Planning CommissionJune 22, 2021

B-10 (C14-2021-0078 - Shoal Cycle; District 9).pdf — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 22 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0078 – Shoal Cycle DISTRICT: 9 ZONING FROM: LO, GO, MF-4 TO: DMU-CO ADDRESS: 812 W. 11th St SITE AREA: 0.405 acres (17,660 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: CJI Properties, Inc. (Lucy Joyce, President) AGENT: Drenner Group, PC (Amanda Swor) CASE MANAGER Mark Graham (512-974-3574, mark.graham@austintexas.gov ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant downtown mixed use (DMU-CO) combining district zoning. The conditional overlay is to limit building height to 60 feet. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: June 22, 2021 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: July 29, 2021 To be scheduled for City Council ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 2 ISSUES The Applicant would like to discuss the Staff recommendation. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject site is irregular in shape and located near the west edge of downtown Austin near North Lamar Blvd. and Shoal Creek. Access to the site is by West 11th Street from West Avenue or via Shoal Creek Blvd. from West 12th Street. The rezoning tract is 0.405 acres (17,660 sq. ft.) and currently developed with a 14,238 sq. ft. office building. There is a band of MF-4 zoning approximately 30 feet wide along the north edge of the tract and a band of GO zoning of approximately 26 feet wide along the east side of the tract from the MF-4 zoning to the W. 11th St. right-of-way. The rest of the tract is zoned LO. The existing buildings on the 800 block of West 11th Street are typically one and two-story structures. Many were built as detached residences but are adapted for use as offices. There are townhome style residences on the west, detached residential buildings used as offices to the east, retail and business services to the north and residential buildings used as offices across 11th Street to the south. The office building on the rezoning site is three stories tall with surface parking under the building at grade. The applicant requests downtown mixed use – conditional overlay (DMU-CO) with the conditional overlay limiting height to 90 feet in order to build 70 multifamily residential units on the property. The existing office building would be razed. No residential units will be demolished. The rezoning tract is in the Northwest District which limits height more that most of the downtown districts. The Downtown Density Bonuses for height are not available in this district. Austin’s Downtown Plan contains a map with proposed future zoning. The Downtown Plan recommends mapping LO zoning to downtown mixed use with a 40-foot height limit (DMU-40), and both MF-4 and GO zones were mapped as 60-foot zones (DMU-60). Staff is recommending that this rezoning consolidate the zoning with DMU at the 60-foot building height limit. Generally the DAP recommends the lowest heights at the edges of downtown, gradually building to 120 feet next to the Central Business District Core, where building can be significantly taller. The Downtown Austin Plan suggests replacing single purpose zone districts with mixed use districts. The newly renovated ACC Rio Grande Campus, expected to open fall of 2021, is about 2 blocks northeast of the subject site at West Ave. and W. 12th Street. House Park/Austin Recreation Center is also about 2 blocks north on Shoal Creek Blvd. The #5 Bus stops are two blocks away at W. 12th Street and N. Lamar Blvd. There are sidewalks along the south side of W. 11th Street and west side of Shoal Creek Blvd. There are sidewalks along both sides of Shoal Creek north of W. 12th St. The site is walkable and bike friendly and close to education, recreation, entertainment and employment. Groceries are a ten-minute walk at W. 6th and N. 2 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 3 Lamar Blvd. The subject location is about a ten-minute walk (0.5 miles) to the State Capitol building. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends downtown mixed use – conditional overlay (DMU-CO) combining district zoning. The conditional overlay would be a height limit of 60 feet. 1. Zoning should not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner; Granting of the request should result in an equal treatment of similarly situated properties. The requested 90-foot building height limit would not be equal treatment of similarly situated tracts. The rezoning tract is surrounded by properties zoned MF-4 and GO and partially entitled with those zones. In the Downtown Austin Plan, those zones map to DMU 60, that limits building height to 60 feet. The center of the tract is LO zoned, which the DAP maps to the DMU with a 40-foot height limit. The Staff recommendation would be to grant the entire site the 60-foot height limit consistent with the surrounding properties. (See attached Downtown Austin Plan Proposed Downtown Zoning Changes Map.) The Staff Recommendation for DMU-CO with the conditional overlay of a maximum building height of 60 feet would be equal treatment of similarly situated properties. (See Area Case Histories table of this report). 