B-27 (8J-2021-0048 - Quad Park 3B-3a Preliminary Plan; District 2).pdf — original pdf

Backup

SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET LOT(S): 63 COUNTY: Travis PC DATE: March 8, 2022 JURISDICTION: Limited Purpose AGENT: Carlson, Brigance, and Doering,Inc (Brett Pasquarella) CASE NO.: C8J-2021-0048 SUBDIVISION NAME: Quad Park 3B-3a Preliminary Plan AREA: 26.67 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: Carma Easton , LLC (Matthew McCafferty) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: Apogee and Skytex GRIDS: K11 WATERSHED: N. Fork & S. Fork Dry Creek EXISTING ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) MUD PLAN: Pilot Knob MUD PROPOSED LAND USE: Mixed Residential, greenbelt/open space/drainage easement lots, and public ROW VARIANCES: None SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be provided along all internal streets and the boundary street. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of the Quad Park 3B-3a Preliminary Plan. The plan is comprised of 63 lots on 26.67 acres, proposing 61 residential lots, and 2 greenbelt lots, and approximately 3,682 linear feet of right-of-way/streets. Sidewalks are proposed on all streets. The proposed lots comply with the PUD zoning requirements for use and lot size. Parkland will be in compliance with the PUD. Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Austin. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plan, subject to the conditions listed in the attached comment report. After the conditions are met, the plan will comply with LDC 30-2-84. The conditions include remove or update notes, review street names, update engineer’s report and provide information as required in the report. These are administrative actions that require no discretionary review. An application that has been approved with conditions may be updated to address those conditions until the application expires and the plan does not need to be heard before the Commission again. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plan, subject to the conditions listed in the comment report dated March 3, 2022 and attached as Exhibit C. CASE MANAGER: Sue Welch, Travis County Single Office Email address: Sue.Welch@traviscountytx.gov Exhibit A: Quad Park 3B-3a Preliminary Plan, Exhibit B. Quad Park 3B-3a Location Map Exhibit C: Quad Park 3B-3a Preliminary Plan Comment Report PHONE: 512-854-7637 1 of 11B-27Legend Streets Street Labels Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ Recorded Subdivision Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ Subdivision Cases- IN REVIEW Watershed Barton Creek Bear Creek Bear Creek West Bee Creek Blunn Creek Boggy Creek Bohls Hollow Brushy Creek Bull Creek Buttercup Creek Buttermilk Branch Carson Creek Cedar Creek Cedar Hollow 0.3 2-24-21 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Feet 0 0.15 0.3 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1: 9,600 Notes Coldwater Creek Colorado River QUAD PARK FINAL PLAT Site Location C8J-2021-0048.1A Connors Creek Commons Ford Creek Cottonmouth Creek Cottonwood Creek 2 of 11B-273 of 11B-274 of 11B-275 of 11B-27CITY OF AUSTIN –DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT UPDATE: PHONE #: 8408 APOGEE BLVD U0 512-854-7637 C8J-2021-0048 00 CASE NUMBER: REVISION #: CASE MANAGER: Sue Welch PROJECT NAME: Quad Park Preliminary Plan LOCATION: SUBMITTAL DATE: February 7, 2022 REPORT DUE DATE: February 28, 2022 FINAL REPORT DATE: STAFF REPORT:3 DAYS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE UPDATE DEADLINE This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent subdivision application submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated submittal. The subdivision application will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. However, until this happens, your application is considered disapproved. Additional comments may be generated as a result of information or design changes provided in your update. If you have any questions, problems, concerns, or if you require additional information about this report, please do not hesitate to contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by writing to the City of Austin, Development Services Department, P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78704. UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 25-4-56; 25-4-82): It is the responsibility of the applicant or his/her agent to update this subdivision application. The final update to clear all comments must be submitted by the update deadline, which is May 12, 2022. Otherwise, the application will automatically be denied. If this date