B-11 Revised (C814-2018-0121 - 218 S. Lamar; District 5) — original pdf

Backup

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C814-2018-0121 -- 218 South Lamar DISTRICT: 5 ZONING FROM: CS-V TO: PUD ADDRESS: 218 South Lamar Boulevard Southbound SITE AREA: 1.260 Acres PROPERTY OWNER: Michael Pfluger, William Reid Pfluger & the Pfluger Spousal Irrevocable Trust, Reid Pfluger- Trustee AGENT: Drenner Group, PC (Amanda Swor) CASE MANAGER: Heather Chaffin (512-974-2122; heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the Applicant’s request for PUD zoning on the property, with the addition of a public restrictive covenant (RC) to attach the Transportation Mitigation Memo (Exhibit G). For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 4 & 5. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: December 4, 2019: TO RECOMMEND THE PUD REZONING AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF (9-1-1). [K. Coyne- 1st, R. Nill- 2nd, P. Thompson- Nay, P. Maceo- Abstained] SMALL AREA PLANNING JOINT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: December 11, 2019: TO RECOMMEND THE PUD REZONING AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF (5-1). [J. Thompson- 1st, C. Hempel; D. King- Nay, P. Howard- Absent] SAPJC RECOMMENDATION INCLUDES A RECOMMENDATION TO MAXIMIZE AFFORDABILITY FOR LOWER MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME RANGES. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: May 14, 2020: March 24, 2020: MEETING CANCELLED February 25, 2020: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO MARCH 24, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY NEIGHBORHOOD, ON CONSENT. January 28, 2020: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO JANUARY 14, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY STAFF, ON CONSENT. January 14, 2020: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO JANUARY 14, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY STAFF, ON CONSENT. December 17, 2019: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO JANUARY 14, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY STAFF, ON CONSENT. B-11Revised1 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: June 4, 2020: April 23, 2020: MEETING CANCELLED March 26, 2020: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO APRIL 23, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY STAFF, ON CONSENT. February 6, 2020: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO MARCH 26, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY STAFF, ON CONSENT. January 23, 2019: TO GRANT POSTPONEMENT TO FEBRUARY 6, 2020 AS REQUESTED BY STAFF, ON CONSENT. ORDINANCE NUMBER: B-11Revised2 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 3 ISSUES: A site plan is currently under review for the subject property (City File # SP-2019-0297C). During the review, it was determined that vehicular access to South Lamar would be modified and no longer match the TIA. ATD has reviewed the proposed changes and has prepared an updated TIA memorandum, which is attached to this report. Please refer to Exhibit G- Traffic Mitigation Memorandum. A petition has been filed in opposition to this rezoning request. The petition includes 17.79% of eligible signatures and does not meet the threshold for a Valid Petition. Please refer to Exhibit N- Petition Request. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: Existing Conditions. The subject property is a 1.260 acre lot at the northwest corner of South Lamar Boulevard Southbound and Toomey Road. The property is zoned CS-V and is currently developed with a Schlotzsky’s restaurant. The property is located in the Butler Shores subdistrict of the Waterfront Overlay. Immediately to the north and west of the property are City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) park and related facilities including ZACH Theatre facilities, the People’s Plaza, and PARD offices. The PARD property is primarily zoned P-Public except for small portions that are zoned CS and CS-1. Across Toomey Road to the south is the Cole Building, a mixed use building with apartments, restaurant, retail, and other pedestrian- oriented land uses. Further south are properties zoned CS and CS-V with a mix of commercial uses including hotel, retail, and more. Southwest of the rezoning tract are properties with a mix of commercial uses including City offices and facilities. East of the subject property, across Lamar Boulevard, are properties zoned CS-1 and CS that are developed with a Bridges on the Park condominiums and a mix of commercial uses including personal services, retail, and more. Northeast of the proposed rezoning tract at the southeast corner of Riverside Drive and South Lamar Boulevard Northbound is 211 South Lamar, also known as Taco PUD. Please refer to Exhibits A and B – Zoning Map and Aerial Exhibit. The focus of the Applicant’s request is to increase the maximum building height from 60’ to 96’. Most properties along this stretch of South Lamar Boulevard have CS base zoning like this site, and therefore are limited to 60’ of building height. Exceptions include the Topher Theatre and the 211 South Lamar PUD. An ordinance was passed in 2008 (Ord. No. 20080724-82) to create a height exception up to 80’for fly towers associated with a public performing arts theater. In Part 3 of that ordinance, City Council directed the City Manager to not consider the height of a fly tower granted a height exemption under the ordinance as a factor in any recommendation regarding height entitlements for structures in the surrounding area. In 2013 City Council approved the PUD ordinance for 211 South Lamar (Ord. No. 20131017- 052), which approved 96’ in height for a residential/mixed use building. In 2019, Council approved an ordinance amending the PUD, but the permitted height remained unchanged (Ord. No. 20191017-079). The amendment at 211 South Lamar was to change to a hotel/mixed use building. Existing Overlays. As stated above, the property is in the Butler Shores subdistrict of the Waterfront Overlay (WO). The subdistrict establishes design standards and permitted land uses that are more restrictive than the base zoning category. For example, although the property is currently zoned CS-V, at least 50% of the first floor of any development is limited to eleven land uses that are considered pedestrian-oriented. As part of the PUD request, the Applicant states that B-11Revised3 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 4 the requirements of the WO are the special circumstances that affect the site, since the site is less than 10 acres. Please refer to Exhibit C – Waterfront Overlay Regulations. The property also currently is subject to the Vertical Mixed Use (V or VMU) overlay. This allows increased development intensity on a site if certain conditions are met, but VMU does not allow increased height. Transportation. Under City Code, South Lamar Boulevard is designated as a Core Transit Corridor. South Lamar has also been designated as a Level 3 roadway in the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP). The ASMP also identifies this area of South Lamar as a Transit Priority Network, Bicycle Priority Network, and Vehicle Priority Network. The Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan (IACP) identifies this corridor as a Growth Concept Corridor. These designations reflect the role of South Lamar as a major roadway that is anticipated to experience continued growth and establishes prioritized improvements for the corridor. Draft Land Development Code. The current draft Code Identifies this property with a MU5A Corridor zoning designation. Mixed-Use 5A (MU5A) zone is intended to allow high-intensity multi-unit residential, office, service, retail, and entertainment uses. The Bridges on the Park across Lamar are also designated as MU5A and other properties south between Toomey Road and Barton Springs Road are designated MS3 Main Street Zone district. Main Street 3 (MS3) zone is intended to provide housing and convenient access to services and amenities for nearby residents in a high-intensity urban main street environment with active frontages located in regional centers, or along well-connected corridors served by frequent transit. Please refer to Exhibit D- Draft Proposed LDC. Proposed Rezoning. The Applicant is requesting PUD zoning to allow redevelopment of the property with an office building with mixed pedestrian-oriented uses on the ground floor. In brief, the Applicant is requesting to: • Increase the maximum building height from 60’ height to 96’; elevator equipment can exceed height by 20% (15% per code) • Reduce all ground floor building setbacks to 0’. The existing CS base zoning district requires a 10’ front and street side yard setback. Different setbacks for building above ground floor to be determined. • Add administrative/business offices as ground floor pedestrian oriented use; administrative/business office use not to exceed 50% of ground floor uses The Applicant is proposing the following items to meet Tier 1 and Tier 2 PUD requirements: • The rooftop deck would be made available by reservation to local non-profits. • 3-star Green Building • Street yard landscaping will exceed minimum code requirements by 35%. Landscape area soil depth will exceed minimum code requirements by 6 inches. • Landscaping will use native/adaptive species as identified by City staff • Contribute a minimum of $20,000 (not to exceed $27,800) toward a planned Capital Metro bus stop upgrade adjacent to the site and $25,000 toward bike track • Enhance supplemental zones along Lamar including 7’ planting zone, 10’ bike track, and 15’ landscape /sidewalk zone • 42 caliper inches of trees • Adopt an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan B-11Revised4 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 5 • 8,000 square foot public plaza at street level • Provide onsite Art in Public Spaces- applicant will provide an 1,000 square foot artist gallery free of charge to a local nonprofit. The gallery will be provided adjacent to the plaza space. • Provide a direct pedestrian connection between this site and the PARD-owned park and related facilities to the north and west • Exceed bike parking by 120% • Provide electric vehicle parking spaces in parking garage • No surface level parking, all subgrade parking • No onsite residential will be provided; the property owner will pay a fee-in-lieu toward housing in the area at a rate determined by Neighborhood Housing and Conservation Department (NHCD) • Participate in purple pipe reclaimed water system when available; double piping until then • Four ADA accessible shower facilities • Parking on this site will be a community benefit by adding parking for nearby park and theater users. This will not be free or reserved, it will be regular paid parking. Tables drafted by the Applicant that outline these proposed conditions are attached. Please refer to Exhibits E and F- PUD Waterfront Overlay Variances Table and Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Exhibit. Transportation Impact. As stated above, South Lamar has also been designated in several Council-adopted planning and regulatory documents as a major roadway that is anticipated to experience continued growth. These plans establish prioritized improvements for the corridor. As part of the rezoning request, the Applicant has prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that has been reviewed by City Staff. Staff has outlined a plan for the Applicant to provide onsite transportation improvements and pay monies toward nearby, off-site improvements. The Applicant has agreed to these conditions of zoning. Please refer to Exhibit G- Traffic Mitigation Memorandum. Affordable Housing Fee-in-Lieu. The Applicant has agreed to terms approved by NHCD: A. Dwelling units equal to not less 10 percent of the bonus area devoted to a residential rental use shall be leased on an ongoing basis to households earning no more than 60 percent of the median family income for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area for a period not less than 40 years from the date a final certificate of occupancy is issued for the property. The property owner shall enter into a restrictive covenant with the City of Austin enumerating these requirements as necessary to ensure compliance with this provision. B. Dwelling units equal to not less than 5 percent of the bonus area devoted to a residential owner-occupied use shall be sold to income-eligible homebuyers earning no more than 80 percent of the median family income for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area. Each affordable owner-occupied unit shall be restricted by a fixed equity and resale agreement approved by NHCD for a period not less than 99 years from the date a final certificate of occupancy is issued for the property. If a condominium declaration will be filed for the property, NHCD shall have the right to review and insert provisions related to the affordable units prior to filing. B-11Revised5 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 6 C. The property owner shall pay a fee-in-lieu of on-site affordable housing to NHCD not less than an amount equal to the planned unit development fee rate current at the time of site plan submittal times the bonus square footage devoted to non-residential use. D. NHCD shall have the right to establish additional guidelines and processes to ensure compliance with the affordability requirements applicable to the PUD. A site plan is under City review for construction of a 7-story office building with ground floor commercial uses and other amenities (SP-2019-0279C). Affordable housing fees will be calculated prior to site plan approval. Please refer to Exhibit H- NHCD Letter. Correspondence. Staff has received correspondence regarding the proposed rezoning. Please refer to Exhibit I- Correspondence. Other Exhibits. The final Staff Comment Review Report is attached, as well as the proposed Land Use Plan. Please refer to Exhibits J and K- Staff Comment Report and PUD Land Use Plan. The Carbon Impact Statement prepared by the Applicant is attached but has not yet been evaluated by Staff in the Office of Sustainability. Also attached is the presentation made by Watershed Protection Staff to the Environmental Commission on December 4, 2019. Please refer to Exhibits L and M- Carbon Impact Statement and Environmental Commission Presentation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the requested PUD zoning with the addition of a public RC to attach the Transportation Mitigation Memo. The Applicant has agreed to this condition. The Butler Shores subdistrict of the Waterfront Overlay was established in the late 1990s. Since then, City Council has placed a high priority on densification of the central city to reduce traffic impacts of the continued growth. In 2013, City Council approved a height increase to 96’ for the nearby 211 South Lamar PUD. As stated above, South Lamar has also been designated in several Council-adopted planning and regulatory documents as a major roadway that is