2. Zoning changes should promote compatibility with adjacent and nearby uses. The western edge of this part of downtown Austin is North Lamar Blvd. The subject property is near the corner of W. 11th St. and Shoal Creek Blvd. North Lamar Blvd. is less than 500 feet from the southwest corner of the subject property. In the immediate vicinity of the rezoning tract there is a mixture of uses including office, retail, personal and business services as well as residential. DMU zoning is intended for the areas on the periphery of CBD classifications in the central core area, permitting a variety of uses compatible with downtown Austin and allowing intermediate densities as a transition from the commercial core to surrounding districts. Site development regulations are intended to permit combinations of office, retail, commercial and residential uses within a single development. 3. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the goals and objectives of the City Council. The City Council adopted the Downtown Austin Plan (DAP) as an element of the Austin Comprehensive Plan. The DAP maps the proposed zoning and heights and the staff recommendation is consistent with the map and the goals and objectives of the DAP. The Housing Blueprint was adopted with goals for creating new residential units in each of the Council Districts. Goals for locating residential units in locations that promote healthy living by being walkable to education, recreation, entertainment and employment would be promoted with the requested zoning and proposed residential development. 3 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 4 EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: Site North South East West Zoning Land Uses LO, GO, MF-4 Office MF-4, CS, DMU Retail, business services DMU-CO, MF-3, LO GO, LO MF-4, P (Across W. 11th St) Houses used as offices Houses used as offices Townhomes/condos, Shoal Creek Greenbelt NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: Downtown Austin Plan (Northwest District) TIA: The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP), adopted 04/11/2019, identifies a need for 80’ of right-of-way for 11th Street. A traffic impact analysis is waived, the determination is deferred to site plan application, when land use and intensity will be finalized. WATERSHED: Shoal Creek, impervious cover limit for proposed DMU is 100% OVERLAYS: ADU Approximate Area Reduced Parking Criminal Justice Center Overlay Downtown Austin Plan Districts: Northwest Downtown Density Bonus: FAR - 3 | Max Hgt - 90 Residential Design Standards: LDC/25-2-Subchapter F Selected Sign Ordinance SCHOOLS: AISD Mathews Elementary O. Henry Middle Austin High NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Central Austin Community Development Corporation City of Austin Downtown Commission Downtown Austin Alliance Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA) Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Historic Austin Neighborhood Association Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Old Austin Neighborhood Association Preservation Austin SELTexas Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group 4 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 5 AREA CASE HISTORIES: Number Request Commission City Council C14-2020-0052 903, 905, 907 & 915 W. 12th St. C14-2020-0036 827 W. 12th St. Rezone 0.38 ac. From CS to DMU-CO. CO is 60 ft max height. Rezone 0.555 ac. From DMU- CO to DMU-CO to change condition of zoning. C14-2019-0050 827 W. 12th St. C14-2017-0077 ACC District 1218 West Ave. C14-2017-0076 ACC-Rio Grande Campus-Block 153 1212 Rio Grande St. Rezone 0.555 ac. From CS to DMU-CO. CO is building not to exceed 60 feet. Rezone 0.8803 ac. from SF-3 & P to DMU Rezone from UNZ & UNZ-H to DMU-CO (Tract 1) and DMU- H-CO (Tract 2) C14-2016-0110 West House, LLC 1005 West Ave. C14-2011-0010 821 W. 11th Rezone 0.0871 ac. from MF-4 to GO-MU Rezone MF-3 to DMU To grant To grant DMU-CO. CO increased from 60 ft. to 90 ft. consistent with Downtown Austin Plan. To grant To grant Apvd. 08/27/2020 Ord.# 20200827-113 Apvd. 06/04/2020 Ord.# 20200604-039 Apvd. 06/20/2019 Ord.#20190620-124 Apvd. 10/05/2017 Ord. #20171005-044 To grant DMU-CO. CO limits vehicle trips to 2,000/day; max building height is 60 feet; list of prohibited uses. To grant DMU-CO as Staff Recommended To grant DMU-CO. CO is 2,000 daily vehicle trip limit; max height 40 ft.; front yard setback 15 ft.; list of prohibited uses. Apvd. 10/05/2017 Ord.# 20171005-043 CO for daily vehicle trips limit to 2,000; max building height 60 ft.;list of prohibited uses for Tract 1; list of prohibited uses for Tract 2. Apvd.01/26/2017 Ord.# 20170126-083 DMU-CO. CO for 60 ft. max height. Apvd. 04/28/2011 Ord.# 20110428-064 CO for max height of 40 ft., min front yard setback, prohibited uses, 2,000 daily vehicle trips max. RELATED CASES: No related cases. 5 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .0405 acre tract of land situated in Outlot No. 5, Division E of the Original City of Austin Outlots on file in the General Land Office, In Travis County Texas. Conveyed in Volume 11554, Page 1380, of the real property records of Travis County, Texas. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS: Urban Design Downtown Austin Plan The property is in the North West District of the Downtown Austin Plan (DAP). The applicant is proposing to change the zoning from General Office (GO), Limited Office (LO), Multifamily Residential Moderate-High Density (MF-4) to Downtown Mixed Use – Conditional Overlay (DMU CO). Some of the Northwest Street District specific goals are: • Preserve the neighborhood’s historic character (p.38) • To improve the pedestrian environment. (p.38) • • Great Streets improvements are a public improvement priority for this district (p.38) Improve conditions for bicycling (p.38) The property is currently the site of a two-story 14,000 sf office building, the change to DMU will allow for greater density. The following DAP goals are relevant to this case: AU-1.1: Replace Single Use zoning districts with mixed-use zoning designations • AU-2.5: Make downtown housing more family friendly • DD-1.1: Maintain height and density limits as a baseline with some adjustments on the surrounding context. (p.23) • DD-3.1: Promote a compatible relationship between new and historic buildings (p.24) Based on the information above, Staff believes that the proposed zoning change to DMU-CO with a 60 foot height limit is supported by the Downtown Austin Plan. Environmental 1. The site is not located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The site is located in the Shoal Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as an Urban Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City's Land Development Code. It is in the Desired Development Zone. 2. Zoning district impervious cover limits apply in the Urban Watershed classification. 6 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 7 3. According to floodplain maps there is no floodplain within or adjacent to the project location. 4. Standard landscaping and tree protection will be required in accordance with LDC 25-2 and 25-8 for all development and/or redevelopment. 5. At this time, site specific information is unavailable regarding vegetation, areas of steep slope, or other environmental features such as bluffs, springs, canyon rimrock, caves, sinkholes, and wetlands. 6. This site is required to provide on-site water quality controls (or payment in lieu of) for all development and/or redevelopment when 8,000 s.f. cumulative is exceeded, and on site control for the two-year storm. 7. At this time, no information has been provided as to whether this property has any preexisting approvals that preempt current water quality or Code requirements. Parks and Recreation PR1: Parkland dedication will be required for the new residential units proposed by this development, multifamily with DMU-CO zoning, at the time of subdivision or site plan, per City Code § 25-1-601. Whether the requirement shall be met with fees in-lieu or dedicated land will be determined using the criteria in City Code Title 25, Article 14, as amended. Should fees in- lieu be required, those fees shall be used toward park investments in the form of land acquisition and/or park amenities within the surrounding area, per the Parkland Dedication Operating Procedures § 14.3.11 and City Code § 25-1-607 (B)(1) & (2). If the applicant wishes to discuss parkland dedication requirements in advance of site plan or subdivision applications, please contact this reviewer: thomas.rowlinson@austintexas.gov. At the applicant’s request, PARD can provide an early determination of whether fees in-lieu of land will be allowed. Site Plan SP1. Any new development is subject to Subchapter E. Design Standards and Mixed Use. Additional comments will be made when the site plan is submitted. SP2. The site is within the Criminal Justice Center Overlay. Bail bond offices, liquor stores, and cocktail lounges are conditional uses, and pawn shops are prohibited. Transportation The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP), adopted 04/11/2019, identifies a need for 80’ of right-of-way for 11th Street. A traffic impact analysis is waived, the determination is deferred to site plan application, when land use and intensity will be finalized. Name Existing ROW ASMP Required ROW Pavement ASMP Classification Sidewalks Bicycle Route Capital Metro (within ¼ mile) 11th St 61’ 80’ 38’ 2 Yes Yes Yes 7 of 22B-10 C14-2021-0078 8 Austin Water Utility AW1. The landowner intends to serve the site with City of Austin water and wastewater utilities. The landowner, at own expense, will be responsible for providing any water and wastewater utility improvements, offsite main extensions, utility relocations and or abandonments required by the land use. The water and wastewater utility plan must be reviewed and approved by Austin Water for compliance with City criteria and suitability for operation and maintenance. Depending on the development plans submitted, water and or wastewater service extension requests may be required. All water and wastewater construction must be inspected by the City of Austin The landowner must