B-11 (C14-85-244, Part 7 (RCA #3) - 10001 N. Capital of Texas Highway RCA; District 7).pdf

Planning Commission – April 12, 2022

B-11 (C14-85-244, Part 7 (RCA #3) - 10001 N. Capital of Texas Highway RCA; District 7).pdf — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of 25 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 7 AREA: 3.66 acres CASE: C14-85-244, Part 7 (RCA #3) ADDRESS: 10001 N. Capital of Texas Highway OWNER/APPLICANT: AUSTIN H ARBORETUM PROPCO, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership AGENT: Smith Robertson, LLP (David Hartman) ZONING: NBG-CMU-NP REQUEST: The applicant is requesting an amendment of the restrictive covenant conditions for this property (please see Applicant’s Request Letter – Exhibit C). CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed amendment of the public restrictive covenant. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 12, 2022 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 1 of 25B-11ISSUES: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: In this case, the applicant is requesting to amend a public restrictive covenant associated with zoning case C14-85-244 (Part 7) and executed on July 1, 1986 that prohibits new development on the Property from exceeding a maximum floor to area ratio (FAR) of 0.9:1, requires a public site plan review, requires that any development comply with the roadway map on page 40 of the Golden Triangle Area Study and states that at the time of subdivision approval the applicant will dedicate right-of-way to the City. Specifically, the applicant’s request is to remove these conditions for this 3.66 acre property so that development on this site can comply with the site development standards for the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) subdistrict in the North Burnet Gateway Regulating Plan (please see Applicant’s Request Letter – Exhibit C). The staff recommends the applicant’s request to delete the conditions of this public restrictive covenant for this site as the applicant is currently proposing to redevelop this property in accordance with the site development regulations approved in the North Burnet/Gateway Regulating Plan that allow for a 2:1 FAR on the property. The tract of land under consideration is currently developed with a hotel/motel use. This property was rezoned from CS-NP to NBG-CMU-NP, North Burnet/Gateway-Commercial Mixed Use- Neighborhood Plan Combining District, through case zoning C14-2008-0182 (North Burnet/Gateway Neighborhood Plan Rezonings), in 2009. The applicant agrees with the staff’s recommendation. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: ZONING NBG-NP Site North NBG-NP South NBG-NP NBG-NP East West NBG-NP LAND USES Hotel (Hyatt House) Hotel (Extended Stay America), Hotel (Marriott Townplace Suites) Multifamily (Arboretum at Stone Lake Apartments) Multifamily (Arboretum at Stone Lake Apartments), MOPAC Expressway Multifamily (Stonelake at Arboretum) TIA: Not Required HILL COUNTRY ROADWAY: N/A AREA STUDY: North Burnet/Gateway NP WATERSHED: Shoal Creek Watershed CAPITOL VIEW CORRIDOR: N/A 2 2 of 25B-11NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Burnet/Gateway Neighborhood Plan Staff Liaison SELTEXAS Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group TNR BCP -Travis County Natural Resources AREA CASE HISTORIES: NUMBER C14-85-244, Part 7(RCA #2) (10001 Stonelake) COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL 6/11/19: Motion to approve staff’s recommendation for the restrictive covenant amendment by consent (11-0); C. Kenny-1st, A. Azhar-2nd. 6/20/19: Approved restrictive covenant amendment by consent (11-0); L. Pool-1st, N. Harper-Madison-2nd. REQUEST To amend a public restrictive covenant associated with zoning case C14- 85-244 (Part 7) for this 2.0974 acre property that prohibits new development on the Property from exceeding a maximum floor to area ratio (FAR) of 0.9:1, requires a public site plan review, requires that any development comply with the roadway map on page 40 of the Golden Triangle Area Study