anticipated to experience continued growth. South Lamar Boulevard is designated as a Core Transit Corridor and a Level 3 roadway in the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP). The ASMP also identifies this area of South Lamar as a Transit Priority Network, Bicycle Priority Network, and Vehicle Priority Network. The Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan (IACP) identifies this corridor as a Growth Concept Corridor. These designations reflect the role of South Lamar as a major roadway that is anticipated to experience continued growth and establishes prioritized improvements for the corridor. As part of the rezoning request, the Applicant has agreed to participate in the corridor improvements, and the scale of the proposed development reflects the anticipated growth in the area. BASIS OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district 1. sought. Per the Land Development Code, the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district has been established to implement the goals of preserving the natural environment, encouraging high quality development and innovative design, and ensuring adequate public facilities and services. The City Council intends PUD district zoning to produce development that achieves these goals B-11Revised6 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 7 to a greater degree than and that is therefore superior to development under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations. The proposed PUD offers a development on the subject property that can create a mixed use space that connects South Lamar Boulevard to the Zach Theatre and PARD parkland. The PUD would provide a ground floor plaza adjacent to the park and streetscape improvements along Lamar. The PUD would provide pedestrian-oriented uses on the ground floor, upper story office uses, underground vehicular parking, charging stations for electric vehicles, landscaping with 100% native and adapted plants, rainwater harvesting, and more. In addition, the proposed PUD amendment supports affordable housing initiatives via a fee-in-lieu of onsite dwelling units. The development would contribute onsite and adjacent transportation benefits as well as contribute to offsite improvements. The development would achieve a 3-star rating under the Austin Green Building program, provide additional bike parking for tenants and others. Granting of the request should result in an equal treatment of similarly situated 2. properties. Height increases have been granted to the nearby 211 South Lamar (96’), as well as other properties that are located in other subdistricts of the Waterfront Overlay. The rezoning should be consistent with the policies and principles adopted by the City 3. Council or Planning Commission. As stated previously, the proposed rezoning is consistent with several policies and plans adopted by Planning Commission and City Council: Core Transit Corridor regulations; the ASMP, which identifies this area as a Transit Priority Network, Bicycle Priority Network, and Vehicle Priority Network. The Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan (IACP) identifies this corridor as a Growth Concept Corridor. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: Site North South CS CS-V P, CS-1 LAND USES ZONING Limited restaurant Public park, Performing arts center Multifamily, General restaurant, Personal services, Limited retail, Hotel, etc. Condominium residential, Personal services, Limited retail, etc. Public park, Performing arts center/support facilities East CS, CS-1 West P, CS NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: South Lamar Combined (Zilker) – Suspended AREA STUDY: Town Lake Corridor Study (1985) WATERFRONT OVERLAY: Butler Shores Subdistrict (Property is outside of primary and secondary setbacks) TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION: Required – Please refer to Attachment G- Traffic Mitigation Memorandum WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake – Urban B-11Revised7 of 89C814-2018-0121 Page 8 SCENIC ROADWAY: N/A CAPITOL VIEW CORRIDOR: N/A CORE TRANSIT CORRIDORS: South Lamar Boulevard SCHOOLS: Zilker Elementary School NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: 57 – Old Austin Neighborhood Association 127 – Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association 511 – Austin Neighborhoods Council 943 – Save Our Springs Alliance – Perry Grid 614 Bridges on the Park 1424 – Preservation Austin 1530 – Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Friends of Zilker 1616 – Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation AREA CASE HISTORIES: O. Henry Middle School Austin High School 107 – Zilker Neighborhood Association 498 – South Central Coalition 742 – Austin Independent School District 1074 – Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Planning Team 1107 1228 – Sierra Group, Austin Regional Group 1368 – 1363 – SEL Texas 1528 – Bike Austin 1550 – Homeless Neighborhood Association 1571 – 1596 – TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources NUMBER C814-2012-0160.01 211 S. Lamar C814-2012-0160 211 S. Lamar C14-2008-0060 – Zilker Vertical Mixed Use Building (V) Rezoning Opt-In/Opt Out Process REQUEST PUD to PUD, to amend conditions of zoning CS & CS-V to PUD Rezoning selected tracts with –V on 124 acres EXISTING STREET CHARACTERISTICS: Name Classification ROW 3 (ASMP) Local collector Yes Local collector Yes 120 feet Arterial / Level South Lamar Boulevard Toomey Road 50 feet Jessie Street 50 feet INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW A: Zoning Map B. Aerial Exhibit C. Draft Proposed LDC Exhibit D. Waterfront Overlay Regulations E. Waterfront Overlay Variances Table F. Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Exhibit G. Traffic Mitigation Memorandum COMMISSION 8-27-2019- Apvd with conditions- affordable housing fee-in-lieu 6-11-2013/ Apvd Apvd –V to certain tracts (73 acres) & an affordability level of 60% mfi for 10% of rental units in a VMU bldg CITY COUNCIL Apvd 10-17-2019 Apvd 10-17-2013 Apvd 10-16-2008 Sidewalks Yes Bicycle Route Yes Capital Metro (within ¼ mile) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes H. NHCD Letter I. Correspondence J. Staff Comment Report K. PUD Land Use Plan L. Carbon Impact Statement M. Environmental Commission Presentation N. Petition Request B-11Revised8 of 89BUTLER PARK 87-074 D V L R B A M A S L P-H H93-0005 EXHIBIT A C.O.A. OFFICE P.A.R.D. P SPC89-0143C 72-129 THEATER CS-1 P W RIVERSIDE DR T O O M E Y R D M/H C14-01-0177 7 7 1 01-0 MF-6-CO C14-07-0018 K R R.V. PA 07-0018 MOBILE HOMES CS C14-2008-0060 SPC89-0143C T. P E N D ATIO S E K R R C A E D R N A C.O.A. P ! ! ! ! CS ! PA RKIN G ! ! ! CS-V ! ! C14-2008-0060 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! D ELI R ! ! R A N T E ! STA U ! ! E S H W GLASS CO. CS-V C14-2008-0060 SP91-0179C C14-2008-0060 C814-2012-0160 PUD FAST FO OD CS REST. STO R E CS-H SP-05-1664C B V L D N R B A M A S L FAST FOOD OFFICE 78-154 CS-1 R N D O T R A E B E L S O C C E R S T O R E P W H S E B U TLE R R D S A L O N SALON T SIE S S JE G KIN R PA CS R E T N E P R A C V. N O C E R O T S O T O H P CS-V C14-2008-0060 O F C. T. S E R 5 8 1 - 5 8 P S T E S HIN P E S JO 5 8 5-1 P-8 S B V L D S R B A M A S L C14-2008-0060 CS-V GAS REST. CS-1 CS S P-05-1279C A. T S S A G C14-2008-0060 CS-V FAST FOOD CS-1-V G KIN R A P C14-2008-0060 CS-V MF-5 ± SUBJECT TRACT ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE ZONING BOUNDARY FAST FOOD CS-1-V C14-2008-0060 CS-V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING CASE#: C814-2018-0121 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ! ! 1 " = 200 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. ! ! ! ! ! ! 89-0039 GOLF COURSE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! GOLF COURSE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! C14-02-0031 P-NP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! D A W S O N R D B-11Revised9 of 89P 2 2 1 B A CS-1 P-NP P-NP P-NP C W C A V H E E S A Z S R T R A M A N L D V L B 2 W 2ND ST Y A P P A A W R D AID N A S R U M EXHIBIT B P P T O O M E Y R D MF-6-CO CS 1 H22 P D V L R B A M A S L P-H B B D S V L R B A M A S L D N R B A M A S L V L CS-1 1 CS-V 2 PUD 1 CS CS-H R N D O T R A E B LE P CS-1 A CS C814-2018-0121 B CS-V 1 A CS 2 KIN N E Y AV E SF-3 B 1 T SIE S 7 6 S JE CS-V B U TLE 10 9 8 R R D 10 9 12 13 14 11 T E S HIN P E S JO 7 8 CS 15 6 4 5 CS-V H21 CS-1 5 4 CS-V 3 2 1 CS 1 MF-5 CS-1-V CS-V 1 B A R T T N O L O B A N S R M A A P M R G P CS-1-V CS-V LR 2-B 14 13 15 12 11 16 17 HIL L M S T O N T 18 1 SF-3 10 2 3 4 9 8 7 8 9 SF-3 12 13 5 CS D V L R B A M A S L BARTON SPRINGS RD A CS-1-V-NP MF-3-NP CS CS-V 1 218 S. LAMAR SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE CREEK BUFFER ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C814-2018-0121 218 S. LAMAR BLVD 1.27 Acres H22 Heather Chaffin This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 6 ± 1'' = 300' W RIVERSIDE DR P-NP CS-1-NP D A W S O N R D P-NP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 37 36 Copyright nearmap 2015 CS-V-NP 35 B-11Revised10 of 89EXHIBIT C B-11Revised11 of 89EXHIBIT D B-11Revised12 of 89B-11Revised13 of 89B-11Revised14 of 89B-11Revised15 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD / Generational Commercial PUD Waterfront Overlay Variances Table October 9, 2019 EXHIBIT E Code Section Requirement Variance Request §25-2-691 (C) [Waterfront Overlay (WO) District Uses] Add administrative and business offices to the list of pedestrian oriented uses. A pedestrian-oriented use is a use that serves the public by providing goods and services including: a) Art gallery b) Art workshop c) Cocktail lounge d) Consumer convenience services e) Cultural services f) Day care services (limited, general or commercial) g) Food sales h) General retail sales i) (convenience or general) Park and recreation services Residential uses j) k) Restaurant (limited or general) without drive- in services l) Other uses as determined by the Land Use Commission. A structure described in Subsection (B) may exceed a zoning district height limit by the greater of: 1) 15 percent. In the CS base zoning district: Maximum Height: 60 feet Maximum FAR: 2:1 Minimum Setbacks Front Yard: 10 feet Street Side Yard: 10 feet Interior Side Yard: -- Rear Yard: -- §25-2-531 (C)(1) Height Limit Exceptions §25-2-492 Site Development Regulations Modification to Section 25-2- 531(C)(1) to allow the elevator cab, and improvements necessary for elevator access to the roof deck, to exceed the maximum height of the PUD by twenty percent (20%) In the PUD: Maximum Height: 96 feet Maximum FAR: 3.55:1 Minimum Setbacks Front Yard: 0 feet Street Side Yard: 0 feet Interior Side Yard: 0 feet Rear Yard: 0 feet B-11Revised16 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 EXHIBIT F Tier I Requirement Compliance Superiority Note # 2.3.1.A. Meet the objectives of the City Code. Yes. the located along The project is located within the City of Austin’s Desired Development Zone as well as within the Urban Core. The project is situated along South Lamar Boulevard which is designated as a City of Austin Core Transit Corridor and also designated as an Activity Corridor under the City of Austin Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. Activity Corridors call for a variety of activities and types of buildings roadways. Specifically, this project will provide an office use along the portion of the South Lamar Corridor between Riverside Drive and Barton Springs Road where there are currently no other office uses, thereby providing a vibrant, needed use to the Corridor. This project will create a high-quality development utilizing innovative design. In addition, the PUD will ensure adequate public facilities for the area. The mixed-use nature of the project is consistent with the pedestrian-oriented concept that is core to the Waterfront Overlay Ordinance and the development that was envisioned as part of Imagine Austin, adding the “work and play” portions to the goal of a “live, work, play” environment along this portion of South Lamar Boulevard. The PUD will equal or exceed the open space standards by providing open space at grade and by providing a rooftop amenity deck. 1 2.3.1.B. Provide for development standards that achieve equal or greater consistency with the goals in Section 1.1 than development under the regulations in the Land Development Code. Yes. 2.3.1.C. Provide a total amount of open space that equals or exceeds 10% of the residential tracts, 15% of the industrial tracts, and 20% of the nonresidential tracts within the PUD, except that: Yes. PUD Notes: 15, 23, 26 B-11Revised17 of 892.3.1.D. Provide a two-star Austin Energy Green Building Rating. Yes. The project will comply with the City of Austin’s Green Building Program at a 3-star level. PUD Note: 5 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 1. A detention or filtration area is excluded from the calculation unless it is designed and maintained as an amenity, and 2. The required percentage of open space may be reduced for urban property with characteristic that make open space infeasible if other community benefits are provided. 2.3.1.E. Be consistent with the applicable neighborhood plans, neighborhood conservation combining district regulations, historic area and landmark regulations and compatible with adjacent property and land uses. Yes 2.3.1.F. Provide for environmental preservation and protection relating to air quality, water quality, trees, buffer zones and greenbelt areas, critical environmental soils, waterways, topography and traditional character of the land. the natural and features, Yes. PUD Note: 9 PUD Note: 8 planning neighborhood The project is not located within an adopted City of Austin area. Additionally, the project is in compliance with the City of Austin Waterfront Overlay regulations. The project is also consistent with surrounding land use as it is surrounded by Zach Scott Theater on the north and west and the Cole multifamily building to the south. To be consistent with neighborhood characteristics, the project will be Dark Skies compliant. The project located within an environmentally sensitive area and the property does not contain any critical environmental features, waterway setbacks or significant topography changes. The property is partially located within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Verification Zone an Environmental Resource Inventory at the time of the site development permit application. To enhance environmental preservation, the project will provide water quality controls that meet or exceed current Code for a site that is currently and will is not provide 2 B-11Revised18 of 892.3.1.G. Provide for public facilities and services that are adequate to support the proposed development including school, fire protection, emergency service and police facilities. Yes. 2.3.1.H. requirements of the City Code. Exceed the minimum landscaping Yes. 2.3.1.I. Provide for appropriate transportation and mass transit connections to areas adjacent to the PUD district and mitigation of adverse cumulative transportation impacts with sidewalks, trails and roadways. Yes. 