pay the City inspection fee with the utility construction. The landowner must pay the tap and impact fee once the landowner makes an application for a City of Austin water and wastewater utility tap permit. INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW Exhibit A: Zoning Map Exhibit B: Aerial Map Exhibit C: Downtown Austin Plan – Districts Map Exhibit D: Downtown Austin Plan-Proposed Zoning Changes Map Exhibit E: (Not) Eligibility-Downtown Density Bonus Program 8 of 22B-10 SF-3 ( 8 1-4 0 SF-6 78-09 82-132 ( ( ( MF-3 P K R A P E S U O H E N FIE L D R D ( ( 02-0112 ( SF-3-NP SF-3-NP A P A R T M E N T S MF-3-CO NP C 4H-05-0017 ( H05-0017 ( 82-147 MF-3-NP ( SF-3-NP ( N LAMAR SB TO W 15TH RAMP MF-3-NP ( ( T L S E HIL L T S A C ( MF-3-NP AIR H N O L A S SF-3-NP ( ( MF-3-NP ( SF-3-NP GO-NP ( MF-4-NP ( APTS. ( ( P-NP 87-82 72-315 K R A P E S U O H D R R O S D WIN H77-23 MF-3-NP C14-04-0149 03 SF-3-NP SF-3-NP ( MF-4-NP ( SF-3-NP C 4-04-0149.27 ( ( GO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP T R S O 04-0149.27 L Y A B LR-NP P A R K W A Y 7 7 9 7 MF-3-NP MF-4-NP ( SF 3-NP C14-04-0149.02 MF-3-NP APARTMENTS MF-4-HD-NP T 7 2-2 7 3 E C GO-HD-NP MF-4-NP ( C14 05-0013 CS-MU-CO-NP C14-05-0012 ( NO-MU-NP GO-NP OFC. GR-V-CO-NP CS-1 CS-MU-V CO-NP C14-2007-0237 87-82 REST. P APARTMENTS ( L T S A C ( ( ( ( ( 74-48 ( GO-NP ( ( ( CS-MU-CO-NP CS-MU-V-CO-NP A U T O D E A L E R T O L R A C CS-MU-V-CO-NP E IC F F O C14-2007-0237 CS T S E R B A O L T O H P CS-MU-CO-NP CS-1-MU-V-CO-NP DMU-CO C14-2020-0052 S H O A L C R SHOPPING CENTER ACC AUTO CLASS CS E E K B L V D SF-3 HOUSE PARK 87-082 P RECREATION CENTER C14H 02-0020 ( ( CP77-09 MF-3-NP ( SF-3-NP W 13T H S T ( ( MF-2-NP APARTMENTS 02-0112 APARTMENTS ( ( E V Y A E L L E H S MF-3-NP ( = MF-3-HD-NP A PA R T M E N T S ( ( SF-3-NP H93-23 SF-3-H-HD-NP ( ( SF-3-HD-NP ( 91-28 SF-3-H-HD NP MF-3-HD-NP T O S C N A L B 86-262 P-H-HD-NP SF-3-H-HD-NP SF-3-HD-NP W 11TH ST = MF-4-HD-NP LO-MU-H-CO-HD-NP C14H-77-026 C14-2007-0201 ( ( ( ( ( MF-4-HD-NP ( C14-04-0149.18 MF-5-CO-NP ! C14-02-0112 ! NPA-2007-0006.01 MF-6-CO-NP C14-2019-0151 W 11TH ST 86-170 CS-MU-CO-NP MF-4-HD-NP ( ( ( ! ! ( SF-3-HD-NP MF-4-HD-NP ( W 10TH ST SF-3-H-HD-NP ( MF-4-NP ( ( C14H-2010-0006 MF-4-HD-NP MF-4-HD-NP C14H-03-0015 SF-3-HD-NP ( C 4H-78-051 ( SF-3-H-HD-NP ( SF-3-HD-NP ( MF-4-H-HD-NP ( GO-NP ( CS-MU-CO-NP ( C14-2007-0237 CS-MU-V-CO-NP STRIP CENTER CS-MU-CO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP CS-MU-V-CO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP C14-2007-0237 CS-MU-V-CO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP CS 1-MU-V-CO-NP C14-2007-0237 AUTO SALES CS 44-04 CS 44-04 SP-00-2079C F U R N I T U R E S A L E S P ( C14-04-0149.08 ( MF-4-HD-NP ( ( ( ( C14H-2009 0036 ( SF-3-HD-NP ( MF-4-HD-NP SF-3-H-HD-NP 73-125 ( SF-3-H-HD-NP ( MF-4-HD-NP C14-04 0149.31 ( SF-3-HD-NP ( F-3-HD-NP MF-4-HD-NP LO-NP D CS-MU-V-CO-NP V L -0405CS R B A M A N L C14-2007-0237 CS-MU-V-CO-NP CS-MU-CO NP CONV STR. CS 44-04 SF-3-HD-NP SF-3-NP AUTO C14-2007-0237 CS MU-V-CO-NP 9 11 96-0 AUTO SALES STRIP CENTER CS 44-04 10th. STREET PARK P 87-082 MF-4 APTS. LO E F I C F O MF-3 ( DMU-CO C14-2011-0010 ( LO F F O E C P 84-458 LO ( MF-3 4 5 0 0 - 1 0 4 4 1 1 7 1 0 2 - 0 8 G KIN R A P C14 01-0054 LO-MU ( ( W 10TH ST MF-4-HD-NP SF-3-HD-NP C14-04-0122 ( 02-0112 W 7TH ST MF-4-HD-NP ( MF-4-HD-NP ( CS-MU-V-CO-NP ( C14-2007-0237 S E L A S R A C DMU-CO\-CURE DMU-CO-CURE C14-03-0168 96-0119 7 4 9-1 6 03-0168 69-10 73-11 SP-97 0483C PKN G CAR LOT CS GO DEALER OFF. C 0 5 4 -0 6 0 P- S OFF. OFF. MF-4 83-290 95-57 LO W 12TH ST CRAFTS CS DMU-CO C14-2019-0050 C14-2020-0036 CS Y B A B 2 6 0 0 3 80-221 LO 79-96 76-10 GO GO-MU 8 -2 5 W 11TH ST 3 9 1 - 3 8 LO 2 0 - 8 7 86 75RC C14-03-0085 GO-MU GO 78-25 89-150 LR-H 80-206 LO SF-3 ( ( SF-3-H ( C14H-2009 0045 SF-3-H C14-69-072 LO W 16TH ST SF-3-H ( ( C14H-2007-0025 C14H-2015-0013 C14H-20 3-0005 ( C14-82-136 LO C14H-06-0015 C14-2018-0120 GO-MU-H-CO GO GO-H C14H-89-0022 CS SP89-0167A OFFCE SP-06-0308D GO OFFICE NO-H-CO 91-0079 LO-H CHURCH PLAYGROUND SF-3 SF 3 H ( C 4H-95-0004 LO 7 1 - 0 8 GO PARKING LO GO-H C14H-2009-0026 W 15TH ST SF-3-H H74-3 LO-H DMU-H-CO C14-2013-0087 ( 79-52 GO-MU-H-CO C14H-00-2182 C14H-00-2183 H00-2182 GO H00-2183 C14-2007-02 9 MF-4 LO 80-13 W 13TH ST DMU-CO C14-2017-0077 OFFICE LO DMU-CO C14-2020-0035 OFFICE GO W 13TH HALF ST ANTIQUES W 14TH ST G KIN R A P OFF. S -3 MF-4 80-23 LO MF-4 Y R E K A B OFFICE E V T A S E W O T U A AIR P E R CS DMU-CO C14-2017-0076 C14H-82-009 DMU-H-CO S U P M A C S H A E G E L L O C LR OFF. 2 5 0 0 - 1 0 W 13TH ST GO C 4-01-0052 LR-CO GO OFF. SP-93-0141CS GO OFF. LR-CO 94 148 OFF. OFF PEASE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL UNZ T S E D N A R G IO R OFF. P G N K R A P OFF. GO DMU-CO C14-2017-0037 DMU-CO C14-2017-0059 GO DMU-H OFF. GO OFF. S C 9 4 3 0 - 8 9 P S OFF. GO CHURCH SP-98-0276CS GO CHURCH C14 2015-0093 C14-2016 0093 E IC F F O OFF. GO OFF. CBD 84-056 C14-84-056(RCT) P73-01 C14-75-085 RCT) OFF. OFF. GO OFF. OFF. GO OFF. P O H S O ! T O H ! P ! !! OFF. GO DMU-CO C14-2010-0197 OFF. C 4-05-0 90 CBD-CO GO OFF. OFF. GO SP91-0195 GO-MU OFF. GO C14-2019-0091 INS. CO. OFF. GO-H GO