and states that at the time of subdivision approval the applicant will dedicate ROW to the city. 3 3 of 25B-11Add NP designation to existing zoning 9/09/08: Approved rezoning of certain tracts to NBG-NP or NBG-H-NP, with conditions (8-0) 9/25/07: Approved staff rec. with amendments (8-0) CS to MF-4 10/23/07: Approved staff rec. of MF-4-CO by consent (9-0) 10/16/08: Approved NBG-NP or NBG-H-NP (7-0); 1st reading 3/12/09: Approved NBG-NP or NBG-H-NP (6-0); 2nd/3rd readings 10/18/07: Approved 1st reading of Phase 1 of NP (6-0) 11/01/07: Approved Phase 1 of NP zonings (5-0); 2nd/3rd readings 11/13/07: Approved Ordinance No. 20071108-097 for MF-4- CO (7-0); all 3 readings P to CH 11/9/04: Approved staff’s recommendation of CH zoning with conditions (9-0) 12/2/04: Approved CH zoning (7-0); all 3 readings C14-2008-0182 (North Burnet /Gateway NP Rezoning: Metric Boulevard) C14-2007-0157 (North Burnet /Gateway Neighborhood Plan Rezoning) C14-2007-0141 (Cresent Stonelake: 10011-100015 Stonelake Blvd) C14-04-0146 (The Shops at Arbor Walk: 10515 North Mopac Expressway) RELATED CASES: C14-85-224 (Previous Zoning Case) C14-2008-0182 (North Burnet/Gateway Neighborhood Plan Rezonings) OTHER STAFF COMMENTS: Comprehensive Planning The termination or amending of a Restrictive Covenant is not under the purview of the policies of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, and therefore an Imagine Austin compliance report has not been provided for this case. Environmental Approved. No comments. Fire No comments. 4 4 of 25B-11Parks and Recreation Parkland dedication will be required for any new residential units resulting from the release of this restrictive covenant. Parkland dedication and open space requirements can be found in the North Burnet Gateway Regulating Plan and City Code Title 25, Article 14. If the applicant wishes to discuss parkland dedication requirements in advance of site plan or subdivision applications, please contact this reviewer: thomas.rowlinson@austintexas.gov. Site Plan This tract is already developed and the proposed restrictive covenant amendment occurs within the existing development. Site plans will be required for any new development other than single-family, two-family or duplex residential. The site is in the North Burnet/Gateway (NBG) district. Any new development is subject to Subchapter E. Design Standards and Mixed Use. Additional comments will be made when the site plan is submitted. FYI: The applicant is responsible for requesting relocation and demolition permits once the site plan is approved. The City Historic Preservation Officer will review all proposed building demolitions and relocations prior to site plan approval. If a building meets city historic criteria, the Historic Landmark Commission may initiate a historic zoning case on the property. FYI: This site is within the Wildland/Urban Interface and will need additional related review from the Austin Fire Dept. Please reference https://www.austintexas.gov/department/wildland-urban-interface-code for additional information or work directly with AFD review staff. Transportation Austin Transportation Department does not object to this Restrictive Covenant Amendment. Any future development will be reviewed with the site plan application and will be assessed for TIA or mitigation at that time. Water Utility Austin Water has no comments on RCA. 5 5 of 25B-11INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW A: Case Map B. Aerial Map C. Applicant’s Request Letter D. Proposed Redlined Restrictive Covenant E. North Burnet Gateway Subdistrict Map F. Regulations for the CMU District in the NBG Regulating Plan 6 6 of 25B-11! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! B S D R V S Y P X E C A P O M N B S Y P X E C A P O M N P M A R B N C A P O M O T X T P A C N B N Y P X E C A P O M N 93-0051 P NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 2008-0182 IP-NP C14-2008-0182 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! EXHIBIT A G R E AT H I L L S T R L SP-99-0091C P SP-98-0403C UNDEV 2007-0141 C14-2007-0141 C14-85-244(RCT) SP-98-0022C GENERAL\RETAIL NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 85-244.7RC AUTO\DEALERSHIP C14-85-244(RCA2) SP96-0457C UNDEV SP95-204C SP92-0365C R85-144 R85-135 UNDEV SPC-92-94 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY NB R84-135 SP-94-0362 SP-93-0414C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY SB ! ! ! ! ! ! SP97-0200C ! ! ! ! ! ! N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY R85-146 C14-92-0145 NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 ! ! ! 85-244.7RC ! ! ! ! ! 92-0145 R85-147 S T O N E L A K NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 E B L V D 85-244 UNDEV NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 R85-146 SP96-0251C C14-94-0108 SP-95-0034 R85-145 SP97-0094C R85-146 R85-146DE SP93-0113C 74-163 UNDEV NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 T U D O R B L V D NBG-NP C14-2008-0182 SP96-0397C R85-0145(DE2) R85-0145(DE4) R85-145 Y O R K BLV D 96-0437C P M A R B S H C R A E S E R O T B S C A P O M SP-05-1365C 04-0146 C14-04-0146 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P ! ! ! ! ! ! NBG-NP ! ! N R T X T P A C N T A B N C A P O M N B N D R V S Y P X E C A P O M N R85-145 ± SUBJECT TRACT ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE ZONING BOUNDARY Restrictive Covenant Amendment CASE#: C14-85-244, Part 7 (RCA) This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 " = 400 ' This product has been produced by the Housing and Planning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or Created: 2/16/2022 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 of 25B-11EXHIBIT B 122112213361131115441C14-85-244.8(RCA)NBG-NPNBG-NPPNBG-NPNBG-NPNBG-NPNBG-NPNBG-NPYORKTOMOPACSBRAMPGREAT HILLSTRLN MOPAC EXPYSVRDNBN CAPITALOFTEXASHWYN MOPAC EXPY SVRD NBN MOPAC SB TOCAPTXRAMPNMOPACEXPY SVRDSBYORK BLVDNCAPTXTOMOPACNBRAMPSTONELAKEBLVDNMOPACEXPYSVRDSBMOPAC SB TORESEARCHSB RAMPNCAPTXTORESEARCHSBRAMPNMOPACEXPY SBNMOPACNBATNCAPTXTRNSTONELAKE BLVDN CAPITAL OFTEXAS HWY NBN CAPITALOFTEXAS HWYSBNMOPACEXPY SBNMOPACEXPY NBJ32J33Copyright nearmap 2015±This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of thePlanning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is madeby the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.ZONING CASE#:LOCATION:SUBJECT AREA:GRID:MANAGER:C14-85-244.8(RCA)10001 North Capital of Texas Highway3.664 AcresJ32SHERRI SIRWAITIS1'' = 300'CREEK BUFFERPENDING CASE!!!!!!ZONING BOUNDARYSUBJECT TRACT10001 N. Capital of Texas Highway8 of 25B-11EXHIBIT C 9 of 25B-1110 of 25B-1111 of 25B-1112 of 25B-1113 of 25B-1114 of 25B-1115 of 25B-1116 of 25B-11/ A \ ///� ( v/,/ \�,/\ ,/ L., EXHIBIT D 4 iO 861G Zoning Case No. C 14-85-244 (Part 7) ,;/;)/) RESTRICTIVE COVENI\N1' S�2gJ�: KNOW /ILL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUN��AVI$)/ § \.. v/H _> / /4v"\ o.{5/ \....-/ /, the{Jl: � / / �\ MORSE, 'fnct�i"Vict�lj )are the owners of the following described property fft•ppfp0 '} located in Travis County, Texas: 'l'l\TE OF FRED MORSE, DECEASED, and ESTELLE K. TRACT 1 � t d lying within and being a part of the · S"(r y <"10.. Travis County, Texas and being 71.91 a¥e/ o,f7. James Rogf:! the seve:.:.-l;tl ·a ¥ 9{/ land in said Rogers Survey con veyed hy CR. uci(et, and wife, Lottie Puckett, to Tully L. Wi ttccr /4i t;.e", Ermine Witter, by warranty deed dated Octobei;/1V, ;r<f/}{;,, of recot·d in Vol. 816, � Pages � i\_yis�1County Deed Records, and more ct�rcriD� o/ �_?\ es and bounds as follows: 1.it the southwest corner of 571-573. of\:ru{ particularly �n _../t;rl{�_, BEGINNING at a1t Tract No. 4 of 4 . 7'}r �rep-as described in the afore- � mentioned deed; / / / THENCE N. 24 degree�; E. ;J;y:".,'� feet to an iron stake ��c�; ; /� THENCE N. 60 degrees lJ 1 ('ii . a leaning Live Oak / r an ell corner of this ...-1li2 1;5 � .00 feet to an ii:"on Hand lton I s land stake set in the east '\in0-- .eff arlie westerly sodthwest/corner for the 1nost of this t ract; '.