 Red Willow Dr. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Timestamp Email Address Full Name Address Would you like to receive updates from Save Scenic Brook? 1/11/2022 13:57:17 bhaktahp@gmail.com Hina P Bhakta ****Anchusa Trail 1/11/2022 13:57:33 ngjacks48@gmail.com Gail Sherman 8500 Red Willow Dr. C 1/11/2022 14:08:56 sally.finan@gmail.com Sally H. Finan 8112 Landsman Dr. Austin Texas 78836 1/11/2022 14:23:45 ohmstudioaustin@gmail.comAimee Johnson 7002 Pinto Cove 78736 1/11/2022 14:42:29 tifferann@icloud.com Tiffany Stone 7613 Orrick Drive Austin, Tx 78749 1/11/2022 14:46:43 cambria.r.carson@gmail.comCambria Carson 8633 Thunderbird Road Austin TX 78736 1/11/2022 15:06:38 alvarezjune@att.net June Alvarez-Fetzer 8516 Lookout Cliff Pass, Austin, TX 78737 1/11/2022 15:10:04 jajordan11616@gmail.comJulie Jordan 7500 Callbram Lane 1/11/2022 16:16:36 ingrid.yaple@gmail.com Ingrid Yaple 7105 Oak Meadow drive 1/11/2022 16:46:54 nedb321@gmail.com Crystal Bomer 1/11/2022 16:47:57 mwbomer@gmail.com Mike Bomer 7629 Hwy 71W 7629 Hwy 71W 1/11/2022 17:27:01 Mtroiano@sbcglobal.net Michael Troiano 7002 Grove Crest Drive 1/11/2022 17:32:01 suzyd2522@yahoo.com Susie Hanks 8305 Farmington Ct Austin, TX 78736 1/11/2022 17:43:34 taylor.dana@gmail.com Dana Taylor 7011 whispering creek dr, Austin tx 78736 1/11/2022 17:59:52 mcrabbit5@gmail.com Melissa McDaniel 6143 Oliver Loving Trail 1/11/2022 18:00:45 syl4v@sbcglobal.net Sylvia Villejo 8312 Roan ln. 1/11/2022 18:05:24 bobream@me.com Bob Ream 7001 Silvermine Dr 1/11/2022 18:34:20 rmart924@yahoo.com Roseann Martinez 6939 Chinook Dr Austin Tx 78736 1/11/2022 18:34:51 cainjames@sbcglobal.net James Cain 6939 Chinook Dr Austin Tx 78736 1/11/2022 18:57:42 dkrolikiewicz@yahoo.comDeborah krolikiewicz 4701 Staggerbrush rd 1/11/2022 20:42:40 vzqalex@gmail.com Alexandy Vazquez 8500 copano dr 1/11/2022 20:58:33 brigates@gmail.com Brianne Gates 7904 Clydesdale drive Austin TX 78745 1/11/2022 21:46:44 ananuila2@gmail.com Ana Nuila 8600 Barasinga Trail Austin tx 78749 1/11/2022 21:56:13 leal1955@gmail.com Marie Leal 7201 Old Bee Caves Rd 1/12/2022 6:37:44 conkat13@gmail.com Connie Justice 8301 Farmington Ct, 78736 1/12/2022 7:27:43 Annabraham003@gmail.comAnn Abraham 6930 Chinook Drive 1/12/2022 8:19:01 melcoly@hotmail.com Melanie Collins 8801 la cresada austin, tx 1/12/2022 8:32:41 jestep@gmail.com Jamie Estep 9905 Murmuring Creek Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/12/2022 8:50:57 matthewdjulian@gmail.comMatthew Julian 6708 Bright Star Lane, Austin, TX 78736 1/12/2022 10:43:16 cynlyn512@icloud.com Cynthia L. Miller 7606 Chelmsford Drive 1/12/2022 12:37:21 loraineleatherman26@yahoo.com Loraine Leatherman 7208 silvermine dr 1/12/2022 14:41:07 macaco04@gmail.com Rodrigo Solis 7302 Whispering creek circle 1/12/2022 15:24:19 seanjohntx@gmail.com Sean Johnson 6929 Scenic Brook Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/12/2022 15:24:45 annemarr2002@yahoo.comAnne Johnson 6929 Scenic Brook Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/12/2022 16:11:33 mmparkhill@att.net Mary Oarkhill 5640 Wagon Train Road, Austin Tx 1/12/2022 16:32:10 aphena89@gmail.com Jennifer Teis 9436 El Rey Blvd Austin TX 78738 1/12/2022 16:44:36 shirinh@sbcglobal.net Shirin Helmi 7013 Via Dono Drive 1/12/2022 17:52:39 julia@austinwomensboxingclub.com Julia Gschwind 7722 