OFF. S C 9 4 0 2 - 0 0 P S 6 6 0 2 - 9 9 OFF. GO DMU OFF. DMU-CO DMU-H-CO 99-2066 C14-2015-0133 DMU-CO C14-2015-0133 C14-2018-0041 C14-2018-0041 C14-2017-0054 GO OFF. ! ! GO ! T S S E C E U N ANTIQUES GO BOOK STORE GO-H C14H-2017-0107 GO-H GO OFF. CS ( 1 1 0 0 - 8 8 H T S O I N O T N A N A S GO PARKING C14-2012-0103 DMU-CURE C 4-2012-0102 OFFICE GO 72-93 MF-4 C14-2016-0110 DMU-CO 75-88 LO OFFICE 80-22 61-119 OFFICE MF-3 LO PARK 79-257 APTS. 62-138 62-138 70-120 GO OFFICE 8 6 2 GO - 4 8 72-226 OFFICE ( GO 75-322 S E IC F F O ( ( GO ( GO-H C14-2 09 0066 C14H-05-0025 LR-MU-H CO ( ( GO ( APTS. DMU H80- 6 C14H-80-026 DMU-H DMU APTS 96-0050 GO-H P C 4-96-0050 CS COURT ANNEX GO LO-MU C 4-2007-02 2 LO G KIN R A P OFF. MF-4 DMU-CO 06-0118 P 96-0050 E IC F F O SPC96-0362C CS JAIL COURTHOUSE TRAVIS CO. COUNTY UNZ UNZ 69-147 87-082 P DUNCAN PARK 87-063 LO C14H-79-020 DMU-H ( UNDEV ( SP88-170C PARKING GO C 0 7 1 - 8 8 P S ( 87-063 OFFC. ( DMU-CO ( C14-06-0177 ( C14-99-212 OFC ( MF-4 ( GO 3 0 2 - 8 6 MUSIC 06-0177 99 2124 OFC GO 75-084 OFC OFC LO DMU-H LO-H DMU DMU-H C 4-96-0 40 ( C14-96-0141 ( ( GO OY\SHOP LR 6 3 2 2 - 0 0 GO C14 00-2236 GO-MU 9314 GO OFF. C14- 008-0150 DMU-CO C R 7 6 1 1 8 ( ( ( DMU-CO 96-0141 DMU PARKING GARAGE SP96-0088C C14-2010-0069 ( ( C14 2011-0036 DMU-CO 67-151RC CS E IC F F O W 9TH ST WOOLDRIDGE SQUARE P-H C14H-90-0012 H90-0013 MF-3 MF-4 CS T D S O O W PARKING MF-4 ( S R A D C E S U DMU DMU-CO ( C 5 2 0 0 - 7 0 P S C14-2012-0083 C14-05-0040 DMU-CURE 05-0040 GR MF-4 GO LO 2 3 1 - 5 7 GO-MU-H C14H-04-0005 ! H04-0005 OFF. ( OFC W 8TH ST RESIDENTIAL ( MF-4 H7 -13 ( GO ( GO ( 77-28 DMU-CO C14-2013-0147 C14-2011-0058 G N TI N RI P GO ( GO-H ( H83-25 C14-2019-0156 DMU-CO GO-H C14-2016-0034 ! ! 81-16RC E ! IC F F O DMU-CO GO-H OFF. OFF. CBD-CO C14-2011-0006 W 7TH ST CBD CBD CBD-CURE-CO C14-06-0183 CBD-CO C14-06-0007 8 9 - 7 8 H83-002 P-H CP7305 75-24 LIBRARY P DMU-CO C14-2010-0207 99-0138 DMU-H-CO APT. E IC F F O H75-31 H74-31 MF-4-H PARKING GO AUSTIN MF- GO-H ( ( H74-13 DMU-H GO-H C14H-2016 0073 GO-H C14 2011-0124 C14-2012-0105 DMU-H DMU ( DMU DMU-H DMU BANK CBD T S E P U L A D A U G ZONING Exhibit A ZONING CASE#: C14-2021-0078 SF-3-H-HD-NP APTS. ( ( ( MF-4-HD-NP ( ( CS-MU-V-CO-NP ( C 4-2007-0237 F. F O 3 0 4-0 8 N CS-MU-CO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP ( T R S O L Y A B CS-MU-V-CO-NP C14-2007-0237 ( RETAI W 6TH ST SHOPPING CENTER CS-MU-V-CO-NP C14-2007-0237 02-0112 SP-98-0073C 86-165 RETAIL CENTER SP-04-1155C ± STATIO N CS CS-MU-V-CO-NP C14-2007-0237 REST. PARK NG SP94-0283AS 80-89 CS-CO 8 4 -1 2 8 STUDIO SP950126C ( MF-4 CS 95-58 CS-CO MF-3 T N S O S R E D N E H C14-96-0063 96-0063 CS 77-12 CS-CO SP- 05-1232C CS-CO BOOK\STORE 93-0 06 OFFICE DMU DMU GROCERY\STORE ! C14-2009-0151(RCA) ! C17-2017-0068 C14-2009-0151 ! C14-2009-0151(RCA) DMU-CURE ! C14H-20 8 0014 SP95-0132C SUBJECT TRACT ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE ZONING BOUNDARY This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative loca ion of property boundaries. 1 " = 400 ' This product has been produced by the Housing and Planning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or Created: 4/15/2021 9 of 22B-10 10 of 22B-10 11 of 22B-10 12 of 22B-10 (4) The maximum heights and maximum floor-to-area ratios on Figure 2 do not modify a site's primary entitlement. If the maximum height or maximum floor-to-area ratio allowed under a Exhibit E 13 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Brennan Griffin Graham, Mark Support for DMU 90 for Shoal Cycle Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:10:15 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern: I'm a frequent user of the Shoal Creek cycle path, and I think the project at 812 W. 11th would be a great improvement, especially if permitted at 90'. There is a strong possibility that the currently envisioned project that includes units targeted to households making $55K would not be feasible if restricted to 60'. I've worked on Shoal Creek Blvd between 15th and Lamar for the last 10+ years, and I frequently take the Shoal Creek cycle path downtown - for coffee, for lunch, and to get to the YMCA and Lady Bird Lake. The current office complex, while fine, does little to add to that walk. The trees and placemaking for Shoal Creek Conservancy proposed by the developer will help make a difference, but I will also say that even having a bit more shade from a building along that stretch could make it more walkable/bikeable during the summer months. I also work for an organization that supports affordable housing in Austin, especially housing that expands access to opportunity. An apartment building targeting working-class Austinites in such a location would be a huge boon. With 3 bedroom/2 bath apartments, it would help bring diversity to the zoned schools, it would give people ready access to great jobs and services, and it would be an easy place for a household to forgo the usual 2 car arrangement that is difficult to escape in much of Austin. Just because the units are not directly subsidized does not mean that it has no impact on affordability. As to the compatibility arguments raised in the staff