B-01 (NPA-2019-0015.01 - 5010 & 5102 Heflin Lane; District 1) — original pdf

Backup

Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan DATE FILED: July 31, 2019 May 26, 2020 5010 & 5102 Heflin Lane 5010 & 5102 Heflin Lane January 14, 2020 NPA-2019-0015.01 NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: CASE#: PROJECT NAME: PC DATES: ADDRESS/ES: DISTRICT AREA: SITE AREA: APPLICANT/OWNER: AGENTS: TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation Approx. 5.11 acres 1 Ron Thrower, Thrower Design Heflin Phase I LLC Base District Zoning Change Related Zoning Case: C14-2020-0022 From: Single Family To: High Density Single Family From: SF-4A-NP To: SF-6-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: November 7, 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Pending Previous Actions: January 14, 2020 – Indefinite postponement on the consent agenda at the request of the applicant. Close the Public Hearing and approve the consent agenda.– J. Thompson -- 1st;C. Kenny -- 2nd Vote: 9 -0-3 [J. Shieh recused himself from this case. C. Llanes Pulido off the dais. A. Azhar; C. Hempel; P. Seeger were absent.] May 26, 2020 – Postponement at the request of the staff to June 9, 2020 on the consent agenda. Close the Public Hearing and approve the consent agenda.– C. Hempel -- 1st; R. Schneider -- 2nd Vote: 12-0-1 [J. Shieh recused himself from this case. F. Kazi recused himself from item B. 10. C. Llanes-Pulido was absent.] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends -- High Density Single Family 1 NPA-2019-0015.01 1 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a ‘High Density Single Family’ future land use category because it would be compatible with residential housing adjacency; provide owner occupied infill housing along with a public amenity (a pocket park); and is supported by housing policies and text found in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan, and the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint. Below are policies excerpted from the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan that supports infill housing and small-lot single family housing in this portion of the planning area, which specifically calls out Heflin Lane to allow a mix of residential types and small lot single family housing. Goal 1: Preserve established residential areas and improve opportunities for home ownership by promoting the rehabilitation of existing housing and new, infill housing compatible with the existing style of this neighborhood. (pg. 44). Objective 1.2: Promote new infill housing in appropriate locations. Goal 5: Provide housing that helps to maintain the social and economic diversity of residents. (pg. 45) Objective 5.1: Allow a mix of residential types on larger tracts having access to major roadways. (pg. 45) Action 44: Allow mixed residential and small-lot single-family on the large vacant parcel off of MLK Blvd. and Heflin. (pg. 67) In conclusion, staff believes that the proposed condominium project would provide new owner-occupied infill and missing middle housing in this portion of the planning area, which is supported by policies within the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan. Below are additional policies and text that are excerpted from the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan that supports a change from Single Family to High Density Single Family on the Future Land Use Map: Stonegate/Oaklawn Recommendations: The priority for the Stonegate/Oaklawn area is to promote compatible infill development that will help stabilize the residential areas. Larger properties in the interior of the neighborhood can be developed as small-lot single family, although many of these properties have flood plain issues that need to be addressed. The large, undeveloped properties with access to MLK Blvd should be developed with a mix of residential uses, while allowing mixed use at the intersections with Springdale and Tannehill. Mixed use should also be encouraged on the 12th/Springdale/Webberville triangle, with consistent zoning that encourages more neighborhood-oriented commercial development. (p. 67( Action 40 - Maintain single-family zoning for the established residential areas. 2 NPA-2019-0015.01 2 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS – EXISTING AND PROPOSED Existing Land Use Single Family: Single family detached or two family residential uses at typical urban and/or suburban densities. Purpose 1. Preserve the land use pattern and future viability of existing neighborhoods; 2. Encourage new infill development that continues existing neighborhood patterns of development; and 3. Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible business or industry and the loss of existing housing. Application 1. Existing single‐family areas should generally be designated as single family to preserve established neighborhoods; and 2. May include small lot options (Cottage, Urban Home, Small Lot Single Family) and two‐family residential options (Duplex, Secondary Apartment, Single Family Attached, Two‐Family Residential) in areas considered appropriate for this type of infill development. Applicant’s Proposed Land Use Higher Density Single Family: Single‐family housing, generally up to 15 units per acre, which includes townhouses and condominiums as well as traditional small‐lot single family. Purpose 1. Provide options for the development of higher‐density, owner‐occupied housing in urban areas; and 2. Encourage a mixture of moderate intensity residential on residential corridors. Application 1. Appropriate to manage development on major corridors that are primarily residential in nature, and 2. Can be used to provide a buffer between high‐density commercial and low‐density residential areas. 