Croftwood Drive, Austin, TX 78749 1/12/2022 18:07:56 des.coleman61@gmail.comDesiree Coleman 7121 Scenic Brook Dr. Austin Tx 78736 1/12/2022 18:19:52 heidijuliar@gmail.com Heidi Juliar 6515 Davis Lane, Townhome #2 1/12/2022 18:26:35 lizzepedascott@gmail.comLiz ZepedaScott 2511 Monarch, ATX 78746 1/12/2022 18:30:14 daniestanley@hotmail.comDanielle Stanley 6400 Salcon Cliff Drive, Austin, TX 78749 1/12/2022 18:42:59 tatiana.vik94@gmail.com Tatiana Bobbitt 6905 Chinook Dr 1/12/2022 19:25:39 emilyjmackinnon@gmail.comEmily MacKinnon 6931 Chinook Dr. Austin, TX 78736 1/12/2022 21:57:14 garyg61@yahoo.com Gary Garza 7512 Black Mtn Dr. 1/12/2022 22:05:14 whitebuffalo1212@hotmail.comJanet Lee 8504 Bargamin Dr Austin Texas 78736 1/12/2022 22:38:41 mcwalzel@gmail.com Mary Claire Davies 7202 s brook drive 1/13/2022 0:03:31 donfawn@gmail.com Don Fawn 8110 Little Deer Crossing, Austin, TX 78736 1/13/2022 6:32:03 carricars@gmail.com Carri Leal 7201 Old Bee Caves rd, Austin, TX 78735 1/13/2022 7:50:50 camilleg85@gmail.com Camille Giffin 7503 Hill Meadow Cir 1/13/2022 8:24:13 joemathews1207@gmail.comJoseph Mathews 6908 Chinook Dr Austin Tx 78736 1/13/2022 8:29:12 smpolo85@gmail.com Sylvia Polozeck Hill meadow circle 1/13/2022 9:02:38 toomanydogs5@yahoo.comSharon Norman 7130 Scenic Brook Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/13/2022 9:04:21 sndogs@gmail.com Patsy Daugherty 7130 Scenic Brook Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/13/2022 9:23:26 gauriiyengar@gmail.com Gauri Iyengar 8408 Red Willow Dr. Austin TX 78736 1/13/2022 10:49:15 patrickobillings@gmail.comPatrick billings 8304 roan Ln. 1/13/2022 11:03:24 larisavons@gmail.com Larisa Von Schimmelmann8309 Farmington Court 1/13/2022 12:53:59 libby.murphey92@gmail.comElizabeth Murphey 8715 Highway 71, Apt 7306, Austin, TX 78735 1/13/2022 13:22:51 melindakilian@yahoo.comMelinda L Kilian 8208 Espanola Trail 1/13/2022 13:58:51 reedc@austin.rr.com Connie J Reed 8502 Selway Dr Austin Tx 78736 1/13/2022 14:34:36 raeh926@gmail.com Angela Hunter 5701 Oakclaire Dr Austin, TX 78735 1/13/2022 15:46:09 melida82@yahoo.com Melida Mathews 6908 Chinook Dr Austin Tx 1/13/2022 16:00:11 susanshipp@sbcglobal.netSusan Shipp Robison 10801 Superview Dr Austin 78736 1/13/2022 18:48:38 jmoltz0@gmail.com John Moltz 7207 S Brook Dr., Austin TX, 78736 1/13/2022 20:31:03 vggretail@gmail.com Vickie Leady 5112 Jacobs Creek Court, Austin, TX 78749 1/13/2022 22:10:44 spiach@yahoo.com Steve Piacentino 119 autumn wood ln, Austin 1/14/2022 5:42:11 averduzco87@gmail.com Alejandro Verduzco 7218 s Brook dr 1/14/2022 8:16:11 rlueth@ymail.com Robbie Lueth 5900 Blanco River Pass Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1/12/2022 22:47:41 vvvsmoky@gmail.com DWIGHT E. HOLLAND 6718 Silvermine Drive # 1202, Austin, Texas 78736 Yes Timestamp Email Address Full Name Address Would you like to receive updates from Save Scenic Brook? 