comments, I would say that we cannot continue to allow "compatibility" to trump all other public policy concerns for Austin land use. Buildings being different sizes next to each other is often aesthetically appealing - it gives variety. Taller buildings give off more shade, which is a major consideration for people attempting to walk or cycle (or scooter) in the Texas summer. Many of my afternoon walks downtown would benefit from a lot more shade! Without DMU 90, we are probably giving up 70 new apartments marketed to families making less than the Austin median income. If restricted to 60', maybe a project would go forward with fewer units, but those units would have to be priced higher to make the development financially sound. It is just abysmal to let poorly thought out aesthetic judgements (which I and many Austinites do not share) to interfere with building more housing that increases opportunity. Best, Brennan Griffin CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a 14 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Dan Keshet Graham, Mark In support of DMU-90 for 802 W 11th Tuesday, June 15, 2021 11:26:19 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good morning Mark, I am writing to register my support for the requested zoning (DMU with a height limit of 90') for 802 W 11th. I live nearby at 908 Nueces St, one block south and a few blocks east of the project. I walk by the site frequently with my daughter. This is a wonderful place to live! We are walking distance away from a ton of restaurants, multiple grocery stores, convenience stores, day cares, churches, the Shoal Creek trail, Duncan Park, Republic Square Park, Pease Park, ACC, the largest concentration of jobs the city has, a ton of street festivals, and much much more. My daughter is eight months old and I have taken her on a stroll to literally every one of these! We are downtown but at a distance from the night clubs that generate late-night noise; it feels like a safe and secure place to raise a child. The biggest issues that we face are all down to the lack of residents. The neighborhood consists largely of older houses built for people to live in but presently used as offices. Economically, a single household just can't compete with what lawyer's offices are willing to pay for a house downtown. Even though there are a lot of amenities in the neighborhood, some residential-oriented amenities can't make it. Pease School operated as transfer-only for years before recently being shut down altogether. There are plans for the revamp of Duncan Park but it doesn't include a playground. My wife and I have a hard time finding other parents downtown. I'm in favor whenever a developer can find a way to make residential work in the neighborhood. One project underway is building residential with exclusively tiny units. Another project nearby is building a high-rise. This same developer has a project nearby that's a co-living space. This project found a way to make the economics work by doing a development targeted at using the unique site near jobs and the Shoal Creek Trail to make a low-parking, bike-oriented development, which is both a great idea and a great way to make the economics on residential actually work. This is exactly the kind of project the neighborhood needs! Thank you so much, Dan Keshet CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 15 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Catlin Whitington Graham, Mark Support for Shoal Cycle Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:59:09 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Mr. Graham, I am a citizen of Austin and, although I reside in District 2, I have a lot of history and affinity for the Shoal Creek watershed. I am on the board of the Shoal Creek Conservancy and have had many memorable experiences in my life along the waterway. It is an important area for me and for the City's character. I support Shoal Cycle rezoning to DMU 90. I want to see more workforce housing downtown. I believe that affordability is critical for future planning in this historically important corridor and I believe that density is the key to affordable development downtown. Thank you for your time and consideration. Catlin Whitington 512-317-3806 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 16 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Bob Roberts Graham, Mark Shoal Cycle to be zoned DMU 90 Tuesday, June 15, 2021 11:52:55 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I wholeheartedly support Shoal Cycle rezoning to DMU 90. It would be awesome to have more workforce housing in downtown Austin. Not to mention a project by a female developer. Thanks for your consideration Mark! BOB ROBERTS Senior Vice President Barton Oaks Stewart Title of Austin, LLC 901 South Mopac, Building III, Suite #100 Austin, TX 78746 O (512) 322-8709 | M (512) 775-5111 stewart.com/austin | | View My Profile NYSE: STC CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 17 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Marshall Geyer Graham, Mark In Support of Shoal Cycle DMU 90 Rezoning Wednesday, June 16, 2021 7:53:47 