3. Applied to existing or proposed mobile home parks. Staff Recommended Land Use: High Density Single Family - An area that is appropriate for infill and mixed residential housing, as supported by housing policies contained within the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan. IMAGINE AUSTIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This property is directly located off an Activity Corridor, according to the Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map. Staff believes the request to change this portion of the future land use map to ‘High Density Single Family’ use in the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan meets a number of policies in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, which supports a variety of housing types; affords realistic opportunities for transit, pedestrian travel; and provides both community gathering spaces, parks and safe outdoor play areas for children. LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION POLICIES LUT P4. Protect neighborhood character by directing growth to areas of change that includes designated redevelopment areas, corridors and infill sites. Recognize that different neighborhoods have different characteristics and new and infill development should be sensitive to the predominant character of these communities. 3 NPA-2019-0015.01 3 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 LUT P5. Create healthy and family-friendly communities through development that includes a mix of land uses and housing types and affords realistic opportunities for transit, bicycle, and pedestrian travel and provides both community gathering spaces, parks and safe outdoor play areas for children. HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD POLICIES HN P1. Distribute a variety of housing types throughout the City to expand the choices able to meet the financial and lifestyle needs of Austin’s diverse population. HN P5. Promote a diversity of land uses throughout Austin to allow a variety of housing types including rental and ownership opportunities for singles, families with and without children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and multi-generational families. HN P10. Create complete neighborhoods across Austin that have a mix of housing types and land uses, affordable housing and transportation options, and access to healthy food, schools, retail, employment, community services, and parks and recreation options. HN P11. Protect neighborhood character by directing growth to areas of change and ensuring context sensitive infill in such locations as designated redevelopment areas, corridors, and infill sites. HN P14. Strengthen planning processes by recognizing that the Comprehensive Plan and small- area plans, such as neighborhood plans, corridor plans, and station area plans, need to respect, inform, and draw from each other. Imagine Austin The subject property on Heflin Lane is located adjacent to the East Martin Luther King Boulevard Activity Corridor according to the Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map. Activity Corridors identify locations for additional people and jobs above what currently exists on the ground. These corridors are characterized by a variety of activities and types of buildings located along the roadway, and are intended to allow people to reside, work, shop, access services, people watch, recreate, and hang out without traveling far distances. Imagine Austin appears to support providing a variety of housing types throughout the City of Austin, especially along or near Activity Corridors and Centers, which this condominium project would provide. IMAGINE AUSTIN PLANNING PRINCIPLES 1. Create complete neighborhoods across Austin that provide a mix of housing types to suit a variety of household needs and incomes, offer a variety of transportation options, and have easy access to daily needs such as schools, retail, employment, community services, and parks and other recreation options.  The proposed high density residential owner occupied condominium project would provide a ‘missing middle’ housing type in the area and is located 400 feet away from a Cap Metro Transit stop. Public sidewalks are also located along both sides of the street. Commercial and civic uses (including a public golf course) are located along East Martin Luther King Boulevard (a major 4 NPA-2019-0015.01 4 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 roadway and an Imagine Austin Activity Corridor), which is located approximately 1,000 feet to the northwest of the subject property. 2. Support the development of compact and connected activity centers and corridors that are well-served by public transit and designed to promote walking and bicycling as a way of reducing household expenditures for housing and transportation.  The property is located 400 ft. from a CapMetro Transit stop on Heflin Lane. There are also public sidewalks located on both sides of Heflin Lane and additional transit options located on East Martin Luther King Boulevard, a nearby Activity Corridor, which is located approximately 1,000 feet walking distance from the subject property. 