B-07 (NPA-2019-0016.01 - Shady Lane Mixed Use; District 3)

Planning Commission – June 23, 2020

B-07 (NPA-2019-0016.01 - Shady Lane Mixed Use; District 3) — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of 29 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2019-0098 - Shady Lane Mixed Use DISTRICT: 3 ZONING FROM: SF-3-NP-NP TO: SF-6-NP (Tract 1) and LR-MU-NP (Tract 2), as amended ADDRESS: 914 Shady Lane SITE AREA: 4.134 Acres (Tract 1: 1.72 Acres; Tract 2: 2.41 Acres) PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT: Kimberly Beal and Stephanie Scherzer AGENT: Alice Glasco Consulting (Alice Glasco) CASE MANAGER: Heather Chaffin (512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the Applicant’s request of SF-6-NP on Tract 1 and LR-MU-NP on Tract 2, as amended. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: June 23, 2020: May 26, 2020: Postponement request by Neighborhood to June 23, 2020, granted on consent. May 12, 2020: Postponement request by Staff to May 26, 2020, granted on consent. March 24, 2020: Meeting cancelled. February 25, 2020: Postponement request by Applicant to March 24, 2020, granted on consent. January 14, 2020: Postponement request by Applicant to February 25, 2020, granted on consent. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: June 11, 2020: Postponement request by Staff to July 30, 2020, granted on consent. May 21, 2020: Postponement request by Staff to June 11, 2020, granted on consent. March 26, 2020: Meeting cancelled. February 6, 2020: Postponement request by Staff to March 26, 2020, granted on consent. ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 ISSUES: 2 At the time of this report, discussions between the Applicant and Neighborhood are ongoing. Additional updates may be made at the time of public hearing. The Applicant originally requested CS-MU-NP on Tract 2 but has revised the request to LR- MU-NP. A petition has been filed in opposition to the proposed rezoning. The petition currently stands at 28.09% of eligible signatures and meets the threshold of a Valid Petition. The subject property is crossed by a section of Boggy Creek and is significantly impacted by the associated floodplain, water quality zones, and City drainage, utility, and access easements. Please see Exhibits C and D – Environmental Exhibit and Valid Petition Request. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property is located on the west side Shady Lane approximately 500 feet south of Airport Boulevard. The property is zoned SF-3-NP and is developed with a single family residence, urban farm, and related structures. Immediately south of the property is Anita Ferrales Coy Facility (formerly Allen Elementary) which is zoned P-NP. Immediately north of Tract 1, in the rear of the property, are single family residences zoned SF-3-NP. A SF-3- NP neighborhood extends further northwest to Bolm Road. Tract 2 is also adjacent to SF-3- NP lots, but also adjacent to GR-MU-NP lots that front Shady Lane. GR-MU-NP and GR-NP zoning lots extend north along Shady Lane to Airport Boulevard and are developed with automotive repair and single family uses. Directly across Shady Lane are properties zoned LO-MU-NP and SF-3-NP that are developed with a mix of uses, including art studio, administrative/business offices, and single family residential. Further northeast, across Shady Lane, is a fast food restaurant zoned CS-CO-NP. Southeast of the rezoning property are lots zoned SF-3-NP that face Shady Lane and Glissman Road. West and southwest of the property are lots zoned SF-3-NP developed with single family residential use; further west and southwest of the property are properties zoned CS-MU-CO-NP, LR-MU-NP, P-NP, and SF-3-NP that are developed with a mix of uses including single family residential, professional offices, religious assembly, urban farm, restaurant, and other land uses. Please see Exhibits A and B—Zoning Map and Aerial Exhibit. As stated in the Issues section above, the property contains a