1/14/2022 8:34:01 parkercheryl22@gmail.comCheryl Parker 7115 Scenic Brook Dr 1/14/2022 10:12:25 me@aimon.net Aimon Bustardo 14 Long Creek Rd, Austin, TX, 78737 1/14/2022 10:15:05 cdpenny@gmail.com Creacy Penny 7105 Dunkirk Dr Austin 78736 1/14/2022 11:17:46 coryknopes@gmail.com Cory Knopes 6942 Chinook Dr 1/14/2022 12:12:04 colleen_davenport@sbcglobal.net Colleen Davenport 8001 Acton Drive 1/14/2022 15:25:20 brian.c.donovan@irs.gov Brian C Donovan 7109 Stone Ledge Circle Austin, TX 78736 1/14/2022 15:26:08 brdgt_donovan@yahoo.comElaine B Donovan 7109 Stone Ledge Circle Austin, TX 78736 1/14/2022 15:39:00 jeaniemartin1374@gmail.comJeanie Meurer-Martin 7102 Thomas Springs Rd 1/14/2022 17:12:03 brianspillers84@yahoo.comBrian spillers 7101 stone ledge cir. 1/14/2022 21:38:53 valerian8@gmail.com Valerian Vosburgh 201 heritage dr. 1/15/2022 7:24:35 mgunn101@gmail.com Mary Gunn 6718 Silvermine Dr, Unit 402, Austin, TX 78736 1/15/2022 9:07:58 koitzsch@gmail.com Thomas Koitzsch 14215 Nutty Brown rd 1/15/2022 9:27:43 jillgraham512@gmail.comJill graham 13665 Nutty Brown Road 1/15/2022 9:54:01 tractorgirl7@gmail.com Debbie k hyde 12 Sentinel Hill 1/15/2022 9:54:32 yasminebb1998@yahoo.comYasmine Ben-Brahim 7206 Scenic Brook Dr. 1/15/2022 9:56:06 anchondo_alicia@yahoo.comAlicia anchondo 8409 Selway Dr 1/15/2022 10:06:47 jinjoomccain15@gmail.comJin-Joo McCain 7100 Grove Crest Dr 1/15/2022 10:14:55 Mikibcook@gmail.com Miki Cook 8000 Niles Cove, Austin, Texas 78737 1/15/2022 10:18:53 emilyannenorman@gmail.comEmily norman 3623 w Alabama st 125 1/15/2022 11:33:11 Texashistoryrocks@gmail.comDawnita Nix 2526 Star Grass Circle, Austin, Texas 78845 1/15/2022 11:36:59 tnk003j@gmail.com Miriam Hamblett 8105 Red Willow Dr Austin TX 78736 Yes 1/15/2022 12:09:41 schoolethanb@gmail.comEthan Brown 9001 Sam Carter Dr 1/15/2022 13:00:26 seyi.odufuye@gmail.con Oluwaseyi Odufuye 2304 Turtle Mountain Bend Austin, Texas 78748 1/15/2022 13:36:52 missannikamaynard@gmail.comAnnika Maynard 2500 South Millbend Drive 1/15/2022 13:41:25 igleharth@yahoo.com Haley Iglehart 6718 Silvermine Drive 1/15/2022 13:46:10 marjbueno3@gmail.com Marjorie Buencamino 168 belterra village way Austin Tx 78737 1/15/2022 14:00:30 carissadavis10@gmail.comCarissa Davis 7631 HWY 290 W 1/15/2022 14:35:04 grambo19992004@yahoo.comMelissa Thornell Garner 7121 Silvermine Drive, Austin, Texas 78736-1758 1/15/2022 15:06:02 lmjavan@gmail.com Linda Javan 8512 Ganttcrest Drive, Austin, TX 78749 1/15/2022 15:07:54 kgottlieb@gmail.com Kendra Gottlieb 6608 Alberta Cv 1/15/2022 15:17:56 karina.cerdag@gmail.comKarina Hanyzewski 1406 Casa Dr 1/15/2022 15:52:17 linvietti@yahoo.com Lin Vietti 7216 Scenic Brook Dr 78736 1/15/2022 16:09:35 sahicurn@gmail.com Charles Swenson 6908 Rifle Bend, Austin, Texas 78736 1/15/2022 17:18:07 alisonbukhari@yahoo.comAlison Bukhari 11509 Georgian Oaks Dr., Austin, TX 78739 1/15/2022 17:24:45 udaugh@gmail.com Nancy Kameya 6708 Maelin Cv 1/15/2022 17:33:16 sschlosser@austin.rr.com Sharon Schlosser 5404 badger bend. Austin tx 78749 1/15/2022 17:55:20 llmw2930@gmail.com Lee Williams 11606 Landseer Dr., Austin, TX 78748 1/15/2022 18:02:42 doods25@gmail.com Sonia Segura 2908 Acopio Bend 78745 1/15/2022 18:04:20 mommabearcates@att.netNina Gayheart 8205 spring Valley Drive Austin Tx 78736 1/15/2022 18:43:11 james.d.gilligan@gmail.comJames Gilligan 8211 Spring Valley Austin, TX 78736 1/15/2022 19:25:42 hrtomlin@gmail.com Ross Tomlin 7209 Whispering Winds Dr. 1/15/2022 19:48:23 imtarabbia@gmail.com Marc Tarabbia 147 Rock cliff ct, Austin Tx 78737 1/15/2022 19:51:40 twmills@gmail.com Theodore Mills 9000 Deer Haven Rd, 78737 1/15/2022 20:09:20 reeves.jennifer@gmail.comJen Reeves 10615 Galsworthy Ln 1/15/2022 20:44:58 lcmorgan40@gmail.com Leslie Morgan 7003 oak meadow circle 1/15/2022 21:39:24 