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Mark, I wanted to reach out to you with a strong display of support for Shoal Cycle rezoning to DMU 90. I absolutely want to see more workforce housing downtown. My fiancee and I are homeowners of a condo unit at Terraces on Shoal Creek, the residential building directly next door to Shoal Cycle. We have reaped the benefits of living in this exact location firsthand and can attest for how desirable it is for its walkable proximity to the Shoal Creek trail, restaurants in the area, bus stops (and the future light rail stops), green space, the lake, numerous dog parks, venues, and history-rich structures in the neighborhood. Since moving downtown, I have sold my car and firmly embraced a multi-modal transportation lifestyle in a city that is struggling to evolve past requiring the individual use of a single occupancy vehicle. I am painfully aware of how difficult it currently is for many others in Austin to optimize their home and work logistics for a car-free lifestyle but I think that downtown is the optimal location for this lifestyle. I am constantly eager to see more attainable residential options created anywhere in downtown, but particularly in areas like west downtown that have been long plagued by archaic obstacles like zoning restrictions, parking lots, and general land misuse. Because of this, I was thrilled to see an attractive residential building plan for the near- abandoned lot next door to us that would deeply enrich the residential community in the neighborhood, be a force in the movement away from cars in Austin, help fight the alarming housing crisis that is plaguing Austin residents, provide sustainable opportunity for working class folks, add some useful retail to the area, and, ultimately, extend all of the privileges that we have enjoyed living on this street to a lot more people. Austin can't retain its charm if the people that make this city great can no longer afford to live here. I can't imagine this rezoning would cause many reasonable issues for the lone residential house on this street but, even so, that cost would seem to be heavily outweighed by the substantial, long-term housing relief this development would provide Austin residents with. Without progressive plans like Shoal Cycle being allowed to innovate the area, this neighborhood is doomed to serve as a historic-house-turned-law-office ghost town void of opportunity, density, and community right in the middle of one of the fastest growing cities in the country. In my opinion, rezoning Shoal Cycle to DMU 90 would be a fantastic move to continue converting my northwest downtown street from a museum into a community. I appreciate your consideration and look forward to updates with this project. Cheers, Marshall CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. 18 of 22B-10 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Mateo Barnstone Graham, Mark aswor@drennergroup.com; I support Shoal Cycle rezoning to DMU 90. I want to see more workforce housing downtown. Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:40:06 PM Dan Keshet *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To whom it might concern: I fully support and urge the city to support the approval of the zoning variance request to permit the Shoal Cycle redevelopment to 90’. In a rational world, this would not require a zoning change. This middle-intensity mid-rise project is the right scale for this quadrant of downtown. It is precisely the kind of building that should be allowed by-right. This quadrant of downtown should be the place where you can mix up historic low-rise, with various other intensities up to mid-rise and it all works together to create a dynamic and exciting neighborhood - a neighborhood that can grow, adapt, change as the city does. I don’t need to tell you that this is one of the most walkable districts in the city. There are like a billion locations within a 10 minute walk and a zillion within a 10 minute bike ride. It’s adjacent to Shoal Creek and its residents will be able to access the increasingly impressive urban trails network that gets them to a huge amount of the city on car- free trails. The fact that this building is lightly parked means the scale and massing and design of this project is far superior to the numerous projects that have been approved in recent years with large parking plinths that reach heights over the 90’ height this building reaches. The city allows parking garages taller than this project a few blocks away! This site is 1/2 a block from North Lamar and 1/2 a block from 12th and you can measure the distance to our most intense employment districts in the city in steps. ACC, the Capitol Complex, UT and all the downtown employment can be reached by a pleasant walk. In short, this is the exact location we should be able to layer on human-scaled intensity to 9 or 10 stories. That density is roughly the same intensity of some of the greatest, most livable and most loved neighborhoods in some of the best cities in the world: Barcelona, Milan, Madrid, London, Buenos Aires, etc. etc. . . If this kind of intensity creates great