falls on a weekend or City of Austin holiday, the next City of Austin workday will be the deadline. UPDATE SUBMITTALS: An informal update submittal is required. You must submit the distribution to the case manager. Please submit 1.0 of the plans and 1.0 copies of a letter that address each comment for distribution to the following reviewers. Clearly label information or packets with the reviewer’s name that are intended for specific reviewers. No distribution is required for the Planner 1. Updates may be submitted between the hours of 8:30 am and 4:00 pm. Updates submitted after 3 pm may be processed on the following business day. Please note: if Austin Water rejects a plan on Update 2, a fee is due at or before resubmittal. Please contact Intake for the fee amount. REVIEWERS: Planner 1 : Sophia Briones Travis Co. Subdivision : Sue Welch Flood Plain : Katina Bohrer PARD / Planning & Design : Robynne Heymans Subdivision : Juan Enriquez AW Utility Development Services : Derek Tucker Water Quality : Jay Baker Wetlands Biologist : Leslie Lilly Travis Co. Transportation : Christine Connor 6 of 11B-27Travis Co. Drainage Construction : Christine Connor Subdivision Review - Juan Enriquez – juan.enriquez@austintexas.gov SR1. This property is located within the Limited Purpose Jurisdiction of the City of Austin and its Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). It is also located within the Desired Development Zone (Suburban) and therefore Travis County is the lead agency on this application and the City of Austin is the zoning reviewer. The property has a zoning designation of Pilot Knob PUD, Zoning Ordinance No. 20170302-014. All site development regulations will be subject to the standards under the PUD (Mixed Residential Area – Residential Detached, Yard House and Others). 30-1-113 SR2. Please revise the following administrative approval block: 30-1-113 APPROVED, ACCEPTED AND AUTHORIZED FOR RECORD BY THE DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, CITY OF AUSTIN, COUNTY OF TRAVIS, THIS THE ____ DAY OF _____________, 20__, AD. _________________________________________________ Juan Enriquez for: Denise Lucas, Director Development Services Department SR3. SR5. Revise plat notes #1 to reference both PUD approval of Zoning Ordinance No. 20161110-032 & 20170302-014. 30-1-113 Electric Review - Andrea Katz - 512-322-6957 No Review Required. Out of Austin Energy service area, served by Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc. 911 Addressing Review - Jorge Perdomo - 512-974-1620 AD1: This plat review is cleared; however, any changes to street names, street name labels, or street layouts will require a new review. NOTE1: DONGAN DR and CHALRGIN PL are reserved. NOTE2: Court is not appropriate and Oak is on do not use list § 30-2-155 End of Comments Drainage Engineering Review - Jay Baker - 512-974-2636 Release of this application does not constitute a verification of all data, information, and calculations supplied by the applicant. The engineer of record is solely responsible for the completeness, accuracy, and adequacy of his/her submittal, whether or not the application is reviewed for code compliance by city engineers. 7 of 11B-27 a. b. c. a. DATE: 2/28/21 ORIGINAL COMMENTS: DE 1. No comments. Travis County is doing the drainage review. Signoff: 2/28/21 Flood Plain Review - Katina Bohrer - 512-974-3558 Reviewer notes: (aka C8-2021-0048) Site is located in the Easton Park area (just south of Prospect Park (C8J-2020-0148%). Applicant indicated in completeness check that they are using the Prospect Park modeling for this area which is why they were not doing a project assessment. Models turned in with CC1. Floodplain report is contained as an appendix within the Engineer’s report. In date: 3/29/2021 Update 0: reviewed on 2/28/2022 Notice to applicant: Applicant must remedy all compliance issues without creating additional compliance issues with the LDC and/or Criteria manuals. A response that fails to correct an issue, or which creates other issues does not comply with the LDC and is insufficient to address the comments. The comments provided describe an issue that must be remedied in order for the application to be approved. Any specific examples are provided as a courtesy and are not intended as an exhaustive list, especially as the site may be updated to have additional compliance issues. Contact this reviewer if you have any questions Katina.Bohrer@austintexas.gov FP1. The site, as shown on the plan provided, is not in compliance with the following sections of the Land Development Code. Please correct your application to be in compliance with Code. 30-4-33 – Floodplain Maps, Delineation, and Depiction 30-4-61 – Criteria for Approval of Development Applications 30-4-152 – Dedication of Easements and Rights-of-Way a. b. c. FP2. The site, as shown on the plan provided, does not meet the requirements set in LDC 30-4-33 & LDC 30-4-152. Detailed information: I did not see any grading plans for this project area. This is not a problem from a floodplain standpoint as long as there isn’t any grading within the floodplain area. Confirm that grading plans are not provided because there is no proposed grading within the Greenbelt Park lot. It is unclear that the floodplain downstream of the existing pond is contained to a drainage easement. Floodplain must be contained to a drainage easement. If Lot 46 of Block A is dedicated as drainage easement in addition to Greenbelt Park lot, this will be addressed. The floodplain note on page 2 states that portions of the lot ARE within the FEMA floodplain, but that is not the case for this lot. Correct as necessary. FP3. The site, as shown on the plan provided, does not meet the requirements set in LDC 30-4-61 and DCM Section 1 Detailed information: No Adverse Impact regulations were not checked at this time since the modeling is not compliant with DCM standards. See comments about modeling below. FP4. The modeling provided does not meet requirements set in the Drainage Criteria Manual Section 6 “Open Channels.” Modeling must be in compliance with criteria prior to approval. 8 of 11B-27Detailed Information The flow change locations in post project conditions do not match the flow change locations is the approved PA modeling for Prospect Park – please provide updated modeling with the flow change locations in the correct spot. The bank stations on post project conditions do not match the bank stations in the approved PA modeling for Prospect Park – please provide updated modeling with the bank stations in the correct spot The proposed grading on the post project conditions do not match the approved PA modeling for Prospect Park – please provide updated modeling with the appropriate grading The proposed downstream reach lengths in the post project conditions do not match the approved PA modeling for Prospect Park – please provide the updated model with the appropriate downstream reach lengths FYI: It appears that the model provided is one which was supplied at Update 2 for the Project assessment instead of the model that had been supplied at Update 4. The HMS model matches the approved PA HMS modeling and is approved for this case as well. FYI: Be aware that not all aspects of the model need to be updated for the entire Easton Park area at this time, but only those for this project area need to be addressed for this project. AW Utility Development Services - Derek Tucker - 512-972-0077 AW1. Per Utility Criteria Manual Section 2, §15-9, §30-2, §25-5, §25-9, and the Uniform Plumbing Code: The landowner intends to serve each lot with City of Austin water and wastewater utilities. Each lot must have a separate water and wastewater utility connection and no existing or proposed plumbing may cross lot lines. The landowner, at own expense, will be responsible for providing the water and wastewater utility improvements, offsite main extensions, system upgrades, utility relocations and or abandonments to serve each lot. FYI. The landowner must pay the tap and impact fee once the landowner makes an application for a City of Austin water and wastewater utility tap permit. Water Quality Review - Jay Baker - 512-974-2636 Release of this application does not constitute a verification of all data, information, and calculations supplied by the applicant. The engineer of record is solely responsible for the completeness, accuracy, and adequacy of his/her submittal, whether or not the application is reviewed for code compliance by city engineers. DATE: 2/28/21 ORIGINAL COMMENTS: FORMAL UPDATE REQUESTED Please provide a comment response letter with the update addressing each of the following comments. All engineering representations must be signed by the responsible engineer. Additional comments may be issued as additional information is received. PLAN NOTES WQ 1. Revise the water quality note to read as follows: [LDC 25-8-211, 30-5-211] "Water quality controls are required for all development pursuant to the Land Development Code” a. b. c. d. e. f. 9 of 11B-27WATER QUALITY PLAN WQ 2. Provide water quality plan for this subdivision.in accordance with the application packet page 17. The report indicates that controls are being provided by an existing pond. Include that information in the water quality plan to ensure