sarah@waltersweddingestates.com Sarah Walters 11961 Overlook Pass 1/15/2022 21:58:26 f5cougar1@gmail.com Alexandra Beaujean 3501 Mills Avenue 1/16/2022 0:16:07 jgor457@yahoo.com Jane Gordon 7808 Copano Dr 1/16/2022 0:38:19 rhoadmelissam@gmail.comMelissa Rhoad 7223 South Brook Dr. 1/16/2022 5:31:12 hmcleave@austin.utexas.eduHarry Cleaver 8004 Pitter Pat Ln 1/16/2022 5:33:48 gtreed2000@yahoo.com Gina 9201 Brodie Ln Austin TX 1/16/2022 6:40:18 noladavis939@hotmail.comNola Jane Davis 7904 Wykeham Drive, Austin, Texas 78749-3249 1/16/2022 6:46:07 artoflivingwell@sbcglobal.netDenise Tucker 6104 Flatrock Ln. 1/16/2022 6:47:38 gkupec@austin.rr.com Gregg Alan Kupec 9902 Michael Dale 1/16/2022 7:12:26 bratygrl1@aol.com Joanna Sollinger 9101 La Cresada 1/16/2022 7:31:09 martidelnegro1@gmail.comMartha Del negro 10613 Tollesboro Cove Austin tx 78739 1/16/2022 7:35:43 doketx@aol.com David Dolcater 7109 Oak Meadow Dr. Austin, Texas 1/16/2022 7:49:12 bfleming222@outlook.comBarbara Fleming 7717 Journeyville Dr Austin, TX 78735 1/16/2022 8:02:57 susieqmachen@gmail.comMarilyn Machen 150 Atwater Cove Austin TX 78737 1/16/2022 8:15:13 sunnyhunt@gmail.com sunny hunt 7000 whispering creek drive, Austin, Rx 78736 Yes 1/16/2022 8:16:30 stacisnell@outlook.com Staci L Snell 7306 Whispering Winds Dr 1/16/2022 8:34:53 aworthy@twc.com Anna Worrhy 9201 Zyle Rd, 78737 1/16/2022 8:59:38 brandirockwell@yahoo.comBrandi Rockwell 9015 San Diego Road Austin TX 78737 1/16/2022 9:11:35 roboseem@msn.com Roni Seemann 9713 Fallow Run Austin TX 78736 1/16/2022 9:14:51 bfreeby61@yahoo.com Arloa Freeby 10233 Clemente Cir 1/16/2022 9:19:41 cdiebel@austin.rr.com Candance H Diebel 6938 Chinook Dr Austin TX 78736 1/16/2022 9:25:27 apierce@utexas.edu Amy E. Pierce 9436 Lightwood Loop 1/16/2022 9:27:31 betharkey@icloud.com Elizabeth Harkey 8844 Colberg Drive 1/16/2022 9:32:25 Juliebrown910@gmail.comJulie Divine 6302-Ames-Ct Austin 1/16/2022 10:21:58 mikentx@hotmail.com Mike Nolen 7825 Beauregard Circle 24B Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Timestamp Email Address Full Name Address Would you like to receive updates from Save Scenic Brook? 1/16/2022 10:32:59 shulai07@gmail.com Claudia Saft 157 Tabago Ct, Austin, TX78737 1/16/2022 10:48:20 acday7@gmail.com Anna Stafford 7723 Kiva Drive 1/16/2022 10:48:52 randolbassmusic@gmail.comRandol Bass 6818 Kenosha Pass, Austin, TX 78749 1/16/2022 11:02:08 aprildawnegarza@gmail.comApril Garza 7118 Silvermine Dr Austin, TX 78736 1/16/2022 11:05:00 holdenkells@gmail.com Carolyn Holden 8508 Fenton Drive 1/16/2022 11:07:17 dianenelson709@gmail.comDiane Nelson 6810 B Raccoon Run Austin TX 78736 1/16/2022 11:57:31 annieclary77@gmail.com Annie Frierson 7101 Dunkirk Drive 1/16/2022 12:18:22 xsaad@hotmail.com Saad Altai 7404 Espina Drive Austin TX 78739 1/16/2022 12:54:33 d.kloc@sbcglobal.net Diane Kloc 5956 Salcon Cliff Dr, Austin, TX 78749 1/16/2022 13:21:09 mindi.d.payne@gmail.comMindi Orth 161 Denise Cove, Austin, TX 78737 1/16/2022 13:23:13 lorikruczek@gmail.com Loraine Kruczek 8802 La Fauna Path 1/16/2022 14:25:18 shawnmpatterson@gmail.comShawn M Patterson 8403 sage mountain trail 1/16/2022 14:25:57 beaswasey@gmail.com Bea Swasey 8403 sage mountain trail 1/16/2022 15:14:31 khkathall@gmail.com Saffron K Hall 4420 Jester Drive Austin TX 78745 1/16/2022 15:27:53 tzaharas@yahoo.com Thaddeus