3. Protect neighborhood character by ensuring context-sensitive development and directing more intensive development to activity centers and corridors, redevelopment, and infill sites.  The proposed project would provide context sensitive owner occupied small lot single family housing, which is compatible in the planning area and supported by the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan. 4. Expand the number and variety of housing choices throughout Austin to meet the financial and lifestyle needs of our diverse population.  The proposed project calls for the development of 34 owner occupied market rate condo units, priced in the low $300Ks and supply a context sensitive missing middle housing type in the planning area. 5. Ensure harmonious transitions between adjacent land uses and development intensities.  While the proposed residential housing project would be located on lots that are smaller in size than most residential lots in the immediate vicinity, the proposed project would supply context sensitive missing middle housing type, which is supported by policies and text found in the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan, Imagine Austin and the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint. 6. Protect Austin’s natural resources and environmental systems by limiting land use and transportation development over environmentally sensitive areas and preserve open space and protect the function of the resource.  The developer’s agent agreed that all environmental regulations would be met regarding stormwater control and provide a much needed pocket park for the area. 7. Integrate and expand green infrastructure—preserves and parks, community gardens, trails, stream corridors, green streets, greenways, and the trails system—into the urban environment and transportation network.  The proposed development would include a trail, pocket park and playscape area, which would be open to the public. The applicant also wants to preserve many of the existing trees around the periphery of the site. 8. Protect, preserve and promote historically and culturally significant areas.  Not applicable 9. Encourage active and healthy lifestyles by promoting walking and biking, healthy food choices, access to affordable healthcare, and to recreational opportunities.  The proposed development would include a trail, pocket park and playscape area, which would be open to the public and is located adjacent to an Activity Corridor. 10. Expand the economic base, create job opportunities, and promote education to support a strong and adaptable workforce.  Not applicable 5 NPA-2019-0015.01 5 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 11. Sustain and grow Austin’s live music, festivals, theater, film, digital media, and new creative art forms.  Not applicable 12. Provide public facilities and services that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, decrease water and energy usage, increase waste diversion, ensure the health and safety of the public, and support compact, connected, and complete communities.  The project would include context sensitive missing middle housing and a pocket park, both which support Imagine Austin and contribute towards making the area a more complete community. Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint The following text and policies are excerpts from the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint, which discuss supporting the development of small houses on smaller lots and missing middle housing: The Blueprint includes goals for affordable housing in every City Council district to ensure that there is affordable housing throughout the city. It also includes goals for the construction of 60,000 housing units affordable to households at 80% median family income (MFI) and below, and another 75,000 units for households earning greater than 80% MFI broken into specific goals for households at different income levels. (pg. 2) Allow the Development of Smaller Houses on Smaller Lots: Land values are increasing in Austin, particularly in neighborhoods near Austin’s core. This is due to a number of factors, but most notably to more households valuing reduced distances between their work, home, and other destinations, which minimizes time spent in traffic. With increased demand for housing in central locations, land prices are likely to continue to rise. One potential way to enable more people to afford to live in these location-efficient areas is to make it easier to build smaller houses on smaller lots through land development code changes considered during the CodeNEXT process. This would help produce more housing choices that are generally more likely to be affordable than houses built on larger lots. Small lot regulations can be revised utilizing a context sensitive approach to require a higher level of design and improved compatibility with neighboring properties. Such regulations should take care to incentivize more affordable housing choices rather than fewer and preserving neighborhood character. (pg. 32) Increase Housing Diversity in New Subdivisions: New subdivisions (especially those in and around Imagine Austin Activity Centers and Corridors) also present an opportunity to increase housing diversity. Subdivision regulations should incentivize the