section of Boggy Creek which limits vehicular access to the site. The subject property has frontage on Shady Lane but is adjacent to two local streets that are interior to the surrounding single family neighborhood. Mansell Avenue is located near the western boundary of the site, but the paved roadway does not extend across Boggy Creek; a pedestrian bridge extends across the creek, connecting the northern and southern portions of Mansell Avenue. Gullett Street dead ends north of the site. Vehicular access and creek protection are reviewed at time of site plan, but the constraints clearly limit if development of the property is able to achieve the maximum densities permitted under the proposed zoning classifications. Please see Exhibit C – Environmental Exhibit. Staff has received correspondence from neighbors in opposition, as well as a Valid Petition request. As stated in the Issues section, the petition currently stands at 28.09% of eligible 2 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 3 signatures, meeting the threshold of a Valid Petition. The Agent for the proposed rezoning and a consulting engineer have provided letters that include additional details about the physical constraints of the site and the proposed rezoning. Some of this correspondence addresses various proposed proposals/counter proposals that have not been agreed to by both parties. Please see Exhibits D and E– Valid Petition Request and Correspondence. The draft land development code (LDC) designates this property Residential 2B (R2B) zone which is intended to allow detached housing with accessory dwelling units (ADUs) or duplexes in a more urban setting. The commercial properties along Shady Lane to the north are designated Mixed-Use 5A (MU5A) which is intended to allow high-intensity multi-unit residential, office, service, retail, and entertainment uses. Across Shady Lane to the east are areas designated R2B, R2A and MU3. Residential 2A (R2A) zone is intended to allow detached housing with accessory dwelling units (ADUs) or duplexes in a more suburban setting; Mixed-Use 3 (MU3) zone is intended to provide a mix of low to medium scale residential and commercial uses, including employment, shopping and daily services. Please see Exhibit F- Draft LDC Zoning Exhibit. Staff supports the requested SF-6-NP on Tract 1 and LR-MU-NP on Tract 2. This property is significantly constrained by Boggy Creek which leaves limited area for development. If Tract 1 is developed with townhouse condominium land use, residential units could potentially be clustered near the termination of Mansell Lane. Clustered units allow residences to be placed closed together and further from the creek. Staff also supports LR-MU-NP for Tract 2. There are commercially zoned properties along Shady Lane that range in intensity, with more intense categories to the north near Airport Boulevard and less intense in the immediate area. LR-MU-NP would allow neighborhood commercial, residential, or mixed use development on the site, providing a transition toward the residential areas to west. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The rezoning should be consistent with the policies and principles adopted by the City Council or Planning Commission. The Strategic Housing Blueprint promotes a mix of housing types and densities across the city. 2. land uses, and development intensities. Zoning should promote a transition between adjacent and nearby zoning districts, The subject property is in an area that transitions from the commercial corridor of Airport Boulevard to the north and the residential areas to the south and west. The property is also located along Shady Lane, which has a mix of commercial and residential zoning, and extends west into a residential neighborhood. The recommended zoning change would provide a transition between these areas. 3. Zoning should allow for reasonable use of the property. The section of Boggy Creek that crosses the property severely constraints development of the site. SF-6-NP on Tract 1 would allow the flexible clustering of housing. 