Zaharas Whispering Trail 1/16/2022 15:53:48 rachfowler@gmail.com Rachel Fowler 8507 Spring Valley Dr 1/16/2022 17:07:52 gmchueh@gmail.com Gabrielle Chueh 7113 Scenic Brook Drive 1/16/2022 20:16:11 mmart32@gmail.com Matt M 8308 Hanbridge lane 1/16/2022 22:00:51 wlong.grps@gmail.com Wayne Long Legend Oaks 2, Austin, Texas 1/16/2022 22:51:16 hollykosin@yahoo.com Holly Medina 9201 Brodie Lane Unit 4102 1/17/2022 7:48:18 julrkgoo@gmail.com Julie Rene Kimmel 7200 Silvermine Dr. Austin Tx 78736 1/17/2022 7:55:56 ahmeelya@outlook.com Amelia Stuerzenberger 7909 Flintstone Cove 1/17/2022 9:01:22 whitneyklint@gmail.com Whitney Altafi 8301 Twilight Terrace 1/17/2022 9:14:12 bbellanti@hotmail.com Beth bellanti 8304 spring valley drive austin tx 78736 1/17/2022 9:41:09 joeyhudgins@mac.com Joseph Hudgins 7810 Mowinkle Drive Austin, TX 78736 1/17/2022 9:42:47 mrschenoweth@gmail.comMindy Chenoweth 8107 Red Willow Drive 1/17/2022 9:58:06 nhunguyenn27@gmail.comNhu Nguyet Nguyen 7625 roaring springs dr 1/17/2022 10:35:53 sym.hicks@gmail.com Symantha Hicks 8104 Red Willow Drive 1/17/2022 15:23:16 jtanous@swbell.net Jeanne Tanous 8905 mission creek cove austin 78735 1/17/2022 17:06:29 evewieand@gmail.com Eve wieand 7124 S Brook Drive 1/17/2022 17:35:06 miadancedesign@gmail.comMia Dance 7209 Silvermine Drive Austin Texas 78736 1/17/2022 22:10:57 tejas1806@gmail.com Tejas Patwa 2920 Zeke Bend, Austin 78745 1/18/2022 7:22:10 mshcp3@yahoo.com Maria Hendricks 9446 EL Rey Blvd 1/18/2022 9:18:58 leisamitch@aol.com Leisa Mitchell 7320 Morning Sunrise Cove Austin, Texas 78635 1/18/2022 11:05:17 reissmank@gmail.com Katharine Reissman 6909 Grove Crest Dr., Austin, TX 78736 1/18/2022 11:36:43 jay@jlms.com Jay (John) McArdle III 6909 Grove Crest Dr Austin Tx 78736 1/18/2022 13:08:37 ldemgen@yahoo.com Lori Lawley 5513 Esquel Cove, Austin, TX 78739 1/18/2022 14:20:06 beltran.yesenia@att.net Yesenia 11809 Easy Street Austin Tx 78748 1/18/2022 16:47:31 dladd396@gmail.com Daniel B Ladd 7909 Siringo Pass Austin, Tx 78749 1/18/2022 20:48:20 jm32austin@gmail.com John McElhenney 8304 Mescalero Cv, Austin, Texas 78736 1/18/2022 23:50:31 jessguimar@gmail.com Jessica Rocha 4301 W William Cannon Dr Austin TX 78749 1/19/2022 8:11:16 suzannefwhatley@yahoo.comSuzanne Whatley 5348 Magdelena Dr 1/19/2022 8:37:22 jsessionsbdf@aol.com Jordan Sessions 7208 S. Brook Drive 1/19/2022 10:43:02 annehawken@austin.rr.comAnne Hawken 6700 Midwood Parkway 1/19/2022 18:11:26 Steve.B.Reyes@outlook.comSteve Reyes 7302 Callbram Ln Austin Tx 78736 1/20/2022 8:05:09 abrandt7@sbcglobal.net Jo Ann Brandt 7012 Scenic Brook Drive, Austin, TX 78736 1/20/2022 8:06:28 tbrandt75@yahoo.com Terry Jo Brandt 7012 Scenic Brook Drive, Austin, TX 78736 1/20/2022 16:30:47 mtaylorhome@att.net Mary Taylor 7123 Silvermine Dr. Austin, TX 78736 1/21/2022 7:42:29 kerilcardenas@gmail.comKeri Cardenas 6929 Chinook Dr 1/21/2022 11:53:38 adpeterson2000@gmail.comAlexis Peterson 7631 hwy 290 w 1/21/2022 11:54:01 mr.gignac@gmail.com David Gignac 7005 Scenic Brook 1/21/2022 17:05:06 karlanoboa@gmail.com Karla noboa Oppose 1/21/2022 19:12:03 ajharrington@gmail.com Andrew James Harrington6806 Silvermine Dr, Austin TX 78736 1/22/2022 8:09:07 naji.saba@gmail.com Naji Saba 8205 Mescalero Dr, Austin, TX 78736 1/22/2022 8:11:17 Madelyn.Miser@gmail.comMadelyn Miser 8205 Mescalero Dr, Austin, TX 78736 