development of a range of housing types, including missing middle housing and co-housing formats (where smaller housing units are organized around shared common space). The regulations should also incentivize a connected street grid and promote a range of more affordable transportation choices. These centers and corridors allow people to reside, work, shop, access services, and recreate without traveling far distances. (pg. 35) Missing Middle is the range of dwelling types between detached homes and mid-rise apartments. (pg. 48) 6 NPA-2019-0015.01 6 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 Future Lane Use Map 7 NPA-2019-0015.01 7 of 33B-01Imagine Austin Growth Concept Centers and Corridor Map and Cap Metro Transit Stops Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 8 NPA-2019-0015.01 8 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 FEMA Flood Plain and Aquifer Map 9 NPA-2019-0015.01 9 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 Photos 1 Subject property photos 2 Channeled drainage ditch on Heflin Lane, adjacent to the subject property 10 NPA-2019-0015.01 10 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 Property to the northwest Property to the northeast Property to the west Property to the east 11 Property to the south Property to the southwest NPA-2019-0015.01 11 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 BACKGROUND: The application was filed on July 31, 2019. The applicant proposes to change the land use on the future land use map (FLUM) from Single Family to High Density Single Family to build an owner occupied condominium project on this 5.11 acre parcel, which triggered a rezoning and neighborhood plan amendment request. Staff recommends a ‘High Density Single Family’ future land use category because it would it would be compatible with the residential adjacency to the north, south, east and west of the property; provide a public amenity (a propose pocket park and trail); provide much needed context sensitive missing middle infill housing, which is supported by policies and text in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint and the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan. The applicant proposes to change the zoning from SF-4A- NP (Single Family Residence Small Lot) to SF-6-NP (Townhouse and Condominium District) to construct 34 residential owner-occupied housing units. ================= PUBLIC MEETINGS: The ordinance required plan amendment meeting was held on November 20, 2020. Approximately 327 community meeting notices were mailed to property owner and renters located within 500 feet of the property, in addition to environmental and neighborhood organizations registered on the Community Registry. November 20, 2019 from 7 PM to 8 PM at the Willie Mae Kirk Library PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NUMBER: NPA-2019-0015.01 ZONING CASE NUMBER: C14-2020-0022 Representing the Developer: Michele R. Lynch (Agent) with Metcalf Wolff Stuart and Williams, James Shieh (Project Manager) and Joel Brock (Engineer) City Planner: Kathleen Fox, Senior Planner Audience Attendees: 15 This community meeting began at 7 PM. Ms. Fox briefly explained the neighborhood plan amendment process and what the definition of a Future Land Use Map was. The request is to amend a portion of the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan Future Land Use Map from Single Family to High Density Single Family to accommodate a zone change from SF-4A to SF-6 to build 34 condo units (duplex and single family). Ms. Lynch came forward and introduced James Shieh and Joel Brock. James Shieh (JS): He gave a power point presentation on the project and explained how project complied with many of goals of the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan. He explained how Heflin Lane was located off an Imagine Austin Activity Corridor. He discussed the measures that would be taken to contain water runoff from the site and showed the flood map for the area. The developer proposed to engineer the water control issue to conform to the FEMA flood plain map, which would be adopted in the 12 NPA-2019-0015.01 12 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 next two years. He discussed how the project would respect the easements and keep many of the existing trees on the site. In 2015, the NPA proposal for this same property proposed 45 to 50 condo units but the new proposal only calls for the construction of 34 residential units. He discussed how SF-6 zoning gave them more flexibility to place the units around the site, have larger buffers and preserve more of the existing trees. Each residential unit will have similar massing to existing houses in the neighborhood. The condo units will consist of single family and duplex houses, which will be two stories tall. For required greenspace, the project included a City of Austin parkland dedication, a playscape area, a trail and pedestrian connectivity from the adjoining residential streets. He showed how the property was a quarter of a mile from priority transit corridor. The proposed project would also include a playscape and a trail and a new pocket park, which would be maintained by this development. The development would also provide workforce housing, be family friendly and multigenerational. As for water quality, the project would be engineered to meet or exceed city requirements. The current zoning, SF-4A only