that the controls are sufficiently sized with adequate conveyance from this subdivision to the existing facility. [LDC 25-8-211, 30-5-211] WQ 3. Ensure that the pond design is in compliance with the current Atlas 14 precipitation requirements. [LDC 25-8-211, 30-5-211] WQ 4. Ensure that the existing pond is in compliance with DCM 1.2.4.E or make modifications as needed. [LDC 25-8-211, 30-5-211] WQ 5. Ensure that water quality controls are provided for the street extension to the future Slaughter Lane extension. [LDC 25-8-211, 30-5-211] Wetlands Biologist Review - Leslie Lilly - Leslie.lilly@austintexas.gov WB1. Update0. Please demonstrate compliance to LDC 25-8-281(C)(2)(a) or 30-5-121(C)(2)(a). Additional information: {This comment can be addressed by adding a note on all sheets stating that: “All activities within the CEF and CEF buffer must comply with the City of Austin Code and Criteria. The natural vegetative cover must be retained to the maximum extent practicable; construction is prohibited; and wastewater disposal or irrigation is prohibited.”} Travis Co. Subdivision Review - Sue Welch - 512-854-7637 Please clearly show boundaries of Lot 46 along Skytex in block A 30-1-113 Please correct the typo in the acreage on coversheet. 30-1-113 Current tax certificates showing all taxes have been paid for 2021. 30-1-113 Verify if this application needs to be signed by two officers of Carma Easton LLC 30-1-113 Clearly label the joint access easements on the preliminary and update the exhibit (some overlapping text). 30-2-113 FYI - JUE easements will need to be provided with the plat application. Add a note that Lot 46 and 17 will be owned and maintained by the owner/HOA. FYI - Provide the draft CCR to be recorded with the plat 30-2-113 FYI – The Drainage Maintenance Agreement will need to be updated with the final plat. Land Development Engineering Review - Jennifer Back, P.E. - jennifer.back@austintexas.gov Release of this application does not constitute a verification of all data, information, and calculations supplied by the applicant. The engineer of record is solely responsible for the completeness, accuracy, and adequacy of his/her submittal, whether or not the application is reviewed for code compliance by city engineers. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 10 of 11B-271. Provide preliminary roadway profiles and storm sewer layout. PARD / Planning & Design Review - Robynne Heymans - 512-974-9549 2/22/2022 Update 0: PR1: Please update note 10 with the correct lot number (lot 46 A instead of lot 64 A as noted) PR 2: Prelim plan shows parkland lot as ‘Greenbelt Park Lot 46 A 11.08 acres’. Table on coversheet has line item: “Greenbelt Park Lots: 2 Total Acres: 10.873”. Please reconcile. PR 3: Please show the proposed trail alignment on this prelim. Show how the trail connects to parkland in Prospect Park Phase I to the north. PR 4: Please provide an updated master parkland tracking table including the units in this preliminary plan as well as the number of acres of parkland and open space owed. Travis Co. Drainage Engineering Review – Christine L. Connor Confirm that the existing pond meets the requirements of DCM 1.2.4 and provide a narrative on how the pond meets the requirements. Confirm that the existing pond was designed using Atlas 14 rainfall. Provide sheets from the plans in which the pond was designed/constructed showing that Quad Park was taken into consideration during the design. Also provide the HEC-HMS model for that project. Indicate how the runoff from Skytex will be collected and transported to the pond in Prospect Park. If the storm sewer line crossing the floodplain to carry runoff from this development to Prospect Park will be constructed with this project, please indicate that somewhere in the engineering report. Indicate how the drainage easement that conflicts with this section will be vacated and why it will no longer be required. On the existing detention map, show the sections of Easton Park that will be constructed prior to the construction of this section as existing. Add flow arrows to the developed condition detention map. Lot 46 needs to be noted as a drainage easement since it contains floodplain. The engineering report provided needs to be updated and resubmitted. It references and onsite pond and other items that do not appear to be accurate. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Travis Co. Transportation Review - Christine Connor - 512-854-7215 Show the right-of-way width for Chrysler Bend. Provide proof from the TIA that Skytex right-of-way is reduced between Apogee and Slaughter. 1) 2) END OF REPORT 11 of 11B-27