1/22/2022 14:50:50 J.weathers36@Yahoo.comJohn b weathers 8409 Selway dr Austin, tx 78736 1/23/2022 20:32:35 seventhshade@gmail.comPaul Merryman 7119 Scenic Brook Dr 1/24/2022 10:22:16 kmdavies@gmail.com Katie Newell 8201 Little Deer Xing, Austin, TX 78736 1/24/2022 14:20:33 jilltaylor1120@gmail.com Jill Taylor 7001 Grove Crest Drive, Austin, TX 78736 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  O.H.N.P.C.T Oak Hill Neighborhood Planning Contact Team Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan DATE: January 26, 2022 TO: Planning Commission, City of Austin FROM: OHNPCT Board RE: Vote “NO” on NPA-2021-0025.02 / 7715 ½ W. SH 71 C14-2021-0130 / Restrictive Covenant C14-85-288.23 (RCA) Dear Chair Shaw, Vice-Chair Hempel, and Commissioners Mushtaler, Llanes Pulido, Thompson, Schneider, Cohen, Praxis, Connolly, Howard, Shieh, Azhar, Cox, Flores, and Singh, The Oak Hill Neighborhood Planning Contact Team Board voted unanimously to recommend leaving the current zoning and land use in place on both subject tracts, and requests that commissioners vote “no” on these cases. Members of the Oak Hill Community, affected stakeholders, and the petitioner (who has submitted a valid petition) have clearly communicated support for maintaining the current zoning and land use (LO-NP and RR-NP). Thank you in advance for supporting the will of the community stakeholders. Sincerely, OHNPCT’s Board of Directors President, Cynthia Wilcox; Vice-President, Tom Thayer; Secretary Leigh Ziegler From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: cbwidaho Rivera, Andrew; Mushtaler, Jennifer - BC; Llanes, Carmen - BC; Thompson, Jeffrey - BC; Schneider, Robert - BC; Shaw, Todd - BC; Cohen, Jessica - BC; Praxis, Solveij - BC; Hempel, Claire - BC; Connolly, Joao - BC; Howard, Patrick - BC; Shieh, James - BC; Azhar, Awais - BC; Cox, Grayson - BC; Flores, Yvette - BC; Singh, Arati - BC Meredith, Maureen; Rhoades, Wendy; Scruggs, Ed OHAN Statement re: NPA-2021-0025.02 Monday, January 31, 2022 1:01:05 PM OHAN-Header-600dpi Letterhead Logo.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** DATE: January 31, 2022 TO: Whom It May Concern FROM: Oak Hill Association of Neighborhoods (OHAN) RE: 7715 ½ W. SH 71 (NPA-2021-0025.02, C14-2021-0130, C14-85- 288.23 (RCA)) At the Oak Hill Association of Neighborhoods Membership Meeting on January 19, 2022, a motion was unanimously approved by a vote of the membership to oppose the proposed rezoning and land use changes for the property located at 7715 ½ West US Highway 71 (NPA-2021-0025.02). Please include this statement in the official backup material. Sincerely, Board of Directors, Oak Hill Association of Neighborhoods (OHAN) CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Champlin, Kaela; Johnston, Liz; Rhoades, Wendy Re: EVC Postponement Request - Item 4b Monday, February 14, 2022 9:07:35 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am in agreement with Amanda Regards Eric Yerkovich On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 8:32 PM Amanda Swor <aswor@drennergroup.com> wrote: Good evening, Please accept this email as a joint postponement request from the applicant and the adjacent property owner of item 4b from the 2/16/2022 EVC meeting to the 3/2/2022 EVC meeting. The applicant and the adjacent propety owner have been working together