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 untreated and will be fully compliant with all environmental and tree regulations. This project will have a positive impact to the school system by providing an increased tax base without the burden of additional students. Additionally, the project will not necessitate the additional City of Austin infrastructure costs associated with suburban development. The owner will work with City of Austin emergency services, fire and police facilities to determine that there is adequate support for the project during the development process for this proposed PUD. The PUD will exceed the minimum landscape requirements of the City Code and will utilize native and adaptive species as well as non- invasive plants per the City of Austin Grow Green program. The project is situated within close proximity to two Cap Metro bus routes (including a bus stop on the property), lines and operating bike share stations. The site is also less than one-half block from the Pfluger Bridge allowing bicycle and pedestrian access across Lady Bird Lake to Downtown Austin. The owner conducted a full Traffic Impact Analysis to determine the impact of the project on the transportation network. In coordination with the Corridor Program Office, improvements along South Lamar will be constructed, including sidewalks with a 7-foot planting zone with street trees, a 10-foot two-way cycle track, and a 15-foot landscape/sidewalk zone. the Bus Rapid Transit 3 PUD Notes: 27, 28 PUD Notes: 24, 29, 35 B-11Revised19 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 In coordination with Austin Transportation Department (ATD), the project will contribute funds to ATD for bus stop improvements on South Lamar Boulevard in an amount not to exceed $27,800, track improvements along South Lamar. No gated roadways will be permitted within the PUD. $25,000 cycle and for There are no areas within the PUD area that include structures or sites that are of architectural, historical, archaeological or cultural significance. The property does not exceed 10 acres of land but is characterized by special circumstances The PUD is located within the City of Austin Waterfront Overlay area and this site is prescribed for a maximum height of 96 feet per the overlay. At this time, the only way to achieve the additional height contemplated in the Waterfront Overlay is through the PUD process. PUD Note: 3 2.3.1.J. Prohibit gated roadways include structures or sites 2.3.1.K. Protect, enhance and preserve the areas that that are of architectural, historical, archaeological or cultural significance. 2.3.1.L. Include at least 10 acres of land, unless the property is characterized by special circumstances, topographic including unique constraints. Yes. Yes. Yes. 4 B-11Revised20 of 89Tier I - Additional PUD Requirements for a mixed use development Compliance Superiority Note # 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 2.3.2.A. Comply with Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards and Mixed Use) Yes. 2.3.2.B. Inside the Urban Roadway boundary depicted in Figure 2, Subchapter E, Chapter 25- 2 (Design Standards and Mixed Use), comply with the sidewalk standards in Section 2.2.2, Subchapter E, Chapter 25-2 (Core Transit Corridor Sidewalk and Building Placement). Yes. the tenant Pay fee 2.3.2.C. established under 25-1-715 (Tenant Relocation Assistance – Developer Funded) if approval of the PUD would allow multifamily redevelopment that may result in tenant displacement. relocation N/A 2.3.2.D. Contain pedestrian oriented uses as (Waterfront defined Overlay District Uses) on the first floor of a multi- story commercial or mixed use building. in Section 25-2-691(C) Yes. 5 PUD Notes: 20, 33 PUD Notes: 29, 35 The project will comply with the City of Austin Subchapter E, Commercial Design Standards. In addition, the project will enhance all supplemental zones along Toomey Road and South Lamar Boulevard. The project will comply with the Core Transit Corridor sidewalk and building placement requirements. Additionally, in coordination with the Corridor Program Office, improvements along South Lamar will be constructed, including sidewalks with a 7- foot planting zone with street trees, a 10-foot two-way cycle track, and a 15-foot landscape/sidewalk zone. No multifamily residents will be displaced with this PUD project. N/A The project will contain pedestrian-oriented uses on the ground floor. PUD Note: 30 B-11Revised21 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 2.4 Tier II Requirement Compliance Superiority The open space for the project will meet or exceed the elevated open space standards by providing open space at grade and a rooftop amenity deck. Note # PUD Notes: 15, 23, 26 Yes. (Minimum 1. Open Space – Provide open space at least 10% above the requirements of Section Requirements). 2.3.1.A the Urban Roadway Alternatively, within boundary established in Figure 2 of Subchapter E of Chapter 25-2 (Design Standards and Mixed Use), provide for proportional enhancements to existing or planned trails, parks, or other recreational common open space in consultation with the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. Environment: Yes. a. Comply with current code instead of asserting entitlement to follow older code provisions by application of law or agreement. b. Provide water quality controls superior to those otherwise required by code. c. Use green water quality controls as described in the Environmental Criteria Manual to treat at least 50 percent of the water quality volume required by code. for currently untreated, developed off-site areas of at least 10 acres in size. d. Provide water quality treatment e. Reduce impervious cover by 5% below the maximum otherwise allowed by code or include off-site measures that lower overall impervious cover within the PUD Notes: 4, 7, 10, 11, 12, 27, 28, 38, 41 of The project will not require any exceptions or modifications environmental regulations and will develop under current code. The PUD will provide superior water quality controls. The PUD will utilize green water quality controls as described in the Environmental Criteria Manual to treat a minimum of 75% of the water quality volume required by Code. The PUD will provide rainwater harvesting of all rooftops and vertical structures, and also parking surfaces to the extent feasible. Cistern outflow shall be directed towards on- 6 B-11Revised22 of 89same watershed by 5% below that allowed by code. f. Provide minimum 50-foot setback for at least 50 percent of all unclassified waterways with a drainage area of 32 acres. g. Provides volumetric flood detention as the Drainage Criteria in described Manual. h. Provide drainage upgrades to off-site drainage infrastructure that does not meet current criteria in the Drainage or Environmental Criteria Manuals, such as storm drains and culverts that provide a public benefit. i. Propose no modifications to the existing 100-year floodplain. j. Use natural channel design techniques as described in the Drainage Criteria Manual. k. Restores riparian vegetation in existing, degraded Critical Water Quality Zone areas. l. Removes existing impervious cover from the Critical Water Quality Zone. m. Preserve all heritage trees; preserve 75% of the caliper inches associated with native protected size trees; and preserve 75% of all the native caliper inches. n. Tree plantings use Central Texas seed stock native with adequate soil volumes. o. Provide at least a 50 percent increase in the minimum waterway and/or critical 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 to is directed site raingardens, landscaping, or otherwise towards the northwest corner of the site. Rainwater cisterns shall be designed not only for water quality treatment per the Environmental Criteria Manual, but also shall be oversized for stormwater detention per the Drainage Criteria Manual unless another method for stormwater detention is approved by the Watershed Protection Department. The detention component is required since flow patterns on the site are to be modified so that all runoff from the raingarden cisterns the northwest corner. All required tree plantings shall utilize native tree species selected from Appendix F of the Environmental Criteria Manual (Descriptive Categories of Tree Species) and utilize Central Texas native seed stock. The PUD will meet or exceed the landscape requirements of Subchapter E by providing a diverse mixture of landscaping and utilizing drought-resistant and non-toxic plants. 100% of all non-turf plant materials shall be selected the Environmental Criteria Manual Appendix N (City of Austin Preferred Plant List) of the “Grow Green Native and Adaptive Landscape Plants Guide.” 7 B-11Revised23 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 An integrated pest-management plan will be provided. As part of the PUD, the project will prohibit uses that may contribute to air or water quality pollutants. The PUD will be internally piped to connect to future expansion of the City of Austin reclaimed water purple pipe system. environmental required by code. feature setbacks p. Clusters impervious cover and disturbed areas in a matter that preserves the most environmentally sensitive areas of the site that are not otherwise protected. q. Provides porous pavement for at least 20 percent or more of all paved areas for non-pedestrian in non-aquifer recharge areas. r. Provides porous pavement for at least 50 percent or more of all paved areas limited to pedestrian use s. Provides rainwater harvesting for landscape irrigation to serve not less than 50% of the landscaped areas. t. Directs stormwater from impervious surfaces to a landscaped area at least equal to the total required landscape area. runoff u. Employs other creative or innovative to provide environmental measures protection. 8 3. Austin Green Builder Program – Provides a the Austin Green Builder rating under program of three stars or above. Yes. The project will meet the Austin Energy Green Builder program at a 3-star level. PUD Note: 5 B-11Revised24 of 894. Art – Provides art approved by the Art In Public Places Program in open spaces, either by providing the art directly or by making a contribution to the City’s Art In Public Places Program or a successor program. Yes. 5. Great Streets – Complies with City’s Great Streets Program, or a successor program. Applicable only to commercial retail, or mixed-use development that is not subject to the 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards and Mixed Use) of Chapter requirements Yes. 6. Community Amenities: Yes. a. Provides community or public amenities, which may include space for community meetings, day care facilities, non-profit organizations, or other uses that fulfill an identified community need. 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 PUD Note: 6 PUD Notes: 20, 29, 33 PUD Note: 14, 26, 40 The project shall provide an art piece approved by the Art in Public Places Program in a prominent location, either by providing the art directly or by making a contribution to the City of Austin’s Art in Public Place’s Program. Said art piece may be incorporated into additional aspects of the project including the bus stop or other public use. The project is subject to, and will comply with, the requirements of Subchapter E as modified. Additionally, in coordination with the Corridor Program Office, improvements along South Lamar will be constructed, including sidewalks with a 7-foot planting zone with street trees, a 10-foot two-way cycle 15-foot landscape/sidewalk zone. This area has been identified as a parking deficient area for the both the adjacent civic uses as well as the City parkland. This project will provide underground structured parking that will be available for use by the public outside of business hours and on weekends. Additionally, a direct connection between the proposed parking and the adjacent civic use will be provided. The PUD incorporates an 8,000 square foot public plaza at the northwest corner that will provide a connection to the Zach Theater plaza. track, and a 9 B-11Revised25 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 The PUD is providing a 1,000 square foot artist gallery free of charge to a local nonprofit adjacent to the plaza space. b. Provides publicly accessible multiuse trail and greenway along creek or waterway. N/A 7. Transportation – Provides bicycle facilities that connect to existing or planned bicycle routes or provides other multi-modal transportation features not required by code. Yes. PUD Notes: 17, 18, 34, 36 In coordination with the Corridor Program Office, improvements along South Lamar will be constructed, including sidewalks with a 7-foot planting zone with street trees, a 10- foot two-way cycle track, and a 15-foot landscape/sidewalk zone. Bicycle facilities along Toomey Road and South Lamar will be reviewed at the time of site plan and construction shall be required in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan. The project will also provide bicycle parking at a level equal to or exceeding (1) 120% of code-required bicycle parking spaces, or (2) 10 bicycle parking spaces for use by office tenants and commercial patrons. The PUD will also provide two dedicated spaces for electric vehicle charging within the parking garage. 10 B-11Revised26 of 898. Building Design – Exceed the minimum points required by the Building Design Options of Section 3.3.2 of Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards and Mixed Use) Yes. 9. Parking Structure Frontage – In a commercial or mixed-use development, at least 75% of the building frontage of all parking structures is designed for pedestrian-oriented uses as defined in Section 25-2-691 (C) (Waterfront Overlay District Uses) in ground floor spaces. Yes 10. Affordable Housing – Provides for affordable to in programs housing or participation achieve affordable housing. Yes. 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 Loading and trash collection facilities for the PUD shall be locate on-site. Maneuvering for loading and trash facilities shall also be located on-site. Public right-of-way shall not be used for maneuvering. Subchapter E requires that every project achieve at least one point from the table in 3.3.2 of the City Code. The project will exceed the minimum points by achieving a minimum of six (6) points. The project will not have above ground structure parking visible at the ground level. All parking for the project will be subgrade. The project will not contain a residential component but will participate in Section 2.5.6 of the PUD program by donating a fee- in-lieu for each square foot of climate- controlled space within the PUD above the CS baseline to a Housing Assistance Fund to be used for producing or financing affordable housing, as determined by the Director of Neighborhood Housing and Community Development Department. PUD Note: 21 PUD Note: 13 PUD Note: 22 11 B-11Revised27 of 8911. Historic Preservation – Preserves historic structures, landmarks, or other features to a degree legal requirements. exceeding applicable N/A 12. Accessibility – Provides for accessibility for to a degree persons with disabilities exceeding applicable legal requirements. Yes. 13. Local Small Business – Provides space at affordable rates to one or more independent retail or restaurant small businesses whose principal place of business is within the Austin metropolitan statistical area. Yes. 218 S. Lamar PUD Tier 1 & Tier 2 Compliance Updated May 6, 2020 There are no historic structures or landmarks on the property. N/A PUD Notes: 25, 31 The project will provide accessibility for persons with disabilities at a degree that exceeds applicable legal regulations in that it will include ADA-accessible shower facilities for tenants of the building. The project will provide much needed parking for employees and storage space for use by the Zach Scott Theater. 