3 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 4 Site North South East EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: ZONING LAND USES SF-3-NP SF-3-NP, GR-MU-NP, GR- NP P-NP Single family residential, Urban farm Single family residential, Automotive repair services Allen Elementary School SF-3-NP, LO-MU-NP, CS- CO-NP West SF-3-NP, LR-MU-NP, CS- MU-CO-NP Single family residential, Art studio, Administrative/business offices, Limited restaurant Single family residential, Professional offices, Religious assembly, Urban farm, Restaurant NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: Govalle-Johnston Terrace Combined NP Area SCHOOLS: Govalle Elementary School Martin Middle School Eastside Memorial at Johnston High School TIA: N/A WATERSHED: Boggy Creek NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Homeless Neighborhood Association SELTexas Preservation Austin Del Valle Community Coalition Claim Your Destiny Foundation Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation Del Valle Community Coalition El Concilio Mexican American Neighborhoods African American Cultural Heritage District Govalle/Johnston Terrace Neighborhood Plan Contact Team AREA CASE HISTORIES: AISD Austin Innercity Alliance Neighbors United for Progress Sierra Club Bike Austin PODER Friends of Northeast Austin Black Improvement Association East Austin Conservancy United East Austin Coalition NUMBER C14-201— 0031 Springdale Farms REQUEST COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CS-MU-CO-NP to CS-MU-CO-NP, to change a condition of zoning (Remove Restaurant (General), Restaurant (Limited), Convenience Retail, and Art 7/9/2019: To grant as recommended, on consent 8/8/2019: To grant as recommended, on consent 4 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 5 C14-2014- 0123 Springdale Farm Workshop from the list of prohibited uses; add a limit of 20 d.u./ac. CS-MU-CO-NP to CS-MU-CO-NP, to change a condition of zoning (to add Outdoor Entertainment as permitted use). Request amended to include: < 2,000 vehicle trips per day; allow Outdoor Entertainment. Hours for Outdoor Entertainment land use shall be limited to the following: Friday and Saturday: 10:00 AM-11:00 PM; Sunday through Thursday: 11:00 AM-10 PM. Outdoor Entertainment prohibited within 80 feet from used or zoned SF properties. Max 30 Outdoor Entertainment events/year. Prohibited land uses: Alternative Financial Services, Bail Bond Services, Pedicab Storage/Dispatch, and Guidance Services.: Hospital Services (General), Maintenance and Service Facilities, Art and Craft Studio (General), Automotive Rental, Automotive Repair Services, Automotive Sales, Automotive Washing (Of Any Type), Business or Trade School, Business Support Services, Campground, Commercial Blood Plasma Center, Commercial Off- Street Parking, Consumer Convenience Services, Consumer Repair Services, Convenience Storage, Drop-Off Recycling Collection Facility, Electronic Prototype Assembly, Equipment Repair Services, Equipment Sales, Limited Warehousing & Distribution, Exterminating Services, Community Recreation (Public & Private), Financial Services, Food Sales, Funeral Services, General Retail Sales (Convenience), General Retail Sales (General), Kennels, Laundry Services, Monument Retail Sales, Off-Site Accessory Parking, Outdoor Sports and Recreation, Pawn Shop Services, Personal Improvement Services, Personal Services, Pet Services, Research Services, Restaurant (Drive- In, Fast Food), Restaurant (Limited, General), Service Station, Theater, Vehicle Storage, Veterinary Services, Custom Manufacturing, Club or 10/28/2014: To grant CS- MU-CO-NP with the following changes: the maximum number of outdoor entertainment events per year shall not be a condition of zoning, and may be addressed at time of conditional use permit; outdoor entertainment events, including set-up, shall not begin before 3:00 p.m. on school days; and the Decibel