__...." / ' land N E.963.07 feef o n iron stake set for ·e Hamilton's a: THENCE along the east line of i'Ch 1 tj 33 degrees 14 � the northwest corner of this �rlu: s1'� THENCE S. 57 degrees and roc;::k mound for a corner of th· s /� ti 1 THENCE s. 26 degrees 31 by a dead Live Oak for a corner o thi;s ):rac;):; W. 220.0 � t�r'a..n iron stake an iron stake ; ,t� 41' E. r THENCE S. egrees 7 r,;. 62. e and a six inch elm for a corner oft ·s f.;t;cict, � A // .) 1 ' 89 f-/ / ':) . k _to _.an ron sta e 13 d f>'l THENCE S. 36 degrees 32' E. 131. 95 fee-6, t_,( for a corner; THENCE S. 27 degrees 10' W. 203. 62 feet tV(�,, " ( /J l degrees 21' E. 2009.99 feet to �m/ i e ; :::N:Ec: :: found in a root of a 12 inch elm for a corv· f � i tract; irnn stake take ' rn I f' \J / 01<.:,. ., � 20' W. 247.85 feet to an ifoh;- ·i "f o/\ / </;: ,J,/v� / / 5 .··. / V / 5 THENCE S. 2 degrees for a corner of this tract; REAL PROPERTY RECORDS Texas navis County, 09839 0566 ( (�y V 17 of 25B-1118 of 25B-1119 of 25B-1120 of 25B-1121 of 25B-1122 of 25B-1123 of 25B-11Figure 1 - 2 : North Burnet / Gateway (NBG) Zoning District Subdistrict Map EXHIBIT E Revised 08-08-19 LEGEND NBG Subdistricts : Transit - Oriented Development (TOD) TOD - Gateway Zone Commercial Mixed - Use (CMU) CMU - Gateway Zone Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) Neighborhood Residen�al (NR) Warehouse Mixed Use (WMU) Commercial Industrial (CI) Ac�ve Edges NBG Planning Area Boundary Parcel Boundary Railroads G R E A T H I T E X A S O F S T O N E L A K E L S L C A P I T A L H W Y 1 8 C A P - O M / 1 P O O L YORK TUDOR 3 / R E S E A R C H DUVAL G R A F A R C Y M S C I R T E M W O L L O H E N O T S DONLEY DENTON ENERGY R U N D B E R G T E N R U B KRAMER BRAKER MCHALE RUTLAND N O S P M O H T S L I E N LONGHORN INDUSTRIAL D I E R D E T I N U L I E N - C M 24 of 25B-11FIGURE 4 - 1 CMU : NBG ZONING DISTRICT GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL MIXED USE (CMU) SUBDISTRICT LOT SIZE FLOOR TO AREA RATIO Maximum Floor-to-Area Ratio (FAR) by Right: Established on Figure 4-2 (Based on the maximum FAR allowed by the prop- erty’s zoning prior to adoption of this Document) Maximum Floor-to-Area Ratio (FAR) with Development Bonus: CMU Zone CMU Gateway Zone 3:1 8:1 development bonus criteria and stan- dards are detailed in Article 6. Typical examples of buildings in the Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict. EXHIBIT F BUILDING HEIGHT Minimum Building Height: Not applicable Maximum Building Height by Right: Established on Figure 4-4 (Based on the maximum height allowed by the prop- erty’s zoning prior to adoption of this Document.) Maximum Building Height with Development Bonus*: CMU Zone 180 Feet CMU Gateway Zone 308 Feet exchange for the provision of public ben- standards are detailed in Article 6. *Exception: If adjacent to or across the street from NR Subdistrict the maximum height is 120 feet. 308’ Max. Height with Development Bonus (CMU - Gateway) Minimum Lot Size 2,500 SF Minimum Lot Width 20 Feet MINIMUM SETBACKS Front Yard and Street Side Yard*: No ground-level front yard or street side yard setbacks are required. Instead, development must meet the building placement standards in Section 4.3. Front and Street Side Upper-Story Building Facade Stepbacks: above must be stepped back 30 feet from the ground-level building facade line. Interior Side Yard: Rear Yard: 0 Feet 0 Feet * If the street right-of-way is less than 60 feet in width, the minimum front yard setback for buildings three or more stories in height shall be 30 feet from access. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVER If located in an urban watershed (Shoal or Little Walnut Creek) : Established on Figure 4-6 (Based on the maximum impervious cover allowed by the property’s zoning prior to adoption of the this Document.) If located in a suburban watershed (Walnut Creek)*: * vious cover requirements of Section 25-8-394(C) of the LDC. 80% - PLATTING REQUIREMENTS If located in the CMU Gateway Zone: Section 24-4-171(Access to Lots) of the abut a dedicated public street or a Major Internal Drive. 5 Stories 30' 180’Max. Height with Development Bonus 25 of 25B-11