and hope to have a finalized agreement before the next meeting. I have copied Mr. Yerkovich on this correspondence so he can confirm. Please let me know if you need anything additional from us to process this request. Respectfully, Amanda Swor CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Johnston, Liz Champlin, Kaela; Ramberg, Kevin - BC; Rhoades, Wendy Re: March 2, 2022 - EVC - Postponement Request Item 4a Wednesday, March 2, 2022 9:58:11 AM Yes I am in agreement Eric Yerkovich Good morning Amanda, On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:50 AM Johnston, Liz <Liz.Johnston@austintexas.gov> wrote: Are all parties in agreement on the postponement request? All issues will need to be resolved and all changes to the backup must be provided to WPD staff no later than March 25 in order to be placed on the April 6 agenda. Thanks, Liz From: Amanda Swor Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:31 PM To: Champlin, Kaela <Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov>; Rhoades, Wendy <Wendy.Rhoades@austintexas.gov>; Johnston, Liz <Liz.Johnston@austintexas.gov> Cc: Eric Yerkovich; Jason Hauck; Ramberg, Kevin - BC <BC- Kevin.Ramberg@austintexas.gov>; Kate Kniejski Subject: March 2, 2022 - EVC - Postponement Request Item 4a *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Kaela/Liz/Wendy, Please accept this correspondence as a request for postponement of the 7715 ½ West State Hwy 71 case on the Environmental Commission agenda tomorrow evening. We have been working with the adjacent neighbor who has a valid petition against the rezoning and have come to an agreement. We are nearly finished papering the agreement and feel it would be in the Commission’s best interest to have time to review this executed agreement with the entire request and we also want to be able to communicate this information to the larger stakeholder group. We request a postponement of the case to the April 6, 2022 Commission date. Mr. Yerkovich, please respond if you agree with this requested postponement. We truly appreciate all of the time everyone has spent on this request and look forward to bringing this request to the Commission at the next meeting. If I can provide any additional information, please let me know. Respectfully, Amanda W Swor, Director of Entitlements & Policy Drenner Group, PC | 200 Lee Barton Drive | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78704 512-807-2904 direct | 512-496-8573 cell | CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. CODE COMPARISON CHART Oak Hill MF 7715-1/2 W. SH 71 Tract 2 Height F.A.R. Water Quality Drainage Floodplain Modification Impervious Cover Creek Buffers Erosion Hazard Zone Cut/Fill Construction on Slopes Tree Protection Erosion Control Development Standard Current Code (assumes Commercial Development Standards for Proposed GO-MU Zoning) 60 ft 1:1 1987 RC Entitlements and applicable regulations - 146,000 sq. ft. of Building Space RC Amendment Proposed 60 ft 1:1 ECM 1.6.9 (S.O.S. Ordinance) Capture first 1/2 inch of Runoff ECM 1.6.9 (S.O.S. Ordinance) Life Safety Issue - Current Code Applies None Net Site Area = 10.73-acres (25%) 2.68 ac of IC Allowed Williamson Creek (Major Waterway) CWQZ 200'-400' & WQTZ 300' Yes Life Safety Issue - Current Code Applies None 65% IC Allowed on Slopes 0-20% 25% IC Allowed on Slopes 