12 B-11Revised28 of 89EXHIBIT G MEMORAN DUM Date: To: CC: January 31, 2020 Heather Chaffin, Case Manager Dan Hennessey, P.E. Curtis Beatty, P.E. Amber Mitchell Joan Jenkins, EIT Reference: 218 S Lamar Blvd (PUD) – TIA Final Memo C814-2018-0121 Traffic Impact Analysis: The Austin Transportation Department has reviewed the January 30, 2019 (received February 12, 2019) “218 South Lamar Development Transportation Impact Study PUD Traffic Impact Analysis”, prepared by Big Red Dog. The proposed land use consists of 189,881 square feet of office space and 5,000 square feet of high-turnover restaurant space. The development will be located near the northwest corner of South Lamar Boulevard and Toomey Road intersection, in southwest Austin. The development is anticipated to be completed by 2020. The following is a summary of review findings and recommendations: Trip Generation: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition), the development will generate approximately 2,685 adjusted average daily vehicles trips (ADT) upon build out. Table 1 shows the trip generation by land uses for the proposed development. Table 1: Adjusted Trip Generation Proposed Land Use Size General Office (710) Hight Turnover Restaurant (932) Total 24-Hour Two Way Volume AM Peak Hour Enter Exit 26 176 PM Peak Hour Enter Exit 145 41 189,881 SF 2,208 5,000 SF 477 2,685 23 199 19 45 26 67 16 161 Page 1 of 4 B-11Revised29 of 89Assumptions: 1. Transit and Active trip reductions of 15% 2. Based on TxDOT AADT volume data, a four (4) percent annual growth rate was assumed to account for the increase in background traffic. 3. Considerations were made for the following projects in the analysis: a. The Carpenter (SP-2016-0073C) b. Dougherty Arts Center (TBD) Significant Results: The proposed site causes minimal impact to the existing vehicle operations. One area to highlight is the eastbound approach at Toomey Road and South Lamar Boulevard where the vehicle queue is expected to extend past the proposed driveway location. This is due to a combination of existing traffic, which currently experiences queueing issues, and the additional site traffic. However, it is expected that most of the queuing related to site traffic would occur primarily within the site parking garage. The vehicles queueing in the garage would be allowed to exit when the light at Toomey Road/South Lamar Boulevard turned green. Improvements have been identified to account for pedestrians and bikes. Sidewalk gaps and pedestrian crosswalks on Toomey Road have been identified. Additionally, contribution will be made to the south Lamar Bond corridor improvements, which include sidewalk and bike lane improvements. There is an existing transit stop at the northwest corner of Toomey Road and South Lamar Boulevard. The bus stop has been identified to be relocated to the south side of Toomey Road to better address CapMetro’s safety and operation concerns. Staff Recommendations: 1. The Applicant shall design and construct 100% of the following improvements as part of their first site development application. Note: Cost estimates should not be assumed to represent the maximum dollar value of improvements the applicant may be required to construct. a. Sidewalk (450 feet by 5 feet) on the south side of Toomey Rd. from Barton Place Trail to Jessie Street.; installation of curb ramps across Jessie Street on the south side of Toomey; and crosswalk striping across Jessie Street and Toomey Rd. b. Designated dock-less vehicle parking area at the northwest corner of the Barton Pl. Trail Crosswalk and Toomey Rd. 2. Fee in-lieu contribution to the City of Austin shall be made for the improvements identified in Table 2, totaling $255,000.00, before third reading. Page 2 of 4 B-11Revised30 of 89Table 2: Recommended Improvements Intersection Improvement Cost Pro-Rata Share % Pro-Rata Share $ North Lamar Blvd. & West 6th Street North Lamar Blvd. & West 5th Street West Cesar Chavez Street & B.R. Reynolds Drive West Cesar Chavez Street & Sandra Muraida Way South Lamar Blvd & West Riverside Drive South Lamar Blvd & Barton Springs Road South Lamar Blvd & Toomey Road Total Signal Retiming $6,250.00 100.0% $6,250.00 Signal Retiming $6,250.00 100.0% $6,250.00 Signal Retiming $5,000.00 100.0% $5,000.00 Signal Retiming $5,000.00 100.00% $5,000.00 South Lamar Blvd Corridor Improvements Program Intersection Improvements Fish Eye Cameras South Lamar Blvd Corridor Improvements Program Intersection Improvements Fish Eye Cameras $2,416,667.00 5.3% $128,250.00 $20,000.00 100.0% $20,000.00 $2,166,667.00 1.3% $29,100.00 Southbound left-turn bay $250,000.00 $20,000.00 100% 2.9% $20,000.00 $7,350.00 Bus Stop Relocation $27,800.00 100.0% $27,800.00 $4,923,634.00 $255,000.00 3. Two copies of the final TIA are required to be provided. 4. Development of this property should not vary from the approved uses or deviate from the approved intensities and estimated traffic generation assumptions within the finalized TIA document, including land uses, trip generation, trip distribution, traffic controls, driveway locations, and other identified conditions. Any change in the assumptions made to the TIA document shall be reviewed by ATD and may require a new or updated TIA/addendum. 5. City of Austin reserves the right to reassign any or all the above monies to one or more of the identified improvements in the TIA. 6. The findings and recommendations of this TIA memorandum remain valid until five (5) years from the date of this memo, after which a revised TIA or addendum may be required. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 512-974-1449. Justin Good, P.E. Austin Transportation Department Page 3 of 4 B-11Revised31 of 89 EXIBIT A INVOICE TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE IN-LIEU DATE: TO: CC: January 31, 2020 Dan Hennessey, P.E. (WGI) Alyssa Gutierrez (ATD Cashier) 901 S. Mopac Expressway, Bldg 5, Suite 300, Austin TX 78746 FROM: Justin Good, P.E. Austin Transportation Department AMANDA CASE#: C814-2018-0121 (218 South Lamar) FDU: 8401-2507-1103-4163 As a condition of approval for the zoning application, the applicant shall post a transportation mitigation fee with the City of Austin in the amount of $255,000 as listed in the TIA Final Memo in accordance with LDC. If you have any questions, please contact me at (512) 974-1449. Office Use only: Check: Received by: Page 4 of 4 B-11Revised32 of 89EXHIBIT H B-11Revised33 of 89EXHIBIT I B-11Revised34 of 89B-11Revised35 of 89B-11Revised36 of 89B-11Revised37 of 89B-11Revised38 of 89B-11Revised39 of 89B-11Revised40 of 89B-11Revised41 of 89B-11Revised42 of 89B-11Revised43 of 89B-11Revised44 of 89B-11Revised45 of 89B-11Revised46 of 89B-11Revised47 of 89B-11Revised48 of 89B-11Revised49 of 89B-11Revised50 of 89C814-2018.0121 MASTER REVIEW REPORT 1 EXHIBIT J CASE NUMBER: C814-2018-0121 CASE MANAGER: HEATHER CHAFFIN PHONE #: 512-974-2122 REVISION #: 00 UPDATE: 3 PROJECT NAME: 218 S. LAMAR SUBMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2019 REPORT DUE DATE: September 17, 2019 FINAL REPORT DATE: November 14, 2019 REPORT LATE: 58 DAYS LOCATION: 218 SOUTH LAMAR BOULEVARD STAFF REVIEW: This report includes all comments received to date concerning your planned unit development (PUD) request. The PUD will be brought to public hearing when all requirements identified in this report have been addressed. However, until this happens, your rezoning request is considered disapproved. PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PROBLEMS, CONCERNS OR IF YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT YOUR CASE MANAGER (referenced above) at the CITY OF AUSTIN, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, P.O. BOX 1088, AUSTIN, TX. REPORT: The attached report identifies those requirements that must be addressed by an update to your application in order to obtain approval. This report may also contain recommendations for you to consider, which are not requirements. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MAY BE GENERATED AS A RESULT OF INFORMATION OR DESIGN CHANGES PROVIDED IN YOUR UPDATE. B-11Revised51 of 89C814-2018.0121 2 Comprehensive Planning Review – Kathleen Fox - 512-974-7877 Connectivity- Public sidewalks are located along S. Lamar Boulevard and Toomey Road. A Cap Metro transit stop is located 500 ft. from the subject area. Several bus lines run on South Lamar Blvd. including the 803 RapidBus. The Walkscore for this property is 82/100, Very Walkable, meaning most errands may be accomplished on foot. The Butler Hike and Bike Trail and the Pfluger Pedestrian Bridge are located within a quarter of a mile from this site. The mobility options in this area are above average. Imagine Austin- The Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan identifies this section of South Lamar Boulevard as an Activity Corridor. It is also located along a designated High Capacity Transit Corridor. Activity corridors are the connections that link activity centers and other key destinations to one another and allow people to travel throughout the city and region by bicycle, transit, or automobile. Corridors are characterized by a variety of activities and types of buildings located along the roadway — shopping, restaurants and cafés, parks, schools, single-family houses, apartments, public buildings, houses of worship, mixed-use buildings, and offices. Along many corridors, there will be both large and small redevelopment sites. To improve mobility along an activity corridor, new and redevelopment should reduce per capita car use and increase walking, bicycling, and transit use. Intensity of land use should correspond to the availability of quality transit, public space, and walkable destinations. Site design should use building arrangement and open space to reduce walking distance to transit and destinations, achieve safety and comfort, and draw people outdoors. The following Imagine Austin policies are also applicable to this case: • compact and connected city in line with the growth concept map. • are connected by roads and transit that are designed to encourage walking and bicycling, and reduce health care, housing and transportation costs. • LUT P4. Protect neighborhood character by directing growth to areas of change that includes designated redevelopment areas, corridors and infill sites. Recognize that different neighborhoods have different characteristics and new and infill development should be sensitive to the predominant character of these communities. • and retail land uses in proximity to each other to maximize walking, bicycling, and transit opportunities. Analysis- The proposed PUD mixed use project appears to contribute towards making this area a more complete community by adding a dense mixed use project consisting mostly of office uses, situated within a quarter of a mile of variety of commercial, civic, and recreational uses, which offers a variety of mobility options (public transit, public sidewalks, and multi-use trails) to people visiting this area along a designated Activity Corridor. The developer also stated in the case file that the first floor of this project will consist of pedestrian oriented uses as defined by Section 25-3-691c of the Land Development Code. Based on this proposed PUD mixed use project being located along an Activity Corridor, which supports dense, connected and pedestrian oriented development, this proposed PUD mixed use project appears to support the policies of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. LUT P3. Promote development in compact centers, communities, or along corridors that LUT P7. Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that place residential, work, LUT P1. Align land use and transportation planning and decision-making to achieve a B-11Revised52 of 89C814-2018.0121 3 Urban Design Review - Anne Milne - 512-974-2868 Development Assessment (CD-2018-0003) Follow-up UD1: Administrative and business offices are not a pedestrian oriented use (25-2-691(C)). Specify the proposed amount of ground floor office/co-working space. Is any outdoor space proposed for the co-working land use (recommended)? U0: Approximately, what percent of the ground floor will be used as co-working space? How much of the street facing façade will be co-working space? How will the proposed supplemental zone activate the streetscape? UD2: A flat rooftop would be appropriate in this area (25-2-721). U0: A flat roof to accommodate the planting and rooftop deck is appropriate. The rest of the roof should comply with the waterfront overlay. Please see PARD comment PR1. UD3: The list of appropriate building materials may be amended to include precast concrete, metal panels, phenolic panels, FRP. GFRC, and composite metal panes. Additional approval of materials adjacent to PARD owned panels may be required. U0: No longer requested. UD4: Staff recommends that not more that 40% of the required open space be located on the roof. U0: No longer requested. UD5: Demonstrate need for additional height for the elevator on the roof (25-2-531). Elevator structures are typically not that tall. U0: Attached drawings do not show elevator over run. Please provide. TIER I: UD6: Ground floor offices are not a use that generates pedestrian activity and must be limited. U0: Response noted. UD7: It is not clear by the description how the design will be innovative or provide adequate public facilities. U0: More information is needed. Please describe how you will meet the requirements in 2.3.1.B. For example, the public plaza shown at rear of building – how is this accessible to the public? UD8: Please coordinate with corridor office. Please coordinate with CapMetro. Traffic impact mitigation and trip demand reduction may also be required. U0: Response noted. UD9: Core Transit Corridor standards are required. U0: Comment cleared. UD10: Office/admin uses are not pedestrian oriented. If a limited amount of co-working space is provided – outdoor seating should be provided. Sidewalk cafes and seating should be used to create an active urban environment. U0: Describe or illustrate how you are creating and active urban environment. TIER 2: UD11: Building Design: The building