requires a 10 foot rear setback while SF-6 would have a 25 foot setback for this project and thus be further away from the existing single family neighborhood. The developer also proposes to keep most of the large trees around the perimeter of the site. Audience Question: What trees would be protected on the site? JS: Those that are 18 inches or larger in size. Audience Question: Is the cul-de-sac to be open or closed which is adjacent to Elmsgrove Drive? JS: The cul-de-sac will only be accessible to emergency vehicles and be grassy. Audience Comment: We want a fence separating this project from Elmsgrove Drive and do not want a connection. JS: The proposed trail and park would be accessible via the cul-de-sac and the smaller houses on this site would have a more affordable price point. Joel Brock (JB). There are drainage and water quality issues in this area and lots of drainage on the site has to be mitigated. There will be a detention pond in the lowest part of the subject property and all water will be collected and treated onsite. Audience Comment: SF-4 would blend in better than townhomes in the area. This area used to flood all the time and the neighborhood is concerned the water will rush onto their properties from this new development. New development near Mueller is currently flooding onto Martin Luther King Boulevard. JS: The proposed project would have less impervious coverage than if it was zoned SF-4A. Our property is at a lower elevation than the properties on Woodmoor Drive. JB: He discussed how the detention pond would handle all the water on the site and how there would be three drains going to the pond. The earthen wall surrounding the detention pond would be part of the greenspace requirement. Audience Comment: They were concerned about the number of duplexes in the project and having them turn into short term rentals. JS: The project will have an HOA to make sure all the properties are taken care of. The price point of these homes will be in the low $300,000 and would consist of single family houses and duplexes, which were two stories tall. 13 NPA-2019-0015.01 13 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 Audience Question: Regarding the proposed neighborhood pocket park, which would be located near the Elmsgrove Drive cul-de-sac, could you move it? It’s too tucked away for public access. JS: He said he could see what he could do. Audience Question: Will a neighborhood traffic impact analysis be done? JS: He talked about the trips per day that trigger these standards. Audience Question: Will there be additional improvements be made on Heflin Lane? JS: He said he did not know. Ms. Lynch said they might get a crosswalk. Audience Question: What sort of assurances do we have that you are going to keep your promises regarding this project? JS: He explained how he was part of the design team and how the developer had already spent a lot of money designing to project and doing an engineering study on the site. Audience Question: What will the houses look like? JS: The houses have not been designed so far but they are looking at mid-century modern as a possibility. Audience Comment: They discussed how federal government officials came to their neighborhood years ago and said that the subject property was a prime watershed area and should never be developed. JS: He explained how SF-6 zoning would actually provide better protection from flooding than SF-4A zoning. Audience Comment: We don’t want to be discriminated against and taken advantage of. We have lived here for years. The community meeting adjourned at 8:03 PM. CITY COUNCIL DATE: July 31, 2020 ACTION: Pending. CASE MANAGER: kathleen.fox@austintexas.gov PHONE: 512-974-7877 EMAIL: kathleen.fox@austintexas.gov 14 NPA-2019-0015.01 14 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 15 NPA-2019-0015.01 15 of 33B-01K S U R T C RAYBURN LN Y LN R K N D ES R TRL SO DIM JA NALLY LN CO N N O R T H E W TO R D N O S HIN R LN E G E U R K C T U H D ALE R LE D HILLD A DR R ALE D TD S EA å THE EAST AUSTIN COLLEGE PREP AT MLK R D K O O R B I Y D N W LOVELL DR R R T D A D E OIN C P E B E R G L N L K NIGHTO WL LN GRASSLANDDR W A C L I R D E N E51S T S T GLESH OT SIN CIR H O W DE NCIR R D N O S D YHILL R A C SEABRO N B U R HILL D R MARLO D PECA N SPRINGS RD TO UCHSTO NE ST OCK TRL R RIM W ALW ORTHST R HILL D OK ST R L D HIL T R O F D L O R HILL D T E SS U R R D YOR K H ILL BU N DY HILL CI R D A O R B C14-2020-0022 E V O R R D W O O D ELMS G G S T A O T E N E D R D R M O OR S T O N E G A T E C I R D ALE R D G RIN SP E M A R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R B L V D E CIR DES O H R CLIFF CELE T S DR D R ASTOR PL E L M IR A R D C T F A I R P L A Y G L O M AR A V E M A R C U S P L å SIMS EL E 1 2 T H S T O AK B AN AV E DERA RD FIL EY CV S RE DO N DO D R O V E D R HILL R KITTY LESLIE AVE Y N N E P T S E N E R VE B E A RIBBECKEAVE V IL L E R R E B D B E W L O U I S A VE LL E S N VE A A M D L E I F T S A E E V A VE OLS A K NIC LIG HTFIELD LN D E L O R E S L O T T A V E LIG STA R HT TER AVE G R E B ST U SH MENDOZA DR R GE R ST BE N O S A M E V A H E FLIN L N A A B DIN ST A KER ST ST T T CO ROB S R D R E D N ME A D R E H C N U B N L T S E HILLCR D O W N S D R JACKIE R O BINSON ST ANCH R B T R O F D V L B E L E A N O R S T D E L A N O S T N L L E X A H U DS O N ST Imagine Austin Compliance Imagine Austin Compliance Zoning Case Case#: C14-2020-0022 5010 and 5102 Heflin