limit at the property line shall be 75 db max. (8-0) 12/11/2014: ORD NO. 20141211-147 Approved adding the following conditions: No. of events/year: < 50 people – no limit; 51 to 150 people – no more than 22 events; 150+ people – no more than 5 events. Hours of Events: Monday – Thursday - 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.; Friday - 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; Saturday - 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; Sunday - 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. No events over 150 will be allowed after 5:00 p.m. Amplified Sound Only permitted for 20 events of between 51 and 150 people, all other events are not amplified. Hours of amplified sound: Sunday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. All sounds are limited to no more than 75 decibels. No amplified sound will be permitted during the last five days of “Spring Festival Season” as defined in 9-2-1(12)S. Location of Events: No events are held within 80 feet from any property zoned or used for 5 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 6 Lounge, College and University Facilities, Congregate Living, Residential Treatment, Transitional Housing, Transportation Terminal, Hotel-Motel, Indoor Entertainment, and Indoor Sports and Recreation. SF-3-NP to GR-MU-NP (not recommended by Staff) C14-2017- 0090.SH Springdale Arts single family residential. 11/20/2014: Approved on 1st reading only (5-1-1) 02/15/2018: To grant GR-MU-CO-NP as rec by PC, Ord. 20180215-064 12/12/2017: To grant GR- MU-CO-NP (11-0). Conditions: NTA, Drive- in services prohibited; 8’ privacy fence & 25’veg. buffer on north property line; Max 3 stories/40’ height; Max 40% Comm’l uses; SF-5 and less intense uses only within 75 feet of the north property line; prohibited uses: Funeral svs, Pawn shop svs, Bail bond svs, Auto repair svs, Auto washing (of any type), Outdoor entertainment, Hospital svs (general), Residential treatment, Med offices > 5,000 sf, Restaurant (general), Service station, Exterminating svs, Alt financial svs, Auto rentals, Auto sales, Drop- off recycling collection facility Outdoor sports and rec, Hospital services (ltf), Hotel-motel, Offsite accessory parking, Restaurant (ltd), Theater EXISTING STREET CHARACTERISTICS: 6 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 7 OTHER STAFF COMMENTS: ENVIRONMENTAL 1. The site is not located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The site is located in the Boggy Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as an Urban Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City's Land Development Code. 2. Zoning district impervious cover limits apply in the Urban Watershed classification. 3. According to floodplain maps there is a floodplain within or adjacent to the project location. Based upon the location of the floodplain, offsite drainage should be calculated to determine whether a Critical Water Quality Zone exists within the project location. 4. Standard landscaping and tree protection will be required in accordance with LDC 25-2 and 25-8 for all development and/or redevelopment. 5. At this time, site specific information is unavailable regarding vegetation, areas of steep slope, or other environmental features such as bluffs, springs, canyon rimrock, caves, sinkholes, and wetlands. 6. This site is required to provide on-site water quality controls (or payment in lieu of) for all development and/or redevelopment when 8,000 s.f. cumulative is exceeded, and on site control for the two-year storm. SITE PLAN SP 1. Site plans will be required for any new development other than single-family or duplex residential. SP 2. Any development which occurs in an SF-6 or less restrictive zoning district which is located 540 feet or less from property in an SF-5 or more restrictive zoning district will be subject to compatibility development regulations. SP 3. Any new development is subject to Subchapter E. Design Standards and Mixed Use. Additional comments will be made when the site plan is submitted. SP 4. FYI: Additional design regulations will be enforced at the time a site plan is submitted. SP 5. The site is subject to compatibility standards. Along the northeast, northwest, and southwest SF-3-NP property lines, the following standards apply:  No structure may be built within 25 feet of the property line.  