design should exceed the minimum points required by the Building Design Options of Section 3.3.2 of Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E. The design of the building should incorporate the immediate streetscape character, particularly consistency of skyline and the need for punctuation and accent; the relationship of height to frontage width and building depth. (From Subchapter E and Plaza Saltillo TOD, 5.6.2) Along the principal street, building facades greater than 100 feet in length shall: 1. Include at least one vertical change in plane B-11Revised53 of 89C814-2018.0121 4 with a depth of at least 24 inches. The distance from the inside edge of a building projection to the nearest inside edge of an adjacent projection shall not be less than 20 feet and not greater than 100 feet. (From Subchapter E) Changes of color, texture, or material, either horizontally or vertically, at intervals of not less than 20 feet and not more than 100 feet. A repeating pattern of wall recesses and projections, such as bays, offsets, reveals or projecting ribs, that has a relieve of a least weight inches. (From Plaza Saltillo TOD, 5.4.3) The façade should include at least 40 percent of the wall area along the principal street that is between two and ten feet above grade shall consist of glazing. The second floor façade along the principal street must provide a minimum of 25 percent glazing between the finished second story floor and the finished third story floor or building eave. At least one-half of the total area of all glazing on ground-floor facades that face the principal street shall have a Visible Transmittance (VT) of 0.6 or higher. Any façade that is built up to an interior mid-block property line is not required to have glazing on that façade if not prohibitions and no contractual or legal impediments exist that would prevent a building being constructed on the adjacent property up to the wall of the façade. U0: The façade design should exceed the Waterfront Overlay requirements and incorporate the standards described in Section 3.3.2 of Chapter 25-2 Subchapter E and or TOD Active Edge Standards (as described above). UPDATE #1 UD1: Administrative and business offices are not a pedestrian oriented use (25-2-691(C)). Specify the proposed amount of ground floor office/co-working space. Is any outdoor space proposed for the co-working land use (recommended)? U0: Approximately, what percent of the ground floor will be used as co-working space? How much of the street facing façade will be co-working space? How will the proposed supplemental zone activate the streetscape? U1: Outdoor space comment cleared; provide information about how the exhibits that have been shared can be codified or noted on Land Use Plan. See also Case Manager comments regarding land uses. UPDATE #2 UD2: A flat rooftop would be appropriate in this area (25-2-721). U0: A flat roof to accommodate the planting and rooftop deck is appropriate. The rest of the roof should comply with the waterfront overlay. Please see PARD comment PR1. U1: Please provide a conceptual elevation to show how the design will meet the intent of the code. UD3, UD:4 Cleared. UD5: Demonstrate need for additional height for the elevator on the roof (25-2-531). Elevator structures are typically not that tall. U0: Attached drawings do not show elevator over run. Please provide. TIER I: UD6: Ground floor offices are not a use that generates pedestrian activity and must be limited. U0: Response noted. U1: Comment cleared. UD7: It is not clear by the description how the design will be innovative or provide adequate public facilities. U0: More information is needed. Please describe how you will meet the requirements in B-11Revised54 of 89C814-2018.0121 5 2.3.1.B. For example, the public plaza shown at rear of building – how is this accessible to the public? U1: Comment cleared; however, staff has not determined yet if this is considered superior. UD8: Please coordinate with corridor office. Please coordinate with CapMetro. Traffic impact mitigation and trip demand reduction may also be required. U0: Response noted. U1: Comment cleared. UD9: Cleared. UD10: Office/admin uses are not pedestrian oriented. If a limited amount of co-working space is provided – outdoor seating should be provided. Sidewalk cafes and seating should be used to create an active urban environment. U0: Describe or illustrate how you are creating and active urban environment. U1: Comment cleared; however, staff has not determined yet if this is considered superior. TIER 2: UD11: Building Design: The building design should exceed the minimum points required by the Building Design Options of Section 3.3.2 of Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E. The design of the building should incorporate the immediate streetscape character, particularly consistency of skyline and the need for punctuation and accent; the relationship of height to frontage width and building depth. (From Subchapter E and Plaza Saltillo TOD, 5.6.2) Along the principal street, building facades greater than 100 feet in length shall: 1. Include at least one vertical change in plane with a depth of at least 24 inches. The distance from the inside edge of a building projection to the nearest inside edge of an adjacent projection shall not be less than 20 feet and not greater than 100 feet. (From Subchapter E) Changes of color, texture, or material, either horizontally or vertically, at intervals of not less than 20 feet and not more than 100 feet. A repeating pattern of wall recesses and projections, such as bays, offsets, reveals or projecting ribs, that has a relieve of a least 24”. (From Plaza Saltillo TOD, 5.4.3) The façade should include at least 40 percent of the wall area along the principal street that is between two and ten feet above grade shall consist of glazing. The second floor façade along the principal street must provide a minimum of 25 percent glazing between the finished second story floor and the finished third story floor or building eave. At least one-half of the total area of all glazing on ground-floor facades that face the principal street shall have a Visible Transmittance (VT) of 0.6 or higher. Any façade that is built up to an interior mid-block property line is not required to have glazing on that façade if not prohibitions and no contractual or legal impediments exist that would prevent a building being constructed on the adjacent property up to the wall of the façade. U0: The façade design should exceed the Waterfront Overlay requirements and incorporate the standards described in Section 3.3.2 of Chapter 25-2 Subchapter E and or TOD Active Edge Standards (as described above). U1: Comment cleared; however, staff has not determined yet if this is considered superior. UD 1: Administrative and business offices are not a pedestrian oriented use (25-2-691(C)). Specify the proposed amount of ground floor office/co-working space. Is any outdoor space proposed for the co-working land use (recommended)? U0: Approximately, what percent of the ground floor will be used as co-working space? How much of the street facing façade will be co-working space? How will the proposed supplemental zone activate the streetscape? U1: Open space comment cleared. B-11Revised55 of 89C814-2018.0121 6 U2: Thank you. Please also provide a minimum percent of active uses – Please see Zoning / Case Manager comment ZN 13. UD 2: A flat rooftop would be appropriate in this area (25-2-721). U0: A flat roof to accommodate the planting and rooftop deck is appropriate. The rest of the roof should comply with the waterfront overlay. Please see PARD comment PR1. U1: Provide a conceptual elevation to show how the design will meet the intent of the code. U2: Please describe how the roof will be accessible people other than the building tenants. Please add a note about the distinct roof to the notes. UD5: Demonstrate need for additional height for the elevator on the roof (25-2-531). Elevator structures are typically not that tall. U0: Attached drawings do not show elevator over run. Please provide. U1: Comment cleared. UPDATE #3 Approved as long as the conditions of the comments are met. Environmental Review - Jonathan Garner 512-974-1665 1. FYI: The site is located in the Lady Bird Lake (Town Lake) and West Bouldin Creek Watersheds of the Colorado River Basin, which are classified as Urban Watersheds by Chapter 25-8 of the City's Land Development Code. The site is not located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone, however the northern portion of the site is located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Verification Zone, which subjects the property to the Void and Water Flow Mitigation Rule (COA ECM 1.12.0 and COA Item No. 658S of the SSM). 2. FYI: According to floodplain maps there is no floodplain within or adjacent to the project location. 3. Standard landscaping is proposed to exceed the standard requirements in LDC 25-2 by using only native tree species selected from Appendix F of the ECM and all required tree plantings shall use Central Texas native seed stock. [Note: See Heritage Tree review comments for additional comments.] Additionally, 100% of all non-turf plant materials shall be selected from the ECM Appendix N or the Grow Green Native and Adapted Landscape Plants Guide, and will be irrigated by either storm water runoff conveyed to rain gardens or by auxiliary water sources (e.g., air conditioner condensate, rainwater harvesting). UPDATE #1: Cleared. 4. FYI: A few trees will likely be impacted with a proposed development associated with this zoning case. Please be aware that an approved zoning status does not eliminate a proposed development’s requirements to meet the intent of the tree ordinances. If further explanation or specificity is needed, please contact the City Arborist at 512-974-1876. At this time, site specific information is unavailable regarding other vegetation, areas of steep slope, or other environmental features such as bluffs, springs, canyon rimrock, caves, sinkholes, and wetlands. 5. FYI: This site is required to provide on-site water quality controls (or payment in lieu of) for all development and/or redevelopment when 8,000 s.f. cumulative is exceeded, and on site control for the two-year storm. Additionally, because the site is divided by two watersheds, the applicant is advised that diversion of stormwater from one watershed to another is limited to 20% of the site based on gross site area or less than 1 acre, whichever is smaller so long as the existing drainage patterns are maintained to the extent feasible. EV Officer - Chris Herrington & Atha Phillips - 512-974-2132 B-11Revised56 of 89C814-2018.0121 7 UPDATE # 0: This project is located at 218 SLAMAR BLVD SB and is within the Town Lake and West Bouldin Creek watershed(s), which are classified as Urban Watersheds. This project located within the Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone. 1. The 18” RCP crossing Lamar, which is undersized per the existing StormCAD model, could be increased to a 24” RCP (based on needed future improvements) if runoff from the site is diverted to this system. Consider replacing the pipe a superiority item. 2. Could the site provide detention to greenfield conditions, which would reduce runoff draining to the undersized system. 3. Is the site proposing cisterns within the building footprint? Provide any information on how rainwater harvesting or other non-potable water sources including AC condensate will be captured and reused on site as a superiority item. 4. Provide information on renewable energy generation on site and/or planned green building certifications as a superiority item. 5. Include distribution for Drainage/Water Quality Review if additional improvements /superiority items are added with Update #1. UPDATE #1 EO 1-EO 4 Cleared. EO 5 As part of the participation in RSMP, WPD wants the drainage from the entire site carried in a new storm drain to either the system being improved by 211 (Option 1 or extending the system to outfall directly to LBL (Option 2). This would reduce flow to the flooding problem area at the intersection of Barton Springs and South Lamar, reduce the flow that must be handled be the private system through the Zach Theater property (especially important given the implications of Atlas 14), and reduce the amount of water in Lamar Boulevard. Please add language to the PUD that describes this requirement, add map provided if necessary. (Attached to report) UPDATE #2 EO 1-EO 4 Cleared. EO 5 Please add agreed upon note for detention and water quality as Note #38 on Sheet 2-PUD Notes sheet. UPDATE #3 EO 1-EO 4 Cleared. EO 5 Please add agreed upon note for detention and water quality as Note #38 on Sheet 2- PUD Notes sheet. 1. Since the sidewalks are shown draining to Lamar with no proposed water quality, is this PUD amendment seeking a waiver from 25-8-211? When we talked on the phone it seemed that you were just suggesting that this condition would only apply to a driveway curb cut. 2. Are there raingardens in these areas that this water could be diverted to? 3. PUD note #7 says that the PUD will meet or exceed current code in regard to water quality, will you be amending this note? Staff will not support any amendment that proposes changes to water quality that do not meet current code. Heritage Tree Review - Jim Dymkowski - 512-974-2772 . B-11Revised57 of 89C814-2018.0121 8 HT 1: Thank you, for providing a tree survey for the Heritage tree to the north of the PUD between the northern offsite driveway and the Topher Theater. Some of the information requested in the previous comments for the development assessment have not been provided with this submittal. Please show this tree’s current growing area and surrounding hardscape. Please also provide a canopy survey for the tree and include information about how much canopy the PUD would affect if the building setback lines are modified to 0 feet off the property line as proposed by the PUD. UPDATE 1: Thank you for the canopy survey. This original request came in two parts for evaluation. You have provided a canopy survey on paper without including the information as to how much canopy the PUD would affect if the building setback lines are modified to 0 feet off the property line as proposed by the PUD. For this, the services of a third party arborist would be required. Also, the current survey does not appear to take in all of the hardscape surrounding the open area of this tree for evaluation. Comment pending. UPDATE 2: Thank you for the additional information. Staff agrees that it is close but does not appear that the building would greatly affect the canopy of this tree. What the exhibit does not show is the limit of the underground parking garage and potential disturbance that its construction proposes that could affect the tree’s canopy. Also, the initial comment requested the information based on the potential canopy the PUD would affect if the building setback lines are modified to 0 feet off the property line as proposed by the PUD. Comment still pending. UPDATE 3: Staff