Lane 5.11 acres TRACOR LN HILL LN E N N TA M H SA USTO å UEL N AVE NORMAN EL N I E T S E U L B D E B S D V L B N I E T S E U L B D E B N D V L B T E CH NI CENTER £¤183 Connectivity Legend 0.25 Mile Buffer DR 0.50 Mile Buffer å School U B L E STEIND PARD Recreational Facility R PARD Recreational Facility Capital Metro Bus Stops Capital Metro Bus Routes WILCAB PARD Existing Trails Bicycle Facilities City of Austin Parks Travis County Parks R D State of Texas Parks N I E T S E U L B D E B S D V L B N I E T S E U L B D E B S D V L B £¤183 F 5/14/2020 0 0.085 Miles 0.17 PLANNING AND ZONING Disclaimer: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the Planning and Zoning Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Document Path: G:\Projects_and_Programs\ImagineAustin\Compliance Review\Compliance maps\C1420200022.mxd 16 of 33B-01E MLK Planning Contact Team Recommendation Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 See the contact team recommendation on the next page 16 NPA-2019-0015.01 17 of 33B-0118 May 2020 To: Planning Commission and City Council Members Re: NPA-2019-0015.01 5010/5102 Heflin Lane The East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team (EMLK NPCT) takes a neutral position on the proposed FLUM change from Single Family Residential to Higher Density Single Family Residential. The NPCT voted 3 in favor, 5 neutral, during our May 18th meeting. The proposed development is generally consistent with the Neighborhood Plan, especially the following goals: • Goal One: “Preserve established residential areas and improve opportunities for home ownership by promoting the rehabilitation of existing housing and new, infill housing compatible with the existing style of this neighborhood.“ o The proposed mix of detached single family and duplex uses is consistent with neighborhood character. • Goal Eleven: “Protect and enhance the neighborhood through code enforcement, property maintenance activities, and by reducing trash and dumping in the neighborhood.” o This property has been neglected and the site of illegal activities and its development will both protect and enhance the neighborhood. • Goal One: “Create more public open space, including parks and green spaces, improve existing parks and increase recreational amenities in the neighborhood.“ o The proposed linear park along Fort Branch Creek will create green space, accessible to nearby residents, that makes use of one of our many creeks. However, the EMLK NPCT grows increasingly concerned that, because our meetings and city land use hearings are happening virtually and therefore require internet access, and because local libraries and other venues that serve as access portals for many are currently closed, not all of our residents can fully participate in this process. The majority of our members therefore voted “neutral,” believing that we cannot confidently support a plan amendment knowing that some of our members are unable to participate and vote using this platform. For the reasons listed above, the EMLK NPCT neither supports nor opposes the plan amendment request for the Property. Sincerely, Jon Hagar Chair, EMLK NPCT (512) 739-4101 18 of 33B-01Planning Commission hearing: June 9, 2020 Comments in Favor and Against NPA Proposal See the comments on the next pages 17 NPA-2019-0015.01 19 of 33B-0120 of 33B-01Fox, Kathleen Case Number: NPA-2019-0015.01 From: digestedbug . <chrislyons1@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 11:50 AM To: Subject: *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good morning Ms. Fox, I received a public hearing notification in the mail for a rezoning (NPA-2019-0015.01) and I am writing to comment in favor of the rezoning. The project location is 5010 and 5102 Heflin Lane. I live directly behind the location at 5103 Woodmoor Dr. I am in favor of this project upzoning because I believe the upzoning will allow more people to live in the area, which is good for the city of Austin as a whole, preventing costly sprawl. I also hope that increased density will bring more services and commercial opportunities to the area. Right now, there is nothing walkable to my home. Every resident is forced to drive to the grocery store, to the pharmacy, to anything. I also hope that the redevelopment of this property will increase connectivity to my street. This property came up for development a few years ago and I attended the hearing that was held for the neighbors back then. The presentation included details about the planned connectivity with my street (Woodmoor/Stonegate.) I was, and am, very enthusiastic for a connection with Heflin Ln. My street, Woodmoor, runs in a U shape. The only access to my street is from Webberville Rd. If a connection to Heflin opened up because of this development that would save so much time and distance every single day. It would allow me to be able to walk or bike comfortably to so many more areas. A compact and connected city is one of the main goals of Imagine Austin and I see this as a great opportunity to advance the welfare of our community. Thank you for considering my input as a close future neighbor of this development. Chris Lyons 5103 Woodmoor Dr Austin, TX 78721 512-903-5973 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 21 of 33B-0122 of 33B-0123 of 33B-0124 of 33B-0125 of 33B-0126 of 33B-0127 of 33B-0128 of 33B-0129 of 33B-0130 of 33B-0131 of 33B-0132 of 33B-0133 of 33B-01