livable neighborhoods all over the world why would we want to disallow it here? This is a few blocks from the similarly situated and scaled Nokonah Building. A few blocks beyond are some of the highest intensity uses in the city. Frankly, we should have a lot more buildings of this scale, and we could. And this would be among the best places in the city to do so. - Mateo Barnstone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 19 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Caroline Bailey Graham, Mark Case C14-2021-0078 - Support for Shoal Cycle to be Zoned DMU-90 Tuesday, June 15, 2021 6:25:09 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good evening Mark, I am writing to express my enthusiastic support in favor of granting DMU- 90 to Shoal Cycle (Case C14-2021-0078). I am a Board Member of AURA, a local urbanist advocacy organization and a member of the City of Austin's Pedestrian Advisory Council - though I am not speaking on behalf of either group, just myself as an individual. This kind of housing development is exactly what we need more of in Austin, especially in downtown. We need more workforce housing downtown. We need more homes that are geared towards people who would like to live a more sustainable lifestyle. If we want to be serious about tackling our housing crisis, our homelessness crisis, and our climate change crisis - then please give Shoal Cycle DMU-90 zoning. We can't keep watering down or reducing the developments that are one of the solutions to our multiple crises. I would love to live in a development like this if they were available. I'd love to live downtown in a place where I could actually afford the rent. I currently live near the Shoal Creek Trail entrance on 38th St, and I think we should be putting as many people as we can next to the trail - because as many people as possible should have access to the trail without having to drive. I used to live near the trail off 24th St, and would frequently walk down the trail to downtown. More people should be able to do that! There are also multiple bus lines nearby, and multiple amenities to walk, bike, roll, or take transit to. More housing near transit is a win. More housing in a high-opportunity area is a win. More housing in general is a win - housing is a community benefit! In the neighborhood, there is currently only one single-family home that is being used for residential purposes instead of offices. It seems backwards to limit this development based on that one home, when this development would provide so many homes for so many more people. I'm a renter, and it's really disappointing to see this constant institutional belief from the City and others that apartments are inferior to single-family homes; that single-family homes should be protected whenever possible. There are a lot of people who would prefer to never own a home or who may never be able to afford to buy their home - and they shouldn't be considered less important than homeowners. I make between $50,000-$60,000 and this 20 of 22B-10 development is actually targeted towards people in my income bracket, which is awesome. Cities change and grow. This neighborhood was once the edge of Austin a long time ago. But it is now a part of downtown Austin, and should be treated as such. Change isn't inherently bad. Apartments are not inherently bad. Height is not inherently bad. Incompatibility with other housing types nearby is not inherently bad. Less parking isn't inherently bad. In this case, I think all of those things are good, and we should encourage and strive for more developments like this all over Austin. Thanks for your time and consideration. Caroline -- Caroline Bailey, AICP | Planner AURA Board Member, Social Chair, Land Use Committee Chair Austin Pedestrian Advisory Council Member CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 21 of 22B-10 From: To: Subject: Date: Daniel Riegel Graham, Mark I Support Shoal Cycle Rezoning to DMU 90 Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:16:00 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Mark, My name is Daniel. I wanted to write to express my wholehearted support for the Shoal Cycle project (Case C14-2021-0078). I've been a central Austin resident for over a decade, having lived in West Campus, Downtown, and now in the South Central Waterfront. I'm also a member of the Downtown Neighborhood Association and the South River City Neighborhood Association, and a frequent and longtime user of the Shoal Creek trail. The Shoal Cycle project provides exactly what we need more of in downtown -- affordable, sustainable residential homes. Furthermore, converting this property to DMU 90 will allow for the development of a much needed mid-rise residential building, which is exceedingly rare not only in Austin but in particular downtown. Altogether, I believe the Shoal Cycle project would be a wonderful addition to the central Austin community. Please feel free to share my comments with the Planning Commissioners and City Council members. Thank you for your time and consideration. - Daniel Riegel CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 22 of 22B-10