has discussed in email and offline that this information be reviewed and provided by a certified arborist. Simply surveying the canopy up to the property line and not having an arborist assess the potential cuts at that location does not confirm what may be the overall required pruning, if the pruning were to need to go all the way back to the main trunk of the tree to be done correctly. Please have this assessment done by a certified arborist and respond based on the potential impacts if building setback lines are modified to 0 feet off the property line as proposed by the PUD. Comment still pending. HT 2: UPDATE 3: Comment cleared. AE Green Building Review – Heidi Kasper 512-482-5407 AE Green Building accepts the proposed 3-Star Green Building requirement for the PUD. Site Plan Review - Randall Rouda 512-974-3338 SP 1. Materials such as EIFS are not durable and should be used for trim/detail and for upper floors only. Please consider amending the modification of the materials list. U0: No longer requested. U1: Comment cleared. SP 2. Please clarify if reflective restrictions will remain. Materials that are highly reflective are not permitted in the Waterfront Overlays. U0: Waterfront development guidelines to apply within the proposed PUD. U1: Comment cleared. SP 3. “Amenitized” will need to be further clarified. As written, the variance request would permit a flat roof, which is not a distinctive building top. Please add details about what amenities would be considered on the roof, and their likely dimensions, especially height. U0: The PUD should establish minimum standards for the proposed amenities, with a B-11Revised58 of 89C814-2018.0121 9 specific focus on the items visible from waterfront and parkland areas. The specific proposal (pedestal rooftop deck with seating, planters and a shade pergola) may be appropriate but should be codified in a manner similar to the existing regulations which identify specific types of building tops that qualify as distinctive.) (Eg. “Distinctive building tops may include planters with vegetation clearly visible from waterfront and parkland areas and shade structures which are architecturally integrated into the building design while demonstrating the rooftop use and/or providing architectural interest equivalent to other approved options.) U1: Comment cleared. Site Development Regulations Note 8 is sufficient to address this concern. SP 4. Please note, South Lamar is a Core Transit Corridor. Sidewalk design will need to reflect those standards. U0: Sidewalk will continue to meet CTC detains standards. U1: Comment cleared per Transportation Reviewer comments and PUD Note 29. General Comments SP 5. Site plans will be required for any new development other than single-family or duplex residential. U1: Informational comment cleared. Waterfront Overlay SP 6. The site is located within the Butler Shores subdistrict of the Waterfront Overlay Zone. Except as modified by the PUD, the requirements, use limitations, design requirements and review processes established by Land Use Code sections 25-2-691 et. seq. will apply. U1: Informational comment cleared. Austin Transportation Department/Transportation Engineering– Austin Jones, Nathan Aubert, Amber Mitchell - 512-974-5646 1. See attached TIA memorandum and mitigation fee-in-lieu invoice. 2. Superiority recommendations: a. Transit: Fee of $27,800.00 to the South Lamar Corridor project to account for a new bus stop. ATD will collect the fee and coordinate with Capital Metro. b. Active/Bike: Fee of $25,000.00 to the South Lamar Corridor project for cycle track improvements along Lamar. All fees can be collected by ATD. c. Trails: Please coordinate with Mike Schofield or Nathan Wilkes at ATD regarding any possible improvements to trails in the vicinity. d. Parking: ATD would consider parking superior for transportation if it is show as a measure to reduce vehicle trips beyond what is required in the LDC and the TIA. To do this would mean: 1. Priced Parking 2. Unbundled Parking 3. Reduced Parking 4. Shared Parking (case by case basis) 3. Provide a note documenting a maximum amount of parking on the site. ATD does not support excess parking being determine as superior. UPDATE #1 ATD 1. The below have been coordinated with the interested parties concerned and would be considered superior. All fees can be collected by ATD. 1. Transit: Fee of $27,800.00 to the South Lamar Corridor project toward a new bus stop B-11Revised59 of 89C814-2018.0121 10 2. Active/Bike: Fee of $25,000.00 to the South Lamar Corridor project for cycle track improvements along Lamar. ATD 2. Parking: ATD would considered parking superior for transportation if it is show as a measure to reduce vehicle trips beyond what is required in the LDC and the TIA. 5. Priced Parking 6. Unbundled Parking 7. Reduced Parking 8. Shared Parking (case by case basis) ATD 3. ATD is against any excess parking being determine as superior for other elements identified in the LDC, (eg public amenity). ATD 4. See attached TIA memo and fee information. UPDATE #2 ATD 1. Comment addressed. ATD 2. Comment addressed. ATD 3. Comment addressed. ATD 4. See attached TIA memo and fee information. UPDATE #3 Update 3: Please clarify response regarding Final Memo and Invoice issued May 8, 2019. Transportation Planning - Jaron Hogenson - 512-974-2253 TR1. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required and has been received and is under review. TIA comments will be issued under a separate memorandum. [LDC 25-6-113] TR2. Include the below streetscape in the land use plan. Contact this reviewer for a more legible copy of it if necessary. This project is adjacent to a street that has been identified in Austin’s Corridor Mobility Program (S Lamar). The sidewalk and bicycle facilities shall comply with the required cross-section at the time of the site plan application. The cross section that will be required is shown below. Find additional information about the Corridor Mobility Program here: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Corridor-Mobility-Program/gukj-e8fh/. Any proposed curb relocations on S Lamar requires coordination with the Corridor Planning Office and Bicycle Program. The cross section will include a 7’ planting zone with street trees, a 10’ two-way cycle track, and a 15’ clear zone all behind curb. Additionally, a protected intersection will be required at Toomey, to be reviewed at the time of Site Plan. TR3. Right of way requirements for the Corridor program are currently under review. Right of B-11Revised60 of 89C814-2018.0121 11 Way dedication may be required. TR4. Modify note 29 to state “Improvements along South Lamar Boulevard will be coordinated with the Corridor Program Office. South Lamar will be constructed to the below cross section or as approved by the Corridor Program Office.” (add cross section as per note above) TR5. Bicycle facilities will be required along Toomey Road at the site plan stage. The design is below. Include the below graphic on the land use plan. If a more readable copy is required, contact this reviewer. SUPERIORITY TR6. For the Zach Scott Theater parking, how is this proposed to be offered? Will they be given a special affordable rate? Include a note on the land use plan indicating how this will achieve superiority. TR7. The $20,000 amount for Capmetro will need to be reviewed and approved by CapMetro. Please indicate if you have been working with anyone from Capmetro, and provide correspondence or approval. TR8. Staff does not agree that #7 Transportation increased bicycle racks achieves superiority. Staff recommends discussing the placement of a B-Cycle station with that firm. Alternatively, bike lockers could be proposed. TR9. Clarify how #12 Accessibility achieves superiority. Give specific examples and include in the note. TR10. For #12 Accessibility, add a note that an accessible route shall be provided from both Toomey Road and South Lamar. MISCELLANEOUS TR11. Remove note 2 and replace with “Access to adjacent streets shall be determined at the site plan stage in accordance with the LDC, TCM, and TIA requirements.” TR12. Provide a distinctive line for the PUD boundary for readability. TR13. From the land use plan, remove existing drives to remain. This will be determined at the site plan stage. TR14. Remove note 1 (see above) TR15. Recommend not showing plaza boundary on land use plan as it may need to change during site plan review. TR16. Remove all driveways from the land use plan. Driveways, existing and proposed, will be reviewed at the site plan stage. B-11Revised61 of 89C814-2018.0121 12 TR17. Indicate why existing conditions are shown on plan. These should be removed. TR18. Modify note 19 to include “Public right of way shall not be used for maneuvering.” TR19. Provide a PDF of the updated plans to this reviewer to be distributed to other departments for review. UPDATE #1 TIA TR1. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required and has been received. A zoning application is not complete until the required TIA has been received. [LDC 25-6-113] U1: Comment remains. See attached ATD memorandum for additional information. CORRIDOR TR2. This project is adjacent to a street that has been identified in Austin’s Corridor Mobility Program (S Lamar). The sidewalk and bicycle facilities shall comply with the required cross- section at the time of the site plan application. The cross section that will be required is shown below. Find additional information about the Corridor Mobility Program here: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Corridor-Mobility-Program/gukj-e8fh/. Any proposed curb relocations on S Lamar requires coordination with the Corridor Planning Office and Bicycle Program. Additionally, a protected intersection will be required at Toomey, to be reviewed at the time of Site Plan. U1: Comment remains. Modify note 29 to include the protected intersection at Toomey, to be reviewed at time of site plan. Staff has sent the wording to the corridor office for review. Pending their response. TR3. Right of way requirements for the Corridor program are currently under review. Right of Way dedication may be required. U1: Comment remains. Update requested 4/5/19. TR4. Modify note 29 to state “Improvements along South Lamar Boulevard will be coordinated with the Corridor Program Office. South Lamar will be constructed to the below cross section or as approved by the Corridor Program Office.” (add cross section as per note above) U1: Comment cleared. Deferring comment language to TR2. TR5. Bicycle facilities will be required along Toomey Road at the site plan stage. U1: Comment remains. Include a note that “Bicycle facilities along Toomey Road and South Lamar will be reviewed at the time of site plan and construction shall be required in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan.” SUPERIORITY TR6. For the Zach Scott Theater parking, how is this proposed to be offered? Will they be given a special affordable rate? Include a note on the land use plan indicating how this will be applied. U1: Comment remains. Please further describe “on a paid basis.” Is there an agreement for reduced rates? If the parking is just open, commercially available parking, staff would not agree that this is satisfying the intent of this section. TR7. The $20,000 amount for Capmetro will need to be reviewed and approved by CapMetro. Please indicate if you have been working with anyone from Capmetro, and provide correspondence or approval. U1: Comment remains. Pending verification of approval from Capmetro. Staff will also need to see a receipt of the payment once approved. TR8. Staff does not agree that #7 Transportation increased bicycle racks achieves superiority. Staff recommends discussing the placement of a B-Cycle station with that firm. Alternatively, bike lockers could be proposed. B-11Revised62 of 89C814-2018.0121 13 U1: Comment remains. B-cycle is not feasible, but staff still does not feel that the bicycle superiority is sufficient, as based on the uses shown in the TIA determination, it would only lead to 8 additional bicycle spaces (4 U racks) TR9. Clarify how Accessibility achieves superiority. Give specific examples & include in note. U1: Comment remains. This would be a code requirement of Subchapter E and is not sufficient for superiority. TR10. For #12 Accessibility, add a note that an accessible route shall be provided from both Toomey Road and South Lamar. U1: Comment cleared. Note added. MISCELLANEOUS TR11. Remove note 2 and replace with “Access to adjacent streets shall be determined at the site plan stage in accordance with the LDC, TCM, and TIA requirements.” U1: Comment remains. Driveways are reviewed at the time of site plan. Please detail via email or memo why the site should be entitled two driveways and the proposed locations at this stage. TR12. Provide a distinctive line for the PUD boundary for readability. U1: Comment cleared. Boundary revised. TR13. From the land use plan, remove existing drives to remain. This will be determined at the site plan stage. U1: Comment remains. See TR11. TR14. Remove note 1 (see above) U1: Comment remains. TR15. Recommend not showing plaza boundary on land use plan as it may need to change during site plan review. U1: Comment cleared. Recommendation. TR16. Remove all driveways from the land use plan. Driveways, existing and proposed, will be reviewed at the site plan stage. U1: Comment remains. See TR11. TR17. Indicate why existing conditions are shown on plan. These should be removed. U1: Comment cleared. TR18. Modify note 19 to include “Public right of way shall not be used for maneuvering.” U1: Comment cleared. Note modified. TR19. Provide a PDF of the updated plans to this reviewer to be distributed to other departments for review. U1: Comment remains. Please provide a PDF, we do not have scanning capabilities for these sizes. TR20. Add note stating that ADA accessible showering/locker room facilities will be provided for building tenants. UPDATE #2 TR1. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required and has been received. A zoning application is not complete until the required TIA has been received. [LDC 25-6-113] U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer clearing this comment to ATD. TR2. Include the below streetscape in the land use plan. Contact this reviewer for a more legible copy of it if necessary. This project is adjacent to a street that has been identified in Austin’s Corridor Mobility Program (S Lamar). The sidewalk and bicycle facilities shall comply with the B-11Revised63 of 89C814-2018.0121 14 required cross-section at the time of the site plan application. The cross section that will be required is shown below. Find additional information about the Corridor Mobility Program here: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Corridor-Mobility-Program/gukj-e8fh/. Any proposed curb relocations on S Lamar requires coordination with the Corridor Planning Office and Bicycle Program. The cross section will include a 7’ planting zone with street trees, a 10’ two-way cycle track, and a 15’ clear zone all behind curb. Additionally, a protected intersection will be required at Toomey, to be reviewed at the time of Site Plan. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer clearing this comment to ATD. TR3. Right of way requirements for the Corridor program are currently under review. Right of Way dedication may be required. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer clearing this comment to ATD. TR4. Bicycle facilities will be required along Toomey Road at the site plan stage. The design is below. Include the below graphic on the land use plan. U2: Comment cleared. Note modified. SUPERIORITY TR5. For the Zach Scott Theater parking, how is this proposed to be offered? Will they be given a special affordable rate? Include a note on the land use plan. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR6. The $20,000 amount for Capmetro will need to be reviewed and approved by CapMetro. Please document if you have been working with anyone from Capmetro. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR7. Staff does not agree that #7 Transportation increased bicycle racks achieves superiority. Staff recommends discussing the placement of a B-Cycle station with that firm. Alternatively, bike lockers could be proposed. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR8. Clarify how #12 Accessibility achieves superiority. Give specific examples and add note. U1: Comment cleared. Staff will accept this superiority option. MISCELLANEOUS TR9. Remove note 2 and replace with “Access to adjacent streets shall be determined at the site plan stage in accordance with the LDC, TCM, and TIA requirements.” U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR10. From the land use plan, remove existing drives to remain. This will be determined at the site plan stage. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR11. Remove note 1 (see above) U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR12. Remove all driveways from the land use plan. Driveways, existing and proposed, will be reviewed at the site plan stage. U2: Comment cleared. Staff will defer this comment to ATD. TR13. Provide a PDF of the updated plans to this reviewer to be distributed to other departments for review. U2: Comment cleared. PDFs may be required by ATD. PARD/Planning & Design Review - Thomas Rowlinson 512- 974-9372 B-11Revised64 of 89C814-2018.0121 15 PR1: PARD will need more information such as building elevations/renderings to approve modifications to 25-2-531 (C) (1) (additional height) and 25-2-721 ( E ) (2) (flat roof top as distinctive building top). (U0) It is unclear how the proposed features will be visible and distinctive from the ground level and parkland at 96 feet on a flat rooftop. (U1) Comment remains. The images included do not indicate how the design will meet the intent of the code. Please see Urban Design comments UD2 and Site Plan comments SP4. (U2): Please codify the amenitized rooftop in such a way that it still requires some architectural elements to preserve the intent of the distinctive rooftop requirement. While the amenities and planting would be attractive to the deck users, it does not meet the full intent of the code due to height/visibility issues. PARD and Urban Design agree that it is possible to incorporate some of the elements given as examples in 25-2-721(E)(2). The language may read as: “’Amenitized rooftop’ shall be considered as a distinctive building top in the Waterfront Overlay. To qualify as an amenitized rooftop the roof shall contain an active area for seating, lounge and gathering with a shade structure which is architectural integrated with the building and covers a portion of the seating area. The roof shall be framed with planters containing native plants visible from City of Austin parkland and incorporate distinctive elements such as cornices, steeped parapets, hipped roofs, mansard roofs, stepped terraces, and domes.” U3: Cleared. Modification no longer sought. PR2: FYI, 25-2-721 (E) (1) will be enforced. Please provide information that ensures that this provision will be met. (1) Exterior mirrored glass and glare producing glass surface building materials are prohibited. (U0) Comment cleared. “Exterior mirror glass with a 30% Ext. Reflectance or greater, and glare producing glass surface building materials will be prohibited.” (U1) Per 25-1-21 (67), “mirrored glass means glass with a reflectivity index greater than 20 percent.” Please update note to 20% reflectance. (U2): PARD cannot accept the request to modify the definition of exterior mirrored glass. While the examples given in the replies to Update 1 may use the same glass as proposed, those projects are outside of the Waterfront Overlay. As such, they were not subject to the restriction on exterior mirrored glass. Also, it may be possible to attain a 3-Star AEGB rating without modifying the reflectance. It is recommended that the architects and engineers meet with AE to discuss the scoring for AEGB ratings. U3: Cleared. Modification no longer sought. PR3: PARD will not likely approve the proposed modification to 25-2-733 (E) (3). Staff is willing to meet to discuss whether other building materials can be used. (U0) Comment cleared. PR4: Other proposed modifications to the Waterfront Overlay do not appear to affect Butler Shores. (25-2- 691 (C) and 2.7.3.D.4, as long as the roof amenity can be considered a distinctive building top.) (U0) Comment cleared, except for the comment regarding the rooftop. (U1) See PR 1. (U2): Cleared. PR5: Which part of the site will the ground floor publicly accessible plaza be located? (U0) In order to comply with Subchapter E, the location of the publicly accessible, ground floor plaza should “be located to adjoin, extend, and enlarge” existing, City of Austin parkland, per B-11Revised65 of 89C814-2018.0121 16 Article 2, § 2.7.3.B. Please contact thomas.rowlinson@austintexas.gov to set up a meeting with PARD planning staff for discussion of the ground floor plaza’s access and location. (U1) Comment cleared. Location of plaza is appropriate from ground floor layout. PR6 (U0): Modification to § 25-2-721(E)(4) is not superior. (U1): Please clarify that modification is no longer being requested. (U2): Cleared. PR7 (U0): FYI development will require its own fire lanes. (U1) Cleared. PR8 (U2): For Note 15, please specify that the rooftop deck access rules and regulations will be determined through a restrictive covenant jointly agreed upon by the owner and the City prior to site plan approval. U3: Cleared. PR9 (U2): For Note 26, please specify that the plaza will be publicly accessible through an easement prior to site plan approval. U3: Cleared. PR10 (U2): PARD requires additional parking for this area and asks that this development provide public parking for the relocation of the DAC, as well as the projected use of the rooftop deck and plaza. Please include a note on the plan that states a certain number of parking spots will be reserved for public use. U3: Cleared. NPZ Drainage Eng./Water Quality - Michael Duval 512-974-2349 RELEASE OF THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A VERIFICATION OF ALL DATA, INFORMATION, AND CALCULATIONS SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, AND ADEQUACY OF HIS/HER SUBMITTAL, WHETHER OR NOT THE APPLICATION IS REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY CITY ENGINEERS. This project is located at 218 SLAMAR BLVD SB and is within the Town Lake and West Bouldin Creek watershed(s), which are classified as Urban Watersheds. This project located within the Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone. WQ1. Provide information on any improvements to surrounding conditions. Neighborhood Housing & Community Development– Travis Perlman (512) 974-3156 Neighborhood Housing and Community Development (NHCD) acknowledges the applicant’s request for a height bonus. The applicable affordability requirements are outlined in Section 2.5 (Development Bonuses) of the Planned Unit Development regulations and will be codified in the zoning ordinance for the property, pending approval by City Council. NHCD 1.mDwelling units equal to not less 10 percent of the bonus area devoted to a residential rental use shall be leased on an ongoing basis to households earning no more than 60 percent of the median family income for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area for a period not less than 40 years from the date a final certificate of occupancy is issued for the property. The property owner shall enter into a restrictive covenant with the City of Austin enumerating these requirements as necessary to ensure compliance with this provision. B-11Revised66 of 89C814-2018.0121 17 NHCD 2. Dwelling units equal to not less than 5 percent of the bonus area devoted to a residential owner-occupied use shall be sold to income-eligible homebuyers earning no more than 80 percent of the median family income for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area. Each affordable owner-occupied unit shall be restricted by a fixed equity and resale agreement approved by NHCD for a period not less than 99 years from the date a final certificate of occupancy is issued for the property. NHCD has the right to review and include provisions related to the affordable units in a condominium declaration prior to filing. The property owner shall pay a fee-in-lieu of on-site affordable housing to NHCD NHCD 3. not less than an amount equal to the planned unit development fee rate current at the time of site plan submittal times the bonus square footage devoted to a non-residential use. NHCD 4. ensure compliance with the affordability requirements applicable to the PUD. NHCD shall have the right to establish additional guidelines and processes to Austin Fire Department Review – Scott Stookey - 512-974-0157 Austin Fire Department review of this ZC Review was limited to the evaluation of the parcel in relation to locations with an AFD Aboveground Hazardous Materials permit. This review did not evaluate the site for fire department access, the available water supply for fire flow, or any new or existing building features. Electric Review - Karen Palacios - 512-322-6110 EL1. FYI: Tier requirement add Austin Energy item- Applicant is required to meet safety clearances per Utilities Criteria Manuel. EL2. FYI: Site development regulations notes number 4 needs to add subject to required easement for electrical services and required clearance and safety requirements per the UCM. EL3. FYI: The following notes need to be added to the Site Plan notes: 1. Austin Energy has the right to prune and/or remove trees, shrubbery and other obstructions to the extent necessary to keep the easements clear. Austin Energy will perform all tree work in compliance with Chapter 25-8, Subchapter B of the City of Austin Land Development Code. 2. The owner/developer of this subdivision/lot shall provide Austin Energy with any easement and/or access required, in addition to those indicated, for the installation and ongoing maintenance of overhead and underground electric facilities. These easements and/or access are required to provide electric service to the building and will not be located so as to cause the site to be out of compliance with Chapter 25-8 of the LDC. 3. The owner shall be responsible for installation of temporary erosion control, revegetation and tree protection. In addition, the owner shall be responsible for any initial tree pruning and tree removal that is within ten feet of the center line of the proposed overhead electrical facilities designed to provide electric service to this project. The owner shall include Austin Energy's work within the limits of construction for this project. 4. The owner of the property is responsible for maintaining clearances required by the National Electric Safety Code, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, City of Austin rules and regulations and Texas state laws pertaining to clearances when working in close proximity to overhead power lines and equipment. Austin Energy will not render electric service unless required clearances are maintained. All costs incurred because of failure to comply with the required clearances will be charged to the owner. 5. Any relocation of electric facilities shall be at landowner's/developer’s expense. B-11Revised67 of 89C814-2018.0121 18 DAVID WAHLGREN – SUBDIVISION SR 1. Please provide a copy of the existing approved plat for this site. UPDATE # 1 - Comments cleared. Case Manager/Zoning Review - Heather Chaffin- 512-974-2122 ZN 1. The property boundaries, the building setbacks, etc. are still unclear. There is one heavy line type that is used for property lines that obscures everything else. Use a different line type, gray scale, or something to make it all clearer. You have that line type listed as Zoning on the legend but it’s also used on the surrounding lots. Cleared. Cleared. Cleared. Cleared. Cleared. Cleared. Cleared. ZN 2. Delete text “PUD Approval Block.” ZN 3. Change existing use from “Schlotsky’s” to “Restaurant-Limited.” ZN 4. Label Jessie Street. ZN 5. Label easements and provide dimensions. Clarify if the 25’ building line is an actual easement or if it is a building line from zoning. If it is an easement, it will need to be vacated. Update #2: Cleared. ZN 6. Show all existing and proposed easements. ZN 7. Clarify that the requested building setback is 0 feet—it’s not just the Zoning Boundary. ZN 8. Show Aquifer zone boundary (see Environmental Review comments). ZN 9. See Urban Design comments regarding elevator structure height. The height should be based on a typical elevator structure, not a percentage of building height. Urban Design reviewer will evaluate the elevator structure. No comments from Zoning/Case Manager. ZN 10. Correct acreage on plan to 1.263 acres. Clarify the site acreage—the tax certificate lists the site as 1.2660 acres. Has ROW been dedicated, or is there some other reason it has changed? Update on plan if necessary. Update # 2: Cleared; use the more recent information (May 21, 2018 survey). ZN 11. Show all adjacent driveways. Cleared. ZN 12. Dimension all existing and proposed driveways. Revise the labels on the existing driveways; do not describe as “to remain” or “to close.” Just label as “existing driveway.” ATD/DSD will provide comments about proposed driveway locations. Update#2: Zoning staff will defer to ATD/DSD regarding driveway issues. ZN 13. Per Code, “Co-working space” is not considered a pedestrian oriented use. It is considered administrative/business office. Staff does not support the proposed 60% office use with the remainder to be occupied by lobby, building support services, and pedestrian oriented uses. As proposed, the ground floor could be mostly used for office, lobby, and building services, B-11Revised68 of 89C814-2018.0121 19 with only a small remainder used for pedestrian oriented uses. Specify a minimum percentage of the ground floor that will dedicated for pedestrian oriented uses. Update #1: Delete Note #7 under Site Development Regulations. Co-working space is considered Administrative/Business Office; there is no need to provide a distinction. Replace with a note stating that Administrative/Business Office land use is permitted on the ground floor. The other elements of Note #7 are addressed by Note #37 under PUD Notes. Regarding Note #37: Staff does not support the land use percentages proposed by the Applicant. Modify from 40% to 50% pedestrian oriented uses. Update #2: Cleared. ZN 14. FYI: Additional comments will be generated. Additional superiority items will be required beyond what has been proposed so far. Update #2: This comment will remain until all reviewers clear their comments. ZN 15. Provide an item-by-item list/chart of each requested code variance from code-- specifically which section is being modified/waived. If modified, describe how (for ex. “reduce setback from 20 feet to 5 feet”). Also provide updated table of which items you are proposing are superior next to each superiority criteria. Update #3: Cleared. B-11Revised69 of 89PUD EXHIBIT K CS-1 P C S - V CS EXISTING ZONING: CS-V USE: RESTAURANT LIMITED CS-H CS CS-1 TOOMEY RD (50' R.O.W.) S ( . 