No structure in excess of two stories or 30 feet in height may be constructed within 50 feet of the property line.  No structure in excess of three stories or 40 feet in height may be constructed within 100 feet of the property line.  No parking or driveways are allowed within 25 feet of the property line.  A landscape area at least 25 feet wide is required along the property line. In addition, a fence, berm, or dense vegetation must be provided to screen adjoining properties from views of parking, mechanical equipment, storage, and refuse collection.  For a structure more than 100 feet but not more than 300 feet from property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive, height limitation is 40 feet plus one foot for each 10 feet of distance in excess of 100 feet from the property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive. (use 540’ radius)  An intensive recreational use, including a swimming pool, tennis court, ball court, or playground, may not be constructed 50 feet or less property in an SF-5 or more 7 of 29B-7C14-2019-0089 8 restrictive zoning district.  A landscape area at least 25 feet in width is required along the property line if the tract is zoned LR, GO, GR, L, CS, CS-1, or CH. SP 6. The site is subject to 25-2 Subchapter F. Residential Design and Compatibility Standards. TRANSPORTATION TR 1. A traffic impact analysis was not required for this case because the traffic generated by the proposed zoning does not exceed the threshold of 2,000 vehicle trips per day. The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan requires 74 feet of right of way for Shady Lane. Additional right-of- way shall be required at the time of subdivision and/or site plan. According to the ASMP, a protected bike lane has been recommended along Shady lane. The adjacent street characteristics are described in the table below: WATER UTILITY 1. The landowner intends to serve the site with City of Austin water and wastewater utilities. The landowner, at own expense, will be responsible for providing any water and wastewater utility improvements, offsite main extensions, utility relocations and or abandonments required by the land use. Water and wastewater utility plans must be reviewed and approved by the Austin Water Utility for compliance with City criteria. All water and wastewater construction must be inspected by the City of Austin. The landowner must pay the City inspection fee with the utility construction. The landowner must pay the tap and impact fee once the landowner makes an application for a City of Austin water and wastewater utility tap permit. INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW A: Zoning Map B. Aerial Exhibit C. Environmental Exhibit D. Valid Petition Request E. Correspondence F. Draft LDC Zoning Exhibit 8 of 29B-7P-NP PUD-NP C814-87-4RC. C14-98-0065 GR-MU-CO-NP 98-0063 VACANT REFINERY TRUCK TERMINAL SP-91-119C C814-2012-0128.SH PUD-NP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! GR-MU-CO-NP C14-2017-0156 ! ! C14-2017-0094 MF-4-NP ! ! ! ! SF-3-NP MOVING STORAGE COMP. CS-MU-CO-NP H80-09 SF-3-H-NP T R S E T N U G ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( SF-3-NP SF-3-NP D E R L A D G RIN P S ( SF-3-NP ( N TIO A T S B U E S LIC O P GO-MU-NP SF-3-NP P-NP SPC-01-0010C P-NP 96-0149 EXHIBIT A AUTO ! ! SF-3-NP RECYCLERY 98-0063 V A C A N T CS-NP APTS. GR-MU-NP E A E V MF-2-NP ( ( ( ( T O ( H C ( ( ( SF-3-NP ( ( ( L Y O N ( S R D ( ( ( ( E V L A L E S N A M ( ( ( ( ( ( N O E LIM ( ( ( ( ( SF-3-NP ( ( L L A C ( ( ( ( ( SF-3-NP ( TRACT 1 ( ( ( ( ! ! SF-3-NP ( ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ( ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ( ( ( ( ( C H U R C 98-0057 ( LR-MU-NP PIE CO. H ( ( MIL ( ( ( B U R ( N LN ( SF-3-NP ( ( TERMINAL GR-MU-NP ( ( P-NP C14-2011-0083 ( ( O T U A ( ( ( USED ( APPL. GR-NP ( ( ( T T S T E L L U G ( ( ( NPA-2007-0016.01 N Y L GR-MU-NP D A H S C14-2007-0080 CS-MU-CO-NP GR-NP 63-136 CONV. STR./ A P P A R E L S H P. B O L M R D CS-CO-NP ( ( TRACT 2 ( GR-MU-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP ( SF-3-NP ( ( ( ! ( C14-2017-0090 ! ( ( LO-MU-CO-NP ( ( ( SF-3-NP ( ( ( ( GLIS ( S M A C H ! U R ! C H ! ! ( ! *98-0057 N R ( SF-3-NP ( ! ! D ! ( ! C14-99-2061(RCT) C14-2014-0123 ! C14-2019-0031 ! ! NPA-2014-0016.02 ! CS-MU-CO-NP ! ( ( SF-3-NP ( ( G O N ! ( ( ( Z ( ALE ( SF-3-NP ( 98-0057 ( S S *98-0057 ! ! ( ( ( T ( ! ! SP-95-212C EQUIPT. CO. CS-CO-NP ( ! ! E V ( L A ! ! L E S ! N A M ( ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72-318 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! RESTAURANT GOODWILL IND. ( ( SF-3-NP FARM EQUIPT. ! ! !! ( ! ! ( ! ! ( ! ! ( ( ( P-NP SF-3-NP LO-CO-NP C14-01-0101 LO-MU-NP RZ85-50 CS-CO-NP 59-134 P-NP A I R P O R T B L V D MH-NP LI-NP ( ( CS-MU-CO-NP 98-0057 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ( ( ( ! ! ( SF-3-NP ( ! ! ( ( ( ( T. S U P E Q UIP ! ! ! ! ! P L Y ! T. AIN M ! E 7 T ! CS-MU-V-CO-NP ! C14-2017-0140 NPA-2008-0016.01 C14-2007-0259 R O P S ! R N A ! T P . M O T C ! H S T ! ! ! LI-CO-NP GLIS S M A N R D SF-3-NP LR-MU-CO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP GR-MU-CO-NP ( CS-CO-NP ! ! ! CS-CO-NP O . C ( GR-MU-NP ( ( LI-CO-NP SP83-345C EQUIPMENT YARD USED SALES CS-MU-CO-NP NPA-2008-0016.01 C14-02-0093 C14-2007-0259 C14-2007-0259.001 NPA-2008-0016.02 CS-V-CO-NP SUBJECT TRACT ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE ZONING BOUNDARY ZONING ZONING CASE#: C14-2019-0098 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. NPA-2008-0016.01 C14-2007-0259 CS-V-CO-NP G. D L T B N A C VA CS-CO-NP NPA-2009-0016.02 C14-2009-0083 CS-MU-CO-NP ( ± 1 " = 400 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Created: 9/24/2019 9 of 29B-73 4 2 1 D E R L A D G RIN P S 1B 1A 3A 1 2 3 4 5 6 T R S E T N U G L22 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 9 LYONS RD 5 7 6 1 16 15 12 11 10 4 L A D G RIN P S 1 2 3 5 5A 5B 5C 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 1 4-A ± 1'' = 400' 1 D E R 1 2 2 3 4 GLIS 3 S 3 2 1 MILB U R 4 5 5 6 6 4 8 M A 5 N R 6 D 7 7 8 9 8 9 7 8 9 E V L A L E S N A M 3 2 1 1 G O 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 10 8 9 9 10 12 7 6 8 11 12 14 15 11 13 6 7 2 2 3 4 5 N Z A L E S S T 1 E 7 T H S T 1 1 1 1 SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE CREEK BUFFER 3 4 5 2 1 B O L M R D 7 8 6 C H O T E A V E 6 4 5 3 2 15 1 14 13 10 11 12 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 7 8 6 5 6 9 9 1-A N L N 7 8 1-B A 1 L L E S E N V A A M 10-A 9 11 10 9 11-A 3 8 1 2 6 5 4 3 5 6 N O 4 E LIM 5 7 7 8 9 10 11 L L A C 8 9 10 6 7 10 8 9 11 LY O N S R 12 D 2-A 1-A 12 13 12 11 13 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 4 5 1 2 2 3 3 24 23 T T S T E L L U G 19 20 18 24 23 22 21 4 3 2 17 16 14 15 1 L21 C14-2019-0098 N Y L D A H S 1 3A A I R P O R T B L V D EXHIBIT B N Y L D A H S 1 1 2 B O L M R D A I R P O R T B L V D 6 5 4 3 1 2 3 GLIS 2 S 1 M A 4 N R D 3 1 2 1 2 B R T S E D R N P O VA M P E A AIR O L R T Copyright nearmap 2015 1 1 2 3 N Y L D A H S 1 2 A SHADY LANE MIXED USE ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C14-2019-0098 914 SHADY LANE 4.13 Acres L21 Heather Chaffin This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 10 of 29B-7CS-NP GR-MU-NP E L A D G RIN P S D R MF-2-NP E V E A T O H C P-NP Multiple Use PUE PUE PUE MULTIPLE USE PUE PUE MULTIPLE PUE USE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE ACCESS ACCESS LR-MU-NP MILB U R N L N SF-3-NP GLIS S M A N R D SF-3-NP CS-MU-CO-NP E V L A L E S N A M SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP G O N Z A L E S S T CS-MU-V-CO-NP SF-3-NP ELECTRIC P-NP