20%+ 7.79 ac of IC Allowed Williamson Creek (Major Waterway) CWQZ 200'-400' None +/- 4' None 25% IC Allowed on Slopes 0-15% 10% IC Allowed on Slopes 15-25% Heritage and Protected Tree Ordinances Current ECM Standard 65% IC Allowed on Slopes 0-20% 25% IC Allowed on Slopes 20%+ Protected Tree Ordinances 1981 Code E&S Cotrols Manual Life Safety Issue - Current Code Applies None 50% IC Allowed on Slopes 0-20% 25% IC Allowed on Slopes 20%+ 7.79 ac of IC Allowed Williamson Creek (Major Waterway) CWQZ 200'-400' Yes +/- 8' Max for site work and grading, excluding building footprint, ponds and related wet well basins and underdrain systems 50% IC Allowed on Slopes 0-20% 25% IC Allowed on Slopes 20%+ Heritage and Protected Tree Ordinances Current ECM Standard 1 OF 1 C14-85-288.23 ***PRELIMINARY*** FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY 3/24/2022 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS This Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions into by and between Eric Yerkovich, 5606 SOUTH RICE LLC, a Texas limited an individual ("Neighbor"), as of the� day of � (this liability is entered "Declaration") company and ("Owner"), 022. RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner owns the property generally to the south of State Highway located more particularly described in Exhibit 71 and to the west of Stillridge A, attached hereto (the "Property''); Dr., Austin, Texas 78735, WHEREAS, Neighbor tracts owns three neighboring of land generally of the Property, "Neighboring Prope11y"). which are more particularly described in Exhibit located B, attached to the east hereto (the WHEREAS, Owner intends to redevelop the Prope11y (the "Project") and has made w i t h t h e Cit y o f A u s t i n ( t h e "Ci t y " ) i n Zon i n g Cas e N o. a p p l i c a t i o n s r e l a t e d Cl4-2021-0130, N e i g h b o r h 0025.02, a n d R e s t r i c t i v e 2 8 8. 2 3 (RC A) (collectively, o o d P l a n A me ndmen t Cas e No. NPA-2021- Cov e nant A m e n d m e n t Cas e N o . C14-85- the ''Entitlement Applications"); WHEREAS, Owner has agreed that upon the final unappealable by the City (the "Entitlement and that these conditions Applications by these covenants, of the approval shall be shall be filed ofrecord Approvals"), the Property with the Official Entitlement restricted Records Public and assigns, made enforceable except of Travis and restrict County, Texas, the use of the Property through otherwise; by Neighbor stated where specifically and shall henceforth bind the Owner and its successors as described this Declaration and such restrictions shall be herein, for the fixed Term described herein, WHEREAS, upon the effective date of the Entitlement of this Declaration, restrictive Approvals, Owner has voluntarily covenants for the Term hereof, to all and subject which are agreed to henceforth of the terms and conditions the Prope11y restrict described herein. with certain NOW, THEREFORE, the receipt for good and valuable consideration, of which are hereby acknowledged, Declaration, fol lowing the Term described covenants, herein the undersigned conditions and subject by this Declaration. and restrictions, Owner shall hold, sell and sufficiency of this to all of the terms and conditions to the subject for and convey the Property which are impressed upon the Prope11y Exhibit E