1 2 0 L A M A R ' R . O . W . ) B L V D CS CS-V CS-V ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( T S E S S E J I W . R I V E R S I D E D R . SITE S . L A M A R B L V D TOOMEY RD BUTLER RD VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 2 9 5 2 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( x a F 4 8 2 3 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( . l e T 9 1 0 2 t h g i r y p o C © C L L , C M E a z r a G 9 2 6 4 1 - F # E P B T 5 2 1 e t i u S , . l d v B o t l i a R 8 0 7 7 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A L A V O R P P A I N O S V E R I . O N E T A D N A L P E S U D N A L D R A V E L U O B R A M A L H T U O S 8 1 2 4 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A M A 8 2 : 8 9 1 , 1 2 g u A n o l y e g n a m y b l d e i f i d o m g w d . l i g n n o Z - n a P e s U d n a L I \ 1 2 - 8 0 - 9 1 0 2 S T B H X E D A C - 0 0 \ I \ l i i \ v C 2 0 0 0 0 - 6 8 5 3 1 1 \ : X : Y B D E N G S E D I : Y B N W A R D : C Q / A Q SHEET 1 OF : . O N T C E J O R P 3 B-11Revised70 of 89S . B L V D R . O L A M A R . W . ) ( 1 2 0 ' 2 9 5 2 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( x a F 4 8 2 3 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( . l e T 9 1 0 2 t h g i r y p o C © C L L , C M E a z r a G 9 2 6 4 1 - F # E P B T 5 2 1 e t i u S l , . d v B o t l a R 8 0 7 7 i 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A L A V O R P P A I N O S V E R I . O N E T A D N A L P Y E V R U S E E R T D R A V E L U O B R A M A L H T U O S 8 1 2 4 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A M A 7 0 0 1 9 1 : , 8 2 b e F n o k a n r m j y b d e i f i d o m g w d . l e e r T - n a P e s U d n a L 7 2 - 2 0 - 9 1 0 2 \ S T B H X E D A C - 0 0 \ I I \ l i i \ v C 2 0 0 0 0 - 6 8 5 3 1 1 \ : V : Y B D E N G S E D I : Y B N W A R D : C Q / A Q SHEET 3 OF : . O N T C E J O R P 3 W . R I V E R S I D E D R . SITE S . L A M A R B L V D TOOMEY RD BUTLER RD VICINITY MAP N.T.S. TOOMEY RD (50' R.O.W.) ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( T S E S S E J I B-11Revised71 of 892 9 5 2 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( x a F 4 8 2 3 - 8 9 2 ) 2 1 5 ( . l e T 0 2 0 2 t h g i r y p o C © C L L , C M E a z r a G 9 2 6 4 1 - F # E P B T 5 2 1 e t i u S l , . d v B o t l a R 8 0 7 7 i 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A L A V O R P P A I N O S V E R I . O N E T A D S E T O N N A L P E S U D N A L D R A V E L U O B R A M A L H T U O S 8 1 2 4 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A M P 4 3 : 4 0 2 , 0 3 r a M n o y k s v o k n a m j y b d e i f i d o m g w d . s e t l o N n a P e s U d n a L 9 0 - 3 0 - 0 2 0 2 \ n a P e s U d n a L \ S T B H X E D A C - 0 0 I \ I l \ l i i \ v C 2 0 0 0 0 - 6 8 5 3 1 1 \ : X : Y B D E N G S E D I : Y B N W A R D : C Q / A Q SHEET 2 OF : . O N T C E J O R P 3 B-11Revised72 of 89Carbon Impact Statement Project: EXHIBIT L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Response: Y=1, N=0 Documentation: Y/N Y Scoring Guide: 1-4: Business as usual 5-8: Some positive actions 9-12: Demonstrated leadership Transportation T1: Public Transit Connectivity T2: Bicycle Infrastructure T3: Walkability T4: Utilize TDM Strategies T5: Electric Vehicle Charging T6: Maximize Parking Reductions Water + Energy WE1: Onsite Renewable Energy WE2: Reclaimed Water Land Use LU1: Imagine Austin Activity Center or Corridor LU2: Floor-to-Area Ratio Food F1: Access to Food Materials M1: Adaptive Reuse 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Total Score: 9 The Carbon Impact Statement calculation is a good indicator of how your individual buildings will perform in the Site Category of your Austin Energy Green Building rating. Notes: The 218 S. Lamar PUD will be a 194,593 square foot building with office, retail, restaurant, and art gallery uses. The project will exceed minimum landscaping requirements and is providing a number of water quality features including rain gardens, cisterns for rainwater harvesting, and greenwater infrastructure facilities. B-11Revised73 of 89T1. Is any functional entry of the project within 1/4 mile walking distance of existing or planned bus stop(s) serving at least two bus routes, or within 1/2 mile walking distance of existing or planned bus rapid transit stop(s), or rail station(s)? Yes, there is a bus stop right off the property line at the corner of Toomey and S. Lamar. T2. Is there safe connectivity from the project site to an “all ages and abilities bicycle facility” as listed in the Austin Bicycle Master Plan? Yes, S. Lamar fronting the site is part of the “all ages and abilities” bike network. T3. Is the property location “very walkable” with a minimum Walk Score of 70 (found at walkscore.com), or will the project include at least five new distinct basic services (such as a bank, restaurant, fitness center, retail store, daycare, or supermarket)? The project has a Walkscore of 65, with a Transit score of 91. New services will include retail, restaurant, art gallery, co-working space, and a large publicly-accessible plaza providing a connection to the Zach Theater. T4. Does the project utilize two or more of the following Transportation Demand Management strategies: unbundling parking costs from cost of housing/office space, providing shower facilities, providing secured and covered bicycle storage, and/or providing 2+ car sharing parking spaces for City-approved car share Parking spaces are decoupled from rent for tenants of the PUD, and showers will be provided for programs? tenants of the building. T5. Will the project include at least one DC Fast Charging electric vehicle charging station? Two electric vehicle charging stations will be provided in the project garage. T6. Does the project utilize existing parking reductions in code to provide 20% less than the minimum number of parking spaces required under the current land development code (or 60% less than the code’s base ratios if there is no minimum parking capacity requirement)? The project will not exceed LDC 25-6 minimum code requirements for parking. WE1. Will the project include on-site renewable energy generation to offset at least 1% of building electricity consumption? The project is not meeting this item. WE2. Will the project include one or more of the following reclaimed water systems: large scale cisterns, onsite grey or blackwater treatment, and reuse or utilization of Austin Water Utility's auxiliary water system to eliminate the use of potable water on landscape/irrigation? Cisterns will be included in the project parking structure. LU1. Is the proposed project site located within one of the centers or corridors as defined in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Growth Concept Map? South Lamar fronting the project is a High Capacity Transit Corridor on the Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map. LU2. If located in an Imagine Austin activity center or corridor, will the proposed project use at least 90% of its entitled amount of floor-to-area ratio? The project is using at least 90% of the entitled FAR and is proposing an increase from 2 to 3.2 of what is currently entitled. F1. Will the project include a full service grocery store onsite, or is one located within 1 mile of the project, or will the project integrate opportunities for agriculture to the scale as defined by Austin Energy Green Building? The project is located 0.4 miles from Trader Joe’s in the Seaholm development. M1. Will the project reuse or deconstruct existing buildings on the project site? No, all existing buildings will be demolished upon redevelopment of this PUD. B-11Revised74 of 89EXHIBIT M ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: December 4, 2019 218 S. Lamar, C814-2018-0121 Amanda Swor, Drenner Group LOCATION: 218 S. Lamar COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: Atha Phillips, Environmental Officer’s Office (512) 974-2132, atha.phillips@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake and West Bouldin Creek REQUEST: To create a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: Staff recommended with conditions 1. The project shall comply with water quality and detention requirements at the time of site plan application and provide a minimum of 75% Green Storm Water Infrastructure treatment. A maximum of 3,000 sf may be satisfied by payment in lieu for water quality and detention. 2. The project shall capture rainwater and condensate. 3. Will provide an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan. 4. Site and structure will be constructed to meet or exceed Austin Green Building 3-Star rating. 5. Landscape will be irrigated by non-potable sources. 6. Exceed the minimum requirements for landscape by 35%. 7. All proposed trees shall be a minimum of 3” caliper and native to Central Texas. 8. 1000 cubic feet of soil shall be provided for each tree. B-11Revised75 of 89Page 2 of 2 9. All street trees will be planted in continuous plating beds. 10. Project will provide dedicated public spaces for electric vehicle parking. 11. Bicycle parking will be provided above standard requirements. 12. Underground parking will be available to Zach Scott Theater for overflow parking and storage. 13. Project shall utilize fully hooded or shielded lights to comply with Dark Sky Initiatives. B-11Revised76 of 89218 S. Lamar PUD C814-2018-0121 Atha Phillips, Environmental Program Coordinator Environmental Officer’s Office B-11Revised77 of 89Site Location Austin ETJ Austin City Limits Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone North B-11Revised78 of 89Site Location North B-11Revised79 of 89Site Location North B-11Revised80 of 89Background: 1.266 Acres Council District 5 Lady Bird Lake & West Bouldin Creek Watershed - Urban Watersheds B-11Revised81 of 89Existing Trees: Note: The tree in red is not located on this lot. B-11Revised82 of 89Comparison: Water Quality 100% capture volume or payment in lieu Existing Code Proposed PUD Drainage No adverse impact 100% capture volume 75% Green Stormwater Infrastructure Maximum 3,000 sf payment in lieu No adverse impact, plus capture and release through rainwater cisterns Maximum 3,000 sf Ppyment in lieu Impervious Cover 95% 95% Open Space Integrated Pest Management Green Building 20% of non-residential tracts, accommodations made for urban properties 5000 sf plaza (ground floor) 2500 sf garden (roof top) Total: 14% No requirement Will provide a plan 2-Star Certified 3-Star Certified B-11Revised83 of 89Comparison: Landscape Irrigation Potable water 100% captured rainwater and condensate Existing Code Proposed PUD Landscape Trees Current code Exceed requirements for landscape by 35% Current code including Heritage Tree ordinance Current code including Heritage Tree ordinance (No heritage trees on this property) Proposed Trees Native for mitigation, 1.5” caliper All trees will be native, minimum tree size 3” caliper Soil Volume No requirement 1000 cubic feet of soil per tree and will provide continuous planting beds with no tree grates Dark Sky Initiative Full cut-off or shielded Full cut-off or shielded B-11Revised84 of 89Other Superiorities • Donation into the Housing Assistance Fund • Dedicated public spaces for electric vehicle charging • Bicycle parking above current code requirements • Underground parking will provide overflow parking and storage for Zach Scott Theater B-11Revised85 of 89 M E M O R A N D U M Mayor and City Council Jerry Rusthoven, Assistant Director/Interim Lead Planning and Zoning Department January 15, 2020 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: ************************************************************************ 218 S. Lamar C814-2018-0121 District 5 Valid Petition Request – Not Valid Staff has received a Valid Petition request regarding the rezoning request referenced above. The petition currently includes 17.79% of eligible signatures and does not meet the threshold for a Valid Petition. If you have any questions about this item, please contact me at (512) 974-3207. Jerry Rusthoven, Assistant Director/Interim Lead Planning and Zoning Department xc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager J. Rodney Gonzales, Assistant City Manager B-11Revised86 of 89B-11Revised87 of 89Case Number: C814-2018-0121 PETITION Total Square Footage of Buffer: Percentage of Square Footage Owned by Petitioners Within Buffer: Date: 1/15/2020 314591.8758 17.79% Calculation: The total square footage is calculated by taking the sum of the area of all TCAD Parcels with valid signatures including one-half of the adjacent right-of-way that fall within 200 feet of the subject tract. Parcels that do not fall within the 200 foot buffer are not used for calculation. When a parcel intersects the edge of the buffer, only the portion of the parcel that falls within the buffer is used. The area of the buffer does not include the subject tract. TCAD ID Address Owner Signature Petition Area Precent 0105020308 211 S LAMAR BLVD 78704 0105020305 311 S LAMAR BLVD 78704 0105020101 200 S LAMAR BLVD 78704 0105020410 JESSIE ST 78704 0105020306 221 S LAMAR BLVD 78704 0105020501 300 S LAMAR BLVD 78704 0105020103 1426 TOOMEY RD 78704 0105020901 210 LEE BARTON DR Total 16 PIGGYBANK LTD AUSTACO REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LTD CITY OF AUSTIN CITY OF AUSTIN LNR ENTERPRISES MANAGEMENT LLC SOUTH LAMAR-AUSTIN GLASS PO LTD ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER no no no no no no no yes 7844.20 5240.20 101186.73 14351.42 8187.22 68181.88 31915.48 55962.50 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 17.79% 292869.61 17.79% B-11Revised88 of 89T O O M E Y R D D V L B R A M A S L W RIVERSIDE DR B D N V L B R A M A S L R N D O T R A E B E L T SIE S S JE B U TLE R R D T E S HIN P E S JO B S D V L B R A M A L S BARTON SPRINGS RD ± BUFFER PROPERTY_OWNER SUBJECT_TRACT PETITION Case#: C814-2018-0121 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 200 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. D A W S O N R D B-11Revised89 of 89