SF-3-NP L Y O N S R D E V L A L E S N A M SF-3-NP N O E LIM L L A C SF-3-NP GR-MU-CO-NP B OLM R D EXHIBIT C CS-MU-CO-NP GR-MU-NP GR-NP T T S T E L L U G GR-NP CS-CO-NP PUE SF-3-NP PUE MULTIPLE USE PUE L21 PUE PUE MULTIPLE USE DRAINAGE C14-2019-0098 GR-MU-NP DRAINAGE PUE PUE PUE N Y L D A H S PUE SF-3-NP PUE DRAINAGE MULTIPLE USE PUE MH-NP A I R P O R T B L V D P-NP LO-MU-NP CS-CO-NP SF-3-NP LO-CO-NP GLIS S M A N R D CS-CO-NP LR-MU-CO-NP CS-MU-CO-NP SF-3-NP CS-CO-NP CS-CO-NP GR-MU-CO-NP GR-MU-NP SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY Utility Easements CREEK BUFFER Shady Lane Mixed Use ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C14-2019-0098 914 Shady Lane 4.13 Acres L21 Heather Chaffin FULLY DEVELOPED FLOODPLAIN ± 1'' = 250' This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 11 of 29B-7EXHIBIT D 12 of 29B-713 of 29B-714 of 29B-715 of 29B-716 of 29B-717 of 29B-718 of 29B-7C H O T E A V E E V L A L E S N A M B OLM R D T T S T E L L U G A I R P O R T B L V D N O E LIM L L A C LY O N S R D MIL B U R N LN GLISSMAN RD E V L A L E S N A M Y LN D A H S GLIS S M A N R D G O N Z A L E S S T ± BUFFER PROPERTY_OWNER SUBJECT_TRACT PETITION Case#: C14-2019-0098 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 200 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 19 of 29B-7EXHIBIT E 20 of 29B-721 of 29B-722 of 29B-7From: Rachel Bockheim Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 11:51 AM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: SUNYONG CHUNG; Tim Murphy; Philippe Klinefelter; Meredith Gardner Subject: Re: city recommended zoning, still the same? Hi Heather, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As you know, we would prefer to see the property remain SF-3, and remain a farm. I have not heard from Rainlily since they told us they would go back to the drawing board and come back to us. Without hearing anything, we have met as neighbors (many times) to discuss the neighborhood needs and possible compromises in the inevitability it can’t maintain as SF3. Since Rainlily has not followed up since September, I thought you may want to hear what we would be OK with considering as a compromise. We hear from you (and Rainlily) that Shady Lane is part commercial, and that justifies thinking they could get that zoning. The majority of the property is not along Shady Lane, it’s along Boggy Creek and in a residential, SF, neighborhood. We believe if any non residential zoning is granted, the tract requesting CS or LR zoning should be cut off to match the neighboring properties back reach. You can see where their house is already boxed out the Zoning map provided, Tract 2 should end there. (Drawing attached) If you will be recommending the LR zoning, we would really like to see you consider ending Tract 2 to keep it along Shady Lane. Please see the attached map. The pink represents SF houses bordering their property. The green marker suggests possible new cut off areas for Tract 2. We believe this would be a more acceptable compromise to consider. Let us know your thoughts. Thank you for keeping us involved! Rachel Bockheim 312.560.1799 CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 23 of 29B-724 of 29B-7On May 19, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Alice Glasco < > wrote: Daniel, Please see our responses in blue below. Thank you for the opportunity to offer comments. ========================= Alice Glasco, President Alice Glasco Consulting 512-231-8110 W 512-626-4461 C Email: From: Daniel Llanes < Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 10:27 AM To: Alice Glasco < Cc: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Sun Yong Chong Potter/artist compound < >; Rachel Bockheim < Subject: RainLily Farm - NPA-2019-0016.01_914 Shady Ln - Compromise proposal Hi Alice, Here is the finalized compromise proposal for your consideration. Please let us know if this is acceptable to you and your client. thanks, Daniel Llanes, Chair G/JTNP Contact Team 512-431-9665 ==================================== Subject: Rainlily proposal, final LR tract ( LR-MU-NP is acceptable as agreed to at the March 7th contact team meeting) 1. Minimum 8' tall opaque fence to block out vehicular traffic lights, reduce noise and to provide visual screening on the North property line (which is in the creek, therefore we'd want the fence to be on the top of the North side of the creek. Acceptable 2. Vegetative Buffer (that meets City criteria) in the 25' setback. We love plants and want them to be an integral part of the development of the land, however, due to 25 of 29B-7the numerous public utility easements straddling the entire site, we prefer not to make this a condition of zoning in case there are conflicts with other city restrictions that we may not know at this time but would find out during the site plan stage. 3. Vegetative Buffer (that meets City criteria) along the creek side (North side), along the fence. We love plants and want them to be an integral part of the development of the land, however, due to the numerous public utility easements straddling the entire site, we prefer not to make this a condition of zoning in case there are conflicts with other city restrictions that we may not know at this time but would find out during the site plan stage. 4. no service station. Acceptable 5 no ATM or Post Box that opens 24hrs, or 24hr. convenience store like 7/11. Acceptable as long as the city can enforce the restrictions as a conditional overly or a city-enforced restrictive covenant under city code definitions. 6. no consumer convenience conditional overlay. Acceptable 7. require 100% of the parking space. Not acceptable 8. no general retail stores (like BestBuy) -- they won't have the space for this but just in case. Acceptable 9. limit the height of the building to same as SF6. Not acceptable – LR building height is 40 feet or 3 stories while SF-6 is 35 feet (3 stories). SF-6 tract ( SF-6-NP is acceptable as agreed to at the March 7th contact team meeting) 1. Minimum 8' tall opaque fence to block out vehicular traffic lights, reduce noise and to provide visual screening on the North property line (which is in the creek, therefore we'd want the fence to be on the top of the North side of the creek. Acceptable 2. Vegetative Buffer (that meets City criteria) along the creek side (North side), along the fence. We love plants and want them to be an integral part of the development of the land, however, due to the numerous public utility easements straddling the entire site, we prefer not to make this a condition of zoning in case there are conflicts with other city restrictions that we may not know at this time but would find out during the site plan stage. SF-3 tract ( SF-6-NP is preferable as agreed to at the March 7th contact team meeting) no requests SF-3 is not acceptable, due to the unique and difficult shape of the lot, as explained by our engineer at the contact team meetings. The property is very large, but not able to 26 of 29B-7be made into flag lots. We are not seeking, nor would it be feasible to do more than 6 duplex units. We are seeking SF-6 only to deal with the unusual lot, and not for maximum density of SF-6. It is the only way we can add more than one structure for the giant space. It was a big surprise to us that this changed back, after the other comprises that we made. Our desire is to meet halfway, so that everyone gets some of what they want. 27 of 29B-7GR-INLI-CC NP C S-l;. U-r',-rlrl-N? t\l P su:,lc; ,..'r- '^' l -l p=nou.r,r *.sF l\ L\ 1- j zrirrrrrue sc,. rNreav / :=. \ CS+C'!NP ZONING zoNlNG CASE*: c14-20rs-0098 riin3 e{rc:.ca n-rr rrr i3!e La y;}:.e..orr rE ilr&re i!j. r.!r! ft d.6 .{t e..is.r{ ,i ,r'rci-,c., -* s;.er a,:.: ."r'ae"ts <".i te -r.::xrcl Erqi.t eo!-a*s e slr e?ce rJrr€. ..r.r, !i!e rerore a€:k -^..1F'}rj.:nrs:r#.}lJ:e3lricTMk-lE:.,"'nF6.d!+=,n.t'c!etr...,:36 ir:i :re :l i; ot A!.ln r€.inng sFetn. icclriir; s c.n.lerr€:t ai yrt€rt, N.li6. Created:3D{J20rg 28 of 29B-7EXHIBIT F 29 of 29B-7